TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

denvitavargen Archive

View 1 posts and 28 comments by denvitavargen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Which is absolutely disgusting, and needs to change ASAP. Unless you think that people who have it easy should have it easier and people who are already struggling should have have it even harder, there's no reason any amount of money, potential or "success" should allow someone to evade punishment anyone else would get for the same crime. That is not "justice".
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:55 PM
1

I sincerely hope that's not true
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:15 AM
18

"You need to have permission to film me, but I don't need it to mutilate an infant child." -Pro-circumcision people, apparently
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:20 PM
2

Yeah, it's probably closer to 99% or so of women.. Of course there are always outliers.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:56 PM
3

I'm inclined to agree with you, the major exception here being if there is any ambiguity of who's responsible for the picture being in the suspect's possession in the first place - say an explicit selfie text image sent from the minor's phone to an unknowing adult.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 06:29 PM
20

Approximate English translation If you take a sexual image of a girl under 18, you will be sentenced. If you take a picture of a boy under 18, you go free Now the prosecutor's office is changing the practice. In December last year, an 18-year-old was convicted of sharing a picture of a boy and a girl who had sex on Snapchat. Basically, the 18-year-old was also charged with paragraph 311, which includes the production of sexual abuse against children or sexual-sexualization, but was acquitted bec…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:27 PM
7

The n-word comes from 'negro', the word that in most romance languages simply means 'black'. We even still use the word 'black' to describe various ethnicities today 'Cracker' seems more offensive in itself: Implying all whites crack whips/own slaves. "Similar origin" refers to the fact they were used in approximately the same place and era, denoting people of a different racial group than oneself
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:35 PM
2

Kind of like how 'nigger' and 'cracker' both have similar meanings and origin, but today as a general rule the n-word can only be used by a specific racial group without rustling some jimmies, whereas the other one nobody really seems to care.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:56 PM
6

If wearing a Native American headress is appropriating native culture, following the logic it's theirs because they created it - then driving a car/watching tv/browsing reddit is appropriating white culture, since white people created those things, no? They're not saying that the extremes ARE logical, but that if you're going to consider copying some things a culture 'invented' be cultural appropriation, isn't it logical to include everything created by said culture? You could even say math is o…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:07 AM
3

Exactly, if the same laws applied to all babies in the US regardless of gender, there would certainly be a few innocent female victims but as a whole this prehistoric tradition would extremely likely be banned entirely immediately after and all this cruel idiocy would finally end.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:01 PM
10

While I couldn't more fully agree that stooping to their level is not the answer, for the sake of argument, simply pointing out there their hypocrisy by reversing it back to them is often the most effective way of convincing them. In this situation it's because they have absolutely NO legitimate argument to back themselves up with: it's purely cosmetics vs. cosmetics here, whether it's male or female. Yes, it's extremely sick and hypocritical that so many women do this to men - and consequently …
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:55 PM
2

Exactly, I never even tried to imply child support was a bad thing - I specifically stated "men who are unknowingly trapped in fatherhood". Child support obviously doesn't need to be abolished and shouldn't for the sake of vulnerable children, just badly in need of being reworked so it also doesn't unfairly take advantage of unwilling fathers (and mothers, in some cases)
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:36 PM
1

That is exactly the point I was trying to get across, thank you!
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:57 AM
2

That's a good point, and another thing that seems to get factored in rather oddly, if at all, in the courts. The economic elite could (theoretically) spawn dozens of children with all different partners and still live virtually unfazed and without relative consequence, while a person working a full time time at minimal wage is often thrown into deeper economic hardship for a single 'accident'
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:55 AM
3

I agree with you on virtually every aspect here. It is a very difficult situation for anyone involved, to be sure. My only concern is that it's simply just overlooked by many as potentially becoming a very legitimate problem, that disproportionately affects a lot of innocent men (and naturally women too when they are affected like this). I feel that too many feel it's a non-issue simply because they are far removed from it, but to those who directly experience it or even just take a minute to co…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:26 AM
4

You are right, that was poor wording on my part. Women are also forced to pay child support but in the US it's much less, and far less frequently (although I do believe this is changing). But my point was that only men can be unfairly trapped by deception in that way, like the birth control lie. And even in an 'accidental' pregnancy - a woman can choose to abort or give the child up for adoption with little to no financial obligation, while a man can be literally FORCED into an 18-year debt.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:12 AM
7

That is quite a blanket statement. Child support is a 'true men's rights issue' in that it only usually affects men, and it's a system that can literally destroy a working person financially for something that they should in no way be responsible for. EDIT: Yes, obviously women can be forced into paying child support, but almost without exception this is only if they are a willing parent in the first place. Once she is pregnant, the biological father has no control over the outcome from that poi…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:45 AM
5

No, I'm not at all not advocating child support be abolished - that was a stretch of a presumption based on my comment. But it can and too often does unfairly cause men to be victimized by women who use solely for personal financial benefits. Child support has its place and is invaluable to many single mothers and children. However, it should also be more of a case-by-case issue, yet it's always handled the same way in the court system (in the US at least). The government could easily cover the …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:42 AM
13

I think 'financial slavery' could be a fairly accurate descriptor here. It's not uncommon for men who were unknowingly trapped into fatherhood to be forced to pay $1,000+/month in child support.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:30 AM
1

30+ year old adult has sex with 13 year old kid. Yep, that's child rape, unless perhaps you live in Pakistan
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:09 PM
1

Why not? Seems fair that both parents should have a choice to commit, from the beginning, to see to the well being of their child, or forfeit their right to parent that child, simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 06:27 PM
1

No. Once the child is born, if the parents want to have parental rights, they should definitely take financial responsibility for that child. Up until birth, it should be both parents' equal right to give up that responsibility. After that, they would BOTH need to agree to adoption, and that applies for both men and women. Although a lower percentage of single fathers receive child support than single mothers.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 10:04 AM
1

Do you mean if abortion is not an option? If that is the case then it seems fair to pay child support, because she had no choice but to go through with the pregnancy.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 05:29 AM
1

Did you just assume my gender?! In all seriousness though, what has more of an impact on a person's life - a 9 week pregnancy followed by an abortion (which pro-choice supporters tend to say has little to no negative impact on a woman's well-being), or 18 years of forced child support?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 04:27 AM
1

Uhh, unless the woman gets an abortion. Then she absolves herself, no?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:38 AM
4

Except that where women are able to get an abortion, they are able to cancel out that 'risk'. Men can not.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:36 AM
13

Well fuck you too kind stranger
/r/MensRights07/01/17 05:14 PM
6

Well it's not a bad indicator, considering Google is one of the most influential and powerful companies in existence.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter