TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

digitaler_demenz Archive

View 1 post and 35 comments by digitaler_demenz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Metadigitaler_demenz/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 04:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Everyone has a worldview in the trivial sense, i.e. a set of perspectives on reality, on values, on ultimate goals and on one's identity in relation to all this. They can change, they can be improved and they can be strengthened, and this (generally) takes places incrementally. Also, "frame" as it's used in this context is not really synonymous with worldview as a concept. Rather something along the lines of the projection of authority and confidence in one's identity and worldview.
/r/MarriedRedPill07/09/18 07:52 PM
1

http://stevewatson.info/readings/philosophical_notes/Anscombe-mmp.pdf Yeah well I guess nawalt
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 01:16 PM
1

This was actually a common criticism of the suffragette movement over a hundred years ago, as for example discussed by Chesterton here, chapter 16 and onwards: https://archive.org/details/whats_wrong_chesterton_librivox/whatswrong_16_chesterton.mp3
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 07:18 PM
2

You think it's "trite" and worthy of dismissal to achieve one's goals and build virtue? Can't see what really qualifies then.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 11:25 AM
1

Catholic and Orthodox don't seem to have a problem of this magnitude.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 11:15 AM
1

I'm of the same opinion, more or less. A small percentage of people are completely tone deaf, and cannot imitate a pitch or carry a tune. If you can do this, you can learn to sing. I'm not sure if it's that much harder than learning to play the guitar either. Get some recording equipment, record yourself singing simple tunes, listen to your voice and try to maintain key and keep a steady pitch. That's a decent start. Also, you could join a local choir, often excellent practice and good company f…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 11:18 PM
1

Exactly, but it's a bit difficult to teach. Few really good cues.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 11:14 PM
8

Indeed it does. I'm leading a choir, and am currently trying to beat this into the members. If you use straight posture, open up the throat like when you yawn, and use the abdominals somewhat correctly, everything else falls into place.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 04:00 PM
2

I think many misunderstood your post and reacted emotionally to certain parts of it, namely the characterization of your immigrant aquaintance and what they felt that this this implied for how men should conduct themselves. Also, your position poses that scantily clad women presenting themselves as sexually available is a problem, and many people here are probably happy with this situation as such. But I do think that your conclusion and suggested solution is in line with a lot of the problems t…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 08:04 AM
1

Nah, that's not really the case. No Western culture has been thoroughly conservatively Christian since the advent of modernity in the 17th century, save for certain enclaves like southern European Catholic regions. The denial of the complementarity of the different male and female natures were in full bloom with the abstract humanism of the Enlightenment.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 07:55 AM
1

Well, if you take that idea to its logical endpoint, you've just refuted it.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 07:45 AM
3

thanks for sharing, cool story bro
/r/TheRedPill21/11/17 10:49 AM
4

From a clean google search with no history whatsoever, on different regions and language settings, I just get men's fashion, men's fashion, men's accessories, an excerpt from a book on domestic violence where men are victims, and more clothes ads. Edit: oh, news tab. That was a different situation.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/17 08:26 AM
0

This is not an attempt to put you down or anything. However, regarding your conversation with your friends on C.K. - in much of my social and all of my professional context, the inability to rationally criticize his first comment, pick it apart and clearly assert one's position as to what one argued to be true or not (and then move on in the dialogue towards a consensus) would be a sign of lacking competence and/or effort. I'm not saying you displayed such an inability here, the joke was obvious…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 08:57 AM
2

I've almost always done around 90% rm deads, which might not work more than once a week, but at lower weights it's probably completely fine. As you say, proper form is key. As an aside, I think bench press is more open to variations in form than e.g. conventional deadlifts due to differences in arm length and such, but certain things aren't optional, such as retracting the shoulder blades. What poor versions of the form do you often see?
/r/TheRedPill12/11/17 08:02 AM
4

Well, no, you shouldn't deadlift for three sessions per week unless you're an olympic weightlifter at a particular part of the season and know exactly what you're doing. Once a week is fine if you throw in some supporing exercises such as barbell rows. Squats can be done a couple of times per week if you must, but only go heavy one of those sessions. I wouldn't bench press or do shoulder work more than once a week in the long run either, mostly because of the risk of shoulder injury.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/17 12:25 PM
0

Of course there's virtue in frugality, self-reliance and avoiding unnecessary consumption. Submitting to marketing strategies and our rampant culture of commodity fetischism is obviously to "play by the rules of others".
/r/TheRedPill11/11/17 10:07 AM
2

yeah, that bunch of pussies marching on Moscow in the winter of 1812 just got lucky
/r/TheRedPill11/11/17 09:43 AM
3

Of course not. Go easy on the bro-science. These two hormones are certainly important factors in terms of behaviour and cognition, but there are a vast amount of others, some purely biological, some clearly social, and some phenomenal/related to a person's intentions.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 07:09 AM
5

That's like arguing there's a prison rape epidemic perpetrated by black Americans, and trying to somehow construe it as a race problem. Obviously the US is a very special place when the ratio of incarcerated African-Americans is much worse when compared to South Africa during the heyday of Apartheid. And the far and away greatest cause is the Anslinger drug laws - which obviously also are one of the most important factors when it comes to street violence due to the nature of competition and dist…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 06:52 AM
1

Thanks for your response. "... then you proceeded to elevate what often amounts to regret sex into a call for a return to the ancient past." This was not my intended point. Rather, I was trying to say that the campaign tacitly expresses a felt need for structured sexual morality and appropriate (male) authority, yet not that this need is consciously and rationally apprehended. "I also think you overestimate how "illegitimized" sexual attention was back in the supposed good ol' days. Women were p…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 09:38 AM
2

Thanks for the response. "But the metoo campaign is nothing to do with sexual harassment." Even if what you're mentioning is true, i.e. that the other factors you point out are important social and psychological factors influencing an individual's decision to partake in the campaign in question, I think it's impossible to say that it has absolutely nothing to do with sexual harassment. At the very least, the fact that it claims to regard sexual harassment, must factor into an individual's decisi…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 09:27 AM
7

Thank you for your response. The only thing that would possibly undo sexual liberation would be at least a moderate collapse of societal institutions and technological infrastructure maintaining it. Yet it does seem that we're heading in that direction. Any stable society throughout history, including the more primitive ones, have had a functional social control of its members' sexuality. I'm not speaking of 19th century Victorian prudishness nor specifically social control of female rather than…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 09:14 AM
1

I thought maybe the reference was to Fr. Ripperger in the talk I linked, which was kind of fun since he's a celibate Catholic priest.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 10:01 PM
2

I'm sorry, I don't follow. Who are you referring to? Yes, much of the forum has this focus. I do have issues with this, but that's a bit beside the point.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 08:43 PM
1

Sure. I'd add that that holds for both genders, if one for instance looks closer upon what effects much of technology has had upon health, human relationships and society at large.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 08:31 PM
5

I'm not sure that this is an adequate representation of my position (nor that I'm much of a representative of this forum, to be sure). Perhaps if one interprets "traditional sexual morality" as equivalent to some form of one-sided indentured servitude, but that's obviously unwarranted.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 08:30 PM
1

Of couse a woman could in principle have played the same role as Churchill did. There have been several female heads of state throughout history who faced similar challenges and performed admirably (yet in doing so, however, I'd argue that they exemplified specifically male virtues).
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 09:17 AM
1

Parallels notwithstanding, I think it's conceptually misleading to describe this as "beta behaviour", since this would specifically refer to men utilizing a particular form of mating strategy in relation to women. Unless, as I believe is probably close to the truth, the behaviour can be adequately explained by common human sympathy for your situation and assumed plight - my friends, both male and female, have on occasion prompted to share their resources with me when they've perceived me as unde…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/17 06:39 PM
1

You mean like scaphocephalic kids or what?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 05:08 PM
1

The problem is that your "objective" observations are almost always completely worthless assertions in every context you enter unless you have lots of knowledge and/or experience. Every culture everywhere, ever, has institutionalized courtesy and decorum, for among other reasons to make sure that proper authority is respected and social arrangements aren't constantly troubled by halfwits spouting their "objective" perceptions. No offense intended. That's not to say that people should be shielded…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/17 12:18 PM
1

My grandfather got these stainless steel food containers back in the 40s, I think they were government issued. Works great to heat on the stove or in a regular oven, if you can't stomach eating your liver and onions ice cold https://blogg.loppi.se/mammaochson/files/2013/10/IMG_5925.jpg
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 05:33 AM
1

Good to hear, but where did you find that sample?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 01:15 PM
1

Yw. I agree, I find that Chesterton's analysis along with that of many other authors from this period is often far more penetrating than anything you can find nowadays. For one thing, it seems that their general knowledge was both broader and deeper than that of our contemporaries, who perhaps instead have become more specialized.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 01:15 PM
24

Read G. K. Chesterton's "What's Wrong With the World" from 1910, particularly the chapter entitled "The Emancipation of Domesticity". Here: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1717?msg=welcome_stranger
/r/TheRedPill23/08/17 09:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter