TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

diaryofadeadman00 Archive

View 0 posts and 189 comments by diaryofadeadman00 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

> but I am also talking here about things like reliable healthcare making women feel more optimistic about her odds of remaining in good health into middle age and therefore being able to delay any desired childbearing. A system which encourages women to delay childbirth produces more children? Please show your working. > Because women are taught they have agency to decide if and how many children they want to have, and that there are life paths available for women aside from 'wife and mother.' …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:45 AM
-8

Having children correlates, profoundly, with having less money. And having fewer children correlates, profoundly, with having more money. > Things like having less and/or worse education, Depends what the "education" is. If it's being sent to Feminist indoctrination factories, aka modern, western universities-- yes, this will decrease fertility rates. > less access to reliable healthcare You mean to abortion. It doesn't make sense if you don't mean that. Surely, having access to better healthcar…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 11:51 PM
-6

> The fucked up society makes me not wanna get together with anyone. Yes, that's the problem. Women have this luxury, because everything they want and need from men is handed to them on a silver platter. Name something you want from men you can't easily access. It's not about being better or worse, likely, in the way that you mean. It's about it being functional. Both men and women need incentives to get together, and stay together. Poorer people have more kids, always have, so this "the economy…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:37 PM
2

> Men demand she cook, submit, adore, Be natural — but flawless — and never ask for more Yeah, that's why men swipe right on at least 50% of all women and will fuck a microwaved oven mitt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:32 PM
-2

> most men are broke and sexist with low social status so...doest count...until all men aquire that or at least most that are..until then the standards are low Who or what caused this? > Most men raped women years ago,most men beat women No they didn't. You're failing to communicate in general. Try some sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:28 PM
-9

Because it's destructive for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:23 PM
-2

Social media is female porn. > I am absolutely aware that women are quite capable living long, fulfilling lives without a man. Neither men nor women NEED to have a partner. Nope. They both need each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:23 PM
2

Again, thanks for proving my thesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:20 PM
0

No, The girl who's tale I'm responding to is like that. She literally said words to that effect lol. That she shows her love to her brother by holding him accountable for his bad actions and she shows love to a female stranger by showing empathy lol. Why is that relevant? I've said I have a sister and I would defend her if she murdered someone. And she would defend me. The same goes for my parents. I certainly wouldn't side with a stranger who wouldn't spit on me if I were on fire, and I only kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:55 PM
0

You can do that privately. Being a good sibling means supporting them and not strangers above them. As I said, this version of "love" generally only applies to men. Men get accountability, women get empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:21 PM
1

> Lol were you asleep when the Menendez brothers documentary was released in 2024? It gained so much traction that even the DA recommended resentencing them for their immediate release. I don't know that case. But anecdotes are only useful if they're representative of reality and data. Like mine are. Have you seen the studies into gender sentencing disparities? > Oh what about Luigi?! Everyone loves him too. He's a man I'm pretty sure.. Lol, women love him because they fancy him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 10:04 PM
1

> Why would the woman have to be accountable for the man's cheating behavior. I didn't say that. But because she picked him. She said that she shows love and support to her brother by holding him accountable and shows love and support to a stranger she doesn't know by showing her empathy. It's not complicated. What either person has done is irrelevant. A normal person supports their family, not a stranger. You have no idea if he was, in fact, a cheater. Nor do you know if she was also a cheater,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 10:00 PM
0

Who cares if it's wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:55 PM
2

That's a myth. It was more equal when men had the same autonomy over their value (their labour, resources, protection) that women have over theirs (sex and reproduction). Why would a woman be entitled to a man's money? Either both men and women are entitled to what they need and want from one another, or neither are. That's equality and fairness. Drunk, unstable men provide things women need, which enables them to get sex, intimacy and children. That is how it would be in a fair and equal societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:54 PM
2

> And you concluded that from what? Observing reality. As I said below, pretty much every Father will lay down their lives for their daughters, without a second thought, and in every conceivable circumstance. Mothers, less so. I suggest looking at the survival rates of the Titanic for another example. Women survived at much, much higher rates than children. Barely any men survived (of course). Are you suggesting that a Mother is stepping in front of her adult son to protect him from a physical t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:37 PM
1

Fathers would lay down their lives, without a second thought, for their daughters. They'd go to prison for their daughters. Mothers, less so. Self-sacrifice in a man's DNA. Self-preservation is in a woman's. Just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:29 PM
1

They're representatives, elected (mostly) by women. What difference does it make? Men have out-group preference and work in furtherance of what women want, generally. So why would women need to hold those positions? The primary reason is because women are also Mothers and do much more of the childcare and family stuff. So they don't have the time to devote themselves to such roles as well. And women don't want to hand their children over to men. They want that power as well. > Hmm... How could a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:28 PM
1

It's more needs must. Men are just more desperate, because society is gynocentric. Men need sex, intimacy and children. And the only way they can get it is directly from women. Whereas women can get what they need from men indirectly and easily. Just as women, in the past, when things were more equal, would be much more inclined to shack up with a drunk, unstable man. Because she needed somewhere to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:13 PM
1

Would you report your sibling to the police if you found out they'd been drink driving? I'm curious where the line is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 05:51 PM
1

You didn't acknowledge a single point I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:15 PM
-1

Men build and maintain absolutely everything. Including the site you're on, the phone you're using and the electricity you're using. What are you talking about? Men are beyond useful, women rely on men for absolutely everything. But men have no autonomy over these things, unlike women have autonomy over their sex and reproduction. That's how society is gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:13 PM
2

They do lol. Women have the majority of political power (they're about 55% of the electorate), millions of men are disenfranchised (in the US). Men are sent to war to die for them, while they stay at home. 90% of the homeless are men. When a couple divorce, the woman takes the home and the children, and the man has to pay her for years subsequent. Men earn most of the money, women spend most of the money. Women control the vast majority of consumer spending. Men are slaves for women, who dominat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:11 PM
2

I am someone with mental health and addiction issues. Why do you think that would be a red line for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:07 PM
1

That's an exaggerated trope. But of course parents support their own children. Including Mothers and sons. Although Fathers support their daughters much more, I'd say. You can also go to all the relationship type subs and see the spectacular in-group bias of women on display. Whatever happened, it's always, always, always the man's fault. Lucy Letby's (mass baby killer) female mates all claim she's innocent. Lucy Letby friend Dawn Howe - 'I will never believe she is guilty' (BBC Interview) And s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:06 PM
0

I'm very unempathetic to women playing the victim. If she's crying, she's lying. I'd support my sister killing someone, and she'd support me. So too my parents. Like I said, you demonstrate extreme female in-group preference, even at the expense of your own blood. I'll also note how you didn't correct my assumption that your brother would die for you. While you won't even support him in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 03:58 PM
0

Clearly, because a woman says so? Do you know the maxim, "there are three sides to every story"? This is why you don't interfere in other peoples' relationships. Because you never know all the details and all the perspectives. She could be cheating on him as well, she could be lying, she could be abusive, she could be a million things. You don't have the whole story (and never will). But even that aside, it's irrelevant who is in the wrong. You support your brother/sister, that's the whole purpo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 03:56 PM
1

You were discussing the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 03:52 PM
0

> The ex-girlfriend has confided to me, she was at her wits end, many things were working against her and she just lost her mom. I chose to look after her because I genuinely think it was the right thing to do. Lmao. So she played the victim, I'm shocked. > I look after my brother by not coddling him when he does wrong and offering guidance when he makes bad decisions. Woman gets empathy, man gets accountability. I'm shocked again. It's amusing you actually think you're furthering your case when…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:34 PM
6

Women will side with any women over any men. You only need to look at comment sections on crime documentaries about the most heinous women, who have committed the most heinous crimes. They will also side with women over children (particularly boys). Take, for example, the JonBenet Ramsey murder-- a huge % of women blame it on a 9 year old boy, and not the clearly sociopathic Mother, whose handwriting matched perfectly the clearly false "ransom" note and who all the evidence points squarely at.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:29 PM
0

You're just further proving my point. Women will side with women they don't know over their own brothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:02 PM
-1

Those aren't women's standards. It has nothing to with standards, it has everything to do with power and a gynocentric society which strips men of their value and power and hands it to women for nothing, resulting in women being able to exploit their inherent sexual power, while men cannot exploit their inherent physical power.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:01 PM
1

Rationalise it however you like. You side with random women you don't know (and have no idea if they're "loving" or what they are like, because they're not your family) over your own blood, over someone you're supposed to inherently care for and prioritise.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:57 PM
3

No, because men have no power.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:56 PM
-4

Nice to see you're loyal to random women over your own brother. But there's no in-group preference among women they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:12 PM
0

Biology isn't "red pill". Almost no man wants to be single. He want sex and intimacy all the time, he masturbates regularly. It's not a choice, he simply can't get a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:10 PM
2

No, in other words, women have all the power.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:08 PM
1

Yes. If she was young and not fat. And most men would.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:07 PM
8

> Obviously he is doing shit in the relationship realm because what about the above qualities would make a good partner or even hookup? > great looking guy, height That is all that's desired for a hookup.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:06 PM
2

My comment explained to you how biases work and how people categorise groups of people. And how what you're whining about is beyond trivial, particularly as, as we've established, men have a strong out-group preference, while women have a strong in-group preference-- which means you benefit, overall, hugely. While men suffer, hugely. > And no, I don’t want these men to “protect me” or “do the heavy lifting” AT ALL Yes, you do. If and when there was need for either, you would expect them to do it…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 11:33 PM
1

> If you honestly think that sexual harassment should be acceptable in a professional setting, you are a seriously sick person. Is it especially difficult for you to treat women with respect? Yes, thanks for giving an illustration of how women abuse and manipulate men-- with fictional and hysterical victimhood. If she's crying, she's lying. > Would you feel comfortable and safe sending your wife and daughter to a workplace without such policies? I don't have a wife or a daughter. But I wouldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 11:28 PM
0

> The fact that IT is a male-dominated field invented by men does not mean that women cannot be experts If I or anyone had said that, it would be relevant. > I don’t need or want them to risk their lives to protect me Yes you do. You also want them to do any heavy lifting. I imagine there's "diversity" policies at your workplace as well, which openly discriminate against men. If you're someone's boss and you're triggered by the way they talk to you, you can't be a very effective boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 09:04 PM
1

Yes. Men don't want such policies in their workplaces. They aren't preventing "all employees from engaging in sexual harassment". They're enabling women to control men, to persecute men, to repress men, to sue men, to get men fired, to get men arrested-- typically for very trivial things or things they've completely fabricated.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 09:00 PM
1

Not to mention "diversity" policies/quotas, repressive, anti-male workplace "harassment" rules, outlawing men flirting/pursuing women, making jokes, doing anything that offends women. All out-group preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 09:08 AM
1

You mean in a male-dominated field, which men created, men tend to think they know more? Do you think womansplaining is a thing for men when dealing with their kids, the home, in teaching, and female-dominated areas? Those men "mansplaining" to you would risk their lives to protect you, if needed. Women womansplaining wouldn't. That's out-group preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 09:06 AM
2

No, I didn't like your answer because it was wrong. For the reason I explained. Lol. Of course they do. Men are much harsher on men than they are women, in the vast majority of situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:02 PM
-1

>"Does that prove Mothers have an out-group bias against children?" - ironically they actually do and a lot of times mothers treat their children as less competent than they actually are. the infantilization is real. But that's really another topic. You're still not acknowledging the point and analysing the entire pie. You're honing in, as feminists do, on a tiny portion of the pie to push your victim narrative. Even if we accepted men view women as less competent, they also view them as more va…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 03:41 PM
1

Men do have more experience in the areas they're accused of "mansplaining" in. Just like women womensplain in domestic areas, areas with children etc. You didn't answer my question. Does that prove Mothers have an out-group bias against children? > "You mean holding people accountable." - i mean holding victims "accountable" for things that they didn't do, yes. Victims are accountable for putting themselves in positions to be victims. Again, you're avoiding the point. Your thesis is that men hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:57 PM
4

> Take mansplaining as an example. It’s a widely recognized and discussed phenomenon. No, it isn't. It's Feminist propaganda and misandry. But lets say it's true. Is Mumsplaining a thing? Does Mothers talking over and dominating their children mean they have an out-group preference for children? > Then another phenomenon, that is also talked widely about, and known. Victim blaming. You mean holding people accountable. They do this much more so with men, so your argument is invalid. A man who is …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:54 PM
9

Stop chad chasing and you'll find a guy easily. The idea that a young woman can't very easily find a man to settle down with is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:40 PM
–

By this rationale, your employer saying they will fire you if you don't do your work is blackmail. Someone saying you have to do x for them to do y is not blackmail, it's trade. Blackmail is when someone says they will do x if you don't do y, and that x is something harmful to you. Not giving you a job doesn't qualify. > Good to know Epstein’s victims werent vulnerable and Diddy’s ex-girlfriend, Cassie, wasnt vulnerable while he beat the shit out of her and made her do things to still be under B…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:56 PM
–

> Part of the reason the MeToo movement became a thing is because there were menusing job opportunities as blackmail for sex. Which they should be perfectly allowed to. Why should bartering sex be illegal or socially taboo? What's so special about sex? "If you want this job, suck my dick" is no different to "if you want this job, make me a cup of tea". > Predators/abusers love taking advantage of vulnerable people, so to imply that abusive men are allowed to act a certain way is victim blaming. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:16 PM
2

> She had no idea and Myron’s argument is that men are required to register for the draft and carry responsibilities that women don’t, yet both get the same level of political authority. He says that imbalance is the core issue. It's about the draft. JFL @ the narcissism of Yanks. > BRO WHAT??? Are you completely uninformed about geopolitics? The US is funding Ukraine and supplying them with military equipment. The US is the world's military superpower (by far). Without the US enabling them, Ukr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:00 PM
1

> The comparison was specifically between combat deaths and maternal deaths. Women also died from many other causes including work fatalities in the 1900s. At 1% death rate and the average woman giving birth 8 - 10 times in her lifetime the odds of dying from pregnancy related complications was around 10% for women in the early 1900s. Lol. Women have always been an extreme minority of workplace deaths. And women didn't give birth 8-10 times lol. Also, your estimates are very much on the very hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 03:20 PM
0

Women are just as responsible as men are for the Hitlers and the Stalins. Once again, you expose how utterly allergic to the concept of accountability women are. One the one hand, you claim women are equal and demand equality, then you say it's men's duty to prevent authoritarian mad men from stealing and asserting power. No, it's women's responsibility. The fact you imply that women need to be given some kind of authority, by men, to assert their will and influence, just proves that women are w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:22 PM
1

No, they didn't kill of the indigenous population (who were living like primitive savages)-- that's why the indigenous population is higher today than it was when white Europeans settled in North America. The whole world used slave labour, including the aforementioned indigenous population. They took white slaves. What is the relevance? What do laws have to do with anything? Laws are only relevant if you have the might to enforce them. You're just proving that women are inferior and need men's b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 01:54 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 01:50 PM
2

No, it's about the draft in general, and men being obligated to submit to it, which is a practice that occurs the world over. This is not a Yank-specific sub. > Irrelevant No, it's very relevant. Especially if you insist on making this specifically about Yankland. The US is enabling a male-only Draft in Ukraine, while women in Ukraine can vote and be in government, and the US is taking female Ukrainian refugees who are not subject to the draft. It's amusing how Feminists think they can eliminate…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 01:49 PM
2

No, not really. Not relevant to frontline roles. Do you think making the tea while your wife goes through labour is a risk to his life?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:34 PM
1

How am I a hypocrite? White men built the western world, from the ground up. They have earned everything and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:27 PM
1

As I said, there are none.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:25 PM
1

They're not "men's wars". Because women have the RIGHT TO VOTE AND SERVE IN GOVERNMENT. Which means women are equally responsible for EVERY act any government undertakes. You can't have "rights" without commensurate responsibilities. Ukrainian women have the right to vote and their government is over 20% female. So, women are drafting men and sending them to die, to protect them and their country. > Raping your spouse was not illegal until the mid 90s and in many cases such laws aren’t enforced.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:25 PM
1

> The rate of maternal mortality went from being around 1% in the early 1900 to a tenth of that now. So what is the number? You can't even produce it. 1% is around 23,000 deaths, and that is the apex, in 1900. How many men died doing jobs in 1900? I'll answer, it's between 25,000 and 80,000. ie significantly more. As I said previously, that is the equivalence you're looking for. War is incomparable to either. The psychological trauma of war is beyond almost any other human experience. > Maybe tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:18 PM
1

My country is not "another country". I know this is hard for Americans to grasp, but other countries exist. > The US draft. Being the subject here. That's not the subject here. The draft is. It's amusing how narcissistic Americans are. > Many sources agree, especially in the Vietnam war, minorities were disproportionately affected. Suffered higher death rates and are of low income. You've managed to highlight the reason in your last few words. It had nothing to do with their race and everything …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:10 AM
2

Those aren't relevant. We're talking about roles which entail risk, and risk to life, and severe psychological trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:59 AM
2

No, this thread is about the draft. And the US is the one sponsoring what is happening in Ukraine. Without the US, Ukraine would have fallen years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:57 AM
1

>But only women get pregnant and can die from it. That was women's problem. Your body, your responsibility. Men are not responsible for biology. > You argued that women chose to get pregnant I argued that some women were raped and forced into pregnancy and your response is men were raped also? Rape was illegal. The function of marriage was to have children. If you got married, you were consenting to have children. That is how it worked. Which was perfectly rational. > the conversation is about f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:48 AM
1

> Why are you comparing the war to just one year of maternal deaths? I'm not. Extrapolate it out. 3600 was the maternal mortality rate, in the UK, from around 1900-1930. It then decreased (dramatically), over the subsequent 70 years. > In the 20th century from 1900 to 2000 more women died bearing children than men died in combat. That is what I said and that is a fact. No, it isn't. Not remotely. I've just given you the stats. 3600 x 100 = 360,000. And that's massively above the actual number, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:45 AM
1

Ah, the inevitable diversion to the micro and anecdotal. Why do women always do this? lol. It's irrelevant what my personal experiences are. I'm not even a Yank, so I wouldn't be serving in either of those wars. This is a discussion of gender equality, not individual person equality. War and the draft doesn't occur consistently over time. You can't measure it in such a way. You don't even need to make this solely about the draft. Military service in general is male-dominated. Men sacrifice their…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:29 AM
2

There are no contradictions in anything I've said. Your only argument is appealing to some "ism", which I don't give a fuck about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:20 AM
1

Yes, I want them to enjoy the privilege of serving, and dying for, their countries, in the same numbers men have. I'm a Feminist and want equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:18 AM
2

We went into Afghanistan and Iraq because the US called us lol. Because they wanted legitimacy, by including their allies. If you were invaded, you'd have no choice but to enact conscription. The US is the world's military superpower. It wouldn't let anyone invade or bomb their, geographically, closest ally. They won't even let anyone invade Eastern Europe. They protect you. Women don't protect you. They're terrible at protective jobs. They can't even carry their equipment. The last thing you'd …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:44 PM
-2

No, I don't, I want opposing armies to kill them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:38 PM
1

> you want women to be killed, like you said on your other comment Yes, because I'm a Feminist and believe in equality. Like I said, I want to close the historic war death gender gap. Men have been forced to fight and die in wars for millennia, it's women's turn. Just like Feminists have fought and argued that it's women's turn to be CEOs, Presidents, Doctors and to fill all the desirable roles in society. > I'm saving your comments for future use btw, when guys here say there's no misogyny Equa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:37 PM
1

> The shit you just spouted would be right at home in a toilet. Well, it's on Reddit. You linked me an article which looks like it was written by a 12 year old for a school project. > "Yet US Army historian Conrad Crane has re-examined the statistics on Vietnam service to make an impressive case for qualifying this view. He cites a 1992 study which showed that while 30 per cent of all those killed in action came from the lowest third of the income range, 26 per cent were drawn from the highest. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:35 PM
1

Great anecdote you've got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:19 PM
2

Of course women lack mental fortitude. Whenever violence occurs, women run from danger, men run towards it. Did you see the female agent tasked with protecting Trump during his attempted assassination? She ducked down to hide behind him, while the men jumped in front of him and covered him. You can't fight your nature. Physical and mental fortitude go hand in hand. The Russia/Ukraine war and the Israel/Gaza war certainly look like they require physical fortitude and manpower. All that's happened…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:17 PM
2

Women not being "suited" for the draft has nothing to do with whether I personally want them drafted.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:27 PM
1

I didn't say I didn't want them to. I think exclusively women should be conscripted, and exclusively women should serve in the military, until the historical war death gender gap is closed. The problem is that women shouldn't be given equal rights if they're not assuming equal responsibilities. It's not complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:26 PM
2

Canada has Conscription during both world wars. The fact it doesn't currently have it is academic. If it needed it, it would enact it. And it would be men (as it was during WW1 & 2) who would be conscripted. Canada also relies on the US to protect it. The world is not a peaceful place, and you need men to protect you and die for you, however you want to frame it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:24 PM
0

> The country that legalizes beating women? No, the country in which women outlive men by 10 years and Women's Day is an actually celebrated holiday. And only men have to do mandatory military service for 2 years. > You mean the men killed by other men? No, I mean men killed by both men and women. Which doesn't include the systemic ways in which women kill men. Such as, for example, the Ukrainian women in their government kidnapping and sending millions of men to the front lines to be obliterate…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:21 PM
0

> ? Where Currently, in Ukraine and Russia. > Or murdered by men? ~83,000 apparently. A third of the number who are struck by lightning per year, globally. And about a fifth of the number of men who are killed each year. Women kill probably at least 10 million babies each year, by the by. Late-term "abortions". At least 10,000 per year just in the US. The UK is much more emblematic of the typical experience. Yankland isn't, Yankland is a country which has never been invaded and practically never…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:28 PM
3

In the way that they're 20 times weaker than men, and mentally much weaker as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:15 PM
0

I'm not upset, I'm more than accustomed to feminist hypocrisy. Millions of men are drafted every year, and they experience something exponentially worse than someone grabbing their arse. And they have no legal recourse, because it is the law. In the UK, women got the vote after WW1. They claimed they wanted equality. Then, when WW2 happened, they sat idly and safely at home while millions of men were conscripted and sent into living Hell, to die for their freedoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:25 AM
3

So what happens when your country is invaded?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:11 AM
0

Speak up about it as much as they do rape and mean words online? Yknow, because Feminism means equality, doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:11 AM
3

Myron GAYness
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:10 AM
2

Explain how more non-whites are subject to conscription than whites are. Prisoners are generally not drafted, so that's significantly more black and non-whites than white avoiding it, for a start. And the wealthy are subject to the draft and used to very much go to war, and be at least as active as the poor. At least in WW1 and 2. Famously, those with senior ranks had higher mortality rates than regular soldiers, partially because they were targeted more. Kings used to lead their armies onto the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:08 AM
4

18-25 men are also the group most commonly disenfranchised, as felons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:05 AM
-1

Perhaps because both of those "solutions" are delusional solutions. Women make terrible soldiers and you need a draft, because war will happen at some point. Especially outside of Yankland. I like how you say "50 years" as if it's a lifetime or something. In terms of war, that's nothing. And it's dramatically understating how horrific being sent into war is-- it's beyond basically any human experience, in terms of trauma and potential harm and suffering. Certainly beyond anything women ever have…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:04 AM
1

If you live in a fantasy world where war doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:01 AM
2

The draft is currently happening in Ukraine and Russia. For men only. While women both sit in government and get to leave the country to be safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:01 AM
0

"pretty much" doing a lot of the work there. They were never forced. Rape was legal both ways, and it was perfectly logical for it to be so. Just as theft in marriage was legal. Women were never forced to bear children, or marry. What you seem to be alluding to is that men had more autonomy over their value, such that women had to actually provide things in exchange for what they needed from men. Unlike today. There was actual equity between men and women. More than 80% of men do physically labo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:59 AM
0

I don't know where you're getting your stats, but they're wildly wrong, certainly for the UK and Europe. In the UK, around 1.25 million military deaths occurred in WW1 and 2 combined. The peak maternal mortality rate was around 3600 per year. Between 80 and 100 million people were killed during WW1 and 2. 4-5% of the global population were slaughtered during those 2 world wars. Deaths during child birth are nothing comparable to that. Not to mention that the trauma of fighting in a war is incomp…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:56 AM
–

You mean retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:51 AM
1

Much more so with the age of the woman, hence younger is better. There are almost no advantages to an older Mother, there are infinite advantages to an older Father. He doesn't have to deal with sleep deprivation if she's a stay at home Mum. That's her job.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:14 AM
1

It's undiagnosed if it's mild. Do you know what % of incels are Autistic? And transgender?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:11 AM
1

This is only true because of the factors I mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:08 AM
1

What's disgusting is willfully creating a person with a hideous, life-destroying condition because it suits your narcissistic life and need to have a child at a certain time. All your rationalisation is anecdotal. The actual rate You don't have any significant form of Autism. If you did, you wouldn't be getting tested for it at your age. I have a nephew with quite profound Autism. He was diagnosed at age 2-3. And he will almost certainly never be able to live independently. So, as you're a narci…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:18 PM
1

Jesus fucking Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:50 PM
1

That's not true. 16 year old girls are impressed if a 17 year old can drive and has a part time job, or if a 20 year old has his own place. You're talking about the current paradigm, which I've just said is a false paradigm. It's built on men's value being stolen and handed to women. That's why women aren't impressed with men's value. Plus there's the feminist culture of demonising age gap relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:35 PM
1

So, girls being sluts should not be discouraged in any way, because you're offended by a word and girls being held accountable for their actions. And all the negative consequences of girls being sluts should be accepted. Single Mothers, paternity fraud, philandering, STDs etc. I'm talking about negative behaviour being demonised.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:44 PM
2

Only because men are treated as resources and they have easy access to everything they want from men. In a fair and free society, where men's money/labour/resources isn't stolen from them and handed to women, an older man is a great deal for a woman. Because he has money/resources, status, experience, can provide and protect much better than a younger man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:50 PM
1

The hilarity of your first two statements. See if you can spot why they're hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:48 PM
0

> It’s creepy because the average 35 year old has more money, resources, life experiences, and connections than the average 18 year old Lol. That's the whole fucking point. You just described everything beneficial in a father. It's not remotely weird. The current feminist paradigm is weird. This is biologically optimal. There is no "manipulation", an adult woman can make her own decisions. Good Lord. If he's objectifying her for her youth and fertility, she's objectifying him for his money, whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:46 PM
1

And the likelihood of them having Autism, Down's Syndrome and a thousand other genetic defects increases exponentially with every passing year.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:43 PM
1

Definitely not. Most 35 year old women aren't childless, just for a start. And half can't even have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:42 PM
1

It's very difficult for a man to be too old to be a Father.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:39 PM
1

Short-term pleasure for long-term harm. Someone who can't delay gratification. Someone of bad character.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:58 AM
1

You're not "ran through", a man cannot be ran through.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:55 AM
1

How do you enforce the positive behaviour without demonising the negative behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:53 AM
2

No, the male equivalent is creep/predator/paedo/nonce/pervert.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:50 AM
1

Agreed. They should be arrested if they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:37 AM
1

No, it's exclusively women. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. Men are not responsible for women's bodily choices or reproduction. > Only exception is if a man is lied to, and that would count as sexual assault anyways Lying about being on contraception is not sexual assault. Deciding to keep a baby you know the man doesn't want isn't sexual assault. Changing your mind about keeping a baby is not sexual assault. Again, a man doesn't decide when a child is produced, women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 11:03 AM
0

No, that's not a fact at all. Do you think children are subservient to their Mothers? If rape was legal in marriage, it was legal both ways. So that isn't female oppression. Women rape men. And prosecuting rape during marriage is the same as prosecuting theft during marriage. You've entered into a contract to provide each to one another, the idea that you can steal either, generally, is quite absurd. The context you fail to apply to history is also absurd-- my Dad was caned at school, violence a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 10:55 AM
0

That's entirely the woman's responsibility. Men don't choose when pregnancy occurs and when a baby is produced, women do. Her body, her choice, her responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:14 PM
1

Fertility rates have an inverse correlation with income. Poor people have more babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:13 PM
1

Deaths are just the thin end of the wedge. Men bear constant workplace injuries and bodily sacrifice. It wipes years off their lives. What do you think 30 years of hard physical labour do to a body?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 10:24 AM
1

Are they expensive in African countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 10:21 AM
1

No, many women did as well. Have you heard of Queens?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 10:19 AM
2

Nope. The world revolved around productivity and utility. Procreation is an essential part of both biology and civilised society, so obviously sex was a big part of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 10:18 AM
2

This is nonsense. Many women dominated their men. And the wife had a much easier life at home than the man did slaving in the fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 10:16 AM
2

That's the woman's responsibility. Men don't choose when a child is produced, women do. Her body, her choice, her responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 09:58 AM
1

Medical intervention being popping a pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 09:57 AM
-1

Of course both matter. But the woman matters far more. She's the one who carries, incubates and births the baby. Most men can have a baby at almost any age. Most women struggle to have a baby after 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 09:56 AM
1

"Creeps" are rarely incels or virgins. Being a "creep" generally means you're behaving sexually aggressively towards women. Which means you're not shy and assertive, and will have some sexual success. Unless you're Autistic (which a lot of incels are).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 11:10 AM
4

Yes, there's a disturbing overlap between Autism and "trans". Because Autistic people are easier to indoctrinate and are obsessed with categorising things (including themselves). Which is tragic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 11:07 AM
1

They're mean privately. Not publicly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 11:03 AM
2

Lol, ridiculous circular logic and gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 04:44 AM
6

> He hates women with high body counts because it highlights the way he sees himself as low value. Not the way he sees himself, the way women, including the woman he's with, do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 04:43 AM
0

Two comments prior, someone said men cheat more than women. > which is completely pulled out of your ass. No, it's a simple fact. It's much easier for women to cheat and they devote much more time to talking to members of the opposite sex, and maintaining relationships with them. Monkey branching wouldn't be much more a female than a male thing if they didn't cheat more. > With that logic, so do MEN. They talk to other women every single day, neighbors, coworkers, friends, side chiks, you name i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:07 PM
6

Well, the problem is that the type of woman who will make it obvious, will make it obvious to lots of men. An extroverted woman will be flirty with lots of men and like men, get bored with them, and move onto other men quickly. Making her actions towards you largely meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 06:41 AM
-1

How is it "switching arrows"? If a woman is talking to other men during the relationship, she's cheating. Therefore, women cheat more. >If a woman got cheated on by her husband and filed for divorce, who broke up the family? The woman. Cheating is a part of marriage. It's "until death do us part", not "until cheating do us part". Cheating is not reason to break up a family and make your children Fatherless. You made a commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 06:14 AM
-6

The person who filed for divorce broke up the family. Women cheat more than men. Women usually have a guy pre-prepared when they end a relationship, men do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 05:26 AM
5

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 05:19 AM
2

> Stats are clear, facts don't care about your feelings. Which stats are these? > Promiscous women are more likely to have mental health problems, are more likely to have been sexually abused as children, are more likely to have personality disorders, substance abuse issues, etc. Oh Jesus fucking Christ. Can women not be infantilised victims for 5 seconds? >Saying that promiscuity is bad for men and women makes me a deranged man hating feminist even though I think promiscuity is bad for women as…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 06:26 PM
8

Nah, they think they're liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 05:43 PM
1

> Yes it does, increases likelihood of cheating, divorce, decreases marital satisfaction, etc. Deeply questionable. Men who can't get sex don't get married, lol. > random damaged women That's a criteria you applied. > Why are you pushing back so hard against this? WHY WOULD I LIE? Probably because you're deranged, man-hating feminist. > SLUTTY women will choose the experienced man, chaste women won't. Promiscuity isn't attractive. Nope. All women will choose an experienced man over a virgin. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:44 PM
0

You do realise the 35 year old will age, right? The 20 year old is a much better investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:37 PM
1

Men and women are not the same. I don't know how many times this obvious fact needs repeating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:34 PM
1

Lol. Having sex with women doesn't destroy a man's brain, not having sex with women does. It fulfils their basic biological needs and boots their confidence. > No we don't, you don't get to speak on our behalf. I do. Because I'm right. You don't. Because you're wrong. All else being equal, women will choose a sexually experienced guy over a virgin guy almost every time. > SLUTTY women are impressed by slutty men. Women who value chastity in themselves also value it in men. Nope. All women are. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:21 PM
1

>Getting trashy women with childhood trauma and daddy issues to have casual meaningless sex with you is a compliment? Yes, it is. To which the male sexlessness rate is a testament to. >You're just proving my point, only other men find it impressive, so have fun impressing other men. Nope, women do. What women find repulsive is virgin and inexperienced men, and men who can't get women to have sex with them. If women were repulsed by men who had lots of sex, those men probably wouldn't be having l…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:06 PM
2

There are, positive consequences lol. Men consider it a compliment-- that they can get lots of women to have sex with them. For it to mean anything, men would have to call other men sluts, and mean it, and those men being called sluts would have to care. That's how it works with women (or did, up until recently).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:29 PM
2

You can call a man a slut as many times as you want, it doesn't make him a slut, or make the slur resonate in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:05 PM
1

No, they can't. Just like a woman can't be a creep. Men and women are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:37 PM
1

A man can't be a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:27 PM
2

Men and women are not the same. Women are attracted to men who can get women to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:26 PM
1

This is mental. Most men today use Tinder, at least once. They swipe a thousand times and get a handful of disinterested matches. They know how "attractive" they are. That's why they have given up and don't bother approaching women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:37 PM
–

"in their leagues" = who earn more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 09:13 PM
–

These mostly sound like egalitarian laws, not anti-women laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 09:12 PM
0

It is true, that's why they're conflicted on policies like this. If it weren't true, they would be firmly against these kinds of policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 03:39 PM
6

>Tim Walz, bud. That did not meet me requirements. Which were the requirements of a diversity hire, and explicit discrimination. >You literally didn't, but it is so telling that you think nominating a black woman is the same as hating men. Are you being intentionally obtuse, or are you just this low IQ? Nominating a black woman *explicitly because she's a black woman* is hating men-- by discriminating against them and barring them from being considered for the position. >Then why has unemploymen…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:50 PM
-1

There's no such thing as a "gender-neutral" society-- because men and women are not the same. Men simply don't want to be women the same way women have been convinced they should want to be men. There's no symmetry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:43 PM
6

>And yet when Harris chose a white man for the same exact reason, there was no outrage lol Show me when and where that happened. Show me where Kamala Harris came out and explicitly said her VP would be a white male (prior to selecting them). >Nah, that's a lie. I've just proven it lol. Here's another. I'm not reading a whole fucking manifesto. Which of her policies are explicitly to benefit men. Her message to men seemed to be the typical Feminist one-- that their role is to serve women and femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:39 PM
5

Harris was literally chosen for her job because she was a woman lol. The Democrats openly engage in, and espouse, anti-male discrimination, both in their own party and across society. What were her policies which would benefit men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:28 PM
2

Russia has mandatory military service for just males.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:05 PM
-1

This is a complex issue. Because most "MRAs" are happy with men fulfilling biologically male roles, but they also want women to fulfil biologically female roles. That's more the "equality" that they want. They don't really want the type of "equality" feminists pretend they want. But the reality is that men have nobody speaking up for them or pushing their interests. Both the left and the right, and all sub-groups, are happy with discriminating against men and want to favour women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:05 PM
1

Yeah, I cba refuting your ridiculous Neoliberal propaganda. "GDP and growth" lol. Not wages. Not house prices. Not healthcare costs. Not any economic measure individuals actually care about and feel-- just economic measures which benefit the rich. Increased GDP doesn't help people when a larger % of it goes in the pockets of the rich, making them, relatively, poorer. Increasing consumer demand, again, does not help people. It harms them. It drives up prices. It only helps the rich. Raising produ…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:48 PM
3

Just go abroad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:59 PM
1

Not only do women think that, men's actual preferences are demonised and pathologised. It's taboo for a man to say he wants a woman who can cook and clean, or who has nice C cup titties.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 01:48 PM
1

Congratulations, you've uncovered the problem with current society.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 01:11 PM
1

>This is completely untrue. "Feminism" did not take money out of mens pockets with women entering the workforce. In fact, their participation in the workforce actually bolstered the economy. Wage stagnation, dating back to the 1970s, is to be blamed on economic and political shifts. lol. Doubling the labour supply didn't reduce wages? That contradicts basic economics. You mean women having men's money. That isn't equality, that's theft. Men are, innately, far more valuable than women, in terms o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 12:38 PM
-1

And women would be begging men to live in their shacks and share their scraps, so they'd at least be able to get sex and a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 12:35 AM
3

It's not capitalism, it's feminism. If there was more free market capitalism, men would make more money and women would make less money. Men's money is stolen and handed to women-- that's the opposite of capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 05:55 PM
0

They don't, they have to remove all the theft from men and male value which is taken and handed to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:16 PM
3

>The vast majority of men and women are in couples. Not Gen Z. Not the last 10 years. Male sexlessness and singleness has at least doubled. So, these stats you've plucked from the ether, will be changing dramatically if things continue this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:18 AM
0

Victimhood is great for women but despicable for men. Just another double standard. Women refusing to be "baby incubators" and "bang-maids" is empowerment, but men refusing to be slaves to women and society is.. shameful. And the Feminist justifies this with, shock of all shocks, more female victimhood. We don't want your empathy. We want material changes to society to make it fairer for men. There's no such thing as "women's rights" if men and women are equal, by definition. There is such a thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:17 AM
2

How are they hurting themselves by not being slaves and instead spending their lives relaxing and playing video games?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:12 AM
3

lolz
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:10 AM
1

Women are innately dependent on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:09 AM
3

Point and laugh while living on the streets, hopefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:09 AM
–

You can buy a cheap house in a small town in the US and live just fine. You can't in the UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:53 PM
–

Not only the sexual power, but also the reproductive power.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:51 PM
–

Men pay the vast majority taxes. Women, as a group, do not pay any taxes, they absorb taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:51 PM
–

Yeah, men being enslaved to provide anything and everything for women, while women are obligated to provide nothing for men is "oppression". Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:49 PM
–

Women never fought for any rights, men did, on battlefields.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:48 PM
–

>. It is also true that way more prison funds are spent on men than on women, so men also suck up a lot of money but in a different way. Lol. Money is spent on persecuting men and enriching women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:46 PM
–

There are pro-women "diversity" quotas and policies in almost every single area of society. Men pay most taxes, women absorb most welfare. Something like a third more is spent on women's health than men's. It goes on and on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:46 PM
–

>Men who refuse to do anything around their own house and act like them going to work - just like she does too - is enough while she should be taking on loads of extra work. Men generally work more than women, and do harder jobs, and earn more money. And what you see on relationship subs is women complaining and sharing their very biased version of events.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:41 PM
–

>You benefit from being in society by having roads, lights, medicine, and safety. That is your reward. All provided by men. Men's reward for providing almost all of modern society is access to modern society? So what are women contributing?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:34 PM
1

>It was women in history who were infantilised. That's what I said. In the UK, women were given the vote around 1918. Right after only men had been sent to be slaughtered in WW1. Then, despite women now having the vote, the same happened again in WW2. Women, like children, have always been given "rights"/privileges without commensurate responsibilities. They're still referred to as "the fairer sex"-- which is a compliment. Fair means beautiful. Meanwhile, men are, today, characterised as dangero…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:57 AM
2

>I did, because we're talking about women's status in history as inferior to men. If you genuinely believe that women were considered equal to men until VERY recently then you're hopeless. No, they weren't, they were considered superior. And more valuable than men. That's why they weren't sent to be slaughtered in their millions (like men were). >Does scissoring produce children? No. Women are exempt from accountability for other reasons. Because they're infantilised. >I think we might be doing …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:54 AM
2

>This doesn't follow what I said. We are discussing men getting railed by men, and the perception of that as feminine, therefore less good. If the reason it is seen as less good is because it is seen as feminine, then the underlying attitude behind "men getting railed is bad because it's feminine" is misogynistic. It's only seen as feminine (therefore less good) *in men*. Which is misandrist, not misogynistic. As it judges and restricts men, not women. >Where does women's alleged "freedom and la…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:49 AM
9

>Man acting like man = Fine Woman acting like woman = Fine Woman acting like man = Fine Man acting like woman = Bad = misogyny, of course! Women having all the freedom and lack of judgement = misogyny! It makes perfect sense! >Femininity and masculinity are trait categories, not genders. They're behaviours spectacularly informed by genders. And also behaviours society needs each gender to fulfil in order to function effectively. eg. if men don't display masculine behaviours, you don't have a hou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 11:12 AM
1

The vast majority of men are not naturally, physically attractive. We know this. IIRC 40% of Autistic men are virgins at 30. How is this not discrimination?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:46 AM
3

They always jump to extreme victimhood by strawmanning the most extreme interpretation of what you're saying. It's tiring but very effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:38 AM
1

>What it does NOT mean is that because you support equal rights for all people that you have to date or fuck all people. Weird, most seem to think that a transwoman is a woman and straight men should have to treat her as such-- which means considering her for dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:33 AM
3

>But yeah society looks down on people who receive penetration. Society doesn't like femininity or anyone outside the patriarchal norms We've been saying this since forever. Like almost all of Feminism, this doesn't make any sense. The "patriarchy" loves both penetration and femininity-- which is why it encouraged and rewarded both. What doesn't like femininity, ironically, is Feminism. Which is why it encourages women to be everything but feminine. Which includes having children-- which require…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:30 AM
13

So you'd have to deal with your man having sexual power and choices-- like men have to deal with when they have a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:22 AM
29

Haha. Of course, women being hateful and discriminatory towards men = misogyny. Your brain on Feminism. By that rationale, the "patriarchy" trying to control women and prevent them from taking on male roles is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter