TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

do-the-thugshaker Archive

View 1 posts and 44 comments by do-the-thugshaker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Does she complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 03:29 AM
1

Does she work? If so how much?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 03:02 AM
1

Yes, and on top of that most other unskilled jobs are substantially more stressful like being a construction worker, cashier, or fast-food worker.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:49 AM
2

I read that study, all the options involved tradeoffs between earning and homemaking responsibility. They're not assessing preference for partner wealth independently. For women the primary alternative to a egalitarian relationship in the survey required them to be the primary homemaker, which obviously many of them don't want. There was no option where their partner is the primary breadwinner but still does half or at least a substantial portion of the housework. Or is wealthy enough to pay for…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:43 AM
2

The vast majority want men who outearn them, substantially.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:07 AM
-2

You're an outlier, per the BLS(Table 5) 43% of mothers don't even work full time. “Literal middle schoolers” Some 12-13 year olds can babysit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 12:32 AM
0

If one partner pays more towards common expenses than the other then in no world are their contributions in that respect "equal", even if they spend the same amount of time at work. If it takes me twice as long to clean the house compared to you, by your logic would my contribution be twice as great doing the exact same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:53 PM
1

If it takes me two hours to clean the house and only one hour for you, by your logic is my contribution twice as large when I clean the house compared to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:49 PM
1

Of course, because women are parasitic and only want equality where it suits them. The vast majority of women want men who outearn them and would never be willing to split expenses 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:48 PM
0

Because they're easy and low stress jobs that require no education or formal training, something that literal middle schoolers can(and do) often do. And if you're working in your own home that makes it even more attractive, the desirability of WFH during and after the pandemic proved that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:46 PM
2

Every couple can discuss themselves what is mutually agreeable to them but if your partner expects you to pay more towards household expenses it's a perfectly reasonable baseline expectation that they should reciprocate in other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:44 PM
3

She’s your partner, not your maid. He's your partner, not your father. but the blanket assumption that “because I make more than you means I can do less than you” It's not about making more per se, it's about who pays more towards common expenses. If you expect your partner to contribute more towwards common expenses, as most women here do, it's perfectly reasonable for them to expect you to reciprocate by contributing more elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:42 PM
1

There still has to be some sort of childcare split since childcare is a 24/7 responsibility. It really isn't, no matter the age of child. Young children sleep a lot of the day and older children go to school/preschool. Unless you think having to stay at home while your child sleeps count as "childcare".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:37 PM
2

but from the stats I’ve seen women in the US are also slightly more likely to have disabilities than men. That's irrelevant, we're not talking about all men vs all men. We're talking about married men and women who aren't working. Her point was that unemployed men often have reasons other than taking care of home/family for not working, most notably being ill/disabled or unable to find work.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:35 PM
1

You're in a partnership. And there's nothing wrong with expecting equal contribution from someone in a partnership.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:26 PM
0

Going to work in of itself doesn't pay the bills. The money you get from going to work does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:25 PM
0

Fight for your rights — to do less The whole point of women complaining about men not doing enough housework is so they themselves can "do less".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:44 PM
1

Women are the sole/primary earner in only 16% of marriages. By focusing on the 16% and not the 84% you are the one cherrypicking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:43 PM
2

That makes sense but it doesn't diminish his main point, which is that women have substantially higher standards for cleanliness and orderliness than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:42 PM
7

All good points, especially the last one. I would like a link for your second point about a survey excluding if possible, I'd like to look into it. The Pew article is based on the American Time Use Survey, if that's the one you're referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:41 PM
-1

Who the fuck shares toothpaste? That's disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:37 PM
5

And happening to earn more doesn't mean you're contributing more if you're spending the same or less time and effort at work The time and effort spent at work is irrelevant to assessing financial contributions. You could work the most grueling and exhausting job for 80 hours a week, but ultimately if the pay is too low then bills don't get paid. and women tend to have more stressful jobs Good one. Doing your fair share means having the same free time It's funny how easily women shift from wantin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:37 PM
3

so I would NOT accept a guy having an higher income as an argument for him to do less housework. Would you be willing to split common expenses 50/50? You are working construction 8hours a day? I'll do more housework even if I bring more money home. How many men have you seriously dated that have earned less than you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:33 PM
0

I can't say I agree with that based on the posts I've seen in the subreddits I mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:31 PM
1

How am I unduly favoring husbands? You're doing the same thing you're complaining about, downplaying the work women do. I don't agree, I think my assessment is accurate. There is a market for housework and childcare and the market value of that work is quite low.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:31 PM
1

Shit needs done around the house. And there is no reason it needs to be split evenly. Especially if expenses aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:30 PM
-10

How much housework each partner does, imo shouldn't depend on the amount of income they bring in Why not? If you expect your partner to contribute more financially why isn't it reasonable for them to expect you to take on a greater burden in other areas? Otherwise you're just being parasitic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:29 PM
10

Wives are not the sole or primary earner in the vast majority of marriages. Why focus on the 16% where they are, and ignore the 84% where they aren't? Per the second link, primary earner husbands spent 62.5 hours on paid work and housework/childcare combined, compared to only 50 hours for their wives. Sole earner husbands reported spending around 50 hours total on all work, compared to just 25 hours for their wives. You're only supporting my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:27 PM
–

no that's not what it means......
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:53 AM
–

I've also noticed that a lot of them get married during or shortly after their DCC career. I wonder if their status helps them land top-tier men, independent of their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:49 AM
–

Do you think NFL cheerleaders should be paid more? Netflix just released a new docuseries about the Cowboys cheerleaders and it sparked a lot of backlash over their pay. I think most of the people crying out either don't understand, or don't like, the basic principle of supply and demand in markets. Being an NFL cheerleader is an incredibly prestigious job, especially the DCC. There are literally hundreds of women that try out every season and if you're not satisfied with the pay one of them wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:30 AM
–

you've gotta be kidding me, another one of these?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:37 AM
–

If I told you that I have about 5 gigabytes of gay interracial porn saved on my phone but I'm not gay and I watch it solely for the plot/humor, would you believe me?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:36 AM
2

Wealth is almost always mentionned Yes, showing off wealth, not necessarily throwing it at them. and they're not on the 50/50 trope It's been a while since I last browsed but I think I only ever saw one post about who pays on dinner dates, and it was suggesting how to discreetly split it by asking the server to bring separate bills beforehand. And usually they advise you to do some kind of activity instead of a dinner date to have fun and to escalate by touching, which are also usually more affo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:59 AM
1

Fraud or misrepresentation If they are deceived into coming to a country to work some other job, only to be offered sex work, what's stopping them from going back? Moreover, legalizing and regulating sex work like other careers would enable them to come legally, with full protections in case of deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:32 AM
7

How are we defining "trafficking" here? Someone being held and forced to work against their will through force or threats? Or an illegal immigrant voluntarily working under a pimp for low pay, because it's still more than what she would make back home?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:42 PM
6

I agree 100% but there's nothing wrong with being a john either. They're unfairly demonized by both conservatives and feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:41 PM
7

Because it undermines the pussy cartel.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:40 PM
4

bluepill = progressive, feminist, female-apologist, male-critical stance
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:39 PM
0

Everything I learned on the TRP subreddit was completely free.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:37 PM
3

I've never seen anyone on TRP actually advocate for being a "provider", not even before the incel subculture grew and invaded them. They may view the gendered society of the past with male providers and female homemakers positively, but they would rarely advocate for being a "provider" to a woman today because the laws and norms have changed against us. Men have more to lose and less to gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:36 PM
1

Bottom-tier women's behaviors (sleeping around, one night stands, Casual sex is still fairly common, a fifth of single young women in 2017 reported casual sex in the past month alone(https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2378023121996854). And the figure would probably be higher for significant subgroups like residential college students and restaurant workers, basically anyone not still living with their parents. ranting on twitter about how they want all men dead KAM was trending on tw…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:32 PM
2

Some men hate cats though They could rescue dogs then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 09:18 PM
3

What she did wasn't a huge deal but it's definitely sexual harassment. And these people don't live in the real world if they don't realize how bystanders would react to a man pushing a woman.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter