TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dork_souls Archive

View 0 posts and 186 comments by dork_souls on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Reminds me of the short story 'Harrison Bergeron' by Kurt Vonnegut. It's about a society where people who have advantages have to handicap themselves to make sure everyone is equal. Beautiful people wear masks and strong people must carry heavy weights to compensate for their unfair advantages in life. Smart people are given regular electric shocks to stop them from forming thoughts that are too intelligent because it isn't fair. It can be found online easily
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:18 PM
1

Why does it get so much funding and attention? Is it because it has a slight chance of effecting men, or because it effects women? Is that a false dichotomy? I don't know exactly why, but I doubt it's one or the other. What I was bringing up is that breast cancer isn't a woman's cancer, and a lot of people don't know that. That could be because of the pink marketing or the focus on boobs, or it could be that people don't think of men when they think of the word breast.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:11 PM
1

Breast cancer, it also receives the most funding for research by far. That would be fine, though, if people understood it affects both genders. People seem to think it's a woman's cancer because the 'awareness' advertising usually revolves around the colour pink or boobs (at least in the UK). People seem to be generally unaware that it does happen to men too.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:19 AM
2

Cis is from Latin. It means this side, whereas trans, from Latin, means the opposite side. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:03 AM
5

I'm uncircumcised and I've never had any problems with hygiene. It's a pathetic excuse and a permanent solution to a very minor short-term problem. As for aesthetics, I think in the US women are used to men being circumcised, but in the UK it's seen as stranger. Also, it'd be like removing part of a little girl's labia because it'll look better for men when she's older. It's weird and creepy to even be thinking of that.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:37 PM
2

Well at least this one you posted looks like a face. The P¬)) looks like it has half of a pair of glasses and a double chin
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:38 PM
2

What is with this weird smiley you keep posting?
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:31 PM
2

Oh yeah, they really are scum. I can't really sum it up better than you have. They are lower than low.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/16 09:51 AM
2

Are they the "We have no gimmicks" gimmick one? Here's a kitten. This guy's a clown. WE would never do such a thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/16 09:22 AM
2

Slightly off topic but I love those Gladstone Brooks bing adverts. "Are you nervous, unsure, or simply don't know?" Who the fuck wrote that script?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/16 09:10 AM
1

Is it because they make you feel insecure about your own identity? Seriously though, seeing people who pop into threads just to complain about "trannies" whenever anything related to transgender/sexual is mentioned is like watching 13 year old edgy atheists pop up to say "hurr durr magic sky fairy" every time someone mentions religion. Could you really not just ignore it and move on?
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:12 PM
1

I've never seen it and I've been subscribed here for a few months so I appreciated the repost.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 03:50 PM
1

I went to a school in Sunderland called St Aidan's which is all boys. There is a sister school just behind called St Anthony's which is all girls. Neither are private or grammar schools, just shitty normal comps.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/16 09:12 AM
1

You remind me of people who want to drag everyone down to their level rather than raising people up. Rather than moving towards nobody being treated badly you want to just treat women badly too. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:30 PM
18

Whoa there redpill. Do you realise how stupid that is to suggest? Don't investigate anything on a woman's word? So what if a woman is attacked and needs to report it to police? Do we just disregard it because she's a woman? If so you're as bad as radfems
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:05 PM
1

And how does that show that 89% of allegations are false? Like you said yourself: Only 2500 of the 22500 allegations each year in the UK results in a conviction so I would go with 89% of all allegations of rape are false! That's ridiculous extrapolation. You're assuming that any allegation that doesn't result in conviction must be a false accusation. That is pure speculation, and paranoia. Do not push ridiculous statistics that you have made up or wrongfully manipulated.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:17 PM
2

Right...? But the statistic that they have comes from Hospitals, not just the UK. I was partially circumcised in a UK hospital for a medical condition when I was a kid. They aren't saying that, in general, circumcision is performed for a medical reason. They are talking in the context of hospitals because a lot of religious circumcisions aren't undertaken in a hospital and aren't measured.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:13 PM
1

The UK column says that the 2 percent of UK boys are circumcised for medical reasons, seems to ignore all the Muslim boys who are forced to be circumcised. It doesn't say that. It says that "In UK hospitals, only about 2% of boys are circumcised as babies or as children." Bear in mind religious circumcisions aren't necessarily carried out in a hospital. A lot of Jewish circumcisions are performed by a Rabbi with no medical credentials.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:31 AM
3

Did you even read their reply? There was no strawman. They just took what you said and applied it to a situation. They certainly didn't use personal attacks either. Your reply is purely deflection.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:00 AM
1

Puberty is blocked for a variety of children for a variety of reasons. It's not something really that out of the ordinary. That is the weakest argument for anything ever. Your chest cavity can also be opened in a variety of people for a variety of reasons. Let me peel yours open. It's not something really that out of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 01:44 PM
1

You're making an awful big assumption here: That a fully-developed mail brain would somehow negate gender disphoria. No they're refuting the biological argument that you presented. You said that a brain will fully develop at around age 25. You also said that "part of how the brain develops is determined by sex hormones. So if you want the brain to develop more like a typical female brain you'd better start those hormone treatments before it is fully developed." What you have basically told us is…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 01:34 PM
5

There's a culture of toxic masculinity How is that toxic masculinity? What about toxic femininity when women tell their husbands and sons to 'man up'? You always see people blame 'toxic masculinity' and 'patriarchy' for issues like this, but nobody ever blames femininity when women commit horrible crimes. Majority of parents who kill their children? Women. Why aren't people calling this out? Around 80% of domestic violence was found by Erin Pizzey, founder of the first domestic violence shelter …
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 11:23 AM
1

Just to counter this, from the article: "The report found incidents of women prison staff assaulting male prisoners."
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 11:02 AM
1

And the statistics prove that. No they don't. Proving that men like to rape would mean proving a majority of men are perpetrators of rape. These stats prove that men are also commonly victims of rape. Also, from the article: "The report found incidents of women prison staff assaulting male prisoners." Stop being a dick
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 11:01 AM
1

No, I'm still trying to get to the bottom of who you were referring to in these statements: "Most spouses don't say their intentions first though" and "the people don't feel in danger until it's too late" They are both so nonsensically vague that I have no idea what you mean by most spouses, who the spouses represent (abusers maybe?), what you mean by 'say their intentions' etc. I also have no idea, but can assume, that 'the people' is meant to be victims, but again its so unclear that it could …
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:54 AM
1

What? I'm not saying anything about punishment. I'm replying to your claims and trying to discern what you were actually getting at. Spouses could describe either party. People could describe either party. We just have different opinions on how important justice is compared to safety at the end of the day. I don't understand where you're getting my opinion from, because I didn't post my opinion. I didn't mention justice vs safety or anything. I just had absolutely no idea which party was the 'sp…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:47 AM
1

Most spouses don't say their intentions first though What do you mean by this? That abusers don't spell out that they plan on hurting and potentially killing their spouse? Because they definitely do. A lot of abusers would use kids, animals, family members, whatever they can to get emotional leverage over the victim. They would threaten to kill the children if they left, or like this woman did, the dog. the people don't feel in danger until it's too late Do you mean the victims here? This also i…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 10:31 AM
7

What? They weren't using the website to prove that Islam is good or peaceful. They were using the website to show that Islam permits lying about Islam to benefit Islam. What were you talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 09:06 AM
1

Well you don't know who is reading. It's a bad thing to assume people will know something that you think is 'well known' because you don't frequent the same academic or social circles as everyone. Also information isn't always spread to everyone. I think there is a thing called 'the Lucky 10,000', that for everything that you know, ten thousand people are only hearing it for the first time. Here's a comic that explains it well
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:05 PM
2

If someone Googles something they could encounter results that skew the data or misrepresent it, so the best thing is to offer your own source when making a claim to ensure that you are providing sources, not letting people source your claims.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 12:52 PM
4

Whoa, isn't this the equivalent of feminists re-purposing the word rape for maximum emotional effect? And its completely disingenuous. I know what you are getting at but its stupid to label it as rape. Especially since in your example you compare actual, definable rape to financial manipulation. Seriously, can we avoid resorting to dodgy methods to try and convince people? We would complain about feminists throwing the word rape around and not meaning rape.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:50 AM
1

Wow, great troll, keep it up
/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:41 AM
2

Which aspects? In what way can a woman be used as a commodity?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:41 PM
7

Proof? You've made a lot of claims here
/r/MensRights12/07/16 11:39 AM
2

However I understand why some women would be. Yeah, feminist propaganda trying to convince women that rape is around every corner.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 09:04 AM
4

So you brought up his gender as if it was discrediting? Do you want to silence everyone for their gender if they disagree with you? You bigot.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 09:02 AM
4

You do realise that by throwing the word 'privilege' around without really explaining yourself, people will disregard you by default? Also, you assumed that someone who is white hasn't experienced racism so you're either a racist yourself or an antagonist.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:56 AM
3

Could you put more effort into your trolling here please? It wouldn't be as bad if you were entertaining
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:48 AM
1

Wow, you created an account just for this? You must really struggle to find meaningful things to do.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:51 PM
1

Thanks for the meaningful response. Seriously though, why would consent classes be included in the curriculum? Sex education should touch on the idea of consent, but why does it need to be separate? Again, how would a consent class help with the scenario you mentioned? How would knowledge of consent laws help when someone was arrested in your example?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 02:49 PM
1

Are you just ignoring how they said that their partner had claimed to be on contraception? It's akin to a man claiming he had put on a condom but lied about it.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:11 PM
1

It is not something you can experience just by trying to imagine it. That is exactly what empathy is. Put yourself in someone else's position, try to understand how they would feel. Why shouldn't it be equally valid? You assume that people who have experienced something should know best, but this isn't always true. People who have experienced something traumatic often have warped memories, coloured by emotion. Witness accounts aren't reliable and people's memories can shift and change after-the-…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:07 PM
1

The consent thing mostly because the laws can be very convoluted. Had a class mate get hit with 40 fucking charges of CP possession because he had pics of his GF I don't understand how that's related to consent though. The idea of arresting someone for possession of child porn for having pictures of their girlfriend is ridiculous, but how would that be helped by a consent class? Even so, consent classes are only necessary to navigate the legal minefield of casual sex these days because everythin…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:58 PM
2

there are still plenty of men who are condescending to women just because they're women. Is that why there are common tropes about husbands being incompetent? Or women 'wearing the trousers' because the husband is a bumbling idiot? How about feminist groups that try to explain to men how men view sex, women, the world, money, employment etc? All of these things are done because they are men.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/16 08:48 AM
7

Lastly, how much would you wager that the perpetrator will get less sentence if she were a man? Well we could at least wait until you have been proven correct to post it. Speculating on what probably will or won't happen doesn't make it a men's rights issue until it has happened.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:58 PM
2

For example, fair maternity leave, abortion rights, treatment to do with prosecuted rape cases (many rape kits are never tested), street harassment, higher rates of sexual assault all need to be addressed domestically. These aren't issues with equal treatment though because most of them don't have an analogue for men. Shared Parental Leave has only just became properly accessible in the UK. Abortion rights aren't an Equal Treatment issue. A lot of Western countries don't even take male rape vict…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 08:50 AM
7

Doesn't this guy have like natural self defense reflexes If he retaliates he will be seen as the aggressor.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:14 PM
1

Interesting. Again, at work but I will look into it tonight. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:14 PM
1

That is true. That doesn't discount the idea that an adult has greater means of manipulation, though. I don't deny that teen-on-teen relationships could be abusive - my girlfriend's ex was abusive - but I think its much easier for someone older to take advantage of their position. A friend of your parents or a teacher is in a position of trust and has a much greater capability for convincing you of what you 'need' or 'want', or what is 'right'.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:43 AM
1

You're more making the point or the question I've been rhetorically or nonrhetorically asking for ages. Kind of. I've seen you post it about, and I somewhat agree. I just can't agree with the idea of shrugging off the law because it's different somewhere else. The law where you are is what goes, not the law in New York, y'know? Still you do bring up interesting points. I can't address the whole thing atm as I'm at work and supposed to be... working. But its a difficult subject because I do think…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:04 AM
3

So what's the point in even having a law about these things if you can just dismiss it any time because you don't agree? What's the point of an age of consent if any other place undermines it? There are places around the world with an age of consent of 14. Does that mean you should be able to pick up a 14 year old in the US, take her to Peru and fuck her, and everything is great?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:30 AM
1

I think that's what conscientious objector status is, isn't it?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:23 AM
3

Men are better at certain things just like women are better at certain things. That's 100% fact. These are general trends. There are women that exist that will be stronger than some men, so your logic doesn't hold up beyond speculation. If women can get into the construction industry and prove that they can do it, even though it was a formerly male industry, why can't they do that with every industry?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:19 AM
1

I'm so bored of bad trolls with 1 day old accounts coming into this sub to post really, really bad troll comments.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:08 PM
3

The correlation is self evident, and I don't need to wait for science to "tell me so" to understand water is wet. This is how you get yourself into an echo chamber. You'll look for evidence to back up your beliefs because you 'know it's true'. It's a slippery slope, and how a lot of people develop very warped views. Be careful with this attitude.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:07 PM
1

Even being a veteran shouldn't you leave the spot for some other more disabled veteran. But what if a young disabled veteran comes by and then thinks he should leave it for the old disabled veteran? And then the old disabled veteran doesn't turn up and nobody uses the spot.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:00 PM
1

To take this to a slightly further extreme: Serial killers like Ed Gein (who would literally wear the skin of women), Edmund Kemper (who killed his own mother), Charles Manson, and the Son of Sam all reported abuse, sexual or otherwise, from their mothers at an early age. Ted Bundy also claimed to have been abused by his mother. All of these killers at least partially blame their mothers for what they had become. They all carried out awful attacks on women because of their twisted view of women …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:59 PM
1

Why is it a matter of "I'm a grown man, I can take it" and not "I'm a grown woman, I can pay for myself"? If the guy had outright asked her out and then she didn't offer to split the bill, maybe he should pay. If they mutually agree to go on a date, he has no obligation to pay himself because he didn't initiate it. If I was going to the cinema with a friend and I invited (and somewhat convinced) them to go, I would also offer to pay because I'm the one who wants company. If we both agree we want…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:45 AM
2

The term is alligator arms I think in reference to 'Crocodile Tears'. A lot of the time when someone is fake crying, they are also watching the other person's reaction to see if it worked. I'm guessing this is the same.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:42 AM
1

Because its not. And everybody knows it's not. Yeah, that debate about abortion was settled long ago and everyone knows it right?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:57 AM
1

Is the woman a braindead child who doesn't have a say in whether the couple use protection? Do you think that women have zero agency? She can say no if he doesn't wear a condom. She can take birth control. The couple can avoid PiV sex.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:55 AM
3

So the IRA are Muslim?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 09:13 AM
14

When you are the stronger party, you back the fuck down No, you shouldn't just back down because then the person will think it is okay. After all, a stronger person shouldn't hit a weaker person. That being said, a stronger person can defend themselves and should, but be mindful. If you're a 6'4" guy against a 5'4" guy, you should only have to hit him once for him to learn that you can and will hurt if you fight back. Encouraging the 'stronger person' to not retaliate is stupid because it teache…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:55 PM
1

None of that post answered the question of whether an adult causes fucking PTSD, just on the chance that the adult will be cruel. Was that the question? Because your post didn't say that. Nobody mentioned PTSD. When a teenager, who is emotionally changing and sexually developing, trusts someone who is an adult and who they look up to, and that adult uses that trust to convince them to have sex for the adult's own pleasure, that is manipulation. When a family friend convinces a 16 year old that t…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:01 PM
1

So what? A peer cant also be coercive and cruel? Conversely, an adult cant have a healthy respect for a teen? Of course all of that can happen. That doesn't disprove that we should protect those who aren't fully developed from those who are and can manipulate and take advantage of that. Also, cruel and coercive is different to actually holding power in society. Being an adult itself is a higher position of authority than being a child by law, and you are a child by law until 18 even in a lot of …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:12 PM
0

Also how teens can have sex with each other but when an adult is involved, suddenly its traumatizing. That's because an adult can likely manipulate a teenager in many different ways. An adult who is a teacher can use their authority and power over their students to convince them that the students want to have sex with the teacher. An adult who is much more sexually experienced can coerce or convince a teen that they have to have sex with them to be seen as an adult, or some other horseshit. Anyw…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:37 PM
1

Great Bait, but it's actually regarding public rapes committed by refugees in Scandinavian countries, and the Cologne New Year happenings. Belgium - a refugee rapes woman after completing course on how to treat women in western society Norway - Politician is raped by refugee, feels guilty prosecuting because the rapist will be deported Germany - rape is rife in refugee camps, it seems men see women as free game This is after about 30 second of searching. If you're going to troll, do it well. /u/…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:52 AM
1

I'll alert the hivemind.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:46 AM
8

Nice bait
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:54 AM
1

Well it is. A teenage boy, according to society (and its laws), is not sexually mature and therefore sexually responsible until they reach the age of consent. What's the point in the age of consent if you can just disregard it because they 'wanted it' or 'were horny'? If a teen boy doesnt want to have sex he can just tell his parents or the police. And if a teen boy thinks he wants something at 13, we should just take his word right? Is that why we let teens take drugs and consent to medical pro…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:19 PM
1

Never being allowed to teach again is a way better alternative to put prison time and being labeled a sex offender for life I kind of disagree, because becoming a teacher does come with extra responsibilities. Protecting the students is one of them, and people who prey on their students take advantage of the position of power. Its like doctors who purposefully hurt people - they took the job with the responsibility to hurt people and they use it to actually harm vulnerable people. That kind of p…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:31 PM
1

If both parties consent then it shouldn't be considered rape. That goes for boy teacher/girl student or girl teacher/boy student. The teacher should just never be allowed to teach again. Why should they never teach again then? Surely if they both consent and it isn't rape, like you say, they can continue to teach. Of course, that would mean the means and position to abuse more students, but everyone consents so that's fine. What I was trying to say is that there will always be the perception tha…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:23 AM
1

They are teenagers who know what's right and what's wrong. So shall we start prosecuting anyone 13 and over as adults? Should we give them financial responsibility? There's a reason we don't let teenagers make major life decisions, like having sex with a teacher. Its because they aren't fully developed mentally, physically or sexually.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:20 AM
1

Most cases the girls are not willing Can you prove that? Are you implying that teenage girls aren't horny and wouldn't fuck an adult that they liked if they could? Because you should look at boybands for the last 20 years. Or even just male celebrities. Or listen to how young girls talk to each other. Seriously, why the fuck do people like you think that boys are horny animals but girls are sweet innocent children with no sex drive?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:18 AM
2

Oh fuck off. No, not all teenage boys want to fuck anything that walks. It's a boring old trope that everyone likes to trot out, but no not every young boy is obsessed with sex. Also, a lot of teenage girls also want sex because they are developing sexually. Should we allow teachers to take advantage of that and have sex with them because the girls would want it?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:11 AM
1

I can pretty much say that as we collectively seem unable to find an actual case of FGM in the UK* then the onus is rather on you to prove it's actually a problem. I can't really 'prove' a negative, I can only say that as we've never been able to locate a proven case of it actually happening here, I'm guessing it's not much of a problem. Well there's Nimco Ali, who is a Somali born Anti-FGM activist based in the UK. Obviously she isn't going to show you her genitals, but she has been affected by…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:54 PM
1

Bollocks. 'Estimated' my arse. That's the total number of women from Somaria and East Africa in the UK, including the Christian ones. Again, this is a totally invented problem just like the Satanic Child Abuse histeria of the 1980s. Feminists have been doing this for years - it's one moral panic after another - in the 80s it was video games and heavy metal music and now it's Social Media. Do you have any proof that this isn't representative of the actual issue, or do you just reject it because y…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 11:54 AM
2

It's pathetic but its not really relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:52 PM
10

I don't think it should be worse, but I think it should carry the same punishment as the crime they accused someone of. Making a false accusation carry a worse penalty kind of undermines rape. I know it ruins lives and is a truly malicious thing to do, but it is still a serious, physically destructive crime. Being accused also doesn't carry quite the same risks as being raped. It is incredibly psychologically and emotionally destructive, though.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:50 PM
1

Abortion - feminists portray this as an issue where 'the patriarchy' is oppressing women and exerting control. But it isn't - it's an issue of where people believe 'like' begins - and the people who feel most strongly about that are women. It's a moral issue where some people have strong views, but it's noting to do with men oppressing women. Before you go any further, I'll remind you we aren't discussing feminists or feminist discourse, but rather women's issues. I never claimed it had anything…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:36 PM
2

let's face it - its a pretty marginal topic; it's not going to kill you to jump on a £28 flight to Liverpoor for an abortion. Well, that doesn't justify that these women are still lacking fundamental rights. Just because some people can "jump on a £28 flight" doesn't solve the issue. Not everyone has the means to do so, and even then people can be shunned by family and communities if it is discovered that they have had an abortion. Of course in Ireland just as many women are opposed to abortion …
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:20 PM
2

Stop being a child about it. He's only saying that both genders have issues, and you're throwing a fit about specific situations that piss you off. Yes, there are women in the first world who can experience 'oppression'. Just because there are trivial things getting brought up by other women doesn't mean the oppressed women instantly have it better. Women still can't get abortions in Ireland. I'd say that's pretty shit. It doesn't affect me as a man, but it still does happen.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:12 AM
1

Are you trying to reply by saying that the -phobia part of Homophobia doesn't mean fear so the definition of misogyny shouldn't be taken literally too? (p.s. it does mean fear, even in this context) Because that's stupid.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:30 AM
2

Misogyny is such a buzzword. How is "...$50 says they're all on the same cycle too..." misogynistic? How does it show hatred for women? If you think that making a simple joke about menstruation is misogyny then how would you even handle people who truly do hate women?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:19 AM
6

Have you ever complained about anything? Then don't. People are starving around the world. Stop having problems.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 07:58 AM
1

Thanks :-)
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:43 PM
1

This is from the BBC. Where are the Guardian outraged? Also, please remember that newspapers allow writers to voice their opinions, even if said opinions conflict with other writers.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:22 PM
1

Legit from what? Its pretty simple argument. Its codified into US case law as a religious right. Right, but I was talking about in general. Everything you post is attempting to be controversial. New is a year old? Interesting math you got Try re-reading buddy. I said set up a new account since the one you're posting on is the one you attempt to troll people on, looking at your post history. I won't. It espouses how intellectually dishonest you are. Does it? Because you claim everyone is 'shaming…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:10 PM
1

Mate, you have 241 karma after a year. Stop trying to pretend you are legit. And if you are trying to be taken seriously, you probably want to: Set up a new account that you don't use to badly troll people Stop using terrible tactics like calling people out for 'shaming you' when they disagree with your fairly inflammatory 'opinion' Don't post like you're having a mental breakdown
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:00 PM
1

Whatever. I admit that age is a factor but it isn't the whole deal. You just reject anything anyone else is saying because you want to insist "it's all about the age". Yes, it is against the rules of some colleges for teachers and students to sleep with each other. Especially if the student is actually in the class of that teacher. Do you really think there are no power dynamics at play? Nothing to do with emotional support, being an authority figure, preying on sexual development, or even manip…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/16 02:47 PM
1

Wow, you react like that to a little joke and I'm the loser? Or do you mean yourself for shitposting and trolling on reddit?
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:42 PM
1

I'm going to assume you're a lawyer and this is sound legal advice
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:52 PM
1

The threat was to go public saying that they were paying her less Not quite true. The threat was to go public saying they were paying her less because she's a woman, which is disingenuous. Its marketing and if you don't like it you are living in the wrong century. As much as the phrase 'any press is good press' is true, you seem to have a loose grasp on Marketing. You wouldn't market your company as seemingly sexist, like she tried to imply. There is very little positive to be found. Netflix jus…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:51 AM
1

it does not strike me as unethical to take a bargaining position that amounts to "if you don't treat me fairly, I'm going to tell people that you aren't treating me fairly". But she is being treated fairly. She isn't discriminated against for her gender, but she tries to shame Netflix by accusing them of doing so.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:48 AM
1

I am against this because its a right and believe it or not parents have ownership over their children. Parents should go back to beating their property children!
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:44 AM
1

I just had to buy pepper spray for my girlfriend who keeps getting harassed at the bus stop. That's hilarious, considering earlier you said... To empower women with as many advantages as possible. This was a good thing back when women were disadvantaged compared to men. That isn't contradictory. A woman taking responsibility and pro-actively finding a solution, or at least deterrent, to her problem is empowering. She isn't staying at home, she's going out with self-defense. And as the other guy …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:40 AM
1

You haven't heard of me either so I must be equal to Kevin Spacey
/r/MensRights20/05/16 10:41 AM
1

Someone else writes the script and the actors just follow it, you know? She isn't actually running for vice president.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 10:38 AM
1

It isnt blackmail when they are fucking her over and she has the guts to come forward about it. It is literally illegal to pay people different wages based on gender/sexual orientation/ect. Shes an actor. She is valued at a certain rate and then paid at that rate. Do you think all actors earn the same in a movie? Do you think that Brad Pitt and Meatloaf were paid the same for Fight Club? If she thinks they are paying her differently based on gender, she has every right to call them out on it. In…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 10:20 AM
1

So if it had happened when he was out of high school it still would have been a huge deal? What are you trying to ask with this question? It reads like a statement with a question mark on the end, almost like inflection. Anyway, how is this all about age? Can you prove to me that there is no power dynamic at play or that it didn't have any bearing on the situation? Imagine if you, as a teenager, had a non-relative adult who you trusted and was supposed to care for you, and that adult uses that o…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/16 09:54 AM
1

There's no shade of grey when she knowingly sexually groomed a young boy. Regardless of whether he wanted it or not, that doesn't justify it. A child doesn't know whether what they want is good or bad, right or wrong. It doesn't matter whether a student gets backlash, it's the teacher who is in the position of responsibility and therefore should be punished. The student might feel good afterwards, but that doesn't make it okay. A lot of victims of sexual assault and rape do later find themselves…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/16 08:31 AM
1

This is more about the age than the position of authority she held It isn't, it's because she has a duty of care towards the students and she took advantage of her position to manipulate and groom a boy from 13. She is supposed to help these children, not take advantage of them for her own sexual gratification.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/16 08:26 AM
3

I chose my words to succinctly communicate what I meant. If you fail to grasp it, that's on you. Oh, yeah, definitely must be me when you keep skipping about the point. I asked for a quote to clarify why you think she appeared calmer and more collected because I don't agree. She was illogical throughout the argument by extrapolating what he said into an entirely different point, or twisting his words to otherwise present him as irrational. I will provide an example, though: You apparently want t…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:24 AM
2

I don't know how I can more unambiguously say that I disagree with her, but she appears more rational than he does. But how? How does she appear more reasonable? I'm asking because I don't see it and you're claiming this is the case. It's not 'going against the circlejerk' or whatever shite you want to say. I'm asking a simple question for you to clarify how you reached a conclusion. Also, I never asked if you agreed with her. I asked why you claimed he was the illogical one. I didn't see him 's…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:54 AM
2

Yeah, Prostitution hasn't been one of the most popular professions in history or anything...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/16 08:35 AM
2

Well can you explain why he's the illogical one? Can you quote the conversation to show where she is being sensible because I can't see it?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:14 AM
2

Why are 1 day old accounts shitposting here?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:35 AM
11

That isn't an answer.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:06 PM
34

Is that why we imprison people who embezzle or commit fraud?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:01 PM
1

I'm glad we can be friends
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:57 AM
1

Thirdly, is it really fair to point at a guy who's job is literally to look like Hemsworth, and then say that pressure applies to all men in society? I agree, it's a stupid connection to make. I do kind of find it funny that it is almost analogous to people protesting models and whatnot because of the 'unrealistic beauty standards' that they promote by existing.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:56 AM
2

So is meth, but people still use it. Brilliant reply, but this doesn't stand up to scrutiny. A lot of things are illegal and still people do them, but that doesn't mean that its a massive problem. Yes, meth is illegal. Yes some people still do it. Does that mean there is a universal meth problem and people should bother me about it? Fuck no, I have nothing to do with it. The same is true for this (untrue) claim that you have made that people still pay men and women unequally for the same work. T…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:49 AM
1

Then it doesn't line up with fact, but rather opinion. Therefore it isn't true. It might be popular, but not true.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:38 AM
1

Well you stated that something is true, and then stated that it was a collective belief and therefore subjective.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:21 AM
2

Ah yes, I was watching daytime tv yesterday where they were discussing this. More specifically Good Morning Britain (fairly well-rounded) and Loose Women (recently became a lot less anti-male) and both times, the hosts of the shows were very unimpressed with this woman complaining about heels. It was great to see (especially Loose Women) these shows take no shit from the ridiculous cry-baby media. Also, Kate Smurthwaite was on Good Morning Britain and she had absolutely no respect for the other …
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:52 AM
1

it's the opinion created by society dynamics. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it isn't true. opinion true something isn't lining up here.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:40 AM
6

Except that she doesn't say that men are dangerous. She only says that some men are creepy, and that she is therefore scared of men. No, she extrapolates that enough men are "creepy" to warrant judging all men. Hence the 'not all men' rebuttal. She's trying to set up the situation where enough men commit enough horrible acts to justify staying away from all men. Her entire shtick is "not all men do these, but enough do for me to demonize them." Just stop telling me that your dog is really friend…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:01 PM
1

I don't understand why that is posted here though. It's not really at the forefront of men's issues.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:48 PM
6

Honestly, if your response to someone who says they are afraid is to say they are probably making it up, then it's no wonder there are women who find men frightening. So you're setting up a nice Kafka trap. "Men are dangerous and I'm scared." "This is an unfair generalisation." "It's no wonder women find men frightening when this is how they respond!"
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:46 PM
3

It's just a summation of the current reality, ie lots of women are scared of men, due to the behaviour of some significant number of men. Not at all. To paraphrase this video, the fear of zombies can be at an all time high, and yet the actual threat of zombies is at an all time low. How people feel doesn't really matter when the numbers show otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:44 PM
3

What a brilliant method for maintaining a closed mind.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 08:19 AM
1

If I was to address the each fallacy in that post I would have to have one of those long quote/counter-point posts; I have way better things to do with my time. Well you can't expect to be taken seriously when you post a 1 sentence dismissal. You especially can't expect to be taken seriously when you come across as pompous in that reply. And I did read your post properly. It is meaningless.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:49 PM
1

As a tip, when you're calling someone out as fallacious you should really back up your claim and explain how it's fallacious. Even if there is a fallacy, that doesn't disprove the point by default. You have to be able to explain why the committed fallacy undermines the point, or you're guilty of the Fallacious fallacy as someone else pointed out, which is the assertion that the mere presence of a fallacy makes a statement or claim false.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:22 PM
2

Do you think feminism just popped up out of nowhere a few years ago?
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:06 AM
2

women are at higher risk just because they are womyn! It isn't a gender issue because this disproportionately affects women. I'm sorry to say, but you're making it an issue. That doesn't mean we shouldn't support men, or women, because EDs are serious and deadly. I'm a male whos struggled with ED and my girlfriend is recovering from Anorexia. Her best friend has Anorexia and my sister's ex was a guy with bulimia. I know that it can affect anyone, but this is something that affects girls and wome…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:55 AM
2

Typically people laugh off these stories as "oh, he just got caught bragging to his friends", but it's much harder to make that excuse when the kid reports the abuse on his own years later. I don't mean to be cruel here, but I doubt the kid was loving it when he was raped by her. It's not exactly a young boy's fantasy.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:43 AM
8

She didn't have to raise you...you know that right? You could literally be thrown from foster home to foster home waiting until you're adopted...instead you have a parent...one you actually know. Wow, what a saint of a woman! She didn't throw you out so be grateful! Do you think that someone should get a pat on the back for taking responsibility for their own child? Because that's fucking stupid. Don't have the child if you don't want to take responsibility. It doesn't make you ungrateful to res…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:28 AM
2

It wasn't just the used tampons or the piss, although that's pretty horrific in and of itself. It was the shit. I don't quite know what goes on in women's restrooms that causes this, but there were far more Code Brown clean ups in the women's restroom than mens. Oh yes. I worked in a bar and the women's toilets were routinely closed off or out of order. One time I went up to find someone had put a full toilet roll in the toilet and then taken a huge, dog-pile esque dump on top of it. My sister a…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:18 AM
11

You don't think it might be because severe sexual attacks by strangers in public are almost 100% performed by men? Do you have any proof of this? Women do sexually assault people too, you know.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:15 AM
2

Hopefully you'll actually get a meaningful reply this time and not passing the buck.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:16 PM
4

She's referring to how western feminists claim to help women and girls around the world but don't help the women pressed into sexual slavery by Islamic terror groups and extremists. Nobody says that all women living under Islamic Law are oppressed, but rather that there are women who live under Islamic Law that are being oppressed, and nobody speaks out about it.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:14 PM
1

There is another, very comprehensive reply with sources to one of my posts. I'm on mobile or I would link to it but it was very helpful.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:31 PM
4

Thanks. I appreciate the lengthy reply, and the sources. It's good to have the data to look at, so I'm going to save this post.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:51 PM
6

That's true. I think it can somewhat undermine your own argument when the stats aren't there, but like you say you can get them thinking
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:19 PM
7

they were found to be almost equal Where is this though? Do you not see how this is so vague that it would never prove anything to anyone? Now I agree with you about the amount of DV committed by women, but it's almost impossible to find the numbers. I'm not trying to be a dick, but this is how I feel when I try to explain to someone that it's not just men. I saw a report stating in a country in Europe that the majority of rape accusations were false. And the FBI have a report that say false acc…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 02:49 PM
11

I know that, but in the context of the thread so far, you opposed the idea of women being more likely to be the victim of rape/domestic violence. Regardless of how the female statistics are, the male statistics are almost none existent and so it's pretty hard to show the facts to someone when they haven't been gathered.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 02:40 PM
14

Yeah, but when the statistics just aren't there, you can't just tell people 'this is the truth'. For example, the best accounts I've seen about DV being reciprocal are from Erin Pizzey, who didn't really have any hard numbers and it would be very out dated. Now this doesn't mean I don't think DV is committed in equal(ish) numbers by each gender, but rather that I can't just tell people to listen and believe.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 02:28 PM
1

Apparently there's no urgent demand to change the law and no public outrage, because all the Irish women just take a short vacation to England and have it done there. This is the worst bit, because it's a real class issue. Women who can afford to go to England will, and will get abortions. It's the poor women, women who are part of 'travelling communities' with strong values, and the women in the middle of the Christian Divide (Catholic/Protestant) who suffer the worst. It's truly sad to think t…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 02:23 PM
1

Ireland? I know abortion is still illegal in Ireland.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:05 PM
2

Exactly. Why would you even mention race unless you think it's relevant. The bouncer could've been a cunt, but that wasn't due to him being black.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/16 09:07 AM
1

I don't give a fuck what some law says in one country What's the point in even discussing a crime if this is the attitude? Rape is defined differently in different countries. What is the definition of rape then? Is it forced sexual intercourse? Because you can excuse a lot of female-on-female rape if that's the case. Forced penetration excuses female perpetrators. Which is the right definition?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:49 PM
1

Why would you even commit to the mental gymnastics required to come to this conclusion? So what if she didn't penetrate the baby? So fucking what if she technically isn't a paedophile?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:47 PM
1

Oh I agree. Its not even a remotely common occurrence, and I think both girls had absolutely shitty upbringings, similarly to the victim. Still, nothing can excuse their complete disregard for human suffering. They deserve to suffer in jail, and I doubt they will ever be fit for society. It's unimaginable to think of doing something like this, especially at that age.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/16 09:09 AM
2

Those girls are evil and deserve to be locked up for life. They didn't use their gender to get anything done I'm from the area and used to live in the same town that this happened in, and I definitely doubt they used their gender to try and get away with it. It's a rough area as a whole and chav culture kind of pushes girls to act very masculine and aggressive.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/16 09:01 AM
8

I think it's Full Blown Sex. Full Blown means fully developed. It sometimes gets used to describe "Full Blown Aids".
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 09:09 AM
2

Do you think Ygritte was Scottish? Her accent was Yorkshire.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 09:06 AM
6

That's a very simplistic view. Yes, it's illegal to hold workers directly accountable for stolen property. It isn't illegal for the company to cut losses and companies have every right to change policies when it comes to pay. At a retail store, if anyone is accountable at all, it would be security, not every worker... First, you assume there is security at all places. Secondly, staff is still responsible for preventing stock loss and damages. Security could be tied to the mall/shopping centre, o…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 02:06 PM
2

They steal from the people by perpetrating low minimum wage and taking advantage of legal loopholes to get away with various injustices. Who do you think suffers when the company loses stock like that? The staff are responsible for preventing stock from being lost/damaged/stolen. The losses reflect back on the minimum wage staff and menial workers when their hours are cut and benefits removed.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 09:04 AM
3

Or false. We don't know who or what the person taking the video is, but it's more understandable to assume the recorder and the slapee knew each other.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/16 09:27 AM
2

Well usually a married couple share funds. Looking at the actual events from this document, it seems she had won a group lottery with some friends and was 'gifted' the money from one of the members of the group. She then withheld the information from her husband. When they divorced, she did not divulge the winnings in her assets or any documentation to him. In this instance, he would have his income and assets valued and had signed a clause in a document confirming that she had divulged her asse…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/16 02:27 PM
1

You're kinda missing my point. I don't give a shit about the law. This woman should be able to keep the money she is entitled to. Whether she told the court about it is just an issue of ethics. So what if she used the husband's money to purchase the ticket? Or shared money? If I stole money from you and spent it on something for myself, it doesn't mean I don't owe you the money or the goods I bought with the money. It just means I thought I'd get away with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/16 11:19 AM
12

Sorry, I didn't explicitly mean in the article, but more the attitude of kicking someone in the nuts in a fight surrenders any pride you had. Yes, if the fight is about truly trying to disable and harm the other person as much as possible, like in self defence, I can entirely understand squashing someone's nuts. In a fight that has no reason to be escalated, this is like hitting someone with a bat during a fist fight - you're just escalating the situation and causing it to get potentially worse,…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/15 12:16 PM
36

Well, no, but if you're bragging about beating a guy in a fight and then you kick him in the nuts, everyone will agree that you've only won in the strictest definition possible.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/15 09:36 AM
2

Well put. It's a class thing much more than anything else. A good, albeit not equal, comparison is Chavs in the UK. If you wear tracksuit bottoms and berghaus, or burberry or something, you're a shitbag. It's generally the clothes the lower classes tend to wear, but the stigma exists now. Some of my closest friends are 'chavs' too but really nice guys.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/15 10:14 AM
2

Hahaha, brilliant. Thanks for the translation :-)
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 11:07 AM
1

俺さ、年取ったからそんなに若くて可愛い女性に・・・難破する訳ないなと思っていますね。 "I've Cause I think the no reason to ... wrecked on the cute woman so young because I Is , was old ." ...Yup.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 10:59 AM
1

イギリスからこんばんは！ A lot of people seem to agree that her being willing to kick your ass for mentioning she's hot makes it all the hotter.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 10:51 AM
1

I think the English are told more often as kids that losing is very much an option so we're a bit less confident and assertive just in case we end up the loser. We love a good loser over here. Yeah, George Best was a heartthrob at the time, and I suspect for the same reasons. Since most sports have a mainly male watch-base, when things like the World Cup and stuff are relevant, the media looks for these types of good looking men to try and get women to watch too. Simple marketing, really, but it…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 10:45 AM
2

when they were posed to male athletes, the interviewees were all "WTF?" - this could be a poor assumption because I only watch MMA and surfing. I think it's more that this is a sport that is predominantly watched by males, so when females are introduced, of course it's natural that they will talk about the attraction side. My examples of footballers kind of work in the same way. Football was a male's sport for such a long time, but David Beckham broke into mainstream media and because of this, w…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 10:10 AM
2

The feminist wasn't voicing it well, and of course she was surrounded by a bunch of knuckle dragger bro-tards and should have expected a poor reception... but it's a valid topic to be raised in a Q&A with Holly Holm. I kinda disagree with you there. Male athletes are incredibly sexualised. I mean, look at David Beckham, Christiano Ronaldo, Thom Evans. And that's just my knowledge from being English. My point being that people in the public eye are often sexualised, and it's become a "feminist is…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 09:52 AM
1

That doesn't make BMI useless, it just means you should use a second of critical thought first - is the guy muscle or fat? If the former, disregard. If the latter, BMI is still relevant
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/15 12:19 PM
1

Women talk better with women... Stop making these generalisations. Women aren't inherently better at talking and men aren't inherently worse. There are some women who could complete the male standards of fitness, but there are a lot of men who can't. Men don't automatically pass the test and women fail because they're women, but men are more likely to pass than women because of the physical necessity in military combat. Women should match the same standard because most of her colleagues would be…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/15 12:18 PM
3

That's why they're assets. Assets have value
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/15 09:39 AM
3

This is terrible
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 09:18 AM
5

Its your second comment, of: "Go look up some statistics on these "child welfare" agencies. Very few of them meet your definition." That has nothing to do with this story, or the individual merits of the social workers, nor the attacker. This was in response to someone asking whether you condone assaulting people who dedicate their lives protecting at-risk children. Your response was effectively "Child Welfare agencies don't protect children properly", so you dodged the question, leading me to b…
/r/PussyPass15/10/15 03:28 PM
4

And that justifies the beating of two social workers?
/r/PussyPass15/10/15 10:18 AM
1

Leave with the kids. If you have evidence of her being unfaithful it abusive then you'll have no problem getting custody. If she's lied, people lie. If you don't have evidence, you shouldn't be hitting her since you can't prove she's deserved it
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/15 03:40 PM
2

Yeah, my SJW narrative of not hitting people? Wow, I'm such a liberal. So much social justice in not being violent. Not just that I don't agree with hitting someone because you think you're right and they're wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/15 03:33 PM
2

That's an incredibly specific situation. That isn't "getting out of line". Your previous post was implying any time a woman "gets out of line" you should slap her to teach her some sort of lesson. Now, there are many situations where one would be perfectly justified to hit someone, man or woman, but implying you should slap your partner when she "gets out of line" is ridiculous. That's controlling behaviour. If she doesn't behave how you expect, you slap her. You can present a situation which is…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/15 02:21 PM
0

He explained how sometimes, people (or in this case women) won't let an issue go. The slap is the thing that keeps it from escalating... So it can't be a last resort if it's just a woman 'not letting an issue go'. It'd be the same as anyone not letting an issue go. It doesn't mean you should hit them for it. You're trying to reason this but you established it's "not letting an issue go" that is the instigator. if you let the woman go on a tirade and do nothing, guess what? Enjoy another tirade n…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/15 08:35 AM
-1

You shouldn't make a statement you can't back up. You especially shouldn't if you're presented with evidence on the contrary and all you say is 'agree to disagree'
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 08:08 AM
3

I must say that if I appeared hostile, I apologise. Reading my comments, they're quite snarky. Anyway, I'm on mobile so fuck formatting, but I concede, we're looking at a similar point from slightly different angles, but you're right really. I think feelz and realz clash when it comes to things like this, and perspectives can be so close but never realise it because of the emotional response of the fact that someone died
/r/PussyPass28/09/15 04:35 PM
3

I think people should assume responsibility for their actions until they lose the ability to be responsible for their actions. Then who takes responsibility? If no-one does, a person is left to suffer without help. If someone helps, they have to assume responsibility. You say just that in your next point. Ironically I thought that Herman should have just left her there in the first place, since he would have not assumed liability. She would have had to deal with the consequences of her behavior.…
/r/PussyPass28/09/15 03:01 PM
5

If you say she was personally accountable for her condition, I agree that she was accountable for getting there, but once she landed she was physically unable to pick up the phone to call for help, let alone food or water. So people should assume responsibility for their actions until they go too far? Then they are absolved of all responsibility? She made the choice to eat herself to half-couch. Letting an alcoholic drink themselves to death is one thing, but bringing an alcoholic his drink whil…
/r/PussyPass28/09/15 10:41 AM
6

It sounds like someone standing on a pig
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/15 08:16 AM
11

Ohohoho, these women are pathetic!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/15 08:54 AM
2

That sounds excellent
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/15 10:10 AM
2

This is exactly what I thought. Just because she isn't going to break his nose doesn't mean she can't cause serious damage.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/15 10:05 AM
2

Yeah, its really obvious
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/15 08:43 AM
5

Pussy pass has nothing to do with race you moron
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/15 08:41 AM
0

No, I didn't read an entire sob story. Individual cases don't represent the norm at all You're painting your case out to be awful to prove your point but one individual case isn't a good reason to come out with ridiculous statements about men being willing to kill.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/15 09:20 AM
-3

I'm not interested in your life story. If you are willing to kill someone when you've lost legal custody, you're shooting yourself in the foot by proving them right
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/15 01:59 PM
1

You suggested both of those things Is it more likely they are all psychos or that they were likely normal men who were pushed too far? So anyway I realize that to a man who considers nothing more important than his children, will do anything to protect them... Even kill. That doesn't justify it. If a man feels he is pushed to kill for his children, and nor his or the child's life is actually in danger, that is wrong. No two ways about it, you can't just go and kill someone because it doesn't wor…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/15 02:11 PM
0

Or that they don't fall into one of two groups and each case is individual? It's not either psychopathy or wives being bitches. There's a lot more to it than that
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/15 08:02 AM
5

I think it was a joke...
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/15 08:36 AM
9

Damn, I'd turn for Milo!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/15 12:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter