| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Today I hit rock bottom: Seduction will not save you.Traditionally referred to as the minor 7th. | /r/seduction | 05/11/15 07:22 AM |
| -11 | Female RAF recruits get £100,000 compensation each... because they were made to march like menSorry, did someone actually make that claim or are you refuting a claim nobody made? | /r/TheRedPill | 24/11/13 05:54 PM |
| 2 | A gay man's take on the friend zoneIndeed. Also, I liked the orange/potato comparison. Made me chuckle. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/11/13 05:33 PM |
| 2 | A gay man's take on the friend zoneWell damn, now I'm on the spot. Let's see. I think that, to me, a high quality person (I'm not sure I see the value in having separate definitions by gender) is a person who is: 1) Self-realized. Knows who they are and is comfortable talking about it, but confident enough about it that they don't get offended easily. Knows their strengths and weaknesses. 2) Attractive. Well-kept, interesting, engaging. This has both physical and mental attributes. 3) Moderate. Moderate in their opinions, knowing… | /r/TheRedPill | 21/11/13 02:58 AM |
| 1 | A gay man's take on the friend zoneWow... that was... long. (That's what she said.) First of all, I'm a guy (like I said in my initial response to you). A straight guy. Ignoring the inciteful couching, I think this was your response: op was saying its too much effort to be friends with women, "a lot of effort for minimal reward or reciprocation" and I concur with that statement. That's what I refer to when I talk about high quality individuals It sounds like much of OP's experience (and yours as well) is built on experience with … | /r/TheRedPill | 20/11/13 06:24 PM |
| 1 | A gay man's take on the friend zoneI respectfully (but emphatically) disagree with your definition of quality for both genders. | /r/TheRedPill | 20/11/13 05:48 PM |
| 16 | A gay man's take on the friend zoneMen tend to be higher quality individuals than women as they can't scoot by on sexuality and victim cards to get everything provided for them. I don't think this is true at all. I'm not even exactly sure where to start refuting... but probably "higher quality individuals" needs to be defined. Does it mean being self-aware and cognizant of your own personal/emotional journey? In my own limited experience, I've met more women with this trait than men. Does it mean living life without expecting tha… | /r/TheRedPill | 20/11/13 02:15 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter