TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

direknight Archive

View 1 post and 28 comments by direknight on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
120

Social Issuesdireknight/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How about if, instead of "signs of humanity" the OP had said "signs of consistency"? I guess that would be better. But I think an ideal situation would be neither side being offended by such jokes. How's that for consistency? Not once ever have I seen any of those articles crack a joke about how much she'll get raped That could be because female prison rape is less common than male prison rape. It's about the news site in question finally taking male-victim rape as seriously as they take female-…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:09 PM
1

Sure, in fact I'll give three examples for each of the mediums I listed. Movies: Avengers: Age of Ultron This is The End Fight Club ("I haven't been fucked like that since grade school") TV Shows: It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia The Simpsons/Family Guy Various rape jokes in sitcoms. (Note that some of these are more sex jokes than they are rape jokes, but the point still stands). Comedy Acts: Amy Schumer Daniel Tosh Louis CK I could go on and on, especially with comedy acts. And I didn't even …
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:56 PM
1

I care that society gets upset over rape jokes about one gender and not the other. A subset of society gets upset over rape jokes about one gender (feminists, SJWs). Another subset of society gets upset over rape jokes about another gender (people in this thread, this article). Just because one group happens to be bigger doesn't mean you should start feeling mad to make up for it or start calling it hypocritical. The truth is that most of society finds rape jokes for both males and females accep…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:02 AM
0

It's about doing the same thing for male rape jokes as you would female rape jokes. I'd make whichever joke makes the most sense given the context. In this case, it's a male rape joke because the person is male and because a Subway sandwich is shaped like a dick. It's about treating men and women equally. Rape jokes exist for both sexes. There's nothing unequal or hypocritical about it. I don't think either gender should be offended by these types of jokes, regardless of how common or contextual…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:14 AM
2

I understand, but to me that sounds like falling into a game of 'who can feel the most offended by something'. That's not the right playing field. If we want to solve the root issue, which is men being raped in prison, we have to work on actual measures that will accomplish real prison reform (removing private prisons, ending drug prohibition, removing mandatory minimums, etc). Trying to stop people from making jokes for being in poor taste isn't going to do much. Eradicating the problem itself …
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:24 AM
0

There is a time and place for jokes, but the front page of a newspaper is not it. You're right. I actually addressed that in another post: The only problem I see with this is that it's a front page news story using a joke in the title. I'd expect a bit more journalistic integrity but I don't read this newspaper and so I couldn't really care less. Sure, we should complain about a joke being used as a headline in a supposed reputable news source, but the content of the joke makes no difference to …
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:49 AM
4

So joking about rape is acceptable now? Joking about anything is acceptable. I think part of it is that most people think it is a worthy goal to reduce rape Reducing rape is a worthy goal. Getting upset over jokes is not. Joking about something does not affect how often it occurs. few care to reduce prison rape Then we should work on productive ways to reform our prison issues, not get butthurt over jokes. Being a man entails fixing problems, not complaining about them. and even see it as an acc…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:30 AM
9

Because jokes are funny, whether or not they are about a serious issue. Is prison rape acceptable? No. Is joking about it acceptable? Yes. Humor is always acceptable and should be welcomed, not condemned. I can't believe that MRA are the ones fighting against "insensitive jokes" now. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:20 AM
7

Rape jokes can be funny. I found this one funny and even laughed at it. We're not here to be offended by jokes like SJWs. Yes prison rape is a serious issue that needs to be addressed, but there's no issue in making jokes about it. The same goes for literally everything else. The only problem I see with this is that it's a front page news story using a joke in the title. I'd expect a bit more journalistic integrity but I don't read this newspaper and so I couldn't really care less.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:15 AM
0

Well things that can't be changed are things you shouldn't worry about because you can't do anything about them. It might be hard at first, but learning to come to terms with it is likely the best outcome. This goes for people who have things like untreatable scars, burns, conditions/diseases that damage skin, baldness, etc. I'm not sure how big of a deal excess body hair is, but trimming/shaving sounds like a simple solution for that. Gyno can usually be reduced by losing body fat, but beyond t…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:20 AM
4

I don't have sympathy for anyone who is ashamed about their body and doesn't do something about it, regardless of their gender. When I want more muscle I eat more and work out. When I want less fat I eat less and work out. If I'm complaining that I have too much fat or not enough muscle and I'm not doing anything about it, then that's on me and I shouldn't expect anyone's sympathies.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:31 AM
11

Reminds me of the case of David Reimer, who lost his penis during a botched circumcision and was subsequently raised as a female. Unfortunately he ended up committing suicide later in his life.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:05 PM
5

You can see a full history of changes made to the CoC and who made the changes. Here are some interesting ones: Disallowing incorrect pronoun usage: https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/commit/7455009ba3414ada016526d07d40f861ac99d8a5 Allowing "reverse" racism and disallowing virtual hugs: https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/commit/b00eff579ded8c76cee0d2cb6b5beed6e84258fb
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:14 AM
7

Between the ages of 11 and 17, Dunham would bribe her younger sister with candies in exchange for kisses and also masturbate while sleeping next to her at night. These are stories she published herself in her book.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:03 AM
1

Also, even if you asked for a driver's license or something, there's plenty of fake ones. I also remember reading about past cases in which people were convicted for statutory rape after hooking up with underage people who were in the vicinity of a bar or a club that checks IDs to verify age. So even if he had asked for proof of her age it probably wouldn't have made a difference in the judge's ruling. Both the judge and the state Senator are completely wrong in their assessment of the situation…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 11:50 PM
7

And he has the power to get her fired and thrown in jail.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 09:03 PM
3

I hadn't thought about that. It seems like the only course of action he can take at this point. Although I'm not sure what other countries' policies are on this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:34 AM
12

Clearly this judge wasn't. Looks like he has some past resentment.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:32 AM
19

Yup. Not sure how he's supposed to attend college or find a job if he can't use the Internet.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:48 PM
45

It's important to recognize the only reason he was convicted so harshly is because the judge is on a moral crusade: The judge condemned what he called a culture of “meet, hook-up, have sex, sayonara, totally inappropriate behavior,” according to court documents.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:47 PM
3

in modern English it is considered a polite term. Sure, let's just ignore the fact that Dictionary.com states it's, "sometimes offensive." Let's also ignore the fact that this entire thread is about people not seeing the word 'girl' as polite (however stupid that argument is) and you suggesting that the word 'gal', a less polite way of saying 'girl', be used instead. I don't pick any arguments so I'm not sure where you're getting that idea from. You're either a troll yourself or you don't know t…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:17 AM
3

Except in this case the definition hasn't changed since it was pointed out in 1795. All the definitions I listed above say the same thing, and these are the current definitions of the word.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:13 AM
5

The source is in my original comment. It's the definition Google gives when you search 'gal definition', which I assume is based on a pretty extensive definition finding algorithm. But okay, let's look at other sources. Dictionary Reference: noun, Informal: Sometimes Offensive. 1. a term used to refer to a girl or woman. Oxford English Dictionary: girl n. (in various senses). Etymology: Representing a colloquial or regional (U.S. or southern English) pronunciation of girl n. Cambridge Dictionary…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:49 PM
2

There are countries with minimum wages at least $15 dollars whose citizens also have higher purchasing power.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:45 PM
17

Definition of 'gal': a girl or young woman. [source] Etymology of 'gal': slang pronunciation of girl, 1795, originally noted as a vulgarism [source] So rather than using a common word that no one should have a problem with, we should use an awkward sounding, vulgar, slang version of the word from the 1700's that has the exact same meaning? Makes perfect sense to me!
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:12 PM
1

The majority of Europe is 14+. The remainder seems to be mostly 16+, which is also the age of consent in most US states. 16 is much more reasonable than 18, but I don't think there's much of a difference between someone who is 15 and someone who is 16. They are both at essentially the same stages in life and development.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:33 PM
-1

I don't see why the sex of the fifteen year old makes a difference here. Yes I think it's okay. So does a good portion of the world. So has most of the world for the 100,000+ years our species has existed.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:43 PM
0

While I'm glad the law is being applied equally here given the sexes of the accused and the "victim", I do think that fifteen year olds are knowledgeable and mature enough to consent to sex with someone older than them without it being labeled as statutory rape. I can't think of one person from when I was that age who wouldn't jump at the opportunity to have sex with his classmate's MILF who also happened to be a former NFL cheerleader.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter