TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dogkindrepresent Archive

View 2 posts and 466 comments by dogkindrepresent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

For every woman that gets a free STD test I will bareback ten women. Ride em ride em ride em. Raaaawwhide!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 10:22 PM
1

And even worse, a self invented fatty.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 10:21 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:24 PM
-1

Women are both physically weaker and less rugged than men so generally or on average they're going to inflict less damage. That doesn't however mean that they can't inflict damage. You can argue your point that in actuality women are not entirely innocuous and incapable of harm but unfortunately that's not how many women nor society tends to see it.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 07:50 AM
-11

Translation: Women often fail to separate play acting from the real deal. There are things men can do that will tend to inflict damage that when women will do tend not to. Both women and men become confused by these and treat them as absolutes. This isn't helped by that default modes of communication between men and women tend to differ. Men are very explicit where as women are very implicit. Also lamppost sex is good.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:08 PM
1

Say sure, but what's your treat? It also better be food delicious. I think all men should be trained in how to barter with prostitutes. If you start off with ten carrots for a chicken but some how end up giving a hundred carrots and getting no chicken at all then sorry but you fucking suck at haggling. We call women hags for a reason you know. They're very good at the old haggling or you give out first (you put your guns down first). It's the same as if someone owes you a debt you're actually in…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:37 PM
5

Excellent. A woman standing up against state sanction condescension.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:10 PM
1

Women can get away with this in the bedroom, it's my sexual fantasy but do it in front of others and they'll have the shock of their life. You can't do that in front of others or it'll encourage them to do the same. Women are shit at keeping things in the bedroom and most I know would bloody love it if I fucked them into a stupor completely spontaneous like up against the nearest lamppost.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:57 PM
2

I think that's just an excuse too. Though I'm also filling in gaps in the imagery with my own imagery. I haven't replayed in slow motion. Though his actions gives it away, he's looking down in confusion at what she's doing or reaching for. I've not examined closely her gaze and movements though I remember the first time I saw it I noticed some indication of her making physical movements matching a pattern of going for it. Reaching around in a way that can only be explained by navigating towards …
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:34 PM
1

I have learnt when looking at videos, especially those that invoke emotional outrage, even if it's on our side, to be very very careful. Things often aren't what they seem or what we want them to be. There's definitely context. People think because Trump said grab them by the pussy then that entitles them to literally rather than figuratively grab men by the balls. They think it's justified in their own bizarre little inner court. The "I was trying to kick your phone guy" it pretty epic. I wish …
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:15 PM
3

To be fair we don't see exactly what happens in the video. Even taking that into account we see enough to be very certain she didn't simply brush up inadvertently.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:06 PM
2

The terms do get a bit confusing and they tend to vary a bit. You go from racism to hey lets just not be racist but then you get the reverse racists that support "counter" racism or "affirmative action" or basically support for institutional activism against racism which tends to accomplish the reverse. Two wrongs don't make a right, they just double the amount of racism by making it bidirectional. Though given that there's no longer much racism to speak off in general it's more creating racism …
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:32 AM
3

I don't really see your point. If you mean gud racism then yes good racism has been decriminalised by the EU but what the fire brigade are doing here isn't even legal under good racism legislation.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:03 AM
3

That's illegal in the UK. It's not appalling, it's illegal. The only thing you're allowed to do is positive discrimination which is only because the stupid EU forced it upon us. Even in that you're only allowed to choose when you have two equally suitable candidates which is almost never.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:10 AM
4

Or just ideological apartheid, that and ideological profiling. The problem now is at this point the enemy knows that they're the bad guys, they know that they're wrong and so they no longer see any point to restrict their evil. The secrets out. The problem is that we're failing to acknowledge that. We as a collective and society should be destroying these people but we're very reluctant to do so but that's just how goodies and baddies has to work. If the baddies come and shoot up your town then …
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:04 AM
9

This is quite funny. Feminist women succeed in emasculating their men and then they find they're not satisfied with their men and unhappy when marketing does it's research so then offers women a way to try to make their men masculine again. You can't cut off your man's penis and then complain that your sex life is dull. When you do expect to start seeing adverts for prosthetic penises so to restore your sex life aimed at you. These unhappy women are not desperately rallying to work out how to ge…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:33 AM
3

I don't think so. They wanted equality and equality is what they'll get. Women get everything they ask for. Be careful what you wish for. It's happening.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:27 AM
2

You don't. That's why feminists ever increasingly become dykes.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:42 PM
1

I wont accept an apology. Most of the company's products aren't even for men they're for women. They weren't advertising Gillette they were adverting their other products.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:38 PM
1

Just get a Bic or home brand. Gillette will have to discount down to next to nothing.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:37 PM
1

RottingVagitables
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:35 PM
0

If you're willing to support a violent killer to get your own way then you need to have your head examined.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:48 PM
0

Trolling isn't someone trying to fathom what you might mean. You came out and said that he didn't have intent. It's a bit vague but what's it in aid of? Is it simply a statement of what you believe to be fact? Are you now on his defence team? I honestly don't know but you seemed to bring it up as a counter and that's on you. I see the cases as the same. They both in one fashion or another fired the shot. After that momentum and circumstances did the rest. The difference is in his case that was m…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 08:15 AM
0

We're having a debate. We disagree with each other. That's fine. But you keep downvoting my other response. You realise that exposes you as just petty? Look I put forward some things in a confusing way with some indirect aspects and I get that you pretty much struggled to get what it was all about so it's not a big deal because you know sometimes what seems obvious to me won't be to others but now you're still trying to uphold this position of it's not comparable. The way manslaughter laws were …
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:01 PM
2

I already made it. It's FeministsAreGross though I'm not sure if I'm the best curator. If not people can ask for mod or create an alt like FeminismIsGross. In fact the more the better. Other suggestions: DisgustingFeminism FeministsAreDisgusting FeminismIsDisgusting Gross or Disgusting or a synonym alone but then only show cases of disgusting feminism. Can be farts, poo, blood but not only blood and guts or gore or gibs but also stuff like feminists calling for disgusting stuff like men being ca…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:35 PM
2

Epic lols... You've Been Banned From Participating In R/FeminismIsCancer subreddit message via /r/FeminismIsCancer[M] sent 5 minutes ago You have been banned from participating in r/FeminismIsCancer. You can still view and subscribe to r/FeminismIsCancer, but you won't be able to post or comment. If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for r/FeminismIsCancer by replying to this message. Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:28 PM
0

Not really, that's where you went or almost accidentally went failing that at least seemed to. There's another thing to this. From my perspective even two years is absolutely incredible for a woman. In woman years that's like more than twenty years compared to man years of incarceration. Normally she'd just be in for a couple of months having the tits and all. Prison years between women and men work the same as like dogs years between dogs and humans. I mean it's actually a sentence that isn't j…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:00 PM
0

I don't really see what you accomplish trying to reject the point to defending a killer. It is a bit relative but by my standards, European standards which is the most lenient and basically the most sympathetic continent that's a respectable sentence. It wouldn't be seen as a slap on the wrist with the possible exception of the possibility getting out in two years or basically getting out early. In these cases he threw a punch, she threw her punch, but in one you want to dismiss the consequences…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 02:10 AM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/26/bournemouth-man-jailed-kill-punch ​ Those are western standards. She only got a bit less than if she'd had killed him.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:07 PM
9

> a fundamental misunderstanding of liberation ​ What does it even mean?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:47 PM
1

I'm perfectly happy to be what other people deserve.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:45 PM
0

But western standards which tends to be pretty lenient, it's respectable. You'll note though I pointed out that basically the maximum sentence he was facing isn't lenient and when you take that into account, it's a fair question why they'e not matched. You can try to get someone in jail for up to 15 years and if it goes wrong the worst you can get is jail for up to three years. That's a genuine problem. ​ You can cling to your example but fact is this was also a screw up with the police and even…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:41 PM
1

That's just creepy. Wife should definitely have better sense than that.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:02 AM
-8

Feminists are so tiring they should make tires out of them.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:45 AM
2

I just checked that sub and took a loot at the posts but I can't for the life of me figure out what it's really about. Just a lot of screenshots of mobile phone chats and stuff.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:18 AM
2

Convictions aren't always accurate. There aren't really any details to know if it's a reliable conviction or not. It's problematic that the press only presents her side of the story. Eyewitness testimony isn't automatically reliable. When reading the article I sort of smell a rat but I don't have blind trust in justice systems either. It's like she's reading a get out of jail script. If she's really telling the truth that's a stupid thing to do, people can pick up on that. My gut feeling is that…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:59 AM
3

The article claims to have seen messages that confirm the story but I'd be sceptical without reviewing the evidence myself. Anyone can fabricate messages. The reality is there just isn't enough information for a reader to come to a solid conclusion. The way she talks raises some minor flags for me around credibility but nothing that would completely falsify her account. She sometimes speaks in a sort of fabricated melodramatic and prescribed way rather than speaking straight. That kind of romant…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:45 AM
-1

I think the sentence is fairly respectable. You also have to consider that while she's reprehensible, a lot of this damage appears to be on the hands of the incompetence of the legal system. You always get nasty people and in this case the legal system appears to have been strangely naive to that fact despite that's its job. When you look more closely at that two things stand out in particular. The maximum sentence for the crime is over a decade but falsely accusing someone is only a few years? …
/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:09 AM
3

Just post actual news stories, science and posts confirming your position. Right done it, lets go, feel free to participate.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:57 AM
1

Banned for what? None of those would be breaking site wide rules. While admins are known to operate outside of the rules they would have a hard time acting against content that's simply true. Feminists for example are gross.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:52 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands Just stop wasting money on those. Average household you can boycott a lot.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:48 AM
3

It still goes up more than it goes down. If it's sustained it could end up higher than the average.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:43 AM
2

Small spikes happen and a downturn after an upturn is really to be expected. The graph really isn't useful in displaying anything. Also the intent here should be the long run. For Gillette to go to zero. For that what you need to do is tell your kids don't use it. Boycott should last a generation.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:42 AM
3

A prostitute's preferred customer.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:37 AM
19

Well there are people against feminism and your cockblocking their platform doesn't do any favours there. As far as anyone is concerned you're just a female supremacist trying to gag the opposition and all you do is inflame matters worse with that. People don't like feminism for justified reasons as well. It's not like a playground fight you can break up by getting in between that's flared up over something petty. Feminism is no longer a movement against sexism against women it's a movement prom…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:28 AM
4

Just create new even worse terminology to refer to them and then make subs based around that. Such as "FeminismSpreadsHiv" then focus on horror stories about women getting HIV sleeping with random black guys just to prove they're not racist and regret stories from cucks that caught HIV from their wives. Or "FeminismKillsKids" or "FeministsAreGross" focusing on feminists being disgusting, disgustingly ugly, etc such as when they're having a period at a protest, etc. All they're doing is upping th…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:22 AM
14

I looked at a post you wrote explaining it earlier which consisted of a load of rambling to be straight with you. If you really want to disavow yourself of it then you should probably put up ToxicFeminism for adoption by a suitable owner that's actually against feminism.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:18 AM
6

As in it's squatted.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:16 AM
12

Also /r/FeminismIsCancer
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:12 AM
2

I do find it annoying when people respond to guilty until proven innocent questions. It's also more dangerous than it looks. If I accuse you of being a paedophile, even if you're not, it's impossible for you to really prove that especially purely in conversation. In trying to deny it or basically playing along all you're likely to accomplish is putting your foot in your mouth or basically your every decision after that becomes a case of what will make you least look like a paedophile. So even th…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:48 AM
2

So it's the you're being made to be her personal babysitter basically? Nope wait other way around, missing out on custody? Or both I guess really. I'd be very careful with this because there are a lot of blog and even legal "experts" who stack the deck against men and tend to put forward legal arguments that might have worked for them before in some case but may have only have been valid within the specifics and context of that case (abuse case law by removing the specifics then ride the precede…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:20 AM
16

You should be infuriated if someone within the legal system arbitrarily acted on your behalf. There are however legal technicalities and loop holes you might have fallen into where if you don't act within a time limit or with sufficient zeal you're considered to have forfeited your right or have effectively opted out. It doesn't sound like that the case here but even if it is it's unethical for the judge to conspire with, through incompetence or negligence side with one party. A right of first r…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:29 AM
4

It's not surprising. The politicisation of academia and science in the name of social justice has been going on for a long time. This is nothing less than an invasion attempt. I always used to be for more women in technology but since it's become ideological and purely about trying to get one over men or get revenge over their brother hogging the playstation because men aren't allowed to have nice things then it's just gotten fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:50 PM
7

Women don't live in the real world. They're used to handouts from men. They think that doing technology is all just an act and that positions are simply rationed out. They do not comprehend the concept of real work. It's just let a man do it for them. It's bad enough in technology already without yet another class of classists being brought in to steal all the glory from your average man's hard work. They'll happily let men do all the hard work for them while reaping all the reward which is what…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:44 PM
1

Same as everywhere else, 1st or second degree, murder or manslaughter. It's sometimes hard to draw the line between the two. There are often cases that are technically manslaughter that for all intents and purposes should be treated as murder. I'll give you one example, a guy complains about another guy riding on the pavement. The cyclist's friend runs in an punches as hard as he can the person saying don't ride on the pavement. The person calls back and hits their head, made worse by the curb a…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:58 PM
1

and wanking
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:50 PM
1

Vilify.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:01 PM
1

I personally stay away from toxic vaginas.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:01 PM
1

I see it as a threat as well when you see it in scientific sexism papers in academia which are then being used to promote public policy and clinical policy against men. Some of those papers are very opaque saying things like oh we think male behaviour is harmful to their well being and therefore yadda yadda yadda. They literally say things like that, trying to strip men of being adults relegating them to children or basically unemancipating them. It's not surprising either because it matches fem…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:51 PM
5

I don't like the term either but I say just be a man and own it. Toxic masculinity? Putting up with women's bullshit like feminism just because titties.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:43 PM
6

Many of the videos are blurred out so you don't see what's going on. In one case before leaving she's talking to a friend. The guy is facing the friend and can't see at that point the girl he's going off with. The friend is presumably checking the girl is going and is alright. Behind the guys back she makes sign language to say we're going to fuck as in literally. That really leaves no room for doubt that she consented. If you do sign language that's going to pick up very well on CCTV. They keep…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:35 PM
3

Well someone's got to adopt all those fatherless black kids.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:30 PM
2

That's paedophilia.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:29 PM
1

I think this post and responses are a bit daft. It's just someone in a text. People are always trying to guilt trip me into caring and using emotional black mail. I just turn around and say yes that's right I'm a monster, I'm an the Devil and you better watch your soul, I'm not your personal well of unbridled altruism and if I were the kind person you wanted me to be I'd soon run out of kindness and run out of person so get lost I don't care about your breast cancer or your periods bleed to deat…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:23 PM
1

If you consider that multi-blade really has it's origins in shaving for women, specifically the legs where it really makes sense then it really does have strong competition with cream. It's not popular for face hair removal and the whole body is a territory to fight over.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:14 AM
1

For a pussy. Shakes on the inside, shaves on the outside. I realised a marketing conspiracy. I've proven using basically a ruler that Gillette is lying about it's closer shave with multi-blade. It doesn't cut under the skin. I've proven this because their illustrations don't match up when you compare actual blade sizes and spacing in the real world to actual scale. They do not include a "not to scale" notice but it changes everything. Their representative also says that the blades cannot be too …
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:34 AM
1

If you get one of those ultra high power lazer pointers you can probably shave with that as well. Lots of innovations for shaving but all Gillette does is add more blades. That and they've recently experimented with using a vibrator as a handle.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:27 AM
1

It's a work in progress. Just needs uptake. Food, shaving foam, air, all full of harsh chemicals.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:22 AM
1

You're wrong. It's the 21st century. This is the future of shaving. Shaving foam should literally be shaving foam. Put it on, wash it off, no more hair. Bladeless shaving. If we're really technologically advancing then the number of blades required should be going down not up.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:19 AM
1

Easier to use, less likely to nick, less time consuming All of those are not only subjective but when quantified rarely make up for the difference. Perhaps the only one that applies is that for optimal surfaces more blades can mean less passes. The man's faces is a pit of suboptimal surfaces where in reality a multi-blade is too ill suited. It's never easier to use nor less time consuming. That's a sort of inbetween area where two blade designs tend not to be as bad and tend to still be thin eno…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 06:19 AM
1

I remember growing up and things like tooth brushes were getting more and more stupid with adverts singing the amazing wonders of their 10X more expensive products that ultimately when it comes down to it the difference between them and a single basic product can barely be discerned, it's all just some marketing claim of theory. When I was a kid I pretty much took that shit for granted but growing up you learn it's bullshit. I remember things like when it became normalised for men to wear perfum…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:15 AM
1

They literally say in their adverts that they pull the hair and shave it under the skin. Realistically if it were really doing that to the scale of effect indicated then you really would be looking at more ingrown hairs, just a few pores blocked and that's it. Honestly it's hard to know what really happens in practice and it likely varies a lot based on how people use the razors, which ones they use and their skin/hair growth characteristics. Though when you read research saying we didn't find i…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:20 AM
1

It's unambiguously an imperative phrase and you haven't corrected it all you've done is said alright it's a suggestion but if I don't go along with your suggestion then blackmail.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:46 AM
1

You give an example of an imperative phrase and call it a suggestion?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:31 AM
2

As much as I'm concerned about when feminists basically abuse their children imposing an abusive ideology (actually very much the same as for example religion indoctrination of children for example those feminism takes things to extremes even by those standards) this thread doesn't by far look like the worse example of that. Though I'd be concerned about a mother asking that question and having the intention to do that to her kids. The answers or responses are all over the place. I don't really …
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:00 AM
1

I was going to say that blowtorch is the cure then I realised it's probably a laser sight. A laser scalpel would do the trick too though.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:56 PM
2

Even though it's presenting the Duluth Model in a way that doesn't confirm it you sort of have to wonder why even bother to mention it. The Duluth Model claims that in all domestic abuse cases the man is always to blame, even if the woman is inflicting the domestic abuse. There's an unconditional presumption of guilt for males and presumption of innocence for females. It's not only incompatible with equality laws (it's actually illegal in fact) but it's also incompatible with a legal process whe…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:43 PM
1

You didn't put it forward as a suggestion. That's backpeddling. You issued an instruction. You're still persisting in trying to force it with this emotional blackmail that it's the left wing lexicon and heck even if it were that doesn't prohibit me using it against them. The term Islamophobia is genuinely a piece of left wing newspeak but I can still use that against them as not only in many ways do they qualify but if you take the term seriously then Islamophobia is not only of insignificance i…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:22 PM
1

Since you seem to have a limited memory capacity I'll remind you how this all started. I explained that the term cuck as a political term while linked to various sexual practices both for pleasure and reproduction that it's also distinct from those other meanings and that it's strange, if not somewhat suspect that the article would indulge in one of those other meanings while really being totally clueless about the political meaning. Sort of makes you think well maybe the article is written by a…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 07:50 AM
16

Go for Wilkinsons.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 07:08 AM
7

I'm going to ask my local shops to swap out gillette for bic.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 07:07 AM
1

For someone so aggressively against labels you're very quick to exploit their convenience.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 06:54 AM
1

Well you know, I kind of am. I never thought that but in the many competitions I've been thrown into it became apparent. That's not based purely on my own analysis but that of others as well and that when you see your competitor bloody and broken on the ground you'd have to be some kind of delusional maniac to believe you're still the underdog. I put my foot in my mouth all the time but it makes no difference in the end. I know being the underdog is oh so appealing these days but fuck you that's…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:32 AM
1

There's probably at least a few things lacking contextual information and you likely aren't ableto fill in the gaps. That's a limitation in language. It's fundamental. The brain as any moment holds zetobytes but language has a maximum bandwidth of a kilobit a second or usually much less, often an order of magnitude. You're expecting too much out of language. The point in those cases is that you actually ask. You're supposed to translate gaps into questions to extract the required information. Th…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:21 PM
1

You've been openly saying you can't even comprehend the language let alone the meaning. When left wingers talk about reverse racism they cite usage examples where it's been used against them by opponents. Their opposition "invented" it. An opposition often simply calling out what they see and picking the appropriate words for that. An opposition that wasn't always right or wrong but often would see things like some call to action to end racism where under scrutiny that action would in fact still…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:17 PM
5

What I found interesting are the bits people missed. At the start it's actually a reference to star trek. The hive mind. If you hear all the voices playing which tells you how the media operates and sees itself. Trying to be the collective conscious. Instead all it does is to turn the conscience against this uninvited invader into the private realm of the psyche.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:21 PM
1

At this point you're failing the Turing Test. You keep saying error, could not compute input and then blaming the input or operator which is exactly how a typical computer program might work. It's not only that but you keep beating a dead donkey. You keep trying the same things over and over. You have no adaptability. The left wing will reinvent any label for it's own purposes including the label racism so you could make the same argument. You're not going to stop anything with that. You've also…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:13 PM
3

Makes you wonder. Clinton campaigned on a lobby of claiming that women have it so rough. She also supported and in fact has routinely and actively engaged in very risky foreign policy playing chicken with Russia where it's not an inconceivable scenario that total war for the middle east where drafting several million men and sending them abroad to die would be on the cards. The only thing overriding that would be nuclear escalation though she didn't care about that either.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:49 AM
44

He surely consented by not using his superior male physical strength to prevent the assault.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:38 AM
1

This armchair psychology, telepathy or clairvoyance is really part of the problem. People think they're so clever when they think they can think what the other person is thinking to figure them out when really they're just exposing their own thinking so that you don't need to be a telepath to know what they're thinking.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:37 AM
2

Hello, I'm Clippy, I'm here to help you with your typing.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:33 AM
5

I hate women who deserve to be hated same as any other group of people. These individual women finding themselves hated should meditate on that.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:31 AM
1

Doing a quick sanity check on someone to check they're probably serious isn't stalking. It's a problem when people bring up irrelevant things though such as "oh your point isn't valid because you've posted here or there". I'm going to hazard a bet that you've had some left wing indoctrination (which frankly is hard to avoid to varying significant degrees in any modern upbringing) and drifted away from it but you still persist very stubbornly in some of the deeper ingrained habits and association…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:41 AM
4

I don't like the implications of that kind of argument. As in either every race, gender and sex is open game or none should be. Within reason I actually lean on the former but it doesn't really matter because only some groups being open game is worse than either. I also really don't like Piers Morgan after seeing him being such a piece of shit over the Koran with Tommy Robinson. I have to give him some credit and respect though for breaking out of the prison of political correctness and standing…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:35 AM
1

You do realise that your obsession against the term and pretty much only the term if you're not play acting genuinely betrays some serious psychological ailment on your part? At the very least you seriously need to visit a deprogrammer. You're behaving like you've been hypnotised into a cult. You cease to be identifiable as anything human. Manmade but no longer man. Given you're typing things such as this: Lol I just got into an argument with an MRA because he was using that term unironically. I…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:36 AM
1

That really made me laugh. At least you have a reverse sense of humour. Bolt on points: It doesn't matter "who invented it" for this case. It's like complaining about the use of 0 because Muslims invented it or are often believed to have. Not all number theories around zero turned out correct either. Confirming zero as a valid concept doesn't magically validate anything else that might depend on it. These bad theories often have far more critical dependencies. This introduces another problem tha…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:01 AM
1

A slippery slope isn't necessarily a fallacy but it's not a means to arbitrarily and unconditionally dismiss anything and everything. It is however the reason for example that, if you look very very closely, I didn't take a huge hungry crocodile and place it so that its gaping maw is at the end of the slide. Actually, that would make an awesome vore series. Erm. I'm heading over to patreon. Got the busty babe, got the scene, while go down great with a bit of oil, got the story. Got to take inspi…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:58 PM
3

It might be a mistake to assume that an in-group bias ultimately translates both across all domains and more specifically as beneficial to the individual. Many in-groups operate against the individual and for the collective which in reality tends to translate to core members of the group. While the individual is still treated badly in the group the situation is often to make it worse for them outside of the group for one losing the benefit of being in the group and for two the group being able t…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:47 PM
4

Or women on their hiring board who turned out to actually be sexist against other women/competition.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:42 PM
0

Feminists: We do all the work making babies men shouldn't get a right to any of it. Feminists: Men do all the work making money we should have a right to any of it. I don't have an exact conclusion on the issue because it's complicated though a general rule of thumb it that it's really ideal for the father to be there in the first place and that if a woman is going to object to the father's presence there really ought be a good reason for it. I'm not sure where I stand on privacy. It can sometim…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:39 PM
1

They're your mental gymnastics. I'm just watching the show and describing what I see. You should learn to recognise yourself in the mirror.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:29 PM
1

That's a well established figurative statement. You've also overlooked would and will. There should be caution around preserving free speech in at least ensuring what was said was actually said and that it's not taken out of context. For example I could take you out of context by quoting only "fucking pizza" and accuse you of scapegoating pizza. I can't find any definitive counter indication in this case and given the context I can't rule out beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt that it's not a…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:23 PM
1

I find it very hard to take you seriously when you take offence against what you claim is an example of policing speech by policing speech. A white man and a black man walk into a bar. The bartender says: "Blacks first? That's racist." The white guy says no it's not, because on the way out it's whites first. The bartender says: "That's reverse racism!" Seriously, it's more like who should pay for a drink. Bob says the black guy should because he's black. Billy else says it's racism. Bob says the…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:30 PM
1

That's absolutely astounding. Incredible. Is this an act? Are you auditioning for SJW 2: The Word Raker? It's pretty good to be honest.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:36 PM
2

It's vane, marketing manipulation, ridiculous and cumbersome. There might be a compromise where in some situations two can work out but for a man's face especially around the mouth when you start having two then three then five it just gets stupid. A single blade is simple and precise. That's quickly apparent from the smallest amount of experimentation though you can find a lot to back it up for example. That and that Gillette is obsessed with that aspect of shaving. Perhaps for some men that mi…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:12 PM
2

I'd do the right thing as well but I can't lie it's not I wouldn't have a gargantuan boner while doing it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/19 08:57 PM
1

Holy broomsticks batman! Such a sub even exists?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:52 PM
2

Jesus Christ you just don't want to concede your mistake. You came charging in like the referee blowing your whistle and holding up your little card calling foul when none had been committed. Get over it, everyone makes these stupid mistakes from time to time. You're so triggered by these two little words that at this point all I can do is laugh at it. "Oh we already have a term for that, sky, how dare you call it a blue sky! You may not add any descriptive or contextual modifiers to this holy w…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:31 PM
2

Shaming can mean a lot of things and I'm quite broad with that. Men openly mock and ridicule each other which tends to be a fairly benign perhaps even overwhelmingly positive form of shaming. Brown's definition is quite specific and refers to a more negative form which is more or less in line with the form I see more of in women.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:20 PM
1

It's a felony offence.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:15 PM
1

There are thin skinned pussies everywhere you look. This is pretty serious though. It breaks the law. If I came on here saying I would give a thousand dollars to anyone who would commit a crime for me that would be breaking the law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/373 It's a felony. It's no joke.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:12 PM
2

Yes, she's breaking the law. Please verify it's real and if so report it.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:05 PM
1

She's breaking the law here. Please report her to the police or to twitter if the tweet is real.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:04 PM
1

I know this is funny and all but she's also actually breaking the law. This isn't simply a matter of hate speech. It's no different to saying "I'll pay $1000 to anyone who punches this person." If this is real then it should be reported to the police. It has a very real potential to incite violence and against children.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:02 PM
2

I'd say men shame a plenty par the course. What's different about male shaming is that it tends to by more forgiving and less spiteful. My observation of male shaming behaviours tends to be more paternal or with an avenue for redemption where as patterns in female shaming tend to be far more about control and condemnation. A strong part of this seems to be linked to this strange almost fashion of women not being allowed to see the funny side in things or have a sense of humour. Take that away an…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:52 PM
6

Men are far superior at showing their emotions and very directly. Men immediately display the most important emotions such as when something pisses them off. The worst ones to hide. Women only show emotions where open display really doesn't account for much such as empathy, compassion, etc.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:48 PM
3

She's not saying men can't work she's saying this. I think people miss it because they assume a black person wouldn't possibly say that.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:44 PM
1

Actually men do have one thing. We can pee standing up and we can make our pee go where we want it to go.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 07:38 PM
6

It slipped off and she didn't notice. It's a common design flaw with knickers. Try your self. Put a cone upside down and then try to put a ring around and get it to stay. Gravity is a notorious sex pest that'll pull down anything not nailed down. This is why women learn to do handstands. It's an emergency procedure when they notice their knickers starting to slip. You see them littering the pavement all the time. More common than dog shit.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 07:31 PM
2

"I thought it was a stool your honour."
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 07:28 PM
2

To be fair it would be really nice if this kind of thing actually happened. A lot. Every toilet visit. Though over poopulation would becum a problem.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 07:27 PM
1

"The exception is not the rule." This rule holds true, even when there are exceptions to it.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:07 PM
1

I have to say I am disappointed with this response. Just pretend when someone says something you don't like that you can't understand them. It's a social ape game that demonstrates you unworthy of enlightened debate. I expected more from you and you sold your self short. You're no different to one of those nasty creatures on the side of feminism unable to contain their emotions except you're batting for a different team. Hint: Sometimes it's not which team you choose but how you play. What I mig…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:32 PM
1

How are you any different to an SJW trying to police language? Don't tell me what or what not to do you cretin. Reverse racism has a specific meaning that applies here. You're welcome to introduce the disclaimer that it's not necessarily reciprocal and it's not effective in restoring some kind of a balance. You might be confusing left wing arguments that try to justify reverse racism as defining it. It's never been a positive term nor a lesser form of racism. It's no doubt that the left wing whi…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:26 PM
7

I think the hero worship in this article is crass but it's not as ridiculous as the vilification despite being it's opposite. I find this whole thing strange. I look at the video and it's just a kid standing there bemused as this old guy performs before him. I'm left scratching my head as what I'm supposed to be seeing. There's nothing particularly untoward going on. Just a bunch of kids mucking around and being predominantly cheerful or playful. Then I see the video giving a wider context where…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:47 PM
-9

Saw a feminist rubbing up against one of these the other day at the zoo so could be good for elephants. They definitely have a lot of room for error. Repeat after me, one two three, the more lady, the more blady.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:14 AM
-21

I just don't see what all the fuss is about. I've boycotted their products for ages. Those razors are for faggots. You don't need five blades that's for large surfaces like legs. Their main product line consists of women's razors skinned to look like male razors. The male face is highly contoured so more than one or two blades is enough before you lose precision. The company invented shaving for women. Yes you've been using women's shavers rebranded for men all this time you plonker and yes now …
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:04 AM
5

More of the old toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:58 AM
1

Lawyers always win.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:25 AM
2

Not only that but the ridiculous payout just went to pay her legal fees against such a ridiculous payout.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:56 AM
1

Up to?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:48 AM
15

Everyone is misinterpreting this. She clearly browses the internet using her clitoris.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:30 AM
2

Says the cow who can't take a rape joke.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:28 AM
2

This kink of righteous taking the moral high ground with emotional arguments especially around cause and effect is what leads to branches of SJW such as feminism escaping all reason. It forgets that people have freewill and their own cognitive faculties. If a guy murders his wife for cheating on him I don't say let it slide her cheating led to her murder. If however you keep insisting on this strict interpretation of cause and effect then we lose personal responsibility and the eugenics made me …
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:25 AM
5

He won't be too popular for it. Normally a man would just shrug that off (I'd grab her tit, I'm a tit for tat, tat for tit kind of guy). But this is a different context where there are serious double standards being applied, feminists demanding zero tolerance, no amnesty and guilty until forever.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:08 AM
4

It's there so people traditionally too dumb for university can still attend.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:05 AM
5

It didn't lead to anything. People keep mistaking various ideas for programming. It takes murderers to murder and they'll find whatever programming they need to do that. There's no reason science can't relatively easily develop eugenics programs that would not involve murder or death sentences if you want to look at it that way for being a burden on society (while wrong we also forget what hard times were like and why that might have been popular). It's just contraception at the end of the day. …
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:29 AM
8

To be fair could also be quite clever. Using the shoe to make sure it's possible to get her foot through first.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 02:07 AM
1

This isn't a joke. This is LITERALLY what left wing propaganda says. They prescribe rightthink and wrongthink. Take this for example. Look bottom right. You commonly find this in left wing ideological print.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 01:53 AM
1

This is why women will never be taken seriously.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 01:51 AM
1

That sounds a lot like the whole feminist claptrap of rape is serious it's not laughing matter followed by the stomping of fetch and either mass sulking or mass tandrum. The point of menrights rights is to be a counter force to feminism but not simply the same as feminism but swapping male with female. It must strive to be better than feminism which is deeply flawed. Anyone with a sound mind is indeed concerned about things such as women deceiving men over paternity (so for example not feminism)…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:48 AM
3

Both you and the article are selectively choosing which meaning of cuckhold to invest in while ignoring the others. There are at least three meanings of the word, one political, one being a relatively harmless but embarrassing sexual fantasy and the other being a serious problem such as the wife having children to another man. You can cut through a lot of that bullshit though and simply point out rape fantasies are highly prevalent among women, it's a perfectly healthy part of a sexual fantasy l…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:15 AM
5

The people calling people cucks don't even care about what people's private sexual activities involve as long as it's not children. It's a political insult usually aimed at white people being racist against white people and sexist against males. If you're making this about sexual fetishes you're making the same mistake as CNN or going along with CNN's mistake.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:55 PM
20

The insult cuck doesn't really apply negatively to cuckholdery as a sexual practice. A bit like how if you call someone a faggot, wanker or a retard even though the meaning derives from those things they're not being used because the person in question is actually homosexual, masturbates or is clinically retarded. The kind of article CNN is writing with that would be like writing about the insulting term asshole and actually how assholes are quite useful as otherwise we'd swell up and burst or s…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:45 PM
10

It's worth pointing out that although some theories of eugenics are questionable, it's otherwise an entirely valid subject scientifically. The reason it's fallen out of favour as a main research subject is due to moral concerns, not scientific concerns. There's no real one secret trick. Certain things aren't scientific at all and that might make it easy though science isn't the be all end all. It's a subset of philosophy that's limited and partial by design. Gender studies fancies itself both mo…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:06 PM
1

Only 68%? Men we need to try harder.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:33 PM
1

There's quite a big difference between a few random feminists screaming that though and it being put into practice in companies or the threat of that with things like "diversity quotas". This is also such a direct and open example of discrimination it makes you wonder how such a person remains a professor. It really doesn't take a genius to see all of the faults in this especially the fundamental ones. Even diversity is superficial and something not to be celebrated. The end of discrimination an…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:56 AM
1

A flapper.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:01 PM
1

Wearing knickers and tights but no skirt.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:57 PM
1

This is getting stupid. Lets just mutually agree to part ways and eventually die.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:56 PM
6

that’s something normal people do, walk in the streets at night in the dark At 2am in the morning.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:27 PM
1

Hurry up and die of AIDS already.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:23 PM
3

It really is.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:21 PM
59

So wait. They proposed blind recruitment processes to eliminate bias against women in recruitment but on testing it found instead that the bias is in fact against men and on finding that out decided to abandon it and urge caution?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:16 PM
1

A stone being polished faster results in it being more polished. You seem to lack a fundamental understanding of language and the things it refers to. I'm assuming you took a wrong turn from a feminist convention and turned up here. The thing is people here don't call perfectly normal use of language they don't like because their conceived implications hurt their feeling "conspiracy theories" throwing labels around haphazardly. Calling evolution a conspiracy theory you'd be well placed with the …
/r/MensRights07/01/19 02:55 PM
2

You mean stirring the pot. Exactly what Russia has done and its intentions aren't clear. Although for the latter you can hazard a guess why Russia might support Clinton over Trump. Trump really wants out of Syria. The US's main contention with Russia. Clinton on the other hand is a warhawk and is openly giddy about for example her role in Libya and her husbands adventure with Yugoslavia and openly insistent on US intervention in Syria. The scope, extent and outcome of any Russian operation or ev…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:35 PM
5

In that case it's effectively for everyone.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:10 PM
1

That's not the joke though.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:19 AM
1

Half assed by averages.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:40 AM
1

Men are less educated and thus disadvantaged but still the best at everything.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:38 AM
0

I've already introduced my position as being against arbitrarily lowering standards simply to force women into it. Specifically where I have a problem is your example which is overly specific. It's also tired. As in it's overused. Typically speaking a successful engagement rarely hinges on the ability to squad mates to be able to literally carry each other. Although it sounds like a practical concern when you interrogate it you squeeze out what ends up being more of an emotional argument with th…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:36 AM
5

It might require a GRC. Though that's potentially being made very easy to get with reforms. Basically GRC requires people having lived as the other gender for a couple of years at present. Transactivists want it to be possible to ascribe to another gender without any kind of due diligence. Realistically though the GRC shouldn't have been passed at all without resolving underlying issues such as intent and definitions.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:15 AM
31

Get some cheap lipstick and save a grand off your tuition fees. What next? Wear clown make up as a lifestyle choice and get a discount at MacDonalds?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:14 AM
0

That's your inability to comprehand the inclusion of a scientific concept into the discussion which is on you not me. You should stop being so arrogant. ​ If I deposit a bunch of stones in different places after a thousand years some are going to turn out more polished than others. ​ That's not pseudoscience. That's a natural process that has a rate and that in different cases can occur at different speeds. ​ If we're talking about the process in general then indeed exactly what will manifest is…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:45 AM
1

What you're talking about isn't anything to do with science. You're talking about political correctness through a kind of scientific isolation or nihilism. ​ There's no good or bad in science but we're not just talking pure science. Your statement is absurd. It's like me saying vehicle X is better or good as it's faster determined by a scientific basis (empirical, pedal to the floor) when we desire a faster vehicle and then you saying there's no such thing as better things or good things and tha…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:32 AM
1

Yes, a professional Jesus impersonator. Though he mocks the religion with it.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 01:57 AM
3

I just can't take this guy seriously.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 01:41 AM
1

Mutilated penis verses vagina to be specific. The notion that plastic surgery to form a "vagina" actually creates a real vagina is marketing. It's like if you sell fleshlights you might say it feels like the real thing. Plastic surgeons take that to the full extent and claim that it is the real thing.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:58 PM
1

Everything in the UK is technically illegal in some fashion or another. It wasn't until the ideocracy started that it became a problem. People have got it wrong about this whole singularity claptrap. It goes the other way. Exponential stupidity.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:55 PM
3

Because they're all racist but because they aren't allowed to be racist against black people they choose to be racist against white people instead. Most of them are ideologically the same as Hitler.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:46 PM
2

White had the most colours.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:46 PM
1

You could argue it depends what men are being selected for. Though on inspection there's no obviously inferior criteria there. It's quite interesting that penis size doesn't appear to be as selected for as you might expect otherwise we'd all be sporting elephant trunks. In some areas it's technically possible women might be more selected for relatively for what they're selected for if it's a narrower range than in men. Sexual dimorphism is quite moderate in humans as well though so the benefit t…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:34 PM
9

This tends to reinforce the notion that men are more evolved than women. If you look at genetics and reproduction there's a similar disproportionate affect to seen in these dating studies. People often assume in evolution that selection predominantly applies to women, specifically sexual. In reality that's not supported. For every five female lineages that survive only one male lineage survives. It's men that undergo a kind of eugenics consistently and globally for about the last fifty thousand …
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:38 AM
-12

I don't see generals often deploying to the front lines. In reality what people are assigned to and how they are deployed varies a lot. You seem to be presenting it as though every experience in the military is uniform which is not the case. You don't have to be an expert to know that. The minimum requirement in the military is pretty much to be able to carry a gun, point and shoot. Anything beyond that is dependent on any number of factors. "We all put in a little extra effort, and we may come …
/r/MensRights06/01/19 08:19 AM
7

Women always want men to be a gentlemen when outside but then break up with you when it turns out you're a gentleman in the bedroom as well.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:40 AM
4

Gaming is competitive and no not nice. People play to win which means surprise getting shot to death in the game or having all your stuff stolen or all your base set on fire. It's also where people blow off steam. The barriers women present are either massively exaggerated or actually apply to everyone. Often those barriers are really not barriers at all but women's intolerance of male behaviour or "immaturity". Such as saying crude things. That's part of the point of gaming. To unwind, wind eac…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:18 AM
2

Careful smiling at the wrong person is sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:32 AM
2

All this does is confirm to the idea that women are weak and feeble emotional cupcakes that need to be kept out of the workplace.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:30 AM
27

She arrests by falling on the criminals and pinning them down.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:23 AM
-20

One of the things about war today in the west is that the circumstances have changes a lot towards making it safe or rather minimising body bags sent home. That doesn't mean it can't still be dangerous but a lot of the time in a lot of places it's now quite cosy. As in we don't see things like another Vietnam. It could happen but it's the kind of thing politicians ignore. Though lowering standards to force women into the army or to try to manipulate things so they get all the credit really isn't…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:22 AM
3

Since google's gotten it's monopology it has abandoned it's do no evil mantra. Search results are now persistently crap and constantly flooded with pop nonsense. These days the main search is like Google news. There's always some more recent theme muscling in now rather than Google actually processing my search terms and finding relevant material.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 09:37 AM
0

There is a very high correlation with other psychological disorders. Not always psychosis but there is sometimes. The thing is abberant behaviour such as transsexualism is very often a symptom of some other underlying cause. Delusions belongs to psychosis but not all delusion is psychosis. There is a famous case going back a long time where one was successfully treated with anti-psychosis medicine. That however is only applicable for a certain proportion of cases. Delusion is extremely common bu…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 09:31 AM
1

When it comes to psychological issues you'd think they'd have bigger fish to fry than "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:42 PM
0

It all sounds promising until you realise it's a law so that when a guy's being cucked the guy she's sleeping with doesn't have to have any financial responsibility. It's for the cuck instead.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:46 AM
22

YOUR COLLEGE MAY EVEN REFER THE MATTER DIRECTLY TO THE LOCAL POLICE! The problem is in most of these cases that's what they should be doing. If someone is raped, you don't go to your HR department to get it sorted out. If someone did come to you and tell you that, it's not in your capacity to handle it, in most cases you would be compelled to report it to the police.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:41 AM
3

It's not really clear in the article either way.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:38 AM
4

If she considers that psychological abuse I have to wonder if she's even ever been employed in her life.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:31 AM
1

I believe that really needs to be tested in court. It doesn't make sense to me that congress can completely ignore, repeal, override or annul not only such a fundamental part of the constitution without an explicit and special process but also undermine the legal process itself with provably flawed laws on a number of fronts particularly if law enforcement on any level acts accordingly to the parts of the Duluth Model that state it's impossible for a woman to be anything but innocent of a crime …
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:52 AM
1

I believe that's illegal in most western countries that have equality laws. You can usually take the police to court for that.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:24 AM
1

It's my mistake I keep mixing up Title IX with the Civil Rights Act. If the Deluth Model passed through congress that's a problem. It's inherently incompatible with the CSA. Contradictory laws are a massive problem when they exist. More: As the CSA appears to derive from the constitution (equal protection under law) then it's probably also unconstitutional as well. Can congress do that? Clarification: What you're saying is, that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdicti…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:57 PM
0

The Deluth Model is itself illegal. It should be possible to challenge it and sue the Police Department for following it under the Civil Rights Act. Or at least if the Civil Rights Act is the same as anywhere else for equality laws where there must be equal treatment in law, education and employment (more specifically differences in treatment may not rely on race, sex and so on except for cases where those factors are undeniably relevant). So for example you can't have something like it's a crim…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:46 PM
21

Just go into the girls toilet, take a fucking huge shit, don't flush then leave the seat up. If they keep doing it then next time go in the sink.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:31 PM
8

Was this article computer generated or something? It's barely coherent.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:09 PM
0

They have to if he presses charges. Because the abuse is recorded there's no excuse. If the police didn't prosecute then they could be sued. A DA would lose their job.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:55 PM
1

Just be a criminal if that's what they want. People should always be careful what they wish for.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:26 AM
1

It's a bit more complex than that. Plenty of reasonable people still uphold it and it's still generally a norm. Indeed though political correctness constantly rises above all else in all things.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:13 AM
7

Culturally in the UK that's an unwritten rule. So two things potentially happening, one they're violating the rule and two they're given exception. Though it depends on level of offence. It could be anything from him making a lewd comment to running up to women while they're sitting down unawares and slapping them in the face with his dick.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:00 AM
3

There's some very interesting things in that woman's speech. Her opposition to microaggressions are often, surprise, microaggressions. She's an idiot and weak. That's not a microaggression but stating things as they are. People afraid to "hurt" others with words are themselves part of the problem as well as people that would so easily claim injury from words. She doesn't seem to understand the concept of people putting their feelings above all else as being wrong. She brings up the example of "g…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:37 AM
3

"Why are you wearing that religious headwrap." Sounds like how a Vulcan would speak.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:15 AM
5

It's also a Christmas party. There's a rule of you don't talk about what happens at the Christmas party because basically it tends to involve the company you're working for getting all its employees shitfaced drunk and out of control. There's no context though for this other than that. What specifically were the allegations?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:59 AM
6

It's a very interesting law because if you take the case of Luke Munday he would be protected by that law if you've seen the video of what his wife was doing to him (in addition to her physically violent attacks against him). Women tend to be very coercive and manipulative in relationships. That's something men tend to be victims of so stopping women doing that would end a lot of domestic abuse including the retaliatory violence against it. The reason for that is that men often find themselves p…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:41 AM
1

All your points seem to be a misreading. I've not claimed that's the case. I've simply pointed out that's an implication. Implications aren't always right. I've also not supported altruism, I've simply pointed out that's the expectation. It goes without saying that altruism isn't an entirely reasonable expectation. I've also pointed out that the focus is more accepting the truth and reality than anything else. Though I've not mentioned an inherent risk of self fulfilment in that kind of defeatis…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:35 AM
1

Temp, is strange.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:24 PM
0

It wouldn't surprise me if the picture is satirical and the person responding just stated the who'll point.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:37 PM
1

I suspect it's quite rare that it's provable either way. From what I've seen there are a lot of prosecutions for things where there's a verdict without it being possible to be sure either way. A versus B sort of thing or basically a coin toss. It's one of the reasons false claims are so effective. This is something I became acutely aware of studying the Assange case where all the evidence has leaked. There's nothing there that can conclusively confirm that he committed rape or even have a decent…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:23 PM
7

As I see it, it's all fair game. Now Ellen Barkin up the wrong tree can't complain when I hope that she gets raped by a tractor even though I have no idea who she is. I support freespeech and if you give it you have to be able to take it. The only real concern with this is that when people being outspoken is in the name of upholding feminism or some other celebrity cause it's kosher but in any other case twitter, even the police are all over it. When we see other's get what seems like a free pas…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:12 PM
-2

I have to disagree. Literally every woman tells me the statement above. But then I also have a 14" tongue and I've learnt to breath through my ears.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:05 PM
6

"No further communication with the moderation team is welcome." Goading you? Wouldn't they just mute? If they didn't mute just send them an ascii art image of goatse and be done with it. They're asking for it. Also check you're actually banned and that it's not just the user PMing you that.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:03 PM
11

This is quite an old video but I believe there's more to this than some people might realise. This is the result of affirmative action which is not only sexist (reverse sexism) and an affront to democracy but has the effect of promoting monsters, especially the entitled type into positions like this. It's amazing that it's legal. The way it works if that if the political party has a safe seat then they'll only put forward female candidates. I have no idea what would happen legally if a male cont…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:43 PM
1

Also reclaiming things. I think an important part of that is restoring the law for what it's actually meant to mean rather than people's personal interpretations, the road to hell, when people try to do good but either it's really just about looking like they're doing good (VS/WK/SJW) or they're just not competent. This case is a good example because the key premise is that she was too drunk to consent. Personally I'd play it very safe but I don't believe my standards or almost paranoia is somet…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:18 PM
0

I've neither refuted that or reinforced it. You've misinterpreted. My point would stand as it is whether the claim is true or not. It's a bit more complex than that. You do have different people there who believe different things which will include that. I don't know how many but to say it's zero is absurd. You also have a sense of humour there where things are not always what it seems. Inside jokes, mockery, satire, etc. Venting as well. People say things they don't literally mean to let off st…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:58 PM
1

There are indeed going to be multiple causes although variations in male fertility don't really account for a significant amount of it. You should also be careful of selection effect and assuming that contemporary hunter gatherer cultures examined which still persist are identical to those in prehistory. There's a lot of confirmed data showing Y chromosome extinctions due to violent reasons and the pattern throughout time as far back as can be measured doesn't match up with something as simple a…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:31 PM
1

It's questionable if she even really had alcohol poisoning or just a monster hangover that she needed to sleep off. It's not always obvious. Trying to keep anyone awake at 1am who is tired and has had a lot to drink can be taxing even with a moderate amount of alcohol. People can be surprisingly cognisant while extremely drunk as well. First time drinkers often get blackout drunk not realising the potency of alcohol for people starting drinking. There's also some variation in absorption. The vid…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:13 AM
1

I can't see it as surprising. Title IX is against discrimination isn't it so that at the inception and the core means denying people education, employment, etc. While Title IX has been amended greatly over the years from what I gather even in spite of that from what I gather if your job as "Title IX" enforcer has boiled down to denying people education then you're more likely to fall afoul of Title IX in doing so than anything else.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:28 AM
3

If you look at the figures then you see from 50 thousand years ago to 7 thousand years ago that around only 25% to 50% of men reproduce compared to women. About 7000 years ago it dropped to something like 1 in 17 before returning to normal again. I think some cases it goes up to two thirds of men surviving. I wouldn't say there's never some amount of egalitarianism as the ratios could be far worse but the fact is overall men significantly get the short end of the stick when it comes to surviving…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:38 AM
1

She also forcefully tries to give him a blowjob if you watch the rest of it, look at how she opened her mouth to take it in.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:19 AM
2

To be fair if you check one of the links above she did actually try to give head live in one of her pieces.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:16 AM
2

With that foul plastic surgery face as well. "I'm gonna to tickle your sack." Later proceeds to try to give him a BJ.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:11 AM
1

People are reading this wrong. She's trying to get Cooper a pay raise.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:10 AM
0

To top it off after eating the cubs and getting the ass you discover it's filled with faecal masses and smelly gases.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:07 AM
2

Don't mean to throw a spanner in the works but I'd be happy with 9 wives or best roll out of 9.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:58 AM
0

Their population needs to be kept <10%.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:57 AM
3

It is also interesting to note that in the most traditional societies of all, hunter gatherer bands (as opposed to chiefdoms), males band together to ensure that no single man or group of men is able to dominate either resources or sexual access: Genetic studies show a very different picture. A Y chromosome bottleneck. Throughout history overwhelmingly most men haven't reproduced, consistently although possibly with the in the advent of farming and climate change around the dawn of civilisation …
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:53 AM
0

The Braincel subreddit is full of men who want to imprison women as sex slaves, or simply hate the female gender. This is despicable, and ought not to be tolerated. That's a very intolerant attitude. It's perfectly tolerable until they actually go and imprison women as sex slaves. You're right to point out their desires are flawed but be careful with your apologist disclaimer not to inadvertently draft yourself into the ranks of the thought police.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:36 AM
11

Respond with this: (.) (👋) or ( Y👈) Cybergroped. Or this: 👉👌 Or this: 8======D~~~ ( ( / Live by the sword die by the word. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:25 AM
9

This isn't something the admins should usually be involved with. Though they're very willing to get involved with certain themes if they're unpopular be it in general or with left wing ideological preferences. If it's a top sub though then the admins should take a peak at that.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:17 AM
1

"Reminds me of my time in Iran" Provider says you're still in Iran.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:15 AM
1

It might also be from something selective like gun deaths. It rings a bell for me as well but I can't remember which. Though it could be any other 7X figure related to death I've heard :D. Implied suicide is very hard to measure. It's very grey. For example in my book Steve Jobs committed suicide trying mystical remedies rather than what the doctor prescribed. A quick Google search finds others of this opinion. Not only that but my religion teaches me that putting too much effort into living is …
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:33 PM
5

It depends on the country so I've played it safe. For the UK though where homocide is particularly low, that sounds close enough to not even bother to search for it. I think actually 7X is for the USA. Nope. Apparently 3.5X for the USA. Including unwilful suicide (Darwin awards, death avoidable through default levels of paying attention or thinking ahead) though would almost certainly bring it up at least that high.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:42 PM
198

Feminists would complain if you opened an explicitly men's only circumcision clinic.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:13 PM
15

If this were in the west then you could just say fuck you I identify as a woman, call the police on them reporting a hate crime for them misgenderring you and you're solid. Well that and discrimination laws would probably always prohibit this.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:11 PM
28

There's a really old onion article talking about something ridiculously specific still being the 30000th cause of death (I think slipping on a construction site and sliding down a chute or something). This kind of reminds me of that. Being murdered rates pretty low. I think suicide might be even more common by a factor of at least two. People talking about how your murderer is usually close, I don't think they realise how close. If age doesn't kill you, the next possibility is overwhelmingly eit…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:09 PM
144

If it's going to counter it could say "But some percent of murderers are men." Murder statistics like this are a stupid thing to make a competition over. It also comes with the territory. Men are more prone to violence. They're also more prone getting things done. In fact, were it not for tendencies of men several billion humans wouldn't be around today because they'd be starving and dying of cholera. Each sex has pros and cons, they're often intrinsically linked and in general the statistics th…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:01 PM
5

This is the second time I've seen the BBC do this so I'm assuming it always does it. There's always a yeh but... The Little Britain Broadcasting Company?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:57 PM
0

That's why you don't let recruiters look at social media. They'll be all snooty like oh they don't like ads and they like to muck around in forums. I'm an adblock aficionado just live with it. Adverts are bad for both men and women for a long time. They try to raise the standard to raise spending and raise profits. They freely attack vice and are quite egalitarian in a way as they try to make things like vanity not only tolerable for women but men as well. The lunatics in marketing will happily …
/r/MensRights19/12/18 05:11 PM
4

Women are sexually abused every planck second by millions of atoms from their garments and atmosphere. The average woman must suffer constantly being groped by their knickers and bar.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:44 AM
1

If a woman hits me and I need to hit her back then no holes barred.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:36 AM
1

You mean twitter the interwebs is a toxic place for filthy disgusting feminists.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:33 AM
-24

Be a sheep if you want to be and worship adverts instructing you how to live your life be it what to buy for yourself or for others.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:15 AM
-3

I wouldn't hire someone who doesn't grasp the concept of looking on job listings for a job rather than casually bumping into them a chitting and a chatting on facebook. Adblock for everyone.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:10 AM
-29

Adverts are for sheep who need to be told what to do and when to do it. Real men look at an actual job listing. They compare jobs and look for what's best.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:06 AM
0

I totally 100% agree, we should bring back the death penalty.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:56 PM
1

Personally I think the problem is that she doesn't have enough cock in her life.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:54 PM
2

There's another way to put it. White supremacist? Raging racist? Join... BNP? Not very reputable. Neo-Nazis? Even worse. Etc. Black and racist? Well come right in and join our anti-racism brigade. We've 100s of tax free organisations with direct access to authorities at all levels of society. Same for feminism.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:51 PM
6

I'm in that 9%. My area is very deprived and I grew up in poverty. The borough had a program for helping promising kids get to university which helped a bit. Though I was in about around 5% or less of white kids in my schools. If you look at the clustering you may see some interesting things. The cities are turning mostly black and asian youth in poor areas. Though if there's a university it's easy for them to attend and stay at home. The authority is also somewhat likely to cover a lot of the f…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:49 PM
4

They're a bunch of twats screwing with people pretending to be all high and mighty. Just screw with them back. They asked for it.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:42 PM
4

Find out where their dorms are. Take a huge shit in a paper bag. Set it on fire, bang really loudly on their door then fucking leg it.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:38 PM
1

That's natural. Most women, black people, etc just want to make ends meet or actually enjoy their lives. Most of them have far more important things to do than specialise in advancing womanhood or being a particular race. If in this society someone is going to specialise in anti-racism or anti-sexism then they're probably fucked up in the head. It would be like taking up anti-smallpox. It's just not likely they're legit.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:36 PM
1

It's a very dangerous thing to tell someone to kill themselves. Because should one commit to it then up until the point you do it you can do anything. I mean when you've killed and tortured your oppressors and then you kill yourself what's the law going to do? Put your corpse on trial and imprison it? On the other hand if someone told you to jump off a bridge, would you?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:32 PM
-64

That's ironic because if a man want's a job he'll hunt one down he doesn't just wait for an ad to pass him by. Only pussies look at adverts. Real men find a job. Job doesn't find them.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:25 PM
1

OP should have made more of an effort to anonymize their story really. Saying that I've been in similar situations like someone is wasted at a party at my house and I say they can crash but their friends are all like "no you'll be raped we must venture home" struggling with every effort to rouse their conked out mate and I'm like alright next time I'm host I'll remember to not invite you and yes that does mean you'll be kicked out if you try to attend and no we don't care if you'll call the cops…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:02 PM
2

Literally true as under the malicious communications law merely any person need be offended and even I'm offended by my oversight.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:00 PM
1

The whole story doesn't really make sense to me. It's lacking context.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:49 PM
4

Troll them by reporting them to the police. They're saying "Boy's can bleed as well." I'd take that as a threat.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:12 PM
4

Plenty of players want to immerse themselves in the experience that was a historical event. There are games out there where you can play as a transvestite dwarf if you want to. It's not a this or that thing. The cost of fixing bugs shouldn't be now you've go to be a pussy. This might be a shock but men don't like role playing as a jewish muslim black downs lesbian blind fat HIV infected trans paraplegic woman receiving chemo. Men like things such as cops and robbers, cowboys and indians. At the …
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:48 AM
3

All of them.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:16 AM
8

I'm less concerned with the drugs at this point and more concerned with the more subtle things. Letting a psychologists anywhere near a male is dangerous when you have feminism infiltrating psychology. There's a bunch of papers attacking things like toxic masculinity trying to link it to depression for example then trying to advise psychologists to attack masculinity as both a preventative and curative measure. You shouldn't send your kids to psychology because it's a problematic enough field as…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:22 AM
12

They're not getting it because being a boy isn't a mental health issue.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:45 PM
0

What I want to know is when the OECD did this study did they sack the teachers caught doing this?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:42 PM
1

Did anyone notice how this article was constantly trying to reel in the discrepancy and trying to make it all about girls with their "under-confidence"? That's not neutral. Yet it's strangely neutral about whether or not it's a bad thing. By being neutral about girls being marked up over boys then you're not being neutral. That's objectively wrong. There isn't a neutral position in there. What next a murderer is caught and the BBC is going to be neutral about whether or not that's a good thing a…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:39 PM
2

STEM usually consists of hard or more exact sciences, from the bottom up. Physical sciences though realistically with mathematics at the root.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:28 PM
1

Psychology definitely doesn't belong under STEM. The S traditionally refers to physical sciences. Applying science to psychology is difficult to say the least. In some cases it's fundamentally impossible for psychology to fall under science as it deals with things outside of the scope that science can describe. Science has no physically explanation for why we have a psyche comprised of real perception to begin with so it's very hit and miss. The brain is also vastly complex even as a physical sy…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:24 PM
2

Those are called assistants. You can pick them up off the street a degree isn't needed. If you go stand outside to the secondary schools you can grab an apprentice. Plenty of kids at 16 with nothing to do and hiring them on minimum wage, as interns, work experience or literally appendices after about two years may rival a university degree for being professionally qualified.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:10 PM
2

Social studies and those allied to medicine (specifically psychology) tend to literally be activism courses. Social justice goes all the way to the top with the UN mandating that science and education rather than being neutral be used for activism to "solve" various "problems" which are mostly solved in the west and not really problems at all. It's like the 70s called (the 1870s) and they want their suffragettes back. This is partly why they have to go out of their way to try to find problems li…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:06 PM
3

You marry them because of that ass.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:24 PM
2

They don't make them like they used to.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:24 PM
4

Pee monster.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:17 PM
5

I'll put the fucking toilet seat down when they stop smearing it with blood. If they fail in turning you to suicide they'll turn you gay instead.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:15 PM
1

Yet you've let your psychology determine your judgement in this matter. All we have is a video showing a man being abused. We can speculate about outside of that what he or she did wrong but it's also being both a bit presumptuous and nosy. Perhaps it's a private affair and she'll make up for it on her own account? If you knew about psychology we could speculate a part of her is feeling awful for just how far her melodrama and histrionics reached. I think she learnt the hard way the lie has circ…
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:09 PM
3

The thing is the there are people who hear things like "take your son to an event that focuses on ending violence against women" and don't see the absurdity in that. In their mind it's "all for a good cause" and don't even see the obvious like that serves the organisations giving the advice and helps them make money.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:20 PM
4

While the commander on desk takes responsibility in reality the ship's crew is as much a vital piece of the machinery that keeps the ship running as the crew. He can't look over everyone's shoulder all the time either. If the crew breaks down suddenly and potentially even silently in the middle of manoeuvres there's only so much that can be done. I don't know the exact details of the situation but your position is potentially misleading. I'd have to agree though, it's such a fundamental error th…
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:25 PM
5

It's been acceptable since forever who doesn't love Cherry 2000?
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:32 AM
3

Actually women do that to themselves. Some of them it's a serious mental illness. I've known some that cannot wear the same thing twice ever. Often constantly buying clothes then selling them again on ebay after they've been worn once.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:28 AM
6

Although she's being a drama queen people are failing to read between the lines. She's high class so you have to do more work to pay for the sex. Also she hates giving blowjobs. Stay away from overpriced high maintenance women and if your partner doesn't like giving BJs but you like them you're not going to have a successful sexual relationship.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:24 AM
1

He only slaps her once in the video that we can tell. He doesn't deny slapping her out of it in the midst of her attacking him which is on camera. He only denies her hyperbole about that making him a woman basher. Though he doesn't confirm the slap either he just says he'll say sorry. The video is really misleading because after that it sounds like he punches her twice. Forensic analysis of the video reveals this isn't the case. The punch sounds are his headphones falling off. The punching would…
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:12 AM
3

The stream just sounds like that. Women often scream and put on an act to elicit sympathy. I remember for example in school a girl keeps hassling me and screwing with things I'm working on from right out in front of me. I see her going again and grab her arm to stop her and defend my shit. Then she starts wailing and screaming like I'm torturing her or something. The teachers all rush in and even though it's obvious she's invading my space they start having a go at me. Females are like that all …
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:01 AM
2

Although her assault is criminal and he could press charges, more realistically it would usually make sense to instead have her sent to the psyche ward as her condition looks like one that would be better treated that way.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 06:50 AM
1

All you've done here is demonstrate prejudice against male partners and gamers. Your imposing excessive demands is armchair abuse. Do you actually have the records of his play? A four hour and twelve hour play session isn't enough. That's normal in gaming, hobbies and pass times. We really need to see annual data. The thing is we have these things called plates she could bring him and she says in the video she knows he's doing something but doesn't care. Missions in the game or sessions with oth…
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 06:28 AM
3

We need two cross cut images like you have of battle ships. Court case will be hilarious as they'll have the guy and the girl teaching the jury oboe and flute.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 06:06 AM
1

That makes no sense. Why not proportionate representation?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:06 PM
5

The solution is simple. She wants the same pay as the chief oboe player. Then she would have to be given the same position. When it turns out she can't play the oboe sack her.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:03 PM
5

Doesn't really matter though as oboe really does appear to be a lot more difficult. Search for oboe difficulty. Lots of stuff like this: https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/latest/worst-things-oboe/ It's a more skilled discipline so more pay.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:50 PM
10

She won't last five minutes in court. This is a flute.. This is an oboe.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:43 PM
9

They're both principal from what I understand. That doesn't mean they're the same. The instrument difference is obvious but there's no telling what other differences there are as well such as him working there longer.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:35 PM
1

There's no surge in aerial sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:21 PM
1

Women have a much easier time on planes than men as they usually have enough leg space.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:20 PM
0

There's no reason to believe that he's not doing his part. This is a lot of people imagining things that aren't really there largely in aid of their assumption that the female creature is in the right. Lots of nonsense like automatically claiming he's a computer game addict which isn't founded. I think it's more people who don't like computer games don't get it. They'll read books for hours or watch television for hours but when someone plays a game for hours suddenly it's an addiction. It's not…
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 07:29 PM
-1

I haven't seen that. Where is it? That's also his time. Slavery has been abolished for over a century now so I'm not sure what the point is. That time is his, it belongs to him. There's no rule stating that if someone doesn't spend their time as someone else pleases that it entitles them to assault and domestic abuse which is what's happening to him in the video. That's called victim blaming. The video only conclusively shows him receiving abuse. We don't see anything other than that his wife is…
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 06:05 PM
2

Good luck making it a crime. Might makes right and we're not all so reserved or pussified (pacified).
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:17 PM
3

They can make killing a cop a crime. Good luck arresting me for that. I love killing people and dying when it means preserving my freedom. Right and wrong. Uniform don't count.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:09 PM
4

Surely you mean /r/reality. You've obviously miss my point. We push men to master reality but keep women away from it. If you truly understood you'd understand things like what makes men superior is a culture of tough love for example.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:55 PM
1

Lolsarililleus.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:33 PM
0

Yeh so what? I'm offensive. I'm so offensive it's a lethal dose. I'm even more uninhibited than your offence of the uninhibited so what are you going to do about it? I can do anything. Can you? You'd best be careful before your offence offends me, punk.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:26 PM
5

I really wish women would actually do something for once it's tiring for engineers like me having to build the world. If only someone else could do that then I could invest my creative and constructive talent towards more artistic rather than essential things. If it weren't for men women wouldn't even have the internet to expand the scope of their whining towards and I guarantee you barely a single woman rattling on over the internet has a clue how SSL, HTTP, TCP, IP, etc works or the original i…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:21 PM
9

I think men should just step aside and them let them see how easy it is to step up. Lesson in reality. Sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:16 PM
0

Women tits. After all men at the end of the day are merely overgrown babies.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:14 PM
0

Wouldn't it make sense to make a reasonable statement as a reasonable person rather than as a reproductive this or that? Still good point though.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:08 PM
1

Even I agree with this and I like my women overly assertive. It's wrong to enforce one's own excessive or lack of standards on others.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:05 PM
2

Feminism has made women inappropriate. Keep them the fuck away from youtube. Men stop being horndogs and start being selective about those fallopian tubes. Stop seeding bitches for Christ's sake. Your lack of pickiness is depreciating the quality of the species. Men can say no as well. How many alpha and beta women have I turned down. Yes it's possible. A man can reject advances as well. Stop it men. Stop breeding bitches.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:59 PM
1

Most of us here are so because somehow as men we're oppressed or repressed. Punished for being what we are, men. Well I say to you be a man. Be who you are and stop letting rubbish like the religion of feminism or popular opinion get in the way of that. Life to men!
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:56 PM
1

To be fair she's already a slapper babe and once you're that far then a flipper baby is so oblivious you'd need to be uncharacteristically nearsighted to see it coming.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:52 PM
1

Too quick to respond man. Be a man. Go outside your comfort zone and others' as well if that's what it takes to be yourself. Stop being such a drone. Love you but don't want to be you.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:49 PM
1

You'd be a more pleasant human if your were more unpleasant.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:45 PM
1

I know right. It's extremely scientific.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:41 PM
1

Learn to see the funny side of things as well as the serious. You're like an SJW blah blah blah I'm so conscientious what will people think oh my this wont please the crowd whether it please me or not. Live a little and enjoy a mood. The more vicious the mood the more vicious the humour to compensate.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:39 PM
3

You mean the work you're ass off gap. Women have a lot more ass than men so they just can't work it off. Lets be a little more considerate. It's not our fault their asses are so fat.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:35 PM
2

This is me when a woman tries to talk shit to me.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:34 PM
0

Stop being such a worrywart we have unstoppable fists of fury. Only a psychologically disturbed ant would challenge an elephant to a dual. Step up and fuck them the fuck up.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:30 PM
0

Men make the most money. Women spend the most money. End of story.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:28 PM
17

Given the term "misandry" is banned in most modern feminist circles so you can't point it out it's not doubt it's out and about. Sorry, drunk, double replied :/.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:25 PM
3

I always worked long hours because I love what I do. I also run various departments. I never impose my own standards on others so everyone goes home on time nearly all the time. Women ask for flexibility and I'm like sure. Only thing that annoys me is when they try to exaggerate. It's a bit strange. Woman asked me for a pay rise. Talked about all their lives lives and how it would impact that looking after their babies, etc (women more often get brought in on lower skilled and salaried jobs and …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:11 PM
3

Men also have longer penises than women.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:07 PM
2

I'd rather have sex with PewDiePie and I'm straight.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:06 PM
20

The biggest problem with feminism is that women have it really fucking good and most are living it up. Given how good society is to women those drawn to complain and campaign likely have something wrong and in all likelihood, given how accommodating society is for women, it's not society. Most likely they're just rubbish people. Happening to be female and desperate to shift the burden. Seriously like if you're a woman wanting to make a difference then you'd maybe do something like make some new …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:02 PM
1

That's a rather broad definition. Why do people keep saying he hit her or beat the shit out of her when all he did was slap her?
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 09:47 AM
0

Most likely he'll just want to move on and wont press the matter.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 09:46 AM
6

I simply watched the video. It's amazing what you can accomplish with your eyes and ears.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 09:46 AM
5

Epic boo hoo diddums sob story. That poor fragile woman with her incredibly high maintenance emotional and psychological needs that she can't wait ten minutes. Stop mollycoddling women.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:47 AM
1

Can you define beating?
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:45 AM
0

Can you define hitting?
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:44 AM
9

He's taking care of his wife and kids. He works his ass of day and night including spending almost half his weekends getting qualified for his job. He pays the bills and also comes home making time for the kids. Your position is abusive. As if he's not allowed to have any personal time at all but instead must live like a slave. If you were in a relationship and treated a partner the way you just described that would be domestic abuse. If you had actually watched the video and listened carefully …
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:41 AM
2

He should have called the police immediately and reported her assaulting him as well as her psychiatric state. However all he did was slap her when she was completely out of control. People are saying he beat the shit out of her but there's no evidence of that in the video.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:34 AM
6

She's throwing other stuff as well and that has the potential to cause injury including to the eyes. When he gets up he immediately has to lurch away from something. It doesn't look like she isn't on the attack. It's also not up to you to decide what level of assault a victim should endure. You might be happy to sit there having things thrown at you but you can't deprive others of their rights. The victim her clearly tells her to stop it but she persists. He's not consenting to assault telling h…
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:27 AM
3

The video starts with her harassing him to come for dinner. What she is doing is abuse. You can't make unreasonable demands and attack someone's free time like that. People have some right to down time and she's fundamentally attacking his right. That alone is domestic abuse of the emotional variety. She throws things at him which is assault, also domestic abuse. This is undeniable as he's forced to physically react ducking and diving. Eventually he gets up and has to dodge / block her. While st…
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:22 AM
2

Some more. There are some good comments coming up on youtube realizing this isn't what it seems but there are a disturbing amount of comments as well just like this one I got posting this else where (excerpts from the SJW): Yeah but instead he beat the shit out of his pregnant wife in front of his 2 kids. While his wife and kids cried "Stop". And the unmistakeable sound of open hand slaps and closed fist punches landing. Seeing as he chased her out of the room and audibly slaps her before she st…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 06:53 PM
1

The longer version of the video states: "the wife tries countless times to defend herself but ends up just getting punched and slapped more" Poe's law? At the start she mentions dinner. In the end there's an inexplicable clicking noise. He says something like fuck yeh or fuck you at the end which doesn't make sense. A chat about pooing on the floor at the start. Some of the sounds are from the game. Some people not paying attention might think it's him hitting her. It's really bizarre we never s…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:55 PM
3

Just about every social justice activism group is doing it. Anti-locals (pro-immigrant), pro-islam, pro-jew, anti-male (feminism), anti-white (anti-racism), anti-heterossxual (lgbT), etc.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:34 PM
2

Everything deserves a bit of scrutiny but indeed there's no reason to consider it significantly misrepresentative. It's my bad the issue of surveys it beyond just this case and it's just a disclaimer. Feminism tends to over rely on them. We must keep in mind the limitations of surveys for example if asked instead to give or choose examples of what they see as discrimination against men that might yield more interesting results.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:50 PM
1

Wait now what's your point? Surveys are limited even when conducted neutrally. It's just measuring opinion. I'm not saying those opinions are wrong and it's good if people are recognizing growing anti-male sentiments which increasingly go unchecked.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:41 PM
4

My long lost twin. I'm no longer an odd sock.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:26 PM
1

I'm saying people should be cautious with now they process survey results. It's good this one is open and honest up front it's a survey. A lot of surveys are often presented as science. They're interesting for letting us know how people perceive things but also have huge margins for error. I'm not speaking as to the veracity or usefulness of this one it's just a reminder since I've stumbled upon constant survey abuse over the year and we ought be careful as well. It's not a bad thing if people t…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:26 PM
2

I'd be careful with survey results. There's a difference between public perception and reality. Though there are ample real examples of sexism against men to back that up. Feminism isn't a scapegoat it's at the tip of the spear in the battle of the sexes. It's a nest of spite against men. It's also kicking men when they're down.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:27 PM
2

Normally that would be breaking discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:20 PM
4

I used to talk to my socks.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:18 PM
348

I totally disagree. Feminism is holding them back.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:00 PM
3

If you read my analysis, when he slapped her just moments before he dodges/blocks her. The two punch lime sounds later are probably his head phones falling off. The first time they stayed on but those times he had to put them back on. Fourth time no impact sounds. Also while she was screaming the third time she managed to pull his shirt neck it would appear quite hard enough to see it looks clearly damaged. Please read my analysis above. Only thing video is evidence of is him being domestically …
/r/MensRights10/12/18 02:41 PM
2

There's no visual confirmation of this and actually she makes some of the racket. Last time he gets up it sounds like a slap again. Also when get gets up that sounds like her making the noise. He could be hitting his palm in front of her face to frighten her. We really have no idea. If you listen to it and watch it very very carefully you''ll notice some things. I recommend half speed. To me it seems obvious he slaps her and after that my first instinct is he punches her but the fact is we can't…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:45 PM
2

I saw a woman abusing her husband a man in public the other day and very nearly interviewed. The poor guy was just taking it and had almost exactly this look.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:06 PM
13

Some analysis of this... Assault in law in the anglosphere can include throwing things. You don't have to punch someone for it to be assault. There has to be a credible and reasonable sense of threat of physical injury. It doesn't have to be direct. Throwing a brick at someone's head is assault. Even if you miss. Even if you "intended" to miss. From the victims perspective none of that's certain. As far as they're concerned they're in real imminent danger. You can see in the video he has to dodg…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 11:36 AM
5

I don't really see that. What I see in the video is her assault him first tossing stuff at him as well as messing stuff up in the process. When he gets up an slaps her there's every indication she's on the assault and he's still asking her to stop it. Given the video shows her assaulting him first he should be able to press charges. It's not clear what's happening later in the video though. That might be affray (two people mutually engaged in assault). Because there's video evidence of him being…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:33 AM
4

This comes to mind. Incessant nagging disorder should be on the DSM.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:24 AM
6

I wouldn't count on it. Psychology is more driven by socio-political activism rather than science and medicine other wise it wound retain the name gender identity disorder and at best gender dysphoria would fall under depression as it basically means being unhappy about yourself specifically your gender. Dysphoria isn't a specific illness but rather a set of symptoms with any number of neurological and psychological underlying causes. Quite often these are very difficult to near impossible to un…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:09 AM
225

I don't buy her insanity plea.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:39 AM
1

Actual story?
/r/MensRights10/12/18 12:09 AM
2

The whole patriarchy thing. Feminism presents a lot of problems. Some of them false, some of them dilemmas (where the only cure is worse than the disease) and sometimes it even unearths legitimate problems. No matter what the origin of a problem it's always patriarchy that's to blame. Not simply the system but the system of men. What this means is that even in a case where feminism presents a real problem their own problem of blame men gets in the way. The level of scapegoating and identity poli…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:49 AM
8

Women have long believed they're superior (especially due to birthing) as a driver for feminism. People ignored it as just harmless noise when it came to things such as wanting the vote, a fair request but since we've pedestaled them elevating them through artificial means with things such as all women shortlists it's become increasingly dangerous. Not least of all is that I don't think women realise men having had all the power makes them kind of good at it including not abusing it. Women have …
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:19 AM
10

Jesus fucking Christ knitting a cardigan what next a beauty pageant for infant genitalia? Small penis humiliation for babies?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:09 AM
6

Keeping her safe from horny 13 to 17 year old boys no doubt.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:07 AM
1

Guys for fuck sake can we stop making such a song and dance about this? Anyone and everyone knows that everyone in Sao Paulo is fat. Why would they make an option to filter that out? It's like rule #1 of UX. Know your audience. Know the supply and the demand. There's no supply. Why would they try to sell it when acting as the middleman?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:03 AM
4

Hmm. White males disappear from academia. Along with them we see integrity and truth disappear from academia as degrees become increasingly useless in the real world as the average degree becomes as applicable as a degree in theology. Goliard rises again. For those that don't get the reference, Christianity had a monopoly on higher education. They educated too many people, there wasn't such a need for clerics and bishops. So they went out into the real world graduating as paupers and in their di…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 03:31 AM
19

Feminists almost openly state this intention. They wish to influence society. Such is the reason for wanting more women in computer gaming for example.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 11:08 PM
7

So women aren't often creating or working for tech start ups. So what? That's their prerogative. This is a sexist article. It's like telling women to get in the kitchen except instead it's tech start ups. If the feminists see this they'll be enraged.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:56 AM
1

Wouldn't the spermacide in some condoms increase the chances of a flipper baby?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:45 AM
1

This is what I don't get. Equality laws usually relate to discrimination often what ends up being civil cases. I don't see where indictable crime comes into that. That's a criminal matter that's little to nothing to do with discrimination. Usually if you deliberately try to do anything under discrimination laws you just end up breaking them because now you're actively discrimination. The usual approach is to ignore protected characteristics in any deliberation unless it's fundamentally and reaso…
/r/MensRights07/12/18 02:11 AM
1

I'm very skeptical that universities can override the law. You should be able to demand full legal arbitration. In law usually you can have something like sharia which both the accused and accuser can volunteer to attend but both parties must consent. You would think if the student refused a private court the university should be forced to refer the matter to criminal justice. I find it very strange how a private entity can have entirely its own arbitrary criminal justice system that would depri…
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:30 AM
-1

To be fair they we're probably taking her to the asylum.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:36 PM
2

Even if it fell through because it couldn't be verified a process that causes disproportionate damage to the accused is in itself something I'd say you could call a Title IX violation by standards often put forward. Even that aside the legal process should not punish those not yet found to be guilty in the sense of exposing them to undue hardship. Even an administrative process may be held to that. In fact that's like sharia. It makes no sense not to have taken this to law. The university should…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:25 PM
1

We've been wrong about women all possessing innate empathy. It turns out a lesson in empathy is required. We need to start spitting out well thought out high quality material on venomous femininity and poisonous feminism.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:17 PM
1

Actually it wants to take care of men. Read that very carefully and think about all the things it might mean.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:14 PM
2

Feminists are using this to try to control men by declaring male behavior a sickness and then that they must comply for their own good. Same as manspreading being a denial of male genitalia. It's ignorance of that we actually have something other than a void between out legs. It's their way to symbolically castrate men like a pair of scissors or nut crackers. It's a very violent and hateful movement. It's emasculation. What you're describing is actually misandry through and through. A movement t…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:11 PM
3

Damages on two accounts. The impact of the false allegation and the process appears to have also caused damages. We're lacking details but I wouldn't dismiss damages out of hand. What he's describing is damage significant enough to expect compensation.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:53 PM
1

You're turning it into an argument. You've presented an unsound argument on at least two counts. You've obviously been caught out as not having studied this and just taking people's word for it. It happens, you've just entered the first stage of grief. I've encountered plenty of transsexuals as well that are fine but they're nothing to do with transactivism. They're not even allowed. They're not radical enough. Not all Arabs are Muslims. Though this is a cult centered on transsexual demands. I t…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:50 PM
1

Although I might agree with the sentiment it's a bit petty. Though a bot that does archive links would be more appreciated. Especially as they can edit or bury the article screwing with the historic record. We should ask the mods if they can do that with automoderator.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:13 PM
2

Proposed new federal rules on Title IX make reporting sexual abuse harder — and getting away with it much easier There are two sides to this. It's a response to ridiculous Title IX claims (a flood of frivolous lawsuits where establishments are left to the mercy of the court to try to decide on the meaning of life) which have led to bizarre policies extremely favorable to the accuser. A serious problem with this legal stuff is that someone will get some legal aid from a charity or something then …
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:08 PM
1

It's a bloody cosmopolitan slice of high life magazine for women and people that thrive on boredom but realistically is traditionally primarily used in waiting rooms to further punish those having to wait. I think things like mobile phones catering to boredom have forced it to go mainstream.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:05 PM
2

Shouldn't he be seeking damages?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:02 PM
7

What I don't get is why there's not process for recovering damages been put into action in this case.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:01 PM
5

He wants to be able to pay women more so they'll have sex with him.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:58 PM
5

For a bill like that basically saying it's alright to pay men less then that might go beyond something to be fixed with democracy. You ought be amassed in the streets and ready to tear down the government if they don't correct their mistake. Though I'd investigate it further to make sure it's really as presented.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:48 PM
5

That's really messed up.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:44 PM
7

For that money he could afford to sleep with a high class prostitute every night of the year.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:40 PM
12

I detest him as well but for $160K you can live very comfortably for well over a year. Years even. Even with kids. The value of money doesn't actually scale linearly. With the amount she's got it would be dead easy after a year to buy a property or two and rent it out for passive income or basically free income at a much higher rate than bank interest will usually pay. With 2 million you can retire and never have to work again.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:37 PM
1

My ex-girlfriend had a consent tattoo for my birthday. When we broke up it was really hard to remove.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:34 PM
-1

There's a simple logic here. If the women you work with must earn as much as you do then it's very easy to screw things up. You earned more because you did over time? Now they have to. You earned more as a says man getting lucky with a rich customer? They're going to have to work that off as well. Most people would find the original statement funny for its absurdity. The reason the left wing has become so difficult today is that they've willfully lobotomized themselves. Their minds are like a mi…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:10 PM
1

You mean you don't generalize? That would be voluntary retardation as generalization is a fundamental cognitive faculty. It's like memory. You might sometimes remember things wrong or recall the wrong memory but you don't inflict voluntary amnesia.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:47 PM
-2

It's you that's trying to generalize muddying the waters making the some that are able and willing the all. You're desperately clawing trying to tear down my point but you can't achieve that with anything beyond a petty disclaimer stating the obvious. Everyone knows there are exceptions and everyone knows the exception is not the rule.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:33 PM
7

Feminists are angry that men exist.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:51 PM
5

Human evolution stretched our learning period. This is why childhood is so long for humans. Humans are like infantized chimps in some ways. Selected for slower development. There's some indication that both males and white people are particularly infantized. If so it's easier for them to take longer and fall behind. However they also have an extended maturation period allowing them to develop further and while they develop slowly it's based on the same input but for more development than others.…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:17 PM
1

I was in that situation once so I just peed against the wall we were lined up against. I've done worse too.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 06:55 PM
2

There isn't that I know of a law in the UK prohibiting toilet use. However most people strongly respect the private facilities of each sex where they do their private business. Though establishments will enforce such a law for the safety and comfort of their patrons. There are laws against perversion for example in the form of voyeurism. If you're caught without an innocent explanation expect trouble. He has been accused of voyeurism not shitting in the wrong toilet. It might be a false accusati…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 06:53 PM
-1

Ben's got it wrong here. Women are asking for equal pay not equal earnings. Saying that women you work with must earn equal pay is actually really cruel and dark. It means they must be forced to work as hard as you. Imagine the wringer you could put the women working with you through when you decide to work 80 hour weeks to earn more pay. They're drop like flies. The mistake is leaving in the word "earn".
/r/MensRights06/12/18 06:09 PM
1

No it's not. By an large society has been pretty accepting. You're acting like this is the 60s or something (even then tolerance was quite widespread). The dispute comes about when we entertain insanity like being able to use any sex segregated facility on a whim or imposing their beliefs on others or justifying rape by deception. All of those things have nothing to do with their right to exist they're attacks on the right for sex and sexuality to exist. None of it's equal rights. It's just give…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:56 PM
1

Since when has their "right to exist" come into question?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:06 AM
1

Then I was possibly mistaken. That's a one tracked mind. It's just the head and tail of the arrow. Though you do have a genuine conflict that might make you see differently and that you've not yet ended your friendship shows hope as your mind is not too quick to act thus far. The most common by far of cognitive faults out of trillions.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:24 PM
1

Feeling ambivalent or having mixed feelings means you have the potential for mental superiority. Most people can only juggle with one hand.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:45 PM
1

It's their attempt at responding to cuck.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 02:22 PM
2

Touching a woman is sexual assault at least in the eyes of someone that'll be able to ruin your day. You should never touch a woman at all. If she touches you inadvertently you should move away. Take extra care not to bump into them.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 02:15 PM
2

It's not really in feminist hands anymore. You're probably behind developments a bit but that was the last season. It's long had some attachment to the homosexual and feminist movement but it's since emancipated itself. It's shifting the blame at this point. As screwed up as feminism is transactivism has its own problems that can't be blamed on feminism. I'd dare say I sense a feeling of being afraid to directly confront transactivism as the problem and if so that's not surprising giving the tac…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:18 PM
3

Zero sum games can be played fairly but as you point out it's just take take take not give and take. That's a fundamental problem with transactivism. It's all me-me-me or transcentric. That's even further than just zero sum it's trying to make the whole world revolve around them. What's happening with white people is that we're domesticated. Leaders and owners don't particularly care at all for livestock. They just do enough to prevent a stampede. It's just a workforce that belongs to those with…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:49 PM
4

What I mean is that even if you're not by any useful meaning of the word transphobic you wont find much luck convincing transactivism. There's no point even bothering or feeling that you should have to. In fact you're innocent until proven guilty. There's nothing there to defend. If people throw around random allegations you shouldn't have to oblige them. You shouldn't have to feel like you should have to do so preemptively either. The fact that you anticipate attack really speaks out to the pro…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:23 PM
6

I believe I'm from Mars. Under the definition of transphobia according to transactivism you're transphobic if you don't also believe I'm from Mars. It's not enough to simply let me believe what I want to believe. You also have to believe what I want you to believe. It's so easy to be transphobic you're wasting you time even trying not to be. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transphobia You don't have to go so far to find a low bar.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:11 PM
5

You're putting words in my mouth claiming I'm putting words in trans people's mouths. I'm not talking about trans people in general who possess an array of different beliefs which do actually sometimes include this belief. I'm talking about transactivism which doesn't promote such a diversity of ideas. In fact a different idea would be transphobia which casts out a fair portion of trans people as well. ‘Sex characteristics’ is more accurate than ‘biological sex’, ‘biologically male’ or ‘biologic…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:43 AM
3

Shot themselves in the foot there because they've really lowered the bar on what counts as trans. You can just say you identify as a woman, nothing else, then say you're trans on the application. You don't have to chop your bits off although there are social ingroup pressures and enticements towards going all the way.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:00 AM
3

It's probably not worth dwelling on but when one of the problems with transactivism is the way the way people go to extremes to defend it irrationally as you just did jumping all over it then it makes me wonder. Also now you know what it feels like to be ridiculously accused of having some hidden agenda.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:18 AM
3

I really shouldn't speculate but I noticed you hang around a venue that sent a transsexual infiltrator to a feminism sub trying to disrupt the conversation on criticism of transactivism who was outed sowing discord and preventing united on the issue. Nah it's probably just coincidence/paranoia.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:11 AM
4

You can just search for "sex assigned at birth". There's a lot of confusion and abuse around the meanings of sex/gender. Also sex reassignment surgery. Is it starting to all fit together yet? Actually it's not just transactivism but branding of a medical service. Another dark side to this.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:07 AM
3

I have Asperger's and my specific obsession is with problems in the with the transsexual rights movement at present especially in respect to oppression of any kind of dissent. Even legitimate criticism is constantly attacked and suppressed. It's a forbidden subject of study.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:02 AM
4

There's no point me arguing my point you're doing a good enough arguing my point for me with statements like that which either don't come across as you think they do or betray your ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:57 AM
3

You're arguing against Trans Rights... that's transphobia.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:54 AM
1

You've picked the most broad statement you could find comprising of the most data and I've said where to start because it needs to be broken down. As you've not specified I'm just going to show you one I did earlier showing an exclusive and disproportionate obsession with transsexual murders.... I was discussing with a transsexual a conversation boiling down to it's not if there should be an expectation to disclose but when and naturally the "but I might be killed" argument came up. I'm aware th…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:53 AM
6

your post is a personal attack against Trans People disguised as a political opinion. That's no different to a feminist coming on here and having a go at criticism of feminism accusing the author of being misogynist. It's great to hear that you're intolerant and wear it proudly. I think we should get to the point here. I'm starting to think you're a transactivist. You're doing the talk and doing the walk. This is the kind of harassment and abuse to expect anyone who dares criticize transactivism…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:44 AM
3

They've recently moved to replace sex with gender although I think if you tell them what that means by the sociology definitions of sex and gender then you'll make them quite angry as that's a step back for transgender rights. There's a lot of confusion in their movement and constantly changing words/definitions everywhere to suit their purposes. Sex/gender, sex assigned at birth rather than born sex, GID, GD, etc. The renaming never ends. It's a circus. God help us all if they discover sed (the…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:41 AM
3

This isn't the kind of place I expected to find an SJW. Most of your comment is personal attack with the rest being a desperate insistence of your worldview. Want another observation? You replied far too quickly to have carefully read, processed, understood and genuinely questioned my post. One of the great little traps of writing a very long post. It really easily catches knee jerk reactions. So if you will please keep calm and read it carefully or otherwise I don't think we can have a producti…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:34 AM
3

I've done a lot of further analysis on that and it's something I've looked into. It's not right to say it's all transgender but the movement isn't completely free of transgender either and they're a significant driving force. However they could not get anywhere if society at large didn't permit them and that's something we need to seriously address. As I said, starting out with no longer being afraid to call this stuff out. It's our duty to set our boundaries. We've not done that. Edit: The prob…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:29 AM
1

That's your concept of transgender. I can also understand your disbelief. It's absurd. It's not something all transgender believe but it is a part of the ideological foundation of transactivism. Have you not noticed they say sex assigned at birth everywhere? Actual sex is increasingly sidelined until it's gone. You can look it up and find sources. There's even a transgender studies lecturer openly saying it on youtube. Open evidence is inline with the statement above so that's where to get start…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:25 AM
6

You've just posted twice. One of your comments basically just says "nurh you're transphobic" so you've obviously not read what I've written and made a prejudicial assumption and you've also just declared "no one thinks that". You think no one thinks that. It seems stupid and unlikely I agree. It is beyond belief so I can't blame you. Have you actually verified that though? You should look it up yourself but if you want I can provide a source.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:19 AM
1

There's no reason you wouldn't be welcome just for being transsexual. However that doesn't mean this is a safe space free of criticism of transsexuals, transsexual ideology, transsexual activism, etc. It doesn't mean people will agree with you either. As long as you're reasonable it shouldn't matter. Same standard for everyone.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 07:50 AM
3

That's more of a fact than a thought with more than enough data to confirm it.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 06:30 PM
6

The prevalence of circumcision in the USA is inexplicable. Those images made my crotch cringe.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:35 PM
4

Short for female supremacist.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:13 PM
11

There a more insidious version of this. Many managers will keep the best people on the bench while giving the most important work to people that can't do it but so that they get the credit. Usually diversity hires. You then end up fixing the work at best. What you end up with is being paid to do someone else's homework while they get all the credit or you find yourself paid as a private in house tutor for the appointed hero teaching them to do stuff you're already qualified to do but aren't allo…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:11 PM
1

There is a bias there. Women or not though massively increasing the student population means dumbing down offerings. There are some stats here. Apart from STEM, construction and business women are massively over represented.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:58 PM
1

I think feminism has always had its side of misandry and it has always been about making things better for women not necessarily stopping at a reasonable definition of equality or not stopping at all. Rights movements are rarely really equal rights movements. Feminism apologists that claim feminism also supports men tend to cause more problems since it's a conflict of interest. It's not the business of a movement for women that's often rooted in misandry to tell men what's good for them. This ha…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 12:18 PM
0

I don't think that's so prevalent today. Back in the day feminism was something more inert. Like how everyone says they're Christian but they're not. They don't go to church, never read a page of the bible and fuck like rabbits before marriage. It used to be just a badge. Today it's all about the pay gap and giving women jobs over men even if men are better qualified. Also banning porn, prostitution, rape jokes, etc. Today it's regarded like Christian conservatism but even more extreme. Modern d…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:21 PM
1

Feminism being perceived as for example allowing women to vote in elections lasted at least two or three generations. Even around the turn of the century. Anyone who remembers before the turn of the century remembers a very different perception of feminism. There wasn't the internet either as a ubiquitous medium not the effort to try to get everyone to go to university. The crazy parts of feminist theory were largely contained in relative terms.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:47 PM
0

This is when for most people, even though it was a very long time ago, it was stuff like giving women the vote. The feminism we see now spent decades stewing in obscurity trying to figure what the bloody hell it was supposed to do now that women got everything they wanted, hiding in in the shadows of university halls, womens' get together's, etc.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:39 PM
1

The entirety of the UK is like that. The economy is just a money sink with few really being productive. Most people are socialist given cash cow money to make their own little socialist microcosm to prove why they're right and how dare the country insult them by not immediately promoting them to God emperor as they know it all and the only thing between the life we know and utopia is their ascension. It's a failed experiment but they have money to burn. We all know what socialism leads to. Brain…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:29 PM
1

UK, one of the most PC countries in the world.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:21 PM
0

I remember this. When feminism used to be a good thing or was residual from that. People just trusted it. Since women are no longer treated unfairly but the cause against women being treated unfairly is still going well fuck me if I know where that is now. It's not trustworthy anymore.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:16 PM
1

All the cities, where jobs are, are socialist and now they're really pissed since losing in their election. I work in a skills based discipline as well. 95% of the job require primarily skills that are nothing to do with my discipline for my discipline as well. Cargo Cult is extreme. It's like no one wants a brick layer anymore and to get houses built. They want you to also be able to do interpretive dance as well and you have to be really good at that, so good at that, it's the only thing that …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:11 PM
1

Women have longer life expectancy and from what I see in the work place they work at most half as much so they should retire way after men. If you really wanted to balance the books. Retirement would be unachievable for most women.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:59 PM
1

I've put it crudely. The rest of my writing should make it clear what I mean. Our species struggled against the reality they found themselves in. It happens men were at the forefront of that battle. Occasionally women got stepped on. Seriously though really. Genetics show that even then, women had it good. Women have always out survived men. For a period it was 17 to 1! As in for every 17 women that survived one man did. See the Y chromosome bottleneck. Whatever was inflicted upon women in the b…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:06 PM
1

That's weak. Pretending like you're a troll because you don't know you live under a bridge. I bet you feast upon jumpers.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:51 PM
2

I've been hit quite a few times. I tend to just scow, stare and then shrug it off probably much to the opponent's relief. But then you have people coming up behind you with a brick and smashing it on the back of your head causing a major brain injury then smashing your face with a bottle and kicking it into your face when you're down and no one saying anything or willing to come forward and identify the person. You also have all kinds of round about attacks back stabbing you because people are j…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:46 PM
0

Sorry I didn't realize you were a troll. If I knew that I wouldn't have bothered with a response.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:31 PM
1

I don't like liars. Some transthingiemajigs are that beyond the unavoidable.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:28 PM
1

You mean is a man, now dressed up as a woman. That's not transphobic. That's just how I see it. The definition of transphobic as my perception not being how they want me to perceive is not useful at all. It's down right tyrannical. If some people want to live as a female and lets say, act out that character, fine with me. What I don't agree with is with this horrible notion of what you don't know wont hurt you or a magician never reveals his tricks. I quite like chicks with dicks. There's no exc…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:56 PM
2

I'd also like to reduce suicide but there's been a lot of misguided attempts at this mostly really not against suicide but for some partisan cause and that's messed things up. Actually I don't even want to sleep with a male that can pass as a female. Unless I know about it and it's my choice. It's not transphobic. In fact it's the other way around. I've always been pro-trans until I asked them directly where they stood on this and they were like "YOU FUCKING TRANSPHOBE WE'LL RAPE THE SHIT OUT OF…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:44 PM
2

Your position is really offensive as well. Not only to me but to truth. Your point? I think the suicide argument is becoming problematic all around. It's like whoever gets the highest suicide score gets the best treatment. Great way to encourage suicide. That's actually made me think of killing myself to support my niche cause. Well done. Please stop with this suicide olympics nonsense. As if oppression olympics weren't bad enough. Is Tibet free? No. Should Tibet be free? I don't know. No amount…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:28 PM
3

You're meant to treat the distress, not conform to the delusion. It's strange because usually in psychology playing along with delusion is the last thing you're supposed to do normally. That was presented in a legal case recently but dismissed on technicality. What this means is that you now must pay for incels with your medical insurance to have height increasing medical procedures and looks enhancements. You must also pay for old people to have face lifts. You must also now pay for breast enla…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:19 PM
2

The problem with the word rape is that there are so many degrees. Cold can range from 18 degrees c to minus two hundred or more. Abuse of a position of authority is considered rape. Probably around -1c in this case. Realistically though she's too well connected and too hot to serve real time rape or not.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:15 PM
2

Aren't these already hate crimes? Legislation says based on sex, not on being female. Not sure about ageism, it's always been a bit on the edge. This is non news to me. It's like some SJW actually read the law for once and realized oh shit, that includes men and white people! OMG I've been attacking them on twitter constantly breaking the malicious communications act (which criminalizes all online communications) a dozen times a day! Fine with me as long as I'm still allowed to enjoy femdom in t…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:57 PM
1

Especially as you just have to put .json at the end and it's way more machine readable then HTML with all kinds of structural presentation noise embedded in it.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:52 PM
7

I remember twenty years ago if asked if you were feminist everyone would say yes sure. Women voting? Why not? Women not having to wear bras? Not my tits, not my wardrobe. People were lulled into a sense of false security. I think if they were told what feminism wants to give to women today they wouldn't be so quick to be gang pressed. Most subs on reddit enforce ideological conformance. Feminism however is one of the worst. They consider anyone not agreeing with it as a continuation of "male opp…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:51 PM
1

I think what really makes it bad is that if you have to get 14 year olds drunk on alcohol to sleep with you when they're already drunk on puberty probably horny to the high heavens then they really must not be gagging for it. Extra effort should require fifty extra years a piece.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:43 PM
0

I have an illusion of power in my immediate surroundings or rather it's hard to treat me in a grossly abusive manner directly. Indeed, it's hapless. Yet I'm not victimless. I'm not unwilling to admit that I subscribe to tough guy or God Mode mentality nor am I unwilling to admit the flaws in that. For example, if I'm dealt a bad hand, I have to deal with it, if someone deliberately deals me a bad hand, I have to deal with it. It's always it's not you it's me even when it's you society yes lookin…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:18 PM
1

For me power is usually about always having a fallback so that you don't have to worry in any situation or control it and let what happens happens. It's a set of last resorts of last resorts that you should never actually have to resort to. In any situation it can be used to put you on top or prevent you from being put under. For me it is used to prevent me or anyone being treated unfairly. In most situations, if push comes to shove, I often have the upper hand and it's something we all try to a…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:06 PM
3

You missed option #0. Have a scraper, bot, whatever backing up all content here rapidly. Just in case.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:31 PM
1

I get what you're saying. I have the same battle. Between people who know either the spirit of the law or the letter but not both. People who have to go to the dictionary to know what words mean rather than learning through their use and context. Funnily enough I do have a degree of Asperger's (I don't think it's right to call it autism because that's really severe where as Asperger's isn't, in some cases Asperger's is an advantage) and secondary social anxiety (when you suck at socializing, fai…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:19 PM
1

What part did you disagree with?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:11 PM
1

Actually the point of that was honesty, confession. The whole point of that was to express that I can be arrogant and so can anyone else. It wasn't meant to be hidden although I can understand your confusion as I never directly said that. Instead I expressed it as it is. The whole point at this is looking at the error in my ways and also reflecting that to understand other common errors we might make and that others might make from blind arrogance.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:05 PM
1

I think my subconscious has some kind of a complex yes and that's what I'm exposing or being honest about. It's also something we strive for. We want to be resilient and we do all we can to achieve that. The further we advance in that cause the more immune we feel to the trials reality might throw at us. It can become a kind of ignorance. We try to escape whatever reality can inflict upon us and then when we do we become ignorant of it. That's the God complex and it's my whole point. men should …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:59 PM
1

I tend to be quite simple. I always go by no harm done. I realize that can also be counter productive. I should potentially consider their lack of control as bad as mine would be even if the consequences might be unequal between the two on average.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:47 PM
7

That seems a bit harsh. Anecdotal or not there are some very good points there. If this is torpedoing your career, say nothing do nothing hear nothing is best for your career. I've seen worse than this on multiple accounts. Several companies I worked for believed in empowerment for "victimized" groups. What they would do in their structuring and hiring is automatically decide who the winner was. So they would hire a random woman, immigrant, etc then declare them the best. I would constantly be p…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:40 PM
2

I agree. The principle of equal opportunity is why the recruitment process doesn't involve DNA testing but actual testing of being fit for purpose for the task at hand. After that what happens happens.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:30 PM
7

I think we should just let the best in as always. The pool available to STEM isn't on STEM. There's a bit of discrimination in STEM or everywhere. Anywhere you find humans there's mistakes. However simply saying it's all the people in STEM and not the people that people want to be in STEM is another example of said human flaw. You give me ten mathematicians all I care about is their mathematics. Anything else is irrelevant. Under-representation is a political concept. A black person for example …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:19 PM
2

That's common across reddit. I wouldn't be so mad at it if they weren't so shy about it. If they just hung a sign outside saying "PS. No dissent." it wouldn't be so bad. You'd just not go in rather than going in and being surprised at being kicked out for dissent. They need better doormen. The measure of how good a doorman is consists of the conflicting combination of how many people they let in versus how many are thrown out. Every time there's a throw out they done goofed. They're trying to be…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:49 AM
16

Of course we need to have more women in STEM because particles care about whether their observer is male or female. This has been demonstrated in quantum physics and it's also the reason that we have dark matter which is male's ignorance of the feminine. All we need to do is have an equal ratio of men to women and the pussy particles all around us will become immediately apparent through the observer effect. Yeh right.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:12 AM
3

Why does it need to be "fixed"?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:09 AM
3

I'm offended by the entire concept of "positive masculinity". It's not women's position to infringe upon men's autonomy as much as it's not men's position to infringe upon women's autonomy. This is a dude but he's preaching feminism so doesn't count. We're the masters of our own destiny and as men we'll decide what constitutes being a good man.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:07 AM
7

In India stripping naked (a woman being naked) is a huge shame. It's a worse self injury than chopping off your own arm. The cops are probably assuming if he caused here to do that then he must have done something horrific. What they're completely overlooking is that she's just upper class wealthy (mega entitled in India) and shitfaced titsout drunk. Actually they're not. They know taking her side in the class system where her class has no concept of shame (the Aristocrats) is a death sentence f…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:51 AM
2

She's drunk.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:49 AM
5

I've got an inkjet that I use to print money. For every dollar I print I spent two dollars for materials.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:47 AM
10

In feminism is all about equality is on a spectrum. Where the dial lands in feminism is dictated by the other dial, benefit to women. That's why you'll see feminism in its quest for equality make things that are unequal equal when it serves them. This isn't a complex affair. We all know about feminism demanding there be more women in STEM but not in garbage collection. I think it's fine for feminism to be about women, after all it's their namesake but for heavens sake they need be honest about i…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:44 AM
5

The problem here is that for some people understanding is a feeling. For the rest of us, it's more than just a feeling. It needs to meet some threshold of actually making sense both locally and globally.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:38 AM
1

After being goaded by the professor when asked what if you're harassed by another of the students and they wont leave you alone even after you've told them to. That's unprofessional conduct.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:58 PM
1

Does she know what retard means? Someone who can't think or who thinks with pain and/or difficulty. This leads to a speech impediment.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/18 02:22 AM
3

They want us to get to the acceptance stage. Then we work out how to see the quarantine as a blessing. We realize, hey, now we can do anything we want, we can do all the things you should do to qualify being quarantined. People start to push the limits and then BOOM, full ban.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 06:11 PM
2

If I was born with a free pass, unlimited use get out of jail free card, AKA tits, I'd be fucking living it up man. Would be like winning the fucking lottery.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/18 07:57 PM
1

People have a right to anger and hate. I don't really think it's actually appropriate to ban emotion. I hate pop music for example. It makes me very angry. Those are just emotions. Perfectly acceptable to have. There are sometimes inappropriate ways to act out emotion and that's entirely different.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/18 08:36 AM
-1

If your goldfish had the capability it would leap out of its bowl and rip off your face.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:59 AM
3

The forbidden truth is that feminist academics incensed at this will all rally releasing dozens of biased dodgy papers as rebuttles which will gain acceptance automatically.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:56 AM
6

Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism The secret is no one ever really peer reviews these papers as it's impossible to figure out what they're on about.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:36 AM
1

That nonsense is ossified in the public mainstream which is even more disturbing.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:32 AM
1

Computer Science and Biology are really variable but in terms of entry you've correctly positioned them. Or at least well enough. CS can actually be dumbed down worse than biology. CS is really adaptive. Biology as well as you can easily do work on a number of different levels. CS also has bullshit that has taken the industry by storm. One of the biggest problems consists of idiots. The more accessible the course the lower the bar. Imagine your list as layers in a pyramid instead and move the ba…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:21 AM
2

I can literally hear him turning in his grave.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter