TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dpero29 Archive

View 0 posts and 129 comments by dpero29 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Yes, but just as almost every feminist talking point this is incomplete. Let's assume that the number is real. What does that tell me? Nothing really... Are we talking worldwide? Are we talking small town? Are we talking about peaceful countries or countries currently at war. I mean, there are so many variables that this isolated statistic is nothing but dishonest.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 10:14 AM
96

I think the best way to answer such an accusation is to say: "that's not mainsplaining. Here, calm down and let me explain it to you because you seem confused". I mean, yes, it can go worse, but I've always found this term ridiculous so I try to ridicule it every time it's possible.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 02:11 PM
4

100%
/r/MensRights20/07/25 03:58 PM
4

Yeah, I know. The argument was not to be twisted in favor of women, but more than this behavior towards men can harm them as well, but they won't think that much.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 03:36 PM
38

That's fucked up, seriously. The worst part is that many of those boys might be misogynistic in the future but there will be no self reflection in the way they were brought up.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 01:30 PM
2

Do you understand the difference between "have" and "had"? Stop talking then.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:57 AM
3

When did I say that women are the cause of circumcision? They are however contributing (not all of them, obviously) to this mutilation by doing that to their sons or openly saying they prefer mutilated penises. I answered your first message about human rights and I said it was relevant because women are protected and men are not. What I'm saying is not for women to stop being protected, but equality in this law, so it protects men as well. So in this case there is no equality.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:56 AM
5

Fine, tell me a right by law that men have and women don't. I suppose it's easy, right?
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:49 AM
6

Ok, so none. Got it.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:42 AM
7

What are these rights by law that men have and women don't?
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:20 AM
9

How's that irrelevant. He told you in the OP. It is forbidden by law to circumcise girls. It is not only allowed by law to circumcise boys, it is culturally accepted. One clear example where women have more rights than men... By law.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 05:32 AM
11

Hold on... Does that mean that abortion is and is going to be illegal from the moment of conception? I mean, if you're supporting this policy, you have to be anti abortion.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 06:36 AM
60

If she lost her tongue, she cannot nag men. Imagine saying this publicly.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 12:48 PM
3

Let's not talk about proof. Since when the phrase "I feel like..." is more valid than even anecdotal or false examples? It's just lazy at this point.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:59 AM
16

Yeah, well, just take a look at 2X sub... Plenty of women encouraging other women not to have sex with their partners because Trump won. I honestly feel bad for their sex life which , apparently, is conditioned not by the pleasure and intimacy of their own body and spirit, but by the political news.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:09 PM
17

Yes, of insane asylum in the 1950s.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:14 PM
2

You keep coming up with non analogous examples. All of these are NOT mutilations. You alter your body with them and they do have risks, but I'm not engaging with these arguments anymore because you are moving the goalpost and you're also implying the slippery slope fallacy. "If we start with this, where does it end?" Go ahead and have all the plastic surgeries you want, but if it is in fact legal to have your arm amputated when it's healthy, then we can discuss it further. If it is, I would argu…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:03 AM
2

Yes, I agree with you if it is done for medical reasons. My point was that even as an adult, if you consider this a mutilation, you shouldn't be able to do it, because it is the same as of you want to amputate a healthy arm. Now, of course you can say it is not the same and as an adult you should be able to decide about your own body and that's fine, but again, this is downplay this practice and not consider it as mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:57 AM
5

Do they involve doctors? Do you go to the hospital to get a tattoo? Is getting a tattoo a mutilation? These are definitely not analogous with what I'm saying. Again, you, as an adult, are not able to get your arm amputated if it's healthy, no doctor will ever do that legally, ever.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:52 AM
1

That would be a medical necessity.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:47 AM
10

Why? It is actually a mutilation, removing a part of the body that is healthy and does not need to be removed. I mean, if I, as an adult, want to have my arm amputated, no doctor will do that just because I want it and freely decided that. Look, your take is far better than whatever is going on right now, but the point is that this practice is a mutilation and it needs to be treated as such.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:44 AM
0

I came here to make a sarcastic joke, but this genuinely crossed many lines. How is media so biased? And society generally speaking?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:35 PM
1

Right, it would be. A little bit like the arguments about the wage gap often given by feminists, which are only percentages without any other context.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 07:58 PM
2

That's why I said "if you don't give any context nor absolute numbers". If you don't do that, technically it could be a real increase.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:44 PM
0

I get what you're saying, I understand, but it's the same thing. If you measure the categories on their own, there is no increase in women's deaths and there's only a decrease in men's deaths from one year to the next. However if what you're measuring is the gap between men and women you get a 90 - 10 one year and 50 - 50 the next. If you don't give any context nor absolute numbers, it's an increase for the women and decrease for the men.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:15 PM
3

Nobody's wishing the death of other people. It depends on how you measure these deaths. So, let's say we measure this by comparing deaths between men and women. I'm making up statistics here. If this year 900 men died in the workplace and 100 women we can say that 90% of deaths are men. Next year, let's say that again 100 women die, but the number of men's deaths decreased and there were also 100 men that died. If you measure just the statistics for women, there is no increase. However if you me…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:43 PM
5

When talking about the increase in women's deaths in the workplace we're talking about percentage of the gap, not absolute numbers. So if that gap has to be closed, you will inevitably see an increase in women's deaths.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:31 PM
5

Is respect a feeling? If it is then fine, it's not my mantra anyway.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:46 PM
8

Yes, and I can agree with a lot of things he says... Not on male circumcision for instance, but a lot of other things, yes. However, not because he says it. That is the problem when you lose respect for the messenger. He's not a reference anymore.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:42 PM
21

Yeah, I lost all the respect I had for this clown when he built his career with the "facts don't care about your feelings" mantra and then cried like a little bitch when he was interviewed by Andrew Neil. He's a fraud.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:26 PM
6

"Yep, that's the exact size of my dick when I look at you or talk to you, Ms. Antierection."
/r/MensRights09/08/24 01:22 PM
55

There was also someone truly wise that said this ultimate truth: "women are the primary victims of war." So much truth and honesty to that. /s
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:07 PM
34

If it should be allowed for a woman to kill a fetus, it stands to reason that it should be allowed for a man to abandon it. Neither is an optimal choice.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:28 AM
14

Worst. Patriarchy. Ever.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:22 AM
2

When there is no enemy within, the enemy without cannot hurt you. That's a clear criticism of the heterosexual marriage implying that the husband is always the enemy who rapes women. So it needs to be destroyed. Smooth seas do not make skilful sailors This is an attack on misogyny around the world, implying that usually sailing was a very specific male profession. This means that women can be sailors too. If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together. It's another way to a…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 06:13 AM
1

This is nothing. I got banned from a subreddit just because I WAS in this one right here. My comment has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights or feminisms or anything else. I have participated in this subreddit so I was automatically banned from the other.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:42 AM
9

I bet that I can come up with a study saying that women who stay at home and take care of their husbands and kids instead of having a career are happier and live longer, but I have the feeling it won't be the kind of study these people would like to read. Edit: if they knew how to read, they'd be very upset.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:36 PM
1

Definitely, especially if you're talking about social media where generally speaking, people are cowards. And unfortunately you don't have to look too far. 2X, for instance, horribly toxic environment where 90% of comments are encouraging women to leave their husbands or boyfriends.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:44 AM
1

Definitely, especially if you're talking about social media where generally speaking, people are cowards. And unfortunately you don't have to look too far. 2X, for instance, horribly toxic environment where 90% of comments are encouraging women to leave their husbands or boyfriends.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:44 AM
7

I think that many women are blinded by a toxic ideology that feeds them nonsense ideas and weirdly enough, it makes them less safe and still they adhere to it. We can agree they are a minority (although I don't know) but sure as hell, they are loud. I really think that women like you should be louder, not for men, but for yourselves.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:57 AM
49

She was so ugly, she made your penis shrink permanently. She was so ugly that you were on the verge of becoming gay... And she pushed you off the edge. There you have the explanation for both of her bullshit in case you need to use them.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:20 PM
12

I highly discourage this. The boner is a snitch.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:08 PM
3

I honestly think you can go on that sub and comment on each post the phrase "Leave him" and you'll get upvotes like crazy. Don't even read the posts.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 04:42 PM
3

Do you understand that in the religion of feminism these questions make you a heretic?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:52 PM
-3

The woman is fertile a few days in a month, like 5-7. If they are off just by a day, you can actually accidentally impregnate someone. Of course, you could say, "Use a condom if you're not sure," and I agree, but there is a way for this situation to happen.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 08:05 PM
3

Look at the muscles on that brain. Mental gymnastics 24/7.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:04 PM
8

Why am I not surprised? They are really reaching for the inevitable point where non simp men will eventually not give a fuck about women's problems anymore. Not really be against anything, just ignore them, pretend like they don't exist. Guaranteed they will start crying.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:04 PM
30

Why do you treat her as a villainess? You should have clearly said: "female teacher, 33, who made sweet sweet and tender love to her pupil, 15..." This is the fucking patriarchy, trying to blame women for everything. /s
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:58 PM
1

Well, if you start from a false premise which is that we live in a patriarchy and men are inherently privileged, it makes sense to have such ministries but not for men. However I have yet to see valid arguments on how and why we live in a patriarchy and also, for the love of God, will someone tell me my privileges, please? I'd really really like to use one right now, but no one seems to care.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 11:15 PM
4

I was trying to read your arguments by replacing in my head the sexual assault on women by men with assault on white people by black people. It amazes me how these arguments stand perfectly fine if you want to defend segregation. Look, no one wants their female relatives assaulted and abused, this argument is simply ridiculous because it tries to reach into feelings and not reasoning. As I'm sure you know, putting in place laws where feelings are paramount and reason is thrown out the window, cr…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 10:41 PM
5

Ok, Mr. Duke... Since I don't want to segregate black people juste because there could be some dangerous black individuals, I don't want to segregate men either. I empathize with women who are actually assaulted and I would encourage them to call out the assault immediately. As for the assailant... Put them in jail, cut off their dick and balls, kill them, I don't care, that's what they deserve. However I am not going to pay for someone else's sin.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:26 PM
3

What kind of argument is this? Fine, maybe very few men were groped by women, but I have been assaulted by other men and I have been in fights. Obviously deranged people, probably drunk or on drugs or with mental issues. However the fact that both men and women are assaulted is something they have in common. The problem with some people is that the most important thing for them is to see what is hanging between their legs. This is crazy. Probably you are trolling now, and I don't blame you, but …
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:04 PM
43

Hey hey hey... If Shakira Flabbergasted wants to call the police because her boyfriend is being like so totally annoying and stuff, Shakira Flabbergasted gets to do that. /s
/r/MensRights10/08/23 02:24 PM
70

That's a stretch. Feminists don't care about innocent children staying with abusive mothers just to be against men. Do you really think they would give a crap or even think about male prostitutes?
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/23 07:59 PM
9

Exactly. A false accusation could put me in jail where I could be raped and killed.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 06:41 AM
4

This is not going to end well. And, in Spain this law is done for political reasons, it's absurd.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 09:14 PM
10

People have had disadvantages for different reasons and in different places and periods during the history of mankind. I think that you are simplifying things. Anyway, I am against biblical punishments. It's none of these boys fault that women didn't have the right to vote a century ago and none of those girls will experience that disadvantage. So, should you talk about that? Absolutely. Should you do something this nonsensical? In my opinion, no. But we agree on that at least.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:58 PM
11

I haven't read the Belgian constitution, but I'm willing to bet whatever you want that there are no laws in there that disadvantage women. And before you make the point that the disadvantages are not in the laws, then the analogy is useless because the teachers are "creating" rules that discriminate specifically the boys. It is absurd.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:29 PM
12

Yes, well. They're probably using their last remaining neuron to try not to shit themselves, so of course they can't do both.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/23 07:27 PM
2

She should indeed give it a male name. It'll be the only hard thing she's going to grab of a man.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 06:14 AM
3

Of course I'm sorry for men who also buy into that ideology. I said women because generally speaking, there are more women who identify as victims due to the lies feminism tells them. But of course, men can also be lied to and can be manipulated.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:50 AM
4

Women are not bad. I see that you are trying to deliberately misinterpreted what I say and build a straw man to easily attack it. Feminism, as a political ideology nowadays, is not only bad, it's evil. I'm sorry for women who buy into that ideology.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 06:04 AM
36

Yeah well, feminism and women are pretty good teachers, they cannot stop talking about how they're perpetual victims, so perhaps we learned from the best. And don't call me Shirley.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 09:42 PM
79

Is this how a rapist's mind work, then? Is she wearing a bra? Ok, next. She's not wearing a bra? (Unzips)
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 08:46 PM
5

Thanks. I'm glad you learned some virtue by being on Reddit today.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:26 PM
8

Who are you talking to? Who is this "all"? I just asked you a question and respectfully asked to be as impartial as possible and to forget his sub. Now, my point is that you need to be able to distinguish between the pathetic cry for help and the one which is definitely not. Now, for instance, let's say (and I sincerely hope it's not the case, this is just an example) the OP has diagnosed depression for whatever reason. Let's say his ex took away his kids and now he's blaming the world for his p…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:23 PM
5

Right. So if, let's say, there's a woman crying out for help and saying that the world is misogynistic because she heard Jordan Peterson say that women shouldn't wear makeup in the workplace (it's not true, by the way), your reaction would be exactly the same? You would tell her to stop acting like a little bitch and get over it, right?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:09 PM
5

Just out of curiosity, why wouldn't you want to help someone who's crying out for some help? Someone who's feeling insecure and maybe even frightened? Isn't that what humanity should be all about? Forget this sub and all ideology. Just answer the question, please, as neutral as you can be.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:02 PM
3

Bill Maher made this point once. He said that women shouldn't be believed without proof, so instead of the mantra "believe women" you should say "take women seriously". If a woman says she's been rapes, take her seriously and investigate. I think he's right in this case.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:51 AM
4

Well, the most obvious answer would be for us to stop existing. However this is an illusion. Their way of thinking is so toxic, it's like they feeding on hate, so they wouldn't be happy either.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/22 07:29 AM
5

Well, I think it's appropriate actually because it sounds like a challenge. It wouldn't be a challenge to do something that makes a feminist angry, they're practically angry all the time without any external reason. I suppose it's just self hate for them. On the other hand, I suppose we're more calm in this aspect.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:25 AM
11

And yet, blasphemy was still a thing. Look man, I can understand that this may bother you, but I think that you deliberately don't get my point of the comment. The point is that actual feminism is a religion where you're not allowed to question its dogmas and when you say something they can't debate, they call blasphemy. This is the point, if you don't agree with this, then tell me.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 06:39 AM
20

In the dark ages, when religion couldn't debate logic, they invented the blasphemy.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:42 PM
20

Neither are women.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 05:03 AM
12

I suppose you can, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 04:37 PM
22

Of course you can, but you don't move out of the house just to make a statement in a traditional marriage... Or a sane one.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 04:35 PM
27

"reject the request of the husband" doesn't sound too traditionalist to me.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 04:23 PM
70

So the feminist is enabling the patriarchy... Ironic.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 12:25 PM
44

Exactly. Just some useless bitches. All that matters is what people have between their legs, that's all. In this case it's somehow the same. See how the point she makes is never to point out who's good at this job. I mean, i wouldn't have any problems with a government or supreme court where there are 100% women if they were actually good at the job and not driven or elected by an infectious ideology that destroys lives.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:36 AM
3

You might have a point there, but there are also girls who transition so it's not aimed specifically to men.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 03:39 PM
4

Well, of course we don't have castration yet in the western societies, but feminizing men... I kinda have the feeling it's already happening and it's not pretty to watch.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 03:16 PM
3

Yeah, they're all love and inclusivity. Sorry to hear about your condition and stay strong, man. And no, don't say "fuck my life". Fuck them instead and fuck their rotten ideology.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:24 PM
4

You're right when you say it's way worse. From what I've seen so far, in TwoX the posts go like this: OP: rants about something. Average response: "Leave him".
/r/MensRights24/10/22 11:24 AM
3

OMG. The first amendment, I suppose applies to yourself, not what you do to other human beings. If you want to get circumcised, fine, go ahead and do it it's your right. Here we're talking on doing it to someone else.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:34 PM
4

Consent. Same as FGM.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:31 PM
8

I think you should look at it as a matter of principle on who's in control of the process, not just the consequences. In both cases, male and female, there's someone else who makes the decision of cutting a functional body part, ergo mutilating the child, again, male or female. You don't have a saying in this, that's why it's horrible.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:30 PM
7

Who doesn't? Here's a little experiment you can do at home. If you're a woman, get your boyfriend/brother/male friend to start screaming and fake hitting you in public. If you're a man do the same thing with your girlfriend/sister/female friend. Keep us posted with the results.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 07:10 PM
1

Interesting giveaway. Does she subconsciously think that alimony is there to help women? Do other women think that also?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/22 04:07 PM
1

"Guy...feels? What the fuck is that? Guys have no feelings." Obviously /s
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:35 AM
13

Yes because it's extremely easy to want and to complain about equal rights, but when it comes to responsibilities, that's a different story. Equal rights cannot be accomplished without equal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:17 PM
7

Great news for him.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 08:24 AM
42

This... I mean, she'd rather believe a stranger woman she doesn't know and not her husband. What the fuck...
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 07:05 AM
1

I've read the post again and I think it is about feminists and what OP describes as their lies. I don't think it's about a woman. As for the second part of your question, unfortunately I don't know what to answer. And for a good reason, I think. I've learned during these years in the social media, that I cannot speak for a group but only for myself. Now you may ask: what am I doing here? Well, my interest is to have a debate about ideas and from what I've seen in your comments, so is yours, whic…
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 07:50 AM
6

Only women can be feminists?
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 05:15 AM
3

Yeah, go ahead.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 06:08 AM
7

Man, really, don't even bother going to this sub. I, once, tried to have a rational conversation with one of their mods because they banned me. And it was impossible. It was like Sam Harris said, if you're trying to have a conversation with an irrational person, what rational arguments could you give in order to have a normal debate? If they don't value rationality, it's impossible to talk to them. I honestly believe they live in a different dimension which has nothing to do with this reality.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 01:38 PM
6

This is a religion. In that small conversation, replace "patriarchy" by "devil" and you'd think you are talking to a fundamentalist christian.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 05:41 AM
4

Actually I think this is quite accurate because these people have their own version of reality which has nothing to do with the real world. In that version this happens, apparently, but not in the real world.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 06:42 AM
15

"you should look in the mirror before calling yourself that"
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 09:38 AM
1

I never said it should. And I think we mostly agree, it's just the sensation of censorship that bothers me, but if it wasn't the goal of your first comment, then I apologize.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 03:45 PM
1

An opinion, religious or scientific, is not necessary a law, even if it's shared by the majority of the population. However the validity of an opinion should stand on its own, whether it is or it isn't a law. Not all laws are just and fair and not all religious views are bullshit. I admit, most of them are, but sometimes it's good just to sit and listen to the arguments by itself without paying attention on who's saying it. For instance, I have a friend who is a doctor an atheist and also a wome…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 07:04 AM
1

Yes, of course, but the doctor's opinion, for me, was an example of an informed opinion, but not the only one. How about the opinion of someone who's deeply religious? And I'm saying this without sharing this belief. Perhaps, with this opinion you can learn something new that goes beyond the medical. Doctor's don't know everything, they're human as well. I found myself many times in this situation. When I think I know everything of something, I hear some different INFORMED opinion and it makes y…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:27 AM
1

How so? In all my comments I've said or tried to say that everyone can have an opinion, unlike yourself whose original comment sounded like you'd censor the men from having an opinion on abortion. Again, I haven't given my own opinion on the subject.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:21 AM
1

I haven't given my opinion on abortion by the way, but as I said before, there are informed and uninformed opinions. Not all of them have the same value, of course and on the other hand, the value of an opinion is not measured by the number of people who share it. So you can give the relevance that you consider to each opinion but you can't censor somebody for having one. That was my whole point since the beginning.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 10:47 PM
1

Well I don't know what kind of people have an opinion. There are informed and uninformed opinions. If a crazy lady thinks that I should chop off my dick, then her opinion means nothing. If a urologist, a woman urologist, since I don't play the identity politics game, has the same opinion then maybe I should listen to her, don't you think?
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 09:54 PM
2

I don't know if they should make a decision, but sure as hell they can have an opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 09:51 PM
3

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 09:46 PM
3

Why not? And why is the fact that someone is guy and/or he's never fucked a woman and/or will never get the chance to have sex, relevant to the arguments this guy could give on abortion?
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 05:49 PM
5

When I was selling my time, my company would send me on trips. Twelve-hour-long flights, staying at hotels, visiting clients. Not a moment of that was enjoyable because I knew what came after that. 10 to 12 hours working day. I let them rape my spirit for money /s
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 09:10 AM
10

First of all, thank you for your serious reply. I give you that the pressure for a boy growing up, can be quite hard. But looking with some perspective while growing up and becoming an adult, I see that it can be a preview for what's to come. Let me explain: in a male environment, things can get pretty violent, even if you're a non violent person. Is this toxic masculinity? I don't think so because it is natural. Boys are more fiscally agressive than girls. This is not societal, it is natural as…
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 11:24 AM
11

Right, it's like a fight between good and evil, I get it. However, this doesn't change the fact that you can create a fictional character which is evil in order to justify your fight, like a jihad or something. In this case this fictional character is the patriarchy. And, by the way, can you define the "toxic masculinity" thing, please? And I don't accept condescending responses such as "educate yourself", I'm quite educated. I'm asking because this whole logic comes from the "toxic masculinity"…
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 10:43 AM
20

Hmm, I don't know. Until now, I've never seen a feminist with some kind of authority and not some random person in social media, stand up for the men's right not to be abused. Actually, saying that, is kind of a deal breaker for them as they assume you're some kind of a blasphemous idiot. Don't get me wrong, it's great that you call yourself a feminist and be against this kind of shit and be in favor of men's rights and all, but this is not the general feeling.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 10:28 AM
6

Yeah... She probably friendzoned or called incels the "good guys", perhaps that's why they're far away now.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:39 PM
9

So, OP... Tried to provoke a little bit, just to have your screenshot for FDS? Didn't work out, did it.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 09:17 PM
46

I'd fucking beat the shit out of them. As you said, you did nothing and almost went to jail. Well, if you do go to jail, at least it'll be for a reason.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 05:15 AM
1

These people... Always looking at older times with nostalgia and wanting those times to come back... In this case it's the stone age.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 04:03 PM
3

It makes sense, however, doesn't it? If there is no rape, there is no more pushing this toxic ideology. If there are no more rapists in the streets because they're in jail, there's no more rape. They need them.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/21 09:07 PM
21

So that makes it ok then? What kind of fucked up logic is that?
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/21 09:33 PM
4

This is clearly toxic feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/20 06:37 AM
15

Well, if the game is woke enough it should be aware of my gender choices. If during the game I (and everyone else) identify myself as a woman, it becomes a normal Monopoly. If it doesn't then I suppose I can sue them.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/20 07:03 PM
2

Oh absolutely, I agree with you, they will always have the advantage in this way. However, in the exact same way that a man's life is ruined just by false accusations, even if he's found not guilty afterwards, the same can happen to this type of women. They may have the advantage in a courtroom, but they will pay a social price.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 10:19 AM
7

And they still don't understand why it's so dangerous to make up stuff like this. It's not only because you destroy the life of an innocent person. It's also because they lose credibility now and in the case they are truly abused, they won't be believed so easily.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 05:39 AM
1

Good... Good.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 09:10 PM
52

Exactly. She thinks she's going to get away with this injustice just because she's got a pussy. Not this time.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/20 08:51 PM
1

Look, I don't expect for Ben Shapiro to be a Saint. There is no need to exaggerate my argument to the point of being ridiculous. Again, if someone is preaching me to behave in a certain way, then only for that specific thing, that specific behavior I'm expecting the preacher to do the same. I don't think this is a ludacris thing to think.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/20 01:23 PM
1

I'm not expecting a professor in astrophysics to build a space ship and fly to the moon. But I am expecting from someone who tells me to behave in a certain way which is correct according to his ideas and claims to behave in the way they preach. Don't you? I am perhaps ignorant about this, but I've not heard for an original idea or claim from Ben Shapiro.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/20 01:08 PM
2

What I meant was that if he's going to lecture people about behavior and then he's doing the exact opposite, even if what he says is right, how could you respect that person. Yes, watch the interview, it is quite interesting. On this subject I have a lot more respect for Jordan Peterson and even if I don't agree with his religious views, his speeches have helped me understanding his position and change my mind over a lot of things.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/20 12:58 PM
2

Of course it's not crap on its own, but the fact that during that interview he obviously put his own feelings over the facts shows that he doesn't believe anything he says. He just built his fame by attacking college kids and not serious journalists. I used to like him, but I guess when you lose respect for someone, doesn't matter what they say anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/20 12:44 PM
-4

Smart? I don't know. He built all this "facts over feelings" and "attacking the snowflake college kids" crap and then melted like the snowflake he is during the interview with Andrew Neil. In that moment I lost the respect I had for him.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/20 12:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter