TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dresaces Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by dresaces on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe he actually raped her, i.e. sex without consent. rape Such double standards are evident, like in the case when that Russian woman raped a man and it was described as "Forced sex" or even "Making love." However, I don't think the Rambold case is a very good example.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:50 PM
10

Men's physical advantage is often way overblown, too--abusive wives/girlfriends are able to and have been known to throw pots and pans, etc. at their spouses. Especially considering that men can't really fight back unless they themselves want to go to jail for domestic violence, threats of violence can be just as effective as physically holding someone down.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:04 PM
31

they would be seen as whores or sluts or asking for it, maybe even resulting in rape Wait, so dressing a certain way can be a factor in rape after all? That's weird.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:55 AM
1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:15 AM
1

Certainly. If the fetus can survive outside the woman, it's its own being and therefore not part of the woman's body. Late term abortions should not be legal at all.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:04 AM
2

The topic of discussion should not be whether or not it is worse than FGM. The topic of discussion should either be "Should person X get their boy mutilated?" or "Should MGM be legal?", not a pointless pissing contest. For the health benefits, point out that only one medical association in the history of the Earth, of all the medical associations there have been, has ever stated that circumcision should be performed on infants, with most saying that it should not be performed. Also, I'm sure you…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:22 PM
-19

Men comprise the vast majority of rapists. I don't think it's offensive to say this because it's true.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:23 AM
6

Downvoters not getting the reference
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:17 PM
6

Those comments are absolutely horrendous.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:05 PM
101

It's not offensive because female rape exists, but because the vast majority of men are not rapists, and telling them that they could be rapists because they are men could cause them to hate themselves or their gender, among other reasons. That all minorities are potential thieves is a negative stereotype based on the fact that minorities steal more than whites, just like that all men are potential rapists is a negative stereotype based on the fact that men rape more than women. Telling men that…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:49 PM
4

They don't hold funerals for that Genius.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:55 PM
5

And the sad thing is, a lot of people sincerely believe that all criminals deserve rape.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:23 PM
2

80% of the health care? Is that over lifetime or per year?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:42 PM
1

One rape case successfully averted.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:17 PM
2

Source? I'm not doubting this; I'd just like to cite it.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:12 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/kFPyV.jpg
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:23 PM
1

The video is a simplistic description of one of the more common definitions of feminism, which makes sense, because the video is aimed at children. The definition they give is, "Feminism is the idea that women should have the same rights, privileges, and status as men." Of course, by that definition, there's nothing wrong with being a feminist. The definition I like to use (and this is one of the only areas where I'm picky with my words) is someting along the lines of "The branch of women's righ…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:33 AM
26

or which gender has the most violence committed against it.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:56 PM
2

Omg, this is brilliant!!! is this your OC?????
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:16 PM
3

I like to call it "The feminist version of men's rights activism."
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:30 AM
2

To say it's "The most difficult job on the planet" is exaggerating insanely, and I don't think too many people seriously think that it's harder than the job of, say, Obama, or the CEO of any major business. But to be fair, parenting isn't as easy as Burr seems to describe it (playing hide & seek, etc).
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:00 AM
2

2x tends to be immune to reason, and they don't exactly like it when men come and post things. It's funny that they use an appeal to nature (Biology gives men the short end of the stick, we can't do anything about it) when we have provided a clear solution to the problem.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:31 PM
1

They're trying to figure out why the woman did this. There's nothing too problematic about this. Ben said that he would yell at the woman for having sex with a hypothetical 16-year-old son, even if it was legal in his state. For tyt standards, this is actually pretty O.K. in terms of sexism regarding underage sex.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:23 PM
10

That's not true at all. It says both that women are more likely to be the perpetrators in one-sided violence AND that in two-sided violence the woman is more likely to have started it.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:39 PM
11

This link should be in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:23 PM
1

My point is more about the inconsistency in arguments against legal financial abortions but for legal abortions. Yes, that is another argument often used against legal abortion.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:11 PM
25

There tends to be a huge amount of inconsistency in arguments against financial abortions. The same peoples' argument for legal abortion is often that having a child at a young age can be crippling to a woman, yet they do not seem to see how crippling financially it can be for a man to have to pay ridiculous amounts of child support to a child he doesn't want. They argue that "If a man wasn't prepared to have a kid, he shouldn't have been having sex in the first place. He should take responsibil…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:35 AM
0

With the risk of committing a no true Scotsman fallacy, serious feminists don't agree with this. It's unfortunate that so many women identify with feminism who believe these things.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:11 AM
6

I think this is one of those issues upon which feminists won't really disagree with us. They know it's sexist, and some of them would be almost as outraged as we are. The problem is the general populace, who sees this as not a big deal, but would be (rightfully) outraged if they saw a commercial implying implications about women and math or science.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:39 AM
1

Well, there's certainly something to be said for teaching boys that rape is bad, but it should be in the format of teaching everyone that violence against anyone is bad, including rape. It's dehumanizing to assume that most men don't already know this, but it's important to make sure that everyone does.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:31 AM
1

I think you misunderstand their point. They don't argue that women should get paid as much as men for working less hours, but that women are being paid less for less hours, which is legitimate, but the fact that they are working less hours in the first place is a result of gender-based discrimination. There's something to be said for that, but I think that this is less due to women wanting more hours and not getting them and more due to things such as women not wanting to works nights, overtime,…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:28 AM
3

Right, and get banned from some feminist reddits.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:17 AM
13

I think the biggest problem with this is that it implies that men aren't already socialized to know that rape is bad. The quote relies on there being a "rape culture", and if you have a relatively conservative definition of rape, "rape culture" doesn't really exist. Just about everyone knows that rape is bad.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:57 AM
1

haha i posted this on r/MensRights and they're eating it up Not only fake, but a bad fake. This is clearly someone pretending to be OP. Are you new?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:29 PM
1

Yeah, that last bit really got me. She's an activist against violence against women, and she jokes about (borderline promotes: "These myths only perpetuate fear, distrust and disgust of female genitalia. There are other ways to bite back") violence by women against men.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:26 PM
1

good haha
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:50 PM
32

Is this bad? Yes. It reinforces the stereotype that men are bad fathers. But it's not something we should be fighting against. There is actual discrimination that happens against men in this world just based on their gender. We should not fight to get rid of tshirts with tasteless jokes on them. We'll leave complaining about things that don't actually matter to the feminists.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:32 PM
-4

Fucking this.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:27 PM
9

Innocent until proven guilty is, of course, the best policy in terms of those accused. However, there is no reason to assume that a victim of sexual assault or rape is lying when speaking in terms of giving the victim help, support etc. No one should be denied help because they might be lying, and no one should be thrown in jail, fired, or ostracized because they can't prove innocence. These are compatible ideas.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:18 PM
11

An unfortunate story for everyone involved. Laws should be put in place to prevent this kind of thing from happening. On the other hand, the adoptive parents want to appeal the court's decision, which is despicable.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:07 AM
0

I agree. It's not really problematic. The issue, of course, is that the poster assumes that the vast majority of domestic violence happens against women (which of course is not true), enough so to use exclusively female pronouns. I think their purpose is to raise awareness about DV, and they probably didn't even think twice about whether or not to use a male pronoun in there. Those posters in the men's room that said "she reads my texts and emails, it starts somewhere, know the signs" used exclu…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:23 PM
-4

The difference, of course, being that viagra is a completely legitimate aid to a condition that can be a result of many things other than being mutilated, whereas your machine is a replacement to all sexual activity. If there were a legitimate reason for mutilating, increased chances of ED would not be a refutation.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:28 AM
-2

Please do. I'm curious.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:15 AM
-26

Irrelevant, as we live in the 21st century where viagra is readily available and covered by health insurance. I'm a huge anti-MGM advocate, but this is not a reason not to mutilate.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:56 AM
6

Really? The majority of blacks are violent? I'd like to see that study.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:51 AM
3

Those studies were also performed in developing nations. Diseases are a result of uncleanliness, and STD transmission can be solved with a condom. However, there is no way to regain the sexual function lost by mutilation.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:55 PM
5

useless vestigial organ whose only contribution to the human body is to put you at risk http://people.howstuffworks.com/circumcision1.htm the more you know
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:45 PM
5

The study you cite was conducted in Kenya, where they do not have access to clean water and other things that help keep the intact penis clean and functioning properly. Here's a study conducted in South Korea: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977/ And one regarding sensitivity: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:27 PM
6

You're willing to sacrifice your son's sexual pleasure, masturbatory pleasure, masturbatory ease, and sensitivity for his entire life in the name of preventing a minor, curable, rare infection? Sounds like a solution looking for a problem to me.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:15 PM
50

Blacks are more violent than whites. Should we enact a tax on blacks? Of course not. You'd be punishing an entire group of people based on the actions of a minority.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:05 PM
1

This iis true. We should be fighting against real discrimination, not things like this. It's just something that we can roll our eyes over. I don't think it's "anti-male", but if it was my decision, I'd change it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:59 AM
6

The problem is that it implies that women are always the primary caretakers of children.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter