detoured_spectacles Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Yuh	Legal Rights	detoured_spectacles	/r/MensRights	30/06/19 11:21 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Yuh If the explanations I gave were somehow not clear then alas the problem is with you, it is something even Dengoids who barely read can understand.	/r/MensRights	02/07/19 01:29 AM
1	Yuh You are not a transhumanist based on what you said, you are a humanist who likes technology, based on your previous posts you still uphold the sex binary and other things that are at heart humanist. The AI thing is probably not what you think it is, the easiest intro to it that I know of is the Sexborg section in Vincent Le's "Slave, Sister, Sexborg, Sphinx: Feminine Figurations in Nick Land's Philosophy". I am fine with waiting if you need time to read or whatever, I don't mean to rush you at a…	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 11:18 AM
1	Yuh This is not "progressivism" nor is it "progress for the sake of progress", this is gender accelerationism, a fundamentally anti-humanist theory, of which the goal is artificial intelligence, a "true" Outside.	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 10:28 AM
1	Yuh The second point is loosely connected to the original post, it is that things such as pegging and other activities that don't fall into the norms have corrosive properties on societal norms, and as such can be used against the dominant ideology/system, to simplify things significantly.	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 10:13 AM
1	Yuh OK, I'll try it another way, would you prefer me break it into formal logic instead of "post modernist word salad"? An average person on the streets wouldn't be arguing about pegging, and even if they manage to get into such a conversation it is reasonable to expect them to have internet access and open Wikipedia (for example my reference to Wittig is clearly explained on wikipedia). And I do spend some level of effort writing my responses, so I should be able to expect at least some effort in r…	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 07:24 AM
1	Yuh This is plain English, what is unclear about what I said? If you don't understand what I am saying do ask specific questions instead of just handwaving everything. There is nothing vague about this, it draws straight from Monique Wittig's understanding of lesbians as the Outside, and Deleuze's and Nick Land's criticism of Freud and his phallocentrism.	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 07:12 AM
1	Yuh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallocentrism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterritorialization The point is a criticism of Freud and the vast majority of Western philosophy for being phallocentric and defending the binary between the phallic and the non-phallic (which often means the binary between the sexes as well), which in turn becomes a defense of traditional family values. Such (arising from what Engels called "historical defeat of the female sex") is an unstable binary that is sustained …	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 07:01 AM
1	Yuh Societal norms are humanist shits. Let pegging (and phallic women for that matter) be that which will deterritorialize the phallocentric binary that Freud has imposed upon the humanities for far too long.	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 06:11 AM
1	Yuh No one is demonizing it though, it's a very good thing.	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 05:28 AM