TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

digitalcapitalissst Archive

View 1 post and 22 comments by digitalcapitalissst on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

DISCUSSIONdigitalcapitalissst/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 01:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

We will have to agree to disagree but to.my.mind risk is personal. Crime tends to involve too.many layers Like a corporation. Too.many safeguards. Anyways it's been nice chatting. I like throwing out these ideas from time to time and see what floats back.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 03:52 PM
–

I fundamentally do not consider crime risk but the avoidance of risk. For example there is very little risk involved in say robbing a someone other than the immediate risk of capture. But the risk involved in say opening a gold mine from scratch, to full operation, with all the stages in that process. That to my.mind is risk. Crime like all other forms of indirect wealth do involve some element of risk yeah. But the risk I am thinking of is the multi layered risk of creating something from nothi…
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 03:46 PM
–

Accumulation. Is fundamentally risky. Mitigation is where the risk is spread through the limitation of liability through say corporatisation. Buf the primary act of accumulation at the level of the individual. Personal risk is what I speak of. I don't consider the CEO of a company as a risk taker but the financier of that company. The source of its life is
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 03:38 PM
–

There is no leverage in crime of say the likes of say the European nobility. When I contemplate an alpha male. I contemplate a man who very publicly projects the fruits of his risk taking.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 03:33 PM
–

No. I mean risk specifically. The sort of risk that secures economic power and leverage. Risk...leverage.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 03:27 PM
0

There's no risk in crime as such. Risks I class as pack leader risks involve territory or resources using skill other than crime. Like conquering territory involves aggression but it's the sort of risk behavior that propels pack leadership of a visibly influential nature. In contrast a drug cartel leader has limited direct power over humans. The people I rate as power brokers would be men who risk their lives militarily and men who legally wield economic power. Politicians less so. They tend to …
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 02:46 PM
0

I don't think humans as a species are in a good place at the moment. We have become soft and to some extent that affects for eg male hormonal levels. And thus how they perform as protectors. We evolved to face challenge.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 02:37 PM
0

Lol. Fair enough. It's interesting getting a take on this subject from women...and men. I think.men are in love with the idea of risk at the moment in a bid to establish their traditional spot in the pecking order but we seldom ask you girls for a take on the subject.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 02:25 PM
-2

In evolutionary flow, the only determinant of objective fitness is domination over resources. Then you get grades of subjective fitness beneath that. Socialist and Enlightenment ideas are those subjective layers. I actually made a point to some guys the other day. Capitalism is fundamentally woman centric (women accounting for 85% of its consumerism) with a small male elite. A very small one as capitalism is relentlessly woman centered. Like me for example. I wield my power with diplomacy. I can…
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 02:19 PM
-2

Risk is unmitigated pain and sacrifice reaching for the stars. In contrast, most everything is easy. In the past more of that went on when say for eg pioneers entered hostile lands. Not as much today.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 01:47 PM
2

There is money and there is money. I don't consider wages money, only passive wealth and there aren't many of those men around.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/24 07:48 AM
0

To put this in basic evolutionary language. When the tribe is in surplus, the woman has leeway to stretching her options. When not, she mates for resource certainty. Males on the other hand function differently. A few strive to dominate resources. Most though elect to be clowns. Especially evident in societies with surplus and women exercising their options. Aa times get harder, women increasingly look for security. Risky though in capitalism...for the rich man where a woman can secure access to…
/r/RedPillWomen05/09/24 10:19 AM
3

Fair enough. I am not against partnering. If I met a committed woman, I would probably marry so yeah, removing is appropriate.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 01:55 AM
1

She wanted a nest period. So she gave me no clues as to what that was and I had to second guess her. Jealousy is a huge problem with humans and the person you make love to can be your worst enemy and he or she will destroy you. Marriage is a dangerous gamble if you are highly rational ambitious so tread carefully. There is nothing more soul destroying than losing yourself in codependent competition.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 01:43 AM
3

To put it at its simplest. A red pilled woman wants to be a team player. Your search will thus involve finding a team you can devote your best side to. That's not easy.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 01:26 AM
3

The only red pill advice I can give you is find a high value man, then nurture that high value. If that's what you want. Don't compete with it. If you are high value in your own right, find a nest building man.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 01:05 AM
4

Let me give you an example. With one of my exs, we were house hunting and I suggested an investment style residence purchase in a very smart area. Today, that area is in the multi millions value wise. She actively resisted that decision which she took no accountability for later. This has been a repeated experience for me in life and it's not for want of trying. Just be very careful. People will bait you at the outset then switch to control mode once they have you legally strait jacketed.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 01:02 AM
–

I never allow myself the privilege of bad partnering so I don't partner anymore. I am extremely good at whatever I do and partner power struggles always wrecked both our life potentials. So this power struggle....be very careful around it. There are a lot of not so smart people out there engaging in self destruction. Which is why only 1% of humanity succeeds.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/24 12:27 AM
1

I don't think women emasculate men so.much as we naturally compete for power. All humans do which is why at some point, most relationships wind down. In other words, you become irrelevant. Until you get to that point, life is busy.
/r/RedPillWomen02/09/24 10:53 PM
1

As a guy, I can tell you, curvy is fine, weighty no. That's the core issue. Add feminine red pilled woman to that and theres no reason why guys should not be attracted
/r/RedPillWomen14/07/23 01:45 PM
1

Can a woman be red pilled irrespective of problems though? As a highly successful guy, my main anxiety is her submission crumbling at the first disagreement and the legal consequences.
/r/RedPillWomen26/05/23 04:07 PM
1

I dont think there is a solution to this. Pre capitalism, women did not work as most jobs were hard and women stayed at home to run what was suited to their biology. In capitalism, the system is suited for female participation.
/r/RedPillWomen24/03/23 04:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter