TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

discoparrot375 Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by discoparrot375 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

THANK YOU!!! People don’t NEED sex. People want it, and people need to socialize and have positive interactions with others, and sexual feelings are an inevitable part of life for most people that shouldn’t be shamed, but all of these things can be true and valid without acting like people must meet some kind of sex quota or they will die.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:19 AM
1

Based as FUCK
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:34 AM
1

It’s easier to get it but harder to enjoy it. The average random encounter isn’t gonna be rocking a girl’s world
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:30 AM
2

They aren’t necessarily getting freaky with anyone at all, they’re just into some weird fucking shit. Check common ao3 tags and you’ll see lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:27 AM
3

That’s why I’m personally an advocate for “women can be assholes just as much as men”!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:25 AM
1

This is true, anyone who’s interacted with pro esports or chess players will pretty much immediately want to be put in a different group from them, they’ve both got superiority complexes out the wazoo
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:24 AM
1

This is true, anyone who’s interacted with pro esports or chess players will pretty much immediately want to be put in a different group from them, they’ve both got superiority complexes out the wazoo
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:24 AM
1

This is true, anyone who’s interacted with pro esports or chess players will pretty much immediately want to be put in a different group from them, they’ve both got superiority complexes out the wazoo
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:24 AM
1

Well, society knows that men like CASUAL SEX more than women. Which is true, because casual sex is less likely to be enjoyable for a woman than a man. (Because of both the risks and the low chance of orgasming). That doesn’t necessarily speak for horniness, just the ability to satisfy horniness through. If a hookup won’t make you feel satisfied, why do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:22 AM
1

“Most women find men unattractive” uhhhhhhhhhh you know this isn’t a planet of lesbians, right? Like we all ended up here somehow and it’s probably cause a woman found a man attractive lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:19 AM
1

Also like I saw another commenter point out, women are a whole lot less likely to actually ENJOY a casual encounter cause they don’t orgasm as easily lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:17 AM
1

Lmfao yeah that’s true, it’s like if you tried to eat but you couldn’t digest it or something
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:15 AM
2

And sex with a crazy girl is like Taco Bell! Fun in the moment but the consequences will follow
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:14 AM
4

Yeah, I really am getting the feeling that a lot of redpill guys (NOT ALL!) are just way more obsessed with sex for the sake of sex than the majority of the male population. Why on earth are there so many men who willingly put themselves in situations where they can’t have a lot of sex if this is really such a universal fact of the male experience? Lots of guys joining the military, guys faithfully following religions that deprioritize sex, guys just focusing on hanging out with their friends (b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:12 AM
2

Ehhhhhhh I’d say there really aren’t all that many men trying to bed as many different women as possible in a row either. Sure they exist but they’re not as common as pop culture makes them out to be. Generally humans prefer being monogamous, if nothing else because it’s a whole lot easier
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:06 AM
1

Oh my god the second paragraph is so true, I also really, REALLY wish people would stop making generalized claims about all men and all women. Neither group is a homogenous hive mind and counterexamples will always exist for each group. If we’re talking about what’s GENERALLY true we need to SAY that’s what we’re talking about. Otherwise every argument can and will be immediately shut down with “well I’m a man/woman/whatever and I don’t feel this way”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:04 AM
1

Bruh BOTH of the above comments were anecdotes, pretty much every argument happening in this thread is an anecdote, you can’t only call something out for being anecdotal when you disagree with it. I’m not saying there isn’t science to support men having high sex drives, but MOST of the arguments people are making here about men having high sex drives are still anecdotal.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:59 PM
–

This is just fighting anecdotes with more anecdotes though. By the same logic I could mention the fact that most monks are male as proof that men have lower sex drives. Tbh that makes me wonder whether men actually account for more extremes in both directions though, could be an interesting thing to look into Edit: (for the record I’m not saying that women and men definitely have equal libidos all the time, I have no idea what’s actually true scientifically, I just enjoy playing devil’s advocate…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:52 PM
–

But you do actually have control over whether you see a woman as an object… Obviously you can’t control your sex drive but the things you listed are all, specifically, choices. If you were going to compare those to periods, which can’t be controlled, you should have said something like “it’s also easy for me to not act like a bitch on my period”. I’d be cool with that comparison tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:48 PM
1

EXACTLY! Thank you!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:42 PM
–

Okay but… it doesn’t matter how strong your urges are, it’s still WRONG to harass people. Sorry if it’s harder to stop yourself, but that doesn’t make it okay to treat people that way. It’s just like people who have a desire to kill. It doesn’t matter that it’s harder for them to not kill people than it is for others, they still aren’t allowed to kill people, because killing people is still wrong. I couldn’t care less if it’s harder for men to “control their urges” than women, they still have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:40 PM
1

Not being able to control your sexual urges IS wrong. Because that implies that you are doing something that you, for some reason, know you shouldn’t be doing. Basically what I’m getting at here is, I don’t really understand what “not controlling your urges” is supposed to mean unless you’re trying to argue that it’s okay to rape or harass people? If it’s something you need to “control”, rather than something you just chose not to do, doesn’t that imply that you’re doing something wrong or hurtf…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:34 PM
1

People make these statements that these things are inherently different in some way, but none of us can KNOW that. Yes, generally, women do seem to be noticeably less horny. The whole testosterone thing is very interesting to study. But there are some extremely horny women out there as well, even if they’re rare, without using testosterone to feel that way. Why do we have to say that those women are somehow super different from men, or that their horniness is a different type of horniness? We’re…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:30 PM
1

Women sure as hell aren’t wonderful but they aren’t a hive mind either. This sub needs to get over that bias but they also need to stop treating both women and men as giant homogenized groups. Some women have high-ass sex drives and some men rarely ever think about sex. Sure there are definite trends, but people on here rarely talk in terms of trends, only broad generalizations. If people would stop pretending that all women and all men can be completely generalized like that, we wouldn’t consta…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:19 PM
2

See, I understand your point, but what do you actually think women should do as a way of “accepting” this? I don’t think the solution to this problem should be for ANYONE to have sex they don’t want to have. That’s why people bring up entitlement, because although I’m sure that’s not what you intend, it kind of sounds like you’re saying women should be pressured into sex because men need it so bad. And unwanted sex is always going to be a much worse thing than a lack of sex, no matter how badly …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 10:52 PM
2

Honestly, I feel the same way and I’m a woman. I don’t really like following gender norms so I really like being more assertive and asking guys out myself, but I honestly get the feeling that no one really thinks it’s normal to hit on people you meet organically anymore. With the existence of dating apps, it feels like everyone’s attitude is “if I wanted to find someone to date I’d use a dating app.” I was actually just trying to explain this exact problem to my mom the other day! Ultimately, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 05:16 PM
23

This is so, so, SO true and I don’t know why it isn’t common knowledge. No one is under any obligation to date anyone for any reason. Of course you don’t need to be mean about it, but it is always okay to reject anyone no matter how “bad” the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 11:24 PM
1

People talk about their potential spouse “owing” them sex as if anyone with their attitude could ever get someone to marry them 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:26 AM
3

Exactly! Cleaning isn’t supposed to be enjoyable. Sex is supposed to be a positive experience that both individuals engage in because it’s FUN for them. You do NOT do it “for your partner’s sake”. You do it because you’re attracted to your partner and you want to have fun with them. If you’re having sex with your partner purely for them, and not because you enjoy it, that’s not a good relationship. It’s certainly not good sex lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:24 AM
3

Exactly!! And if anyone, man or woman, starts talking about their partner owing them sex or cleaning, they’ve already deeply fucked up. Relationships are not about owing anyone anything. Relationships are not about obligations. No one has any right to demand anything from anyone like that, no matter whether they’re a stranger or their spouse of 50 years. Relationships are about mutually caring about one another, and the reason people do things for their partners is because they LOVE their partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:21 AM
1

That’s fucking disgusting. Sure, sometimes people have sex they’re not super interested in because they think it’s fun to make their partner have fun. But that’s not a chore, that’s enjoying something based on your partner’s reaction more than your own physical sensations, which is a pretty common way to ENJOY sex. If someone has sex because their therapist TOLD them to, that’s fucking icky. They obviously have zero desire to engage in that activity or they would have done it already without the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:57 AM
1

Exactly, and it’s fucking repulsive. There’s no better way to make a relationship gross and miserable than to tell someone to force themself to engage in intimacy that they’re not able to enjoy. Sure, it’s not a good thing that she doesn’t want it, but the solution is to HELP HER WANT IT through actual proper therapy or encouraging the couple to bond in other ways first. Not to try to force her to do something she doesn’t want to do. That will only make her hate sex even more. And any good man w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:51 AM
2

Well, they shouldn’t say to punish the man by withholding sex. That’s fucking gross. Sex shouldn’t be a commodity to be given or withheld as some kind of sick reward. Sex should occur because both parties want to have and enjoy sex together, and that’s the only reason it should ever happen. The man SHOULD receive the advice on helping the woman feel better though, that advice is sound even if the woman’s advice isn’t. If she doesn’t want to have sex with him, it’s probably because she’s unhappy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:48 AM
1

You know what? You’re right. I didn’t expect to, but I agree with this comment wholeheartedly. The only difference between sex and cleaning in this way is that most people do not have the same hard boundaries around cleaning as they do around sex. But if someone truly does not feel comfortable with cleaning, they shouldn’t be forced to do it. I mean, maybe they have some kind of trauma around cleaning, idk I won’t judge them. They shouldn’t have to do it then, as long as they’re willing to live …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:42 AM
1

No, because if they truly can’t stand not having sex, they can just leave the relationship. But, I guess the same thing does apply for cleaning. Ultimately people need to stop acting like they’re being trapped in relationships. If you love your partner, you accept them for what they are. If they’re terrible at noticing when the house needs cleaning, you need to accept that or at least accept that you’ll need to remind them about it. If your partner is going through a dry spell and doesn’t want s…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:37 AM
1

“Consensual” probably wasn’t the right choice of words but their point was good. I think they’re trying to say that sex is different from cleaning, because sex is something that should never happen if it isn’t a positive, desirable, enjoyable thing for both parties. Almost no one enjoys cleaning, cleaning doesn’t hold the same emotional weight and doing cleaning you don’t want to do is not the same level of awful as having sex you don’t want to have. Of course, sometimes people have sex more for…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:29 AM
1

Yes, this person is assuming that almost no man would ever reject her friends. Now, maybe her friends truly are all incredibly gorgeous and likeable, but EVEN THEN, they still won’t be everyone’s type. People have wildly varying preferences. No one is everyone’s type, and being rejected is normal. Even the hottest person on earth would still be regularly rejected. It’s ultimately really not a gender thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:39 PM
1

Good! The fundamental truth that she’s ignoring is that the majority of approaches will always end in rejection. No matter how objectively attractive a person (male OR female) is, people have different types and wildly different, often highly specific tastes. It says nothing about the attractiveness or value of a person for them to get rejected. It just means they are not the person they approached’s preferred type of person. They didn’t do anything wrong, and the person rejecting them didn’t do…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:37 PM
1

This comment is based af. Honestly you’re right, “approaching” just isn’t a great experience for anyone involved regardless of the genders. When I say I approach I mean I tend to make the first move with guys I’ve gotten to know somewhat. It’s still almost never successful, because this stuff is RARELY successful. What’s important for everyone to remember is that this is a numbers game, and rejection is normal. You just need to keep trying until you find the person who likes you as much as you l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:32 PM
2

In general I just love flipping the script on as many gender roles as possible. Sometimes the result is still bad, but there’s a lot to be learned just from considering alternatives like that. I love approaching guys, I love being a provider/protector whenever I can, and I love complimenting male partners and making them feel beautiful and valuable beyond their utility or skills. Not inherently because I want to have “more power” or anything like that (I’d much rather be equal!) but because I th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:25 PM
3

Exactly! It’s so much nicer when you select your own type instead of praying that your type will like you. Sure, rejection inevitably happens, but it’s better than assuming you will only ever be able to date the pool of people who specifically approach you, and gradually devaluing yourself based on that idea, and eventually settling and being miserable (which is, unfortunately, what happens to most people). Chasing possibilities, even with a lot of failure, is still more fun than being stagnant …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:16 PM
3

This is SO true!!! As a fellow member of the bi gang, I think it often really helps us to see past traditional gender roles. What you said is so, so true. I would never want to be with a man who’s turned off by me making the first move or “threatening his masculinity”. It’s not only much more fun to choose to approach whoever you like instead of waiting to be approached, but it’s also a wonderful built-in filter for weeding out any guys who don’t like challenging gender expectations. A guy who d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:11 PM
3

The women were still significantly less attractive than him. But I get the impression that they were made slightly more attractive by their straightforwardness, so it probably wasn’t a bad decision for them to try it. It could work out for them eventually, all of this is just a numbers game EDIT: Also, the typical woman is ALSO not interested in the majority of the men who approach her. This is just how this stuff works, rejection happens to everyone and it’s not worth it for anyone to structure…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:58 PM
2

This is a good point. As a woman who approaches fairly often, I do feel like there’s probably an art to making guys feel at ease that needs to be mastered, but unfortunately I haven’t quite gotten the hang of it. I do my best to make guys feel comfortable but I’m definitely still a bit awkward, and it’s hard to learn how to improve when it’s still not a super common thing to do, cause it’s tough to find good advice! I do try to incorporate advice that’s given to men for approaching women, but th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:56 PM
4

I approach first, it’s embarrassing because obviously it means I have to deal with rejection, BUT it also saves me a ton of time compared to if I just awkwardly tried to be enticing and waited around to see if a guy liked me. Especially because the men I like are usually kinda shy. I wish more women approached first WITHOUT constantly saying it’s an inherently terrible thing to go through, so I could have a larger group of women to commiserate about being rejected with, lmao! A lot of times wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:50 PM
3

Exactly!! I also prefer guys with less experience! It’s not as common but it certainly does exist
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:36 AM
1

Eh, life is all about tradeoffs. I don’t personally see people in a transactional way and I sincerely wouldn’t care about a guy’s level of experience. But even with women who do care, I bet they’d still want to be with a guy who’s successful in stem cause everyone likes dating rich people, lmao. It’s probably still not the end of the world to them if the guy is appealing in other ways!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:24 AM
2

I think the disagreement here comes from a difference in how you define “social skills”. When someone talks about “lacking social skills” as a major negative trait, they usually just mean the basic ability to talk to people in a kind and understanding way, and to help them feel comfortable with you. A guy who isn’t kind or polite when talking to others is not a guy most women would want to date. He doesn’t have to be super smooth or a social butterfly, just decently considerate. This stuff can h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:19 AM
1

I think your pointing out it being different if it’s a choice is very important. I can’t imagine seeing it as a red flag if a guy was a virgin because he wanted to wait to have sex with the right person, that’s quite sweet and potentially very romantic. And even if it’s not something you believe in or it’s not the most realistic thing, it’s certainly not a bad trait. And as others pointed out, this can be really common among guys from other cultures and it’s often just how they were raised. Ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:11 AM
0

And you know what? That’s a good thing. Sleeping around doesn’t make a man more appealing! Even when women DO want an “experienced” man, they typically mean they want a guy who knows how the parts work, but would generally prefer that he learned it from a longer relationship with the same partner rather than a series of hookups. The “experience” from hookups is not the best way to learn to be good in bed AND it gets unsexy real fast when you start keeping in mind the constantly increasing chance…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:02 AM
1

People need to be less entitled, you’re allowed to prefer whatever you prefer. However, I do think sometimes it’s worth wondering why it matters so much to people for men to take the lead. It seems like men never feel bothered by women being virgins, and honestly even when a man is experienced that doesn’t mean he won’t still have to learn about your specific body and what YOU like. You absolutely don’t have to date or sleep with anyone you don’t want to, no matter what the reason. But I do wond…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:55 AM
1

Of course it’s not! Less sexual experience means less risk of STDs and potentially a chance that he takes intimacy seriously (he isn’t just a fuckboy). Normal women looking for a genuine relationship would not see this as a red flag. The classic rule that everything is easier to deal with when the person is attractive still applies, because less relationship experience can come with a bit of awkwardness. But if the girl is already attracted to you, and she’s just in general a nice person looking…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:44 AM
1

I guess it’s better if your only goal is to have a lot of casual sex, but it’s sure not gonna feel great long-term for a guy to know that every woman who ever loved him never really loved his true self. That would ultimately feel miserable and isolating. That’s why there are so many people feeling depressed about not feeling able to be themselves around people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 03:18 AM
2

Well, they might not have to be lonely exactly, but they can very much still struggle to find meaningful or positive relationships. Just because a woman can find dates doesn’t mean those dates will treat her with kindness or respect. Both sexes very much have their struggles, I’m not downplaying how difficult it is to have no dates at all, I’m only saying that having dates doesn’t necessarily mean a person has gotten the human connection they truly need. We’re all just trying our best to find ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter