TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

drgfromoregon Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by drgfromoregon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"You didn't make this strawman argument I'm accusing you of making because it would me me look better, but you totally did!"
/r/MensRights23/09/13 09:26 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/U8DAho1.jpg
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:49 PM
7

That is definitely rape, you've got a case there, and you totally should report it.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:53 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/U8DAho1.jpg
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:22 PM
10

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/36997875.jpg
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:50 PM
0

source please.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:16 AM
2

In a fair world, Men's University wouldn't even exist on a professional level. How can you be a "professional" when you're not even on the same level as women in your age group?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:17 PM
1

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:23 AM
4

I think a lot of her views on women come from looking at herself and assuming everyone else that happens to share her gender also shares her toxic personality traits. To put it in meme-image form...
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:09 AM
1

Be fair, most people with mental retardation have enough social skills to know topless calenders in the workplace are a foolish idea at best. They're actually usually pretty normal, socially speaking.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:42 AM
7

The article doesn't even mention feminism beyond the title, her justification for it is actually a pretty convincing one involving how productivity improved with fewer days.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:08 AM
5

This doesn't even have anything to do with feminism, stupid or otherwise. The article's pretty gender-neutral, and nowhere is she using 'feminism' as a justification. She's actually got a well-thought-out, convincing argument using how productivity has improved once the work week was shortened.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:07 AM
0

That's not what I meant and you fucking know it.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:02 AM
2

Aaand that actually is a strawman. I never said that, and neither did anyone supporting rape victims. People don't need the kind of proof you guys seem to demand of rape victims to start any other kind of investigation for bodily assault (because investigations exist to, you know, investigate and find proof for or against the accusation.)
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:00 AM
4

because without proof to back you up, you look a lot like you're making a strawman argument.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:10 AM
2

Have any hard evidence that the people who support rape victims are supporting false accusers?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:20 AM
7

Supporting rape victims isn't victimizing the wrongly accused. Sympathy is not a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:38 AM
1

Most people who use it don't use it as an insult, much like how most MRAs don't use stuff like 'mangina'. As for 'die cis scum'...that's complicated, I don't really get it, and not everybody in the social justice world is cool with it. But you can't really call it an honest threat. At worst it's just kind of insulting.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:31 AM
-1

but that's not actually true. among lions females hunt and males take care of children, and in human hunter-gatherer societies which gender does what can vary.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:20 PM
-1

source?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:19 AM
-2

I'm sorry you have such a negative reaction to how the real world actually works. Men are only stronger than women in certain areas, women are stronger than men in others. And trying to use "evolution!" to justify sexist bullshit is, well, bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:17 AM
2

It's just a word for "not transgender" that doesn't have the weird implantations 'normal' does.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:13 AM
3

He spends meaningful amounts of time not shooting himself in the foot?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:55 PM
-1

and those laws were put in by feminist ideals Source?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:37 AM
2

Gee, it's almost like no subreddit likes people who call down downvote brigades, and twoxchromosomes has a rule explictly saying No drama-inducing crossposting of content found in other subreddits, or vice versa. Likewise, posts found to direct odious influxes here may be removed.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:25 AM
-1

Wow, you didn't even get the font right.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:26 AM
4

Nice job brigading, guys. For people who whine about being supposedly downvote-brigaded by SRS, you sure are happy to do exactly the same thing you whine about them doing when suddenly you're the target of the "jokes".
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:08 PM
11

...you do realize fedoras were originally a women's hat, right?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:25 PM
-13

I didn't need armor to dodge that insult, I just needed to be able to move faster than a toddler.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:52 AM
-20

ooh, you called me a 'white knight'. I'm so hurt. Truly you are the Shakespeare of creative, unique insults.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:59 AM
1

Sorry, I misread your post and thought you were gonna go making misandrist pages just so you would have pages to report, Nothing wrong with reporting ones that already exist.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:05 AM
-20

I'm a guy, actually. You people really should stop assuming everyone who disagrees with you is a woman. also; this subreddit's sidebar say it "strongly supports principles of free speech." Does speech that disagrees with you suddenly not count as 'free'?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:09 PM
-9

Feminism "doesn't" a monolith either, but that's never stopped you guys whining about supposed things all feminists do.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:55 PM
-23

Hey, it's the same "logic" MRAs use when talking about feminists. Does it suddenly stop making sense to you when suddenly it's the group you're in that's being "represented by its trolls"?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:16 PM
10

I thought the idea that Men couldn't control their sex drive was Misandrist? or is that only when it's people other than MRAs trying to use that as an excuse?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:57 PM
-15

Except that the shit they're condemning MRAs for doing is shit MRAs have actually done.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:56 PM
-36

No, threatening feminists because they disagree with you counts as threatening feminists because they disagree with you.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:55 PM
-35

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:54 PM
-40

Then why's there documentation of it happening?.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:54 PM
2

what makes you think feminists would be any more OK with those? and how is making passive-aggressive "false flag" facebook pages a better solution to the problem then, say, starting a campaign on facebook to ban sexist shit against men, too? It's got a lower chance of working out for you and it makes your side look like petty douchebags.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:48 PM
-3

So, can we be better than this please? Judging by the number of downvotes you're getting, the answer is no. BUT THE MENS RIGHTS MOVEMENT IS TOTALLY LEGITIMATE AND NON-REACTIONARY, AND DESERVES MORE RESPECT, AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A FEMINAZIS WHO OBVIOUSLY SECRETLY WANTS THE D.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:37 PM
3

Wow, that's such a new, accurate, totally-not-played-out insult to give. It's still the 1960s, right?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:34 PM
5

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/37681273.jpg
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:41 AM
2

...how is that an example of being 'more likely to delete things in favor of women than of men'?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:20 AM
5

why not? Assertions like that don't magically not need evidence just because they happen to support the narrative you want to push.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:44 PM
0

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:37 PM
-2

Gee, it's almost like basically every public and private employer thinks professional workspaces aren't the type of place you should put your borderline-porn or something.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:33 AM
-6

No, we aren't. We come here all the time. Mostly to laugh at you.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:27 AM
4

👊 🙋 👏
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:45 AM
3

You didn't get my Sarcasm!!! GOOD JOB ✨
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:12 AM
3

FALSE FLAG!1!!!1
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:07 AM
6

what the fuck does an antisemitic conspiracy theory have to do with this?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 08:05 PM
-7

Hey, I think I found a picture of you.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 08:04 PM
6

Bloomsbury, her publisher, admitted it themselves. end of the second paragraph; She [the representative from Bloomsbury] added that the publishers decided to use initials instead of a name to attract boy readers. "As it happened the first book was such a success that within two months of publication she was on Blue Peter, so it was blown. There are many examples of authors changing their names."
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:32 PM
15

must be Misandry.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:27 PM
8

hey, it's what JK's biography says the publishes thought.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:26 PM
1

...which it generally is, in serious circles. But there're a lot of privliged clueless people who think being called out when they're clueless is 'silencing dissent' or 'against free speech' or whatnot.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:50 PM
8

wow, you're so mature.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:27 PM
87

Yes, it must all be SRS, it's not like worstof linked here an hour before SRS did, or anything
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:44 AM
1

source?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:36 AM
-1

I'm not the one going through post histories to check if I can ad hominem someone who said something I didn't like. "Argumentum ad SRS" isn't a valid debate tactic, dude.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:00 AM
11

I've seen you post comments like this like, 12 times now. Are you a bot, or just a sad person with nothing better to do than to look through other's posting history?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:56 PM
4

thank you for setting the record straight on this post that totally has to do with Mens Rights, o great final-authority-on-what-certain-words-mean
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:19 AM
11

Actually, it is fake. Some of the article's real, but a lot of it's edited to make it look worse than it actually is, probably by someone who thinks seeing this subreddit get mad over a fake is hilarious.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:19 PM
5

this article's fake, you're arguing against something specifically made to piss you off, not an argument a real person honestly made.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:17 PM
4

that's the point. You're being trolled by a fake article.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:16 PM
3

the article's fake, Jezebel never actually said this.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:14 PM
6

that's because it's suppsoed to be. It's not a real Jezebal article, it's a heavily-edited faked version made to get people like this subreddit pissed.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:14 PM
-2

You have no non-anecdotal evidence backing that up.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:11 PM
-1

Yeah...no. If you actually look at the numbers, on average submissions posted to SRS actually get net upvotes.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:37 PM
12

SRS doesn't ask anyone to downvote and people still call them a brigade.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:31 PM
18

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/36997875.jpg
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:31 PM
-9

Reading this subreddit for more then 5 minutes makes it quite clear that you really don't.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:58 PM
-7

Then why is pretty much everyone in this post who's a regular of /r/MensRights doing just that?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:40 PM
8

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/36997875.jpg
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter