TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

doomsought Archive

View 0 posts and 165 comments by doomsought on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Men can't experience sexism because sexism describes a system of oppression. The correct reply to that is "You are the system. So tell me, how are you discriminating against women?"
/r/MensRights25/06/16 11:58 AM
1

Really depends what qualified them as being gender confused to start with. Did their parents bring them to a shrink for having atypical play and/or mannerism? Then it's the parents who were confused, most of said kids never said anything about not being a boy or not being a girl, they were just non-conforming. I know in the world of "resistance is futile, become the borg, conform to others" this is much for parents, but not a sign the kid identifies as the other sex. I found the actual article o…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:48 PM
3

The primary duty of infantry is the forced march, all other factors, including combat capacity, are secondary to being able to walk for twelve hours strait before getting into a fight. Recognizing this was how Caesar became one of Rome's greatest generals, and it hasn't change much since then.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:25 PM
4

Judges do what they think is best for the child FTFY
/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:36 PM
3

I'm not sure Mary sue even used a lawyer, one of their arguments was based on hearsay.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 01:11 PM
1

What you are talking about isn't monoculture; what you are talking about is called bias. Scientists have developed many ways, simple to elaborate, to eliminate bias. It does not matter if the scientist is a man or a woman. If changing the sex of the researcher changes the outcome, then the methodology is flawed and the results should be thrown out.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:14 PM
1

It means he goes to federal court where he can contest it on constitutional grounds.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:09 AM
0

This is extortion and kidnapping. He should take his child to another state.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:54 PM
-2

No it shouldn't. Some states should legalize and regulate prostitution. Things like prostitution are outside the federal jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:51 PM
-1

Clothing is a form of communication. Immodest dress is a signal for sexual availability. We don't want students screaming "FUCK ME!" at the top of their lungs during class, why should we let them do it with their cloths.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:41 AM
5

Tell her in no uncertain terms that you never want to meet her again. If she tries to contact you file for a restraining order. Momentum is key.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:05 PM
3

That or terrorism. I doubt modern feminists have the conviction for an actual bombing, but there have been bomb threats quite recently made by them agianst Mens Rights events.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:22 PM
10

Is it wrong of me to hope one of the kids kill the mom in a revenge killing?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:47 AM
1

If they aren't discriminating by class, they are discriminating by action.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:45 AM
-5

I don't think they were asking for a gay cake. Just gays asking for a cake. No, they were asking for a gay cake. A gay wedding cake to be specific.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:32 AM
7

You have no right, however, to deny service to either because of something they can't control. The bakery didn't refuse to bake them cakes, they only refused to bake them wedding cakes.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:31 AM
3

Ignorance is an accident, stupidity is a decision.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:17 PM
5

Isn't it funny how they refuse to name her.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:09 AM
14

That is illegal.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:31 PM
3

I think a public hanging would do better. There is a point whence past the one becomes a monster rather than a person. The world would be a better place without her.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:34 PM
1

In actuality, his proven damages are probably only tuition lost and opportunity cost of whatever time he spent not in school. He won't get a butt load of cash for a constitutional harm, you have to prove damages (although juries can do whatever they want; this didn't go to a jury). You simple add up the cost of every page that is declaring him a rapist on the news as if it wre advertising space.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:00 AM
1

I'm not surprised. Even those of us that think you are wrong for it know it would be a greater evil to try and force the issue using the law or other forms of secular authority.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:32 AM
0

The fact he is a gay man that doesn't agree with gay marriage and the "born this way" thinking and wants science to look into it is probably* part of why he wasn't allowed. As far as I understand there are two things that get called homosexuality. One is basically a fetish, its completely voluntary. The other is gender dysphoria, which is a neurological disorder.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:10 PM
1

I just leave all of mine in my checking account. A little over four thousand but its going to drop a good bit to get a new fuel pump for my car.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:03 PM
14

They also drove the woman that INVENTED the very concept of offering shelters for the abused out of the Brittain. I'll give you one guess as to why they sent her bombs.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:58 PM
2

I just hung out in the groups that don't attract that type of crazy. Try looking for your school's gaming or Anime clubs. Most of the girls there should be "one of the guys" and too interested in their hobbies to cause trouble.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:46 AM
1

that scientist who said women fall in love in the laboratory The thing is he didn't actually say that. It was a self depreciating joke.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:38 AM
1

He needs to seek jury nullification.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:31 PM
1

The main reason for dress codes it to stop the students from sexualizing themselves. Clothing is a form of communication- there is a language to it. Skirts that leaved the underwear visible can be easily translated to English: "Please fuck me!" We don't let teens yell at eachother in the class room about how horny they are, and we shouldn't let them do it with their cloths either.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:53 AM
6

I wouldn't have been able to do even that much if I didn't have a lawyer in the family willing to help me out pro-bono.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:41 PM
9

We managed to get to him to let us 'win' while he still was able to save face: a $0 deferment. We considered contacting the ACLU, but we don't really have the time to deal with it.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:45 PM
17

Go about an hours travel time away from a city and he will get away with it. I had to go to a court room in the ass end of nowhere for a traffic ticket- the court didn't care about the law. The judge didn't even read the motion do dismiss (lack of evidence), to prosecutor gossiped with the police officer while I gave testimony, and there wasn't even a court record. The judge literally tried to send me off without even recording the ruling- but the prosecutor made the judge put it in writing beca…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:30 PM
45

Its not because its in Texas. Its because its in the middle of nowhere in east Texas. Small town judges can pretty much ignore the law because nobody they deal with has the money or time to appeal to their decisions.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:26 PM
1

Get her a derringer and a self defense class. Tell her that complaining won't do anything but she can empower herself to solve the problem.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:28 PM
2

The where you set "due diligence" is way too high. Not only that, but it places the burden of proof on the accused.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:24 PM
0

He wasn't "hooking up indiscriminately with 14 year old girls", he was hooking up with a girl publicly advertising herself as available for sex. That is the entire issue here, the girl advertise herself as a consenting adult, why should he expect her to be lying?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:07 PM
-4

I think you are forgetting what it was like to be a teenager. "Something might go wrong" is the furthest thing from their mind when they hook up.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:20 PM
27

He also banned the kid from using computers. The kid wanted to go to college for computer science. He literally skipped maximum judgement to go for cruel and unusual punishment.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:19 PM
18

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection It also explains everything. Everything she say men feel about women? That is actually how she feels about men.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:15 PM
4

Many black families actually immigrated on their own because the united states was one of the best places for blacks to live even during the worst of it.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:13 PM
4

HAHAHAHAHa I've got family that has worked in the prosecutors office. You are either very naive or have impaired faculties.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:20 PM
6

Mostly because of Japan having a shame culture and the myriad of excessive expectations placed on its members.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:54 AM
1

This should do nicely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lxoStFBrjo Erin Prizzey, the inventor of shelters for the abused, basically describes feminists as terrorist when they were founded.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:52 AM
1

Apparently they have actually settled down a bit, they don't send actual bombs with the bomb threats anymore.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 05:17 PM
3

I hope you like bloody horrors on the floor, because that is why janitors always say that female bathrooms are worse than men's.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:24 AM
3

The question is weather this is cultural or not...
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:17 AM
-1

conscription/selective service Honestly, that is a whole bag of worms that nobody who actually understands the problem wants to open. The biggest reason women aren't on the draft is because doing so would create a legal situation where pregnancy becomes draft dodging. This can't be allowed happen, and nobody wants to pursue the legal circus that would come up while trying to fix it. There are other logistical problems as well produced by a combination of social and biological factors (different …
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:41 PM
1

It depends entirely if your target location has an extradition treaty with your home base.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:34 PM
6

Because any limitation to eliminate that wold lead to worse things. It is ultimately better to trust in due process.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:11 AM
1

The polygraph test is not used for the output of the polygraph, that shit is useless. But what is useful is the bluff that it can tell if you are lying, which sometimes leads to confessions. Or you can manipulate the graph results and use it to bullshit your way through a kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:05 PM
0

She was still moving.
/r/PussyPass21/01/15 12:20 AM
1

This is part of the progressive stack, and its one of the ideas that lead into the SJW quagmire.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:43 PM
3

Funny thing is, if you don't make the quotas the US will force you to make a discriminatory hiring.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:53 PM
0

In these cases, I think death would be a mercy.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:59 PM
2

For example the very popular "they were too drunk to consent" in this case seems not to be considered rape. The problem with calling that rape is what happens if to people get blackout drunk and wake up together? Which one is the "Victim" here?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:18 PM
1

The problem is that many of those regulations were put in place by the predatory corporations and union leaders, but when we try to remove the corrupt regulations they have the power to redirect the attempts to correct the problems. Unions should never have the power to demand mandatory union dues, and the corporation should have the ability to say its piece about any changes- not be legally blackmailed into silence by unions. This is how corrupt unions get their power, only by being strictly vo…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:22 AM
1

Uhm what? That is not the purpose of government. The purpose of government is to gain a monopoly of force to promote order. Government has nothing to do with morality.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:16 AM
-2

You can't refute that the Ends justify the means, you need to say that the ends don't justify all means. What it really comes down to is two different world views: The first is: Rights are protections that a everybody deserves for being a person. The second is: Rights are privileges granted to you by the government. In the second case, the needs of the many are greater than the needs of the few, thus it is justifiable to rob Peter to pay for Paul and Sam's food. However, in the other worldview t…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:25 PM
10

Furthermore this happened in Great Brittain, a state known charging acts of self defense harsher than actual crimes.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:22 PM
1

That is not a criminal prosecution, its a propaganda tool. The closest thing to international law is a treaty, everything else is hot air and imperialism.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:25 AM
0

No no no no! You're not understanding what rights are, which is the big trap. You have rights because you are a person. It is not for any other reason and there are no qualifiers on rights.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 01:22 AM
6

I think t would be interesting if we could put an agree/disagree next to the up/down vote.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:56 PM
1

I think Anitas position is that video games reinforce misogyny rather than create it. That is actually a genius tactic for a con artist like her. It makes the matter even more difficult to measure and deal with in a scientific matter.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:39 AM
1

well, it would be better to compare 50shades to shitty porn.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:37 AM
5

That is one of her core strategies for success.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:35 AM
3

Imagine spungebob decided to take on serious business. Then make him a girl. Then make her sexist.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:34 AM
5

If she is passed out drunk, the responisble thing to do would be to call for an ambulance get her stomach pumped.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:48 PM
1

Hotbox Pizza employees and performers.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:31 PM
4

At this point, I believe your best bet would be to try and force a trial by jury. Unlike a judge, a jury has the power to decide the law is bullshit and acquit you despite the technicalities.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:20 AM
2

Its not like its possible to be an individual person with motivations and thoughts separate from group membership /s
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:54 PM
3

Most people don't want to believe in the real conspiracies because they tend have such petty motivations compared ot the damage they can cause.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:50 PM
6

The core truth of feminism is that it is about obtaining advantage for women without having to earn it. The same is true with all the fruit of Marxism.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:26 PM
2

Hillary isn't stupid, she's predatory.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:38 PM
15

There's a difference?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:51 PM
15

Child support is rarely ever used for the sake of children either.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:49 PM
2

We don't have enough details here yet.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:45 PM
10

Actually, it was because he was on probation.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:58 AM
15

Not really. All the great things were accomplished by the women's' rights and suffragettes movement. Ideologically they were completely unrelated to feminism, which is actually a splinter group from Marxism/communism. It is merely a result of feminism's propaganda machine that the accomplishments of the previous movements is considered a feminist victory.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:47 AM
1

I think the third most common criticism I see of Feminism on this sub is misogyny.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:21 AM
9

Its says that the police thought he was dead when they arrive, until the checked for a pulse. He probably has some form of sleeping disorder.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:39 PM
0

No, the reason that sexual victims don't come forward is because they are not financial or emotionally independent.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:26 AM
2

True, biological factors would make the healthiest factors different, the statistics would have to be normalized. Actually, there are probably half a dozen relevant variables, give me several thousand datapoints and I can have matlab spit a few things out.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:22 AM
2

Why is it age restricted?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:05 AM
13

Ask the lawyer. Media attention can get things settled out of court, but can cause problems if it has to go to court. If the university or woman publish his name, libel is proper grounds to sue.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:21 PM
0

And then lots of women will get pregnant to get out of being drafted.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:25 PM
-5

This again? What I was told years ago still applies: women cannot be registered for the selective service because it would make pregnancy draft dodging. This is how the problem was explained to me by a law professor of high esteem.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:33 PM
4

The Daily Currant is an American satirical news blog that focuses on politics, technology, and entertainment.[1] A number of its satirical stories have been taken for true news reports by press. I keep saying to be careful about this stuff. You can get caught by satire and made to look like a fool.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:22 PM
1

Winning a claim for financial damages against someone who can't pay it is pointless. She's not rich enough to afford the settlement she'd owe, and you can ignore such claims easily by just declaring bankruptcy. He'd be better off just masturbating. No, no they are not. She is proven in court as a liar, and it may help get support from the prosecutor for a perjury case.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:26 PM
0

Lets not post stuff that belongs in /r/tumblerinaction here. It makes us look bad by taking the crazies and trolls seriously.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 01:54 AM
1

Lets try to keep anything about the Tumbler/SJW crowd off this sub. They regularly invoke Poes law, and we only make ourselves look like fools for taking them seriously.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:32 PM
2

Part of the confusion is that in Europe, royalism is traditional as you can get so fascism fell into the right there; however the United States was founded by a anti-royal rebellion, so royalism and thus national socialism have nothing to do with our traditions.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:06 PM
1

Keep going,think about what comes next after people, and the media, notice this happening.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:36 AM
0

Now take a moment and think on what would happen if you do that.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:37 PM
-6

That can't happen. As explained to me by a law professor, making women eligible for the draft would make pregnancy draft dodging. Making pregnancy illegal is a can of worms that nobody wants to open, especially when facing a war.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:21 PM
3

I think the only thing they gave a second thought to was the death star petition.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:12 AM
13

The proper response should be "No, you are just a scam artist."
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:18 PM
1

The problem is that people in power - especially those in "diversity" positions - will only help men as a group to the extent that they belong to another group that they actually do care about. This is actually one of the sources of the problem.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:56 PM
2

clothing choices Exactly, Clothing choices.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:08 PM
9

I disagree with you completely: Cloths are a mode of communication. What a person wears says something to the world about them, you should listen and make decisions based off it.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:13 AM
1

Cloths aren't just something to keep off the elements, they are one of the most important methods of human communication. Cloths let you broadcast a great deal about yourself just by walking into the room. Removing the sex orientation of clothing is just like trying to remove the genders from words. You aren't really helping anybody, in fact you are hurting everybody by making it harder for them to communicate.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 10:37 PM
8

If there is a game that can have mixed sexes, its golf.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:27 PM
17

The best way to deal with the guys that are being too pushy is to be direct. Don't be afraid to hurt their feeling, just tell them that they are being assholes (and why). Many of them might not realize that they are being hurtful if you don't tell them. The rest really are just assholes and deserve the grief.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:41 PM
1

A contract is a proper legal procedure, one that predates any government than now exists by more than a thousand years.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 04:32 AM
1

Holy shit, that Judge is full of it: "A parent may not terminate parental rights by contract ... even when the parties have consented," Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi ruled. I bet She wants to revert adoptions too.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:54 AM
7

Yes, this is the core flaw of feminism: they have swallowed the poison pill of Marxism. This has lead to the patriarchy conspiracy theory and the zero sum thinking. This contrasts to the classical liberal ideology that most MRAs work off of: People have rights, anything less is a transgression, anything more is a privilege.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:46 AM
1

I think its more than black and white thinking: its treating cause and effect as a zero sum game. They cannot comprehend that doing something foolish that enables the attack does not remove some of the responsibility from the attacker to the victim (thus in their logic, the victim cannot have done anything foolish).
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:30 AM
1

This is exactly what we DON'T want in the sub. We are not here to be Misogynists. This thread should be removed.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:24 PM
1

As the situation was described in a book tittle: "Its a mighty thin pancake and it ain't have two sides."
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:41 PM
0

According to the Torah, there is a significant benefit.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:42 PM
9

Being pro-active and seeking damages will help you look like a victim rather than a suspect to the legal system.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:49 PM
15

He has alibis, she has, well, at least 4 known possible motives, and his lawyer and him have no doubt that they he will win the case, thank god. Are those motives good enough to have her put up on charges? You can also sue her for defamation, because that is exactly what she is doing.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:23 PM
8

It is impossible to draft women. This is due to the simple fact that women carry the pregnancy- getting pregnant becomes draft dodging and nobody wants to open that can of worms.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:23 PM
4

Avoid getting caught? Discrimination is legally mandated.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:47 AM
1

Legal immigrants in the US are treated with the worst insult in the world: While they do everything they are supposed to, Illegal immigrants, whom are by definition criminals, are treated better than they are. That is what pisses me off the most about the immigration fight, legal immigrants aren't given a voice.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:40 PM
-14

Which however leads to a lower population, and all of the economic troubles that follow with one. Tax revenue is lost before the retired portion of the population dies. Japan actually has a huge problem with its declining population.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:36 PM
22

But books that boys tend to like are "problematic" in that they often discuss terrifying themes like competition and struggle and overcoming some enemy. Hoplophobia is becoming a terrible problem, and it is afflicting schools worse than elsewhere.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:49 PM
1

Just imagine for a moment how feminists would react if selective service in the U.S. targeted only women, instead of only men. I bet that issue would be getting a lot more from them than the mere lip service it has had regarding the "exclusion" (exemption) of women from it. I remember how my grandfather, a Law Professor, explained how it could never happen. The problem is that you can't send pregnant women into combat, thus some enterprising women will get themselves pregnant to get out of the d…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:29 PM
1

There are fates worse than death. I would actually prefer a quick death, than spending the rest of my life in a prison.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:52 AM
25

This should get the death penalty.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:49 PM
3

Actually, I think it is selection bias. Parents that are involved enough to search for a special school for their child, are also involved enough to encourage the child to study. On the other side, failing schools have a culture which does not value academic excellence and intellectualism.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:44 AM
1

If the haters put their webpages up on their own hardware and paid their IPs for the connection, you would be right. But this is Facebook, not a public forum. As long as they publish their rules and enforce them impartially, they are both legally and morally in the green.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:21 AM
11

Removing a page from face book, in compliance to written and impartial rules is not a violation of freedom of speech. Facebook is not a public forum. Facebook is a private data-mining business which allows you to use its databases as a means of communications. Facebook has the legal right to place rules on what content may and may not be placed on its machines- furthermore it also bears a legal responsibility for any content it maintains.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:18 AM
1

We have twice as many Suicides as homicides, and that is still not discriminating justifiable homicides (crimes prevented by guns) from murders (gun crime). It also doesn't normalize for weather either.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:03 AM
2

The gun-related homicide rate is not the gun based murder rate. It includes suicides and justifiable homicides.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:55 PM
29

we do not have god given rights. Humans have rights innately. The State does not give rights, it only infringes upon them. To say otherwise means that the state is right to restrict any form of totalitarianism upon its people because what the state gives the state can take away.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:02 AM
13

I've said before that I would never set foot in Brittan unless at the head of an conquering army. This is just a symptom of a greater disease: before this you have had your right to self defense broken, first with gun control laws, then with the preferential prosecution of persons who act in self defense. After that, anything your state does to infringe upon your God-given freedoms should not be a surprise.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:45 PM
1

Its not actually wires, its the same reason boys don't grow boobs: Testosterone. There is certainly a high standard of deviation, but that is because humans can choose to act against their natures.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:35 AM
3

I'm fairly certain it is a 14th amendment violation.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:31 AM
1

I've been noticing some post, that while sarcastically amusing, are better suited for r/Tumblerinaction and detract from the intellectual level of the conversation
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:54 PM
14

No, the length helps lend it weight. You did a magnificent job.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:21 PM
3

People in power. The only people who are racist anymore are people who have political power, because race politics is another way to control the masses.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:16 PM
1

and this is why you absolutely must press for charges and file lawsuits as soon as possible, it will give you the momentum of the battle.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:54 PM
1

To clarify, my pet peeve is people picking up fertilizer in little plastic bags and sealing away the biomass forever in a landfill.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:46 PM
-6

Once for talking to a small girl who asked to pat my dog and once for not picking up my dog shit before it hit the ground. That is a pet peeve of mine. Dog shit goes on the grass. If it shits on the sidewalk, find a stick.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:45 AM
0

I will take this opportunity to prove that I do not subscribe to double standards: I think any man who sleeps around alot is a slut too.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:58 PM
7

It should be. But the law is made by liars, and it is never what its says on the tin.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:59 AM
1

Bayesian belief networks- those are just plain mind-screws.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:43 AM
6

There are statistical tricks to overcome this, but you need large sample sizes and more importantly you need to understand statistics. Statistics is the hardest form of math to understand and if you don't understand it properly you will let your bias taint the analysis.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 10:27 PM
-3

So it was just blatant sexual discrimination then.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:52 PM
1

As mentioned earlier, she was probably listed as a dependent.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:10 PM
3

It probably wasn't permission for the procedure but permission for the money.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:56 AM
5

I think this has to do with a lack of tolerance, understanding of tolerance, or even demand of tolerance. Tolerance is when you think something is bad, but let it happen anyways. Example: I tolerate intoxication. I think its wrong to get drunk or high. However, I support the legalization of Marijuana because I believe prohibition to not only be more harmful than good but also morally wrong.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:10 PM
2

Stupid is having the opportunity to learn and refusing, ignorant is just not having the opportunity to learn.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:15 PM
4

However, the judge has friends whom helped him get in office, and there is NOTHING that pisses a judge off more than his decrees beign ignored.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:33 AM
1

You might want to see if your lawyer can help you with this. Many lawyers are political.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:31 AM
7

The ID crowd can at least be tolerated with their assumption, because it is Religious; Religion is something that is supposed to tell you the divine truths of the universe. Where as Feminism is supposed to be a rights movement.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:20 PM
20

Holy shit, they are not subtle at all!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:33 PM
1

A proper reductio ad absurdum is really a less formal disproof by contradiction.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:04 PM
1

I wounder how poorly she would do if confronted with the delightful subtleties of the first Bioshock game. Its all about agency, and choice.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:54 PM
5

Before certain laws were passed in the southern colonies, it was the same in North America. In fact there are records of freed black "slaves" going on and operating their own plantations.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:41 PM
2

Report the OP post then.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:20 AM
5

There are two schools of thought in what equality means: Equality of opportunity Equality of results Anyone familiar with the Soviets or Pavlovian learning knows that equality of results is the fast track to failure.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:18 AM
-1

plenty of options for avoiding parenthood: Chastity, contraception, or murder. Chastity is always available.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:15 AM
-3

Amusing, but wrong place to post it.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:18 PM
3

Hate is a defense mechanism- fight or flight. When you hate something, you have to make a decision: destroy it or stop hating it. Otherwise the unaddressed hate will destroy you.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:16 PM
1

It is incredibly violating, but so is forced medication, isn't it?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:56 PM
0

Since when were those anything resembling safe?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:39 PM
0

She already looks pretty ugly to me.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:05 PM
6

It goes to show, we are concerned about a women's rights, even when other women are oppression her. That is some real Irony right there.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:02 PM
2

That is pretty much the Accuser's job.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:01 PM
1

By using her sex to bully others.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:49 AM
6

Yup, many of the women I hang out with are much more rude and risque than I am.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:37 AM
3

Lets not forget the Original series. Equality of the sexes, anti-racism, and individualism were all big messages, especially for the time when the show was published.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:33 AM
2

Bribes, connections, favors.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:06 AM
1

This is just parody. If you want to see a real crazy that believes in shit like this, look up Jennifer Diane Reitz aka Chatoyance. He is most well known for the Conversion Bureau fanfics, the most disgusting festering pit of blatant misanthropy that has ever darken the name of the My Little Pony franchise. Discussion of him is banned on spacebattles forums such was the rage generated against his work. He also wrote a work of fiction fairly similar to the parody posted above, also hosted on the s…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter