TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

drrsek Archive

View 6 posts and 126 comments by drrsek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

An average man and an average woman don't exist. There's individual A (you) and individual B (Obama) and you have zilch in common What a weak ass argument - this quite simply shows you have zilch backing to your pseudoscience. Also converting back and forth between group identity and individualism to suit your narrative in a debate ain’t making anyone believe your points anytime soon. Here’s a quote of your original comment: Yes. The men at top level positions are less similar to the average man…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:24 PM
1

Men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:09 AM
1

once they get a new woman they don't feel bad about their ex any more That ain’t exclusive to men. What’s that saying? You need to get under the new one to get over the old one or something like that. FYI, it was a girl who told me that when she was talking about one of her girlfriend’s recent breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:05 AM
-1

Will men ever be able to empathize with women? Nope, at least not with gender related issues. Having said that the answer to “Will women ever be able to empathize with men?” is also a “Nope, at least not with gender related issues”. Then one day we hit puberty and that changes forever. The boys and men in our lives want something from us. They look out for us in hopes of a reward. They do nice things for us for a reward. They engage with us for the opportunity of winning a reward. Sex, inseminat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 08:43 AM
1

Heh 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 08:40 AM
1

it's nothing to study Well that’s just ignorant. But regardless, genitalia isn’t the only distinction between males and females. Brains are too, and so are hormones - the hormonal profile of a female is quite significantly different to that of a male (especially when you consider cortisol management).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 08:18 AM
1

Oh... okayy :(
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:37 PM
1

And those people who think it's worth it are a "separate species" (and within this 'species' the men and women are more similar to themselves than they are to the 'average species'...) Any studies to back this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:27 PM
1

Please take your time to refute these claims. Circle jerking doesn’t help anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:22 PM
1

OP said "often", not "always" So yes, OP is hella neat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:10 PM
2

Well you can’t prove masculinity has nothing to do with biology by simply highlighting societal inconsistencies. So yes, OP is hella neat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:50 PM
1

Unfortunately, we haven't yet figured out how to make a competitive environment completely stress-free. Ain’t gonna happen. Btw, is this a troll? Hard to tell...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:37 PM
2

I see superficial jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:34 PM
1

women are being oppressed nearly into slavery as we speak. Sorry, must’ve missed the party. Could you point it out for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:24 PM
1

So you believe it’s primarily pregnancy and family concerns that prevent women from reaching these positions?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:21 PM
1

Women have just as much chance of obtaining high level positions as men. Now we just need to argue that it's antidotal evidence and get some shitty statistics to confirm what your eyes aren't showing you - that women are being oppressed nearly into slavery as we speak. Do you have any examples of these anecdotal (I assume that’s what you mean by “antidotal”) evidence that backs this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 10:32 AM
1

The men at top level positions are less similar to the average man than they are to a woman in a top level position. Could you clarify this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 09:36 AM
2

Intellectual stimulation is more important to them than getting that last few percent. Are you able to clarify this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 09:33 AM
1

Let’s assume these women don’t have relationships or want to have or raise kids. EDIT: I’ve updated my OP with the definition of high level.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 09:30 AM
1

I'm interested to see what BP'ers have to say about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:22 AM
1

I see your point. But I question it’s validity for two reasons; 1) Arranged is what happens in most cases, yes, but it isn’t in all. Some people still find romantic interests on their own and get hitched that way. And in some peculiar cases, women in these pre-marital relationships end these relationships to marry the guy their parents have found if he’s more AF or BB than her current partner (trading up) - this happens often enough that it’s been noted countless times on Indian TV and movies (p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 08:59 PM
1

I'm a guy and I can confirm. I definitely do not do this with women I consider to be good friends though, if I see them as a good friend, they will be a good friend regardless of whether or not they get engaged/married. Though, to an acquaintance or someone else I interact with during work for example, what you said, is what I do (quite literally, if I see a ring, I don't bother with "going out of my way").
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 10:34 AM
0

Someone give this human an award.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 07:34 AM
3

I don't think you quite understand how "arranged marriages" work. Times have changed, and some people's understandings of "arranged marriages" haven't been updated. So let me explain; Even though it's still called "arranged", in most cases all parties involved must agree to the match (i.e. including the bride-to-be and and the groom-to-be). It's not simply, parents going to their daughters and saying, "here's a guy we found, marry him". EDIT 1: How do I know this so well? I’m an Australian whose…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 07:31 AM
5

a large part of the user base is from a non sexually liberated culture You hit the nail on the head with this sentence. I'm Australian but my parents are Indian. I pretty much grew up in Australia so culturally I'm way more western than your stereotypical Indian guy. However, I still keep in touch with my lineage so I don't completely cut out my "mother-culture" if you will, and the situation in India is so damn different. Most women in India (and men alike), aren't even free to choose their par…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 07:06 AM
2

I) I’m very new to the pills (only a few months old), but as far as I’ve read up, TRP at its core is like a very loose, much less careful version of Jordan Peterson. I’ve personally gone for posts that have self improvement aspects more than ones that promote any level of misogyny (usually these are guys who had repeated failures and don’t focus on self-improvement and have no level of accountability for it). But having said that, some of the generalisations that TRP makes about women aren’t cra…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:51 PM
1

Think he’s referring to your age.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:13 PM
5

Nailed it monkeysinmypocket!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 07:16 AM
1

TBH I’ve been engaging with comments on this thread for a while now and it’s rather frustrating. I also have a life outside of reddit so I can’t exactly be engaging in discussions whenever and wherever. TL;DR: I’m pretty tired rn. Good chatting with you tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 07:12 AM
2

That doesn't make any sense because TRP theory predicts that women in stable long term relationships must view their partners as supermen. That's the only thing that can possibly halt hypergamy. Conclusion: You honestly have no clue about TRP. But maybe you should ask u/LewisCross if his intended goal with that OP was to make a study of self-reported data. Well, let’s hope he replies to your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 04:40 AM
2

Seems like its taken a detour. 🙁
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 01:26 AM
2

Not trying to defend OP, I’m simply interested in the behaviour of respondents.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 12:21 AM
1

1) Still no explanation... 2) Just because we disagree doesn’t mean I’m not engaging in discussion. 3) Very well then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 12:17 AM
1

It’s a wall of text without explanation. Also just putting it out there, in case it gets lost in conversation, I have nothing personal against you. Just engaging in discussion, so please calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 12:06 AM
2

Okay, yes he had an insinuating stance and it would’ve helped if he didn’t. But I’ve personally had an experience with one of my posts where I tried my absolute best to not insinuate anything (and did) when asking a question. I got some direct answers, but also lots of deflection of the question blaming it’s quality. That’s my problem you see, when people aren’t transparent, deflect and say things that mislead people from the absolute truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 12:03 AM
1

The way the OP framed it made honest discourse pretty impossible. Oh... Yeh... Blame the OP, get outta of jail for free. ^ Just pretend I rapped that line As with the “beating-wife”-esq loaded question, it’s nothing like what the OP asked. It was simply what are your partners flaws...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 10:55 PM
2

Well the question in itself and the fact that it was posted in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 10:52 PM
2

A misrepresentation was heavily implied. Also wth is with all the beating your wife stuff? I’m honestly so confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 10:04 PM
2

Huh? He explains it poorly. I am asking you what you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:59 PM
2

I believe his intention was to find out what flaws there are in male partners of women on PPD and then to see if TRP theory predicts it accurately (i.e. certain characteristics in men putting women off).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:53 PM
2

The post in question was basically “Women here lie that their partners have no flaws. Liars. What are their flaws?” I don’t recalls the words “lie” or “liars” being used or implied, but okay... It’s not necessary to answer a bad faith/gotcha question in order to engage or critique the question. I think you miss the point. My point is that if you want the other side to trust and listen to you, you’re more likely to achieve that with transparency than deflection/ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:48 PM
2

I would say some reds (considering the number of TRP subscribers). I believe most are grounded in their thoughts. Well, I would certainly hope so. 😕
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:38 PM
1

I see a natural conversation where two people argued their points, and at the end found some common ground. But I get what you’re saying, only this specific example isn’t the best you could’ve provided.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:25 PM
2

Floods coming your way son, get ready. Side note, you’re most likely way older than me hahaha 🤷🏽‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:17 PM
2

Read the OP? He explains in enough detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:15 PM
2

I would trust people who directly answer “gotcha” questions and then refutes the intention of the asker (there’s a certain transparency to that personality), rather than someone who merely questions the quality/spirit of the questions at hand or provides irrelevant answers to save themselves any trouble. A name comes to mind... I could swear it ends with Peterson.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:14 PM
1

Oh really?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 09:01 PM
1

Yes I got that part. I just was trying to figure out if you thought this post was shitty. Oh and I go for the merc F1 team btw. Just...putting it out there. We could be friends. 🤷🏽‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:21 PM
1

My guess is you're probably talking about things collapsing to semantic arguments related to that ambiguity. Yep. Definition of masculine and feminine in the stereotypical/traditional sense is pretty straightforward if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:17 PM
1

Why you say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:11 PM
6

Extremes will be extreme. 🤷🏽‍♂️ One could only hope some of these men question the information they’re fed before taking it in. But from my experience, top rated posts on TRP are less women hating and more self improvement, so there’s that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:07 PM
1

Do you mean posts discussing feminism? I’m curious as to why.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:02 PM
2

One of my own: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/8jtia8/q4bp_would_you_get_into_a_serious_relationship/?st=JHDFLFE2&sh=bfaa0d65 This recent one: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/8kczod/q4w_do_your_men_have_any_flaws/?st=JHDFP9DG&sh=61cfffe5
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 01:56 PM
2

you’re wrong, Maybe should be entertaining. Definitely
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 01:55 PM
0

It’s the latest one of them, yes. Maybe you and I saw things differently? 🤷🏽‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 01:29 PM
1

Well, this isn’t so much about should/shouldn’t, but rather changes you think would make PPD a better environment to hang out in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 12:14 PM
2

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 12:10 PM
1

Care to explain further? I don’t understand what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 12:08 PM
2

Sneaky meta? But I know what you mean, IMHO wouldn’t even call them studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 08:45 AM
2

Wow, I had no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:58 AM
4

A futile argument as the reply “r/againstmensrights” is very relevant to the discussion you linked. But if you have to be so pedantic, yes, he did indeed, not reply with examples. But take a second to compare that to your reply with the frog study you linked. Just sayin’...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:52 AM
5

Examples mate, not enactment. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:36 AM
6

No one can see the dirt on their own backs. We need someone else to point them out for us. Let’s just say, this is to increase awareness of the not so likeable behaviours on here (that are not explicitly covered by the rules).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:33 AM
2

I’d have to agree with you. I dislike deflection/disregarding as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:29 AM
2

But I also want to hear other things too. Serious! This is just my thing that I dislike.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:26 AM
3

Examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:22 AM
1

Behaviours in engagement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:18 AM
13

Can I start off by saying BP’s habit of deflecting questions that they think the true answers to would weaken their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:16 AM
2

[META-DISCUSSION] BP and Blue-Leaning women of PPD are master deflectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 06:58 AM
3

I think RP can circlejerk at times too. But it doesn’t seem too bad because of some level of scientific approach to the issues at hand. Causation and correlation based information is often shared there, and as a group when a lot of people find themselves or people around them in similar situations, it seems more trustworthy. BP on the other hand are purely there for satire - for people to comment on and make fun of RP. I only learnt that by subbing there. I like a balanced view to everything, so…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 06:39 AM
1

okay, maybe i'm wrong. send me some threads that suggest good BP reads Now this I can’t wait to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 06:18 AM
2

For some reason I thought you were a guy until I read this reply lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 09:20 AM
3

Hetero-male here. I’ve always found it hot fantasising about my partner being screwed over by someone else and her loosing her shit over it. But god forbid, if that happens in real life, hard next. In real life I’m monogamous af. My point is, fantasies aren’t real. It’s kind of like with the gaming situation. If you love headshots on Call of Duty or whatever FPS you play, it don’t mean you’re predisposed to actually go around shooting people in the head. But then again, you never know when peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 01:26 AM
1

Holy crap. Hope you red pilled the poor bugger.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 01:19 AM
2

He turned her down (smart guy), though soon after she found another guy and went out of her way to make me find out. Idc anymore though, especially now with the rose coloured goggles off.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 01:14 AM
1

You simply can’t rule out the friend all together. I’m not saying the friend is the only problem either, or that the friend in all cases would be a problem (which is why I said more often than not). As with anything, other factors need to be considered as well, like frequency of interaction, what information was shared, how they interact etc, and last but not least, good old gut feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 10:32 AM
1

Yes, makes her roll her eyes back and gasp for breath, smells/feels/tastes good. I think most guys wouldn't mind going down (ofc, there's going to be cultural/geo-social aspects that affect the validity of this statement).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 09:36 AM
1

Idk how this would translate to non-heterosexual relationships, but in heterosexual ones, where your partner starts discussing your relationship with and asking for advice from the opposite sex (to your partner), you're almost guaranteed for a shitty end. Worst thing is, it's not bad (hey, it's not cheating right) because boys and girls can be good "just-friends", but at the same time, it's faaarrrr from good because good "just-friends" now don't mean forever. More often than not, this good "jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 09:26 AM
1

I'm not trying to be a jerk I swear. But the following is more accurate, IMHO. Beauty is not objective. It never was, and never will be. Breast size nor firmness are accurate indicators of youth/fertility. Taking the mean/median of subjective beauty does not make the mean/median objective (i.e. those scientific/mathematical ratios you talk about). Those sites/subs again, only serve to provide a larger sample size that increases the accuracy of the mean/median, which as stated before are not obje…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 09:11 AM
2

Honestly, I’ve held a liberal political view for as long as I’ve understood politics (disclaimer, I’m only 23 though). But in recent times, seeing PC’s cancerous growth everywhere and how it’s dictating speech has made me realise I prefer having a more conservative political view. It’s also the reason I now completely distrust the motivation of feminism. Yes I said that. Done hiding in the shadows. I believe feminism and liberalism are part of the reason PC has gone out of control. Honestly, I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 06:38 AM
1

Here’s some... https://archive.is/jlg6M https://archive.is/nVmyr And to answer your question, yeah there is an undeniable presence of sexism in TRP. But the post evolves into more than just displaying TRP’s sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 03:15 PM
2

Thought you might ask. Here’s a pinned post for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/2nj2ed/my_compilation_of_posts_on_why_trp_is_sexist_and/?st=JH984KEE&sh=ed544c16 . Basically the A-Z list of “Exhibits” provides plenty of examples. I agree there is the odd one or two where the guy is just handling things stupidly, but most of them are of guys in toxic relationships that need out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:55 PM
1

I understand what TBP is meant to be. But when you have top level posts on the sub twisting stories about men trying to leave abusive/toxic relationships into seeming like TRP is ruining these implied “heavenly LTRs”, it’s not exactly “making fun of terpers”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:48 PM
1

Random bot is random
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:06 PM
6

She’s entitled to her preference just as everyone else commenting. No need for slighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 02:01 PM
1

It doesn’t literally translate to. It implies as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:45 PM
0

Having read some top rated TBP posts, guess I have to agree on this: I can't see TBP as anything but an ill constructed antithesis to RP
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:28 PM
3

Your foresight is uncanny.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 10:37 AM
1

What is your definition of "hypermasculine"? Is it analogous to RP's "Alpha"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 10:33 AM
1

I think having characteristics that are traditionally thought to be typical of or suitable for a woman/man is pretty clear cut for a definition. But hey, to each their own. I'm afraid I can't do any better than an english dictionary's definition of an english word.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 10:25 AM
1

Good idea. Just updated, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:18 AM
1

Chill sweetly. This is my first time here.
/r/askTRP15/05/18 03:39 AM
1

No, not that. I wouldn’t want the gym kicking me out (i.e., her complaining to the gym). If she’s friendly, then that’s a different story I suppose.
/r/askTRP15/05/18 01:59 AM
1

Not worth the risk IMO. I'd rather stay at my gym.
/r/askTRP15/05/18 01:52 AM
1

Can confirm - I have a southeast Asian origin. Guys loose their shit over breasts from where I come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:25 AM
1

That’s a very weak argument. I watch porn almost everyday. And I love the sight of a naked woman and playing with breasts (yes I’m that guy, surprise). And I’m sure most people that are sexually attracted to women would have a somewhat similar stance to naked women. But there’s a major difference between being naked in private and parading. P.S. Calling someone gay as an insult is kind of outdated, and IMHO a bit tasteless.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:21 AM
1

Yes, but the argument here is that humans have evolved in a way that breasts are sexual. There’s scientific evidence for it. Whether you believe in science and research isn’t my concern. But the sexualisation is the reasoning behind the idea of keeping breastfeeding out of direct public sight (i.e. not discreet/using a blanket). Like I said in my post, I got nothing against breastfeeding. That’s how nature intended it to be anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:08 AM
1

Ever heard the saying “out of sight, out of mind”?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:03 AM
4

Thinking they’re better than everyone else. Unreasonable expectations of society and people around them. Assuming and acting like everyone else around them owes them something. Double standards left, right and centre. Worst of all, mistaking entitlement for liberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:00 AM
1

One serves a biological purpose one doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 12:55 AM
13

Entitlement. It’s a bit rampant these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 01:12 PM
1

What would you say modern acceptable fashion is?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:28 AM
1

The same reason why we don't want kids seeing primary sex organs. Humans are curious and kids become sexually capable at an age that can be safely considered far from being an adult. I believe that kind of public exposure would have their minds distracted from doing kids things - studying and socialising with other kids etc. But if you don't like the idea of showing your boobs to your own kids after they reach a certain age, why should it then be okay to show them to other kids? Worse still, is …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:23 AM
1

I highly doubt that would be the outcome of that scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:09 AM
2

A man's chest and woman's breast are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:08 AM
1

Well yes, when the state regulates what you can and cant wear, it becomes very invasive. So yes, horrific and totalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:07 AM
1

Because I believe we have evolved in a way where breasts on a woman are sexual parts (yes, secondary). I would most certainly not want my future kids (or any kids for that matter), have to walk down the street to go to school or something and have to see that in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 08:05 AM
1

Not quite, legs don’t have to do anything with showcasing sexual maturity. I don’t see how they’re even remotely correlated...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 07:36 AM
1

Yes, I didn’t imply they are the same. Like I said in another comment, I’m fine with public breastfeeding as long as it’s discreet. I’m more concerned with parading.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 07:34 AM
1

Fair, I was just contemplating the implications of being publicly topless, and other children was something that came to my mind. What would be the consequences for these kids in public, forgetting grown ass men for a second.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 05:13 AM
1

Claim harassment. Publicity around supposed harassment has the potential to damage people’s livelihoods.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 04:57 AM
1

And the reasoning behind it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 04:55 AM
1

I meant the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 04:40 AM
1

Child
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 04:40 AM
1

You make a fair point with going topless and having to accept being “seen”. With breastfeeding, to what age would you say it’s acceptable to do so?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 02:51 AM
1

How do you propose society achieves that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 02:43 AM
1

Yes, but in a public setting? Being paraded?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 02:41 AM
1

The “I’m going to parade it, but you’re not allow to look at it because it’s harassment” part terrifies me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 02:40 AM
2

Bearish indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 01:41 AM
1

I give that idea a 5/7
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 01:25 AM
1

Yes the government telling what people shouldn’t wear and not wear is horrific and totalitarian. I hate and will always oppose that. But I don’t know if I’m cool with bear bare breasts being made societally acceptable. Breasts are different to chests, even if you argue about “big ones” on a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 01:17 AM
-1

I’d rather a screaming baby. And I’m being honest here not just to go against your point. But here’s where we can find common ground, if the breastfeeding happens without others having to look at your breasts/nipples in “public”, it might be the best compromise. For example, I’m in retail sales, and I’ve had a mum breastfeed her child while I was helping her get her new laptop up and running. But she did it with a blanket. While it was uncomfortable, it wasn’t bad as she wasn’t showing her asset…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:31 AM
-2

I am quite young and I’ve personally never had the experience of dealing with “my own hungry baby”. But is it that much of an inconvenience to find a more private area? Because when the word “public” is used I’m thinking in parks and buses and stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:22 AM
1

To clarify, breasts/nipples should not be sexualised?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:14 AM
0

How are they different?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:11 AM
2

In a lot of feminist/BP forums, “shouldn’t” is used rather frequently. So I just kept it that way in the discussion for the sake of transparency.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter