TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

disposable-name Archive

View 2 posts and 145 comments by disposable-name on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But you must refer to it as being treated equally, because they don't want anyone else to think they're being treated specially.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/16 01:20 PM
3

That's the scary thing: I'm seeing that a lot of modern feminists have normalised these actions, and flat-out don't understand the damage they do. It would be understandable if they were some Germaine Greer-esque ball-crusher, but most of them genuinely think that their behaviour and beliefs are not just neutral for men, but actually positive.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:40 PM
8

The "Patriarchy" is to feminists what the "International Jewish Conspiracy" is to white supremacists.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:52 AM
9

I sincerely doubt that's the reason - in a time of war, ANY able-bodied person can serve. Look at Israel. (Their army, at least. Not the rest of their politics...)
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:23 PM
12

Neither will most of these boys, either, but that's almost never a problem for conscription - the focus is on getting them in, rather than the physical perfection of professional soldier.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:46 PM
11

"Bein' a ginger roofer in July, that's a fuckin' tough job..." - Bill Burr.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:43 PM
4

Economic centre-ish, socially left. And, funnily enough - this will shock a lot of the STEMlords here ;) - I studied one of the most liberal of the liberal arts subjects at uni... ...which is why I'm here. You want outright discrimination based on gender on a university campus? My friend, head on over to the arts faculty. Every single thing that legbeards accuse STEM guys of overtly doing to women (which doesn't fucking happen) they do to men in the arts courses.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:52 AM
1

Stop trying to make fetch happen. You need to talk to my mum's Cavoodle.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:42 AM
44

crickets tumbleweeds distant coyote howl
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:32 PM
22

No, we're living on Venus.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:24 PM
5

She's an old-school feminist, aka the kind that fought against actual discriminations, not the kind that can't stand having their feelings hurt. This. I keep telling people this - that, yes, there WAS a time when there was a when feminism actually WAS about getting guys and gals on equal terms - and get down voted :(. I'm damn glad she's trying to recaiming it. To paraphrase Michael Bolton from Office Space... "Why should I change? They're the ones who suck!"
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:21 PM
6

Which pledge level gives me a free brown shirt and bottle of castor oil?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:20 PM
1

Aside from being morally wrong, it's not as if gay people need to breathe new life into the idea that we steal people's kids. There's a joke I wanted to make there, but I won't out of reasons of taste (no, it wasn't homophobic...)
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:14 PM
1

Geographically speaking...the accent in Britain changes, on average, on every 32 kilometres (no joke).
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:11 PM
4

Someone made a great comment on the situation on another sub: If true equality were to come about, it would result in a net loss of privileges for women. "Yay, I get to be an engineer! Wait, what happened to the Women In Engineering scholarship?" "I'm ditching my idiot husband- wait, what d'ya mean, no alimony? I have every opportunity to provide for myself, and I'm expected to?!?" "Meh, I don't care if he doesn't want a baby - I'll just pretend my birth control failed after the fact. What? Sinc…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:10 PM
2

Here's the funny thing I've noticed on the internet: When boys are socially awkward - like how you described - they're called neckbeards and 'spergs. When girls are the same they're merely social justice warriors...
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:43 PM
2

Seriously, hairy-legged harpies the world over should be happy us Aussies have completely reclaimed the word "cunt" as gender neutral.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:42 PM
1

To be fair many variations of the Aussie accent sound quite British Yerfuckin'what, mate?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:39 PM
3

It was very much a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment. The was a brief period where gender politics was expanded beyond feminism in the eighties to truly re-evaluate gender roles in society, and how society thought of genders. It's exemplified, for example, of the Australian "Give A Girl A Spanner" program - getting women into trade and blue-collar jobs like welding which were previously the domain of men. There were talks of men being deserving of male-only spaces, just as women get female-only sp…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:36 PM
3

No, and TYT is just dragging MRAs into this to get views. The guy who wrote the blog is not MRA. MRAs had nothing to do with it. Exactly this. It's such a non-event in the MRA-sphere...but it seems that certain groups have made up this "outrage" to try to weaponise the movie against MRAs.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:30 AM
2

It seems like feminists push two messages We're luck it's only two in this case. Normally they just push whatever they feel needs to be pushed for them to win the argument at the time.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:31 PM
3

"Geech - das our ol' smell-hound..." "Geech gone ta heaven, Mister Terwillijjer..."
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:04 PM
3

I laugh whenever I see, say, HuffPo bitch and wine about the sickening den of sexism reddit is...and then having a imgur gallery that showcases something cool a redditor did that was on the front page yesterday...
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:19 PM
10

"Awww, poor silly little Kristine! She can't think for herself!" That's what they're saying when you have "internalised misogyny". It's a way of denying you your own agency, insulting you, but making you seem like a victim...and so not having to directly address your position (in case it's valid!) After all, it would be wrong to debate a poor "victim", so they think they come out looking like they're taking the moral high ground. You could also just shoot back and say he's got internalised misan…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:14 PM
-11

No, that's an egalitarian, fuckwit. I'd say you're an Uncle Tom.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:07 AM
11

I love seeing women get the other end of the friendzone. "I told a guy I wasn't interested in him romantically, now he won't talk to me!!! How dare he!" Well, he's allowed to have a choice, too, sweetheart. You don't owe him sex...but he also doesn't owe you friendship.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:23 AM
5

Until they need to wheel out the argument that "See? Girls can build stuff as well! Got it? Good. Ok, you filthy diesel dykes in your ugly overalls, back to the factories. Ugh, I can't even look at you. God, you're not even wearing any makeup, have you no self-respect?"
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:19 AM
7

Reminds me of that Kiwi bartender who slept with Andrew Johns (football player). Boasted about shagging him for a year to all her friends, the, meh, twelve months later decided to hit him with a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:17 AM
28

Male feminists are both the saddest and creepiest of them all. Look, I can understand women supporting modern feminism, but when I see a guy "freely" admit to how terrible he and his gender is, I just can't help but think he's an Uncle Tom.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:06 AM
3

Attraction isn't something that you can negotiate. But you can try to shame for it...
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:02 AM
4

The reason MRA's are supposedly "pissed" at Mad Max is projection on the part of the tumblrina SJWs who tend to get irrationally invested in fiction and unable to distinguish it from reality. They think like this. So, they want to believe others think like this.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:23 AM
18

It's interesting to note that most of these are older feminists. Yes, once, feminism was about the idea of re-evaluating gender roles, and offering equality to all. The radfems shut them down. And that's when we entered the dark days of the nineties, where the "male = bad" and "female = good" narrative took hold like a cancer, which we're all dealing with now as these kids mature and gain social and political clout. And that's how you get Jessica Valentis, folks.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:16 AM
2

It applies to the civil sector, too.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:50 AM
9

It's just that the only way you can mention reddit on your average online news/clickbait site is to paint it in the worst possible way. Why? Because reddit offers for free what these sites try to monetise - it won't stop them harvesting reddit for content, though. They'd rather you generate revenue off their second hand content than you simply going straight to the source.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:48 AM
0

She would've milked her new tits out of a shrink claiming "low self-esteem" and other "mental health" issues.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:53 PM
4

It's amazing how easy women have it. No, really. They have so many options in life. They can go to uni, build a career. They can become a perpetual student. They can take some part-time work and spend the rest of the time on fun. They can drop out to raise a kid. They can do "bullshit" work, "non-serious" work like write a novel, take up painting, start an anti-vaccination blog espousing homeopathy, or run their very own Quirky Cup Cakes business. They can go traveling on a whim. No one will hol…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:46 PM
32

Ah, academia. Especially social sciences academia. Crawled down from the ivory tower to spend thirty seconds in the world she no doubt claims to survey, and couldn't even last that long.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:32 PM
2

Ah, the ol' unfalsifiable hypothesis.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:54 AM
2

"So, what d'you have for us?" "I've got a little idea I call Marriage." "Ok, what's it involve?" "Well, basically, you enter into a contract with a woman and engage in a monogamous relationship with her for life. " "Ok...what're the benefits for me?" "Well...you get the chance to have emotional support, a friend, a lover. You might even get kids." "There's a 'chance'? What sort of chance?" "Well, nearly 25%.“ "Not even one in four?! Jesus, what are my outlays for this?!" "For a man? Money, time,…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:53 AM
1

They didn't catch because I'll bet you any money the people who create those marketing campaigns WERE workmen themselves.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:40 AM
2

I don't believe that a happy, respectful, lifelong marriage is impossible... ...all I'm saying is that if I were one of the investors on Shark Tank and you pitched it to me, I'd tell you to fuck right off.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:50 PM
3

I'm just going to assume that human traffickers are pretty much the HR ladies of the developing world. Same sort of person that does it, I'd imagine.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:40 PM
5

Nah, it touches on a key point: that feminists try to stick their theory in EVERYWHERE, and it just ruins things.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:25 PM
2

Token "Woo! Fellow 'Strayan!" You don't owe anyone an apology: because you've done nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:21 PM
12

I have a theory: The reason why feminists think all men are privileged is because they can't see past their own sexual attraction - in other words, they're thinking with their clits. And that's why feminists claims of "male privilege" are severely overblown. What makes the top 20% of men attractive to females? It's the same things feminists would as "privilege"... A successful, well-paying, status-laden job (and all the $$$). Confidence, and the power to defend his actions (think of this as the …
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:58 PM
2

Exactly, the text of the article only deals with "physical attractiveness", because it's more PC: reinforces the idea that men are all shallow sleazebuckets, and that woman are not...because you're only using one metric of attraction that mainly applies to men. Now, if they threw income into the mix, it'd be more interesting. And accurate. But if they at all suggested that some of the guys who got messaged lots weren't all Brad Pitt clones, but balding accountants who were posed in front of thei…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:09 PM
6

And they say women have zero privilege in our society...
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:25 AM
5

Also, I'm not a Scotsman. Which is doubly appropriate in this case.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:15 PM
3

Ah, the old "You can wear mascara, guys!" spiel. We don't want to wear dresses. It's a token gesture of "egalitarianism" feminists often trot out as a meaningless, worthless offering that's supposedly heavy on symbolism but light on effect. It's buying Manhattan for a few beads, in other words. Or, more appropriately, you're offering to trade a Muslim his felafel for a ham sandwich. Call me when you're offering no misandry in the Humanities field, equal treatment in the eyes of the law, equal em…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:13 PM
1

Misattribution seems to be a big part of the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:38 AM
1

The sad thing is that he alludes to the reason why women earn less, but then throws it all away for the bullshit myth.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:36 AM
2

attractive/desirable, Date these guys in your twenties, girl! That douchebag night club manager, the drug-fucked singer of Shitty Local Band, the low-grade criminal dealing eccies! Feel free to get knocked up or catch an STI from 'em, as well as a few track marks, tattoos, or broken bones, to show how liberated and edgy and...feminist you are, as well as giving you plenty of victim cards to play. Then... useful/exploitable, Move on to these guys - the Safe Choices™! Marry 'em! Those guys you had…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:01 AM
1

Also in a very real sense, we're genetically mutated grasshoppers.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:05 AM
1

The funny thing is there's way, way more things to be critical of with Age Of Ultron. But SJWs will SJ.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:04 AM
1

I'd love to see the status/finance of men rolled into that data...
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:00 AM
1

Earning gap, not pay gap. "Pay gap" is used so they can imply that women get paid at a lesser hourly rate.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:44 AM
2

No, it's picking and choosing the best of what they want from both the "modern" and the traditionalism. Feminists want to have access to the same high-paying jobs, right to go out and drink in bars, drive cars, go to university etc. This is because these areas were traditionally the domain of men. This is where men "ruled". They want that. They're getting it. Indeed, they've got it. Yet when it comes to romance, dating, sex, and family life, they're so conservative there are probably Mormons goi…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:31 AM
176

Halfway through, some of them should be "fired" from the march, then shamed and belittled for losing their "job".
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:29 PM
3

The feminists are the only ones still living in the 1950s.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:06 AM
2

And therein lies the rub: narcissism is a psychopathic trait. But women are getting a free pass for it.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:05 AM
5

It's not a game. You shouldn't be keeping a score card and tallying whether you or your spouse is doing exactly 50% of the load. In a healthy partnership, both people focus on delivering all of what the other person needs from them and trying to deliver as much of what the other person wants from them as possible. Tell that to the divorce lawyers and family courts, bub.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:00 AM
19

My mum dated a guy who was destroyed by a similar ex-wife. He had a successful business. Made good money. She (the ex, not my mum, lol) was a nurse. She ends, of course, fucking a surgeon. Surgeon's on $200,00 a year. She divorces him. Gets full custody ("SEE HOW MENTALLY UNSTABLE HE IS?!"). During the divorce, he has a complete breakdown, loses the business (duh), while she gleefully fucks the surgeon. Moves in with said surgeon. Rarely lets him see his kids...but still gets child support of hi…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:59 AM
1

It's funny that the only ones still trying to maintain the "status quo" of the 19th century are the feminists?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:36 AM
3

Yup. There's a few good women on there, but a lot are just doing the whole "Oh look, a vast concetration of men! I can go there for attention!" They feel they have the right to answer masculinity-oriented questions. It's the old double-standard: a woman's allowed to comment on and correct men, but if a man were to do the same - OMG SEXIST! I don't mind maybe 10% of the posts in that sub. But if there were a breakdown of the rest... 50% are bullshit dating/relationship/how-do-I-get-gurlz posts fr…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:27 AM
-1

Called hypergamy. Google it.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:23 AM
1

Isn't amazing ADHD never became an epidemic until third-wave feminism kicked off in the nineties?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:41 PM
12

Most women are fucking sick of the sort of frothing-at-the-mouth, white-with-dreadlocks, feculent militant lesbians that always get elected to these positions normally. So, a choice between some guy called "James" and a fat hippie calling herself "Boadicea Moon-Sister" is pretty much a no-brainer.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:36 PM
2

Er, what? So she's as good as even a subpar personal chef? Or cleaner? Is she even as good as the sort of cleaner that comes to your house on the day, pours herself a rum-and-coke, smoke three Alpines, and then gets to work? Also, this would only apply if the man doesn't do a single thing. So his wife has never, while she was slicing the meat, said "Honey, can you peel the potatoes?" She's never asked him to take the laundry out of the dryer?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:34 PM
13

Like I've always said: third-wave feminism doesn't make much sense...if you view it within the framework of a movement for equality. But if you place it within the context of a movement that purely seeks to place women over men...
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:01 AM
1

New, female Women's Officer: "I totally earned this on merit alone."
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:09 AM
2

In my defence, it could apply to almost any industry, really. "What?! We need to work overtime?! I have a child at home!" "Well, so does Bob, but he's knuckling down, same as-" "I'm a mother!"
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:37 AM
-1

I would also posit that it's because of the ol' "It's not creepy if the woman finds the man attractive" standard. Sounds like there's a little bit of butthurt, too: "Rich, Christian Grey-types don't cat-call me enough!" Their perceptions of the "fact" professional - ie, higher-class - men "don't cat-call" is due to the fact that if such men did, the women wouldn't call it cat-calling, because it would be acceptable to be cat-called by a man they deem worthy to sleep with them due to status and m…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:24 AM
18

See also: askwomen.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:15 AM
2

Gamers who lived through the 'violence in video games' debacle remember this cycle very well. That's exactly my take on it. The trouble is, the vast majority of gamers who harp on about "gaems r misogynist" are about 15 years old, and don't remember the violence debates surrounding it.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:57 AM
1

On average women may be more empathetic. That doesn't mean there aren't any female social spazzes - just look at tumblr: "I DON'T KNOW HOW TO REACT PROPERLY TO EVERYDAY , COMMON SITUATIONS, SO I'LL JUST BLAME SOCIETY FOR MAKING ME AWKWARD!" And this myth, propagated by white knights who are just as socially inept, that women are somehow always "better" than men at social situations is what allows idiots like this to be believe and have their feelings taken as fact. It's what Janet Bloomfield wri…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:50 AM
2

It's funny how the gender that's claimed to be "naturally more empathetic" by SJWs have fuck-all empathy.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:21 AM
1

manarchist Ah, thank you for another word to add to my Bullshit Lexicon.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:19 AM
3

What a strong, responsible, and mature woman who totally doesn't expect everyone else to pick up after her.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:15 AM
22

"As a 'strong', 'successful' woman working in the tech sector, I believe that women are just as capable of anything men can do... "...as long as those things are changed to better suit the women."
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:14 AM
9

Don't worry. In order to be fair, I'm sure the position of Men's Officer will be filled by a woman...
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:13 AM
1

Just look at how much people love the free running in assassins creed (hold a button and push the stick where you want to go and it happens by magic) Holy shit, that's literally my main criticism of AC, and so far I've been the only person I know of who has it. To be fair, though, on PC you had to hold three buttons...W, Shift, and Space. Yay. Meanwhile, Mirror's Edge got bitched at for being "weird" and "simple" - because it focused on doing one thing well rather than jamming a bunch of shit in…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:26 AM
3

Forcing other people's politics into art makes it propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:26 PM
26

Exactly. Please ensure your Marital Wanting status is permanently switched and locked to the "On" position, so that if a woman deems you suitable you are available for her marriage.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:24 PM
7

Feminists corrupted domestic violence research by starting with the premise that it's a form of patriarchal oppression or male dominance. That's pretty much the basis for all modern feminism. A while back, in the eighties, the prevailing thought was "Look, society-enforced can suck for all, not just women. Let's cast off these old ideas and let people do whatever they want without fear or shame." Rad fems shot it down, and replaced it with the good-versus-evil model (where "female = good" and "m…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:23 PM
3

It's an unfalsifiable theory: "If women were in charge" means, then, that the person issuing statement believe women aren't in charge. So, therefore, we are unable to know if they'd actually be better - since it's never happened. Or, even better, you could've just said "Would it help if I were black?" and watch 'em squirm...
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:19 PM
51

There are zero men's names in the text of the article. No one asked men why they didn't want to marry.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:13 PM
2

Sure. I'm a trained editor, give me a look. You're American, I take it? I'm Aussie, but I can compensate for your spelling ;).
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:21 AM
3

It's not the behaviour that's important, nor the outcomes of it, but rather simply the fact that a woman's doing it. Choice!
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:18 AM
2

I see egalitarianism as important.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:17 AM
1

ubisoft Your test results have come back from the lab and we think we know what the problem is... basket weaving He's not wrong.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:15 AM
3

Wall of text is all I see. I'm sorry for your illiteracy. Way to break the stereotype of men not reading! He's not trying to start a debate beyond "Guys, when will you realise you're all in the wrong?" He's white knighting pretty hard.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:12 AM
5

Woman doesn't get the job she applies for, she was discriminated against for being female. Man doesn't get the job he applied, it's because he wasn't good enough.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:18 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31n9vz/im_a_male_who_identifies_as_a_feminist_starting/cq3xwt7
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:16 AM
1

Here’s an example of something that hits on the same subject, but both sides see it very differently. That subject is the idea of “masculinity” in men. MRA’s having many times spoken up to say that men are also victims of sexual assault which is true, but I’ve also seen MRA’s admit that it is because it goes unreported because men don’t want to be the victim. I believe this is due to the way society views “masculinity”, and that male victims of sexual assault feel as though there place in societ…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:15 AM
4

So here’s hoping this doesn’t get downvoted into oblivion before it sees the light. As the title says, I am a male who identifies as a feminist. I’ve been combing through /r/MensRights[1] to try to discern what it is MRA’s are striving to achieve. Instead of platforms and disucssion abundant, I seemed to find things that were attacking things such like feministing.com and attacking feminist on their “inability to cooperate.” And there's nothing like that from feminists attacking MRAs, right? Rig…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:14 AM
2

I'm busy at the moment, OP, but you'd better believe you've got a reply from me coming.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:50 AM
4

Mostly the shitcunts at the publishers, alas.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:38 PM
44

Aye. Personally, I think gaming is one of the shittiest-run industries and, more importantly, art forms out there. I'm just a consumer of it, and it fucking hurts to see it run into the ground. "Well, we could do something bold, unique, ludic - BUT HAVE BROWN-SHOOTER 9: BROWN HARDER INSTEAD! We've got a Doritos tie-in, and over 67% MORE cut scenes than the last one!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:22 PM
6

The quantitative focus when it comes equality - well, when it comes to a lot of things - over quality really shits me.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:18 PM
104

No, no, no, games developing is a bunch of fellow geeks just sitting around in a cushy office somewhere with a foozball table and free snacks and it's just like the DOTA LAN party you went to last week but occasionally you pump out same games for only eight hours per day while joking and having a good time, right? There's no getting fired before you get your shipping bonus, or "crunch" time and all the games you work on will be games you love to play, right?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:17 PM
9

Other topics he might like to make videos on! Black people are responsible for the majority of crimes! Jews own all the money in the world! Gays are responsible for AIDS! Caucasians are just more intelligent! Coming soon to Bullshit Generalisation Theatre!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:19 AM
1

...it's not a double standard if you contextualise it within the "women's sexuality = good, men's sexuality = bad" framework...
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:22 AM
8

Unfortunately, despite decades and millions of dollars spend on the part of the corporations who want it, outright, blatant slavery is still illegal. So, marriage is the next best thing.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:16 AM
2

Dang. There's a ton of blame-shifting in there... ...also she claims she lied because "compassion".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:08 AM
3

If she's smart (ie, if she's got a decent PR manager/speech writer/handler), it'll go a li'l somethin' like this, if it's to be done in the style of the Statement To The Press apology. First of all, her opening statement will be along the lines of: "Rape is a very serious crime, and is happening all over college campuses". This sets the tone of the speech: that she wants you to think about rape and sexual assault, NOT her apology. It will also set up a "justification" (at least in the heads of c…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:31 AM
1

Yup. Seconded by another Aussie here: most of the time Miranda Devine is batshit insane.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 10:02 PM
3

Ironically, for Aussies and Kiwis, this is also Anzac Day.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:54 PM
3

100% - 23% = …
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:47 PM
11

In other news, people with ongoing medical issues less likely stop seeing doctors.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:45 AM
4

Yeah. Neither did the feminists...for the same reason: the designer just did their job, made a character they thought was appropriate for the game, and that was that. They did not do the Grrl-Gamer™ Approved thing and spend every second day writing articles or making tumblrs or whatever shouting and clamouring for attention: "Hey: I'm a WOMAN. And I'm working in GAMING. That's right - VIDEO GAMES. Did I mention I'm a WOMAN?" Pretty much all the criticism, of course, was dependent on the designer…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:40 AM
4

That's the thing: the Fat Princess character was designed by a woman. After a shitload of feminist criticism, the designer finally came out and called them out on it. And the critics quickly shut the fuck up because that designer was a woman, and basically told all those crying sexism to shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:01 AM
4

Remember Fat Princess?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:41 PM
46

See, I actually love when Cracked does articles like this: because it simply proves that feminism is now simply another tactic co-opted by business. They don't give a shit about you, ladies. Not beyond the clicks you bring.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:00 PM
6

She's so brave, hiding behind the status quo like that.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:56 PM
2

Dunno about OP, but I'm looking for fairness. I'm not for broad, blanket legislation pigeonholing ANY gender into a role, just because someone's arbitrarily decided "no, that's men's/women's work". If you can do something, do it. Except for giving birth, I'm gonna let each individual do what they want. What I'm not for is the exceptionalism and double standards and picking-and-choosing that goes on. Or, in a practical sense, the changing of something that may negatively affect that something but…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:53 PM
6

I think they saw any males in academia (and in higher education in general) as invading their (wait for the magic phrase...wait for it...) "safe space". This is, of course, based on the tired, bullshit notion of "every other space on the planet is for men, it's OK to discriminate against them wherever we get a chance to be in control and hopefully get them to leave." However, they also like to believe they clawed their way up through a "male-dominated" sector, and thus feel even more entitled. T…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:42 PM
7

It's why a lot of women get to spout that shit: "Oh. She's a girl. She must be more on the ball socially than me." Add the White Knight factor ("...maybe if I agree with her she'll let me touch her bewb..."), and there's not a lot of pushback to it. To go back to your OP for a bit: However I don't think most women realize what men experience. Even if they did, its hard for people to admitt that, sometimes, men have it harder. If there's an equivalence to being objectified for men, I'd say it's b…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:05 AM
2

Don't tell them about the Xperia Z3 Compacts, then...
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:19 AM
2

I have a female lawyer friend who would beat the ever-loving shit out of those women. She chose to work in a low-paying field because that's where her heart is. Had zero complaints about it. She understands her decisions. This friend of mine started out at a piddling (for Australia) post-grad salary, in law, of $45,000 a year. She could've got and worked for BHP or Rio Tinto or Macquarie Bank...but didn't. But nor does she complain.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:19 AM
3

That is when you start hiring the woman's basketball team to help her out around the office. Or a bunch of male dwarves.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:16 AM
2

Because - duh! - every single man was part of the elite! /s
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:14 AM
13

Hah, fair point. I was in the arts faculty, though, and the dudes were DEFINITELY cooler than the females. "Hey, you've got a problem, come see me sort of thing." The women? It was like going to a staunchly Christian doctor for contraception, you know? "My beliefs say I shouldn't have to help you, even though my job description does".
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:12 AM
5

It's separate from whatever your opinions on non-violent offenders - it's the fact that mothers in prison get treated better than men in prison, regardless of what they're in for.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:09 AM
29

Ever notice how men's magazines have picture of women on the cover and women's magazines have...pictures of women on the cover?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:06 AM
15

Thank you. The main excuse I hear from women (and especially from women-only subs) is that "Women are more naturally empathetic than men - there, problem solved forever, we need never speak of it again!" I don't know where that myth came from, but it's the sort of gender stereotyping most women in those subs would grab their torches and pitchforks for...if it were inverted. Mostly, it's a convenient excuse: "Women are more empathetic - and understanding of someone's TRUE feelings, so they get to…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:58 AM
1

Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:57 PM
2

Of course, all subpar men should be psychic to know if they're subpar in the eyes of a specific woman. If you must show appreciation, do so anonymously, should she can just bask in the glow of being found attractive by a generic mass of males rather than having to see them as individuals.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:51 PM
10

Then, like all things sex-oriented, it's a beautiful expression of feminine sexuality and body acceptance.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:54 AM
12

This isn't about caring about the prostitutes. It's about how feminists see sex (and therefore the sex industry) as theirs and theirs alone. It's why they love, for example, strippers, but hate, you know, the customers that allow stripping to be a highly profitable business. Strippers are wonderful goddesses who empowering their sexuality... ...but the men stuffing twenties in their undies are creeps.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:16 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:48 PM
9

Girl in my city was just run over... ...because she'd been out all night getting shitfaced and passed out on a motorway on-ramp. Newspapers fawned over her. Including the photos of her looking cute in a selfie. They crucified the guy who hit her. He ended up killing himself.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:51 AM
42

Read any newspaper. Young guy killed? One paragraph on page 5. Young woman? Front page, giant photo of her (preferably in a bikini), story continued on pages 3 and 4, with breakout boxes, timelines, and a full biographic/hagiography ("Lynne was about to start studying medicine!" Yeah, well, she didn't need to study it to know taking a fistful of unknown pills from a random stranger at a festival was a bad idea, the dumb bitch).
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:46 PM
10

"Boys don't read. No one knows why." my university young adult/children's writing lecturer. There's an ironic story behind that. So, our YA class was completely taught by the exact sorts of female academic stereotypes you'd expect in a fine arts faculty. Either young, angry rad fems, or older, condescending rad fems. And so I turn up. First few weeks are great. Especially the lecture where it was pointed out - very correctly, IMHO - that you don't talk down to kids in books. Don't condescend. Do…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:42 PM
1

Sooo...men = faster clock, fewer cores; women = slower clock, more cores?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:26 PM
3

The words contained in the article aren't satire...but the publishing of it on buzzfeed, I think, is: it's a simple inversion of the sort of shit they'd publish - but inverted. Janet's just giving buzzfeed a taste of their own medicine. In other words, buzzfeed would themselves totally write and publish an article exactly like...as long as it was written by a guy and he were listing stupid things men do.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:26 PM
2

FUCK YES! Love your site.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:17 PM
5

But these women didn't see the firefighter risking his life to save others. They didn't see the cop driving a car for 12 hours a night getting shot at. They didn't see the electrical lineman, construction worker, steel mill operator, or garbage man putting in hours of backbreaking work with little to no accolades, for minimal wages, working their asses off to get by and support themselves or their families. I had a back-and-forth with a woman about this. I said how I'd been told, in a phone inte…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:13 PM
16

I love that the people who write bullshit articles the one above would also be the first to decry that men "have zero social pressures and can do what they want".
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:24 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:46 AM
1

Did you think I was being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:58 AM
0

Yeah, hence the smokescreen at the end: "Hey, this insert organisation/industry they tried to sue here still has a big problem with discrimination coughIdidn'tlosebecauseIwasIwrongIlostbecausethere'samassiveconspiracyofpenisesthat'ssohugeitssuccessfullymanipulatedtheentirelegalsystemcough."
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:38 PM
4

Climate change will turn women into hookers? "food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health" Women are "uniquely" capable of adapting to climate change? "despite a unique capacity and knowledge to promote and provide for adaptation to climate change, women often have insufficient resources to undertake such adapt…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:31 PM
2

The "Bibles and pants for the godless heathens" approach. "Look, tribe, if you allow us to rule over your lives and take over your land, will give you this religious book! And these stuffy European-style clothes!" "Er, thanks. We're happy the way we are. We don't want your books, or your trousers!" Same goes with the pitiful "concessions" I've seen so many RIF-RAFs offer to males "come the revolution": "DON'T WORRY, BOYS, WHEN EQUALITY IS ACHIEVED YOU'LL BE ABLE TO WEAR MAKEUP AND SKIRTS AND CRY…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:05 AM
1

Thank you. This is the most succinct and perfectly-put way I've seen it written. It's hard not to view those guys as, well, (to borrow an old phrase) Quislings.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:01 AM
0

Ah, yes, the ol' "FEMINISM MEANS EQUALITY!!!" line. Funny, for a sect who craps on about the "harm" of "gendered language" (which apparently also includes arbitrarily defining neutral terms as "gendered" because they don't like 'em - but I digress), they're awfully quick to apply the "correct" gender to what is emphatically, obviously, and by very definition a neutral term.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter