TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

duchess_jackanapes Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by duchess_jackanapes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Obviously a joke. I know you know this, OP, but it's sad that the "original OP" on Facebook didn't catch on. Of course women aren't the only ones able to get raped (although I have a few male friends who would disagree with that, trying to save face? I don't really know why), but even so, if someone honestly believes that telling a rapist "not to rape" is going to work, they have a 0% grasp on any concept of psychology. If that were the case, it's like wondering why every murder victim ever didn…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 10:38 PM
22

...and oh yeah, contraception.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:48 AM
1

like I said, I don't disagree with you. however, if a guy wanted sex from a woman and didn't get on top of her and try to force penetration - resorting to beating her out of frustration instead - he would probably be charged with domestic violence or sexual battery. the law has MANY different charges relating to beatings/molestation/sexual assault/rape... I'm just saying that the law probably wouldn't see it the way you do, because it tends to be hyper-specific.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:05 AM
1

I don't disagree with you, I just didn't read anything that said she tried to force his penis into her.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:48 AM
2

you obviously missed the sarcasm that was implied there...
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:27 AM
1

I agree she should perhaps be charged with a form of sexual assault/domestic violence, but I wouldn't expect them to charge her for attempted rape, unless she tried to penetrate him somehow. Maybe she did and I'm just missing that part of the story? Anyway, what a fucking psycho. I wouldn't want to sleep with her either.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:26 AM
1

wow, I stand corrected. so many riveting and productive things you've done with your life! /s 24 hours of silence... sounds about right.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:57 AM
2

I suppose I see what you're saying, however, rape is much more than just "the physical"... the way I understand it, it's deeply emotionally and psychologically scarring as well. don't worry, I don't think you're trying to make a case for rapists!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:41 AM
2

that's okay, I don't blame you. thanks for your response! :)
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:22 PM
2

abusive mothers, maybe. but I still think your analogy is way too far-fetched. we're talking about parents (mothers or fathers) who withhold money from their children, which is much different than beating or torturing them. abuse and beatings are perhaps more akin to rape than being a deadbeat parent, but the connections end there.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:21 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:37 AM
0

no, I fully understand how some "feminazis" have suggested changing the spelling of "women" to "womyn." thus, not over my head - you just added an extra y, because you're not even fully aware of the issues you apparently fight so strongly against. NICE TRY THOUGH. also - way to avoid my question. it wasn't rhetorical. go ahead, answer it! enlighten all of the Reddit communities with your many intellectual endeavors and valiant world experiences! I won't hold my breath, but we are dying to know.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:20 AM
0

just showed this thread to a conservative MALE friend of mine, and he and I had a good laugh at your expense. he was impressed at your expansive vocabulary, which includes words such as: "projecting," "comprehension," "wymynz" (we will give you credit for this one despite your horrible spelling, but just for the record, it's "women's"*), "despot," and "colors." ...good job! I vaguely remember seeing some of these vocab words on my middle school entrance exams! you must be so proud that everyone …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:29 AM
0

my favorite thing about you is how you quote something I've said, and then state something completely irrelevant and/or insult me. take how you quoted me on voting for Bush, for example. you can't handle the fact that you were wrong - the fact that I surprised you by revealing to you that I voted for him - so what do you do? you tell me that you feel sorry for me for "having an underlying contempt for men," which has NOTHING TO DO WITH ME VOTING FOR BUSH. the best part? then you try to school ME…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:01 AM
1

thanks for your answer! :) I agree with the part about the school. my uncle was forced to pay out of pocket for my cousin's private education, when he deemed it a bit unnecessary (they could have at least decided on something more affordable). but then again, his ex is/was crazy.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:33 AM
1

lol, you're probably kidding? but if not, I disagree; I was planned (and not just by my mother). and I've had conversations with plenty of men who have expressed a blatant interest in having kids, some have even wanted them even though their SO didn't.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:05 AM
2

Yes. I deny this is what I am claiming. I deny this because my original question reads: ...end child support? just an honest question here: wouldn't most men WANT to partake in and/or feel obligated to financially support their own child(ren)? there is a big difference between asking if someone would feel like they WANTED to do something, versus being FORCED to do something. my apologies if the "feel obligated" part threw you off (no sarcasm, I promise). I didn't mean it the way you interpreted …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:13 AM
0

this is classic. I don't hate men, most of my friends are male, I have loving men in my family as well as a loving boyfriend - and I love them because they're the OPPOSITE OF YOU. I read you as a pathetic, ignorant, loser piece of shit who is probably upset you're still a virgin. please stop hiding behind your "big words" and shitty analogies on Reddit; if you want to tell lies, get a job writing fiction (but first - learn how to write). also, I laughed out loud at how you assumed I "blamed Bush…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:04 AM
2

you try again, you misunderstood me. I was agreeing with you. I wasn't referring to the article; I was referring to the quote you linked to this "Jason" person. sorry, I should have clarified.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:53 AM
2

this has to do with the kids. not her. I don't care to make you a slave, because that would require me giving a shit. I was just asking a fucking question. RELAX
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:49 AM
1

no, wrong. read it again. I never ONCE said that a man should be obliged to cover all of his child's expenses. stop trying to incorporate your own damage because it's making you take this way too personally, when it wasn't intended to be at all. btw - "all other men with visitation support theirs"? yeah? do you have proof of that? that's a pretty broad generalization right there. I would like to see the stats on that one. there are shitty fathers just like there are shitty mothers. I guess that …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:47 AM
1

not really sure where "someone else's kids" got brought into this?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:43 AM
1

I hope you're not using sarcasm, because I actually wasn't. I really did mean it as a genuine question, and I really am sorry for what you had to deal with.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:42 AM
3

I agree with that
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:39 AM
0

your idea sounds like a good one, but like you said, in a perfect world. almost like welfare but specifically for children from their parents? I'm sorry about what your wife did. that sucks! :( I would have been pissed too. modeling lessons aren't a necessity. she could have at least asked you first, but I guess lunatics are called lunatics for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:41 PM
0

ps. you made it sound like in your situation you are paying 100% of the cost to raise your children. is that true? I do agree that 50% is fair, so long as there is something in place to ensure it is going to the children instead of the mother. I'm sorry about your 4 days of custody. I consider that a separate issue, but not saying I agree with it, like I said I don't know the extent of your situation. feel free to explain if you'd like.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:38 PM
1

I'm avoiding the question? You are avoiding the answer. I didn't say he should. exactly. sorry, I didn't realize this thread was specifically revolving around you and your situation. If you want to go into the details of your exact scenario on here, then please, feel free. I'm not going to answer about your specific case with such a low amount of background context. I don't know anything about the nature of your marriage or divorce, or how good of a mother and father the two of you are, so how c…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:35 PM
0

I don't see you discussing Men's Rights, I see you attempting to dissect every fraction of my sentences in order to have them fit your own assumptions about what I've said. how is that working for you? not well, I can see that. I don't think there's anything wrong with telling women to be careful when they're out; I just don't think there's anything wrong with raising sons who know that raping people isn't an acceptable part of society. Change needs to happen on both ends. do you get that? I'm s…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:24 PM
3

I meant it's a good answer because it's showing his actual opinion without him being a complete asshole about it, like many posters on this are unable to do. I didn't say I agreed or disagreed with him. I don't agree or disagree with things I don't know enough about before I know enough about them. so in that respect, yes, it was a good answer - and so was yours. I appreciate the opinions.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:15 PM
1

that sucks, there should obviously be checks in place to ensure that. thanks for your answer
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:13 PM
2

I doubt you're as smart as you pretend to be, but hey... he was saying that child support laws are biased against men, and only in cases where the mothers are extremely shitty and bad (ie. cracked out prostitute) does the father have a chance at fair custody or child support laws working in his favor. pretty obvious. did you need me to spell that out for you?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:10 PM
4

THANK YOU. so many people on the defense on here! I agree with you so much.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:08 PM
2

that's a good response
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:07 PM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:06 PM
2

thank you for your kind response. I was asking an honest question and don't appreciate all the crazy posters on here who attack me just because they assume I'm against them. I was asking an honest question. I am open to discussion about how people think it's good or bad, because I'm open-minded. I am WAY less likely to listen to people who automatically jump on the defense and berate me. It's not a very good way for those people to get their points across because I just stop listening. I've neve…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:05 PM
2

I didn't say he should "support the children in full." in another thread I mentioned "equal financial contributions" between the ex-spouses. nowhere did I say that the man should give 100% while she gives 0%. I was only talking about 50-50.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:00 PM
1

that makes sense
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:59 PM
2

that would be nice, wouldn't it? I agree with you, no need to get snarky.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:58 PM
1

I agree with you. but if you notice, I'm not the one here doing the original assuming. the OP posted something about "ending child support"...this automatically assumes the father doesn't have custody. I'm not saying I agree with it.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:58 PM
4

no. please stop adding context where there is none. of course a (good) father should have more than a financial role in his child's life. but it just so happens that this thread is specifically relative to child support, not all aspects of raising a child.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:56 PM
2

I was following you until the whole "should we make rape legal" argument. I think it's a bit crass of you to compare rape to child support payments. I agree with the rest of what you said, though, so thanks for your reply.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:55 PM
-1

if it's asked and answered, why are you answering again? idiot and it's really sweet that you think I give half a shit about you telling me to leave.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:53 PM
0

no, but if you could learn how to read, you might've noticed that the OP posted specifically about "actually helping WOMEN protect themselves from rapists." if you have a problem with that, take it up with him. I know that men can be raped and never once denied that they could. I know male victims of sexual assault so I would appreciate you keeping your mouth shut when you try to make asinine assumptions like that. thanks for putting words in my mouth though, I really appreciate it.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:52 PM
0

so what? just like women are told to exercise caution, men are told to treat women (and other men) well. no one is saying you're automatically a rapist because you're a man. just like you're not automatically a rape victim because you're a woman. they're telling women not to become victims and men not to have unconsensual sex. SO?? get over yourself. 90-something% of all rapists against male and female victims happen to be male.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:50 PM
2

fair enough. thanks for your answer :)
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:59 AM
8

no, that is a good answer. I've never been married/divorced/had a child so my question was meant to be taken at face value. thanks!
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:57 AM
-5

holy shit. are YOU serious? what don't you understand? I was speaking English the last time I checked. THE ASSUMPTION HERE IS THAT THE MAN PLANNED FOR - AND WANTED - AND ULTIMATELY HAD - THIS CHILD WITH HIS WIFE. please let me know if I need to simplify this any further for you. I am not talking about men who didn't have a say, or their crazy wives or gfs lied about contraception, or shoved sperm inside them to get secretly pregnant. honestly I don't know what is so difficult about considering t…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:25 AM
0

wow, JabCross. one person is being raped and the other is told to stop being a rapist. you're right, no comparison here... seriously. cry me a river.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:20 AM
4

thank you your answer! I wasn't trying to come onto this forum and troll, just had a sincere question. I appreciate this reply.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:11 AM
-3

to be exact, I specifically said: "anyone who is 'unwilling' to care for their child (that they supposedly wanted in the first place) should just do the world a favor and not procreate." perhaps you disregarded my parenthesis. I used clarity there for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:57 AM
6

yes, I agree. but I cannot really emphasize much more than I already have tried to about the scenario that my question was based on, which implied that the woman in question wasn't a "back-stabbing" bitch. thus, in the case I suggested you wouldn't be "rewarding her." I'm assuming the ex-couple is rational, the divorce is amicable (maybe they just grew apart), perhaps they have shared custody and they divide their possessions amongst them equally. I'm getting kind of tired of repeating myself he…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:53 AM
-9

"forced to do it at gunpoint" ...a bit extreme, no? sure, there is a difference between those two things, HOWEVER, that doesn't mean that they don't overlap. if I had a child not only would I want to provide for them, but I would simultaneously feel obligated to provide for them. that's what being a responsible parent is about, as opposed to a deadbeat parent (note: I did not say deadbeat father). anyone who is "unwilling" to care for their child (that they supposedly wanted in the first place) …
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:45 AM
1

there are BILLIONS of scenarios that could fit any particular divorce situation, and I tried to make my question extremely simple by implying that it was to be assumed that both parents wanted the children and the mother happened to be a decent person. my opinion will change with the situation, but like I said, there are way too many different complexities that one could bring into this and thus my perspective is variable. long answer short, I'm not just automatically "for" child support in any …
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:40 AM
-1

I am basing my question solely on the scenario I provided (everyone involved is being rational). I am not delving into the realm of crazy divorced bitches, bastardized or unwanted children, deadbeat fathers, etc at 5:30 in the morning.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:34 AM
8

I'm sorry for what you endured, however, that doesn't mean all mothers would do that. and personally I believe that having a child together is one of the biggest "strings attached" you can have. If I had a child with my partner and we later grew apart and divorced, I wouldn't randomly turn into an evil person and dick him and my own child over. Being a bad wife is one thing (I'm not condoning it), but being a bad mother is another. IMO, you have to be kind of a bad person all around to not put y…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:56 AM
3

ps. thanks for answering! :)
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:49 AM
10

just playing the devil's advocate and giving her the benefit of the doubt, since you know, there are good women out there. hopefully there are less unfair situations in amicable divorces where the ex-spouses make as equal a contribution to their children's financial well-being as possible.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:49 AM
120

...end child support? just an honest question here: wouldn't most men want to partake in and/or feel obligated to financially support their own child(ren)? this is assuming, of course, that the divorced wife isn't crazy and will actually spend the money on the kids and also contribute financially to them herself.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:14 AM
4

it's kind of hard to argue this when you're dealing with facts vs. opinions. the author(s) of this article clearly cited several legitimate sources - many of which seem to be based in science or medicine. furthermore, the author(s) cautiously avoided making generalizations by saying "higher levels of testosterone [...] GENERALLY cause greater levels of aggression," and so forth, suggesting that this obviously does not imply that "all men" have "more aggressive, uncontrollable emotions."
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:19 AM
1

they can, but it's obviously less common.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:12 AM
5

since when does the term "domestic violence" imply violence against women ONLY? it doesn't. rather, "domestic violence against women" implies violence against women only. "domestic violence" as a phrase by itself is merely suggestive of abusive situations that typically occur at home or within tight family dynamics. sorry, but your own assumption that "domestic violence" is a term solely pertinent to females only serves to justify and enforce exactly what you seem to disagree with.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:03 AM
-2

just your title alone is obnoxious. "they say that like WE NEVER LET THEM do anything!" honestly it sounds like two parents discussing their children. it's rude and offensive. you don't need to "let" a woman do anything. she is a person with her own free will, and so are you. hopefully you have something better to do with your time.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:16 PM
2

that's pretty ridiculous, let alone hypocritical. call me what you want (an egalitarian?), but I do support "equal" rights. that means that both men and women deserve platforms for discussing the issues they feel most relevant to them. however, I do favor and respect these platforms much less when such groups turn them into misogynistic or misandrist bashing sessions. I don't see why there has to be a bunch of hateful venting on either side to make any sort of steps towards "progress" or fulfill…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:52 PM
1

my bad, I didn't originally realize her age. so it is probably true that she is lacking a great deal of maturity. but even so, when I was 16 years old, I still knew enough to say "yes" when I wanted something and "no" when I didn't. pretty sure those are some of most people's first words.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:32 PM
1

because it made me laugh, that's why. (thanks)
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:28 PM
1

so since you agree that "clothes make no difference," despite the fact that you just made all of us assume some weird biased comparison between her dress/behavior to you "waving a wad of cash around at an inner city bus stop"... let me ask you this. say she was dressed "normally," kept to herself, and was completely sober - and then got raped. meanwhile, you're standing across the bus station from her, with your money and wallet away, completely sober, and you get mugged. okay - where is the per…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:24 PM
5

I'm pretty sure the article you posted is both pro-men and women. so I'm not really sure what the issue is here, or why anyone is even offended at this. not only does it blatantly suggest that most men AREN'T rapists and shouldn't be presumed to lack self control, but it also avoids blaming the victim. it's a win-win situation. so why are people bitching about it?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:17 PM
458

that's absurd. I'm a huge advocate for women's rights and even I can admit that. unless you're fucking a psychic, how the hell is a guy able to read your mind - or know that you don't want to have sex if you're not giving him the red light? sorry, but saying "stop" in your head doesn't count. grow up and communicate your feelings like an adult should. don't blame him just for trying. you're only a victim of your own inaction.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:43 AM
1

so someone got a C- on a women's studies assignment. next please.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter