TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

doubleunplussed Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by doubleunplussed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

This, and the distinction can be subtle. Some shows come across as preachy about it, and the gay characters don't have enough flaws or are caricatures of gay activists or something like that. Like in Sense8 the trans character is a 'hacktivist', and the first scene we meet her she's fucking (or being fucked by, I forget) her black girlfriend with a rainbow-coloured strapon. She and many around her have massive chips on their shoulder about it and have deep conversations about identity. But in Mr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/21 01:11 AM
1

<eli5> It can mean some women get into the habit of being mean to men, which those men don't like, it's not very nice. </eli5>
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/20 09:54 AM
1

It's not unfortunate, it's a manipulation tactic. Women are natural masters of this stuff.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:23 AM
1

That's unfortunate, but in that case explain it in your reply instead of expecting everyone to understand already.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:42 PM
1

Then reword the automod comment to say that there are exceptions, at the moment it reads like a hard rule, and it is understandable that nobody is messaging asking for exceptions.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:09 PM
1

If it's hidden then I understand why you can't judge for yourself upon seeing the deleted comment. But how does messaging you help? Are you just trusting that the link is what the person messaging you says it is before approving it? If so that's a pretty shitty system, it would be better if mods could see deleted comments before deciding to approve them. Also, if you would trust the info from a message, why not trust the info in this thread? Seeing as we all know where the link goes. Just not se…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:04 PM
5

Why are you repeating this comment so much? If you think the comment should be approved, why don't you just approve it instead of leaving these comments?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 01:53 PM
-1

The message says links to the site are disallowed, so it sounds fruitless to ask for an exception. If granting exceptions is normal, the message should say that.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 01:51 PM
2

Of course, I don't disagree with that. I was just saying that having a college degree doesn't preclude women from going on to make those choices, and is not evidence against hiring discrimination. It is evidence against college admissions discrimination, but that's not enough to rule out other discrimination. Now, I think there is plenty of evidence against hiring and salary discrimination - I just don't think this adds anything to it. You might have been saying that the fact that women have lot…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:51 PM
1

I agree with you that the wage gap reverses when you consider single and childless women, but since most women aren't childless and single, the gap persists (and is due mostly to career and lifestyle choices that correlate with women being married and having kids).
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:27 PM
4

This comment makes very little sense. The reasons for the wage gap, whether they are choice-based (childbirth, desire of more flexible work arrangements, working fewer hours) or overt discrimination (employers just hating women), are fully capable of showing up after someone gets their degree. Also, this data isn't divided by type of degree. Men tend to get degrees that result in higher pay, and men without degrees also out-earn women without degrees. In conclusion, there are about a zillion way…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:33 PM
15

Well, they are less interested in the topic and so don't develop the skill as much.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:25 PM
27

Redditor for 8 days Hope nobody's judging this sub by this dickhead.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:38 AM
12

What the hell man? Here you got someone agreeing with you and you're gonna be an ass to them because of their gender? That's fucked up.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:36 AM
14

Your scathing assessment of the personalities of people who would turn violent at losing their position in society is irrelevant. It's nobody here threatening violence - the people you're criticising can't hear you, and if they could they would ignore you. Say I agree with you. Yes: those people prone to violence are indeed not very mature. It doesn't matter. If there are many of them and we don't have a practical way of convincing them not to be violent, then we need to take their likely respon…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:28 PM
2

I think the shift is the other way. In the past, being strong and aggressive was more adaptive, but nowadays being intelligent and more pacifistic is more adaptive. So while many women are still attracted to what was adaptive in men in the past, these women (or rather the combinations of genes responsible) are being bred out, since they are less successful in life. But it's a slow process.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:27 PM
2

Roll to disbelieve. Numbers are all over the place. Wikipedia says: Studies ranging in date from 1991 to 1999 quote the following incidence rates: 11.8% (Mexico), 4.0% (Canada), 2.8% (France), 1.4% and 1.6% (UK), and 0.8% (Switzerland). Maybe Germany has a very low rate for cultural reasons, but I wouldn't naively generalise from that to other countires.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:58 PM
1

They're probably not coming together to plot it any more than in the past - it's just that it's gotten some media attention now. An unfortunate side effect of which is that it might put ideas in people's heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 11:15 PM
1

It's ridiculous. In Australia we don't even have the equivalent of county police - each state has its own police force, and then there's the federal police, and that's it. Having police departments so intimately connected to the organisations they are supposed to police the membership of is a massive potential for conflict of interest. It's a terrible idea. They should be representatives of the state, there to enforce the state's laws, and where that is contrary to the interests of a private org…
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:21 PM
3

People of the future are going to look back on this as horrible psychological abuse and demonisation of innocent people.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:19 AM
8

My car's oil level? That's it right? Man, I'm always forgetting.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:57 AM
114

Currently arguing with some dickhead on facebook who thinks this is actually evidence of sexism against women. The fucking mental gymnastics these people put themselves through.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 03:46 AM
1

Meh, we can have a backlash without talk of "real men". We can have a backlash because what is being taught is unfounded ideology that will create resentment between the genders. We don't have to be "real men", whatever that means, to have a backlash - just not batshit insane.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:26 PM
44

No, it was a real thing Satanic ritual abuse (SRA, sometimes known as ritual abuse, ritualistic abuse, organised abuse, sadistic ritual abuse and other variants) was a moral panic that originated in the United States in the 1980s, spreading throughout the country and eventually to many parts of the world, before mostly diminishing in the late 1990s. Allegations of SRA involved reports of physical and sexual abuse of people in the context of occult or Satanic rituals. ... The panic was influenced…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:01 PM
1

Only for that brief moment in one's education before one discovers the complex exponential. Cis. Psh, why did they bother.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter