TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

drunknuckle Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by drunknuckle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Sort of. I thought you were saying they fear exposure of having bad arguments or that they understand they have nothing based in truth.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:23 PM
–

Disagree that it's a matter of truth. It's more to do with us vs them mentalities and winning at any cost. Feminism is considered a legitimate movement in the mainstream. MRA isn't. What does winning debates gain for feminism? It does nothing but legitimizes their opponents.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:50 PM
–

I wasn't saying what men should and shouldn't do.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:17 PM
–

It's a precedent for what? Is it a precedent for more women only screenings? Is it a precedent for men and women being forced to segregated by the government across all areas of society, forcing men into a lesser class? I'm not saying this doesn't create precedent for something. I disagree with where it is and where it's heading, which is suggested by the comparison of Jim Crow era segregation. It's a fallacy when you can't give me a good reason for why you believe it's heading in X direction.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:04 PM
–

I'm not endorsing anything. I have a problem with the comparison. This is slippery slope fallacy to me and your using a way worse situation to say that's where we are heading. What good reason do you have that this will lead to that? It may lead to more theaters having women only screenings. And that can only go so far. I would think a business would lose money the more it excludes half the population. The reality is this was a publicity stunt by a movie theater, and it may happen again, but I n…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:17 PM
–

Are you asking if I'm cool with the sham legal doctrine "separate but equal" that justified segregation? That a state or local government can require racial segregation as long as things were equal, but in practice they weren't equal? No, I'm not for that.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:52 PM
–

Male behavior tends to dominate spaces and intimidate women. Women are perhaps weaker in a lot of ways, but weaker is not the same as weak. Which makes sense why they would want a women's only gym, but I'm pretty sure the movie screening is more about celebrating the rare occurrence of a female movie superhero directed by a female filmmaker.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:36 PM
–

What the fuck. There is no comparison between this and Jim Crow segregation. Do you know why that segregation was so wrong? The unequal distribution of resources. Black children either went to a underfunded inferior schools or forced to not go to school at all in towns that could not afford to have two schools. It's not just about principles. It's also about the effects. What effects of wonder women screenings compare the to the affect of school segregation during Jim Crow era?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:23 PM
–

Okay. There has been a men's only gym in America. It was called Cuts Fitness for Men. It looks like it might be closed now.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:39 PM
–

What's wrong with a women only gym? I'm for men only gyms.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:28 PM
–

How does women only in any way equate "diversity"? Instead of a diverse group consisting of all genders, it's only women; it's the absolute opposite of diversity. Diversity in a larger sense. Not within the screening. Within society. From their perspective, males dominate the media and a lot of spaces, so adding a drop of women only space would increase the diversity of the overall environment. I think from their perspective, controlling space to exclude men would be the only way to ensure men w…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter