TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

derek20la Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by derek20la on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

How do you know the brother is fine? How do you know he wasn’t among the countless boys who suffer complications requiring revision surgery? Parents don’t typically post that kinda bad news on their socials. And the boy is a newborn. He won’t discover his sexuality for a long time, and it is incredibly presumptuous and arrogant for you to speak on his behalf.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:22 PM
2

The vagina cleans itself for the most part That explains why there needs to be an entire aisle full of feminine hygiene products. And no need for specialized medical care. Gynecologist? What’s that? To quote Mr. Garrison from South Park, “Well I’m sorry Wendy, but I don’t trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn’t die.” 🤮
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:49 PM
2

easier to have a boy circumcised because most of the ones who weren’t I feared having the cognitive understanding to be clean and understand self care and hygiene Wouldn’t the cognitively impaired females have similar hygiene issues as well? All those girls should be circumcised not only for their own health, but to make your job easier and less uncomfortable too. Alternatively, get some Lysol spray to cleanse the girl’s genitals. It’s doctor recommended! 🤣 https://i.imgur.com/aFscv6x.jpg
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:31 PM
2

How would female circumcision prevent UTIs? How would male circumcision prevent UTIs? And if by chance there is some benefit to cutting (no moist folds of skin for bacteria to grow), wouldn’t that be true for females as well? (especially with more excess genital skin than males).
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:26 PM
3

skin is skin Apart from the foreskin, what other normal, healthy, otherwise permanent part of the human body do we perform a risk-benefit analysis for removing, and then claim that parents have a right to elect such a procedure on their child? Answer: none The prepuce, and curiously enough only in males who have less genital folds and are actually less prone to genital infection than females, is a bizarre exception. This is against standard medical practice, in which preservation of tissue is a …
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:17 PM
3

The "circumcision reduces HIV by 60%" myth is a result of only looking at the relative reductions in infection rates, ignoring the absolute risk reduction of just 1.3%. Comparing two small percentages generates a big-seeming number: Of the 5,411 men subjected to circumcision 64 (1.18%) became HIV positive. Of the 5,497 controls, 137 (2.49%) became positive. It's ironic how the USA, with the largest group of cut men in the developed world, also has the highest STD & HIV rates. Yet in other countr…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:09 PM
2

Adult men who are circumcised as adults are quite happy and notice no difference But if you followed up with them a decade or two later, they may claim otherwise. The glans (head) of the penis is meant to be an internal organ. Just like eyelids protect and moisturize the eyes. When flaccid, foreskin keeps the head covered preventing chafing and friction against underwear when walking. If cut as an infant, at least 15 years goes by with the penis rubbing and chafing before puberty/sexual maturity…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 05:21 PM
1

“there is no association between sugar consumption and obesity“ - Richard Adamson, National Soft Drink Association, 2003. Unlimited free soda for toddlers and young children then! Because there is a study that says it’s fine and healthy! Everyone knows there are never ulterior motives in academic studies. Never any payoffs. Never any profit motivation. No sir!! 🤣 /s
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:57 PM
3

Cope harder.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:08 PM
3

You missed my point entirely. He intentionally is being obtuse. By blocking any meaningful understanding of circumcision, he protects his ego by believing having less penis “is better this way”. Feel sorry for him.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:08 PM
2

How would they know what they’re missing? Because I’m gay and have a very high body count. Penis is my specialty, especially uncut Latinos. Being cut I may never fully know what I’m missing, but by seeing the men’s reactions I guarantee they feel sensations that cut men simply can’t. For infant circumcisions, the frenulum (bottom of the head) is almost always removed. It’s one of the most sensitive parts of the penis… and for me I feel nothing there. I’m sorry you are so insecure about your body…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 03:49 PM
2

Being cut completely changes the mechanics of sex. sex with uncut = smooth back and forth gliding motion. sex with cut = friction and thrusting. The foreskin is a double fold of skin, allowing the penis shaft to slide within itself. After circumcision, it’s like stroking your index finger — no skin movement, all friction.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:47 AM
7

In western countries, female circumcision is almost always portrayed using the most severe form (Type 3, infibulation) where the external clitoris, hood, and labia are removed with the vagina stitched almost shut. This is also the rarest type. In raw numbers of baby girls, southeast Asia has the highest rate of FGM. However their practice, called Sunat (Type 4, scraping), consists of just a small cut on the clitoris or clitoral hood, leaving otherwise fully fuctional genitalia. This is the same …
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:37 AM
4

And I’m sure the females would be easier to clean and get fewer UTIs if they were circumcised too? Let’s make everybody get genital cosmetic surgery just to make your job easier!
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:34 AM
11

“Only clean what is seen.” There is no need to retract, in fact it is harmful. Until puberty, the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis (much like how a fingernail is attached to the finger with a membrane). This “seal” also prevents bacteria from getting underneath.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:29 AM
3

Circumcision is easier as an adult. First, you understand the concept of a medical procedure. A newborn doesn’t understand why he’s being strapped into a restraining device. Second, as an adult the foreskin has separated from the glans (head). Until puberty the foreskin can’t retract and is attached to the head of the penis with a membrane similar to a fingernail. For infants, when starting the procedure the doctor uses a metal probe to separate. Third, pain management. Infants can’t get general…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:20 AM
12

Remember: Those who opposed the Afghanistan War were not supporters of Osama bin Laden. Those who opposed the Iraq War were not supporters of Saddam Hussein. Those who oppose the Ukraine War do not support Putin or Xi. Ukraine started as a proxy, but has become a parasite.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:49 PM
1

Yes, they would. But the problem is if new recruits try to surrender their officers [unalive] them.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:41 PM
1

Such as these studies showing female circumcision reducing HIV infection by 50%? Stallings et al. (2005) Reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone female circumcision was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer. Georgia State University, Public Health Theses. The Association between female circumcision and the Risk of HIV…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:32 AM
2

What other contracts are able to be cancelled over a whim, or for no good reason at all? No fault divorce is wrong. Don’t like it? Then don’t sign on the dotted line (marriage certificate). The only exceptions should be for infidelity or fraud (faking who they are). So many women think marriage as “their big day” where they get to be a princess, but fail to think of the long term commitment. Many men rush into it thinking “it’s the honorable thing to do” only to get screwed over in the likely di…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:14 PM
1

Wrong. There are dozens of different sugars: glucose, sucrose, dextrose, lactose, maltose, etc... Any cell in your body can metabolize glucose for energy, whereas only the liver can process fructose... with negative health effects as a result (obesity, diabetes, metabolic disease)
/r/MGTOW05/03/21 07:15 PM
0

Fructose sugar - whether it's high fructose corn syrup, cane sugar, or even natural fructose from fresh fruit - all could be considered poison to your body. The only organ that can process it the liver, and it is metabolized almost exactly the same as ethanol alcohol, with similar negative health effects like alcohol.
/r/MGTOW04/03/21 09:25 AM
9

In western countries, female genital cutting is almost always portrayed using the most severe form (Type 3, infibulation) where the external clitoris, hood, and labia are removed with the vagina stitched almost shut. This is also the rarest type. In raw numbers of baby girls, South East Asia has the highest rate of FGM. However their practice, called Sunat (Type 4, scraping), consists of just a small cut on the clitoris or clitoral hood, leaving otherwise fully fuctional genitalia. This is the s…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 09:49 PM
7

Projection.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 08:34 PM
0

The 1996 federal law against FGM was struck down by the Supreme Court in November 2018. Sadly it wasn't due to the law's sexism, which only prohibited genital cutting for girls, not boys. Instead, the Court ruled FGM to be a local criminal activity - a matter for individual states to regulate. At the time, only 27 states had laws banning FGM, surprisingly making the procedure legal again in the other ~23 states. The method used by the Dawoodi Bohra sect in the USA v Nagarwala case is just a tiny…
/r/MGTOW03/07/20 11:53 PM
2

Even in jurisdictions with a low age-of-consent or "close age" exceptions always forbid an adult who is in a position of authority over the minor to have consensual sex. Flip the genders: adult male teacher and young female student, and the guy's life would be destroyed.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:37 PM
4

The 1996 federal law against FGM was struck down by the Supreme Court in November 2018. Sadly it wasn't due to the law's sexism, which only prohibited genital cutting for girls, not boys. Instead, the Court ruled FGM to be a local criminal activity - a matter for individual states to regulate. At the time, only 27 states had laws banning FGM, surprisingly making the procedure legal again in the other ~23 states. The method used by the Dawoodi Bohra sect in the USA v Nagarwala case is just a tiny…
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 06:45 PM
1

The pilot fucked up. While the pilot himself was rated for IFR (instrument flying), the charter company Island Express operated only VFR (visual) flights. Also it's been reported the pilot, Ara Zobayan, had not flown any IFR flights since the last recertification date. The crash was likely a case of "get-there-itis", where the pilot was so focused on arriving to the destination that he didn't fully react to the dangerous situation (low cloud ceiling and deteriorating conditions). For someone lik…
/r/MGTOW25/02/20 08:31 PM
14

The 1996 federal law against FGM was struck down by the Supreme Court in November 2018. Sadly it wasn't due to the law's sexism, which only prohibited genital cutting for girls, not boys. Instead, the Court ruled FGM to be a local criminal activity - a matter for individual states to regulate. At the time, only 27 states had laws banning FGM, surprisingly making the procedure legal again in the other ~23 states. The method used by the Dawoodi Bohra sect in the USA v Nagarwala case is just a tiny…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:18 PM
10

Rape Fluid: "Sex that was 100% consensual at the time with no coercion, alcohol or drugs, manipulation, or threats of violence involved... which the woman later regrets due to social stigma. As a result, in order to protect her reputation, the sex that was previously consented to is 'rape fluid', and can now be upgraded to be classified as rape."
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:10 PM
4

Sadly, it's even worse. At least in California, community college professors get amazing health and retirement benefits. When nearing retirement, their CalSTRS pension is based off the last 1 year of service. Often times they will take interim positions like a department chair just to pad their income. This is in addition to Social Security Retirement and any other investments like a 403(b) which is like a 401(k) but for government employees. As well as lifetime private health insurance for them…
/r/MGTOW14/02/20 08:43 PM
2

Don't feed the trolls. The guy is obviously insecure about his penis, and his projection is so obvious.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:13 PM
1

I'm sorry you are insecure about your penis. Your projection is so obvious it's sad.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:12 PM
0

Honestly I had to search what that meant... never heard the phrase here in the US before. I should've looked it up before replying 🤦🏻‍♂️ sorry
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:39 PM
2

The "/s" indicated sarcasm. Which is apparently lost on you. I am opposed to cutting the genitals of girls and boys. After turning 18, they can get any cosmetic surgery they wish.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:42 PM
2

The "/s" indicated sarcasm. Which is apparently lost on you. I am opposed to cutting the genitals of girls and boys. After turning 18, they can get any cosmetic surgery they wish.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:41 PM
2

Woah. You're all over the place... my body my choice , so he won’t circumcised his son Many feminists love promoting the idea of bodily autonomy, saying women and their bodies must be respected and protected. But then go silent when it comes to protecting men and boys. Girls bodies are legally protected from any alterations (except emergencies), why don't boys get the same care? why do you guys vaccinate your children then To prevent airborne communicable diseases that are highly contagious. Mea…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:36 PM
3

Whenever FGM is mentioned, the girls are almost always referred to as victims. And not just any victims, but survivors deserving of our deepest sympathies because their entire lives have been irreparably "ruined". Even the term Female Genital Mutilation is preferred (versus the less judgemental sounding Female Genital Cutting, or even Female Circumcision). How do you think those cut women feel hearing they've been mutilated in order to "destroy" their sex life? It's just another double-standard.…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 09:18 AM
3

not valid for women because they don’t have penis with extra skin that can get infected They just have lots of extra skin surrounding their vagina. And women, both as infants and adults, get infections more frequently than boys. Except the standard treatment for them is antibiotics, not surgery. There's also an entire aisle of feminine hygiene products at every supermarket and drug store. Clearly, females should be circumcised at birth for their own health. /s The reasons given for cutting girls…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:46 AM
8

I feel you! Guys in here get upset over the silliest things. When I took my daughter in for circumcision to remove her clitoral hood, she was crying the entire time even though I assured her it was only a tiny snip! I know both she and her future husband will thank me later for helping her vagina look streamlined and with greatly improved cleanliness. My daughter belongs to me, and its my right to control her body until she turns 18! People should mind their own business. /s
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:34 AM
5

This country was doomed in 1913 when The Federal Reserve Act was signed into law.
/r/MGTOW07/01/20 01:42 AM
3

I recommend /r/RightwingLGBT Unlike all the other LGBT subreddits, they support free speech, and don't ban users for going against popular opinion. For a long time, being a gay man insulated me from many of the struggles straight men face -- family courts, sexual harassment claims, etc. The more I learned, the sadder it made me. Women have an in-group bias favoring other women. Men have an out-group bias favoring women. I always hoped gay men could help advocate for other men, but so many in the…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:53 AM
2

"Apart from the foreskin, what other normal, healthy, otherwise permanent part of the human body do we perform a risk-benefit analysis for removing, and then claim that parents have a right to elect such a procedure on their child? Answer: none The prepuce, and curiously enough only in males who have less genital folds and are actually less prone to genital infection than females, is a bizarre exception. This flies in the face of standard medical practice, in which preservation of tissue is a pr…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:19 AM
1

The 1996 federal law against FGM was struck down by the Supreme Court in November 2018. Sadly it wasn't due to the law's sexism, which only prohibited genital cutting for girls, not boys. Instead, the Court ruled FGM to be a local criminal activity - a matter for individual states to regulate. At the time, only 27 states had laws banning FGM, surprisingly making the procedure legal again in the other ~23 states. The method used by the Dawoodi Bohra sect in the USA v Nagarwala case is just a tiny…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 01:13 AM
10

The foreskin is not just "a small piece of skin". When erect, the average penis has a length of 5.2 inches and a circumference (girth) of 5 inches. Most circumcision procedures will cut 1 to 2 inches behind the tip of the penis. Let's do the math: 1.5x2=3 length of skin removed (average of 1.5") times 2 (the foreskin is a doubled-layered fold) 3x5=15 length times circumference In an adult, that's at least 15 square inches of densely innervated skin that has been removed.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:37 PM
2

Three women, each a victim of FGM. All three agree that cutting the genitals of both girls and boys is harmful. Every society that practices FGM also circumcises their boys. For a given culture, the methods and conditions are the same. Tribes in the middle of nowhere in Africa that cut girls with dirty glass do the same to boy's foreskin. Wealthier Muslim countries such as Egypt and Malaysia have both done in a hospital by doctors. FGM is not always done to prevent women from having sex, nor is …
/r/MensRights09/11/19 05:20 PM
2

Some opinions on male circumcision from feminists/activists. Nahid Toubia, anti-FGM activist and Sudan's first female surgeon: "Cutting any healthy part of a child's body, including the genitals, is wrong. The female clitoris and the male foreskin should be guaranteed the same protections as the nose, the hand, or any other body part. Cultural and religious reasoning must be respected, reviewed, and possibly reformed on the basis of interpretation inspired by the values of social justice inheren…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:15 PM
1

Why help Google make money from ads? Even better to use an adblocker extension on a desktop/laptop browser, or on Android, use YouTube Vanced or NewPipe. Both apps completely remove ads, and allow playback when the screen is turned off. NewPipe also includes a built in video downloader. YouTube Vanced is made by a trusted XDA Forums member, and is NewPipe is open source. Every cent of profit that I can deprive from Goggle is worth it.
/r/MGTOW22/04/19 12:59 AM
0

Some opinions on male circumcision from feminists/activists. Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happening in those parts of the world about female genital mutilation. And people were horrified, they were shocked, they were angered; it was not even a feminist stance, it was the rights of the child, taking her humanity and integrity. But behind closed doors they we…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:15 PM
0

Circumcision in antiquity, such as practiced by the Jewish community, was completely different than the method used today. Previously, only the very tip of the foreskin would be removed, or in some cases just a small knick would be cut. In Roman times, some Jewish men would pull their remaining foreskin back over the penis head to appear uncut. Religious leaders forbade that, and modified the procedure to remove the entire prepuce. And circumcision has nothing to do with cleanliness. From birth …
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:04 PM
3

But just imagine how sexy and streamlined a cut vagina would look! No droopy clitoral hood to get in the way, and far less smegna too. If I ever have a daughter, she's getting circumcised. Her future husband will be thankful. /s
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:46 AM
0

I feel you! Guys in here get upset over the silliest things. When I took my daughter in for circumcision to remove her clitoral hood, she was crying the entire time even though I assured her it was only a tiny snip! I know both she and her future husband will thank me later for helping her vagina look streamlined and with greatly improved cleanliness. My daughter belongs to me, and its my God-given right to control her body until she turns 18! /s
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:39 AM
1

The Manchester concert bomber was a 2nd generation man born in the UK. Extremism doesn't always dissolve.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:15 AM
1

/r/nopoo
/r/MGTOW14/02/19 01:09 AM
2

HSV Type 1 is oral herpes (cold sores), and HSV Type 2 is genital herpes. While uncommon, both types can infect the opposite area. Usually outbreaks of this sort are not as severe and do not recur as often. Taking acyclovir, or even better Valtrex (valacyclovir), will reduce the severity and frequency of outbreaks in addition to reducing the risk of infection to partners.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:22 AM
1

This reminded me of the time Katie Couric discussed feminism with Judge Judy. "I don't feel as if there was any time in my life when I thought that being a woman held me back." Katie's typical NPC reaction was to insist that feminism must have indirectly helped Judy's judicial career, rather than her hard work and determination to succeed.
/r/MGTOW22/01/19 07:56 PM
2

Not necessarily true. Simple Mobile sells a new SIM card for just 99¢, and cards with preloaded service plans starting at $25 for 30 days (3 Gb data, unlimited text/talk). I paid cash at RiteAid, and activation did not require a name, address, or any billing info. I'm sure there are many other prepaid carriers that work similarly. On the other hand, buying a phone from Metro, Cricket, Boost, will require personal info (could probably lie about it though).
/r/MGTOW10/01/19 08:01 AM
0

Even though the age-of-consent laws vary between states (usually set at 16, 17, or 18), all 50 states consider adults holding a position of authority over the minor (teacher, counselor, or "in loco parentis") to be guilty of statutory rape if sex occurs. In this definition, consent does not matter, even if the younger partner meets the minimum age. For example, the New Hampshire AoC is age 16. If there is a 45 year old hooking up with a random 16 year old neighbor, and both consent willingly the…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:38 PM
5

Some opinions on male circumcision from feminists/activists. Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happening in those parts of the world about female genital mutilation. And people were horrified, they were shocked, they were angered; it was not even a feminist stance, it was the rights of the child, taking her humanity and integrity. But behind closed doors they we…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:25 PM
7

Such as these studies showing female circumcision reducing HIV infection by 50%? Notice how it's called a "conundrum" when it's found that female circumcision reduces HIV, rather that a wonderfully exciting "medical opportunity" like male circumcision. Stallings et al. (2005) Reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone female circumcision was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wea…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:12 AM
7

The type of circumcision common today is not at all like the method used by the Jewish faith in antiquity. The previous practice was called Brit Milah, which only removed a tiny piece of the foreskin. Often this ended up being nothing more than a nick on the penis, resulting in just a small scar. After Roman Jews began to "hide their faith" by keeping their foreskin pulled over penis head, the procedure evolved to Brit Pariah which completely removes the penis' foreskin and frenulum... a "high a…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:13 AM
12

I feel you! Guys in here get upset over the silliest things. When I took my daughter in to remove her clitoral hood, she was protesting the entire time even though I assured her it was only a tiny snip! I know she'll thank me later for helping her vagina look clean and streamlined. My daughter belongs to me, and its my God-given right to control her body until shes 18! /s
/r/MensRights08/07/18 12:46 AM
8

Yeah... looking at dicks with dry keratinized heads and scar tissue halfway down the shaft is just so hot! /s The glans (head) is meant to be a semi-internal organ, protected from friction and kept moist by the foreskin. In a healthy, well-hydrated uncut man, the skin texture/color of the penis head matches that of his lips. That's almost never the case for cut men, especially as they get older (after decades of constant chafing against underwear). Don't believe me? Check out r/hardcutdick (nsfw…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 10:15 PM
24

Female circumcision has been shown to reduce HIV infection by 50%: Stallings et al. (2005) Reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone female circumcision was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer. Internet Archive Link, original was lost during iasociety.org site redesign "Georgia State University, Public Health Theses. …
/r/MensRights07/07/18 07:38 PM
28

Some opinions on male circumcision from feminists/activists. Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happening in those parts of the world about female genital mutilation. And people were horrified, they were shocked, they were angered; it was not even a feminist stance, it was the rights of the child, taking her humanity and integrity. But behind closed doors they we…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 07:02 PM
36

Two additional points: consent and "health benefits" Adults understand the concept of a medical procedure, the doctor can administer an effective amount of anesthesia or even fully sedate, and pain medication can be prescribed during recovery. Additionally, for an adult the penis is fully grown, and the man can express his preferences like high vs low cut, keep frenulum, etc. For an infant, the doctor can't know how much the penis will eventually grow and just makes a best guess when cutting. Im…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 06:31 PM
15

Correct. The men push their sons to get cut, the women push it on their daughters.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 06:09 PM
32

In western media, female genital cutting is almost always portrayed using the most severe form (Type 3, infibulation) where the external clitoris, hood, and labia are removed with the vagina stitched almost shut. This is also the rarest type. In raw numbers of baby girls, South East Asia has the highest rate of FGC. However their practice, called Sunat (Type 4, scraping), consists of just a small cut on the clitoris or clitoral hood, leaving otherwise fully fuctional genitalia. (This is the same…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 06:00 PM
152

Many people today get awfully triggered if you dare make a comparison between male circumcision and female circumcision. They'll falsely claim that it's "totally different". But that is due to having a cultural bias, their belief that only females suffer, and denial that they themselves or their sons have been mutilated. Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGC: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happeni…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:03 PM
1

Yes, so let young boys grow up with their whole body. As independent men, they can decide to get cut (with full informed consent)
/r/MGTOW25/06/18 09:06 PM
9

Many people today get awfully triggered if you dare make a comparison between male circumcision and female circumcision. They'll falsely claim that it's totally different. But that is due to having a cultural bias, their belief that only females can suffer, and denial that they themselves or their sons have been mutilated. Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happe…
/r/MGTOW25/06/18 02:53 PM
8

At least as an adult, you understand the concept of a medical procedure, the doctor can administer an effective amount of anesthesia or even put you to sleep, and you can take pain medication during recovery. Also your penis would be fully grown, and you can express preferences like high vs low cut, keep frenulum, etc. The adult foreskin is also detached. Normally from birth to puberty, the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis in much the same way as a nail on your finger. During circumcis…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:20 PM
7

Keto diet. Fructose sugar is a poison to our body. It can only be metabolized by the liver, using the same process as alcohol. Here is a lecture by a UCSF professor called Sugar: The Bitter Truth. He explains the history of sugar in the American diet and lobbying by the sugar industry, as well as the chemical process of fructose metabolization and all its harmful effects (like fat generation). I eat a high fat, high fiber, very low sugar diet and weigh 135 lbs. Visit /r/keto for more information…
/r/MGTOW03/06/18 06:15 PM
17

Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happening in those parts of the world about female genital mutilation. And people were horrified, they were shocked, they were angered; it was not even a feminist stance, it was the rights of the child, taking her humanity and integrity. But behind closed doors they were mutilating their own young boys, sons. And it's an everyda…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:03 AM
19

Soraya Miré, Somalian human rights activist, victim of FGM: "The thing that really shocked me when I came to America was the reaction I got when people find out what was happening in those parts of the world about female genital mutilation. And people were horrified, they were shocked, they were angered; it was not even a feminist stance, it was the rights of the child, taking her humanity and integrity. But behind closed doors they were mutilating their own young boys, sons. And it's an everyda…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:15 AM
5

I gathered screenshots of different search engines. https://imgur.com/a/kuPpu On Bing, searching for "myles power circumcision youtube" had the direct link to the video as the second result. On DuckDuckGo, searching for "myles power circumcision youtube" had the direct link to the video as the second spot. With Google, no link to the YouTube video is available. To be fair, results further down linked to Myles Power's own site. But still no link to the YouTube video. Finally, searching with YouTu…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:22 AM
1

Even with age of consent at 16 or 17, if the adult is in a position of power over the minor (such as a teacher), it is always considered statutory rape... even if the sex happened to be consensual.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:25 PM
4

The type of male circumcision common today is not at all like the method Jews used to perform in antiquity. The previous practice was called Brit Milah, which only removed a tiny piece of the foreskin. Often this ended up being nothing more than a nick on the penis, resulting in just a small scar. An example of this method of circumcision would be Michelangelo's statue of David. (Yes, there is an almost imperceptible circ scar line on his penis. To modern eyes, the statue looks uncut.) After Rom…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:34 PM
2

Never hit a lady. Ladies never resort to violence, and in return they're entitled to not have violence used against them. If a woman takes a swing at you, she's no lady and should be prepared to get back what she's giving out. As another user commented, "Don't hit human beings. If you do, expect that human to retaliate. Fuck the gender shit."
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:23 PM
2

On Curbed LA (a Vox site), two articles were recently published trying to rebrand the 1992 Los Angeles Riots as an "uprising".
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:14 PM
2

I'm a gay man, but hearing the word faggot doesn't bother me. Usually I just assume people who say it are projecting​ their suppressed ​desire for a big dick in their mouth. People today are sensitive little bitches.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:03 PM
9

No, faggot is the perfect word to describe the accuser. In this case it has nothing to do with his sexuality. His fake cry for attention cost an innocent man his life. As another comment said, faggot ≠ gay.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:39 AM
3

The type of circumcision common today is not at all like the method Jews used to do in antiquity. The previous practice was called Brit Milah, which only removed a tiny piece of the foreskin. Often this ended up being nothing more than a nick on the penis, resulting in just a small scar. An example of this method of circumcision would be Michelangelo's statue of David. (Yes, there is an almost imperceptible circ scar line on his penis. To modern eyes, the statue looks uncut.) After Roman Jews be…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:03 AM
4

I deleted my Twitter account today over this (after sending a message to customer service as to why). Twitter is turning into an echo chamber of identity politics. Eventually it will reach a point where the whole thing implodes and it becomes the next MySpace.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:33 PM
1

Anyone have another link?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:05 PM
22

I'm not sure about Ohio, but California has a "safe surrender" law. Within three days of birth, a new mother who is unable or unwilling to raise a child can drop off the baby to any hospital or fire station without fear of arrest or prosecution. For LA County, since 2011, over 142 newborns were taken into foster care and placed with permanent families.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter