TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

douglasg14b Archive

View 0 posts and 129 comments by douglasg14b on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why do other subs think this is a hate sub! ... Posts generalized flame bait like his Gee, wonder why. Cmon. If you wanna make change, radicalization in this form is a great way to turn people away from your cause, like 1/2 the population, at least. Yeah, modern feminism isn't about equality any more, and is more about control and accumulating privilege. We know this, and it's a problem, but this just makes our job of trying to make progress there harder, not easier. In short, stuff like this is…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 03:35 AM
1

I mean, it used to be, you know this, but in a lot of modern western culture it really isn't anymore. There or course are some countries where it still exists, denying that would be denying reality. But these current movements have little to do with equal rights in places like that, and instead are about power assertion by way of self victimization.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 12:07 AM
-2

The problem is that this sub sometimes edges into that territory and there is no moderation to avoid it. Sometimes going as far as a generalized "f*** women" mentality. (Stared to avoid bot related stuff) So to the rest of Reddit this sub is it's most extreme comments, posts, and viewpoints. Which this sub does little to prevent. Edit: You know I'm right when a comment calling out extremist views as bad for the image of a sub which complains about others thinking it harbors extremists is down vo…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 06:57 PM
2

Same women that blame men for not watching women's sports when women don't even watch women sports?
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:53 PM
1

A mix of people not knowing, and actual toxic behavior and comments on this sub that go unmoderated, giving plenty of ammo to latch on to, that's been getting worse year over year.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:51 AM
-19

Feminism never was. This is why people think this sub is a joke man... Shooting yourself in the foot by alienating at least 1/2 the population from your cause.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 12:21 AM
6

Wut.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 02:55 AM
1

So, you have nothing then, and are just making up FUD. Imagine that, disinformation on reddit. When asked to elaborate, you say even less. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
/r/MensRights11/01/22 07:06 PM
3

Yeah still waiting for you to substantiate that claim.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:27 PM
15

Except that the burden of proof is proving that it happened, not proving that it didn't happen. It's impossible to prove a negative...
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:25 PM
22

There was no evidence to prove his innocence, so he didn’t want to risk spending the rest of his life behind bars. That's ... Not how the criminal justice system is supposed to work. Innocent until proven guilty. This sounds like he was guilty until proven innocent. What a fucking joke. How was he even convicted?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:23 PM
15

.... She's 16? She looks like she's going on 30.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 06:38 PM
9

I don't think that makes me a pedophile or sexist. Just a realist. Women lose value as they age and men gain value. Lose value? The way you states that is already sexist. If your reality hinges on women's value being their physical attractiveness, then your outlook is sexist to begin with. Cripes man, that's the kinda shit that gets this sub put in the same bucket as the cancer centers of reddit. Let's not
/r/MensRights18/07/21 04:44 PM
8

Pedo's have an involuntary attraction to pre-pubescent children. Hebephilia is the attraction to children 11-14 or so. Tanner stage 2-3 of physical development. Ephebophilia is the attraction to 15-19 year olds. Mid-late physical maturity. Most people are attracted to people that have high physical maturity, that's literally how our biology works. There just so happens to be an overlap between physical maturity and mental maturity, the later happening several years after the former. The jist is …
/r/MensRights18/07/21 04:04 PM
0

This is what happens when you allow leftists into politics and women to vote. /u/redFenning22 This is what gives this subreddit a bad name. Can we not with the blatant sexism & toxic politicalism backed by a lack of critical thought? Seriously, how TF do you manage to mentally hoop yourself into such asinine conclusions...
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:49 AM
3

It's absolutely insane that that sort of subreddit is a default... Wtf
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:05 AM
5

Interesting take. Do you have a source for those claims? I genuinely want to know more.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 08:36 PM
-8

Come again?
/r/MensRights05/03/21 05:52 PM
1

Which is the point... In countries that rehabilitate instead of punish you have a wealthier society, less crime, less recidivism, and a happier more fulfilled populace. Regardless of your feelings on this, the numbers don't lie.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:26 AM
-1

I don't think you know what you're saying. You're claiming that a sane world is one operated on and ran solely by emotion. While at the same time all of our cultural and world advancements are facilitated by moving away from emotion and into logic. I'm not sure if your perception of reality is accurate?
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:25 AM
-4

Because being tough on crime encourages more crime... You don't really have to look far to find evidence of how poorly a punitive judicial system works. You also don't have to look far to find evidence about how well a rehabilitation and education based judicial system works. America is just obsessed with punishment, it's ingrained as part of the culture. You have social, economic, and medical instability. You have inferior education and mental health services, and instead of educating and rehab…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:19 AM
10

Yeah, that's what this post doesn't get. Their judicial system is largely based around keeping productive members of society... Productive. Which means it's based on rehabilitation and education, not punishment. And it works. North american is just out for blood for everything, and expects harsh punishments across the board, because the only solution they know is punishment...
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:15 AM
-2

Way to make overly generalized statements that are laughably inaccurate just to plug your political bias.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 05:23 PM
1

The references actually added some credibility, so awesome job there.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:27 PM
1

Of course! You can never please everyone, but getting the largest chunk possible isn't a bad thing. A couple "red flags" for this post (if you're the creator) that immediately stood out in a way that made me question the credibility/truthfulness: The early 2000's style gradient on the bar graph bars The drop shadows under the red letters The drop shadows under the graph bars The italicized lettering The QR code overlapping into the chart Disclaimer: Not bashing you, just trying to give construct…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:01 PM
0

I understand it may be correct terminology, but a major part of presenting is knowing the audience. Most of which I'm willing to bet will see that and think this is equivalent to the fake or sensationalized facebook posts they ignore each day. You may have a great message, but it means nothing if it doesn't get through. Spreading awareness isn't just about having a good message, it's about presenting it in a relatable and digestible manner.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:57 PM
-2

Intimate terrorism I was having a hard time getting past that, while this is presenting a good point, that wording makes it look and feel very sensational/unreliable/try-hard like. It makes it hard to take the post seriously.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:29 PM
1

I know... did you read my first comment?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 04:05 PM
3

That's not my point. That seems to push that it's ok to not have equal pay. I'm saying that the pay is already almost equal.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:46 AM
31

This kind of comic only perpetuates the misinformation that a gap of significance actually exists. The data is misleading as you could compare a women working 35 hours a week to a man working 40 hours a week, and say that she earns 87.5% of what her male counterpart does to push for a higher wage for her while ignoring the actual worked hours difference.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 10:22 PM
33

This right here is why other subs think this one is a joke....
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:19 AM
1

That proclamation does not have set-in-stone laws to back it or give it teeth, so it's essentially a feel good phrase unless it has legal backing.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:48 AM
1

It's not illegal.... it's just immoral, and it happens all the time.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:18 AM
4

Wage gap means different pay for the same job. It is illegal in USA That's not how it works. A company can pay you more or less for the same job all they want in the U.S. as long as it does not violate federal or state labor laws. Which unequal pay does not.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:17 AM
1

I don't think you get my point, I'm speaking to the commenter I replied to, not to the others that advise against this. The number of upvotes it has along with other replies would further push the SRS similarities.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:01 PM
-19

And this is why people think this sub is the male version of SRS....
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:13 PM
1

We split ours down the middle.... Considering we just use a shared account and pay 50/50 to keep it balanced.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:13 PM
27

Pretty much, by those rules my fiancee and I rape each other on a regular basis because we initiate sex without asking for explicit permission to move forward.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:57 PM
0

Fair enough, perhaps a milder sub than SRS would be better suited for comparison.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:59 AM
-4

This sub has turned into just another echo-chamber. Nothing good has been coming out of it for a while now. Bringing logic and reasoning to the table here will get you the same treatment as it would in SRS or similar subs.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:44 AM
1

Hilarious..... Though to be honest in my workplace most of the women are cold while us men are nearly dozing off while getting our swamp ass all over the chairs. Yet they want the heat higher, its already out of the acceptable indoor comfort zone. I'd rather wear a warmer shirt than be hot as hell.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:53 AM
17

His "offensive" has nothing to do with modern technology or alcohol though. Removing someones ability to use modern technology is absolutely terrible.....
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:09 PM
0

Hindsight is 20:20 no matter what the person did someone will find inexcusable fault. If I was a teenager hooking up with someone who looked to be my age I wouldn't think to ask to see a drivers license. Especially if she told me her age, are you going to tell the girl you're about to fuck that you don't believe her age even if she looks the part?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:04 PM
3

Reminds me of places that only have the diaper changing station in the womens restroom, and not the mens.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:05 AM
2

Not just voting, but most of the things required to function like a normal working person in this country.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:47 AM
21

Voat I think so many people are trying to flock there that it's getting hugged to death.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:59 PM
18

And she's been dismantling the core values of reddit since she was appointed.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:58 PM
27

Sounds like it was written just for SRS, though I doubt they will ever get any repercussions considering how they are buddie buddies with mods and admins site wide, as well as very sympathetic of the reddit CEO and her causes.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:56 PM
0

Pedophilia is clearly defined in international medical text, by directly associating pedophiles with crimes without any further definition propagates the misinformation that a pedophile is someone who has committed the crime of molesting a child or other similar acts. Of course this has the ironic effect of preventing them from getting the medical assistance they need, increasing the chances that they will act out on their urges. I am not defending anyone or anything, rather my goal is to point …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 07:58 AM
1

Of all the subs, I would expect this one to sue the proper terminology. Being a pedophile is not illegal, you are using the word incorrectly. Pedophilia is the attraction, which is a mental health condition and should be treated as such. Child molesters and the like are who get thrown in prison. You can very well argue against sentencing pedophiles to prison, it's not their fault, give them the healthcare access they require instead of vilifying them.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:46 AM
1

Reminds me of target bathrooms in my area, there is no diaper changing station in the men's restroom, only in the female one.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:20 PM
1

Yep. Plenty of times that I've called the cancerous content out in a constructive and neutral way and got replies from people on this sub along the same lines I would get in SRS. I especially see a lot of over-generalization and stereotyping on here. "a women are xxx" "All women are yyy"....etc Just because I disagree with your over generalization does not mean I am suddenly defending them, this sub ranks among the best at coming up with strawmen arguments. I lost hope for this sub months ago.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:43 AM
-2

I'm not talking about her, or disagreeing with her. I'm talking about how weak these videos are, most of the time they are just another version of "he said she said".
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:35 PM
11

these are just educated guesses. What you meant to say is that they are projection-based predictions? Of the same kind that almost every human being on the planet uses on a regular basis. If something has happened xxx way before, xxx times. It's very likely you can make an accurate prediction about how it will turn out again. You do this while driving, cooking, working, eating, walking, playing sports...etc Companies use this to manage workforce to customer ratios, ISP's use this to manage over-…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:02 PM
14

That's nice and all, however like most of pragers university's videos they provide a lot of claims with little supporting evidence. I'm not disagreeing with the video, but most of their videos have no real solid ground to stand on.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 04:57 PM
1

Didn't Feminism teach us that there are no biological differences between the sexes? Instead all differences are social in nature. I find it ridiculous, if you mention that physiologically men are stronger than women you get shot down and called sexist. We will completely ignore facts and obvious truths just so we don't sound sexist or elitist.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:43 AM
27

Or get a drivers licence in many cases I believe.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:21 AM
8

60% higher odds of HIV infection among circumcised men I'm so confused, a few days ago I read a sourced comment about the OPPOSITE. :s
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:21 AM
7

I'm a 23 year old male, and completely scared of kids. I avoid them at all costs, I had a bad experience with a mother labeling me as a pedophile in public because their talkative daughter stopped me to say hi. Everyone around looked like they where one twitch away from assaulting me. I avoid them, I don't look at them, I don't talk to them, I don;t help them. As far as I'm concerned kids just don't exist, it's easier and safer that way. I even felt bad buying girl scout cookies, and only addres…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:25 AM
3

And you need to verbally enforce your right to remain silent.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:23 AM
5

And of course knee jerk overreactions all around, leading to absurd shit like this.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:18 AM
13

I don't think you understand how mental illnesses work. In many cases you don't just "get over them". There needs to be special places that facilitate the recovery of metally ill patients. Jail should not be "10 years in some shithole". It should not be a deterrent. ... It should simply be a place where criminals are forced to overcome their mental problems or die trying You are contradicting yourself, which is it?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:12 PM
19

It is even more disgusting that a person was sent to prison on just an accusation. The fuck happened the due process?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:46 PM
5

Titles like these are what makes the rest of reddit think we are no better than SRS...
/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:34 PM
1

Not a miscarriage of justice at all.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:08 PM
2

Death Penalty will take more of your tax dollars, most people don't realize this.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:02 PM
6

It's significantly less over her lifetime than it would cost to give her the death penalty. Most people don't realize the death penalty costs more than keeping someone in a prison till they die of old age. The single most expensive part is the pre-trial and trial costs. Followed closely by appeals and petitions. All at the state's expense.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 03:57 PM
0

Bringing in outside statistics in is not relevant the the discussion. The discussion is what is the average between "10% to 50%", why "over" means nothing, and why you cannot just ignore the first half of a range. If the statistics said 10% to 51% then they would have said so. Saying 10% to "over" 50% means nothing. The "over" is not a number, it is not a statistic, it is not giving us any discernable information. Therefore it can be ignored. And unless over is now defined as 82% then the statis…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:46 PM
1

You are not understanding how math works. Your reading comprehension is also in the gutter, I clearly said that the "over" does not matter, it means nothing. If it was 10-51% then they would have said so. It is 10%-50% the average is 30%. If you notice (which you did not) that it says FROM 10% TO 50%. This means there is a clear and already defined average in the middle. Which is 30%. That's how math works, that is also how logic works. What the statement also says with those percentages is that…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:34 PM
0

Perhaps you didn't read your own comment or mine, I'll be kind enough and quote it for you. 10% to over 50% 10%-50% This means that between 10% and 50% of them have an orgasm during rape. They didn't say 10% to 51% or 10% to 60%, they said 10% to over 50%. The "over" is worthless and means nothing for this example. Lets average what we know. 30% Definitely not the majority
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:01 PM
2

Even if it was true (where is the real source?) 10%-50% is not anywhere near "the majority". And the number is spread over to large of a range to be anything except inaccurate.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:43 PM
0

Pretty sure, but not entirely sure. Unless there are sources take it with a grain of salt. Just like reading something off of Fox news, or MSNBC.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:42 PM
29

I have been banned for saying I'm a guy, just arbitrarily. It is just on a whim it seems.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:00 AM
5

Why are you being downvoted? The statement above yours is the extremist shit that makes people think less of MRM's. I agree with you, "finishing her off" helps no one, it's just getting back at her. Even if she did horrible things to you, does revenge improve anyone life? What about the poor child?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:39 AM
3

You are playing ignorant, you know exactly what you meant by the previous statement. Downvote me all you want, lets not make MRA into a male SRS hate women circlejerk.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:54 PM
3

That's just as bad as SRS man :/
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:37 PM
62

Girls are Dogs: George's all-boys elementary was very different from Birchwood Middle School where the girls run through the halls like wild animals. But with a little experimenting, George realizes that like his new puppy, maybe girls can be trained too. Featuring George's hilarious take on friendship, girls, and his all-new life, this novel / survival guide perfectly captures the joy—and agony—of junior high school. And it might just teach you how to tame the wildest beast of all, the teenage …
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:21 AM
2

I'm poor and the only educational access I have are 6.8% unsubsidized loans from the government, with a limit of $5500/year. I believe my access to better education is outstanding.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:44 AM
6

Take my situation into consideration. If I was required to pay $450/m in child support I would have to either lose my car/insurance or the place where I live. I would probably end up loosing where I live because I need the car to continue working. For many of us $450/m added to an already tiny bottom line is just too much.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:41 AM
2

Starting an argument off with an ad hominem? I will automatically assume you have no idea what you are talking about and are just here to rile people up for your own satisfaction.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:22 AM
0

You could easily live off of 1.5million for the rest of your life. As a house alone will wipe half of that easy. We are talking about 1.5 million here.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 07:56 PM
1

You can buy a house and not pay outright for it. Actually the majority of people do it that way. If you want to blow $750,000 on an extravagant house then go for it. But then again you could be wise and invest the money so that you can live off of it very comfortably for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:58 PM
1

You could easily live off of 1.5million for the rest of your life. Invest 1.2million and live off of the interest as well as watching your account grow.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:06 PM
1

I'll assume this is sarcasm, please let it be....
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:13 AM
2

Because men aren't psychic
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:10 AM
-11

Literally /r/athiesm circle jerk you have going on.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:17 AM
2

Yikes mate. I'm so happy my SO is understanding and not intrusive when I don'y want her to be.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:20 PM
11

Take it, make a womans version then compare and make a study on people's reactions.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:44 PM
5

Holy shit... I saw an obvious question on there and gave a helpful answer. Got a completely skewed and fuck off reply back and was banned. How do these subreddits exist? My god.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:42 PM
11

srs? /r/srs only has a single post. I'm confused.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:59 AM
1

I'm just surprised that it can survive without massive trolling and harassment from the reddit community.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:33 AM
7

This.... exists.... Wow, I am blown away that this could even stay alive on Reddit.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:54 AM
1

The bite marks on your dick could and probably would be used against you.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:54 AM
1

Gah, this shouldnt be necessary. I'm just happy I'm in a great relationship and don't need to hook up. Saves me all the worry.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:52 AM
-7

Either way, if she had said "I wished" or "I should have" or "I was going to" OP's comment would have still been relevant. Yes he did leave a piece of information out, but I doubt someone would be talking about how the *did do that to a "creeper".
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:09 AM
2

It shows, and is a great improvement over the babyboomers. I am very excited to see the current 20-30's getting into major political positions.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:35 PM
2

Indeed. Though younger people get a lot less respect or consideration as soon as they are identified as being young. Whether that is by physical features or their birthdate. I often get mistaken for someone 16-17. I'm 23. I worked at a hospital for about a year and noticed that a significant number of the staff would trat me like a child when they first met me, until I started talking and doing my job. I was generally ignored and purposefully left out of important conversations and informal meet…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:33 PM
2

They are honestly that stupid.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:12 AM
5

It seems all of you in this thread missed the ama of the dude who is engaged to a woman who was born a man. He went into great detail about it, that the only differance is that her vagina does not self-lubricate. It blew my mind.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:16 AM
-2

If Romney wins we are utterly fucked with a bat of religious banter that is pulled into the political system as facts and beliefs.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:01 PM
0

Must be true, since she enjoys flirting and "wrestling/fighting" back. She will sometimes say "no" or" stop" in a playful manner. Yesterday I stopped and asked her directly is she wanted me to stop, she looked at me funny, then I referenced the fact that no means no... she told me that was ridiculous and that she did not want me to stop and she was just having fun. Ended up with her being tied up, so that her clothes would come off without interference. If I relayed the entire thing it would sou…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:34 PM
2

Oh you.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:15 PM
2

Most definitely this. If your SO is going to hold you to the standard of her favorite romance novel or cosmo magazine she is better off not being in a relationship and you are better off not being with her. My SO reads Cosmo, though she reads most of it as satire.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:25 PM
8

This makes me so god damn angry..... furious even.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:19 PM
1

My gf wants to have drunk sex :( She encourages me to get extra booze for her when I am at the store so she can get drunk and have sex with me.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:16 PM
1

Ok, what the hell is "/s" ?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:13 PM
2

And if this was allowed and widely accepted. You would see it being medically regulated to ensure patient safety and best practices. You would not have to visit a crooked DR to get it done. This is not the case in all places, but in many it is.... sadly. What I really hate are the abortion propaganda that shows 6-9 month fetuses maimed and butchered. Those baby's where most likely emergency aborted to save their mothers due to other medical issues. Most abortions, the fetus is the size of a coin…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:10 PM
27

My head is exploding from sarcasm.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:04 PM
39

This made me sick to my stomach.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:57 PM
4

That was an amazing explanation, perfect even. I do not understand quantum mechanics, but with a little googling that entire speal is crystal clear. Actually, this explanation makes more sense than those described in common language.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:43 PM
3

Be mad. You know exactly what I meant, do not try and play it off like I am generalizing each individual in this country.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:42 AM
1

No, just a mad, mad country.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:20 AM
5

They could argue it.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:19 AM
1

Are you reading the context?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:58 PM
1

You have suddenly got me confused. I stated that is is harder for women to get off via intercourse, yes. I meant that in comparison to the other ways a woman can achieve an orgasm not in direct comparison to a male. I am talking about this becasue this IS more for her than it is to me, I eventually get off, no biggie, I'm not worrying about it. When we are having sex I try to get off for my own sexual pleasure, and only my own in the heat of the moment. The concern I have, afterwards, is that my…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:37 PM
1

I don't live with a stereotype, we have been together for a couple years and are completely comfortable with each other in this regard. My problem is concerning a physiological one instead of a physiological one. I don't find it much of a problem, buy my SO feels like she isnt doing something when I don't get off. I tell her and convince her differantly, but I know it still affects her. This is more for her than it is for me.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:48 PM
1

Hm, what would you suggest she do differantly, or to work on getting me off as well? If I lay down with an erection she can get me off without me fantasizing, most of the time. She gets off fairly easily, very easily in fact, it really does not take much.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:32 PM
1

Well, it takes work to get a woman off just through intercourse. She greatly enjoys sex, even when concentrating on getting me off. I find that when I exert myself and resist cumming for more than 10min I can't cum afterwards. We end up having to abort and I just get off later, except its so hard not to concentrate on her sometimes.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:10 PM
0

It may be, I can generally only hit her cervix doggy style. Though a differant posistion with her right leg up on my shoulder and her on her back worked well. She looked like she was gonna pass out (eyes curled back a couple times) I must have been doing something right. One problem for me though... if I concentrate on getting her off I can't get off during that same sex session. Don't know why...
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:34 PM
4

I found, with my SO, that for the first few minutes cervical stimulation is painful for her. After a lil bit though she warms up and loves it. I enjoy it as well, love seeing her orgasm.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:03 PM
2

You see, the best wingman is one that is already in a comitted relationship, such as myself. I would let my SO know that I'm going and and will be helping out a friend, that I will be flirting and hitting on girls there. Though it is only for show. Another thing you might want to try, is to find someone who you can enjoy company with. If you want an actual relationship, instead of off-and-on sex with randoms you should start hitting up events, rallys, get-togethers...etc Just chat, have fun, mov…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:00 PM
6

I can confirm this, though when aroused a womans vagina does grow in length, some also have feeling on their cervix and can be coaxed in orgasm that way. From experiance, at least with my So, I can bottom out with a 6" penis, barely. Having a lot of girth is not always a good thing... I literally have to take time getting myself in or it hurts her.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:18 PM
23

Sounds to me, like you sir, need a good wingman.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:14 PM
3

Very true, that is more along the lines.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 10:15 PM
10

Counter male culture: All women are one misstep away from feeling guilty about last night and filing rape charges.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:42 PM
2

Gotta love em, they definitely wont rape you in the elevator.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:41 PM
1

I also read that any sexual touching while unconscious would also fall under this. So, nearly every married man can be convicted.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:34 PM
2

The whole regretting it next week and now its rape thing kinda pisses me off....
/r/MensRights21/06/12 04:10 AM
3

So... when my gf invites me to have sex with her when she is sleeping. I am raping her? -__-
/r/MensRights21/06/12 04:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter