TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

disgruntled_lawyer Archive

View 8 posts and 375 comments by disgruntled_lawyer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No...i specifically AVOID movies about vikings and Anglo Saxons due to historical inaccuracies. Your literary sagas are not consistent with the archeology. .... they are myths. You are using the equilivent of stories of king arthur. Vikings in reality used large round iron rimmed shields and later kite shields. They did not use longswords, but rather one handed spatha and axes. You can't fight in a shield wall with a long sword... there is no room to swing it. Vikings did not fight in heroic mel…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:31 AM
2

Even though I can't stand sports myself, at least it's healthier than fucking daytime trash TV which all women are even interested in. Most women have NO interests in anything other than just being spiteful cunts and making everyone's life a living hell. "I like long walks on the beach and deep conversations.....' No, you don't...you like watching trash reality tv, being glued to your social media feeds, and are more concerned with what celebrities are doing and office gossip than anything "deep…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 11:15 PM
2

Women really need to get a grip and just learn how to tell men what they actually want from them otherwise, how are men supposed to know? 90% of all fights in a marriage are THIS! "Well, I said that, but I didn't MEAN it....you're supposed to say X....."
/r/MensRights14/09/17 11:13 PM
3

I never said they couldn't be strong "in their own right". This just shows some women were captains of ships. That fine. I was specifically talking about fighting in the front line of a shield wall. If you train for it, you can do it. False--all of the US armed forces experiments consistently show women cannot hump an 80 pound pack 20 miles--no matter how "fit" they are; they wind up with hip and low back injuries because of their bone structure. A coat of mail (which if they were captains of sh…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 10:47 PM
-1

Meh... just a post birth abortion
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 08:51 PM
2

can be whatever they want to be. An ignorant philosophy bound to lead to disappointment.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:48 PM
2

They should not be brainwashed at age 4 to be feminized emasculated pussies.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:11 PM
3

Men should be men and not have to apologize or atone for their masculinity.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:53 PM
0

Its like they are fighting for the right to be pansies.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:42 PM
1

No shit, right.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:41 PM
3

Well.. she was going to turn him to the light side. .. he just hasn't had a girl as good as her
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:23 AM
2

"men are getting the benefit from women's progress." Because they can't get good paying jobs and are now reliant of their wives? Thats a "benefit"?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 08:26 PM
29

When rebuffed, she said: Did I interrupt gay time Why is this always the first go-to when you rebuff a woman's advances? They feel entitled to sex from whomever they want and EXPECT that desire to be reciprocated simply because they are offering.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:13 PM
2

Because many high stress jobs are filled with unstable people who do 1 thing really well and are (usually) able to apply high levels of focus and concentration to accomplish a difficult task. Most such people also have behavioral problems and chemical additions and are a complete wreck and a shitty person to be around.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:11 PM
2

slutshaming is still bullshit. Yes, bullshit to criticize people for needlessly exposing themselves to STD's, modifying the DNA structure of potential offspring, and destroying their ability to pairbond and form stable, lasting relationships.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 08:36 PM
2

Because they reject the modernized secular sex cult that 95% of western culture buys into, including the "sex positive" feminists.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 08:35 PM
2

Isn't that the rub of the "internalized misogyny" argument?--They literally believe that all the shitty behavior of women is attributable to men.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 08:33 PM
34

Why don't they just come out and criticize men for having balls legs? They do
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:29 PM
22

'Have you tried to ask him to sit properly, I fail to see what is "improper" with the man's posture. That is a reasonable spread. His legs are close to parallel. NEwsflash, men cant squash their thighs together!
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:28 PM
12

because it did seem to help the boys in the (troubled, low-income) district ...maybe because they lacked male role models and the male teacher was not only teaching the subject but also life lessons on becoming a man.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:13 PM
3

That and the PC bureaucracy and educational ideology. You can't think for yourself or hold opinions contrary to the powers that be. You can't question admin decisions that negatively affect your ability to teach. You can't innovate--You must "teach for the test."
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:12 PM
6

I remember how restless I used to get in school, especially in English Me as well. The irony is that I very much write for a living and love reading. I also am a stickler for grammar rules. Why did I hate English? Because my HS English teacher (who had a PhD and insisted on being called "Doctor"), just would drone on and on about "symbolism" and "subtext" even where there wasn't any. We had to write essays about "symbolism" in this or that. Three quarters of it was just made up bullshit that had…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:10 PM
8

I agree. All of my male teachers really pushed me. Female teachers just droned on reciting the text and couldn't answer a question if it wasn't addressed in the text. Only exception was crusty old "old school lesbo" history teacher who was mean as a nun but super passionate and challenging.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:04 PM
1

They - literaly - can't be fired. Sure they can..you just need good documentation of multiple complaints, coaching, progressive discipline, and similarly situated white males who were fired for the same behavior.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:39 PM
3

Right..... People fail to recognize that boys do NOT learn by rote memorization or regurgitating talking points. Most boys could care less about "points" in class---they want to figure shit out. Take apart things to see how they work....come up with their own answer. These skills are not valued by modern education.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:30 PM
24

Thank you
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:16 PM
17

Agree
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:15 PM
2

Which brings up a great point. ... really their objection is that they are getting fucked but not paid enough
/r/MensRights24/08/17 01:28 PM
1

they don't move autonomously; they don't change facial expressions; they aren't even 'robotic' at all. More importantly, they don't reach back and grab your balls.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:00 PM
2

Great...its "equally valid" It is not: "equally marketable" or "equally valuable'
/r/MensRights23/08/17 10:56 PM
4

mmmmm "My baby ball....all mine"
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 08:37 PM
15

Holy fuck thats retarded. Normal dating behavior is now "psychological abuse." I shit you not, these fucktards want to make it illegal to fall in love with someone. It appears there are no 2 types of permissible relationships: No strings casual sex with "affirmative consent" demonstrated via a video or 2 Being a lifelong beta doormat that empties you bank account and caters to the woman's every desire (of course without ever mansplaining anything to her).
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:18 PM
1

One must make a distinction between being drunk and making a bad decision and being so intoxicated you legally cannot form the requisite mental intent to consent ...legally, the latter occurs only when you are so drunk that you are incapacitated ..i.e. passed out.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/17 08:44 PM
4

How people think libertarianism has anything in common with facism is beyond the pale
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:08 PM
2

Which is usually covered under an E & O policy.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:07 PM
2

Tonight at 9..... are your children at risk?...... find out a news team 4 investigates a pedofile moving to the area
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/17 12:38 PM
1

Completely depends on jurisdiction
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/17 12:35 PM
2

Newsflash: People are NOT equal. They never have been. Pretending people are equal creates this precise kind of schizoid dualism wherein we are told that the most important thing is someone exercise their right of choice but then complain when people do not chose as we wish.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:15 PM
2

Brilliant. I have even heard feminists say that math is sexist.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:11 PM
1

Hah...We didn't get the results we wanted, so we are not releasing it....We will re-do the study to rephrase all of the survey questions to ensure we can manipulate the answers and then get back to you.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:19 PM
4

According to the law, yes. In reality, also yes due to their undeveloped brains
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:15 PM
2

The number of married men who subscribe to "happy wife, happy life" is amazing. One of my buddies was a classic "Type A" personality, outgoing, did what the fuck he wanted. He is constantly getting taken advantage of by his wife and daughter and just does what the fuck the say and then bitches about it. One day I said: Why not just say no. He said: What do you mean Me: Refuse to do [whatever it was they wanted] Him: I can't do that...they'd get angry and I'd never here the end of it Me: So? Him:…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:11 PM
6

rather than being truly neutral is asking for them to fall prey to confirmation bias. Oh, you mean like putting the defendant in an orange jumpsuit and chains and then telling they jury *wink he is presumed innocent
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 08:48 PM
4

Not how the criminal law works. You bring an accusation, the burden is on you to provide proof of the crime sufficient for the cops to investigate
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 08:46 PM
9

Yes...they do They also believe you can rape some one "unintentionally"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 06:48 PM
143

Well, when sexual "harassment" includes: 1. Being asked out by dude you don't like; and 2. Falsely assuming every "creepy guy" is trying to "rape you with their eyes" what do you expect?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 06:47 PM
3

But, but, but "LISTEN AND BELIEVE" I bet the guy still gets expelled though
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 06:46 PM
3

I have found quite the opposite actually. I am a an old fashioned paleo-con (isolationist, low taxation, less federal gov't, states rights, traditional family, traditional view of masculinity), and find myself in the minority here more often than not.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:17 PM
3

The myth of diversity can easily be disproven when one acknowledges that membership in a class or subclass does not necessarily equate to a different perspective on work problems/solution. If the rationale is we want a diverse workforce so we get the best and brightest, then you should hire the best and brightest, regardless of class membership. The notion that a woman brings a unique perspective simply because she is a woman falsely assumes that all women think alike or that there is a defined …
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:50 PM
4

Its almost like they are starting to realize what it feels like to date as a male.......
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:43 PM
3

i.e. fucking on the side
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:43 PM
1

More proof that feminism is a secular religious cult
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:40 PM
11

More double standards. Feminism killed chivalry. Guys in my generation were accosted for holding doors, ordering first, putting on coats, etc. as being sexist pigs. Fine bitch, open your own door Re: "ghosting, benching, and bread-crumbing"--i.e. not paying me enough attention. Newsflash girls, guys got other shit going on in their lives. And if all you are doing is "hooking up", why would he invest more time in you? He didn't need to make the investment up front. Besides, women have been doing …
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:00 PM
4

You mean they wouldn't let them command without passing the Seal course? That sounds like misogyny.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 10:43 PM
67

Fuck me...what a cunt
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 10:41 PM
1

Thats fine...But then don't complain they you aren't being promoted.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:38 PM
2

This is very accurate. I would also note that many female law graduates decide to work in public interest jobs or low paying public defender work. To provide further clarity to the above, one of the top female attorneys at my office has 4 kids. They have a full-time stay at home nanny who raises them. She works the same hours everyone else does, more even (there is a story of her working in the hospital and billing hours right up to actual delivery of her first child), took almost no time off wh…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:32 PM
1

I don't think biology has anything to do with your favourite field. No, but it does have to do with your willingness to "commit" and sacrifice being a good parent for your career.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:45 PM
4

I don't mean this in a derogatory manner, but IME, it seems like younger females expect to find "friends" or at least a "supportive community" at work where people "share the same passions," etc. Not going to happen. Work is about one thing and one thing only--making fucking money for the person in charge until you position youself to make money for YOU. Sure this is a "sexist" comment, but I find that most young female hires simply do not comprehend that no one is there to help them, that peopl…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:00 PM
2

But why is it harder to "relate to" men? {Edit: If by "allies" you mean "friends" then that is your problem. There are no "friends" at work. You don't need to "like" or "relate to" your "allies"--you just have to do good work for them and pretend that you like them and the same things they do.}
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:55 PM
3

Allowing and truly endorsing (as part of our culture) part time work though can keep more women in tech. That is just it...THAT is what women do not get. You CAN'T HAVE IT ALL. You can't be a corporate exec AND work part-time. You cant work the 50-60+ hours a week it takes to compete in the workplace AND be a good mom. You have to chose. Men chose the former more often than not. And don't think for a minute that men aren't given the same choice---I can chose to be home and play with my kids at 5…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:22 PM
7

Same rationale applies to introverted males who don't "play politics" in the office [Edit: IMHO this has less to do with gender and more to do with your ability and willingness to kiss ass, "play the game." I see this all to often where I work. I chose NOT to "play the game" because I am not good at it. Lots and lots of young folks come to talk to me as a sounding board and bemoan the lack of "mentors." And by "mentors" they mean people who will clear a path for them, vouch for them, etc. The re…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:10 PM
1

And the reality is a dude who cuts off his weiner and pretends he's a woman is still a dude who cut off his weiner
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:58 PM
1

You are conflating the FORM of words with a substantive shift in their meaning. (not to mention ending a sentence with a preposition). What you are proposing is stripping a word of denoted meaning and having it include the exact opposite. "Woman" cannot mean both a female and a man who thinks he is a female. Words should reflect reality; to have the meaning of a word change or vary based on a person's subjective state of mind irrespective of the physical word is madness. I will have none of it.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:00 PM
1

by using "Mr." or "Ms." or "he" or "she" instead of the other one Yes. exactly. I will not acknowledge something that isn't. I will not say 2+2 = 5 just people it is politically trendy to do so. Language evolves. words still need to have a set meaning to distinguish ideas. If words lose the ability to differentiate between things, then they cease to serve a purpose.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:46 PM
-1

I disagree. Calling someone by an alternate name is inherently different that acknowledging that the substance of the person is different than its actual physical and biological characteristics. You can call a table a cat, that doesn't make it so. You can call an apple an orange--even paint it orange....it is still an apple. It is a matter of metaphysics. I refuse to ignore physical reality and partake in someone's mental delusions.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:40 PM
0

Because the nature of the "trans" man's problem is that he thinks he is something he isn't. Its not merely "call me Ronda"; its "treat me like I AM Rhonda."
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:27 PM
0

Better example would be a friend who thinks he's a dog.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:14 PM
3

At first retaliated. Then left.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:11 PM
1

I agree whole heartedly
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:00 AM
6

You would think the law would be the opposite--normally there are harsher penalties if you have a position of "special trust" due to the increased duty of care and easier ability to take advantage of the other.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:51 PM
0

They want performance, not problems. Thats not a gender specific response
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:29 PM
1

I have a problem with government forcing people to transact business when they otherwise would not. This does not mean I favor racists, sexists, etc.... But what social utility is being served by forcing the fundamentalist christian baker to do a gay wedding cake? There are plenty of businesses that cater specifically to this demographic. If the bakery in question does not want to share in that business, it is their loss. And, why does the couple being married even WANT a cake from a bakery that…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:53 PM
1

A degree was always simply a status symbol...not an indicator of knowledge or ability. With the surplus of college grads, a diploma no longer serves its signalling function to the marketplace. Hence why it is no good "good enough" to just have a degree.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:46 PM
2

Interestingly..none of these came up in a google search for "man wins sexual harassment suit" ---not even 2 pages in. All the google results were able the memogate and female sex harassment suits. Duckduckgo had these as top 3.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:04 PM
2

http://www.ibtimes.com/texas-man-wins-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-boss-jury-awards-james-gist-567k-pam-matranga http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/queens-man-wins-sexual-harassment-suit-female-boss-article-1.1753876 http://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/21/us/man-wins-1-million-sex-harassment-suit.html
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:03 PM
1

I abhor the idea that it is a proper function of government to improve upon the moral character of its citizens. People have a right to be jerks and assholes.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:58 PM
2

You have it backwards. Everything should be viewed with a presumption of disbelief. Those making the accusation have the burden to overcome that.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:55 PM
2

Why can we examine the men's sexual history but not the woman's?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:54 PM
43

In June, the federal government introduced a bill, not yet debated, that would require that judges deem a complainant's sexual text messages or e-mails to be covered by a "rape-shield" provision, making it difficult to introduce them as evidence. All that matters is her feelings NOW....not what occurred then.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:53 PM
24

The difficulty with a decision like this is a chilling effect it has on survivors, because it does appear very difficult to get a conviction." Yeah...its supposed to be.....
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:50 PM
1

If you don't want to for any reason, you have the right to say “no,” and no stupid homophobic responses should change that. RIght, but the kind of woman that will call you a fag for not fucking her on demand is the kind of girl who will let someone else fuck her to "punish" you.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:40 PM
2

Well, part of the problem is that the act of having sex--of penetrating is viewed as validating one's virility and "maleness." Hence, "turning it down" means you can't be a man because no "real man" would turn down an opportunity to assert his manhood.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:39 PM
20

Literally Hitler
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:32 PM
1

Yes... what i was trying to say
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:34 PM
5

In my day, the rhetoric was that we needed to be exposed to different cultures and perspectives and would all benefit as a result
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:27 PM
2

Yes, you have now graduated to level 3 of patriarchy re-education camp.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/17 07:35 PM
40

"I have never seen letters of support for a defendant with nothing about the victim," [Judge] Grant said. "They were all about you and what you were going through. Poor you.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/17 07:34 PM
3

Diversity requires acknowledging differences and that such differences provide some sort of "value added." "Equality" means either everyone is the same or everyone should be treated as if they were the same--any differences should not affect outcomes. If people want equality, then there is no point to diversity because any differences are meaningless. If you want diversity, you are presupposing meaningful differences exist, which means people are not equal.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:43 PM
39

Diversity requires acknowledging differences and that such differences provide some sort of "value added." "Equality" means either everyone is the same or everyone should be treated as if they were the same--any differences should not affect outcomes. If people want equality, then there is no point to diversity because any differences are meaningless. If you want diversity, you are presupposing meaningful differences exist, which means people are not equal.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:43 PM
2

TIL: I a need a feminist to teach me how to be a man /s
/r/MensRights07/08/17 05:29 PM
10

"giving a ride to out of country friends" ....so thats what she calls it.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:08 PM
2

Civilization would not exist but-for the planning, hard labour, and fighting done by men
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:01 PM
1

You all need ODIN. Hey..don't leave out the three norns
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:59 PM
2

shudders Can you imagine how worn out and leathery those vajizzles are?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:52 PM
1

Good for them...they are nuts and their insanity is not the standard used by the criminal law
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:53 AM
1

Show me a case where someone was sucessfully prosecuted for that. Being a cunt doesnt make you a rapist
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:41 PM
1

What us occuring here is a classic quid pro quo... under your definition of coercion, agreeing to do something for any benefit would be illegal
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:17 PM
2

Do you think my username is a farce? You cannot legally coerce someone by "taking away" something to which they have no a priori legal right. Fuck me or i will shoot you is coerion. Fuck me or i will take your wallet is coercion. Fuck me or i wont date you/wont be friends with you/wont stay in your presence with my friends is not coercion because the person has no legal entitlement to that which us being theatened to be withheld.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:16 PM
1

What is she actually threatening to do to him that is amounting to call Roshan? She's simply saying that her and her and her friends are going to leave. The gentleman in question has no right to have her and her friends present to begin with. Therefore by threatening to leave she's not coercing him to do anything because he has no right to their presents to begin with
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:08 PM
1

What you call coercion in the legal definition of coercion are two entirely separate things. I furthermore do not require a lecture on the elements of the criminal charge of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:07 PM
0

No, it really isn't. Repeating it doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:44 PM
0

Its called decision-making. No law decrees that all decisions must have pleasant consequences. That is not how legal consent works. Unless his physical safety was in danger, a "threat" does not revoke consent. Consent is only invalidated if it is given under "duress."
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:42 PM
0

No threat of bodily harm. Consent is fine
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:41 PM
1

It is not legal duress. He was not threatened with bodily harm. She presented him with options. Or, are you going to claim someone was "involuntarily intoxicated" because their friends said "do the beer bong or else we will tell people you are gay"?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:40 PM
3

Was I "raped" when I banged my professor to get a better grade? Would I have banged her if she wasn't my professor ? Probable not. Would I have banged her if she hadn't let me coast in her class? Probably not. Was it the best sex ever? No. Did I feel "dirty"? A little. Was I "raped"? Hell no. I made a conscious choice as a adult (18). Did she abuse her position and was there in "imbalance of powers"---maybe...but I could have still said no. I weighed the consequences of saying no with the benefi…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:28 PM
14

All I have to say is WOW....i'd love to see an article written by a man with the same tone and language about his cheating wife. He'd be reviled both as a "cucked beta" and as a misogynist for interfering with his wife's sexual freedom.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:20 PM
2

Muh, internalized misandry
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:12 PM
4

Yeah, that's not what a safe space is. A therapist's office is a "safe space" because it's bad form for your therapist to tell you outright that you're a lunatic. AA and NA is a safe space, because when you slip and start using again it's not good form for them to tell you that you're out of control. You say a safe place is not "a place to protect you from bad feelings" but then go on to describe environments where that is exactly what is occurring.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:51 PM
7

When campus' start talking about implementing 'safe spaces' they're talking about creating resources for counseling. They're not talking about quelling free-thought and avoiding triggering students and banning speakers. But they ARE! Speakers have been banned form campus under the auspices of maintaining a "safe place." Certain student groups ban males or non "persons of color" in order to maintain their "safe place" Regardless of whether the intent was to use the term to refer to counselling, i…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:50 PM
11

The beef that we have The BEEF I have is the idea that students should be protected from bad feelings. WHen I was in school CLASSROOMS were considered to be "safe places" for IDEAS--meaning you needed to listen to every view and be able to respond without becoming a spoiled pissant and getting "triggered." My BEEF is that the term has been inverted and now means the exact opposite--a place where you CANNOT express certain ideas because they might offend someone.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:49 PM
6

They seem incapable of understanding that a different subspecialities have different supply/demand curves and thus pay differently. Of course a cardiac nurse will be paid more than one working for a pediatrician. But no...t o them "a nurse is a nurse" and the pediatrician's nurse is "undervalued" because she a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 06:43 PM
1

Bingo
/r/MensRights02/08/17 06:22 PM
2

Tl; Dr. Men have a penis and are therefore dangerous. But they can sometimes do stuff for us, so, we shouldnt be mean to them all the time. We want castrated man-servants.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 06:20 PM
2

That or the "end of sentence interrogatory inflection" kills any job applicant I interview
/r/MensRights02/08/17 06:16 PM
2

I agree with your overall sentiment. However, I would note that in ancient rome, the pater familias had absolute authority over his wife and children, and that included whether to keep a newborn. This is illustrated by the following letter from one Oxyrhynchus who was in Egypt writing to his pregnant wife in Rome in 1 B.C.: Hilarion to Alis his sister, heartiest greetings, and to my dear Berous and Apollonarion. Know that we are still even now in Alexandria. Do not worry if when all the others r…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:32 PM
1

Well then, I stand corrected on my timing point.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:27 PM
2

Are you asserting that men DONT have a moral obligation to support and protect their families?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:32 PM
2

is that society has been and will always be willing to That is false and is true only post-WWII. Historically, when a woman lost her husband, she immediately sought out another for material support. Up until the "no fault" divorce laws, a man could generally avoid paying alimony if the divorce was caused by his wife being unfaithful. It is only very recently that society has been willing to affirm the "choice" of the woman as the primary virtue to be protected and "celebrated", regardless of the…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:31 PM
1

I am discussing a moral duty to be responsible for one's family--part of a broader moral duty to be responsible for one's actions and "take care of one's shit". That is entirely separate that specific laws in effect at any point in time governing marriage, divorce, and child support. I am all in favour of changing the current legal structures which unfairly discriminates against and penalizes men and forces then to become wage slaves for their ex-wives. That does not change my views that when pu…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:16 PM
3

No. Just because I believe in traditional values does not mean I support the sexist inheritance and divorce laws the feminists first foisted upon us. Generally speaking, I do believe a man that elects to have a family has a moral duty to support and provide for the family. I do not support long-term alimony and female-default child custody. To be clear: I am not supporting Shapiro's comments/views.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:09 PM
1

"Tradcons" are not "ignorant"--we just have different value systems.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:44 PM
7

Its the completely irrational emotion-driven responses...No ability to stop, analyze, think.....its just one open-ended circuit from their fee fees to their mouth
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 05:13 PM
3

Regret = patriarchy = rape
/r/MensRights31/07/17 03:08 PM
2

But but ....gender is a social construct......
/r/MensRights31/07/17 03:08 PM
2

Tl; DR Regret = patriarchy = rape
/r/MensRights31/07/17 03:07 PM
17

I like how she is blaming the black officer for attacking the white girl
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 02:47 PM
19

And people wonder how the Salem Witch Trials happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 02:38 PM
1

Fuckin animals
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 02:31 PM
13

double decker pecker wreckers ?? Explain for a yank .....
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 04:16 PM
1

But we changed it so there are no default subs now....
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 04:12 PM
11

Before our first, I sat through a month of "birthing classes." Total joke....no mention of resources for dads. Dads are just there to "support mom." One father got "shamed" by the "doula" teaching the course for asking too many questions because "this is a female-oriented class". We were just there to carry shit and pay the bills.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:53 PM
10

if the movie is about men and for men, so what? Probably a girl won't like it too much. Because, everything "for men" must include women because muh patriarchy, but women get to have their own "girls" stuff because muh patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:38 PM
1

Stannis is not a religious fanatic in the books. He is a hard, principled lawful man. The TV show has murdered the books and made all male character look like a bunch of spineless boobs, except when they are fighting for women.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:39 PM
2

If those politics are about being nationalistic, freedom, patriotism, and being self-sufficient then yes you do.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 08:59 PM
2

They ruined Stannis the Mannis....cannot forgive.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:39 PM
3

The whole series is about male patriarchy collapsing and strong independent wymenzes taking power.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:36 PM
4

Because an allegation about "sexual assault" is not lodged to convict a man of a crime; it is lodged to validate fee fees.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:32 PM
12

Why is it "especially a woman or child....." does that mean its less "molesty" when it happens to a dude
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:17 PM
1

She is SOOOOO literally triggered right now
/r/MensRights27/07/17 07:41 PM
2

I care not about whether I offend people. I debate and pursue truth. I have no control over or responsibility for people's subjective emotional reactions to facts.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:30 PM
1

Yes. I was considered one of them and had similar experiences to this guy....
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:17 PM
3

If you are trying to make a valid comparison, the teacher should not "shut you down." In fact, in a rhoetoric class, a teacher would strive to ensure that all opposing views are heard and the emphasis should be on HOW to articulate them, not WHETHER they should be articulated.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:28 PM
2

In all likelihood it means, among other things. that you are supposed to learn how to discuss things politely, so that you take into account the context, like other participants and their views. Thats a lot of fancy words for: Shut up and don'f offer a contrary opinion.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:11 PM
1

Going to be a minority opinion here but: Independent Confident Gets shit done/gets results Takes care of his own shit Self-reliant/sufficient
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:03 PM
1

I dislike the "not responsible" label because that implies something "bad" or "wrong" still happened for which someone could have been responsible. The finding should be that the accusations "were not founded."
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:00 PM
10

It is always "forced" to some extent when you have a teacher who is in an authority position, who has power over your grades, disciplinary record, and can make life hell for you if she isn't happy/
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 01:23 PM
2

really?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:16 PM
2

I guess she didn't dance to his tune. She didn't want to play along.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 07:28 PM
1

Tell that to the Johns Hopkins doctor whose first patient committed suicide.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:21 PM
1

Only a mentally deranged person could consider removing a boy's manhood and turning him into a circus freak to be an "excellent" result.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:17 PM
1

A child that age is not competent to make that decision. Can't drive, drink, smoke, join the military, or get a job, but you can have your balls cut off and your dick inverted into an open wound. Makes great sense.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:07 PM
1

No child should be subject to this....
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:03 PM
1

Do you dispute any of the facts in the article?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:51 PM
19

Fucking child abuse; plain and simple. How the fuck can a doctor do this: "Do no harm."
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:23 PM
0

https://ihavethetruth.com/2017/07/24/lesbian-couple-in-california-chemically-alter-their-11-year-old-boy-to-prep-for-sex-change-surgery/
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:19 PM
2

We can agree on that
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:12 PM
1

women with "let me speak to your manager" haircuts LOFingL
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 06:42 PM
5

Welcome to America. Land of the free....so long as you follow police orders.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 06:40 PM
5

The hypocrisy knows no bounds
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:08 PM
17

My own anecdotal experience confirms this. My daughter is happy to sit and listen to directions and repeat what she is told. My son can't sit still for a minute, absolutely refuses to listen to directions, but is more than happy to take shit apart and put it back together or just figure it out on his own. Sometimes he does it quicker, othertimes he fails and fails and fails until he finds the solution---but it has to be HIS solution
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:04 PM
1

Where is it written that outcomes must be equal?>
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:01 PM
5

solid....good frame......has his head on straight
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 09:58 PM
6

Look how low they hang WITH a bra man........
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 09:58 PM
1

Maybe being drugged and sexually assaulted and then being told:"quit complaining, you got lucky."
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:48 PM
2

The reality is that almost all of the holiday customs and traditions surrounding "Christmas" come from the roman feast of saturnalia and various germanic Yule festivals. The date itself falls flat in the saturnalia festival and is also the same "birthday" as the cult god Mithras. Getting drunk, exchanging gifts, caroling--all elements of Saturnalia. The trees, wreaths, etc. are all germanic pagan symbols of rebirth and rejuvenation. My statement that you find "contradictory" is simply that there…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:24 PM
3

Well, with wives no longer knowing how to cook and working, most married couples eat out a lot...add in the financial stress, bitch factor, "happy wife, happy life" mindset and constant worry about divorce and you have a recipe for stress and weight gain.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:05 PM
1

In that case, great. Most people where I live are christian/catholics. While I am happy to get into a 45 minute discussion of the various pagan origins of Christmas and traditional "christian" holiday symbols, I also recognize the reality that we wouldn't have a secular "happy holidays" if it were not for Christmas. Thus, I have no problem with "Merry Christmas"---it is a sign of greeting and good cheer. No one is forcing me to go to church.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:00 PM
4

They both want the extinction of the traditional western nuclear family
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:55 PM
3

Agree on cost of movies. I was really interested in this, hence why i read the early reviews. Agree to disagree on being PC. I am an atheist who still says merry christmas.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:43 PM
9

I saw this review when it first came out, as I was reading all of the early reviews for the movie. I am fine with calling out a publication for unnecessary and (IMHO hilarious) excessive political correctness.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:41 PM
8

I read the review in full actually.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:21 PM
5

So much truth here. They think equality = being nice to everyone and playing by the rules. Hence why they think it is "sexism" when they get to any upper level position and find out that everyone is out for themselves, everyone lies, and you can only get ahead by playing politics and fucking other people over. [Edit: the other thing i'd point out is that even in case of blatant sexism/harassment, the issue is power and not gender per se. That is, I have seen plenty of gay (open and closeted) abu…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:19 PM
1

Huh? What am I "denying"?
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:09 PM
10

The writer is being called out for making a ridiculous comment about the representing of POC and women in a ww2 movie. I am fine with the headline. The writer's comment makes sense ONLY if you believe that women and POC should have equal representation in ALL movies regarding of the genre, setting, or content---also a ridiculous supposition.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:07 PM
1

Only by the half of this sub that are progressives. I am fighting for the right of men to be MEN and acting that fucking MEN without reproach.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:00 PM
1

What time frames are you looking at? I am sure it gives short term "mental health" benefits, as you are validating the person's mental delusion. IIRC, there are studies showing most trans patients wind up with a much higher incidence of depression and substance abuse later in life. Utility aside, its not a decision someone should be making before they are a fully formed adult.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:00 PM
1

Only a matter of degrees. You have a dick, your a dude and should act as such. Its child abuse to try and convince your son he is really a girl.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:58 PM
12

Okay, now we are moving goalposts. I am not IMPLYING anything. Certainly there is such a "debate." But, such a "debate" has no place in a historical war epic set in ww2 and focusing on the British troops at Dunkirk. The REAL "under representation" debate that should be taking place re: the movie is the almost complete absence of the french.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:57 PM
2

"Progressive" parents trying to score points in the oppression Olympics with their local commune.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:54 PM
1

and that's totally aside from the fact that people, y'know, aren't trying to do that). Oh, they in fact are. Lots of stories of "progressive" parents dressing their boys as girls, or refusing to "assign" them a gender.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:54 PM
1

If you can't buy a beer, you shouldn't be able to decide to cut off your wang.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:53 PM
22

False equivalency. I am specifically referring to the use of "some claim" to level controversial or politically charged accusations. It allows the media to "take a side" while pretending to be objective.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:47 PM
7

Comments to the article are "toxic" Some gems: females initiate 70 percent of divorces because men cheat more and are more abusive Women need to work because men "aren't keeping up their end of the bargain" and don't support them anymore. Prenups are sexist.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:44 PM
2

Another example of projection
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:30 PM
19

Not mental gymnastics. Typical deflection approach used in propaganda pieces. No different than when media outlets say "Some people allege" or "Some people question"...."Some people" is always a proxy for the editorial staff and allows them to convey their own opinions without stating as such.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:27 PM
23

I disagree. Headline is accurate interpretation of USA story.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:26 PM
4

Huh...I thought it meant you were scared of "catching the gay" /s
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:08 PM
8

Bingo
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:06 PM
1

women have always been like this. While do not doubt female hypergammy has existed throughout history, I do think we are seeing a level of sexual promiscuity not heretofore seen. While I don't doubt the 1920s flappers were out slutting it up, I do doubt they were having blow-job competitions or lining up to get fucked in the ass in the restroom of the local speakeasy.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/17 08:05 PM
2

rates are much higher. Depends on how the survey defines sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:39 PM
2

The numbers aren't high enough for your liking, so they must be wrong?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:22 PM
1

I have emotions. I just do my best not to express them or let them dictate my behavior.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:14 PM
6

To be a man is to be self-sufficient. One asks for help only after exhausting all other options.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:31 PM
3

The problem is three-fold: Party/hook-up culture foisted on public by media last 20 years: Men need to "pull" in order to be "alpha". Women need to ride the CC to feel "empowered." Need to "experiment" with drugs and alcohol to have "a full life experience." Special Snowflake culture schooling/helicopter parents: No one is responsible for their actions. We raise kids to never feel bad about themselves. Participation trophies galore. Parents swoop in to protect kids from the consequences of their…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:56 PM
1

So much truth in here
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:47 PM
1

Why is it "immature" to be emotionally detached?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:51 PM
1

Hate Speech Stupid term used by those (feminists and SJWs) trying to shut down conversations and debates on controversial topics.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:57 AM
1

masculinity was created by women ??? Da fuck you going on about?? Being masculine is simply being " a man"--being responsible, resourceful, in charge of your own life/destiny, taking care of your family, etc.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:55 AM
2

Exactly
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:52 AM
2

Whats wrong with "emotional detachment." I make a conscious effort to practice that every day. That is not "toxic."
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:51 AM
13

Like if the bitch I met at the bar turns out to be a skank without the makeup on...I can claim rape....amirite?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/17 11:49 PM
8

If she had a sex change operation, then she would HAVE to have sex with zim or else she would be trans-phobic.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/17 11:47 PM
11

Except, sometimes, a marriage may involve a "good" wife but nonetheless fall apart....Things break down due to work pressures, financial pressures, and people changing. While a thorough background check is a good idea, it does not guarantee a lasting marriage.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:21 PM
3

This is why you can go to jail if you have an obviously drunk person sign a legal document. Nope..False This is why you can go to jail if you rent a car to an obviously drunk person. Nope....might be sued by a third party if the drunk crashes into someone for negligent entrustment...but not going to jail. This is why you can be penalized for serving alcohol to an overly drunk person. Nope. Many states have specific laws absolving bartenders from liability for overserving. This will always be a h…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:32 PM
3

Nope......it never ceases to amaze me how ignorant officers are of their basic duties and constitutional limitations. Reasonable suspicion is fine to justify a traffic stop (swerving, light out, etc.), but not to search.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 08:02 PM
0

Talking about systematic oppression of women really is upsetting to you, isn't it it. No, championing someone's ability to kill their baby is upsetting to me.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:48 PM
1

So, they want me to fuck a dick?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:58 PM
8

I worked in an all female office at a hospital. It was fucking hell 80% of the new hires at my firm the last 5 years have been female. I have to supervise several. Holy shit is it an effort...I constantly have them in my office bitching and moaning about some perceived personal slight or that they are upset at this person, etc. Or, they complain that they were yelled at when they screwed up, etc., etc. Jesus christ. Just shut the fuck up and do your fucking job.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:55 PM
2

insults were hurled at me by women for being a cisgender hetero normal guy. FIFY
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:53 PM
1

You are on a soapbox.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:33 PM
1

There is no difference between "personal property" and "private property." Property cannot be "personal" unless it is privately owned. What you are calling "left libertarians" sounds a lot like "socialists who like to do drugs."
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:26 PM
9

Anecdotal, but many of my colleagues (esp. the older ones) still have SAHWs, who, among other things, manage the checkbook. These people def. have a leg up on those of us with working spouses, as they do not need to come late or leave early to pick up/drop off kids, their wives take care of the housework/dry-cleaning, etc. On the other hand, they are always bitching about how they need to work longer hours to pay for their wives' spending habits.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:24 PM
1

You are correct that there is very little difference between anarcho-capitalists and libertarians, other than that the later recognizes the need for government to provide some basic level of infrastructure, public protection, and safety services. The line is easily blurred however.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:14 PM
1

Again, you are making distinctions that do not exist. As a political philosophy, libertarians do not support any regulation of industry beyond restricting conduct that overtly harms another person or property and do not believe in protection of what some call "the commons." To the extent people who support industry regulation call themselves "libertarians," then they are mislabeling themselves.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:03 PM
1

There is no such thing as a "right libertarian." Libertarians favor maximum personal and economic freedom, including freedom of movement so that one may chose to sell one's labor where they see fit. Libertarians do not support Trump's border policy. "The invisible hand"--i.e. the law of supply and demand DOES work to correct market imbalances when there is no government interference. Prices go up/down to reflect the relative need/value of a good or service. It works everyday. There is no such th…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:54 PM
7

Just FYI: The "rape" was that he alleged had anal sex with her against her wishes while they were engaged in coitus; it later came out she had sent him text messages saying she wanted him to "fuck me in the ass" and then got miffed when he left afterwards instead of cuddling.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 09:55 PM
3

I only have used my "lawyer card" once, and that is when the local PD was asking for people for consent to search after a moving violation and then using the denial of consent as "reasonable suspicion" for searching. The kicker was, I had just defended another officer from the same municipality for doing the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 09:44 PM
66

How is this "trolling"? There were multiple charges in the indictment. She was found not guilty of the higher offense (willful conduct) but found guilty of the lesser offense (reckless endangerment) Judge was simply following standard protocol of starting at the top and working his way down the lesser charges.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 09:39 PM
0

abortion = healthcare LOL
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:20 PM
-1

More bullshit. Women have no different RIGHT to health care then men do. What you are talking about is the "right" to have sex with no consequences and have someone else pay for your poor decisionmaking. That isn't "structural sexism"; thats being an irresponsible entitled twat.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:20 PM
1

Structural gender issues poppycock nonsense invented to take rights (and money) away from men and grant extra privileges to women.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:19 PM
3

I value freedom over equality and believe in equality under the law, not to-down enforced equal outcomes.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:28 PM
1

You don;t seem to realize that right and left are simply marketing schemes being applied corporate interests and global banking cabal to divide the population and "sell" the new world order under different brand names. Historically, both the far "right" and far "left" result in totalitarian forms of government where a small oligarchy control all wealth. "Right" and "left" is just the ideology used to justify it.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:08 PM
1

there is no such thing as a free market Sure there is, just not presently. A completely unregulated economy in which there is no legal protection for corporations, no business is able to accumulate market power, and there exists numerous small businesses engaged in atomistic competition
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:06 PM
1

Facism is not an ideology, but a means of imposing policy
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:05 PM
2

corporate free markets arghhhh......yet again a millennial confusing corporatism with free markets. Corporations are able to accumulate market power, erect barriers to entry, and enjoy the benefits of corporate cronyism, government sponsored syndicatism, oligarchy, and rivalry.......That is our present state of affairs and has jack shit to do with "free markets."
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:04 PM
1

What is this economic political bs doing on here? "Our movement." Hate to break it to you, but there is no cohesive "mens rights" movement/ideology. One can be in favor of mens rights and also be an anarchist, communist, centrist, libertarian, or paleo-con traditionalist. Take your political soapbox over to r/politics.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:01 PM
3

people passed out in a running car.....cops do have a right to check on that.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 07:09 PM
1

Congratulations.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 11:03 PM
1

Boo
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 11:02 PM
7

Bet you was swearing on the phone dropping f-bombs and passengers complained enough that the train conductor came back and had to talking with the very well-educated young lady
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 02:54 AM
28

Well exQUeeeeeze me for forcing you to waste a single click. Good day sir
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 02:54 AM
1

Umm..I don't know why this is directed at me, as I did not cite any figures or studies. You are responding to topics I did not even raise. Further, I think you are confusing "literacy" with "illiteracy." Yes we had 90% in the early 1900s, but it too has gone down to almost zero since then Are you really asserting we have almost zero literacy?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:38 PM
2

Actually, I have not made any comments for or against Davos. You are the one on a partisan rant. I was simply discussing the current state of public education. Personally, I do not like her connections to the charter school industry. Public servants should not have financial interests in the industry they are overseeing/regulating. That said, I have no objection to school choice and chartered schools, but do not think the government should actively be promoting them at the expense of public scho…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:36 PM
1

Can't YOU see that the modern public school system produces a bunch of mindless automatons with little to no actual knowledge. I don't want everyone to be equal. I want them to have equal access to education. You are disruptive, don't show up--GTFO. You don't do you work, you fail. We used to teach high level maths and latin in high school. Now, most kids can't even read at an 8th grade level.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:27 PM
2

Actually, the public schools are "dumbing down" society by rampant grade inflation, refusing to fail students, using non-tracked modules so smart, hardworking kids are pulled down by those who aren't, and prohibiting teachers from disciplining disruptive students, because muh racism.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:25 PM
1

You are comparing sexual assaults to complaints to a title ix officer, 90% of which are not assaults. Apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:19 PM
1

BAsed on what? If you are going to dispute official findings, then have some stats to back up your claim
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:18 PM
1

What makes you say it is "inaccurate"?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:17 PM
3

Why doesn't she put HER feet on it?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:32 PM
1

Your belief is that I need to be forcibly deprived on my property and forced to work for the collective rather than my family.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:01 PM
1

Well, seeing as it requires one to take another's property at gunpoint, yeah, id say its an insult.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:49 PM
2

But harassment is all about internal workings of the mind. Sexual Harassment requires: 1) repeated and 2) unwanted conduct/contact of a sexual nature. The problem is that the "victim" never has an obligation to communicate whether behavior is "unwanted" and many falsely believe that a single instance of making a pass or flirting is "harassment."
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:47 PM
17

Can confirm re: the babbysitting thing. An 10 year old boy should not have to explain why he "peed his pants" while the babysitter put on Porky's and reached in his pants.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:42 PM
11

I got banned from r/history for posting here. User didn't like a post and reported it. Mod banned me because I was a "sexist douche" for being a part of this sub and some others he didn't like.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/17 06:56 PM
1

As opposed to in the US where you can be convicted of statutory rape even if you have 2 forms of ID and the girl is working as a stripper....strict liability offense
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:57 AM
1

Blah blah blah....blah.blah.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:45 AM
3

He wasn't even arguing. He simply posed a question and asked for facts. Facts = Manplainin?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:41 AM
3

A criminal defense attorney is retained to defend against the criminal charges. You want to sue your accusers, you need to hire a civil attorney. Some general practitioners do both, but those are entirely two separate scopes of services. Also, very difficult to sue accusers for defamation if you plead out in the criminal case because you have to prove that the accusations were actually false.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 10:54 PM
2

That is usually outside a lawyer's scope of services. You are hired to defend, try the case, negotiate a plea deal. If there is no appeal, you have very little involvement post-sentencing except if there are conditions of the plea that need to be fulfilled (community service, etc.).
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 10:38 PM
2

I am not disputing that what they did to this kid sucks. My only point was that the guilty plea was probably the best option available to him.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 10:18 PM
2

But, lawyers aren't concerned with justice. We are concerned with putting our clients in the best position possible and mitigating risk. The risk of a guilty verdict and mandatory minimum sentencing is such that for many defendants a plea to a lesser charge makes far more sense than going to trial. Same reason why big civil cases settle. Juries are unpredictable and so much is on the line that it is better to have a sure thing that sucks a little, rather than run a 50/50 risk of being in prison …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 10:04 PM
2

A women who subconsciously understands her only value to men, but can't quite articulate it.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:45 PM
-1

He had very competent defense counsel
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 06:45 PM
1

Dude admitted to some of the charges and is serving his sentence http://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-news/235023353-story
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 05:29 PM
2

Many schools dont have recess at all, meaning boys cant burn off energy. If no recess, then boys cant sit still snd focus. 3.-4 are related. Most educators are female, meaning they utilize methods of teaching suited to girls. The bottom line is that Studies have shown that boys and girls learn differently and modern schooling is designed to cater to girls. When boys don't fit within the structure, they are labeled as having behavioral problems and drugged up
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 01:01 PM
-3

I didn't say his "claim" was false...just wanted to see reaction here, the upvotes confirmed my suspicions.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 09:16 PM
1

Volitionally drinking to the point where you are unable to make sound judgments does not mean you are unable to consent. Bad decisions != rape.
/r/MGTOW05/07/17 08:16 PM
1

I read them. More people are redpilled than I thought.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:59 PM
-1

Notice at the end how he claims she was rolling the window up on his hands.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 07:34 PM
159

How is dear old Mr. Mungus these days?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 07:29 PM
7

If I was in error, I apologize. Parts of your post seem to indicate that you do not view rape as a 'big deal."
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:22 PM
-4

Not sure is this is serious or not....I smell a troll
/r/MensRights05/07/17 05:35 PM
1

Taking away recess. Punishing boys/drugging them when they can't sit still due to "excess energy." Making all learning dependent upon rote memorization and following an established protocol, rather than allowing students to come to the answer themselves with a set of tools they have been provided with. Not allowing criticism of girls. And, last, but by far not least, the fact that 90% of educators are female.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 03:34 PM
1

What is factually incorrect in the article?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:48 PM
2

What is factually incorrect? It links to study. Same story has been in several outlets. Are you dusputing the authenticity of the study?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 04:06 AM
12

Who cares? Whomever is best qualified should get the job. Businesses exist to make money......not cater to female family preferences
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 02:07 PM
46

What is factually incorrect in the article?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 04:36 AM
182

Same reason they had to abandon language proficiency tests for English teachers in new jersey.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:48 PM
–

no....the show pays for travel, etc. But the courtroom stuff is actually stipulated binding arbitration.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 06:31 PM
13

TL; DR????
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:50 PM
4

Stop making sense...its almost like we are bombing their countries for the purpose of creating refugees. ... Also, you dont need an extraordinarily large number...you just need them to be violent and willing and able to kill the existing leadership....while the feminized male populace just sits and watches.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:22 PM
3

Common fallacy of elites: "we can control them." Happened with Rome. Happened with Britain. Eventually the "barbarians" who are being imported for whatever reason (cheap labor, protection, mercenaries) wind up realizing they can just take over the system. Here, in the USA we are very close to stage 2, which Europe is already entered. Stage 1 is a critical mass of the immigrants arrive and do not conform. Stage 2 is they carve out their own legal or de facto local political units (i.e. the Muslim…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:55 PM
5

When did you stop beating your wife?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:50 PM
12

Who is a subject. Whom is a direct object.....Now you know.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:39 PM
2

Exactly. As my Gramps always used to say if you want to be on time plan to be early
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 12:09 PM
6

The one who didn't "feel" raped
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 12:08 PM
6

We used to do that quite regularly before our cops and prosecutors lost all common sense and decided to slap public indecency exposure charges on anyone caught publicly urinating
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 12:04 PM
1

I like to fuck with them by saying I am a man who identifies as a gender non-conforming female
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:32 PM
2

fuuuuuuck
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:27 PM
5

That judge was brilliant. Legally he can't say...you a crazy bitch....well...she just proved it. Everything the judge did was above board.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:25 PM
4

It was a custody hearing. And you are damned right that when a judge speaks, you shut the fuck up and take it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:19 PM
13

When you are in a judge's courtroom, he is king. You don't interrupt and throw a scene that like. She got what she had coming. Whether you agree or disagree with a decision, you sit down and shut the fuck up and let your lawyer talk when it is appropriate. She will now be facing several charges of contempt and assaulting a police officer. Dad may wind up with sole custody....
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:17 PM
1

Funny about the contempt part..i just had a similar conversation with my 4 year old this weekend...almost word for word.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:11 PM
7

Obviously impressed by the young alpha male
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/17 12:03 AM
2

My guess is they were riding down the street hopping some curbs...not much "damage" you can do that way other than missing your olie and doing a pace plant
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 07:20 PM
5

Maybe she didn't like hooligans hanging out in her hood?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 06:53 PM
3

male victims paying child support to their rapists who have custody of the child That's the part that really infuriates me. Men in such positions need to start filing civil actions for damages. If paying child support is a natural and probable consequence of the rape, then it should be an element of recoverable consequential and foreseeable damages in a civil action for assault.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 06:40 PM
3

Quite a few female attorneys i know who are married to what they describe as "lazy" men who they view as "beneath" them in either blue collar jobs or jobs like nursing and IT.....the way they describe them is just pure revulsion. I hate to use the word "cucked"...but these men are either cucked already or on the way to it.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:40 PM
1

I'm in the minority, being a conservative, paleo-con.....albeit an atheist.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:36 PM
12

My favorite is when I had a mother jogging accuse me of "staring at her and sexually objectifying her." I'm like: "bitch, I was checking out your double stroller because my wife and I are looking for one and I have never seen that model before." "oh........."
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:34 PM
3

Like all the times they pull their sweaters closed over their chest when I am just looking past their ugly faces
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:32 PM
3

Literally raping them with their eyes
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:31 PM
4

I'd say closer to 40 cottage cheese thighs...saggy ass tits that have had a few kids on them already...stretched out leg tattoo.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 02:16 PM
3

As an "old person" disagree. When i was 14 i would have taken any boobies i could get
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 03:02 AM
3

L.O. fucking L.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 10:52 PM
4

Usually do. Then there was the time when we just moved into our house that a busybody called the cops on me being a suspected pedo because I was taking pictures of my kid at the park
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 08:04 PM
6

Chick is gross. Those things would probably knock her knees if not encapsulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 08:03 PM
2

Agree from an objective 40-yr old viewpoint. As a 14-yr old kid........
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 08:03 PM
19

You are right on that. I got accused of "free-range parenting" because I let my son run ahead of me in the field to the park. I'm like 1) WTF is "free range parenting"; 2) I can see the kid the whole time; and 3) I spent my entire childhood without my parents knowing where I was or who i was with.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 06:27 PM
10

But why does she keep coming back for more? I am convinced the kid was just filming the watermelons.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 06:22 PM
26

When I was a kid, my "average american day in the suburbs" was: 1) do chores; 2) go out on bike; 3) do shit I wasn't suppossed to do without getting in trouble; 4) come back for a PBJ sammy for lunch; 5) rinse/repeat until dinner at 5; then 6) back out until streetlights. We never encountered adults....who were usually at work or drinking in their lawn chairs in their garage.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 06:19 PM
2

This one is good as well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OpV5KcsmdQ
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 04:38 PM
17

I saw no booty...only a crack separating an uninterrupted wall of back and legs
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 04:05 PM
8

Cops did a great public service..can you image the poor bloke who took that skank home?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 04:05 PM
2

dont cast the news on me!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 03:08 PM
22

Basic prisoner's dilemma. Love how she reverts to the "i want your shit so 'man up'" bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 09:11 PM
2

Can I speak to my comrade?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 03:38 PM
4

Until recently, common response was to ask if/state you were gay.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 03:34 PM
2

This is why "regret rape" makes perfect sense if you understand the basic emotional context at work: "I feel bad therefore someone did something bad to me. Even though I did consent to sex and cheat on my boyfriend, I feel bad, therefore, I couldn't have really meant it; therefore, I must have been taken advantage of; therefore, I was raped; therefore, boyfriend can't be mad at me"
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:37 PM
1

I don't want someone to film me doing stupid things without my consent. What you WANT, and what the law is are two different things. If you are in public and publicly visible to a passerby, you have NO reasonable expectation of privacy in anything you are doing that can be observed,
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:19 PM
2

There is so much truth here. The ability to conjure up explanations to avoid personal responsibility for bad choices is without equal. We have a generation of girls raised to believe that they can do anything they want without consequences; ergo anything bad that happens is the fault of someone else.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:17 PM
1

Well, to be fair, I think most women are biologically better equated to "care" for children--i.e. attend to their emotional needs. My instinct with both of my children is to "teach" them skills to survive; to "toughen them up", "make sure they are prepared, etc." The sound of my child crying is a warning/alert to me that something may be wrong. My response is to figure out what happened, is the child hurt, why is he/she crying. My wife is programmed the complete opposite. She views her role as t…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:12 PM
14

The irony of them proclaiming to be "educated" when all they are doing to repeating SJW talking points they "learned" in school is too much for them.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:06 PM
1

How many fathers spend father's day doing what their wife wants to do "for them"...i.e. visiting their father's in law or having some stressful "party" requiring them to make the house immaculate, etc. when all they really want to do is sit in a chair, crack a cold one, and bounce their kid on their lap?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 03:49 PM
2

I swear, their goal is to make it socially unacceptable to be heterosexual.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:53 PM
2

And they see no problem with it
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:52 PM
3

Some of us men have a natural "wide stance." Of course, I will, out of common courtesy, retract my legs if someone needs the seat. But, if no one is there, I am letting my junk and thunder thighs breathe.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:50 PM
8

The bigger problem is they are criminalizing conduct based on whether a female is subjectively "offended." Maybe a part of it is tha people don't want to talk and just ask...but if you read the fem b.s. they find having to looking upon a man spreading his legs to be "offensive" as they consider it an attempt to assert dominance over them
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:48 PM
7

You can. The laws vary by states in the US, but generally there is a time period in which you have to do so.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:50 PM
6

He digitally penetrated her vagina, supposedly.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:48 PM
1

"Hate facts" will soon be a thing.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:47 PM
2

Or how about stop teaching young girls "rape" includes a whole bunch of shit that falls outside the legal definition of rape.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:47 PM
1

Quick...someone to a truth invalidity test!
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:45 PM
5

If he vaginally penetrated her, I think it is safe to assume consent by conduct.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:42 PM
3

Hate facts
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:38 PM
60

The woman indicated she consented. Another case 3rd party "declaring" a rape happened when the participant admits it was consensual.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:29 PM
12

Haven't been married, have you......
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:20 PM
8

I'm not wearing this low cut midriff and tight as skin shorts revealing my ass cheeks to get attention! I am wearing them for me because I like it!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 07:11 PM
2

Do they do that for chicks?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 04:10 AM
8

The Mic on her phone
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 04:09 AM
2

The bus one is the best
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 12:03 AM
30

The answer is that men aren't acting as a group. Because, we are, you know busy making sure western society functions....all those "icky" jobs that are male dominated but we never hear women complaining about not being "fairly represented"
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:15 PM
11

She's just a girl living in captivity
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 02:32 PM
11

Police state? WTF? She convinced an emotionally unstable teen to kill kimself..repeatedly sent him messages asking if he did it...called him a coward, etc....all so she could play the role of the "best friend honoring him" afterwards.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 01:59 PM
21

She actively encouraged the kid to off himself so she could get attention points
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 01:57 PM
1

Well, yeah....do stupid things......
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 01:54 PM
3

If they bring up the "tea" meme, I counter with "cake rape".
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 07:48 PM
7

Or your friend "pressuring" you to eat that piece of chocolate cake or just go for 1 beer.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 05:07 PM
1

I find any claim of "forced blowjob" to be questionable. And, in general, as an attorney, I do not believe ANY accusations of wrongdoing until proven otherwise.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 04:08 AM
8

Beta cuck boyfriend Will "support her choices"
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 12:21 AM
2

The real irony is that if someone had stopped to help her, she would be all up in arms that men assume she was unable to figure out how to do it herself
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 12:19 AM
1

It was not literally or forced... chicks think "forced" means "I didn't really want to do it but did it anyways to make him happy".... when in the real world " forced" means "physicslly face fucked you against your will"... never understood how someone could be"forced" to give a by unless they had a gun to their head
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 12:17 AM
2

Wow...real example of REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Fuck your shit
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 08:59 PM
8

LOL--"Under maritime law....."
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 08:48 PM
2

Its like dealing with my 4 year old.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 08:45 PM
2

I am here to commiserate, not be lectured to!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 08:42 PM
10

Western feminists are incredibly narcissistic I'm entitled to fuck as many men as I want without judgment and yet am still entitled to a good, faithful provider who will take care of all my needs and love me for who i am
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 08:36 PM
1

I disagree and say the biggest problem is that boys do not have any male role models and the men are discouraged from BEING men, because to be a man is "toxic." So, instead of learning to work hard, be rational, not let emotions run our lives, exercise, and be responsible, we have a society encouraging "men" to dress in lacy rompers, cry to their therapist every week, and "emote" to virtue signal and white knight their female "friends"--not to mention doping them up on drugs as boys so they act …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:30 PM
2

Or C) she is a wanna-be whore with appearance issues who is used by her whore friends to make them look more attractive.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:20 PM
1

It cost to learn spellings and grammars.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:19 PM
2

My local mountainbiking group hosts "females only lessons." Men are not welcome because that would ruin the "female safe space where they can learn, fail, and succeed without fear of judgment." Apparently, us guys are just supposed to fall enough that we figure out what we were doing wrong.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:50 PM
7

RIght....because females have "deep and intricate social behaviors" and men are just pigs
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:46 PM
2

so the theory is that products for women cost more than products for men. I don't know exactly what accounts for the difference however Its simple. Female demand for beauty products is higher than male demand. Females will pay more for the same stuff. Hence, the price is higher, because the market will bear it.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:40 PM
2

Hypocrites.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:48 PM
2

Well, thats a violation of Equal Protection
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:43 PM
9

Obviously part of the patriarchy
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 07:30 PM
113

"See this is why we can't be friends. I would've invited you if you hadn't failed my test." Fuck, thats so true
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 05:58 PM
5

TO her, yes
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 05:56 PM
10

live and learn bud.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 05:56 PM
3

Oddly, on the other hand, they also state that a man is not entitled to know his partner's sexual history. Esp. if "That's not who i am now"
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 03:35 PM
1

Correction..self-made rich people are less likely.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:10 AM
3

They don't care. You are a man; therefore you are guilty. Thanks for playing. Enjoy your prison rape.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:04 AM
6

Feminists already believe that. Apparently, lying is rape...so if you sleep with a girl and then decide you don't want to date her, she can retroactively revoke consent.----Which I pointed out as basically saying they want to prohibit all non-prostitution sex (i.e. I will fuck you if you ...x, y, or z)
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:03 AM
14

So confused...I thought porn was "empowering"?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 01:23 AM
2

Excellent movie
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 01:05 AM
2

Thank you Mathus
/r/MensRights17/05/17 04:35 PM
7

But the overbearing parent is almost always portrayed as the dad.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 04:34 PM
2

So, we need to kill people to prevent people from dying.....?????
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:28 PM
2

The fundamental problem is that current law is completely self-contradictory. One the one hand, marriage is treated as a "contract" that one party can break at will. On the other hand, unlike any other contract dispute, the non-breaching party is required to pay damages TO the breaching party in perpetuity. It is a codified moral hazard. "lifestyle" alimony needs to be abolished and it should be reserved for instances where one party was staying at home or forewent education with the expectation…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:27 PM
1

How about we let the parties freely negotiate those terms a head of time?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:22 PM
14

How about how Disney movies treat fathers? The funny thing about Disney princesses......they are always trying to run away from their controlling dad/parents and be "independent" while their parents warn them of danger....yet, they would all be dead if not for some magical fairy god-mother, sea-spirit, or other supernatural force. Just got done watching Muana with my son and this aspect was SOOO bad. She would have died 50 times over. HEr father was RIGHT...but "muh, girl power/special snowflake…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:19 PM
2

Agree. Lots of resources available to moms for postpartum depression...even mentioning it as a guy is displaying unmanly weakness. My own personal experience is that me and some of my close friends experienced depression/anxiety/crisis of identity when our first child was born. I suspect a lot of men do. But, no one tasks about it. You just go drink beer and laugh how "life is over", etc., etc.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:07 PM
20

Proof that "all that matters" is the narrative they want to push. Facts, logic, objective truth have no relevance if they conflict with the narrative.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter