destruedo Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-5	Slates take on make circumcision. There are very few scenarios in which circumcising a baby boy, or a boy of any sort, are medically necessary Odd that you would point that out. Surely you don't think that medical necessity makes it less of a mutilation or somehow results in the infant's consent. It must be because you would feel like an asshole if you accused parents of being defenseless child mutilators, but the procedure turned out to be medically necessary. Pinpoint the specific bit where you think there is an equivocation o…	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 11:55 PM
-6	Slates take on make circumcision. It's turning off people who might be sympathetic to mens rights causes, but for some reason just aren't into being called "mutilated" on a daily basis.	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 10:53 PM
-7	Slates take on make circumcision. Rightly or wrongly, the characterization of circumcision as "mutilation" is a very fringe viewpoint.	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 10:01 PM
-9	Slates take on make circumcision. That's because it's not a point. It's an if-by-whiskey appeal to emotion.	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 09:46 PM
-10	Slates take on make circumcision. The weird and disproportionate obsession that MRAs have with circumcision is one of the biggest turn-offs of the whole movement.	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 09:34 PM