TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

desderon Archive

View 0 posts and 378 comments by desderon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

I'm not complaining about the results of men. I actually agree with you that society is becoming too sensitive. I'm pointing out the double standard.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:59 AM
45

Yes, you can clearly see how Google has blocked the results for the women but has no problems with the results for men.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:03 AM
1

Where is the fun on that?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:09 PM
385

They are obviously saying more women need to die to achieve the holy 50-50 equality.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 08:03 PM
4

Companies could use those same kinds of statistics to justify ALL kinds of discriminatory practices if we allowed them to do it. But in most other areas we DON'T allow it. As they should and we mostly allow them to because it is the best solution. The problem is not that car insurances make young men pay more, that is reasonable. The problem is that feminists are passing laws prohibiting insurances from making females pay higher health care insurances, when statistically they spend more in healt…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:37 AM
1

The issue is he still was moved away.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 01:15 PM
2

Yes. Come back to us. Earth needs you.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 01:14 PM
3

What I don't get is what does the firm paying her 7 figures get out of hiring her. Is of payment for old services? Are they ideologically committed to feminism? There must be something else.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:55 PM
4

Actually women have a few physical advantages over men. Its just that the physical advantages that men have over women are the ones that make you good at most sports. I really don't understand why it is so difficult for some people to accept that men and women are different.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:17 PM
4

Good job. Go celebrate, you deserve it.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:11 PM
5

Who does not have ass?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:46 PM
1

European union countries, I think the UK as well.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:17 AM
87

It is discriminatory and that's all right. Its OK to discriminate for the right reasons. The problem is when it comes to health insurance, women should have it higher because statistics indicate they use more services, but in this case a law was passed against it.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:03 PM
7

Not really. Feminists are very straight forward. Feminism is about power and money. If saying something helps them achieve power or money, they say it. If saying the contrary helps them achieve power or money in a different moment, they say it. Once you accept it is not about equality, but that feminism is about power and money, feminist actions are very coherent.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:58 AM
5

The ego of that paragraph is off the charts.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:52 AM
3

Women are programmed to try to shame men into compliance. It's very good that you resisted, but don't expect women to change. It will keep happening.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:47 PM
3

Liberal only means left wing interventionist in the USA, because the meaning of the word changed with Roosevelt. In the rest of the world liberal maintains its original meaning, which is support freedom both economically and socially. In the USA you refer to them as classical liberals, which is where libertarianism evolved from.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:26 PM
50

Why do you allow your relationship to be like this? You might not realize but this bullshit cuts your selfsteem.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:49 AM
44

I said it before: Bill Cosby was going against the narrative of the poor oppressed negro that needs the help of the well intentioned rich progressives, by saying there is a problem in the USA black culture with fatherless and not valuing education, and that the black communities need to change and make an effort to move forward. He needed to be taken down. So they took a bunch of women that happily did drugs with a famous man because they were young and they though it made them cool and changed …
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:55 PM
8

Or accuse her first.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:04 PM
3

Why? CNN is full of shitty discriminatory articles and I see nobody complaining. The guardian is full of hateful articles and yet nobody complains about using it as source. Why signal Breitbart specially?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:14 AM
5

What exactly do you mean by eye opening?
/r/MensRights06/04/18 07:27 AM
22

Fun fact: Saxophones were created to be part of the classical orchestra, but initially people though they sounded bad and would go nowhere, so they did not make it into the classical orchestra. Later jazz players started using them and the rest is history, it has become easily the most popular wind instrument.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:53 PM
47

Children services are full of men hating feminists. They are all too happy of projecting their prejudices in their cases. Its sad.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:48 AM
2

We actually don't experience the same emotions. A lot of them are common, we are all humans after all, but there are certain emotions that are feminine and other masculine. For example, a man will never truly understand what a mother feels when pregnant, because we never fill it. Similarly a women will have a hard time understanding what is to experience a strong rush of testosterone. That said, IMO the problem of men not seeking help is that modern society has cut all the environments where men…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:28 PM
1

Men are having a hard time though. I completely disagree with the typical feminist solutions, but saying that the modern western men is lost and confused is not wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:55 PM
3

The reality is men are more risk takers, for the good and for the bad. All the people that put themselves as human shields for another person in the recent Vegas shooting were males. Some died. Do you think we should address it? Try to get more women to give their lives for others? Both the shooting and the human shield behaviours come from men taking more risks. Unless you can change human biology you are not going to change this difference. When a person is so frustrated, depressed and mentall…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:54 PM
10

Feminism has never been about equality. That's a fairytale explained at school. Read what the early suffragettes wrote about men. You can read the same ideas of patriarchal oppression that modern feminists use to justify their actions. There was man hating. The whole lot. They were also racist and very snobbish against poor people (they denied an activist entry into the feminist association because she was not rich enough and would have made them look bad). The idea a lot of people have of the e…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 09:33 PM
20

My mum tried to educate me like a feminist and at first I tried to make it work. Failure after failure I decided to try some other way. After non feminist ways yielded success I was sold out off feminism. The real problem of feminism, identity politics, intersectionality and all that shit is that its not based on reality, it does not work. If the kid is not half as retard as the father he'll realize at some point.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 06:13 PM
1

I personally think that masculine and feminine behavior is simply a social construct, and need not be followed so strictly at the expense of personal comfort. Obviously each person is free to behave as we want as long as we are willing to accept the social consequences our actions bring. That said, it is a bit disingenuous to say that masculine and feminine behavior is simply a social construct, as if insinuating any other roles are as useful and those are just the two that happened for no reaso…
/r/MensRights01/04/18 01:20 PM
8

Feminists have convinced themselves that men as a class oppressed women against all evidence so they have a justification to be assholes. This is just another example.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:36 AM
0

Bitcoin and crypt occurrences are risky, but especially since they are currencies that aren't backed by any nation, or anything at all. This is not a risk, this is a guarantee. Nation backed money always get debased, it does not need to be good money because it is forced by law upon the citizens. So if you hold national money you are guaranteed to lose. On the contrary Bitcoin or crypto is completely voluntary, so it has to be good money, offer you something interesting, so you decide to use it.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:24 AM
4

This is just a rehash of the toxic masculinity bullshit. How the traditional man is apparently not a good human and needs to be more like women to be good, by an actor that feels very enlightened.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:14 AM
20

This area of study has been very ideologically driven. In my opinion it is still not that clear what exactly is the best option.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:24 AM
3

LBJ's war on poverty was and is disastrous for the black community. It is bitter sweet to watch the pictures of the Harlem Renaissance and how well organized and prosperous the black communities were. Then the gov introduced heroin in those communities to destroy their growth and created the war on poverty programs to keep them down. Its an absolute disgrace.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:16 AM
24

It is more profound than "one person doing the job of two". The problem is that children seem to need a masculine and a feminine figure, not just two people. Whether it is a masculine figure or exclusively a man is something not very clear.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:07 AM
32

Dogma over science. That's what's happening in the west.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:03 AM
14

Feminism is a horrendous movement with a horrible history, starting by the initial suffragettes. If anything, the people trying to support it make the MRM look bad.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:14 PM
30

Feminism has been fighting against men's rights actively. Why would you assume they want to help suddenly? You know the kangaroo courts in USA colleges that are fucking men left and right (those news you call outrage porn)? They were promoted by feminists and are executed by feminists. You know why made to penetrate is not rape in the eyes of the law? Because feminists lobbied for it to be this way. Do you know why people still talk about the wage gap as if its real despite being studies since t…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:04 PM
2

The complicated issue here is that they have a point, male and female sexuality are different. It does not justify statutory rape, neither for boys or girls. But it is true male and female sexuality are different and denying it won't help your argument.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:38 AM
9

Exactly. Feminism created the problem and is now offering itself as the solution.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:01 AM
155

Feminism is anti-male. They just hide it and make excuses to make it more palatable. The sooner you admit it, the sooner you'll understand the game they are playing on you.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:59 PM
5

You are delusional about what feminists are.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:54 PM
8

Feminism is good business
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:16 AM
17

I don't understand what is going on in the UK with Islam. It seems criticizing or mocking Islam will trigger the government to make your life impossible. The same with any other religion is acceptable. Check this case, Lauren Southern recently, Tommy Robinson and obviously more importantly the police actively overlooking the children prostitution Islam gangs. I get that some of the people attacking Islamists are racists, but not all of those are racists. There is no excuse to what is going on in…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 09:10 PM
6

You spin it however you want. Traditionalists never asked to create alimony. Feminism pushed to create and keep alimony. Those are the facts.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:49 PM
6

Feminism asked for alimony and has lobbied hard against any reform that means reducing the money women get. Rewriting history to blame someone else is very dishonest. Feminism might have used traditional mentality of society to push alimony forward. But nevertheless it was feminism who pushed for it and it has been feminism who have fought to keep it.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:08 PM
3

Why would it be illegal? Insurance can only know so much about you to estimate how much you are going to cost them. Sex is an obvious data point. Race used as a proxy for culture is another. Insurance also use age to estimate how much you will cost them, should they stop because it's not treating everyone equal? Has the world gone retarded?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 02:03 PM
21

Being anti feminism is being pro women. Feminism hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:34 AM
14

I get that men and women should get the same treatment for failing to pay allimony, but what is the point of sending a person to prison for failing to pay allimony? Its not like sending someone to prison will help him secure a better job to pay.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:16 AM
29

This is the main problem. I personally think a free society should at least tolerate this type of content. The problem is if you switch the genders it will not get publish.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 07:08 PM
9

I got genuine suicidal urges reading that. If that got you suicidal, the best course of action is to step down of the internet for a while. The content is disgusting, but it should not get you suicidal. Seek a family member, a friend or a suicide line and talk to them.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 07:07 PM
1

It is useless to promote things people don't enjoy. If it is fair that these women keep playing their sport because that's their dream, why not also start subsidizing small movies so every person who wants to be an actor but is not successful can also follow their dream. It is only fair, right? Fuck the people that actually care about doing something others find useful and take hard decisions because of it, everybody to follow their childhood dream no matter how ruinous it is, it is only fair ri…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:50 AM
2

That's the point exactly.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:45 AM
3

Lee Morgan was one of the best jazz trumpets. An absolute disgrace. There is a recent documentary about what happened.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:28 AM
64

Tbh, at least she is coherent. The rest of feminist bring up the patriarchy when its convenient for them and forget about it when its not.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:55 PM
2

Anywhere we can see the odds?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:16 PM
2

Prenups get thrown out constantly. The British crown does not need prenups because we know how they deal with spouses that want to leave.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:16 PM
1

Because then the government will come for you and your business.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:54 PM
5

If religion calls for cutting a hand is it alright because a religion says it? Religions have been changing and adapting through out all human history. Jews will learn to live without circumcising their boys. It really changes nothing of the core believes.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:10 PM
5

It is sexists in the feminist sense of equality of outcome. If you accept the fact that men and women have different natural tendencies, then its not sexism, just catering to the different preferences. That said the boyfriends should grow a pair and either tell the girlfriends they don't want to go shopping and she can go alone or with friends, or actually go and spend time with her. But going to the mall to go into this pod is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:56 PM
7

For Odin's sake, who the hell let this Special Ed student get near a keyboard? Retarded, its called retarded.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:16 AM
13

True, but tattooing racial pride (from any race) in your body is not a good sign. Race is not something you accomplished, it is just something that happened to you. That you feel the need to tattoo it on your body tells a lot.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:55 AM
1

Being treated like shit is the way of the man. Get used to it. Learn to get what you want despite of it.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:50 AM
20

Good to see.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:17 AM
1

If the job is an upgrade I say take it, shut up while you are there, and after one year (or even less) start looking for a new job with the new experience and upgraded CV.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:27 PM
13

This is what feminists will never admit. They take all the work and effort for granted. Eventually they will angry enough men, there will be so many men avoiding the system, that it will collapse, and feminists will be wondering how it happened.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:24 PM
3

Because spending male only time is fun and awesome. I like chocolate, but that does not mean I want chocolate in everything I eat. I like women but I don't need to be around women all the time. Psychological studies have shown males automatically change the way they relate to each other if there are women around. When in a group of only males cooperation will be easier, if there is a women around males will tend to compete with each other. So spending some time away from women with a bunch of gu…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 08:22 AM
16

Is there a female version of Peter Pan syndrome? Feminism
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:52 PM
6

Fair enough but you'll have to admit the metaphor is begging the ridicule. And even worse, if a man used the same metaphor he would be shamed to death, there would be no space for nuance.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:31 PM
29

Feminism is schrödinger's sexism.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:28 PM
15

Thank god for vibrators that get women like this one out of the dating market.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:17 PM
34

Put down the sword and make peace with reality. Why would they when they keep getting more and more privileges out of the victim wars?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:08 PM
64

Feminism and identity politics stops being crazy when you realize it is a money and power grab. The problem here is that feminism, using the victim hood fake narrative, have gotten a bunch of privileges that guarantees women positions of money and power without having to compete the same as men. Now, trans theory opens a way for women having to share these privileges with some men and eventually all men if we want to abuse the system. These women realize, do not want to share the privileges and …
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:42 PM
1

Because men are better drivers but take more risks, which leads to men having less but more important accidents. Insurance companies are very careful with their pricing, and there is a reason for all they do.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:05 AM
45

That is complete bullshit. That is just a feminist lie to paint people who defend due process as rape apologists.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:21 AM
14

Communist and fascist fought against each other, authoritarians vs authoritarians. Fighting fascist does not automatically makes you an anti authoritarian. In fact, animal farm was inspired by what Orwell saw happening in the Spanish Civil War, where the communists took over and imposed their authoritarian ways under different pretenses, which is exactly what happens in animal farm. Communists and anarchists even fought each other while they were fighting the fascists at the same time. Animal fa…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:15 AM
176

I don't understand how people don't see the problem with "believe the victim" automatically. How brainwashed do you have to be to not see it right away?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:09 AM
2

It is always nice to make them eat their own medicine.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 03:08 PM
10

So because a few women don't want to hug him, now nobody can hug him? What about the women that don't want to hug him stop hugging him and that's it? Absolutely ridiculous damseling.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:54 AM
1

It is very debatable that feminism got women the right to vote. What it is sure is that it was not only feminism that made it happen and in fact in the USA some terrorist actions by feminists actually delayed female vote. As per women working, it will surprise you that women had always worked. It was only rich women that did not work and it was (and still is) a privilege. Women's activists (not feminists) that were trying to improve poor women life conditions always asked for women to be able to…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:11 PM
9

First wave feminism was a bunch of racist and elitists group of rich white women. They even refused a white woman activist joining them because she wasn't rich enough (they said so explicitly). Feminism has to be the most well publicized and marketed hate movement ever.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:26 PM
11

Logic is a construct of the Patriarchy. You decide who is right in an argument by looking at who has more oppression points.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:46 AM
1

Sounds like an ad for the delivery company.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:44 PM
22

I've seen a couple of them and he did not. To be fair I would not have either. The college people presented very little in arguments and a lot of indignation and virtue signaling. The state of the education in USA social "sciences" is very sad.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:37 PM
6

The solution is to start suing women for their sexist remarks. Women hate real equality, they are making sexist remarks constantly. Keep suing women and you'll see how quick this law goes away or becomes so hard to trigger it becomes irrelevant.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:28 PM
6

Yes he is
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:11 PM
71

Feminists don't advocate equal representation in all men dominated jobs, just the ones that pay well. You don't see feminists asking to have more women down the mines or picking up the trash. They had no problems with geeky men messing with electronics and code, until it became an extremely profitable industry, then they started complaining about how misogynistic those geeks supposedly are and to give them advantages to get those profitable jobs. It is all a rouse.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:01 PM
3

Are you sure she is his mom? He married several times.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:53 PM
19

Some people don't learn.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:52 PM
9

RT has an agenda, but so does CNN or MSNBC and I don't see the same contempt for those sources. USAmericans are a bit brainwashed with your own propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:05 AM
3

No, because it is just a rehash of "boys are defective girls" feminist theory. Instead if recognizing their ideas are hurting boys and are one of the main reasons boys are falling behind, feminists are doubling down on promoting the ideas that are hurting boys.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:49 AM
16

Of course, the woman shouting the nonsense is fat.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:22 AM
6

Poor guy.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:53 PM
15

I guess it is just now that I am realizing that they may not care so much about objective improvement of the working environment as much as to enforce power Bingo, feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:56 PM
7

When you see an article shoe-horned like this, I can only think that is a paid for article.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:47 PM
2

Not true though. There is a guy suing Google claiming he was fired for his anti-sexist opinions, but in reality he was fired for making violent threads.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:57 AM
6

Blood type can prove the kid is not yours as certain combinations are genetically impossible, but it does not prove the kid is yours.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:18 PM
3

I have read its estimated around 10% of the kids are not biologically of the parent they believe. I would not be surprised if it was 33% as you mention.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:17 PM
7

Then it will blow your mind that Nigerians, not african-americans of Nigerian roots, but actual modern Nigerians emigrated by their own will to the USA do even better than Asians. There can be three factors here that help explain it. 1. Nigerian culture, like most of Africa, strongly supports traditional family values and strongly discourages having babies out of wedlock, which means kids grow in a strong family atmosphere with both parents. 2. Nigerians that can move to the USA are at least mid…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:07 PM
14

Equality bitches!
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:31 PM
12

Sorry, but the core doctrine of feminism goes against biology. This is not a few idiots in the movement.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:24 AM
107

Biology not real, only feels.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:01 AM
2

In the so-called age of girl power, we have failed to cut loose our most regressive standards of female success -- like pleasing others and looking sexy -- and to replace them with something more progressive -- like valuing intelligence and hard work. Despite their heavy programming from school to media, they can not stop women from being women. If they were not creating so much suffering, it would be funny to see feminists hit against the biology wall again and again.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:34 PM
4

Spiked did not lost their marbles, they were just bought. Its always surprising how people don't realize how often the press sell themselves. Press is a business. The trick is to post enough decent articles to create an audience and then monetize the audience.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:28 PM
3

Sound recordings don't take a lot of space, unlike video. You can also use an external memory card. Finally, regularly unload the files to a backup to make space.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:14 PM
2

Why not use your phone?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:17 PM
5

And Hillary Clinton is a rape denier.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:09 PM
5

Marx was great at criticism injustice. But he was horrible at proposing solutions.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:31 AM
9

Which means the only logical conclusion is adult women are children.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:01 PM
17

Schools used to do this test because it is a cheap and fun experiment. They had to stop because of the amount of children that discovered their legal dad could not be their biological dad.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:23 AM
2

As in someone feeling they are a different gender than the one in their chromosomes? That exists obviously. What causes it its not so clear.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:09 AM
12

Lol, I want Hillary to "listen and believe" Lewinsky. Always believe the victim, remember your own words Hillary?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:58 PM
9

Feminists decided decades ago that gender was 100% a social construct and any difference you see in society is the fault of The Patriarchy. Its one of the main parts of the feminist dogma, its at the core of their ideology. Now that evolutionary biology and neurology is contradicting their dogma, they are refusing to accept it and are fighting it because their whole ideology depends on it. Without this part their ideology falls.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:20 PM
5

Not sure about the enjoy.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:26 AM
10

Yeah, he is either a fool or he knows what he is doing and is heartless.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:54 PM
3

Where have you been hiding? Talking rubbish is a requirement to become senator.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:08 AM
7

Those cute little bacteria did not deserve to die but The Patriarchy cares only for men.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:30 PM
65

It is not compensating for the past. Its just a power grab. For feminists it will never be enough.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:21 PM
31

And this all comes from Obama threatening to remove federal funding from colleges that did not comply with the "men are guilty" feminist agenda. I still don't understand how he and the people who suggested the policy though it was going to do any good. Maybe I'm just being naive and they did not care at all. Whatever the reason it has been a fucking disgrace.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:09 PM
31

The government is forcing companies into this bullshit under penalty threads. If you invest in USA companies you wont find a big company that can get away from the bullshit. The feminist mafia wants its cut.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:04 AM
36

The next step is claim that, since men and women are equal, the reason the teams only select men is discrimination and demand quotas.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:15 AM
10

Go watch interviews of college USA people. They are not stupid but deeply brainwashed which often looks similar on the surface.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:38 AM
45

Revolutionary? A fucking accommodated fat college professor that uses its position to indoctrinate naive students, that's a revolutionary? Maybe I should try smoking whatever she is having.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:48 PM
1

There is a difference from holding racist views and being a wife of the KKK. They were not casual racists. They were ideologically committed to racism and using their position of power to promote it.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:57 AM
0

Are you the "So what you mean is..." of the subreddit?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:40 AM
14

Its all about the escalators... I'm sure someone is getting paid good money to argue that bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:39 PM
31

She sounds lovely. I'm sure men are lining up to spend time with her.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:44 PM
1

You are not forced to be normal. You can be however you want, but you have to take a couple of things into consideration: Biological tendencies will make people tend to act in certain ways, therefore certain attitudes will be more common and other more uncommon. People will be more used and will have and easier time reacting to stereotypical attitudes. It does not mean you have to comfort to everything, but it means that the further away from what is common you are, the more effort you are askin…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:04 PM
8

If by 'not normal' you mean its far away from the average of human females then yes.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:11 PM
3

It is citing first wave feminists. Its hard to misinterpret when she is citing their own words. You can go and check the source if you don't believe it. First wave feminists were openly racist, its not like they were trying to hide it, you just have to check what they were saying. I find it curious and sad that people are not aware of this historical fact and even find it outrageous, when the first wave feminists were open about their racism and you just have to check their own declarations.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:03 PM
-10

You mean the historical facts? Should I tell you to go educate yourself, that is not my job to educate you, femlord? But I'll indulge you, for example: https://womenagainstfeminismuk.wordpress.com/2017/01/24/who-said-that-suffragists-ku-klux-klan-or-feminazis/
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:16 AM
5

Leftist parties are not exempt of being full of rich kids. Communism was widely popular among European elites before they saw how the communist revolution in Russia went along. If you check leftist parties they are full of trust fund kids, specially the more radical. Saying that feminism was very popular among leftist does not mean what you are implying.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:24 AM
7

In all countries there was women's right movements, even in the USA. The issue is that women's right movement is different from feminism. Feminism is just one of them that thanks to the money and connections of its members imposed itself over the rest. In the USA, non feminist women's right movement activists were very critical of feminists and called them entitled stupid rich women. Some tried to collaborate with feminists but were rejected for not being rich enough. Some were even slandered by…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:54 AM
3

My, my, how the tables have turned. What happened to always believing the accuser? Survivor, if you want to be a good progressive you call the accuser survivor.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:59 AM
9

Feminism did not start as a legitimate social and political movement, but as a rich white women power grab, a lot of them wife's of the KKK. Then later it was dressed as a "legitimate" movement to make it more presentable.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:53 AM
0

Ah, yes, hormones not real, only culture is real /s.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:39 AM
2

Don't link directly to feminists articles. It gives them clicks and only encourages more of them. Archive them.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:44 PM
5

and then it got all incely I'm not complaining how women are, I'm OK with women choosing what they chose. I'm just saying that if we are going to asign blame stupidly, there is blame for everybody.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:07 PM
340

Also, its unfair to look at one side of the coin only. It is true that men murder more. But it is also true that men take more risks to save people heroically. Remember the recent Vegas shooting where it was only men that jumped on top of women using their bodies to protect them. Some of them died while saving the woman. Men take more risks, because of the different hormonal profile we have. And that means taking more risks for the good and for the bad. Its true that the Vegas shooter was a man,…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:27 AM
7

It looks more and more as if his own party set him up: he gets accused by two anonymous women all coming from one reporter, on hearing the news he denies everything and wants to fight but the three party delegates quit together and the party resigns for him. It looks like he was set up.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:04 AM
3

Enjoy feminism.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:20 AM
62

He is actually changing Obama's policy on the way colleges deal with sexual abuse allegations that lead to the college 'courts' that are fucking over men. It is OK to think Trump is making some good decisions while disagreeing with others. I don't get the demonization of Trump and the elevation of Obama.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:36 PM
1

Maybe not camel toes, you are right, but you could find the list of the best asses in men magazines 20 years ago. Today it would be sexist. That's how quick the indoctrination has happened.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:00 AM
10

Its not really that creepy. Humans are sexual and we like to see the top human specimens, which athletes tend to be. Before the feminization of men in the last two decades by feminism (yes only the last two decades), similar stuff was 100% normal for men also. In fact, it was normal for men and it was seen as tacky for women. Now, even men see it as creepy and it would produce backslash, but it is normal from women. This is how far feminist conditioning has been successful.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:56 AM
10

WTF How has Canada become such a a shithole? The girl should have just told him 'no' without the stupid excuses and be done. So much bullshit for nothing.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:19 AM
2

Stop using Google and they lose money. Then they get better or become less important. Either way, stop using google. You can argue all you want and they will give you a smile and the corporate turnaround, while doing what they are doing. Stop using them and they care.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:05 PM
1

Link does not work.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:50 AM
4

Google staying neutral is a lost battle. The best thing you can do is avoid Google all you can.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:05 AM
12

I agree with you. It is fair that men are charged more in car insurance. The problem is that it is also fair that women are charged more in health insurance because they use healthcare more. But on this particular issue feminists protested and got the same price.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:09 PM
15

I really hope once it starts touching the money the nonsense will be put to rest.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:07 PM
8

Why has she not been put down of her position already? What happened to #believethevictim ?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:45 PM
6

Feminism is not falling apart. Feminism has always been a rich white women movement. They have attacked and harmed poor women in the past and nothing has happened. This is nothing new. This is a victory for these rich women, because now they have less sexual competition from these poor attractive girls.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:37 PM
3

Oral contracts have been enforced before. They are hard to prove for obvious reasons but it has happened. In any case, this is not really about marriage or men's rights, but about a private agreement between two people.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:55 PM
0

This is not about common law or their relationship. It is about an oral agreement between the two, read the article.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:54 PM
1

They regularly were buying lottery tickets together. There is precedent of they both sharing previous small gains. Then he saw one ticket won big, took the ticket and left. She is arguing that ticket was like the other ones, he argues he bought that one for himself and she had no knowledge. If she is saying the the truth she deserves half of it. This is not about men-women, marriage or being boyfriends. It is about an oral deal. If the issue was about two friends or two work partners it still be…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:53 PM
2

If you read the case there is more to this case than an entitled women wanting an ex money. I am not sure who to believe, but if what she says is true she has a point. She could obviously be lying, but IF her version is true she has a point.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:54 PM
2

We should embrace it and tell women how many rights to be responsible they have.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:01 PM
2

If there is no gapps, nowhere (unless you install a program that specifically sends it somewhere obviously).
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:15 PM
13

You can use Android without installing GooglePlay.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:29 PM
1

Wasn't there a terrorist group of indians at the same time of Gandhi, that actually helped Gandhi achieve success?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:12 PM
11

Flee the country? In some cases it might be worthy.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:19 AM
3

And expecting someone to help her. Talk about damseling.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:16 AM
18

Because nobody cares about men.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:15 PM
2

Humans are animals. You and me are animals. Nothing you do or think will stop you from being an animal. You behave like an animal. Just because you have the fantasy that being "more" than an animal is somehow being enlightened, does not mean you will ever stop behaving like an animal.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:22 PM
5

Chile was in no way or form libertarianism of any kind. You are just like a talking point machine. There is no logic discussion possible with you. You just want to keep posting your talking points, day after day.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:22 PM
9

Oh look, its my friend that wants free markets and regulations at the same time... Seriously, you pretend to be so obsessed about r/mensrights when you just want to promote your economic policies.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:34 PM
479

Women don't realize how privileged they are and have been brainwashed by feminism to believe they are not.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:30 AM
3

but it really speaks to the way women dehumanize, objectify and misprioritize men when it comes to sex/romance. >They are not interested in who those man are, as much as they are interested in the value/power that attaching herself to a man gives her over other women. This is the same bullshit feminists expose. Knowing people takes a lot of time and effort. Its impossible for humans to get to know to a decent deep level most of the people we interact with. Therefore we all, men and women, use pr…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 11:09 PM
1

It means you are creating an environment that is scaring the strong and independent women and you should be punished by daddy government.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 10:17 PM
1

Then you'll have the USA government threatening you with a fine for discriminatory practices.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:48 PM
10

They are trying to rehash the idea that anti feminism is a right wing idea. They keep trying the same bullshit again and again.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:17 PM
1

There are only two currents inside socialist libertarianism, communism and mutualism. Can you tell us which one you identify with? I have never seen you write an opinion that was even close to mutualist positions, nor link an article from a mutualist source. Always communist leaning. By saying you are a socialist libertarian you just confirmed you are a communist. I don't understand why you feel you need to lie and deny what you are. From some months ago, you have been dutifully posting communis…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:23 PM
2

Because it seems it is your job to spam r/mensrights with links to communist leaning articles and your opinions always expose communist ideas as well. This is the third time I repeat it, you say you are not a communist but you are here every day posting communist ideas.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:57 PM
7

The UK is already on their second female president. None of them both run on a feminist campaign. It seems clear western societies voters don't care about a candidate being male or female but strongly dislike feminism and identity politics.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:01 AM
1

As I said, you say you are not, but the ideas you usually expose are.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:13 AM
2

You keep saying you are not a communism, but your ideas are.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:09 PM
18

/decade
/r/MensRights29/01/18 08:20 PM
6

As long as you funnel money into feminists organizations you are safe from accusations. So I doubt Trudeau will get fucked this way. Check how Hillary Clinton attacked Lewinsky and more recently protected one of his election collaborators from sexual accusations. Feminists are yet to attack her. Why? She funnels money towards feminist organizations.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:20 PM
3

Next woman that is dancing with me and does not ask me for consent again mid dance, I'm going to sue her for rape. Let's see that equality.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:17 PM
4

On the contrary, that's not feminism, that's actually caring for women.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:13 PM
3

Looking at all these romantic comedies of woman past their prime, Hollywood is either unaware or, more likely, in denial of the biological realities that underpin sex appeal. Neither. Hollywood is fully aware of what attracts male sexually, proof being the females they chose to star on "guys movies". But these movies the video is citing are for females. They are "emotional porn". Hollywood knows its completely unrealistic, but the market of unmarried post wall women is growing. Hollywood is a bu…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:28 AM
2

He was voted in because he is cute. If he was ugly he would not be president.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:11 AM
-7

But men don't actually think with their dicks Errrr....
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:34 AM
1

Do you think she will dare to try again for the presidency?
/r/MensRights27/01/18 01:45 AM
17

I hope she was drunk, otherwise she is badly uncoordinated.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 01:13 AM
12

Personally, I think is a result of how much women are shielded since they are kids. Boys and men are treated more harshly so they grow up to be able to deal with these situations better, while women have a harder time because you've had a lot less exposure. Have you ever notice how minority women from poor backgrounds are more tolerant with these type of questions? They are more of a trooper personality wise, than middle class and above women. It is possible there are some biological reasons too…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:13 PM
11

She broke the law and the FBI decided to let it go with very tortured justifications. Instead, the intelligence community has tried to nail Trump since the start. Notice that once Trump positions have come closer to what the establishment considers more reasonable, the whole Russia thing has gone into hibernation and the press has become less critic and sensationalistic about him. Elections are just a show to see who is the spokesman of the elites. If you fight them they destroy you.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:07 PM
109

With the caveat that not only you have to be sure they find you attractive at that moment but also after the fact. Because if they feel different about you a day, a month, a year, a decade... after, what was acceptable at the moment becomes rape.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:02 PM
2

Not sure if sarcastic.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:48 PM
1

It really is settled. International organizations do not recommend child labor ban laws anymore because of the damaging effects they have. It is that clear and settled. You mention child labor laws in first world countries, but even in those countries children can work in some cases. Some professions are legal for kids, like child actors. And kids help the family in small business, like grocery stores and it is let slide. Furthermore it's wrong, without any doubt, to say that there was a point i…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:41 PM
2

In the USA, federal level child labor laws only happened when the family income average was above what has been seen empirically as the threshold when families don't have to rely on child labor to survive. There were some local laws banning child labor, that were ignored when necessary. In general, it has been proven that laws banning child labor are not only ineffective but damaging for children and poor families, to the point where UNESCO and other international organization do not recommend a…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 12:55 PM
4

Its a hit piece.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:03 AM
6

People did not stop child labor in democratic countries. Economic development made it affordable for families to have the children in school instead of working.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 08:57 AM
10

all it takes is a single outlying funny woman to prove that women are capable of being funny. I did not say no woman is funny. Just that there are more funny men than women. Then why aren't more men funny? There should be an insane number of awesome comedians... Like hundreds of thousands... Being funny is not the only strategy men can pursue to become more attractive. If men are more evolved to make comedy. I did not say men are more evolved to be funny. It could easily be that, since sex is ea…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:36 PM
7

The theory says that men become funny to attract females. I think it could at least explain why there tends to be more funny men than funny women.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:15 PM
6

I don't disagree, but good luck. They love their censorship.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 10:32 AM
2

What is so wrong about what she is saying? It is very over simplified concepts that make me disagree with some of what she says, but I don't find anything that garants you going crazy about it or calling her a psyco.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 10:12 PM
24

France does not have freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 10:07 PM
1

The gender studies bullshit has not spread through grassroots or market mechanism, but by infiltrating government or government regulated areas, that are by definition centralized. For example, they started to occupy education departments and then started to bring their friends and bully anyone who disagreed, they occupied government regulatory bodies, ... Now that their ideas got enough traction and are being discussed in the open is when they are suffering. Kids in the schools are rebelling ag…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:30 PM
1

No, this is why you avoid misrepresenting other people position, building an straw man, forcing them to repeat their position again. You also should avoid pandering to social constructionists by avoiding certain ideas, because they will not see it as you being considerate, but as you being weak and will pound harder on you. We are not disagreeing on how things are, but we are certainly disagreeing on how to deal with feminists and the like.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:42 AM
2

If by gender essentialism you are saying biological determinism, nobody is defending those ideas and you are building a straw man. Nobody says nurture does not influence. But those tendencies exist and they have a biological origin. There is nothing wrong in saying that no matter how much convoluted you want to get. And you should not be afraid of calling it how it is.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:38 PM
2

I don't see why I or anyone should avoid disagreement with the "socially constructed performative gender roles" people (as you call them). We should call out the gender studies nonsense, not try to appease them as there is no way to make them happy because they want power, not truth. Don't be afraid of calling them out on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:55 PM
4

No its not. It is true that those tendencies exist. Why would it be wrong to point them out?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:32 PM
5

I have hope that this bullshit will die with the end of the economic crisis like a lot of nonsense ideas of the late 60's and 70's died during the 80's.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:38 PM
37

I agree that MRA should not turn into a left bashing festival, but as a lefty myself I think it is fair and even necessary to admit that the left has a problem with the SJW ideology that is gaining more and more traction. Its not all the left, but this nonsense has come from left side and has even reached deep into academia, government and corporate. For example, see M. Obama promoting the idea of the wage gap, Trudeau approving international help for women only, Google and its historic toxic cu…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:47 PM
11

Its not a college exam. Its a competition to find the most competent students in math. It makes sense to make it very tough so you select only the best.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:50 AM
5

Both men and women are needed for a functioning society. Its very "curious" how feminists don't want to register this part. When you mention men and women are different, they automatically accuse you of thinking men are better, as if the only possible outcome of being different is that one sex is better than the other. For them, it is impossible that they are complementary, despite being the more logical option. Specialization gives advantages, so it makes sense the reason to have a dimorphic sp…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:05 PM
9

And its not only IQ. Men tend to be more independent, which is good to think out of the norm, while women tend more towards consensus. Men tend to take more risks, which is also good to experiment. Its a bunch of things. But if you mention biological differences to a feminist you automatically are labeled as misogynist, that's the level of what we are dealing with in 2018.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:18 PM
22

Her response to this would be, after calling you misogynist and a bunch other names, is that it only happened because women were oppressed under patriarchy and could not get the opportunities men got.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:01 PM
16

Bravo. The only criticism is that he says the rich white women game is not feminism, but in reality that has been feminism since day one. It is not the idea of feminism that is sold in schools, but rich white women feminism is historically the real feminism. Go check the suffragettes. Its a shame that people have these idealized visions of feminism instead of understanding what feminism has been in reality.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:29 AM
9

'RIP Cathy Newman' is not a threat, its usually used as an expression to indicate someone was severely beaten. Go to any sports subreddit and when some team loses by a big difference you'll find the expression 'RIP [team]'. It does not mean they are threatening the team, and nobody takes it like that. Its just damiseling to change the focus. On top of that, its relatively easy to send threats to yourself passing as other people in a way that's not detectable. So it is perfectly viable that her p…
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:04 PM
23

And some critical thinking capacity would be nice too.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 01:40 PM
28

Typical for feminist to play damsel in distress when they are humiliated. Where is the brave and independent?
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:42 AM
10

Kids should not be asked to remain sit in one place for hours. Its not natural for kids. They need to run and move around.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:45 PM
1

Whatever the reason, you are wrong. Also, it is a legitimate concern, not just stupidity.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:19 AM
2

Because it is physically impossible. For example, climate affects a person personality and disposition to work. Should we try to compensate for different climates? And if so, how?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:47 AM
1

Again, no one cares whether more white women benefited than non-whites This post already proves you wrong.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:39 AM
4

You can go further and say equal opportunity is a myth too. We can strive to make society more accessible for everybody and try to level the play filed as much as possible, but there will never be true equality of opportunity either.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:42 PM
157

She tried to be critical but she came out as dumb and childish. To be critical you first have to understand what the other person is saying, instead she just assumed he was a misogynist and used any "gotcha" argument she could muster.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:29 AM
3

Very, specially in kids. Forcing a pledge conditions people, specially kids, on being compliant, on not questioning the dogma. Its close to brainwashing. Once the person has taken the pledge out of shame and not wanting to stand out, the person will tend to rationalize in favor of whatever the pledge was, instead of against, out of fear of looking silly and admitting he was shamed into compliance. If you repeat it enough times you can brainwash people into your dogma.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 10:50 AM
4

How is getting your cock out and masturbate in front of a dressed women not worse than pointing to your cock and receiving a blowjob from a women that is already naked?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 09:19 AM
20

He dealt really well with that. She threw the typical emotion driven feminist gotcha questions at him and nothing stuck. It was really frustrating her until she even started getting a liking for him towards the very end. He is quirky but extremely knowledgeable. It was a treat to see.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:39 PM
3

You have a point that because feminists have infiltrated, conscientiously, not at all random, education, press and government, some of their values have transcended into society, but the ideology, the core ideas, have not. For once, because they make no sense.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:35 PM
18

It is starting to look more and more like a huge power play.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:40 PM
4

Feminism is popular in a small minority of women. They just occupy positions of power, mainly in HR, press and government, and that is why they seem to be everywhere, but they are just a small minority of women.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:35 PM
10

I taped because I was intimidated and was fearing for my life despite the guy not making any threatening action.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:08 PM
1

Great article, thanks for bringing it.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:02 AM
7

No shit women are confused too. Stupid hoes giving advice as if they are very clever. That was horrible advice.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:21 PM
5

Vitamin D also increases your happiness because its good for the brain.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:18 PM
32

I agree with you. Its hard to have sympathy for a guy that has thrown any other man under the bus. If this exact situation would have happened to someone else I bet you he would have sided with the woman, but now that has happened to him we have to believe him? You collect what you plant. I still don't understand why these guys can not imagine shit like this happening to them.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:06 PM
6

You are correct. The problem is everybody is saying with the guy that he should have known. Yet when a Hollywood producer tells an aspiring young actress that if she accepts a dinner with him, she'll have a shot at her dream role, and she goes to the dinner and then to his hotel room, nobody is saying she should have known better. Everybody is saying "you poor little thing", when everybody knows what that situation meant. If anyone says she should have known better, the reputation is gone.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:00 PM
3

"No, you don't get to be hierarchical with abuse" There, I showed you and dismantled all your arguments! I promise these people are like trained monkeys. They have learnt and know how to use these words, but there is no substance behind. There is no real logic, no coherence, they just combine them in a way they think will give them whatever short term objective they have in mind.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 11:45 AM
11

What's up with the frenchies showing so much common sense?
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:17 AM
3

A white middle class women, and they'll call her a minority representative. I'm calling it now.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:54 AM
14

Criticizing or attacking feminism is not criticizing or attacking women. Even in western countries, only a small minority of women consider themselves feminists. Feminism is just one ideology.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:46 AM
1

Trump is fighting against campus discrimination against males. And he is being shitted on for that. Obama instead created the policy that is fucking males and he seems to get a pass.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:39 AM
6

We should start shaming white knights hard, like men did in the past. Weak men need to know that betraying his own sex only to score brownie points with feminists will have consequences.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:32 AM
4

Its not gay if a women does it.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:25 AM
4

This is what makes the case. The 2 other points can be seen as a bit dodgy, but they are not that special. Taking a female friend to an isolated area and asking for a blowjob is not and should not be a crime. Now, if the person leading is a figure of authority it becomes fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:58 PM
19

People, both men and women, care about female suffering. Therefore, for females, victim hood is power. And a lot of them are experts at playing the game and exercising that power. If a man tries to do the same he will be seen as weak, if not ignored or laughed at.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:50 PM
24

Its because women have a bias for powerful men. They don't even acknowledge "weak" men as real men. There has been repeated psychological test proving that no matter how attractive a women is, she will always rate herself above 70% of all men. Even a fat ugly 3/10 will rate herself above an 6/10 man. Men rate themselves quite accurately. Then there is also the fact that genetically most women get to pass their genes while only around a 30% of men genes remain. It seems women tend to select from …
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:09 PM
7

There has been a big push by post modernist ideologues in the last years. In my opinion Gender Studies is hurting society, as you have a lot of people trained in bullshit and which only path to employment is to use the bullshit to make up discrimination to gain employment. When you deny their ideology, you are not threatening their beliefs only, but their income. Hence why they band together and bully any opponent so hard. Postmodernism is taking a place in society this way and its worrying. We …
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:20 PM
3

And so it starts the assault of feminism on engineering studies. It will not happen suddenly, they will take their time as these people have nothing better to do, but progressively more post modernist bullshit will be forced to new engineers.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:55 PM
4

Its a endless pit, you will never fill it. What society should do is get a grip and do not bow to stupid attention seeking causes.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:22 PM
15

Not all woman are toxic. Feminists on the other hand...
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:59 PM
3

I can guarantee you it did not happen and the feminist is just starved for attention.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:29 PM
41

There are no feminist women in a house on fire https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=onNBxynagXE (And yes, I know the starting point about the wage gap is wrong, but you get the point)
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:43 AM
20

Honestly, it seems like fake outrage created to promote a series that is failing.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:34 AM
12

I think the point is that feminism makes up a lot of the structural issues.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:44 PM
1

Not reaIly holding the gov as a good example, more like saying its not the biggest thread at the moment. Ultimately, USA conservatives should have been this way since the start because in theory their roots are at classic liberalism. Although we know that over time they got more and more influenced by progressivism and created the social conservative monster, its nice when they go back to their classical liberal roots.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:27 AM
8

What if money is my utopia? Checkmate atheists!
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:14 AM
1

I know its bad to burn bridges and could affect you professionally in the future, but it would be epic if you were consequence free to respond saying that you don't work in companies that follow SJ ideologies.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:55 AM
3

You can run Android without GApps and use F-Droid for apps. Its not the same, the app selection is more limited since they accept only open source apps, but it works great for me. If you need some apps from the play store, you can use the f-droid app Yalp Store which allows you to download apps from play store. I use it to install a couple apps from private companies that I need. The alternative to Google Maps is to use Open Street maps. They are made by volunteers and they lack some info in som…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 09:37 AM
8

But in real life it does.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 09:20 AM
1

She has a point though. And in fact women get paid more than men for their looks already, as demonstrated in higher female vs male pay in models or porn stars for example.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 12:58 AM
5

This merit excuse you are using to hide your misogyny is getting old... (joking obviously). It is the ideology of these people and everyone is scared to face them because they are very well organized and are vicious with their bullying. I always think they are going to bite too much every time, but they keep getting away with it. Maybe western society needs to have real tough times before merit is appreciated over feel good bullshit again.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 12:48 AM
12

For what I've read google is already having trouble with the top talent that are worried over all this. I would not be surprised if the HR team is told to keep their bullshit on the low (do the same but be intelligent about how you publicly justify it). Seriously, one male manager after reading the Damore memo emailed him saying he was so upset about his opinion that he could not do any work in two days. Even if its just an exaggeration, how can you work with such a drama queen as your boss? Its…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:57 PM
17

Also, that memo was literally baiting that exact response. In no world is writing, essentially, a reddit post and then forwarding it to a bunch of people in your company a reasonable or plain approach to a problem. It basically comes across as insubordination, rabble rousing, passive aggressive, and whiny. The way the message was delivered essentially ensured only one type of response. Not at all. That's very close to blame the victim because he should have known how these bullies would react. W…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:46 PM
2

Did you replied?
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:32 PM
23

Its not. They have a majority of male engineers doing the real work (some few women engineers doing real work too) and keeping their head down in anything not technical, while they have a troupe of mostly women in HR, PR, design, ... creating this toxic environment. Which BTW it has been government induced, as google has gone this route after the government started investigating them for not having enough females. If one thing feminists do very well is infiltrate positions of power so they can f…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:29 PM
-2

Acting is a high risk career choice, not childish. Its not the same. Some people succeed and have a great life, well beyond any average life. As long as you are aware you are going for a high risk it is not a childish option, just risky. For example, Brad Pit was studying architecture while pursuing modeling and acting. It does not seem like pursuing acting was a childish decision. If he had not made it as actor he would have lived a more mediocre life, but most likely at least more than decent …
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:28 PM
17

I bet you she finds a way to claim Franco removing her from the films after she complained is exploitative too.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:21 PM
9

50% miners, 50% waste pickers... The list goes on and on.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:48 AM
4

I do dislike the crazy seeking attention gay stereotype types. I dislike any person that needs to have histrionic personalities to constantly seek attention, gay or hetero. These type of personalities are light anti social and hurt social dynamics, they end up poisoning social relationships. You are gay, you like to fuck other dudes in the ass? Fine by me but do not use it as an excuse to behave in an attention seeking way or any other toxic personality. And the people who feel the need to defin…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:43 AM
4

Feminist are going to start criticizing this article for sexist any minute now. Everybody knows feminist theory says men and women are equal.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:39 AM
10

He must see women and immigrants as very weak.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:33 AM
20

He also declares hurting feelings as violence.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:32 AM
2

It is still insane even if its not directly hurting anyone and denotes personality issues that will come out at some point. Its worrisome, I would not want to be or work around such person.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:27 AM
2

You misunderstand political individualism. Political individualism is a moral framework, a set of rules and guidance, on how to behave and interact in a community or collectively. The difference is a individualistic community will base its moral code in individual rights, while a collectivists community will decide based on collective rights. They are both different philosophies on how to manage a community or collective. Individualism (politically) is not about going alone and doing everything …
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:15 AM
5

Psychologist have consistently found that men tend to be more independent while women tend more towards consensus. The result is not surprising really.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:43 AM
6

The husband now has to deal with the death of his mother and the double betrayal of his wife, cheated on him and then killed his mother to cover it up. Imagine one day living with a person every day, planing the future with her and the next day she cheated on you and killed your mother... Has to be devastating. Poor guy.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 06:25 PM
3

The point is not that it was overturned, but that it was overturned because she is claiming she is crazy.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 04:27 PM
8

What's wrong with hair?
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:55 AM
1

He is the local commie, everything is right wing for him.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 06:18 AM
72

Feminism is a cancer that needs to go away.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:04 PM
3

That's a nice excuse... /j
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:32 PM
1

That's a good question. People are fucked up.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 12:43 PM
1

Because women will use white knights if they need to but they hate them because they can see through their facade.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:53 AM
9

Yes. It seems the more SJW you are, the more you assault women.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 08:33 PM
12

Why wouldn't you? People are not robots, hugging people when you feel it is part of human interaction. Touching people makes you feel better, its been scientifically proven.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 05:30 PM
11

If a woman is stupid enough to believe that crap let her. She will get meat grinded in hook up culture and then end up as a lonely cat lady feminist or at best marrying some boring smuch that makes her unhappy. The best thing we as men can do to fight this is to be very selective about who we have long term relationships with. Select women who respect men.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:41 AM
0

Libertarians
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:07 AM
1

I think they really had enough with the "believe all victims" people. They are not going to openly question feminism, but they are going to tell police to go back to questioning everything and ignore the feminists idiotic ideas.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 07:31 AM
2

So delusional.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:52 AM
3

Sargon of Akkad is not conservative, he is just anti-feminist. I bet you he is a lefty or maybe libertarian, but not conservative.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:13 AM
13

Women have always had a lot of covert power. Thanks to feminism, women are gaining overt power, the one typical of males, and what are they doing with it? Trying to get rid of basic and cornerstones rights of society like free speech, innocent until proving guilty, right to a fair trial,... by creating moral panic and sensationalism. If they think men are not taking notes of what they are doing with their new found power they are mistaken. We are becoming very aware of what they are doing and ho…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:55 AM
2

Public perspective forcing the academics to give up the charade. That is why it will take time.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:27 PM
3

Feminism makes money for a lot of people. Lots of money, feminism is a big industry. As such, anything that threatens feminism, threatens the income of a lot of people and therefore its going to be attacked in any way possible. Hang in there, these slander tactics only last so long. Eventually the charade comes crashing down as people check the facts. But it will take years until the feminist industry is forced to give up.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:31 PM
21

She will find some, she will just not like them.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:00 PM
1

Let me rephrase, how do you know what kind of commitment he had with his family?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:26 AM
4

They can not. Same way we men can not deny our instincts.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:16 AM
2

How do you know he break his commitment to his family?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:11 AM
4

Is that a crime?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:12 AM
5

The first wave. For example, previous to feminism if a marriage separated the man had custody of the children and also the obligation to maintain them. This might seem unequal but at least its balanced. The one who had the privileges also had the obligations (keep the kids, but forced to maintain them) and the one who had no privileges had no obligations. Moving towards equality would have meant sharing the privileges and obligations. But instead feminism used its influence to change the law and…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:59 PM
14

I am aware. Their actions since the start of the movement says otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:39 PM
2

I am not playing any game. I'm just rebutting your comment.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:31 PM
14

Not even first wave feminists were for equality. Study your history. Feminism has never been about equality.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:59 PM
17

You are assuming feminism is for equality.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:39 PM
6

OK, I'll bite, why?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:08 PM
117

Feminists are women who have convinced themselves they are oppressed so they can be assholes.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:43 PM
9

Ask your father to read this subreddit for one week. Tell him that you won't ask again even if he is unconvinced. Let's see what opinion he gets next.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:26 PM
5

And then hired men teachers over a woman because she had the "wrong" political ideas.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:31 PM
5

They will never get over it.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:59 AM
19

It is impossible to diagnose someone just from internet hearsay, but she strongly fits the pattern.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:57 AM
805

Poor guy. With a mother like that he did not have a lot of chances.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:53 AM
5

Its not weird if you think that biologically sex has always been a weapon for women. Sex toys and specially sex robots threatens that power.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:01 AM
3

I was raised by a feminist mother. I am now an anti-feminist. The problem of feminism is that their propaganda works, extremely well, its very effective, but their ideas don't. When you are raised with feminism as the normal you go out to the world and try to be a good feminist, just to realize it does not work. Women specially hate it. They respect you a lot more when you don't behave in a feminist way. Feminism behaviour made my life difficult and complicated. When I realized and stopped follo…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:01 AM
2

Its already happening. They are accusing left wing feminist politicians, the ones that work to secure funding from your taxes to feminism, and the NYT already released an article saying that 'Always believe' has limits (Always but with limits, so not Always). Feminism is about money and its showing it once again.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:33 AM
19

Feminism is always claiming outcome inequality is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:35 AM
11

Do not post direct links to buzzfed, always use http://archive.is/
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:24 AM
8

No, I was unaware of the rest of circumstances. It paints a very different picture.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:41 PM
-12

Did the client know she was a minor? Because if he did I can justify her getting a pass.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:25 PM
224

If you are going that route, you might as well leave the country and have a good live somewhere else rather than be in prison.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:18 PM
7

I was reading the whole thing waiting for the actual evidence. Nowhere to be found. Very suspicious.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:19 AM
5

Careful Denzel, you are going to get the Bill Cosby treatment if you keep going against The Narrative.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:14 AM
1

I care about the people around me. I would never do that to a friend. I do not care, basically because it is humanly impossible, about all the people in the world. It is not my responsibility to worry about the well being of the marriage of someone I have never met. Would it be a shitty situation for him? Yes. Would I feel bad if I see him suffering? Yes. And yet it is not my responsibility, because it is humanly impossible to take responsibility for every other person in the world. Let me twist…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 09:42 PM
3

Nothing to add, great commentary.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 09:22 PM
1

Whataboutthechildren-ism? Really? If the family breaks and the children suffer is because the person with a family cheated, not otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:45 PM
0

Unless the partner has some sort of relationship with you, yes.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:15 PM
17

other than to shame him
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:29 PM
1

I have been arguing morally all the time. And no matter how much you repeat it, does not make it true. She knew he was married and still owed his wife nothing. You want to think it does because it makes you feel more protected, but what makes you feel good in your head does not change how the world is. Only your partner has a responsibility with you.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:04 PM
3

And still she has no responsibility in that marriage, so no, she is not equally responsible. I understand people want to spread the fault of cheating and find ways to hate the person that participated in the sex, the one that "stole" the partner, but that is not how it works. The world owns you no fidelity. Your partner does, that's it. Try to spread responsibility in your head all you want, but it won't do a thing. Only your partner is responsible. Hate the other person all you want, its natura…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:43 PM
-3

His marriage is not her responsibility. He was being irresponsible to his wife. She wasn't. Fail to see your point.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:53 PM
4

We can not overcome biology. We can play around it and mold it somehow, but its influence will always be there.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:23 PM
16

Why? Hillary Clinton called his husband accuser a liar and later on claimed all women should be believed. And no feminist seem to care. Feminism is about money and power, not about logic and coherence, so don't expect anything to come out of this.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:52 AM
1

Feminism does not fight for equality. Women can fight for equality.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:10 AM
2

Drop feminism.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:09 AM
9

This subreddit is sneaky like that. You start reading and without even realizing, one day, you start drawing weird Indian symbols and saluting with your extended right hand and arm.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:44 AM
31

Mensrights is anti-feminist (mostly, some are still under the delusion that feminism is salvageable) and feminism is the source of income of a lot of these "professionals". Attacking feminism is attacking their source of income, hence it is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:42 AM
12

Feminism is about money. First they ignored men and trashed anyone who wanted to put some focus on us. Now that they see there is enough attention on men problems, they have changed their approach because they follow the money.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:41 AM
5

Its not the best moment to say it, but its true nevertheless. Flaunting your money and wealth is never the best idea.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:39 AM
10

Indeed. You can see how most tv series end up very feminized, even when they start differently, because a big part of the audience and the big consumers are women, so it pays to pander to them.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:37 AM
3

My bad then.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:35 PM
9

To be fair, she has been decent. She did not exposed him, and has said it was not harassment. Its other people leading the charge on her name. Some women are going historical on this shit, but let's not blame this reporter who is being rational and decent.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:35 AM
3

Good on her. Specially liked how she pointed out that "misjudged sexual apertures" are not harassment. She told a guy to fuck off and he did.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:04 AM
2

I donwvote any link from a feminist source that is not archived.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:10 PM
6

Its true. Women mature faster than men due to the difference of brain development between girls and boys. The hypocrite part is that then they claim there are no biological differences between men and women brains.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:05 PM
3

I guess it fits, still ridiculous. And the dude is tech support. How much can he make?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 10:58 PM
12

He spent 10k in two years for a gym?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 09:30 PM
5

Also, if someone is being obnoxious like looking too much and making some people uncomfortable, it can be dealt with socially, like it has always been dine, no need to make a law for every small social interaction.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 07:45 PM
1

If you link to The Guardian use http://archive.is/
/r/MensRights26/10/17 08:23 AM
2

I did not know that but its a great idea. These article are often rage-bait. I would not be surprised if we are encouraging some of the stupidity with our clicks.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:32 PM
5

No http://archive.is = down vote
/r/MensRights24/10/17 05:31 PM
13

I doubt he will learn. Good post nevertheless.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:59 PM
4

The Victorian feminists can go fuck themselves or get some thick skin.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:52 AM
9

Isn't the Indian girl the one that complained that air conditioning at office was sexist?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:56 PM
2

Wtf
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:42 PM
36

Get out as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:47 PM
5

Any Vice post not archived I down vote without clicking. If you are going to post a Vice article, post an archived version.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:48 AM
4

Left wing and authoritarianism are not opposites necessarily. Historically there has been a lot of it, despite some left wingers always thinking its a right wing thing only.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:35 PM
79

And how the people who say the brain of men and women are different are just bigots.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:52 PM
524

Biology is only real when it proves women are better.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:51 PM
15

Feminist racket in full display.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:17 AM
6

Exactly. They will ignore until it costs them money.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:00 PM
4

Send women down to the mines, for equality!
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:59 PM
10

Statutory rape is not rape anymore? Its open season on young people according to you?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:15 AM
43

They have a president that was raped and then ended up marrying his rapist, but the problem is that people say mean things?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:23 PM
-2

Taxes is literally unfree labor, or rather taking part of the results of your labor. You can agree or disagree with the need for taxes but that is what they are.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:06 PM
8

How would this keep feminists happy though? Because it pays them money. If you read the full comment my position is explained. And which feminists? The real life ones. The ones who studied gender studies and get jobs at government, big corporations and media, promote these ideas and bully whoever refuses to pay tribute to the feminist racket.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:57 AM
19

Yes, but Tinder wants to pretend it doesn't to keep feminists happy. If you are a guy and believe the bullshit oh well, sucks for you, you'll be the fool of the town. If you are smart enough to understand what this is, you keep fucking tinder sluts. You have to think this is a payment from Tinder to feminists to avoid backslash. Tinder pays some women studies graduates to make these stupid videos, and in return feminist do not bully tinder. Its the feminist racket. Hot guys keep doing their thin…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:38 AM
2

I will down vote any Vice link that is not archived.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:17 AM
9

Next time someone steals from me, I'll sue them for rape.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:12 AM
1

Legally yes, completely no. Men and women are different and complimentary.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:42 PM
33

Feminism doesn't believe in biology, so she might claim discrimination if his son is not accepted.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:30 AM
22

Feminism is about money. If they create new problems they can rack in more money.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:25 AM
11

I get the feeling most MRA's are libertarian leaning more than left or right.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:06 PM
8

Feminism is for equality, but equality for women, not equality for men, see? Feminism is for "equality". That's her way of justifying all the bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:13 AM
7

And if they discover some students are engaging on what seems to be a male club in their private time, what are they going to do? It all seems surreal and taken out of some authoritarian nut job wet dream.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:24 AM
4

The article doesn't say, how exactly is Harvard going to make sure the students don't associate in their private time in a non approved way?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:25 AM
44

Her family is very wealthy. This judge will be promoted in the near future because of this ruling.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:35 PM
118

It will not die because its the narrative that is being pushed.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:54 PM
5

Can we? Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:11 PM
34

Its crazy that we can not be sure anymore.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:11 PM
1

No discussion there, Sherlock.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:10 PM
35

Gender-based violence harms women, families, communities and societies. Of course, when they mean gender violence they mean violence against women and when they say equality they mean giving women more privileges without any responsibility.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:58 AM
1

If I remember correctly she was the most level headed feminist of the bunch.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:19 PM
1

The biggest irony is that Trump economically is very progressive. But because of his other stances, conservative support his economic policies and democrats oppose them. Politics are stupid.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter