dropkickdog Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
9	Individuals and Structures		dropkickdog	/r/MensRights	12/03/10 12:12 PM
0	Mensrights, I need your opinion.		dropkickdog	/r/MensRights	03/03/10 05:13 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Headphone Cutie I say be extravagant and hold up a BIG sign. I think it would show a bit of effort and confidence. But that's just me.	/r/seduction	23/09/10 03:43 PM
3	What is wrong with this definition? Dictionary.com's first definition for it also specifically states a woman. However, its follow up definitions keep gender neutrality. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic	/r/MensRights	06/06/10 04:44 AM
1	Mensrights, I need your opinion. When you sit down next to somebody you're still a good foot (if not more) away from them. It just so happens this guy was across the table. Sorry I didn't make that point completely clear. Lets call it at MOST 3 feet away. Yes, it IS a bit out of hand that she finds him creepy. It's the same concept as if I was sitting next to somebody (whom I've never met) and and said hello to them, and then they calling me a jerk because I didn't ask their permission to speak with them. And no, right now I DO…	/r/MensRights	04/03/10 05:25 AM
2	Mensrights, I need your opinion. There is a HUGE difference between striking up a conversation and catcalling a girl. This guy didn't sit RIGHT next to her, didn't touch her, didn't DEMAND any information. He was simply one human getting to know another. Could he have ASKED to sit down? Sure, I will not deny that his approach was less than tactful. But to blatantly label this guy as creepy and intrusive because he tried to speak to her just seems a bit self-absorbed. I mean what person is SO high and mighty that they can't have…	/r/MensRights	04/03/10 04:18 AM
1	Mensrights, I need your opinion. What I have a problem is your definition of "personal space". You're in a public area, where people are GOING to be. If you wanted your private time, go to your room where you don't run that risk. When I see somebody sitting by themselves (especially in a cafeteria) I would imagine they would want somebody to talk to. And if NOT, it's THEIR responsibility to simply ask them to leave. But labeling somebody a creepy guy for simply trying to have a conversation is just ridiculous.	/r/MensRights	03/03/10 11:25 PM
5	Why I hate feminists. When I first started reading this, I thought he might gather a decent point. Something along the lines of feminism taking it too far to the point where woman are now dominating men and we're (men) becoming the oppressed one. Instead of coming to a decent kind of point, he simply thew metaphors out making women out to be bloodthirsty savages. He had a good idea going, but either he lost his train of thought or just can't write. Or both.	/r/MensRights	27/02/10 08:39 AM
4	The Sad Truth About the Typical American Relationship I didn't downvote, but how is this NOT typical. I'm pretty sure it hits on everything you would think about in a marriage. Also, you cite them for downvoting for not giving a reason, where are your reasons for it NOT being typical?	/r/MensRights	16/02/10 09:04 AM
4	Stop the women Hating, seriously, it is getting old. Yes, but I would imagine you wrote it on your blog first, and then reposted the title of the blog onto Reddit. You could have named your post anything, and then reposted it. What I'm simply trying to say is that both her examples are ones where somebody just reposted the title of the blog itself. And I applaud the inflammatory posting because it obviously did it's job. It got people to read it, and as such (hopefully) learned a thing or two.	/r/MensRights	08/02/10 12:09 AM
7	Stop the women Hating, seriously, it is getting old. Did you actually read the article? Both of those are the NAME of the blog in question. Both of your examples are things that Redditors didn't actually write. Find new examples.	/r/MensRights	07/02/10 11:41 PM
5	Stop the women Hating, seriously, it is getting old. This is ridiculous. What would you rather the titles say? These titles reflect the nature of the article, and match them completely. You say they're "demonizing" women when the only reason they "demonize" them is because it's the nature of the article, and not HOW we post them.	/r/MensRights	07/02/10 11:04 PM