| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is the "That" in TRP's version of AWALT?correct answer | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/15 08:14 AM |
| 2 | Is male attractiveness more rare than female?Is avoiding heart disease and diabetes not a goal? Was the minimum exercise requirement not devised as a means of achieving that goal? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/04/15 12:24 AM |
| 2 | Is male attractiveness more rare than female?Yeah, that's a pretty low bar for self-improvement. All exercise involves time spent. That said, the fact that this metric doesn't differentiate between performing exercises with skilled technique and aimless flailing makes it pretty worthless, IMO. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 10:56 PM |
| 5 | PSA: A rule of thumb for debate that NO ONE SEEMS TO BE AWARE OFIn contrast, in females, the wiring goes between the left and right hemispheres, suggesting that they facilitate communication between the analytical and intuition. The female connections likely facilitate integration of the analytic and sequential processing modes of the left hemisphere with the spatial, intuitive information processing modes of the right side. Ironically, the article you linked doesn't support your "interesting fact" at all. It suggests that women's brains relate analytical pr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 10:39 PM |
| 2 | Is male attractiveness more rare than female?the required amount of exercise each week (2.5 hours of light cardio, or 1.25 hours of intense training) Required for what, exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 08:17 PM |
| 1 | The Academic Study FallacyBut that's standard debate. In order to further debate, you add information to it. Have you had a debate that does not involve it? I've got no beef with adding information - it's vital to debate. It also constitutes new premises to be attacked or accepted. And the way in which debaters will handle new premises depends on premises they have already internalized ("perspectives", as you called them), and whether they rationalize or analyze in the face of cognitive dissonance. Logic's form is a cons… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 05:26 AM |
| 1 | The Academic Study FallacyBy this logic, every belief that either debater has must be accepted as a premise to have an argument. Not every belief, only the beliefs which are central to the debate. Let's have an altruist and a utilitarian debate on a premise like: When you are faced with a situation where saving one person's life would sacrifice another person's life, what do you do in such a situation? Sure. Altruist: -"saving one person's life would sacrifice another person's life" -Helping others is good; maximize help… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 04:29 AM |
| 1 | The Academic Study FallacyA utilitarian identifies as such because he/she has accepted certain premises (e.g. "an action is moral if it maximizes utility") which align with utilitarianism. Ditto for an altruist (e.g. "an action is moral if it helps someone else"). Why? How deep does your understanding need to be? Because this person's willingness to accept a new premise depends on how well it fits with his/her already-accepted premises, and how he/she deals with cognitive dissonance (rationalization vs. analysis). In you… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 03:29 AM |
| 1 | The Academic Study FallacyFor example, a utilitarian is not going to use the same rationale as an altruist. To assign one form of logic as wrong and one as right is to inherently bias the argument in favor of one party. These are not different forms of logic; they are different premises. Important difference. You have to be able to understand the construction of a premise before you attack its flaws. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/15 12:02 AM |
| 1 | The Academic Study FallacyThe problem with Redpillers is they don't use critical thought in their arguments. Got a study fer that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/04/15 11:24 PM |
| 1 | Defining Femisinsm and TRPWhat's the alternative? Criticizing honestly and thoughtfully, and removing name-calls from one's vocabulary. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/04/15 07:28 AM |
| 1 | Comfort ChallengeNice. A similar motive has recently led me to try sleeping on the floor. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/03/15 06:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter