TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dinklebob Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by dinklebob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

It's actually a form of brigading. Thinking and reading take time and effort. With everyone on the list visually pulled out of the crowd, every good and loyal SJW can simply fly down a Reddit thread, downvoting tagged posts on contact without requiring any effort or brainpower. Given that "winning" an argument on Reddit revolves almost entirely on whether your post does well or poorly early on, it'll probably make a huge difference in how these things swing. It's diabolical but brilliant. Expect…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:01 AM
8

Never not archive.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:54 PM
2

But when we're specifically referring to the genitalia then someone's political views don't matter at all. I mean you can certainly argue that fake genitalia don't count, however.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:22 PM
2

:reddit:
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:36 PM
12

Never before has someone wooshed this hard.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:15 PM
10

Oh that would be the best case scenario. They can pull a lot of bullshit for sure, but this particular case is an open-shut win. The general public may allow a lot of shit, but they ain't that dumb. A restraining order for looking like someone who committed a crime? Beyond preposterous. Supporting such silliness would be to Title IX what L&O:SVU was to GamerGate. In fact, the odds of this happening seem so unlikely that I'm inclined to think the story has been Brian Williams'd from the very star…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:49 PM
6

Well, this is one of the times. I meant that this is one of the easiest and most clear-cut civil disobedience actions you could take. Your chance of failure is pretty much nil, since the school overstepped it's bounds to such a hilarious degree.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:42 PM
10

Hold off on the suit until you've forced the issue. If they harass you, then you go to the media and sue. The public outrage will all but assure your victory with a much larger settlement, and you'll bring public awareness to the issue that it wouldn't get if they quietly paid you off.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:40 PM
41

If there was ever a time for civil disobedience, that is the time.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:34 PM
17

Different crime. Stooping to that level earns you nothing.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:09 PM
23

men need to feel a cold spike of fear when they begin a sexual encounter. -Ezra Klein, Editor-in-Chief for Vox "Yes Means Yes" is a terrible law, and I completely support it
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:44 PM
11

She's just that good. But seriously him using that stall is completely his right. It's picking a fight, but obviously OP was looking for one and if he's standing up to an unjust rule that's completely fine. Was it sexual harassment? Hell no. Would it have been considered sexual harassment if the genders were reversed? Hell yes. Should CP be fired/demoted in either case? Hell fucking yes.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:37 PM
2

Stereotypes aren't objective criteria. If it is a random applicant and hiring people for these jobs is something you do a lot, then from a purely mathematical perspective yes [I agree with the methods in the original post]. With the caveat of course that there are laws and morality which also have a say in this kind of thing. This is what I was reacting to.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:45 AM
3

Ok well I'll agree with the objective criteria. The thing is if you are such a bad judge of character that you have to lean on stereotypes to help in judging an applicant, then you shouldn't be in charge of hiring in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:22 PM
0

I'm.... appalled? Yes. Appalled is the word.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:13 PM
3

So what you're saying is you agree with the post's logic?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:11 PM
23

Citizen arrests are legal, but if you can't justify it eleventy billion percent then you are all kinds of screwed. They can sue you to the stone age for kidnapping and stuff.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/14 02:04 PM
6

100% trolling.
/r/PussyPass09/11/14 08:14 PM
-1

:') Explain that one, /r/TRP morons.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:58 PM
5

The driver freaked out, and as soon as the police heard why he did it he was let go. This sounds like a non-story, to be honest.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:29 AM
2

Officer Video, with the Colonial Police?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/14 10:17 PM
132

You mean you just ruined your own life. Hurrrrrrrr.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/14 10:09 PM
25

"Review" = "We're working on it. The situation is under control. Go away."
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:22 PM
5

I'm getting more of an "at attention, salute" vibe from that one, given the military styling of the post. Of course, the "fuck you" is always implied.
/r/PussyPass31/08/14 07:26 AM
0

If you hadn't referenced the Twitter post I'd claim you hadn't even clicked on the links. Firstly, there are no double links, I have no idea where you came up with that. Secondly, that first link pretty well debunks the claim that Phil did it himself, even good enough for the poster who made the claim in the first place. Thirdly, and most importantly, Phil is a narcissistic moron who tried to show what a big mistake we'd all made by "canceling" projects, but really just fed us all tears. He stoo…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:06 PM
0

Here you go Also here And here
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:39 PM
1

Eh. My point was that this has been disproven. I've been trying to find the exact post but it's been eluding me. I gave my explanation as best I remembered it.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:41 PM
6

If I recall correctly, this theory got blown to fuck. Cloudflare doesn't host your site, it serves it. If I understand this right, Cloudflare takes site requests from users, pulls the page from your actual website, and then serves it to the user. This prevents DDOSing because Cloudflare takes all those pings instead of your little website. So it is possible for your website to be hacked. This explanation brought to you by my fuzzy memory on a topic I don't really understand, but read another exp…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 12:40 PM
2

At least we can still say stuff like this online without fear of reprisal. It won't be like that forever. Someday not too far away a comment such as yours will result in a no-knock raid for sedition and disturbing the public order.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:29 AM
6

Yes, but what is the actual turnaround on "suspended with pay" to "dismissed/fired/prosecuted for crimes against the citizenry"?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:24 AM
11

Sober me has a mental block on dancing. Drunk me can move, but makes sober me want to die in the morning.
/r/seduction02/01/14 01:47 AM
1

It essentially is both, but really it's big government that causes this. Give a politician too much power and corruption is the only result.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:35 PM
24

then display government corruption and just take all the cupcakes for yourself and your small group of elite friends? That sounds a bit more accurate.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:00 AM
1

DON'T TALK TO THE WITNESS, YA DUMBASS
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:00 PM
6

No, you fool. We need Patriarchy Encoder Rings
/r/MensRights07/10/13 02:46 PM
20

It would definitely get reported in a week or so. And if it didn't get reported in the time that you wanted, just have a few friends report them for you. Easy experiment.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:01 PM
43

Therefore justifying their position in the statistical analysis. "A shocking 27% of males surveyed stated that women are always to blame for rape and that males have a right to a woman's body." Congratulations.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:31 PM
-2

victims of these types of laws I don't know if victim is the word I'd use, as many of these people are perpetrators of criminal acts. Victim implies they were wronged, when in reality, taking the jailbait isn't acceptable. Oh wait, I see you dislike statutory rape laws. Eh. Not sure how I feel about that. Your opinion, I guess. EDIT: I'd probably use targets instead of victims
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:52 AM
1

Bingo.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:52 PM
83

"Give me your number? Give me your number."
/r/seduction27/08/12 10:18 PM
53

If you don't try more less harder. Wait what?
/r/seduction27/08/12 10:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter