TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dharmaticate Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by dharmaticate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

More than half of women don't view it as a right... Source needed. Most data suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:29 PM
1

No one has the legal, explicitly stated right to be comfortable, sure, but where exactly is your right to stare delineated? Don't these "rules" come from cultural norms?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:22 PM
0

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:32 AM
-3

As an alternative to the "Hail Mary" someone else suggested that involves lying to your girlfriend and generally being a scumbag, I recommend you ask her what she would do if she had to choose between having the baby and having you in her life. You guys have been together a long time so she might not want to throw that all away.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:47 AM
1

Maria Bamford?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:47 AM
0

I get what you're saying, but might not be cheaper for them if he's impregnating women who have insurance with different companies. Sterilizing a woman that they cover guarantees that they won't be paying for childbirth. With men it's a little more ambiguous.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:58 PM
4

I'm guessing that it's cheaper to pay for a woman to be sterilized once than for any number of childbirths, so it's in the insurance company's best interest to incentivize tubal ligation. I don't have any resources to back that up though. Edit: That's just a feeling though, I don't have anything to support it and I don't think it's morally acceptable.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:59 PM
1

It means you could still encounter a good orange, but if you've had really bad experiences I can see how you still wouldn't care about that. It's just frustrating sometimes because I see a lot of generalizations that aren't true for me personally, and it feels like I'm assumed to be something I'm not just because I'm a woman. (I realize that feeling is very common among men, with the various horrible generalizations that are applied to them.)
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:14 PM
1

I would consider "all oranges are bad" to still be a generalization because it leaves no room for the possibility of good oranges. If they were to quantify the statement and instead say "in my experience, all oranges are bad," it allows for good oranges to possibly exist outside of their experience. You could definitely argue that the "in my experience" bit is implied in a lot of posts, but it's not true for all. Does that answer your question? I completely believe that generalizations reflect t…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:24 PM
6

There's a self-post by a female MRA apologizing on behalf of the entire gender at least once a week, so I'm going to guess there are a number still here. The issue I feel most strongly about is circumcision. I recognize the inequality in reproductive rights, but I haven't seen any potential solutions that I'm completely comfortable with... I'm working on that. I agree with most of the ideas presented in men's rights. I take issue with the way some people present their experiences with women (and…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:26 AM
1

I didn't post that picture but I came here to ask a similar question. I know quite a few men who are more comfortable sitting like that than with their legs apart. If all the things in OP's post are true, shouldn't that be really uncomfortable for most men?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:20 PM
6

Northwestern's student body is actually pretty homogeneous. I'm from the area and have a lot of friends who go there... most of them are straight, white, upper-middle class, and male. I don't know why you were rejected, but it probably wasn't because you lack diversity.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:25 AM
3

I think the entire point of the joke was that she just wants a pretty diamond ring, not an engagement.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:27 PM
1

...really? If what I said qualifies as a concern troll, then you're using this sub as a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:31 AM
1

I'm glad you're happy! Your wife sounds wonderful, and it seems like you have a great relationship. However, I don't think it's really fair to say that all American women are the way you describe... I fully believe that's been your experience, but I know plenty of women who don't deserve to be thrown in with that lot.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:37 AM
4

You mean like chemical castration for rapists and pedophiles? That's a bad road to go down.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:45 PM
19

Noticed that I'd lost all interested in American women because of the way they behave when compared to Filipina women. Obviously this is a sweeping generalization, but I'm curious. In what ways do you find them different?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:30 PM
1

Aren't you the one who said that "power" means different things for different people? Just because you keep saying that power for a girl is being pretty doesn't make it true. I'm saying that that's the idea of "power" that is promoted by Barbie. As in by Mattel. As in not by individual women. I'm a woman myself, and I certainly don't get my sense of power from my physical appearance. If you understood power you would know that in real life power is usually derived from more substantial qualities…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:28 AM
1

To be blunt: I think the idea of Barbie as a "power" symbol has to do with the idea that "power" for a girl is being pretty so that you can get what you want (which is not a message that I agree with). It has nothing to do with health. I agree with what you're saying about it being physically unattainable and an awful message to push on little girls. I don't really understand what point you're trying to make about what I said. Do you think I'm trying to justify Barbie's proportions or something?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:40 PM
1

However i'd like to suggest the possibility that power means different things to different people regardless of their gender. I agree completely! I was talking more from the view of a marketing agency that has to appeal to as many people as possible. Unfortunately, large corporations can't really market to individuals.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:32 PM
3

I think Broccoli_Tesla is suggesting that "power" means something different to each gender, and that women get theirs from being physically attractive rather than strong. Or at least that's the idea that Barbie promotes.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:09 AM
1

But women are told to take self defense classes, always go out with a friend, and not accept drinks from strangers. The difference is that these aren't slapped on posters under a "DON'T GET RAPED" headline--and I think that's a good thing. People on this sub complain that women view all men as potential predators, and posters like that would kind of encourage that behavior.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:21 AM
0

Then maybe this wasn't the best example to show us, even if it was the final straw.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:26 AM
2

Source? I was looking for stats earlier but couldn't find any.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:52 PM
1

I don't really buy that Lego is an exclusively male hobby for adults. That's a pretty big assumption, and there are plenty of stories about adult women being turned away as well.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:28 PM
2

So if this had happened at, say, the American Girl store, you wouldn't care?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:01 AM
0

I think height restrictions make sense... you want flight attendants to be able to reach the overhead bins and still be able to maneuver about the cabin easily. I just don't get why they're not the same for both genders.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:44 AM
0

You literally had to be 5'10" or more or they wouldn't hire you. Most airlines now have limits on how tall flight attendants of both genders can be. I think women can't be taller than 5'8".
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:30 AM
3

Very good point, but wouldn't that still be unprofessional?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:39 PM
2

Just curious, but isn't reddit usually very adamant that people have every right to photograph other people in public? I don't really understand why this situation is different (just talking about the photo/tweet, not the blog post and complaints that followed).
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:21 PM
2

Are you sure? Yes. How often do women risk themselves to save a male (that isn't their son) in real life? ^ This is what Revan_Deschain was responding to. I'm fairly confident that by "risk themselves" he/she meant "risk their own lives." Revan_Deschain then said: Female cops, firefighters, and soldiers are a thing. Which you directly responded to with: Part of their job, that's what they get paid to do. Which implies that the fact that they risk their lives is less significant because it's thei…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:42 AM
1

I know the context of the conversation. Your response made it seem like the risk involved was less legitimate because it's their job. If someone said that the deaths of male firefighters, cops, and soldiers are less significant because it's "part of their job, what they get paid to do," people would be pissed. I know I would be.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:06 AM
1

Part of their job, that's what they get paid to do. There would be complete outrage if someone said that in response to the statistic about male workplace deaths. I don't understand why it's acceptable to say in this context.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:06 AM
2

The survey that these stats are based on says 60% of females play on mobile devices; that still makes ~24-28% of the kind of gamers we're talking about female. Other surveys say that 25% of console players and 39% of PC players are female. You still haven't included a source. The reason I asked in the first place was because 5% sounds like the kind of number that would be suggested as a "reasonable estimate," when in fact the real percentage (though debatable) is definitely much higher.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:40 AM
4

Also consider that like 90% or higher of the playerbase is men... I'm not trying to be a dick, but do you have a source for that? The only statistic I can find suggests that around ~40% of gamers are female. (Source)
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:44 PM
1

Where I'm from (Illinois) both parties were prosecuted under child pornography laws until 2011. Now they get sent to family court and have to do community service or counseling, and they don't have to register as sex offenders.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:56 AM
1

I thought romance novel covers were mocked by pretty much everyone, including the women who buy them.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:31 AM
3

I dont bitch at Cosmo because they don't cover Male things That's not really a fair comparison. I don't think people are mad at individual games for being marketed towards men; the problem is that almost all of them are. It would be like if EVERY magazine was marketed exclusively towards women.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:27 AM
2

I think you might have misread my comment. I was talking about when a woman rapes a man, not when a woman accuses a man of raping her. Sorry if that was ambiguous.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:47 PM
2

I agree completely.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:09 PM
1

I was thinking more of situations where someone (guy or girl) says "No" but doesn't fight back when the other person keeps going, out of shock or fear or what have you.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:07 PM
2

And I would consider that a problem.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:03 PM
6

But by that logic no woman who's accused of raping a man (without penetrating him) should be charged because that crime leaves virtually no evidence, and I think we can both agree that that's a problem. I'm not saying anything at all about this particular case, much less that he's guilty (in fact I specifically gave an example where "evidence" could support a false allegation). I'm just pointing out that it's not that black and white. What you're calling a strawman are shades of grey that need t…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:25 AM
11

I posted this further down, but if someone freezes up and doesn't fight back, what evidence is there that they were raped? How can that be proven? Someone responded that they need to be checked by a doctor for signs of forced insertion, but there are definitely problems with that: What if she explicitly said she didn't want to have sex, but was physically aroused? What if it was consensual, but she has vaginismus and tears every time? In both of those examples the evidence would inaccurately ref…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:29 AM
7

What if she was aroused but explicitly told him she didn't want to have sex? Or she has vaginismus and tears every time?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:33 AM
4

Can I ask a sincere question? If someone freezes up and doesn't fight back, what evidence is there that they were raped? How can that be proven?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:59 AM
1

I think their point was that the school doesn't really care about how the guy feels, they're just trying to get back at this girl for drawing negative attention to them with the lawsuit.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:54 AM
1

Yeah. I was thinking that it looked like something from Urban Outfitters.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:10 AM
1

Okay, fair enough. This is definitely true when it comes to Title IX, but is there an educational amendment that gives students the right to legal representation in disciplinary hearings (or something to that effect)? If not, they're totally within their limits.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:41 AM
1

Actually, posting lies about someone is called defamation within cyber harassment laws. I wasn't referring to it as a separate crime. The vast majority of cyber harassment laws only cover when someone is contacting you against your will, or stalking you on the internet to find information about you. What you're describing is not cyber harassment.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:28 PM
1

This school (Washington University in St. Louis) is private. They can do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:44 AM
1

I think you're missing out on a big part of their complaint, which is that there aren't very many women in video games who even have the option to behave heroically. Because they actually could be that pretty... I'm also not sure what you mean by this. For most people, the level of attractiveness depicted in video games is completely unobtainable.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:30 AM
2

This app crosses that line by making the intimate details of men's lives open to the public without their consent. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it defamation only if the "intimate details" are false? That'll obviously be a huge problem with this app, but it's not illegal to post things that are true.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:03 AM
1

I know they're done for a variety of reasons; what I don't know is what the most common reason is, and I can't find that information anywhere. Even so, it's still a leap to attribute that percentage to the general population because it's not a random sampling.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:39 AM
1

Can the couples seeking paternity tests really be considered an accurate representation of the entire population though? Generally people only get them if they already have reason to be suspicious.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:45 PM
1

Is that not at all compensated for by the fact that more than 80% of politicians are male?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:23 AM
3

...the female stranglehold on political process will be slightly reduced. I've never heard of this before. How exactly do they have a "stranglehold"?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:45 PM
2

Women have long held the power to send men off to die in a war without exposing themselves to the same risk. Okay... but throughout history, how many women have been involved in the decision to go to war? Your argument certainly suggests that women would be more supportive of war because they have less at stake, and I don't disagree with that, but I think the decision to go to war has mostly been made by men. Women haven't had the power to send men off to war. What they HAVE had is the privilege…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:35 PM
1

If women are obligated to become mothers, then men are obligated to become fathers. No one is obligated to reproduce. Edit: And even if you do believe that people are obligated to reproduce, that's a universal obligation because it applies to both genders. Women can't reproduce without men.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:56 PM
1

Do you have any examples? I'm having trouble thinking of any.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:47 PM
17

I think they intended for the question to be interpreted as "Are women obligated to do anything simply because they're women?"
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:04 AM
1

The fact is that the more promiscuous a woman is the more likely she is to cheat on you. I'm not entirely sure that's true. The only study I know of that suggested that was criticized for its definition of promiscuity.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:15 AM
2

I'm a woman and I've gotten sucked into the same argument. I said I would rather be raped than killed, and was promptly told I can't say that because I haven't experienced it myself. I think victims (and maybe even more so, people who consider themselves potential victims) are just very afraid of the issue being trivialized, and suggesting that there are worse things sets off alarm bells for them.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:53 AM
5

When I got 100% on a chemistry take home test in college, my professor asked if I had my boyfriend do it for me. Your world view doesn't necessarily have to be warped in order to come to the conclusion that she did. Honestly, either of you could be right, and it's entirely circumstantial.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:47 AM
5

It's a man. Comments like that are why so many people think this reddit is sexist.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:38 PM
1

Then wouldn't this affect mothers more than it would fathers?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:29 PM
2

Why did you assume it was a woman posting?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:24 PM
0

It applies to both. She chose to double park: that was selfish and obnoxious. He chose to hold up traffic: that was also selfish and obnoxious. They were both in the wrong. My comment was more focused on him holding up traffic because he didn't seem to have considered the impact his actions had on other people. If he had parked and then returned on foot to chastise her, I would be singing his praises.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:44 AM
-1

I'm very willing to defend my principles. One of my principles happens to be that people should be conscious of how they're affecting the lives of those around them.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:50 PM
-3

Is there any particular reason that you couldn't have parked your car in another spot and walked back to chew them out? Good for you for sticking up for your principles, but you were being just as selfish and obnoxious as she was by holding everyone else up. Had I been in that line, I would have been equally mad at both of you. Possibly even more mad at you because at that point you would be taking more time out of my day. By all means, stand up for your principles, but please don't do it at eve…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:27 PM
2

In the spirit of fairness, I'd like to point out that no one has submitted any sources that suggest what someone wears affects the likelihood that they'll be raped. The huge study that most feminists cite is this: According to the Federal Commission on Crimes of Violence, only 4% of the reported sexual assaults involved any participative behavior by the victim, and most of this consisted of nothing more than dressing or walking in a way that is socially defined as attractive. (source)
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:36 AM
11

I don't think it was an issue of the pens being "against women," they were just mocking Bic for making a stupid product.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:14 AM
11

Probably not the best thing to bring up as an example, as all of those PMs are exceptionally creepy.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:28 PM
1

The relationship between gender and suicide has been extensively researched by Western sociologists, given that males die much more often by means of suicide than do females, although reported suicide attempts are 3 times more common among females than males. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_and_suicide Men are successful more often, but women attempt more often.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:51 PM
1

I was just rereading this conversation and realized I didn't address this: a woman is three times more likely to attempt suicide than a man is. That's all, back to your regularly scheduled r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:14 AM
6

To stop all purposeful sexual contact? Couple seconds. Only one that matters, in my opinion. Being naked in bed with someone isn't rape. Saying "Just a few more minutes," and not stopping when they've asked you to might be.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:10 AM
1

I appreciate your analogy, but I don't think the situations are comparable. What would a reasonable amount of time be, in your opinion?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:41 AM
1

Nice edit. Edit: He said he posts whatever he thinks will get him the most karma.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:10 AM
3

Do you think women shouldn't be allowed to withdraw consent?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:44 PM
1

How can you know that though? I'm not disagreeing outright, but I can't see a way to reach that conclusion without a lot of assumptions.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:41 AM
1

I was told that the difference was because men are more likely to choose a violent and guaranteed way to commit suicide (jumping off of buildings, gunshots to the head), and women tend to choose less violent and less reliable methods (cutting, overdose, carbon monoxide poisoning) because they're concerned with preserving their bodies.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:00 AM
1

From the second link: I have a much lower chance of being driven to successfully commit suicide than a man. This is true, but it rubbed me the wrong way. The way it's worded is invalidating, like people who survive suicide attempts just weren't driven enough.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:21 PM
1

Don't forget the fact that men drive more than women on average. Source? I can't find anything that says that.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:59 PM
2

That's not the media so much as marketing. If the majority of consumers who buy Tide laundry detergent are middle aged women, that's who they're going to cater to in their advertising. A lot of lawn mower advertisement campaigns are aimed at men. Do women still mow the lawn? Yes, but they're not the primary demographic. To call for equal representation in advertising is a little ridiculous. The "bumbling dad" character is harmful; an ad campaign aimed at mothers is not.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:40 PM
5

Despite the fact that it was obviously a hyperbolic statement...
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:42 PM
2

Despite the fact that it was obviously a hyperbolic statement, there are a ton of legitimate reasons for not wanting to have sex. I can't imagine someone withholding sex to spite their partner when they would otherwise be in the mood. For example, no one thinks "Damn, I really want to jump his bones right now, but he said something that made me feel bad about myself so I better teach him a lesson." Generally they wouldn't want to have sex because they feel self conscious or undesirable, and they…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:01 PM
6

I'm pretty sure it stems from the idea of stay at home moms. You know, barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen and all that. It has nothing to do with careers.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:46 PM
1

I'm not saying you would be offended. But it is insulting to have someone read something you wrote, form an opinion about you, find out you're not of the gender they assumed, and then think less of you. If that happened you might give a shit (assuming you still have shits to give). I'm not talking about people who start posts like "As a _____, I feel..." like their opinion is superior. I'm just talking about women on the internet acknowledging that they're women.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:25 AM
3

It's a little insulting to have it assumed that you're a guy, and then when you make your actual gender known people think less of you. There's nothing wrong with wanting your gender represented accurately. If someone replied to one of your posts and assumed you were a girl, would you feel no desire to correct them?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:40 PM
0

Would you rather assume someone's into it and face possible rape accusations afterwards, or ask and risk ruining the moment?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 10:52 PM
2

I always use "they" in speech and informal writing, but since it's traditionally a plural pronoun it can be tricky to use in academic writing. A lot of professors (in my experience) will mark off for it because it's technically a grammatical error.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:35 PM
2

"They" is a plural pronoun. Colloquially it can be used as a singular, but it's technically wrong and therefore isn't used in academic writing.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 06:04 AM
3

The "inclusive language" remark meant the professor wanted gender neutral pronouns. Typically people are taught to use masculine pronouns. For example: Conservative: "The reader comes to his own conclusion." Inclusive: "The reader comes to his or her own conclusion." I've actually had a professor who told the class if anyone used inclusive language he'd mark it down, because it felt "clunky and superfluous." It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:54 AM
2

I would go even further and wager that most women who self-identify as feminists don't hold radical beliefs. Some do, but most just consider themselves to be in favor of women's rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:52 AM
1

How exactly is that relevant to my post? I used a hypothetical situation to make a point; women are legally eligible for the death penalty. And again, someone who is against the death penalty isn't going to be like "Know what we should do? Kill more women. You know, just to make it fair." I'm not saying the issue isn't important. It just isn't relevant to what I wrote.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:30 AM
1

Both are horrible. I didn't say it was justified, or that I agreed with it. Actually, I thought I made it apparent with my death penalty analogy that I think the draft should be abolished. I don't even know what you're trying to argue with me about.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:41 AM
1

I read your response as two separate thoughts. I'm guessing you meant to suggest that the latter is an additional purpose of the draft? If so, my bad. That being said, you don't enslave people for no reason. That in and of itself can't be the purpose because there's no inherent objective; it's a means, not a goal.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:23 AM
1

The constitutionality of excluding women was decided in 1981 by the United States Supreme Court in Rostker v. Goldberg, with the Court holding that registering only men did not violate the due process clause of the Constitution. "The existence of the combat restrictions clearly indicates the basis for Congress' decision to exempt women from registration. The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops. Since women are excluded from combat, Congress concluded that they wou…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:40 AM
2

No. Priority should be given to children, but gender shouldn't come into play. Yes, statutory rapes committed by women should have consequences matching the severity of those met by men. I am in favor of Romeo and Juliet laws that benefit both sexes. (not numbered) Yes, if you can prove intent to deceive. No one who is raped should have to pay maintenance or child support. The exception to this is if both parties are teenagers (a Romeo and Juliet law situation) because one cannot be held more cu…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:39 PM
1

Ah. Your post made it seem like you thought it was stupid of her to come to that conclusion because few men were in her nursing classes on account of it being a predominantly female profession. I agree that it was an illogical conclusion anyway, as is anything else drawn from anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:55 PM
1

When I was doing my prerequisites for nursing school, I noticed how few males there were enrolled in any classes. OH well fewer males were in nursing classes, so clearly males in general don't prioritize education. Prerequisites for nursing school are not nursing school classes. General Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Anatomy & Physiology, and Microbiology are all prerequisites, for example. Edited for quote formatting.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:26 PM
8

Let's say only men were legally able to receive the death penalty. If you don't agree with the death penalty, you aren't going to fight to expand it. You'll want to get rid of it entirely. That being said, women are exempted from the draft because the military doesn't allow them to be in combat troops (what the draft is/was for), and there IS outrage at that.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:16 PM
3

They don't. That standard is set by the military.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:43 PM
3

I'm sorry, but it must be really difficult having to be less fit and held to a de facto lower disciplinary standard all while getting the same pay. Right. How dare they even try to serve their country.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:06 PM
1

Show me a beer marketed at men that says "for the times when your nagging wife just won't shut up..." Is commercial subtext admissible? If so... all of them. Edit: I find this kind of marketing annoying, regardless of which gender it disparages.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:11 PM
8

The closest thing to a threat would be that I said I wished she would kill herself... You expressed a desire for her to be dead in a heated argument, which could easily be interpreted as a threat. You'd think that would be considered a show of restraint when you find out for the first time that your wife is lying and cheating. No, I wouldn't. Your description of what she does when she's angry is horrible, and while your actions pale in comparison, it doesn't make them justifiable. Being better t…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:23 PM
4

Girls technically do mature faster than boys, since they go through puberty first.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:59 PM
2

I am a white person, and I would laugh my ass off if someone called me a cracker. I just can't see a guy being offended at being called a manwhore. That being said, I'm sure it does happen.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:39 AM
3

That seems kind of like the equivalent of calling a white person a cracker.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter