TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

devotedpupa Archive

View 1 posts and 406 comments by devotedpupa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm coming from SRS and this thread seems filled with fake-MRA sock puppet accounts made by anti-mras to make you guys look bad or do lame satire. Abandon thread, only pointless fights ahead.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:09 PM
35

Yeah! Let's criticize Anita's appearance! Moral highground, here we go!
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:21 PM
-2

There seem to be sources that said the woman never gave consent, alcohol or not. Why are you so certain it was a "buyers remorse" case? I repeat, were you there?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:33 PM
-1

Were you there?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:33 PM
5

crickets having sex with tumbleweed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 05:22 AM
7

Any and all misogyny nowadays comes from both men and women that try to apply their bullshit morals to women in a way that is design to make themselves feel high and might, not to elevate the male sex. For example, abortion. It's not "men trying to control women's bodies" it's "Rich conservatives trying to control people"
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:55 AM
5

MR downvoting here. Grow up dude, you make us look bad. He may need to get citations, but that neither the way to ask nor is it an obscure fact.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:37 PM
5

They shoot to the top because they are dedicated enough to continue even with sexists bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:15 AM
7

Maybe it's a translation thing. Sometimes I think I have too much hope on humanity.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:49 PM
17

Anything in the butt is flat out gay to society.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:49 PM
0

There is a difference however. Hypermasculinity is not a women fantasy(mostly) it's a men's fantasy, as is hot fighting women (even though cammy, the ice queen, might not be a good example). That being said, the impact of this, especially in videogames is grossly exaggerated. But in essence, that makes the opposing argument worse! IT states the obvious, yet true and not exactly good; games are for young and adolescent men, and aim at their fantasies. Nothing wrong with these, but if it changed, …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:42 AM
1

You can't be sure. And generalizing that much will only make us look like asshats that deserve downvotes.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:51 PM
6

Why? You d realize it has 100 upvotes now? There is really no rational reason for your assertion expect a victim mentality. Dude, EVERYONE hates cosmo, especially /r/XX. Everytime there is a gender switch across subreddits it comes as either trying to start a flame war or just plain "yeah we hate that too". We share a lot with those subreddits too you know?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:37 AM
1

Oh shit is his edit that some before women? If not, I'm sorry I swear I didn't see it. I thought he was talking about all women. Plus some of his other comments explore more on that.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:57 AM
2

I support brothels and think the feminist that want to get them eradicated because of sex trafficking (which would be easier to eliminate if they were legal) are stupid, but I wouldn't want such a misogynist asshole run the one I'm going to. EDIT: DISREGARD THIS I EAT DICKS.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:08 AM
18

I fucking hate everyone in this post and thread. Everyone is too clouded by their hatred of the other gender to say anything semi-rational and all the good point get lost in the vitriol.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:19 AM
2

As a in between guy, I fucking loath it. It automatically assumes that women = worst than everything. I could be a gay black lower class American, or a indigenous Mexican or Bill Gates and they wouldn't fucking know. Check your privilege fails to check it's own. The ultimate hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 11:27 PM
0

I'm happy to see this being celebrated across all subreddits, although I'd hope more people would realize that even if this is a symbolical win, without the forceful-man-penetrates-woman the definition is pointless still.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:47 AM
1

Israel is crazy in all matters religious. Like those misogynist nowadays harassing children that don't cover every single square inch of their skin. I'd say Judaism in Israel is just bigoted against EVERYTHING.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:14 PM
2

Calling it “populist legislation,” she added: “It seems to us that the proposal to abolish the Presumption Law is simply yielding to political correctness using the rhetoric of equality. I'm sorry but I don't think that any American feminist would say that. Aside from being ridiculous and in-your-face-sexist, they themselves some political correctness. I say the blame is 60% feminism 40% Israel is crazy.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 09:33 AM
1

Wasn't tying to dispute you =D
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:57 AM
4

Israel is such a shitty, racist, sexist country. Even without Palestinian issues, the have this kind of shit and the religious misogynist zealots. What a piece of shit government.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 02:45 AM
5

She is right in calling him sexist, but the reason she is so clumsy about it It's just wrong Is that she knows something is wrong, but since she can't get into a less woman-centric spot, she can't see it! The reason this is wrong is that it allows women complete controll over their lives while it puts men on a role that they can't escape, the breadwinner. Oh sure, women can help, but they don't have to hurt their delicate bodies earning something! Send the men to do it, they don't need to be wit…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:40 AM
5

Woman of mine cringes. Love the guy, but this and Irak made him fall from his pedestal.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:35 AM
1

Dude today we got the news of the Katey Perry divorce. that's a male golddigger.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:55 AM
7

Also in Africa? UN sponsored male genital mutilation. Equality!
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:02 AM
19

And to be fair with 28, the fact that women don't initiate is caused by both men and women calling her sluts (Yes guys, slut shaming is not only a feminist catchphrase, it does affect all of us). And with 42, she's not called gay, just called a spinster and laughed at. But that also happens to men.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 08:59 AM
2

Another thing MRM doesn't need? Insulting opposite views with the word "mangina" or faggotry.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 08:52 AM
4

I think it more that it's sometime pro-equality, especially in education and socially, but in matters concerning law and money it's usually pro female. But yeah, I agree with your statement that it's never pro-male, but you can't deny that being pro-equality is better. I just wish they did it more often though...
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:23 AM
1

Of course, but most of the times it does so accidentally. Some areas do need to have power redistributed to women, but it's their failure to see that both sexes can be oppressed by the other that is their real problem, but that why I said it is not inherently anti-male. Edit: response to your old comment, but I think it answer you new one too.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:15 AM
7

while I agree that the article totally misses the point it tries to archive, feminism isn't Necessarily anti-male and we should stop thinking so, it hurts both movements.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:02 AM
3

And watch the downvotes in comments. Subtly sexist guy? Negative. Obsessed with the evils of feminism? Negative. Criticizing gender roles? Positive. Gives you hope in this place.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:37 AM
1

You wife and you can fill the family roles you assign to yourselves all you like, but generalize it.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:32 AM
3

Also no reason for the latter? That woman part in you sentence.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:30 AM
9

And you call us butthurt.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:27 AM
-1

Also fixing cars and making sandwiches have nothing to do with what is in my underwear, but sandwich jokes are the least funny of the sexist jokes and because the joke is associate to sexism, they get offended.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:25 AM
-3

I figured him the kind of guy that said "Welp, I'm already a billionaire" Guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:25 AM
-10

I though he was better than this, abusing the system. Maybe if it was to prove a point, but I expected Russell Brand to be less of a leech.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:49 AM
29

Will it work? I don't think rational women do this and irrational women will not care. It's kinda like saying "Don't rape" is ridiculous. Criminals will be criminals. It's nice to see that the authorities will not take this shit any longer though.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:40 AM
1

Not exactly a scientific study or a reflection of anything other than US soccer moms, and while she is a gynecologist, she still is a talk show doctor. But I will give you that your point might be true, just that it's to complex to just point in that direction IMHO.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:13 PM
1

I don't think the idea is helping African anythings. Female or male, in different ways, our governments give two shits about them. It's just stupid urban myths taken to the extreme by ignorant people with power, and if there is a bigger scheme behind, I doubt it's to benefit anyone in Africa, let alone women.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 09:44 PM
4

WHO is a fucking joke. Between this and cellphone cancer, I don't know why we take them seriously. As for scientific American, they either cite the WHO or themselves. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 10:42 AM
1

I never use the word unless I can see it on the comment history and/or is and obvious sock account.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 08:35 AM
1

Love your username. The problem is that there have been trolls that pretend to be feminist and spout nonsense or pretend to be MRA and spout misogyny. But yeah, troll is really just what some people say when they don't know what to argue anymore. There are a lot of legitimate men disenfranchised with feminism. As a third world MRA, trust me, feminism is necessary, but sometime misguided. Lately in my country, a lot of adds against domestic violence are shown, but they of course demonize men. We …
/r/MensRights29/12/11 04:10 AM
2

I actually got some respect for being an MRA. I guess because Mexico is not really that fond of feminism, even tough it still has problems that need it, but as an advocate against things like male-female segregation in subways and other pointless feminist tactics and maybe the only guy in my highschool (though thankfully not my college) that is a LGBT activist, and MRA or hell, an anything activist, I get some kudos from the people that matter. But you know what I tend to avoid in my discussions…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 09:04 AM
3

So, came up with a response to my question that is not linking to the Spearhead, because I already had my daily taste of pointless misogyny.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:31 AM
2

Let's see what I can find in those sites after searching things like "Ignoring feminism" or "misogynist" From an article about wikipedia : A Wikipedia for women would not be a fairly static collection of facts, but a flickering panoply of constantly changing images, never the same for more than a moment. Well, that sound like objective journalism. But ok, I'll search for more. Edit: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/12/20/north-korea-and-dynastic-decline/ Is this site really comparing Dictators …
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:13 AM
2

Like, say, every other anti-men's rights movement ever? I've seen this before and everyone has. A movement dedicated to hating other movements is bound to be filled with miswhatever and antiwhatevers instead of rational people. At least I'm glad no one pays attention to /r/antimensrights anymore.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:06 AM
3

I actually visited SRS today and I still don't get what the hell is that supposed to be apart from a circlejerk. In all seriousness, putting the argument aside for a while, as someone that hasn't really been active since last summer, what the hell is up with that place?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:55 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:54 AM
1

Stop paying attention to them! They are irrelevant! If they hate us, good, if they don't, fine. Feminism is barely relevant today as it is, with almost all women's issues solved or the answer is always "don't be misogynists and educate your children". That why they have become a platform for pointless arguments. Let's not become that too, we have a lot of shit to do and some of them include interacting with activist from other groups. Let's look at them as an example of what to do and what NOT t…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:49 AM
8

Enemies? That the victimhood ideology showing.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:36 AM
6

Feminism isn't for men, it's for women. That's why it's called feminism. That's why the suck dealing with men's problems and only adapt them to suit their needs. That why we exist as MRAs and that's why seeing this as a you vs me is stupid.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:31 AM
-1

I'm sorry, it was just such a painfully bad read. Badly written, badly constructed pointless comparison and a stupid conclusion I'm tired of arguing. My point stands. Blog and subreddit fights are pointless and stupid and just drive everyone away. So does people like Aerik or you.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:13 AM
3

That's a good point. I still hold that yours is more truism than true, but you certainly got me there.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:04 AM
1

You're avoiding the issues, amigo
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:02 AM
3

Your links to blogspam and thread that house my same opinion versus yours are very compelling. Western society =/= feminism =/= feminism 4 decades ago. You want to hate on something? Hate on the terms "Child-man" or "Whinner" when used to describe an MRA fighting for is rights. Feminism is a broad term, an easy boogeyman to get lost on and forget the real shit.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:00 AM
3

Macho douche is more overemphasized that unhealthy. What does unhealthy masculinity even mean? Hell what does masculinity mean? I do more for men's rights by trying to look and raise awareness at issues instead of movements in my real life than you do by continuously fighting in internet forums and using shock words such as anti-something, like the feminist you so hate do.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:53 AM
7

If that would make your logic feel any more valid to you, go ahead and knock yourself out with any diagrams you might need.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:46 AM
4

I used to be very active in gendered subbreddits. You know why I don't come back anymore, apart from less free time? Because I stopped coming here after I grew tired of macho douches like you, constantly bashing subreddits like OneY and circlejerking over what was worse, /r/femminism or /r/femminisms. I rather have not MRA cred in the last year than be part of the PR problem of this movement and subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:42 AM
11

http://www.reddit.com/user/JeremiahMRA This is the kind of person that drives people away from the subreddit and does so proudly.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:34 AM
5

Nice parenthesis there bro. Don't group me with anti-feminist please, I'm am not retarded enough to not see the difference between feminism and misandrism. As someone that's banned from the rad feminist subreddits, consider my downvote completely MRA based.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:32 AM
15

You, my friend, sound like the problem in this subreddit. The kind of guy that says shit that can be replaced with "women I've met on forum and I don't like" or "women don't agree/are attracted to me" with the vague and broad term of feminist. Also you call a whole spectrum of political ideas only for "ugly, smelly lesbians" and you call yourself NOBLE?? GTFO
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:30 AM
7

Not all the time. Louis C.K. takes power away from nigga. Rednecks don't.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:26 AM
16

What does it matter? She is just expressing her sexuality! Unless you like it, which makes you a PERVERT PIG.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:25 AM
7

I saw this link in /r/feminism and they didn't reach that conclusion. Just that those magazines are shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:48 PM
4

If you kid pays to see the softest porn ever, wrong advices and poorly written articles, it's too late.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 03:41 AM
17

However, misogynist find shelter here because they can disguise their retarded ideology as ours simply by switching "women" with "feminist" in their rants. And we DO fall for it. This movement needs to stop denouncing feminism, as it's both an easy target to get derailed and distracted, attacking them instead of issues, and they fight back, beginning a pointless shouting contest laden with strawmen . Instead we should attack legal injustice and social prejudice like we do now, but without the ag…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:11 PM
1

We don't. We all know that they suck. Let's ignored them please.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:31 AM
3

Because if all the evils in the world are because only men rule, surely it will be an Utopia if only women decide.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 07:38 PM
8

"YOU! Yes you there! You have pleased us, and we deem you worthy of being a honorary non-pig"
/r/MensRights11/09/11 07:35 PM
3

But--But--- reality---liberal bias!!!! Uu... Meme!
/r/MensRights06/09/11 04:44 AM
5

They have a place, and they are sometimes incredibly relevant, but you are right, sometimes they just cloud the sub.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 09:38 PM
1

That's the whole fucking problem. I actually could buy the idea of the mods deleting comments if they are made by their "enemy" on this pissing contest between mods. Edit: If you look at Kloo explanation it's basically it. The comments were deleted because she came to "stir things up". I've seen worse shit fly here, both from feminist, MRAs and trolls. But it's different, because it's personal. At least I see that the subreddit is tired of it, but for a month, this subreddit was dragged by kloo,…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 09:36 PM
2

Pfff no, he is fucking rich. He got fired and lost any chance of being elected president however. But I've seen professors destroyed because the local paper printed some stupid girl's accusation because she failed.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:32 PM
1

Stephen Hawkins i an internationally known and respected scientist and writer. Bill Maher is an American C List celebrity I know just because I see link to him in youtube.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:29 PM
11

You even less funny that the batman guy.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:32 AM
13

I disagree. Look at the LGBT movement. They made a progress by showing that they were normal and good citizens like everyone else, and calling to attention their own problems, not exclusively by insulting republicans. Edit: on a more ideology based battle, who gets the most respect and converts? Stephen Hawkins or Bill Maher?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:19 AM
3

A fishy and ugly affair. I hope this is the right choice. But in the end we learned the price of lies, power and justice and the power of media and public opinion. Public trials like this just build bias or destroy lives. Specially on something like rape, where every side has something to prove, even without consideration of this man's influence and power.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:17 AM
5

That describes accurately the whole /r/AMR. Let's just stop paying attention to them, that's what they want.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:05 AM
1

A million dollars the law would only apply to women.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 01:10 AM
4

OK. I now assign you my son. Please raise him. You could also pay me. I know there should be rape or sex involved, but let's skip down to businesses. Because responsibility apparently comes from other's decision.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 01:06 AM
0

Too funny. when you lose the argument, ad hom! How feminist of you. ...
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:26 PM
0

Don't agree with it? Must be troll!
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:25 PM
1

Half of those douches are men and that doesn't change anything one bit.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 04:44 AM
1

Your continued efforts to put yourself above me are pathetic. You're talking a fourth of one's life in difference. That's a god damn large difference.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 11:25 PM
1

Anti male? Why do you insist on labeling me for no reason? Whatever the genders, 13 and 17 is creepy as FUCK. That was my whole point. If a 17 year old dated a 13 year old guy, it would be doubly creepy for the "girls mature faster thing" but 17 year old guy and 13 year old girl is still far from normal.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:05 PM
3

You got it backwards. It's not because of lack of respect for men, but because radical feminist go out of their way to be offended by anything and claim oppression. Men can usually take an insult, because that's how must of us behave with our friends.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 10:42 PM
2

That's a really rash and one sided view. The view society has of male sex drive and the sexual revolution have some things to do with each other, but your claim makes it sound too direct and biased. For stares, the sexual revolution was the first wave of feminism and the retarded "men are pigs" is second wave. Third wave is much more rational, but it's radicals are loud and retarded, as radicals tend to be.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 10:38 PM
4

Shit, most men see themselves that way. It's sad really. Also, I'd like to add a little Dan Savage "There is nothing wrong with being a sex object every now and then" Some women are afraid of seeing men as sex "objects" for fear of society labeling them sluts, just as men are afraid of seeing women as "status objects" because they think they have to "earn the bread round here"
/r/MensRights14/08/11 08:01 PM
8

But their thing is completely irrelevant and pointless. They have 247 subscribers for crying out loud. They don't even hurt our PR because everyone on reddit knows /r/anarchism's mods, which are the same, are fucking jokes. I say let them fade into obscurity.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:54 PM
4

Yeah, why argue and refute when you can just debase the entire ideology! Ha! Genius! You really know how to change society for the better.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:27 PM
1

We believe that these conclusions are mistaken, due to sampling bias. (This is just a hunch, we have not analyzed data to prove this). This doesn't fly. As much as the Bavarian Police are biased, so are MRA blogs. Unless any one of them have proof, this is just a waste of time.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:25 PM
2

You can tell because the one that are actually bad where negative-neutral karma to begin with and those that are not just get 5 extra downvotes from that attack subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:21 PM
0

I disagree. Most misogynist here use that tactic to get away with it. This douche is at least honest.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:20 PM
2

You doubt most of these trolls are women? I dont. I've got a perfect example. YOU
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:17 PM
3

Don't forget downvoted to hell comments on threads 6 months old. "It might be -40, BUT WHO UPVOTED 5 TIMES"
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:16 PM
1

Isn't that what we are doing though? We also claim equality, but every time slutwalk are brought up, we strawman the fuck out of it to dismiss it.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:01 PM
6

Demonize male sexuality? First, a 13 year old more mature than a 17 year old? That must be the most sheltered boy ever with a MENSA girl. Second, are you saying that if you switch the genders it's not wrong? This is not a gender issue, 13 is NOT an age anywhere CLOSE to being able to consent. And third, NORMAL male behavior? I'd say there is nothing normal in looking for someone 4 years younger if you are a minor.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:26 AM
3

I agree, they only care about women. their claim of equality is false. But that's not bad, there is nothing wrong with focusing on one gender if you have a movement for the other. What people need to understand is that feminism doesn't harm men. It just doesn't help. The courts and congress filled with biased judges and politicians trying to do anything to not look "soft on crime" or "anti-feminist" are building this bullshit laws. The system, not the feminists, is the problem.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:10 AM
23

And disturbing number of men. This is why drunk = rape laws are still on. This stupid notion that if she is cute, you OBVIOUSLY want to have sex with her, and if she's not, well, you only need some beer goggles and that fixes the problem! This common ideology helps misandrists build this laws where if both of you are drunk, you are the rapist. Because men always want sex and women have no sex drive, so obviously you are a rapist.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:17 AM
1

It's shameful really. "What? refuting you comment? nah, I have not time to read it, downvote" As for your comment, I would argue that any time you see one of this commercials that portray men being beaten or being incompetent, switch the genders and see if you still think it's not sexist.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:10 AM
2

No. Not really. That thread is pretty pro MRA already. The only thing this post does is bringing a downvote train to distort the discussion. THIS DOESN'T HELP OUR CAUSE.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:06 AM
6

A 4 year gap between those ages is far worse than a 8 year gap between 18 and 26.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:04 AM
1

I don't think the connection you did between this and slutwalks is relevant at all.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:02 AM
3

Bull fucking shit. Asian men AND women earn more than black men and women. And that has fuck all to do with gender.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 08:58 PM
2

Indeed. Neckbeard misogynists are not only giving us a bad name, they are against the ideals we represent, adding more discrimination and reducing the opportunities men have to really control their lives.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:35 PM
3

Yeah, I think you were born yesterday. At least your maturity tells me that.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:57 PM
2

Just another one of those that need to remember themselves of how manly they are by insulting anything that doesn't fit their narrow definition of masculinity.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:56 PM
4

I'll bite. Why is it telling? What's so insulting about you calling me a woman? I bet you know about a lot being a man, neckbeard.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 01:10 AM
6

What's that supposed to be? An insult? I'm sorry, but being compared to the other sex is not an insult for me. I don't hate them like you for a start.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 01:04 AM
2

The why don't you post your bullshit sometime in the future.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:53 AM
5

I'm a dude, Einstein. I have been an active member of this subreddit since before you made this troll account.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:41 AM
3

That didn't explain anything, you pathetic troll.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:00 AM
8

I'm not saying downvote, but you shouldn't upvote a comment that claims something without proof just because you like how it sounds guys.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:39 AM
5

What? Are you fucking serious? Ignoring the fucking sexist voting rights shit, what does London have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:38 AM
1

Who the fuck thinks we are rapists? I've heard misogynist, but your hatred for us seems to be on a whole level of your own.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:26 AM
3

You really are new here right? I have been commenting against this stupid contest for months. I can guarantee you a real feminist will be 100% nicer than me since I am not one, nor a MRA or even an Egalitarian or whatever. Then what the fuck are yo... Redditor for one day Oh, trolling. Go ahead then.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:53 PM
1

Har Har, no, even the some radical feminists I know where like "Wow there, slow down" when they read that.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:41 PM
6

Thanks for the tips, I hope feminists are as friendly as you.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:39 PM
2

Yeah, but apart from surgery(Which would be awesome if it were free), condoms are really the only male birth control, and many places already give them away. Pills are for women, and are much more expensive. So, this sounds bad in paper, but in practice it's not that bad. Maybe we only have to balance the health related components.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:53 AM
1

You're right, it's ridiculous. Any tips as to where could we find what feminist truly believe?
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:50 AM
2

Ummm... sir, I have a question! Why do we give a FUCK what do those guys think? That subreddit is even worse than all the feminist subreddit combined.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:04 AM
2

I was actually expecting that number to be higher, but how many of those experience true "hopelessness" and depression? I mean is could be a "Oh darn, I wish I had a choice" thing. It doesn't measure the how drastic those feeling are.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:21 PM
4

Just as I suspected. When I saw /r/AMR, I thought "Wow, this is just a pissing contest between mods" but I had no idea how far back it went, I just thought it was between kloo2yoo and pinkmask and company. I'm surprise these wackos have convinced other subreddit to hate each other just to have a boogieman. Sounds Orwellian. Edit: Grammar
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:13 PM
5

I don't think that even touches the amount of population that's circumcised. Most people don't even think about it. But don't get me wrong, it should totally be banned.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 04:51 AM
1

So because we can't, they shouldn't? That's a sad approach to equality. If your point is that in that case we have it worse, then yeah, I agree. I don't think this has much to do with feminist though, it's mostly societies disdain for the male body and those fucking soccer moms shouting "think about the children!!"
/r/MensRights01/08/11 04:50 AM
-1

I am sometimes, but it's when discussing with MRAs. Really guys, I agree with you, my parents wronged me, it's should be banned like female circumcision is, but please, could you ease on the "YOU WERE MUTILATED" thing? It makes me feel like the feeling you get when you see a guy getting punched in the nuts mixed with feeling inferior when I read it.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 04:31 AM
3

I got a plan! Let's do the same here! Why are this wackos relevant again?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 04:27 AM
3

we can damn well be anything we like including sluts and you men can damn well behave and accept it... Bingo. That's the point. The have freedom to be whatever they want, and it doesn't give anyone a free pass for rape. By the way, they say “Yes means yes, no means no. Whatever we wear, where ever we go, no means no!” That's gender neutral, and I think an important lesson. I would add "being dressed as a slut or having a boner is not yes" You are the one that turned it into a misandrist statemen…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:21 AM
2

Thanks, but I'm gonna need more than a biased opinion, however likely and based on experience it is.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:55 AM
1

I agree slightly, but this one doesn't seem to portray any f them as victim or aggressor, in fact it's rather vague. That's why the title sounds a little sensationalist.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:18 AM
3

Of course. However it doesn't say who started, it just says "They slapped each other".
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:06 AM
3

Was expecting something more than slapping but still, not cool. On the other hand, that guy seemed like a douche, coming to a protest to fight a game of "MY OPINION IS LOUDER THAN YOURS" without anything to support him. One thing is saying that dressing, let's say, modestly helps prevent sexual assault, which is IMHO a valid point, if a little simplistic, as rape no about sexual attraction in most cases. What you have to understand is that this protest are meant to send the message that just bec…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:23 AM
13

Or because "Well, darn it, call me ol' fashioned, but that's how things are supposed to be"
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:02 PM
38

We should just abolish this stupid bullshit altogether. No one wins because a bunch of entitled people think they deserve money, men or women. While a victory, it's an empty one.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 04:54 PM
7

And if you doubt what Kill_The_Rich said about spreading white-nationalism, check marcos_de_santos posts.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 04:20 PM
5

Only the foolish and weak minded speak in absolutes.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:49 PM
5

The real problem is that the subtitle make US think that our purpose is "defeating" feminism. It oversimplifies our cause, ignores the real problems. Antagonism hurts both parties, and makes their point seem petty.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:47 PM
9

You are right. It need more than one paragraphLook at other comments and you will see the same problem. When he talked about telling the psychiatrist about abuse by her mother, it sounded like lying even if it was not. The context is missing.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:43 PM
1

Yeah I thought that was kinda the whole point. What are you campaigning for, not giving Christmas presents?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:46 PM
23

I'm suspicious. No offense but you make your reaction seem incredibly one sided and quick. It's not bad, just... REALLY odd.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:31 PM
2

Downvoted just because the way to deal with them is to let them fade into obscurity.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:27 PM
3

Good. Let's make his mission a failure then. The worst thing that can happen is civil discourse haha. Good response btw.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:11 AM
1

At the time, it made a little sense. I'm not saying I agree with him, just that, for a mod of a attack subreddit, he seems rational.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:07 AM
2

Illustrate me. I bet your evidence is very objective and scientific. After all, you wouldn't generalize like that for nothing, would you? That would be intellectually void and pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:31 AM
3

Like what?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:27 AM
2

Feminism is quite balanced sometimes. They wouldn't go that far, that's a place where our mods get upvoted if they are right and Aerik get Downvoted for being a douche. Your thinking /r/feminisms, but of course, you can't post there. Feminists only.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:26 AM
14

Noooooo!!! The vast, vast merits of objectivism! All gone!
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:23 AM
3

That hardly qualifies as trolls though. They just have different opinions. Which happen to be wrong. It's not like he is Jewish to spite us.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:09 AM
3

I say it's too soon to qualify him. He might be honest, he might be a sockpuppet, he might be a douche. As for now, the headline is just irrelevant with your edits.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:05 AM
7

I would argue against the fairly respectable part. Specially for Aerik. There is nothing respectable about constant need for drama, downvote brigades and strawmen sensationalist submissions.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:00 AM
6

You could maybe argue that feminism is by definition man excluding, but man hating? Yeah, I don't think you know what definition means. Even in practical terms that's not true.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:57 AM
4

Really?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:52 AM
3

Just ignore them, the real crazies are banned, and the one that are not bring some good points, like Stephen and Bolshevik, even if other time the don't or if their circlejerk subreddit bans is you so much as cough. The worst the can do is... DOWNVOTE!!! Uuuuuuh, scary!
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:46 AM
6

Dude, batman is totally self-loathing.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:41 AM
2

Circumcision trolls? I don't know what you mean, but from what I see form bolshevikmuppet in this thread, s/he doesn't seem like a troll to me. I actually agree with him/her.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:38 AM
7

He's right though. We seem to be throwing around "misandry", "self-loathing" and "troll" around to often. This shit needs to stop. No more insulting assumptions on both sides. It's just like the feminist mods calling kloo a troll for disagreeing.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:36 AM
12

He is arguing that your insult was unnecessary. You don't do a good job of defending your argument by insulting him.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:33 AM
12

That is an assumption as baseless an insulting to both female and male MRAs as the stupid "self-loathing" in the title.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:32 AM
3

it makes the ninnies whinny. Stay classy kloo
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:19 AM
2

I simply feel that the mens rights group on reddit is misguided in its focus, aggressively hostile toward a feminist movement it ought to work with and at times a safe haven for downright reactionary views. Then again, I don't think that the anonymous nature of reddit has allowed for particularly productive activism on the part of any group, and I think your critiques of feminists and mods here reflect a failure of reddit as a medium more than they do feminism or the concept of mens rights thems…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:14 AM
3

You know, I kinda agree with you for the most part. But I don't know about this "feminism cover's everything" part yet... From personal experience, in this last six months on reddit, MRA's may be stupid a lot of the times, but radical feminists (the one's usually at the front of the movements) leave no room to breath, no room for ideas too different. Look at my baseless downvotes (out of pure disagreeing, as I don't think I've been aggressive or offensive to you, at least I hope so) and my ban o…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:41 AM
2

Like all the other 50 viewers subreddits, where the mods have delusions of grandeur and ban-trigger-happy fingers? There are far too many of those, and it wouldn't matter one bit.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:36 AM
-7

Just what I thought. Upvoting this is just promoting this stupid idea that this is a competition, a struggle between ideologies, be it against "patriarchy" or a "feminist conspiracy" or whatever.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:35 AM
-2

You make a good point. You're not saying YOU ARE REALLY A MAN, you are saying "Not all transsexuals and gender queer identify as that". Which is the thing they should be embracing IMHO.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:52 PM
-2

MY SEMANTICS ARE BETTER THAN YOUR SEMANTICS, LET'S FIGHT AND CALL EACH OTHER NAMES.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:50 PM
1

That explains my ban. And now that I think about it, all of them.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:46 PM
-10

I see no difference between this and "D00de, you got pwned"
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:39 PM
-5

I meant the disparity of men and women in prison, and looking at the why's and how's. Everyone of this problems affects both sexes. But for some reason, when they are aproached in a female perspective, it's good. When it's an egalitarian perspective, it's good. When it's a men's perspective, they tell us to shut up and be egalitarian, or feminists. I don't get that. Why is it good to focus on both genders and women, but not on men, even when they are the more affected group? Who cries to protect…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:38 PM
3

You mean Cartels?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:42 AM
2

I wouldn't say horrible. Let's just say we have to be careful, or our lives could be ruined. We have a shitload of issues to address, but we are not that far into the dirt.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:12 PM
2

This is not a rivalry. It's just a dick waving contest between mods trolling other mods, pitting their peons, the users, against each other for being butthurt.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:00 PM
-13

So, let' just ignore prison populations, vague laws about sex assault that harm both sexes, the cry for protection of women's victimhood and men's violence, rape in prison as a joke instead of an issue, no say in parenthood and other problems? You know, because, we are not super oppressed, just some issues, let's focus on they things everyone else focuses and ignore this.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:58 PM
4

Since when is Aerik Laurelai?
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:54 PM
7

What? Are you serious? Nice assumptions there, bro, they don't sound bigoted and biased at all.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:53 PM
2

I swear they were better with the enlighten thing before. In this oast month half of the mods, the active ones, have become really militant against men's rights and they start to shout transphobia with the slightest disagreement, or, a lot of times, in arguments about semantics with fairly moderate people. Shame really.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:36 PM
3

My first reaction was "Politically correct? This must be the nineties!" Wasn't wrong.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:46 AM
2

As always I disagree with then ban. I would have explained that there is scientific evidence that transsexuals have brains similar to those of the other gender, and that words that seem to be sinonims like gender and sex are different. But noooo. They decided to ban you. Pfft, like that help combat transphobia.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:21 AM
3

Massive? I don't have any number so I won't argue with that. I thin we should strive for equality. Just as we help women with pregnancies and make a big deal of breast cancer, we should help men with prostate cancer and help reduce the gap in life expectancy and amount of prisoners. Why are women so distant from men in your opinion? Biologically, what great and massive investments are necessary to level the field with us superior males? I have to make clear that I do think that legally women hav…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 09:32 PM
1

48 subscriber. No ideology exept "Women rule". Let them have their "Fuck men's rights" subreddit number 45, they always wither and die. Not worth our time. How (or why) the fuck do we destroy a subreddit? An attack, obscure bigoted subreddit. We ignore it.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:23 PM
1

Pffft, just walk on. The can't comment here, and their subreddit is a 30 something subscriber echo chamber, so what's the point? At worse, the can give us 5 downvotes uuuuuuu!!! Let's just completly ignore them.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:53 PM
2

I want nothing to do with either of you. Both radicals are stupid.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:52 PM
-1

Your the guy that said that women should submit to their husbands right? That -1 is badge of pride to me.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 06:30 AM
-1

Are we gonna circlejerk about how feminism is evil? Because we do that everyday. Just downvote and move on. I'm not gonna convince anyone about the three different waves of feminism or how there's radicals and moderates. You already have you mind set.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 06:16 AM
3

Still, no reason to be antagonistic against the idea.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:34 AM
7

The guys that upvoted him.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:32 AM
5

Why don't you?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:32 AM
5

You know, part of this little thing called equality. Also, being a rational fucking human being.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:31 AM
1

There is already 50 -ism. the last thing we need is more of them. Let's just work together instead of arguing who is better at being equal.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:31 AM
2

No, you are enemies with them. Don't throw your insecurities and bitterness into this movement.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:27 AM
1

I was joking, but according to that xkcd comic I'm to lazy to search Math-Physics-Chemistry-Biology.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:37 AM
3

You know, those are actually good points, and vastly more related to this subreddit than that image.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:53 PM
0

Every science is applied math. Even grammar haha.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:38 PM
4

The sentence is a conditional. IF he believes that, he is bigoted. IF he doesn't and he was joking, he is not.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:41 PM
3

How do they intersect? Because we are also men? I don't see how this fits.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:12 PM
2

That was ALL about racism. The only thing in common is our gender. That doesn't make it a MR issue. Is proper shaving a MR issue? No. Try /r/OneY. This one would go in /r/racism, but we know how the mods there are. Pics is where it belongs.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:11 PM
-3

If that's your view of feminism, you are as close minded and bigoted as they are.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:08 PM
7

/r/transphobiaproyect has it's place, it's sometimes needed. The mods seem to have lost it this month for some reason. I think they are just in a dick waving contest with kloo.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:07 PM
1

The why do you put it in the middle? That can lead to a lot of circular logic my friend.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:49 PM
2

This answer is almost enough to satisfy my brain. Thanks. This question bothers me more than it should for some reason.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:42 PM
0

I don't think there is any difference. But a lot of people out there do. It's a shame, but we can't just ignore their stupid beliefs or force them to change them. No harm would be done by changing the meat in a Hindi's sandwich to beef, but I personally don't think it would be moral.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:04 PM
2

Shouldn't it be your responsibility to ask if the person is transphobic? I mean, I agree with you, safety first, but morally? In a less imperfect world, where everyone has opinion but isn't violent or rude, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:57 PM
0

Let's say a study said most men wouldn't carnivores and that 99% women are vegan. You eat meat. You don't mention this, and that guy won't because he's not used too. You know he doesn't like people that eat meat, and you know why he doesn't ask. No harm done, but doesn't his bother you? Morality aside, because we will disagree on that and I won't be able to persuade you.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:54 PM
1

I know. That's what you believe and me too. But people some don't believe that. And isn't ignoring that shoving your belief down others throat?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:38 PM
9

They true nature is being uncaring cold blooded bitches, and misandry happens to be acceptable in society. If we were 50 years ago, they'd be racists.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 01:54 PM
8

And if there happened to be mastodons still around, say, the Middle East, mastodon hunters should go there or become elephant researchers here.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:35 AM
2

Ditto. The trend points to /r/wtf and /r/ffffffuuuuuu not /r/feminism or /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:25 AM
9

Seriously, universities are fucked up. It's starting to get hard to know if this kind of things are reposts or not. This is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 02:49 AM
0

Yeah, that's kind of ironic. The only one that warned not to downvote before posting was Laurelai, and she hasn't been that active since the lulzec bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:52 AM
2

However you feel about kloo2yoo, we know, and that includes pinkmask, that he is not trolling. He is sincere in his views. That ban was uncalled for and quite stupid. She is also deleting and undeleting comments almost at random.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:37 AM
2

Sorry man, in men's right you can't know who is trolling, whose honest, who is a sock account and who is joking. It's crazy.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:02 AM
1

Hardly. 2 and 3 come from misinformation and cherry picking, coupled with misguided interpretations of knowledge and a bit of being a douche.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:53 PM
2

More than a voice of reason I think it's more like "What an MRA should really do", and they aren't a lot of female MRAs. Since MRAs should be rational, and most of them are men, that's why it's a man. This is a copy paste response of someone that didn't throw the word patriarchy in for no reason. You can criticize without starting with direct antagonism, did you know that?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:49 PM
1

I think it's more like "What an MRA should really do", and they aren't a lot of female MRAs. Since MRAs should be rational, and most of them are men, that's why it's a man.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:45 PM
1

Your second one is a valid point, but women were not in a position of inventing anything when due process was invented, so I don't think that's a fair consideration.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:44 PM
1

You're right, I judged on a quick glance to you karma and age and deciding I wouldn't bother. That was wrong and I apologize for that. Watching your comments though, while I can agree with you in some points, your "let's blame feminist for EVERYTHING" is exactly the same thing that radical feminists do for this so called "patriarchy" that they imagine still exists. But remember Name calling < Mentioning the Holocaust. By internet rules you lost first haha.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:03 AM
1

I have no beard, and my day can verify this.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:41 AM
2

Jog on. I don't argue with troll accounts that end there sentences with "...lol." and put words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:22 AM
1

The system adds a ton when 100kgs are needed to balance the issue, not an ideology.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:45 PM
4

Some comments of true misandrist use the word "feminist" instead of "women" to mask themselves behind the cover of Men's rights and yet still spout misogynist things. Let's not get caught in their game and let's not let anyone tell us that MRAs are all like them.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:33 PM
7

Misandry is the voice behind misandry. Just like misogyny is the voice behind misogyny, not Men's rights, like some feminist insist, either because of confusion, deliberate confrontation, or, occasionally, misandry.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:30 PM
1

Popular subreddit: alliteration puns and poking fun a fat people... keep it classy reddit.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 09:40 PM
4

Probably the same. Or at least few would argue that there is sort of a double standard.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 04:44 AM
19

I've been all "This doesn't belong here" a lot of times and your justification and the fact that it isn't a generalization means it's good enough for me. It's not like it's a fake facebook screenshot with a title like "WOMEN SUCK FOR this", it's a comic about a genuine double standard.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:12 AM
2

While I am all for waiting for a verdict and evidence, this does seem opportunistic. Unless she has a child of his hidden somewhere, I doubt she can even produce evidence of a sexual encounter period. Hell, of any encounter at all.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 03:54 AM
2

Yeah the 2% is an old myth perpetuated by who knows how many feminists. I couldn't find any other reports on the matter so thanks.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 12:50 AM
0

It's mostly used to say normal without being rude rude transgenders. outside of conversation with them, it's sort of pointless.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 08:03 PM
10

It's usually "who care about the 2% of fake rape accusations, the 98% is the important part. And no, I won't source that, you should already know it' true"
/r/MensRights03/07/11 06:09 AM
1

Permissive? How many women that kill their children walk free? Could I get a source please?
/r/MensRights03/07/11 06:03 AM
1

Here, 2 stories from google. http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2010-10-30/passerby-helps-duluth-woman-rescue-child-fire http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/05/11/at-least-3-rescued-after-boat-overturns-near-montrose-harbor/ Do we have to always fight? I know most rescues are from men, being the it's sex that take more risks in general, and that some feminist do claim superiority, but your comments and the top comment seem... well angry, hating.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 06:01 AM
6

Well, I for one, thank she was not raped. Now, get her to prison. And no one make a prison rape joke, they are not funny.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:38 AM
6

Welp, guess what they are saying. It starts with V and ends with ictim blaming! Of course, it's so ridiculous, only the zealots believe it, and it's negative karma even in /r/feminism
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:36 AM
2

Well, that can be attributed to them spending more time with them, or disorders such as PPD. It's kind of like how we can get injured more in our kitchens and bathroom, two areas we visit, often slippery or with sharp things.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:26 AM
3

So? That headline just tries to degrade her by assigning a bad stereotype. The headline should be "the accuser was a fucking liar".
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:20 AM
3

It's funny. She is all about how awesome men are when they are stay-at-home dads, but when they are in direct opposition to feminists in high places of power, they are sex fiends, their life should be regulated, they sex public, their lives tied to their works.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:47 AM
1

How about this? Men are under attack by those that try to define masculinity.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:35 AM
4

I agree, I don't really see a lot of feminist propaganda here. Only a narcissist douche in love with himself failing to do a Bono because he can't get his facts straight.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 12:04 AM
1

The traditional meaning is useless now. I rather have no official meaning than having the meaning of old white rich men or old mexican catholic men.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:07 PM
5

Imagine the thousands of men that are not filthy rich and have no way of proving their innocence with big lawyers like Strass-Kahn. If a maid can bring down a powerful man, how many people are in jail because of vindictive exes? How many teachers lose their jobs and basically their lives for failing the wrong teen dumbass?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 11:44 PM
15

Why not? This is not a facebook picture, this is evidence of societal legislative discrimination against men. As soon as the woman said rape, the media branded him a rapist and his life, if not for the fact that he is filthy rich, would be over.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 08:13 PM
20

Don't forget he was replaced by a women that blames economic collapse on men. The issues surrounding this guy are one child support away of having everything to do with MR. Edit: On men. FUCKING on/in, hardest thing ever.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 08:11 PM
4

Up until this points BOTH stories are consistent. The sex act is evidence of both stories. We got a man with everything to lose and a liar. You sound so bloodthirsty in that post, with no evidence of his guilt.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 05:12 PM
1

Not funny.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 04:25 PM
2

It's hard to take those arguments, witch might contain some truth, seriously, if only trolls use them.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 04:23 PM
7

The only evidence I read in that article, the semen in the collar, could be both from consensual and forced sex. What evidence are you talking about? Please cite you sources. She has already been caught lying to the court several time according to the article.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 04:20 PM
1

I disagree on the basis that most issues with feminism arise from the second wave of feminism, the one with the whole "men are pigs" business and and anti-pornography. But to that wave of feminism that is still alive and well thanks to the internet, LGBT, both the men that are seen as criminals in the waiting, the women seen as victims and the transsexuals seen as traitors, we have a common enemy.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 04:01 PM
3

Masculinity is under attack by those that try to define it. Get your bigoted subreddit out of this one please.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 03:49 PM
1

Not "in our", it's "and your". Those are clearly typos. The point is not it being a stretch or completely unthinkable. I didn't fail spelling, but I had a lot of mistakes in this thread, so it's a logical theory. It's also rude and douchey. I might not be good with a keyboard, but you are not good with people. I hope that isn't much of a stretch.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:25 PM
1

In a way. I don't care what /r/feminisms thinks of us, the hater gonna hate fully applies there, and Aerik get downvoted everywhere else, but I care that sometimes they do convince people with this idiotic links. Most complaint about this subreddit are about two things : front page rage "misogynist" comics, that I address in this thread, and links to trolls and the occasional true misogynist that get away with it by swapping "women" with "feminist" for instant upvoted in his offensive comments, …
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:52 PM
1

I called you an asshole because you mocked me instead of just pointing out an error. And your corrections where wrong. Lead makes no sense in that context. If you had pointed out the error nicely I would have responded "I actually meant to say need, but sorry for the typo haha".
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:44 PM
1

I was gonna say that female firefighter also sacrifice the lifes but I haven't found any fatalities in the FEMA website, and while I still think we should not disrespect the brave women that risk their lives, there are certainly fewer, an no casualties, as men tend to take more risk in both the work and career choice.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:43 PM
3

"The fact are that women try to get money out of men". "Always". Only the weak minded speak in absolutes, and completely siding with one gender doesn't help.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:36 PM
24

But some issues do coincide. The sidebar says no LGBT ANYTHING. There is a lot of discussion that share homophobia and misandry as a topic. Just as an example, the classic "two chicks kissing: HOT. two guys kissing: the cops come to inform children are present in a 1 km radius an they should stop." Maybe it's not all right and relevant, but the discussion might be. Inclusiveness is worth it.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:30 PM
11

"More content by me, less BS by people I don't like"
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:26 PM
4

The sidebar says no LGBT issues allowed. I imagine that's what the discussion with the mod and top submitter was about.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:22 PM
3

You are doing the same thing. Downvote and jog on then.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:17 PM
2

1) A lot of people downvote or upvote from their frontpages without seeing what subreddit it is sometimes. I'm just talking about submitting in a subreddit that's appropriate. 2) It's also a call to reduce the circlejerk and help our frontpage be more relevant. I'm not dictating, I'm just voicing my opinion and I hope people agree. 3) As for mods, I really don't mind if kloo or ignatious disagree with me or not, even if their opinion was the same as mine, this subreddit isn't known for censorshi…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:16 PM
3

It's happened. At least 3 times that I remember. The depths that some subreddits (and Aerik) will sink to to try to smear us.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:05 PM
2

You mean the one where you mod and post half the things? Where no posts about LGBT things are allowed? Sound like an awesome subreddit!
/r/MensRights30/06/11 07:27 PM
3

inb4, link to this guy titled "See what men's rights TRULY is"
/r/MensRights30/06/11 07:25 PM
0

iPhone hates me. Asshole.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 07:24 PM
2

I just think we need more Dawkins and less Maher in men's rights, if that makes sense. Edit: I came back home, fucking iPhone spelling...
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:38 PM
6

I've always compared the relationship between /r/mensrights and /r/OneY with atheist and agnostics. Many people of the latter side hate being put in the same category because they say "I'm am not a misogynist/arrogant". Much of the conflict comes from a smear campaign from feminists/theists. The conflict between sides and the abuse of ad hominems and stawmen can dissuade the casual middle ground. This is why I think we should care about what the feminist call us.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:38 AM
9

Specially when the answer is "well feminist do this too". What are we 8 years old? This is not a game of "no you potato face". Let's keep the moral and intellectual high ground please.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:33 AM
6

While I love moviebob, the link is not that relevant because I think while they will always hate us and the conflict is good and necessary, the reason some guys flee from the mere mention of men's rights is because of this image that they perpetuate of us as misogynists and whiners. The less links to comments and posts in this subreddit we give to those intellectual weaklings that try to use ad hominens to get us out of the political spectrum, the best IMHO.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:32 AM
1

You must not have been subscribe for too long then...
/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:19 AM
1

More of a feminism thing. It's a nice blog post, but those point have been said before countless times and it doesn't belong in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:53 AM
4

Nothing. It's just circlejerk and karma whoring.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:43 AM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:43 AM
15

Welp, there goes the intellectual high ground.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 05:06 AM
10

Obnoxious, yes. Generalizing, yes. But sadly those views ARE held by many men. I would say specially the first and fourth one. I think the problem is the "men can stop rape" part. We needs to eradicate this views, but in a way that doesn't demonize men. Those ads still suck.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 03:57 PM
3

Yeah, I was going for what 15 year old atheist feel when they turn 16 year old agnostics before realizing all of what you said. "I'm not an arrogant atheist" "I'm am not a pussy agnostic" Then, you read a bit, and realize how pointless it all was, and that you share some common goals.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:42 AM
3

That's what I'm saying. I'm talking about the people that don't understand or care and insist on exclusivity. It's part of the us vs them mentality that I used in my comparison.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:34 AM
1

Those that name themselves agnostic and those that name themselves atheist are though.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:22 AM
4

Well, you do rant a lot. I wonder why though...
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:37 AM
5

Yeah, me too. It kind of says narrows it down to black and white. Either 100%, 50-50% bisexual, or you are sexually timid. No room for "I just like skinny guys and all women, or blond girls and all men". Nop. Your timid. Because I know you better than yourself.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:36 AM
1

Because the more we call them feminist dogs, or /r/2x clients, the more they see us as misogynist, and that make them want to distance themselves from us, leading to a wider gap, even if we share a lot of concerns and topics. We call them whipped and pussies, they call us whiners. Stupid pointless antagonism and name calling that perpetuates itself. Maybe the one thing that separates us is the complete hatred this subbreddit has for feminism. Granted, it's deserved, but we sometimes fail to see …
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:32 AM
0

With a few adjustments I would say. More than "feminist" OneY is deeply antagonistic of /r/mensrights in a sort of agnostic vs atheist way. OneY is the guy that is pretty intelligent, and takes time to appreciate all points of view, but sometimes get waaay into Buddhism, while mensrights is more to the point, has an agenda, wants to change things, but sometimes says thing like "all Muslims are killers" or "all the Catholics are pedos" Putting women on crazytown and men on heteroville isn't going…
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:24 AM
3

The crazytown part was kind of a generalization though.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:18 AM
0

Oh, it's this thread again. I'm so tired of seeing MR and OneY antagonism. It's mostly circular.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:17 AM
3

The disconnect is, this is not f7u12, or any other place to whine about your friend-zone. This is a place to point out and discuss where our RIGHTS , not our feeling, are compromised. A egotistical bitch is not infringing the law, nor is your ex or your awkward crush.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 02:07 AM
11

So saying how difficult women are is part of men's rights?
/r/MensRights06/06/11 10:51 PM
55

Ok now this has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 06:35 PM
1

Or just Badonkadonks for fun.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 02:07 AM
30

More like "I get easily attached. FUCK MEN"
/r/MensRights04/06/11 07:18 PM
2

Your comment makes me happy. This subreddit is improving! /r/mensrights, 59 days without claiming feminist downvote conspiracy.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:18 AM
0

And even then, no opinions about FHM will be changed.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 11:39 PM
3

Those two cases are definitely present, but they are neither the most extreme nor the most prevalent of cases, IMHO.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 10:26 PM
1

I don't know, it never came up in any of my conversations. I agree with you though, but I can't speak for other MRAs.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 11:13 PM
1

Ditto to that. It's frightening how easily you can get stuck to your own narrative. Even if it is better than the other one, it might not be the best.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:09 PM
10

No you won't because this is a 1 use account for a bad attempt to troll this subreddit, you sad, sad neckbeard/neckbeardette.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:03 PM
1

So according to you, if I stare at a car for too long I can be accused of carjacking? If I stare at a painting for 2 days, am I an art thief? If I stare at your house from mine for one week, am I invading your property? It's only the safe thing, as I am surely thinking about stealing it, and you know exactly what my intent is!
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:50 PM
1

If he stared a a woman, however, at most he is creepy. He did not deserve this at all. However, with your friend... If she was groped twice and he was fully aware, he did deserve punishment, man. Not acting when faced with direct abuse IS cowardice and fear.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:38 PM
1

How the FUCK does he belong in jail for staring at someone? I you are talking about the groping guy, yeah he belongs in jail. I would call not taking action for a direct abuse true cowardice and fear.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:36 PM
3

That would never happen, they would just get downvoted to hell at most. But people here still open the hidden branches to continue the discussion, so it's not censorship. If you have a healthy amount of karma, swimming against the tide is easy.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:33 PM
22

Ahahahah you seriously think someone will fall for you deleting your own comment and you claiming it's censorship? Fat chance, this is not TV, mastermind.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:23 PM
2

Come to think about it, I have not read about concrete evidence, just ideas and essays that sound logical and plausible. If someone could point me to one of this, I would be very happy.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 10:05 PM
2

Wouldn't surprise me he changed that fact every 100 comments or so, like most MRA trolls do. This kind is the second worst though, the worst are those that pretend to be MRAs then say stupid, clearly misogynist things so that their main accounts can quote them and generalize the whole subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:28 PM
2

While I think that you were too aggressive over the course of this discussion, this pathetic 43 karma troll can go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:24 PM
2

I don't have the data either, but yeah 10% is hardly rare. Plus there is never the mention of woman on man rape, which is still rarer, but it happens.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:18 PM
3

Rape is a woman’s issue because, except in those rare instances of homosexual rape, it is the woman who is the victim. UUUUUUNK sorry this paper doesn't pass the bias detector. The psychology part has some good parts, like I said, rape is not about sexual attraction. Good paper, but it could use less claims of patriarchy IMHO.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:46 PM
1

Ok, then I'll rephrase it. Exercising and showing that power is a main motivator of rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:44 PM
2

I will admit they have this kind of atheist versus agnostic mentality in which they like to point out how accepting they are by upvoted submission by women that say "I'm a women and I agree", but it's not really overrun, I stand by my assumption that it's predominately male.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:42 PM
5

Yes, my junior high Language teacher was falsely accused of rape by a teen he failed and he was fired. The next year he was re-hired but he lost his house in the meantime. It was a tough time for him, but my generation (the asshole girl was one year younger) help him a lot. The school refuses to believe him, but we knew he wouldn't do something like that, and we knew the girl was a lying dumbass.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:35 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:33 PM
5

Something radical feminist say that has always confused me. Rape is about power. Ok, I agree, but then why do they say all men are potential rapist because they have lust and find girls attractive? Isn't that what rape is NOT about?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:24 PM
2

Power is a big part of rape. See: Prison rape, relationship abuse etc... I don't think those slut walks achieve anything, that's my whole point. I agree with some of those issues, but doing a "slut walk" is bullshit that only reinforces the idea that women and only women are attacked by this "rape culture"
/r/MensRights24/05/11 04:51 PM
4

While you are right that it might affect, rapist are often encourage to rape by thing different than attraction. Like those guy that rape old people. While dressing as a slut might be better and logical if you are walking past a bad street, the point of the walk was that it is no something you can put as an excuse to brush the rape aside, and that attraction is not the main factor of rape. Even when a man is raped, power is the main concern. Clothing has less to do with it. "Rape is not a comple…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 04:42 PM
1

Ok, I think you are right about the false parallel, I get your point now. I still don't think they are sexist per se just for wanting a place to discuss things of only one gender, but I'll admit that it is a place to discuss thing of only one gender.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:32 PM
3

Hardly worthless. Even when the relevance of those post in /r/mensrights is often discussed, I think the examples of "If we switch genders it would be a shit storm" are important both here AND in female subreddit, to make us think about how we treat other people. Kinda like the experiment with the abusive partner in the park. But I agree we do get on an Us vs Them mentality faaaaar too easy. My karma score in this thread can bear witness.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:28 PM
9

While I sort of agreed initially with this Slut Walk thing, as I agree with some arguments they make about the irrelevance of their clothing sometimes, that rape culture thing is what put me off from the start. Rape Culture? Are you serious? This is the bullshit mentality that allows false rape claims to successfully destroy a man's life!
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:20 PM
0

What I do hate about the saturation of 2Xers is that they are as downvote trigger happy as we are. Seriously, the discussion in OneY about gendered subreddits over there is fantastic, but MRA get downvoted to hell and I hate that. I started posting here in this thread because I got pissed of I was defending this subreddit over there about how not all of us were "immature angry men" and here we call them whiteknights and eunuch.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:10 PM
3

I have not discussed this because I have sincerely no idea of the demographics of OneY but unless everyone is really good at pretending to be a man, and this is the internet so we should never assume that, I still think OneY is predominantly male. I take it you are not calling them women as an insult are you?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:00 PM
1

Start half of your sentence rough then en with "sometimes maybe not always" because you know this is not true. This time it is, but why generalize with only this example?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:50 PM
2

I agree somewhat but I would also argue that a subreddit entirely devoted to one gender over another is still entirely and inherently sexist(A subreddit called "/r/WhiteSkin" would still be considered pretty racist; especially if it was filled with white people going there simply because they don't like hanging out with other people who aren't white). That would mean Menrights and OneY are sexist, and that's not the case. It's not a physical place with a no boys allowed post. It's a place where …
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:46 PM
3

Actually, no. This thread started it, I reacted. But never mind, what is this 4° grade? NO U POTATO FACE.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:40 PM
1

While cross post come with good discussion almost always the also come with negative karma to one of the parties.This come from and to other subreddits btw. And this narrow definition? Take a look at the comments crying pussy, whiteknight and even eunuch.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:38 PM
3

You are right we should never step out of our frame of mind and opinion. Being in somebody else's shoes is for whiteknights. Edit: Shows instead of shoes, typo.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:35 PM
1

sigh See, always with the pointless insults.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:35 AM
3

Even if I don't support bans unless direct bigotry or violence is involved, that was kinda stupid dude haha.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:19 AM
4

Grrihorih dxfh Ok you got me there. I have commented more calmly in matters like this before, but they never get past 1 upvote 0 downvotes, and I just got tired of that in this post. But ok, point aether.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:57 AM
-3

Yeah, that conversation was just wrong on many levels, with some guys truly victim blaming and some guys just raising their shoulders, then getting called misogynist. I think I made a good call staying the fuck away from it. I don't know what your comments were, even if I say them, but victim blaming is one of the big things in 2x. Still, I would not support a ban. I don't know if you can get banned for stuff like that in OneY though...
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:31 AM
-1

You're right, even tough we tend to do cross sub downvote brigades every now and then, I think feud is an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:24 AM
0

Well I have noticed that I can criticize feminism in both 2X and OneY. The key word criticize, not insult. Just like we downvote every crazy that come here and shouts misogynist, they downvote us when we go and write reply where we are always complaining about "those filthy misandrists at /r/everywhere" always rambling about "shaming language" and putting every word in mocking quotations (not talking about your post, but others in those subreddits). I have commented frequently about rape and fal…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:08 AM
-2

No! I have actually day the contrary for the entire day in other subreddits. I think here in /r/mensrights we have a very narrow definition of what a proper man should be. If it deviates, he becomes a slave, a feminist, a pussy or a whiteknight. Most MRA I have seen criticize OneY do so because of trivial stuff like this or because they are not in a constant feud with TwoX or something. This post has nothing to do with Men Right's yet we jump at the chance of laughing at other , instead of fixin…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:52 AM
-7

Seriously? That is either the most paranoid thing EVER or you just called all of us pussies for not being eternally aggressive against women. Apparently the only thing one needs to be a white knight is not being a frat boy.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:35 AM
3

GOD DAMMIT. I defend this subreddit every single time in every subreddit, and every time some here doesn't agree, you immediately insult the other party and whine! Grow up guys! We don't always have to be bitter confrontational bastards, this is NOT the way to make our issues respected or ended!
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:32 AM
9

Way better than the rest of Hate Week. Back to good old Amazing Atheist, logical and with the ability to be calm and outraged when necessary.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:41 AM
5

Come on now, let's not exaggerate. I meant that if that situation came to me, I wouldn't fell like a man, but outright figurative castration is kind of hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:05 AM
46

A man chooses, a husband obeys the court.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 02:02 AM
1

Really? I have found that most people don't know what the fuck they are talking about, so a couple of good arguments can take care of those that know, or think they know, what MR are.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:09 AM
15

Yeah seriously did you marry Jezebel's editor in chief or something?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:07 AM
8

I actually got some cred with my Ethics professor because of my MR views on abortion and how men have no say.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:06 AM
2

Reddit is very aggressive when MR are introduced into the conversation. They consider this subreddit misogynist and dismiss us without consideration some times. God that pisses me off. But at the same time, I admit that I find this subreddit a bit bipolar. Sometimes misogynist comments are downvoted to oblivion, but sometimes you see threads have a top comment directly attacking feminist as a whole, or even females as a whole. I think we just need a little more self regulation, and reddit as a w…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:32 AM
2

Shaming language? That sounds more feminist that everything I can say. You are as sexist as any dumb bitch that shouts misogyny at the first sign of disagreement. "Waaaa you called me bad names, I can't defend myself rationally". Sounds like someone?
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:50 PM
1

45 years give you a infinitesimal amount of experience more than a 25 year old. You may know a thousand more women, but I doubt you know half of the population of the planet enough to make your ridiculous and sexist claims. If you can't understand why generalizing is wrong and fallacious, then maybe YOU can't grasp logic.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 09:59 PM
3

And I mean, I expect it from the other guy with 299 Karma, but skooma714?
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:08 AM
4

Exactly! It's good denouncing the extremes, but, however widespread they are, let's not get all Fox News "every Muslim is a terrorist"
/r/MensRights16/05/11 04:35 AM
0

Ummm... I get the hate against feminist, they suck and have no place in this society, but what's up with all the "women" in the responses... Stay classy guys.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 04:31 AM
2

I'm sorry I just get really angry at all this account with Mis-something-y They are like a plague here in MRA and critics always choose their comments to say we are bad people or hate facts.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 05:05 AM
0

Yep, let's trust Misandry-fucking-Motif, I bet he is a reliable objective source of female performance in battlefield. All you say sound like an MRA strawman. Educate yourself and get some morals, or piss off troll.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 01:52 AM
9

Even tough I would like to see statistics, it makes sense. Like the fact that most accidents happen in the kitchen, you know where you spend a lot of time surrounded by sharp things.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 06:03 AM
2

South Park is not a guideline people. The justice system seems to forget that.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:04 PM
1

You have no right to force them to believe you are female. They have no right to force you to believe you are not. And come on, you can be happy without those people. We all can.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 09:34 PM
7

No she is not. You may have your opinion and I defend your right to not sleep with transgenders, but your opinion is wrong. You are also being a douche about it.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 06:04 AM
3

I understand you plight. I'm on your side. You have the right to look at the real you in the mirror. You have NO right to shove your belief, however correct they are, at others. You might not be a man, but people out there, otherwise kind and considerate, might not agree. It's is as much their right to be wrong as it is your to be right and happy.THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO WIN THEM OVER. I'm sure you are a beautiful woman and I wouldn't notice or care, but be more considerate of other people's belie…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 03:18 AM
5

I checked his history to prove this after an argument, and I found this. So yeah, he is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:20 AM
1

Foolish me, that didn't see you comment karma. You win this one troll. Nice play, you magnificent neckbeard.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:19 AM
1

Just something that came to my mind. I edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:43 PM
11

This is the first positive karma recognition of the differences of opinion in the feminist movement I've seen in a while. It's nice to see our subreddit is getting less angry and aggressive and more rational. Let's keep the good work. This whole argument with /r/transphobiaprotect gave me new hope in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:14 PM
1

An intelligent handsome man that knows what he is doing and isn't afraid that doing housework because it's "being whipped". This commercial made me see why some women get turned on by men doing housework.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:41 PM
2

I'm a guy. I am a MRA. I think when other subreddits picture us as misogynist, they see you. I want you buried in downvotes for that.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:40 PM
4

As a liberal open minded bisexual, to me it says that they put me in the same category as everyone else. I would date a trans, man to woman or woman to man, and to discover that we got intimate and they still didn't trust me enough to tell me the truth tells me that they are not honest to me, or that they consider me as much of a risk as any bigot.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:18 AM
6

And it is a good way of avoiding the classic asking for downvotes of "what if I had AIDS" misunderstandings.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:11 AM
13

To me it says that they put me in the same category as everyone else. I would date a trans, man to woman or woman to man, and to discover that we got intimate and they still didn't trust me enough to tell me the truth tells me that they are not honest to me, or that they consider me as much of a risk as any bigot.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:15 AM
0

No one in the US, but it is really easy to find someone that thinks some women are just "asking for it", maybe not as an excuse but as a factor that puts some blame on the victim. Like gay kids that were just asking for a beating. They should really just stop being faggy and hide their true selves, or those who can't control their impulses will harm them. I know it's not the same, but both mentalities share some qualities.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:52 AM
11

You do realize it is the whole point right? This is like the 60's protest on nudity. Sexual power is not only the strategy, it's the goal. The point is that they can wear stuff like that, and that doesn't give anyone the right to use the way they dress as a excuse. The way the point is being made is by using their sexual power. It's not desperation, it is a legitimate strategy and argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:34 AM
-1

You are right. Guys this article has what we hate in feminism with different subjects.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:30 AM
6

You linked to yourself in the same subreddit... You could have just self posted you know?
/r/MensRights02/05/11 02:20 AM
4

Columbia to, I think. Too many Hitler Jesus and Adonis Superman's
/r/MensRights01/05/11 08:42 AM
5

Fist fights are for men, slaps are for women (who are obviously inferior), and men that don't wear Brut deserve slaps. This is the context and subtext of this ad. Fuck Brut
/r/MensRights28/04/11 03:32 AM
2

/r/OneY comes as feminist because it is made up of guys that have some views in common with us but really hate being called MRA or comments in the subreddit going all "feminist conspiracy grrrr"(This is a problem in this subreddit). Sort of atheist vs agnostic stuff going on. I visit both subreddits, and I say, I like this one, but it does come as angry or hyperbolic every once in a while. I say /r/OneY is with menrights in the matter of true equality + responsibility. It is more female friendly…
/r/MensRights04/04/11 01:41 AM
2

Plus I'm willing to bet half/most trolls have no agenda, just trolling MRA for the lulz.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 10:07 PM
11

Ummm... just saying but 77% upvotes is pretty high. Everything gets downvotes in reddit. I don't think downvotes are from people like you or just normal. Claiming feminist conspiracy at the first downvotes is a real turnoff for me in this reddit.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:51 AM
4

Harr Harr, Cliffor backwards, very clever. Sock or fan accounts REALLY help with the whole not trolling thing. I think if there is someone stupid, it's not feminist or MRA but losers like you. Whatever sex you are. But whatever. I've seen better trolls on youtube and facebook.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:46 AM
14

Typical...generalizing Facepalm
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:43 AM
1

I think he just has strong opinions and is often ignorant, sometimes willfully ignorant, which is not good, but I hesitate to call a 13 k karma 1 year member a troll.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:37 AM
3

I think dragging them is not only relevant but necessary. People need to know that lesbian abuse is high, and that the get the worst of it. For example some states like Arizona(go figure) don't allow protective orders for battered same sex relationships.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:32 AM
3

The part about the irrelevance of "butchness" breaks a lot of preconceptions people have.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:28 AM
4

Holy McFucking Shit! Thanks for the info. Every time I see a study I haven't heard of I say "we need more/bigger studies to confirm" and this is not different, yet it is disturbing and interesting. Thank you
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:24 AM
3

You are respectable member of reddit, with high karma and more than a year, so I doubt you are trolling, but men are in risk of domestic abuse. You will find "anti-equality misogynistic abuse apologetics" in this subreddit, sometime upvoted, sometime downvoted, but what you responded to wasn't. And shouting that at every discerning opinion hurts your case, that has no evidence to begin with( not that he provided a citation either) I suggest we ALL take a look at some statistic and stop shouting …
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:20 AM
3

[citation needed] No really, I'm dead curious.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:15 AM
1

MRAInTraining. I had my doubt as of yesterday, but his new threads are him and Cliffor circlejerking. Don't know if he's a feminist but he is certainly a MRA-strawman troll.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:25 AM
2

The guy that responded twice.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:22 AM
2

Actually YOU are worse than him. Shouting misandrist at every opportunity, my Poe's law sense tingles like fuck every time you comment.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:05 AM
12

1)Correlation does not equal causation. 2) The graph is comparing both suicide rates, I think. So It might mean that females kill themselves less, so that helps to raise men's in comparison. 300% is a lot though. I think the actual numbers are necessary, percentages are vague over decades. Do you have a link? I would also like to investigate if the trend is going down, if it was going up before
/r/MensRights22/03/11 05:02 AM
8

It's called Louis C.K.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 04:06 AM
15

I thought the equivalent for boobs were abs.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 01:57 AM
1

Get your facts out of here!
/r/MensRights13/03/11 08:06 AM
2

Maybe not intended, but it still is, buddy.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 04:31 AM
2

Really? That is too much hyperbole for me.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 02:00 AM
1

Maybe the college part. Just playing devil's advocate, I didn't downvote. There may be some truth to it, but it sounded a little over the top, in a 50's black and white cartoon "how to recognize a feminist" kind of way.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 01:10 AM
1

Downvotes usually follow being self righteous too..
/r/MensRights28/02/11 01:07 AM
6

Bullshit. Human rights in general have to improve in many parts but women are still disproportionately screwed in some places. In fact I would instead argue that it is not needed in the URBAN west. I don't know if you guys consider Latin America part of "the west" but rural areas here could use some help.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 12:07 AM
1

Thanks, you are right. But the next paragraph attributes the equal representation to business or robberies. A more complete quote: The study reported 40 percent of acid attacks in Cambodia are the result of “extramarital affairs or hate or jealousy”. According to a previous study by Licadho, in nearly 30 percent of acid attacks from 1999 to 2002, a wife had attacked her husband’s suspected mistress or second wife. Demographic data collected from the three countries found acid violence victims in…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 08:06 PM
2

When I attended U.N. models I used to say "We all sit around a table and discuss about world matter pretending we can save the worlds. So just like the real U.N."
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:48 PM
6

Are those men killed targeted because they are men? This a sincere question, I don't know and I think this is a vital part of why women sometimes need laws that affect them in some countries.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:46 PM
16

Feminism is not needed in the west. But in other parts of the world the story is different. Men don't get acid facials in the middle east for not wanting to get married. Most honor killings are women Is violence committed against men? Sure. Sometime even in higher numbers. But the laws need to address this issues are usually gender neutral. In a place where women are still a vulnerable group with less rights, special laws are needed, this commissions are a way of separating the gender neutral is…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:36 PM
14

You represent a big problem here in /r/mensrights. People that, when encountering resistance or a different point of view, shout "misandrist!" or "troll!" Do you realize you sound like the feminist you hate? Those that shout "misogynistic" or "pig" when they see a point of view unclouded by their hate of the other gender, their feeling of persecution. Maybe people downvoted you because of this. I personally did because you came here to post about how you were downvoted. Don't you realize you sou…
/r/MensRights26/02/11 11:10 PM
5

He that's my nickname!
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:52 AM
5

Yes, it is the tale of a boy I would nominate for man of the year, inspiring a chain of events in the area not seen in a long time. Inspiring, amazing. NOT related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:33 AM
4

I see you calling a well spoken, rational redditor "Man-hating misandrist" and I have to wonder if you think you are doing your side a favor.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 08:49 PM
7

You are not helping. You are even worse than this guy here. Get out of here, and let people that really care about equality and freedom take care. We don't need you spitting on both men's rights and feminism.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 07:51 PM
1

I would have upvoted if it was only "Why does it matter that he was male?"
/r/MensRights20/02/11 07:37 PM
22

Since no one has said it in a non-stupid way. What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights20/02/11 07:36 PM
1

I've talked to maybe 30 girls about the "what's worse cheater or gay cheater" and the answer is gay because: 1) Makes them feel like they were not really attractive to them(biggest portion) 2)The now feel jealous of everyone, not just girls (small portion admitted this) 3)Homophobia (small segment) And why the hell should straight men care? That's a good question. They shouldn't. But they do. You may become undatable for girls, but it's not a sex specific pressure! You become alienated from guys…
/r/MensRights13/02/11 09:27 AM
1

Basically women are punishing same sex behavior in men. You kidding right? Everyone knows that guy who acts faggy and wears always pink but has a smoking girlfriend. If I started acting gay, GUYS would be the ones punishing me for my gayness.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:43 AM
1

Wait battered wife defense works for planned murder?
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:34 AM
4

If there is any reason they are more likely, if they are at all, my bet is on the fact that the can get away with it more easily.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:30 AM
0

So what does that mean then? It makes them lesbian rapist? Eager to be raped? Also, the statement this dumbasses made kind of says "only dude like this games, cause they like... like killing and raping and stuff. Go play a barbie, and watch out for molesters!"
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:45 PM
2

Yeah, I don't want to be a hypocrite and say how much the sex offenders list destroys an innocent or not male life then dismiss it because it's a guilty woman
/r/MensRights11/02/11 04:19 PM
1

Just keep in mind they downvoted too.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 01:45 AM
1

I am circumcised and I can jerk it pretty well thank you very much. "Almost always successful" I am sorry, but in the country I live, pretty much everyone is cut, and everyone wanks.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 05:32 AM
1

Should say repost 1000
/r/seduction16/06/10 10:54 PM
2

Repost from not even a month ago. fuck you
/r/seduction16/06/10 09:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter