TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

devilwaif Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by devilwaif on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But saying it doez realz? Still misogyny, sez them.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:15 PM
2

And don't park your car in a bad neighborhood and leave it there. And don't leave your collected savings in a pile on your lawn. Because even if stealing is wrong, there is only so much society can do to stop the bad guys and you should fucking know better.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:24 PM
–

Literally everything is misogyny to those people.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:20 PM
1

Genuine modern feminism aims to achieve equality between both genders Where there's smoke there's fire; where is the "modern feminist" smoke? I see women whining that programs to help boys and men of color don't do anything for women; I see anti-male witch hunts on college campuses driven by government on the basis of a fake rape epidemic invented by feminists; I still see feminists whining about the so-called wage gap, even though women choose lower-earning degrees, jobs, and lifestyles; I stil…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:54 PM
2

Yeah, we've been listening to feminist bullshit for years. If all they're going to do when they come here is retread the same old lies, I don't see why they need to be able to speak here.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:27 AM
1

We all eat babies. Hundreds of delicious, delicious babies. That's all you need to know.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:10 AM
–

There might be, if feminism had spent the last 50 years fighting for what its defenders pretend it fights for (equality) instead of what it actually fights for (more power and privilege for women, forever). It's not a _mis_conception that feminism is a man-hating movement, it's a fact, and there's a ton of evidence pointing to it.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:05 AM
–

Yeah! It's not like the wages for "male" and "female" jobs are set by market forces or a- ...oh. If women want to get paid what men get paid, they should do what men do.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:59 PM
3

To everyone saying, "There should be more feminists like her," they are much more common than you think. "I know there isn't any smoke, but trust me, there's tons of fire!"
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:56 PM
–

That seems to be rather essentializing of both male and female behavior. It's not essentializing; rather, it reflects how men are viewed in society and how they respond to it. They don't have status or power by default, so they have to acquire it somehow, and they endure hardship because they must. Women are automatically valued and empowered; why struggle if you don't have to?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:24 PM
3

I directly and unambiguously perceive my free will continuously during every single conscious moment. 10 PRINT "I directly and unambiguously perceive my free will continuously during every single conscious moment." RUN
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:30 PM
–

Women don't run for office much for three reasons: They don't need to increase their status to be valued like men do. They already have substantial informal power. They don't actually want the job.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:25 PM
2

Oh, I'm sorry, are people showing empathy for the other sex now? Why wasn't I informed?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:58 PM
2

This. Why aren't there more male nudes leaked? Because not enough people want them. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:51 PM
3

Strictly speaking, boycotting companies that side with SJWs isn't enough. Because if you remove yourself, the enemy has essentially won. They WANT you to go away. At the same time, mod power is absolute, so there's no point fighting back; they can ban you, delete comments, close threads, etc. much faster than you can make cogent arguments and credible accusations. This is why we need alternate institutions to replace the damaged ones.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:50 PM
1

You could try stealing their tactic: "Excuse me, this subject isn't appropriate for a professional environment and I'd prefer it if you found something else to talk about." Then, if they don't fall in line, go to management (or HR, but probably management first, and then HR if management doesn't do anything effective) and let them know that you find their political discussions inappropriate for the workplace. But keep in mind that HR is not your friend and it's mostly or entirely staffed by wome…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 07:32 AM
3

They're given in court rooms and the defenses that you and I agree are invalid are used I think you don't understand rape trials. The only thing that really matters in a rape trial is consent. But consent is nearly impossible to prove, and fiendishly difficult to infer with any confidence. This is why things like personal character, history, intent, the nature of the relationship between the accuser and accused, and so forth are brought up. and juries do not convict Juries are held to a high sta…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:45 AM
1

I'm sensing an implied narrative here where women who have a lot of sexual partners (where "a lot" is anything above 0, arbitrarily set) are dirty, worthless sluts, and I don't see that as a useful narrative for the MRM to adopt, nor does it reflect my beliefs and goals. Is it fair to call him an asshole for treating her that way? Maybe, maybe not - I don't give a shit. There are so, so many bigger and better fish to fry.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:30 AM
2

No woman would be shamed for breaking up with a guy, period. But the genders aren't flipped, and all I'm seeing here is tradcon sex negativity, and I can't imagine why that belongs here.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:26 AM
4

Rape already has its apologists and legal proceedings where common questions include what the person was wearing, if they were at a party, etc., so we really don't need your rose-colored glasses here. I'm being lectured about rose-colored glasses by someone staring into a 3D ViewMaster with a Legends of Patriarchy disc in it? In case you've forgotten - which you seem to have done, strangely enough - rape is illegal. "She was dressed like a whore" is not a defense to a charge of rape. "She was at…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:03 AM
7

That's a weak straw-man. I'll let the peanut gallery decide that. many in that camp reason that the onus is on us to halt predatory behaviors, not figure out a way for those being preyed on to accept the distribution of predators in our own species. Except that no one is actually suggesting that drug-detecting nail polish makes drugging women and raping them okay, or that failing to wear drug-detecting nail polish means that a woman who is subsequently drugged and raped deserves whatever she get…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:55 AM
2

Maybe we should.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:31 AM
5

The point is to change the culture so that the act of drugging the drink and the act of forcing targets unconscious is stopped. And uninventing drug-detecting nail polish accomplishes this how, exactly? Be specific.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:29 AM
2

You can quit being a feminist any time you like.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:26 AM
–

catcall: "Shake dat ass over here!" me: "You first." (this resulted in hilarity as he tried to shake his drunk ass and wound up hitting his head on a 'no parking' sign) I am genuinely uncertain about who won this exchange.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:23 AM
1

You could actually do a thing where you go around to different feminist forums, identify as male, and try to talk about men's issues, then record ALL the responses until you get banned, or you have a pretty good collection of abuse, and slap them all up on the web, documentary style. No unfair generalizations, no assumptions, no cherry picking; it would literally be "I went and talked to a bunch of actual, living feminists and this is how they responded." If you did this, other feminists who saw…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:18 AM
1

Why conjure up a fake matriarchy in Celtic times or whatever, before "patriarchal" agriculture came along. For contrast, and to articulate a vision (however blurry; feminism is full of empty signifiers anyway) for a non-patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:57 AM
4

The explanation I've seen more often, and one which I consider somewhat plausible, is that women were controlled in order to ensure that their children were of the husband's line, and thus eligible to inherit his wealth and status. After all, when a woman gives birth, you can't be sure who the father is, but you can be pretty damn certain who the mother is. Any history that supposes that we used to have something called a "matriarchy", no matter how it is defined, can generally be assumed to be …
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:55 AM
–

Explain prostitution.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:14 AM
–

You're thick, aren't you? YES IT IS BLATANTLY UNFAIR, AND THERE IS FUCK ALL ANY OF US CAN DO ABOUT IT.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:14 AM
1

I am annoyed that we - as in the internet - care more about a celebrity's death by his own hand than we do about innocent black men being gunned down by out of control racist cops. But that's just me.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:28 AM
1

young women, dressed and posed like ads for DIY escort services Black nail-polished hands hold a notebook over a half-shirt exposing a bellybutton the protuberant cleavage enhanced by a pushup bra under a tank top almost all the women on the site are nubile and posed in ways that fulfill dirty old men’s wildest dreams pretty proxies for pervy Methinks the author doth protest too much. She sounds like one of those ultra-right wing, anti-gay firebrand politicians who gets caught sharing dicks in a…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:34 AM
0

God, not another one who thinks I'm the one with clouded vision because I say the world isn't enclosed in cardboard.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:14 PM
2

Feminism is meant to be for everyone in the same sense that laws are for everyone.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:08 PM
0

If I ever hear another clueless appraisal of Gandhi and MLK that ignores the fact that they acted within the context of a society where others were already employing aggression, thereby giving the soft speakers their necessary stick - or the fact that Gandhi objected to violence less than he objected to apathy and cowardice, and SAID so - it will be too soon.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:06 PM
1

She is the normal kind, not yelling in your face but wanting equal rights for all, actually. The normal kind of feminist only wants to help women, doesn't think men face sexism, and embraces gender roles whenever it's convenient to them, and by this standard, Laci Green is absolutely a normal feminist.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:59 PM
–

Men cannot shake this idea that feminism represents women. No matter how many men try. How many men have tried? I think men are perfectly capable of beating feminism, if they'd just make the effort.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:39 PM
1

The definition never actually says that feminists promote equality. It says that feminists promote women's rights, and equality is their excuse. It's fine the way it is, you just gotta understand what it's really saying and not let "equality" be a thought-terminating cliche.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:13 AM
–

I'm curious how the libertarians in here feel about this. Most property is privately owned, and even so-called "public property" is a kind of a trust; it doesn't literally belong to everyone. Shouldn't the owners have the right to declare their property off-limits to anyone they want, including homeless men? And don't the police exist to enforce property rights? And shouldn't effective public policy include costs for misuse of property, in order to discourage such misuse and make law enforcement…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:40 AM
5

So wait. Super Mario Bros. Bowser kidnaps Peach, for some reason, and keeps her in his castle. There's no indication that he's abusing her per se; apart from her lack of freedom, she's just kinda chillin' out. Mario attempts to rescue Peach. In doing so, he risks (and not infrequently suffers) being bitten, beaten, stabbed, crushed, burned, shot, stung by jellyfish, plunged into fucking lava, or lost in fatally-deep pits. But, you know, he's got agency, so who cares if he dies 37 times, in a doz…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter