TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

donthassleme-imlocal Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by donthassleme-imlocal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

link?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:18 PM
16

The point is that one a choice of whether to have a child while the other doesn't.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:32 AM
1

I more or less agree. I agree with Whoopi that if you hot a man you should except to be hit back. I agree we should teach all people not to hit anyone. I was just quibbling with the line some people were taking which was that in ALL situations when a woman hits you you're justified in punching her. I just wanted to point out that isn't necessarily true. Yes, anyone hitting someone should expect it and shouldn't initiate a violent confrontation, but if you get hit you can still use some discretio…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:17 AM
1

Well grabbing a bottle or knife is different now isn't it, from the scenario we started with which was a woman hitting a man. And really, anyone at anytime is capable of potetially grabbing a weapon and stabbing you, but until they do you can't react to them as if they already have. And you actually demonstrate my point--any scenario of assault is contextual and my point is simply, regardless of the gender of either party--you're allowed to do what is necessary to defend yourself, and in many si…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:35 AM
1

My point really has nothing to do with gender in that it applies to anyone no matter what gender either party is. Self-defence does not give you carte blanche to strike back. It does if the situation requires it. But in many cases you don't need to punch someone in the face to defend yourself. I'm a doorman. There are lots of times I've been attacked and it would be completely over the top to punch the person back. Completely disproportionate. Doesn't matter if attacker is man or woman. In many …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:20 PM
-3

I can tell you're not reading what I'm saying just by what you wrote uner #2. My point is there is no carte blanche right to go mental on someone who assualts you. There is a right to do what is necessary to defend yourself. What is "necessary" is contextual. In some cases that may require punching. In others, certainly not. It's really that simple and it has nothing to do with what gender either party is. The point is this automatic, "if you get punched, you are allowed to strike back" is wrong…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:17 PM
-9

No, there is no absolutes here. And sorry, but size is relevant. If a kid hits me, I can easily grab the kid to prevent him hitting me. If a petite girl hits me and I can easily grab her to prevent her from hitting me, that's what I should do. I don't need to punch her in the face. And I don't get free reign to strike her back just because she hit me first. The test is using reasonable force to prevent her from assaulting me. That test requires the minimal force necessary to get the job done and…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:03 PM
-23

Just as the "never hit a woman" group is extreme, so is your view but on the other end of the spectrum. Regardless of gender, if you get hit you should only hit back if they are continuing to attack you. If they hit you but stop, you shouldn't hit them back and if you do, you are committing assault just as they are. Everyone has the right to use force to defend themselves, but getting hit doesn't give you the rest to "get even." The standard is, "do I need to do x y z to prevent myself from bein…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:48 PM
13

/r/Iamverysmart Is there a /r/pedantic subreddit too? Don't forget to correct the grammar!
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:29 PM
8

Two quotes stood out for me: "Backhouse, Cross and MacGregor insist that if these courts are created, there must be extensive training and education for everyone involved." -->HUGE issue. Who teaches? What do they teach? etc. etc. ""Sex education at a really young age, like two or three, that is as natural as learning how to tie your shoes or read a storybook would change things," she said." -->This is absolutely nuts. My 3 year old nephew and niece can barely talk and is learning how to share. …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:28 AM
0

Nope
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:24 AM
1

Same principles apply in Canada. Bail is denied if there is a risk the accused won't show up or will commit crime. The woman is presumed innocent and deserves bail unless there are extenuating circumstances.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:23 AM
9

Nothing wrong with her getting bail.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:04 AM
1

Victim blaming, no?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:48 PM
5

I can hear it now: more frivolous cases brought before the court, most of which don't result in a conviction, resulting in lower overall conviction rate for sexual assault, which is used as evidence that legal reform is necessary to make convictions easier for sexual assault cases.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:08 PM
2

The Charter would absolutely not allow this. I'm amazed a lawyer would actually suggest this.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:17 AM
-3

look up
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:16 AM
2

Harsh.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:54 AM
1

Please do. Am interested in reading about it.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter