TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dingoperson2 Archive

View 27 posts and 1,721 comments by dingoperson2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2792

dingoperson2/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/20 03:13 AM
2265

Social Issuesdingoperson2/r/MensRights31/12/20 02:23 PM
1628

Discriminationdingoperson2/r/MensRights03/11/21 08:44 AM
670

Social Issuesdingoperson2/r/MensRights26/01/22 09:21 AM
387

Discriminationdingoperson2/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:48 PM
308

Discriminationdingoperson2/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:20 AM
271

dingoperson2/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/14 04:01 AM
107

dingoperson2/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 02:58 AM
106

Discriminationdingoperson2/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:24 AM
70

Feminismdingoperson2/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:50 PM
69

Feminismdingoperson2/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:14 AM
45

Misleading Titledingoperson2/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:45 AM
42

dingoperson2/r/AntiFeminists11/10/21 08:57 PM
40

Intactivismdingoperson2/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:28 AM
33

Humourdingoperson2/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:06 AM
27

dingoperson2/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:16 AM
14

Questiondingoperson2/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:19 PM
10

dingoperson2/r/AntiFeminists15/09/21 12:00 AM
8

Social Issuesdingoperson2/r/MensRights14/11/20 02:42 PM
4

dingoperson2/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:41 AM
2

Discussiondingoperson2/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:29 AM
2

Reverse Gendersdingoperson2/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:19 AM
1

Generaldingoperson2/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:13 AM
1

mediadingoperson2/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 11:15 AM
1

Feminismdingoperson2/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:12 AM
0

Discussiondingoperson2/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:36 AM
0

Discussiondingoperson2/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:27 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,721 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Straw man use and lying aren't arguments. Act like a psychopath, then claim victimhood when you are treated accordingly. Surprised if you aren't using your talent for money.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:10 PM
1

If you want to be treated as a human, you shouldn't act worse than an animal.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:12 PM
1

but you refuse to stand up for anything you say Liar. I respond directly to you, and others do as well: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u2pyvr/hypocrites_how_do_they_expect_to_be_taken/i4kk0e4/ You don't present reasoned arguments, but vomit up the trash inside you: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u274nd/why_is_this_subreddit_under_so_much_hate/i4ke3n0/ You're a liar, demonstrably, who uses straw man arguments, demonstrably, and take part in discussions by vomit, demons…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:40 AM
1

Your straw man use has no substance, pretty much by definition - why should others treat you better than you are?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:33 AM
1

Straw man. He didn't say that a single rule on a single Reddit sub was the basis for making the determination. He said it was a reminder of it. Stop using straw man arguments. It's a sign of a poor character, and harms children when they see it - they could think that it's OK to do.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:41 AM
2

Funnily, being confrontational has never stopped feminism from succeeding.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 04:12 AM
1

The mod could also have handled it way better - by accepting that the topic has little to do with men's rights. Enforcing unreasonable rules against criticism is one thing - but that doesn't in any way exclude accepting that the criticism is valid. The mod didn't do that, just met the valid criticism with a wall of silence. This simply underscores that "menslib" is about as much in favor of "men's rights" as you would expect from its name.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 04:11 AM
1

Your words don't change or limit what someone is. feminism isn’t about free speech or anything else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism - (2) deliberate obscurity—a recondite literary or artistic style, characterized by deliberate vagueness. The world will move past you, luckily.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:52 PM
20

They are totalitarian monsters. The kind of antihuman trash that should have died out 70 years ago, but somehow still cling to some kind of digital existence. They don't deserve to be be treated with respect, consideration or anything at all positive.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:41 PM
11

The topic of the subreddit is AskFeminists and they blocked an answer from a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:40 PM
6

Men are killed far more than women pretty much everywhere across the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender Men are also victims of violence more than women - the statistics are a bit less accessible/comparable globally because murder is far more clear cut, but should be accessible in most western countries. The student claims to rely on some kind of rule or principle: "WHEN A PROBLEM AFFECTS GROUP 1 MORE THAN GROUP 2 WE SHOULD NOT FOCUS ON A MEMBER OF GROUP 2 WHO HAS…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:09 AM
1

You don't see an issue with believing the apparent victim. What about the apparent accused? Do you also not see an issue with believing the apparent accused?
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:59 AM
0

Equality is intolerable to them. Equal demands for evidence for all types of accusations makes them scream - the Divine Woman MUST Rule All.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:57 AM
2

It’s intent though is more like “believe all sexual assault victims” Yeah, so the problem is that it's uncertain in the first place whether they are a sexual assault victim. That's literally the core, central issue. I feel this should be obvious and that it's baffling that it isn't. "Believe all people who have verifiably and certainly been attacked when they say they have been attacked" - wow, no shit. Profound, a rule that should guide us all through such uncertain matters.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:38 AM
2

You're right. "Believe All Women" is perfectly in line with psychological research about women's in-group bias: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ White supremacists would say: "Automatically believe the word of any white person". Scientologists would say: "Always believe the word of any scientologist accusing any non-scientologist" Hardcore communists would say: "Believe the words of your Communist comrades" There is nothing strange or surprising about "Believe All Women" coming from a f…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:33 AM
4

It should be "take every accusation seriously & investigate" but that's too long. Yes, I am sure it was simply a regrettable matter of over-simplification. Twitter having the word limit it does and all that. Quicker to type 3 words than 5-6. It was pure unplanned and unfortunate accident that feminists overstated the weight that should be placed on female person's words.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:30 AM
6

What it means is that ... we need to get away from the culture of immediately disbelieving her. There is no culture of immediately disbelieving all claims of rape. You're a conspiracy theorist. are you sure you're not exaggerating Asking questions to get more information and question the claim is literally core and essence of neither believing nor disbelieving, but being agnostic about the truth. You're contradicting yourself. Treating the claims as beyond question and beyond questioning is the …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:16 AM
7

Those scared of being accused of shit, in my experience, are those that want the freedom to be off-color so to speak. If you lock your door at night or claim that there are thieves out there, you're actually the thief yourself describing your own lack of morality.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:54 AM
10

I keep asking for examples of women feminists who have made the situation worse for women in order to increase equality with men. None have been given. There are none. Feminism isn't pro-equality. It's pro-women in every way.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:28 AM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism "deliberate obscurity—a recondite literary or artistic style, characterized by deliberate vagueness" "Having it both ways" hasn't been requested. What was requested was a response to some points and questions, still unanswered.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:03 AM
8

Your comment was justifying and speaking in favor of such hate, and attacking the members of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 01:59 AM
9

A complete non-response that does nothing whatsoever to address any of the points raised. When someone makes a comment opposing you, you have a hard time listening or responding to their viewpoints. There is no "rule" or "standard" applied to the feminist movement that it must have decorum. ... You are unable to show any comment you have made attacking feminists for lacking decorum, even when they do. You have taken quite universal behaviors - so common that you're showing those behaviors yourse…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 01:53 AM
7

In this reality, anyone who doesn't have a history of man-hating is man-friendly. When the collective five-minute hate starts, staying silent is pretty much the only way to oppose it. Like when I look for live streamers. If they mention nothing about pro- or con wokeness anywhere, I watch them, and inevitably and always hints slip through that they are not a fan of it.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 01:03 AM
13

My comment to you was "opposing a girl", to use your own phrasing. You didn't listen or respond to the points raised when I was opposing a girl, but automatically went on the attack. You are hence a perfect living example of what you construe in others. When someone makes a comment opposing you, you have a hard time listening or responding to their viewpoints. The reality is far uglier than that - the points I raised and you failed to respond to are valid criticisms. There is no "rule" or "stand…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:51 AM
13

It wasn’t a song … it is a sonnet from Shakespeare You posted the man-hating in response to a song thread on TwoXChromosomes - doesn't matter, the same applies. This is my whole point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism " (2) deliberate obscurity—a recondite literary or artistic style, characterized by deliberate vagueness" No, you haven't responded to the points above.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:04 AM
18

Posting something "opposing a guy" sounds like it would often be a great way to have a discussion turn ugly - you know, like if someone posts something "opposing" yourself. I invite people to try to post "opposing a woman" on feminist subs and seeing the reactions. "They cannot even validate" is obscurantism. Decorum isn't any feature of feminist protests whatsoever and hence isn't required for either women or men: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfVzA5amI54 . This is a fabricated and hypocritic…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 11:35 PM
13

Otherwise, this movement would be following the same path as feminism. No, it wouldn't. At all. Why and how would it? Feminism isn't for equality. Attacking feminism doesn't make you "like" a feminist, any more than attacking Nazism makes you "like" a Nazi. How would it? To go the same path as feminism, we would have to.... present similar claims and have similar goals as feminism. We would have to be against equality. Attacking feminism isn't that. You're a concern troll.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 11:06 PM
2

Because there's fucking situations where benefits for women are at the expense of men, or there's a limited amount of tax money currently distributed more to women than to men and limited willingness to increase taxes. Money is already redistributed between education, social services, infrastructure, the military, and numerous other areas. There's no sensical reason for a unique rule of "No Benefit For Women Must Ever Be Redistributed Away To Create Equality And Benefit Another Cause", when ever…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:46 PM
1

The article I linked to and referred to in the comment you responded to. Did you respond to the comment without understanding what it referred to?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:12 PM
1

that infuse more humanity. If "infusing with humanity" was a requirement, feminists wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:11 PM
1

The word "Jews" is intentionally used by Nazis.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:10 PM
1

No girls are mentioned in the article, and it immediately switches from "female" to "women" in the introduction: Mia Mottley is just one of a raft of strong women (..)
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:08 PM
1

She refers to male rapists and female victims, and says the male accused must be presumed to be guilty. "Reads more like" is obscurantism, applying your filter on top of what she's saying.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 07:42 PM
3

"Because [the word "female"] reduces women to just their reproductive capabilities. It depends entirely on the context in which you are using the term. In this case, no. Which is it? Does the word "female" reduce women to just their reproductive capabilities, or does it depend entirely on the context in which the term is used? You say that "Female Leadership is Good for the World" is good/acceptable. "Females just want money" is bad. Sounds like it has nothing to do with reducing women at all, a…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 07:11 PM
1

Female Leadership is Good for the World, by The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/jan/21/female-leadership-is-good-for-the-world-just-look-at-barbados Does The Guardian reduce women?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:56 PM
2

The term 'females' is often used by incels The term 'jews' is often used by Nazis. Are you just like the Nazis in this way, in using the same word as them?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:53 PM
3

Were they mad for the hundreds of years "males" was used to refer to men?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:52 PM
1

No, both terms are used sometimes to refer to adults, sometimes to refer to adults and children. The article about "Female leadership" refers to women with political power. Not girls.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:51 PM
4

whilst attacking anything like that for men I've never actually seen this happen. I am glad to inform you better about a topic you're posting about on the internet. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2009/nov/23/men-students-support-groups-universities despite outrage from critics who claim the existence of such a group undermines women's ability to speak out for equality. A reason you don't see more of it is that these attacks have already been done, succeeded, and the men's networks elimina…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:46 PM
1

The words "Female" and "Women" are used interchangeably. The reason they appear upset is that by claiming to be upset and claiming you have transgressed, they get to attack you. By setting rules for you, and attacking you as a group when you don't follow the rules, they demonstrate their power and make others afraid of them. They love attacking. The best solution is to refer to left-wing media outlets also using "female": Female leadership is good for the world: https://www.theguardian.com/globa…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:20 PM
7

Can you come up with a single example of feminists making life worse for women in order to promote equality? No, that's not what they do Thanks - we agree that mainstream feminists aren't for equality, but for the promotion of women. Women-exclusive recruitment events, women-exclusive networks, women-exclusive academic tutoring and courses, whilst attacking anything like that for men, do affect men negatively. Why would you say there are ways they leave men unaffected, when there's also ways the…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 06:07 PM
3

Can you come up with a single example of feminists making life worse for women in order to promote equality?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 05:52 PM
4

All my respect to the writer of this article. It can be hard to stick to principles, but good things are often not easy.
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/22 04:15 PM
12

If the claim is that it was a deliberate and coordinated attempt, then it's absolutely a conspiracy theory. E.g. You can point out that men are the victims of organized crime more than women are. This is an inequality, a disadvantage for men, a measureable and actual way men have it worse. Like women might have had it worse in 1848. But if claiming that the criminal gangs are deliberately and systematically attempting to inflict harm on men, in order to hold men down, then that's a conspiracy th…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:24 AM
12

Patriarchy theory: Men hold dominance over women -- just not complete power. Therefore, even if it can be shown that women can study what they want, get the jobs they want, vote for the man or woman who represents their interests, travel where they want, that doesn't in any way disprove patriarchy. After all, patriarchy theory never claimed that men hold COMPLETE power, so it can always be said: Okay, I accept that men don't hold power in those ways, but in other ways. Men hold power Ignoring th…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:21 AM
43

A term I wish I had come to know earlier in my life: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism "Patriarchy" is obscurantism. It's not clearly defined. It's pretty much a conspiracy theory - a vaguely defined network of men cooperating in vaguely defined ways to create vaguely defined effects. A usual claim is that it's men who hold power. This is wrong. Women vote, and vote for their interests, just like men. Just like in the US now - more men voted for Trump, more women for Biden, the women go…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:05 AM
1

You are a single-comment troll account. Thanks for a demonstration that the worst monsters of the feminist movement are still alive and even in some cases have access to the internet. As an alternative to becoming jobless, penniless and homeless, there's a good deal of sanity in rather having a guaranteed 19 years of state-paid home, food and family life. Many homeless people do serious crime in other to get out of homelessness - the option of living securely in warm, free housing with food on t…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:26 PM
11

Binary? Absolutely. By degree? It's a lot higher.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:39 PM
6

I’m a 30+ white dude who’s liberal and votes democratic When Hillary Clinton spoke about "deplorables", you know she was referring to you, with your skin color being a major factor in that.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:38 PM
9

What right, currently denied men, does this post advance? The right to equal treatment with women in having attempted murder excused and normalised and met with sympathy.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:07 AM
16

Is there any time a man is excused for trying to kill his wife because of depression? Where someone goes and declares that this is normal or a natural thing to do? Article: Man arrested for attempting to murder his wife Response: Depression is a legitimate medical emergency.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:36 AM
12

No, it's anti-women-who-murder-their-child. Luckily, most women don't try to murder their child. The "mensrights" is in how this is met - with understanding and support. Please show me the husband who attempted to murder his wife and is met with "this is natural" and "depression is a legitimate medical emergency".
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:34 AM
3

The feminists similarly excusing a man murdering his wife as something normal and natural because of his depression are lined up here: (crickets)
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:33 AM
10

Goodluck with living a secret life online where you declare that child murder is natural, yet dodge the obvious implications. For the sake of your life preservation from your immediate surroundings, you will keep this persona locked up so tightly that it will never be visible to anyone, not even your closest family. Keep taking "empathy courses". It will help you survive.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:26 AM
7

That's amazing coming from something that responded to an actual case of attempted child murder by declaring that child murder is natural. Your comment invited a very obvious and natural question: When you are normalizing child murder as natural, what does your "biological narrative" say about rape? It would be very easy for you to answer this - you would use far fewer letters than you have used here. It would be done in a few seconds. Yet you are avoiding it completely. A question invited and r…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:19 AM
13

It's an ethical narrative that child murder is wrong, can easily be avoided and should not be normalized or excused as "normal", as you do here. It raises the question of why your "biological narrative" is either uniquely tailored to normalize child murder, or also considers rape to be natural. I am fully on track responding to the monstrous comments of something that would be considered a dangerous and diseased animal if it made those statements outside of an anonymous online persona.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:06 AM
12

His comment is appropriate and doesn't evidence rage. Please tell your surroundings that your response to an actual case of attempted child murder was to declare that child murder is normal. They will treat you like something less than human, justifiably.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:01 AM
13

Not within the definition of whataboutism. The issue and question is raised by your claim. Excusing an actual case of attempted child murder by saying that it's a "normal" thing to do, is so monstrous that you are very lucky to have this anonymous online persona to let those thoughts out. If you told people your thoughts in real life, they would justifiably point guns at you, and consider you something not quite human, something dangerous that should be put down. In that sense, living out your t…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:58 AM
13

If an animal is under duress it's normal for the mother to kill the offspring. That's interesting. When do you think it is normal for a man to rape or kill a woman?
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:46 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section#History
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 01:19 PM
7

Yeah, OP, nothing in the above should be seen as an attack on you. It's just that the reality and history of that movement contains far more monstrosities than people are taught.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:28 PM
0

It's arguable whether it actually made the situation for women worse in any way, because the possibility of the Netherlands being attacked is virtually zero - something that "could happen" but hasn't happened and isn't whatsoever looking like it's happening. There's no military service either. So 0 women have their life affected negatively now or at any foreseeable point in the future, by a single hour of time or a single euro. On the other hand it helps women because it removes an argument from…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:59 PM
14

Women always have several different life paths available. If one becomes too hard, they can switch. Men don't. If the current path doesn't work out, it's often game over. A woman might struggle at work. She keeps screwing up. She doesn't like working. She gets written reprimands on her record. She's about to get fired. What could a man do in that situation? It's game over for him. What can a woman do? She can become pregnant extremely easily - meet some random person at a club, say she's on the …
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:46 PM
18

Here's a little challenge: Can you point to any area of society where women who are feminists have supported and managed to carry through a change that increased equality and made the situation for women worse? To rephrase that: A change that increased equality and made the situation worse for women, and was supported by female feminists? I can point to this for men. Men supported imposing alimony obligations on men, thereby making life for men worse in the name of equality. I don't think you ca…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:36 PM
76

It's interesting that you say this, because the goal of one of the most famous historical feminists was to deliberately increase the social isolation of men. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the "real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:21 PM
1

"He comes when I want him to" "He leaves when I want him to" Could you describe how his free choice is present and respected in these situations?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 10:52 PM
2

"Respect for her choices" is the opposite of respect for his choices. It's completely ignoring his choices, treating them as irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 01:43 AM
1

"a playful slap" "with his entire bodyweight"
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/22 09:57 AM
1

I still don’t think the police should wrestle someone to the ground and cuff them for throwing a drink in their face. You've spent too much time living in computer games
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/22 03:16 PM
665

Just pointing out that she's not just rescheduling, she's doing that immediately before the date, for something work-related that should be very foreseeable. Big difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/22 03:11 PM
1

You're comparing black people to women?
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 06:21 AM
7

Where's the full video then?
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 02:02 AM
8

It's "debunked" when they have released the full video. Have they?
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 02:01 AM
14

The wokes like power. That's their drug. They also don't like competition for power, so nonjewish wokes aren't usually fan of jews. Also, attacking Whoopi Goldberg alienates their supporters.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:35 PM
12

It is a gendered issue. Women get lighter sentences than men. Please don't spread disinformation. We're already at the point where someone might feel it justified to prevent you from spreading disinformation.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 06:52 AM
23

The boy who captured the girl, tied her up and tortured her, beat her genitals and burnt her with a lighter was found by the judge to have shown genuine remorse and contrition, and have prospects of rehabilitation. Words that will never be written in any news media.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 06:51 AM
1

Male police officers: Drive around to attend reports of crime, navigate at dangerously high speeds to save lives if possible, break up fights, force people into handcuffs and being arrested against their physical resistance. Female police officers: Walk around in civilian clothing and write down license plates if someone shouts something offensive to them Salary: The same
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:17 PM
5

That's been my experience with feminists. The closer you look at them, the more they look like absolute monsters, the most antihuman despicable and worthless trash.
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 04:54 AM
8

Men don’t WANT to make home furnishing or vacation decisions, what a joke. Sexist bigot. Change.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 08:50 AM
6

They are totalitarians. They enjoy exerting power. Their mindsets should have died out with WW2 and the Cold War. They still exist.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 10:53 AM
3

No, and neither should it apply to who someone is sharing their bed with.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:51 AM
7

There are also clear and simple ways to secure the workout-in-isolation they desire whilst not breaking the law - simply have the exercise machines in small private rooms that can be booked for 5-20 minutes. Each person of any gender can work out by themselves. It would absolutely be more expensive than today to run a business that way, but so is building a wheelchair access ramp.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:08 AM
9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender worldwide, 78.7% of homicide victims are men, because people generally support things that benefit them and are against things that don’t. How do you explain men's support for ovarian cancer treatment?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 02:11 AM
6

he told me that every so often a man would come in ready to argue if they wouldn’t let him join and they would just say he could if he wanted to but then ask was he not strong enough to work out with other men? Sexist insults to defend a sexist policy, fantastic
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/22 02:07 AM
17

Identifying similarities is pretty much the definition of nuance. Black and white means either equal or not equal.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:38 AM
16

Absolutely, the same way a racially exclusive bar would just a bunch of people with the same skin color drinking together.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:37 AM
7

Sane people who have been raised in sane households by sane parents wouldn't defend sexist discrimination. Please stop defending sexist discrimination. It makes you a monster who deserves to be treated badly in your daily life.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:35 AM
14

Proving that an attack was racially motivated is very often hard. You don't deserve to be treated badly for lacking knowledge of the difficulties of proving what was inside people's heads when they didn't express those thoughts verbally. You do deserve to be treated badly in your daily life for defending sexist discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:34 AM
8

No, you failed to comprehend - it's no problem at all to dissect a desire for sexism in an academic way as a problem that we should get rid of - the problem is in defending and justifying it. Please stop defending sexist discrimination. It makes you a monster who deserves to be treated badly in your daily life.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:30 AM
14

I didn't refer to proving attacks - I referred to proving leering and proving a racial motivation behind attacks. Please stop defending sexist discrimination. It makes you a monster who deserves to be treated badly in your daily life.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:26 AM
11

It doesn't matter. There can be certain people who are more comfortable if certain races and religions are eliminated from their bars and schools. Their feeling of comfort or lack thereof is ignored by the law - as is your desire for sexism.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:19 AM
15

Proving leering and proving that an attack was racially motivated can both range from rather easy to rather difficult. Please stop defending sexist discrimination. It makes you a monster who deserves to be treated badly in your daily life.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:18 AM
14

Absolutely. Stealing a diamond ring is also very, very different from stealing a big fish. The same rule would still be applicable to both.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:11 AM
28

Easier, absolutely, in the same way it would be easier to avoid racially motivated attacks by segregating living areas. The good thing is that the people behind it are getting punished, and hopefully someone will take acts to stop those defending the sexism as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:07 AM
5

Are you ignorant of the content of the comment written to you just above starting "Women already have many places (..) ?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:53 AM
22

If you can't see the strong similarities between this and racism, perhaps you suffer from some kind of drug-induced brain damage?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:50 AM
12

Hi, you were politely asked to stop being rude. You ignored that. I am going to start being rude to you as a result. It is perfectly legal for women to start gyms where any man or women can exercise in a closed room one at a time. It's just not legal to discriminate.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:47 AM
16

Women already have many places to workout. Women just can't combine this with sexist discrimination, which can be compared with racism. Please don't describe the arguments others make inaccurately. It is rude of you. Please do not make even a single more comment in this subreddit defending sexist discrimination. It is illegal, and rude to defend. Please answer the questions asked of you: Sure - we'll just replace "a place to work out" with "an area to live". Still agree?. It is rude to avoid que…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:43 AM
55

Are you seriously pretending you are ignorant of the hatred of men displayed in social media? Come on. Are you seriously incapable of understanding that certain schools and night clubs could want to exclude black people for business reasons only? Come on.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:31 AM
14

Sure - we'll just replace "a place to work out" with "an area to live". Still agree?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:29 AM
56

Private schools would also have known there was a market for schools that banned black children. Of course, they wouldn't do that because they hated black children. Not at all. It would simply be their business model. To make money only. That's really different from doing it for some other reason than making money.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:22 AM
6

fantastic, i honestly care about this, if women want to break the law and discriminate then they can get convicted, maybe just stop the lawbreaking?? this is a good solution by using the courts
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:21 AM
30

The gym clearly wants the market of women who want to work out without men leering at them. Then the lawful rule is "no leering", enforced by video camera evidence used to ban any person who is leering. Why do women insist on lawbreaking instead of sane and legal nondiscrimination?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:13 AM
18

Would it really be that big a deal if I wanted a bar clean of (certain skin color/religion)?!
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:10 AM
15

I just want a space without people of (certain skin color/religion). Why do these worthless trash shits have to be so petty that they want to deny me a place clean of (certain skin color/religion)???
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:08 AM
12

Or just get them convicted in court
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:05 AM
15

Defining all jews as rich, or all men as non-vulnerable, or all blacks as threatening, is discrimination. Can't do that shit.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:05 AM
1

The more you look at "feminists", the more of their writings you read, the more they come across as monsters that have no legitimate place in any sane world.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 07:34 AM
2

Is your plan to stop homicides written down anywhere? How long do you estimate it will take until your plan causes homicides to be eliminated, or nearly eliminated? Has anyone else tried following your plan to eliminate homicides? It seems surprising that something as horrifying as homicides could be ended with your plan, but somehow it has just never been carried out in any country in the world? In the interim years, the years from now until the time you estimate your plan will have succeeded, …
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:49 PM
2

Genuine question don't freak out and have a psychological breakdown or try to come to my house or something but how do you think the question you ask is relevant?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 12:04 PM
2

Yeah, the hate is still alive somehow.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 11:38 AM
3

Wikipedia describes Sally Miller Gearhart as a feminist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Gearhart has stated that: "II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture." Is Wikipedia wrong in claiming that Gearhart is a feminist? If you think Wikipedia is wrong, why do you think the article still says so, and why hasn't it been corrected?
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 10:59 AM
29

"Girl latest victim in stabbing spree" "Girl attacked in stabbing spree" "The latest victim of shocking knife attacks was a xx-year old girl"
/r/MensRights22/01/22 08:45 AM
16

Feminism is a shit movement for shit people. The closer you look, the worse they look.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/22 09:52 PM
2

"Some women are being aggressively prosecuted" shocking
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/22 04:58 PM
4

By praising EVERY woman (who says what they want), and attacking women who don't say what they want, they simply condition women to say what they want. You, too, can join this glorious host of women are are PRAISED and LIFTED. You just need to say these small words. Oh, and not those other words. Good girl.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 06:10 AM
23

"PickMe" = this person doesn't mean what she says, she actually has a hidden agenda and just pretends to mean it in order to be liked by men. It's rather rapey.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:01 AM
5

there is frighteningly little separating Maxwell from that tiny but grotesque pantheon of female offenders seemingly so desperate to be loved that they collude in their partners’ abusive fantasies, I'll donate $100 a feminist cause if any feminist can point to an article in The Guardian in the last 10 years that portrays men as raping children because they are "desperate to be loved", using those precise words.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:53 AM
3

The men are always treated as free actors, wild, intelligent, forces of creation and free will. The woman acted because a man forced to her, induced or pressured her, the victim. The man acted because he had the choice to act.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:37 AM
4

Ghislaine’s “naughty eyes” as she flirted with a young Boris Johnson at Oxford, back in the days when none of them had ever heard of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Trust The Guardian to use child sex victims to tarnish the UK prime minister by association. They say themselves that there was no Epstein in the picture - but still, hey, let's just name-drop him. Anything can be used. The child user in a jet and the child sex user in a newspaper are just the same psyche manifested differently.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:29 AM
5

They will also point out that women aren't very likely to be attacked by strangers, mostly (unfortunately) people they know. This is to a large extent fabricated by feminists eager to portray positive relationships with men as as death-traps for women. How? By simply counting "people they know" to include people they have "known" for a few hours. A woman who goes to a party, speaks with a man, heads home a few hours later, and is followed and attacked by that man, will be counted as being attack…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:47 AM
4

After you get jumped on the street as a guy, that's it, when it's over it's over. You go home and resume your life the next day. That's exactly what this is, women invalidating the staggeringly common experiences of men because it's more convenient for them to keep believing we're just hysterical.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:32 AM
22

I respect how the second girl instantly twists this around to support the ideas of "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity". Always take every opportunity to win, whether by harming or by gaining.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:08 AM
36

Very right, and a very good illustration.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/21 01:13 PM
18

What do you think about prejudice or precautions based on race, nationality or religion?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:54 AM
10

Imagine a man justifying action based on bizarro-world fiction. "Return of X-Men comic 48's plot line for Earth 19 shows clearly why we have to vote for Trump!"
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:53 AM
53

As a woman ... As a woman... As a woman... As a woman... As a woman... As a woman... With the crushing sexism and discrimination against women claimed, she must have been trying to self-harm and increase her penalty.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/21 06:04 PM
23

Imagine actually wanting to spend time with some thing like that.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/21 03:19 PM
4

That violence against men won't receive a milder sentence than violence against women.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:17 PM
3

The president of the French Judo Federation, Stéphane Nomis, and female French judo star Clarisse Agbégnénou said they were shocked by the court's decision. Both have injuries. He says she attacked him. She says he attacked her. It is intolerable to them that the woman should not be believed and the man not punished. They are monsters. The law wasn't written by monsters, but it can be changed by the monsters.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:42 AM
29

A man who told women to use a surgical contraceptive method that gave them a 25% risk of permanent infertility would be considered a monster. Many women say men should use such a method.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:29 PM
2

If hate was ended or destroyed, there would be a lot less women like this in the world.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:38 AM
6

"Femicide", the invented word games of the fucked-up conspiracy theorists.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/21 04:27 AM
6

We might as well stop recognizing feminists as human beings, as they are more like some horror writer's nightmarish fantasy caricature of humans.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 02:00 AM
25

Notice how they react to a man actually speaking about his emotions.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:07 AM
410

to meet his friends and co-workers at a grand opening for the retail company he works for, He invited her to a function for his company, related to his job. She completely ignores the requested dress code, and dresses up in something that looks like an enormous bright pink sheet.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 06:31 AM
11

Any reasonable person knows that a woman doing that is also wrong. Sure - the problem is just that the world has an overwhelming number of women-favoring, pro-women-biased unreasonable persons in it.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 06:27 AM
1

Send an email to yourself with all the details. Your consensual sex, your suspicions, why you have your suspicions, your concerns. This may be a small tilt in your favor if this ever comes up - as it shows that you became aware of this and "explained" yourself in a timely fashion - instead of potentially some time into the future. People somehow believe older and "timely" explanations more than explanations many years later once the accusation has been made.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 12:42 AM
4

They are totalitarian monsters that should not have existed beyond the 70s, but somehow clung on. That's why.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 12:37 AM
18

"Fair competition"? You missed that this is a lifting club where people lift alongside each other, not a lifting tournament. He has presented the logic behind it. It's not what you claim it is. The logic is perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 04:01 PM
14

I mean sure, as long as you cheer violence towards cheating women and men. I think what people react to here, other than violence being generally bad, is double standards. A man who inflicted grievous harm and big open bleeding wounds on a woman for cheating would be condemned, not get giggles and cheers.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 08:10 PM
59

It's to try to recruit you to fight their wars by lying to you: https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/poerzl/feminist_trickledown_equality_the_fight_against/ Regularly, feminists make statements on the form of: You are worried about bad thing X that affects men negatively? Well, X is actually caused by patriarchy (in very intangible, indirect, thoughts-and-perceptions ways). So you should help dismantle patriarchy, then your goal will come to you and be achieved as a side effect, trick…
/r/MensRights08/11/21 06:28 PM
6

Some women, and women's magazines and cultural sources, seem to completely miss that what men are looking for in a woman is someone they become happier from spending time with. CEO job? Why would that cause a man to become happier after spending time with you? Long education? Why would that cause a man to become happier after spending time with you? Being "intimidating"? Why would that cause a man to become happier after spending time with you? Having a perfectly manicured house? Why would that …
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 09:41 AM
6

A possible angle is "objectification" - of women and men appearing in movies. One of the teachings of feminism is that there is something called "objectification" -- which is supposed to (vaguely) be when you are treating someone as an "object". Of course, it's very rare that people are actually treated as objects, because objects can be bought and sold, rented out, insured and put into storage. So it's used about situations where women are simply shown for filling the role of sex appeal, withou…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:23 AM
3

I have written a pretty big pile of essays and texts in my life, scored decently well. As I understand it, your overall topic is "free choice", and you have chosen the specific subject feminism. Is it correct that what you write has to fit well under the umbrella of "free choice"? I think that might be a challenge - but not an impossible one. A danger is that if the teacher is negatively inclined, and you deviate too much from the topic of "free choice", you could be marked down for that reason …
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:52 AM
12

Men are killed far, far more than women in pretty much every country on the planet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender The nonhuman deathballs will cry that "but this is not SYSTEMATIC". The nonhuman deathballs will cry that violence against men is not "SYSTEMATIC oppression", the murder of men is somehow not "STRUCTURAL" murder. The killing of ten men isn't SYSTEMATIC or BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN, whilst the killing of a single woman is FEMICIDE and BECAUSE SHE WAS A WOMAN, …
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 08:24 AM
65

Destroying "male bonding", men's networks, friendships and support systems has been a deliberate goal of feminists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the "real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport." Gea…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:27 AM
1

c-can w-we p-please b-be a-allowed t-to m-marry p-please sir
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:21 AM
0

c-can w-we p-please b-be a-allowed t-to m-marry p-please sir
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 07:20 AM
2

Here's Feminism in Australia: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qlsy4o/australia_disciplinary_action_has_been_taken/ "If they had not been discriminated against, the CCC estimated about 200 more men would have been successful in their attempt to join the police service." No problem at all, it's just a disposable blob of 200 men. Just a smaller blob than 500 or 1000 men. Note that this wasn't one person's bad deed. It was an entire system of many, many staff acting together, convinced …
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 05:57 PM
8

They went private over internal disagreement about a podcast. Never any hint that the antihumans have taken action against them.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/21 09:48 AM
1

12 likes on the original post, nice
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 05:58 AM
32

Feminists are the most monstrous antihuman trash that good people should fight to to get rid of, but this story sounds unlikely. I mean, you're an account with virtually zero posts. Sad if true.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 05:43 AM
3

Demonstrating yet again that the life and existence of feminists cannot be reconciled with a safe planet for others than themselves. There is no "common interest" as long as the monsters and their institutions exist.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 11:28 AM
1

This girl must really have hated herself. After all, since girls are discriminated against, saying "I'm just a girl" must be a way of trying to get worse treatment.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/21 06:05 PM
-1

When I see the most monstrous, antihuman, batshit deranged shit that shouldn't exist anywhere on the planet, like some kind of monster wearing a skin that doesn't belong to them, I Google that person's name and a word
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 05:44 PM
2

Fantastically precise and well said.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:25 AM
14

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender There's no reason to care about the wellbeing of this monstrous nonhuman trash. They deserve everything bad they experience, and probably far more.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 06:40 AM
1

The question is absurdly overbroad and meaningless. It depends on what the "bad" is. "Which is worse, old accountants doing bad or young electricians doing bad?" would even be far more specific. Tradcons aren't a problem. Feminists very much are.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 06:36 AM
48

"u are right i do hate men but for good reason" Replace "men" with "brown people", "jews", "women" etc.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 06:31 AM
35

Women increasingly harmed, suffering from being in majority at universities
/r/MensRights01/11/21 10:13 PM
-1

The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. A comment is not necessarily informative or well-founded. Tradcons who criticize men for not fulfilling traditional roles would also criticize women for the same reason. The simping and white-knighting that's done on behalf of feminists and online whores hence cannot come from tradcons.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:58 PM
34

Sure - but tradcons sure are a hell of a lot better than feminists. They would also be opposing feminists, and good in that sense.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 12:14 PM
4

The worst people always take care to use the prettiest banners.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 02:40 AM
4

Simone de Beauvoir was a pedophile evangelist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws It's no wonder that child abuse is a thread throughout feminism - it's just a sub-branch of nonhuman psychopathy. Feminists who rape children for their pleasure is just a subset of abusing children in other ways for their goals generally. They aren't animals - animals are better than them. Feminists cannot be reconciled with a good planet for humans to live in. There's no just…
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 02:37 AM
2

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: "On average, Australian females experience different health outcomes than Australian males. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/men-women/female-health/contents/who-are USAID: "How Jordan’s Fearless Females Are Paving the Way for Future Generations" https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/frontlines/september-october-2016/how-jordans-fearless-females-are Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: "However, females are more likely than males to be killed or inj…
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 02:24 AM
10

Your definition doesn't reflect reality.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 12:51 PM
6

You're a mentally ill child who looks like someone threw acid in your face. You attempt to fabricate the minimal self-worth required for an organism to not kill itself by shitposting online. You have turned your mental illness into an online persona. Your self-descriptions make you come across as something that belongs in a glass jar in a freakshow.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 10:33 AM
20

well, it's AITA, so a woman there would absolutely be entitled to describe something as a kidnapping if it gives her those feelings
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 10:21 AM
4

That you even have to ask this question
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 08:10 AM
6

On your profile page you've got "Non-binary , they/them, gay, 16, BLM" and a picture of something that could be a prop in a horror movie. You're definitely not an incel - life, biology, society, your face and your mental health has all fucked you.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 07:59 AM
6

Are you for real?
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 07:50 AM
1

Could unfortunately be considered brigading.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:43 AM
48

Ah yes, the source "Revenge Porn Statistics".
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 04:27 AM
13

Victims of abuse wait so long because they’re terrified of being hurt or murdered. If someone had a tongue stuck in their ear, and were terrified for 30 years living in fear of being hurt or murdered if they told about it, we should combine our sympathy for them with treating them as unfit for any kind of work or responsibility. This is different from feeling you won't be believed, feeling it will hurt your job prospects etc.. But thinking you will be murdered? Batshit looney deranged.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 11:00 PM
1

The article just engages in obtuse word games. Note the article on obscurantism, although it misses out that this is extremely prevalent today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism Like something I made up just now: "People always crave the things they don't have. After all, if they have something, it makes no sense to crave it. By definition it's demonstrated that people's cravings are unlimited, cannot ever be fulfilled, and would be globally destructive if carried out. Therefore, we sho…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 10:45 PM
18

The style is pretty unusual, but interesting and attractive. Really awesome that he can make money from selling reproductions.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/21 09:50 AM
94

“The ex-wife admitted in court she wanted the property to sell it and derive monetary gains from its increase in value” Just something not usually seen in news articles
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/21 09:48 AM
4

I support self defense
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 06:31 AM
6

"Is this something I need to overcome in order to be fully feminist?" Where outside a mad cult would you see a statement like this?
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 11:29 PM
11

I agree. It's really bad to forget to highlight women who are top quality, good people. Consider just reading one of several oneliners on Twitter: All men are bad Men are bad Most men are bad Men are bad, other than men like Bob Johnson Most men are bad, but some are good Some men are bad Some men are bad, many aren't Most men aren't bad, but some are For most users here there would be a vast difference in how something towards the top is read vs something towards the bottom. The same goes for w…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 09:31 PM
7

One month old feminist troll account: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/qeoje5/mob_beats_a_guy_and_kicks_him_out_of_the_hood/hhv2cu6/
/r/MensRights24/10/21 09:20 PM
8

le reddit knight /u/JVictorRRW is always happy to help any person who needs it, which is why most of his days are spent cleaning the houses of morbidly obese single mothers in their 40s
/r/MensRights24/10/21 04:20 PM
42

Ah, "Equality", a situation where a man wishing to make a point or argument online can post a picture of a man with a decapitated woman's head.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 01:14 PM
4

Ah the "It Was Great Before But Is Now Bad" meme. What time period did you like the sub? I'll find some posts from that time.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 12:35 PM
72

Yep. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger In-group bias is the tendency that, let's say you're white, and you automatically favor and give preferential treatment to white people in every way, from believing white people more to giving white people the best piece of the pie. Not all women are sexist, but research shows that this sexism is far st…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 12:32 PM
7

Wow, sounds like you are promoting hate against OP, have you made arrangements for when you're jailed for that?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/21 04:23 AM
16

Yeah, pretty much what you expect. https://i.imgur.com/uQYnVfL.png On MensLib, women are the victims. Women are particularly victimized when they are treated better than men, like being given more varied and interesting jobs.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:58 AM
1

I'm not american, so not so much I can say on the legal side of things. 1- have you been found guilty of domestic violence, or been charged (accused) of it? Misdemeanor or felony? 2- based on an independent review of the evidence, is there any chance of being found innocent or getting a conviction overturned? 3- for jobs, you can search out if potential employers do background checks. Not all do. Blue collar jobs far easier than white collar.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 01:47 AM
13

no nuance or contextual difference between shouting "nice cock" at a human being in real life Worthless trash pretending that this is in the image linked, or is remotely relevant to the image linked.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 06:53 PM
8

Trash literally posts dozens of comments about a magazine then couldn't care less about it 😂 Its parents would have aborted it if they could have seen what it became, and it knows.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 06:47 PM
11

Good call coming from something that fantasizes at length about its favorite cartoon characters being transsexuals.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 06:43 PM
5

Words mean things. Worthless trash attempting to fabricate justification for escaping abortion through meaningless platitudes There's a significant difference between [phrase 1] & [phrase 2]. Worthless trash attempting to fabricate justification for escaping abortion through pointless truism No shit there's a difference between two completely different expressions. In this case however, an image shows Cosmo publishing complaints about "objectification" of women, whilst at the same time "objectif…
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 06:38 PM
44

Comment from /u/passablepatissier: You.... you people realize there's a difference between finding people sexy & dehumanizing them into sex objects that you don't view as people, right? This absolutely worthless trash.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 04:37 PM
4

It's hard to say for sure. Many possibilities. Some people will just prefer a meal because it allows for both good food (which they may like) and a longer interaction. At the same time, she should know about this, and that her choice is the unusual one. How about proposing a certain date at a nice restaurant, and adding "since this is the first time we meet, are you fine with splitting the bill?"
/r/MensRights23/10/21 04:00 AM
1

Asking for help in reporting Oliver from the person who is dating him seems unlikely to be a good idea. She would be forced to choose who to back or support, no? The police is extremely unlikely to care. Some young people have a belief in the police as either a social SWAT force to kick down doors and redress all wrongs, or as some kind of laser microscope to punish all events that pattern-match the precise letter of the law. In reality the police is already drowning in cases where someone was p…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 03:41 AM
9

It was very fun to stick my hand down her pants as she said no.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/21 01:23 AM
-6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionism_in_the_United_Kingdom#Campaigning_after_the_act In 1827, Britain defined participation in the slave trade as piracy and punishable by death. Between 1808 and 1860, the Royal Navy’s West Africa Squadron seized approximately 1,600 slave ships and freed 150,000 Africans who were aboard British people used military force to stop slavery across the world. Based on you it would be better if they had never done that.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/21 05:44 PM
8

It's not tough to pin blame. We pin blame based on what's visible in the movie. If the video simply shows a man beating a woman, there's no "wE dOnT KNoW thE baCkStoRy We CaNT JuDgE hIM". It's a platitude and meme that gets rolled out to defend women only.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/21 05:37 PM
17

"Are you serious?" "No, madam, we are detaining her as a joke"
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 06:14 AM
1

Could you list your own somewhat reasonable ultimatums to women in your life? Presumably you have written down some rules for them?
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 02:15 AM
1

https://www.womensaid.org.uk/information-support/what-is-domestic-abuse/domestic-abuse-is-a-gendered-crime/ Feminists downplay and minimize women's domestic abuse against men. Your "anonymous username" "presumed-feminists" are absolutely irrelevant nonentities compared with actual feminist organizations and pressure groups. Please stop defending feminists. I won't defend Nazis or KKK members.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 02:11 AM
1

Part of masculinity is by your own will putting your foot down in the face of threats, pressure and insanity.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 02:08 AM
1

even feminist (real ones) would visit this subreddit and enjoy with harmony Feminists have controlled ten million megaphones for decades, and between zero and one of them have been used to shout out about the harms of controlling behavior by women. Events like the above would be virtually nonexistent if the peer pressure and cult behavior of feminists had been dedicated to ending it. Please fuck off. Edit: Here's actual organized feminists' take on domestic abuse: https://www.womensaid.org.uk/in…
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 02:03 AM
1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1051137718300457 Minority and male applicants are discriminated.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 05:06 AM
3

Thanks, you're a good person. Ironically, the "Do what's useful to get the result you want" attitude seems to promote sexual harassment if anything. Like if someone grows up surrounded by nothing but people who do whatever they want to get what they want, that's a great starting point to both carrying out and not caring about sexual assault.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 04:49 AM
16

Sounds like a cartoon villain made by feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 01:22 AM
16

The "actual feminists" include the nonhuman monsters. E.g. https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/andrea-dworkin-quotes "Childbearing is glorified in part because women die from it" "Seduction is often difficult to distinguish from rape. In seduction, the rapist often bothers to buy a bottle of wine." The monsters are not part of humankind. They do not have human rights, and should not be treated as human. A comparison with animals fails, because animals are far better than them. Any act towards th…
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 11:57 AM
1

Me: If you had made a mirror post on a feminist subreddit, you would have been banned. Here, you were not banned. You: Maybe because I think on feminist subs if someone posts that they usually end up being just a misogynist rather than a real MRA. Then I think you misunderstood my top comment here. I meant that someone who made a mirroring post on a feminist subreddit would be banned immediately. Not after a while and based on several more posts, but based on the "I'm an antifemist" post alone. …
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 10:07 PM
6

Imagine being so oppressed, hated and downtrodden that people pretend to belong to your group in order to gain a higher popularity.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 09:59 PM
1

But that would be their speculation, belief and stereotype, not actual knowledge. They would punish based on belief about what might turn out to be true - that the person might turn out to be a misogynist. In the same way, you could be punished based on speculation and belief about you. Someone could see you and think that you will probably do bad things, even if you haven't, so let's treat you as a bad person.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 09:54 PM
1

Okay, that's interesting. From the list of staff, there's a number of them, for example: Ozichi Okorom is a graduate of Princeton University in African American Studies where she studied Black Feminist Theory and African Diaspora Studies. She is an incoming PhD student in African & African Diaspora Studies at University of Texas-Austin. So someone who studied Black Feminist Theory at the well-regarded Princeton university -- you label as not a real feminist. That's pretty interesting. By the way…
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 09:47 PM
1

Okay, so they ban people based on a stereotype and belief rather than evidence. I wonder if someone will ever in your life punish you based on nothing but stereotyping and speculation. Have you been taught how feminist icon Emmeline Pankhurst was the driver of a mass terrorist campaign: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suffragette_bombings or how feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir was an evangelist for pedophilia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws What …
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 09:25 PM
1

If you had made a mirror post on a feminist subreddit, you would have been banned. Here, you were not banned. Do you have any conclusions or thoughts about this?
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 09:04 PM
3

No wonder really: https://mpsi.umm.ac.id/files/file/723%20-%20728%20Djudiyah%20Dahlan.pdf There were significant differences between male and female neuroticism personality (t-test = 2.138, df =49, P<0.05) where males’ neuroticism usually lower than females. (Mean=111.833 for males and Mean=127.303 for females ) I bought an ice cream the other day. From the body language of the clerk who took the money for the ice cream from me, it was like he had no regard for my hopes and dreams, no care for m…
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 08:38 PM
1

Any conclusions or thoughts about us not being as ban-happy as them?
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 08:30 PM
1

Do you accept that the same post saying "I'm an antifemist" on a feminist sub would most likely have resulted in the poster being banned?
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 07:41 PM
3

I don't understand your "development", what caused your reasoning to change "since then". Was there ever any doubt or uncertainty in your mind that feminism wanted to promote and give power to women at the expense of men? To further the cause of women? If I was a woman, I would view feminism like I view Nazism now as a straight white non-Jewish man. A movement that ultimately would benefit myself, and in part of the process treat others quite badly. Should I as a woman be a supporter of such a m…
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 06:33 PM
6

It's a far shittier version of the old "virgin". As a kid there was a lot of attention about whether someone was a virgin or not, and "virgin" was an insult - hey, this person can't get laid! But there was an objective side to it - once you actually had sex just once, you were no longer a virgin. At that point the insult became less serious. Like being called an amputee, deaf or poor when you know yourself you aren't - it sucks, but it sucks less.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 05:29 PM
3

Have someone told you that your reading comprehension is at a young child level, that you are unable to process simple statements and how they are connected and refer to each other, with terms like "it" and "this"? Or how a response directly below a quote is normally a response to that quote? You promote a fucked-up movement of antihuman monsters, and you promote that movement by lying about them. You are a fucked-up monster yourself who deserve the worst. But out of my principle, and any other …
/r/MensRights15/10/21 03:27 PM
4

Maybe ask about whether different cultures in different countries have different amounts of "rape culture". Assuming she says yes, then about her view on culture exchange with Afghanistan.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 03:13 PM
7

Just read the responses to the mod sticky. Fucking amazing.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 02:15 PM
25

Rule 1: Feel free to speak your mind and please be open-minded - This is a place where all who want to get something off their chest, can get something off their chest. The Mods at /r/TrueOffMyChest will never enforce any rules that exclude any race/gender/etc. or other views from posting in /r/TrueOffMyChest. We ask that you do the same. /u/nexerxe mod sticky: "I’ll allow this for now, but will lock the comments if the incels come here" AHAHAHAHAHA
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 01:59 PM
2

It is hateful language targeting YOU, because of the statements YOU continue make. where you attempt to gaslight me by telling me your abusive language is in my head Oh, there's a lot that's in your head, not much good. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 12:55 PM
3

this has an S at the end, may be a different one
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:25 AM
4

Hi, your self-admitted brigading has been reported, thanks: https://archive.vn/hGhyw
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:10 AM
1

People in this sub just love tell women they deserve to be treated poorly by men. But you have no basis to state that. This is your fantasy and craving, your desperate desire for something to be true. You are not women. Women are not you. You are not part of a "woman-blob". Many women are far better than you. Many women should never be spoken about in the way you are spoken about. You repeatedly express some kind of brain damage where attitudes TO YOU, based on the posts YOU make, somehow secret…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 10:49 AM
1

This is mysoginistic. This is hateful language targeting women. In your mind it is - because you're a worthless, stupid bitch, and your post here just supports that further. In reality it isn't - calling you a worthless bitch isn't misogynistic. It isn't hateful language "targeting women". It is hateful language targeting YOU, because of the statements YOU continue make. You are not "women". You are not "womankind". You are not a small part of a gender blob. An attack on you is not an attack "on…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 10:32 AM
1

You consistently go out of your way to defend and promote feminism in the most dishonest ways, using a wide spectrum of techniques. Oh, it is impossible to think that a feminist could say X. Oh, you could never imagine that. You get the evidence presented - oh, but most feminists don't think that way. Etc. Fuck off, worthless bitch.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:54 AM
2

"I wonder how popular the director of the Feminist Majority Foundation is amongst feminists"
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:52 AM
2

The chance that someone is an adult on the internet and simply never seen feminists shit on men in a wide variety of ways is very, very small. The definition excuse is just dishonest and disingenuous in itself: "Hey, actually, no sports fan has ever been violent, because the definition of sports fan includes that you are motivated by the sport and not violence teehee"
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:48 AM
2

Feminists absolutely put people/men down massively, and every participant here will have seen it, but you gaslight people and claim it doesn't happen at all, you worthless trash bitch. Any bad events you have in your life were not enough - you deserved far more of them. Nobody on this sub should see you as anything more than a liar and evangelist for feminism.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:29 AM
2

"Bopikins2600" is actually far worse than your average feminist, because behind the fake "compassion" there's just lies to promote and evangelize feminism. Like our exchange here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q7vbu7/make_women_feel_safe/hgl7rs2/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Claiming that absolutely no, zero, feminists places the blame on men for violence against them is... beyond discussion. The polished liar, the liar who seems compassionate, is actually far wors…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:25 AM
18

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/11c0pz/why_are_many_women_more_safety_concerned_than_men/c6lb0s8/ Men are less safe, there is no if about it. There are more male victims of violent crimes compared to females. For 2008 there was 21.4 male victims compared to 16.7 female victims (this is per 1000 people) I'm curious how much of that is the result of drug or gang-related violence that men are more likely to be involved in. I imagine that can skew the numbers, in most high-crime areas…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:14 PM
78

True. Women are the victims of far less violence than men. "But it's men's/rape victims own fault for who they choose to spend their time with!" responds the feminists. "After all, the men/rape victims have chosen to associate with violent people!" Wait, that, but only the "men" part, not the "rape victims" part.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:27 AM
18

"PickMe" all in one package claims that: the woman doesn't actually hold the views she claims - she doesn't actually mean what she says - she just pretends to hold those views and the reason she pretends to hold those views is to appear attractive to men And there's no evidence behind this, it's just a oneliner that still gains universal nods. Imagine this actually happening in a face to face discussion. The accuser would or should be considered an absolutely worthless, deceitful, evil fuck and …
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 07:39 AM
12

"gendered aspect" isn't very precise. More like: They aren't separating men and women as individuals in their minds, but thinking of a "man-group" and a "woman-group" in a gender war between groups. When the "woman-group" hasn't done something, then it shouldn't be the problem or anything to care about for the "woman-group".
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:45 AM
1

From profile: "Message me to buy videos of me getting fcked or custom videos" Yeah, no. Also, the outrage if dicks were posted to feminist subs.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:37 AM
2

Imagine being a grandfather and seeing this is the end of your family line.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:22 AM
1

It's just deliberately phrased to seem evenhanded and balanced, like in how many letters and sentences are written for each, whilst actually being fantastically one-sided and favourable to women. The monsters were never bad at wordgames.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:16 AM
1

Women: Defend and support men who want to wear lipstick and dresses. Men: Listen to women and care about them. This isn't balanced or human, just more of the sociopathic monster wordgames.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:13 AM
3

Indeed. There's a vast imbalance between men's work towards women and women's work towards men in the above. The only reason this gives anyone a small bit of pleasure and hope, is that what they usually see from feminists is even less human. When you are used to living with an absolute monster that shouldn't exist in this world, then even a tiny hint of humanity from the monster is treated as the most precious gold.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:10 AM
1

Yeah, OP's paragraphs aren't remotely "equality" at all. It rather shows how desperate people are for the very tiniest concession from the nonhuman biotrash that this is upvoted. Boys are given a wide spectrum of comprehensive tasks and responsibilities towards women: "Call people out when they make offensive jokes." -- implicitly, jokes that some girl finds offensive, which is extremely, extremely many. "Stand up to those who treat girls like objects" -- obscurantism, girls aren't treated "like…
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 01:58 AM
2

No, it isn't. Feminism doesn't involve protecting boys whatsoever. Feminists "protect" boys the same way a man would "protect" a woman by locking her up in his basement.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 01:31 AM
7

Feminists are deranged per the picture - there's no "real feminism" when it's just a collection of the most mad delusions of the most mentally ill. See paedophilia-evangelist Simone de Beauvoir and her countless followers, for example.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 01:18 AM
3

Fundamental reading comprehension? Your presumption that Jen Ortiz, Jordan Larson and Kerensa Cadenas are more likely than not fantastically incompetent at their jobs and fail to vet writers as real is, after all, your fantasy. Go ahead and campaign for them being removed from the industry for printing fake texts, if that's what you believe. Also, fantastic job dismissing an extended ideological mass terrorist bombing campaign targeting random civilians by a globally hero-worshipped feminist as …
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 07:12 PM
3

/u/sinfulcucumber is utter idiotic trash. Text is literally from a feminist magazine with a near-exclusively female team of editors: https://www.thecut.com/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:32 PM
3

Yeah because that definitely happened. Stop believing everything you see on the internet and weaponising it as a form of justification to espouse hatred towards feminism. /u/sinfulcucumber https://archive.vn/Cqgpe Very sad to hear about how those pixels fired from that Assault Reddit-15 went straight through your head without impacting much. The text gun merchants came from this location: https://www.thecut.com/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html About The Cut: We are i…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:29 PM
3

Considering all the other insanity that's part of feminism, this isn't out of character for feminists at all.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:37 AM
11

wanting to be treated with basic respect while also been treated as female I want all the traditional privileges, perks, gifts, holidays, lighter duties, more sick leave, paid dates and segregation-when-I-choose-it of women, whilst at the same time massive effort should be taken to improve my situation in any area I don't have traditional perks and bonuses. Hopefully, some cleaning chemicals will enter the daily life of the biological trash that holds views like that. It's hard to build a better…
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/21 07:06 AM
5

The sources I can find say pretty clearly that copyright created during marriage will be split: https://www.altdivorcesolutions.com/blog/2021/january/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-divorce/ Created and protected after marriage: The copyright or patent is likely community property. https://judyburger.com/who-gets-the-intellectual-property-during-a-divorce/ Because the books were considered community property in the divorce, “such copyrights and related tangible benefits must be consider…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:15 AM
4

If a law is unreasonable and keeps favoring women and screwing over men, equality-in-unreason MUST ALWAYS be step 1. If it isn't, the situation will simply remain unchanged for 10-20-40+ years. People like us will keep making noises, saying how unreasonable it is, how things must change, but "somehow" change will never happen. "Somehow" all the proposals will just be dead on arrival, be met with polite nods then end up in the bin. In the extremely rare situation that a proposal for equality goes…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:05 AM
1

Not sure how this is related to antifeminism. Although men are the main victims of violence, occasionally and in a minority of cases, women are too.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/21 06:19 AM
3

Notice the guy's statements: Palmer told Stuff gaining copyright was “not a control tactic”. “Unfortunately yes, I could end up competing against her, technically speaking, by printing more, but I don’t want to do that.” The article doesn't say what the journalist's questions are, but the answers are phrased like they are responses to accusations. "Is this a tactic intended to control her?" Fuck the evil bitch Jody O'Callaghan. If anyone gets a call from her, record it and insist on getting ques…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/21 07:37 AM
1

If a law is unreasonable and keeps favoring women and screwing over men, equality-in-unreason MUST ALWAYS be step 1. If it isn't, the situation will simply remain unchanged for 10-20-40+ years. People like us will keep making noises, saying how unreasonable it is, how things must change, but "somehow" change will never happen. "Somehow" all the proposals will just be dead on arrival, be met with polite nods then end up in the bin. In the extremely rare situation that a proposal for equality goes…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/21 07:06 AM
5

It glosses over the fact the same thing happens every day to thousands of men but seems like this specific case only matters because the genders are reversed. Very well said. Open offer to feminists: If any feminist can point me to a single article in the same newspaper in the last TEN YEARS that gives equally much space to a man complaining only about his obligation to pay in divorce, I'll donate $100 to a major feminist organization of your choice. Open offer to all feminists reading this. A h…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/21 06:31 AM
7

Can't let babies choose. The danger is that they might say no.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 11:59 AM
0

because the Nazis called their ideology a form of socialism to make it seem more palatable Wrong, Nazism was a peculiar and racially-focused implementation of the ideology Nationalist Socialism - which is a brand of socialism very similar to Internationalist Socialism. Per the name, the only real difference is Nationalist vs Internationalist. See for example the National Socialist party of the UK, founded in 1916, which was left-wing and absorbed into the Internationalist Socialist Labour Party:…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:03 AM
145

Part of the reason people are against the MRM it's seen as anti-woman because somehow in the hive mind of society being anti-feminist equates to anti-woman Gee, I wonder what movement this has roots in: https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/23879.Andrea_Dworkin “Antifeminism is a direct expression of misogyny; it is the political defense of woman hating.” I completely agree that we should focus on making things better for men. Feminism is however not the only thing, but a mountain-range, stand…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:23 AM
4

Antihuman worthless trash. Parasitical dipshit. Nonhuman imitaton of something that pretends to have rights. You look like you care for your dog. Hope you have trained it well.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 01:10 AM
4

if you're mad about men being murdered, you should be mad at the men doing the killing. Not women who also don't want to be murdered. That's interesting. How does your principle apply to who can legitimately avoid who when it comes to race and skin color?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 11:40 PM
2

Men can't be responsible for the majority of domestic violence, rape and murder and then get mad when women are scared of them. That's a funny law you've stated. How does it apply to race and skin color?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 11:38 PM
1

Men are wanted because they, generally, provide for their families. Women are wanted because they have to pop out children left and right and take care of their homes. Ah, yes. This obligation and threat on men that they need to work if they want to survive and thrive. This obligation and threat on women that they need to have children left and right if they want to survive and thrive. Feminism's recognition of both these obligations, and work to enshrine both of them in society. /s
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 04:54 AM
38

It's also an argument that completely ignores that this is how it works for all other crimes. The same applies to all crimes - all people who make false accusations of any crime and come forward as having lied risk punishment. Just a demand for "special rules for women". We must create new principles, new rules, new ideas, for the benefit of women specifically.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/21 05:24 AM
13

Reading those messages is extremely telling. Encourage everyone to read them to understand the minds and behavior of some women.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/21 05:20 AM
41

Yeah, it's not easy compared to what women usually get. Just easy compared to a what a man would have gotten. Sexually abusing a child, recording video of it and distributing the video . If you asked a group of feminists without mentioning the gender, they would presume it's a man, and so call for life in prison without parole and chemical castration.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/21 12:26 PM
2

Sounds like they are just paranoid and neurotic, finding pleasure in anger and lashing out. About neuroticism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism#Age,_gender,_and_geographic_patterns Just avoid any woman saying things like this. The angriest and most paranoid ones are the loudest.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 06:13 AM
1

If feminism was about equality - it would mean that it would own the faults of women, not just assert faults in men. I discussed with a feminist once. I pointed out that there's widespread negative stereotypes of men, and far more positive stereotypes of women. She claimed that feminism would fix this - basically trying to recruit me through promise of trickle-down equality. I pointed out that the media could just start writing a lot more about female criminals and less about male, to even out t…
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 06:07 AM
3

"Pickme" = you know you are wrong and we are right, but you deliberately lie in order to be liked by men Compared to accusations like "you suck" or "you're ugly", it's about three tiers high on insectile sociopathy
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 05:53 AM
0

There's actually a bunch of comments saying they think this breaking of sitewide rules is inappropriate.
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 07:56 PM
1

I think you are overreacting. Then please describe, what content do you think led to MGTOW being banned, and TheRedPill being quarantined, requiring a verified email to post and thereby cutting the submissions massively? Death threats? Bomb recipes? Or just posts like the above? I think this kind of post should belong here because criticizing feminism should be more than just showing their double standards and misandry but should also show how they negatively impact society. The post doesn't sho…
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 06:37 PM
-6

"I hate women who grew up in a feminist society" demonizes all women in pretty much all of the Western world. "I hate white people who have grown up in white countries" is extremely similar to "I hate white people" "I hate black people who have grown up in the USA" is extremely similar to "I hate black people" "I hate all men who have been born and lived under patriarchy" (spoken by a feminist) is extremely similar to "I hate all men". Many women are not very feminist. Only about 20% of women de…
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 12:23 PM
3

Sitewide rule against repurposing this sub to serve the same purpose as MGTOW
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 10:14 AM
-15

I made /r/trueantifeminism because of posts like this. Still getting it up (writing rules, getting useful material).
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 05:23 AM
5

The bitch walking up to someone who's lying on the ground covering his head, to get in a few free headstomps.
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/21 01:06 AM
0

Rule 1: Don't demonize women Rule 2: Don't repurpose a sub to serve the same purpose as a banned sub (MGTOW)
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/21 08:30 PM
2

20 hour old account, seems like a troll - the type of feminist who makes a post, then screenshots it and says "look at the posts!"
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 10:09 AM
1

20 hours old single-purpose account I disagree. Anti-feminists aren't necessarily good people. Anti-feminism is a concept like democracy or human rights, but that doesn't mean all the proponents of something good are good. This just seems like some kind of edgy trolling.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 10:07 AM
1

Let's note that you've posted a number of negative oneliners in the sub - not arguments, just attacks on people, and still haven't been banned. At the same time, feminists wouldn't just ban you for that, but also arguments. 1 - Do you hence accept that we are meaningfully more tolerant and reasonable than feminists? You write that: Look, I’m on everyone’s side(or so I like to think myself), but the hatred has to stop. From one or the other. Why not give the good example and lead with it? I under…
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 02:45 AM
1

I’m also fed up with the patriarchy bullshit that is being thrown around and that somehow every individual man is responsible for the suffering of women. I’m done with all the stereotyping and being blamed for shit I didn’t do. Do you accept that feminists have been absolutely key to spreading this bullshit, and it would have been a fringe theory if it wasn't for feminists? Do you think feminists will stop doing these things if people are nice to them, despite doing this for decades? How do you …
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 02:36 AM
-2

Not sure why you’re pretending that politicians don’t exist I don't, your brain malfunctioned. I wrote that "virtually zero" men are politicians, which means "just about zero". Because it's absolutely the case - just about zero people, as a proportion of the population, are politicians. When speaking about life for men for the past 1000 years, life for politicians is largely irrelevant, because virtually no men were politicians. Your faulty reading comprehension makes discussion hard. Please try…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 06:23 PM
9

Do what? If you mean judge all feminists, it's because feminism has a large number of these antihuman monstrous fuckshits who should have felt something unpleasant from sunrise to sundown -- and a very large number of feminists praise and defend them. Hitler wanted animal welfare. I don't praise Hitler, even though animal welfare was a good point. The most batshit psycho of feminists were more insane than Hitler - even if less able to implement their views. Other feminists applaud, praise and ce…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 06:08 PM
10

You're a newly created troll account with literally negative karma. Fuck yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 05:59 PM
1

Is telling people that they have victimhood as a profession, like you do, a way to negative affect those people?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 05:54 PM
1

That didn't answer the question. Why are you here instead of speaking with feminists who would not accept that he has his opinion?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 05:53 PM
2

Your acceptance of a hate mob against men is suicidal, self-harming and ill, and I pity you for having it. I refererred to feminists, not women. Do you accept that feminists and women are different categories?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 05:50 PM
2

"Good Because Male" has been the status quo for politicians for basically the entire history of humanity. Virtually zero people have been politicians. For virtually everyone, "Male" has meant "Disposable". "Good Because Male" hasn't been the case for most people's lifetimes. Hence, "Good Because Female" and its proponents shouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:34 PM
-1

It's sexist -- all we really can do is vote for the parties that are most opposed to the sexism, boycott the sexist companies, and give negative feedback to their supporters. Oh, and spread the word. Actually, quite a few things.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:46 PM
5

The BBC highlight and celebration isn't that it's an "equal" parliament, but a "female majority" parliament. The BBC article isn't a non-issue whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:44 PM
-2

It's not "beyond statistical possibility" that something can happen when it already has happened. Try to rephrase.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:42 PM
1

but realistically we don't know that until there's evidence for it in practice. There has already been evidence for it when Iceland got its first female judge in 1970: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gu%C3%B0r%C3%BAn_Erlendsd%C3%B3ttir
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:29 PM
2

The fact that women are the majority now implies those barriers have been removed. That's why it's a win for equality No, the "win for equality" would have been the removal of those barriers, which happened a long time ago. An unequal situation isn't a "win for equality".
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:15 PM
10

All we need is a majority probability. The majority probability is established by the BBC article that focuses precisely on their gender as a very good thing in itself. When the majority probability is that you're wrong, it's up to you to supply the opposite, or have your view dismissed.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:48 PM
65

No, not if the female majority was voted in because of focus on their gender as a desirable goal in itself -- precisely as shown in the BBC article. "Good Because Female" is applied to female politicians. "Good Because Male" is not applied to male politicians.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:38 PM
1

And the same statement would earn sewer systems of rabid bile from countless feminists - so why are you here instead of speaking with them?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 01:54 AM
1

Absolutely -- since there's at least two feminists in the entire world who support equality, you can justify the plural "s" there. If there was just one, you would have to drop the s. They are just so insignificantly few that they are completely irrelevant, with no political power whatsoever, hence there's no need to make any symbolic exception from the general rule that feminists are antihuman monstrous bioslime who deserve the absolutely worst life it is possible for a living creature to have.…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 01:43 AM
2

Just satire over those who says it shouldn't matter when a girl punches someone because she's not "harming" them
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 07:26 PM
14

Maybe you /u/dangerzonebjj are just projecting your own desires to rape? Your father did something to you maybe?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 07:04 PM
6

Man uses handheld taser on woman repeatedly: "It's not like it did a lot of damage, it was just painful, no reason to react as if it harmed her"
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 07:03 PM
1

No idea who has said that. He was hesitant to be vaccinated or refused and she emotionally blackmailed him into it.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 04:21 PM
8

No, he couldn't. She would have used even a single arm or leg free to punch or kick him. There's no simple and guaranteed way to restrain all four limbs of someone - other than slamming them to the ground or similar and sitting on them, which is more than what he did.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 01:41 AM
6

Sorry to hear you're scared by this. Maybe you should take some mind-altering pills prescribed by your doctor to cope better with existence.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 01:40 AM
2

The idea is the woman in the post is manipulating her fiance into getting the covid vaccine by threatening breaking up with him if he doesn't get it (which is called an ultimatum). I, however, don't see it like that The first statement is a statement of fact. The second is a bizarre declaration that you dissociate from reality and simply choose not to see facts. E.g. There are some that think that George Floyd is dead. I, however, don't see it like that. There are some that think a person forced…
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 05:55 PM
6

It does - it shows emotional blackmail that's being supported and promoted. Hopefullt the antihumans defending this can be consigned to a buried trash heap of history one day, whilst humanity moves on better.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 12:32 PM
2

Daugherty “admitted making the false report but testified that it was Seaman Recruit Warren’s idea and that she only participated in the scheme because she was afraid of Seaman Recruit Warren,” according to the ruling. I would have paid to see this utter twat in court. "Your Honor, after I overslept and missed my duty time, my colleague threatened me into fabricating an excuse to save my own ass and fearing for my life I had no choice but to do it"
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/21 09:16 AM
3

Might be based on whether viewed on desktop or mobile. I could see it on desktop. They are trying to push mobile users to sign up.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/21 08:50 AM
297

*gropes man's chest* TEE-HEEE
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/21 08:50 AM
1

Ah, yes, they are victims, simply a product of other people, mainly men.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 04:44 AM
2

Setting up a sub to discredit an entire movement for equal rights Begging-the-question fallacy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question ) - It is not a movement "for equal rights". You're promoting a bigoted hate movement filled with monsters of a type it should have taken a horror writer on drugs to fabricate -- but creatures that have actually been alive, living and existing, in several cases up to recent history: https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/pto439/moderators_co…
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 04:19 AM
2

You're already doing so much. You don't need to feel a burden to do much more. Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 06:49 PM
1

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-it-legal-to-record-someone---s-audio-during-sex-4345802.html Q: I had non-consensual sex when I was drunk with a person. He says he recorded the audio as a proof of consent. I know it’s one party consent in ny but does it apply to sexual intercourse? A: Video would be illegal in its own right, audio probably would not. https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/i-recorded-the-audio-of-myself-engaging-in-a-conse-1258108.html Q: I recorded the audio of myself engaging…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 06:28 PM
1

No -- rather, recording yourself and a person you barely know going from pleasant conversation to consensual sex dramatically reduces the risk that you are found guilty of rape if she claims that. Whether your complete "misunderstanding" of this is faked or real doesn't matter so much - either a troll beyond redemption, or oblivious socially-inept idiot. If your parents had seen and expected what you are today, they would have aborted you - killed you to spare the world and themselves from you. …
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:45 PM
1

The Guardian is a rag https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Guardian-British-newspaper "The Guardian, formerly (1821–1959) The Manchester Guardian, influential daily newspaper published in London, generally considered one of the United Kingdom’s leading newspapers." An influential and "leading" left-wing newspaper promotes FDS. Post is removed, based on "The Guardian is a rag". Either a fabricated stance of convenience, or utterly oblivious to the widespread praise of The Guardian. In both cases,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 11:51 AM
44

Reminder that The Guardian has promoted and glorified FDS. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/aug/08/sales-funnels-and-high-value-men-the-rise-of-strategic-dating Psychopaths and monsters.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 11:12 AM
28

People are being erased because of their gender. 43% of those erased are women!! /endofmessage
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:48 AM
0

With that being said traditional roles are as bad for men if not worse Disagreed - "modern" roles for men bring all the same downsides of traditional roles (work obligation, pay obligation, stoicism obligation) just with none of the upsides.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:33 PM
-1

What you can do, and I would advise anyone to do: In addition to your usual phone, get a second iphone - you need an iphone for this because see point 2: Get a recording app that records even when you have pushed the power button / it's got a black screen - this will often shit out on Android phones which stop recording after a brief while, but you can literally get iPhone recording apps that run for hours and hours If you're inviting a lady to your bedroom the first few times, just leave it und…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:30 PM
1

Worthless mentally ill trash
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 09:03 AM
3

That's funny. You come into the sub to vomit up your own cancer, but end up crying like a broken pile of worthless shit. Trust me, most actual humans are better than you, broken human imitation.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 09:02 AM
1

By trying to get the sub banned. Thanks, I'll continue to describe them as they deserve.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:15 PM
3

For the time being at least - the antihuman biotrash is doing their best to make it impossible for him to tell his story here as well.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:04 PM
-8

Doesn't belong on /r/antifeminists
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:51 PM
8

must... find.... every.... remotely...... possible... way..... of... defending...... m'lady.....
/r/MensRights19/09/21 03:01 PM
13

The "giving of 10" is done with full knowledge that the serving will be far shorter though. If I give you a fine of 1000, but know fully well that you will actually only have to pay 400, was my intent that you should pay 1000 or that you should pay 400?
/r/MensRights19/09/21 02:58 PM
1

By realizing this, you are already so far down the path of self development. You are 14 now, and to you, you are the person you are now. You'll probably agree that you are a different person from who you were when you were 12. But you'll be another person when you're 16, 18 and 20, and 25. (Then it kind of stops, but hey ;) You're at an age where most people you meet are stronger than you, better than you at what they do, and kids are competing strongly with each other. So you are in a very comp…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:30 PM
5

If an MMA fight is an example of men's violence against women, then it's also an example of women's violence against men.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:47 AM
3

Well, if you're going to play a single role your entire life, it would be a lot harder to pick a role that was the complete opposite of your personality, than one that was just an exaggerated or adapted version of it..
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:43 AM
1

"Others say it's about addressing women's issues and rights (sounds fine. There are plenty of things that exclusively or mainly affect women)" This is only conditionally and partially fine. If there's 500 issues affecting women badly, or placing women at a distadvantage, and 500 issues affecting men badly or placing men at a disadvantage --- then singularly fixing women's issues may appear a combination of pro-women and pro-equality, but the sum outcome won't be equality.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:48 PM
29

Dangerous here - the antihumans will invent "brigading" accusations to get the sub banned. I advise everyone here AGAINST posting direct links. Only screenshots with usernames removed, or copy/paste. Sending links by private message works.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:34 PM
1

Found it, it says "Submissions restricted - only approved users may post" Impossible to say - could be many reasons. Squatting on it - or can't be bothered with moderation to prevent it from being banned - ask the mod
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:34 AM
2

That's pretty exceptional, even with no radio emissions? Although a lot of people seem to think you have a slam-dunk case, the problems are that racist statements aren't directed at you, and I doubt that discrimination covers it. I would expect age and sex to have a bit of a hurdle to overcome ("you young people are clueless, you don't have the experience of someone older" probably won't cut it). You have a large amount of written notes - but it would help your case a lot if you had just a few r…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:22 AM
5

I totally recognize wanting to do something good - but the track record of even well-developed Reddit competitors isn't great at all, as you may know. You would have a near-infinite number of trolls to death with, and the prospects of the app itself getting banned if it had "hateful content". So you would most likely put down a lot of work without reward. Could be useful for a CV, but could also be hard to explain - men's rights isn't a winner at interviews. All in all, there are better ways for…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:02 AM
0

It gives me hope that this is at +858 net upvotes.
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/21 01:41 AM
6

Thanks - let's also not forget to praise the women who aren't like this.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:22 AM
6

You can't promote men's rights without dealing with feminists.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:17 AM
5

Your sister is on the level of a very young, angry, stupid child, younger and more stupid than yourself. Like someone who declares that she HATES her dad because her dad doesn't WANT TO buy her a horse and carriage. You can't deal with her in a permanent way, you can just outgrow her and see past her, and hope she'll change. If you want to engage in shitty childish arguments on her level, just repeat "you're a bigot, you're sexist, you're stereotyping, you're racist against men" ("But men aren't…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:14 AM
34

Hey guys, I made a million dollars a year as a world champion runner. Then I had an accident and had to amputate my legs. I'm accustomed to the lifestyle, so I can have welfare payments of like 500k a year, right? I feel not getting that would hurt me mentally. Feminists: ... Hey guys, the father of my kid makes a million dollars a year as a runner. I have full custody and have moved away, so he doesn't see the kid either and he's cut out of both our lives. I'm accustomed to the lifestyle, so I …
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:25 PM
0

"Its better to discuss here and create a Mgtow replacement." Your posts are extremely contradictory to the point you come across like a troll, with some bizarre agenda. You declare that you don't want "MGTOW content" on this sub, because it will be banned. But you also declare that a new MGTOW replacement should be created, seemingly oblivious to the fact that it will be banned. So in one post, you are extremely worried that just small traces of MGTOW content on this subreddit would lead it to b…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:12 PM
2

Spend your time better - very unlikely to give a positive payout.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:07 PM
4

Example: Child support payment is set at X. The father loses their job, and only pays X-500. The mother receives welfare from the state, and the 500 becomes owed to the state. This accumulates month by month - 500, 1000, 1500 etc. Losing your job may be a reason to get child support payments reduced - but only going forward from the time of the decision, not retroactively. It takes time and effort to get child support payments reduced. It may be extremely difficult to deal with despair over losi…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:57 PM
8

MRA wants to address things like divorce court and custody, which are woefully biased in favor of women. How do we address this? By addressing cultural issues of men not being able to care for children. No. What you try to sell is "Trickle-down equality" -- at best an extremely indirect way of creating equality, but largely fraud and bullshit, recruiting people to work against their interests by some obscurantist promise that at the end of a long chain of intangible events it will give them what…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:25 PM
9

I'll agree that many arguments from feminism are dogshit, however, the egalitarian principles it strives for should be acknowledged Yes, fantastic. We acknowledge that inside the momentous and contradictory pile of shit, hate, bigotry, sexism, discrimination, chauvinism and unequal treatment, there is also (see "contradictory") egalitarian principles. Now, inside Nazism, together with the jew gassing, there was also principles of animal welfare and more holidays for the people. In the same way, …
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:07 PM
3

The reason men get wrecked on divorce is because we have culturally constructed that women are better at caring for children than men, Okay, great. You have identified a problem. You know about this concept called "positive discrimination"? Where blatantly sexist, discriminatory policies are enacted, because the end goal is a more equal society? Something justified and supported by feminists? A very direct way of dealing with the problem you describe, is in portraying women as often being not ve…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 08:55 PM
1

https://conference.iza.org/conference_files/Gender_2018/hjalmarsson_r4824.pdf The Persistence of the Criminal Justice Gender Gap: Evidence from 200 Years of Judicial Decisions 200 years of discrimination in favor of women.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:07 PM
1

And another post like those of the now-shot to death. How sad. My post refers to you - "yours". It's not a conversation, any more than I would have a conversation with something the police shot and killed in justifiable self defense. I'm speaking to the subreddit, about you, and those like you.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:05 PM
1

Let's just reflect again. They were killed. When they were shot to death, thoughts like yours became a little bit more extinct, a little bit more rare. The world changed. Very sad.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:27 PM
3

Very well put, and accurate. This was their fantasy.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 10:38 PM
2

For the reaction against him.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 10:34 PM
2

I'm glad that it was satirical - but we just had /u/bulletkiller06 whose post doesn't seem satirical at all.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:33 PM
6

"Fighting the good fight", by demanding a stop to statements like "Men are friendly"?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:25 PM
2

Finding the smallest shred of possibility to blame the man.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 10:20 PM
1

39 years old - is far less than Nazism. But her ideology didn't die with her: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart "Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the "real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport." Gearhart identifies the self-perpetuatin…
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 10:17 PM
2

Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum very likely had minds very much like yours. Imagine the loss to the world that they are consigned to nonexistence for all of all time and posts like yours just became a little bit less rare. Very sad.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:39 PM
71

Anger on the spot over being sexually assaulted by her = "being aggressive towards the woman"
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:36 PM
18

In the fantasies of the mentally ill. It's not that the woman didn't appear to be high enough quality and lost the chance to demonstrate that she was due to FDS illness - it's that the man wasn't ready for her. Most likely he noticed the mental illness behind the facade - like men would consider you trash for the same reason. Femcel supporters of a toxic ideology on par with parasitical fungus. How sad when someone doesn't want you in their house.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 05:37 AM
20

The video shows a demonstration - someone is holding a handmade sign. It's in the first four seconds of the video. Clearly not "trying to start arguments with random girls". That's the thing about the antihuman sludge - it just fabricates whatever is useful in the moment. In that sense, we absolutely do need criminal or mental illness theory to understand it. How can we use our normal understanding of humans to understand something that fabricates whatever statements are most useful in the momen…
/r/AntiFeminists10/09/21 07:45 PM
35

Traditional concepts of humanity just doesn't cover feminists. Where's the behavioral theory that explain this person and their responses? The only place you can find theory that describes feminists, is in discussions of mental illness and criminal behavior.
/r/AntiFeminists10/09/21 06:23 PM
1

So in this analogy, feminists are the LGBT community, and this subreddit are LGBT activists?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 06:43 AM
1

Your assessment is false ("hardly anything about men's rights"), but even if it was true, it wouldn't be a reasonable justification. If radical feminists are fringe unhinged loonies that everyone hates, as various feminists keep insisting, then this subreddit reacting negatively to them should not at all warrant hate.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:09 AM
2

but I’ve never seen this subreddit try to find find solutions or get to the route of the problem I've seen this subreddit try to find solutions and get to the root of the problem countless times. A very recent example was to point out a legal proposal that would increase gender equality in California, and point out that feminists worked to stop it and succeeded. It found a solution and got to the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 09:31 AM
2

/u/Nick10inch posts his rape fantasies online. Some good people will hopefully keep their guns pointed at him.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:18 AM
1

Try the legaladvice sub. Meetings off the clock are very illegal. The only problem and issue is to document it. If you have the documentation, any lawyer would slam-dunk the case. Are there several people willing to confront the employer, or just you? Are you able to get other jobs? Whistleblowing is going to create a terrible working environment. Really too many variables to discuss easily.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:15 AM
3

systematic bad treatment of men in their daily lives and through negative public statements is NOT MENS RIGHTS issues, but the fault of men themselves If you tell me your personal details, I can call in a child abuse concern to your local authority.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 01:52 AM
2

The same issues that the men here complain about effect women as well. Issues like "false accusations" Ah, yes. Those women found guilty of rape without hard evidence in a he-said-she-said situation, then the accusing man admits many years later that it was made up. Really bad for those women, I feel bad for those women every time it happens.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:48 PM
69

Although I'm sure you mean well, lawsuits cost a lot of money. Advising people to file lawsuits against the state based on legal theory you have no knowledge of may not be the best advice.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:21 PM
1

Situation is too complicated and emotional to give advice on here. If your only thought is getting out of child support, the marriage and she goes back to brazil route seems to be an option, if her family is wealthy enough. If the baby was born in the US, then the baby's a US citizen, right? It's decently likely she would be able to go to the US then anway.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:18 PM
1

Saved you some time - OP is antihuman trash per his own posts: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/phyrne/no\_institution\_has\_done\_more\_for\_mens\_rights\_than/hbq3fyb/?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:01 PM
2

That's hilarious again. You start out with a declaration of "equality", fabricated indignation that someone would imply that feminism isn't about EQUALITY: -Yeah i sort of get that you are angry at feminism. The problem is, feminism is fighting for EQUAL rights, so you are fighting AGAINST equal rights. Mis-labeling feminist thought and being angry at THAT is fine, but you can't call that feminism. Then shortly after proceed to justify a reason to be against equality based on your own sexist, ne…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 07:59 PM
5

Who knows, maybe one day you'll get cured.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 07:39 PM
8

Thanks, I'll just wait for the cops. Will be better.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 06:38 PM
5

Oh, I was talking about you being permanently cured lol
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 06:37 PM
10

Yeah, expressing that mutilation would be fun, seems to indicate that you have a self mutilation fetish. Good luck with getting permanently cured of it. It will be a good day.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 06:34 PM
13

Looking at your profile, you're one sociopathic animal. Hopefully some cops or other good people will keep their guns trained at you and react the moment your rape fantasies move one molecule towards reality.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 06:30 PM
5

From feminist Karen Straughan: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusion…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 06:06 PM
63

"we're a direct threat to their vaginas" Imagine men's subreddits being as fucked-up as this.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 10:25 AM
1

Turns out it's not that at all. The rules say "1) Posts must feature a woman in a drunk win/fail situation" and most of the top posts are just successes. https://www.reddit.com/r/holdmycosmo/comments/nsbt0o/hmc_as_i_assert_my_dominance_over_tony_hawk/ https://www.reddit.com/r/holdmycosmo/comments/c87ork/hmc_while_i_spin_kick_another_one/ https://www.reddit.com/r/holdmycosmo/comments/b6vuia/hmc_while_i_dont_skip_leg_day/
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:38 AM
2

Wow, didn't know about that. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:24 AM
19

Your anger, while justified, should be directed NOT at women who are understandably resentful at being relegated to the position of second class citizens That's hilarious - a deranged belief that the men dying in mines to support and finance the women who got to spend time with their own beloved children were somehow "first class citizens". I implore you, please stop looking for things to be angry at women about, That's also funny. You realize that the anger is directed at feminists and not at w…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:15 AM
20

She obviously didn't expect it to happen. This sub includes women who do bad (criminal) things and apparently from the facts and their behavior expect no consequences from it, based on a balance of probability.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/21 01:49 AM
4

Only about 20% of women call themselves feminists, despite the massive pressure for them to do so. (of course, maybe another 50-60% support them). But there are good women out there.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:51 AM
3

"We're going to pretend misandry doesn't exist, by attempting to justify it" Islamic State isn't all-female, but it's not all-male either - plenty of women were part of it.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:49 AM
1

The recent removals of large number of statues is absolutely something that shows acts can be taken and justified based on feelings and symbolism. The same goes for abortion.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:47 AM
12

A tough man is someone they can't control easily. He might inspire others. A self-sufficient man is someone they can't control easily. He might inspire others. These are bad things because it reduces the totalitarian psychopaths' control.
/r/AntiFeminists03/09/21 09:41 PM
2

Worker coop = start a corporation/stock company and include in the articles of association that the shares shall be divided equally among all employees. Any electrician, carpenter, truck driver or AC repairperson can start a worker coop today. Nobody does it because they don't want to. Just like communist leaders didn't let ordinary people share in power equally because they didn't want to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/21 02:32 PM
10

Sounds batshit insane, like people in an asylum having weekly book club.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:05 AM
41

You're absolutely right. If a man has been stabbed in a disagreement, how does the gender of the perpetrator matter when it comes to: the depth of the wound and the harm done the pain felt when it happened the time to recover from the harm the need for mental support to deal with the trauma the need for physical and monetary support to help with tasks no longer easy, like working or moving around, ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 12:40 AM
39

Mentally ill man cuts off penis. Asks to be taken to a hospital for help. Vice: At some point during the chase, he ditched his own dick out of the window of his Honda Accord like a banana on a Mario Kart track. Redditors: Maybe they could put the picture of it on a milk carton? This made me spit out my drink hilarious Whoever wrote this [Vice quote above], I salute you. Legend (about the writer of the quote) "Voices on the radio told him to do it." Damn thats why I use Spotify right there. The r…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:31 AM
14

And when feminists wonder why I hope they experience the absolutely worst in their daily lives, this case is a drop in the ocean of the reason why.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:41 PM
2

The relevance is that this girl was provoked into violence through speech Source? Thus I'd expect further unreasonable reactions like "I didn't use enough violence" or "I should have brought a knife" Since slapping failed against provocative speech, she would use a knife against speech? And if the knife failed, she would maybe use a gun against the same speech, or a bomb? In your mind, a knife or a gun would not be stopped due to appearing disproportional?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 08:56 PM
23

It gives me hope that this was upvoted to 2.9k. Although the "incel!" has become a far worse perversion of the "virgin!" insult of some years ago, at the same time, it seems more men care about equality than before.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:13 PM
12

It might be the case that the police won't do anything, but there's always going to be other litigation possible. Now these are kids and so there is probably not going to be the same consequences as if adults did this, but nontheless there are still serious consequences for this. Apparent contradiction - asserting that there are serious consequences for this - whilst at the same time accepting that the police might not do anything. In my country, and in neighboring countries I know about, it's v…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:10 PM
6

but how are we sure they learned something like "don't hit people" over "next time bring support" or "hit them in a disabling way"? We can't be sure, but we don't need to be sure - we only need to have a strong estimate of probability based on your experiences with people. I'm inclined to think people who are willing to use violence because they are provoked will probably just think they need to use a little more when it didn't turn out favorably with a pinch of it. I'm not inclined to think tha…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 06:57 PM
36

Bad idea. If the threat had been reported and nothing had happened as a result, the perpetrator would have learnt absolutely nothing, and likely had none of the change in perception she needed. The retaliation taught her something very valuable to her, something useful to carry with her for the rest of her life - it also taught all the onlookers some potentially bad consequences of initiating violence, also a long-lasting good.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 03:12 PM
1

the armchair psychoanalysis There's no psychoanalysis at all in the part quoted. Of course, to someone who self-describes having "Be a general nuisance" as an intended accomplishment, there's no need for any correspondence between statements and reality whatsoever. It really just illustrates the earlier point - when feminists suffer crippling emotional experiences, the world is spared them and better off.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 03:07 PM
21

Just pointing out that "dildochaser9000" is a 1-day-old account, most likely a leftist troll screenshotting his own comments. Recent comments by dildochaser9000: "there is legitimate evidence to indicate the Earth is flat." "Women shouldn’t be seen speaking to men outside of their immediate family." "Women shouldn’t be seen in public without male supervision. " "Women shouldn’t be in the workforce much less in an important one time anything science related. They should feel uncomfortable." I've …
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:14 AM
3

"Dry humping" requires actual physical contact. Maybe you're thinking about "pretend dry humping" or "air humping" or whatever. If someone literally grabs you and starts humping you with clothes on, then absolutely, feel free to punch them in self defense. The law would be on your side. There's just no dry humping here.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:07 AM
5

Sorry to hear. Yeah, it's a shitty situation. The law doesn't deal with it - if she posted this publicly on social media, you would probably have a case. Even the worst and most unfounded accusations - spread to friends and family but not in public? Pretty much legal. Whilst feminists cry "Listen and believe". Posting about it here is a good outlet.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 06:15 AM
3

It likely has something to do with feminism - working to instil in this woman the perception that this man is an oppressor working to harm her, and she is a victim of his harm in countless ways, even completely invisible, conceptual, "structural" ways. When are you a enormous nationwide movement of antihuman psychopaths represented in massive and powerful organizations and networks at the highest political levels, actively feeding groundless hate and disinformation into one segment of the popula…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 04:32 AM
2

Most of your posts here don't contain anything resembling a coherent argument. The repeated "doctor" references is brainless idiocy. You're a reminder that if feminists have experiences in their daily life that leave them emotionally incapable of functioning, there's also a good chance those around them are spared from interacting with someone who considers being a nuisance to be an accomplishment. We should be glad when we see this happening.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 04:16 AM
1

I'm not a doctor, just an observant person noting the fit, which indicates that it's true. I also don't have any motivation or justified reason to be supportive to a person who considers being a nuisance to a community I am a part of to be an achievement. Your vague scattiness on that fits well with and supports the personality inferences.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 02:27 PM
1

No, as far as I remember, research shows that traits like those are quite stable over time.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 12:36 PM
3

It's not an official diagnosis, it's pointing out a very good fit. I have no idea what the treatment plan is, but it would probably be better if you left the community.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 12:21 PM
4

I do have a purpose other than to upset everyone involved You described being a nuisance as an accomplishment. Claiming other goals than to be a nuisance is in no way whatsoever incongruent with being a troll - according to the same research, trolls do claim other goals than to disrupt.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 11:12 AM
4

Your comment is a bigoted, sociopathic, violence-embracing lie, but okay. Political lesbianism was promoted by a group of LESBIAN women. There were a bunch of antihuman, monstrous, fucked-up lesbians that tried to trick straight women into hating men. See: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/30/women-gayrights In the late 70s a group of lesbians in Leeds, known as revolutionary feminists (RFs), made a controversial move that resonated loudly for me and many other women. They began …
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 03:50 AM
3

Be a general nuisance https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and Sadists Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 03:05 AM
9

Extremely broad question, really too broad for a comprehensive answer in a forum like this. Here's a brief summary of some points, shortened by necessity. 1 - A large number of organized, powerful feminists have acted to harm men. It pretty much doesn't matter whatsoever for their power and their influence that you wouldn't have done the same thing as them - they are still feminists, and indirectly benefit from you labelling yourself the same way as them. Feminist opposition to these groups have…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 02:38 AM
14

The desire for conversion therapy has been a thing amongst lesbians and SJWs for a while: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_lesbianism Political lesbianism asserts that sexual orientation is a political and feminist choice (..) Lesbian leftists enticed women to camps, and pressured them into lesbian sex as part of conversion therapy. I don't think anyone were ever punished for that. Many applauded it. The desire to use conversion therapy to "recruit" straight women is part of feminist hist…
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/21 09:18 PM
3

Exactly. The "Compensation" IS the discrimination when what it's "compensating" for is minimal or nonexisting today.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:05 PM
4

Scotland has made sanitary products free for women: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-51629880 Men have a biological need for meaningfully more food than women: https://www.nhs.uk/common-health-questions/food-and-diet/what-should-my-daily-intake-of-calories-be/ . Scottish public welfare benefits still don't reflect that and men don't receive the extra food for free.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:03 PM
4

Removed from /r/HolUp because of reason: "Shitpost". Meanwhile on /r/HolUp : https://www.reddit.com/r/HolUp/comments/pcii7t/what_did_he_say/ There's many terrible people in the world, and many of them are on Reddit. The totalitarians didn't die in WW2.
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/21 07:23 PM
16

she wants to "focus" on the domestic violence against women and that's why she insisted on that. Like if someone just has a desire or want to focus on gypsies committing crimes against non-gypsies, so that's the only thing that exists in their narrative?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 12:35 PM
5

Because it takes time and costs money, too much for "maybe help prevent some". People die at work. We could reduce workplace deaths by training courses. Why don't we have more and more training courses, as long as maybe one death could be prevented?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:03 AM
4

80-90% of rapists are the victim's SO or date, Source please?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:00 AM
12

Here's something we know inspired the killer, to quote himself: and then there are feminists like female dating strategy who just trash men all the time say men are all trash and unless you meet all these requirements you don't even deserve anything He didn't misperceive those feminists or the content of that sub. The description of female dating strategy is absolutely correct. Other subreddits have been removed for gender-based hate. But for Reddit's staff, it's glorious, delicious, fantastic. …
/r/MensRights22/08/21 12:53 AM
22

Yeah, it's absolutely fucked up. A combination of: You don't believe in what you're saying. You know it's not true. You're pretending to believe it, but actually don't. You know what you're saying is a lie. Your motivation for lying is to be liked/picked by men. It's just so incredibly, enormously fucked-up. It's a claim on par with the worst of actual historical misogyny, and coming from so many feminists.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:52 PM
30

but running 80% of all small, medium and large companies as well as being 70%+ of all high paying job fields means men have a leg up "Men" have a leg up? Which men? Can you point to each individual man that has "a leg up", because another man they have no relation to or contact with is a CEO? I am not a CEO. Do I have "a leg up" because Elon Musk is a man? Can you describe the practical ways the "leg up" I have benefits me in my everyday life?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 08:19 AM
11

and the big question really is why the fuck would she put herself in that situation. A possible reason could be to promote an insane, bigoted, sexist ideology, or for personal publicity. Many people have done far worse things for those reasons. Apparently the idea that it was a hoax to garner attention has been thrown around to throw shit on the girl An alternative reason it's thrown around could be that it's perceived to be true and those saying it like the truth and like for others to know the…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:07 AM
1

What does "A different perspective" refer to? Different than what? My post quoted your statement. It added very little beyond that.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:00 AM
1

We don't need to be sure for most purposes, we just need a preponderance of evidence. I’ve found through working in the mental health field that “failed” suicide attempts are more often than not a desperate cry for help. Human beings need attention and to feel loved and cared for If the purpose of the "suicide attempt" is to get love, care and attention, then the purpose isn't to literally end their own lives.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:00 AM
6

Writer and movie producer Karen Straughan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey\_badger\_(men%27s\_rights)#Karen\_Straughan So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves fem…
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/21 03:54 AM
1

But he didn't actually criticize them for caring. I think they are not doing a convincing job at all. It looks like a bunch of psychopaths trying to gaslight people to me - and the heavy overlap with a psychopath sub is indicative of that.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:27 PM
8

"men's venting about discrimination and violation of civil rights" maybe?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:26 PM
1

If women use ineffective suicide attempts as a way to get positive attention, and this is a strategy that works, then this gives rise to the question of why men don't.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:06 PM
3

Because the content he posts in the sub isn't hate content.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 01:57 PM
6

How do you know that this is how Afghani women feel?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:48 PM
14

Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum probably wrote posts as mentally ill and worthless as yours.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:45 PM
21

"then she sacrificed the possibility of a career" the opportunity to advance in his career Most people don't have "careers". He's an electrician, what's his "career" that he's "advancing in"? He works as an electrician, she can work as a chef, cleaner or babysitter.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:30 AM
27

This. School chef? Cleaner? Babysitter? If I had been a stay-at-home dad for 20 years, I'd be a michelin-level chef.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:27 AM
14

Hopefully equality can destroy your thoughts and ideas one day so they die off and never exist again.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:07 PM
5

OP actually asks for equality. But I know some people hate equality.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:06 PM
2

One of the things that's been said over and over about COVID is that, although far more men die from it, "women are most affected". Men die more, but women are somehow the victims. It's kind of hard to be affected more than death.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:35 PM
4

"Hello, you seem delightful" - oh, the brutality and harm.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/21 03:23 AM
11

Loss of privileges - Only 5.2 percent of Korean conglomerates' board members are female. Ah yes, that privilege which gives all South Korean men the right to sit at the board of a giant company have knowledge that there are companies out there which have a miniscule number of other men than themselves at the board.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 03:18 AM
3

feminism is about equality for the sexes and that men’s problems will be fixed by fixing women’s problems. Aka "trickle-down equality"
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:17 AM
1

Hi, delusional psycho. The phrase "suicide by [X]" refers to people who decide to kill themselves by attacking someone who's armed, knowing that it's going to end their life, ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_cop . ... a suicide method in which a suicidal individual deliberately behaves in a threatening manner, with intent to provoke a lethal response ... I can understand how someone who's struggling with language or lost in their own drug abuse would fail to have picked up common phr…
/r/MensRights12/08/21 04:41 AM
3

Telling me to commit suicide You have paranoid delusions of people telling you to kill yourself. Sounds like you have some kind of paranoid psychosis. What do these voices sound like? Would any of them happen to sound like your parents? Maybe you should cut down on the drug use and you wouldn't hear people telling you that. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5a17e8c44.pdf For the DHS 2002, however, women who had undergone FGM were asked about type and whether they had experienced any problems as a r…
/r/MensRights12/08/21 04:08 AM
2

It's an umbrella term for a wide range of different practices. These range from at the lower end pricking or nicking the genitals to draw blood as a symbolic act, to at the upper end removing part of the clitoris and sewing the vagina mostly shut.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:22 PM
7

Yes, the National Organisation for Women (NOW) has nothing whatsoever to do with women /s
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:06 PM
8

There's a quite vague line between "doesn't give a shit about group X" combined with "helps others at the expense of group X", and hating group X.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:05 PM
7

You're either utterly clueless about a topic you claim knowledge of, or you're a liar. Both of those are character defects that will hopefully harm you in your life, and unfortunately harm those who interact with you. Female circumcision has a wide range of severities, and the lowest range is nothing whatsoever compared to male circumcision. It's in the fucking Wikipedia article: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p26ldo/why\_is\_it\_illegal\_in\_the\_us\_to\_circumcise\_a\_women/h8iri…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:03 PM
5

There's no reason whatsoever to isolate discussion to a vaguely defined "direct profits" as distinct from "direct plus indirect profits". Why did you try to do this?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:00 PM
8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_circumcision Type IV is "[a]ll other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes", including pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization.[1] It includes nicking of the clitoris (symbolic circumcision) "pricking" and "nicking" involve minor and symbolic wounds. Not really sure about the details of "scraping", but doesn't sound like it involves cutting off a meaningful part.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:07 AM
10

You cannot presume that he's talking about cutting off a clit. There's very many types of female circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:31 AM
26

There's types of female circumcision that are far less invasive and harmful than male.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:30 AM
6

Another deeply fucked-up thing: For a university to declare a student guilty of assault or rape, and therefore expel them or similar, it wasn't fully clear what standard of proof was necessary - how certain the university had to be. 50%? 75%? A criminal standard, "beyond reasonable doubt"? The Obama administration literally, not exaggerating, decreed that the only acceptable standard was 51+%. Universities were forced to lower any higher standard of evidence to find someone guilty. If a universi…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:55 AM
2

Trust the Biden (Obama) crew to tear it down using law. Can't have any of those protections - when they mostly benefit men.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:40 AM
34

Feminists are accurately described as sociopathic monsters who deserve to be treated as such. This is foremost because feminists systematically harm both men and women who oppose them, and in the process of that, deceive and discriminate. All feminists should be told that to their face. Here's a brief statement by writer and movie producer Karen Straughan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_badger_(men%27s_rights)#Karen_Straughan#Karen_Straughan) So what you're saying is that you, a commenter u…
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/21 09:09 AM
5

OP's account was made 9 hours ago. Troll account, probably leftist trying to get sub banned.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/21 01:02 AM
6

Account made 9 hours ago. Looks like the leftist trolls people talked about, who first make an account, then posts like this, then take a screenshot of what they've just written.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/21 01:01 AM
2

What in his post makes you think he doesn't "have to worry"? The relevant "target" for equality is whether the STEM men/women employee mix is the same as the STEM men/women qualified graduate mix. It seems his worry is that women are targeted for a higher percentage of employees than they are of graduates. This would be harmful sexism and discrimination, making male STEM graduates significantly worse off than female. There's nothing in your post to address that, so it seems your "have to worry" …
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/21 03:55 PM
3

They are monsters of the type good people have fought in history.
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/21 02:29 AM
-2

Huh, that's precisely the point, you didn't, so you're not contributing anything whatsoever, unlike the video above.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 08:09 PM
-8

How does it feel that he is still more useful, helpful and informative than you?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:17 PM
0

The arguments you use to convince someone, will usually be most effective if they align with the person's culture, values and belief system. I think most here, including myself, has limited insight into the Kenyan Kikuyu tribe. It might be better to find groups in Kenya or nearby countries that work against circumcision, and try to look at their arguments.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:55 PM
1

Feminism can pretty much be summarized as a pro-women, sexist movement, like a cult, propaganda group and political pressure group to give women increased power. This may or may not be "reasonable" or "good". If women are actually treated like absolute dogshit in a certain area, then this may well be justified. Hell, if the conditions for any group, based on sex or anything else are bad enough, it could justify far more than this, up to having an armed guerilla group. So are women in Egypt treat…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:37 PM
5

Organization called "Men Engage" literally dedicated to, amongst others, countering anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:49 PM
1

If anyone is gonna oppose this its gonna be the conservatives. Uh.. what? https://floridapolitics.com/archives/206474-womens-rights-groups-host-statewide-media-conference-sb-668/ A coalition of women’s groups including the National Organization for Women, the League of Women Voters, Breastfeeding Coalition, National Council of Jewish Women and UniteWomen FL will all rally in Tallahassee on Tuesday against Senate Bill 668, a family law measure awaiting Governor Rick Scott‘s signature. The new sta…
/r/MensRights20/07/21 05:19 PM
3

Another great consequence for this is that it will lessen the penalty for men who don't register. Once women start being punished for not registering, there will be intense calls to reduce the punishment, which in turn will gradually drip somewhat on men.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 05:16 PM
33

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect "This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger" Research says the majority of women are extremely sexist. Not just a little sexist, but very sexist. There's no clear explanation for why.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:28 PM
4

It's more like pussy pass granted, because she got a plea deal in spite of overwhelming evidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 10:33 PM
29

In a rather tragic and brutal thread I just found this pretty funny.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 10:31 PM
1

well, I've read a lot of text written by people without English as their first language, and never seen anything like it. The grammar and sentence structure looks identical to a native speaker, whilst the misspellings are unlike any.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 05:52 PM
1

Sary we have been tacking a brack for a while because we have been trying to find ether media/platforms to provide awer goals, ambitious, whants and needs. Thank you for your patients.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 01:55 PM
6

OP seems to be a troll based on his posts. E.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/M\_R\_P/comments/oa13qe/awer\_flag\_designs/
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:52 AM
22

"Much of standard operational practice in prisons can re-traumatize women. Loud noises, raised voices, search procedures, and unfamiliar people create threats to well-being that undermine their emotional and physical equilibrium." If a man in a prison complained about "raised voices" and "unfamiliar people", he would be laughed out of society. These people are monsters and deserve the absolute worst and most painful verbal criticism.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:27 AM
137

"this man was stabbed, but the stabber was a man too, so it's not like he is as much a victim or deserves as much tailored support as a woman"
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:46 AM
3

You just moved the goalposts. Stop doing that, please.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 05:01 PM
8

don't move the goalposts. Don't fabricate events that have never taken place. It justifies you experiencing bad things in your life. The term was "nothing to fear", not "nothing to fear that victims of other crimes don't also fear" Fantastic that you accept this is a universal across all crimes - which makes it a lame excuse. Based on your online posts, and based on what you write, yes.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:30 AM
3

I vote for and support whichever party will make your likeminded friends scream, cry and curl up in fear, that's what I am doing. Edit: Oh yeah, based on your posts you're a drug user suffering from depression: "I am so incredibly bored and lonely. I want to go on a walk or play music or ANYTHING but I feel so depressed and weak and tired. I need help really bad." It's funny how, just on rare occasions, those who suffer actually deserve not only their suffering but far more.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:37 AM
9

Pretty much absolutely everyone who report a crime have retaliation from the person they report to fear. If someone robs Bob's house, Bob must fear retaliation from the robber which may lead to him not reporting the crime. Pretty much absolutely everyone may fear that they will get KILLED if they ever tell anyone about the crime. Somehow, this is virtually never raised about virtually any other type of crime. You deserve every bad thing that has happened to you.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:34 AM
1

No, if you go step by step on the list by Karen Straughan: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/og24ot/womens_rights_and_mens_rights_are_not/h4gk3r9/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 We would have shut down all that sexism. We would have shut down the sexist organisations, removed the sexist professors, changed the sexist laws. If it was up to us, the sexism she lists wouldn't exist. Because it's not up to us, but up to feminists, the sexism still exists.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 08:34 AM
30

Based on the article: he probably slept with her, then after she claimed he was the father, a paternity test showed he wasn't. She kept saying he was the father regardless and accused him of being a deadbeat dad. So the headline doesn't say much. It's extremely unlikely a woman would be found liable for declaring a person as the father just after birth. Different when it's conclusively proven by DNA they aren't and the accusations go much further than just being a father.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 12:22 AM
1

we can hope to bridge the gap between these two equalist groups Feminism isn't an "equalist" group. Feminism is a sexist hate movement.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 11:12 PM
1

Women’s rights and men’s rights are not fundamentally opposed True men’s right and the feminist movements are fundamentally opposed. They are not. False You're conflating women's rights to equality with "feminist movements". These are not the same.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 10:00 PM
3

Everyone is already taught not to commit any crime, including rape. The belief that someone is not taught not to rape is wrong, to the point of being delusional. To the contrary, the lack of honesty and respect usually shown by feminists most likely works in favor of more rape. When feminists aren't honest, how can we expect rapists to be?
/r/MensRights09/07/21 09:52 PM
11

You can also still answer "man" to most forms and surveys. You can just say you were worried about transphobia if you didn't.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 07:23 PM
7

violence and rape towards men is that the violence is still committed by a male which on the face of it defeats your point and validates theirs. It doesn't defeat his point, it damns feminists if they try to raise it. It's pretty much irrelevant for a victim - the degree of injury suffered - the amount of support the victim needs - which gender the perpetrator has. To deny a male victim any form of recognition, support, victimhood, status, in the cases when the perpetrator is a man and not when …
/r/MensRights30/06/21 07:34 AM
2

and that means 90+% of "feminists" reject me I appreciate a lot of things about your attitude and post. However, you're literally describing yourself the behavior of 90%+ of feminists. Can you really expect anything else than feminism being described, interpreted and considered to be "real feminism" based on the behavior of 90%+ of its adherents?
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:39 AM
3

From the antihuman sociopath fuck-the-truth sub linked to (don't go there): boyfriend already has TWO previous assault charges against him. Meanwhile in reality: https://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au/what-we-do/community-partnerships/womens-domestic-violence-court-advocacy-program/what-is-an-avo An AVO is not a criminal charge.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 05:21 PM
2

Different treatment outcomes by gender is a known fact. Whether something could exist to justify that, is speculation. Such speculation is up to you to prove. As it is, you're blaming victims. Hey, you know that ethnic group that people don't want to hire? What if there's a good reason for that?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:38 PM
6

Yes. Also when a man posts that he was arrested for breaking into a car, we don't know the truth so we shouldn't judge. Maybe someone claimed the car belonged to them and a small animal was trapped in there as a joke. We should give sympathy to men who are found guilty of crimes because after all we have no idea what the truth is.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/21 12:02 AM
0

And these antihuman monsters who should have died off with the Soviet Union have power and influence - they control tech, and they control government.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:47 AM
0

I should add the wearing of uniforms and gathering in large, segregated groups, rhytmically shouting supremacism.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:20 PM
-1

Religion that worships a brutal, militant, expansionist, slave-taking, mass-murdering torturer who committed inhuman acts, and the inhuman book he wrote: "Respect them!" Ideology that worships a brutal, militant, expansionist, slave-taking, mass-murdering torturer who committed inhuman acts, and the inhuman book he wrote:: "PUNCH THEM, HURT THEM, HARM THEM, BAN THEM"
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:38 PM
0

I'm assuming you actually have somewhat specific negative thoughts about those men, not just a vague and general feeling of discomfort isolated to yourself, but more specific negative thoughts about those men, like "those men could hurt me", "I wish they weren't here" or the like. I think it's just at the absolute edge of the definition of the term, outside of reasonable use. Like: A stops B on the street, points a gun at him and tells him: "If you don't shoplift a bottle of liquor from that sto…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:05 AM
29

It's "I am not my gender". It's positive for the person, but negative for the gender. Like a person from Bronx saying "I am not a Bronx kid". Or "I am not the city I grew up in". edited
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:41 AM
34

"The Dominant Half"? If so, we're doing a rather terrible job at protecting ourself from being murdered, abused and living in pain and horror. Some men have great lives. Many men have acceptable lives. Many men have terrible lives.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:20 AM
4

Muhammad was a brutal torturer and child abuser, but your statement is both too imprecise and not suitable for this thread. Keep it where it's relevant.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:19 AM
72

#menarehuman is a good post. "I am not my gender" is idiotic shit. It implies that there's actually something wrong with men as a gender. What you would expect from "LeftWingMaleAdvocates". A slogan like that for women would never be popular, because women would feel that it was anti-woman. It's anti-men.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:18 AM
2

No crime was committed, despite how much it should be one. She will not go to jail. There's nothing he can do to "protect himself", other than turning all he owns into bitcoin, leaving the country and not going back to that country. If the child is his, he will have to pay child support, unless (probably, check the law) they get 50/50 shared custody. It's unlikely she could tell after 8 days - but it's absolutely possibly to make someone pregnant without birth control. Her claiming this without …
/r/MensRights22/03/21 01:29 AM
7

No, it doesn't. Saying that women have an in-group bias is not the same as hating women. Plenty of science shows a strong in-group bias is very common amongst women. The conclusion of a strong in-group bias hence isn't either "because they are women", but because surveys and experience show it.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:00 AM
2

Why and how do you think he "prove the Feminists right"?
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:59 PM
1

If all girls should be treated as princesses - should all boys be treated as princes?
/r/MensRights20/03/21 08:24 AM
1

People who are treated badly by women and men keep directing the harm in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 08:23 AM
2

"Informativity rule"? That's a ban
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:10 AM
3

It's a shit argument because it's utterly and completely irrelevant to: the degree of direct harm suffered by the male victim the after-effects of that harm suffered by the male victim the male victim's need for support and assistance whether the perpetrator was a man or a woman. When the topic of discussion is the victimization rate of men, it's simply not very relevant. There's also no such thing as "male violence", any more than there is "asian female opioid abuse". Women also commit violence…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:04 AM
3

Yeah, it's pretty much totally irrelevant for a male victim whether the person who victimized him was a man or a woman. "I was physically and emotionally abused, even in public sometimes" "Oh, but was it a MAN or a WOMAN who did it? Because if it was a woman then yeah these events are relevant to include in statistics, but if it was a man, then well, you're a man too, if you know what I'm saying?"
/r/MensRights17/03/21 07:58 AM
1

People make mistakes in perception and description, and if it turned out that police let the actual criminal go because his coat was (dark) blue and not black (or vica versa), people would have demanded firings. Bright blue isn't too common, so I'm assuming dark blue.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 07:30 AM
10

Forrestall was sentenced to house arrest at her Markham home for 12 months, As part of her sentence, she will have to be inside her home between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 01:07 PM
8

Those with the most edgy "gender theories", often seem to be the most monstrous psychopathic rightsless human-imitations.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:07 AM
5

Hey guys!, if they made it criminal to make false accusations of terroristic bombmaking and child porn production against political opponents, then I would be fearful of reporting ACTUAL terroristic bombmaking and child porn production when it happens!! No punishment for false accusations! It would chill me into not reporting these things when they actually happen! I would be fearful that it might be proved beyond reasonable doubt that I lied, even if I didn't lie but simply stated my beliefs in…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 12:44 AM
84

"We need someone to make lunch, and you're a woman, right?"
/r/MensRights25/02/21 11:21 PM
9

Let's hope nobody commits acts of revenge and destruction against fascist, violent and misandrist structures and their perpetrators.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 11:47 AM
1

You deleted the disinformation, so it's not visible any more. That makes the discussion pointless. I'll just delete mine as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 08:17 PM
1

It's literally in the posts above. You keep repeating incorrect information when you know better. That is harmful.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 12:40 PM
1

No, a core part of the post is that you deserve to experience people being what you call "transphobic" to you, based on the posts you make online. Bad people deserve bad experiences. You deserve that. The word is, correctly, disinformation: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/disinformation
/r/MensRights13/02/21 10:02 AM
1

I already asked you once to stop spreading disinformation. I pointed out that it harms people. I linked you the information and quote you needed. You ignored that. The article points out one type of female circumcision that doesn't involve cutting at all. It's literally in the quote. It's less bad than male circumcision. It's not "about" causing pain during sex. The article points out this as a rite of passage or initiation. Stop spreading disinformation. It justifies people treating you badly i…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 08:44 AM
1

Stop spreading disinformation. It harms people and changes you into a different person who deserves bad things happening to you. My post is correct. Read the link. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-019-00198-8 "Pricking is here defined as a practice where the clitoris or the surrounding tissue is pricked with a sharp object, but where no tissue is removed."
/r/MensRights12/02/21 01:27 PM
7

That is, until it can be proven that your ex remarries or cohabitates with someone else. "Hey, here's a full annual wage for being in a relationship and not getting married, and somewhat pretending to live at a certain address"
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/21 01:16 PM
2

Minimizing ... harm done to girls It doesn't "minimize" harm done to girls. It brings harm done to the girls to the level of harm done to boys. This has the effect of bringing the (perception of) harm done to boys UP, and it provokes feminists into action because they can no longer as easily fight for girls exclusively. isn't going to do anything to help boys and prevent them from being mutilated. Speaking about female circumcision would do that, for the reasons described.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:18 PM
4

You're a boss. Thank you for resolving this in a good way for everyone, including yourself, other than the person who can learn a lesson from it. Personally, I don't forgive deliberate acts easily, because I don't think people change easily, but am open to people changing in 10-20 years. Hopefully she will reflect and learn restraint with time.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 05:54 PM
2

A number of them are probably desperate losers with the perception that any female contact is better than none, no matter the situation. No man in a good relationship, who has a friend in a good relationship, would ever be happy to see their friend raped by an unknown woman, or imagine that their friend was happy about it.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 04:17 AM
3

Pricking is a type of less invasive female circumcision: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-019-00198-8 "Pricking is here defined as a practice where the clitoris or the surrounding tissue is pricked with a sharp object, but where no tissue is removed."
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:39 AM
1

Being good or bad is defined by thoughts, not acts. Rape within viking societies was a serious crime - and I doubt the majority of vikings either took part in raids or raped during those raids. Meanwhile, there's plenty of people who would rape today if they had a chance and were free from consequence. Doesn't make them good people that they abstain from it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 03:16 AM
1

I mean hey a girl's gotta make a living tee hee
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 03:12 AM
2

Because everyone will ignore you and nobody change their language or even think about it.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:06 PM
1

I don't know if we need to excuse people who have knowingly and purposefully established sexist dichotomies, with a speculated excuse that they possibly were not highly concerned with establishing sexist dichotomies, as long as they knew they established sexist dichotomies.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 06:11 AM
4

It’s simple, women historically have been the oppressed and the men oppressors. Wrong. Historically, both men and women have been oppressed, and men oppressed far worse. Whether the oppressor was a king or a queen is completely irrelevant to the 99% of the population who wasn't nobility. Time spent with the children you love and in housework is also rather less bad than time spent working in a coal mine.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 04:49 AM
5

I tried the search phrases: "male genital mutilation" site:who.int "female genital mutilation" site:who.int there were about 5 hits for the former, and 10 000 hits for the latter.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 04:40 AM
3

But won't referring to female gender mutilation as female circumcision just make people think female gender mutilation isn't a big deal? No, it would do several things: it would INCREASE the brutality of the word "circumcision". People have been fed the image of crying girls having their vaginas sliced to pieces with rusty razors - using 'circumcision' would fill that word with the same brutality, inevitably pointing out that men also have parts of the their penises sliced off with rusty metal. …
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:50 AM
1

You say that you: 1) never really made much effort to learn about men’s issues , and at the same time: 2) dismissed men as not paying attention to women’s issues. And that's been my experience with feminists - living in a bubble where women are portrayed as the victims of everything, and deserving of far better things, and angry/negative towards anyone who doesn't care about that maximally, but just not interested in the victimhood of others. Example: I read brief statement by a feminist, arguin…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:40 AM
4

however i think that women’s is a technically larger issue in the fact that it happens to more women than men, Murder happens far more to men than to women in pretty much any country in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender Do you agree that the murder of men is "a technically larger issue in the fact that it happens to more" men than women? Which justifies focusing more on the murder of men than the murder of women?
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:19 AM
1

583 people taking a detailed survey like this sounds like a very high number to me, in terms of evidence for thoughts and attitudes in the population.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:26 AM
15

Thanks, Biden voters!
/r/MensRights31/01/21 08:17 PM
1

I stopped caring so much about rape once I realized that a large number of women (feminists) are deeply fucked-up monsters no better mentally than rapists. Great kudos to the other large number of women who doesn't support these groups or their rhetoric.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:55 AM
58

if someone posts #killallblackpeople or #killallmuslims the situation doesn't even get to #notall Female privilege: Doing terrible things without consequences.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 11:31 AM
79

A key part here is: The child was a little under one year old when I found out. ... “I left her almost immediately ... So despite having less than a year's relation to someone else's child, many still want to coerce him to pay for that child's living expenses for the next 17 years or more. As a man, you are treated as a work mule. A man without obligations is almost like an affront to nature.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 02:06 PM
13

Why would men make an effort particularly on behalf of women, rather than on behalf of all gym visitors equally? What effort are women making to make gym environments more friendly to men specifically?
/r/MensRights11/01/21 06:31 AM
6

Yeah, that's an example of sexism, inequality and gender-based discrimination. Hopefully those responsible for the sexism are punished or suffer some kind of harm or consequence in their daily life. Sexism is bad, and those people shouldn't be able to act evil without that coming back to punish or harm them in some way in their daily life. Then we'd be living in a quite unjust world.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 06:23 AM
2

Feminism is about psychopaths gaining power. For the psychopath part: Look at the key figures in the feminist movement. From the Society For Cutting Up Men monstrous pseudocreature-feminist, to the Reduce Men To 10% Of The Population antihuman meatsack-feminist. The psychopaths wanted power, and women being out there to gain influence and control helps them. Women being stay-at-home mothers doesn't help them. The monsters hate what doesn't help them gain power and control. The monsters love what…
/r/MensRights10/01/21 12:22 PM
5

They aren't "free speech" whatsoever or remotely. They are totalitarian and want control. It benefits them to rile up women against men, and harms them to disturb that narraitve. The Soviet Union died. The brain types, neurologies, that made the Soviet Union possible, didn't die.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 08:26 AM
11

The WTF is that the same principles should apply, if they actually were principles.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 06:40 AM
3

You are utterly clueless. a) There is no singular "point" of incarceration reflected in criminal justice theory, but multiple - and one of them is that a criminal is prevented from doing crime as long as they are incarcerated. There is no way to replicate that point without incarceration. You will also find both deterrence and retribution referenced in the legal theory of a very great number of justice systems in the world - so it's interesting that inside your head all those lawmakers and crimi…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/21 05:20 AM
1

Rapists are mentally ill in probably more than 90% of cases, but still punished. We should get rapists help, not punish them. Only lock them up with help and support.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:13 PM
3

And what about situations where reoffending is highly unlikely? Let's say Adam bullied Bob very severely 30 years ago. Adam has gone on to become wildly successful. Bob has become a dropout drug addict. Bob spends many years resenting Adam and planning a murder, then finds and kills Adam. Two psychologists find that it's very unlikely Bob will kill again, because Adam was his singular focus of attention. Should Bob go free pretty much day 1? Or: A woman has a baby, then regrets it because she wa…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:10 PM
3

Federal executions. The US government is a bit more significant than one of 50 minor state governments.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:05 PM
2

Rapists are mentally ill in probably more than 90% of cases, but still punished. It's no problem to punish someone mentally ill. We have done it to men forever.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:03 PM
2

The phrase: "Women are treated better than men, but the solution isn't to subject women to the same treatment as men, but to treat men better!" could be repeated 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 and 200 years from now. No, the only solution to men being treated better, must always be to force women to be treated as shit as men as first, then raise everyone. Otherwise you get 1000 years of fuck all.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:02 PM
12

Women are generally treated better than men in the justice system, so equal treatment is pretty much PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:57 PM
2

no, that wouldn't be "better equality" at all. You end up with the situation: "Guys, this woman is treated much better than men, but the solution isn't to treat her worse, but to treat men better!" 10 years later: "Guys, this woman is treated much better than men, but the solution isn't to treat her worse, but to treat men better!" 20 years later: "Guys, this woman is treated much better than men, but the solution isn't to treat her worse, but to treat men better!" 30 years later: "Guys, this wo…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:56 PM
11

It is gender equality. Your post is disgusting. Hear yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:44 PM
11

Please do
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:44 PM
4

yeah, probably a lot of rapists aren't well in the head either, we still prosecute them
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:43 PM
5

It wasn't a no-brainer at all, women are given more lenient treatment than men across the justice system. This is an example of equal treatment, and hence something more rare.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:43 PM
15

A federal execution is still of major significance, because it's done by the government of the USA, not by one of 50 various sub-governments.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:41 PM
5

Pretty much 100% of rapists would be found to be mentally ill. We still punish rape. Maybe we shouldn't?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 08:39 PM
9

The primary danger with not circumcising infants is that they might decide to say no when they are older. Can't say no as an infant. Would threaten the whole system.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 12:30 AM
2

You know as well as I do that a man trying to pull down a young girl's bathing suit in public has a good chance of ending up with a crushed skull or 20 years in prison, or both. Those girls seem to be doing fine.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 02:13 AM
4

Well, hey, it's infinitely better than no delivery.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 02:10 AM
45

HAHAHA, nice satire
/r/MensRights31/12/20 03:02 PM
2

Feminists love that scouts became gender neutral. Literally every feminist is happy about that. Its the girl scouts organization's pocketbook that is upset What the fuck kind of fantasy definition of convenience is this?
/r/MensRights28/12/20 01:44 PM
12

Have you seen the interview with him? He comes across as some kind of fucked-up psychopath constructed by evil aliens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSyczwuTQfo
/r/MensRights24/12/20 05:08 PM
42

Netflix employees probably a bit like Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:09 AM
0

No, we won't. Feminists direct themselves at men in general. Anyone who directs themselves at only feminists, as long as feminists exist, are not comparable, because they don't direct themselves at women in general.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 09:39 AM
7

If someone isn't boycotting them, I can recommend the Razorpit (several variants, and cheaper than this too): https://www.amazon.com/RazorPit-Slide-Razor-Sharpener-Cleaner/dp/B00CWCW8TA/ Basically, razor blades don't start feeling dull because they are dull, but because they are covered in microscopic hair and debris. This is a rubber surface you can stroke it across and remove that debris. Makes the blades last much, much longer.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:59 PM
0

The phrasing in your post is nowhere in my post, so no.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 07:38 PM
-3

Are you implying that I'm sarcastic? We don't cry for Taliban supporters who lose their limbs to factional infighting. There's no reason to cry for a feminist being raped. Sociopathic monsters, members of hate movements, getting actively fucked over, is the kind of harm we deliberately inflict on male-dominated movements. There's no reason to cry for similar monsters being raped in London, Los Angeles or anywhere else in the Western world.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:33 PM
-1

Yes, I am saying that. It's not sexist whatsoever. People can be hateful monsters regardless of gender. It applies to men and women. When a feminist is raped, that's a sociopathic supporter of a hate movement being raped. Why should we expend money on them? Why should we consider that a bigger grievance than the bombing of Taliban? Stop defending monstrous members of a hate movement. It makes you an accomplice to them and part of them, quite close to being one yourself.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:25 PM
-13

Any time a woman is raped, there's a good chance she's no less of a monster than the rapist, and hence not really something people should be too concerned about. This doesn't apply to all women, only those who spout feminist ideology. My support to all the other women - hopefully we can get enough funding to the police to help catch those criminals and put them behind bars.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 01:21 PM
20

"apprehensive at how this will be received" Yes, the idea of providing accurate information to a cultist network of extremist activist quacks and liars might make anyone apprehensive
/r/MensRights20/12/20 12:59 AM
3

Laws?! Apply to women?! Unthinkable! The laws were OUR weapon against the conspiracy of jew- I mean, men, in powerful positions!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/20 01:04 PM
576

Yeah so this law will be repealed or just stopped being enforced extremely soon. And when some man takes acts of revenge on the state or feminists, they will gasp in shock: "HE WAS EVIL, OUR DISCRIMINATION WAS PURE, HE SHOULD HAVE SIMPLY ACCEPTED IT AND DONE NOTHING".
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/20 09:50 AM
24

In spite of this, there is a narrative of "gender-based violence" where women are somehow the target of violence because they are women, determined by some mind-reading, and that this makes their (minority) victimhood that much worse than if they were targeted because they looked wealthy or some other reason. If there are anyone doing research on men here, I BEG YOU TO DO THE FOLLOWING: Run a survey amongst men who have been in prison for violence against men: "If [victim] was a woman, would you…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 02:01 PM
1

Online arrest records show Huber was arrested several times on battery, drugs and other charges. Huber probably took one look at his own drug-abusing, violent self, and felt two things to motivate him to commit suicide: One was a view of himself as utterly worthless and despicable, a failure in every way, less than a human. The other a fascination with death, when his regular drug use simply failed to provide him with enough of a high. By ending his life, he probably felt that he could both make…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 04:58 PM
0

Yes- drug use probably played a big role in both Rosenbaum and Huber's desire to kill themselves by gun. It seems part of their daily life.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 11:33 AM
0

You seem entranced in assholes. Member of a local circle? I hope you don't live in Iran, where you would be lawfully tortured to death for that by an applauding crowd. Imagine a shithole, death-embracing country like that and its friends and supporters who all are fans of this.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 10:55 AM
0

It's highly unfortunate that Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum craved death so much that they both wanted to commit suicide by gun. What could cause someone to desire death so much that the sight of their guts and heart blood spilled on the ground was the most loving, dearest thing they wanted to see? Was mentall illness a factor in their choice to have death? Highly likely. Unfortunate that you cannot bring them back from the oblivion of nonexistence. Imagine the loss to the internet when thei…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 10:52 AM
9

I have to wonder how many acts of violence are actually retribution and revenge on abusers, monsters and their supporters. Probably quite a number. This "feminist" from the women's shelter is no better than a rapist herself, and deserves no greater concern. Sometimes, the victims of monsters are themselves monsters.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:39 PM
1

Only deceitful trash would claim - or even worse, vaguely imply - that "ideology" does not create actual real-world results, pain and experiences for people. Come back when you have suffered the suicides that anti-male ideology brings, and declare that "it's just an ideology!"
/r/MensRights11/12/20 08:00 PM
1

Absolutely. It's just a lower concern than if it was murder of a good person who lacked the psyche of a murderer.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:46 PM
1

It's absolutely rational thinking. Feminist organisations like this gained power because of support and lack of opposition from women. How well did you know those women? Sure, they could have been exceptions, which would be extremely sad. Still, the resources put into that problem has to be compared with the resources put into other problems, in terms of seriousness.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 04:10 AM
0

Feminists like these make me feel that anti-rape measures really aren't so important at all, because the victim will often not be a better person than the rapist in any way. Rape is absolutely bad. But all this means is that you have shitty monster 1 raping shitty monster 2. But shitty monster 2 isn't any better than 1 and would have done other bad things to 1 in another situation. There's no reason to cry great tears or invest massive resources into something like that.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:38 AM
6

Nothing "lawyers say" about their client is newsworthy unless they say she's dead. They are paid to present her as a victim. The media is shit when they turn the lawyer's claims into a headline.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/20 11:45 AM
26

however, since she sought unconditional apology and submitted before the Court that her matrimonial life would be destroyed if the present case is sent for trial, the Bench accepted her unconditional apology. So will courts start accepting unconditional apologies as a way of not being punished for harming women too?
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:40 PM
7

I would never donate anything to Amnesty International, and wish their adherents a crispy day in hell.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 11:34 AM
7

Then you should maybe unsubscribe?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 02:09 AM
6

Maybe they can, they just can't be bothered. If you respond, make sure to put every second word in morse code.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/20 10:36 PM
6

"People aren't showing sympathy, therefore they are NiceGuys(tm)" 200 IQ
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/20 10:35 PM
21

This subreddit is for women to be treated equally, not be treated less than. Men selling sex videos of themselves fucking sex dolls and fake vaginas to lonely and desperate women would be treated with respect? Are we using the same internet?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/20 10:33 PM
2

When people are raped, there's a non-zero chance it happens to some monster like this.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:50 PM
2

Could you demonstrate how the combination of HIDING race hate against black and brown people, whilst ALLOWING race hate against white people, is the precise combination of actions that maximises profits? What makes this more profitable than allowing all, or disallowing all?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:19 AM
3

Leftists pretend to be against race hate. There is an establish system and mechanism to remove visibility of race hate - reducing the amount of race hate visible to the public. Leftists take deliberate action, invest effort, to exempt from this system race hate directed against white people. Yes, they want oceans of blood and ripped limbs.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:17 AM
31

While the new policy will prioritize automatically flagging anti-Black content, while de-emphasizing flagging certain anti-White content Leftists want a race war, with explosions ripping off limbs and bullets mowing down crowds.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 06:23 AM
39

Men are overrepresented as perpetrators, but men are also overrepresented as victims. If support should go to the gender with the most victims, very simplistically, support should go to men. "But, the perpetrators are men!!" - meaning absolutely fuck all, nothing whatsoever, when it comes to the support needed by a male victim of violence.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 08:16 AM
31

Not sure if a troll post upvoted by trolls. The film doesn't seem to be solely about male victims of domestic violence. According to the movie's website, the movie shows abuse against men: “Silenced, when they are the abused ones” shows the hidden reality of abused men, but also reveals the total ineffectiveness of the LAW AGAINST GENDER VIOLENCE. " http://silenciados.org/ Is it SOLELY about abused men? That's an irrelevant question. The title doesn't claim it's SOLELY about abused men - abused …
/r/MensRights01/12/20 08:14 AM
198

I feel like another good option would be to make a pledge saying: "I will give Aquaman 2 a negative review on release because it has a domestic abuser in it" That WILL actually rile up studio execs. Also, there may be cries about "REVIEW BOMBING" - but anyone writing about the poor victim-movie that's getting review bombed will just have to mention the abuse part of it, can't pretend it's not there.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/20 09:56 PM
0

A female boss can't be abusive towards a male employee because the male employee is physically stronger than her, it's impossible
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:07 PM
11

Yeah, this isn't progress.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 03:19 PM
5

The genitalia are different, so there are always differences to exaggerate. That doesn't make it reasonable. In your mind, is urinating with male and female genitalia equivalent? Touching male and female genitalia? Having sex with male and female genitalia? Cutting away part of male and female genitalia?
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:46 AM
13

I'm pretty sure a lot of parents performing female circumcision also don't do it because they hate their children, but because of beliefs, culture, religion, tradition or more. It is still called "female genital mutilation" and banned regardless. Please don't think that "female genital mutilation" is only used for cliterectomies. That's just ignorant. how it's sexism isn't remotely obvious to me, especially since there is no female procedure that's equivalent Your logic isn't remotely obvious to…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:44 AM
9

If it was about poverty, they would make it a poverty commission. If it was about a lack of education, they would make it a lack of education commission. It's not about poverty, or lack of education. It's race, and race, and race, and race.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 07:52 PM
5

That's funny, in a way. They cared to write the gender of those who live, not those who died.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:14 PM
4

That's funny - you pretended to ask, but was actually out to argue your case.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:44 AM
2

It doesn't help me, as a man, that a microscopic number of men are insanely rich, powerful etc. It's completely irrelevant to me, and plays no role in my daily life. I get no advantages from it. In my daily life, I am more likely to be subject to crime than a woman would be. In applying for jobs, I have a disadvantage compared to women. Whether Jeff Bezos or the top ten 0.01% of the population are men or women does not impact, reduce or change that in any way whatsoever.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:42 AM
3

When the topic is women in prison, there's often an outpouring of GENDER-NEUTRALLY PHRASED principles and ethics. Such as, when the topic is women in prison: " I can advocate for prisoners being able to reduce their prison sentences (...)" Obviously, since these principles and ethics are phrased in a GENDER-NEUTRAL manner, they are not exclusively invented on the spot for the benefit of women. Meaning that they also apply to men.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 07:35 PM
2

Hey, no problem! It's possible that she won't file now, but will file later. Speak to the lawyer about how to secure evidence in case she files later.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 03:48 AM
5

One thing to be aware of is that "LAWYER" is like "ENGINEER". All lawyers can do basic things. But having 10 years of experience in creating metal alloys, is different from 10 years in road surface composition. Rape accusations is basic criminal law, and something all lawyers who do criminal law can deal with. Title IX is the specialist area. You have nothing to worry about in terms of criminal law. Title IX is the thing that could hurt you. Title IX is "recent", so you can't expect a star lawye…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:40 AM
3

"Our school's website states that Title IX does not handle events that happened off-campus, such as in my apartment, so should I contact Title IX authorities or some other group?" Be sure to point this out to your lawyer - it's not super clear in your post what happened where.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:26 AM
43

Yes - similarly, if a man has raped a female jogger, or drugs the drink of a woman he meets and rapes her, then I think it's extremely important that the man has the ability to be released from prison early. This because the possibility encourages good behavior. There's also strong arguments for why a man who rapes a female jogger, or drugs the drink of a woman he meets and rapes her, should not really even go to prison. This because it places him at risk of COVID-19.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 01:45 PM
22

Yeah, Warner Bros treated him as guilty before the sentence. I boycott Hollywood already, not much more to get from me.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 09:06 PM
5

Misdemeanor, for taking a long series of steps to end the life of a man.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 07:46 PM
4

If you consider the government illegitimate, then every act taken by any police is illegitimate.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/20 06:28 PM
1445

"Are you serious?" "No madam, we only pretend to arrest as a joke"
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/20 06:27 PM
7

I read it. Sorry that you experienced this. Shitty, paranoid women. They would probably file a police report against a cat for showing them its ass, if they could.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 10:28 AM
3

I tend to adopt the general level of sensitivity I notice around me. If transsexuals feel insulted at describing "male-to-female" as "male-turning-into-woman" that's something I hope they cope with.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:00 AM
11

The description here and on Wikipedia "just assume innocence". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorian_Corey After her death, the preserved body of Robert Worley (aka Robert Wells) was found in Corey's belongings with a gunshot wound to the head.[9] Investigators determined the body had been dead for approximately 15 years. It's speculated that Worley was an abusive ex-lover of Corey, or that Corey may have murdered him in self-defense during a lovers' quarrel or during an attempted burglary, as su…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:41 AM
7

It has more to do th the "arrest for rate and assault" than gender. It's pretty astounding that you have the capacity to determine what was inside the minds of the people who investigated the body, to determine that gender was not a factor in their decision. After your death, scientists should cut up your brain to study it. There is no guarantee that they were actually guilty, but that's a different story. What does this even mean? What is "a different story"? The "story" is that a body is found…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:32 AM
1

There's various programs like this in my country as well. They way it's done, there's just different bodies/committees who have the freedom to assess if they want to provide grants/assistance like this. The bodies/committees that govern male-dominated areas have decided to offer assistance to women -- those that govern female-dominated have decided not to offer anything for men. The government's stance is simply: these are independent bodies making their own decisions.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 12:52 AM
23

"Gustafson's anxieties about being found out" POOR HER! Imagine that life, the torture, the pain she must be in, having committed a crime and feeling anxiety about being punished for it. It's like a punishment in itself! Imagine the horror, let's imagine an adult man raped a girl, and then he would have to spend so much time with the worry and fear of being found out?? It's like living torture. Although an adult man who rapes a girl child or a random female jogger obviously must go to prison, I …
/r/MensRights02/11/20 01:50 AM
18

Similarly, I think that any man reading this who ends up raping and murdering a woman should not go to jail, because I believe jails are not the ideal places for rehabilitation.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 01:45 AM
7

Because it shows that women are believed on word alone, to such an extreme extent that people take aggressive life-directing actions (evicting someone from a property), on the sole word of a woman, without evidence of anything.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 03:32 AM
32

"Brown said. "As soon as I got this message I thought wow I need to start trying to message him again cause he thought we were good friends at that point because we've had a few conversations before." "I tried sending him money through Western Union to see if I could get his location that way, tried getting him to screenshot his weather app, cause that would show where his location was," Brown said. When that didn't work, Brown offered to send Virgil a pizza. Virgil initially resisted and said h…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:56 PM
32

Attractive women with similar income to that person, will go for men with a higher income.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:23 AM
1

I don't think it's unreasonable to react negatively to a spouse acting like that. If what's said is true, and he doesn't relent in any way, it's a genuine marriage ender. One person cannot permanently dictate what every surface in the house should be covered by. However, it is indicative of a mental problem, that may well subside over time, or support can be given. The vow is "through good times and bad", and she should support him to the best of her ability for a while, and try to get him some …
/r/MensRights28/10/20 12:38 AM
11

When the American Civil Liberties Union is literally trying their best to take away the liberties of the accused.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 01:50 AM
2

Then maybe you should be 'blowing off' those people.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:36 PM
2

It is obviously good that today's adherents to the movement near-universally condemn such insane bigots as Valerie Solanas, Andrea Dworkin, Germanie Greer, Catharine McKinnon et al. Oh wait, they don't at all. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:41 PM
2

I think most teachers take a very dim view of beating children ('physical discipline'). This is a good idea. You say that your son blames you. I think you should try to write something for him to have and read in some years. How much you love him and care for him, that you have always felt it's wrong to discipline children physically, and that you wish you could stop it, but that there's no way - if you escaped with him in a car, you would be found within hours and would never see him again. To …
/r/MensRights25/10/20 08:26 PM
7

Obivously, when Wikipedia describes people like Andrea Dworkin as feminists, Wikipedia is simply wrong as True Feminism (tm) does not contain anything like that.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 06:50 PM
17

'When we, feminists white people put together lists, produce data, are outraged, they have the nerve to ask: "But you don't think, you just hate men black people. 'When we, feminists non-muslims put together lists, produce data, are outraged, they have the nerve to ask: "But you don't think, you just hate men muslims. 'When we, feminists ethnic Europeans put together lists, produce data, are outraged, they have the nerve to ask: "But you don't think, you just hate men immigrants. 'When we, femin…
/r/MensRights24/10/20 02:59 PM
30

FemIniSm Is abOuT EqUaLiTy
/r/MensRights24/10/20 02:54 PM
6

There's nothing to tell that she's speaking about jobs specifically.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 01:20 AM
2

There are plenty of countries where a 15-year old and an 18-year old can legally have sex. This is unlikely if there was a high risk of harm coming to a 15-year old having consensual sex. I suspect the people blaming the guy have the attitude that the law must be followed no matter what, and anyone violating it has themselves to blame for their punishment. Like if the law said you must switch off your lights after 8PM, they would argue that anyone fined for not doing that had themselves to blame…
/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:01 AM
1

The lack of empathy for men is what prevents an improvement and correction to the situation.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 01:47 PM
2

"Self defense" can very likely under Australian law include defending your possessions using very mild force. Check that. Holding someone immobile might be acceptable. If yes, you need to emphasise that you tried to prevent her from damaging your expensive and life-necessary laptop, and why you had a reasonable belief that she was going to do that. Discuss this with the lawyer. Then, that you were worried she would attack you, so you pushed her out to protect yourself, and her. Her use of the cl…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:59 AM
27

Empathy gap. As a man, you will get less empathy than women in the same situation, according to plenty of surveys, in pretty much any country in the world.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:37 AM
1

If you are criminally charged, you have a right to a defense lawyer, no? What have you explained to the police? This is crucial. I'm not Australian, but generally speaking in law, any physical act against someone is assault, unless it's done to prevent some kind of illegal act which justifies it.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:19 PM
9

just 13 per cent of white boys entitled to free school meals (because their families are on benefits) go on to higher education. Yet 27 per cent of similar black Caribbean boys go to university, 42 per cent of Pakistani, 51 per cent of black African and 66 per cent of Chinese boys. White children have been designated as the sacrifical racial meat to feed into the machine for all of recent memory, Everyone knows that e.g. immigrants from countries with rape and violence cultures will keep showing…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:27 PM
7

Wrong again, I read plenty of your posts. You know that, because I pointed out the mental illnesses you describe yourself.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 06:39 AM
2

Maybe they consider homosexuality "divisive" or some progressive term like that
/r/MensRights15/10/20 10:23 PM
1

Absolutely - it's just not likely, because that wouldn't be what the term usually means: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Freak 1. A girl most likely that likes to act all innocent then she has sex with you and she is real freaky or kinky, she likes to have sex alot and do weird stuff. It also wouldn't be a rape accusation or an indication that he did anything bad.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:11 PM
1

I don't know for certain what the text messages said - but OP appears to know, and based on their statements it's a reasonable conclusion that they don't contain rape accusations. See: "she texted him that she was a "big freak". Then texted him the next day."
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:54 PM
2

That's not an analogy. It's a story not analogous to the situation posted here, because in your story, there's certain knowledge that the tea was unwanted. There's no such certain knowledge here that the sex was unwanted. It looks more like an attempt at a begging-the-question fallacy, turning the outcome to the uncertain matter under discussion into a premise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question A better analogy is that A and B agree to meet up for tea, they meet up in a room wit…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:51 PM
2

The information you got is ancedotes and text messages Yes, both of these provide information to indicate that she is most likely a liar. Do you have the mistaken belief that anecdotes that contain personal information about someone is irrelevant when making superficial judgements about them? (which again, cannot be used as evidence she consented to sex). Incorrect - the text messages can be used as evidence she consented to sex. Are you delusionally mixing up the term "evidence" with the term "…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:29 PM
2

That's funny, there's the illness again. You claimed everyone assumed her guilt. I pointed out someone that doesn't. You then claimed I assume her guilt. I challenged that, and asked you to name the crime you think I assume. You haven't responded. None of these actions is "gaslighting" you. I would be more justified in pointing out that your accusation of gaslighting is in itself an attempt at gaslighting. Either that or paranoid delusions. Most people are assuming - based on information supplie…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:17 PM
2

You have convinced yourself of the ability to read other people's minds far, far beyond what they express. This is likely related to the mental illnesses you describe. What crime am I assuming that she is guilty of? Also ADHD is not a mental illness You keep editing your posts to add things. Here's the top hit when you search for this, from the Canadian Mental Health Association: https://cmha.bc.ca/documents/attention-deficithyperactivity-disorder-in-adults-2/ "Attention-deficit/hyperactivity di…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:11 PM
2

No, your belief about cause and effect are mistaken. What justifies describing you as mentally ill isn't asexuality and anxiousness, but anxiousness to the point of mental illness, and various other illnesses you describe yourself, such as: I don't understand why my brain can't conjure a positive sexual fantasy. I feel like I have some kind of mental illness if this is all I can think about. I have so much wrong with me. First I have ADHD I may have an anxiety disorder These illnesses particular…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:06 PM
1

In your own recent comments you describe yourself as having various mental illnesses, including relating to sex, and a lack of ability to imagine a positive sexual event. Just pointing this out so others can understand the situation here. "Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal principle for someone accused of a crime. It means that until the crime is proven, they are treated as if they are innocent. This from a legal perspective, and to a lesser and more contextual degree in a social perspect…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:55 PM
0

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/consent?s=t permission, approval, or agreement; compliance; acquiescence: You seem like a troll. I will RES tag you and downvote your posts when I see them.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:43 PM
2

No, non-enthusiastic consent is still consent.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:28 PM
2

No, but it is evidence in favor of consent.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:27 PM
6

Oh, they just argued that it should be illegal to protest against abortion. Illegality implies punishment, so I just threw that back and said that it should be illegal to make the statements they did and they should be punished for it. It's easy to ignore the "punishment" aspect of making something illegal, and to comfortably declare that others should be punished without thinking about being punished.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 10:28 AM
7

Uh, you're arguing that others should be punished or prevented in some way from speaking, and you find it surprising that others think you should be punished or prevented in some way? Shocked pikachu face
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 08:39 AM
7

Wrong, you are going against progress. Spreading disinformation is harmful as well. You now have two events in this thread justifying action against you. Which country are you in? Edit: Ah, Italy apparently. North or south?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 08:22 AM
7

Alternative view: You shouldn't be allowed to make posts like this and people should come to your house and inflict discomfort on you, lock you up or take your money until you stop. Your posts aren't peaceful, so unpeaceful acts from you would simply be met with unpeaceful acts from others. Think of how people who favor free speech must feel reading your posts.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 08:18 AM
83

Scene: Bob holds a crowbar and swings it at Adam's head. Officer comes running and grabs Bob's arm. Officer: You can't hit that guy! Bob: I didn't hit him. Officer: Yeah, you didn't hit him because I stopped you. Bob: I don't want to be arrested. Officer: Did you try hitting him? Bob: I just held this crowbar and moved my arm. Officer: Why did you do that? Bob: Because.... (points to Adam) Officer: I'm going to have to detain you. Bob: For what? Officer: For trying to hit him. Bob: He didn't get…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 07:30 AM
27

True MVP
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 07:21 AM
0

Christians don't get to say "the entire Bible is the word of God Christian majority theology is not that every word in the Bible is the word of God. This is a key difference between Christianity and Islam. Once again, monumental cluelessness and stunning ignorance. There's even the pretty astonishing paradox of mixing together "word of God, divinely inspired" in the same sentence. You don't even comprehend that this an oxymoron. If words are "divinely inspired", then they can't be the "word of G…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/20 01:14 PM
0

Christian majority theology is that Jesus has abrogated the Old Testament. It's really more illustrating cluelessness when someone attacks the Bible on the basis of the writings there, which are probably closer to Judaism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/20 12:38 PM
5

if men are normalizing it - it’s hard to expect women to disagree Uh, what? If a small number of men are saying something bad is actually OK.. we should not expect women to disagree with them? Like women are infantile brainless machines incapable of taking their own decisions? What if a 40-year old man forcibly grops and kisses a 17-year old girl who tries to resist and shows extreme discomfort, and a lot of men are normalizing that? I guess women couldn't be expected to voice any dissent there …
/r/MensRights13/10/20 07:31 AM
12

Girl: "Hey guys, you should really open up about your problems more" Guy: Opens up about issues and asks for support Girl: "AHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHHAAH SO PATHETIC, ARE YOU A MAN OR NOT"
/r/MensRights13/10/20 07:16 AM
3

Yeah, you would no doubt be strongly opposed to the police, even when you felt they cracked down on those you hated.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:23 AM
1

Fascists love the police when the police is on their side, and hate the police when they feel the police opposes them. There's no principles more than in an insect brain.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:18 AM
2

No, the fascist that tried to pull this shit lost a large chunk of his arm, and luckily didn't manage to murder anyone. Scream louder, maybe you can awaken your fellow fascist shits from their permanent nonexistence. Oh wait.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:09 AM
3

In Kenosha? Nowhere, they got evaporated into nonbeing as their brethren squeal and cry. Two fascists shot to death, a third losing a large chunk of its arm, as their fellow fascists cry and rage but can't do anything at all. Like in WW2, when thousands upon thousands of Joseph Rosenbaums were killed by fragmentation bombs and the world rejoiced and a new age dawned when the insectile machine-things were gone.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:06 AM
4

Yes, imagine that the psyche which feigned surrender, raising its hands with open palms, before trying to pull a concealed revolver and enacting murder, didn't succeed but was instead shot itself. What a loss.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:02 AM
1

The monsters, antihumans and insectile spider-things stopped squealing in Kenosha when Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. Sadly a great loss to the world.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:54 AM
6

Every instance of PPD would be an asshole move if a guy did it as well. The PPD is in the entitlement and expectation to get away with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/20 11:53 PM
2

The woman who was beaten and didn't object has demonstrated that it's okay with her past behavior. She knows that being beaten is a cost to being in the relationship and she has chosen it.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 06:31 AM
18

Because hey, it's definitely more than 50% of men who are pedophiles
/r/MensRights09/10/20 03:39 AM
1

It really is ridiculous. For a relatively brief period of time, if you do any crime, you will receive a heavier sentence than you otherwise would have. How brutal. I'd take a 10 years "threat of heavier sentencing" for $10k. Wow, I would have to avoid committing crimes for 10 years.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 03:50 AM
2

Same. Consequences and costs for the false accuser is pretty much the only thing that can deter false accusations. At least I would improve the world in some permanent way and protect others, and stop them from enjoying the benefits.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:16 AM
6

Republicans did change Title IX to have far more due process and to allow universities to demand a high standard of evidence for a guilty conviction
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:12 AM
11

OP is a moron or concern trolling white knight. OP expects only situations where the woman declares "I am a woman so you can't do this to me" or similar. The sub has always included women who act badly in what appears to be completely noncaring, flagrant, privileged ways, seemingly not fearful or cognizant of any potential retaliation for what they do. This may be because they think they are immune to it as a result of being women, or it may be for some other reason - it's impossible to tell. St…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/20 10:01 AM
0

If that's what you perceive, then maybe you should leave the sub?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/20 09:35 AM
12

Kidnapping wives and forcing them to undergo labiaplasty and silicon breast implants, to make them cleaner and perform better in bed? Or how about having the husband force a ceasarean birth to preserve a tight vagina? Surely this will generate outrage from feminists, leftist governments, international organisations, the UN, the WHO, Jewish groups etc. Everyone is very much against cutting women's bodies to suit the preference of their husbands.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 05:24 PM
1

A "stated purpose" doesn't place any restrictions on what the actual focus is. Feminism is a focus, as pointed out. Whether this is a result of the demographic that tends to go there or not is a separate question, and doesn't impact whether feminism is a focus.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:34 AM
3

on women, not necessarily feminism. "Not necessarily" is obscurantist weasel words. It absolutely did not by definition "necessarily" need to be focused on pretty much anything at all. But that's irrelevant, because it IS focused on feminism. Women too. But feminism too.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:23 AM
3

8x Mensrights active online members then
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:52 AM
11

Wow. Ultimate white knights in that sub. First they care enough to challenge it, then suddenly hey dude why do you even care. The ice cream "melts on her chin, slides down her neck and drips into her cleavage". Ice cream runs much slower than water and sticks to the skin. Even for a pretty much chinless person, to keep walking as you feel ice cream running from your chin, down your neck and into your cleavage is insane in itself. Women's anatomy is completely irrelevant, because it would be equa…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:44 AM
9

TwoXchromosomes, a batshit radfem sub, has 13m members and 8x mensrights numbers online.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 01:15 AM
70

TwoX is utterly batshit. Because you mentioned it, I just checked it out. One front page post is by a girl who was rated 8 out of 10 by her boyfriend. She gets the response: "It’s very hurtful to think about how in his mind there is anything about you that is undeserving of a 10 which can make you question what the missing 2 points equates to in expectations." Sounds fantastic - in a good, loving relationship, the boyfriend should not have any kind of negative thought about the girlfriend. Oh wa…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 01:13 AM
1

There's so few people involved in acting, with so extremely unique circumstances (on many dimensions - personal fit for the role - acting fit for the role - reputation - need for a job - recent performances - ability to boost earnings - contract negotiation - how desperate the director is to fill the role at that moment) etc etc that it's pretty much impossible to determine anything systematic. What struck me was that I've never heard of a female fashion model giving up part of her salary to ben…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:26 AM
249

The world is filled with monsters and terrible people. She deserves to have a bad time, but there's nothing you can do. You could have responded something like "I think women who are raped should just suck it up and deal with it", but then you would be the bad guy.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 07:29 PM
18

24-year old raping learning-disabled 14-year old in their care? Community service, it's a woman after all. And that sex offender registry was mainly meant for men so she might not be the type of offender it was intended for in terms of not being a man.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:23 PM
5

They are bad people willing and eager to lie to defend their "brand". The number of extremely bad people in the world are far higher than the media gives the impression of. You never see anti-male feminists in the media, but there's massive numbers online.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 03:19 PM
8

Congratulations!
/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:15 PM
13

Top comment: Even in the best case scenario where this is all due to anxiety brought on by the pandemic don't believe that after the test he'll be better. Soon it'll be 2 tests. Then 3 because he'll be afraid of false positives. This type of anxiety gets worse until it moves on to something else Yes, here he is maybe a bit irrationally and a bit justified anxious about something, but DO NOT THINK that doing something to give him peace of mind will help, because he WILL demand more and more, it's…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 02:16 AM
2

If you are a false rape accuser, your posts shouldn't be treated with much credibility. Sorry, you have to provide evidence you're not a false rape accuser before it's possible to engage with you in discussion. Even if you claim you aren't - people lie here all the time - you need to provide solid evidence before you can be treated as not being a false rape accuser.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 11:07 AM
2

Probably no help for this guy. I would first be looking to the person responsible for the false accusation, instead of to myself.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:52 AM
2

Can you prove that you are not a false rape accuser? I have to wait for the evidence before taking your post at face value. There's no reason why a person posting anonymously should lie.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:47 AM
31

Looks like you're attacking and devaluing the lived experiences of women by asking for evidence of them
/r/MensRights19/09/20 09:25 PM
10

Ah, how utterly sociopathic. An attempt to counterbalance a global, systematic, millenia-lasting phenomenon involving untold many families, with a vague and disputed anecdote about bad treatment of the wives of dead or mutilated miners at one point in time in a tiny area in the US. A woman who owed money but couldn't work had the option of selling sex. A man who owed money but couldn't work didn't even have that option, and had to do something even worse than selling sex. You should get some for…
/r/MensRights18/09/20 04:42 AM
10

And the "horror" of having a varied workday in large part with your own children, whilst the husband is working in coal mines. Poor women.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 02:36 AM
4

I checked out MensLib once and felt genuinely sad for the people taking part. Seems it's pretty much dead. There's 3 posts on the front page that are less than a day old.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 01:41 AM
5

Not really any less relevant than if it was today.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 03:09 PM
2

All I can think of when I see this is that I consider Kyle Rittenhouse a hero.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/20 03:03 PM
28

An obvious alternative is to have a flat pension age, but recognize that this affects men more negatively than women, and hence ensure that men have an advantage in some other way over women. Even if you reach the conclusion that "there's an inequality here, but we're going to accept that", you can still compensate the disadvantaged gender in some other way.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:35 PM
9

were dealt a devastating blow
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:34 PM
1

Based on HER description, it seems fucked-up. But that's all we have to go by. We have her emotions and a little bit of facts, but the facts look pretty bad in combination. If you want to be a friend, you could a) not name him, but b) post his version of the story. Post that you know the person and this is their version. Maybe it's much more innocent. Maybe he was passed out drunk in another room, then went and sat in the kitchen and didn't notice other people left - that would be a good reason …
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:40 AM
25

I agree. It's not about equality at all, and most "feminists" usually aren't good people. It's about getting special advantages for women, general tribal man-hating, and just expelling their inner shit and getting satisfaction, being feared and getting a profile by trying to dominate and abuse people online. For someone who wants to be abusive, but don't have the strength to be violent in reality, they'll just do that on the internet instead - and then people will fear them. Big sadist egos who …
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:19 AM
2

Thanks, I'll donate $5 to Kyle for good and important world-improving self-defense against people who were most likely redditors
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/20 07:51 AM
3

What the fuck? Are you claiming that about feminism today?
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:49 AM
-1

Circumcision is considered good in Judaism so it will never be banned.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:55 PM
2

Leftists have human value and contribute to discussions, and much quality Redditing like yours was lost when Kyle killed two in self defense.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 04:22 PM
5

Asians score higher than whites on many relevant tests
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 03:34 PM
2

I'm also not making any posts about this you smart ass fag yourself
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 03:13 PM
5

Yeah, these women weren't attacking OP. But while OP received a shitton of the most extreme insults, they got nothing at all.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 09:57 AM
41

The most fucked-up part is, there's several women in the comments saying they take STD tests regularly even though they are in a relationship, and they get upvoted and supported and nobody gives them trash for it. Woman 1: I am a woman. I plan to secret do STD checks even when I am married in a stable relationship (although they would be every couple of years instead of every six months) because I don´t trust HUMANS, period. Woman 2: Mine aren’t secret. I straight up tell my bf I get tested for …
/r/MensRights12/09/20 04:37 AM
24

If you give me money, then want to stop giving me money, you should be physically threatened to keep giving. That's what your post boils down to. For all we know 50k a month is less than what he was giving her, if it isn’t then yeah, sucks for the guy It DOESN'T suck for the guy to give 600k a year to an ex-partner to fund a lavish lifestyle for them, IF they used to give more? So if he gave her 60k a month when they were partners, and must now give 50k a month for ten years, then you think he's…
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:04 AM
4

Yeah, Trump making women think it's natural to spit on police without being arrested, or thinking that a woman being arrested must be arrested by a female police officer, or that the existence of a black woman on the ground during an arrest is somehow unnatural. Damn that Trump.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 01:59 AM
5

I downvoted because of all the edits and you don't know how to spell 'ridiculous' It's funny on Reddit how some people's desperate need for approval and being the "Popular Kid" interacts with downvotes. They see themselves downvoted and can't cope with it, so they start squirming around desperately with edits and explanations. Some combination of trying to justify themselves and "fuck all you guys you are worthless". It's just fucking internet points from people you probably wouldn't want to hav…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 01:56 AM
10

The speech and acts of the women in the video is insane, but feels natural and obvious to them. It's natural and obvious to them because of an entire ecosystem of ideological insanity they live within. The Democrats have been supporting and growing that ecosystem of ideological insanity for years and years. Trump is the only viable political choice for slowly choking it off. Hence: I don't really like Dems but saying Joe Biden is for these riots is an insane thing to think or say. Fantastic wate…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 01:22 AM
1

It's the top post, but you have to click "Show content" or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/20 01:08 AM
39

I would say the same about most Trump opponents. Trump is the only political alternative for reducing what you see in this video - the Democrats will continue to push it sky-high. Edit: to quote one of the most important posts above: Even after years of this insanity I’m still shocked at the level of stupidity. She fucking SPAT on a police officer and they’re CONFUSED as to why she’s being arrested and claim it’s unjust?? I know there are probably serval answers but how have we come to this? How…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/20 02:58 PM
89

Invoking the 397th right to not be touched during an arrest
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/20 03:15 AM
21

If you're in a one-party recording consent state, there's iPhone recording apps that keep recording when the screen is black. So you basically open the app, press record, press the power button to sleep the screen, and put it in your pocket, in all of 10 seconds. Recording stops for some reason if you get a call. But hey. It might not make you safe from everything, but could provide useful defense. Even in a two-part consent state, I would rather risk it if meeting someone familiar, and then pub…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 02:59 PM
1

Focusing on what you hate or dislike just invites more attention to it. I do agree we need to bring hypocrisies to light, it's important to do it only in a productive way and not get lost in hate. Interesting theory. However, in the real world, there has been intense focus on what leftists dislike, and they have had significant success and gained much power by focusing very much publicly and loudly on what they hate.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 02:46 AM
4

I never knew that fathers had a problem with child support because my dad never did himself. And in all the years you have spent alive, you have never become aware that there are situations not like this, where there is some kind of hostility between the parents, or the parents live some distance away from each other, or the parent with custody denies the kids from seeing the other parent? Well, now you have been informed, I guess. You learn as long as you live. Obviously, your experiences would…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 03:56 AM
3

Because you have to give up a significant part of your income whilst not being able to spend time with your child? I feel like this should be obvious. It's hard to understand how you can not understand.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 03:08 AM
5

Even if the legal system in his country doesn't consider it rape, it would still be rape.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 06:45 AM
3

Poor woman. After trying to frame a man for cutting her with a knife, she was subject to the cruel and devastating threat of prison. Imagine how she must have felt, almost having to go to prison.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:41 AM
2

Yes - also utterly irrelevant to OP's point
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:38 AM
1

Pupil testified about about sexual abuse by teacher versus Pupil admitted sex with teacher
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:37 AM
3

Just checked it out and noticed something else immediately: "If you have to change your behaviour out of fear for what your partner might do, you are experiencing domestic violence." That's a funny definition. Meanwhile: https://www.1800respect.org.au/violence-and-abuse/domestic-and-family-violence Domestic and family violence happens when one person in a relationship hurts another or makes them feel unsafe, and is a repeated pattern of behaviour For men: if you HAVE TO CHANGE YOUR BEHAVIOUR OUT…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 11:46 AM
1

I think of feminism as a movement defending the rights of women. See top post. Removing men from domestic-violence bills is not "defending the (violated) rights of women" Opposing shared-parenting bills is not "defending the (violated) rights of women" Lying about sexual assault law is not "defending the (violated) rights of women" Defining male rape victims as not being raped because of ambivalent feelings is not "defending the (violated) rights of women". Yes, feminism is awesome - when you li…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 11:30 AM
1

Other than being in the picture?
/r/MensRights03/09/20 11:11 PM
0

Well and 97% of all killers are male. How on earth does the gender of the killer matter for the killed? How on earth does it play any role for the victimhood of men, the resources needed by men, the need for self-defense by men, the justification for having tasers by men, or the injuries suffered, whether those who inflict that victimhood are men or women? Please, explain in detail. But the parent comment talked about abusive spouses and ex-spouses so this statistic doesn't really matter right n…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/20 10:09 PM
5

To be honest, men are killed at far higher rates than women in pretty much every country in the world. If being in mortal danger justified having a taser, men should be given preferential treatment and possibly even government-funded tasers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender Too many examples of men being killed.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/20 03:04 PM
7

implying
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:14 PM
-66

Declaring that having a vagina means: your opinions and experiences are valid and appreciated nobody should be dismissive to you for any reason ever other people should listen and hear what you have to say isn't exactly promoting equality. It's putting women on a pedestal and giving women better treatment than men pretty much anywhere. Unlike OP, I will happily criticise and be dismissive of bad arguments and poorly founded views, and I may not necessarily appreciate everyone's opinions and expe…
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:55 PM
3

No, he's not 'basically talking about NLP'.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 10:38 PM
3

There's about a universe of distance between "ALL THE TIME; ALL INTERACTIONS" and "DOES IT EVER HAPPEN". I receive non-genuine interactions. The norm is to receive non-genuine interactions in some amount.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:25 PM
4

These are not just compliments and it does become creepy when it’s all the time and with the intent of trying to or wanting to penetrate you. While I hear what you're trying to say in this post, this is a little disingenuous. You don't have a reasonable basis to imply that women "all the time" receive compliments "with the intent to or wanting to penetrate". Can I just have one genuine interaction where I’m just communicating human to human? Contrived and imagined victimhood, where women receive…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 10:47 PM
9

The entire purpose of the "privilege" label is racial and cultural marxism in a switchover from economic marxism. Upper class privileged rich = Upper class priviledged white Oppressed victimhood poor proletariat = Oppressed victimhood poor brown/black Getting rich children to attack their parents = Getting white children to attack their parents Solidarity between the proletariat = Solidarity between black/brown people Rich guy saying "I'm more proletariat than you!" = White guy saying "I am more…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 04:08 PM
525

The brutality of a woman saying "Hello, lovely gentlemen" in a meeting at work
/r/MensRights16/08/20 02:39 PM
7

Women who want equality would care that the worst off 20% are men - because equality would mean massive economic resources spent on lifting these up - or that women lose privileges until equality is reached. As it happens, most women don't want equality, just power - and then the 20% don't matter.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:09 PM
3

Hilarious that he celebrates being a women's world champion several times. That literally means beating out biological women from that spot - making several biological women NOT be world champions. Great jorb for womankind! Looking proud!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/20 08:57 PM
10

This. A nation of women is far easier to control. Surveys show clearly that women are far more conformist than men. I was just thinking of examples. Here's a list of people who were killed trying to escape East Germany: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deaths_at_the_Berlin_Wall Overwhelmingly men.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 07:40 AM
2

Not to forget Hitler's "daring arguments" regarding the Jews. Very brave, took a lot of guts to make, etc.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 07:32 AM
1

Also: To focus on Osama bin Laden's daring bombings, is to ignore his legacy in marketing and communications.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 07:31 AM
2

It's perfectly normal for a man to threaten women with violence if they come within fifteen arm lengths of him.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 07:14 PM
3

Similarly: Hey guys, I just wish a lot of women were disappeared, not all of them tho, not a misogynist obviously since it's not all
/r/MensRights14/08/20 05:09 PM
3

This particular insanity too: The Woman should be able to express her concerns to the Man at any time without the man finding that nagging or negative The Woman should have the freedom to be emotionally unavailable to the man's emotional expressions at any time
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:20 PM
40

Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who doesn't cook Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who doesn't clean Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who doesn't look good Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who doesn't snap back Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who doesn't hold a job Most Women would find boring a man who isn't a freak Most Women would despise and avoid a single man who isn't happy Most Women would despise and avoid a sing…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:17 PM
0

Yes, sure. They weren't however 18-year olds doing compulsory service. My point is that the reasoning "How easy is it for a warmonger politician to send soldiers off to stupid meaningless optional wars like Syria, Libya, and Iraq when his political donors and cronies all have sons serving?", although well-intended, doesn't achieve its purpose. This because the "sons serving" would be serving (by definition in the discussion) in compulsory service, and those in compulsory service wouldn't be sent…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 09:13 PM
12

The results are surprising To someone who is retarded, they would be surprising
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:46 PM
1

almost no Correspondingly, Switzerland deployed 31 soldiers to Afghanistan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participants_in_Operation_Enduring_Freedom#Switzerland Edit: I'm from Europe myself. No, any country here would never send an 18-year old compelled into military service for 6-12 months on patrol in Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:33 PM
4

Good thought, but even in countries with military service, the people sent off to places like that will be professional career soldiers, and not people doing military service.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 04:09 PM
2

I think the feminist spiel is the biggest danger for women today looking for a good relationship, because it's almost the inverse of reality, like it was purposely designed to fuck up women's chances at a good relationship. Men want a woman who makes them happy. Who they are more happy spending time with than not spending time with. Who makes them happier when they leave than when they came. Things that don't contribute to that at all, or at least very little: a high flying job, a career, import…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:48 AM
12

Men forced to give up two years of their life is portrayed as a great benefit. However, those freely given the choice choose not to. Women must be very stupid to not choose this great benefit for themselves. Edit: Oh, and we could not risk the chance of men not seeing how great the benefit is by making this voluntary. Maybe they wouldn't realize how great this benefit is and harm themselves by not choosing it, so it would be dangerous to give them the option.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:23 AM
0

I said that there isn't a single definition - which there isn't. There is a whole mass of definitions and ways the word is used. Funnily enough, the one source you have quoted for "an academic definition" actually contains three different definitions. Then there's all the other sources with different definitions from those again. edit: and one of the three definitions from your one source is an extremely vague "any of various economic and political theories (..)".
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:22 PM
-1

There is no single definition of 'socialism'. Socialism has the side effect of concentrating enormous power of all kinds in the government - hence it opens up for some particularly terrible consequences, like what George Orwell wrote about. The rulers in a government controlling many things including the economy to a detailed level, are far, far more powerful than the rulers in a government controlling many things but not the economy. Such a government will hence likely attract more control-desi…
/r/MensRights09/08/20 02:42 PM
1

The big secret is that nazism is mostly just socialism on a national basis rather than an international. The ideas of socialists and leftists, but implemented on a national scale. Instead of saying "We should feel sorry for the poor people in Africa", he said "We should feel sorry for the poor people in poor parts of Germany". Then on top of that, there was the anti-Jewish and racial things. But that's not whatsoever a necessity in national socialism. It's something tacked-on and in addition. Li…
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:42 AM
3

It's common decency to shut up about whether you want the toilet seat up or down, and just place it in the position you prefer, no?
/r/MensRights08/08/20 01:18 PM
1

When people are powerless and being abused by someone, they may come to terms with their own powerlessness by excusing or accepting their abusers. What about people who stab? People who rape? People who steal and cheat? If someone stole your personal details and took all your money out of your account, would you excuse them as being under the influence of an ideology that permits this to happen?
/r/MensRights08/08/20 09:53 AM
7

A woman experiencing the cruelty and torture of being "perceived as not running her home properly"; the brutality! Meanwhile exhibit 1: The 90% of homeless who are men and have no home and live in squalor.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 03:42 AM
17

NoBoDy cArEs AbOuT WoMeN bEiNg rApEd Men kill at the word of a woman.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 03:38 AM
5

Exactly this. Stupid women have been fed retarded ideas by shitty, terrible fuckwits. Hey, women, spending ten years of your life to get a high-flying job doesn't make you any more attractive to pretty much all men. Men are LESS likely to want to spend time with you, because you are probably more of a bitch and less pleasant than someone simply working in a cafe or whatever.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 07:15 PM
4

Men want to be with someone who they become happier by spending time with. One of the toxic mind cancers of feminism is convincing women that becoming successful in their careers was the most important thing and would give them what they needed. Well, men don't become happy by spending time with bitches. Men mostly like women who, other than being cute, are kind and sweet. Tomi Laren isn't kind and sweet and I have to wonder whether any man on the planet would be happier from spending time with …
/r/MensRights06/08/20 07:13 PM
10

You literally declared that it happens in every instance ("a woman can't even talk about rape without a man ..") Now you have moved the goalposts to whether it ever happens at all ("it must not exist right??")
/r/MensRights03/08/20 09:30 AM
3

Sensible people have thought and done this for all of modern time. Philosophers, educators and benevolent rulers have made general decrees and statements towards nonviolence. Feminists aren't sensible and desire war.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 12:31 AM
8

Burning down buildings, trying to cause eye damage with green lasers as is plainly visible in several videos, direct personal threats, doxxing families of police, is terror. Terrorism includes illegal activities to cause significant harm and instil fear for political purposes. You are defending terrorists - obviously, you do so with mockery and dismissal. All I am pointing out is that if someone returned the favor and tactics, and blinded the terrorists permanently with a green laser or burnt th…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 07:35 AM
3

I like how they support their case with a fictional, fantasy TV series. "Guys, my case is totally important, just look at Duke Leto Atreides!"
/r/MensRights26/07/20 04:23 AM
7

That's what I point out about leftists. They crave violence. There's just something in them that needs violence to take place. There's nothing in me that wants to be that woman. On the other hand, that craving for violence is something from some parallel fucked-up dimension of evil that really should not exist as part of humankind, and as long as it manifests anywhere I'd be happy to do my part to stop it. Sometimes it screams when it stops, sometimes it doesn't. Unlike leftist desire for violen…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 03:11 AM
13

Always trust leftists to bring the piss an dshit. If someone had taken a green laser and returned fire and blinded some of the black terror fascists in the video for life, I am sure they would have screamed and cried to their parents and considered life in perpetual blindness very unfair.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 02:57 AM
97

The retarded view on her face is because she is perfectly comfortable in the knowledge that she will suffer no harmful consequences from doing this. This is female privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 04:39 PM
19

Are you retarded? You're suggesting that he could avoid being subject to this sexual harassment by "ending" the girl - killing her? Or bashing her head in? If the man uses violence against the girl, he would be charged or expelled and she would suffer nothing. It's literally not an option available to him because he would be punished severely for it. The idiotic view on her face is because she KNOWS that she will not be subject to violence. She cannot imagine it. Because it won't happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 04:38 PM
10

Paying attention to the right things.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 04:31 PM
48

No, he can't, or he will get charged or expelled.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 04:30 PM
105

The media will write about how terrible it was for her to be the subject of a criminal investigation. I've seen the quote from a judge that the woman charged has gone through the "ordeal of a criminal trial". The ordeal of a trial. For doing a crime. As an extenuating circumstance.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 04:29 PM
15

It's not petty at all because it indirectly highlights the hate men would get for posting similar demands about women's clothing.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:51 PM
30

Men are treated as disposable trash to be laughed at - until they take violent action, then they get the importance and focus women always have.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:22 AM
8

Men are murdered, in virtually any nation, at far higher rates than women. Protection is for the upper caste. Disposability is for the lower.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:12 AM
3

Men actually are the victims of being homeless to a far higher degree whilst not having NPR care about writing about their plight as homeless men. It does demean their suffering. The meme rhetoric of declaring that even though something is being done, it's not "THE POINT" to do what's being done, is worthless trash.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 09:14 AM
5

I, too, similarly don't find it offensive when men pretend their girlfriend has something on her face and smacks her.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 03:12 PM
-4

We should similarly find a video of a man pretending his wife has an insect on her face and smacking her that we can laugh about.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 03:11 PM
4

It's an abusive trend for psychopaths and it justifies men punching or smacking their partners.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 03:00 PM
1

The only times feminists portray men positively and with validity and worth, is when they are useful lapdogs.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 12:49 PM
1

It doesn't matter whether a rapist was a man or woman any more than it matters whether his skin was black or white. The male rape victim is still a male rape victim.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:39 AM
49

Interestingly, it just happens that there's no similar mechanism where a man can name a woman for "something", with no legal repercussions if wrong, and the woman needs to contest that or pay a heavy cost for the next 18 years.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:50 AM
11

Literally thinking about this 10 years later. "Man, fucking men, 10 years ago they made askmen after askwomen was created, damn them"
/r/MensRights09/07/20 08:24 AM
17

"As a woman, I want and expect men to pay for me. Have I hence internalized the hatred of women?"
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/20 02:15 PM
3

And yet it has in no apparent way set back any "cultural revolution", nor the BLM movement. Instead, it has brought them success - they have removed the symbols they disliked, and others have lost symbols they liked. How is that not a victory for them?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:13 AM
3

" She was said to be “very upset” when police showed her video footage of the incident. " Poor woman! I can't imagine the distress from seeing her own actions. "She appeared for sentence on Tuesday knowing her liberty was at stake." Brave woman, appearing for sentencing knowing she could be sentenced to jail! This must be rewarded.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 09:06 PM
4

Welcome!
/r/MensRights17/06/20 04:48 PM
1

"Some emotion on your birthday" isn't that great in my eyes. Even counterproductive - it reinforces that you should usually not show emotion - only rarely can you show a bit.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:30 PM
3

White flight is a rational act of self-protection and the pursuit of happiness.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:19 PM
2

I've literally never heard it in my life.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 02:20 PM
0

The "Women Are Wonderful" effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect That people stereotypically have a much more positive view of women than men, and even discriminate in favor of women. This should be 70% of the presentation. We want to combat stereotypes, right? So the media should take care to particularly highlight media stories with women as criminals, until the stereotype associating men with crime is gone. This should be a feminist cause. Of course, it's not, becaus…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 02:16 PM
15

Ah, yes, that well-known problem of men calling women "dishwashers". Not at all fabricated by sociopathic feminists.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 12:58 PM
1

Yes and no. What we first should have is some kind of basic consistency. "Kill all men" should be treated like "Kill all blacks", "Kill all jews" or "Kill all French". One we have some kind of basic consistency, we can discuss whether the total bar should be changed.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:44 PM
93

Fantastic way to portray them as victims yet again. When underperforming, you have the privilege of not being given harsh feedback - BUT YOU'RE A VICTIM OF PEOPLE NOT BEING TRUTHFUL! Hey guys, can I have a bit of that everyone showering me with praise? I know it's a heavy burden to take on, that some of them will be lying but praising me regardless, but I can take one for the team.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:55 PM
1

I said Alinsky didn’t write about ... the power, From the actual book: In the Civil War President Lincoln did not hesitate to suspend the right of habeas corpus and to ignore the directive of the Chief Justice of the United States. Winston Churchill's remarks to his private secretary a few hours before the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union graphically pointed out the politics of means and ends in war. All great leaders, including Churchill, Gandhi, Lincoln, and Jefferson, always invoked "moral prin…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:33 PM
1

Yeah but neither of those are true... Here's Rules for Radicals: https://archive.org/stream/RulesForRadicals/RulesForRadicals_djvu.txt Here's The Prince: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm anyone still in this thread, read either Alinsky or both to understand people like those in the opening post. Machiavelli didn’t write fantasy, he wrote about real world examples. There’s no fantasy in that. From The Prince: ... a [Civil Principality] is obtained either by the favour of the…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:17 PM
1

And this is where the effort to clear up deliberate or unintentional misunderstanding starts to exceed the interest and likely gain for any reader. I'll respond to this for the benefit of anyone else reading this who cares, and then drop it. To say Alinsky didn’t write for people without power The statement "Alinsky didn't write for people without power" is nowhere in my post. In fact, your paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 all relate to who Alinsky or Machiavelli "wrote for", the "intended audience" - but …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 06:51 PM
1

"The Prince" is filled with a mass number of sweeping generalisations about situations he had never been in himself, each poorly supported by very few examples. The only reason you can say that it has "plethoras", is that the sweeping generalisations are so many that the poor supports of each add up in volume. His "rules" are extremely reductionist and grossly oversimplify situations. Although Machiavelli sure speculated answers to a lot of questions, I'll just quote Wikipedia: "The descriptions…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:46 PM
3

Yes, that's my impression as well. He wrote about it like a fantasy theorist. Like any armchair fantasy author imagining a world without empathy, or where people eat metal or whatever. Alinsky was the real deal. edit: /u/Adrewmc is conclusively shown as either a liar or clueless about the book, skip here if you care: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gp10sw/hypocrisy_as_its_best/frks9ag/
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:04 PM
11

I meant in the book: "Moral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means. Machiavelli's blindness to the necessity for moral clothing to all acts and motives — he said "politics has no relation to morals" — was his major weakness." Basically, Machiavelli is the iconic brutal psychopath of politics. Alinsky one-upped him: all of this complete and utter brutality and psychopathy is well and good -- Machiavelli's weakness was t…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 12:54 PM
1

Yes, this. They know that their horde of adherents will mindlessly repeat the same, and nobody will challenge them, because to challenge them would be to break with the herd and become an outsider.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:47 AM
103

Understand these people by reading "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. It's really a book about something completely different, but it shows the personality and psyche - the point is that any "principle" they have is just clothing put on for the occasion. You can search for the phrase "moral clothing".
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:43 AM
171

"Vegan cafe" sounds like a place you are charged steak prices for mashed salad.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 02:22 AM
20

In the Soviet Union, they had two central newspapers: Pravda (Truth) and Izvestia (News). The saying was: "there's no truth in Pravda and no news in Izvestia". Everyone knew this. It did not matter. The government kept everyone in a constant state of psychosis. An intentionally constructed and inflicted psychosis where everyone could know that something was false, yet they still had to pretend it was true. It does not matter that policies are reasonable or impartial. When it's beneficial, to cap…
/r/MensRights20/05/20 08:54 AM
1

Good analogy. "It would simply be impossible for a rich but weak kid to bully the stronger kid of one of his dad's employees. After all, the other kid could just beat him up!" -a complete idiot
/r/MensRights19/05/20 06:04 AM
3

If your father killed your mother with one slap, he would go to prison for murder, aggravated as someone who killed his wife. You declare that he "could" kill your mom with one slap. No, he could not even punch her and give her a single mark, or he would go to prison and probably lose his job. Even if she hit him first. If your mom hit your father, then no, if he tried to punch her, he would go to prison. It's a delusion that he "could" slap her, when he would go to prison if he slapped her.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 06:00 AM
12

RelationshipAdvice is an interest club for the psychothic. I strongly advise anyone posting there to make a throwaway and flip genders, or just avoid the fucked-up crowd altogether. In a recent post there, a wife said that her husband was a "disgusting pig", amongst other similar things because she was convinced that he was jerking off to certain female actresses, because she knew that he liked those actresses. He hadn't talked about jerking off to them, there was no indication that he had talke…
/r/MensRights19/05/20 05:55 AM
1

Are you a feminist? Deceitful switching of what my post referred to ("one thing that one woman said that one time"), deceitful switching of what I said ("on par with"). To repeat myself, as that's what should be done when trolled by psychopathic liars: Posts like those referred to are identical on the relevant measures. Overall, sociopathic disconnect from truth. Tagged as 'troll/feminist', will downvote every post I see from you on sight. You should stop lying online, it makes it so that bad ex…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:42 PM
41

If a man is convinced his girlfriend is pregnant, she might be able to convince him to drop condom use. After all, she's already pregnant.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 07:48 AM
2

Wrong - they are identical on the relevant measures. They are identical in that both are likely to induce rage, that it makes no immediately visible positive change to spread impressions of it, and that there's nothing obvious people can do about the situation posted. Posts about rape fulfil the definition of "rage bait", which should be ended if we are going to end "rage bait". Also, neat completely ignoring the other rage-bait mentioned we should end reporting about.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:59 AM
-2

and will risk posting: Whoa, you are really placing yourself at risk by posting here. Good that you're letting us know about it.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:30 AM
0

Presuming it actually happened...
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:29 AM
-1

Conclusion: Forcibly end all media and social media reporting on rape - because it's events likely to make people angry. Oh yeah, some people tend to get pissed off every time Palestinian militia get killed. Better forcibly end reporting about those as well. And protesters outside abortion clinics? End reporting about that. It makes people angry. Particularly, groups of women talking about women being treated badly should stop that. Such groups should not exist.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:58 AM
11

The only reason it's likely to make people "rage" is that the events described are worthy of being angry over.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:32 AM
5

Resources are always country by country, and in the US often state by state. An exhaustive list of resources is a job to maintain, although I am sure it would be welcome if you did. Menslib doesn't really have an "exhaustive list" at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:31 AM
11

Yes, this. I SINCERELY WISH the only thing I risked for describing myself as a men's rights activist was mean words. This is a situation that feminists have played a key role in creating. Feminists in my country have spoken about "Men's rights activists" as violent, dangerous, evil, hateful, etc. GEE, I WONDER WHY USING THAT LABEL COULD CARRY HEAVY COSTS.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:29 AM
58

Not like Johnny Depp lost the main role in Pirates of the Caribbean because of sexist ideas
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:46 AM
3

That's what "rent money" refers to. You don't have it, that's the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 04:03 AM
3

Sounds like something a simp would say in between donating his rent money to egirls.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 09:40 PM
5

She thinks she's immune to the rules.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 09:15 PM
4

But you ARE serving as their apologist when you use the same label as them. Like, if I go around handing out ice cream to children with a shirt with a Swastika on it and say "From a good and helpful Nazi!" - then it doesn't matter if I personally define Nazism in a very friendly and wholesome way. It still helps and gives support to the mass number who obviously are not friendly and wholesome.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 03:47 PM
8

Yes, clearly a man who tells the fathers of a miniscule number of women that they are selling sex videos of themselves HATES ALL WOMEN /s
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 06:39 AM
2

"My action is legal, therefore the action is not misandry"
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 06:26 PM
4

This is great news, and shows a fair-minded agency. Particularly: The CCC agreed with the complainant’s feedback that if a similar situation was depicted by reversing the gender, the advertisement would have been considered to be in contravention of Chapter II of the ASCI code.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 06:20 PM
3

Holy fucking wow. The first question on the list to ask men who have been subject to domestic violence, is "Have you been violent?"
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:24 AM
3

I like how they try to twist the too-good grades into a potential negative. "Hey guys, we're going to give all white people $1000 and nothing to anyone else. In the long run however, this might mean that white people don't learn to save their money as much as others, which might be a problem when money is tight!"
/r/MensRights12/05/20 05:05 AM
6

"Hey, it looks like you don't care about fighting capitalism. But it looks like you care about [Problem]! Well, didn't you know? [Problem] is caused by capitalism! Don't you want to get rid of [Problem]? Join me to fight capitalism!"
/r/MensRights11/05/20 01:13 PM
1

If you're counting rape, you can't omit rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/20 06:10 AM
8

Pointing out that the vast majority of the sociopaths who pull the "Men just don't open up about their troubles enough!" meme are women is absolutely helpful to our case - it helps identify monsters and monster networks.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:29 PM
3

HOLD IT! When a woman makes a serious accusation, her fragile womanly psyche cannot handle the pressure of being asked questions by a third party that the accused has submitted in writing. Her fragile womanly psyche melts down and she becomes incapable of responding or even functioning. - women are so incapable of handling questions, that simply being asked questions from the accused indirectly through a third party destroys their minds and silences them. /s
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:22 AM
2

Women are so fragile and irrational that simply being asked questions through a third party about a serious accusation they have made makes it impossible for them to speak /s
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:10 PM
15

This starts when they have already been pulled over. There was probably something before this.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 11:02 AM
43

"Your honor, in defense of my client stabbing his wife, he was drunk when he did it!"
/r/MensRights04/05/20 11:47 AM
5

Guys here's 40 minutes about why the Razer Pro gamepad is not a good buy compared to the original
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 07:40 PM
12

And these antihuman monsters are what the feminism apologists imply don't exist.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:51 PM
27

Effective, immediate, proportionate, lesson-teaching. 10/10
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 04:29 AM
2

Yeah. I'm all for stupid violence that doesn't leave a lasting mark to be responded to with a good and more forceful smackdown, but there's teaching a painful lesson and there's sadism and brutality with an excuse. Some people cheer when a shove is responded to with kicks to the head and that's not so great. This guy's reaction is 11/11.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 04:24 AM
35

Yeah, also an appropriate and proportionate use of force. If someone slaps or hits they should get slapped or hit back the same or harder like here, but I don't like the videos where someone have their head stomped on for shoving someone.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 04:17 AM
3

A method to recruit. "Hey, you care about the issue [boys having a shit time]? If you join MY army to destroy capitalism and promote communism with people like me in power (nono I couldn't possibly, I am much too humble but perhaps I might put forward some suggestions and someone may obviously suggest me), then the issue that you care about i.e. [boys having a shit time] will be solved! Don't you want to solve the issue you care about?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 08:25 AM
7

Not everyone is a psychopath. If everyone was a psychopath, there would be no need to "pretend". The only reason to pretend is that many people aren't.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 07:20 AM
14

From "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky (Hillary Clinton's close friend, mentor and the person she wrote her thesis about), available online: Machiavelli's blindness to the necessity for moral clothing to all acts and motives — he said "politics has no relation to morals" — was his major weakness. Basically, Machiavelli mostly had the right idea, you should be utterly brutal and have no human restraints, but you must pretend very hard to be moral whilst doing it. The closest analogy for them i…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:25 AM
44

Female privilege: Don't want to work? Just quit! You'll be taken care of!
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:24 PM
2

It seems almost unreasonable if £250 was what he's supposed to receive. Starving and sacrificing himself for the sake of a twat.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:35 PM
52

Also posted April 1st..
/r/MensRights03/04/20 02:17 PM
1

Men dressing in women's clothes don't just dress in women's clothes. They will ham it up with makeup and voice, and caricature women, in a good-natured way. See Monty Python. I could definitely see a woman being funny doing the same. I just don't see women do that. Maybe this "comedian" doesn't understand that putting on a shirt and a pair of trousers isn't particularly funny. Or that she's incapable of separating dressing up like a man from sending unfunny barbs against men. Edit: I don't think…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 08:03 PM
3

I haven't seen the movie. Doesn't the poster portray it very much unlike what you're saying?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:28 AM
6

As far as OP's case goes, "women who live on floors with only mens bathroom" shows the entire problem is the design of the dorm. No, it doesn't show that. Unless the women in question are disabled, they are fully capable of walking up or down a flight of stairs. Ya'll are out here looking at things with a 49/51 split and screeching that it's unfair. Back when I joined, the concern was with things that are more like a 25/75 split You sound like a concern troll. This isn't a matter of either 49/51…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 05:40 AM
2

I strongly, STRONGLY advise you to read the rather short book "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky was Hillary Clinton's close friend and mentor. She literally wrote her senior thesis about him. The book doesn't shit on leftists. The book is an instruction manual written by a famous, key ideological leftist for leftists. And by reading it, you will realize what's inside the head of the people who attack you Most likely, you have never, ever even considered that creatures like that …
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:49 PM
1

Reminder when anyone sees leftists: This is their psyche This is their degree of humanity This is their value to the world This is their contribution as a result of having life and existence
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:44 PM
75

Send a message to the university and ask. Get it formalized. IF they say this is fine - then you can use the women's bathroom. IF they say it isn't fine - but women still do it - then send another email a bit later - then another email a bit later. And at that point, you can use the women's bathroom, because if they try to penalize you (or anyone else), you have a Title IX case yourself.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:31 PM
1

It doesn't really sound like he is saying that.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:29 PM
-4

Example of shit comment above. Just let me know and half of this thread would be banned. Otherwise I'm happy to stick to post removals.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/20 10:48 AM
0

Instead, the posts are "all woman group fails and goes bankrupt Forming an exclusive one-gender group without being ridiculed, abused and harassed for it massively is Pussy Pass. The removal of such a group is Pussy Pass Denied. because women suck". Although you put this in quotes, I would guess that you would present yourself as paraphrasing, hence not having to back this up. Easy escape route.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/20 10:44 AM
-8

Hey, would be happy to join as moderator. Happy to remove shitposts. Also happy to remove shitposters if necessary and by agreement.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/20 10:40 AM
24

The concept of the sub is seeing women who are clearly of the mind that their sex places then above law or common rule. She resisted arrest and taunted police by doing flips, obviously believing there were no consequences. There were. At the very least she didn't expect to get manhandled like that. Exactly this.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/20 05:09 PM
7

You're pretending the evidence in this case doesn't exist, by simply likening it to anyone "facing trial". There is no blanket, universal or automatic reaction to a man "facing trial" on this sub, when the videotaped and recorded evidence against him is overwhelming. Stop being evil. It indirectly justifies others being evil and harming others. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7820971/Caroline-Flacks-boyfriend-Lewis-Burton-arrives-court-appearance.html 'Police then knocked on the door ei…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:20 AM
55

Notice how they portray her as a victim, when she's literally a domestic abuser.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:45 AM
2

We are just a month into this year, so..
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:54 AM
2

Not at all. They are psychopaths and monsters beyond humanity, it's not surprising they would ban you.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 11:19 PM
20

All utter cunts. Good people are rare.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/20 08:32 PM
0

Yes, the regular masses are very much in support of this. Just look at the message boards (oh wait, I can't find any), the slogans and placards at the protests (oh wait, there's none) and the trending Twitter topics (oh wait, there's none).
/r/MensRights13/01/20 09:36 AM
1

Whoa whoa, this presumes that a potential accuser or victim is able to separate actual facts and events from fantasies.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 09:34 AM
11

I think it makes sense when described like that.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 05:17 PM
1

if it was the other way around, and a man treated a woman like that, people would say his an abusive asshole. Indeed. I can imagine the oceans of scorn and hate poured on a man who showed up for a date with a woman, underdressed, and asked her to take a walk in the cold, then asked her for her clothing (let's say a scarf, cap and gloves).
/r/MensRights11/01/20 12:19 PM
2

So don't take this out on 5 guys, it's not in their control. Wrong. It is in their control whether to make both toilets unisex.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 12:12 PM
3

Yes, a couch is nice for anyone needing to sit down.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 12:11 PM
8

To the extent rewarding incompetent antihumans who destroy lives and violate the law is customary, right?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 03:18 PM
3

Do you have any examples of this happening in the UK? Some program designed to be of benefit for women exclusively, later extended to include men? Any program within any sector for the last 2-3 decades?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 07:32 PM
17

It will put money into the hands of women, so it's a success for the Labour party in that sense.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 07:31 PM
10

"To be honest, we should treat everyone extremely well, with many free benefits and mild punishments... as it happens, we are going to enact this policy for women TODAY... .... and for men at some undetermined point in the future.... ... but men should be happy because we are making the world a better place one step at a time! Don't you want the world to be a better place, men?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 07:28 PM
1

if we presume that they were just emotionally immature and not psychopaths, then they were just emotionally immature and not psychopaths No, most high schoolers wouldn't be retarded enough to do something like this, and would be able to see that this is wrong. Moreover, if they were actually stupid and not evil, they would commit a whole bunch of mistakes. For example, although the article about men is based on a premise that it's perfectly normal to comment on people's bodies and genitals cover…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 04:01 PM
14

prove them wrong with your character and they will appear as a gossiping batch Uh, do you live on a different planet? No, women who make public accusations of sexual assault can't be countered by "prove them wrong with your character". No, they will not be treated as gossiping bitches.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 03:09 PM
40

The issue is that people here think that "standards" exist. Standards imply a rule system or underlying principles that are sought consistently applied. These people are psychopaths, and don't think that way. There is no standards. They have the infinite capacity to invent standards and justifications, but they don't feel any obligation to standards. If they want to grasp a man's crotch they do it, unless a cost/benefit calculation tells them otherwise, and an hour later they can hold a speech a…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/19 02:27 PM
6

Men: "I broke the law, but I did it to help my ..." Society: "Shut the fuck up, scum, suffer your punishment, we're not interest in excuses."
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/19 05:19 PM
1

They are all psychopaths, not human beings, other than the most evil and antihuman parts of humanity.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:59 PM
1

Er, what? SweetPinkSocks seems to have a good attitude.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/19 03:19 PM
10

No, it's not off-topic, since it's a male space that was invaded by feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/19 04:01 PM
2

Okay, sure. I am not asking specifically you personally to consider whether you, HomerNarr, would have asked the same question if a man did this. I am asking people reading this to consider whether they would have seen that question being raised. In 99.999% of cases, you would not be present, so whether you personally would have asked the same question or not if this was a man, isn't very relevant. It's not a question of whether you would have done it, but whether it's common - prevalent - enoug…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/19 12:29 PM
1

Because, I want people to consider, whether a man, who did the same, thing, would lead people to ask or care whether he, had mental problems. Your logic, is hard to spot.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/19 10:18 AM
6

AU$6,316.99 - will be reimbursed to Emi Thompson - ( Emma’s friend ) for her initial payment to the BIMC Bali Hospital - for the Bali Hospital bed accommodation - and the initial tests on Emma’s brain injuries - in order to diagnose the proposed treatments… So her friend won't have paid a single dime, whilst the donators will be out of pocket.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/19 01:27 AM
1

guys we were all so confused and oh it was so difficult to figure things out and yeah I guess in all the confusion and uncertainty we just spoke some massive blatant lies but we were all so confused
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/19 01:26 AM
1

Yes. I asked whether anyone asks or cares whether a man who does the same thing has mental problems.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/19 01:24 AM
-4

There is no "women beating". Your belief that it is is most likely a result of mental illness, a delusional disorder. You should speak to your doctor about whether antipsychotic medication could be of help.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/19 10:28 AM
15

When a guy is arrested for throwing rocks at cars, do anyone even ask or care if he has mental health problems?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/19 10:26 AM
2

If you have any information about that, then absolutely post it. It still wouldn't compare at all though.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:16 PM
0

Oh, agreed, although less so when the drug is safe and common. A few weeks to a month or two maybe.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:12 PM
2

Not at all. I just think it's great for a party full of monstrous antihumans who helped facilitate the Rotherham industrial-scale racist child rapes to suffer and fail.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:10 PM
3

No, I think it's great for a party full of monstrous antihumans who helped facilitate the Rotherham industrial-scale racist child rapes to suffer and fail.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:00 PM
0

YES! YES FOR JESS!
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:59 PM
3

Sure, it's just an act that raises the question of why a woman murdering her fetus against the father's will doesn't face penalties.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:58 PM
-2

Poisoning? This is a routine medicine taken by women daily, the harm to her will probably be less than being punched in the face. So a few weeks in prison.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:57 PM
2

Sure. It's just that allowing a woman to abort against the father's will is mentally hurting a man, and forcing him to play child support against his will is (most likely) physically hurting him.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:55 PM
0

Not only was it 'something' but a medical procedure that could be directly harmful to the person. Sure, although, so could punching someone in the face, and the harm to her will almost certainly be far less than punching someone in the face. Going by the "abortion is not murder" movement, this should be about 1-3 months in prison.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:53 PM
15

No you didn't argue that it had wit. You said that stand-up shows are often about stupid and trivial things. This wasn't an argument against me pointing out that the "joke" itself here was witless, trivial and stupid. Maybe you thought so, but didn't understand the words you tried to use.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 03:32 PM
30

You’re not arguing against me. The point is that it’s a trivial and stupid joke, which makes a trivial comeback perfectly suitable.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 02:26 PM
36

No, the woman’s joke doesn’t have any wit. Observing that an item is numbered “6” but less than 6 inches is trivial and stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 02:14 PM
0

That's not a correction, and grossly misleading as well, due to "just". She doesn't "just" feel unsafe, she claims she is at great risk of psychological harm, to quote my own summary.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/19 10:18 AM
65

tldr: Woman says she was subject to "subtle" emotional abuse from dad for years, and decided to break all contact with him. Two years later he sends her a snapchat message, and she responds she intends to seek a restraining order if he does so again. One year after that he sent her a letter asking for reconciliation even though she hasn't told him her address. She thinks this is stalking and she feels unsafe and unable to protect herself against him, and wants an order of protection. She says sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/19 07:00 AM
20

She is representative of feminists. Hence, she is the face of feminism. You can assert that there are feminists not like her. They are not the face of feminism as they are not representative of feminists. Being "representative of" doesn't man that it applies to everyone. It means that it's a reasonable representation of what is typical. It doesn't take credit from them, as they never had the credit of being representative of feminism. Feminism is a cult-like movement, and the insanity displayed …
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/19 11:31 PM
15

A man who came to a debate as clueless as she is would be laughed at, ridiculed and dismissed. It would be considered a low point of his life, a time that he really fucked up. This is unlikely to haunt her in any way ("Mimi", not even the name) and she apparently does not feel bad about it at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/19 11:28 PM
2

Leftists have chosen Muslims as their allies. I'm not a fan of either of them. I feel bad when I see Indians being attacked.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/19 10:08 PM
80

"If I scissor kick in his general direction, my power will destroy him"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/19 10:02 PM
10

No, the wrong thing is what ValhallaBoundBoy just described: Could you imagine thinking so little of yourself that you need to find tiny little details in history about how someone with the same genitalia might have been involved in the creation of something no one even thinks of as invented by 'men'?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 04:43 AM
6

Okay. I think you hold unjustified beliefs, making it hard to sympathise. Check out statistics on homelessness, suicide, workplace injuries, victimhood of violence and murder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:09 AM
1

Your "whole point" was that the other side can be hypocritical and that it can be hard to discuss? So suddenly your recently discovered motivation of wanting to hear arguments against their logic has vanished into thin air?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:31 AM
17

It's not a beauty standard at all False. Both being muscular and being skinny are beauty standards. I was saying we don't all require the muscles - that's surely being supportive not oppressive False. The only alternative you presented to fulfilling one beauty standard of women is another beauty standard of women. That is not supportive. Men are incredibly picky when it comes to how they expect a woman to look (I should know with the critical judgement I regularly receive!) but they don't seem t…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:29 AM
1

You presented the argument that if this is mostly men criticising each other then it's an example of toxic/fragile masculinity? You did this in the following, simply attributing the argument to someone else? Is it mostly other men criticising each other? If it is, these sjw people would probably just say this is an example of toxic/fragile masculinity? This is an argument. It is an argument you attribute to someone else, but also an argument you present. I downvoted you because you presented a t…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:18 AM
25

How ironic. You try to present women as victims of oppression - but your only qualification to "Women go for muscles" (a beauty standard) is "Some go for the skinny look" (surprise surprise, another beauty standard). Then contradict yourself by declaring that women "must" accommodate all sizes of men. No, you just said that not all women go for muscles and some go for skinny, both of which are narrow beauty standards. There's a contradiction between these.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:10 AM
1

It is strange that we are placing question marks behind statements? You presented an argument in your opening post? The argument you presented was terrible? The fact that you claim it is what someone else would say does not make it less terrible? Edit: Anyway, maybe this was not your intent. But you asked why you were downvoted, and that's the answer in my case. See in particular the example about Bob above.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:01 AM
1

But it's a terrible and invalid argument. There is no need to present terrible and invalid arguments that would be made by bad people. Why do it? If Bob has been punched in the head for cutting in the coffee queue, I don't go "Oh, I dunno, there's some people who might say Bob deserved it because he's making everyone's day worse and at least now he knows not to cut in line?" Unless I actually want to present that argument myself in an underhanded and terrible way.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:57 AM
6

There are very, very, very many women who exclusively work to support women. They don't ask for your justification. They don't care if anyone thinks it's wrong. They just do it.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:53 AM
8

There's plenty of people who have had bad experiences with black people, muslims, etc. To most people, that doesn't justify stereotyping those groups negatively. You are expected, at the very least, to simply shut up. Feminists think it's perfectly fine for someone who has had terrible experiences with men, to say "Men are terrible". Feminists think it's not fine whatsoever for someone who has had terrible experiences with black people, to say "Black people are terrible". In fact, we would proba…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:52 AM
0

I wrote my explanation for downvoting him above: that he's pretty much presenting a terrible argument himself in the guise of saying that this is what someone else would say.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:47 AM
1

Edit: why am I being downvoted? Because you're basically presenting a terrible argument in the guise of "oh, isn't this what someone else would say?" That's even worse than just presenting a terrible argument yourself outright.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:44 AM
452

It never entered into her mind that she might be incapable of fighting him. Female privilege ingrained from birth: You can attack anyone at any time and this is normal and something to do if you want.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/19 03:18 AM
80

No shit, children are an obstacle for dating men. That's why you have children with a good man, so there's no need to date men. Exceptions to this are rare.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/19 06:08 AM
5

I don't have your information about snow plow drivers. I have no idea about their racial makeup. You imply that I have some hidden agenda ("conveniently left out"). Quit fantasizing about other people.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:47 PM
22

Did you know you can report people to the IRS even without confirming that they have avoided taxes, simply based on a reasonable possibility? And I don't see you going after other contract workers like landscaper, snowplow drivers and others who also don't always pay taxes. Whoa dude, you're stereotyping landscapers as not paying taxes, many of whom are minorities. Does your internet community know you're a racist bigot spreading hate? Go pay women for their bathwater and dirty socks and post on…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:31 AM
-8

*virgins
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:21 AM
21

Wamen should be immune against paying taxes /s Trying to make a hateful dipshit on the internet pay the taxes she owes is a bad idea /s If you do this you are not smart and you're childish /s
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:10 AM
1

In her second police interview, Richardson denied burning the baby more than 15 times but later said she tried to cremate the corpse. Actually the person that was accused of burning the bones said she tried to burn the bones.
/r/PussyPass12/10/19 02:17 AM
8

None of them are about men's rights. All of them are about Feminism. Oxymoron. Feminism is centrally related to men's rights. Most things relating to feminism is by definition related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:28 PM
9

Feminism is about gender equality in the same way that Marxism is about social and class equality- that is, it's understandable and right for their believers to claim their movement is about equality This is blatantly a lie in very many cases where it's extremely obvious that the person calling themselves a feminist does not believe in equality.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:15 PM
37

Generalization is perfectly acceptable as long as it's sufficiently descriptive, which this one is.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:13 PM
13

No, there is no sign he harassed her. You make paranoid and false accusations.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:34 PM
3

He literally said that women had been "squeezing his arms". Obviously, based on his muscles, because there's no other explanation. This is then rewritten in the comments section to "touched" his arms, with references made to workplace touching, like someone tapping you on the arm or just putting their hand on your arm a brief moment to get your attention. Squeezing, with sexual connotations, minimized to workplace hand-on-someone's arm. They don't care. There's a special place in hell for them.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:04 PM
4

We always have third wave feminists making fun of men for being emotional. An emotional woman would have been hailed by third wave feminists and consoled. An emotional man earns ridicule. It has nothing to do with principles, it's because the people involved are utter psychopaths and antihumans wearing human skins but without any human content. Ridicule is the point, because it hurts, and hurting is the goal.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:30 AM
2

Welcome to reality. This will persist throughout your life, and you will continue to see it when you are 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, etc. until the day you die. You have two choices: accept it, or become very angry and act accordingly. Some choose the latter, I can't say I blame them for that.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:16 AM
7

https://www.amazon.com/Husband-Boyfriend-Fiance-Festival-T-Shirt/dp/B074PB2MX5/
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:09 AM
3

If you are in the US, you should file a Title IX complaint against the school. You were most likely discriminated against based on your gender. Happy to guide you through it. The school webpages should have info on Title IX complaints.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:02 PM
7

If I had a dollar for every time I've seen this tactic, I'd probably have a few hundred dollars. Ask about multiple things, where one is extremely severe and negative, and another is vague and relatively mild and innocent. Like "RAPE" and "UNWANTED EPISODE". Then quote the statistic together: "89% OF WOMEN HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO RAPE OR UNWANTED EPISODES"
/r/MensRights02/09/19 05:28 PM
2

It would be repercussions because there would have been for a man, and there is supposed to be equality.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 07:27 PM
4

No, it isn't. White knighting reeks of inceldom.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 02:31 PM
39

As a man you are disposable and irrelevant and nobody gives a fuck until you start reacting with violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 01:00 PM
1

Female Privilege: The belief that you can abuse someone endlessly and suffer no consequences for it at all. A man knows that if he acts like this, violence may result. Men have never had that privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 12:56 PM
15

It's "virgin" making its rounds again.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:20 PM
1

There's many terrible women like her in the world. Some also who are not like her. But... just, many like her.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:19 PM
1

I watched the first video. To illustrate that you are clueless, let's imagine some differences: 1) They are not on snow, but on pavement 2) The woman refuses to get out of her car and refuses to walk 3) When the police tries to get her to move, she suddenly throws herself forward and lands on the pavement with her face first Nothing of the above is unrealistic. All of it could have happened with your "civilized" police. Apparently you think that the policeman somehow decided to push her head int…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 07:04 PM
1

You don't understand cause and effect in police work. Breaking into a truck means the police will stop you. If you jerk around when they stop you, your face might hit the pavement. There is no "comparable" or "deserve" entering into it. Well, you can say she deserves to be stopped. Then she caused her own injury when she was being stopped.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:40 PM
2

You don't understand cause and effect in police work. Breaking into a truck means the police will stop you. If you jerk around when they stop you, your face might hit the pavement. There is no "comparable" entering into it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:34 PM
4

40lb, said the guy whose only knowledge of women is his mother and sister.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:33 PM
7

40lb, said the guy whose only knowledge of women is his mom.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:31 PM
2

She has probably never suffered consequences for her own bad actions in her life.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:30 PM
16

Yes. It's literally at the very end. "HE TOUCHED MY BOOB, HE TOUCHED MY BOOB" as a last resort. Rape claim, the magic card of women.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:21 PM
5

What do you think is her "excuse" for being a drama queen?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:20 PM
378

Yes. This is the incredible privilege afforded to girls. A guy who did this would probably be bleeding, from being slammed into the pavement, then from the puncture wounds of the taser.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:18 PM
75

A girl who has never in her life suffered harmful consequences as a result of her own insufferable shittiness. This is what privilege looks like.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:14 PM
1

Do you understand that attempting to reshaping dead Jews into bullets to fire at your political opponents for reasons unrelated to Jews is abusing the misfortune of Jews, and anti-Semitic? Your post uses the misfortune of dead Jews to attack someone you disagree with politically. You are an anti-Semite, or acting like one. It's funny that you would imply you're Jewish. Either that's just a lie from an anti-Semite, or you're a Jew who happily abuses Jews, of which there's been a few in history.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 02:34 PM
1

Do you understand that when you abuse dead Jews, then you seem like an anti-Semite?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 02:04 PM
13

They are psychopaths using ideology and politics to gain power.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 12:53 PM
7

I AM WOMAN HEAR ME DESTROY EVERYTHING BECAUSE LOL VAJAYJAY PATRIARCHY etc
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 12:49 PM
2

You are indirectly claiming, by phrasing it as a question, that this woman does not support IS. You have no basis for that. It's a mentally ill delusion. It is the archetype of white knighting, a result of your own sexism and bigotry in somehow being convinced that she just cannot support IS, even though by all visible markers she very much does so. Does your family know you are sexist, and indirectly support terrorists? Should they know?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 09:17 AM
2

or become part of the next generation of soldiers. There's about 30 of them. If being mistreated lead someone to commit terrorist attacks, we should have seen a few hundred bombings from Rotherham victims.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:59 AM
0

smacks of nazi-ism Stop abusing dead Jews for your own political purposes. It makes you look like an anti-semite.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:56 AM
1

Yes, it's just morally justified.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:49 AM
2

at least 30 british children a whole generation of disenfranchised youths There's a bit of a disconnect between the article and your post. Anyway, if being badly treated made people commit terrorist attacks, there should be a few thousand from Rotherham alone.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 06:42 AM
3

You think it is 'her' ideology? She shouldn't have been in the position to be radicalised in the first place, the system failed her. /r/whiteknighting
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/19 05:56 AM
1

'He was an amazing guy he just didn't get the help he needed.' This feels like such a joke. The "help" he needed was to see his daughter. There was no way any other amount of "help" could replace that. Can "help" make life easier to live? Yes, absolutely. Can it necessarily fix the problem that causes someone to kill themselves? No, not necessarily. There's a good chance that no "help" would have prevented him from doing this. Declaring that it would all have been avoided if he just got "help" f…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:05 PM
1

given that I don't think there is a double standard Thus I don't know if there is as marked a double standard You are misrepresenting your own post immediately above.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 07:51 AM
1

/u/Mightyoak123 believes that a man admitting that he pretens to be artistically interested in order to get women to pose nude, whilst actually just wanting to get off, would not receive negative reactions.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:24 PM
2

I get that there is a double standard here. But just because a man doing it would be considered creepy doesn’t mean it’s wrong when a woman does it. The wrongness is in the existence of double standards and a dual set of rules that are more permissive for women. This wrongness is independent of what the rules are.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 10:12 PM
32

If words could make her change, she would have changed by now, because in her lifetime she would already have come across all the requisite words.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 10:11 PM
1

It's a little bit late. A lot of men today have grown up feeling despised by some for who they are.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 06:07 AM
11

That made me tear up. Your daughter sounds amazing, and you have done a good job in raising her.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:23 PM
13

“I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath,” the 32-year-old actress wrote, adding that she felt as though she was “on trial in the court of public opinion.” It's funny how she attempted to put him on trial in the court of public opinion, but didn't expect to be put there herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 03:40 AM
9

Men need about 500 calories more per day than women to live. 500 healthy calories a day cost a hell of a lot more than tampons.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 12:12 AM
1

I have also seen a lot of men hating on all women Where? I see very little of that. Can you find some examples?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:35 PM
8

Let's do a little exercise for your and our enlightenment. 1) Please list up any people you consider threats to men's rights 2) We try to find out if they are describing themselves as, or are considered by others as, feminists
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:34 AM
1

Just curious: Do you see a difference between 1) hating most women for doing something bad, and 2) hating all women? Or are these the same thing to you?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:20 AM
37

If they drive cars, they can be inattentive and kill someone. The chance of them doing that is above 0%. Therefore, they should be banned from driving cars.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:27 AM
23

Yes, I recognize the look on the faces of men who plan to eat babies. I have seen it many times.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:41 AM
4

By law when the threat stops becoming a threat it is no longer self defense. ... Once they stopped hitting him, they can no longer be conceived a threat and therefore was no longer self defense by law. Absolutely. Good thing that what's morally right is more important than what's legally right.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 04:08 AM
2

Yes, it is a lesson to learn for those who pursued physical aggression, that after doing so they received several well-deserved punches, teaching them not to pursue physical aggression in the future.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 04:06 AM
18

The grin of someone who knows they can go out on the streets and have thousands of woman shout "YOU GO GIRL, LMAO" at her.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 01:30 AM
1

Yeah, and part of being a reasonable human being is recognizing that sometimes hot women criminals should be locked up in small cells for most of their life.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/19 09:28 PM
6

And the same for requesting a white driver?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 11:24 PM
2

They will ignore any statement of this kind.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:26 PM
1

Ahh. My bad. Well, my comment applies to him then. When "the working class" organizes child rapes, why would someone ally with them?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:53 AM
1

I am a worker. Why would I want to unite with utter sociopaths? Fucked-up antihuman liars, abusers, fraudsters and rapists? "Workers" played a large part in creating the Rotherham mass racist rapes. Sure, it was driven by the media and some politicians, but "workers" were the group giving those power. Why would I ally with a bunch of child rape drivers?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:47 AM
-2

Bruises on her ankles were cited as forensic evidence in support of her claim.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:43 PM
-6

Because the text is extremely misleading. It was a he-said-she-said case. She claimed rape, he claimed it was just kissing. Rape could in theory have happened. That makes it really hard to go on a crusade over, unless the crusade is against he-said-she-said as a concept.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:18 PM
7

Because the headline and petition are both extremely misleading by omission - they went from the club to his apartment, got into bed, did something in bed, then walked back. He claims they just kissed, she claims it was rape. This is a case of he-said-she-said. Not 'jailed for kissing 17-year old'. The headline quotes his claims, whilst the judge believed her claims.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:15 PM
3

It's not the same men. Like the statistic that men are more likely to be the victims of violence. I've numerous times seen feminist antihumans respond that "it's men committing the violence". But that's utterly irrelevant to the pain, injury and victimhood of the man being subject to the violence.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:21 PM
1

Laughing during court proceedings over a DUI death is fucked up, but 93 days in jail for it is insane.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/19 02:47 AM
1

Also, there's the issue that if it were illegal, false accusers - who suddenly realize that they've broken the law, and would be seriously imprisoned if they admitted it - would have extremely strong incentive to double-down and never admit their fault to anyone. This applies to admitting pretty much any kind of crime. "Guys, if we make the penalties for carrying out terrorist attacks heavy, then we discourage people who have committed terrorist attacks from giving themselves up and admitting wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:15 AM
1

"If we ban boys from the competition, it's fair for everyone taking part in the competition!"
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:47 PM
3

"Per New York State law, as a level 1 sex offender, Piche will have to register as a sex offender for 20 years." /u/jaqzzzzz supports rape, and wants women to be raped. /u/jaqzzzzz loves it when that happens.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:23 PM
12

From the content of the article: "Per New York State law, as a level 1 sex offender, Piche will have to register as a sex offender for 20 years." Have medication inflicted on yourself by people who know what they are doing.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:22 PM
8

/u/jaqzzzzz has posted the same link 9 times here, with bullshit and lies. Check here.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:19 PM
8

/u/jaqzzzzz has posted the same link 9 times here, with bullshit and lies. See this.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:19 PM
7

/u/jaqzzzzz has posted the same link 9 times here, with bullshit and lies. See here.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:19 PM
8

/u/jaqzzzzz has posted the same link 9 times here, with bullshit and lies. See here.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:18 PM
17

he specifically is NOT being placed on the sex offender list. He specifically IS placed on the level 1 sex offender's list for 20 years. He will also get 10 years of probation and is now a convicted felon. Very much unlike the woman who got off with none of the above. getting off rape charges completely, did you even read it, lol Antihuman bullshit. Stop being antihuman, stop embracing evil. You justify others treating you badly and show the massive amount of spam, bullshit and lies that shitsho…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:15 PM
14

Man admits to raping 14 year old Second-degree rape includes statutory rape, and excludes use of force or her being helpless e.g. blackout drunk. A 26-year old man had sex with a 14-year old who gave drunken consent, after her and a bunch of her friends went to visit his house. Why is this sub ignoring this story? Probably because 20 years as a sex offender, 10 years of probation and a lifetime as a convicted felon is a heavy or reasonable punishment for doing the above. Male rapists are almost …
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:11 PM
6

"jaqzzzz" is being deceptive. Second-degree rape excludes violence and doing it to someone helpless, like someone blackout drunk. 10 years or probation, 20 years of sex offender's registry, a registered felon, for having sex with a drunk-but-not-unconscious-or-resisting (i.e. most likely drunkenly consenting) 14-year old. Doesn't sound like an injustice to me. I would lose years of my life rather than being a felon, a sex offender for 20 years and on probation for 10.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:10 PM
6

much more common male equivalent: You've posted that link 5 or so times in the thread. 20 years as a level 1 sex offender 10 years of probation convicted felon for life Not a "male equivalent". If anything, the fact that someone is so desperately eager to portray it that way is a sign of how fucked-up the situation is for men - even a man suffering lifelong extreme restrictions has somehow "gotten off lightly".
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:46 PM
3

/u/jaqzzzzz has posted the same link 9 times here, with bullshit and lies. See info here.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:44 PM
18

a MAN receives only probation From the article: 10 years’ probation Per New York State law, as a level 1 sex offender, Piche will have to register as a sex offender for 20 years Stop lying. Stop being evil. Stop harming others. Stop being sexist. Being a registered sex offender for 20 years is not "only probation" at all. He will also be a registered felon, which in the US is also an additional burden, and not "only probation". A lot of people would prefer to lose a year or more of life rather t…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:29 PM
1

We just have to suffer through it, but we can complain about it even though complaining has not helped and it's very unlikely complaining will ever help - but that's your obligation - so chin up soldier, you will get your reward in heaven
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:23 PM
3

I have to wonder if this is what they say to a guy who has been biting his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:31 AM
7

It looks like all it would have taken here was her spending 10 seconds squeezing her own throat and he'd have been going to jail.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:31 AM
1

Looking for some advice, including personal advice, before speaking to the attorney?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:03 PM
9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Haigh Louise Margaret Haigh MP (born 22 July 1987) is a British Labour politician.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 01:38 PM
9

But it's safe to say if it "Interesting uses for woman" there would be no shortage of people crying about it. This is the part to care about.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 01:30 PM
5

Ask her things every now and then If she doesn't give a reasonable answer, file a Title IX complaint, saying that you felt badly treated and you think it's because of your gender. Say that you have seen the mug on her desk and it makes you feel unwelcome.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 01:29 PM
4

The prosecution always has the choice to drop the case. It's hard to know the reason the first jury trial was "scrapped", but after a jury trial is started and doesn't go anywhere is a good time to review the evidence again. The prosecution could have dropped the case after the second trial didn't find him guilty. In any case, he's gone through two trials and started a third. The fact that the prosecution still insisted on bringing the case is evidence of something deeply wrong at the prosecutio…
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:06 AM
81

It doesn't sound fake. It sounds like normal reality, step by step. Sleeping with a coworker? Plenty of people do that. Not want anything more? Plenty of people do that. Become apprehensive when a rumor is spread? Plenty of people do that. etc.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:41 PM
3

File a Title IX incident complaint. Your school should, somewhere on its front page, have information about this. Write that you believe the incident of verbal abuse was not responded to because of your gender, and that physical violence has not been responded to adequately because of your gender. That if the roles were switched, it most likely would have been responded to. Use their own system against them.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:47 AM
29

"The issue" always includes anyone who throws an object at someone else's head. Declaring that the mother is "entirely to blame" STINKS of pussy pass. It wasn't her, she wasn't in control of her own actions, it was bad influence, she couldn't help it, she should be let go, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 06:03 AM
2

Anyone know good replacements on Aliexpress?
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:19 PM
1

"Disposable" is only in a certain way and context. Not in other ways and contexts. In mathematics, you might be the number 1. That does not mean you generally are the number 1.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter