TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

draftgraphula Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by draftgraphula on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, not all men are ready to enjoy your help. Most of them fear showing weakness, because they (sometimes rightfully) believe that women are not attracted to "weak" men. In fact, their reasonability might be harmed already by years of excessive expectations, so you might be powerless to address those particular cases. You might want to focus on sharing your insights with other sisters, so they can compare their feminist and your reasonable povs.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 06:15 PM
2

If you hear some mysandric crap from a girl, I'd be happy if you point your finger and clearly say that you've heard her shitting on a human for their gender.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 06:08 PM
1

Ohh, the culture "you enjoy make" is exactly the feminist type, bashing patriarchy for societal fails, and avoiding responsibility for all the bla-bla crap you produced in this thread. Out.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:18 PM
1

No, I was answering to the misinformation you tried to spread in this reddit. You were asked to tell us what the partiarchy is for you, and I clearly saw you had reacted without actually having any clue. This is really offensive of yours, to come here and not even know what partiarchy is.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:14 PM
2

Ye, sadly fools are gonna keep fcking each other, can't prohibit that...
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:11 PM
2

Lol, if you don't know who Claude is, then be my guest and talk to his lesser sibling: ChatGPT. You're welcome, don't thank me.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:10 PM
-1

People like you have no clue what they're talking about, RandomYT.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:05 PM
4

Wait, where's her birthgiver been all that time? Handcuffed in a closet by those male siblings, for sure /s
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:04 PM
1

Also, I enjoyed being subject of your attention for this little while, but I mostly do it for this particular /r. That's enough for today, take care, I believe you can learn.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:57 PM
1

Oh, you're familiar with the word extremism. Now, consider this: there are too many feminist extremists, and you kinda fit the bill for being one.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:54 PM
1

Patriarchy should not even be mentioned in most contexts where it is mentioned in current public discourse. And even if it's mentioned, Matriarchy should be mentioned be-fore that.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:52 PM
2

Also, mother is a title your son will give or take from you. For now - you're simply another low-educated birthgiver.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:51 PM
1

Ye, so it breaks my heart to let you know you're not better than any of those categories of people you've mentioned with disgust. You're not superior than any other human. Time to understand that. Please read what humility means. Check etymology, Claude will gladly help.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:50 PM
4

You should've stopped with "I don't understand". The rest is accusation from your personal distress, and an assumption of my internal state. "You seem angry" is an assault on my authority. Just go talk to Claude instead of spreading miss-information here.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:48 PM
1

Invoking the "I'm not insulting you" context - is a passive agressive defence of online authority. It actually implies I'm insulting you. Which is totally dependent on what it takes to insult a low-educated person who does not know what patriarchy even mean.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:45 PM
2

Luckily, I have no authority to produce such a list. So it is my reasonable opinion, that at least you should have been trained to use etymological dictionary before you become a birthgiver.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:43 PM
1

Wait, did you somehow experienced the word partiarchy? Or are you retranslating the dumb idea that "partiarchy is the core problem here"?
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:42 PM
5

That ;)
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:38 PM
1

And you see, since you're so defensive with me, it tells me how you behave towards younger men.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:38 PM
1

Yeah, you're simply retranslating some crap. Please don't pretend it's harmless.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:37 PM
5

Where did i say "All the words"? Are you able to read properly?
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:36 PM
9

Cuz the whole premace of feminist movement - is denying responsibility for how the world is fckd up.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:34 PM
7

Tell me you're not executing authority over your son? How do you reckon his chances of becoming a nervous wreck?
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:33 PM
7

I'm pretty certain that learning what etymology means and how it works MUST come before having babies. You're too busy to learn now, you have a kid.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:32 PM
2

Yeah, so I shouldn't really care what you want, right? Learn to use words properly.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:30 PM
6

In fact, I have doubts that you've understood what I said before asking "how so".
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:22 PM
2

You don't think you said something, because you don't understand the etymology of the word you're using. Patriarchy - is the hierarchy of the fathers. Now, since you've failed to give credit to the mothers hierarchy in society, I cant take your opinion seriously, you're clearly prejudiced.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:20 PM
16

Or, in other words: Your view of patriarchy conveniently ignores how women actively enforce expectations on men while pretending it's just "society" doing it. Claiming victimhood under a system you help maintain is quite the privilege - acknowledging your role in policing male behavior might be a more honest starting point for this conversation.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:17 PM
13

This particular view places no agency on females to produce expectations. It implies all expectations on both sexes come from "patris" - "fathers". Never heared anything less connected to reality. Most expectations on men are placed by their mothers and wives.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:11 PM
0

Vagueness at 11...
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:27 AM
0

Simply read the wikipedia on wars waged in and about Crimea over the past 250 years.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:01 AM
2

Can you imagine east-european men suddenly becoming THAT woke? The level of delulu in here...
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:55 AM
11

Try being pleasant, for a change? Or you only do it for tips?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 02:27 PM
1

It's a problem with the person that calls the court to enforce their lies.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 09:22 PM
1

My first memory is my birthing person using me as a human shield. If anybody tries to call her a victim, I have more data to make you ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 05:59 PM
5

Men are underreporting female assaults. There is no easy procedure. One should start with their childhood memories.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 07:12 AM
2

Very reasonable take - most extra obligations implemented in the past were used by corrupt government officials to do dirty stuff.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:41 PM
1

What about rape prevention?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:36 PM
1

There's a huge step between the "right to know" which is being prohibited in France. And obligatory testing - that is, if I'm getting the child, I'm gonna be tested. I am keen on simply removing the problematic law of prohibition of paternity testing. Would solve most problems. Wanna check - check. Don't wanna check - no one can force you. Speaking from the husband perspective of course. By suggesting even more obligations on fatherhood you reach the opposite result. Why does the state need to t…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:31 PM
2

Oh, I thought they bang only the guy they love. Turns out they bang first and decide whether to love later... Not how my mommy told me... /s
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:04 PM
2

They'll find where to get more sperm donors with all that subsidy ;))
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:58 PM
2

Or concealed paternity;)
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:46 PM
1

Q.e.d. //For the interested men: That's how "no" sounds.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:35 PM
1

So, you'd give your life to give birth to your husband's son?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:29 PM
1

is that you?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:28 PM
0

I'd like to know why you claim "bitterness", while it's merely your perception of my text? I didn't make it bitter, you read bitter. So, you're replying to me, in order to love yourself?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:24 PM
0

Wait, you're soo good, because your bloodline is soo good? Ever felt superior to another human, simply because you were high born?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:20 PM
0

Oh, so it's back to animal kingdom... Thank you for clearing the doubts.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:19 PM
1

Notice how I didn't even mention that a husband would probably have some reasonable WANTS himself, don't you think?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:18 PM
1

You're not planning anything. You're merely outing a claim about how good and sutable of a mother you will definitely be. I'd say you should start by recognizing the fact that "Mother" is a title, earned with harsh self-sacrifice. When you give birth, the appropriate term is "birthgiver". You might become a mother, but I highly doubt it, looking at how highly you esteem yourself. If you're soo good already, you won't be able to change, according to what your husband and child REQUIRE. You have n…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:16 PM
0

Ye, here's the recipe for parent role inversion down the line...
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:12 PM
1

So, you're referring to God, and then foretell the future in the same message. This is, like, really-really wild crazy overestimation of your capabilities. I'd imagine you'll place undue burden on your family with such excessive self aggrandizing...
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:11 PM
1

Are you somehow foretelling your future? Sounds... Excessive?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:09 PM
1

So why do you think you SHOULD?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:04 PM
4

I'm not even sure why there might be two potential daddies. I thought you can't Love 2 ppl at once?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:04 PM
4

They are trying to tell us it's impossible to prevent stupid people from engaging in dangerous activity of unprotected sex.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 05:02 PM
1

What happens when you are not able to support that promise you made? Would you be fine giving birth to a child, and then losing your life in process? Since you've mentioned you'd "Give Anything", your child would actually be the one to decide if you were decent.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:58 PM
0

I'm not sure your "wants" are a valid reason to actually contact people you require for bearing a child of theirs. I want a lot of things, doesn't mean anyone has to do anything to satisfy my wants. Keep your wants to yourself - you're wanting too much from life.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:53 PM
1

Lol, I don't know what you read. Why do you assume the gender of your conversation partner, and why do you pretend to know they're hurt? I see you lolling around here. Lols are not any good legacy.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:51 PM
0

So, what's your legacy you want to produce more of? I couldn't care less how cute the pie is. I'd rather have not to much sugar in it. I have no wonder you're trying to be a good person, but the value of your legacy is questionable. What have you achieved to be worthy of spreading? How do I know you're not overesti mating yourself?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:44 PM
1

False.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:42 PM
1

You skipped my questions, your article is fishy.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:49 PM
-10

Do you see how this line of sophistics robs birthgivers from agency in deciding what sperm donor they want to breed?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:48 PM
1

Let's see if there's more than "an article" of science on this topic, and how it supports your claim. Are there any opposing opinions to the article you're going to provide for us to explore the validity of?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:45 PM
1

So, who decides if you gained sentience and when?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:38 PM
-9

My statement is different from the radical position you try to promote here.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 01:21 PM
-19

One with privacy concerns themselves? The obligatory testing is not really a sign of freedom. In fact, simply making it obligatory - is the exact opposite of what it is now - deemed criminal. State has to refrain from governing this at all. Birth by contract, no birth - no official relation...
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:44 PM
2

So, life is forced onto a child at the moment of ejaculation into vulva, or at the moment of a particular egg cell coming out into the same internal body area? At this point I'm actually curious of how do you consider people who buy sex cells (sperm/eggs), being unable to give birth by themselves.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:43 PM
4

Doesn't sound any less sexist to me... Liberation is actually military term as well. Palestinian people are fighting for the liberation from the wall, now what?
/r/MensRights18/03/25 08:14 PM
7

Also, if feminists weren't sexist they would pick a different name. It's much more valuable for society to actually spend all that grant money on gender-indifferent child neglect/abuse prevention!
/r/MensRights18/03/25 08:05 PM
1

Take a look at the Charity Principle. Especially the Dialectic iteration of it. Share it with others. If they don't submit to DPC - lower your stakes to 10%. Requires you to submit to DPC yourself, wouldn't be difficult, I guess ;)
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:59 PM
2

Bully tactics indeed.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:55 PM
2

Take notes of their argument, prepare at home, bring the proofs, come back, label accusations as such, note emotions spilling out, rinse, go your own way.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:52 PM
3

There's no reason in your text. Here's why: "Trust" has the connotation similar to "Belief". "Believing" cannot be "Trust", since one is a process, and another is a decision. Now, Love does not require Trust, nor Belief to the subject of love. Now, if you're agent of love, pay attention: If you love - you give love. If you don't give - you don't love. If you can't tell exactly how your love is given at any time - you have no clue how to love. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:35 AM
1

I suggest you start fighting for your rights as a poor woman. Maybe start addressing rich women first, before you need to talk to poor men?
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:13 AM
2

So, you can't prove you can be trusted?
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:11 AM
1

Hey, check out France laws on paternity testin.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:09 AM
2

France literally makes voluntary paternity testing a crime. Up to 1 year in jail. This "progressive" "first” world is so fake...
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:07 AM
-1

In fact - pure genetics. Women are XX, Men are XY. Men bring variety. Women are literally limited in this.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:53 AM
2

Most men have no clue what makes them happy. They delegated the source of happiness to women. Because the romantic bullshit is all across the schools. Men have to grow alone, yet every fckin teenager is being mentally pampered to breed as soon as possible. Sure, elites need more flesh.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:52 AM
1

Circular argument indeed.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:49 AM
2

Oh yeah, it's actually funny how gaslighting is genderless.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:48 AM
3

To add an insult to injury, female parents dominate children of male parents in order to "get back" on their husbands. So, if a woman is abused, most likely she will abuse her children 2x. Now imagine, if a woman is not abused. She will still make derogatory comments about the deficiencies of a boy's father. Now tell me how you would like to prosecute such an abuser. She's not doing acute harm, she does chronic harm. Any girl learns this at a young age.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:47 AM
1

Woman's inherent value is the womb. Still they pretend it's something they call Love!
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:41 AM
1

The fun part is, for the majority of lower-class females it is indeed a men's world, and they need all their cheats to get to that tasty banker semen... Higher class Men's semen is legally binding nowadays. Guess what: everybtch and their momma wants to become a Higher Class Bride... No wonder it's a taboo to even question Higher Class Females about anything they do. Lucky it's been bout 100 years, since there's no danger of being prosecuted for questioning a powerful female. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:36 AM
2

Yeah, women somehow forget "being" a mother does not equate to "coaching a serf"
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:32 AM
0

This has to do with the ways men and women compete for survival. Women have to pretend they're harmless, so that men would take you home. Men have to pretend they're dangerous, so that women can use a bodyguard. Both are the type of human capable of cannibalism. Do not ever forget that: A woman will kill a child to survive herself. Anybody who denies this is a sexist faker. Now, get this: They say, once you give birth, you're a MOTHER. This is fake. More correct word for most female parents is "…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:23 AM
1

Poor argument. There are enough bloodthirsty queens.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:07 AM
1

Also, when suicide attempt is induced, the inducer usually calls the police for "being afraid for the suicidal person", or even can be as thicc as "he threatened violence".
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:33 PM
1

We're probably better off fixing this ourselves ;)
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:31 PM
2

Shows how men fail less. If you fail to kill yourself - means it's not that bad after all.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 11:04 AM
1

You forget there are a lot of harmful women with kids (discrimination in custody outcomes) I couldn't leave my narcissist mother as my father did, and nobody cared how she treated me. So, it's not reddit that's extreme. It's women who avoid responsibility. And other women who cover those. So, stop pretending you're doing any good. You're still covering for all the crooked "ladies". There's a problem, with a specific behavior in women, any "goes for everyone" is whitewashing the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:44 PM
2

You only need them to get children. Make sure to prepare a contract for that. Otherwise - good luck trying to please a black hole.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:28 PM
2

There's nothing just in your list. You "simply" put Russia at the top of countries worst for men. And then you say "there's no order" and then again say Russia is the "worst" atm. You're clearly biased, and it is NOT a coincidence. I bet you won't change the order you made, by putting Ukraine in the first spot, since it's quite worse for a man to fight for the clown regime with credit weapons.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:15 PM
5

So it's not a ranking, yet, in the next sentence you say it's worse to be a man in Russia. Brainwash much? In Ukraine random men are hunted in the streets to be thrown into the grinder. Can't get much worse than that...
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:44 PM
1

Pointing fingers at China for free speech oppression? In a group that exposes western mindfuckery about gender? You're brainwashed, and don't even notice... Typical grunt... I'm wondering if that's the core of the issue...
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:33 PM
3

Actual Sex is less than 1% of human activity, yet, so much thought is wasted on anything related to it... Can we get busy with anything more elaborate, than caring whose private parts are of any size? Why is this even an issue when everybody knows it's a plain assault on the person targeted, in order to gain social capital at the expense of the victim? Can we already identify AND report all harassment?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:50 AM
1

Humans are sinful. It's both dumb hate, and craving for the greater good, at the same time... Nobody promised "you" a big one! Unmet expectations are nowhere else, than in your head. I laugh at insults lately.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:38 AM
3

It was a combination of the tone of your communication, with some ambiguities in how you represent the statistics in natural language. I'm pretty clear on your message as far as I've read what you psted.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:29 AM
2

It's hard to see how cutting off body parts of any healthy person would be considered as an enhancement [potential benefits]. It's also known that mutilation at young age is executed to improve handling/exterior in dogs... Also, are you considering US perception on the topic, or the global one, including all types of cultures? And I haven't even started on the part of the consent... Who's body is mutilated? What can parents actually decide for the child, and is it actually enforceable at scale?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:28 AM
3

I'd rather have feminist activists not make mutilation a gendered issue. The unified genderless movement for the wellbeing of children, battling genital mutilation in children across cultural boundaries!
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:54 AM
3

Are you somehow implying mutilation could be beneficial in male children?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:52 AM
3

So, what's your opinion on the perpetuation of MGM? It wasn't obvious from your comment...
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:49 AM
3

The actual reason is religiously instilled harmful dogma. That's why they FGM in Africa, no reason to assume it's any different for MGM anywhere else... Here's what history tells us: In Victor Hugo's "The Man Who Laughs," the deliberate facial disfigurement of the protagonist by comprachicos mirrors genital cutting practices across cultures—both show how power structures permanently alter bodies without consent, slicing away at identity while the perpetrators smugly claim tradition, religion, or…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:50 AM
6

I'd imagine "my body - my choice" to be the mantra for this case.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:41 AM
5

If you say the government is the enemy and not women, you paint the picture women decide nothing in government. That's obviously not true. There are definitely feminist movements active in governmental lobbying channels. In fact, villianizing social structures in order to avoid talking about cultural influences of female actors is kind of a subversive rhetoric... You're inciting anti-government sentiment. Can't see it being helpful in conversation. There's a clear difference in approved child ha…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:41 AM
3

You don't need anyone 24/7 to hold your hand to grow yourself. Relationships burden us with too much unnecessary business. Too much expectations. Too much drama. Too much uncertainty. I'll need to find someone to be a good parent for my children. I need to become a good parent myself first to know to compare parenthood styles. I parent myself for now. Best relationship ever!
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:30 PM
1

I'd argue that the sperm donor is selected by the ovary to be at least equally mentally dysfunctional. Anyway, in some cases I'm pretty sure both parents are harmful enough to produce unwanted outcomes for the child...
/r/MensRights25/02/25 02:57 AM
3

Thank you! Also the Dutton 2008 lecture is eye-opening. I come from experience, but I'm still amazed at the figures and the availability of this data!
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:23 AM
10

Wait, since you came with the data, do you have anything on maternal abuse against children? I've seen some random numbers of 70% of reported neglect and about 60% of corporal damage is female?
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:37 PM
1

Dude, I'm not judging, you clearly said it's hard to tell the truth and you don't know how to handle stuff like this. I'm reassuring you, there are ways to treat children like humans, and I wish you luck in gaining power to do so BEFORE you get into a relationship. You might want to make an effort, it's achievable. That's it.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:59 AM
2

I am sorry, it's unclear from your comment whether you actually think the female teacher did anything wrong. If you think she didn't, then there's no need to act. If you think she did - then why lie to the boys? They're asking themselves, so by denying the fact, you're actually contributing to active gaslighting and helping the abuser do their dirty things.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:35 AM
2

We chose to go to the moon not because it's easy. You WANT to become that. I do.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:23 AM
0

So, you're removing yourself from action by citing inexperience. Then please reserve your opinion on the rest of the stuff, due to inexperience. I'm telling you that lying to children is wrong, you pretend there's no other way. Clearly you're still proliferating the harmful lies you've got fed yourself. Not judging. Takes a very specific introspective/reflective effort to sanitize your own mind from all the popular BS. I wish you luck.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:21 AM
-1

Lying to children is not the way. You almost did a good try right there. Now if you skip the snark and try for real, I'm certain you can manage a truthful yet reassuring statement about how life is with regard to men.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:06 AM
0

Santa is the "proper" balance - simply because you didn't think about it properly. If you try to mislead a grownup in a similar way - you'd get punished. Yet, treating children with fakes is somehow fun and games? Tbh, seeing this kind of bs in Men's Rights movement is sickening: Men are being lied to all around, and there are more men trying to feed young boys more lies... Like, are you even aware of the manipulation you're perpetuating?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:39 PM
0

The container is incomprehensible to a creature that's bound to live and die inside of it. You simply brag with your ignorance. Learn to separate the church (sinful people) from Logos.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:30 PM
4

It creeps me out how gaslighting the children is actually normal to a majority of ppl. Santa is such a sad joke...
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:14 PM
5

You see, this kind of argument is exactly harmful, by implying there's some goodness in this completely arbitrary action. So, you're still making the sexist difference between the kids, basically playing along with the manipulation, but pretending you're subverting the game by sounding wise. Nothing to do with Jesus. Nothing to do with Reason. Simply pedalling the disinformation of children. This is why I had to react to your comment.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:57 PM
5

The "ladies first" custom appears to have emerged from medieval European chivalric codes and courtly manners rather than religious texts. It was partially a practical consideration - in elaborate dresses, women needed more space to navigate doorways and carriages. It was also tied to the aristocratic ideal of the nobleman as protector and gentleman. So, tell the boys this behavior has nothing to do with Jesus, and stems from the time we don't want to go back to. And then tell them this: generosi…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:25 PM
17

This is not ok. They feel that's not, OP has that feeling too, so only reasonable is to share their experiences of being excluded. Boys have to know they're mistreated, otherwise you're just covering the abuse of power.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:56 PM
-15

I suggest you make a space and see how to govern it. It takes a lot of effort to avoid becoming a hateful echo-chamber, where irrelevant grief is hyped over and over again. And there's only so much time one would actually enjoy coming to such a place. If you have difficulties having deep vulnerable conversations with men, a "men-space" won't help you quit the implied competition. So in the end, you should be able to go your own way within any social circle, by simply addressing men in private.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:54 PM
14

You don't have to be gay to laugh at the petty insults. I'm amazed some ppl can't see beyond getting bred...
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter