TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

duffelbagninja Archive

View 1 posts and 114 comments by duffelbagninja on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

duffelbagninja/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Arctic is a harsh mistress and unless you are fiscally well off, supplies suck. The fiscal needs to live in the environment are very high.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:37 AM
1

Looking at the Scandinavian countries vs China. Nope, this is a wealth grab.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:27 AM
16

1994 -ish. Me a struggling CS student looking to get financial aid so I could concentrate on studies more. Financial office slipping and saying if I wasn’t male or white, the could get me aid. I wish I had recorded the conversation. It has been going on for even longer.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:59 PM
1

https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/women-in-combat-five-year-status-update More for relevance than me saying or implying anything.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 05:55 PM
5

Equality means bullet catcher is open to be filled.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 12:34 AM
11

Depends on if you want to mentor or genetic legacy. Both are kids but he could want to pass on a genetic legacy that can’t be had by adoption. Don’t get me wrong, adopting is great (I have an adopted child) but it is not what everyone wants.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:31 PM
6

Women go see male gynecologist. A MD is still an MD. The female MD I have listened to me, and together we managed to bring my diabetes into control, while the male MD continued to accuse me of cheating my diet. Guess who I’m not seeing. I also have prostate issues and at her (my primary care physician) recommendation went to see a urologist. First thing he (urologist) did was to introduce his NP/student (wants to make the jump from Nurse Practitioner to MD). She was the one who asked the questio…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:27 PM
5

Another Scotsman.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:25 PM
3

You missed LBJ war on poverty which rewarded father absenteeism in the family by providing additional resources for single mothers. Although not intended to be racist or classist , it had a huge unintended consequences.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:40 AM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:30 AM
18

Source for claim please. I am interested in reading.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 11:13 PM
1

It is the common example that hangs with most people after being introduced to the concept.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:08 PM
5

Men suffer from depression and loneliness at an alarming rate. I am concerned that you are staking happinesses on being a man versus being the best person you can be and happiness may come or it may not. I understand that part of what you are trying to communicate is that you will be happier than you are now because you will not be fighting the wrong gender, and not because you are a man. Granted there is subtly in what I am saying, and I’m not implying you will be disappointed/ displeased to be…
/r/MensRights08/11/21 02:02 AM
4

Please expand .
/r/MensRights08/11/21 01:26 AM
2

It is not the not taking the pill part. It is fine that someone does not want to take the pill and most people won’t object to that . It is the lying part that is being objected to, along with the asymmetrical responses. On both sides of this , if a man does not want to get a woman pregnant, he should bring his own condoms , use them , and take the used ones away . It is unfortunate that crazy has forced all men into this corner, but here we are. Granted, there are times when this is unnecessary…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:31 PM
1

I say that I am using birth control (condom) and I don’t , it is rape. I say that I am using birth control (pill) and I don’t , not rape. In both cases sex was agreed to. In both cases, one party expressed a non-intention of child. In both cases one party lied. Both need to be treated equally.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 12:49 PM
2

Because lying about condom use is now rape.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:37 AM
1

Come now, Melinda Gates promoted Microsoft Bob.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:40 AM
4

Rape - men can be raped and a child is the end product. Young parents - men can also be young. Financial instability - yep, men can be financially unstable. Unfit parent - yep, men can be unfit . Every reason you listed applies equally and yet men cannot have a paper abortion and are obliged to pay. Therefore being against abortion is a logical stance. Edit: I should clarify on the Rape portion, men can be made to forced to penetrate, although technically not rape in the legal sense, it has all …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:33 AM
1

On speaking out about gender equity, unfortunately we can only point out the irony and use it where we will. Cultivating a movement that is women saying “equal rights, not special treatment “ will probably be more effective due to the “Women are wonderful “ and in group/white knight biases. But honestly, idk. Some days it is more Sisyphusian than others.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 12:06 PM
1

Your cousin , in my view, was raped. End of story from my perspective. ( A drunk person cannot give consent. If we are going to say they can, then there are other morays that need adjustments.) Granted the law does not see it that way. My response was purely on the political side about holding Trump accountable. The vote was 50 democrats plus 7 republicans voted guilty, 10 votes short. If we as the electorate, wish to hold the senate accountable for that vote, you vote out those who voted not gu…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:29 AM
0

Republicans did not hold him accountable. Democrats tried to impeach him in the Senate. If you want to hold Trump accountable, start voting against the Republicans that voted to not impeach. The problem here is that the Dems (for the most part) support a pro-feminist agenda. And I consider myself a blue dog, for the most part.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:02 PM
4

It was that way 30 years ago (was there, did not qualify for anything, and I had better than average grades. Not superb, but not Average) .
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:16 PM
1

The charges being dropped are a declaration that the evidence means that in a court of jurisprudence, the prosecution faces a difficult time convincing the judge he is guilty. It is neither an indication of innocence or guilt.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 09:20 PM
2

Positions of power. I find it very informative that 99% of men will never be in a position of power.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:53 PM
5

Not op, but people change. Ex may not be the person that OP had a child with.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:08 AM
2

Thank you for doing what you do, and I am sorry that you had a shit of a day. I will accept that the article is not intentionally being sexist, as unintentionally sexist as "1 in 4 homeless is female" , because it can be assumed that the other 3 are male. But, hey, I'm not an "epidemiologists with formal education, training, and experience in critiquing peer reviewed public health journal articles" nor am I social worker.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 12:29 AM
2

Depending on bais, by reporting female as the only sex, the report is a) deemphasizing the impact on males and b) hiding which sex is more impacted. After showing coworkers this report, I asked what were the four largest impacts on COVID mortalities, not one of the ppl I asked got that it was males being more impacted.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 09:57 PM
1

Try TwoX Or pink pill
/r/MensRights11/05/20 04:02 AM
2

Dovetails right into the discrimination men face in family law. Seems interesting that the homeless family stat mirrors custody awards to women. It is also telling that a family can’t get help if a father is present.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 07:03 PM
1

This is a national program and not specific to your school. https://girlswhocode.com Doesn’t help with the feelings you are dealing with but you are not alone in your frustrations.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:57 PM
1

Thank you for the data source.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:54 PM
1

OP, can you provide a little more clarity to the data ? Fields, intended jobs , etc.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 07:20 AM
2

Communication is hard. On a semi anonymous internet forum, with strangers that have diverse views , very hard. :) Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:49 PM
3

Yes, that was my point. Body fashion is a construct and not necessarily the healthy option.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:16 PM
20

On another post I read it this way; “Women have the right to vote, Men have the privilege to vote”. The more I think about that statement, the more I like it. The way it encapsulates the entire Men’s Right movement is phenomenal.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 06:53 AM
15

You don’t know different. At the bare minimum , you suffer from keratization (sp?) of the head of the phallus which is know to reduce sensitivity and pleasure. The hygienic issue is 5 seconds in the shower, and a red herring. If you don’t wash, can’t help you. Looking better is not necessarily healthy or correct.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 06:48 AM
1

Spoiled, idk. In need of psychological therapy and being used by adults, definitely.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:23 AM
1

Eh?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:08 PM
3

Dude, that is why he went into computer science and not English Lit.... /s Every year of college , working on 25+ yrs ago now, I took a business communications class as part of my competency grouping. The ability to communicate clearly and effectively is a core skill. Especially if you are in STEM , where the subject matter must be conveyed to non-technical managers.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:45 PM
1

Brian Banks*. *Not an actual rapist.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:37 AM
2

It is a national program, not a local thing.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:41 AM
2

It is a perception from across the pond.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:01 AM
2

As long as you are aware of your biases (which is more awake than most people) then you should investigate.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:42 PM
6

https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/22457-studies-show-judicial-bias-against-dads Newer. Also google gender bias family court.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:02 PM
3

Isn’t this victim blaming?
/r/MensRights13/09/18 01:14 PM
0

Mansplaining.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:09 PM
13

As a guy on HRT for years, respectively, you are full of shit. Testosterone impacts people differently and it is documented that it can make you aggressive/angry. When on HRT it is one of the things that you are asked to watch for.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:44 PM
3

Please do ask for clarification. It is not that you are disrespecting him, but verifying.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:23 PM
2

Both the CDC and the NCBI (ya know, those who do PubMed) have excellent articles on the effectiveness of HPV vaccines. Try a search engine. Even the counter argument provided by the BMJ stated that HPV related cancers provide for 20% of throat/neck cancers in males. Even it argued that vaccinating females was enough (I disagree).
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:54 PM
2

Let me quote the CDC for you : "Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States (1)." "Men had a higher prevalence of oral HPV than women, overall and within each race and Hispanic group." (4/2017) https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db280.htm Too much skepticism will kill you from something that is preventable. But please, by all means, rely on herd immunity. Don't bother with your MMR either.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:46 PM
4

Just a quick PSA, do go get your HPV vax and make sure your boys get it also. http://www.mountsinai.org/patient-care/service-areas/ent/areas-of-care/head-and-neck-cancer/oral-cancer/hpv/hpv-faq
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:21 PM
1

OT (and serious): what is the difference between risible and laughable? Risible is a word that I am not overly familiar with, and a quick google showed that it was synonymous with laughable. Although I think that I am missing a subtly. Any help?
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:38 PM
9

it plays on the rift that he is all brawn and no brain, with no sense of subtly or tact. aka testosterone poisoning. (Please note, I am not saying this is right or wrong. Just explaining the cartoon to OP.)
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:07 PM
2

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gun-deaths/
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:40 PM
1

Why do we expect better from Social Media (I'm including Google in this, due to the Filter Bubble) ? They are not in the business of reporting the news.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:32 PM
2

So don't quit. You have found what you enjoy. Be a Big Brother. Be the iterant Uncle. Adopt a family. (We moved to Alaska and adopted grandparents. Kind of the reverse of what I am suggesting.) Change a child's life. Volunteer at your local school or church. Coach. You may find these are enough to satisfy the want of a kid. Or not. If you ever need an anonymous sounding board, PM me.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:25 PM
6

As a 40 something that is just seeing his kids leave, you really need to consider that there are downsides to having children later in life. The two chief issues are that you will begin to physically breakdown (If are going to start to have mileage issues they begin to show, and they get worse as you age) and you just aren't as spry as you once were (running around after a kid who only slept 2 hours the previous night and the night before and the night before does not sound like fun...) Mind you…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:15 PM
2

Although I have seen the CDC report on non-reciprocal violence (Lord help me if you ask for a link) and that was primarily men getting hurt, with the most violent relationships being in order : lesbian, hetero, gay (gay men were the least violent). The other issue that comes to immediate mind is that while it is true that the smaller subject will get hurt (often worse/more often)in a straight up brawl, what is the breakout of weapon usage versus not in violent confrontation,how many convert from…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:34 PM
3

What would be interesting is to tie that homicide rate into a pre and post-shelter breakdown. I have seen it advanced that pre-womens shelters, the homicide rate was more 50/50. Now that women have somewhere to go, the homicide rate (excluding things like Chicago's Cell Block Tango) for men dropped dramatically. But I have never seen hard links either verifying or refuting this claim.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:42 PM
2

It is a YUUUUGGGEEE river....:)
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:17 PM
5

No, men need the same choice that women have in reproductive issues. If a woman has a 16 week abortion window w/o the father approval, and there are safe haven laws that do not take fathers wishes into consideration, why don’t fathers have the same ability to terminate parental responsibility?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:30 PM
1

Note the weasel word “may”.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:40 PM
2

You are forgetting, what is termed, stuffing the genie back in the bottle. Once the guy is falsely erroneously accused, you can’t remove it from the internet and social media.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:30 PM
1

My take on that is ... Most HR departments are female. They influence if not out right make the hire decisions. Go figure that one out...
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:03 PM
2

TIL, thank you.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:49 PM
1

Ti ? Surely you are not referring to a graphing calculator?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:28 PM
1

And we buy nothing... Frankly, I agree with the sentiment but discerning which company does or does not hire on dangle or color, but on merit is a difficult proposition. Heck, even figuring out if something supports in-country jobs is tough.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:28 PM
3

You forgot barefoot and pregnant....:)
/r/MensRights10/03/18 05:28 PM
2

That was not even the kerfluffle I was referring to, although that is pretty much par for the course w/ feminist action heroines. I was referring to director selection being made on non-dangle only. Then being proud of it.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 09:10 PM
3

Between that and the Jessica Jones kerfluffle, canceling NetFlix could be on my todo list.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:41 PM
1

/u/thepigmanagain , we are on the similar pages. But, as it has been said before, sarcasm does not translate well on the InterTubes and it is hard to tell if some things were ment as sarcasm or not. Especially when the sarcasm changes the entire tone of the comment. If /u/DougDante comment was sarcastic, it means something entirely different than if the comment was made in earnest (as you were hammering on). In the sarcastic version they are highlighting a double standard, in the normal version …
/r/MensRights07/03/18 04:27 PM
1

Can’t tell if /s is needed.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:37 AM
1

There are also left wingers who believe the equality of outcome line.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:14 PM
1

As a Western/US person who took a minor in Islamic studies in the mid 90s, I chuckle at your characterization of not being an extreme feminist. Replace the words feminist with Muslim and it sounds all too familiar to me.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:12 PM
3

See teacher from Florida. It does not work the same way for women.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:29 PM
1

That is nothing. Cases of diapers add up fast.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:42 PM
3

I'm long gone from the dating pool (happily married 20+ years) so what was the Jeff Dunham joke ? I can run to the end of my chain and bark.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 04:01 PM
2

And the classic next sentence: “ which part of No did you not understand?”
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:19 AM
2

The problem is that if "No means No" then a shit test does not work, because then "No" means "Maybe" and when do "I/You" stop ? Then there is all the mental gymnastics that go on justifying why "I/You" did not or did stop.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:27 AM
9

'72. "No means No" was the commonality that I was also taught. What I find humorous is the ones who want to be pursued and then wonder why almost no one does...
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:41 PM
5

http://tumblinguistics.tumblr.com/post/142090790851/smallwanderer218-dedalvs-madmaudlingoes
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:38 PM
2

Ah, okay. Never seen and thus why I did not get the reference. Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:54 PM
3

Can you explain the reference ? I think I am ducking something very basic, or looking at something obvious and dismissing it as obvious.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:40 PM
11

Even with 20 years of marriage, it does not really change. Youjustloseyourupperrangehearing...
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:55 PM
1

Why, yes, it does...
/r/MensRights25/01/18 11:32 PM
1

We mostly agree. My only nitpick is that if someone wishes to fetishize a lifestyle and it is their conscious choice, more power to them. So, all the men that want to live under feminist rule and the feminist who want to rule them, ship them to ... I don't know , Australia is taken ... and let them be.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:05 PM
6

I did not see him as complaining that he could not wear tights, but complaining that the choice of workout clothes that women have is more socially accepted as to what and when they wear it - they can show camel toe/curves at the store and the gym, versus he has to wear sweats (or something similar) to cover his bulge/masculinity (perceived or not) . Although I am split on if this is a self-confidence issue, a social construct (e.g. gender-specific business attire), or both.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:40 PM
5

YearoftheLinuxdesktop...
/r/MensRights25/01/18 01:51 AM
1

Interesting . The acknowledgement that being a mother is not necessarily for everyone is fine and all, but stop projecting your wishes for a different lifestyle on the fact that you ultimately chose to have sex and got a trophy.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:30 AM
2

HRC ? Hillary (I'm assuming this one, but want to verify.) ? Human Rights Commission ? House Republican Committee? H-Word , R-word, Chocolate (because everything goes with Chocolate) ? FEC is Federal Election Committee/Commission based on the previous choice.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:05 PM
33

So accuse him. Obviously facts don't matter.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:28 PM
3

expansive not expensive. Although expansive and ornate implies expensive... And if it is a typo , I like the typo of expansive...it is more ornate.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 06:51 AM
1

Median income is closer to 60k (and dropping in real terms), average income is 90k (and climbing in real terms). The disparity is the long tail in the high income earning bracket and the fact that they are not essentially taxed enough. Which says exactly the same thing as what you are saying. edit : Okay, example to the absurd. Assume we have a sample size of 10 people (we ask 10 people how much they make) and get the answers of 9 of them make $10k/yr and one makes $910k/yr. Since the median inc…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 05:57 AM
5

It is blind to the mental load carried by men. Fixing things around the house, taking care of the finances, dealing with the electronic gadgets that power our lives (have you patched for spectre / meltdown on all your gadgets ? Do you know what I am talking about ?) Granted that I'm being gender stereotypical, but no more so than this cartoon.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:51 PM
94

Leave her. This is a huge red flag.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:43 PM
1

Which leads to a tragic split second decision that would be cleared. One way of suicide by cop.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 09:43 AM
1

Not a great example, we need more information on the toy gun. Please remember that toy guns are suppose to have an orange safety tip, but how hard is it to buy orange model paint and apply it to a real gun ? Edit: Not down playing what she did, but what he did could have drawn a lethal response from LEO or a bystander that carries.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:34 AM
1

Mere exposure to the risk... SCOTUS says otherwise, and is the entire argument as to why men can be drafted.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:52 AM
43

Dear Huffpo Advertiser, Recently an editor of the HuffPo came out as supporting Black Male genocide. I am asking if your company also supports this position? John Q Public.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:31 PM
3

Ooooooo! That’s great!
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:47 AM
4

Now, who are the advertisers on Huffpo ? We can ask if they support this editors support of black male genocide.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:20 AM
1

Edit and this sentencing seems to fall nicely in line with your ideal justice system. She undertook the beginning of rehabilitation prior to sentencing and was given a suspended sentence based on her progress at the time. Punishment and rehabilitation. She also lost custody of both her children so she cannot repeat the crime. Wrong. It falls inline with YOUR ideal sentencing, not mine. 90 days on the outside, is not enough time for BPD (in the best case, full-blown narcism at the worst) to begin…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:41 AM
2

I answered your question, you did not like the answer. It just is not the answer you want. So far, you did not answer my question. I asked a simple, yes or no question. <s>It appears that you can spare a room for this felony, while she rehabilitates ? That way you can contribute working towards a solution in within the community. I mean she is not really that violent, now is she ? And rehabilitation is the name of the game. No, I do not honestly expect you to house this person. However, if the i…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:16 AM
1

Have you stopped beating children, yet ?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:08 PM
3

If a man had experienced childhood sexual abuse, been raped multiple times, had mental health problems, and was now showing remorse for their actions, had completed rehab, was getting psychological help, and had committed to further education Her texts after the trial show she is not showing remorse, she is taunting. You are implying that this woman has a bunch of excuses for her behavior (Oh, poor her. She is the victim. Look at everything that happened to her. Not the infant she beat so badly,…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:41 PM
4

Remorse in under 3 months, yeah it is for being brought to task for her actions not yet for those actions. To be blunt, that healing process ,you were implying has occurred, takes YEARS to happen if ever. She is still psychopathic / borderline personality disorder / highly manipulative. And tell me again, how a guy has the same rehabilitation prospects?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:10 PM
10

Not this. Put a guy in the same situation and tell us how lenient the judge is going to be.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 08:26 PM
2

You seem to have this selection bias issue with “creepy”. Try to remember that what you consider creepy are also people trying to connect.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 10:21 PM
1

Tough one. The English jurist Blackstone postulated that it is better for 10 guilty to go free versus 1 innocent man suffer, but we have lost sight of that particular sentiment in our rush to enact vengeance and now in the Public court of righteousness we see 10 innocent men suffer, versus 1 guilty man go free. Possibly.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:53 PM
5

I’m gonna bite, we already shield the alleged victim - and we KNOW victims NEVER have ulterior motives, so what is your point ? Extending the same courtesy to alleged perpetrators until after trial (and then depending on innocence) does not seem to be unreasonable. I mean, it is not like we may ruin an innocent persons life.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:56 PM
2

It is the 80s and recovered memories all over again...
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:20 AM
20

It is due to what food is cheap. Soda at $1 for a 2 liter or milk at $3 a gallon. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 05:37 PM
1

Dad bod.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter