TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

disposablepurplepill Archive

View 0 posts and 368 comments by disposablepurplepill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

In our current generational culture shift, no, western women are not capable of the same kind of love their grandmothers were capable of and that might not even be going back far enough. If the culture were able to shift then yes, it's possible again but whether or not the culture shifts in such a way it will not do so in our lifetimes. It took multiple generations for it to get this bad and no one is truly acknowledging that something has to change. I estimate the current momentum of the pendul…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/23 12:31 AM
1

Farrell is at this point the distillation of NAWALT bluepilled controlled opposition. I simply do not hold respect for anyone who still thinks his position on gender dynamics in the west is at all relevant or even cogent anymore. Even to his last breath he's still drowning in the "Women are wonderful" fallacy - like his comment on ~40something% of women having children out of wedlock (towards the end) - because they are worried about domestic violence and don't want to get married. Fucking pleas…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/22 03:54 PM
1

Sir, you are partially misinformed. The last time there was parity between the genders in enrollment was between 1975 and 1980. Ever since 1980 the thrend has been steadily marching to higher and higher proportion fo women in Higher education. It's been 60/40 split at a minimum since at least 2005, and likely a bit further back than that because no one was talking about it then except a rare-few. Including, of course... "Based mom" https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-aga…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/10/22 11:02 PM
15

"All women are feminists until the ship starts sinking"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/06/22 03:43 AM
1

late reply but to expand and confirm your point of view. If it wasn't explicit acts that were also the issue, the excuse would have been volunteered "It's not like I did porn" etc. That that is missing as an excuse means it cannot be denied, even in her crafting and re-telling of the tale.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/21 05:43 AM
7

I was a feminist radical leftist idiot until ~2000/2001 - got "red pilled" by divorcees back then who used nothing but logic to break me out of it - and humor. However it's been a sad 20 years watching the rest of the world go to absolute shit socially.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/21 05:23 AM
7

Women already are - and the high count types label the low mileage women "pick me's" implying they are faking their virtue etc. just so they are picked.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/21 05:21 AM
2

Simple calculus. If he had left her/filed she would have said "he divorced her" in order to garner sympathy. Since it was just "we got divorced" she filed - keeping it neutral looking to dodge responsibility.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/09/21 04:08 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-gbacsUKpc
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 03:06 PM
8

"Yas queen slay, you go girl, if he can't handle you at your worst he doesn't deserve you at your best... etc. etc." culture that has been ever-present but especially so in the last 15-20 years.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/04/21 01:42 AM
3

49. She as a 49 year old "I'm still in my 40's, I can fib a bit and say I'm 37."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/04/21 01:41 AM
2

There was a moment in culture where the "not the father" dance-offs kept one-upping themselves. I miss those.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/21 11:24 PM
2

Since we are here - this is my personal favorite of classic The Onion. Columbine Jocks Safely Resume Bullying
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/21 10:39 PM
16

I used to participate there, maybe a year ago now - but I saw the writing on the wall - it was just steadily turning into an echochamber and never went back.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre04/01/21 10:07 AM
2

Not if she owes you, women don't ever think they owe anyone anything. she will do you favors as a ante for the next hand.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/20 05:40 PM
14

I've been following the dynamics between the sexes on an academic levels since the early 00's. You are more likely to find studies on the resulting influence of jazz music on the mating rituals of honey bees than you would any sort of study that puts woman's nature under an objective microscope. Remember, Feminism took over academia decades ago. What is researched or published flows down river from that fact. There are solar system sized gaps in what is researched today (and for the last 30 year…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/12/20 05:01 AM
1

H.R. Giger's work Giger's work has always been very heavy handed with sexual imagery. So it's to be expected. Extremely Not Safe For Work Art Piece by him as an example. https://i.redd.it/dfrm1vkviroz.jpg It's no accident that the derelict spacecraft in the first alien had vaginal openings for its ports and a pair of phallus at its extremities. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/db/c3/dedbc3983b7d29d8ab15eba0e9a2db33.jpg Hey, look, they went into a vessel through such an opening and inside it it …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 09:11 AM
13

According to OKCupid data blog they are also one of the "least desirable" Asian men and Black women had the lowest engagement/respondent rates out of all the racial/gender demographic matchups.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/20 10:29 AM
30

This was the math. 80 and 40. I learned about it as far back as the "Is there anything good about men" paper by Baumeister that he apparently turned into a book in 2010. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/is-there-anything-good-about-men-9780195374100?cc=us&lang=en&
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/20 10:15 AM
1

Shakespeare should not be taught to high school students or younger - there is no point, you simply do not have enough life experience to appreciate it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/20 11:25 PM
21

This is a fib women tell themselves. They do understand chastity and its value. Women know to try and hide their numbers if they are high and will treat low numbers as a badge of honor if they are looking for a relationship. I've run into this multiple times across multiple cultural backgrounds. Women do know what value not being a whore carries - but the giny tingles overpowers them. They just lie to themselves afterward.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/20 11:18 PM
22

Definitely watch it. I was fucking dying when she was saying men need to feed her and not split the bill. "You need to feed me, k?" with a finger wag attitude to boot. It's practically parody.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/20 08:04 PM
6

Honey, when you cannot even pronounce Chivalry and then complain it's dead you demonstrate exactly how and why it died.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/20 07:59 PM
16

I've got a friend doing this right now to their children and I've started to pull away because I heard it over the phone one day. In text it's not obvious but over the phone the kid was literally just crying in the other room for their mommy. Kid is 16 months old. The mom (my friend) basically just ignores them for long spans of time, puts on headphones, then just watches shows. Turned my stomach when I realized what was going on. I interact with them less in hopes they give their kid more atten…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 05:58 AM
4

3 day late reply. Most religions that made it to modernity were functionally simple forms of government for early man. One of the key components in one form or another is the function of societal stability. Within THAT framework marriage helps a lot to keep people from killing each other over infidelity. WITHIN THAT framework is an in-built stigma for divorce. Divorce bad because marriage good because societal stability good.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 04:47 AM
1

I don't recall the specific phrase but it was essentially challenging/refuting their claim in mixed company without caring about their own ego or their husband's approval. "No filter statement." The intention was not even to play any games to get them on any sort of hook. Just hearing someone spout off BS - on occasion you know enough about a specific subject that you can't stay silent. It was one of those times.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 04:25 AM
9

yet they breed like rabbits. It's one of their diagnostic criteria high risk promiscuity in my case her "revenge sex" for the breakup she initiated was as high fucking risk as you can get. Raw vaginal and anal with a perfect stranger off of Craigslist. Even her otherwise supportive social circle/corner of the ring didn't approve.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 07:15 PM
18

I don't blame guys who don't believe it and I think women are incapable of seeing it - I think it's pretty much a hard wired blind spot of theirs. If I jumped back 20 years and told my younger self the above I wouldn't believe it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 06:14 PM
10

"There is what they say and then there is what they do."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 05:59 PM
12

Dated a BPD - almost broke me as a human being. Never again. The lows to which they will drag you are down right dangerous.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 05:58 PM
43

It's frustratingly predictable once you "See the code" /matrix. The hottest I've ever made women is when I'd get into a conflict/fight with someone (not just her). If you don't know what it's like to be "lusted after" by a woman you just haven't entered in the right "code" yet - but the code isn't difficult. What is difficult is getting over the disbelief that women function this way. That was the hardest part to me. The irony is I don't bother with a filter anymore and call it like I see it and…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 05:53 PM
1

I've been "Redpilling" my younger and only sister over time. She is in a good spot because she really likes my company/input on things even if some of the "truth hurts" and doesn't want to lose contact with me. etc. But she knows I don't care about the opposite and she knows if she turned into one of the women featured on this board I'd functionally disown her. Her husband has no idea how lucky he is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/08/20 02:08 PM
1

Oh my gosh! Where did all this wage stagnation come from?!?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 04:53 AM
3

Nah, old hat at the chans - I know when I'm treading too close to a line and don't begrudge getting a ban when I know I potentially crossed it. In the last few months (maybe a year?) jannies have been using "replying to off topic ban" as a blanket cheat to functionally kill threads/discussions that they don't like because it's an easy catchall. I don't go to one board to talk about shit from another. Mods just have been slowly coloring/influencing the site. This isn't news. Constantly happens on…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 04:13 AM
33

You have been banned from all boards for the following reason" Replying to off-topic garbage. Because of the short length of your ban, you may not appeal it. Please check back when your ban has expired. Don't worry, 4chan is nearly as SJW as the rest of the internet.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 08:27 AM
5

A compliment is useful to get a woman's attention. It's not useful for keeping a woman's attention.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 07:10 AM
4

The best romantic successes I've had were from accidentally being rude or short with women. The largest flubs were when I pulled out all the stops to be as genuine and romantic as I could be. Of course in later years nearly all the flubs turned into years later reach-outs for coffee and a date "post prime years." Some of the successes and flubs were with the same woman so it's not a matter of sample size.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 07:07 AM
11

Women love nothing more than turning a mans death into a vector for their own attention. My first year in HS at a private school overseas a senior who had emotional issues got kicked out of class then committed suicide by jumping out of a 3rd or 4th story window. No one in our grade knew him. No one in the two grades above us knew him. This happened in front of our class window (1st/2nd floor) so some of us saw the result (I was one of them, the untouchables got head trauma right). Anyway - inst…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 06:56 AM
3

Being a nurse = she gives it up for Doctors on the side. Don't ever date a nurse - even if you yourself are a doctor. Nurses are to doctors what flight attendants are to pilots.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 06:32 AM
52

Women will competitively sabotage the relationships of other women. Family, friends, best friends, it doesn't matter. The biggest threats and poison to a stable relationship are the friends of your girlfriend. Single or otherwise.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/20 01:08 PM
2

Cutco
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/05/20 01:53 PM
1

https://i.imgur.com/B0neRRw.jpg
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/05/20 01:41 PM
48

Because it's this cheap and known pattern of shaming language. To deny you are afraid is an easy point in their camp (at least they view it this way). To deny the accusation for the slay queen yass squad is to "admit guilt". Don't defend yourself - attack back, that's how some of these people operate and it's the only thing they understand. It's an attempt at a sucker punch and is one degree removed from challenging your masculinity.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/20 07:49 PM
17

Be the asshole. My social circle knows and understands my perspective on dating single mothers and you know what? While most of them would never agree openly - male or female - nearly all of them individually have told me that they agree. Guess who are the only ones who disagree? I'll give you only one guess.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/20 07:46 PM
18

It's less that she is still interested in him and more she just doesn't want other women to have him or she doesn't want him to moving on faster than she does. I've never met a woman that cared about my personal life if their recovery was further along. I've also never met a woman that wasn't bothered by moving on faster than she has. It's all about ego, nothing to do with "love".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/04/20 05:23 AM
3

Moving on from exes. There is a difference between moving on from some exes and all exes. No, women aren't all of a sudden having a hard time moving on from all exes and they are having the same amount of trouble moving on from the "some" exes they always have. The difference? They are more vocal about it today.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/04/20 05:20 AM
7

While the sub is relatively small - it will be fine. We are currently in the optimum "Golden age" or a reddit sub. Just large enough to have regular daily activity - but as small as possible to avoid the eye of sauron of either the Admins or other ideologically motivated but mentally and emotionally weak individuals. I give the sub 1 year, two at the most before it gets hit by an quarantine then closed a month later. I've seen it play out at least a dozen times personally. The best subs eventual…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/20 07:26 PM
2

"I'm really 21, my DOB is wrong" /former 16 year old who snuck onto tinder - every time. The really worrisome ones are the ones with a deficit of 3.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/20 09:48 AM
1

of all the women who have existed in human history 80% of them have living descendants today. Of all the men who have existed in human history, only 40% of them have living descendants today.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/20 02:37 AM
11

Fictional characters developed and "written for" by a staff of 12-20 professional writers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/20 07:04 AM
1

I do believe it's up to societal norms to shape how women behave. I don't have an opinion on if it would take societal collapse to change that aspect. I'll admit I don't see a road that would - but I'm too ignorant to the aspects that need to be considered.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/20 04:58 PM
2

This is a huge issue. I'm pretty close with my sister and we discuss and debate "red pill" type issues and she finds it fascinating, however she constantly lets slip clues that tells me her history - the vast majority being some derivation of the above. The presumption that I or my friends in our teens or early 20's acted like she acted.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/20 04:56 PM
2

To continue with your theory (2day late reply). Another shift also happens. They are now in a pool of guys who specifically don't use the 30 cutoff criteria, which means they might be much lower value as a base and/or much older where a "18-40" range is premium for them like 18-30 might be for "everyone else". It's not just them no longer being in view of the mode of male interest but they are also digitally immigrating to an entirely different ecosystem of standards and expectations.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 09:40 AM
3

The former, as you run through dating profiles, around 23 and above they start popping up (post "real" 21) because they've been using hookup aps since they were 18 - (correction amount). I most commonly see "16 year old" inductees floating around the 23 and above bracket.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 09:35 AM
11

Serial monogamy is no closer to monogamy than a swinger party is to speed dating. Serial monogamy is just debauchery with soft language applied. In functionality serial monogamy is just a qualifier that excludes threesomes, orgies or polygamy. That's all it means.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 09:25 AM
13

If you read the book or follow Helen Smith you will realize 2 things - She gets it and honestly does. She could run circles around you in giving even more justified examples. The book isn't targeted at the choir so it doesn't emblazon an accusatory hook on the cover so it can possibly reach the minds that need to be changed. The book does not blame men, it actually very much blames culture , society, government and women - but in doses that can possibly sneak by the people who actually need to l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 09:16 AM
8

worse quote than that "Women are the primary victims of war"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 09:11 AM
6

My entire time in college and University I only met one American Black chick that I'd bring home to the parents or consider having a relationship with. She was of course taken but that was 1 out of maybe 30 or more that I could determine their character. She was very much a unicorn and completely divorced from any sort of hood culture. We study grouped chemistry together. Really great person people gravitated around. No publicly visible chip on her shoulder.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/02/20 09:15 PM
4

No, they want the opportunity to "trick" straight men into emotionally compromising sexual acts. They get off on this - they have gotten off on this for over 2 decades - at least. Most transgender murders are the result of said "tricking." Not just in the US either - this is a worldwide thing. It's likely the same sort of high rapists get from the power display. Some entertainment media outside of the US actually make fun of the phenomenon/trope.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/20 05:20 PM
7

A long time ago, maybe 7 or so years ago cross posting and "cross pollination" of reddit was how it was designed and was how it was meant to be "used". Since that time the culture changed where certain communities would set out to specifically sabotage other communities they disagreed with/disliked. Reddit as a business and as a site changed even down to the coding level how the site worked and changed the rules to reverse the previous culture and try to, at least tacitly combat the "new culture…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/20 01:15 AM
23

I've been reflecting on the same thing over the last couple of years and come to similar conclusions. Dating apps have skewed women's expectations by superimposing the best possible traits of tens, dozens, or scores of men that any given woman has experienced and then in her emotional irrationality fabricates a claim in her head that there not only exists a man out there than encompasses all the highlight checkboxes of this mosaic amalgamation of a man that the dataset has "theoretically" expose…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/20 12:55 AM
3

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/20 10:25 PM
2

That there is called opening the barn door wider after the horse has bolted.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/20 05:18 PM
13

I didn't mention anything about mate guarding. I specified the only difference is that the other person is doing more with others than they are doing with you. You believe that's ok?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/19 08:10 AM
20

There is a difference between the actions of others and the actions of others that then is a reflection of their perception of you. Typical scenario. Casually dating a girl that will do more with other people than she will with you. Will have more sex with other people than she will with you. The sex she has will be more varied and "better" with other people than the sex she will have with you. It would be irresponsible for a self respecting man to let that continue. Some things simply do reflec…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/19 07:22 AM
1

One small caveat to your analysis - attractiveness predisposes individuals to success when all other things are equal. However to off-set that you didn't do an age bracket designation as mentioned elsewhere.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/11/19 03:20 PM
1

All things being equal (working out and maintaining the same diet) Women don't look "more attractive" at 24 compared to when they are 21 but don't necessarily look any worse. After 24 or 25, on average - it's just a steady tick downward. Could a woman who was slightly overweight in her teens and early 20's turn it around and stay active and eat properly work out and tone a body so she individually ends up looking better at 25-30 than she did between 18-24? Sure - but that's not due to her growin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 04:50 PM
4

All it takes is being the best man in one traditional Italian wedding to learn very quickly that all those gifts do actually come with strings attached. The politics of "old world" weddings are as dramatic as game of thrones or house of cards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 04:36 PM
3

I thought it was a "Q4Men". For those who are in a perpetual state of frustration/anger trying to understand and accept women’s sexual choices, do you really not get why women don’t act like men? Rhetorical close ended question. Or is it just the anger talking? Same thing. You aren't looking for knowledge or understanding, you are looking to dump on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 01:26 PM
5

It's just another "Rhetorical complex question designed to dump on men" -post. More common than acual "Q4men" or "CMV"s in good faith. The sub has just slid back into man hating once again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 06:08 AM
3

9 syllables vs. 1. "Rich" would work just as well. The issue is it's too honest.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/11/19 07:46 AM
0

It could be 4040 and the guy will still need to "win her over." If men could only ejaculate once every 2 years it might be different - but that's no the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 07:57 PM
0

That's not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about your own accomplishments and memories outside of a relationship, that's a given.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 01:07 AM
1

Build memories of a life with someone without that someone? .exe stopped working.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:17 AM
0

And if you, as a dude, get fired by your chick, how do you not throw a party at the opportunities ahead of you? Because of the time investment to build something that will last past youthful looks being wasted.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 10:22 PM
1

21 minute TED talk on the science and testing behind proving this to be the case. Back from when TED was great. The surprising science of happiness | Dan Gilbert 2012
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 08:06 AM
8

I had to explain to a younger friend that "inviting a guy to your hotel room is functionally asking him to have sex with you." She was about 21/22 at the time and floored that this was the case. She did not at all understand implied consent and various social cues and their meanings. Another girl who I gave a ride home to who was 18 or 19 who's boyfriend was due home in like 10 minutes or less asked if I wanted to see her bedroom. I also advised her that that wasn't wise and why. "Kids" are idio…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 12:19 AM
1

Women have been steadily out-pacing men in college graduation rates since at least the late 90's. This is not... at all... a new trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 10:31 PM
3

And that's why women with a high n-count should be avoided (among other things) They have experienced many different iterations of "better" than what any single man can provide and therefore no single man can satisfy her subconscious expectations of the cumulative quality of all those iterations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 03:43 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBqjZ0KZCa0
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 12:30 AM
1

There are a few that still have them believe it or not. NC, I recently learned is one such state. https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/weird/man-sues-man-he-says-stole-his-wife/275-4cf11143-cec0-4ba7-8c60-decbd4d96219 I had no idea until like a week ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 12:24 AM
2

"Toxic" [fill in label]. You do not understand the history of the western world and seek to vilify how it worked before 1960. If I had to guess, largely through ignorance and not actually malice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 07:11 PM
1

1: Most porn is violent. It is normalizing sexual violence against women. Define "Violence" because most porn most certainly is not "violent" by the common standard of "violence." is this one of those "all sex is rape" perspectives?" If most of the porn you watch is actually violent in nature that is very much an algorithm that has profiled you and is serving you up what it determines you enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 06:27 PM
3

prisoners to a culture of toxic masculinity and femininity. You are mis-lableling pre-modern society. Read see you in 100 years to understand why it wasn't anything like "toxic masculinity and femininity" but necessity. Before automation, service sector, modern appliances, baby formula, modern sanitary products, wide spread electricity and refrigeration, and scores of other technological advancements your "labels" were the only path forward. Someone at the turn of the 20th rejecting "gender norm…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 06:21 PM
3

And the population at large are entertained by scores to hundreds of humans dying all the time. STFU.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:07 PM
2

That wasn't the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:06 PM
2

What of it leading to infidelity? I just learned the other day there are enforceable laws in some states that by state law punishes infidelity through fines. https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/weird/man-sues-man-he-says-stole-his-wife/275-4cf11143-cec0-4ba7-8c60-decbd4d96219
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:01 PM
5

Literally "won't you think of the children" in the scope of "Slut shaming". Work out that calculus for a second.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:00 PM
1

And what happens to smokers and racists isn't at all confined to "social isolation" further - we absolutely do shame smokers and racist and all sorts of "Socially acceptable to shame" individuals, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, young earth creationists, amway/pyramid scheme types, womanizers, extreme capitalists, and many more.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 07:59 PM
7

I don't agree that it's the vast majority- or even majority of men. Statistically speaking if your standard is such that "the vast majority of" anything is below-standard then your expectations of reality are way too high or your perceptions are faulty. That was going to be my original refutation. The thing is not all of your argument is invalid - but then I questioned the validity of debating with someone with your perception (vast majority of men....). I'm not saying lower your standards, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 06:42 PM
0

The vast majority of men are crappy and indistinguishable so from any other. All men are indoctrinated into misogynist groupthink and that’s true regardless of what level they are in society
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 06:32 PM
2

The other issue is that if it's easy for the girl/woman to abstain from sex it means she has either an exceedingly low libido (Rare) or more likely isn't actually attracted to you and you are just a tepid flavor of rip chord.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 07:30 PM
1

Two sets of weaknesses and faults and possibly two sets of different complimentary skills or virtues.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 07:00 AM
1

I made a similar comment a week or so ago. "Boomers think we are entitled and lazy, zoomers blame us for stagnant wages and poor job security and prospects." We functionally get it from both ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 06:52 AM
1

A boomer (Baby boomer) is the generation born from the generation that won WWII. Generally speaking boomers are in their 50s+ these days. (50 is the low end of the curve.). You sound like a gen X - the generation that the offspring of the older boomers sired. - A bit before participation trophies but your parents didn't fight in WWII.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 12:54 AM
3

When speaking about broad concepts it's ok to generalize. When someone asks "Why does [Insert half the population] ... [insert proposition]?" It's impossible to answer without using broad generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 12:25 AM
2

Road trips with their close friends That isn't what you think it is Sparks. It's functionally a cheaper and quicker to organize/pull off version of: Travel around Europe with their close friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 02:59 PM
1

https://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/alton-brown/haggis-recipe-1911083
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 02:55 PM
6

"I travel very often and always up for an adventure." Looks like infidelity is back on the menu boys!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/19 02:39 PM
5

https://imgur.com/6XIAJfG
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 09:06 PM
1

I'd rather go down on a girl three time without any reciprocation for an "earned" 1 BJ without any reciprocation. For me one of the things that kills some acts is the "checklist quid pro quo" The absolute best BJ I ever received was 100% selfless and I couldn't reciprocate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:48 PM
2

I'm a guy, I think the opposite. Well - here. PIV > BJ > PIV with Condom > BJ With Condom > HJ In my head going down on a girl is slightly more intimate than a girl going down on a guy because of the vulnerability to std's and such.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:43 PM
1

Lifting heavy weights isn't a biological need to the point of compulsion. Sex is - for both genders - Women who nearly always have access to sex are severely underestimating the impact it would have on their lives if they could never have it. Your analogy sucks. A better analogy is hunger. Women are always fed so they never experience hunger but if they were to ever without food they would experience hunger (nearly) as acutely as men. Many men are always hungry and nearly all men are hungry at l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:27 PM
1

Nothing you wrote immediately above refutes either the idea that you are unaware of your own privilege or that men's sexual attraction to women in the manner it happens isn't an extreme advantage (privilege) to women. What you wrote isn't even a non-sequitur in the traditional sense. It's just a completely other statement 2 side streets away from the main subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:22 PM
2

Don't even need to - you could then apply that effort to a career and be a shoe-in for every quota starved startup on the west coast. Hell, con some venture capitalist money on nothing but a turtle neck and a "little girls dream" and just aim a bit below impossible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwJyX15R4rQ You could buy your boy toys then and be cheered for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 04:04 PM
1

It's really valuable to me but at the same time I don't negotiate with terrorists. I'll never "bargain" for physical intimacy. This also means I have to end a relationship if the bargaining comes to the table because threatening to end the relationship can be considered coercion by society. You bring quid pro quo into the equation you just ended it without realizing it. I think only one of my relationships ended this way though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:46 PM
12

I've won argument with ex's by having them repeat back to me what they said. I think it's one of those things they hated about me. I wouldn't get mad/feed emotionally into the argument I'd just hold them to rationality. It's a special kind of brooding anger when a woman wants to blame a man but is convinced that she is at fault with her own words (the only way in my experience) but still has the wound up emotions she was expecting to dump on someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:40 PM
3

It will probably change for the worse - with one exception. The pill for men will lessen men's burden but it will make the skewing dating market characteristics today more extreme in the direction they are already going. What few men had some restraint from taking advantage of women due to the potential risks of being latched with paternity obligations will be let off the chain and players and "Chads" will become hyper-charged. One small rebalance is that commitment for women will be harder to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:29 PM
2

If being a young woman "isn't as fun" to that woman it's only because she lacks perspective to her own privilege (I know, I see the irony) and/or lacks the ability to empathize with others. All other things being equal, there is no more a privileged place to be in than a young woman in the western world. Your cake and your ability to eat it too doesn't even have to be worked for - its foisted upon you on a golden platter.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:17 PM
28

He also said women are constantly patting themselves on the back and no one wants to correct them because we all want to fuck-em.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:17 PM
0

when things get bad to the point I'm referencing money isn't worth anything. You can only convince people to protect what they have if they have something valuable to protect. Take a critical mass of men with no future or investment in the future (progeny) and nothing is going to stop them from attacking the aristocracy. They too might burn out (french revolution) but they won't do so without taking heads first. It's in the wealthy's best interest for the average to pair with the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 03:09 PM
1

Know what that's a recipe for? Getting conquered over night by a more belligerent force.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 10:39 PM
1

He didn't say wife - and a wife not having sex with her husband over a long period of time is pretty universally seen as a breach of the marriage contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 10:37 PM
0

This would actually fix the problem faster than you realize. It would create revolution over-night and re-set the system. A top 20% man can best an average man. A top 20% man cannot best two average men. There are more average men than there are 20% men. - this is the math that resets the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 10:35 PM
1

Your ex breaks up with you and within a day is dating her co-worker that she was telling you about for the last month? She was cheating on you. Especially if the breakup comes immediately after a wonderful vacation with each other. Breakups I can handle, you usually see them coming a ways off. When everything is going swimmingly and a break up come out of nowhere followed by an immediate and specific hook-up? Yeah, call it what you want but that's cheating. Human relationships and behavior are n…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 10:08 PM
3

Just a counter point to your above. Every woman who has gotten the tingles for a Chad has "seen a potential future with him."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 09:50 PM
3

Yup, the best thing a person can do for their health is buy a food scale. Once you start consciously counting calories it makes it much easier to portion control and manage your weight. It might seem obvious to some but just because it came out of the box does not mean it's "one serving". Food manufacturers get away with murder by using servings as a way to adjust marketing. Like a candybar being quantified as "2 servings" - you aren't cutting as many calories as you think you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 09:36 PM
1

It's a power/shame thing. Like Fujoshi or shipping canonically heterosexual male characters together with each other. Women are more fucked up in their fantasy appetites than men - men don't hold a candle.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 06:05 PM
1

A stripper that didn't also fall into prostitution? Sure, I wouldn't have an issue with it as long as the job wasn't the limitation on her identity or who she is, interests, hobbies, etc. As long as it's just a "job" like any other. I don't like fake tits though, they are deal breakers for me. One of my friends surprised our social circle by revealing she stripped for a time to make ends meet. It's one of those cases "NO FUCKING WAY, YOU ARE LYING" - I'm not going to reveal more details because …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 05:52 PM
0

Moving those goalposts pretty quickly there... need a hand?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 05:37 PM
1

Feminism and political correctness have largely waged a culture war against both genders but the one's that it had the most sway over have been women. Feminism and PC culture over the last 50 some odd years have convinced women that they will be happier as men. Surprise, they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 05:20 PM
1

I'm saying just because Cosmo or Forbes writes a glowing piece about how great it is to be a career woman and how SAHD's are sexy does not all of a sudden change our genetic sequencing in what turns us on and off. A man producing less or even the same amount as his prospective mate is a mood killer because women have it written into them the realization that they are vulnerable and less capable compared to men. This is how our species simply is. Women are attracted to ability to procure resource…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 05:13 PM
2

50,000+ years of evolution does though, and there is no re-writing that in a generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 05:00 PM
5

I now want an Idiocracy sequel that embraces the madness of social media and dating apps.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/10/19 08:27 PM
9

It's funny, I read your first paragraph then started typing out a long reply, then read the rest to continue the replies - My rant was essentially your last paragraph beat for beat, lead in and conclusion. I wrote that boredom's counterpoint is curiosity and bored people in 2019 aren't actually bored, they are lazy. We live in the best moment in all of recorded human history for people who are "bored" - you can learn about absolutely anything at a moment's notice 24/7 for virtually nothing and d…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/10/19 08:26 PM
6

Oh boy... so, I ain't tackling all of that so I'll just tackle one. Incel - angry misogynistic douchebags who are unable to get a sexual or romantic partner. Depends on the person using the lable and who they are describing. Technically all "Incel" means is "involuntarily celibate". Simply meaning (men) who have a libido not being able to be physically intimate with the gender they are attracted to due to usually the lack of interest from the other gender as a general whole. Now there are differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 07:50 PM
2

Wait, Canada doesn't have no-fault divorce? Just looked it up on wikipedia In Canada before 1968, the only grounds for divorce were adultery or cruelty. However, in 1968, the Divorce Act was amended to permit divorce for other reasons, including physical and mental cruelty and separation for at least 3 years. The Divorce Act was amended in 1986 to reduce the separation period to one year, with no requirement to prove "fault" by either spouse. The fault grounds for divorce are also available. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 07:31 PM
2

breaking either side of the monogamy contact is infidelity. That's a really great way of framing it that I'm stealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 07:31 PM
7

I think they meant "doomed to be", that's how I interpreted the imprecise comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 07:09 PM
1

Yeah, the guy didn't just lose a fiance, he lost a child and a brother. It would have been easier to weather a parent's death than what happened to him. When I read the initial entry the first time I got a pit in my stomach, an adrenaline rush and a chill down my spine for the entire last third. further down in the comments there was a flippant off-hand comment about murder then someone else linked a second story (news source) where that exact thing happened, one brother murdered the other/famil…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:56 PM
2

just found it. https://old.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/d27ww9/aita_for_wanting_to_forgive_one_brother_for/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:12 PM
3

There was a pretty epic "AITA" a month or so back dealing with exactly this. Brother cucks brother who is about to get married. Entire family ends up a warzone. About to get married brother's fiance was with child at the time. The AITA post was by a sister that wanted the cucked brother to "just get over it". It was fucking hilarious and sad at the same time. Thankfully I only have a sister so I don't have to deal with this theoretical - but from the responses in the AITA thread - it was very ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:09 PM
1

No. There are pockets of "old reddit" that spring up from time to time. It's usually when a community gets enough participation and traction to be constantly active but is small enough that "one side" or "the other" doesn't drive the minority out and the sub gets "hiveminded". They aren't very common and they have a limited lifespan. Such a place is here (for now) and there are some great exchanges here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 05:00 PM
-1

Have you not encountered the absolute deluge of male-bashing "CMV's" that happen daily when it's not purge week? Yes, yes there are women on here, actually, I'm constantly surprised at how high the ratio is at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:14 AM
2

I am almost positive they have been and I believe (long ago) I even read some comparative ones, and you are correct, co-parenting even in two households is preferential to single parenthood. Intact to-parent household > co-parenting "broken" home from two locations > Single parenting
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 06:19 PM
1

My line of questioning was mainly designed to confront Preaddly's perspective the women need men like a fish needs a bicycle by framing the aspect of child welfare and well being and she anticipated this and dodged the question. The questioning was not a lead in to a solution to fathers who abandon. I don't know the stats off the top of my head but I would imagine married couples with kids have a lower rate of father abandonment than unmarried couples with kids. While not the singular solution t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 06:11 PM
1

It's very likely to happen. Google, MS, Apple and Amazon have all employed teams of writers and psychologists to better engineer their respective "voice AI's" to be more personable and less robotic and it's working. The "AI" in Ex Machina, Her and the latest Blade Runner films - in their "personality" and interactions/interactivity and adaptability to a single person is much closer to reality than people realize - amazing really. We will likely have "AI" that is indistinguishable from the depict…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 05:55 PM
1

https://abcnews.go.com/us/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 03:31 PM
1

This could be worked into a bitching SCP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 03:19 PM
2

Read the rest of the comment chain where I'm replying to her. She is arguing in bad faith or a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 03:01 PM
3

Know the great thing about this exchange and in you dodging the question thrice? Anyone reading this comment chain knows, I know, and the greatest bit, even you know you are wrong in this case and you aren't fooling anyone. Thanks for answering the question, I'm satisfied with the fault in your logic that it exposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:39 PM
2

You still didn't answer the question and are now spouting off fabrications that are patently false. There is a large amount of data out there about single parenthood and child development, no matter your political allegiances, and it has shown time and time again that a two parent household is better than a single parent household for children. Presuming, for the sake of the argument that the above is true, do you believe women shouldn't be responsible for the well-being of their kids if they ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:35 PM
2

You dodged the question and answered one I didn't ask. I can't speak to how it was used politically against welfare but that's not to what I'm speaking. Single motherhood among all ethnicities (except Asian I think) in the United States is on the rise and not all of it is within the financial margins of welfare. Even outside the margins of welfare single parenthood is still the largest and strongest determining factor in a child's future prospects, two parent household being the best, single par…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:27 PM
-1

less than half of new couples That's not how statistics work. Of all of the space shuttles that launched none ever exploded t+10 seconds from lift-off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:13 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmc21V-zBq0
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:09 PM
2

Fatherlessness/single motherhood is on the rise to a significant and alarming degree. This has been show to be the largest determining factor to a child's success in life (whether they had a two parent household). This is almost certainly linked to how dating has changed in the last 20 years. Do you believe women shouldn't be responsible to the well-being of their kids if they choose to have them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 02:09 PM
5

You make no sense, you suggest women should achieve everything on their own because they can and should and there is nothing a man can give her. Then you toss out a weird straw man about men expecting "something for nothing". Then call them rediculous idiots. Ok. If women don't need anything and there is nothing a man can do for her or give her... then how exactly do you see a relationships between the opposite sexes forming? Describe the "ideal" way you see a relationship happening between a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 01:52 PM
2

Ok, here, let me take some honey and syrup, put it in a pan, then reduce it further so I can lay it on extra thick.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 11:01 AM
2

I disagree with your latter conclusion but agree with the minutia. I think it's slightly different, at least from what I've observed. It's a case of the only times people debate is when the outcome of the deliberation is low risk and doesn't matter. With broader perspectives or broader analysis of data one or both sides "talk past each other", not because they agree, but because it's likely obvious to both in two ways. One side sees the shameful forest and wants to pretend it's not there (talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 10:57 AM
4

The empathy gap concerning men will likely be a large factor many are not taking into account. It's easier for both genders to "look the other way" to men's plight so if they are doing poorly it has to get really bad before anything is even discussed about doing something about it. Want proof? It's already happening before our very eyes. Boys have been behind in schools and college since at least the mid 90's, yet even today there are more efforts to help women and girls in education than there …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 10:49 AM
1

"A will to branch swing" is an oxymoron. Branch swinging is the opposite of risk-taking so "Will" has nothing to do with it. That's like saying you can't blame soldiers for having the will to break ranks and retreat. It's the path of least resistance, no mental effort needed. Also, anyone curious about this thread should look up "Hardcore History" podcast and their "Wrath of the Khans" series - it's functionally a dynasty's volume of data-points concerning this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 05:26 AM
2

I respect Atlas_b_shruggin. To date they are at +21 with my RES tag (they have a net +21 upvote tally with me). The reason why I respect them is that they tend to be honest/logical in-spite of their conflict of interest. A lot of what they write feels like they want to lash out at incels or something, like most of the women on the board, just looking to bash men - but Atlas_B is different. They argue the core of at least the majority of points and don't dismiss, twist, or ignore reality even if …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 04:31 AM
1

When they said "girls dating the uggos FIRST" they meant "all the other girls dated the uggos FIRST., I on the other hand found my true love, he is so smart, and charming, and kind, I don't like him just because of his good looks." Control: *"HMSTR-VII, we have good telemetry on the board, stage 1 is a go." HMSTR-VII: "Control, that's a roger, initiating stage one separation, I truly love him for who he is, not what he looks like despite only going out with him for a week. Stage 1 separation com…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 04:15 AM
3

Your point was what I was going to explain. Women generally avoid direct confrontation so many "shallow" platitudes are just different forms of soft rejection. Too much of this soft rejection is categorized as women stringing men along. A beta orbiter orbits by their on volition. A beta orbiter is functionally a man who has never matured past adolescence in the realm of rejection and so deludes themselves into thinking the "soft rejection" was an actual sincere "maybe." This doesn't discount the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 04:05 AM
3

That presumes symmetrical zero-sum supply of the opportunity to cheat. A single man can sleep with more than one woman, and is actually inclined to given the opportunity. Because your wife only finds 20% of men attractive does not mean there is a linear correlation to her likelihood of cheating (all other things being equal, this is of course setting aside things like personal accountability, loyalty and morals of said woman, just because a woman can cheat doesn't mean she will, obviously). This…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 03:56 AM
5

Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father, prepare to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 03:42 AM
1

I'm wondering if the irony is lost on you that you just cited the two most egregious self-insert fanfics to have been written in the last 10 years as a counter-point. The plane janes in those works are plane janes because they are meant to be empty molds. Twilight was unironically a fanfic of Harry Potter. 50 Shades was unironically a fanfic of Twilight.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 06:54 PM
1

My generation of men thought an n-count in the teens was high for wife material.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 06:46 PM
1

No, I don't. In the animal kingdom evolution is king. Some species have evolved a strategy of monogamy while others polygamy - there are variations in-between. The evolution of civilizations has long-ago solved the issue of "what is better, polygamy or monogamy?" - and in-spite of our human nature the stability of the most successful civilizations was generally buttressed with some system of monogamy. This is a really rough take - but essentially men without mates, if they achieve critical mass …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 06:03 PM
3

I disagree - but respectfully, and I also believe it's weighted depending on your gender. Men take physical infidelity worse than emotional infidelity (but the latter, if discovered is immediately converted into the presumptive former). I cannot speak for women as I'm not one - but the difference in a man's perception of paternity and a woman's perception of maternity could be the core divide in the perception. Men are never 100% sure it's theirs unless they had her locked up (well, except with …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:08 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean, can you re-phrase the Q or possibly use an example?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 04:45 PM
2

Being attracted to healthy members of the opposite sex is programmed into us. Youth is one of the if not the primary indicator of health. The concept of fidelity and monogamy is not naturally ingrained into the primate species (although it varies to what degree within it). Humans fall somewhere between Chimpanzees (absolute debauchery 24/7) and Gorillas (Fairly Monogamous, but by rule of force harem style). Modern civilization's concept of monogamy (marriage) is a societal stabilization techniqu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 12:34 PM
12

straw stuffed effigy wrapped in a skin of hyperbole spray painted with a good coat or two of histrionics. Let me break it down. It is not unreasonable for either gender to expect a prospective long-term romantic partner to have Loyalty Basic manners (etiquette, aka decorum. you can also throw "charm" in here since you are being hyperbolic) It's also not unreasonable for either gender to reject the extremes of promiscuity, obesity, promiscuity (you list this both under sex and fun as a euphemism)…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 12:16 PM
2

The "BMI is shit" meme is in-itself shit. anyone who is affected by the possible contradiction of height vs. weight BMI metric is no where near being mistaken for being fat or unhealthy. It's a two-fold compounding issue. It's not just that muscle can account for mass the same as fat - it can't. Muscle is more dense than fat - significantly more dense - so it becomes very apparent on which side of the possible conflict a given individual resides. Or the short version - "If you are wondering if y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 07:56 PM
1

Just a note - 3 days late but your answer/reply was read. I think the difference between partner and stranger is moot - A stranger going through the process of becoming a partner gets vetted and you either consciously or sub-conciously evaluate who they are (and what their flaws might be). My initial response from you was drawn out by the phrasing of your first sentence in the OP I replied to. After coming back 3 days later it still reads as my first impression. Correct me if I'm wrong but it sm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 07:48 PM
1

As a woman I don't consider it my responsibility to validate someone for any perceived "flaws" they have. I don't see anything wrong with your perspective - however quoted above can be read a few ways but I think I know which way you intend for it to be red - so follow up question for clarification (and it's not really important actually, just shooting the shit, if you will). Every human has flaws, especially when weighed against the subjective and ever varying expectations of other humans. I co…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 04:47 AM
6

I wrote something similar a month or so ago. One of the issues of a high n-count is that a woman will "price herself out of happiness". Ignorance in a lot of cases is bliss. You will not miss or lament not having something you never knew existed. A high N-count woman is an easy target for never being content with any one partner no matter how great that single partner because they will never be able to compare to all the highlights of the best aspects of all her previous partners. It's like what…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 04:43 AM
1

The philosophical argument that allows this court ruling is the following. Man doesn't understand consent goes after a woman. The woman happens to want to be involved with the man who happens to not understand consent. No one is hurt and nothing illegal happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:05 PM
4

Women don't like being rejected. No one likes being rejected. Women are the bottleneck and gatekeepers and choosers in the relationship/sex realm. Since you are buy what they are selling they get to set the price, the tax on that price is that you need to escalate so they can reserve the right to "not be rejected" at any point while also reserving the right to "reject" at any point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:01 PM
1

I don't care about the fairness of the dating world -but I understand and empathize with those who view it that way. It's a fun thought experiment. Generally speaking, an easy fix to "make the dating world fair" would be the cessation of all forms of modern birth control including abortion. Within a generation the "dating world" would become a more level playing field. Sex becomes a much bigger risk, getting pregnant becomes a real possibility, women will become more choosy initially but they wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 12:27 PM
1

Yes. Absolutely. I have a younger but close in age sister and had a "purple pill" type debate with her a few months back when I was visiting her and my niece. I framed an example where if a woman dated and married a series of men and they all, through no action of her own, fell ill and died just by happenstance, be it cancer, a car accident, whatever - and she had a high-n count, -other than the bad luck that follows her around, I'd not have an issue purusing a relationship with her all other th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:35 PM
0

Women lack the ability to empathize with others? I doubt it. If "women" -in general claim it's because of a minority of guys as to why they act so cold to all they are either 1. Using it as an excuse to defer appearing to be shallow. or 2. consistently picking the wrong guys. Or are you suggesting all guys are like that? The math doesn't work out in your reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:23 PM
2

Oooh, I have a response for this one from 2 months ago. group of 20 people on an Island. 10 men, 10 women. 1 guy fucks all 10 women weekly, the 9 other guys get to fuck one of the women once on their time on the island. They are all there for 50 weeks. The "women" as a group are having more sex than the "men" as a group by any sensible understanding of sexual behavior and needs. "Having sex" and "Having more sex" has a time component to it that isn't reflected in the hard math of the statistics …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:21 PM
1

There were still social pressures that served the same function. Women might not have been stoned but they would be spoken about negatively among the neighborhood. That's another thing - social circles were much closer nit compared to today. There was no internet to anonymize "bad" behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 12:01 PM
1

Traditionalist societies didn't need to be more red-pilled because there were overarching societal controls and pressures that "solved" a lot of the issues "red pill" thinking attempts to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 11:59 AM
36

The vast majority of "flip the genders" comparisons don't make sense. "If the genders were flipped" - we would be exactly as we are. Men's sex drive is derived from the "Spray and pray" aspect of our reproductive biology which then informs our reproductive instinct. Men on average have higher sex drives compared to women because Men have minimal risk in the procreation game are functionally in estrus 24/7 They can always gets someone pregnant. Women cannot always get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 11:41 AM
2

Ok - so, you are presuming bad faith from anyone who is presumptively male. Then why participate on the board? Or are you seeking only to "Debate" with other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 08:16 PM
6

Women are the gatekeepers. The only thing that can stop the eligable bad boys from sleeping around with scores of women are the women. The genie came out of the bottle at the behest of women so only they can put it back in the bottle (without some sort of societal collapse and re-ordering). You can't even "slut shame" anymore - that's how bad it has gotten.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 06:54 PM
2

They probably do. Why presume bad faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 06:48 PM
1

Women waiting for marriage? Yeah, it's extremely rare outside of fundamentalist sub-cultures and even then families start younger than in the general western population. Married by 20-22 if not younger. I more laid out the 3 situations to clearly delineate the "Values" distinction, or the intent distinction. It's not that an individual is a virgin or not - it's more is that person trying to have their cake and eat it too which then speaks to how selfless or selfish an individual is (either gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 04:27 PM
0

This isn't a question for conservatives. This is a rant. One scentence has a question mark. All the other 5 do not. Why do you believe woman's traditional gender roles are more flexible and shouldn't be enforced, while male gender roles should absolutely inherently be enforced either legally or socially (conscription, protecting, providing, etc)? Because women are inherently privileged in the evolutionary sense - in that both genders have evolved to want to protect them. This is because of the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 03:27 AM
1

Would you be upset or grateful? Grateful for a list of demands? I didn't see a single thing that the hypothetical woman was bringing "extra" to the table. Further. Dating a woman who suddenly changes the deal after the relationship has started or is established is significantly different to a woman who as a condition of the relationship lays out her expectations up front. I would date a woman who wanted to wait until marriage for sex. I would date a woman who was fine with being intimate before …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 03:12 AM
3

"better to have love and lost than to never have loved at all" was written in a time before no-fault divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 02:30 AM
14

I don't think that women are in denial, but they rightly focus on the negatives of this "privilege" that they have rightly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU wrongly
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 03:25 AM
0

I believe that women who spend their 20s enjoying their lives are 1) not all wracking up 200+ partner counts and 2) have every right to live a life they want and are not accountable to you or anyone else. You did. And I said "200" shouldn't be the low bar where men are justified in sounding alarm bells - more or less. Ok, I read the rest - you are arguing in bad faith. I don't care at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 11:53 PM
0

Then I guess I’m not up on the latest slang. Any millennials here want to weight in? Is this what it means to most of you? If you want the truth of the matter, don't ask the board. Two divisive sides will answer in such a way that will suit their own agendas through the answers. Want the truth in good faith? Ask a mother with a 16 year old daughter what she would think of her daughter running off to Europe (if in US) to "Find herself". Ok, Now ask the father of that daughter. That will get you y…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 11:33 PM
2

"Finding yourself" for at leas the last 20-30 years has taken on identity of a euphemism that roughly translates to "I'm going out to sleep with a lot of people while potentially also doing other things." It's functionally sexual "Carpe diem." Someone who uses the term "finding myself" to mean something other than being open primarily to sexual exploration is in the minority. Even the OP implies it's sexual in nature. If the definition the OP meant meant anything other than "sexual exploration a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 11:03 PM
5

A 6 is a chad to a 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 10:23 PM
1

Stepdad learned he had half siblings in Australia decades after his dad died.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 09:59 PM
5

Would you say men wanting a significant other to start a family with to not have a long list of past lovers are being unreasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 09:43 PM
2

I would, absolutely. - except for those where the ring might be a health risk - and should be put on after work. (working with heavy machinery, or wherever it might be an issue. Men's rings tend to be thicker and stronger than women's rings so are harder to cut in an emergency) - the workplace safety thing is an edge case however.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 08:51 AM
1

Concerning B. If only there were an easily visible almost culturally and geographically universal visual cue that has been used for thousands of years to signify a woman being a wife of another man. There is no B. Unless your wife herself is being disrespectful to you and forgot that visual cue on her nightstand.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/19 04:09 AM
10

This is what happens when new societal norms convinces people they are not adults in their 20's and don't need to take life seriously. They get this mentality that "adulthood" starts at 29, you know, when you need to get married and settle down. Between the ages of ~16 and 28 is when you are supposed to sample as much cock as possible because you go girl... slaaaaaay queen slaaaaaay. Also, I remember when I was in my very early 20's and late teens hearing about people (women) "Finding themselves…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/19 08:24 AM
4

Had it in the can before I got to your comment
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 01:29 AM
2

They must mean "Rare-er" ... you know... in 60% of cases instead of 80 like it used to be. That said, I do know of women who have had to pay alimony to the husband, but have no idea about the details (distant cousin)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 07:50 PM
2

but I reserve the right to flake out and ghost you for a week/weekend where I see if I could work it out with "complicated."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 08:36 AM
1

And one more addition - sorry to keep going on. I have thought a lot about RvW and the abortion debate over the years and have been on both sides of the equation, even personally - with friends seeking guidance in the issue when the issue came up for them personally. Ok, so, I get the spirit of what you were closing with. "we should" -> go into law and change something so it's enshrined. There is no where near enough consensus on the issue for that to ever happen under the structure of the US go…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 04:08 AM
1

Just a note - if you are curious and have the time you can listen to the actual oral arguments of Roe v Wade before the supreme court. There is an invaluable resource Oyez.org - which is an archive of all SCOTUS cases. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18 That's the direct link to Roe v Wade and the audio stream is on the left side. Invaluable if you are doing anything law related in Uni. Another ruling should clarify whether abortion is “intending to do harm to others” and hopefully a case com…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 03:31 AM
5

TIL Muhammad had a BPD wife.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/19 10:35 PM
3

I'm neither for nor against Roe v Wade, or rather, I've heard sound compelling arguments on both sides that aren't pertinent to what I'm about to state - but Roe v. Wade is not secure. In the legal community it's seen as a shaky ruling that could be easily overturned if challenged from a different angle. It's no where near as secure of a ruling as, say, Brown vs. Board of education. In the last 20+ or so years Roe v. Wade has been twisted into the notion of "my body my choice" as the "legal" jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:00 PM
1

There zero evidence to suggest this is the case. It's TRP/incel revenge porn. "Here is a study by a university" equivocating equivocating goal post moving equivocating.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 09:37 PM
4

One of the infamous classic examples. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaC-2lj6HNg Divorce meat starts at 11:40ish
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 09:10 PM
2

Woman has multiple children from multiple fathers. Polygamy is now legal?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 11:19 AM
1

I'm not redpill myself - far from it (been arguing with them for years) but I think your OP title question is a great one actually - and I think I can give a guess/perspective. It's because "pro men" or rather any data that is "anti-women" or - more specifically, any data that frames women in anything other than an absolutely flattering light is so extremely rare, and if it happens is often enough suppressed (even the OKC blog post has been sicne deleted and most articles on it also deleted) - t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 12:00 AM
0

That is a loooooot of extrapolation from very little and tangential data. You are proposing an interpretation based on a conclusion on data you are likely mis-reading. I've been studying family law and all the stats that surround it for a good 2 decades now and I couldn't come to your conclusion - for or against with all the data I've gathered. If I had a few grants I know how I'd set up studies for it and what data to look for that might answer your proposition - but I can assure you it's not o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:55 PM
6

I don't know when it happened but for a little while now PPD has become very one sided in perspectives, it continues to list that way to the point now I see rather consistent and accepted man hating/man blaming. I've been reading less of it because a lot of the thread subjects appear to be women just circle jerking with other women in a way to bash men under the guise of "change my view" or some sort of "when did you stop beating your wife" complex question. Not all threads are like this, there …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:50 PM
2

There is just a barrel of lube with a basting brush in it by the bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:44 PM
3

Agree - but it's sort of both. I think oneprettycoolcat could have said it better by stating "All women can be convinced to sleep with an attractive enough man soon after meeting him" From the attractive man's perspective who pumps then dumps - it's casual sex. To the woman not looking for casual sex it's a serendipitous meeting that for some weird reason didn't go anywhere, what did she do wrong, she thought they made a connection? Does the quoted portion remind you of anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:42 PM
5

The math and equation is wrong in the OP (and video's) premise. She isn't securing commitment, she is securing a pump and dump. They are using the euphemism "Dating" to play the shell game. No one is swiping right on her thinking about a future family. She is just a unique form of interactive fleshlight. Further - something about the scale of numbers - I'm not a math major so I can't recall it off the top of my head - but in population samples of hundreds of thousands, yeah, I believe she could …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:36 PM
1

And back it up with divorce if these women aren't willing to do that. "Here, have half my stuff because we aren't working out because you are being duplicitous in your nature." lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:22 PM
4

Women initiate roughly 80% of the Divorces in the west. This has been the case for decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 11:14 PM
2

for the reason of holding boys back That doesn't exist. There are lobbies, and there are lobbies that lobby against funding or things that will specifically help boys, but it's always framed as "helping girls" or "preventing unfairness". They never explicitly state "holding boys back" as the goal. You know this, that's why you included it in your qualifier. -All of the above - inspite of boys being behind for almost 3 decades now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 09:35 AM
1

Feminism doesn't touch or care about those things in reality, at least it doesn't actively lobby against them. What will you wager if I can prove this wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:48 AM
1

Your callous and flippant dismissal just saddens me at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:35 AM
3

Since the late 90's women and girls have been ahead of men in boys in education on a systemic level. A level that has been suppressed so institutions and governments in the west can put more weight on the scales in favor of women and girls. Over 20 years this has been going on. You want to blame someone for the drought of male earners - blame feminism and the status quo that has been pushed for as long. .. unless you believe education has nothing to do with earning potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:12 AM
1

The answer is a deafening "no" anyone arguing otherwise isn't paying attention or has their head in the sand. I find it extremely entertaining however. It's not just one thing that is going to "crash" the courtship economy - it's multiple things. OLD/Dating apps and the idealized culture that they are generating Increased promiscuity they enable Cultural shift, HUGE cultural shift in attitudes towards sex, commitment and even pregnancy and child rearing A larger sexual revolution than even what …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:03 AM
0

eveyone is tippy toeing around the obvious. The OKC study is infamous at this point so everyone reading this knows the data. Any missing data, if there is any - is chiefly income. That's the only pertinent piece missing from the data and it might have been there at the time (just not quantified.) In any case the perception is still skewed. A "7/10" guy with no information has the same amount of possibility of the "rest of the package" being in line with his looks as anyone. Just because it's an …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 07:28 AM
3

For men it's a nice deal compared to the past, for women too - or it seems that way. For men the rejection is nearly painless, sometimes invisible depending on the platform. For women, it's a case of an enjoyment of choice where the variety is a quality unto itself. I doubt humanity can back away from this phenomenon without some really drastic shift.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 07:23 AM
2

There are regional accents in the US. Many of the states below the Mason-Dixon line have a particular regional twang that is part unique to the state/region and part homogeneous to "the south." An example of this is Helen Smith, a highly educated woman who I was transcribing once and I "guessed" a Tennessee accent with no other information. Turned out she had a Tennessee accent. I myself did not grow up in the south nor do I have a southern accent (mine is generically American but neutral). I sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 05:32 AM
1

Profile photo with a clearly visible swastika tattoo? dem Jokes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 05:04 PM
3

Tom Leykis was preaching your point 2 decades ago. Don't take women out for dinner. Ask her when she is having dinner, when she answers, lets say 6, you then respond with "great, I'll pick you up for drinks at 8." Paying for dinner started being the losing side of a suckers bet sometime in the 90's. Courtship etiquette in previous eras had a give and take. It wasn't blindly "paying for dinner" as a roll of the dice like it's represented as today. I did a write up on it in response a week or two …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:48 PM
1

That is a lie. Women initiate 80% of the divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:42 PM
2

+1day reply. Another note, at least in all my circles - men look down significantly on other men who abandone in bad faith any of their commitments, be it a wife who was with them through the rougher years or their children. You never see men celebrated for "trading in for a new model" -unless it was the woman who took advantage (cheated, left him, etc). I've got a few instances of men behaving selfishly and out of all my social circles they are all universally looked down on with scorn and dist…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:41 PM
1

Late retort/reply (2 day) You are strongly inferring that if a woman does not have her youth she should be ignored wholesale no matter the deliberation. You are also suggesting that the only logical "exchange" is older gainful men pursuing youthful women. Or am I getting something wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:36 PM
4

cue fake pedophile twitter accounts openly talking about their crimes to pick up chicks. The caveat? They were hot. Attractiveness is far more of a factor as to what women will put up with from a guy than people want to admit. https://thechive.com/2017/08/10/guy-poses-as-pedophile-on-tinder-and-it-doesnt-deter-women-one-ounce-13-photos/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:18 PM
3

So stupid that they read past the broadstrokes and post-modernism it up to be in support for their position. Logic should be a viable tool when debating "the woke crowd" - but in my experience it never has been - to a paint drying mind numbing degree. Don't underestimate just how willfully ignorant a feminist can be when confronted with reality - or even data analysis of reality. Those grey hairs grew in a long time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:33 PM
4

Who says he is trying to be a slut?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:27 PM
3

As a fan of Pinker and Peterson I never made that connection. It's something I'll have to think about. I'd even dispute the Pinker association. I've read a couple of his books and watched some of his lectures/debates before - I was also aware of the manosphere since about 2000 and Pinker and it never really crossed streams (I learned of pinker chiefly from Uni but kept up with him afterward). I think Peterson being against feminism is incidental to the manosphere, I mean, he says so about relate…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:23 PM
4

Before the internet men were experiencing essentially the same things they are experiencing now to one extent or another. The difference is before the internet it was harder to compare notes and find commonalities outside of extreme cases that became publicly known. Divorce jokes existed before the internet. As did jokes about the differences between men and women As did "manosphere" type jokes. But a lot of them lacked any context as to how the came to be. The specific testimonial of burdened i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:10 PM
2

I think you need to read between the lines. You read her question then asked it again to yourself the way you would ask the question. You aren't empathizing with the other person. The purpose of her question was "Are you looking for something long term or short term" -is my guess, but I didn't see the rest of the conversation. Empathizing with who I suspect you are the right answer would be "I'm trying (tinder?) out to see if I can find something short term that might turn into something long te…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:59 PM
1

Ah, I read it wrong - in which case I don't have an opinion as it stands as I've seen the opposite data (higher earnings disparity - higher divorce rate). I don't know which data or if either is valid in this case. An example of such data https://www.theladders.com/career-advice/survey-when-women-get-promoted-to-the-top-job-they-double-their-chances-of-a-divorce But I've seen tangentially related others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:52 PM
2

We are descended from 80% of the women who have ever existed in Human history. 80% of the women who have ever existed have offspring alive today. That number for men? 40%
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:34 PM
1

So the result is as I expected - women might be marrying men with lower earnings/earning potential, but they aren't happy about it. Ok? -Edit, and thanks for the follow up answer. It is appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:28 PM
2

What are the follow up divorce rates in those relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:12 PM
1

Best revenge is to just politely keep her at arms length at a minimum because it will chew at her that you are giving her nothing to vilify you with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 12:58 AM
3

I've been treated as both by two different women at the same time. It was rather amusing and eye opening. I didn't treat either woman differently and was even loyal. Friends with one that was coming onto me hard while presumptively cheating on her husband while my GF was looking for the fire exit because of the "booooooooored" issue. That particular era of my life taught me two things. 1. Don't ever design for a relationship with a woman who cannot entertain herself. 2. AWALT, even the 80 year o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/19 11:59 PM
1

I think it's more a "Theory" vs. "Practice" thing. You need to expearience itself because we are designed by evolution to want to love and trust women as a matter of primary means to procreate. You aren't re-wiring 50000+ years of conditioning without some shock to the system. At least without being raise to be a complete misogynist but that's just brainwashing/indoctrination then. I can never describe a steak in enough detail to you for you to understand what it tastes like if you have never ha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/19 11:52 PM
1

What flavor of tootsie roll was inside the tootsie pop would contribute to the nervousness of the "Scare." Might also be a reason why she shagged hard after coming home, part guilt, part plausible deniability.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/19 11:47 PM
2

You are missing the step where she casually "hey, what's up" and will try and tangentially reconnect with you by first referencing a good memory, likely from early in the relationship. "Remember that Christmas where...." Expect it. It's coming. She will circle around, especially when enough time has passed to where she forgets the in the moment justification for leaving you. I've never not had a woman who broke up with me (and some I broke up with) not circle back around at least once to "test t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/19 11:39 PM
1

I revealed this concept/quote to my sister. She had no retort or defense. She pensively thought about it for a noticeable silent length and sort of just accepted it as a perspective on women she never heard before and couldn't refute. Just as a datapoint out there for guys looking for some sort of objective corroboration.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/19 11:35 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za7jQ1s1BV0
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 04:01 PM
-2

In the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's newstands around the world were filled with porn mags that advertised "Barely _______" People can hem and haw and pretend to pearl clutch at the Epstein thing and all of that - but this is so fucking stupid to argue. Lets un-pearl-clutch the argument for a bit. Ignore 16 year olds. Make the argument easier. Take your average 18 year old and your average 33 year old. Hell, take your average 33 year old and Ask them personally when *they themselves were hotter, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 11:27 AM
0

The difference being you don't give a BJ in the car as a matter of societal obligation after the paid for dinner, nor should you be expected to. Paying for dinners in the past was different compared to the modern day because in the past relationships grew chiefly out of your social circles. Paying for dinner on a first date in 1970 is not at all the same thing as paying for dinner on a first date in 2019. In 1970 someone "taking advantage" of the societal norm would quickly be outed as some sort…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 06:13 AM
2

Tangential question - if you are asking "Where are you" to a presumably departed demographic - ummm... well, yeah, the equation doesn't compute.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 04:41 AM
3

In your case I'd think it was the opposite. They had you pegged as a plate and your character flipped that on its head after the fact. We are all still human after all. The guys who sought something short term with you could have been wrong with the kind of character they thought you had. Just an idea and another equation that fits into the problem. -My sister is sort of like this. On the surface she is one way - her looks "force" a set of judgements on her that one simply cannot defeat easily -…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 03:00 AM
1

I know, that's why I was saying he was being charitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 02:51 AM
1

16 year old girls Unfortunately I think you are being charitable there. In some states and most countries that wouldn't have been an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:17 AM
3

That's possible. I was/am viewing the images on large monitor. her arms are severely under-developed. That was the biggest tell. I've been with skinny chicks, they still have biceps and forearms.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/08/19 12:12 AM
2

On the societal level that's not the equation. Currently through the confluence of quite a few things an environment that reject monogomy is being created (has been created) in the west. This is just stage one of a process that will unfold over the next few generations. No one is telling young women that they need to be with a man. Just the opposite, they are telling young women they can be with any man they want to - but the equation doesn't balance. The opposite message ot the other gender, me…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 12:43 AM
1

example that popped into my head. Swatting. Outcast lashing out against relativistic "alphas" using other means.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 12:35 AM
3

Yeah, no, as others have pointed out look at her wrist size compared to the rest of her arm. Also her eyes are sunken and you can make out her cranium through the skin, especially her zygomatic (cheek bone). They aren't supposed to be that pronounced. She definitely has an eating disorder. Just because there is an obesity epidemic doesn't mean anorexia doesn't exist anymore.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/19 12:10 AM
15

I've read this copypasta before.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/19 11:58 PM
2

I've always wanted a family - but in that perspective I wanted a partner to have and raise the family with. If I could not raise a family with a partner I would not opt to have a family to raise as it's a severe detriment to the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 03:21 AM
1

I'd have no complaints with 3 times a week in a steady relationship and I'd be able to tolerate once a week for a time - however once a week is a red flag to me that something is wrong with the relationship. More than 3 probably on things like vacations or special events/seasons. 3 times a week I see as an "Average" that things are fine. I have a very low tolerance for "transactional" intimacy and there isn't a frequency that will off-set the turn off a partner holding sex hostage is. The moment…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 03:17 AM
2

It is not all the same to teenagers - maybe it was all the same to you when you were a teenager though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/19 10:25 PM
1

So ok for you to travel, but not women because women you don’t know, the vast majority of whom you’ll never date, lol wut? No where did I make a judgement call of who can travel where or for what? MIGHT have a fling with foreign Chad overseas? the lady doth protest too much methinks Yes, please tell me it isn’t about controlling women’s sexuality again. Again, what? No where did I write anything about what women should or shouldn't do. Are you sure you are debating with the right thread of comme…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:29 AM
1

sex tourism =/= women vacationing over seas and getting laid because "what happens in x stays in x." Which is very much a common thing. Sex tourism is something else and is very much more a male thing than a female thing but both partake in it. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2401788/Sex-tourism-Meet-middle-aged-middle-class-women-Britains-female-sex-tourists.html Don't conflate the two (vacationing with the option of flings and sex tourism). This seems like a huge assumption. Obvious…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 06:08 PM
1

Good eats was the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 05:40 PM
1

https://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/alton-brown/haggis-recipe-1911083
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:56 PM
1

That distinction, I believe, is the "core" of what the average person means when they say "women have more sex than men".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:58 PM
3

I have had the great fortune of being able to travel the world over. My sister truly loves to travel as a hobby. Most people who say "they love to travel" "love to travel" when someone else is paying for it. very few people who say they love to travel will commit the majority of their disposable income to actually traveling. They will be happy to use other people's disposable income to travel however. There is a difference between a profile that say "I love to ride motorocycles" and one that say…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:54 PM
1

Which would you rather have? 100 sexual encounters in a year then never again or a maximum of 50 sexual encounters over the rest of your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:47 PM
3

Another - better explanation. group of 20 people on an Island. 10 men, 10 women. 1 guy fucks all 10 women weekly, the 9 other guys get to fuck one of the women once on their time on the island. They are all there for 50 weeks. The "women" as a group are having more sex than the "men" as a group by any sensible understanding of sexual behavior and needs. "Having sex" and "Having more sex" has a time component to it that isn't reflected in the hard math of the statistics and for some reason people…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:33 PM
1

That's conflating novelty or partner with amount of sex. group of 20 people on an Island. 10 men, 10 women. 1 guy fucks all 10 women weekly, the 9 other guys get to fuck one of the women once on their time on the island. They are all there for 50 weeks. The "women" as a group are having more sex than the "men" as a group by any sensible understanding of sexual behavior and needs. "Having sex" and "Having more sex" has a time component to it that isn't reflected in the hard math of the statistics…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:31 PM
3

more women are sexually active. woman can't be having more sex with men than men have with women it doesn't make any sense. that's obsfucating the definition of "more" and treating the novelty of partners as equal. 100 men, 100 women. 99 men don't have sex, one guy bangs all 100 women. "Women" -as a group, are having more sex than "men" as a group. not more than a singular man but more than "men" as a collective. This is a quick and dirty argument to the extreme but used to illustrate a point. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:26 PM
1

Huh, it seems I was - I acknowledge my mistake. I apparently get Trudeau and Macron mixed up. Pardon.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 11:57 AM
0

Justin Trudeau's wife is old enough to be his mother - was my point. It was his teacher IIRC.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 01:13 AM
0

Justin Trudeau? Non joke answer - semi source https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Twilight%20Mom
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 12:53 AM
6

"n-4 who had a few flings over a few years period?" Oh boy do you not know women. Most these days get out of highschool with a higher count. An n-count of 4 over a few years is damn near virginal in this day and age.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/19 02:00 AM
5

The most passive aggressive person I know is a guy. Passive aggressiveness is perhaps considered a form of "female" communication so you rarely see it in guys because when a guy is passive aggressive is is not seen as attractive by either sex. Passive aggressiveness is also a form of cowardice both offensively and defensively. The basic concept is to "get the last word in" functionally while preserving just enough ambiguity in the communication that if one is to be confronted with a retort you h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 02:10 PM
1

Also going to add that passive aggression does not work with guys--men actually aren't wired to understand subtle social cues, etc. It's not that it doesn't work, it's that we know exactly what's going on and find the duplicitous nature of passive aggressiveness cowardly and deceitful to a small extent. Passive aggressiveness is one of the least flattering forms of "communication" a human can partake in. It's a form of dishonesty. It's also not nearly as clever as women think it is and falsely a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 12:34 PM
2

Late reply - curiosity satiated, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 10:34 AM
26

I'm not MGTOW but I was aware of them for quite a long time - since the early 2000's at least and tried to understand them a bit. At least back in the 2000's they were very justifiably bitter men trying to re-orient the world. MGTOW likely saved a lot of male lives, maybe not in a necissarily healthy way - but likely in the only way those lives could be saved. Men internalize their problems - they blame themselves even if it's apparent at times that it isn't their fault. If you go back to early …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/19 03:21 AM
1

passive curiosity, what do you create?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/19 03:10 AM
0

I don't disclose the number except to potential relationships. I do generalize a lot and when I am incorporating a generalization into a judgement or a decision I actually take into account the possibility of exceptions in the internal deliberation, far more so than I let on "here". Generalizations are required for humans to navigate the world, especially socially. You cannot approach every interaction as a blank slate, you would never learn from experience if that was the case. Everyone general…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 07:26 AM
1

I don't think it's that cut and dry, on a hunch I checked and... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar-based_contraceptive_methods They knew of the rhythm method in the year 388 - or it was written about in 388 so there is no telling how long ago it was known about but at least since 388 so 1500 years. There are some dead beadrooms out there that would be overjoyed with once a month.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 07:05 AM
0

Some do, maybe even most I suspect, just the ones who take the Stoic route likely aren't noticed or possibly even scorned for doing so. In one of my relationships when she ended it - after I fought really hard to keep it together, when she wouldn't pick up or recieve any phone calls, when her sister just informs me "She doesn't want to talk to you". When she started posting that "flip side" happy banter about a new date on social media etc. I was like "Ok, got the hint" And just moved on. All go…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 06:50 AM
1

Why do men take responsibility for something that isn't always their fault? You have never been in a heterosexual relationship I take it. Ask any guy what would happen if they even allude to "bad sex" being the woman's fault. Holy shit, Holy fucking shit. Fuck me this is funny. I see you mention "empathy" in replies below to some other posters. You don't have even the slightest idea of what that fucking word means going by your bolded question. Women rarely ever take criticism without a storm...…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 01:38 AM
3

I respect your perspective but things have changed - not human nature, but human perspective. Attraction dies much quicker in the modern day among those in their "peak" because newness and freshness is but a swipe away. Hell, it's even younger than me but there was enough crossover as I left Uni to see the shitshow on the horizon. The interpersonal fallout that is being sewn right now will make the no-fault divorce cataclysm look like a disagreement over the cut of steak for dinner by comparison…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 01:32 AM
1

This was a hilarious thread filled with the genders talking past each other while dropping backhanded criticism masked in an authoritative take on their given example. The interaction in this thread is a better example of why definitions of words are "mixed up" than it is a list of which ones are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 01:14 AM
1

That's a valid counter argument. I don't think it's the case in this sense - but it's a very valid counter argument. I don't think radical feminism is so specialized and unique that an average woman couldn't become a rad fem. It's largely due to their expeariences in life. Cults function by telling their followers what the followers want to hear - feed their egos, take their grievances and become their fellow traveling best friends. Feminism works exactly like a cult - set aside any sort of crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 10:42 PM
1

"main" No- RadFems alone would not account for their decades of popularity. Do I think RadFems also consume it? Unless Lesbians (or men) I'd say they consume it at the same rate as the general populace. RadFems are hypocrites, and they are still women (presuming you mean women here). I'm sure behind closed doors or behind the curtain of their mind they still respond to and are attracted to the same things your average woman is attracted to. I don't think indoctrination and ideology can that easi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 11:15 AM
1

They don't think dominance is hot? Maybe they don't find it hot? Late reply https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Twilight+book+sales+records https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=50+shades+of+grey+sales+records And before that when it was more taboo to purchase mommy porn - their genre was literally called bodice rippers as a short hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 10:50 AM
2

I think you will appreciate this bit
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 10:41 AM
2

One of my previous relationships went through a wicked anger phase and of course this is anecdotal and biased - but I've never seen nor read about male self-destructive behavior comparable to what she did. If I catalogued it you would think it was a fabricated hyperbolic troll post. The behavior was so bad for so long on so many levels it made me feel bad for her while it also actually helped me get over her. Replaying it in my mind and it reads like poorly written fiction to me when I reflect o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:15 AM
2

Up to 80% of human communication in person can be and usually is non-verbal. People like to hide their judgements behind the idea that if they aren't talking they aren't revealing it to others in their presence what they are thinking (or are ignorant to the possibility). We learned to communicate non-verbally before we developed speech as a species. Reflect on that. That said I think this is more of a question of various peoples temperament than their ability to read body language.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:05 AM
2

Take this chart And This chart. Combine them together and that's your answer. It really is as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 07:35 PM
1

I always "knew" I was going to be an extremely jealous individual growing up. I feared being betrayed, I could give myself a fight/flight response if I thought long enough about it. In my first long term relationship things went to shit in a bad way. She ended up changing into a rather ugly person. Trust was broken and to my amazement - flabbergasted really - I was wrong. It turns out that while, yes, I feel jealousy and can get jealous - it was no where near the degree I imagined it would be, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 07:28 PM
2

with a man of a woman’s choosing That is entirely in the woman's court. The solution is "choose different men". Stop punching above your weight. It's been shown women have a heavily skewed perspective as to what the average man is. Which does double duty in making women unhappy. Not only because they are chasing an impossible outcome (splitting 20% of men among 80% of women as life parners) but then reinforcing resentment if they ever have to "settle". Men understand this and some, not all, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 12:07 AM
2

Ok. I want to try and answer (or debate with you) over the subject. I get that you are looking for the framing in I guess the modern "last 5 years sense" of some sort of percieved change in dynamics with interpersonal relationships - It hink. I need a re-set. Are you proposing that it's women who have a much harder time getting into relationships than men? Do you mean women are unhappier in relationships than men? The "eaiser" description is throwing me off. "Easier" getting into them? Staying i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:35 PM
0

There is evolutionary proof of the opposite, I think you mis-read something. It's easier for women to get a relationship than men on an evolutionary scale. The proof? Our own DNA for one (there is more that I cover above). Humanity is descended from 80% of the women who have ever existed. Humanity is descended from only 20% of the men who have ever existed. In evolutionary terms men had a 4 times harder time procreating than women did. This is literally in our DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:16 PM
2

Crackrocksteady7 jumped in with a response I don't disagree with but wanted to give my own to your retort that likely would go in a different direction. Women as it pertains to relationships simply and provably do have it easier and have had it easier for a very long time... long enough that the differences in genders evolved as a ying/yang against each other. Let me propose a small seeming simple piece of data. "Men are more competitive than women." This has been observed, measured and is gener…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:05 PM
2

I don't think this was/is and age/stage thing, I think this is more of a cultural influence thing. I doubt the greatest generation's women and even possibly the boomer generation didn't have had these ideas of entitlement. If you are looking for a zero hour, of when it started? Maybe 1975? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6fHTyVmYp4 The message in itself is not negative and is very positive but over the decades I suspect different perspectives that have corrupted the message have transposed them…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:17 PM
2

Sort of because for a man to even get his foot in a theoretical relationship door he already is bringing copious amounts of everything to the table. If he didn't he wouldn't even be seen by the prospective mates. Women's ability to get a foot in the door requires the minimal amount of self improvement if any. I think women as the negative vs. men as the affirmative (in formal debate terms) are talking past each other. Women in our current thread seem to be defending themselves from the perspecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:01 PM
1

To jump in a bit, But wouldn't radfems want men to be more supplicating and less masculine? What people say they want in front of peer groups and what they actually want in their own private thoughts is more often than not leagues apart. Women, in general, are not attracted to men trying to more like what feminists say men should be like. This doesn't mean men have to be boorish or diametrically opposed to what feminists say men should be like - but feminists by and large simply do not understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 03:08 PM
1

why do you keep universalizing it to argue? Because when speaking in generalities the broadest dataset offers the most accurate picture. You opened with a generalization, the one I responded to women have sympathy for the woman and men have sympathy for the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 02:45 PM
1

I've been following the trends of family court law for almost two decades now. I can assure you that men are biased against in divorce by often enough other men. The men that tend to sympathize with other men as a peer group on divorce tend to be other divorcees, those who as a rule learn about divorce or "mens rights advocates". Your general joe shmo on the street does not blindly sympathize with a random guy going through divorce (*unless he meets the previously mentioned criteria).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 02:38 PM
1

I'm not saying what you've seen or heard is wrong. I'm saying what you have seen or heard are possibly outliers. Outlier an observation that is well outside of the expected range of values in a study or experiment, and which is often discarded from the data set: edit Hell, it doesn't even have to be an outlier, it just could be the data that the trends is moving away from. few things in statistical anayisis is "100%". There isn't "100% bias for" or against men/women. But there is a measurable an…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 02:14 PM
1

the TLDR is a bunch of people (not just these videos) replicated a social experiment where they would have a couple have a public one-sided fight and see what happened/who would intervene and when. When the girl fights with the guy in a one sided manner the vast majority of the time no one does anything, they just move on. When the guy fights with the girl in a one sided manner people regularly and on occasion immediately intervene. Once again - water is wet stuff. Women do indeed bias towards w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:59 PM
1

Ok, how about something more practical https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNrWuZV3jjw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GccCWo_eZdw https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=dtVHnZX8E50 This is water is wet stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:50 PM
1

Psh! Statistics, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:40 PM
1

Tacky, disgusting, inappropriate by either gender for any reason. To celebrate you failing at your vows and what must be an absolutely brutal part of life for one or both parties has to be one of the most vividly red flags ever woven by an individuals actions. Find some fucking humility in your failure at what was likely believed by you or the other party to be one of the most important promises of your life. For fuck sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:35 PM
-1

I'm not about to argue with my husband about what I can wear. I'd nope out of that - not because of the ankles thing (that's ridiculous but cultural norms are subjective) but that you think you have carte blanche in a marriage to do whatever you want. Argue what you can and can't wear when you and your husband are going out? I don't know, is it a black tie event, is it a work event? Are you traveling together in a semi-professional manner? The husband can't discuss or have any say at all? Ok, le…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:28 PM
1

Same advice applies. My tolerance for bitchiness "chip on her shoulder" is even lower if we are theoretically talking about any sort of relationship. This isn't a fucking mystery. "Why don't guys want to date a bitching judgemental girl with a chip on her shoulder?" Theworldmayneverknow.tootsie
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:10 AM
1

women have sympathy for the woman and men have sympathy for the man. Studies prove this wrong. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:00 AM
-1

*friend's sister. And if your response is anything to go by I might have an idea why guys might be avoiding you. And it's not primarily your looks. What does an oblivious retarded adult girl have you don't have? Maybe the lack of a chip on her shoulder? Guys aren't idiots, despite what media might suggest to you through decades of comedic "bafoon" portrayals might suggest. Your one response above back to me would have me flatly avoid you at all costs, no matter how hot or willing to jump in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:55 AM
1

Likely the men giving you the attention you think you should be getting are invisible to you so you think "no men" are giving you attention. Don't get me wrong- there is drop-off at the very bottom extreme but- well. I have a good friend who needed to have her mentally retarded and handicapped adult sister sterilized because she was having so much sex with random people. It was necessary for the family. (that or impede her agency as a higher functioning mentally handicap person). If she can get …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:37 AM
3

I saw your request for different perspectives so here is mine through analogy. I visited my sister recently and we discussed past relationships in-depth. It's pretty useful having a sister in this respect as she can give me a no-ulterior-motives perspective from the opposite sex on things that would otherwise be shrouded in sort of unified front secrecy by women. She isn't always honest with me or even herself, but it's by far the most reliable and honest "female perspective" that any male will …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre09/07/19 08:42 PM
5

I think that's an ancillary side effect. I suspect the virgin marriages had more to do with paternity in the offspring. It wasn't fool-proof but it was functionally "the best" humanity had before DNA testing. Humans understood for a long time paternity fraud, science just eventually caught up with our expectations/understanding (and at the same time has been suppressed by women's groups).
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre07/07/19 05:29 AM
25

It's not actors but they sign release contracts and usually they get their costs covered by the studio. If I recall correctly the first iteration and most famous format was "People's Court" which was a televised small claims court (neighbor knocks over another person's fence etc). The way "the deal" would work is both parties would go on the show and whoever "lost" would get their costs covered by the studio. I'm not sure how it works in the modern day but the above example might have the studio…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/19 09:31 AM
18

I mentioned a couple of months ago in another post the theory of competing against not just high standards of women but their skewed sense of what is possible. If they are prolific daters they will take all the best things individually from various men they have experienced and combine them into a checkbox wishlist believing if a guy can have any one of those individual traits there must be someone out there that has all of those traits. We likely have already crossed into a culture of women sub…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 10:34 PM
9

This is not new, this is very common and a very old practice. Before things like 401ks, pensions and government backed social security nets your "retirement fund" was your progeny. For a modern take see: China. There is a reason for the disparity in gender demographics from the 1 family 1 child policy. (Families abandoned/aborted girls, wanted a boy because of earnings potential)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 11:16 AM
6

That and it felt like she partially catfished him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 11:05 AM
6

Personality type: Princess Longest relationship: Under 1 year 2 children with a 3rd on the way. Profession: Good Mother [x] doubt
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/19 01:02 AM
16

"A fat girl bragging about her breast size is like the unemployed bragging about time off."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/19 12:57 AM
3

Men can't even fix it if they wanted to. This is ~60 years of social, technological and cultural shifting all in one direction. "Fix it" not in anyone's lifetime that is reading this.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre27/04/19 08:08 AM
18

I would never stick my dick in a single mother lawyer. There's stupid then there is that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/19 09:01 PM
8

That follows the boom of "tinder" type online dating. Further it's interesting how black women are suffering the "same fate" as most men. It's an uncomfortable data trend I'll side step for the moment. For the rest of it it reads like "Women have a new devilish tool that deludes them into thinking they can have it all." It's like a twisted magic mirror. It shows them who they "match with" who, in their own fantasy built from decades of happily ever after fairytales could possibly come sweep them…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/19 08:17 AM
5

I made this small post a few days ago in a thread about a con-artist. Low-key the dad was trying to wave-off the relationship. The dad knew his own single mother of 3 at 40 was beyond post-wall. "too good to be true." All of these post-wall women are literally waiting around for a "too good to be true" story to sweep them off their feet. Ripe for taking advantage of. They don't want reality, they want "too good to be true". "Where are all the good men?" By your metrics? They are pure and utter f…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/19 08:15 PM
6

As it pertains to the "dating discussion": 80% of women are only attracted to the top 20% of men. This idea existed before OK cupid's data. OK cupid accidentally published data supporting the theory. My guess is whoever collated the data had no idea of the prevailing "water is wet" theory among some circles and especially the PUA circles. The data, blog post, and information in general blew up because it's one of those pieces of data that would only be published out of ignorance as it was agains…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/19 09:00 PM
32

The simple math they inadvertently revealed in their own publication which has me grinning from ear to ear. Fewer men are having sex, not fewer adults. Balance out that equation annnnd....
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/19 10:08 PM
7

Low-key the dad was trying to wave-off the relationship. The dad knew his own single mother of 3 at 40 was beyond post-wall. "too good to be true." All of these post-wall women are literally waiting around for a "too good to be true" story to sweep them off their feet. Ripe for taking advantage of. They don't want reality, they want "too good to be true". "Where are all the good men?" By your metrics? They are pure and utter fantasy, complete fabrications that pimply do not exist..
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/19 11:48 PM
3

What I don't get is why would anyone's sexual past make a partner insecure? Because humans evolved to lie about promiscuity as both sides of the equation (men cheating, women cheating) serves as an evolutionary advantage to genetic diversification through procreation. That "insecurity" about a prospective mate's sexual past is a hard-wired emotional and psychological reaction to dissuade the species to seek out partners with "high" n-counts. On the evolutionary scale, You are on a deserted islan…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/19 11:32 PM
3

They have, for a long time now, captured the reigns of culture and society and have disarmed pretty much all of the social pressures that kept our most base instincts at bay. "Shaming" was very much a core and important aspect of civilization and functioned as the grey middle ground to take up the enforcement that didn't need rule of law to cover. It's like immunization - if a critical mass of people are vaccinated not everyone needs to be vaccinated for nearly everyone to be protected. If I cou…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/19 01:27 AM
1

My sister had her first about 2 years ago. Either the kid is neglected or the mother has a minimal social life. In either case single mothers are to be avoided as they are either shitty people (neglecting the kid) or horrible to date (you get near zero time with them) - all other things being equal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/19 07:37 PM
4

Concerning that study. I first heard the figure referenced in a paper by Roy F. Baumeister called "is there anything good about men" back in 2008. https://psy.fsu.edu/~baumeisterticelab/goodaboutmen.htm While I was researching something else.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/19 12:34 PM
4

Astute observation. I've been on Reddit for almost a decade now and what you describe has happened all over reddit. "Uncomfortable truths" is censored and banned in all walks of advice sections. You see it migrate from unknown sub to unknown sub month after month and those unknown subs, for brief moments become "the place" to hear the painful truths... until the bans and censorship starts to happen. Even a place like XXChromosomes used to allow, even upvote painful truths... way waaaay back in t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/19 04:01 AM
30

Women lack the capacity to empathize with how men feel about paternity fraud. They have evolved to not empathize with men's plight as it pertains to paternity fraud. They wouldn't be able to cheat otherwise. Men experience cheating differently to women and women, evolutionarily only "lose" short term security or resources. Men lose their progeny. Have a police officer or social worker tell a woman that their 3 year old was the result of swapped babies in the hospital and see how she reacts. THat…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/19 08:32 PM
1

Late reply. I went to a couples counselor with my most involved ex. It's both funny and sad that after about 3 or so sessions + classes he just came out and completely sided with me and flatly told us "some couples just aren't meant to be." Functionally I was giving the relationship 130% but 150 would have been required to keep it going and I simply didn't have it in me. He made it very clear to her that all her misery as well as most of the relationship woes was very likely on her side of the e…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/19 02:07 PM
1

There is a shit-ton of "medical fraud" that comes out of India. I don't have a number but over the years I'd say a large majority of any medical story that ended up being a fraud or hoax that I've read about came out of India. My money is on his wife stepping out on him. If he was having sex 3 times a day for 94 years that wouldn't have been his first child if his fertility was normal. What's more likely? And don't forget the board we are on. The other possibility is that it wasn't his first kid…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/19 12:35 PM
216

He has not yet been repeatedly redpilled. The word count is fine for the first time out of the gate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 02:18 PM
1

The great thing though is that the word has lost and continues to lose a LOT of its power. I've watched the word use over the last 20 or so years and it truly has lost nearly all of its bite.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 02:38 AM
10

I figured out the math. It's not that the doctor, lawyer, CEO is neglecting them. It's that the amount of time any one man can give to any one woman is not enough to satisfy that woman's ego. Therefore it's not that they are or are not a CEO or whatever, it's that for "her" to be happy he would need to be a retired CEO turned personal travel concierge. This results in her "outsourcing" the attention requirement and cheating with multiple men who all, individually, would not have enough free time…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 02:13 AM
2

5'11" "I'm sorry, you are great but I'm not really ready to settle down yet, I'm still finding myself."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 04:30 AM
15

It's completely ignorant and myopic if you think raising kids is harder than any number of lifetime professions. I think what has happened is that the "myth" that it is hard bled over from when it was actually hard. When families had 5+ children, there was no electricity or running water, there were no nannies for the middle class (there was no middle class) and Mom had to balance a newborn on her hip while dragging along a toddler while keeping 3+ other older kids from getting into too much tro…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/19 07:48 PM
4

In broad terms it's via the state because the state wanted to encourage stable families and offspring as it's good for the tax base. What has happened in recent years is that Feminism (largely) along with other groups with ulterior motives have turned the social controls government had into their own levers to pull. Keeping the framework of these social controls but changing how the pressures are applied.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/19 07:21 PM
1

Purposely vague platitude meant to sound deep and smart that is designed to be nebulous target that a guy can't refute or call bullshit. "That doesn't mean anything" applies to something like 90% of those sorts of "dating" advice platitudes. They are 1st cousins to those contradictory "real men" lists.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/19 07:16 AM
15

Another red pill is realizing your mom is just as selfish as most/all other women out there. A tough one, but very much the case in my experience, especially if you are a son vs. a daughter.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/19 06:53 AM
6

You can't beat biology and the link between being the strong unmovable anchor in the relationship and a woman's attraction to you is both a logical and observable one. The "ugliest" thing to both men and women is seeing a man cry.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/19 06:51 AM
4

It's the one exception, and even then it comes with a different set of baggage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/19 10:03 AM
2

Any woman "Defending a few" sexual partners had no where near "just a few" sexual partners.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/19 09:14 AM
11

My family lost our father when my sister and I were very young. (9 for me, 7 for my sister). My mother re-married and has been married to that one man since (multiple decades, they are well past the point of getting a divorce both worked hard and supported each other at the hardest of times and are having the easiest of times currently). I would roll the dice on widowed mother. I'd rather cut my dick off than date a single mother or a divorced mother. They are different versions of selfishness p…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 03:19 PM
10

I'm friends with a family that had to have their adult high functioning down-syndrome daughter sterilized because she was so sexually active.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 01:46 AM
1

I'd say it's the population. It hasn't hit critical mass to the point of attracting various ideologies that are just interested in pushing their own dogma and suppressing others. No one at this population are doing it for "outside attention points". I don't know what the population breakpoint is, but this board is still in the "undiscovered" margins where the only one here are the ones that want to be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 11:07 AM
1

There is a lot of black and white argumentation in this thread from the perspectives of the two genders. I'm not a fan of wishy washy shades of grey but in this case I think we need to speak in generalities. I can only attest to what I've observed and experienced. I'm a guy and when I've observed the comings and goings of infidelity and close calls by friends of both genders this is what I've observed. Girls definitely can forgive purely "physical" indiscretions easier than guys can. This doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 10:47 AM
1

Women literally want to be oppressed by feminist standards. Quick and dirty example of this. Women are attracted to taller men and at the very least men taller than themselves (+ heels). This is literally their biology seeking someone who has the capability of oppressing them. Now what came first is up for debate. Did women's psychology evolve to be "happy with" being oppressed as those who were best suited to protecting them and their offspring were also best suited to oppressing? (most likely)…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 11:05 AM
2

What I want to know is do you apply the same standards to yourself? I absolutely do Do you keep your n-count low and treat sex as an expression of romance, love and commitment to keep yourself in the state of being a worthy partner for a woman with similar values I absolutely do and it has unfortunately lead me down a path not often traveled. I've had intimate relationships but I've always been very careful of how I've approached them. I make sure to hold myself not just to the same standards as…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 10:47 AM
1

They eat their own all the time. Not even the left is safe from their fundamentalists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 03:30 AM
2

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 02:45 AM
1

Any particular reason why?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 05:20 PM
3

Do you personally have a number for what would be "too many children" for a man to have with other women to never want to date him?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 12:15 PM
1

Oh, like - it wouldn't be a long info drop at once. I'd be talking with her over the 6 months as an example so if something wasn't working we'd be talking about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 04:18 PM
1

Take all of it with as many grains of salt as you feel is appropriate. It would also be a back and forth thing with my sister if it was the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 08:51 AM
2

Which changes nothing and she is still across and up - I guess she's just objectively self aware of it now? (how does that change anything in the equation?) Hell, I'd argue it makes her an even worse partner because it encourages giving up on trying to be a more compromising person in a relationship "I am who I am, now I know I can't help it". It sounds like a convoluted in-built excuse to not have to better yourself in the difficult ways.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/09/18 12:26 PM
2

Also marriage functioned as a way to dull societal unrest. One man for one woman and one woman for one man in a population of 50% of each in a species that experiences jealousy and has evolved to "cheat." By logical standards marriage is a foundational standard to any successful civilization.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/09/18 11:46 AM
2

You made two comments I replied to, neither suggested your above statement. I was simply pointing out information you were likely not aware of previously. 1. actually how common psych degrees are (they are the college equivalent of real-estate licenses, it seems everyone has one) and 2- that there is a likely over-representation of degree holders in the community. You are correct, one of the first things that is made apparent to you when you pursue a degree in psychology (and research actually) …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 11:28 AM
7

Careful with "parental" studies - they often find what they want depending on the interests of the researchers, grant origins or organizations somewhere above. https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases/frequent_school_moves/ Parents can influence kids greatly in ways only parents can but are easily overlooked by accident or on purpose. Being a parent is more than just playing with your kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 11:06 AM
0

Compared to the general population? Well above average. I don't know a quick way to give an accurate percentage but factoring in Reddit's origin, the fact that it's an online interest cultivating community that largely rejects "social media identity popularity" in the way it functions (meaning the default is anonymity) - I'd be surprised if the number of BA or higher educated wasn't at least 50% on accounts ~pre-Trump or older. (the 2016 election brought a lot of attention to Reddit so that will…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 10:59 AM
1

part 2 Ok, so you are seeing a psych (let them determine how often). You have an interest goal set based on something that interested you as a young girl that has nothing to do with boys. You are exercising/getting in shape and you are taking a break from dating. So what do you do now? Well, I'd give it a MINIMUM of 6 months. I don't see it as being easy but get a vibrator, you should already have one I'd imagine. Don't even lean on or think you can swing a FWB thing. Keep guys out of your psych…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 10:49 AM
1

Part 1 Not the guy you replied to but I'll give it a shot. I'm assuming your name is related to your age so I'm going off of that. There is good news - adults don't really stop developing the person who they are going to be the rest of their lives until about 24-25 (everyone changes over time but this falls off greatly in the mid 20's). You are still very young and by the nomenclature of the board your SMV is still very high (presuming all other things are equal and we can move past you N-count)…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 10:49 AM
1

Have you seen how many people get psychology degrees when they go to college? https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cta.asp If you math it out it's the first or second most common degree. 60% of those going to college today are female and the second most popular degree field is psychology. The one more popular than it is health services - however that seems like general designation for a few different types of specific degrees. If someone was replying to you and they had a degree in anythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 08:37 AM
1

It's her body/her choice though? I mean, technically she could become pregnant from a fertility clinic then abort and it wouldn't be seen as amoral by today's society.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 09:44 AM
3

Easy example of this. father with a shotgun trope aka father with a shotgun speaking to father of date for first time back before [x] talk grief buddies will give a new father for having a daughter Likely many more or iterations/variations of the above. It's cross cultural too and extends into the extremes and even shows itself in folklore (Rapunzel being locked away). There are likely scores if not hundreds of examples of men, culture and folklore understanding the nature of men's sexual desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 09:42 AM
1

Should single women be barred from using fertility/sperm donor clinics?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/18 05:38 AM
2

lol - you just broke open the equation - or found the parallel in gaming. "Anyone with a lower KD than me is a scrub, anyone with a higher KD than me cheats" "Anyone with a lower N-count than me is mentally defective, anyone with a higher n-count than me is mentally defective." Thanks, I got a good laugh seeing the parallel.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/18 03:26 AM
8

I can't tell if this is parody or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/18 02:05 AM
3

Any interest by men gets framed as childish if it impugns on women's time, that or "toxic".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:26 PM
24

I couldn't resist so I made my own throwaway. Firstly, lets get this out of the way. New Study Claims People Who’ve Had More Sexual Partners Report Unhappier Marriages This is a water is wet kind of knowledge that women in the new age of online hookups want to kick and scream and fight against. It doesn't take any great rationalization to understand that when you subject your psyche to the peaks and valleys of relationships (and sex, no matter how fleeting is a relationship) that it wears down a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter