~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Time magazine's editorial includes a nasty quote from an MRA. One problem: it's not real.I'm not suggesting that the bots, in time, will not index the pages. The problem is that some redditors have their pitchforks out because they can't find the source quote to an article posted one day ago, and in which their interpretation of exercising due diligence is performing a simple google search. Think of how self-deprecating it would be should this have gained any momentum. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Time magazine's editorial includes a nasty quote from an MRA. One problem: it's not real.in a couple of days the robots/spiders will crawl through here and index everything. See, that's where I'm not completely sold. It doesn't seem like the spiders are collecting everything. For example, 9 days ago you posted this. So, I did a search to find this specific quote. I agree it fits perfectly but a analogy should also be something people can relate to and I don't know about you guys Again, I got this. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 02:23 PM |
| 2 | Time magazine's editorial includes a nasty quote from an MRA. One problem: it's not real.Have you ever tried searching for some obscure statement? How about some of the comments in this thread? I bet a ton of these are impossible to find through google. I don't want to get into an argument over this, but so did I. Seems to me that just because something was posted on reddit does not mean it has been archived (Full disclosure: I'm no tech specialist--Just making an observation.) | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 12:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter