TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dude21862004 Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by dude21862004 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-10

I know I'm gonna get downvoted for this, but: This is a low effort shit post if I've ever seen one. You have a picture of a paragraph of text, with zero identifying features, watermarks, or really any kind of proof or verifiability of any kind. This could've been typed up in Word 5 minutes before you posted it. It's also some of the dumbest content I've ever seen. I mean, really, this is your big issue with feminism? That they protested a female stripper and not a male stripper? Yeah, ok great, …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:04 PM
2

Honestly, not true. Women value the "spark" or emotional connection far more than physical attraction. I've seen some beautiful women with some busted dudes because they felt the "spark." Also seen "average" women turn down hot dudes because of no spark. Also plenty of men and women out there who only value money, power, or luxury, and no spark or physical attraction can compete.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:47 PM
1

You'd be very surprised. Men and women are strikingly similar once the superficial differences are stripped away. They aren't fuckin' aliens dude.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:29 AM
1

By the same token, if you don't think men are superficial you have some learning to do. Most people are superficial douche canoes, that's just human nature. And your last sentence is my point, exactly. I doubt these women are even average, but even if they are, they don't owe you anything much less physical attraction or attention. You also don't owe them anything. Tbh, I have no doubt, after a short conversation, these women are picking up on your internal attitude, even if just subconsciously,…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:20 AM
1

Wait wait, you mention making good money like it's a part of your draw, yet you don't bring it up to the women you're pursuing. Yet somehow they're superficial bitches (at least that's the vibe) because they aren't interested in you even though you make good money? Buddy, I'd say your problem is more than likely your attitude. It definitely bleeds out when you talk to these women, especially over long periods of time. You seem like you think these women are obligated to go on a date with you, bu…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:01 AM
33

I stopped editing Wikipedia when I found a grammar error and poor sentence structure. I fixed it without changing the meaning or the facts included, so it was the same info after I edited it, it just looked cleaner/was more accurate. They changed it back within a day.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:34 PM
1

Except her only charge was "false report of a felony" so I'm guessing they were trying to point out that she wouldn't have even been in trouble because it's only illegal if you have HIV/AIDS. So, it turns out, "If “all” she did was falsely accuse a man, she may not be facing any charges" is completely incorrect, and that's exactly the reason she's facing charges.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:31 AM
-5

You can't decry someone's behavior and then use that behavior as an excuse to do it back.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:15 AM
-21

This doesn't work in reality. People are different, they have different cultures, hell the USA is a swathe of different cultures that don't adhere to anything other than where you live. Sometimes it's ok to discriminate. You don't let pedophiles get close to schools. You don't leave rapists alone with potential victims. You don't leave children alone with violent/crazy people. Women only gyms shouldn't bother anyone. What should bother you is the inability to create a men only gym. It's like com…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:09 AM
3

This dude obviously smacked a bald eagle once.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:12 AM
6

If she had a job throughout: That's bullshit, he is not responsible for supporting her just because they were in a relationship for a long time. If she didn't have a job and he essentially payed for everything: Then yeah, 10 years is a long time, but depending on age and dependency it might not be that long. Especially if he bought her the house.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:08 AM
4

The problem is you guys are downvoting this guy and dismissing her entire comment because it contains "toxic masculinity." But she's clearly saying what they call "toxic masculinity" is just bottled up emotions turned to anger. She also identifies the original woman's behavior as part of the cause. Any literate person can see she is being supportive of men in general, and decrying the original woman's behavior. But she literally added "toxic masculinity" in quotes and all (which can be used to i…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:07 AM
5

Prison in the US has been proven, multiple times, to be detrimental to rehabilitation for the vast majority of people. What she did was insensitive, even evil, but there's a distinct possibility she was just stupid and young and didn't understand the consequences of her actions. At least with this outcome she will be forced to go to therapy, she'll have to deal with probation for 10 years which is no small burden, and it's likely she'll fuck up and go to jail anyways. The odds of her rehabilitat…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:00 AM
0

Women don't owe you a date or their time.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 07:34 PM
5

If 85% of men think they need to buy dinner, then the vast majority of dates a woman goes on the men insist or automatically pay the tab. Of course they expect men to pay for dinner, it's what they're used to, it's what they expect to happen from experience. You're putting the onus on women to stop expecting men to pay for dinner when both sides are playing the same game. And it will never end, because no one hates a free meal and paying the tab is the easiest way for a man to flex and peacock f…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:55 AM
2

But it's not really an issue. It's a trade. For some women it's a scam they're pulling for free food, but that's not generally acceptable behavior, especially among the kind of women you'd want to date. You pay for dinner, they give you their time and a chance to court them. For most women, though, it's not "pay for dinner" so much as "show them a good time." If a woman's idea of a good time is fancy dinners and expensive stuff and yours isn't that just means you're not a good match and try else…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:40 PM
-1

It's only a problem if you aren't a good match with the person you're dating. If you are she'll either understand, or you'll be willing to follow the simple math of: I pay for food = she kisses me good night The only exception would be the women who use dates for free food with no intention of a follow up date or a relationship. There are women like that, but why would you want to date someone like that in the first place? And how are they a part of men's rights? At most they're in the same tier…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:15 PM
-3

I'm not going to extremes right away, I'm giving examples of things that matter far more. There are serious issues men face and threads like this are the exact things they use to trivialize our arguments. I'm not saying it isn't relevant, it's just not important. There are plenty of women who don't mind paying, or going on cheap dates. This is a minor issue among minor issues, and really dating is a negotiation in many aspects. You pay for dinner, she blows you on the way home. You show her a go…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:11 PM
13

Gender roles are not a right, nor are they set in stone. What you expect is irrelevant, and what they expect is also irrelevant. You're basically just talking about preference here, and that has nothing to do with your rights. You're having the opposite conversation as FDS when they talk about "high value men" paying for dinner. "If he doesn't pay he's not worth your time" - Them "If she expects you to pay she's not worth your time" - This thread This sub is about advocating men's rights not the…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:17 PM
43

This whole thread reminds me of FDS and their "low value male" and "micro aggression" theories. Men, and women, have real issues that need real solutions. Bitching about paying for a date is so far down on the list of priorities it shouldn't even be mentioned in the same context as Men's Rights. Here's a thought, if you don't like it then don't do it. It's really that simple.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:21 PM
1

Nope, but insulting women as a whole and all these little straw men arguments are. That was just an example of the hypocrisy I constantly see on this sub. One comment section is whining about how women want what they can't have, meanwhile on the FDS type subs, the exact same argument with the genders reversed is happening. Is that what you want? To be like them? To argue about stupid bullshit while creating straw men to attack for being men/women? Do you think making broad, generalized, insultin…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:17 PM
2

Why aren't you on there complaining towards them? Because I'm a guy, and I don't feel the need to tear women down in order to build myself up. Funny how you call it "concern trolling" when really I'm just pointing out blatant hypocrisy. "All men are rapists!" How could you say such a thing? "All women are rapists!" Bravo, you brave man!
/r/MensRights01/12/21 09:18 PM
13

Used to be this sub focused on men getting treated better by society, now I'm constantly seeing straw men and insults directed at women as a whole. That attitude is no better than the chicks on female dating strategy.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:54 PM
1

My whole argument has been said, and I don't feel the need to continue explaining my point. Men and women are remarkably similar for all their differences. That there are differences between men and women is without doubt, but for every flaw you "generalize" towards women an equal flaw can be used to "generalize" towards men. We don't like it when they say "All men are rapists." Why is it ok for us to say "...a women is truly never happy with what she has she’s only happy with what she can get" …
/r/MensRights21/10/21 01:37 AM
1

Dude look at the comments this chain was inspired by. "...a women is truly never happy with what she has she’s only happy with what she can get." How the fuck is that not demonizing an entire gender? As to your other point, if they enjoy it why does it matter? You think men aren't doing shit so they can get positive attention from people? All the shit ya'll are talking about is either common in both men and women, or uncommon and, again, effects both genders.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 11:35 PM
1

Ok, and you think somehow women don't do things like make up and shopping recreationally? They spend more on those things because they're more likely to enjoy doing those things. It just seems to me that for all the complaints I see on here about "femcels" and twoxchromosomes that many of ya'll like to do the exact same shit you complain about. I.e. Demonizing an entire gender based on what amounts to hearsay. Portraying the opposite gender as somehow morally inferior. And over what? This argume…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 08:26 PM
0

Having and doing things like I listed is what gives men status, is it not? Those are the things we do to compete with each other and establish "status." Who has the bigger boat? The faster atv? Who can get a better kdr? Who bags the biggest buck? Who got that hole in one that one time? The perfect game? Who climbed Everest? And on and on it goes. Men compete for status in a different way than women, but they still compete.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 02:34 AM
1

I wonder how video games, hunting trips, sports (golf, bowling, mountain climbing, fishing, etc), and things like boats, atv's, and other recreation vehicles factor into that cost outline of yours. The point is, men and women aren't all that different. We just value different things, and that's ok. Trying to spin an entire gender as somehow worse than the other is not ok. The grass is always greener on the other side is a saying for a reason. It applies to everyone, not just women.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 09:06 PM
-6

Maybe we're just watching vastly different shows and movies, because I honestly don't see much of either attacking men or women in that way.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:48 PM
-14

All these comments make it seem like the only thing on Netflix is manhating feminist garbage... Tbh, I don't really watch the new stuff unless it's an action or comedy. And while there are some obvious feminist propaganda scenes I've never considered it overwhelming or even particularly bad.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:31 PM
4

I want a girl who knows what's best.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 06:16 AM
1

I was calling out one specific point in my original comment. Can you read?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:29 PM
1

I discussed things yesterday, you can go through the thread to see how none of the guys arguing with me were even mildly interested in a discussion, they just wanted to tell me how wrong I was. You wanna talk about logic and you defend a guy saying that all of these teachers are lonely hags who can't get a relationship and take it out on boys. You wanna sit there are send me a wall of text when you can't even figure out in my 3 small paragraphs that my problem was the hyperbolic generalization o…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:55 PM
1

Most teachers are middle aged men that don't get much attention from women anymore. They develop a hatred for women and their female students are easy victims. At this point you can't take a man's degree seriously anymore.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:04 PM
1

Most teachers are middle aged men that don't get much attention from women anymore. They develop a hatred for women and their female students are easy victims. At this point you can't take a man's degree seriously anymore.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:44 PM
1

Most teachers are middle aged men that don't get much attention from women anymore. They develop a hatred for women and their female students are easy victims. At this point you can't take a man's degree seriously anymore.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:40 PM
1

Ok, and where does it say that it's because these are middle aged women who don't get attention from men and so take it out on boys? I'll wait.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:39 PM
2

That's the same excuse the feminists use, and the reason I became an MRA. I don't see how you can't see the problem with that behavior when you've surely seen/experienced it yourself.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:31 AM
2

I'm saying that the comment is hyperbole at best, and it's the exact type of shit that made me become an MRA except it was the feminist saying it. I didn't become an MRA so I could be a part of the male version of the feminists.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:03 AM
1

You're the same as the feminists you decry. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 09:36 PM
1

I wasn't saying they were perfectly identical or a 1-1 ratio of bullshit, I was saying that neither statement deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt when they're both hyperbolic bullshit. I already reiterated that guys argument with the genders swapped, so I dunno why you're honing in on one specific detail that has nothing to do with the actual point being made.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:46 PM
2

Yes, that was the point of my comment. That your defense and his statement are not the same thing. Neither of those arguments, his or my imaginary hers, deserve the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:39 PM
5

You're giving him the benefit of the doubt in a big way with that argument. I doubt you'd give the same benefit of the doubt to a feminist saying "teach men not to rape" when she says she just meant "sexual assault is bad and should be discussed more openly as a bad thing to young men."
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:30 PM
0

Hmm, that's weird, because my comment to you never directly accused you of anything except defending a blatantly sexist comment. Which is what you're doing when you say his comment is accurate. You make a lot of assumptions about his argument that don't come across as true at all. Maybe you're just being defensive because you know they apply to you, but at the worst I implied you were part of the group making comments that give feminists ammunition. That's a bit of a stretch, but I'll make the r…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:06 PM
6

You don't fight against something you hate by becoming the exact same thing. And you seem to be mistaken about what the intent is behind my comments. I was being very specific about which parts of his comment I was calling out, and your comment is not relevant to that argument whatsoever.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:18 PM
1

Just because he couched his bullshit in a speck of truth it doesn't make it right. You wanna talk about my assumptions while defending some dude whose argument is entirely derived from an assumption? That's rich, dude.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:08 PM
18

The cause is unknown, yet he's calling that sexist bullshit "fact." How is that more accurate than me saying that's his opinion? You idiots don't seem to get it. You, and I mean you are the ones giving these radical feminists all the ammunition they need. When they spout off equally bullshit statements like "All MRA are just mad about losing power" or "MRM is a cesspool of incels who hate women" it's your comments that they can point to for proof. It's your hyperbolic opinions that they use to j…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 06:05 PM
22

Saying something is a fact doesn't make it one. Your feelings aren't facts, your opinion is not a fact. Get outta here with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 05:07 PM
85

This comment is a great example of how to become the radical feminist version of an MRA. I don't care if I'm downvoted, this sexist bullshit is ridiculous. How would you feel if some woman said this shit about men? Most teachers are middle aged men that don't get much attention from women anymore. They develop a hatred for women and their female students are easy victims. At this point you can't take a man's degree seriously anymore. Sounds like bullshit right? That's because it is. This is the …
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:58 PM
3

They call toxic femininity toxic masculinity. I just had this argument in /r/selfawarewolves the other day.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 03:01 AM
0

You make me sad.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:57 PM
-1

So how did you go from being a kid who didn't care about skin color to "black people are unattractive and unpleasant"? Elves don't exist, so a black elf makes perfect sense. It's a fuckin elf, dude, an imaginary creature. But you have a problem with that, but no problem with an Indian, African, or Chinese character being played by a white dude? You have an issue with black people being over represented, when the exact same thing could be said about white people, but that's a good thing in your o…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:48 PM
-3

sjw-filled trash. If it isn't a strong-independent woman kicking stupid men's ass in a lead, then she's at the very least present. Or there's some shitty gay on a team. Or black. There are so many blacks EVERYWHERE recently, whether they belong or not (looking at you, Witcher TV show).... I don't want to see any of that Dude you need to reevaluate your life if those are things that actually anger or upset you. Gay people? Just a black dude on screen? Just having a strong woman present? The fuck …
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:15 PM
16

And this right here is why the Feminist movement has become so misguided. They don't attack ideas, they attack people who disagree with people they agree with. Usually based on the same criteria as racists, sexists, and any other prejudiced group you care to name. Unfortunately this method seems particularly effective in our current political climate. Super depressing.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:42 PM
20

Well if you stopped reading there then you missed the entire point he was making. Since Anna Freud was a minor detail leading up to what he opines is the reason why visitation is a serious miss step concerning "what's good for the child." If you can't even handle a simple comment within a large body of text with a differing opinion how are you any different than the tumblr sjws and other echo chamber groups?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:10 PM
1

I can do all of those things. It's just not particularly comfortable. Also, I can only do it by crossing my right leg over my left, and there's a definite pop somewhere in my hip depending on the angle. Doesn't hurt.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 01:24 AM
0

Besides, everyone knows Anarcho-Capitalist is the One True Reli Path to the perfect world.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:35 PM
7

As far as I'm aware men's intelligence has a higher variability than women. Men are not more intelligent so much as there are more intelligent men. On the flipside there are also more stupid men than women. It's stupid to really compare men and women as they each have their own areas of specialty. For instance women are on average better able to multi task, while men on average are stronger and faster. As far as PhDs and higher forms of education are concerned we can all look to Ben Carson as th…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:49 AM
17

As well as the male preference towards direct confrontation and the female preference towards indirect forms of confrontation.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 10:27 PM
12

Education does not indicate intelligence except in the broadest of terms and a lack of education signals nothing more than ignorance, not intelligence.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 10:17 PM
4

/r/Frugal_Jerk would be a better fit. Edit: I don't care how old this is, you needed to know.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/17 06:16 PM
16

So is female circumcision and that's almost exclusively referred to as genital mutilation. It's the same thing even if the female genital mutilation is more dangerous. You're cutting off a piece of a persons genitals, for a religion they may not want to follow, before they even have a chance to object. Well, in the states. There are many places where they circumcise the boys in early adolescence.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:41 PM
4

Not really a joke, Australia used to be a penal colony.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 07:24 PM
21

*Over a life time and *Different career choices
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:37 AM
3

Well it was a 3 year old so less force than a full grown adult. However, it would still take a considerable amount of force to do so. The kind of force any decent or half decent human being would know not to inflict on a small child. If I had to guess I'd say either an extremely hard kick to the chest or repeated blunt force trauma to the torso over a short period of time. Sickening to even imagine.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:58 PM
1

Except 99% of the time I've heard it it has been used with zero racial implications.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:27 PM
2

I am very specifically saying that the phrase is not racist without context. So no matter what context you bring up that happens to make the phrase racist, it is not inherently racist.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:29 AM
1

Most of the times I've seen it used has been in movies being said by a grandparent to refer to their grandchildren or a helpful youth. Usually while hugging the person they're talking about. "Have you met my niece Mary? She's one of the good ones." "This is Jeremy, one of the good ones." "Thank you sweet heart. You're one of the good ones." It is not inherently racist unless you try to make it that way. All three of these examples have a 50% chance of being racist or not, but without context the…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:00 AM
0

I think it's more racist to assume when someone describes another person as "one of the good ones" they are referring to their specific race. It's like that stupid micro aggression shit, sure someone who says that might be racist but there's just as good of a chance they aren't.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:07 AM
30

"Stop once the aim has been achieved."
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:28 PM
1

The die is cast Although, I thought it was written Alea iacta est.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:50 PM
29

For anyone not interested in watching the drama video: Thunderf00t reads the letter out loud. Cuts to audio of Crazy Witch vehemently denying writing the letter and blaming one of her followers. Cuts to a video of Lying Witch again saying she didn't write the letter and showing her computer screen. Eventually she shows the email she sent, and claims to have sent in the video, in order to prove it wasn't her that wrote the original email. Her proof was that she sent her email under her own name. …
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:41 PM
7

I'm the same but moderately attractive. Women like me well enough, but it's hard to find anyone dateable. Edit to clarify: Most people suck, it's not cause you're ugly :(
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:44 PM
5

No I stopped at the quoted part because your argument seemed overly aggressive and not particularly insightful.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:09 PM
-1

"If female rights are at 1 and men's rights are at 2, it's a little more prudent to add one to female rights before focusing your efforts on adding more to men's." The good old, "I'm more persecuted than you so your rights matter less" argument. I think it's ridiculous to even focus on one or the other rather than trying to get equal rights across the board. Bring people up instead of dragging others down.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:54 PM
29

You have that backwards.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:57 PM
2

It's on Netflix. Bill Burr: I'm Sorry You Feel That Way
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:38 PM
2

The gifs are just a detriment to the argument you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:38 AM
3

Sounds like someone was on her period...
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:42 PM
7

The idiom "He made his bed...." pretty much means "He was asking for it." No one deserves to be abused for something as ridiculous as what they're wearing.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:04 PM
1

You have an inferiority complex! I say as I argue to keep my inferiority complex.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:53 PM
3

I know he was being sarcastic, but "which I composed by shooting at the letters on my computer keyboard with the gun I keep duct-taped to my right hand." sounded pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:22 PM
2

So, is she legitimate wayfarin?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:08 PM
0

Well I meant the video in the general not the message. I just tend to think of this as a more serious sub and I'd rather not have it degenerate into stupid shit, like this video.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:49 AM
1

This was stupid.... why is it in MensRights?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:13 PM
26

Did anyone else notice that the faces of all the girls nominated were blurred but the males were not?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter