TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

deusdeorum Archive

View 2 posts and 128 comments by deusdeorum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

"Seems to mean" .... imagine respondents all having different thoughts on what the survey is asking. That's a big issue with studies, and more specifically surveys. The usefulness of this "study" is limited to assuming respondents are equally honest in addition to understanding the survey in the same manner. Food for thought: other studies show women tend to underreport partners while men tend to overreport partners - this is a pattern that could translate to a survey like this.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:32 PM
18

I don't see how any of your bullets are objectively sexist or misogynistic. Misogyny is a heavily, heavily over-used term, inappropriately so. I think a better question is how much misandry is there in feminist communities? I think the "bad reputation" of male advocate spaces is less to do with the individuals or spaces themselves and more to do with the empathy gap and radical feminists spreading misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 03:51 PM
3

Personally I think the left has done more harm than the right, but at the end of the day, neither side has a particularly good track record.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 03:42 PM
2

Bit ironic you are talking about the "merit" of quotas. Quotas have zero value in any scenario, the only form of discrimination that should ever exist is on the basis of actual merit - not your race or gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/23 01:08 PM
1

Everything is not discriminatory.... and not all discrimination is equal. For example, discrimination based on merit is good, discrimination based on gender/religion/sex/ is not. This isn't about determining who you give your money to, it's about eliminating types of discrimination which should not happen in any circumstance.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 07:39 PM
0

Gendered handouts of any kind are problematic. Segregated programs fuel division and inequality.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:48 PM
1

Because it's discriminatory - all these discriminatory groups perpetuate discrimination and the "need" for other discriminatory groups. The need for a group that supports men's rights or women's rights goes away when we have a humanist group instead that focuses humans holistically.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:46 PM
-6

It's far from ridiculous. The right to not be discriminated against is in the constitution. When one discriminates based on race socially or otherwise - we call that racism no? Individuals nor organizations should discriminate, accordingly any organization you wish to support wouldn't be discriminatory if those organizations don't discriminate themselves. What's required is paradigm shift, thanks to things like affirmative action, which is legalized discrimination - much the same as these race/g…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:58 PM
1

Discrimination shouldn't be acceptable in any circumstance, the fact that someone donated money shouldn't bypass and therefore destroy the principles of fairness and the right to not be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:02 PM
6

Private scholarships should not be able to discriminate either, the same way it's illegal for private companies.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 01:51 PM
26

Any sub that bans you as a result of posting here isn't a sub worth frequenting.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:15 PM
6

That doesn't surprise me it was argued she was less involved but what evidence supports that? I find it hard to believe as they knowingly did the acts jointly, they wouldn't have been prosecuted in this manner if that wasn't the case. As studies do show women get lighter sentencing or no sentencing at all (in such cases where prosecutors won't even go after women when they think a jury wouldn't convict).
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:30 PM
1

On June 7, 2022, a jury convicted the Chrisleys on all counts of a superseding indictment, including conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit tax evasion. The jury convicted Julie Chrisley of an additional charge of obstruction of justice. Tarantino was also convicted of multiple tax-related violations. U.S. District Judge Eleanor L. Ross sentenced the defendants as follows: Todd Chrisley, 54, of Brentwood, Tennessee, has been sentenced to 12 years in pri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/22 03:27 PM
1

Truly ironic, given that's a big reason why women want access to abortion - to have consequence-free sex, by the same logic to skirt their responsibilities - the same rhetoric used to vilify men is instead portrayed as empowerment for women. If men want abortion they are pinned as a deadbeat dad, but if women want it, it's their right and they are celebrated for doing what they want. Just a reminder men have zero rights or choice one way or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/22 03:19 PM
10

I'm not sure how accurate the concept of women more likely to be injured is, given the fact it's well established men heavily under report abuse and even when reported it's often not believed (and likely undocumented or not accurately captured). Think about the instances when police are called where the man is actually being abused with clear physical harm, woman is untouched, the man gets hauled to jail - do you think it's accurately documented in such situations that the woman was physically v…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/22 01:42 PM
1

Should read the about section on that website, actually insane and reminiscent of FDS. If there was a gender swap version of this website it would be DDoS'd.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:21 PM
7

I think worth mentioning is the "soft" power that many women hold, including the wives of these male CEOs, heads of state and billionaires. Ask how many of these top 1% of men have wives (or had wives who benefited during marriage and upon divorce) who have an equal share of that success? In addition, we can say that while men may be the majority in "positions of power" that doesn't mean that benefits men - certainly not the 99.9% of men who are not in power. As these men in power do not make po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 02:12 PM
51

Given there are actual studies demonstrating this bias which favors women, this is a very unsurprising result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/22 05:13 PM
46

While I can appreciate this some, I believe this is also the result of enforced gender roles. Men are encouraged to sacrifice their life for others, whether it's by giving up their dreams to work the highest paying job they can find to support a family, using their body as a shield for a woman or child they don't even know or dying in a war - "it's the brave and honorable thing to do". edit: to add to this, it contributes to the problem that is men being valued by what they can provide compared …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/22 01:47 PM
1

It wouldn't even be a massacre of men and dogs, it would just be "massacre of dogs"
/r/MensRights23/08/22 10:46 PM
2

Much of Elam's controversy is due to him taking things radical feminists have said and gender flipping it to point out the hypocrisy - though sadly people tend to miss the hypocrisy. Him thinking people depend on him to be an activist isn't inherently narcissist.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 10:35 PM
1

My school graded for behavior in Kindergarten - I actually was held back due to "bad behavior" even though I had good "academic" grades - teacher recommendation due to "lack of maturity" even though it wasn't affecting my learning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 10:25 PM
3

Post the opposite stance and see what happens.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:08 AM
12

compensation for exonerees is tax-free the lump sum was approximately $2.1 million, the rest is a monthly payment of $11,600 per month + medical/education benefits. Texas state Senator Rodney Ellis, one of the architects of the Tim Cole Act, which increased monies for exonerees agrees that the payment is for time spent behind bars and not lost wages in May 2014, Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas reversed the decision to award his ex-wife money https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2014/05/13/appe…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 01:22 PM
9

Gotta be one of the easiest things to fix and prevent but neither the government nor women have interest in potentially increasing their burden.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:29 PM
6

You should tag the user or reference the post, this is well written.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 07:37 PM
2

Standards? Nah, the difference between those other groups and men is empathy, society doesn't have empathy for men as a class. Rights for men isn't appealing to politicians, even the ones who would consider it won't do it because they know it's political suicide. There's a number of organizations and individuals who've tried and still are trying, so your post comes across a bit disingenuous.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:34 PM
16

You really think that losing and damaging countless nerves in your penis doesn't lead to reduced pleasure and sensitivity? Or the fact that a significant portion of that organ has been removed which drastically alters how it functions? Do you think it's a coincidence that the U.S. which has the highest rate of circumcised men also has the highest rate of erectile disfunction? Let's even ignore the fact for a sec that it's an unnecessary procedure 99.99999% of the time, even in cases of phimosis …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:41 PM
1

The inability to decide when and with who to have a child should be a universal basic right It already is - for everyone - it's the choice to have sex or not. For us folks who enjoy recreational sex, there's many different choices of effective contraception to mitigate pregnancy risk.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:49 PM
11

On average, the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:20 PM
1

You're rather misinformed. As bad and empty as the cleanliness argument is, it's a much stronger one for female circumcision than it is for male, and yet that's banned in many places.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:13 PM
3

Divide and conquer isn't modern, it's ancient.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:40 PM
22

Men get employed more easily because they're not expected to go on paternity leave, meaning both men and women get screwed over. This hasn't been true since diversity has been pushed. Women are more likely to be hired than men these days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 07:56 PM
2

If and when it ever gets turned on its head and women earn more on average Well, they already do in certain fields. And as a whole they do up until having kids, where many make choices that detract from earnings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 11:45 PM
2

Personally, I don't condone medically unnecessary procedures. All procedures come with risk, this is not a risk I will ever take, even if I come to a point where I don't want kids, it's not an option for me. Just make sure you understand the risks - if you have even the slightest inkling that you may want kids in the future I'd suggest not doing it because why take that risk?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 12:43 AM
3

There's a theory that one reason for that is because men just don't have the time, energy, and flexibility that women have to go to the doctor. Women are less likely to work, less likely to work full time, and when they do, they choose careers and jobs that are more flexible. And the result is that women are actually better able to go to the doctor than men are. One reason we know this is a factor is because retired men go to the doctor just as often as retired women do. So when men have time av…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 03:41 PM
17

I find it hard to believe the experts given the man died within 5 days of blunt force trauma (both initial from a lunging punch that knocked him to the ground and the impact to his head hitting the ground caused by said punch) caused by this woman. Seems at a minimum she should be charged with manslaughter, any court would convict a man of the same charge without a second thought.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 02:20 PM
2

Some tips: 1) presenting controversial viewpoints requires delicate wording to avoid inflaming the reader who may be of the opposing view, you must lead with facts using citations. You cannot write in a way that attacks other viewpoints - that only leads to closing that person's mind due to putting them in a defensive state. 2) do not engage in emotional dialogue, stick to facts and statistics to support your argument. Ask any opposition for citations supporting their view
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:16 PM
2

That's pretty much what you have to do with most teachers, there are some quality professors out there still that are open minded and welcome opposing views that are supported, but it's risky to navigate without knowing for sure your teacher is like that.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:07 PM
8

That's not relevant. The problem here lies with the fact that Chris Noth is not being treated as innocent until proven guilty, he's being treated as guilty by media and employers without due process.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:17 PM
4

This article states that neither have been formally charged and the man was released on bail while the woman was detained. I believe you should change your title.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:01 PM
0

I think it's been well established that the guardian is garbage and an embarrassment to journalism. Please change your link to an archive to avoid sending traffic to their website.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 05:57 PM
3

Choices being limited to walking away from your child or continuing to suffer isn't power, it's punishment for being male.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:15 PM
15

Yep, though I have been told by a man not to cry, the vast majority of shaming, name calling and sentiment of "not crying", the expectation of being tough has come from women.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:09 PM
1

Nope, if the men won more games they'd get paid more overall but on a per game basis and in totality the women made more. What's ironic is that doesn't factor the value of the extensive benefits and guaranteed pay women receive, which means in reality their total compensation is significantly higher.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:21 PM
1

the email is documentation of reporting harassment, that's all you need to make a case for wrongful termination where you were terminated after reporting such harassment.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 12:28 PM
1

Curious that you call this law government overreach, given you probably don't call it overreach when the government locks away a murderer or rapist? The concept of abortion being reproductive rights is a fallacy, your reproductive rights - for both women and men, is the choice to have intercourse or not. It's not a reproductive right to kill an unborn child. Is it really government overreach to protect the innocent unborn child?
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:13 PM
19

Doesn't matter what the law allows, when the accused can't prove the accuser consented during but regretted it later and then "withdrew" consent and alleged rape, people believe the accuser.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:53 PM
1

I personally don't think either should have a choice in abortion, it's not a right of anyone to take a life, least of all against a helpless unborn baby. Also, this fallacy that it's men "oppressing" women by being against abortion is lunacy, just as many women and in some cases more women, are against abortion than men. It's not men "forcing" women into having a baby, it's society saying you already had a choice to have intercourse, you don't get a second choice which also takes a life in the p…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 06:26 PM
4

What a shocker, that the guardian would not only publish an article referencing FDS but also endorse FDS with a positive spin. Please do not link to sites like this, they are garbage and don't deserve a boost in site traffic.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:04 PM
1

What percentage of the average company is operations or R&D? 10% on management & administration? That would be pretty unusal outside some areas with very high materials costs. How's any of this relevant? If you know that program expenses includes labor attributable to the purpose of the org, you'd realize non-program expenses should be very minimal. You seem to think that charities are unaware of and aren't responding to these ratings. That simply isn't the case. No I don't think that.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:40 PM
1

I don't believe Goodhart's law applies here as there is no designated target. Very good numbers tend to either indicate that there is a problem or system gaming. How? What's your basis? "General business practices" doesn't support this Less good numbers tell you very little although it does leave open the possibility that the organisation is well run, honest and open. This in part contracts your earlier sentence and again, I see little supporting this. Your thought process here would be more lik…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 05:26 PM
1

How is that? What in the world are you basing that off of? You somehow think that an org with a lower program expense ratio ISN'T gaming the system and one with a high ratio IS? Do you understand what program expenses are and what that encompasses?
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:32 PM
1

Nah, nonprofits who have high nonprogram expenditures have a bloated structure with nonessential overhead and typically have excessive spend on advertising, fundraising, etc all which takes away from it's purpose.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 02:14 PM
1

I think it's one of the best metrics, it shows how effective the org is at utilizing their resources and what their priorities are. Non profit organizations should be close to 90% IMO Are they achieving their mission is incredibly subjective - how does one measure that? Is the Innocence Project making a difference? I think they are but could they do it better? Accomplish more with their resources? I think the answer to that is yes based on these metrics.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:34 PM
2

It's pretty low to me, there's a decent number of organizations that have over 90% and plenty over 80%.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:29 PM
2

Only 77% of expenditures being program related at the Innocence Project according to the 2019 financials is disappointing but what they do is needed.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 03:42 PM
2

You are so misinformed I feel sorry for you and any potential offspring you will likely end up mutilating.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:51 PM
19

They don't mistakenly think radical means extreme. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical You've described (root) one sense of it's meaning and use. It also is synonymous with extreme.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:07 PM
1

I disagree. Studies form conclusions based on limited data sets, with the intent to be applied to a larger group. Many studies either lead to generalizations from a conclusion or in the conclusion itself. You can of course make your own conclusion from a study's dataset. It would be wrong to treat a generalization completely separate from a study, a study is simply data and a generalization is made from data. Example of a study: "Studies show that women are 10% more emotional than men" (obviousl…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:15 PM
1

Generalisations means you're inferring something based on personal or anecdotal experience, not that you're applying a study to something. That is not what generalizations are - it is not limited to anecdotal or personal experience Studies DO generalize, they form the basis of generalizations.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:30 PM
1

Generalisations pretty much always do harm Ironically that is a generalization
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:26 PM
4

If you truly want to advocate for all, then you are not a feminist but an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:43 PM
2

You're assuming people didn't read because you think it doesn't deserve being downvoted. I for one find click bait, inflammatory titles disgusting - it's a rampant issue in society as it is, no need to add to it. The content and organization of the post itself is lacking. You can do better.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 03:43 PM
9

I'd say they weren't necessarily raised to devalue and disrespect men. What it did do, as jamessac11 said, was to do the opposite, and in doing so, they were raised to value and respect themselves WITHOUT doing the same for men. The sentiment was "girl power, independence, you don't need a man, make your voice heard" even if doing so is at the expense of men. I think many of this new wave, don't even realize how they are devaluing and disrespecting men. Their perspectives and "justification" are…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 01:24 PM
13

This isn't a man, it's a boy. This isn't victim blaming, it's about fairness. You're assuming she trusted the person it was sent to to not share it, at this age trust isn't much of a thought nor are these kids worried about the risks nor do they fully understand the consequences. The girl who took it for the other girl and likely encouraged the picture taking should take some blame here, as that peer pressure is part of the problem in the first place. The point of the article, is pointing out th…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 03:08 PM
16

Having free speech or tolerating opposing views doesn’t make us better. How does that not make this subreddit better? We also need to share academic studies, research Have you been reading this sub or do you just tunnel onto negative comments? There's plenty of threads here full of links with research. We don't have massive numbers, and people have to be willing to listen. In a society driven by algorithms forging echo chambers, having people open and willing to listen to views that counter thei…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:56 PM
74

but i see more woman hate than actual talk about how we can bring about a change for male betterment I disagree, I see about as much "hate" or LESS here than i do on feminist and female oriented subs. It makes sense for this sub to be larger than feminism given men have fewer outlets to voice their issues, you can find feminist friendly subs all over whether it's labeled as such or not. Many subs on here are anti-male or anti anything that goes against the popular feminist narrative. So why are …
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:49 PM
10

What happens less often for men? Doctors ignoring symptoms? Really? What are you basing that off of? What does that have to do with what I said?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:37 PM
25

Your distrust is ill-founded, medical research is highly favored towards women - both in terms of dollars allocated and issues researched. Dosage of medication will vary based on what your doctor prescribes, people want to blame lack of women in trials but it's up to your doctor. Doctors know women have stronger immune systems and aren't going to need the same dose as a man. Also, women have to be interested in participating in trials, testing is often done more on men because men are considered…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:10 PM
7

There was a documentary on netflix "american circumcision" There isn't going to be a lot of studies on this for obvious reasons. But you can definitely find testimony of people who did the procedure later in life and deeply regretted it.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:23 PM
3

I disagree, there are plenty of type 1 who can't be reached. When you've been fed feminist propaganda for decades since childhood and see it everywhere you look - it's basically asking these people to turn their world upside down - effectively red pill'd - and for most, that's too much to swallow for them.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:55 PM
1

Life is precious, with your logic, abortion shouldn't be a punishment on the lives that were conceived. Those who don't want kids shouldn't participate in sex, it's the literal purpose of the act. Contraception is highly effective, there's a minute risk of it not working and people need to accept that risk instead of getting a free pass on a choice they made.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:11 PM
3

Yup...this takes the legs right out from their entire argument, absolutely ignorant article.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:00 PM
2

Well, time to uninstall firefox.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:27 PM
6

To some degree they did, basic economics supports that correlation of women entering the workforce on a large scale means a larger labor pool and higher competition for jobs which favors employers.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 10:26 PM
1

One solution I've heard is that organizations dedicated to serving women disproportionately affected by a specific trend should shift their mission to include services to men. I can see this being helpful, but I can also see why it may be a lot to ask, especially if that organization was specifically created to dedicate resources to a female disparity, especially if that issue is still super prevalent. (For example both men and women are victims of domestic abuse, but since women are more likely…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 12:11 AM
6

You seem to be pretty misinformed. I'd encourage you to watch the "red pill" documentary. There's countless acts by feminist organizations preventing or choking the life out of initiatives for men. Warren Farrell himself, a well documented advocate for women being on the board of NOW, was ousted for trying to get support for men. Feminists are actually why rape is defined the way it is. How many articles have you seen where instead of it saying a woman raped a man it will say a woman sexually as…
/r/MensRights03/02/21 11:44 PM
3

I've been to a DSW where the men's section was easily less than 10% of the store, the rest of it dedicated to women. I've also been to one where it was probably 30%. Some places have a more equal balance of products by gender. It's either demand based or difference in target market. Could be managerial decision based on local volume trends.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 03:00 PM
3

It's been well documented democratic group leaders were demanding Biden to nominate both a female and black VP candidate.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 04:42 PM
5

"Study" Absolutely absurd conclusions and framing.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 04:37 PM
2

Given that: -men typically lose the most in a divorce -men have significantly worse support systems both institutionally and socially -men are more likely to succeed in a suicide attempt -men are not only taught but reinforced by society's treatment that their value is in what they can provide or do for others, it makes sense men will suffer more in a divorce given not only do they lose more materially but purpose through loss of children It's really no wonder why divorced men are much more like…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:13 PM
11

1) Toxic masculinity as a term and concept is rubbish 2) Men aren't told empathy is weak, men are not told seeking help is weak, and neither concept has anything to do with society viewing men as needing less help and empathy, what a laughable fallacy. 3) Article has nothing to do with men not showing emotion, men don't need to show emotion to have empathy of their own or for those to emphasize with them 4) Feminism hasn't been fighting against a lack of empathy for men, it's contributed to the …
/r/MensRights10/12/20 03:06 PM
11

To walk through a packed night club and be groped by strangers in the most terrible ways. That happens to men. To find myself in a scary one-on-one situation with a man who I know has more strength than me and can control what happens next. Also happens to men, in fact it happens to men more than it does to women.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 01:38 PM
2

I agree, regardless of what anyone thinks about when life starts in terms of whether abortion is murder or not, both man and woman have a choice when they choose to have sex. So the whole "my body, my choice" argument has no basis unless a woman was raped. That's basically saying you want a 2nd chance, a 2nd choice, and that's something that isn't offered to the child. And in terms of what's best for the child once conceived, death obviously isn't best. While no one should be forced to be a pare…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 04:25 PM
1

If you want to have a discussion, I'd suggest opening with one instead of vague comments that lack detail or explanation. How can you expect discussion when you offer so little to start with? Furthermore, you start out with ignoring any negative aspects, as though you are seeing with rose-tinted lenses, which may explain while you make no mention of the negative portrayals in the series. Your education has no relevance nor does it bring any credence to your words on subjective matter.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:09 PM
2

You might ask yourself why that's disappointing at all? Negative comments are everywhere, no matter what sub, are you disappointed with every sub? You must be severely disappointed with subs like feminism, that sub along with others have far more negativity IMO. There is no shortage of subs supporting women or subs that are generally biased in favor women - do yourself a favor and check your perspective.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 03:35 PM
1

You are definitely missing the point, and the irony is clearly lost on you.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 03:08 PM
1

Stereotyping was in such excess I don't think my explaining would do anything if you can't already see it.... You seem to entirely ignore the negative portrayals in this show I really appreciated the message of the importance and impact fathers and father figures had in young mens lives the original movie did a much better job of that
/r/MensRights23/11/20 02:02 PM
1

Kobra kai was pretty terrible IMO, dramatic overuse of stereotypes, many which were negative and I felt it did a disservice to the original films.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:54 PM
17

This isn't about what women did for women, it's about what women are doing to spite men, just like they do on father's day.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 07:16 PM
2

There's also an insistence on viewing women/feminists as a monolith. And I understand. Anyone who feels disenfranchised is likely to have some resentment there, but it's not necessarily conducive to goals here. There are few places for men to voice concerns, frustrations or resentment on these matters. While it may not be conducive to activism, it can be positive to those who have nowhere else to vent. There is no shortage of safe space and support systems for women, and i don't see a subreddit …
/r/MensRights16/11/20 03:33 PM
1

It's one thing to mock him for being wrong about something, it's entirely different to mock someone for expressing their feelings while dying from cancer.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:59 PM
1

The 1/6 number is unsubstantiated and has been debunked.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:55 PM
-2

He mocked them about cancer and death? I don't think so. There are some things you just don't do. Just because you didn't like him doesn't justify shitty behavior, I'm personally indifferent towards him. Also spiteful behavior is exactly what makes the world worse. Like I said, it's fine if you don't have sympathy but no one deserves to be mocked like that. Also ask yourself if Rush had been a woman would people or you still act like this? I'm betting not.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:59 PM
16

Easy to say when you aren't dying from cancer. Who said Rush wants sympathy? Regardless of what he wants, he doesn't deserve to be mocked for that.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:39 PM
1

There's plenty of correlation there, I'm not asking you to take my word for it, I don't need to. It's' really not difficult to see correlation, I would expect you to see at least that but if your perception of the world is dug in feminism perhaps it's harder to see for you. I imagine it's difficult tor you to think of something you view so positively as something other than purely positive. You are not as open minded as you think. I don't hate feminism and I remember you made a sweeping statemen…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:49 PM
0

I mean... It's very difficult for me to prove to you that there isn't a causation between two separate things that don't have causality. They are hardly separate and you aren't going to find a study on it because men's issues are significantly overlooked - women's issues have taken precedent and significantly more funding than men's for over 50 years. Do you really think there's going to be a study like that? We should assume there is no causality between two phenomena until we can prove there i…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 02:50 PM
1

INCREASE in men’s eating disorders, you should be able to prove that. Like you should be able to prove feminism HASN'T led to negative outcomes for men? Why don't you prove that first? I'll wait. At the end of the day you seem to not realize that women have received outpouring support for decades while nothing positive has changed for men, it's been negative. Take a look at happiness factors over the years - it's down for both men and women significantly, but happiness for women has gone down ev…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:40 PM
2

You have no evidence to claim feminism hasn't resulted in a net negative outcome for men in that issue or any other. It's the whole reason I was calling you naïve. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696560/ This study highlights that this issue effects both men and women with minimal differences in severity but women report it at much higher rates leading to a biased perception that it affects women more when it really doesn't. You can even make an argument for the reverse, given men …
/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:22 PM
4

I'm calling you naïve for believing that supporting half the population while ignoring the other half doesn't have negative consequences. It's also insane to compare eating disorders to suicide, the discrepancies between gender on the two issues is vastly, vastly different. Men and women suffer from eating disorders differently but this does not overwhelming affect women more. Men are significantly underdiagnosed (leading to higher deaths from anorexia for men) and under report than women, which…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 09:56 PM
3

This is something that disproportionately affects women to date. It’s also something that doesn’t negatively impact men at all Does it though? That's incredibly naïve. The notion that women are disproportionately affected is absurd, they are the ones that speak up and complain about it the most, but that doesn't mean they are affected more. It does negatively impact men, along the same lines as how feminism has been focused on empowering/supporting women, this has a negative effect for men and b…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:17 PM
1

You been brainwashed my dude. Women actually have more rights than men, they aren't trying to get equal rights.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:51 PM
4

check out.... r/pointlesslygendered
/r/MensRights29/10/20 04:45 PM
4

Where did you read that? It's the opposite - more educated and more income -> higher divorce rates
/r/MensRights29/10/20 04:36 PM
13

Actually top women are worse than top men, it's why the women's national team lost to FC Dallas under 15 boys team. It's why men's world records are better than women. There's a reason why you don't have men and women playing on the same team - biological differences. Now that doesn't mean women's sports can't be as enjoyable to watch but there are simply less women interested in sports and people watch sports for different reasons. The average man AND the average woman prefers watching men play…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:24 PM
2

You certainly can have legal binding on such a basis. People often get married or in a relationship with mutual understanding of X. These things are usually discussed and agreed upon. Verbal agreements are contracts, just a lot harder to enforce than written ones, i.e. a prenup. These kind of suits are happening in India where guys are getting hit with non-consensual/ rape cases on the basis the women had sex only on the basis they were to get married (and ended up not happening).
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:15 PM
15

Is this satire? Grit and strength have no connection to toxic, in any way, they are not described as toxic.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:07 PM
1

you should also add this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/
/r/MensRights03/08/20 01:43 PM
2

I've seen the pnas one but this new one is a good additional find. It's unfortunate these stereotypes and narratives persist against data like this.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:15 PM
6

While this thread will result in a nice collection of information, the OP is a disingenuous troll as evident by user comment history.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:10 PM
6

The statistics aren't meaningless, it doesn't mean blacks accounts for 50% of the crime, it means 50% of arrests were blacks.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 01:24 PM
2

The remaining 11% is primarily explained by specialization, and experience. Read the actual workpaper this is based on and you'll see they have a "controlled" number of only 2% differential when all factors are taking into consideration. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311314/WHO-HIS-HWF-Gender-WP1-2019.1-eng.pdf?ua=1
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:52 PM
2

Haha, thank you.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 04:32 PM
3

Right, it's why I referenced Wovlerine in my first comment, as that dehydration diet is obviously not a reasonable attainable image.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 03:52 PM
5

I'm not making assumptions or claims like the image does, I'm making observations and stating what I think about them. Nah, Batman's body type isn't the insane body you see celebrated in Men's magazines. As I said, Batman is one of the more attainable body types, and it's not like they make it look like he just wakes up with that body. There's nothing wrong with promoting peak physical performance when the work it takes to get there is also highlighted. I have to disagree, you don't need to go t…
/r/MensRights28/05/20 03:43 PM
3

You are making numerous assumptions here, including that actors are forced to do these extreme methods and didn't simply choose to. I've seen multiple interviews where these actors have discussed what they've done and nowhere did I get any impression of unwillingness or coercion. In fact the impression I get is more of a brag about what they did. For Robert Pattinson I genuinely believe he's just lazy or doesn't have the interest in a high level of physical fitness, he's never done a role like t…
/r/MensRights28/05/20 01:10 PM
-2

Personally I think you'd have a tough time arguing that this comment was not reflective of a feminist view or coming from a feminist, given the official definition. That's a mod jumping the gun and abusing moderation power.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:08 PM
2

I agree, communication is immensely complicated. The meanings of words change, and it leaves the old meanings orphaned and inaccessible. That entirely depends on your perspective, I find it's not meanings of words that change but perceptions of those interpreting a message contrived from those words, accordingly how some may use a word can change, doesn't mean it's definition or proper use changes. One can communicate with words understood and defined to mean one thing and be interpreted as some…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:59 PM
2

I don't see it as branding, it's ideology and belief of civil structure. it's not a role a group assumes. Political philosophy and ideology is not a trend, doesn't mean it can't become one but that's really not what it's about.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:59 PM
1

I'm missing the clear distinction here, it's about doing things the way we have always done them, resisting or slowing change, with careful (or conservative) adoption of new innovation only after it has been fully vetted by existing power structures. Feminism is a conservative position. It is the way we have always done things throughout our lifetimes. It is the politics accepted and expected by the institutions. I think the distinction is pretty clear, it's against rapid or extreme change - con…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 04:10 PM
2

Conservative doesn't mean resisting change, it's against rapid or extreme changes while favoring tried and tested values. Liberalism wasn't about including many voices and perspectives, it was centered around freedom and rights with an emphasis on minimizing power among elites. It evolved from and retained some conservative values. Progressive is more about being inclusive or at least intended to. I think it's pretty easy to understand why conservatives care more about men's issues.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:01 PM
2

I agree that women are usually taken less seriously in a business context. I don't think this is usual in western society at all, I'm sure it happens to women, and I also think it happens to men in female dominated industries. I think any man or women who doesn't look serious isn't going to be taken seriously, and I think the laid back dress code women are able to enjoy in business most certainly affects how they may be perceived.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 07:35 PM
1

Many modern feminists aren't true feminists, modern society is flooded with buzzwords and clickbait to catch views/likes. Read about the different waves of feminism, there's interviews out there with original feminists who don't support the current wave of feminism. If feminism was truly about equality as some tout, there wouldn't be such disparities in messaging and funding for organizations and causes. Nor would feminists ignore issues that plague men or the areas where women are already privi…
/r/MensRights17/04/20 07:18 PM
1

An issue I still don't fully grasp is the glass ceiling "paradox". I don't understand the topic at all, beyond the definition "men get paid more than women for the same job". Tbh from what I read from both sides I think each group has a particular scope that is not comprehensive enough to tackle the topic. The data on this topic is comprehensive enough, if you actually look at the fine print and it doesn't support what feminists claim. And finally, I've noticed a lot of hate towards "feminists" …
/r/MensRights17/04/20 07:09 PM
3

Men are also objectified, sexual objectification of men is different than women, but it's there. Men are also objectified in other ways - often seen as only a provider and tool to be used whether as a a punching bag that can suppress emotion or emote only rage, a scapegoat for war and an enforcer.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 03:03 PM
1

The reason why it's called violence, is because words can be violent. Note in your own cited definition, it includes: "vehement feeling or expression" and "injury by or as if by distortion, infringement, or profanation" It is not limited to a physical nature.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:36 PM
2

The idea that feminism is about women's rights is a misnomer, women have more rights than men in western society, not less. Feminism is more about fighting for issues women have with society while hiding behind a facade of "we are fighting for equality". Feminist activists ignore issues where women have privileges and rights in excess of men. There are numerous laws across the globe which favor women, and I'm not even talking about things like affirmative action or inherent bias throughout the c…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter