TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dslybrowse Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by dslybrowse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Upvote for proving my point. Literally nothing of substance in any of your posts. GG have a nice day.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:21 PM
1

Agreed. Of course it's been stated, and some people actually believe it should be the case, but those people are indeed morons. It's just very difficult to discuss real issues when people are constantly assuming everyone must be at one extreme or the other. Just look at some of the responses to my posts. Nothing I have said suggests men should be treated unfairly, only that there obviously has to be SOME process by which police determine what happened. And that this process should apply 'both wa…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:20 PM
0

They literally can't comprehend it. Some people cannot entertain 'thought experiments' where you set aside what you believe is true to examine an issue from a new perspective. Truly some people are incapable of this, for whatever reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:17 PM
0

Looking through your post history is pretty sad, dude. You're literally, to a tee, a SJW feminist moron in a different body. Unable to form any rational thoughts yourself, you just spew the same fucking propaganda over and over again. You seem consumed with this issue of perceived inequality, which DOES exist for sure, but doesn't need to define you or run your life. It's literally all you do, post nonsense about men versus women, alongside "funny" shit that 12 year olds insult each other with o…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:15 PM
0

You're irrelevant.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:01 PM
2

Flip the genders, and my post applies 100%. It's your fault you can't set aside your preconceptions and NOT assume I'm some idiot, not mine. If I accused a girl of something, I'd want the police to take me seriously unless/until it came to light there was no evidence to support the accusation. Literally, 100% the same statement, with the genders flipped. Go nuts. Literally the only one here making an issue of this is you. Do you need me to rewrite me post with the genders flipped to prove someth…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 03:00 PM
0

Thanks for thrusting your own biases onto me! We're literally talking about a case of a girl accusing a man, god forbid I use the current topic as an example. That makes me a "pussy worshipper"? You people are fucking deluded, why do I even try. Go fuck yourself, not even honouring this bullshit with a real response.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 02:55 PM
-1

That's no different than police wrongly thinking you're a suspect in a robbery and arresting you, is it? If one person said "I saw that guy skulking around back and he looks like the person you describe", you might get wrongly arrested based on one person's misleading statement. Ideally you get cleared quickly as the police question you and can't find more evidence to support it. Same with this case: they should have "arrested" him (if that's the most gentle way of coercing answers from someone,…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 12:08 PM
46

"Taken seriously" != "believed". Which I'm pretty sure is the actual point the people you're misrepresenting are advocating for. All reports of rape should definitely be taken seriously. The issue is just that some people refuse to see how "taking it seriously" doesn't mean automatically arresting the accused, applying extrajudicial punishments (like expulsion, etc), and forgetting that whole innocent before proven guilty thing. Cuz I'm totally on the side of actual justice, but how you phrased …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 06:34 PM
0

Stop just doubling down. Stop, and breath. Reread their posts from a point of view of "this person honestly isn't blaming men". See if you can understand that, hey, you actually can read it from that point of view. That interpretation of the words written does in fact exist. You will absolutely see that the slant you're reading is entirely self-generated. If you insist on finding some evidence of man-hating, well you're going to see it in every negative comment about men. But that's a preconceiv…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 02:17 PM
1

People are just reading what they want into it. Nowhere did you come across as placing this at the feet of men. "How men behave around beautiful women" is absolutely the reason for her behaviour, some people just can't read that without taking offense to it as if it's a criticism of men. It's not (or, doesn't have to be).
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 02:15 PM
1

Agreed. She could be a nice person. I have my own standards after all, about women I'd consider dating. Where she falls flat, is the fact that she thinks it's both reasonable and somehow virtuous to flat-out list them. I would NEVER propose even a single one of my "criteria" to a potential date. Not even something as innocent as "you should probably like cats, because I have two of them", because that's not up to THEM to fit my preconception of some perfect partner. Go get to know them, learn if…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 02:11 PM
1

To be fair isn't this just a rebound off the way it has been for the prior X years? "Your husband deserves your best" kind of thinking of the WW1-2 era? Men were to keep their wives in line, working for their benefit. Women were to keep their head down and bear the inconveniences that came with the privilege of being with her man. Obviously not advocating/reminiscing about either. It's interesting, as I near 30, the way your view of the world, other people and yourself changes with time. Relatio…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 02:05 PM
-1

If you compare it instead to men who want their women to be idealized sex workers/maids, it's not really all that different. The genders 'value' different things in that regard, but both sides can be equally shitty towards reducing the other to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 02:01 PM
2

Oh absolutely, I mean case and point here I am :p. Didn't meant for that rant to be directed at you, more just continuing the discussion about the analogy. The number of times I've laid out what I consider to be a top notch analogy, only to have some aspect of it that is completely besides the point get used as ammo against it, is infuriating given that's not even how analogies are meant to be interpreted. It's a touchy subject for me, apparently.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:47 PM
3

I hate this, and I see it all the time. Analogies aren't supposed to be 1:1, airtight, completely-relating-from-every-perspective-to-the-original-point situations. They're supposed to highlight at least one fundamental similarity between the two situations, yet so many people are quick to say "here's one way in which your analogy is different, therefore it's completely moot". Well no, it fucking isn't. They're highlighting that it would be unfair to do such a thing, not in any way suggesting tha…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:40 PM
14

You know those are the raw numbers that everyone has issues with directly attributing to the wage gap myth, right? Like you're basically pointing to the 77% number and going "see!? the 77% thing does exist!!" You are not accounting for ANY factors with that information, it's just raw data. This is literally the issue behind this and why it's so hard to stomp out, because apparently people like you can't accept rationalization and reasoning and only take that to be "attacks on stances we don't li…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:13 PM
4

The original vague "studies" are basically considered common knowledge, at least around here, at this point in time. The onus is now on people who want to challenge that view to provide their accountable sources. Initially, our current theory of gravity would have required sources to back up its existence. Nowadays it's common knowledge and if you wanted to refute it or propose an alternate theory, you need sources. You can't just say "well, 'gravity exists' is a positive claim, so YOU have to c…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:59 PM
1

Ah I'm sure there are exceptions. I was mostly just being facetious, since they'd basically be asking "do I buy this or not?", to which they have an obvious preference.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 07:06 PM
9

Who even asks that? Of course they'll say it's fresh.. It's like asking "I'm wondering if we should eat here.. is your food good, or is it bad?" "Oh, it's good? Awesome!"
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 05:41 PM
11

Be careful with dichotomies, it's easy to assume you've covered all the bases when in fact you haven't.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:08 PM
7

And Amy typed all that on instagram. People type shit, what's your point? Can't get through it all?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 12:23 PM
3

First of all, you don't have to reply. That one realization will make reddit a hell of a lot nicer for you, as you won't feel obligated every time you see a little orange icon up there. I used to get anxiety around having to constantly reply to people who I mostly considered as misunderstanding me; the messages in my inbox forced me to spend more time refuting claims I really didn't want to have to keep going back to. Eventually you realize you can just not respond and life goes on for everybody…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:00 PM
1

TIL people getting stabbed are "just letting the assailant stab them". I mean after all, they definitively didn't stop them, right? Therefore they "let them".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:12 PM
23

Same with "guys". I ask my girlfriend "what are you guys up to tonight" when she's hanging out with exclusively other women! Unfortunately I think a lot of 'feminists' and/or people looking for a fight see this in the wrong light. Whereas I might think "you are being welcomed under a previously exclusive term" and it's kind of a positive outlook, they might interpret it as "you are forcing your term onto us and eradicating our terms". Which is I guess a valid way of looking at it, but I don't th…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/17 03:06 PM
1

I'm just being skeptical, as people say shit like this all the time to feel like they're part of something. If nobody questions it, bullshit can take off. I guess I'm glad you're reinforcing what you saw (despite it being unfortunate this poster was found anywhere else). You simply rebuking my post is enough for me to be more inclined to believe you.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:15 PM
1

Which school? Because by all indications this was posted on a single university campus for a couple weeks tops, eight years ago. Interesting how several people in this thread "have seen this exact poster IRL".
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter