TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

donald347 Archive

View 27 posts and 216 comments by donald347 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
121

donald347/r/MGTOW08/12/16 03:21 PM
75

donald347/r/MGTOW23/10/14 07:51 AM
41

Dramadonald347/r/MGTOW01/01/16 08:32 AM
36

donald347/r/MGTOW23/12/17 12:43 AM
29

Questiondonald347/r/MGTOW26/12/15 03:10 AM
22

Aphorismsdonald347/r/MGTOW31/12/15 11:51 PM
22

donald347/r/MGTOW28/07/17 03:39 AM
20

donald347/r/MGTOW11/02/15 11:27 AM
20

donald347/r/MGTOW26/02/15 04:41 AM
14

donald347/r/MGTOW07/01/15 03:03 AM
13

donald347/r/MGTOW02/02/16 11:04 AM
13

donald347/r/MGTOW22/03/16 09:04 AM
11

Agentsdonald347/r/MGTOW31/12/17 04:06 AM
10

Videodonald347/r/MGTOW08/02/16 10:17 AM
9

Anti-MRMdonald347/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:07 AM
8

donald347/r/MGTOW04/09/16 11:30 PM
8

donald347/r/MGTOW10/05/21 12:17 AM
6

Videodonald347/r/MGTOW26/02/16 03:40 AM
6

donald347/r/MGTOW14/02/15 07:21 PM
6

Videodonald347/r/MGTOW11/02/16 07:00 PM
5

donald347/r/MGTOW07/11/14 10:04 PM
3

donald347/r/MGTOW19/12/16 08:32 PM
3

donald347/r/MGTOW02/08/16 08:46 PM
2

Videodonald347/r/MGTOW03/12/15 08:02 PM
2

donald347/r/MGTOW02/12/16 11:36 AM
1

donald347/r/MGTOW15/10/16 10:14 PM
1

donald347/r/MGTOW10/08/16 09:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think you're right because I was genuinely surprised by how many leaned left a few years ago. I never would thought so many red pillers went deep but somehow avoided economics or the philosophies or natural rights ect... ESPECIALLY the guys who tend to think/talk about divorce court and female suffrage, and welfare, and so on. Weird but whatever- no hate from me.
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 12:27 AM
1

I'd love to know exactly how much this chick thought looking at her tits was worth. Imagine how deluded she must be-- probably an insta-thot or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 06:32 PM
3

This is the best argument commies have-- they are always claiming people will make terrible deals and basically exploit themselves if given the freedom too lol. If they were smart they would just say: "you think voluntary association is moral? look at marriage."
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 12:43 AM
4

Toxic masculinity isn't real, but fatherlessness is.
/r/MGTOW03/03/18 06:35 AM
3

We ARE based on comparing men and women. The whole idea is- women are people and have rights, well, so are men. Compare them and see that we both deserve to be free of coercion. We're absolutely comparing them, because that's what everyone is doing. When women talk about "toxic masculinity" they are comparing men and women and saying women are better. Why else should they get custody, ect? It might not sound nice- but that's not relevant.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:54 AM
5

The opposite of a mgtow, is a husband
/r/MGTOW24/01/18 12:06 AM
1

Bee is quickly becoming the quintessential feminazi.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 11:16 PM
3

As a younger man working as a club promoter on the streets I saw this type of thing constantly. Constantly.
/r/MGTOW31/12/17 04:04 AM
1

I really like Red's theory that everything really started to go downhill when women got the vote in spite of their lesser responsibilities to the state. You couldn't engineer a more perfect circumstance for the state to grow, and eventually take over the economy, than to put bleeding hearts in charge who think free things exist and who think a lack of parity is proof of discrimination. And really, socialism and feminism are virtually identical, not just in how they rely on clases and identities …
/r/MGTOW31/12/17 04:03 AM
9

I thought she hulk was a distinct character? I'm all for putting pc culture away for good, but I don't think she hulk is a problem. Female Thor however is
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:19 PM
1

poetic justice
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:53 PM
5

Lesbian rape is a serious problem
/r/MGTOW19/11/17 11:15 PM
1

Hey, a agree with a feminist on something; male feminists are disgusting losers.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/17 02:39 AM
1

"The Star also reports that one of the men put his arm around the woman who brushed off his creepy advances." lol "harassment"
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/17 01:41 AM
1

Needed to be way way hotter and younger to try that kind of shit
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 02:12 AM
1

Roastie hahah I love it. Btw, they could hire hookers all day, and many do! I'm skeptical of romantic relationships as a source of "emotional companionship" otherwise this so-called "black pill" seems like boilerplate mgtow really.
/r/MGTOW21/08/17 08:31 PM
1

I'm creeped out by these people who need to constantly positive- doesn't seem genuine and they are virtually always the type to argue against a position solely because it doesn't sound nice. Wouldn't say they are feel over facts- more like, facts matter but should be balanced with feels which is just as illogical.
/r/MGTOW29/07/17 08:47 AM
8

What's really weird is, SJWs including bleeding heart libertarians use the same measure as PUAs for what makes a successful man: how attractive/accepted you are by women. "You're probably a neckbeard!" lol meanwhile that's mostly male feminists rocking the neckbeards and fedoras. It comes out when they are triggered or in white knight mode and betrays their personas as anything but gynocentric lap dogs. No wonder they think criticizing women, or even disagreeing with them is so offensive- they w…
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 04:23 AM
2

Wasn't me, but I like to think it was chosen to be annoying to read, to lead authenticity.
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 04:22 AM
-6

I'm still upvoting even though shoeonhead. Her and Armoured are pretty lame tbh but she's right here.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:08 AM
19

Sometimes I have dreams about being in my early 20s and chasing women. When I get up, I'm already exhausted from just thinking about it. Then I start thinking of what it would take to go back to that lifestyle and even if the laws were perfect it still wouldn't be worth it, nevermind that women nuts
/r/MGTOW03/05/17 11:07 PM
1

A hooker would have been cheaper and you would have gotten laid, and no dressing up/bitchy women.
/r/MGTOW03/05/17 11:05 PM
3

Anyone who is favored by the monopoly of violence that is the state is scary to me, yes. When my right to self-defense/ownership is culled in the name of being nice to that group, I see no other reasonable response than fear. Give me back my ability to protect myself and give me back my property rights and I won't need to fear anyone- terrorists, authoritarians/women, no one.
/r/MGTOW03/05/17 11:03 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/mgtowmusic/
/r/MGTOW02/05/17 11:39 PM
1

lol true
/r/MGTOW02/05/17 11:38 PM
7

Bluepill/PUA: "You're just jelly terrorists are so alpha."
/r/MGTOW02/05/17 07:38 AM
3

Because they and most people they know have convinced themselves that single mothers are victims and entitled to a standard of living they can't earn. This is part of why MGTOW is a libertarian ideology if you give even half a fuck about consistency and intellectual honesty.
/r/MGTOW14/04/17 02:55 AM
2

"We must overcome our biology, become men who live for ideas, self-respect and personal fulfilment and not simply animals after orgasms." - Bar Bar
/r/MGTOW21/12/16 06:18 AM
2

Bob Cucksnatchagain?
/r/MGTOW21/12/16 05:31 AM
2

The writing's on the wall at this point- anyone who cares about reason isn't dating anymore in the west, period. If you're going to live for orgasms, you're a lost cause. I've given up on any guy who isn't a real mgtow.
/r/MGTOW21/12/16 05:30 AM
1

I use the same account for everything because I've given up being anything but and out and proud mgtow monk, and I don't have any evidence but it wouldn't surprise me if I was downvoted by feminists. They are authoritarians- I don't know why you would put this past them. Being a voluntaryist, I'm also sure many socialists are doing the same thing, tbh.
/r/MGTOW21/12/16 05:27 AM
1

A new level of Darwinism. Let the least simpish survive.
/r/MGTOW20/12/16 09:17 PM
2

Thanks man, much obliged.
/r/MGTOW20/12/16 01:09 AM
4

What's also tragic is your story is hardly unique. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MGTOW19/12/16 08:51 PM
13

This season was GOLD for mgtow with a sense of humor. The cum and jokes mines of mars? lol this season was for us.
/r/MGTOW19/12/16 01:45 AM
2

This was a reaction to stats re: single motherhood presented by Ann Coulter (a clip.) People in the thread were raging with no logical reason. It was about women not taking responsibility for their life decisions and making it our responsibility though the state... and denying facts because they aren't nice to women. Ie, like the title... female entitlement. Edit: which is propped up by gynocentrism (validation seeking from men)
/r/MGTOW02/12/16 08:52 PM
4

lol yeah any time the person rage quits with a personal insult I call it a W
/r/MGTOW02/12/16 12:32 PM
6

Isn't that what he just said?
/r/MGTOW05/09/16 09:34 AM
5

Notice, even when "apologizing" (but not really), she doesn't miss the opportunity to push feminist language. The point of controlling language, is to frame the debate. "misogynistic thoughts" don't exist. They aren't misogynistic unless a misogynist is thinking them! Sexism like racist is in one's world view, not in a word. "often violent history of the over-sexualization of black male bodies" wtf is this shit?
/r/MGTOW05/09/16 07:26 AM
2

Sure, let's see what she says after settling in.
/r/MGTOW05/09/16 07:18 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised if you could choose any jurisdiction in North American or western Europe, and just look at how many men are paying support to the mother. "The numbers show that the system is unfair to men. Women are primary or equal breadwinners in many families, and about one in three fathers is a primary caregiver. And yet, among the cases surveyed by Statistics Canada in its report “Interjurisdictional cases of spousal and child support, 2010-11,” 96% of support payors were men. Moreo…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:06 AM
1

Actually people here also care a lot about family court cases too! Another area where women are given a clear advantage is custody.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 11:47 PM
1

I think most of those are men, except the actors but the fact that people want to see women in those positions, not because they would be more qualified but just because they are women kind of shows you what I mean. The quota is the epitome of this. But the thing is, not only do people care about women, they care about a woman. Women don't realize what it's like to be an anonymous man and have ZERO social value (until they lose their looks) they have value regardless of their abilities. The bias…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 06:23 PM
42

Okay at this point we all know there is a gynocentric bias in society. Anyone who is willing to see it, sees it. Now what?
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:40 AM
2

Oh but I'm not blaming welfare for women's nature- I'm accusing welfare of incentivizing the worst of it. I'm blaming it for allowing them to be the cause of economic issues by exploiting their nature for the sake of the state's growth. It's symbiotic- women's need for security and the need of the state for a mandate. WOmen aren't new- I know that lol. But welfare is a realetivley new wrinkle which is highly relevent currently. From there its a simple feedback loop. Women's nature is used by the…
/r/MGTOW03/08/16 04:31 AM
1

Hell no, that was back in my PUA days to. Fuck that
/r/MGTOW03/08/16 12:10 AM
1

True true. Nothing like just straight up buying votes (that is, bribing people) lol
/r/MGTOW02/08/16 08:58 PM
2

Two lives for the price of a single accusation. Good news for feminists: only one life lost was female (valuable.)
/r/MensRights30/07/16 04:52 AM
1

btw, the friend of the girl was a lesbian so we ended up awkwardly listening to them fuck through the wall.
/r/MGTOW16/07/16 08:26 PM
21

I knew a girl who dated a friend of mine and always acted super innocent. Then after they broke up another one of my buddies invited her over. Her and her friend came over, did a bunch of coke and she fucked my buddy in the next room haha. And yes, my first buddy is pretty simpy although he is aware of redpill. Guess he is a purple piller. Makes me cringe.
/r/MGTOW15/07/16 08:50 PM
5

wtf how can you 'choose' to not be a victim? It's an objective fact if you are a victim of a a crime or not. This is clearly her way of saying, it happened, believe me and don't question it because I'm only half making the claim. Are we supposed to take rape seriously or not? Was she trying to actually stop him or not? Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:19 AM
2

Who knew being a single mother was a good reason to not go to jail. So as a society we aren't just subsidizing single motherhood but providing legal perks? lol
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:07 AM
1

All of those are just taking from some and giving to others, which we don't need a middle man for, unless you're wanting to force people to contribute (in other words, NOT go there own way) in which case you need people with guns. I think social darwinism would be not allowing people to help each other.
/r/MGTOW17/05/16 05:14 AM
1

Than aren't you as well?
/r/MGTOW26/03/16 11:49 PM
0

So you're admitting you can't address the contradiction between mgtow/wanting to not contribute to society and women and wanting a state? I'm the idiot you can't stop replying too with insults and zero arguments? You think somehow the Declaration of Independence (I'm not even American) and the issue with the NAP are somehow related to the contradiction above but I'm the idiot? You think Anarchy results in Somalia (where the quality of life is up since they were under totalitarianism) and I'm the…
/r/MGTOW26/03/16 01:19 PM
1

I don't think you understand what I said- I'm saying if you have already said what the articles said then they clearly say nothing! But regardless none of that address how you can want to cut off women/society but also pay for them via taxes/the state. Will you address this contradiction or not? And if not who is actually the ideologue? I'll add that to the list of names you're call me lol. Perhaps if I wasn't so lazy I could understand how simply describing an opponent and his arguments without…
/r/MGTOW26/03/16 06:01 AM
0

A minimal state is still a state. Minarchists are statistics as much as totalitarians are. A monotheist is as much a theist as a pantheist is- the amount you are for the state is not relevant. Isn't that what you'd call a "contortion?" None of what you wrote addresses how it's not a contradiction to want to cut off society but still want to pay taxes to a state? Because civilization wouldn't be possible without it because we'll need to make exceptions... 1 these two premises are unsubstantiated.…
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 06:18 AM
1

Look, just tell me how you can want to cut women off and go your own way but also be a statist. Even if the NAP is bullshit that still doesn't even address that contradiction re: the wellfare state. Are you saying no society could work where men aren't used as utilities? I'm here waiting to be told-- even if I'm lazy and afraid and like a SJW and the other dozen things you've called me. Saying what I've said are contortions is just more characterizing. Pointing out that all you've done is attack…
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 02:53 AM
2

It isn't deflecting to point out fallacies lol all you can do is attack me but there is no substance. Is this considered 'deep' thinking? lol
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 02:31 AM
2

All those words mean nothing to the issue. They are just insults. Not really. Pointing out that no argument has been made isn't sophistry and without you actually saying why my position that gmtow thinking leads to anti-statism or at least anti-welfare state is incorrect there's nothing else to do.
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 02:27 AM
2

No it's what you're doing: impractical & unworkable Superficial hollow Shallow "hand waving" lazy child Ignorant bullshit None of this means anything- it's just characterizing. Pure sophistry. You're going to effort and spending time saying I'm wrong but can't say why. If it's so complicated that it can't be said in as much or less typing than you've already done that's already a strike against it. It's a simple claim on you part- that initiating force is necessary, and it's a simple question: w…
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 01:59 AM
2

Also not an argument. Why not make an argument? Anyone can just throw out insults or deflect.
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 01:33 AM
1

Again, just saying a position is "shallow" means nothing. How do you know any of this about me of what I know? You still haven't presented any arguments of questions so you couldn't possible know let along prove something about my mind. I don't understand your second sentence.
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 01:18 AM
1

The market crash was exasperated by government policy, and in many historian's minds created by the state. FDR did more to prevent a recovery than he did to fix things. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ta2m3D9Ig0g Of course people struggled to attain better conditions but it was only possible because of the increase in technology and prosperity. There will always be struggle- I don't believe in Utopia, I just don't think the state solves these issues. We don't HAVE a free market. The state, and r…
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 01:12 AM
1

This isn't proof of what I've thought about, it's just more characterization. In point of fact, I have thought about the implications of anarchy from both an economic stand point and (as a paralegal myself) from a legal one. I was a liberal but was argued out of it. Why not present an argument?
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 01:10 AM
1

You still haven't made an argument just assertions and characterizations. Why would I go to the trouble of reading these articles when I can't trust your reasoning? Why not just present your argument for the comparability of mgtow and statism?
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 09:42 AM
2

No again this is the weird false dicotamey that keeps coming up where it's a- we have the state do it, or b- we do nothing. The idea isn't to get rid of hospitals or something and people can still pool their money for charity ect, it's just to force competition into the market. How do you think costs would go up in a free market? The reason I brought up Obamacare is to point out how restricting competition produces higher prices- rates in this case. The state will always be the tool of the rich …
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 09:34 AM
1

Wait, you're not aware of the many ways libertarians have suggested these things could work, but I'm ignorant? One idea for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute_resolution_organization Another example is how disputes are handled in private arbitration, or simply information propagation about people's behaviors-- their reputation and/or agreements to financially isolate firms who do not respond to creditors. Even just normal reviews and customer-targeted publications can punish and prom…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 07:18 AM
2

America doesn't have a free market either. In both places competition is restricted through regulation. Ontario's healthcare costs 50 billion per year. If there was a free market not only would competition drive down prices, it wouldn't cost taxpayer anything because the state has no role in a free market. Look at the rates for health insurance before and after Obama care. Regulation = higher costs to start and do business (taking the poors advantage when it comes to undercutting) and less compe…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 07:05 AM
2

Rulers DON'T solve problems, they take money from the people and use it to pay others to solve the issues. I'm saying why can't people still organize to provide services in a free market that the government provides today? I'm talking about the individual. There is no consent from the minority simply because a majority of people voted for something. No those froms of transport are not free market. They, especially air travel, are highly regulated and prices reflect that. Subsidizing the road/aut…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 04:27 AM
1

I don't understand how spending money (on government itself) to spend money can result in more value? How can you know what people would have spent that money on and what the implications of that spending would be, especially in a free market. It's competition that lowers prices and increases the quality of the products/services. What can the state do that any voluntary group can't do?
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 03:49 AM
2

But I don't understand this dichotomy between forcing people to contribute to these things and just not having any of these problems dealt with? Why does the state need to force people to "help" and why does the state need to build roads or schools when they do everything poorly and funded by coercion? It's better compared to what? I'm willing to bet the free market would produce better transportation because it produces better everything. It's circular to say we need public services, or else we…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 02:20 AM
2

Well that's just it, we should open the system up to competition and away from protectionism and regulation that keeps prices so high and provide no financial intensive to improve product. I'm a Paralegal and I can tell you the same dynamics also work in the legal field. The problem of access to justice is one of the protectionism of the profession. Poor people are hurt the most by this. Also, you didn't address the issue of these services never being free- just paid for by taxation and massive …
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 12:39 AM
3

How does it do that? How can a beaucrazy output more than it takes in when it has to pay for itself? What does the state do that private firms cannot? How can you enhance freedom by infringing on people's freedom (property rights?)
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 12:38 AM
1

No because there are other ways of reacting to behaviors we want to discourage a part of force or coersion. All of our trades/interactions without the state's involvement are examples-- our personal relationships are examples.
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 12:36 AM
3

You can't help but make hive mind decisions when you're being taxes regardless of your will. If you don't want to contribute to woman and a system that treat men like wallets I don't see how you can support taxation? (I'm tempted to argue the point that a free market is somehow less stable than an economy with centralized control but I will leave it alone.)
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 12:36 AM
2

Yes but a perfect society is not the goal. The goal is to not initiate force. The claim isn't that this will produce Utopia. People may not be able to eliminate violence but we can minimize it and at the very least not build it into our civilization- and not give a group of (as established very flawed) humans a monopoly on it. If mgtow is for personal freedom and personal responsibility, is the only reason we should resist the use of force because it won't produce perfection?
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 07:17 AM
3

I live in Toronto and I've been waiting for the report from the specialist I saw months ago to get to my family doctor. I don't think you're going to like what you get when you put the government in charge of health services. Removing competition will only drive up prices too. Ontario can't afford the system we have, for instance. Even Sweden is privatizing it's health care. I can understand not minding helping people, I just don't understand the rational for forcing people to do so, nor can I u…
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 07:15 AM
2

Thing is, the MGTOW who don't want to contribute are forced to. That means government prevents some mgtow from being how they want. Also, some political philosophies don't allow you to go our own way because you don't have that freedom like totalitarianism.
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 07:11 AM
3

The state can only give what it first takes from others. It can't provide anything let alone Independence, it can only make people dependent on IT to take from others on our behalf.
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 07:09 AM
1

We can link the state to wealth disparity with the influence of companies on policy/regulation. What sort of protection for the poor does the state provide when they use regulation to make it harder for the poor to take advantage of their one edge: their ability to undercut the rich? What sort of solidarity is their when your contribution is mandatory? By turning us into just taxer payer that IS valuing people by their utility. If you aren't free to leave how can you go your own way?
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 07:07 AM
4

Luke should run for his life
/r/MGTOW21/03/16 01:01 AM
1

They are making women less valuable potential hires. They are hurting unemployed women.
/r/MGTOW04/03/16 04:52 AM
1

My responce to this comment is the same as my responce to the author of OP's article; oh boohoo
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:23 AM
3

I think women are just better at backwards rationalizing their interpersonal decisions.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/16 08:53 PM
3

What is with female teachers? I mean I know women are more likely to abuse children, and then boys are more likely to be victims but Jesus... And yet women are still thought of as more nurturing. If I was hiring a babysitter I would definitely hire a man. At least they won't be treated with kid gloves if they are caught. They would called a rapist and kept in jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/16 08:15 PM
1

A woman in a legal dispute claims her male adversary did something sexually inappropriate. The real news here is anyone was surprised.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/16 08:10 PM
3

most prank videos are fake so I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 07:13 PM
3

I like this clip of Rudov
/r/MGTOW12/02/16 02:21 PM
1

I cringed but then again I would get married no matter what the dynamics were.
/r/MGTOW12/02/16 02:19 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Marcuse
/r/MGTOW11/02/16 07:00 PM
1

If you want to put a positive spin on it, you could say they are highly intuitive. They don't use logical arguments because they are emotionally reactive to conversations.
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 07:46 AM
1

My bad John!
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 02:11 AM
2

Jon asks the key question.
/r/MGTOW08/02/16 10:21 AM
2

I'm surprised VICE would even publish this
/r/MGTOW03/02/16 07:32 PM
3

I didn't even think I was posting anything that crazy. Like linking to a VICE article on facebook and point out how feminist bias it is, but apparently for these people it's you're with us or you're a misogynist. Guess I should alter my fb profile a bit.
/r/MGTOW02/02/16 03:46 PM
1

Apparently, if you're a bad man, it's okay to read into words and find admissions that don't exist.
/r/MGTOW02/02/16 03:43 PM
2

Yeah I guess that's cause the comment was for the feminists. I was trying to make it seem like associating the two didn't make sense. I agree like I said in the original comment, we have so many PUAs here because of this stuff. I remember reading an article last year (or perhaps 2014) about the last few remaining gentleman's clubs. I think it was actually about how they were accepting women now but most of the debate revolved around how it was such an outdated idea to have a men's only space sti…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:10 PM
1

Yeah that was my thinking
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:06 PM
0

That would match my experiences. I feel the same way.
/r/MGTOW02/02/16 02:04 PM
1

I don't really know a lot about that guy. My point was not that a rapist couldn't also be a pua or that the fact that they are PUAs means that they couldn't possibly be rapists. I was saying that it doesn't make sense to assume these guys are rapists just because the are PUAs.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:46 PM
-3

It's not this event in the particular that concerns me. It's how insanely misandric this city is. I want people to know Toronto's rep for being terrible for men and free speech is NOT an exaggeration and it's NOT contained to our university campuses. Feminism is a part of the culture here and it's scary.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:43 AM
10

People think Toronto's rep is an exaggeration. It is not. I actually had a friend message me worried about my safety telling me to be careful posting anti-feminist things. This city is utterly fucked for men.
/r/MGTOW02/02/16 11:41 AM
6

My comment was: Why would they be pickup artists if they were rapists? What rapist bothers to learn how to talk to women? This is why Toronto is known as the center for feminism (see Gregory Alan Elliot) and misandry and anti-free speech. If you advertise wanting to have a meetup here just for men it's pretty much guaranteed you'll get some woman or a male feminist suggesting you must be rapists. Apparently, it doesn't even have to happen on a U of T campus anymore for you to catch shit. The cit…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:07 AM
12

My comment was: Why would they be pickup artists if they were rapists? What rapist bothers to learn how to talk to women? This is why Toronto is known as the center for feminism (see Gregory Alan Elliot) and misandry and anti-free speech. If you advertise wanting to have a meetup here just for men it's pretty much guaranteed you'll get some woman or a male feminist suggesting you must be rapists. Apparently, it doesn't even have to happen on a U of T campus anymore for you to catch shit. The cit…
/r/MGTOW02/02/16 11:04 AM
3

Hahaha, I didn't say men couldn't be too!
/r/MGTOW27/01/16 07:23 AM
6

I knew a girl (last one I slept with before mgtow) who has the spiritual gurus routine used on her. It's amazing how obvious it was too. Women can he so naive.
/r/MGTOW27/01/16 05:12 AM
4

As a Torontian let me just say, it's as bad as you think
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:07 AM
3

More munchausen and more unfair leniency
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:30 PM
3

true
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:29 PM
27

Woman sues a minor whom she raped, for making a recording of the rape, which was used to convict her. That takes some balls.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:56 PM
6

So the theme seems to be "yeah sexual strategy is a thing, but living in ignorance is better/moral" which really is the blue pill attitude I guess. A lot of it sounds like pandering to women even though I doubt any women read it
/r/MGTOW10/01/16 12:23 PM
2

"Not all Jews are Zionists and not all women are SJWs." Just answered your own question. No the terms are not interchangable
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 11:17 AM
10

Hahaha, a homincidal white knight and a white nationalist? A white-white-knight
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 11:09 AM
4

MGTOW never looked so good.
/r/MGTOW08/01/16 03:18 AM
1

What power will men have in a culture where they are seen as the source of all problems? If men were killed off in a war that's one thing, but if we are diminished in numbers by a social project to solve us as a problem that's another. I'm not sure if this was a joke post or what but I have to agree with the tag "Fucked Up."
/r/MGTOW05/01/16 01:00 AM
4

Used to care about keeping my "game" sharp and supporting my pickup habits. Ran out of money and time to fuck around so I moved home to go back to school and started to consider how my life and decision making was all about being able to get laid. Starting to think about how it took so much time and money and realize that even if you only have one night stands, you pay for it all the time. There is always a price to pay. Decided to say fuck it to trying anymore. Then found gmtow and learned abou…
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 05:04 AM
1

Thank you! Done and done.
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 11:49 PM
3

I've made an account and I assume this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way&gettingStartedReturn=true is the correct page to vote? I'm not sure how to add my comment that I would like to keep the article in it's longer form?
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 10:26 PM
12

Oh and it's "being considered for deletion."
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 08:47 AM
2

Those are great, thanks.
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 07:25 AM
3

Thanks for the link. I still haven't work my way through all of that flashy new site.
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 03:32 AM
1

lol do you know who said this?
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:59 AM
1

Sounds like you identified with you libido. I used to be a hardcore PUA and I made my ability to get and have sex a big part of my identity. Now I can't imagine thinking that way. I think once you fill in that time and spend that energy you would have on women, and get the rewards those endeavors offer (as opposed to the reward of social approval chasing women got you), you'll learn to appreciate other aspects of yourself and build a new identity. I think the loss of feeling like a real man come…
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:56 AM
12

Right up there with "harrassment" and "rape."
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 11:47 PM
1

Are you saying you don't think the brain developed as a result of evolution? Also could you explain how you see it working only in "culture" and how that is distinct from social behavior?
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 03:48 AM
1

How do you define fungible in this context? I've only ever heard that terms used in economics. Also, isn't the fact that our brains are organs, shaped by genetics like all parts of the body a real reason? I understand it may not explain everything on the individual level, what with environmental concerns, but as a way to explain behaviors of populations, especially similarities in desperate populations it seems to be the best model available. I am however willing to have my mind changed if you h…
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 03:02 AM
1

Why wouldn't our psychology be a result of our evolution? Our brains are part of our bodies. Unless you're a skeptic of Evolution in general or you believe the mind as separate from the body, I don't understand why the distinction. If you'd like to hear some pro-EvoPsych arguments, I recommend looking up Saad Gad
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 01:02 AM
1

Good news!
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 11:57 PM
2

Ha! I hadn't seen that before. But where did this comes from? Why has this become a part of the culture?
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 06:33 AM
1

Sorry for the loss of your old life, and a big congratulations of the beginning of your new life as wiser, more savvy man! Since you have money for a good lawyer I hope that means you get a good deal re: the kids. "I will call Jamar(because that is his name)." Lol, you got me.
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 06:29 AM
1

Thank you I think I will take your advice!
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 06:09 AM
2

1 Start flight training (helicopter.) I've wanted to fly for as long as I can remember. Already signed up so that's pretty much done. 2 Finish my second screenplay and at least start my third. I had to set writing aside for a few years for school/work. 3 Start a blog or YouTube
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 06:03 AM
2

Whereas if a department only produces BS anyway it makes no difference to pay the gender racketeer with even a faculty position if the threat is taken seriously. So its easier to find a beachhead and use that small bit of university territory for instant credibility and merit by publishing works alongside the name of the school itself. This is a point I hadn't considered. I imagine the kind of credibility Universities (especially those ivy league institutions, which we know for certain are infec…
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 05:14 AM
3

So Universities aren't just where we see this the most, but in fact, you believe it's where it actually originated. Interesting. Thanks for taking the time to provide a detailed response. EDIT: You know, I hope this is the explanation because then it would seem to suggest an end to the madness, or at least a cause that can be dealt with.
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 04:32 AM
1

Agreed. You can't say there aren't rules or it becomes litterally meaningless. Who doesn't think they are "living on their own terms?" Many husbands can say this. Many PUAs can say this. Many guys who used "alpha" and "beta" but call themselves mgtow even though they define men by how women respond to them, can say this.
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 03:04 AM
2

At least it's not rationalwiki edit: The MGTOW page has a section called "Power?" (which mgtow isn't even after) and this is it's body: "It's unclear if the movement has any power beyond "disgruntled douchebags talking shit about women on the Internet." The reaction of people who come across their posts online largely tends to be "Go your own way and stop whining already!"" lol
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 12:37 AM
2

These accusations fuck up men's reputation pretty much for life (even without a conviction) and she gets 2 years?! Tell me again how this is a man's world.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 10:27 PM
1

I thought feminists had already expanded "rape" to include way more tha-- oh, right, she's a woman...
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:16 AM
5

The opposite of gmtow isn't traditionalism. I think you'll find there are many guys who are mgtow who don't care about "traditional gender roles" in the slightest.
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 12:32 PM
2

That one girl they interview says she feels bad for her. Would she feel bad if it was a man?
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:28 PM
3

I'd argue if you look at everything rationally western women are probably the most "privileged" demographic on the entire planet. Seems pretty obvious to me. And if they are the most "privileged" now, they are probably the most "privileged" group of the general public in the history of civilization as the quality of life is higher than ever before.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:05 PM
1

well done. I have no idea what these guys talking about colours and god are on about. For me as long as it's logical I can stand behind it
/r/MGTOW05/12/15 06:44 AM
9

I love this subreddit
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/15 03:27 AM
2

Yeah exactly, but tbh, it's a nice feeling to go from "she wants my money" to "she might actually be enjoying this" to the opposite. Usually you go from "she might be enjoying this" to "She just wants my money."
/r/MGTOW02/12/15 01:23 AM
1

This nails it for me too. Really well said Greetings1. And I only ever had short relationships
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:17 PM
2

You've have to pay me to go to a bar to pickup. Rather get the escort and drink at home where the douches aren't competing to be the head slave of whichever plantation owners are there.
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:16 PM
1

That might cause psychological damage. I can barely look at that shit without throwing up
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:15 PM
1

hookers if it's legal where you are. No logically reason not to
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:14 PM
1

Some guys call themselves mgtow until they find some tail and then rush back to the plantation. They are as intellectually honest as feminists. Idiots.
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:11 PM
1

Fuck the MRM. Fuck any movement that has even a hint of collectivism. Fuck anyone who wants to get married or spent time trying to chasing chicks/being more attractive/have an attractive lifestyle or otherwise measuring success as having anything to do with women (whatever their excuse is) and still call themselves mgtow. Slaves, addicted, indentured and in denial
/r/MGTOW01/12/15 10:05 PM
2

well said. Ignorance is the matrix
/r/MGTOW30/11/15 03:30 AM
1

Now compare to radfem and feminazi https://www.google.ca/trends/explore#q=MGTOW%2C%20%2Fm%2F06h1z%2C%20feminazi&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B5 and the gamergate bump https://www.google.ca/trends/explore#q=MGTOW%2C%20%2Fm%2F06h1z%2C%20feminazi%2C%20gamergate&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B5
/r/MGTOW30/11/15 03:02 AM
3

Well that's the recipe: shoot yourself in foot, blame patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:47 AM
10

And apparently, it's a man world lol
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:24 AM
1

this is exactly what I thought of too
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:36 AM
2

if you don't proposition a women when you first meet (which will obviously never work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxyySRgrYsU ) then you're a lying man
/r/MGTOW01/11/15 07:02 AM
6

want to really piss them off? Buy the robot a ring-- I bet she shits herself
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:54 PM
8

Anything to justify acting on your pussy addiction. I feel bad for PUAs
/r/MGTOW22/08/15 11:30 PM
12

The rock bottom! The rock bottom! It's all over!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/15 05:24 AM
0

We can agree to disagree but I would like to mention that my opinion about not finding answers to thoes questions is informed by having been part of multiple reputatable seduciton lairs back in the day including Frank Kermit's Toronto lair which was the basis for the Starting Your Own Lair handbook http://www.franktalks.com/lairs/ (there used to be a wikipedia entry for it but I guess not anymore) and in all though thoes years, and having met all the guys I did (most of course over hyped) I neve…
/r/MGTOW27/02/15 05:25 AM
2

That's because it's a fantasy.
/r/MGTOW27/02/15 02:18 AM
0

I would consider these two to qualify but I grant you there hasn't been much. I have noticed more PUAs however and I would argue that if there is one thing MGToW does not entail, it's chasing women. http://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/2wynjh/the_mgtow_bible_brought_to_you_by_mgtow_jesus/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/2wqkx8/50_of_women_have_plan_bs/
/r/MGTOW26/02/15 06:40 AM
2

The solution to all those problems is to not get laid or pay for it if you can. A good PUA (and I realize there are basically none) should be getting laid more than a MGToW because they know the best way to chase and they make a lifestyle of it-- they build habits that get them results (one night stands.) If you want results, go learn from them, but those habits are also the ones that hold you back from actually going your own way. Also I don't understand the logic that just because those people…
/r/MGTOW26/02/15 06:25 AM
1

What advice can be given on that? Unless you're looking to get laid, you don't need advice, and if you do, there are lots of other subreddits for that. This isn't meant to be a place to learn how to be more attractive to women, this is a place where you learn about what YOU want in the absence of women's approval or attraction response.
/r/MGTOW26/02/15 05:21 AM
2

We all could, but my point is PUAs build there behaviors by what works which is what he does. Walking away is the obvious solution-- everything he says is redundant UNLESS you want to get laid
/r/MGTOW26/02/15 12:21 AM
2

Bullshit.... fucking bullshit. I studies pickup for years. Not all of them are like Eric/Mystery (who by the way isn't that crazy.) His behaviors are shaped by what is most effective with women, not some abstract notion of "strength"- he belongs and is owned by his libido. You think he's cool for 'standing up' I think he's lame for having to. Why label/generalize? Because it's expedient and it works. Don't give me this tone-policing rhetoric nonsense on /r/mgtow of all places for fucks sake.
/r/MGTOW25/02/15 11:54 PM
3

lol "gmtow jesus" I guess that means he got married for our sins? I'm confused. Also, as someone who knows PUAs, this guy sounds like a PUA. He still cares about what women respond to/find attractive.
/r/MGTOW25/02/15 11:15 AM
1

this guy creeps me out, I get narcissist vibes off him in all his videos
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 08:24 AM
1

women aren't a cure for loneliness and neither is being in a relationship. That's like having a kid to cure loneliness
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 08:22 AM
9

Yeah he's in the business of losing his shirt
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 08:19 AM
1

Hottest sex ever was with a woman who I had just met and who was engaged. Swear to god something about cheating turns them on like crazy. Maybe it was being with all these cheating women early on that kept me from ever being in aserious relationship and put me on the path to MGToW
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 08:17 AM
2

Great quote. Although he actually said "Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." but same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 12:39 AM
1

heartbreaking
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:39 AM
2

I think maybe there's still a little bias in most of us when it comes to young men- we assume they are all still blinded by their libidos (maybe cause that's how we were) but actually many are catching on.
/r/MGTOW16/02/15 11:11 PM
3

Ha well glad I'm not alone
/r/MGTOW15/02/15 10:13 PM
1

Man, I just really liked the gratification of seducing women. The sex was almost alway shit (cause that's how short relationships go I guess) and it was rarely attracted to the women themselves beyond their looks. Most were boring or annoying as fuck, and most knew shit all about fucking. Once I left that behind I found the new freedom more than intoxicating enough to make me forget about pussy. (Very grateful I never got married/got a chick pregnant.) I have no need that has gone unmet by being…
/r/MGTOW15/02/15 04:20 AM
2

I see people who get into it as silly. The whole feeling like a loser thing I'm long past-- when I can logically see what I'm doing makes sense I don't give a shit what idiots think.
/r/MGTOW14/02/15 10:22 PM
2

pimp
/r/MGTOW14/02/15 10:17 PM
3

"She was not injured, Christenson said." Oh thank God!
/r/MGTOW14/02/15 05:41 PM
1

Aprecio Internet Cafes but they aren't for men only right?
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 02:42 AM
1

Yes, these are the sorts of things I've been thinking about. Legal liability is a fear. I'm a paralegal in Toronto (of all places), so that should be some clue as to where I'm coming from. I've also identified a number of other pitfalls but I'm still really fascinated with the idea and I'm going to continue to research.
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 02:36 AM
3

I respect that. Thanks for the feedback binrobinro
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 02:28 AM
2

Ah so it's guys who in relationships not wanting to be left out. Weak idiots
/r/MGTOW04/02/15 06:01 PM
1

lol fuck team. This reminds me of going out with a group of guys trying to get laid in my early 20s
/r/MGTOW04/02/15 02:16 AM
3

but instead redefine it as a broader thing that includes LTR's sans marriage Are people suggesting this? lol that's retarded
/r/MGTOW04/02/15 02:14 AM
5

sexual desire isn't really a 'problem' and with even a modicum of dicipline it really never should be. Why fuck with your body like that. bone density loss, added fat...not worth it
/r/MGTOW07/01/15 02:43 AM
2

I see my home town is up it's old tricks! Oh Toronto will you EVER learn, hahahaha.....
/r/MGTOW28/12/14 04:19 AM
2

Yeah and beyond that, from what i understand, there is a culture in social services that says men don't seek or want help and programs for them will fail therefore focus on the women
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:28 AM
11

My mother is a fairly senior manager at the local branch of a international organization that runs women's shelters (trying to be vague) and she was the first one to point this out to me. In my city, even if I have no kid, an education, no drugs, whatever-- I'm fucked if I end up homeless. As a guy you're treated as worthless when you're at the bottom and you're expected to pick YOURSELF up or die period. Also, there's another side that often isn't talked about: boys being raised in women's shel…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:46 PM
2

Haha thanks for sharing! Glad I made the request! The concert was my favorite lol Please post the others, this has made my day lolol
/r/MGTOW10/11/14 12:06 AM
2

I'd just let her have it since I'm not really one for cuddling
/r/MGTOW08/11/14 09:57 AM
2

"I'm not with her anymore man." take a step behind her. Wait patiently
/r/MGTOW03/11/14 05:08 AM
1

lol didn't notice 14 and 15 are missing. I wonder what they were!
/r/MGTOW23/10/14 05:55 PM
1

Ex pua turned dad? My feels for you man.
/r/MGTOW21/10/14 10:57 PM
1

Man, I feel so lucky I started studying women and relationships young and went through my PUA phase without ever getting into a marriage/common law/she's pregnant situation before becoming a mgtow. And I'm glad there are guys around to warn me off that shit. (Great find!)
/r/MGTOW18/10/14 09:53 PM
2

OP is this is youtube playlist? Link please? EDIT: Shoutouts to r/mgtowmusic/
/r/MGTOW15/10/14 05:33 AM
1

Ah, good point. Thanks for pointing this out man.
/r/MGTOW13/10/14 10:31 PM
1

Really? I'm no expert (just out of college myself) and that's just what I've been told. I was left some Canadian bonds from my father who passed away earlier this year.
/r/MGTOW13/10/14 08:49 AM
1

I understand government bonds are a good way to save without taxes, at least here in Canada.
/r/MGTOW13/10/14 05:02 AM
3

I think I straight-up hate Greene
/r/MGTOW07/10/14 08:44 PM
1

It is sort of. I've heard a theory: Wives are contracted (marriage) for exclusive rights to them. That's why wives hate "sluts" (unpaid women who the husband slept with) because it hurts their value if you can get it for free, but aren't as threatened by whores.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 07:22 AM
2

Most people sure, but all you have to do is look at the data to see how many women (mothers) abuse children all all sorts of ways. It's an open secret
/r/MensRights06/09/14 07:37 PM
2

I wish this was illustrated like the original. I want to share it
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:33 PM
1

Yeah I don't blame him for not hitting back if he lives in the US/Can but why does he keep going back? Maybe he's grown emotionally dependant on her or has some sort of Stockholm-like attachment to him. If not, I don't really feel that bad for him.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 11:08 PM
-1

Haha does anyone want to bet? I really don't think she will.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:36 PM
1

Not sure why people are surprised, this is pretty much the how all my arguments with feminists have gone. That's why I don't bother trying any more unless I'm baited into it while trolling.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:49 AM
1

I get how fucked up this is, but honestly, he was letting her walk all over him. Why didn't he kick her out? He's sitting and taking it. This would be the last time she ever interacted with me. He's let this go one long enough that he can anticipate it and record it. She's crazy.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:43 AM
1

Just discovered redpill. I've been around self help for a long time and I've found this to all be true except for the fact that you missed something; at some point, things will suck. You can't ALWAYS have your shit together. It's the wheel of fortune. Sometimes you fall off. You're not every fully in control of life. Realizing that's part of growing up too.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 05:37 AM
0

I agree. I'm not talking about how funny they are, I'm talking about how funny or clever they have to be before they are acceptable. Like, if you just replace the roles in OP's joke is it AS funny to most people? I know I'm just repeating myself from my last comment but I'm not sure how else to put it.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:00 AM
4

You three have missed the point imo. This to me is about a woman making a type of joke (invoking imagines of violence) that wouldn't be AS FUNNY if it were reversed. I'm not sure what op is trying to say in the bigger picture, but I think it is a valid observation that violence against men is so easily turned into an acceptable joke whereas it takes more finesse to make violence against women funny. EDIT: Or to put it another way, violence against men is more readily acceptable as joke material.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:44 PM
1

I love this story
/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:16 PM
4

I'm single and sexually active and I'm afraid of how badly the system, as it currently is, can fuck me over if I'm not really careful and even if I am. Also I'm tired of living in a culture and system of law that seems to hate me just for being a man who isn't ashamed of being one. And, living in a culture that seems to think misandry (comical or not) is okay, and a male life is expendable.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:02 AM
2

All three of those people sound annoying.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 10:26 AM
6

As if /r/mensrights wasn't already vaguely gay enough
/r/MensRights22/06/11 05:24 AM
-6

click see she's not hot not interested
/r/MensRights07/06/11 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter