| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | She got off with one yearThe rapist Brock Turner was a rapist. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/11/19 07:48 PM |
| 5 | CMV: A woman who genuinely likes MFM threesomes is a very bad idea for marriage or an LTR.Is it sex out of wedlock you believe is immoral? Or, is it sex with two or more people that's immoral? If so, then perhaps only moral people copulate in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/17 06:31 PM |
| 16 | CMV: A woman who genuinely likes MFM threesomes is a very bad idea for marriage or an LTR.That doesn't make sense. Why are they more likely to cheat? Are women unable to enjoy sex and still be responsible adults? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/17 01:15 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Women moderate their sexual behavior to a much greater extent than men believe they do.Well, it's also true that it is a statement of fact whether or not you have a GED, whereas the rating system is subjective and would essentially make whatever they are rated an opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 10:37 PM |
| – | CMV: Women moderate their sexual behavior to a much greater extent than men believe they do.Someone's doing the fucking. And, you're making this strange assumption that men are looking for "5s and above", when there are plenty of men who are "5 and below". But, when people have sexual partners, they tend to seek a partner who is attainable. I mean, you wouldn't bother applying for a job at NASA with your GED, would you? No. You apply to places where you have a realistic chance of being hired. So, even if we assume that women don't approach men to nearly the same degree as men approach … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 08:49 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countWell, if you throw a relationship into the metaphorical trash, then it probably means there's nothing left. You're done with that sandwich. I think a more apt metaphor would be making a casserole out of leftovers from the night before. Same food in a different dish. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 01:37 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countAnd, as a dude, I know how easily people can manipulate people. But, this is about trust. Whether or not you don't trust him, you also don't trust her or respect her enough to believe she's capable of calling bullshit. I think a good relationship requires a certain degree of faith. Unless you manipulated her or pulled some bullshit and already know that she can be manipulated. At that point, the relationship already began on bad faith and you reap what you sow. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 12:51 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countOh, well. You'd know them well enough, I guess. I did not mean to assume your gender. But, you know. Sometimes you build a friendship that can outlast a breakup. No point in throwing it all away if it can be salvaged. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 05:24 AM |
| 4 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countI dunno, man. Watching her to "see how she acts" would definitely raise a few flags for me if I was a woman. It shows you don't trust her. And, if you don't trust her... why are you in a relationship with her? It's kind of silly to invest yourself into a relationship and then try to figure out whether or not they'll cheat. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 05:11 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countI don't know, man. Peeping your girl while she's talking with someone else kinda smells like insecurity. I mean, is it really a problem if a girl is friends with her ex? Or has guy friends? I was friends my ex after we broke up. Best wingman ever. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 04:46 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Being able to have a few solid LTR's in the past (no cheating, minimal fighting) is a better metric of a girl's marriage worthiness than low n-countDo you ask for her resume? Do you check references? Like, how would you know? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/17 04:22 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter