TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

digital_carver Archive

View 2 posts and 37 comments by digital_carver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

If it was the reverse situation it wouldn't factor in at all, but that of course tells us nothing.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 09:24 AM
-5

Yeah, this is some next level circlejerking. Contentless, pointless post.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:20 PM
1

On the one hand, I agree that comparing apples and oranges ourselves seemingly validates some connection between MRM and TRP. On the other hand, such a connection is already posited in lots of reddit discussions, so a clear list of differences like this is in fact useful, to point to when someone new to the topic is getting mislead elsewhere. To continue your own analogy, some people are both theoretical physicists and jews. This does not create an actual connection between the groups. True. How…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:49 PM
1

but doesn't it attach a very negative connotation to the original term? The negative connotation is being attached much more effectively by the thousands of misandrists out there using the feminism tag, one sub isn't gonna add too much to that. Anyway, my intention was only to inform you of the meaning of the term as used here, I don't particularly care to keep defending the usage of a freaking word. Just make sure that the "biased hatred" you perceive is not because you're still subconsciously …
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:30 PM
2

Guys, read the thread further and you'll see this person is talking about the original definition of feminism, which we'd call gender equality. A lot of us started from that point, so please stop with the downvotes. TO /u/salvodaze: In this sub the term 'feminism' usually automatically refers to radical feminism, or at least to unreasonable bias towards the female gender. The term itself refers to women only, and thus could actually be considered an appropriate term to refer to that. What you're…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:02 PM
1

Can I complain if I haven't bought either the physical or online version of it? If so, how would I go about it? Edit: Ok, there's a contact-us email ID for "Content comments", one for North and South America: [email protected] and another for UK and Rest of World: [email protected] . Both IDs are from http://public.oed.com/contact-us/.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:53 PM
2

1 and 2 are actually good options, I agree that that would be a good estimate for the percentage in general. I don't think a "minimum" obtained from 3 would be any less misleading than you consider this one to be though, and 4 is either nigh impossible to conduct or extremely limited in the applicability of its results or both. Options 1 and 2 can give the results you seek, but they give projected estimates based on samples while the 30% here is a concrete number based on actual tests, which mak…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:23 PM
0

Yeah that's a great comeback. Truly you are the king of comebacks, it is known!
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:24 AM
1

Right, and that is best shown through an estimation of the actual % of duped "fathers" in the general population. Where would you get that data from, without actual testing having been done? Any such "estimate" would only be an Ass Pull which would be much more controversial than this (and rightly so).
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:10 AM
2

At first I didn't understand how people even saw this as misleading, but now I understand, I guess some people are reading this as an attempt at woman-shaming by claiming 30% of children are born out of cheating, whereas the point of the inclusion of that statistics is very different IMHO. It's about attempts to abuse the system of childcare and to show that it's not a few instances here and there like some feminists would claim but rather quite widespread. It seems to me like some of you are re…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:49 AM
1

It's not "all wrong" - parts of it misleading according to some people, but there's a lot of actual data in it and it's very well sourced, which is rare for the infographics, so thanks for sharing it! It has lead to some good discussion here too.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:38 PM
6

based only on those that chose to have a paternity test; The very next thing that follows after "named as fathers" is "who test for paternity". If that "leads the reader to believe" it applies to the whole population, the reader is a moron. What it makes me wonder is how many others "named as fathers" were mislead completely and didn't choose to fight, leading to a lifetime of extortion from them.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:34 PM
1

most of the disparity is in the number of single parent homes which have mothers. Any numbers on the actual proportion of those? I hope it isn't a depressingly small proportion of single-parent-as-father there.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:30 PM
4

There's Hubski that tries to provide an alternative, but I don't know how well they're doing or more importantly how censorship-free they really are. Can't trust almost any site these days.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:02 AM
1

Retarded self-expression and shattered self worth don't usually lead to lives worth living (and who knows how many have taken their own lives because of it), and employment in tech was much less feasible or profitable until recently, but I realize you might be unintentionally trivializing their pain due to your (reasonable) bitterness, I'm sorry for you and wish you good luck. The personal comments are misaimed though, I've seen this pain in people I care about and empathized, but I grew up outs…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:05 AM
4

Jon Cryer as in Alan Harper of "Two and a half men"? So... life imitates art and actually manages to top it in ridiculosity!
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:48 AM
1

That's very good news, thanks! I actually searched far and wide for a forum with decent threading (multi-level, single page display) after making the comment above to ArchangelleDaddy, and found there were very few good options actually. Other than reddit itself there seem to be only mwForum and drupal forums, each with its own problems. Very good that they're using the reddit code eventually.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:06 PM
5

To be honest I kinda stopped paying attention at that point, otherwise would have included a warning in the title. That said, if her price for putting together this convincing piece of argument for ten minutes is to add two minutes of advertising about Islam, I personally am willing to pay that price. I think of it as similar to disabling AdBlock Plus on useful websites.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:08 PM
1

Hi, copy-pasting my comment from elsewhere here: The threaded nature of Reddit interface is a huge reason for the rational discussions it spurns, supplanting it with phpBB would be a huge step backwards. If someone posts a convincing but entirely fabricated argument, would you rather have its counter-argument detached and possibly several pages later (as in phpBB) or in small font with reduced visibility (as in OSQA etc.), or right next to it with equal visibility and importance (reddit model)? …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:22 PM
3

The threaded nature of Reddit interface is a huge reason for the rational discussions it spurns, supplanting it with phpBB would be a huge step backwards. If someone posts a convincing but entirely fabricated argument, would you rather have its counter-argument detached and possibly several pages later (as in phpBB) or in small font with reduced visibility (as in OSQA etc.), or right next to it with equal visibility and importance (reddit model)? Such things make a huge impact on the way the com…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:19 PM
-1

Women being brilliant coders isn't too anomalous in my experience, the part I find incredible is that they wrote IRC bots or programmed C64 - even the good coders among women I know, those who are interested in programming, do it only if it has some external motivation for it, like school or work. I don't know a single woman who would do it just for the kick of it like men do.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:52 AM
3

90% of us are actually still ignorant of the need for men's rights and laugh at the concept of men's rights movement. Maybe that's what we need to do, put up a good relatable collection of men who have suffered from unjust laws and practices, in a way that actually makes people think about this seriously.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:08 PM
1

The post was about the general trend, and I haven't kept up with news recently, so I don't understand what event you're talking about - could you give a link?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:04 PM
0

Note that the original post isn't saying women aren't discriminated, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy involved in taking this discrimination (which does happen but is magnified many many times by "feminists" and used as an excuse a lot of times) as a huge serious issue while saying nary a word about men going through the same thing for decades. Also, They were discriminated against because management didn't feel that either one of them could work the longer hours required with the promotion. …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:43 PM
5

That makes sense, I guess the female psyche in general tends more towards "settling down" and "stability", and away from the risk-taking that's necessary to break new ground. Now with all these funded researches they're finally starting to make many more contributions, but of course the feminists would love to claim that as a result of "female liberation", not plain old money.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:58 PM
3

At first glance that sounds too much like simplistic misogyny, and I'm still wary of accepting that at face value, but it does seem like men have pioneered most fields - in fact, any field I can think of: physics - galileo, newton, etc.; biology - mendel, darwin, etc.; psychology - freud, jung, etc. There have been significant contributions from women (eg. Marie Curie), but I can't think of any field where they broke entirely new ground. Would love to be proven wrong on that though.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:24 PM
14

I usually try to think beyond "it's all about the money" arguments, but in this case I tend to agree, it makes complete sense. They stayed away from these fields for so long out of stupid prejudices of their own, and now when they see guys making tons of money in this field they suddenly want in. This feels even cheaper than their usual attention-seeking stupidity.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:42 PM
5

One of the foremost complaints of the women-in-STEM activists is that girls are apparently discouraged from participating in science and technology activities from school age, that they're being told that being geeks is not girly, and lots of their "activism" is focused on that area. I see very strong parallels between this and the decades old mantra that nerds are sissies etc. Also, if their complaint had been about workplace problems only, that would make their position even more hypocritical …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:36 PM
7

Thanks. :) I just wasn't sure if I was missing something, whether my logical process was correct, hence the post.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:46 PM
12

But it isn't black/white between like and don't-like, this may sway someone who's unsure about MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:24 AM
8

Actually, while it might seem that way, these do have an actual purpose. "Teach men not to rape" posters are ridiculous because every man knows that rape is morally wrong, so there's nothing to teach there. In this case though, there are lots of "feminists" (celebrity and otherwise) going around informing girls that it is rape if you revoke the consent after the act. Some of those girls do get confused whether these feminists are right and whether they themselves are just ignorant not to conside…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:12 AM
8

I've been a semi-regular visiter of the subreddit for years and I'd never seen this. Reposts of stupid memes = Useless. Reposts of informational posts relevant to the subreddit = Welcome by the several who haven't seen it yet.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:25 PM
3

Your one anecdotal evidence makes not an argument. There are lots of men who are unhappy about having been circumcised, for various reasons (reduced nerve endings in the penile head leading to less sensitivity, for one). If you're happy about being circumcised, good for you, but you'd have had the option of choosing it anyway. Infantile mutilation takes away that right for millions, and that's the human rights violation happening here.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:58 PM
2

I just bought this book on Amazon after reading the sample on my Kindle, seems pretty decent and has good reviews. (Non-referral link.)
/r/seduction19/08/12 09:14 PM
5

Of course, that's what makes them privileged people: homeless males dominate by occupying that segment of the society in overwhelmingly large numbers! /s
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:16 PM
2

in the lower income bracket How does this fit into the "privileged" part?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:04 PM
1

Oh God yes, I cannot count the number of times that has happened to me. And I have been a redditor for 3+ years now (in various accounts), so I don't know what to tell ya.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 06:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter