TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dumbguyscene28 Archive

View 25 posts and 1,268 comments by dumbguyscene28 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
218

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:26 PM
59

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:08 PM
57

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:22 PM
55

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:28 AM
35

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:44 AM
34

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:08 PM
30

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:24 AM
28

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:29 AM
25

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:53 AM
23

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:36 AM
18

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:16 PM
17

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:52 PM
16

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:27 AM
14

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:41 PM
13

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:54 AM
12

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:40 PM
11

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:03 AM
8

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:09 PM
4

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:29 PM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:08 AM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:34 PM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:58 PM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:49 AM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:59 AM
0

dumbguyscene28/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:15 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,268 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

That's a really good point. Get any logs you can that she friended you on facebook. Consider subpoening facebook if it looks like that has been wiped.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:43 AM
5

I'm upvoting you, because we haven't had a woman come here and tell us how fucked up we are in two or three days!!! W00T!!!! Who had late Sunday in some dumbass tart tells us how we can't experience their oppression!? Come on down! /jk, I didn't up vote you, but your concern has been noted.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:38 AM
2

I disagree completely. 1. Douthat is hardly a fire-breathing right winger 2. everything he points out is logical and based on verifiable observation. It doesn't matter what he is. It matters how this op-ed will be received. And regardless of content, it will be received as an op-ed written by a Republican partisan.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:04 AM
1

You are a gentlemen and a scholar. I AM OFFENDED! :)
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:47 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:34 AM
1

What does your stats on two parent homes or your thoughts re: Romney have to do with anything? I gave the tl;dr: of the author, I am not endorsing Romney or Obama, I am giving the author's very jaundiced viewpoint. The author basically says her childhood experience in a two parent home was horrible, THEREFORE everyone's experience in a two parent home must be horrible, therefore Democrats must vote for Obama because Romney supports horrible two parent childhood experiences, and she is deeply jea…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:32 AM
17

The op-ed is undercut because it was written by a Republican pundit. This is one of those situations where you need a Democrat or someone seen as liberal to be able to make this statement and have it taken as something other than partisan.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:19 AM
2

What dumbfuck downvoted my comment for giving the tl;dr? Too cowardly to leave a reason you disagree with my tl;dr? Or just too fucking stupid? Or you're just a dumbass that doesn't know what tl:dr; means?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:17 AM
63

Take pictures of bite marks. Get examined by a doctor ASAP if possible. Interview people at the bar. Get their names. Record them if possible. Find the cab driver. Lawyer up. Create some sort of journal - paper or online - and document everything that happens to you on this.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:16 AM
1

tl;dr: dad hit me repeatedly, mom never had the guts to leave him, I am jealous of all my facebook friends that tell me of how wonderful their single mother childhoods -- this is the typical two party traditional home that Romney supports so re-elect Obama.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:07 AM
0

I don't know. I'd hate to follow SRS, but I think I have heard of other microaggression subs. MensRants sounds fine. What would be nice is if there was someway to move the threads ala StackExchange.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:43 PM
2

I guess I'm just a little scared of this movement making issues where there aren't any which is part of what I hate about the current feminist movement. I agree with that. Plenty of real issues. No need to add the non-real in. I will say that I look at /r/mensrights as a random sampling, a bell curve, of reddit, and that many of the people here are seeking karma, or are only here one day a month, or maybe trolls or have axes to grind. But I also see that for many people, they have been pretty se…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:08 PM
9

Get rid of the commercial prison industrial complex.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:25 PM
9

False accusations are a real problem and need discussion, but if the seed of that discussion is a facebook comment, then it seems weak.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:24 PM
14

Also, do we approve when David Futrelle cherry picks comments from here and then makes a big deal out of how horrible we are? Facebook comments are almost entirely useless and almost entirely ignorable. If they should be posted anywhere it's in /r/mensrightsmicroaggressions or /r/mensrightsfacebookcomments
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:23 PM
3

Matlack is the owner/publisher/editor guy in charge of the whole damn thing.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:08 PM
-2

"What’s not widely known about feminism is that it is not now, and has never been, a grass roots movement. It was conceived, organized and funded by bankers who actually run the corporations and governments of the world. Some of this was revealed by Nicolas Rockefeller to the documentary film maker Arron Russo. Some is revealed by the employment of feminist activist Gloria Steinem by the american CIA[1], and her relationship with Henry Kissinger[2]." This is total horseshit and why AVfM cannot b…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:58 PM
10

Good Men Project: Men are bad, we feminists are here to fix you. Fuck off asshole.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:41 PM
1

Zero day troll account posts misleading link on mensrights, news at 11.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:34 PM
1

Is there a link to an article that I am failing to see?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:30 PM
7

Did not see that one coming.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:41 PM
3

It might be nice to place it in a mensrightsmicroaggressions if that's the reddit way. I do think the belief in the image is a relatively common belief amongst various feminists, and so worth discussion. I also agree that having that discussion over a random facebook comment not terribly rewarding for anyone. And further since I think it's asinine when David FuTrolle cherry picks comments out of our reddit, it's also asinine to pick comments out of a facebook stream.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 04:11 PM
3

You write: The way I see it, this post is not at all about gender roles, it's simply about feeling that your partner has your back and cares about/notices your feelings. The woman wrote: Not only did my SO say he never noticed the boys, he began to grow frustrated at the fact that I expected him to stand up for me. He lectured me, justifying that there was nothing he could have done, and it was unfair for me to expect him to say anything on my behalf. Is it wrong for me to ask him to say somethi…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:50 PM
2

I'd be curious how many of those have SA accounts.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:22 AM
2

A small nit, the "subway incident" occurred, I believe, on the LA Blue Line, a light rail, not a subway.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:44 AM
8

I can note my speculation that if a man wrote "Killing Rage" on a pad and showed it to a woman, that man might well be arrested for making a threat, especially if it comes after a series of altercations including the man yelling at the woman. There have been arguments on Men's Rights, that a man cannot express his justified anger without being incarcerated. So you would hold HER to this same stultified standard? I am not holding her to my standard. I am holding her to her standard and the curren…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:26 PM
7

Can you explain that because I'm not getting it. How is her misplaced anger anything other than destructive? Does she ever acknowledge her anger to anonymous white guy she wants to kill is terribly misplaced?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:20 PM
10

See, I never was very good at English criticism. I read statements like this: The essay does an interesting thing. It allows us to explore two things. The objective external result of predisposed notions from one 'group' of society. the internal subjective response of another 'group' to the behavior of the aforementioned group. And I literally am unsure what they mean. Her essay was an essay. It was not a scientific observation. We are reading one side of a story. We are reading of one individua…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:36 PM
13

I think what you write is reasonable, but at the nuts and bolts of it she writes she wants to murder a person, an anonymous white male, for failing to take arms with her after she has abused him, and shamed him. And it's not just fantasy to her, she threatens him with a sheet of paper on which she has written killing rage. And she saves none of her vehemence for the stewardesses, pilots, or institution most responsible for that injustice that evening. If she wants to be judged by the quality and…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:30 PM
12

And apparently she YELLS at the guy, she writes that she did, how she expects him to defend the black woman. And it's like how many times have I been in that situation, yelling at others to fight some battle with me, then disappointed that they don't, after I have yelled at them and shamed them and rejected their apology as insincere and face saving.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:22 PM
6

I thought he was the Dalai Lama (at first.)
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:20 PM
3

Also, why do some feminists claim to be sex positive, yet insist on perpetuating the negative stigma around women who chose to engage in sex work, men who do business with them, and sex work in general? I am not sure this is an accurate representation of sex positive feminists. I'd say some sex positive feminists do not perpetuate any negative stigma on the work, women, or men (see Renegade Evolution) some feminists that claim to be sex positive and may be do not perpetuate any negative stigma o…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:18 PM
2

As often as possible.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:12 PM
-1

if that's the nature of your relationship, then it's ok". Stunned to see that as a justification really. Really? Because if that is the nature of their relationship, and it's not outrageously abusive to anyone, and it works, then it is okay. or complain to the staff. I didn't include that one. And she could have done that just as well as he, so you're right. Your attempts to justify this are bemusing. I'm not justifying anything, I am saying you haven't been clear in what the men's issue is. You…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:50 PM
1

Yeah, but I'm not sure where your post is coming from. If the woman and her boyfriend have some traditional man protects woman relationship, then there is no problem with her post. If the woman typically holds contemporary feminist attitudes about people not being forced into gender roles, then yeah, she's a hypocrite, but this is still not much of a men's issue. I'm still not sure how "men" should respond to this provocation. By shouting back? By saying nothing? By leaving? None of that seems 1…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:33 PM
6

I'm not sure women are not just as competitive as men, nor that they are all that open to each other about their faults. I think the evidence is that women are just as competitive. And yeah, I think one reason men are so competitive in these regards IS that women will pass gossip of a man's shortcomings (in the dalsgaard sense) around.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:22 PM
2

I thought I recognized Mulan. Had to google to be sure. One of my favorite Disney movies to watch with my daughters.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:20 PM
6

Thanks, that was a well done video that expressed some of my thoughts very nicely.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:11 PM
1

I'm not really seeing the issue here. If the OP has taken all sorts of gender feminist positions in the past, then she might be hypocritical for demanding her boyfriend conform to gender roles and defend her. But we don't know that. I can imagine that if I (man) were at a table with friends, and some other table was harassing me, I would want others at my table to defend me, and yeah, that might be the case, even if I wasn't actively defending myself.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:11 PM
19

Gedanken Experiment: Make a list of the reasons why women would object to anyone, man or women, defining "real womanhood" to them Go up to a woman, any woman, and tell her exactly why you think she isn't a real woman. Compare Women, and all kids are encouraged to celebrate their diversity, their womanhood, their individuality, however it expresses itself. A bell curve, a rainbow, a world of infinite possibilities and expressions. When you hear someone tell you you aren't being a man, or what a g…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:36 PM
66

Yes we do, but look how misplaced hers is. She's doesn't want to murder the stewardess, or the pilot or the folks handing out the boarding pass, she wants to murder the guy sitting next to her, when he has done nothing, and has expressed his regret for a situation he had no responsibility for in any manner. His flaw that justifies his killing was in not taking the action bell hooks demands he take when she verbally accosts him. AND THEN, AFTER she admits to verbally abusing him, AFTER she admits…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:46 PM
0

Or it could be an honest expression of joy, from a feminist, that men are feeling comfortable spending time with their kids rather than being pressured into the public sphere away from the private sphere. That, too, could be the case. Again, and if so, fuck her. If she wants to express that joy as a human, that's fantastic. But if she is intentionally expressing that joy as a feminist, she needs to explain what it is about feminism that allows her to appreciate that joy differently than any othe…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:25 PM
15

She might be referring to feminism challenging stereotypes about dads and allowing them to be more involved in their children's lives. Except that it didn't on the whole. It replaced the distant authoritarian with the demon abuser. Right, but like I said fathers and parents have been taking their kids out for donuts and ice cream and hot dogs and meals and to the zoo and to the beach and hiking and all that stuff for a zillion years. Feminism is responsible for ZERO of that behavior. Feminism IS…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:42 PM
-1

It is harsh and frankly over the top. I think her statement says a lot about her unjustified biases against fathers and against men and her inordinate pride in women's studies. I think her statement and her picture paint a portrait of a person deep in privilege and unable to see it. In my experience, using Bayesian probability, this makes the likelihood of her being a cunt and deserving a khitbash quite high. More importantly, I wanted to add counterpoint to Nathan_Explosion-'s exclamation of ho…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:31 PM
10

I think it's supposed to sound as if: feminism is somehow responsible for dads acting humane with their kids, otherwise dads would probably be beating on their kids or fucking them, so thank you feminism no one other than a women's studies major would be aware enough of how fathers used to beat kids and now feed them donuts until feminism
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:41 PM
-1

Do you even understand what an ad hominem attack is? Actually, it's pretty clear you don't know what ad hominem means. :( Anyway, I'm moving on.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:12 PM
-20

Why? What does her feeling have to do with women's studies, except she has some pre-ordained bias against the world? She sounds like a fucking cunt that needs a khitbash and this sounds like a viral facebook ad from Top Pot Doughnuts.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:05 PM
0

Ad hominem... It's not ad hominem. If you look at the thread, 99% of the posts are downvoted to oblivion. You look at this and see normal behavior. It's clear you are an idiot. I am labeling you as such, I am not telling people to disregard your statements because you are an idiot. Anyway, I am moving on.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:59 PM
0

No problem, I'll note you're an idiot and move on.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:31 PM
1

First, it's ErasmusMRA not EranusMRA and second, it's not clear ErasmusMRA downvoted it at all. Each and every post in the entire thread has been downvoted heavily. I am not certain how anyone could look at that thread and not understand a downvote brigade is working in it.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:20 PM
1

Why assume there was a downvote brigade? Because the thread was 45 up and 45 down and that downvote for this topic seems very unlikely.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:46 PM
0

Hey, I don't want to creepshame you mikedao, but I think I find Apple Store employees about an 11 on the creep scale, and probably for the reasons discussed in this article. Anyway, I am glad you were able to escape.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:18 PM
1

Yeah, according to theory, there is a rape a day, and according to the newspapers there are ZERO reports of rape. My guess is both theory and the newspapers are wrong, but certainly theory is wrong. My guess too is you're a dumbshit if you think the newspapers, especially the campus paper would print ZERO rape reports when a rape a day, or a rape a week or even a rape a month is occurring.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:50 PM
1

I moved the headstones AND the bodies.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:49 PM
2

Tara Parker-Pope often has some interesting things to say, but the problem with her column here is the column doesn't explain the headline "Why" women can't do a pull-up Regardless, it's not clear we are giving women a free ride. I probably can't do a pull up either (since heart surgery a few years back) There may be some real physiological reason why many women and some men can't do pull ups. Parker-Pope seems it's related to arm length, and that could be when leverage is considered. But there …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:50 AM
2

It does seem very strange, but it is also a changing standard. For much of existence these kids of 16 and 18 were of marriage age, right? Right now it does seem we have this infantilization thing going on where we treat some people as kids until they are late 20s. And there is a double standard. The movie Summer of 42 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_of_'42 was huge when I was a kid, and it basically tells a very similar story to the one linked to in this thread. But flip the sexes and yeah i…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:50 AM
3

Or Atheist Plus Pissed.... I just thought it was funny because my view is that social justice warriors would never abuse downvotes and would follow the reddiquette.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:40 AM
2

On the other hand, so what if she was his mistress? That he has an affair gives her the right to tie up and beat on the actual wife?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:14 AM
2

I think the analogous tale is: Your wife and daughter were in an accident, and your wife was killed. A couple of weeks later you were driving your daughter's sixteen year old friend (the age of consent in some states) back to her home when you just broke down. You asked the girl to stay with you for a couple of hours, and you poured her wine, and eventually the two of you made love. Over the next several weeks you made love repeatedly with her, until the day your daughter was released from the h…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:11 AM
2

Yeah that story made for a great book and movie when it came out in the 70s. I remember finding it and jacking it to Jennifer O'Neil many times. And it is interesting that the book and movie could probably not be made now. Good to see it being ripped off in AskReddit.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:44 AM
0

This is just Patriarchy Hurts Men Too derailing. Think of Patriarchy as invisible sky demon. Feminist: "Patriarchy hurts women! Men are privileged" You: "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation, how come Feminism doesn't acknowledge that most men are not Patriarchs and live lonely lives? How come Feminism often seems to blame men and work to make men's lives more difficult? How come NOW and other Feminists consistently oppose granting custody of children to fathers" Feminist: "Yes, Patri…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:35 AM
8

Intersectionality and Kyriarchy are related. Intersectionality is supposedly an understanding that all of us have different privileges. Kyriarchy an understanding that society is made up of different and overlapping pyramids of power. In practice, intersectionality is used when feminists want to answer the question: who is more oppressed by older white males, Group A or Group B,? Like intersectionality, kyriarchy seems theoretically better than patriarchy, but again in real life practice it seem…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:27 PM
4

In the last week, I've seen many posts like this that paraphrased are: "getting my assed whupped in /r/blahblahblah come help me!"
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:51 PM
1

Because of hypergamy? That women marry up? Wow, thanks, never knew.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:37 PM
1

Those are tactical or operational objectives. Not to me it ain't. That is a strategic objective. I couldn't give two shits about hypergamy and see little in it for affecting my life any more than how some men work to obtain trophy wives. Your tactical is my DEFCON 5. Your strategic, my defcon 2. If Men's Rights wants more to do with hypergamy than reforming custody, that's fine, I'm out. If you want to explain why you prioritize them differently please do.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:08 PM
13

Feminist Jen Graves says "men get the boot" and calls it "overdue". Am I missing something? I don't see that in the piece. Is there a real issue here? Will Seattlites not be able to see art made by men? Is it a permanent display? Is the women's art not up to snuff? Will contemporary artists in Seattle somehow be discriminated against?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:07 PM
8

Yeah, this is one way that Obama has been a huge disappointment. So many better ways to support reproductive rights, so many better ways to deal with Mourdock and Akins et. al., but he constantly takes the easiest worst way out. I can't vote for that guy again. I'll vote for Gary Johnson, and Obama can get his own damn votes, because he clearly doesn't give a shit about my issues.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:28 PM
6

We have problems with divorce law, problems with child custody law, problems we can actually do something about without trying to change human nature. Pretty much my take on it. Are some women viciously hypergamous? Probably so. Do some men seek out trophy wives, or much younger wives? Probably so. Was one of the reasons my ex divorced me because I didn't give her access to the right social circles? Almost certainly. Regardless, I'd focus first on custody issues and things where we stand a chanc…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:32 PM
1

I think you can find far better examples to make your point then the sensationalistic voyeuristic crap of world star hip hop. I think many would see that video on these pages and not get your point, but instead think we are somehow endorsing this behavior.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:49 PM
1

And that's what's important.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:23 PM
3

Still seems of marginal relationship with mens issues. I think you should delete the video. If you hadn't of commented at all, I would have reported it.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:19 PM
2

I found my way here while trying to look for a good therapist (my wife gave me an ultimatum to go to a therapist for my depression, which turned out to be suffering from emotional abuse). Hey best wishes to you, my wife also gave me ultimatums to see a therapist, and frankly, the person really in need of therapy was her.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:53 PM
2

It does seem weird that over 15 months later, she is now reaching out to Slate, and yeah, with nothing more that what happened 15 months ago. But that seems to fit in to what I've learned from conferences that most of the time it's the same people giving the same canned lectures....
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:43 AM
11

Does this make me misogynist and a creep? Actually Feminist Theory states you're a misogynist and a creep because of Feminist Original Sin, that is, a man eating the apple, and your being born a man. It has very little to do with what you think.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:03 AM
3

Thanks for posting this. It is sick that a court would split up a family when there are perfectly qualified parents ready and eager to step up. It is racist or imperialistic as all get out to split them up and adopt them out. And it of course has everything to do with Felipe being the father and not the mother. What happened at /r/parenting? The only suggestion I have is to make this some sort of reddit campaign -- where's the best subreddit to get this voted to the front page, maybe with a chan…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:21 AM
2

It's late for me, and I'm not necessarily thinking clearly. So read what kencabbit wrote, he is clearly more lucid than I at this point. Do you know of Bayesian Probability? If so, consider how you might use Bayesian Probability to determine if the man you see is a rapist or not and what the numbers turn out to be. Do you know how to calculate expected values? So take the probability of a man being a rapist computed with bayesian probability and multiply it by the negative "value" a woman might …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:04 AM
3

No, but it makes my citation of this common belief not the gross generalization you would have unless you want to cite some specific ways in which I grossly generalized. Saying and often that marriage is noted by various behaviors of women in regards to negativity and withdrawal from their husband, if not worse. Hardly seems to be a gross generalization in the context of how many articles, books, seminars, etc., are devoted to that topic. Hey if you want something to read, read this: http://www.…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:51 AM
4

This is my biggest issue with this sub. I abhor feminism, and sought out a way to get involved with egalitarian movements. But you're right, most people on this sub will never be convinced that women are anything more than the sole contributors to all the ills in their lives because their own personal experiences have left them cynical and bitter. I don't often comment on here because, in my experience, I will get down voted for providing an opinion regardless of its merit. People that disagree …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:39 AM
3

Yes, if by L-D you mean this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGjElvt4nP8
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:29 AM
6

'I did nothing wrong and she's screwing me over'. Oddly I rarely read anything like this on this sub. And most of the time stuff like that comes across it is refuted pretty quickly. I don't understand your complaint about this link or your complaint about my comment to you. Best of luck trying to convince people here that women aren't often terribly negative about their partners, which is not to say that men don't cause problems as well.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:17 AM
2

It's political speech, it's not always pretty, but it's what is important to defend. Your hope they don't do jail time is noted, but that is in fact what is being threatened. “My belief in free speech is so profound that I am seldom tempted to deny it to the other fellow. Nor do I make any effort to differentiate between the other fellow right and that other fellow wrong, for I am convinced that free speech is worth nothing unless it includes a full franchise to be foolish and even...malicious.”…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:12 AM
2

Can you clear something up? http://i.imgur.com/Cx0gf.jpg ifeminists.com is Wendy McElroy's site and it's pretty clear that McElroy has been identified at times as an Equity Feminist and I gather at times as something different an Individualist Feminist. Do you know if she takes a firm stand and differentiates the two terms? McElroy refers to individualist feminism as Libertarian Feminism http://www.wendymcelroy.com/indfem1.htm but describes it in ways that make it sound very much like equity fem…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:55 AM
-1

If only there was a website to teach us how to be Good Men and a blogger who could tell us more about what we do wrong.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:45 AM
7

I think that's a fairly large generalisation. Keep in mind on this sub we are only presented with the male partners side of the relationship breakdown, so obviously he is going to have examples of his spouses negativities, and is not likely to be forthcoming with his own. But, short of an unfaithful partner, I think most relationship breakdowns would have a fair bit of negativity from both sides. In my professional field I deal with disputes daily (not just domestic) and in my experience the tru…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:45 AM
17

It's salient and strikes a chord with me. I know a lot of men find their way to Mens Issues if not Father's Rights after a disastrous marriage, and often that marriage is noted by various behaviors of women in regards to negativity and withdrawal from their husband, if not worse. So while not a mens issue per se', "WE DEMAND HUGS AND SAMICHES!" it is an issue, or a story, of how one person was able to repair her marriage. And it echoes a lot of stories and advice that runs counter to many of the…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:20 AM
3

FWIW, the name Amandagon sounds like a total troll naming itself after Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon. This same story was also posted in SRSWomen by Sole_Sistah http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSWomen/comments/11yuig/was_i_sexually_assaulted_or_am_i_overreacting/
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:53 AM
0

but what I've come to understand is that the discussion we're missing is that feminists are arguing for equal pay despite lifestyle choice (which from my understanding accounts for the majority of the discrepancy). I have heard this basic argument as well. I do not know to what degree this is a mainstream or minor view of feminism. But google pink collar jobs and you can find this argument: http://womenshistory.about.com/od/glossary/a/pink_collar.htm And one of the remedies for pink collar jobs …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:12 AM
1

Ah, that's actually interesting too, since you are the recipient. I deleted my comment in the reddit thread because a) it finally did post, and b) reddit gave me a page that "was in temporary read-only mode due to high traffic." Funny the different forms that bugs take.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:04 PM
9

Google for explanations of the differences between "Gender Feminism" and "Equity Feminism" Look at aei.org for Christina Hoff Sommers's original paper, "Who stole feminism" http://www.aei.org/speech/society-and-culture/race-and-gender/who-stole-feminism-speech/ tl;dr there is no reason you can't be an equity feminist and an MRA, but if you want to be a gender feminist you will have many contradictions you need to overcome to be an MRA.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:48 PM
11

Seems like political speech. I think the students should ask the law school for a civil rights professor to defend them.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:38 PM
28

I believe it refers to this Martin Luther King, Jr. quote: I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Often now, you can find conservatives referencing this quote as they oppose affirmative action, and you can find liberals saying that conservatives use of this quote is itself racist. As an experiment, find a reddit or two and an appropriate thread, and using a throwawa…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:36 PM
2

You and me both, but it is fun to think about these things, and a shame when others take things written in jest and twist them and use them against you.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:06 PM
9

First, actually the most important element in a pre-nup I wish I had demanded would be that in case of divorce, there would be a rebuttable presumption of joint shared physical 50/50 custody. That's the only thing that was important to me. Okay, so if you think about a pre-nup the way a company thinks about stock options, you want to protect the company from giving stock options to a bad employee recognize that over time an employee more and more deserves (vests) his/her stock options in the com…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:24 PM
4

I'm curious, how do you think he and you would feel about a prenup that expired in 10 years?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:42 PM
3

Next time, you say, "it wasn't her hair, it was her big vagina. Huge!" then make a wide 'V' symbol with your hands.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:33 PM
3

I haven't been following this, but I had thought that Maxon, who Schwyzer names as Todd's harasser, was in fact not the harasser, but a victim of Anonymous. Has that changed again?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:32 AM
3

Many parents of Millennials are quite literally technologically illiterate not because of a lack of intelligence but simply because they do not make the time to learn the intricacies of online communication or how to filter, censor, or control the flow of information. Older people seem to be quite literally oblivious to the fact that pornography filtering software is a click away on a Google search and completely free. Actually two pretty funny statements considering how many of us older than mi…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:13 AM
2

Actually Larry, I am trying to imagine it was you that committed suicide, but I need a little help here. Can ya throw me a bone and commit it, and then I'll let you know how it was for me. Anyway, welcome to /r/mensrights you fucking troll, now go away. reported.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:07 AM
2

To clarify doing something sexual to someone who is sleeping is wrong. That's not clarification either because that statement is not 100% true and much too absolute.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:03 PM
1

Absolutely! This is known by anyone with an understanding of Basic Sugar and Spice Theory. What's interesting is how often many feminists spout Basic Sugar and Spice Theory while other feminists admit, proudly so, and actually correctly, that female leaders are equal in every manner to male leaders in the ability to wage war, and oppress others.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:02 PM
2

Add in Boadicea, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica, a first century English woman famous for rising up against the Romans and leading some pretty vast slaughters and having a large number of late 20th Century bookstores named for her.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:00 PM
-2

I just think it's a silly story. "I am having this argument with this feminist and neither of can drop it...." Sounds like the beginning of You Got Mail. But it's 14 years later, so clearly Billy Crystal is now a PUA.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:04 AM
-6

Um, I'm thinking she is physically attracted to you. And this is how some people think flirting and attraction works. I would neg her, something like, "of course though you're a feminist, I'm willing to bet you still shave your pubes." I'm pretty sure if you play your cards right, you can get her between the sheets, and have your way, and even turn this into a cute meet and a rom com.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:11 AM
3

Actually another name for "Feminism 101" is "Basic Sugar and Spice Theory"
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:36 AM
1

I usually get to where Wayne starts playing the guitar, and then I feel all sorry that he and Garth are splitsville, and I have to turn the video off. One day I might be able to make it past the guitar and listen to all of what Wayne has to say on men's rights. Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOKociU8t_Q
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:32 AM
1

I think you're right about that, and I did save a copy of that link.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:43 PM
3

Not a bad article. It would be nicer if it were in English and not Marxist Theory, and if its author were paid by something other than the word. But it is essentially (obviously) correct in a way the Church Lady would agree with. The Feminist definition of sexism = prejudice + power is terribly convenient in how it excuses the prejudice of women against men, but condemns the prejudice of men against women. Also though, the feminist definition of sexism = prejudice + power conflicts terribly with…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 09:47 AM
2

It would be a rare day I call a feminist a feminazi. But, it's not as rare as it used to be since Paula Kirby wrote her essay and also coined femistasi. READ: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B02RDDb71N8Xc2EwYmw5T2Z4eDg/edit?pli=1 I don't think feminist nazi is a great meme, but at the moment, I am all for it spreading across the net. I would hate it see it at /r/MensRights but I would love to see feminists face it every single fucking day, right in der fuhrer's face. If it becomes a well known m…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 09:34 AM
9

You might ask your friend to survey 10 people at a mall and ask them if they think women can't be sexist against men, or black people racist against whites. Then ask her to survey 20 more people. Let her know that her social justice, critical race theory definition of racism and sexism is useful inside her university classes, and nowhere else. And then ask her why was it okay for feminists to co-opt the original definition, and suggest she check her privilege.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 09:29 AM
1

When you read the original quote, it's vague enough to sound well, fine. A system of interlocking power structures. When you read here http://myecdysis.blogspot.com/2008/04/accepting-kyriarchy-not-apologies.html and similar, it basically just boils down to Patriarchy on Steroids.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:02 AM
1

Yes, you're absolutely right. Clearly from their behavior and other definitions, there war is with all men. I think this claim of theirs, that not all men are Patriarchs is relatively recent. It fits in with what they call Kyriarchy which should be a mens rights friendly concept, but just like with Privilege it is used not to understand that "control" and "privilege" have little to do with sex, or race, or age, or religion, or gender, and is more class based if anything, but mainly a characteris…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:40 AM
2

I gave it about 7 minutes, mainly because I was making lunch, and that's often about 6:30 more than I give most YouTube rants. So a few thoughts Stardusk, whoever that is, does have a nice YouTube voice and the ability to make a reasonably high quality audio recording. So kudos for that. Paul Elam certainly takes shit from every side possible. I worry about the misogyny and offensiveness of "mangina", Stardusk doesn't believe Elam is revolutionary enough. Now sometimes when everyone on each side…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:12 PM
5

Exactly.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:57 PM
1

This was well done, though the part on CEDAW went by a bit too quickly for me to understand it well enough to agree. Also, I perhaps was not paying attention closely but it ended abruptly after you began telling us how Patriarchy was a shaming tactic. My main complaint though is this video seems to thoroughly buy into the premises that our society was patriarchal and still is patriarchal, and that men belong to that patriarchy. And further that the patriarchy (that is men and not women) was sole…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:56 PM
14

Are Women Shallow? A woman's desire for a wealthy man may have an evolutionary basis. It's a fun study confirming what seems to be obvious behavior, but it doesn't answer whether the results are due to evolutionary pressures or modern cultural pressures. Regardless, any feminist that does read this will see that it's that utterly misogynistic field of "evo psych" and snerk about how feminists rely on real science....
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:30 PM
41

Oh. Well your therapist is certainly the best person to speak to about this. Mens rights are just a typical group of redditors with no particular insight into you, or how to counsel about rape. I know how frustrating it is. I've been to many therapists and only on very rare occasions have I felt a real connection or trust to them. But you need to find someone local, who knows you, to give you the best advice. That said, reddit is helpful for semi-anonymous speech and to hear the raw thoughts of …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:29 PM
5

No link per policy, but this appeared at Jezebel, a Gawker site, on February 22, 2012 in Hugo's "genderal" column. Hugo is a sociopath who hates himself because of all his rotten behaviors over the years, the many times he has hurt women and men. He rationalizes his behaviors by claiming that his own actions are actually actions that every man takes, and it's due to a fault of men, not his own fault. So when reading Hugo's crapola, just remember to swap "Hugo" for most instances of "Men". Men an…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:26 PM
30

Have you told your therapist about the rape?
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:18 PM
-17

Cool, I'm out then. Enjoy your thread.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:05 PM
-12

I don't know why you stripped out identifying information as to what college you are attending. How small is this college? 15 people? What do you expect anyone to do given the information you have given us? Why should anyone believe you?
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:00 PM
-21

So with respect, there is no reason to believe this story at all. Until, that is, you provide us a copy of the email, complete with its headers, and another person who can verify they received it too. Otherwise, it sounds completely unbelievable, or that you've left out some major details. Now, if you can provide the evidence, which should be absolutely fucking trivial to do, THEN there is the potential for a real story. So get a couple of copies of the email, with mail headers, and paste it int…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:46 PM
1

I think that's a valid insight, but honestly, that's not usually the fear about rape I get from Feminists. And it may be that I am just a bit dumb or insensitive. The fear I get from them about rape is the fear of the sexual assault much more than the fear of pregnancy. And with the various abortifacients and abortion, the fear of pregnancy is greatly reduced. Again, not to minimize at all what you're saying, but that's just not the message I get. It's part of the cultural message that feminism …
/r/MensRights20/10/12 07:32 PM
4

That's my take on it, and why I am not as upset with PUA stuff in Mens Issues as others. The battle of the sexes has been going on for millenia, and just because Feminists are outraged with PUA stuff is not actually a reason to be outraged with PUA stuff.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:52 PM
1

I was reacting to this language: “We hope that our anti-HIV milk antibodies will provide a user-friendly, female-controlled, safe and effective tool for the prevention of sexually acquired HIV infection,” Dr Kramski said. “If proven effective in humans, it will empower women to protect themselves against HIV.” Which seems to go out of its way to imply that men would somehow deny women protection from HIV. But okay, thank you, I can see your point.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:53 AM
2

Well, plp97, you're right, but regardless, I am not sure a photograph of an Iraqi male soldier killed and burnt on the Highway of Death in 1991 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_of_Death when they were retreating is truly the most salient image of male privilege that you feel it is.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:04 AM
19

Well the info was almost certainly fake. It included a Texas A&M student living in Austin over 100 miles from Texas A&M. And you should know it came from AnneArchist.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:33 PM
1

Breaking Bad is one of the best shows ever made, and almost certainly the best show on right now. And most of it is Netflixable up until the most recent stuff. Beware, the first show will hook you though....
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:13 PM
2

And if you watch Breaking Bad, Walt the Chemistry Teacher takes on the name Heisenberg as his alias for when he is the evil meth dealer.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:56 PM
3

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:54 PM
2

comment replies are titled "comment reply" Okay, reviewing my messages reveals "comment reply" and "post reply" and I guess PMs are everything else. slaughter is the best medicine Conceivably, this is true.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:38 PM
6

I think this is a terrific breakthrough, I am a bit worried about how it might taste, but if it's a milk based vaginal cream, perhaps it will come in chocolate or strawberry. And so will I.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:12 PM
11

It's one thing to develop a vaginal cream because that's the most effective application, but another to have quotes about how this is empowerful and stresses the need for female control. As we all know us Feynmannian Rapists are pro-HIV infection.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:10 PM
8

Someone sent me (It's sometimes difficult for me to tell what's a pm, and what's a comment reply) the same crap using this 0 day account http://www.reddit.com/user/AnneArchist that misrepresents a regular user. The information itself makes no sense, for instance it lists a non existent address for a texas a&m student but gives him an address in Austin, over 100 miles away.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:21 PM
2

Yishan Wong, Reddit CEO speaks about his feminist views and why he supports SRS While I find his statements here disappointing, but also surprisingly vapid and inelegant for a CEO who should know how to edit his comments on a bulletin board before pressing save, I don't see any direct support for SRS. His comments re: women and feminism are rote and trite. SRS is not women. SRS is not feminism. I'd actually like to see stronger statements either directly in support of SRS or against SRS. I still…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:46 PM
8

The thing is, I'm a straight, white male, and basically everything about it is great. I work with a lot of women and minorities, and I can't tell you how many times I've watched people assume that I must be "in charge" or at least "the best person to talk to to get things done", despite the truth being to the contrary. Not everyone shares your experience. Your experience even as straight white male is not every other straight white male's experience. Just because you made it doesn't mean everyon…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:06 PM
1

Robert Reich a clueless pop economist? Do you have any idea who Robert Reich is?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:13 PM
1

Thanks, and that study is right in line with what Robert Reich said. That's the infamous study that was pulled down within weeks of President Obama taking office.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:11 PM
17

Oh I know. I don't believe in Patriarchy Theory either. I was offering my speculation as to how feminist types might justify it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:45 AM
55

It's not that rinsing culture itself is oppressive to women, it's that it's the disrespect and oppression of women by the Patriarchy that keep these women fixated on appearances and material goods. Also, there are no real women like this. Also, it's entirely consensual. And the women are providing companionship and so deserve their payments. Also, the men are Heisenberg's Rapists, and you can't tell their velocity or position. Also, you need to check your privilege buster.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:03 AM
23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hSLN2aRm27Y#t=404s Q: Are you still seeing that guy? A: If I'm not getting something I need or I want, I have no need for the friendship of that guy.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:14 AM
16

My take is similar to yours, nlakes. Namely that Patriarchy Theory is an unfalsifiable, pseudo-scientific, pseudo-anthropological theory based on an invisible sky demon. Now, I don't know how it is taught in school, but it's possible that Patriarchy Theory is not taught to be explanatory like a scientific theory, more like an artistic metaphor. Regardless, if we are asked to restructure society based on feminist theories based on Patriarchy Theory, it is only right to demand that these feminist …
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:23 AM
2

I am not in Maine or even 1,000 miles close, but if I were.... Anyway, all you Mainer and Mainiacs, and frankly, any Yankee in reach of Reddit, now would be a very good time to spend a day or two picketing Judge Robert E. Murray courthouse. It would be great if we could have a discussion of what day is the best day where to meet and when what to bring He's in jail. There seems to be reasonable press about this. This would be a good thing to do for Vladek Filler, and it would be a good tangible r…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:54 AM
1

I will visit here http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page and see what I can do. Pardon my ignorance, when you write "main forum", this is so dumb, which main forum are you referring to?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:48 AM
1

Sorry, not tonight, fighting about 3 dozen fires, and I only know what I've read anyway....
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:46 AM
1

Well you can start here at teh wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:27 AM
1

Then do it. Well, I would, and I will, except that: I am in the Southwest and unable to go I am not aware of the physical localities and unable to help much with logistics I am an unknown mensrightser, subscribing for about two months now I think if I issued such a call, it would most likely not succeed I think it would be more likely to be successful if the leaders that are writing about this were to call for such a picketing. Or if the leaders at this reddit were. But I can suggest it be done,…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:22 AM
1

That's true. But I think it would be good to ask.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:13 AM
1

If he's in jail now, and there are 50,000 /r/MensRights subscribers, might be a good time to ask /r/mensrights to represent.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:57 AM
4

and I think that's a bit of a cop out because we have no control of what other people say. ... The most effective groups work as dictatorships, not democracies. No offense, but bleh. We already have atheismplus and feminisms and SRS for shining examples of heavy handed moderation. I haven't been here that long, but I really haven't see a ton of stuff to be ashamed of apart from noting what I noted above. There's a ton of people here, many of them experiencing a lot of suffering, and the speech i…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:39 AM
3

I am confident all but our trolliest of trolls (Aerik and FuTrolle) will see the dark humor in my comment.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:33 AM
2

Well, look at it this way. If you take the 77 cents to the dollar claim, and halve it and halve it again, you're down to 23 / 4 or less than 6%. I am willing to consider there might be a wage gap due to prejudice somewhere between 0 and 6%. That's a much different story than 23% being due to Patriarchy! At 6% it's much easier to sustain arguments that not much more than monitoring of the trend needs to be done, and maybe education and outreach, but certainly not quotas or other various active pi…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:30 AM
1

Is there any reason why /r/mensrights and AVFM and NCFM and all the others can't organize a real world on the ground good old fashioned picketing?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:13 AM
4

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/viral-video/bus-uppercut-charges-098521 Hughes remains suspended without pay from his RTA job, according to an agency spokesperson. He faces a maximum of six months in jail and a $1000 fine if convicted of the assault count. Lane’s lesser charge carries a maximum of 30 days in custody and a $250 fine. This is why men are paid more.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:38 AM
3

http://www.freakonomics.com/2008/05/01/robert-reich-answers-your-labor-questions/ Robert Reich Answers Your Labor Questions We recently solicited your questions for former labor secretary Robert Reich. He met your questions with earnest, interesting answers and some good advice — like how to avoid being outsourced. He also opined that there are too many M.B.A.’s running around, and that “they are killing the economy!” You might also like this line: “Democrats aren’t disciplined at anything; that…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:27 AM
4

Is this an undergraduate course? I wouldn't go in there to pick a fight, and I don't think you'll get very far with a battle of studies. I'd go in there as an undergrad asking the Professor about her views and knowledge. The material tells me rape is a crime of violence, is there no evidence that it is a crime of sex? We see rape in many other animal species including ducks, dolphins, chimpanzees, and even in bonobos. Do we think rape is a crime of violence in these species as well? That we see …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:14 PM
1

When I walk down a street late at night, I am wary of everyone, but I've actually never been mugged. I think it's completely reasonable to point out how blaming it is, and stereotypical, and misandrist in terms of how often the message is sent, but I am not going to tell anyone they are crazy to be wary of strangers. I believe the fallacy is in sending the message out as strongly or with the various misrepresentations as is done. I am not sure thinking that once you are alone walking that other …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:28 PM
7

Well you're the student. I am not sure any of those are philosophical. I think they fall more into questioning authority, and questioning the assumptions. Is rape a crime of violence, or a crime of sex, or can it be either? is supposedly very much based on research and psychology and forms the basis of the way rapists are found, and how rape is now prevented, and how rape is punished. Is rape a special kind of evil, and if so why, and if not, do we treat it as one? http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmw…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:23 PM
1

Near as I can tell "Schrodinger's rapist" is just a fancy feminist way of saying you are presumed a likely rapist until proven otherwise. I try not to police other people's thoughts, so I can't say that there is anything wrong per se with "Schrodinger's rapist". On the other hand it's closely linked with stranger danger, and paranoid fears of men, so I do think it's problematic that: we're so comfortable blaming all men we're so comfortable preaching paranoia of men if this were placed in other …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:09 PM
6

If I was taking a class in human sexuality that discussed rape, I think more interesting questions than just the raw statistics are: Is rape a crime of violence, or a crime of sex, or can it be either? Is rape a special kind of evil, and if so why, and if not, do we treat it as one? http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RapeIsASpecialKindOfEvil Do modern demands of "enthusiastic consent" criminalize normal sexual behavior? edit: changed from bullets to numbers.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:42 PM
3

Do you recognize the futrollity of such chaotic disorder, lack of discipline and misdirection? It's not clear it's completely futile. Granted, due to reddit being free links not being moderated until after the fact url links not requiring an explanation of the mens rights issue comments not being moderated until after the fact enormous amount of trolls enormous amount of ignorance enormous diversity of the population It is hard to imagine it being anything other than futility and rant. However, …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:09 PM
6

I think Manzboobz is a bit more focused on trolling which is why you gave yourself a name derived from another troll's name and rarely post anything interesting. And yes, reddits are a bit anarchistic and this one represents a diverse population with a wide variety of political beliefs. If you're going to pick on us for how there are people here that supported fundraising for a guy that lost his job, please add in we also allow a wide set of trolls that have very little of positive value to add.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:40 PM
2

I heard femitheist and felt sad someone wasted 20:22 recording how they fed the troll.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:59 PM
2

Well, my request for anyone that posts a link is to make it clear why you are posting that link. http://www.ohiocollegeclowningarts.com/ We ain't mind readers. With your explanation, we can have an interesting discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG1y_YsxANo Otherwise, there's not a whole lot to go on, and David FuTrolle and other people easily take it out of context and start fapping to it. Oh, there go the mras defending CP.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:03 AM
2

This subreddit suffers by letting people link random crap without having to make them explain what mens right issue they see in the link. And when random crap like this is posted what happens is that Aerik and Manboobz get out their SRS dildz and have a raucous and wild pleasure party.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:23 AM
1

Child Porn case may have 1st Amend. impact In Law Scoop By William Freivogel, special to the Beacon 4:10 pm on Mon, 05.19.08
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:56 AM
2

The article says the difference in IQ for races is genetic. Any evidence to support this? Good catch. That "theory" is entirely discredited. To the extent "races" even exist, any difference in average IQ between "races" is swamped by the variance of IQ within a "race". The differences, if any, are surely due to different historical paths, ie., slavery, education, stuff like that.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:42 AM
3

I sure hope s/he was a troll. (My guess is it was either Aerik, SuicideBanana or David FuTrolle.) My fear is that he was genuine, and really was taught these things in class.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:32 AM
1

What do I know, but that seems to be grounds for an eventual appeal by an actual lawyer due to incompetent counsel during the trial.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:07 AM
2

There is information about Goh's life that is interesting and does paint a new portrait of him, but the article almost tries to make Goh's killings of the students seem reasonable, and then goes out and makes a target of the dumbass administrator. And though I can well understand where Goh might be coming from, I'd say there are far worse jobs than working in a grocery store next to Dad in Daly City. That actually sounds kind of nice.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:57 PM
2

I appreciate this link phlake14222, and I think everyone should consider donating $5 to counterpunch, but fuck Carol Norris and fuck her article. There's so much psychological bullshit and self-congratulation in there I can't take her seriously, but I've seen the damage that psychologists inflict on other people first hand. And by the end of the article, it's still not clear that Norris genuinely feels this way, or if it just fits her agenda as a supporter of the Mirkarimis. I think at other tim…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:46 PM
1

Turns out it's actually an ad for the Glock Personal Space Protector.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:06 PM
2

Why do you write "would have done"? I believe there were two Lilly Ledbetter bills, the 2007 failed, but the 2009 was signed into law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay_Act_of_2009
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:59 PM
2

You truly are stupid, because throughout this thread people have explained to you she was 12 when she flashed her breasts, but you haven't been able to understand that. And even if she was 15, she was well under the age of consent, and extortion is extortion and always wrong. Remind me to take a shit on your grave.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:09 PM
9

That's a terrific video -- what's the best subreddit to post that into to try and get it to Reddit's front page? I'd title it something like: In 2007, Gawker's Emily Gould defended Violentacrez against Jimmy Kimmel Or?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:46 PM
4

She was 15 when she committed suicide, she was 12 when she was online and flashed the webcam. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Amanda_Todd And I have a 15 year old daughter, and I can't say that she couldn't get caught up in a blackmail / predator scheme like this.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:09 PM
17

She was 12 years old. Remind me to take a shit on your grave.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:59 PM
2

Well thank you!
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:35 PM
5

Is shitlord SRS terminology? As an SRS victim, I'd just as soon not be retriggered by SRS terminology. During my SRS assault, I was subjected to thousands of shrill fat huge vaginaed young white males flinging shitlord at me. /shudder as I remember that day
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:28 PM
1

Hey, I was just giving you shit dude. We've all been there and gotten the same response and left dumbfounded. I am truly sorry if you feel suicidal, ever. Many of us, myself included, know how that feels as well. I am hopeful we and the world can all make it to a day when the forces being atheism plus finally realize the war was over decades earlier and they can come in out of their caves. /r/SuicideWatch is apparently a good place if you really have the need to talk to people that know how to r…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:38 AM
0

Heh, one of the classic blunders is "never get involved in a land war in Asia", but what the hell were you doing thinking feminists had a sense of humor or trying to have a conversation with them? Come on dude, get real.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:22 AM
2

Yeah, none whatsoever, no fears, no need to worry about it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:16 AM
5

Okay, that's interesting, but my guess of course is the FBI and the Admins can get to them, and if they are not deleted read them, if they are deleted possibly retrieve them, or at least verify if the URL is within the appropriate range for that user. It is an interesting question to me, how one really can verify things like private messages or emails.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:40 PM
10

If the permalink points to it, it can be captured and made much more verifiable by the FBI who can ask the reddit admins about the veracity of the permalink. But not giving the url/permalink blows all of that away.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:29 PM
1

"She appears to be hitting him, the camera view is occluded, but that is what witnesses tell us". Here appears to be means, "WAS BUT WE CANNOT SEE IT" versus your claiming "appears to be" at the wiki means not actually occurring. That isn't what I was taught in my physics department. My physics professor explicitly stated that quantum fluctuations do not violate conservation of energy. If you have email access to him, please do, sincerely I mean that, ask him if he can clarify that as well as an…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:03 PM
2

Anyone who posted that and failed so completely to capture it in a verifiable manner is an idiot that needs shunning. Though I want to Believe, it seems like nonsense for now.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:50 PM
1

Okay, can we just agree that we got off on the wrong foot? Well, I'd be okay with that but... local violations of conservation of energy THIS IS/WAS TAUGHT IN PHYSICS DEPARTMENTS. It relates to local violations for local meaning very very very small distances and times. The sun creates a local violation of conservation of energy on earth, so that really isn't the best way to put it. THIS IS NOT TRUE AT ALL and certainly does not occur over very very very small distances or time. In a closed syst…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:39 PM
6

subredditdrama has a pretty good discussion of this in the thread about VA coming back to reddit as mbrutsch. mbrutsch's post correcting the many errors as he sees it in gawker's report is all pretty informative, more so than most of the stuff you've probably read about it. One point that is made is that Andersen Cooper has a lawyer look at it and on air the lawyer stated that he saw nothing illegal. There is also a possibly faked (just can't tell) image floating around antisrs of some SRSer adm…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:33 PM
1

One theory of virtual particles is that they are local violations of conservation of energy due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. That's how I learned it and what it says here http://i.imgur.com/eJQKS.jpg before stating "a modern view" that doesn't actually explain the modern view or rejecting the former view. Hell you even quoted it yourself, you just couldn't understand it: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11it41/happened_just_now_i_dont_even_remember_ever/c6mxa6w Amiright gu…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:18 PM
0

Space is a vacuum. The absence of matter. Matter is energy. There is no matter in a perfect vacuum, in space, so there is no meaningful way to discuss energy of a vacuum. WOOSH!!!! Yes, I said that. And what did I write next?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:10 PM
-1

No you idiot, my entire point was that the vacuum of space is not empty.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:51 PM
0

I wouldn't know anything about that. I don't even know if it that is possible Sigh. Regardless and sincerely, I am certain you are a great biochemist and very well qualified to discuss biochemistry.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:41 PM
10

I really don't know where they got the atheist bit from. I have some conspiracy theories about it, about wanting cover from atheism because the name feminism is stinking up the planet.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:40 PM
9

That was actually a pretty reasonable discussion.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:30 PM
1

Fine, but isn't this statement inaccurate? Those particles exist specifically because they don't create energy. A pair of virtual particles don't create energy. The single virtual particles of course have energy as all massfull particles have energy. If one of the virtual particles is sucked into a black hole, the result is that black hole ends up radiating energy and shrinks. The original point is still the same, Atheism can be defined on paper as X, doesn't mean atheists actually behave like X…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:14 PM
2

I am very happy for you.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:58 PM
1

Which particles? What particles don't create energy? Beats me, my degree in physics was quite long ago, when was yours?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:57 PM
10

Yeah, the best thing to do is probably to ignore it, but if you want somethings to google and waste your life over, start with elevatorgate. But a certain group of feminists (social justice workers) are trying to give themselves cover by identifying as or taking over atheism. Turns out atheism has too much misogyny and racism in it, so they have all new atheism plus, which is supposed to be atheism plus wonderful stuff for humanity but is mainly feminist atheism with a ton of name calling of peo…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:56 PM
1

My main point was the difference between Atheism and atheists. One can be defined one way, but the human implementation won't be bound by those purist definitions. And that's explicitly violated for Atheism Plus which is Feminist Atheism, certainly a religion since it explicitly believes in an untestable Sky Fairy, the Patriarchy. By the way, up a bit, the solution to my puzzle is not, "there is no such thing as a perfect vacuum", for even if there were, there would still be vacuum energy. It's …
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:49 PM
-1

When you see Mr. Heisenberg, ask him to explain "woosh" to you.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:45 PM
0

I was mostly joking. Was a physics major decades ago. My main point was the difference between Atheism and atheists. One can be defined one way, but the human implementation won't be bound by those purist definitions. And that's explicitly violated for Atheism Plus which is Feminist Atheism, certainly a religion since it explicitly believes in an untestable Sky Fairy, the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:07 PM
1

google vacuum energy. It involves "virtual particles" quantum theory the big bang heisenberg, the universe refusing to act in accordance with our definitions, and things existing where definitionally they cannot.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:05 PM
-2

At any rate, I think my response is reasonable. His "man made definitions" still have to hold together in a coherent, logical whole, and more importantly, they still have to conform to reality. Defining atheism as lack of religion may work fine on paper, but map it into reality and onto humans and your paper definitions become just another technological terror -- don't be too proud of them. They won't last the first minute when imposed on humans.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:02 PM
1

I apologize, I am not clear on what you are trying to say (or if you understand I was mostly joking.) (Or maybe trying to express something Zen) (As if I knew Zen.)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:58 PM
-12

Space is a vacuum. The absence of matter. Matter is energy. There is no matter in a perfect vacuum, in space, so there is no meaningful way to discuss energy of a vacuum. Vacuum energy don't real, amirite?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:53 PM
9

Please see my prior comment, which basically clarifies my comment as saying, Atheism maybe defined to be without religion or dogman, but atheists are human and completely susceptible to having biases, and behaviors typically associated with religious behaviors. Consider science. Science is a well defined methodology used to determine various truths about the universe and that methodology excludes biases and other forms of corruption. Scientists on the other hand, are humans, and completely susce…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:50 PM
25

Oh boo hoo. Atheism is the lack of religion. Atheists as humans are not immune from having thoughts, behaviors, tactics, normally associated with the religious. And bigger fail, Atheism Plus is not Atheism. It's Atheism + Feminism.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:46 PM
4

Or as they defend it, "It's MsInformation not mis-information!!!"
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:23 PM
4

A couple of things: CIA/OSS Involvement in the media is not a conspiracy theory. It starts with the The Mighty Wurlitzer, Operation Mockingbird, and hey, with the cozy atmosphere between lazy journalists and greedy and "patriotic" publishers likely continues to this day. "Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA" is a MRA bingo card, so yah, some aging fat bitter feminist troll watcher just got a hit on his or her bongo card. But in fact, she did. Regardless, THIS article fails to put any of this toget…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:05 PM
69

Pre-emptory bans are a feature of SRS mods. I think they have a script that pulls out /r/mr posters. It's because atheism plus at its heart is no better than any religion -- it is religion.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:22 PM
2

While I think this is a good idea, and while Reddit is a nice tool, I don't think it's the appropriate tool for this. I think a wiki would be a far better way to organize this, since it allows better organization, and hence, better searching and browsing for the quotes in the future. I would have loved to have been tracking Amanda with a wiki coupled perhaps with screenshots to keep her quotes verifiable and out of the memory hole (the real reason pandagon moved to rawstory was to scrub its hist…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:02 PM
1

Thought you might be interested in doxxing from 2 years ago in a completely different reddit being discussed now in subredditdrama. That doxxing was in /skeptic http://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/11hwbq/classic_kleinbl00_his_wife_get_doxed_and_receive/
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:57 AM
1

I think white knight is not insulting, has a reasonable cultural reference, and holds a lot more definitional power than coward. I don't think coward expresses what John The Other is describing in the first part of his essay. Is he trying to express the condition of being a serf, or supplicant, or a monk, or novice, or one of the mortified? Actually JtO tags it with the correct name, a sycophant or a flatterer. That said, I think mangina is insulting, has no relationship to how I feel about vagi…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:40 AM
1

Nah, if she really couldn't demonstrate consent by passing those tests, showing her ability to make meaningful yes/no decisions about her body while being taped then I wouldn't even touch her with David FuTrolle's feminist encrusted Amanda Marcotte scented Jessica Valenti signature Jeff Stryker dildz. If she can say no to giving someone credit cards, say no to driving, say yes to sex, then it's consensual and likely would blow under a BAC of what the cops named "girl so high she slept with PZ My…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:22 AM
0

I saw about half of it. I would have asked some questions since tape was rolling, established her consent and ability to consent, that she was "not that drunk", asked her for her credit cards and money to make sure she could dissent ask her if she wanted to drive the car or if she knew she was too drunk for that. And then if she passed and on tape had consented, oh yeah, I would have been glad to have spent my roughly 120 seconds with her.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:34 AM
-3

I love private equity lesbains. You can break me up, break me down anytime, gals.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:28 AM
8

I don't even want to get into this, because I find way too much anti-semitism on the net these days and it's depressing as all hell. Ever hear stories about sort of emasculated jewish man-boys and jewish american princesses? Quite funny. And we call these people some of our best comedians Woody Allen Eugene Levy Fran Drescher Bette Midler Seth Green Senator Al Franken Richard Drefuss Billy Crystal Lots of Jewish comedians have played to this type, even if in real life they weren't of this type a…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:25 AM
0

Up Yours Atheist! Your entry needed a Trigger Warning. Like this: [Trigger Warning] Trigger Warning for Trigger Warning because of Trigger Warning
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:19 AM
1

Well, FtB seems to be down at the moment, but this link is one reason: Why do I despise MRAs? | Pharyngula Basically David FuTrolle lies and distorts what happens here, PZ Myers believes him and goes on a rampage and I believe PZ Myers has in the past made similar claims about MRAs if not about /r/MensRights Visit /r/AntiAtheismPlus or visit SlymePit.com for more surfing goodness about PZ Myers.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:02 AM
-2

Hey I apologize, it's been a long weekend for me, but it's not really clear to me which site you are speaking about. I posted what I posted about register-her due to their claims about what they do. But I haven't audited them to ensure that is the case. If you feel that their claims are inaccurate, or they have violated them, or they just lying, please do give us some examples of that. Again, I have not audited them, I copied from this link on their site: http://register-her.com/index.php?title=…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:03 AM
0

I think this is a reasonable topic to discuss, or even just rant over. I certainly know the pain of arguing in good faith on the net to have some feminist or white knight tell me that I just couldn't get laid and I am a bitter white man. So I think it is true, how ironic that feminists use the very things they complain about as weapons against men. They will claim the hipster ironic hypocrisy exception though, it is US that finds those terms upsetting, not them, so they are just circle jerking u…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:01 AM
3

I don't see /r/mr focusing on this. I do think it's reasonable to make people aware of the issue, how doxxing is done, the threats of doxxing, the legality of doxxing, why you may wish to either be perfectly well known on the net, or be as anonymous as you can, tools that can help, and other issues including is it likely. But I have to say in the redditosphere as it is now with millions of users none of whom know each other IRL and the amount of vicious trolling and enormous circlejerks within r…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:15 PM
2

I only skimmed her article, I found the font hard to read, it's been a fucked up weekend for me, etc., I certainly disagree with most of the views she expresses at her website and I suspect most of her politics as well. She is a Ph.D psychologist with about 15 years of experience. While the article she published is not peer reviewed, it does have a few references at the bottom of it. I have seen the views in her article expressed elsewhere. It's not revolutionary to think that many rapes are cau…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:05 PM
3

I just can't imagine any employer taking such tattle-taling seriously unless it were actually a case of workplace harassment. On that, I guess I disagree. I read everyday about employers and HR departments scanning facebook. There have been cases of employees being fired over facebook content, sometimes content that appears on someone else's page entirely. Just a few days ago, a diversity staffer was suspended because she signed "the wrong" petition: http://www.volokh.com/2012/10/11/suspending-e…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:44 PM
-2

register-her only publishes information already, previously, published by a recognized news affiliate and/or digital copies of court records gawker and doxxers go out and data mine the internet to find private information about people, most of whom are guilty of nothing other than ugly speech, to encourage others to harass and intimidate them.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:39 PM
1

Actually it is far far better than hollaback. register-her only publishes verifiable information: http://register-her.com/index.php?title=Submission_Guidelines It is not the intent of this registry to emulate those who commit false allegations, therefore this policy is written to provide guidelines for the approval of submissions designed to ensure the authenticity of the information provided. Only those submissions that can be corroborated by either a link(s) to a recognized news affiliate and/…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:32 PM
3

I don't understand why anyone on r/mensrights would be concerned about doxxing. There are many people that happily say, erroneously, the SPLC lists /r/mensrights as a hate group. Political speech is not protected. Employers can fire you for political speech. At the beginning of my divorce (prior to Facebook), my lawyer told me to be very careful about the Internet, that belonging to Father's Rights groups was often not looked on favorably by judges or psychologists. I have definitely had blogger…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:21 PM
2

I believe it is supposed to be a pun and add some pseudo-science terms to the gender wars. But it comes from chemistry in which there are cis and trans versions of molecules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism The terms cis and trans are from Latin, in which cis means "on the same side" and trans means "on the other side" or "across". The term "geometric isomerism" is considered an obsolete synonym of "cis/trans isomerism" by IUPAC.[1] It is sometimes used as a synonym for …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:05 PM
0

It would seem the resident ladies For what it's worth, from what we can tell from his twitter page, Aerik is probably yet another SAWCSM (Straight Ablebodied White CiSgender Male) and Stephen_Murphy almost assuredly is a male identified individual. Of course, if you believe their polls, most of SRS is composed of young North American SAWCSMs which is why they know so much about oppression.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:23 PM
1

Weird. So I don't know who made the OP post in ideasforadmins, but if it wasn't you, I'd swear it was someone with a fakingly similar name. But this is the AnnArchist post that I think is the most interesting. http://www.reddit.com/r/ideasfortheadmins/comments/11fehl/close_the_srs_subreddit/c6m7ct5 http://i.imgur.com/deysJ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/rQlMo.jpg http://i.imgur.com/fX7JT.jpg
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:10 PM
3

Whitehouse.gov has one that is directed to the Obama Administration, sadly, and famously, they have ignored some very important petitions with thousands of signatures on them.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:41 PM
1

Ah, maybe it was from AnnArchist It was here: http://i.imgur.com/DikkA.jpg If I recall correctly, it was link after link of cites to SRS saying one thing, doing another in terms of rotten behavior, and then, it was link after link of posts at Reddit and Something Awful making a very good case that SRS started as and is an ongoing Something Awful project to disrupt reddit, and that there was a profit motive behind it, at Something Awful you have to pay $10 to get to all the threads at Reddit all …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:22 PM
2

It's a take no prisoners, winner take all, today is a great day to die, holy war for the fempire. The rest of us would like to reduce unwanted pregnancies.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:14 PM
1

Your post in ideasfortheadmins was wonderfully researched. Can/should that be posted here or in the "mens rights wiki" for archival?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:00 AM
17

As a computer scientist and software engineer, I would love to see more women busting out in this field. But there is no need for women's only workshops. Outreach consists of workshops open to all, but perhaps with advertising to targeted populations. Women's only workshops promote the idea that somehow with a man in the audience, women will somehow not be able to speak freely, and ask their questions and femsplain why scheduler algorithms should take into account women's processes cycle time an…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:53 AM
1

This would still be a stupid idea, but would this make it legal? They should: Describe drivers as entertainers which seems to allow discrimination ala Hooters waitresses and Tilted Kids. Take on everyone Do it this way, they can still have female only drivers and supposedly women would find their service of value.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:26 PM
-2

I actually think their list is interesting, because some of what we say IS funny, and yet often, some of what we say is extremely real, extremely tragic, and extremely poignant and all of these things are things that feminists mock us for. So I think it really would be a good thing to take their list and discuss one item on it every few days and use it to populate the wiki in the right sidebar. And ask /r/MRs to help either define the term, find instances of it in the real world, find men and fa…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:29 AM
0

If I can get up off my huge ass, I was thinking of taking one of these a day, and playing it, explaining it, and putting it into the wiki. Sort of reclaim them, and note what we think the issues are that they are happy and eager to gloss over as they insist there is no such thing as a male rights civil rights movement. But you know what they say, "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win" then you get to drive the enemy in front of us and hear the lamentat…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:44 AM
-4

No, seriously, I think it's totally okay to say these things. But these are apparently the cliches we say all the time, and the topics that are sooo outrageous that are bringing it up just brings howls of laughter to our watchers. And apparently there are people with so much time on their hands they play bingo using our posts for bingo fodder. So, I just think to make their lives a bit more fun, we should say these things more often, so they don't go too long without a bingo. So for instance, an…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:41 AM
-2

Well apparently that is advice one straw MRA gives to another straw MRA when advising how to keep Feminist and other women from spermburgling us. If you hunt down known troll straw watching MRA sites you can come across this stuff pretty easily.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:37 AM
-4

Anyway, since I was financially raped by a bitch cunt, I'll be stepping out for awhile to go to a discount barber. Perfect princesses, my cut will be $7.00 their's is normally $50 or so and I have to pay. FEmales. Of course, women don't really like sex and women use sex to get money. Why a woman's vagina is like a man's wallet! Women don't work. Women are herd animals. After that it will be happy hour, which men invented. Why aren't feminists fighting for Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:10 AM
-2

Unmasking violentacrez is Misandry! MISANDRY! The perfect princesses at SRS are busy creepshaming. Women use sex to get money. Slut shaming is good for women. And why is there no birth control for men? Of course, Adrian Chen is the Rationalization hamster. Remember when fucking Adrian Chen, Put hot sauce in the used condom, because he'll spermjack you. Feminism will destroy civilization. (+) these are things that MRA-bitches believe straw MRAs say. (++) First they ignore you... (+++) bitch isn't…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:56 PM
0

Okay, well, I need to get a haircut (really badly too), so, ... I absolutely heartily encourage you to: visit COTWA and/or put them on your RSS list and read them for two weeks or a month (a month) lurk or participate at /r/MensRights Tell us what you have learned at the end of that period about /r/MensRights MRAs false accusations whether people that communicate in /r/MensRights need throwaways, and if so, why
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:32 PM
1

So Google does find "Their brutish existence holds no dreams and for a man who goes out into every day" but does not find it in Google Books until I explicitly click on "Books".
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:30 PM
1

Thank you so much! http://i.imgur.com/W7b2B.jpg (myth confirmed? :) )
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:28 PM
1

It's a throwaway. Obviously. Why do you feel the need for a throwaway? Why shouldn't a throwaway raise the probability you are a troll higher? But why do you feel the need for a throwaway?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:15 PM
3

Actually what makes you look like a troll is Your zero day account with only one link and comments only to this question Your intense refusal throughout this thread to acknowledge or concede or thank anyone Your insults of people and claims they may somehow be rape apologists (by asking them if they think rape is a big deal.) Your intense desire to defend your position which takes you from your relatively neutral position "is this a problem" to a very partisan "women don't do that" posiiton Your…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:52 PM
5

I'm also curious if you consider rape to be a big deal. What is this other than a bad faith argument?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:48 PM
3

My question now though, that we've moved outside of false rape accusations and into false accusations of many kinds, does this continue to be a mens rights issue? Surely everyone faces false accusations that can negatively affect others views of them? What I've been accused of, false accusations of domestic violence, false accusations of being a threat to the kids, occurs primarily in the context of divorce. Men's Issue or Father's Issue or does that matter? And yes, all men, all men and women s…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:29 PM
2

I can sympathize with their desire to fight street harassment - I think they need to blur faces (like Google Street View does), and make it easier to get a hold of admins there and have a process in which photos are taken down and/or rebuttals apply or other measures. But what I also am very annoyed with is how loving their press is, and why not most of the people reporting on them are young, very feminist oriented, idiot reporters lacking an understanding of what false accusations can do and to…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:55 PM
-1

My complaint about ihollaback stems from their iphone app (which I've never actually seen) and their website that encourages the anonymous posting of photographs of men with descriptions like the one above of their "crime". ihollaback then does not blur faces, allow rebuttals, or even provide a place to email to to take a photograph down. Not sure how facebook works these days, but at some point with automatic face tagging, it was likely possible to identify the men by uploading the photograph t…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:22 PM
7

ihollaback exists to capture, create trophies of and fetishize these sorts of incidents. I think some men and women could decide this is harassment and some men and women think it's not. I can understand hearing that out of the blue and trying to understand what was being said and why, and having to re-examine the surroundings and decide if there was now a danger. I can also see that the Tom Brady standard might apply. It's harassment when it's unwanted and sexy and confident when it's that guy …
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:07 PM
1

I can't find it now, but in another thread here, Guy Braunum's video was taken apart pretty persuasively. It probably would be good to have someone produce videos with high production values and a good interesting and comedic speaker for mens rights. But this video was accurate only at a very high level of propaganda -- I would hope we could do better.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:00 PM
3

During my divorce, I have been falsely accused of domestic violence, and falsely accused of being a danger to my kids. I've had a TRO obtained against me based on these false accusations and I've had custody reduced in ex parte hearings. There are lots of false accusations that are wielded against men, not just false accusations of rape. The presence of one kind of false accusation can help confirm the likely presence of the other kinds. Some people even now will read that I say I am falsely acc…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:48 PM
2

Thank you, I need to look that up.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:14 PM
6

Abortion should not only be safe and legal, it should be rare. BILL CLINTON, speech at DNC, Aug. 29, 1996 If you google it, Hillary has said that too, as well as President Obama, though apparently, that's no longer the official Democratic position. If you google it further, you can find that's basically the position of the majority of Americans. (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-05/how-democrats-lost-their-way-on-abortion.html) And further still, you come up with many feminist blogs like th…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:07 PM
5

I am sure if I could afford a lawyer for an n day trial and to protect me each month when my ex attacks me to the children and in court, I would be much better off too. But hell, I can't even afford the lawyer phone calls, much less a several day trial.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:28 PM
1

I admit, when I see videos of girls fighting, it does seem very weird. They are videos video'd for a reason, so they aren't representative, but girls, wow, they fight like hell, without boundaries, and top it off with lots of terrible bullying. At least that's what it seems. The boys fighting, seem to know where the boundaries are, and respect that. But beats me, I haven't been in a fight for decades. But if all the girls were to flock together? The very concept is unimaginable. Why, if that hap…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:46 PM
4

Didn't Romney say he would make no legislation regarding abortion? Honestly I don't know. I don't know what a President could do apart from nominating Supreme Court Justices and jawboning.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:56 AM
5

Yeah, I don't think that's going to work. Feminism was able to succeed when it did through language because it has a women's studies department, and it launched on the back of the civil rights movement and the 60s and 70s where everyone was questioning authority and subverting the dominant paradigm and listening to Noam Chomsky and pretending they knew what Lacan and Foucault and deconstruction were all about, and even then most people thought Feminists were pretty silly with their womyn and ovu…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:51 AM
11

This position is a ridiculous emotion based cop out Well, I think humanity often holds positions that are based on ridiculous emotions. Agree with Ryan or not, his position oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. used to be the standard position of several religions and many Americans. I am more Clintonian, safe, legal, and rare which I think is close to the plurality of American views these days. There are feminists and others that dislike the Clintonian sta…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:12 AM
0

Regrettably IMGN, I responded to your copypasta answer in the wrong place, so I didn't make the allusion to Jezebel. And since I haven't said this anywhere else, fuck Jezebel for using the name of one of the best Twilight Zone episodes, with Anne Francis and a young James Best who became Sheriff Rosco P. Coltrane.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:39 AM
0

Well, I guess you should have saved links. Even Warlizard doesn't seem to be saying he is sticking up for VA because VA is a nice guy. He says in his interactions VA was a nice guy but the subs he created were as offensive as anything I've even heard of and then he talks about the doxxing. In the next thread, the one here, I'd say that the focusing on the doxxing issue and the lack of support for VA because of his actions are the takeaway. Skimming through the threads today, I see a lot of peopl…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:15 AM
0

Feminists have a lot more in common with Hitler, with their biological determinist positions, than they do with Marx. Well, I wouldn't mind reading some historians with excellent reputations discuss this, though my understanding is that it's more Marx and not Groucho. But I don't think that Reddit is the right place at this time for that discussion, and if someone wants to have a discussion about that, it's best for everyone if they are careful how they word and explain what they are attempting.…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:00 AM
8

Here is a huffpo article where he is quote as saying but the policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/11/biden-ryan-debate-abortion_n_1960078.html WARNING LINK GOES TO HUFFPO So unfinite, my guess is that you are right, that such a policy would result in an increase of rape claims. For instance before no fault divorce, married couples wanting a divorce would often collude and m…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:55 AM
0

Oh stop that. Do not compare feminists to Hitler, that way lies doom for everyone. If you want to discuss how much of feminism comes from a marxist ideology that's fair game and of interest. Please do that. But all you're doing now is getting SRS panties wet, which is sort of sad, since they are 70% young white north american men.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:48 AM
2

"Men are the real victims. Confusion keeps them going. Their brutish existence holds no dreams and for a man who goes out into every day there is not signal of reassurance." - John Cassavetes [citation-needed.jpg] I can't find this quote using Google. Can you provide a citation for this?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:46 AM
1

Hi IMakeGaggingNoises, I see you are an Interface. Welcome to Mens Reddit, I can see you have never been here before. I will be happy to answer all of your questions, first though before we start discussing your thoughtful question, please [ ] Check here indicating you have read the various threads on the subject at /r/mensrights and can thus answer your own question by realizing it is a straw question and no one is defending violentacrez as a nice guy you stupid dumbass lazy troll. Thank you IM…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:31 AM
2

Yes, those costs sound about right. Of course where I am the courts are so busy there apparently is almost no such thing as a 3 day trial, much less a 5 day trial. It's apparently hard to get a 1 day trial. But many of the costs for research, depositions, etc., will be the same. It's really no wonder why so many average income fathers just drop out. No one can afford it. Of course if you do drop out, other people will take that to mean you deserted your family, or weren't really interested, or y…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:23 AM
5

So in the US, thanks to Miranda and TV Shows, everyone knows that in a criminal trial, a lawyer will be appointed for us if we cannot afford one. But that's not the case for civil trials, even if an outcome of a civil trial is jail time since parents that cannot pay support can and do face contempt charges. What's the story in Canada?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:15 AM
7

This is a sadly familiar story. RIP.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:12 AM
3

I think the only issue is, that not only do I want a male pill, but I want it to turn my penis temporarily green, or stripe it orange, or something that proves I have taken it. Maybe it tattoos the days date on my nuts or taint or something. Because I hate condoms, okay? There, I said it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:19 AM
3

I think it's a reasonable issue, but it differs for a) husbands and very serious boyfriends, and b) casual sex partners. If I was a woman I would never believe a casual sex partner saying he had taken the pill, no need for condoms. Would I believe a husband or very serious boyfriend? I dunno. I have to take a daily pill for my heart, and sometimes hey, it's late in the day when my heart reminds me it's time to take that pill. If the requirements are daily and at the same time and the result is i…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:35 AM
-1

Why are you posting this? Your history indicates you have never contributed anything, comment or link to mensrights before. Now you are posting this and not explaining what your mens issue is with it. Go eat a bullet asshole. Take your trolling elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:27 AM
2

I agree. As a kid it was trivial for me to lie. Now as an adult, though I may really want to lie, I find it very difficult to.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:13 AM
4

Testosterone Administration Reduces Lying in Men Paid for by the Committee to re-elect President Testosterone (I am President Testosterone, and I approve this message.)
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:37 AM
1

It's about equality, namely the equal responsibility aspect. This is vague. If you feel this is an issue, you should explain it in the link or in a comment. The video to me is about a fight between two angry people and tells me nothing. I can see people complaining that angry mens rightsers think beating on women is good and then using this submission as evidence, regardless of your good intentions. So if you want to post this stuff, I suggest you make it very clear as to what the issue you see …
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:31 AM
3

how am I supposed to feel about this dickhead It sounds like an explosive situation. You're the one who needs to be firm and not give that dickhead too many strokes.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:05 AM
30

You can’t complain that guys are not sensitive, then when we become sensitive about something, tell us we should just man up about it. Absolutely. Take it from someone who is white and male, and at one point felt so overwhelmed and alone that suicide felt like a good idea, it doesn’t matter what gender you are, and what race you are, feelings are all the same. I am sorry that you have been made to feel this way, and I understand it entirely and I have been there.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:44 AM
-1

I don't know what this video of aggression between two people has to do with mens rights. Since you didn't bother to explain the mens rights issue while presenting such an inflammatory video, I have reported your link and downvoted it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:42 AM
1

My point isn't saying "this reddit is like that reddit", my point is in questioning the various media sites that have applauded hollaback, which I think is a terrible site due to their policies.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:43 PM
1

That's a tough one for me. I'm honestly not sure. Right now it is legal to fire somebody for their political beliefs - should it be? Should political affiliation be a protected class? I found this 10 year old Slate article that says the same thing you just did: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2002/07/can_your_boss_fire_you_for_your_political_beliefs.html But yes, I find it difficult to reconcile free speech with the ability to be fired for expressing political position…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:42 PM
2

So they do. But the example you cite is not an internet-anonymity issue. Yeah, that's why I said sort of related. Free speech =/= freedom from the consequences of saying things that piss other people off. Hmm. If we aren't free to sign political petitions without fear of being fired, I would say we don't really have any free speech at all. Actually in the case I linked to, it was the diversity officer and she was apparently signing a petition against gay marriage -- so there's an awful lot of ir…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:26 PM
1

people calling up your loved ones or your boss and telling them something nasty and untrue about what you do online, etc.? I think this is a very real fear. My lawyer told me at the beginning of my divorce to be very careful about online forums, and told me NOT to let it be known I even read Father's Rights forums because it would be used against me. It's also not illegal for employers to look at your online activities and regardless of your job performance decide to fire you because you are not…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:02 PM
1

There aren't pictures http://nyc.ihollaback.org/share-your-story/ When ihollaback first came out, it was lauded big time across feminist websites and the Internet itself and it encourages posting of pictures and many of its posts do contain pictures. http://i.imgur.com/Bf40H.jpg As recently as April, The Atlantic Wire was hyping hollaback and hollback was posting photos. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/04/app-fight-street-harassment/51493/ And my guess is that if you ask prominent I…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:34 PM
4

If a newcomer came to this subreddit today, I could see how they got that impression. Yes, if a newcomer came to the ACLU the day they were defending the KKK's right to march in Skokie, that newcomer might get a bad impression of the ACLU as well. As I said earlier: As I struggled during my divorce, and still do, I have always been afraid that posting to forums like glennsacks.com (when we could comment there) (and before reddit) would get me doxxed in real life and in court. My lawyer told me t…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:45 PM
2

LOL. My understanding is that men get tipped more, actually - but the advantage is proportional to men's average greater height, and the fact that tall people get tipped better than short people. That's interesting.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:03 PM
1

Let's flood r/MR with posts and comments in defense of the guy who created the sub where a teacher posted pictures of his underage students, taken without their knowledge. Oh, and another sub called r/jailbait, which I think speaks for itself. That won't come back to haunt us, will it? As I struggled during my divorce, and still do, I have always been afraid that posting to forums like glennsacks.com (when we could comment there) (and before reddit) would get me doxxed in real life and in court.…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:42 PM
0

My guess is you do jack shit.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:34 PM
17

I have one of the best lawyers in my state. I'm more than content to sue their asses off for harassment, extortion, libel/slander, and defamation of character. I can't even afford a shitty lawyer, so how do I encourage people to dox you, not me?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:23 PM
17

But we don't actually know those men did anything wrong. It could be a lot of justice porn. And the men don't know they have been accused of anything. So they get accused of a crime, they have their real world faces posted, they have no knowledge of that, and wat? That's okay? That's a good thing?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:15 PM
0

I've never been talking about non-verbal consent or the finger up the ass, I've been talking about how sex should be political. Well, for my political sex I have FARK.com. With real people I engage in loving acts and shy away from donkeys, elephants, or politicizing acts. If that works for you, politicizing all your actions, thinking all the time about power dynamics, I guess, great, I am glad it works out for you. It's clear that Jezebel's author was not writing for you or people like you, and …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:13 PM
7

That's actually a pretty interesting, insightful article. It sure does remind me of the feminism I read in the papers growing up.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:37 PM
0

Not the point. BDSM is no stranger to the stuff being talked about here and the writings about it can provide a pretty good base when one's considering sex in a non-BDSM context. It's entirely the point. BDSM needs very strict protocols because they purposely push boundaries of consent. BDSM protocols have very little to say amongst most lovers in loving situations engaged in loving loving who are quite able to reasonably engage in modes of non-verbal consent.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:22 PM
-1

Wow, nowhere in the article does anything even hint at that. She "dramatically hurt him" by not letting him touch her breasts? Really? Yeah, obviously. He clearly wanted to, that's what the article is about right? He wants to, she doesn't let him. I'm sorry bad math too much alcohol last night, not for 15 years but for five. So 5 years, from 22 to 27 or so she has no cancer, and keeps her herself from loving her entire body, who she is, and keeps her loved one from doing that as well, all to fee…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:20 PM
-2

2) I find it laughable you're playing internet doctor (and psychologist) over a short first-person article. I'm sure you know better than her team of doctors. Do you really think she would have opted for a double mastectomy without being really, absolutely sure as to its necessity? She had years to think about it and back out if she wanted. I never said anything at all about the operation she had. Perhaps I am not the person misreading the article or the responses. The women should have had bett…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:59 PM
0

Uh yeah, not everyone does BDSM and so not everyone needs BDSM's rules about consent when they're having sex.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:56 PM
-2

They're both the same thing though? Sorry that "the personal is political" is a thing and that the entire point is to consider the complexities of a consensual sex act occurring in the midst of complicated power dynamics and social pressures and that is somehow a bad thing because it'll ruin the spontaneity (what are we, 13 years old?) and the rules of "real life" don't apply in sex because it exists in a vacuum. If that's the way you like your sex, all the more power to you. The author at Jezeb…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:59 AM
7

Not in a work of fiction set on Planet Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:32 AM
-2

Nice Mitt, I like the way you take charge of the question and answer the question you are prepared to answer, not the question actually asked. If you go to the original source, the author gave a lengthy explanation why she felt the original questioner was overthinking the situation. Go read that and then ask yourself if Rebecca is more upset with the response to that question, or more upset with the author's treatment of feminism. On way you might figure it out is by examining how much time Wats…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:51 AM
6

I think she's doing something worse. She's taking one incident of bad parenting and a bratty kid, she notes there were two other boys with much better skills, and nevertheless she manages to blame the first kid on patriarchy and rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:32 AM
-1

Yeah she says the sex columnist is advocating sexual assault. The sex columnist is writing at j*bel, so you can probably safely assume she is not advocating sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:10 AM
2

Yeah, that it is.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:08 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3EzRAgjo_s
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:31 AM
-1

Where I agree with Watson: You don't just shove things into orifices without the other person's prior consent. If you follow the links (shh: it will eventually take you to j*bel) no one is suggesting they shove things into orifices, and the need to obtain consent is basically discussed, but it's a non-verbal consent between, lovers.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:27 AM
-2

Are there porn channels that specialize in Feminist Enthusiastic Consent Fetish Porn?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:20 AM
-4

Does it have to be enthusiastic verbal consent, or do you and your lover have other ways to express yes and no?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:01 AM
20

Oh it's absolutely insulting to the mods of /r/politics /r/mensrights and any other subreddit that agrees to the ban, and it's also very short sighted. It would have taken no effort for /r/keto, r fucking keto to block gawker, they have probably never posted a gawker link or have any worry that gawker would link to them. Well, consider past times in history where people stand by idly and don't fight for other people's civil rights.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:40 AM
3

A lot of bots at reddit use pastebin for logging, or storage, so what I find when I do this are bots similar to rightsbot logging all of a thread at subredditdrama, then an srs bot noting I post in /r/mr. What I find amusing is that a lot of these pastebins are so useless and never expire.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:33 AM
2

I was actually surprised to see Paglia at Salon. Since Walsh took over and started the Broadsheet era there was a real freeze on Camille Paglia, Cathy Young and other equity feminists.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:09 AM
8

I'm not sure which Anne Frank quote you're referring to, but I did respond with Pastor Niemoller (and voted up the guy who was downvoted for his Pastor Niemoller poem in /r/politics)
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:06 AM
19

Since screenshots are allowed If you absolutely must post something from one of these websites, post a screenshot. Please do not link there or your post will be removed, even self posts. Then it's not really censorship. It's more like withdrawing enthusiastic consent. And it's raising awareness with the goal that there can be greater discussion of gawker's encouragement of doxxing, or their campaign to attack reddit.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:05 AM
36

Sadly, ladysixstring of /r/keto writes back /r/keto mods have nothing to worry about since, as far as i know, none of us are pedophiles. http://i.imgur.com/GKCxi.jpg
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:01 AM
18

I just sent a version of the announcement to the moderators of the other reddit I frequent, silly as it is, /r/keto, encouraging them to join in on general principles and to help lead to a greater reddit banning of gawker.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:36 AM
5

Okay, thank you.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:19 AM
21

Well, that's why I think Reddit/Conde Nast/Advance Publications should ban Gawker -- I don't see how our banning them will be effective.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:18 AM
13

I understand this policy and think this is both good and bad. Frankly, I think whoever the fuck it is that runs Reddit should kick gawker out of ALL of reddit for a month or more for this bullshit. That said, it seems at times important to link Jezebel as they are often considered an important site for women and feminism and they have several women there (Lindy West, Anna North, Katie Baker, etc.) that are terribly misandrist and are never called on it. I dislike kicking domains out, I would pre…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:56 AM
-10

Look like Aerik's having a grand old circle jerk against this thread. Make sure you use plenty of lube Aerik! You don't want that chafing problem like last time!!
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:18 AM
-7

At the time they met, she had a strong suspicion she would need the surgery, but as to when I don't believe that was established or could be. I know shit about cancer, but Susan G. Komen says: http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/GeneMutationsampGeneticTesting.html Having a BRCA1/2 mutation does not mean you are going to get breast cancer. And, not having a mutation does not mean you will never get breast cancer; you are still at risk. And so when she writes this: When I was 18, a blood test reveal…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:55 PM
21

Edit3: After discussion with Manboobz he has assured me that he does not promote doxxing. I think David FuTrolle is being disingenous (that is he is lying). When he has discussed it on his site his attitude is along the lines of: I don't think people should dox each other but look how hilarious it is and it was his own damn mra fault but really, we shouldn't do it FuTrolle is a fucking liar that won't take responsibility for his bullshit
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:15 PM
-18

He could look at her breasts, just not sexualize them. Yeah, that's time to see a psychiatrist. Her idea was to alleviate later disappointment for the both of them. At some indeterminate time in the future. This is sort of like helicopter parenting, and always looking into the abyss and seeing only darkness. It really was past time for her to see a doc. And then later, when she gets her new breasts? I am glad she has been cured, but her reaction to them and her ability to order them up in size i…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:05 PM
1

You have to wonder if they can help it. Maybe it's some kind of mating directive that just takes over and they discuss penes and balls. Then they go to the most virile and try to snooker him into conceiving a child with them Pretty much explains you. How I regret those three minutes with your mom.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:59 PM
3

Yes, I think so too, but maybe we could hold bot races, see which are the most efficient of reddit cycles, which are fastest, which obey the three laws.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:53 PM
1

Simplecosine, First, this is not a mens rights issue. Second, this is an issue that will split groups. Third, the report here is completely uncorroborated. No hardcopies, no screenshots, no links to his posts at other sites. It's unsubstantiated rumor that actually contradicts other information about a so called Israeli propaganda desktop tool called Megaphone. It's also posted at a bullshit new agey, christian, we're all going to be redeemed by aliens website. So if you believe anything this gu…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:40 PM
-11

I would tend to agree. Her reaction before hand is somewhat understandable, mostly bizarre and unhealthy.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:31 PM
-1

Hey look it's truthman2000 again! Welcome back truthman2000! I thought you had been banned.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:25 PM
3

On a related issue, I am somewhat surprised as I move around reddit how many different bots there are all doing the same damn thing. Which I guess is good for unemployed bots.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:54 PM
0

Okay, thank you for that.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:53 PM
5

My suggestion would be slightly different. I would boldly post in the sidebar the free speech philosophy of /r/mr and make it about as clearly known as possible what sort of posts violate those rules. And then state that moderators are here to enforce those rules and often may disagree vehemently with what is posted, but if they abide by the rules, will not take them down. And then I'd ask for a group of 5 - 10 moderators and ask them to moderate, but moderate only, not posting with, their REAL …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:52 PM
3

There's a more complete discussion of him in /r/SubredditDrama And the answer is: it's hard to know. There was this guy violentacrez that seems to have been formative in much of the reddit mythos, from running user meetups to being adamant about free speech, to pushing buttons and trolling, somehow in the name of free speech. His actions ranged from good to horrible and he accumulated a lot of enemies and followers. It might be (I've only been here two months and never ran across the guy) that h…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:46 PM
6

imgur and imgur tools have become some of my best friends when playing on the internet.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:38 PM
4

Yes, but there is also this: http://code.reddit.com/wiki/help/faqs/Admin Official statements from Reddit.com can be found on the Reddit Blog And that mentions this new guy dacvak, and trying to send him a message leads to this as a way to message all the admins: http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Freddit.com Beats me, seems needlessly opaque to me, especially from a site that portrays itself as a free speech site.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:37 PM
13

Thanks. I was aware she has a big pink SRS tag next to her name, but sometimes even from horrible people and horrible robots I can learn.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:27 PM
7

I'm relatively new here, about two months, why would that be an insane abuse of power? Who actually is in charge of reddit, or in moderating the entire site, and keeping one reddit from attacking another either at reddit or in real life?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:07 PM
1

I may have had the url wrong (but I don't think so), I did make at least one url error, but yes, it's coming up for me now too.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:01 PM
23

I tend to think so, but given what has happened in the past 24 hours, and given the history of the two groups, and even the outside egging on from third parties, other websites, and zines, given that the joke would have to make ignatiusloyola the butt and have reasonable fears of doxxing, and given that the joke itself is then a violation of Rule 3, Well, it's a pretty foul joke and one the Admins should look into and ensure it stays as merely a joke.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:53 PM
2

Maybe. Did you ever see Stalag 17? He may seem to be one of our guys, for now....
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:49 PM
6

/r/violentacrez is coming up as banned now, but a half hour or so ago, it looked like this: http://i.imgur.com/Lscan.jpg EDIT: fixed URL and note: while it seems to have been banned, maybe I had the URL wrong, and maybe it's is back in its corrupted state.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:26 PM
27

Is there anyway to get a backup of the /r/mr forum? I've seen nothing there that needed a take down. If they kill it, let it go, rehost it elsewhere in static form, and provide commentary as to how this action was undertaken by SRS permitted and encouraged by Reddit enabled over the months by PZ Myers, David Futrelle, and the SPLC a terrible move for free speech a terrible move for the Internet to permit doxxing All done under the aegis of Conde Nast (Advance Publications.) Let the folks on Hack…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:14 PM
87

Just sent to Dacvak and the Admin team Please read this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/119k8j/rcreepshots_and_rviolentacrez_taken_over_by_srs/ And read this: http://i.imgur.com/Lscan.jpg The Reddit Admins need to make an official statement about this. There is nothing ignatiusloyola has done that should leave him frightened or worried from doxxing or bullying of from SRS. This is not free speech, this is crushing of dissent and crushing of free speech, and permitting a heckler's ve…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:09 PM
163

ignatiusloyola, I respect your work and efforts here entirely. If they have anything to dox you with, if you feel blackmailed by them, you need to do what is best for you. If it ever came down to giving up /r/mensrights to save yourself, I definitely think you should do so. Fuck Reddit, fuck Conde Nast, fuck all those people. In the two months I've been here I've seen nothing but respectful post after respectful post here that anyone can be proud of. If Reddit and Conde Nast can't protect you, o…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:59 PM
1

Some short thoughts. A few days ago we discussed here of an Australian Take Back the Night that excluded all men, which they justified by saying some women are frightened of men. I said, well they have a justification I disagree with, but it's a private group, so whatever. The Susan G. Komen Foundation is refusing seemingly millions of dollars in charity from Porn Hub. Again, they provide various justifications for turning down money. The so called justification here, that you are a straight whi…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:50 PM
1

I once read someone write: When feminism began, it WAS focused on women, because women at that time had a desperate, immediate need to have their issues addressed to achieve equality. The term "feminism" is actually a relic of that time, and the but goals of the movement itself have changed over the course of 100 years--how could they not have? Since its beginning, many of feminism's initial goals have been achieved, You should read that. And then read that again. Perhaps once more. It's time fo…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:40 PM
6

Visit SRS. Visit gendertrender Visit radfem hub Visit I Blame the Patriarchy Do your homework.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:36 PM
29

And it's far from reddit. Visit the number one places on the net for feminists, the blogs, the zines, and see how any of these feminists deal with mens issues. by insisting there are no mens issues by disrespecting and dehumanizing the people that want to discuss them elsewhere on the net by banning people that come to their forum and enforcing strict speech codes by insisting there is no such thing as misandry and then by claiming the true friends of men are feminists that will tear down the pa…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:33 PM
7

First, wall of text makes your post very difficult to read, there is no shortage of "enter" key presses possible so use them Second, please read this: http://www.news.com.au/national/my-children-never-came-home/story-fndo4eg9-1226491983929 and read the comments to it. Okay, so in the context of my being one of those fathers, and never understanding how Feminism (NOW) year after year supports and encourages and files legal briefs to oppose a rebuttable presumption of joint shared physical custody…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:21 PM
5

Yeah, for all of us. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:50 AM
6

You should go if your daughter wants you there. Do you have a way to talk to her without her mother present? If you can, ask her what she wants. As important as this is to you, this is even more important for her. If you can't talk to her, I say go, but don't sit right up front. Maybe stay in the back where she can see you if she wants, but if she doesn't want you there, you can still leave Yes, this is exactly my thinking as it is at the moment. Thank you, sincerely. I'll get a haircut in the n…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:37 AM
4

yeah, too shitface to understand the issues. I'd say as long as non custodial parent is paying say, significantly above poverty level, than given him/her great benefits of the doubt. And yeah, if that person cannot come up with it, hounding other individuals makes no sense in a state of social security. And most importantly, for the sake of all children and parents, enforice visitation OVER support issues.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:34 AM
8

I guess I'm more shitfaced than you -- I have no idea what you are trying to say. There are many issues concerning child support. Sometimes it is indeed very onerous compared to cost of living for the parent paying it, and accountability by the parent receiving it. I think what bothers me most about child support is how difficult it is to change it when layoffs occur, or when a father wishes to change career to a more interesting, more personallyh rewarding career. But I would happily pay every …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:17 AM
1

Be careful, one law professor warns that it may be overturned and replaced with something worse: http://www.volokh.com/2012/10/10/thoughts-on-fisher-v-texas/
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:55 AM
2

It was your use of the phrase "never-op" that really drove it home as a slam - whatever you meant by it, in the context of the rest of the comments it strikes me as "she's not a REAL trans because she won't have the operation." As I think you understand now, I never meant to slam her, as I said, she has a shrink (but I do hate shrinks) that says she is for real, so I assume she is for real. But the article said she never planned on having an operation, which is why I was wondering where Mitschu …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:39 AM
2

I admit my knowledge of Australian politics is pretty much nil apart from knowing fathers are getting the shit down there. That said, whether it's the UK's question time, or whatever we saw on that video, I do like that open, frank, attack more than the bullshit we never see on US TV by US politicians.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:31 AM
1

Speaking of your cats then, didn't the Kzin know exactly how to handle their women? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kzin /sending out love and a freebie to David Futrolle, and all our hoopy stalkers at Reddit
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:29 AM
7

I would mostly prefer you just leave your pets alone, Manzboobz. We've mentioned this before.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:36 AM
1

Sigh. I hate these things because they are so often like the xkcd cartoon, someone is wrong on the Internet. And because they bring in subredditdrama, and because they take so much time I would rather spend on other things. But in the 48 hours of our correspondence, I value our discussions, so since you seem to have asked some questions or challenged me, I think I need to respond if only to show you I am taking what you write seriously. So to your second point.... I'll post an imgur of where I t…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:32 AM
1

Thank you so much for posting that. Also, congratulations on your dick.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:58 AM
-6

I take it what she is doing is defending a member of her party who texted at some earlier time some sexist stuff? And that the opposition, male, is going after this other guy for his stupid texting? Seems more like political hypocrisy ala going after Clinton while engaged in your own affairs than any mensrights or womens rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:36 AM
-10

It's too bad she has no chin, and a bit much of a pear shape.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:33 AM
4

"Make an honest woman" and "Ditch the bitch" well, if he said that, then yeah, he's made a nice target of himself.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:32 AM
0

Have to say that if the leader of the opposition was being interviewed by Davros about who should lead society I'd find him pretty suspicious too. Fucking Daleks.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:29 AM
3

So? Do you have a point to make?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:25 AM
2

I encourage you when you are done, to write a blog post, or post somewhere of what you have experienced, and well, make that known to feminist bloggers.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:51 PM
6

I encourage you to read this article from yesterday: http://www.news.com.au/national/my-children-never-came-home/story-fndo4eg9-1226491983929 'My children never came home': Father tells of custody battle' It now has 120 comments mostly of other fathers telling identical stories of how their ex wives, during or after a divorce, alienated the children against the father, moved, and the fathers now have no contact with their kids. The swiftness at which I went from being super-dad to villain-dad wa…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:21 PM
10

Here's an interesting article discussing affirmative action in college admissions describing the experience of the UC Campuses after affirmative action was rolled back: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful-truth-about-affirmative-action/263122/ Turns out, it was better for everyone, AND kept a secret because it was so politically incorrect to discuss it. NPR also discusses this today http://www.npr.org/2012/10/09/162565642/at-u-of-texas-a-melting-pot-not-fully-blended
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:09 PM
1

Dunno, I am not a free speech expert, but I am not sure that is exactly true, so for example, I gather that in New York, the annual St. Patrick's Day Parade still does not allow gays to participate. I would find it hard to believe we the people have a right of freedom of assembly if that meant we could only take private roadways as we travel with our groups. In general, I do believe it's the case that if groups (schools) take Federal Funds, they cannot discriminate against any of the protected c…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:02 PM
1

On the other hand, after reading the material myself (and the more I read, the more nonthreatening Ms. Francis looks to me) I see this as a pretty clear case of a guest telling their host what kinds of rules to have for the home. I should think the general result of this would be that universities everywhere might think twice before letting high school kids use their facilities, because obviously those kids (and their parents) aren't ready for college life. I think this is 99% true, but I've vis…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:25 PM
1

As I've grown older, perhaps because of better salaries, or just more mature co-workers, it doesn't seen to have been the problem it once was. Most folks automatically take into account their drinks or meals and toss in the extra and then there's a fun round of returning money to people that paid too much for their meal, and then giving the rest to the waiter. (Usually)
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:21 PM
1

Surely you're not going to tell me that you are going to use "I'm on the internet" as an excuse for descending into unreasonability in discussion. Well, respectfully, near as I can tell, Mitschu's speculation about the cost of SRS surgery being the big barrier here is apparently supported in none of the many blog posts or news articles on this, so I am left wanting in my ability to respond to someone that thinks his speculation was warranted. This leaves me with few options to politely move on t…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:02 PM
1

Thanks. Best wishes. I wouldn't mind a followup explaining how it's resolved, how many court hearings it takes, who pays for it, and whether serious charges of fraud or discussed.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:51 PM
3

And while I'm at it, Gareth, you are a pathetic piece of shit. I think the ethics of using a brand new throwaway just to call someone a piece of shit are pretty low. Probably bad netiquette. Wouldn't surprise me if this was David Futrolle or possible even PZ Myers or maybe an alt of SuicideBanana or someone from the Dead SRS Society.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:43 PM
1

Well, it depends. If there were a few people who were drinking alcohol, or someone had a pretty expensive meal, then I think it makes sense and is acceptable. White collar worker, here, and I like going out to lunch with my co-workers, but not necessarily paying for their beers while I drank water and had the lunch special.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:39 PM
5

Well then, I think you should participate and point all that out when you see it, and educate us. And perhaps be open to a bit of education in return. While I think it would be great to have all transphobia disappear overnight, to my uneducated eyes, it seems we have come forward very fast. And while there are certainly transphobic comments made, I also see a lot of support for the transgendered, and a lot of questions that arise naturally as society learns about what seems to be a new ability f…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:30 PM
3

Okay, I might forget in the future, but I certainly intended no offense. Well, except for the fucktwit comment, which probably was intended to cause offense. So I would like to apologize for that.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:55 PM
4

11 minute youtube videos need a lot more commentary about them than simply "this needs to be hear".
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:52 PM
1

Graphs are always nice. Perhaps you can excel one or two out quickly enough (I mean CSI can do stuff like this on their phone on the drive home.) I also think the Barbara Kay columns can be insightful, BUT THEN since you all are law students, I would encourage you to follow up with the Dean of Windsor Law's actions, because I think that helps clinch the deal towards how unfair this is.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:50 PM
1

Fair enough indeed. In this case though, I think the evidence is overwhelming.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:48 PM
1

INCLUDE THIS: http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2012/09/25/sexism-female-favoured-policy-change-at-community-legal-aid-stirs-outrage/ Dean of Windsor Law School stops community legal aid from helping men accused of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:45 PM
2

2007 study discusses women initiating much domestic violence. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/115p0w/women_were_the_perpetrators_in_more_than_70_of/
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:44 PM
1

http://www.saveservices.org/pdf/Seven-Facts-Every-American-Should-Know-About-DV.pdf
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:41 PM
2

Google barbara kay domestic violence. Maybe you can print out a few of her columns.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:39 PM
-4

I am sorry you were downvoted to oblivion, because I think bigotry and idiocy like yours should be prominently displayed and not hidden beneath a "+". Also, I can smell your cunt through the Internet. Take a shower please.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:37 PM
3

Hey look! New name, same dude.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:35 PM
1

I've never said feminism was my enemy, buddy. I've identified as a feminist since 1972, guy. Rotten feminism IS opposed to mens issues, friend. Until feminists can acknowledge that, take responsibility for it, and stop it, then rotten contemporary feminism is certainly not my friend, pal, and is pretty much an enemy. And I'm not your dude, fucktwit.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:27 PM
1

I've updated my comment, not sure if you saw the updates, so please read again. It's pretty clear it's SRS. If you don't believe that, just ask in atheismplus. So like, to me, I feel like "it's moderated by SRS" is a pretty big stretch, although I get that that's the normal go-to attack against any person who expresses support for any kind of social justice stuff with which the speaker doesn't agree. On the other hand, that's a non argument ad hominem to make leads me to think you're going to re…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:23 PM
1

Is it? Well, TIL. All I know is that from my limited experience it seems pretty good. It is. Look at the early posts there, they begged SRS to come into it and moderate it. http://www.reddit.com/r/atheismplus/comments/zf35c/can_we_get_the_srs_mods_to_help_out_there/ Then all new mods appeared with zero day accounts. Check out their mod list. The bottom four are all prominent in SRS. and tends to block MRAs Go in there and tell them you're an MRA, and discuss some MRA positions, and see what happ…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:03 PM
1

Absolutely!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:53 PM
2

I think you forgot the /r/atheismplus thread... That could be, but since atheismplus is moderated by SRS and tends to block MRAs, I don't consider it a valid forum for anyone to discuss any issue at. Atheismplus is not a safe space for free speech or any sort of speech. It's pretty much gendertrender but with a different viewpoint.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:52 PM
3

Then lists of our activism, and how to add to that, should be added to the faq and sidebar or to the Mens Rights Wiki in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:51 PM
3

I agree that we could and should be doing more. I've been waiting for reddit to roll out sub reddit wikis, then I was going to suggest using the wiki in an agile like fashion to create lists of tasks, allowing us to vote on tasks, and assign ourselves to them, and see if we can't do a bit more towards activism, whether that is letter writing campaigns, reasonable and friendly wiki editing campaigns, campaigns to organize websites of resources, campaigns to kidnap babies about to be circumcised, …
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:48 PM
3

I do think this is a real issue, just want to point out the link goes to a blog goes to another site which finally links back to the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:31 PM
3

WokeUpOlder, so regardless of all the other crap you've been through, I am curious what it took to get Renee off the title. Was that accomplished by the same judge / same legal process, or did it involve a lot more grief elsewhere? And has anyone discussed whether her actions on putting herself on the title was criminal fraud? (I am not a lawyer, realtor, or even property owner, just curious.)
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:26 PM
2

Does this just vary hugely from place to place? I think it varies from country to country and border to border. Also, contrary to your experience, if they traveling with their mother it's frequently the case, that little is asked despite the law. My kids went to Israel, I did give permission, and when I researched it, it seems Israel makes it almost impossible for fathers to leave Israel with their kids to travel, and yet, Israel doesn't much care at all about allowing single parents into Israel…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:53 PM
1

I think by adding assumption to assumption, you guys ended up unnecessarily sniping at each other. Wat on the internet? Unnecessary sniping?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:14 PM
3

It's not clear to me what the high school leased, but I do agree, from the gendertrender article Francis is a student at the college. That gendertrender page and the comments contains a lot of pretty typical radfem hatred against mtf transgendered individuals. Which sad though it is, is confirmation when so many contemporary feminists tell us that oh no, all that transphobia is history. It's also interesting to note that this discussion cannot be had on /r/feminism - it's been purged there and i…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:20 AM
2

Thank you. My point about the queue, was merely that it wasn't 40 fathers with similar stories, but could be many many more.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:05 AM
3

You don't support the T. Stop it. Say you're a supporter of the LGBQIA community. As a member of the T, I'm straight up telling you "You are not my ally". Fuck you. I know literally who I am, who I have always been, the struggles I have gone through and who my best friends are. Take it and shove it. You may be t, but you are not the T movement and I gave a link to at least THREE other member of T that agrees. The OP's link links to several more transgendered women that agree as well. Discussing …
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:30 AM
17

That's quite a story -- thank you for writing it down here. Every waking moment, I was afraid that the police would show up, It's been years, and having been served several times, I am still very paranoid about what shows up at my door and believe my ex could have one serve me at anytime for another specious issue. One thing about your Dad that you I am certain you already know. He wasn't choosing your dogs over Renee, he was choosing you.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:28 AM
7

Yes, I am glad you saw that. That seemed to be the dumbest description of a feminist wave I can possibly imagine. I left a question in AskFeminists about that. (Probably should have gone to google first.) http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/116mw8/is_there_a_fourth_wave_of_feminism_how_does_it/
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:43 AM
1

I think this incident does bring up some interesting quirks in the law and some interesting issues in feminism: Does Federal Title IX supersede the State law? On what basis in 2012 should we even have separate restrooms and showers? How would feminists react/split to the suggestion we just eliminate all separated restrooms entirely? How would MRAs for that matter react/split to that suggestion? What would more official spokespeople for the transgendered community and transactivists say about thi…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:41 AM
2

That's the first thing. Everything you write after that is almost certainly true. (Except sadly, it does seem like normal blogging to me.) My interpretation of the missing pages is that Colleen took them down and that gendertrender should have archived them first. I can't argue with you that you don't think they ever existed, but I just think on that I believe gendertrender, much as I probably disagree with them on many issues, probably is telling the truth here. Ignoring that, Here are some add…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:36 AM
25

I mostly have no problem with this. With few restrictions, private organizations should be able to have the right to include/exclude whomever they wish. Augusta Golf Club, Victoria Reclaim the Night. I think you can argue about the reasoning behind the event, but whatever, private group, right to freely associate (I assume they have that right in Australia), anyway, have a good time girls. But this statement is interesting: "This is to stand in solidarity with people who feel unsafe in the prese…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:42 AM
-2

Do you know how to read? Have you read the article? But yeah, let's bash the people that did read the article. -1 because you didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:26 AM
3

They have 40 comments, and when I added mine it told me it may or may not be published, so who knows how long their queue is. But suffice it to say, I have a very similar story. And I hope my kids are well tonight, and every night. Thank you Sonja for linking this.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:26 AM
1

Why should she? First, she is absolutely under no obligation to compromise. If this is a fight she wants to fight she should be free to fight for those rights. Why should she? Why should she? Why should any member of a civilized respectful society seek to work out meaningful, respectful compromises? Beats the fuck out of me.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:07 AM
1

I agree, but that's why I said the facility seems to have blundered by somehow not being able to achieve any reasonable compromise with Ms. Francis.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:35 AM
-1

Yeah, in the battle between mostly underage high school girls versus the never-op transgendered, she's certainly fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:33 AM
2

The A is at times "allies" or "asexual". There is also LGBTQIQQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersexed, Queer, and Questioning) I had a physical trainer once, great guy, happened to be FTM, and he told me he was sorry it wasn't GBLT for giblets. Anyway, do you know about i18n and numeronyms? I am pretty sure in the future we all will just speak about the L23Z community.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:44 AM
1

(actually I am pretty sure it was s0nicfreak rapidly downvoting each of my responses to her as quickly as I clicked on save.)
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:56 AM
17

Feminist Axiom 1: Men and women are equal. Feminist Axiom 2: Except when women are better. Feminist Axiom 3: Or when they need protection from evil men Perhaps going over this list will answer some of your questions.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:18 AM
12

Nothing strange about the gun thing, she was in the Army for 20 years.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:15 AM
-1

I agree. On the other hand, if you believe the article she has a shrink that seem to agree she is trans. Now, I can't fucking stand shrinks, but what can you do? I agree with what you write, but to me what makes her an asshole is that she didn't voluntarily resolve the situation by rescheduling, or using the lesser alternative facility, but apparently pressed the issue in the name of trans rights.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:15 AM
5

I was surprised at how much I agree with a lot of the things said here. I hate it when that happens! (I'm about twice your age, and regretfully, I have to admit it still happens.)
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:45 PM
11

I do have to wonder how much of this represents blundering on the part of the facility, and attention seeking behavior on the part of the individual involved. I am not certain why the high school has opted for the lesser facilities and why someone did not ask this individual if she could use the different facilities herself. Yes, in some ways that might be discrimination against transwomen, but at other times, surely our 20 year veteran understands that discretion is the better part of valor, an…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:42 PM
34

Sure, but remember, two feminists, three opinions. You can always find feminists that disagree with some outrage other feminists are pushing. What's difficult is to find any feminists that will take ownership of such an issue and agree it is a problem for feminism. No True Feminist is their favorite fallacy.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:39 PM
10

I appreciate your post. While I agree with much of it, I hesitate to embrace your title here. "Two Sides of the Same Coin". I want to embrace it, but at the moment, for me, it's a bit too close to a classic contemporary feminist derailing, "Feminists are the best friends of men, men's issues are best handled by stopping the Patriarchy. Patriarchy Hurts Men too" followed by "Men's Rightsers are evil..." But I get what you are saying, and I largely agree, and it would be great to see you participa…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:34 PM
3

I agree. If society and families were supported to allow father, mother, parents to easily change professions, get training, try new jobs out, it would be very cool and I would sign up for that. But it's basically not set up or interested in doing that. And while this is not a crack at feminism, it's certainly true that when more women entered the workforce the main reaction by society was to demand more money from families (or people), not to make it easier for anyone to actually succeed.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:29 PM
8

Holy Shit! Kuro5hin is still around?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:49 PM
2

I said MR users will downvote pretty much anything from a non-self-loathing woman. See also: FeMRA. Sorry I don't adequately hate myself and other people of my gender. http://thesignalinthenoise.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/youre-not-helping.jpg
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:10 PM
1

I said MR users will downvote pretty much anything from a non-self-loathing woman. Yeah, sounds like a troll. Sorry for identifying you as a troll. I wonder how my correct impression came about?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:09 PM
10

I contrast the names of two publications: The Good Men Project and A Voice for Men So Which one considers man's default position to be bad? Which one is a top down structure (White Man's Burden) intended to enlighten and bring up the rotten masses? And Which name accepts men for who they are? Which name describes an outlet for the (male) voices? I have a problem with some of what goes on at both publications, but I know which one is trying to help me, and which one is trying to help itself.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:08 PM
6

The contrast between "I dun fucked up" and "I am here to tell you what a bunch of lousy humans you are and what you need to do to be a good man" reminds me of the sociopathy of Hugo Schwyzer where he went for decades abusing women and rationalizing his own rotten behaviors by blaming all men and telling them how to clean up. (And I wouldn't be surprised if that turned out to be the backstory of David Futrolle.) If I were Tom Matlack and honestly wanted to tell that story, I would be very careful…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:03 PM
2

Okay, well thank you, and thank you for your defense of someone else.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:01 PM
3

However, contrary to popular belief, feminist =/= troll every single time. I think it's clear from some of my posts that I have some pretty damn feminist leanings myself. And I appreciate your defense of VSS and will think again about her in the future. Still, anyone that so quickly falls into "you hate me because I am a woman that doesn't hate myself" I think convicts herself of being a troll far more than my paltry claims.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:54 PM
0

Hmm. My experience (for two short months) indicates likewise. Anyone with the argument /r/mensrightsers just hate women that don't hate themselves enough certainly seems to be more troll than non-troll.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:41 PM
0

Oh? Is that the problem? It's because you're a woman, it's not because you're a troll?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:17 PM
6

Not sure if men are "going galt" So that's the thing. I often hear all sorts of wild seemingly unbelievable claims rarely backed up with any sort of meaningful statistics and often spouted by very partisan authors, that I may agree with, but that aren't necessarily reliable or unbiased. But this guy isn't making wild claims, nor does he seem to be terribly biased, he is just noting his own experience and linking it to some statistics. So for me, he seems much more credible. more men having to re…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:58 PM
0

s0nicfreak is the kindest, warmest, bravest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:34 PM
1

Kind of interesting though. What the hell can you write where the cops, not the courts, tell you you need to stop. Well luckily for me (since I would be distracted), I can't find where it says that in the comments. I believe you, but please don't give me the link, I would spend time reading more of this train wreck.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:33 PM
-1

But you have some hidden truth about women being preferentially hired and coming into gaming companies with no experience. Or that somehow Anna whatshername was offending you and saying white men were worthless in gaming. Wow. How could I have gotten all those the miss-impressions about you? Whatever, go away now and find us another stupid link that you can misrepresent.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:30 PM
-2

Well, that explains why you argue like a feminist then by stating that somehow I am not interested in the truth only proving you wrong. Fuck off then.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:28 PM
-1

You really do have reading comprehension problems and love taking things out of context. ignoring them, and saying I am not arguing with you in good faith. No wonder you can't write games and fear competition with girls.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:19 PM
0

But writing a FICTIONAL game does not require experience on the subject in real life. Do you think Stephen King actually experienced being a teenage girl with powers before writing Carrie? Stephen King is an amazingly great writer, he's not you, some retard that thinks he can write games, and he's not what I posited, you and me alike in all ways except for scuba diving versus rock climbing experience. And yes, as an AI developer, I think that having domain knowledge is critical. And I suspect th…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:18 PM
11

Well written, reasonable tone, interesting statistics that may support random internet claims of "men going galt".
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:10 PM
0

Yeah, well I hear this from feminists a lot. Basically you are looking at all my posts, ignoring them, and saying I am not arguing with you in good faith. Well fuck off my friend, because now you have clearly marked yourself as a troll, a sore loser, and someone unable to argue. Fuck off and die, we're done here, asshole. Until our next thread then.... http://i.imgur.com/LHqUc.jpg
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:01 PM
-1

Um, are you sure you're not very special snowflake? Saying some people are better at some things that they have special experience with than other people that do not have that experience does not mean that those other people are not better at things they do have special experience with. If you were a rock climber and I were a scuba diver and otherwise we were equal, I would let you write the rock climbing games and I would write the scuba diving games and I wouldn't be upset or offended about th…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:59 PM
0

I wish on the side, under where it says how many voted up or down the thread, it could keep running totals on my posts and perhaps a few of the other posts. Make it easier to determine who is winning Gamification of Life.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:48 PM
1

I wouldn't mind reading more of how the police told her to shut down her blog and youtube account. That sounds interesting and appeals both to my first amendment interests and wow, she really must be horribly bad, sounds fun.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:46 PM
1

Hey, I'd personally prefer to see the three to five hour "making of" videos of "people trolling us badly" that are included as extras on the DVD than the three minute clip of "people trolling us badly".
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:40 PM
1

Its not feeding the troll its just posting a link in how ridiculous she sounds as she spurts bullshit. She clearly doesn't understand how the middle ages worked nor how war works. This is the women that was told by the police to shut down her blog and youtube account. Than you should write about that in a post. It sounds interesting. Linking to her video tells me none of that, but makes me think you think she should be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:39 PM
-1

I can not talk in detail about the hiring of unqualified women over qualified men in the games industry without mentioning some things which will get this whole thing taken off reddit. Yeah, well, then pardon my saying that sounds like conspiracy theory. You may be correct, but it's a deux ex machina that weakens your argument. This is saying that straight white men are not able to write those characters as well as "queer people, people of color, and women". In other words - straight white men a…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:37 PM
3

There's only a certain amount of attention and resources, for which there is competition. Yeah, I'm not seeing that, especially in the link between Anthony's headline and the actual article. If you want to make that a topic for a post it might be an interesting discussion. As I said in another thread, I see a positive sum game, I am not sure why so many insist on playing zero sum games.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:27 PM
0

1 If a game company has 1 position to fill, 10 men apply and 1 woman applies, the woman, even if she has just writing experience but no game development experience, has a better chance because they have very few women and have to fill their affirmative action quota. 2 My problem is with saying that someone is worth less as a game designer due to their gender or sexual orientation. There are so many ways I could agree with you, but your first statement, after I asked you for citations, is still j…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:25 PM
-6

TIL: Trolls consider themselves "people" too.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:14 PM
0

Hey! Whoever is intrinsically downvoting me, you missed one!
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:13 PM
-1

Which don't support your claim at all that women are somehow preferentially hired in the gaming industry, or that having LGBTQIA game designers or companies will somehow threaten the straight gaming industry or gaming employment. I see a positive sum game here, why do you see a zero sum game?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:05 PM
3

Why are you feeding the troll?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:03 PM
0

Your niece has a good chance at getting a job in the industry. The 10 males in her class that want the same, not so much. ??? Why is that? What evidence do you have to support that?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:01 PM
9

I've read far more interesting submissions from you Anthony. While your headline is sort of true, it's not really what the linked article is about. CNN working with a global action campaign to educate girls is probably a good thing on its face, and doesn't have to detract from any campaigns to educate more people in general or boys in specific. Education is good, let's educate more people absolutely, but it's quite possible in many countries not the US, there is a good need to have campaigns to …
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:56 PM
0

Few women want jobs in the game industry. citation-needed.jpg My niece would love a job in the game industry for a data point of one. And she is definitely a gamer in the sense of preferring XBOX over wii. She is certainly not a man hater. She's a wonderful individual, a bit troubled, and I hope would do wonderfully if she could get herself to Oakland and San Francisco.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:52 PM
1

I only briefly skimmed the article, but I guess what I am taking away from this and all the other gamer stuff is that Stranger in a Strange Land and Snow Crash aren't occurring on the web so much anymore, they are occurring more in Game Space. If there are LGBQTIA game makers, I say more power to them. That there would be and would come from Oakland and San Francisco and the Silicon Valley area or Seattle or Japan I guess would be foreseeable and very cool indeed. That this article didn't mentio…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:48 PM
2

Well, I hope you're right, and I do try to act as though you are right. (But I'm not sure you're right and that their tactics aren't overwhelming us.)
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:11 PM
7

Well, there is a tendency among some to treat srs as if they are real opponents Well we could discuss this on a different day, but SRS is not a real opponent? I mean, between David Futrolle, PZ Myers and the SPLC, it's hard to imagine a more real opponent. I actually think that her troll of the men's movement would be more richly rewarded if she, as a Feminist Theist & Rad Fem ally, were trolling Feminist Atheism, because I think the Feminist Atheists have a much larger, more active, and real li…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:53 PM
7

This is actually a good thing. This shows very clearly how easy it is for a woman to lie about something as serious as rape AND be so convincing that others genuinely feel sorry for her and her pain and suffering. While not a good thing, I think you're basically right, and I sure hope to see this covered by HuffPo, DailyFail, Jezebel, The Frisky, etc. (Hey, all those fucktarded external sites that gleefully reported on the infamous reddit rape thread a few months back should be reporting on this…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:40 PM
5

She could bate me anytime. I am hopeful she is so obvious no one in the "men's movement" will respond to her bait with anything other than sillier jokes.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:19 PM
3

The shame of this troll is that it would be so much more popcornerifferic if it targeted feminist atheism. Feminist Atheism has to be opposed to Feminist Theism(, and Feminist Atheism claims to be often opposed to Radical Feminism??) And Feminist Atheism has real life meetings and in real life works to get people fired from jobs and stuff.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:17 PM
3

Almost certainly an Aerik directed downvote brigade from the assholes at againstmensrights http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/11448l/jill_filipovic_sides_with_innocent_project/
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:23 AM
2

Thanks, at the moment, I am too swamped with personal issues to actually work on this. It might be an interesting experiment to create a sub-reddit just to discuss such a site and collect feedback.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:28 AM
4

I don't know what to say, but we are about the same age, and I just wanted to let you know I hear ya. My situation is similar and different. But I hear ya.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:50 AM
2

One reason why there isn't is that judges in family court can silence complainants. It's far from rare for gag orders to be placed on divorce cases and custody cases under the guise of protecting the children. More often than not, it's a lie - the order is in place to protect against exposure of the judges bias or the mother's flaws. I wonder what would happen if a sub were started where the topic was just stories like yours and ours, posted anonymously, with major details explained, but identif…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:29 AM
2

And you as well!
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:21 AM
5

Well, she has a history and she is a founder of one of the top three feminist blogs, feministe. And as she blogged her way through law school she wrote a great deal of typical feminist stuff at feministe. So well written as the article might be, like most well known writers or politicians, it is fair to examine it in the context of the author's prior writings. If she were writing it as Jeralyn Merritt, feminist author of TalkLeft, but also a staunch defense attorney, or as Wendy Kaminer, feminis…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:21 AM
3

What you, my husband, other men in your position, and the kids caught in the tar-pit of divorce are subjected to at the hands of selfish, bitter, and angry ex-wives and the discriminatory system is an abuse so heinous that it can only continue with impunity if it is kept under tight and total concealment. If the general public really understood what the system governing divorce does to you and your children, their outrage would be deafening. This is exactly the case. I read a lot of the anger in…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:05 AM
5

I absolutely do agree that it would be a much stronger and more interesting post and argument to go through Filipovic's postings and tie what she has written in the past to her writing now. And then having found something to ping Filipovic on it and ask how/why her views changed and if that wasn't also worthy of an editorial.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:58 AM
1

No, I actually mentioned it first to the RES group /r/Enhancement where I was pretty much told I was a dummy. I know there is a wiki to be rolled out at some point, so I thought I would let that come first and then bring it up.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:42 AM
4

Thank you. It's just a miserable situation. My ex filed for divorce. I got 50/50 joint physical custody after negotiations and discussions with the court. She immediately moved with the children to another state (under now overturned Marriage of Burgess). I followed as soon as I could but the courts in the interim reduced my time to 20/80 since she was now in another state. She has spent about ten years alienating the kids from me and from my side of the family, literally bribing the kids with p…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:53 AM
4

Sometimes it suffices to read an article as is, and comment on it from there. But the headline was specifically about the history of feminism and if you aren't willing to examine that, or know nothing about that, than you are unqualified to comment on that, especially in such an absolute manner. So sometimes reading the article is not enough, especially when the question or headline refers to historical events or events that have many contexts. It doesn't matter whether I like it or not, in fact…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:45 AM
5

Maybe she's just (perhaps understandably) uncomfortable using a toilet around members of the other gender. She gets a porta potty entirely to herself for the entire shift, and somehow she is understandable uncomfortable using a toilet around members of another sex? Fuck her. That's the requirements of the job, and the men on that job sure as hell don't get their own portapotty. How is her discomfort in anyway understandable?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:48 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/tSygq.jpg
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:58 PM
3

Before telling us your opinion on all of this, you could have tried to verify the "cliff notes" that you doubt. Those cliff notes are pretty easy to bust or confirm. Then, once you busted the cliff notes, your post would be much more persuasive. And if you confirmed them, then your argument here would be much more focused without needing the random doubts. You could also research Filipovic and read the blog she founded, especially around the time of Duke Lacrosse and find out how her views chang…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:57 PM
1

American cars would be so much better if they were spring loaded and flew apart when hit like our old time toy cars did.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:37 PM
5

That was in no means a personal attack. You can claim it was your past and you have reformed, but it certainly wasn't a personal attack. It goes directly to your claims about how other redditors are bad redditors and don't use logic, are easily moved, vote as herds, and act like twelve year olds.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:54 PM
4

I wish reddit would rollout the sub reddit wikis there was a button to press that pushed comments into the wiki so I could make it trivial to retain your comment in such a wiki or faq under "Feminists are men's best friends"
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:51 PM
5

A good catch. Astonishing mental gymnastics on Filipovic's part to write such an article without mentioning the environment of fear and demands for swift (in)justice that feminism provides daily. It's nice to hear that suddenly she believes in the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:33 PM
9

http://i.imgur.com/tSygq.jpg
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:29 PM
6

Nor do we want to hear it, I am busy drinking my scone and eating my tea and dislike hearing that others find our natterings to be nabob like.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:16 PM
3

Most of the time I ignore the downvotes. I dislike that downvotes are used to hide comments, especially because it hides all the very worthwhile comments under the downvoted comment Sometimes the downvotes are pretty funny as in, I said I like blue skies and fresh air and somehow got 3 downvotes, who could have downvoted me? It's not the downvoting that's the problem itself, but there is an awful lot of name calling. truthman2000 has his own subreddit where he maintains a list of all of the enem…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:12 PM
7

I'll make a few points for PlayaDelRay408 re: circumcision and MensRights 1 Last week or so I wrote in a comment about a young kid going to a bris that I largely agreed circumcisions should be stopped but that millions of men have had circumcisions and if he does attend he should enjoy the celebratory atmosphere surrounding his new nephew. I told him he didn't have to participate, and I told him of a specific relatively easy and small gift that would show his sister and her family that he honore…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:05 PM
9

Hmm. When I read the great acknowledged internet feminists of our time, starting with Amanda Marcotte, well, I want to believe what you wrote, but it just doesn't ring true. Anyway, the True Scotsman wants his fallacy back.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:28 PM
9

i used to be a white knight fighting for womens rights until i realized they actively hated upon me. Yeah, I've certainly been there. In fact, it's largely how I feel about the Democratic Party these days. And the opposite of fighting for contemporary feminist views of women's rights or the Democratic candidates is NOT hating women, or hating minorities or hating society or anything like that.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:26 PM
5

I am going through (about 10 years now) a world of shit right now, on very similar issues, so thank you for writing this.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:20 PM
1

Well, I'm way to old for that anyway, but it does seem to take much of the fun out of it. I wonder why they made that change.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:00 PM
1

np. I need to turn this all off. turn prometheus off and crash. later.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:55 AM
2

Even if he wants to be the child's father (and good on him!) his next step is STILL to see a lawyer to learn the appropriate steps to preserve his rights which may include: registering on a "putative father's" registry, and providing monetary support to the mother, and making it clear to everyone he intends to be a father and adoption is out of the question.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:51 AM
14

Sounds reasonable to me. She is entitled to her opinion, she's not being hypocritical about it, and you're entitled to mention her when other people cry about how racist and bigoted their mean old uncles and dads are. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combination. PS. OP. If you can't drive a manual you're probably a ... (Sorry, never got to use that meme before.)
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:46 AM
6

Both had fine humorous responses. Steffi brings a lot to the table.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:18 AM
4

but I don't want to be crushed by feminists who take offense to the speech. Thanks in advance! Sorry, but that's a bit unclear. Do you mean you want a mens issue topic that no feminist could be offended by? What are your parameters? Depending on where you live, I might address: How come custody support is enforced by the courts through arrests, jail time, wage garnishments, denial of licenses, but parenting time (visitation) is rarely enforced at all, unless the person being denied parenting tim…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:24 PM
1

That's interesting. But not quite clear. Do they still give you a new identity? And are you still basically, immune then from various laws and French extradition treaties France may have signed? And note, I am not advocating anyone do this, I am just curious about the French Foreign Legion. Up until a year ago, I thought it was a mostly mythical thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:52 PM
6

I am not really aware of the common behavior of men, women, soldiers, sailors in the streets of NY at the end of the most horrible world war in history, but arguably, yes this was a sexual assault even by the standards of the day. One of the people writing about this says http://cratesandribbons.com/2012/10/05/the-kissing-sailor-part-2-debunking-misconceptions/ that just because the woman today doesn't seem terribly offended doesn't mean we shouldn't be terribly offended. But this is part of the…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:42 PM
-3

why isn't it the putative father's place to speak with the pregnant mother naming him as father to discuss the future of the baby and go through all the options? Don't put words in my mouth. I said it's not his place to convince her of a certain outcome. And it isn't. fuck off snowflake, that's a distinction without a difference. she goes into talk wanting to keep baby. he goes into talk wanting to adopt baby out or whatever. you come into thread to be an ass Why isn't it the place of the best f…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:13 PM
2

Well it beats paying my bills. :) In general it is very depressing to see where the women's movement and politics has gone since my kid days in the 70s when I first became aware of it. One of my best teachers was a woman who during WWII flew about 20 different kinds of military aircraft as part of the WASPS. She was in the Olympics. She won the powder puff derby. She used to fly aerobatics over LAX long before there was an LAX. She founded a flight school. She taught several astronauts how to fl…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:08 PM
5

Put fathersandfamilies.org in your feed reader. Read old essays from glennsacks.com The issue is rarely over fathers wanting to not pay child support. There are many other issues involved about child support that due warrant discussion though. For instance and number one, why is child support enforced at the point of jail, but visitation is almost never enforced without costly lengthy time delaying court battles? If you do read fathersandfamilies.org and glennsacks.com and Christina Hoff Sommers…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:59 PM
2

If this is interesting to you, good places to read would be: http://www.aei.org/scholar/christina-hoff-sommers/ to read what Christina Hoff Sommers has to say about equity feminism glennsacks.com to read Glenn's old essays about fathers issues www.fathersandfamilies.org to read Robert Franklin's essays about fathers issues
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:53 PM
2

Again, I can't speak for "MRA"s in general, but my sense is that most are okay with equal opportunities but not okay with equal outcomes and so removing barriers and encouraging poorly represented populations is generally seen as a good thing. So run a science camp for kids and don't complain if a group of women engineers reaches out to young girls but do complain if for some reason (as a bad example) girls were given higher grades in a math class just to make sure girls and boys got the same gr…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:44 PM
-1

Whoever downvoted me, are you saying Truthman2000's list of enemies wouldn't be improved with back stores, super powers and little avatars?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:39 PM
-10

Hey, reminds of what your dad was telling me last night, or at least I think so, he had his mouth full at the time. EDIT: BECAUSE HE WAS SUCKING MY COCK.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:37 PM
-5

I think that /r/mensrights should reclaim benned and dildz and use it as often as possible ourselves. The terms are somewhat funny (dildz especially) and whenever we can tell an SRSer to remove her dildz the better.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:36 PM
2

Hey! I haven't seen you around for awhile, and I am glad to see you.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:34 PM
-6

I hear SRS serves tacos as well, but caution, they have a lot of fillers and the cheese is somewhat skunky.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:33 PM
1

Read the article I submitted here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1120c9/the_painful_truth_about_affirmative_action_this/ It's very interesting and speaks to how affirmative action for minorities in schools backfired and how removal of affirmative action due to voter action in California led to better results. But that's in school, so what about in government or even private business? So men's rights activists tend to be opposed toward government incentives to hire women? I can't sp…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:30 PM
6

I sometimes hesitate about posting articles that can turn into hate filled spew fests, but I have no fear that /r/mensrights can stick to the issues and read and discuss this as it pertains to sex based affirmative action or diversity programs. It's an interesting read about an old argument about these programs that the two authors, a law professor and economist and a journalist now seem to have some data on.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:10 PM
2

Do you think that feminism and men's rights are compatible? I would say it depends on the various definitions of feminism and men's rights. I would think the answer is yes, if you are referring to equity feminism, but modern contemporary feminism doesn't seem to even understand what equity feminism is, and their notion of gender feminism and mens rights is largely at odds. Equity feminism is essentially the libertarian notion to remove all the legal barriers preventing equality between men and w…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:05 PM
1

I think it's a real consequence, and a very nice reference.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:46 PM
1

Hell, after seeing a documentary a few years back, for young people the French Foreign Legion sounds pretty neat. Military adventures, learn to speak French, entire new identity with new passport that allows you to come back into the states.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:44 PM
3

That all may be true about his wanting to be a father. And if so, guess what his very next step should be?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:42 PM
2

Huh? Seriously, why isn't it the putative father's place to speak with the pregnant mother naming him as father to discuss the future of the baby and go through all the options? Why isn't it the place of the best friend of the father to counsel him or them both? Do the woman's parents have a place doing so? Her friends? Her priest? Feminist websites? What is the guiding principle by which you deduce the putative father's best friend has no place doing this?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:40 PM
0

With all due respect, who the fuck would know what you are talking about, because you submitted a link that just says nothing more than, "uh, what about this?". Is it really too much strain on your brain to describe just what the fuck your poutrage is about that makes you call down the attention and power of 40,000 redditors and 20,000 SRS trolls? Can't tell what is more worthless to read the article that has your panties in a twist, or this submission.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:28 PM
-2

Oh, I'm not worried, his list speaks for itself. And honestly it WOULD be improved if he listed the back stories and super powers of each of the villains on his list.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:18 PM
-2

Well over in the new hipster antiegalitarian subreddit, truthman2000 wants to ban me for this comment made in response to his well cataloged list of the manginas, white knights, feminazis here: http://www.reddit.com/r/antiegalitarian/comments/10ygy5/catalogue_of_feminist_and_egalitarian_concern/ My response: http://i.imgur.com/4BSBL.jpg And the warning from truthman2000 of the deletion and almost certain ben: http://i.imgur.com/hAB5c.jpg So what have we learned here kids about absolute power and…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:44 AM
6

Seriously? That seems so outdated and... wrong. :/ He needs to find a lawyer in his location, or actually a lawyer in whatever state the girls ends up. It really varies from state to state. Depending on how early it is, he probably should discuss the situation with the girl's parents directly, or even have his own parents present. Given that they are Catholic (IIRC) they may not favor an abortion, but then again, lots of Catholics get abortions, and once they know of the situation, and once your…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:39 AM
2

According to the roast beef sandwiches at SRS, demmian is male.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:13 AM
2

Well, if it helps you feel better SRSCunts are all up in their panties about demmian's benning them too. EDIT: For /r/againstmensrights : MISANDRY, I MOCK IT. http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/112a4t/use_of_srscunts_154_11pts_totally_not_a_hate/ I also referred to SRS as the roastbeef sandwiches of SRS as well as the tacos with the skunky cheese of SRS. This is not hatred of women. This is mockery of SRS. It is taking one of your and their talking points and explicitly taking it…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:12 AM
30

I don't think he can do much, but he should definitely consult a lawyer because his various rights differ from state to state. He should certainly ask for a paternity test, and depending on what the lawyer says, if it looks as though he will have to pay child support (which is probably likely if she keeps it), he should probably do what he can to assert his rights as a father -- because at some point she may need to give up the baby, and he may from birth on, want to be a father. But he needs to…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:54 AM
1

I hope you got to know your mother before her passing. Never forget her memory, dude. Absolutely not. Or my father, both of whom I miss tremendously. And I am at this forum, because they were both hurt by the actions of another's strife who kept my daughters from seeing their grandparents, and vice versa. So here's to a day where we are all equal, free, and fulfilled.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:37 AM
-1

Not a day goes by that I do not think about my mother. Political issues and regional conflicts, however, have absolutely impeded my efforts to find my mother/grandmother/ and nanny. I feel so fucking helpless regarding this issue, man. Oh gosh, I am certain you do. Please do not take my comment which was really just intended to be a joke about Star Wars as any sort of comment about your relationship with your mother, or family. I am terribly sorry that my post was taken that way, and I can certa…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:57 AM
5

In all fairness, But I honestly don't understand how you can be sitting around in the Republic worrying about trade embargos in a distant solar system, instead of trying to figure out how to rescue your mom. This has been said about Anakin Skywalker's behavior in the Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones many times over.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 01:08 AM
2

This may be antithetical in many ways to your views, but reading your post, which I found compelling, I thought of this interesting clip from a classic cold war movie. All that hate
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:25 AM
4

While I appreciate this post, it might be even better if you were to compile a bibliography, or even imgur the bookshelves.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:59 PM
4

I think you're right. But my experience with at least one lawyer tells me that some men do as well. So I am willing to say that the person contemplating the divorce often has a lot of premeditation going on. Anyway.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:38 PM
3

You make a good point bw2002 but article terrible a What. Wow.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:45 PM
1

Very well stated, thank you.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:09 PM
0

You write, "but if she doesn’t say “no,” he’s a rapist." Did you mean "but if she doesn’t say “yes,” he’s a rapist."
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:53 PM
0

Thanks for posting the transcript. I am not going to watch 30 minutes of youtube. Jebus, I just don't understand why anyone would put more than a five minute discussion on youtube and expect people to watch it. But I can read, and skim a transcript easily within a few minutes.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:49 PM
1

What I enjoyed about her post was: I certainly want to coexist with mens rightsers, but If you believe men have any hardships due to feminism you are just wrong and we cannot coexist (unstated but assumed) women's hardships are of course due to Patriarchy
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:45 PM
0

But she replied, and she didn't say she was anti-abortion.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:43 PM
4

I completely believe that. In fact, hell, I had a very expensive San Francisco divorce lawyer, literally yell at me, while I was interviewing him, because I had not planned it all myself for several years in order to get custody. And if you listened to him, I had to be a grade A dummy not to have done that -- apparently all his buddies and other San Franciscans know to do that. Disagreeing with some of the others that have replied to you, this lawyer was evidence that men and women can both enga…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:04 PM
40

My ex convinced me to pay off her student loans by putting them on my lower rate credit cards. Then two months later she filed for divorce. Guess who got the loan balances. Was it premeditated? I dunno. It was pretty slick though.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:01 AM
4

This video was pointed out to me yesterday. It's about Norway, Sweden's neighbor, but it is really about global feminism. It's a very well made video about the question of gender preferences, nurture or nature. I think it sheds light on research and politics in Norway and perhaps by extension in Sweden next door. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ2xrnyH2wQ&feature=youtu.be
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:55 AM
6

The flip side is I find it hard to believe it's just one Admin. The behavior seems so contrary to what would seem to be reasonable goals that it seems like something many admins must be doing, with corporate approval. It's just so odd how SRS likes to go to sources outside of reddit like jezebel, huffpo, cnn, etc. and use that to attack reddit, that I can't imagine they have any support from the corporate masters to do this, and yet, if they have no support, how does one lone assassin not get fo…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:45 AM
-1

The fact that the NFL - a male dominated organization with a huge male audience - did absolutely nothing to promote prostate cancer awareness last month while they're now doing everything to promote breast cancer awareness is enormously frustrating. WHAT ARE YOU DOING NOW, YOU, SGMD1, TO MAKE SURE THE NFL WEARS BLUE NEXT YEAR!? Have you started a change.org petition? Have you written them a letter? Have you facebooked or linkedin or tweeted them? Have you contacted alumni that play in the NFL? H…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:17 AM
4

I try to use man and woman, male and female. I like to believe people over 18 are adults, and it seems wrong to blame men for their patriarchal evils and complain about girls acting like evil fuckhole receptacles. (It's only been 18 hours since I visited a radfem site, so I am still coming down, please excuse occasional lapses.) So I use woman, women, and females to help denote these are rational adults with agency and logic that are so often totally fucked up beyond all repair. Referring to the…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:04 AM
0

Though this site is clearly a scam, how different is it really from http://ihollaback.org Actually is this site potentialpredators.com actually on the same spectrum as ihollaback.org AND www.splcenter.org?? At least when investigating the mens rights issue, the SPLC research was shoddy, it was unclear of the process by which an organization was nominated, or the criteria they used. There was seemingly no way to appeal, appeals were actually mocked, and no way to get off. And the SPLC seems to do…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:41 PM
2

But I love the Big Dog!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:27 PM
5

Interesting site. I am not a lawyer, I would love for someone (bleg to AVfM???) to speak to the EFF and get their opinion of their claims re: the CDA. They claim that what you publish is not their responsibility due to the CDA, it is your responsibility and you have the liability. AND they state they will not remove profiles. I would also wonder what would happen if whenever one of us were at a coffee shop, on a borrowed wifi, we submitted the profiles of various lawmakers. Submit a bunch of pro…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:02 PM
0

Interesting information. Just curious, how is Chromakode linked to ArchangelleAzraelle? And yes, reddit Admins ought to be absolutely transparent about what handles they use, and about their activities.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:10 PM
12

I dunno, if reddit Admins want to favor SRS, a group that goes outside reddit to attack reddit, a group that makes so many distorted attacks, well, half of me wants to see that happen, especially as it is all funded by conde nast. It seems the complete opposite of what I'd do if I wanted to sponsor community formation, free speech, and/or make money, so I kind of want to see if it works and hope it fails spectacularly. It would be very nice if the Admins were at least transparent about how they …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:13 PM
1

It's not a big deal. I thought my response was semi-humorous, and semi-critical and my points are: I myself don't perceive mens issues to be: a women haters club a 100% anti feminist club a let's return to the 19th century club a let's treat women (or anyone) like shit club And I also don't perceive reddit to be: let's talk about something I saw on facebook club
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:16 PM
2

I apologize, I don't think I was being hateful. I figured you would appreciate a comment more so than just a downvote. The discussion of posting of images with "what do I think about this"? has been a topic over the last week or so. Posts similar to yours can be a form of trolling.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:47 PM
1

There is a meme here: I found X on facebook, not sure how to react. First, then complain about it on facebook, or Second, make sure you make clear why you think this is a mens rights issue, and Third, explain why some image is sufficiently gross/wonderful AND popular in the popular culture that anyone should give a damn. I found a sign that says fathers should teach their kids to respect women, I'm pretty upset by that, it's very misandric.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:29 PM
0

Found this on facebook, not sure how to react. Well, my reaction is to wander over to /r/MensRightsMeta and lobby to have imgur and facebook posts tossed out of /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:58 PM
3

It's a shame the Record's reporter didn't ask about the legality of ordering the removal of records from avoiceformen. IANAL, but it reminds me of the The NYTimes being ordered to remove the Pentagon Papers (and the NYTimes winning that case) or more recently of papers being told to remove wikileaks material, and the papers winning those cases. I do have to say though there are other interesting points raised here, namely the "santity" of closed hearings and how violating should be responded to.…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:07 PM
4

Listen to them, they're dying R2! Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough, it's all my fault! My poor Master.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:58 PM
3

Shut down all the garbage mashers on the Detention Level!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:56 PM
2

Someone should consider calling CPS on her. It sounds like terrible behavior and possibly risky to the child. It's the internet and difficult for me to judge what happens in other people's homes, but this sounds like a cry for help to me, the defiance before the breakdown. I think the professionals at CPS are indeed the people society says is best equipped to deal with this situation.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:46 PM
2

I super skimmed the article (which is to say didn't read more than about ten sentences at random) and didn't look at the comments. But the game David Futrolle plays is to take articles written here that get considerable push back and write about them as if there was no push back. And to elevate comments that express anger, or frustration, and that are often downvoted heavily or only minimally upvoted and to claim they are somehow representative of lots of approval. So yeah, none of us wish to ea…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:43 PM
2

Is this the same vice that somehow complained about /r/mensrights a few days ago?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:37 PM
3

Well, it worked for your Dad, so welcome sister.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:36 PM
12

I think it's certainly true that the authors are Republican, but nevertheless I think the complaint is accurate. OTOH, I am in part voting with my male parts. I have never voted non-Democrat, but one reason I will vote for Gary Johnson and not Barack Obama this time is due to his actual behavior on civil liberties (ala Glenn Greenwald and Conor Friedersdorf) AS WELL as his constant bad mouthing of fathers on fathers day. It's a small thing, but real and indicative of various anti-male, anti-fath…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:28 PM
1

Get back to me when you wake up, please. I want to understand your side of the argument. Yeah, that's not going to happen. I explained, I gave links, then you said something pretty incredible about teachers not having to leave doors open when with students which indicates you have not a single clue as to what you are talking about or you are trolling, so, sorry, do your own work. Have a goodnight.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:49 AM
2

I'm going to bed.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:40 AM
2

Ask the male teachers who cannot be alone in a room with a female student without leaving a door open and who are faced daily with people that distrust them how they feel about other teachers claiming to have consensual relationships with their students. Ask the boys how they feel about having so few male teachers in their schools. Ask the men that have been turned down for jobs as preschool workers because they are men and it's considered odd. No one here is saying that either of these two peop…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:32 AM
2

No, but crimes from people in position of authority are specifically crimes that undermine all of society. It's similar to "color of law" crimes. Or public corruption crimes. How does the judge taking a bribe on one case undermine society? I don't see how it is automatically non-consensual if it involves a person in power over the other. The truth in a very specific case is it may be consensual. The judgment and experience is that in most cases it is not consensual, nor is it fair to the people …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:28 AM
5

Also, you skipped my last question. please explain Apart from that, people in authority, that is teachers, should never have sexual relationships with students. That undermines all of society. to me like I'm 5. I really don't see how you came to that conclusion. Well sorry, it's way past the time of day where I do your googling for you. In many states it's a crime for a teacher to have sex with a student, or any person in a position of authority to have sex with people they have authority over. …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:20 AM
8

We tell parents, you must send your kids to our schools, for a certain number of years, and no you have very little control over what happens in those schools, even though you are the parent and ultimately responsible for the kid. However, we cannot control our teachers from sexually preying on your kids. You're responsible for that kid up until 18, or 21, or whatever depending on the law, but we get to fuck them at 16. And Jane over there that didn't respond to my advances? Well, maybe I will m…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:59 AM
15

It might be one thing if the kid was over the age of consent, but if not well by definition the people's representatives in that state have decided it cannot be consensual regardless of what pokepat460 believes. Apart from that, people in authority, that is teachers, should never have sexual relationships with students. That certainly could screw up the kid, and undermine that kid's understanding of consent, and it undermines all of society. Yes, we are going to demand your kids go to schools. N…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:55 AM
5

See if there is room for a GoPro or a wifi camera, because as a member of the Patriarchy, what better way would you have to help the Patriarchy oppress the sub-human women and keep them down then by taking unauthorized video of your using them as fuckhole receptacles when engaged in penis-in-vagina (PIV) or penis-in-anus (PIA) or penis-in-mouth (PIM) sex and simultaneously broadcasting that with ustream, skype, google hangouts, or a justin tv channel and show?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:33 AM
4

Ah, well good. I would actually have been surprised they didn't because Neuticles allows your pet to retain his natural look, self esteem and aids in the trauma associated with altering. to hell with neuticles for dogs, I certainly know I would have lower self esteem and be worried about my natural look. But I had never heard of them, so thank you! (Next question: does insurance that pays for the removal pay for this sort of reconstruction?)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:24 AM
3

I am not sure you have a sense of humor about this, I don't think I would, but you might consider that dogs can get neuticles. As a prank you might ask your doctor and surgeon and insurance company if you can get something similar. As a mens rights issue, are there neuticles for men? Women certainly can get reconstructed breasts and implants and my guess would be insurance would pay for that after breast cancer. Corpseflower Race for the Cure(tm) should be a Mens Rights foundation dedicated to i…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:18 AM
6

I will add, ALWAYS get a second opinion. If you have a good relationship with your primary care physician ask him to get you a referral to someone else. I am actually not that crazy about my primary care physician, but when I had to undergo some pretty serious heart surgery, I always respected and appreciated the fact that as soon as I told him, the first words he said was, "Let me get you a second opinion", which alleviated lots of anxiety I had in asking for one. So don't be anxious, ask for a…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:14 AM
2

I am not a doctor and don't play one on TV. So are you fertile now? If so, I would imagine you could donate and have your sperm frozen.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:10 AM
2

You might be right technically, but at least one of the women had her ovaries removed, and the wiki says that is common to do along with hysterectomies.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:08 AM
3

What is the difference between this and a hysterectomy? I know several women that have had hysterectomies, one after a delivery. But they seem very much like women, and I am sure everyone that knows you would want you around.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:52 AM
5

Yeah, Internet is fucked sometimes. I've thought many forums would be better if the forum gave each person some known number of posts in each thread, and then counted them down. So you get three posts in this thread, then you're out, so better make your posts good.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:09 AM
6

Talk of women being lesser humans who are incapable of thinking logically and only respond with emotion.... Yeah, those people sound like dipshits and certainly not people I would prefer to know IRL or want associated with a MRM or positions that I think would advance such a movement.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:03 AM
2

Perhaps I am not aware to the inside baseball problem that is occurring at /r/mensrights, but what is the definite problem you are seeing?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:53 AM
2

It is difficult. It's also highly dependent on context. In general, I like to believe the answer to ugly speech is more speech. That David Futrolle and Anna North and others can cherry pick comments out of a Internet Forum and exploit it really and truly is not a reason to discourage speech in these forums. But truly despicable and ugly misogynistic comments should be parried with people calling them out on it, and near as I can tell in my six weeks or so here, usually are. Some ranting is okay …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:51 AM
9

How do you feel about women in the MRM? I think it's vital. Not to objectify them, but it sures aids our credibility enormously when women, mothers, sisters, daughters, grandmothers, aunts, cousins, scientists talk about how feminism has injured their relatives, and injured them. It's much harder for the default position of feminists to be to disparage asshole misogynists mras rape apologists when women got our back. GWW has a wonderful voice and insight, but even if she just wrote the same old …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:07 AM
-1

Read this entire thread again, closely. It's somewhat hard for me to understand how you could have missed the link. If you can see where I get upset he responded to my posts, please point that out.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:46 AM
2

This is not a clear mensrights issue per se, or a /r/MensRights issue, and frankly, I agree with much of what Watson writes here. But she never mentions why it was so wrong for evil mras and not freethoughtblogs bloggers to question if ElevatorGate even occurred.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:59 PM
-2

If you don't know who Robert Reich is, it won't matter. Once you do learn who he is, and learn about all the things he has stood for, then visit http://www.freakonomics.com/2008/05/01/robert-reich-answers-your-labor-questions/ But don't do this until you have spent the time to truly learn about Robert Reich.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:12 PM
-1

Do you know who Robert Reich is? Are you aware of what Robert Reich proposed in terms of women's jobs at the beginning of President Obama's efforts to stem the flow of jobs during the recession? How would you characterize Robert Reich's views towards women or feminism? Do you know what Robert Reich's views are regarding the wage gap?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:51 PM
4

Thank you for posting this.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:46 PM
-4

No, the discussion was if you were troll, slug, or savant. I brought up that you're an odd cat, and a Hitler defender. You said, no I'm not a Hitler defender, it's just that he's a swell guy who had a lot of bad press and terrible people working for him. I am honestly not sure why people think you're a troll or worse.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:09 PM
-1

Yeah, well, take your Hitler theories to some more appropriate forum. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:07 PM
3

Thank you for the link. Admittedly many days I don't know how to interpret what you write. Sometimes I read what you write, agree with it, see your name beside it, and groan. I do. He never really did anything all too outrageous. It was the people who enabled him and who actually carried out the murders. Saying Hitler was terrible is excusing the true tyrants and evildoers; the people. This though is inexcusable on many levels. I could ignore it, eventually, as ignorance, if not for your other m…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:52 PM
1

He's said many trollish things, and has defended hitler in a terribly non funny, non ironic series of posts. So, screw him. The occasional funny post doesn't mean banana isn't bananas.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:28 PM
3

I think you need to take care of yourself. Based on your AMA: http://www.reddit.com/r/rapecounseling/comments/z6gan/think_i_was_ganged_on_at_college_party_dont_know/ I strongly believe this is not the reddit for you to ask this of. Based on your perceived behavior deficits and inability to discuss this, I think you should seek a mental health specialist (psychiatrist or Ph.D psychologist) on your campus that you can develop a long term relationship with and who can be your advocate as you progre…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:52 AM
0

Don't go away mad! Just go away!
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:23 AM
0

Okay, I am taking you on your word that if I no longer reply to you, you will take your idiot demands and bigotry and ignorance elsewhere. I hope you can be honorable about this. I am willing to donate to a village idiot fund if that's what it takes you to fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:58 AM
2

Especially in high traffic areas where there are enough people that worries of violence are pretty much ruled out. But still, I think there would be resistance from the elderly various religious communities But yes, I think a design that was unisex but with more privacy than the current stalls is the way to go, perhaps with a few stalls devoted to the disabled or family changing rooms.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:57 AM
1

Google translate tells me that's: yes. Every second post should be in french, and I went to the Gulag. I'm not sure what that means, but, I'm signing off, see ya'll tomorrow.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:53 AM
1

CSSR, uh, is that Canada? :)
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:41 AM
0

Seriously, I just did this two weeks ago. I ended up having to paypal 50 DKK to get this guy to stop responding. Can we just short circuit this now you huge hunk of shit? I'll give paypal you 58.0772 South African rand if that's what it takes for you to take your bigoted crap and just go away.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:40 AM
0

Uh, I've told you as plainly as can be, I think you're an asswipe and not worth any more of my time. What can I do to make you just go away? Do you have a paypal address I can send money to?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:04 AM
1

Yeah, I think it would differentiate AVfM from a lot of "ranty" sites. And I am sure there are feminist sites featuring feminist stories and feminist poetry, and good for them. Sort of the playboy model without the porn (because we all have better sources for that.) But in the late 60s, 70s, 80s, I learned a lot about future cultures, including sexuality by reading a ton of science fiction that dealt with these issues, if not overtly than just as background.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:58 AM
0

No one is playing the victim. Pointing out that your anti religious views border on anti-semitism because of they way you choose to write about them has nothing to do with playing the victim. It has to do with how you are an arrogant ass and how well you play with others and all about your #winning nonsense. I am not here to be your google. You're a fuckhead that has repeatedly insulted me. The answers you seek are one google away. Jam your fucking head up your asshole then jump in a vat of acid…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:54 AM
2

Sigh, it appears to be 7 parts, each 40 minutes long -- I doubt if I will get to the end. But it starts off interesting, and I would probably kill people just to get the women's number at 10:05 even to hear her reject me and mock me. It's actually a very fun and well made video. Do you know who the narrator is, where he got funding? In videos like this, I always wonder how he got funding to fly from Norway to San Diego to interview a professor there for what appears on the video for two minutes …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:50 AM
1

1) That's interesting -- I get so little out of poetry -- once I got past memorizing Jabberwocky that is. So thanks. 2) I suggested to Paul Elam a few days ago that a voice for men start seeking and publishing fiction and science fiction about mens issues, and try to become known for that, so people can expect some interesting piece of well edited "mens issues" fiction or SF comes out once a month, or once a week.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:48 AM
-1

It is a fucked up religion. All religions are irrational but very few of them expressly command that parents horrifically abuse their children as a matter of course. As I said, own your anti-semitism. Be loud and proud about it. #winning.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:38 AM
1

Thanks. I was wondering if it was a band name, a reference to some feminist conspiracy (which the GHWB NWO in part contains), or something more recent. GHWB NWO is now 20 years old, it needs some updating??
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:32 AM
-1

Just yelling the arguments are fallacious isn't actually an argument just so you know. I've actually backed up my reasoning, and invited you to learn more about FGM. When you write things like "their fucked up religion" you're being borderline anti-semitic. Own it, wear it, you've been an abusive jerk. You could've have written everything you've written without being as asshole, and read and tried to understand what I've written, but you have insisted on arguing in bad faith and name calling. So…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:30 AM
15

I've been in unisex bathrooms, some of which feature floor to ceiling stall walls, some of which don't! The latter was actually in a converted Army base located in the Marin Headlands that is now used for conferences, weddings, all sorts of stuff. Actually a very nice location, but I think for reasons of preservation, they weren't able to get permission to build a new restroom for women, so they just made the old army restroom unisex. And I guess it works pretty well.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:25 AM
1

Oh. Thank you. Apart from the words and the George H.W. Bush thing, is there anything in specific you are referring to?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:22 AM
1

I basically agree with this with many other civil liberty issues tossed in. My vote doesn't matter because of where I live, that is, it'll be a landslide no matter what. So I'm voting for Gary Johnson and voting for ANY third party just to help keep third parties alive.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:22 AM
-1

You've missed my point in two threads now. You've been abusive. You've been borderline anti-semitic. You've demanded I jump through hoops when I've been clear about my stances and why. So how about you suck your own dick.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:20 AM
1

What does NWO mean?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:08 AM
2

I like the poem for how it relates to mens issues. But if you wanted to give us a paragraph on how it fails as a poem, well, I am curious.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:06 AM
-1

Well double dumbass on you.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:55 AM
1

My guess is that Tess Michiko Rinearson would look terrific in a Kim Possible Mission Outfit. Perhaps even a glow in the dark Shego ensemble.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:24 AM
7

Between VAWA and his annual Mother's Day "Women are Heroes" and Father's Day "Men shouldn't be deadbeats" speeches, it's surmised he's not terribly fond of mens rights. A very good source is Fathers and Familes blog (if you're interested in Fathers' Issues.)
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:00 AM
4

Wow. Amazing. What's the best place to cross post this on so it rises to the top at reddit?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:19 AM
1

It's not a gender issue that can be changed, must like feminists insist I be ecstatic with heavy women, but it is certainly an issue that can be noted, along with well, the female affinity for security and a big wallet, and discussed in terms of horrible objectification of women and the evil desires of men.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:08 AM
2

I gather that one possible conclusion to draw from GWW's putting the two articles (psych today and factcheckme) together, is that feminism or at least Patriarchy Theory as we love it arises as a sui generis outcome of female psychosis.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:06 AM
2

That voice comes from the Rad Fem reboot of Dark Star. It's FemBomb #20 speaking to us, explaining why it has to blow up.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:03 AM
2

Holy shit. Love that voice. It's like Radfem AI Womyndroid coming alive to destroy the Patriarchy. Over and over, Contemporary Feminist must be confronted with Rad Fem because in many ways rad fem does set the agenda.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:01 AM
-2

Ah, but FGM can be as intensive as what you are describing to something as simple as a pinprick or clitoral mutilation similar to MGM. Also, I don't know the most extreme extent of either MGM or FGM, nor am I interested in learning. Then you are not actually competent to engage in this dialogue. Regardless of whether you see MGM as a problem, however, the main problem many MRAs have with the procedure is that it detracts from an individual's right to self-determination, insofar as they can choos…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:56 AM
-2

I am not the one in this thread (or the earlier one) comparing male and female circumcisions. There is no developed world female circumcision apart from the illegal. So if you want to say they cannot be compared, I AGREE. If you want to oppose male circumcisions too, I will probably donate and help so long as I think you are going to be effective and not just hurt the movement or contribute to Islamophobia or antisemitism. Regardless, the people in this thread and others are advocating all sorts…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:38 AM
1

I think that's a fine way to convince people that your arguments are superior, and that you are morally superior, to ambush them with sounds taken out of context (that is in no way a Jewish handling of a bris) and your blugeons, well, hell, Typhonblue, you really don't seem all that much different from a member of atheismplus after all. And now that the guy here has offended his entire family by taking your advice, I wonder what their reaction will be when their next child is born, or what their…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:23 AM
1

I apologize, whatever you linked to, YouTube is asking me to log in for and warning of content, so I can't do that, and won't for awhile.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:18 AM
2

This was very well done and makes some terrific points. Needs to be cut down to 4:59.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:28 PM
1

I can disagree with Dines on many issues but still think this article is insightful. My take on both articles were similar in that Rosin's really forecast a change in feminism more than in men. Regardless, regrettably, Alexander Cockburn died a few months back, and I am overjoyed to know he is still able to edit Counterpunch. Seriously, that's very cool.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:20 PM
2

"Hey dude, while no man chooses to be falsely accused, they do choose the situations they get themselves into, so you know, those men contributed to their own convictions." WELL ALL WENT SILENT. She was clearly being sarcastic, but this guy had no idea what to say! Yes Suzie, this is mostly true. Often, we are all partly responsible for the situations we find ourselves in. Still, everyone recognizes the rape was wrong, and yet the man is faced with many feminists saying there is no such thing as…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:13 PM
4

Your dad told me it was his favorite place to hang out. As he was sucking my dick.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:09 PM
1

This was actually a pretty interesting article, thanks for posting it. It's almost certainly a good idea to address issues of meal quality and obesity at schools. A flat 800 calorie limitation does nothing. I'd love to eat 800 calories of french fries everyday. Probably a bad idea. Same with the 800 calories of pizza or breaded chicken nuggets.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:02 PM
1

Not according to the article that plainly stated this kid needed 1000 calories which would have been evident to any reader of english that bothered to read the article written in english that clearly spelled all of this out plainly in english. But you have to read the article.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:00 PM
-5

The Internet Tough Guys here all ready to kidnap the kid or make a brave stand against circumcision by annoying everyone are amusing. A good reason perhaps while anti-circumcision and for that matter mens rights advocates often get nowhere aside from being called nuts. If you were interested in success you would play the long game. Support the family, celebrate the new baby, refuse to participate personally in the bris, and support politely and respectfully engaging these communities with educat…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:57 PM
5

Would you do me a favor, seriously. If the circumcision was done earlier today, that is the bris. What ceremony are you going to? Is it possible it's just a naming ceremony in front of the congregation? I'd am very curious and would be better informed if you let us know the details when you are done. I'd also suggest you bring a gift along the lines of what I suggested earlier, $18 in a new baby card, that allows your sister and husband to understand you honor their choice of religion and celebr…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:49 PM
1

Heh, I tried saying that earlier, got downvoted to oblivion.... Apparently mens rightsers here think this kid should be kidnapping the baby and making a giant stand to save the kid. Amazing since we don't hear of the same mens rightsers making these stands everyday in the communities near them.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:45 PM
6

Things I am surprised are not on this list, and I think maybe it goes to how OLD AND TIRED this list is, but maybe it goes to how stupid people are: Talk aimlessly on my cellphone to my girlfriends Text on my phone while walking
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:42 PM
2

I never make eye contact with anyone I'm not familiar with and am cautious about it even with people I do now. I often put on my casual walking through town hey I am aware of my surroundings space so don't fuck with me face, and give a short nod or maybe even short hello/hi/hey to the people I walk past. I always avoid crossing paths with groups in public when possible. Yeah, dogs too. Little kids as well. Keys in my hand? Almost certainly at night. A lot of these lists are things many people of…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:39 PM
1

Well then he should say so. Linking to some issue and then giving no indication of what the issue is is really a pretty shitty link.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:18 PM
1

I wrote what you just read into a comment form at buzzfeed and then their website had issues with chrome and it wouldn't take.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:58 AM
-9

Both are religious practices that, as you said, may be wrong, may elicit regret, but happen to many people. For some reason you seem to think only one is bad while the other should be celebrated as a big moment in a defenseless child's life. Why is it right to mutilate a baby boy for religious reasons when it is unspeakable to do the same to a baby girl? It doesn't help your case to ignore the herd of elephants tromping through your arguments. Have a g'night, I am going to write a rent check and…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:35 AM
-11

Yeah, that's bullshit and shows you know very little about female genital mutilation compared to a male circumcision. Just saying you know shit.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:16 AM
2

You make some good and interesting points re: feminism as practiced by thinking adults. I've never been convinced that Marcotte or many in her cohort are at that level. While you also raise good points about liberals and conservatives allowing their ideologies to sway how they feel about science or issues, I just suspect with many contemporary feminists it's a lot shallower than that. Maybe not much. It's part of my thesis of 3 feminists, 5 opinions, (based on a RL example I lost a few weeks bac…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:42 AM
8

My suspicion (and I can feel my brain fading tonight) is that feminists like Marcotte have embraced atheism merely because of the feminist stance on abortion. She's opposed to religion because of abortion and that's the only reason is she really an atheist. My guess is that if science and medicine were to make premature fetuses viable at earlier and earlier ages, or that if science were to show that there is cognitive thought or pain felt at earlier ages, Marcotte and other feminists would take …
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:26 AM
2

They think they are doing this cool thing, having this dialogue with feminists in a way that allows critique of the feminists. But to do so, they buy into many feminists tropes that are very anti-democratic free speech and frankly just abusive of non-feminists. The worst of which is they have two threads for every issue: a feminist safe space thread similar to any SRS like or modern feminist thread that they call No Hostility, and then a thread that us shitty men that want to say something frank…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:15 AM
-4

Reddit seems pretty damaged tonight. I've had two comments disappear. One reappear, and lots of emergency maintenance. Anyway. Let your sister know as soon as you can. I don't know why you have to do anything, but give her as much time as you can to have someone else take your place. Bring a nice baby gift, but my suggestion is, if your sister and/or her husband are Jewish it would be especially nice to give a new baby card (maybe a Jewish one) with $18 placed in it. 18 is a special number in Ju…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:08 AM
1

No one should be angry with you. You know your sister better than the rest of us. Give her a call as soon as possible. Just say you cannot participate for your own personal reasons. No need to take a political stand or force any sort of confrontation. Let her know early so that she can ask someone else, and if it's not too late and you can afford it, bring a nice gift, or even better, a Jewish new baby card, or ANY new baby card, and place $18 in it. 18 is a special number in Judaism that repres…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:00 AM
12

What's journalistically dishonest about that is she doesn't even acknowledge the clear possibility that Throwaway is a troll. Rule 1 of the internets, no one knows you're a dog http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you're_a_dog Rule 2 of the internets, when needed to prove a feminist/atheismplus point, no one could ever be a dog Rule 3 of the internets, unless they are mra assholes.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:25 AM
1

Free association link: When I was just a little girl I asked my mother, what will I be Will I be pretty, will I be rich Here's what she said to me. Que Sera, Sera, Whatever will be, will be The future's not ours, to see Que Sera, Sera What will be, will be. ...
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:54 AM
12

So buzzfeed, didn't acknowledge the possibility it was a troll did acknowledge the reasonableness and support of /r/MensRights Due to the latter that actually puts Buzzfeed miles and miles ahead of the David Futrolles, Arthur Goldwags, PZ Myers, etc.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:40 AM
14

Well I wrote this, but their silly facebook login doesn't like Chrome very much: I encourage you to visit http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights daily, weekly, hourly. You'll find the rumors of our being evil monsters mostly over the top. Polls show that we our pretty much representative of the population at large, with women, LGBTQIA members, men of all races and classes, and that often, by and large we support many "feminist" goals. My guess is that most of the time you read someone just viciously…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:38 AM
22

I think there are some interesting free speech issues here. I applaud AVfM for taking this on and seemingly be willing to put their money where their mouth is. If they intend to take actions such at these, I would consider how looking as much like a media outlet as possible would help them in their defenses. IANAL, but I would also examine how wikileaks organized itself and has defended itself in court.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:35 AM
1

Yeah, I think linking to feministcritics needs a great deal of thought. Like GMP, I just don't find the banning policies, free speech restrictions, the separate but unequal threads at feminist critics to be conducive to thought or discussion regarding mens issues. Is it the Beeb you want to discuss, or is there something extra special about the feminist critics thread that needs discussion? If the latter you should say what it is, like "Dude at feministcritics is extra douchey today, check it ou…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:39 PM
2

I am very glad to hear that, thank you.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:50 PM
3

I heard Al Franken on the radio one day saying that when his mother was dying, he just sat in the hospital next to her and just held her hand continuously for hours and hours. And when my mom was that way, after hearing Al, I did the same thing, and I would squeeze her hand and she would squeeze back. It's sort of a sad and nice memory. I am really glad I could do that for us both, all night long. Anyway, I am hopeful your brother will be fine, and I know how boring it is for everyone in a hospi…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:35 PM
1

I have a problem with authority. RAINN is cited by so many people including mens rights people that I find it hard to say they are just making things up. And I don't know if they perform their own research or get it from academics, cops, etc. I do think there is such a huge discrepancy between their claims and what is reported that that itself needs to be explained. And I favor anyone that would ask for that explanation however they do so.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:26 PM
5

Oh well, you are from SRS after all, it was a given I disgust you. The only question was how many times would you intentionally misconstrue my statements before telling me that.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:20 PM
1

You think RAINN is making up stuff, and that demanding to see the "cover up" will expose the scheme? Not quite like that. I don't think RAINN is making up stuff, I think they sincerely believe what they print It's more like I think RAINN very sincerely points to research papers describing how elegant and fancy the emperor's new clothes are And I think asking more questions about that will either show me the clothes really are than fancy, or have everyone reveal to themselves how naked the empero…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:18 PM
3

I don't really know what to do in these kind of situations as I usually try to avoid trouble, so thank you for your advice. yeah, me too, I usually just eat it. I will say this from having been in a hospital 3 weeks. Having a visitor there is very important both from being bored BUT ALSO to act as an advocate when machines are beeping and no one is paying attention or for getting ice or water or whatever. It actually helps your brother that you can stay there as long as possible and if sitting d…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:16 PM
2

I don't go to hospitals too often, but spent three weeks, one week at a time in them, and while some nurses are terrific, and most are meh, I've had one or two that were purely evil. But it seems they don't have much power to make the visitor's experience worse. And if they are ethical and human won't hold the visitor's behavior on the patient. Asking her why, asking her why she isn't telling that to these other people, asking her how it will affect your brother's treatment all seem reasonable. …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:00 PM
9

Ignore her and/or ask her loudly, "if I continue to sit in this chair will that affect the care you give my brother?" And get her name. And then report her.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:49 PM
1

If someone is drugged or forced to get drunk clearly they have been abused and are not in control. There is no evidence in the story in this thread or in your posts that it deals with a person who was drugged or forced to drink. Giving you a free drink, or offering to buy you a drink, does not force you to drink. Before you go to a bar, you need to understand your body's limits. No one else is a better judge. Give yourself a rule: one drink that's all. Two drinks I am out of there. Tell the bart…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:45 PM
1

At times I think you're right, at other times I think campus men should humor them more. As I suggested, it might be fun to use the RAINN statistics, investigate at the paper as to what the paper says, and why the papers either aren't printing more about rapes or writing articles describing the huge disparity. RAINN seems very well respected, and yet there numbers seem to be a huge red flag that the claims are wrong. I really would like a campus reporter, local paper reporter, AVfM reporter to h…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:38 PM
1

So that would fit in with my totally wild ass guesses. I still think that it's completely reasonable to call up the campus newspaper and ask why they haven't reported ANY rapes. What does it take to have a rape reported, and when is it they don't report them, and why aren't they looking at the police blotter. Etc. I think a rape of one per day or one per week or even one per month would have cops all over the place, the campus terrified, and the papers reporting.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:28 PM
3

But that's a different reason for your advice than what you originally gave which was to: the only responsible thing to do is to first ask details to see if her claims are valid before suggesting she go to the police. Unless you like helping send innocent men to prison. And if you do, well, you're certainly an anti-MRA. none of us online are in any position to ask her details and investigate enough to tell her not to go to the cops. If you feel you can't tell her because the system is broken, th…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:26 PM
2

Stop drinking if you find you cannot control your behavior. After the first and only time I woke up drunk in college puking on my carpet, I didn't drink again for 10 years. It doesn't sound like drinking is for you. That's not a terrible thing, there are many other ways to enjoy your evening. Also, consider reviewing spoken conspicuous enthusiastic consent. If you believe you were fed alcohol to make you compliant, consider telling your dates upfront and soon what your plans are for the evening,…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:21 PM
1

No, it's like saying BEFORE you get into the car you and AT the bar you are responsible for your drinking behavior. Other people buying you drinks is not an excuse. Your blacking out indicates you were so drunk you cannot tell how intoxicated your partner was. It makes for a very ambiguous situation that without further investigation leads us all to remember Blackstone: It is better that 10 guilty people go free than jail one innocent person. Or as Ben Franklin put it, 100 guilty people go free.…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:17 PM
4

Well, apparently, we've seen trolls come in here before. And, this person doesn't identify merely as a woman asking a question, but specifically as a FeMRA, which doesn't seem terribly relevant. I don't know if it is troll or genuine, but the suspicion seems reasonable. But since everyone likes these totally pointless upvotes (I swear rats have more brains than people), I will upvote your comment as well.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:09 PM
5

And in general, how am I a good judge of whether YOU are intoxicated based on the beers I remember you drinking? Am I an MD or cop or ENT or something? A person saying the other guy didn't seem intoxicated while I got blackout drunk should not be considered a reliable judge of anything.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:07 PM
2

There's no way people on reddit should give much advice if any to any legal or criminal issues. As much as we like to talk, about the only legal advice to give to someone that says on a public forum they were assaulted or raped is to speak to the police. What will appear on Manboobz is manboobz usual rape of the truth. He will take your comment and cherrypick it and ignore the many comments giving out good and reasonable advice. Manboobz whole site is about raping the truth.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:02 PM
1

A good idea for much better accuracy. For getting a handle on whether campus rapes approach the RAINN projections, the damn campus newspaper should be a good approximation. At the same time RAINN predicts a rape a day and the campus women's centers are plastering campuses with don't rape posters, the campus paper is reporting ZERO rapes. Maybe it's been a decade or two since I was in college, but yeah, a single rape was big news.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:49 PM
1

I'm a scientist and engineer, and what I did was called a swag and a botec and it uses statistics over a very large population (13,000) to estimate the numbers of rapes. It comes up with a rape a day using RAINN numbers. You're totally full of it, if you think that a rape of one a day turns into absolutely zero media interest in rapes. Here's the search woman raped site:azcentral.com from 1/1/2011 to 1/1/2012 You're unique though, the first person I've ever heard of that says the media isn't int…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:26 PM
3

Though I wrote what I wrote above, I absolutely agree with you on this. The response poster should be that everyone needs to be responsible for their behaviors at parties and everyone needs to ask for consent.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:26 AM
14

I don't see that poster as implying that all men.... I don't see that poster as telling women that all men are rapists. I just see a poster that raises awareness that consent is needed. I give it a meh, there are many many worse things to be offended by. I doubt if that poster is effective, and I can't imagine any rapists seeing that poster and saying "oh yeah, better not rape", and on those grounds it's annoying, but I suspect you have bigger fish to fry than on that poster. Don't do drugs, dru…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:04 AM
13

Okay, I need my bifocals, metamucil, and walker but this poster? I don't see a real problem with this poster.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:36 AM
3

cell phone / imgur
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:39 AM
1

I can confirm most of this, and have been subjected to some of this, but I can't upvote this without confirmation and verification of a few of the legal points: that unemployed / reemployed this guy couldn't get a downward modification of support that after the dna test, regardless of ocasio, given the history given in this post, that a court would still order support I agree about the rest of it, I think it's worse too. This guy is laid off, re-employed, and wishes to return to the same career.…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:37 AM
2

Add in careless, arrogant, and an attention whore. The whole thing is yet another event in which some scientist/academician proves to me there is nothing special about scientists or academicians and they can be just as human, corrupt, biased, full of shit as the rest of us.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:36 AM
1

The whole Umbridge was raped has been going around for years in feminist circles to help prove that JKR is a misogynist. So that's one level of idiocy. But there's also, JKR made a rape joke (rather Ron did (my memory is it's actually Hermione that made the clop clop noises)) and of course you can't make rape jokes. And now we have /r/sub-that-cannot-be-named all upset that a virtual rape joke occurred at reddit. Just insanity.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:33 AM
2

Wife and husband married 20 years with 3 kids. Husband has 7 years more education. Chance of wife filing if husband is expected to get custody -.095, chance of wife filing if wife is expected to get custody-.69 Ain't it though? For fun or boredom, visit the PZ Myers thread I linked to earlier. I mentioned this article a few hours ago, and a few them tried to argue it out with me, then each fell silent. :(
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:06 AM
3

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs. Bu-bu-but there's a post there proving rape culture exists because redditors think Professor Umbridge deserved raping by the centaurs.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:01 AM
3

arabian sisters? I suspect Pam Geller considers her sisters to be Jews in Israel, so can you expand on, and clarify what you mean by Arabian sisters?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:53 AM
4

I have no idea what SB's point was, but a few days ago he was defending Hitler, it wasn't that Hitler was bad, it was his employees that were bad. So take banana face with a grain of salt...
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:47 AM
2

I think it's here: http://www.unc.edu/courses/2010fall/econ/586/001/Readings/Brinig.pdf
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:44 AM
1

Sorry no, I am taking the given statistics and applying them, projecting them to make an estimate. At each step I dramatically cut back the expected results and proceed thus making for a very conservative estimate. As you can see though, even skipping ALL of the steps, the simple google searches reveal NO rapes are mentioned when RAINN and feminists would believe we should be seeing as many as 1 rape per day. If you dislike my searches, I encourage you to perform your own. Seriously. I do. If yo…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:59 AM
5

It always is.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:48 AM
5

It would be nice to have a wiki page listing all these common images along with the five best responses to them. On the other hand, seeing them again just reminds me I am about to meet Ned Ryerson, and to be careful where I step off the curb. Bing!
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:48 AM
3

This is historic revisionism. Nothing in the linked to article suggests that. To prove your case take a wikipedia diff of the pages affected on October 18 and October 20 and make your case.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:10 AM
3

Who cares? I am glad Rosalind Franklin is getting the attention she deserved. Watson and Crick are heroes of mine (and for that matter so are Franklin and Pauling), I loved the book The Double Helix the first time I read it. (And though I think Pauling was a genius of geniuses, it sure was fun seeing him get beaten in The Double Helix) There are plenty of ways to get as much information on James Watson as you wish, including driving over to see him. It's much more difficult to find information o…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:56 PM
2

Don't be taken in by misleading troll headline. If you have evidence they are rewriting science or history in an orwellian sense, bring it. Having details added to female scientists does nothing to take away from history, science, or mens rights. It adds to it all.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:54 PM
5

Wikipedia rewriting history for women in science. Oh no they're not. Stop being an ass.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:53 PM
2

Nevertheless in many communities / states(?) it's criminal to sleep with your students or students in your school district -- you have too much authority over them.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:05 PM
2

An interesting experiment I conducted. Estimate population of females living on campus at your nearest big university Estimate rapes per year as determined by your favorite feminist rape calculator Use google to search your local newspaper websites and the campus paper to determine the number of rapes reported in the papers during the past year, or 2 years, or 3 years, or 4. Compare projected forecasts of rapes on college to actual newspaper reported rapes on campus. Are the numbers close? Draw …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:43 PM
15

A few days ago, female supremacist and Internet Troll PZ Myers took to task /u/nigglereddit for his audacity in weighing his options whether to get divorced or not. http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/09/27/why-do-i-despise-mras/ The kicker is in the comments, where someone suggests that he divorce his useless wife (throughout, she’s faceless and with no personality at all — just another female, weeping). He says he’d rather not, and like the typical egocentric twit, goes on to explain w…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:20 PM
1

"but this is really another in what I assure you is an endless stream of people suggesting what I "ought to do." And if I could share the nickel you would like to have had for each one.... But just so you know, I have a very open policy about contributions and ideas to the site. My one insistence is that if people feel strongly about AVfM doing something, and I think it would benefit AVfM, they are welcome to sign on and do the work making it happen. Very nice to know!
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:40 PM
2

Hi Paul, AVfM definitely is your intellectual property and you have every reason and right to be proud of that. It's late for me, forgive me if this comes off annoying or insulting or exceedingly naive. I am sure it is. I looked for AVfM incorporation information at the site, and couldn't find it. I may not have looked hard enough. I'm not exactly sure why, but that it is incorporated and how it is incorporated is interesting at least to me. And since a lot of you folks use pseudonyms, providing…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:16 AM
3

I understand that. I am still trying to determine for myself what I think of AVfM - as I said maybe I need donuts (I am at /r/keto so I hope not), but in the past some AVfM material has put me off. I am also thinking about AVfM and it's future and where Paul Elam seems to want to take it. When I write: Whether they are incorporated, have a board of advisors, consider themselves a journalistic effort, applied for membership to journalism societies or what it would take to qualify to issue press p…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:15 AM
-8

A high ranking Engineer at Siemens told me this in summer 2012. Yeah, whatever, that guy's blog sucks.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:19 AM
15

I am reading more of Paul Elam, he says he doesn't sugar coat things and has suggested perhaps that I should go get a doughnut and maybe I should. I disagree on his spelling of donut and at times the tact (or sometimes the lack thereof) he has taken in his efforts. But there is no denying that many times he has written well of the issues, and he has clearly put a tremendous effort into it and no doubt at great risk and cost to his career and personal life. I would like to know more about AVfM. W…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:15 AM
3

I dunno, think about it like feminism going to 11 or something. Or maybe that there are so many whacked out contemporary feminist theories that 100% just isn't enough to capture it.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:33 AM
6

Whatever. We're not going to do away with this, nor with ladies night at the bar, and it's not clear we should or we should want to. 50% of Contemporary Feminist Theory is based on Women are equal to Men The other 50% says that Women are better than men The final 50% says that Women need protection from men.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:55 AM
1

The second one was very interesting, thank you. I wouldn't mind reading an anthropology of the evolution/invasion/takeover of how psychology, especially therapy has changed with feminism. OTOH, the site whatmenthinkofwomen has changed homes and now seems to be more typical of the "Blast lefty communists Obama with a hint of discussion of feminism" genre.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:29 PM
1

Interesting, I don't imagine you have a link? (I admit I am being googlazy here...)
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:02 PM
2

From Loh's original piece, this is notable: Indeed—do you know a male therapist? I don’t Any one (men especially) who seeks therapy should understand it is probably a therapist trained by, biased with, contemporary feminist beliefs. And they will be biased, even as they strive or claim to be objective and non-judgmental. Mostly, they are mental.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:10 PM
3

Sandra Tsingh Loh is such an interesting case to me. She's about my age, also a physics major originally, and sometimes she writes things I very much agree with, and sometimes I want to throttle her for what she writes. Note to manboobz or SRS: the above is not condoning violence against anyone, except for you.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:04 PM
1

Thank you. They are on the defensive. Oh, how I wish I had some good data on that! I hear that all the time, and I've even heard some feminists extol the importance of the conversion effort, but more and more in law, and policy, it seems contemporary feminists are winning. Re: the Sarkeesian videos, well, if I were in charge of how to dispatch our mens rights army resources, I would certain have a platoon summarizing, critiquing, responding to them. I think if only because she is young and makes…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:49 PM
3

Typically people your age are pretty set in their ways. Which is true as well as terribly ironic given the ages involved. Typically people your age are pretty set in their ways for the next six months until someone else comes along and then they are set in their ways again, just differently. More accurate??
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:22 PM
9

You will find that when you argue with someone that is a leftist they will always make a personal attack ... and then proceeds to make a sweeping generalization and personal attack. downvote
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:20 PM
0

Anyway, most of this sounds like womens help book section porn -- is this guy of any importance whatsoever? Obligatory Dude: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:04 PM
1

In text, not as an image: When men feel inconsequential, it’s easier to blame women than it is to confront patriarchy - the true source of the diminishment and lack of meaning in so many men’s lives. When men feel unloved and disconnected, it’s easier to accuse women of not loving them well enough than it is to consider men’s own alienation from life. It’s easier to think of women as keeping men from the essence of their own lives than it is to see how men’s participation in patriarchy can suffo…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:01 PM
2

in deportation cases: Unmarried fathers are generally not considered family members in any meaningful way. If this is true, it is a good thing to fight against. I'd really encourage you to email Robert Franklin at Fathers and Families with the details.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:56 PM
1

I really hate listening to most internet rants these days, either the atheism ones back and forth or the male issues. Reddit gives you 300 characters to describe a link, and 99700 more if you just make it a text link and include the link there. Please describe this video better. Men issues? So it's about prostate cancer? Sexual dysfunction? What?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:54 PM
2

The lie seems to be described here: http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/10nw0k/anita_sarkeesian_update_xpost_r4chan/c6f3tvo
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:49 PM
1

"Yeah, what the fuck. DNA tests can prove if he's the father or not... how the hell would an option like this ever be offered to an accuse rapist?" An excellent point. Sometimes judges are complete idiots, and I can imagine this one might have been. But I agree there is a back story we don't know, and in another thread I was wondering if the girl's mom and dad had at one point been approving of the relationship and so just wanted the guy to admit paternity. But that sounds very off too. The ruli…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:45 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:39 PM
1

Well perhaps, but that's funny coming from you, because you use your handle at times to troll and deceive people that you are manboobz, an effort I think is deceptive, a waste of time for all, and wish you would stop. Anyway, I disagree it was a waste of time - I don't want to sound like Colonel Jessep, but Reddit claims to be this democratic voice, and yet it has both rules against spamming and SRS and manboobz. Maybe SRS is democracy in action -- I think SRS and manboobz are anti-democratic vo…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:38 PM
1

Probably -- I've heard it as Title IX for Science, but you could be right.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:24 PM
3

Look at some of those fields: engineering, physical sciences, math & computer science, even business. What this demonstrates is the importance of Title IX for Science.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:48 AM
3

At 3:00 she is rolling her eyes because a "straw feminist" objected to "semester" and wanted it called "ovester". Of course Christina Hoff Sommers has reported for years how her colleague renamed "seminars" or "ovulars. Around 7:30, with a roll of her eyes, Sarkeesian announces that no women would fake a rape to blame men as they did in Veronica Mars. But in fact, instead of an eye roll and claim that women would not fake such a thing, we have seen some very famous claims (as recently as the lat…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:27 AM
1

Yeah, I certainly don't know the reddit rules about that, but that sounds good to me -- I would add cotwa to that list.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:30 PM
3

If anyone wants to put AVfM on their RSS feed to make sure you see what they are writing, here it is: http://www.avoiceformen.com/?feed=rss2
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:08 PM
3

Yes, while I try not to believe in conspiracy theory, I do think that the very first day of a divorce hearing, the judge determines who is most likely to pay the bills, not of the child, but of the two lawyers and maybe the child, and determines custody accordingly.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:17 PM
4

What prosecutor or judge gave this rapist probation if he accepted paternity? Why would you do that in any but the strangest of cases? That court official needs to fired. Damn any court official that places me on the side of Wendy Murphy.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:02 PM
5

I'm stealing that. Not even asking for permission.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:27 PM
6

Yeah. Well, my feeling is if reddit sets up rules, those are the rules we all should play by. And I do feel that if content is good, it will be submitted on its own. I will note that avoiceformen does NOT collaborate with specific subreddits to attack other subreddits. He submits material that is interesting, and is not just about the evils of a group of redditors. As far as that goes then, I think the behavior is significantly different than manboobz, but it will be up to the admins of course t…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:17 PM
17

Well I agree with your analysis completely but you can take your cookie and eat it, privileged wheat/flour guy. I'm on /r/keto and I find your attitude towards giving me a cookie and wanting me to eat that cookie creepy and rapey and triggering.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:01 PM
2

One project I'd like to work on, or see as an outgrowth of mens rights activism is a search engine tailored to feminist sites and blogs. It will be interesting to see what happens as our favorite blogs and webzines as they decry the encouragement of violence, domestic violence, and finally acknowledge the word misandry all embodied in this video.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:59 PM
1

Tenure is pretty damn wonderful. I wish as a kid I had been told: cops, firefighters, and similar can retire after 20 years with a pension. And though you may not think it now, 40, really is pretty darn young tenure is oh so sweet in terms of retiring while on the job
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:46 PM
0

something called an /u/impulsemoment left the following, then deleted it. http://i.imgur.com/i5uCt.jpg
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:43 PM
5

I largely agree with your position but I will note: reddit has stated rules reddit is like a democracy, but how far does it need to go in terms of infrastructure and expense to deal with each individual reddiot [EDIT: Did I write reddiot? Or did someone "correct" this. Maybe my unconscious wrote it, I thought I wrote redditor. Whatever, I like it.] SRS was certainly correct to complain about child porn, and yet, that was free speech too david was doing more than just writing, he was clearly gami…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:53 PM
7

There are certainly fathers rights groups, that have meetups, lobby for laws to be changed, and on occasions perform "actions" to gain attention to their/our cause. Some fathers in some countries do some pretty amazing things in the names of fathers rights. Google for fathers rights in your local area. I do wish there was a more tangible mens rights movement in meat space. Perhaps the first stage of activism is awareness there is a problem and be willing to take a stand for it.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:33 PM
1

No I should've....
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:14 PM
2

I think there is Academic Feminism of various flavors Shit blogs say is Feminism that are like the Onion http://www.theonion.com/articles/women-now-empowered-by-everything-a-woman-does,1398/ in which women, girls, at their blogs arbitrarily label X either pro-feminist or misogynist while other women, girls at their blogs will write just the opposite.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:21 AM
8

A class a long long time ago. Anthropology minor Lots of reading of books, websites, blogs about feminism, anthropology, law, etc.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:12 AM
2

Very well written, thank you!
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:45 AM
10

African or European?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:54 AM
10

Truer words. http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/10l0ju/umanboobz_page_not_found_a_shadowban_or/ and http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/10l0ju/umanboobz_page_not_found_a_shadowban_or/ Anyway, I'm locking my door tonight because I'm a bit worried about SRS TEAM 6.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:44 AM
8

Ah, thank you for explaining.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:41 AM
6

Sigh. I can see this will be in SubRedditDrama pretty soon. It will get out of control and I'll be lucky to live through it.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:36 AM
5

Yeah, that's fun, but when they dox me, that flair will be a bit difficult to explain....
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:35 AM
9

Yeah. I am starting to get responses from reddit feminists.... ItsMsKim suggesting I would be the better person to ban. http://www.reddit.com/r/reportthespammers/comments/10ffd7/i_believe_david_futrelle_manboobz_is_part_of_a/c6ef60v
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:31 PM
2

Hmm, perhaps, but I refuse to believe someone with the name of "AndIMustScream" (wiki) comes from that different a childhood. ??
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:29 PM
13

I think he also thinks "Sharon" at his forum is me, but alas, it is someone else. That's a common fallacy I see at ALL blogs, that they only have one critic, and every person that comes by to tell them to fuck off must be the same person, because really, they are so right there couldn't be two, three, or many people that disagree with them.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:19 PM
2

I'm saddened I spent too much time on reddit. Bastards at AMR!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:16 PM
9

I doubt anything was stolen. Looks like a pretty simple piece of python to go through the forum find the users and use the API to figure out what's been happening. Google reddit investigator for a very nice, very slick piece of software that does the same and much much more. On the other hand, I happen to know Aerik blows dogs and swallows, and I did get that by hacking into its laptop and turning the webcam on.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:13 PM
2

I have to admit that as a young kid growing up, even though I admired Jim Phelps, Barney and of course Paris, and was in awe of what they could accomplish, at heart I felt what they were doing was probably right wing and unconstitutional. Grew up, took a couple of econ courses, and learned the IMF was worse than I had imagined.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:46 PM
3

I honestly don't see how. All I can hope for is that his research is adequately double blinded when needed, his papers well reviewed, and his findings replicated.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:42 PM
25

For great justice I have sent us up the bomb: http://i.imgur.com/vpqqs.jpg
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:40 PM
9

Yeah, read that and was glad I had bought a waterproof/cokeproof/spitproof keyboard years ago. Like somehow it is evil of any person in a marriage to weigh the utility of divorce. Would PZ dare say this to a woman?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:57 PM
7

Thank you for the translation. Maybe my not translating it because I felt "man" here was universal was responsible for the downvotes, or something. But yes, just like you say, (although I think Sinclair said it better)
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:50 PM
0

I absolutely agree with every single word, sentence, paragraph you wrote. On a personal level, the misandry in the court system against fathers has affected me terribly -- David Futrelle can fuck off and die. If he, as often published journalist, wanted to actually and honestly critique Mens Rights and the Mens Rights Movement that would be one thing and I might even be a reader. I have many critical things to say about the Men's Rights Movement. But that's not what he does, or what he is about.…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:20 PM
15

Feynman is one of my personal heroes. Also for many reasons one of the reasons I find Feminist Theory so objectionable even as I agree with the goals of equity feminism.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:27 PM
41

So in fact, As a scientist, I question the validity of his research knowing how quickly he makes judgments without actual knowledge this is exactly right. And why science itself developed things like double blinds, demand for repetition, open data, and to some extent peer review. But blogs have been terrible terrible things for many scientists as we discover they are just like people, "dumb panicky dangerous animals and you know it." So I find many scientists are not the neutral, cautious, but p…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:44 PM
19

PZ commented making gross assumptions as any white knight would. His problem, among many, comes from treating David Futrelle as a reliable source, when it states right there at manboobz that Futrelle is there not to critique mensrights but to mock it. Does anyone remember in their school days when mocking didn't mean terrible distortions and exaggerations of reality? FWIW, I had a bit of a meltdown at David over in here: http://av.reddit.com/r/reportthespammers/comments/10ffd7/i_believe_david_fu…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:41 PM
1

Not sure why this was downvoted -- I am genuinely curious as to why.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:12 PM
1

I apologize, I am not going to address what you wrote (which I did read) point by point. I think the order of the judge, probation for acknowledging parenthood is bizarre, and needs an explanation. If the explanation is anywhere close to that the parents were okay with the 14 / 20 year relationship when it was happening than I can see letting the guy out of jail on these conditions, and I can see giving him visitation. But if the judge did this solely to get child support from a rapist and the p…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:09 PM
2

That blog sucks. Dude should learn how to write and format a web page.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:40 PM
42

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. --Upton Sinclair
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:35 PM
1

All I'm saying is the court ordered him to acknowledge the child, and now he's asking for the same rights that any other parent would be asking for. Yeah, upthread somewhere I think I said that this was the basic flaw the court made (IANAL). I'm not a fan of using age as an absolute determiner. Mental aptitude and emotional maturity are far more important to the health of a relationship than specific ages. The idea that a 20 year old and a 14 year old can't be a couple is a relatively recent inv…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:32 PM
-1

If you haven't, read some of Phyllis Chesler. She's an interesting case in smart and stupid and naive. She's a Jewish radfem that as a much younger woman went to Afghanistan to be married and had pretty much the experience that one might expect (but somehow she didn't expect (edit: adding in "expect")). So now she still writes a lot of radfem stuff, but also writes about the idiots of western feminism for supporting the burka. Reading her is sometimes like playing tennis. http://en.wikipedia.org…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:50 PM
-1

It is somewhat true, and you can hear that in any argument that just rotely, tritely echoes the talking point of how westerners hate "brown people". It also seems to flow out of feminist "intersectionality" a theory that ostensibly was created so we can all understand how all of our privileged and not privileged but really seems to be used day to day to create a hierarchy of oppressions so that we understand why a white cisgender woman has it worse than say a black transgender male. It appears t…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:45 PM
1

With respect, seriously, I think you're missing just about everything in this case. The presumption should be that convicted rapists of the mothers should have parental rights terminated from the get go. There is a loophole in many states where that is not the case. This guy was let out of jail on one proviso, pay child support. So now he wants to use the state's charity to him as a lever. I say fuck that, stick the asshole back in jail. The age range of 20 to 14 is just too great. This doesn't …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:37 PM
1

I appreciate your lecture. Do you understand that when someone writes "I may be biased", and then explains how and why, they probably don't need that lecture?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:28 PM
0

The guy is a rapist. There are statutory rapes where the two people are a year or two apart in age and one is older than the age of consent. And then there is this guy, 20, and this girl 14. This falls way outside of Romeo Juliet laws. At 14, way under consent age, at 20, way older than consent age there was no way the girl could consent now way the guy could not have known. As a father, fuck that shit, this guy is a rapist and deserves to be hung. Instead he was given probation on the condition…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:20 PM
3

Hey it works. I went to http://www.rizon.net/chat and used the web client there.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:02 AM
-1

Are you a bot?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:27 AM
1

Hey, identifying as a parent, I'd really hate him too. (But yes, what you wrote is also likely.)
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:29 AM
3

We sort of do here too. Some universities are often made up of colleges, but it seems rather informal. I graduated from college, then later I graduated from the college of engineering at a university, but then later still I graduated from a school at a university. Go Bears!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:15 AM
3

The whole new policy is insane. How can someone rise to such a level and make such a bizarre decision? It's one of those things I read that I have to assume are untrue. Too weird to be true, right? Wait, it really is true?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:03 AM
3

Good question, though at first I thought you were asking me that.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:49 AM
1

Heh. It's only in the past month I've been reading everywhere in the femosphere about Schrodinger's Rapist -- that is the actual necessary belief by women that any man approaching them is there to rape them. manboobz needs to get out more. Schrodinger's Rapist: http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:45 AM
2

If the woman wasn't traumatized by what happened, and he wanted to see the child, he would be seeing the child and we wouldn't be reading about it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:18 AM
-1

He was an adult, she was not. And there was a six year age difference -- she was 14. He was given child support and probation or jail time. I wouldn't cry about his being expected to pay for the child. I'd be okay with him crying about being paid for the rope.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:17 AM
3

Just to pick at nits, I would not compare the two in terms of badness. I would include your example, and say, "there are many other examples of such stupidity too, the system really needs reform."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:15 AM
0

It is outrageous. Clearly being convicted of rape should be easy grounds for termination of parenting rights. If there was a mistake it was here: But Superior Court Judge Thomas McGuire sentenced him to 16 years of probation with the condition he acknowledges he's the father of the baby and abide by the probate and family court. If the Judge did not make him accept no parenting time ever OR no probation.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:12 AM
-4

You're just being argumentative. nigglereddit wrote: I worded it poorly, I apologise. I was wrong to say that men were the only place they could get reality. My bolding added. This and your other misperceptions have been pointed out to you repeatedly. I am sorry you do not understand them or do not accept them. But them's the breaks. Change your name from the insulting to something that indicates you do not argue in bad faith and we can have a discussion. Until then, bye.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:12 AM
1

Fine, it follows from the course of this conversation, that you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:45 PM
5

I am not a lawyer of any sort much less one from Canada, but I would certainly think, or hope you are correct.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:15 PM
-6

The poster has even stated[1] that that is what they were saying. Yes, and he said then that wasn't what he meant I was wrong to say that men were the only place they could get reality And as I said, you can reasonably argue that women have more than one place, and it turns out, you and I and nigglereddit all agree on that. But what you wrote was Saying that the place that women are supposed to get reality is from men When what he wrote was the men in their lives, their dads and husbands and bro…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:11 PM
12

It's a Canadian college, there is probably not a lot of Title IX going on there.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:04 PM
-5

Hey niggleredit, hang in there. I view /r/mensrights as a bit of a support group, and I think for people to get help and progress, they need to be open. I find absolutely nothing you have written to be offensive in the slightest, or even different from what one might expect to hear in a support group of mothers, or feminists, or young women. The completely fucked up fucking fucktards of David Futrolle and /r/againstmensrights have chosen to make an example of you. These people, especially David …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:00 PM
1

Yes, but you have to understand what "inciting imminent violence" means. That means actively telling you to pick up a weapon. And it means telling you to do it NOW or very very soon. Merely saying another group is horrible subhumans and deserves no rights, is truly ugly speech, but it is not "inciting imminent violence". May I ask, respectfully, and I am just curious: how old are you, and what is your nationality? When I was growing up in the 70s in California, people seemed to be a lot more inf…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:53 PM
-9

This is actually a terrific point. Why would anyone want to reply to someone labeling themselves as DoesntReplytoMRAs? This is not, could never be, someone to think would be a respectful, honest partner in a debate. DoesntReplytoMRAs dehumanizes and delegitimizes me -- okay, well I hope DoesntReplytoMRAs dies in a terrible single person car crash and then people come by and perform terrible sins on the corpse.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:46 PM
-5

What was said: And the one place they could have got their reality, the place they're supposed to get it - the men in their lives, their dads and husbands and brothers and boyfriends What you claimed was said: Saying that the place that women are supposed to get reality is from men These are different. What was said has two claims: The ONE place the men in their lives You can reasonably argue that women have more than one place to obtain their "reality". I don't see how you can claim that women …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:42 PM
7

I don't know, I don't know what classifies as a AMA.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:05 PM
1

I don't think we agree at all then, not unless the poster is inciting imminent violence. "Today at 4pm, meet at the quad, get your pitchforks, we're hunting witches".
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:00 PM
5

Amended, thank you.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:31 PM
9

Amended, thank you. http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/10ispf/ama_request_university_of_windsor_dean_of_law/
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:40 PM
7

Going by the title, I was really hoping that the students of a women's studies class really had solved some crime through some combination of detective work on the ground, googling, partnering with other students. I mean, that would actually be a great class to have taken. Unless the crime was like figuring out who keeps pissing on their door.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:38 PM
6

FWIW, I submitted an AMA Request based on this and the Dean's statement she would be happy to meet with people to discuss it: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/10ispf/ama_request_university_of_windsor_dean_of_law/
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:32 PM
1

I think you have to ask what your feelings about this would be if the display board had advocated the gassing of all Jews. If the display board had advocated gassing of all the Jews, I would have been very angry. I may even have come by when no one was looking and defaced the poster. I may even have torn the poster down in front of other people. Had I done so, I would have known I was wrong legally and working against the concept of free speech to deface the poster. I may have felt morally justi…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:41 PM
1

I don't think it's a big deal, I was just trying to see how our discussion got to this point, and it seems to be a casual discussion concerning definitions, which I agree, often end up pretty tedious. Anyway, enjoy your day.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:31 PM
1

In fact I daresay had the posters been put up, without any changes, by someone like N.O.W they would have been left alone. The posters weren't torn down for what they said, but who was saying it. Of course they would have been left alone. But that's the point showing how innocuous these posters were. If the posters had been offensive to some, we would not then change our mind and say they should have been torn down. In fact in the video tapes very few (if any) criticize the posters content, they…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:12 PM
1

One of the problems I have with arguing with feminism is that they are often very loosey goosey with their definitions, and they kind of often rely on that, with a "that's what she said, but it's not what true feminists believe." And one problem I have with wikis and wikis of faqs is they often change even in the middle of discussions. But that's neither here nor there, just me grumbling at the moment. I don't believe the feminist definition of privilege is the same as institutional power. Simil…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:09 PM
2

You may truly be interested in this book review written by Justice John Paul Stevens: Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed? It sort of agrees with you, and then ends up disagreeing with you, but taking your point seriously and saying we might learn from it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:01 PM
1

Most Americans understand and agree with this famous quotation, I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it But perhaps you disagree with it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:47 PM
1

I believe that's actually quite contrary to the principles of free speech. Free speech is free speech, regardless of content. Barack Obama yesterday: I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. More…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:39 PM
1

So differentiate for me why you think tearing the posters down in Vancouver was outrageous. The people that did that DID feel the content of the posters was offensive. We defend speech, even ugly speech. We don't examine content unless it is inciting violence or yelling fire in a theater.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:52 PM
0

Regardless, it was placed there legally and should not have been subjected to the attack.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:49 PM
0

I think you need to ask yourself what the ACLU should have done in Skokie Illinois when the Nazis wanted to march there. Which was to defend the rights of Nazis to march there.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:48 PM
2

That poster is offensive, but nevertheless it was placed there legally. The answer to ugly speech is more speech, not tearing it down. Not assault. Mona claiming it was her free speech to spray paint over it, and even assault the other woman is very similar to what happened in Vancouver. If the poster placed in Vancouver had been equally offensive called feminists savages are you saying your feelings towards the removal there would have been different? Are you saying it is okay for Muslims aroun…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:47 PM
0

Someone should ask Katie Baker of Jezebel if she defends this tear down like she did the tear down in Vancouver. http://jezebel.com/5941876/mens-rights-activists-shocked-that-their-misogynistic-posters-are-being-torn-down Now this case was clearly different since the woman was assaulted, but Baker was quite enthusiastic in her support that MRA posters ought to be torn down. Similar with David FuTrolle: http://manboobz.com/2012/09/11/posters-getting-torn-down-a-crime-against-humanity-includes-vid…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:30 AM
0

Hey, how are you my misogynist?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:58 AM
7

Shit, I know you guys are going to call me a pervert, but that is a terrible URL. I'm punching the first of you assholes that call me a pervert.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:57 AM
2

Just, and my brain is going tonight, that while you think doch_doch is (was) a fantastic MRA, truthjusticeca thought otherwise. And vice versa wrt demonspawn. That makes the circular firing squad aspect of tossing out the "bad mras" that much more prominent. There are days I think that obvious trolls like SuicideBanana has made a good comment and days I think SB should be tossed. Same with mras that are less tolerant of others than I am. It's one reason I'd prefer to favor inclusion, with a defe…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:22 AM
1

You bigoted SOB, what is wrong with in / out voting arrows?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:52 AM
1

But see, that's one of the problems, is that your doch_doch is truthjusticeca's Demonspawn.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:51 AM
1

I do. Much of it saddens me, because I know how it sets "us" behind. Some of it I recognize as blowing off steam, and their expressions of frustration and anger. Some of it I recognize as I do prejudice, an expression of ignorance. I don't know what the answer is. Regardless of how well behaved we are, we will still be dismissed with slurs. I think the best approach is just to respond to ugly speech with more speech. I also wish reddit/the net/life had better, more accurate, more precise, more d…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:35 AM
2

Wow. I've never had a facebook conversation over two replies long.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:26 AM
2

Why are there so many songs about rapists and what's on the other side? Rapists are victims, of our sad confusions, and rapees away from me pried. So we've been told and some choose to believe it. I know they're wrong, wait and see. Someday we'll find it, the rapist connection. The lovers, the dreamers and me. Who said that every wish would be heard and answered when wished on the morning star? Somebody thought of that and someone believed it. Look what it's done so far. What's so amazing that k…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:55 AM
5

I accept your rant, but I have no idea how to operationalize it. I may agree with much of your rant, but I have no idea where to go with that.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:49 AM
2

SPLITTER!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:48 AM
2

Oh, you're probably right. I only read a few chapters of the book here and there.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:49 AM
1

As an old fart 5pankpant5, and meaning no disrespect, but I am currently hit with a catch 22 of annoyance. If the assault did occur then the poor girl did not get appropriate justice. If the assault did not occur then the scummy girl did not face justice. is not a Catch-22 situation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln81Y87DHQA (it's the best there is.)
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:32 AM
1

http://gozie.com/video/2AYA441BY33N/SNL-Frankie-And-Willie-2-Sketch
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:16 AM
4

What do MRAs think should be done about bias problems like this? Do nothing, because science is not about one study. Suggest the study be replicated because science is all about replication. Once the findings are confirmed, I would dig deeper to find out what is behind this bias, is it prejudice, is it somehow rational? I'd look for root causes before proposing a solution, because hey, the wrong solution could make it worse, and also, maybe it's ephemeral and doesn't really need fixing. If it do…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:06 AM
-1

So? This is how you spend your time?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:17 PM
2

I actually appreciate being introduced to Ladytron. Much of the rest of the video reminds me of why so many blogs and 98% of YouTube rants are utter fail. Including that video.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:13 PM
10

Nicking, or a pin prick was a wonderful solution for both female and male circumcision. A ceremonial pin prick, as done everyday testing for blood glucose levels, but fulfilling the religious needs of a learning, enlightening, but religious community. It was a terrific compromise, and as a Jew, I wish more Jews would consider it. But of course the dumbest of the dumbassed literally holier than thou salt the fields atheists complained about it. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:58 PM
2

I agree about 10,000%. I would love to see an Alec Baldwin (who went through parental alienation with his daughter) become a leader, or a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, or someone anyone with charisma, and a notion of how to handle himself with all the abuse he would receive, and an ability to get funding. I don't think that's going to happen. Alternative 1, support the FRA groups as much as possible. (And I sure hope Glenn Sacks is doing okay.) The FRA groups seem much more naturally sympathetic …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:53 PM
1

I think the problem with classifying this as mental disorder is that it doesn't lead to the kind of social or other impairment that you see in other mental disorders and only affects the child's relationship with one parent (and that side of the family). I am not a psychologist, but I think this is a good point. (But I am not a psychologist.)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:41 PM
1

Another factor is that it's controversial and new mental disorders get added to DSM more through consensus rather than any kind of scientific rigor. Yeah, based on what happened to PAS, and Aspergers, how the DSM has been reorganized and watching what happened to some other disorders, I think consensus there could mean political and other agenda reasons Another factor is that both mental disorders and child custody disputes are Big Money, and intersect nontrivially. This could affect the additio…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:37 PM
2

This is a good thing for men's rights. I am not sure of that. I absolutely detest and my first inclination would be to fight any person that told me my children are mentally ill, but I certainly believe their mother has conditioned them (in the psychological operant conditioning sense) to well, hate me. I heard a psychologist ask the question: is there any rational reason for a child to hate a good loving parent with the vehemence and lack of evidence that PAS children have? (or something like t…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:38 PM
2

That's a wonderful quote, but sadly for me, just as the feminist stereotype says, it was a horrible experience in family court, and I am still not sure I am an MRA, the FRAs certainly are more focused and even successful and it's rare these days they shoot their feet off with the frequency the MRAs do.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:15 PM
8

Nah, sometimes it just means, I'd rather remain friends than remain stuck over something neither of us will ever agree on.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:00 PM
6

Feminism doesn't have a strict definition of sexism, Feminism has either a parallel or skew definition. Feminism's definition is the definition that carries connotations the real world does not recognize. http://goo.gl/oGaf7 The real world thinks that sex·ism [sek-siz-uhm] noun 1. attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles. 2. discrimination or devaluation based on a person's sex, as in restricted job opportunities; especially, such discrimination directed against wom…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:59 PM
9

"You're holding it upside down!" Alice interrupted. "To be sure I was!" Humpty Dumpty said gaily, as she turned it round for him. "I thought it looked a little queer. As I was saying, that seems to be done right----though I haven't time to look it over thoroughly just now----and that shows that there are three hundred and sixty-four days when you might get un-birthday presents----" "Certainly," said Alice. "And only one for birthday presents, you know. There's glory for you!". "I don't know what…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:51 PM
1

FWIW, not according to the Finally Feminism 101 FAQ Bloq! http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/sexism-definition/
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:48 PM
1

Probably was. That sounds way more familiar. I pulled it out of a google snippet as opposed to reading the actual search result.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:12 PM
1

You have allies at the GMP. People who care deeply about men's issues. Like me. Maybe you should consider not throwing the baby out with the bath water. It would be more honorable for you to find a different venue for your writing. Make one if you have to. Or find a good outlet for writing about issues about men and make it better. The GMP has never shown itself to be a good faith ally. Quit being a part of the fucking problem, Dwayne.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:30 PM
2

In the past week you have submitted 17 of your own links to reddit and made 6 comments. You have submitted ONLY your own links. http://www.reddit.com/help/faq#Whatconstitutesspam You are a spammer Mark Greene. Why don't you take your spammy links and go away. If your material is any good, it will be submitted to reddit. Rejoice.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:12 PM
1

That is sort of my take on it, ... for animals. But do we allow parents or people to condition their children in this way? To hate their other parent? I don't know if that sort of conditioning of the children is a mental illness. It doesn't seem to be considered that way when you train a dog to not pee in the house. But what if every time you fed your dog, you then hit him in his ears so he associated punishment with eating. If you did that for months, ears, and ended up with a terrified, nervou…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:07 PM
58

Feminism says that sexism = prejudice + power. That apparently comes from a claim that racism = prejudice + power. I think the response I would use is: Thank you for your input on what constitutes sexism. No one on the planet outside of a few narrow feminists believe in that definition It's certainly ridiculous to think that Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona could not be sexist towards some of her male employees. Millicent D. West, the DC's homeland security director working for Janet Napolitano, r…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:54 PM
1

Just because feminists and society have gone off the derp end doesn't mean I'm going off the derp end.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:37 PM
6

No, we absolutely do not have allies at the GMP. http://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values/dismantling-the-mens-rights-movement/ As long as GMP prints fucktards like David Futrolle who takes his very distorted message of how evil /r/mensrights are on a world tour, as long as David Futrolle can get away with maligning Glenn Sacks at GMP, then no you fucking fuckface we do not have allies at the Good Men Project. Come back here when this column has been retracted: http://goodmenproject.com/ethics-va…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:16 PM
1

Thanks, I'll try to remember that. That is certainly a blockquote, and can certainly be easier to read and appropriate, but italicized quotes shouldn't be considered a bad choice either.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:11 AM
1

Who is truly evil? The asshole that should be banned for minimizing Hitler's role in the Holocaust. Fuck off and kill yourself already banana, or go back to your feminist forums troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:08 AM
7

The article is titled "women" not feminists, and one can think it's just fine to encourage women to edit Wikipedia more without encouraging "feminist revisionism". So as far as that goes, I am just fine with a professor organizing a women edits wikipedia edit-a-thon. Not seeing this article, this version of it as a mens rights issue until someone points out how this will somehow harm "male" pages. Now when they are done maybe we'll have Pinter-pedia and lots of etsy stuff. If so, then I'll be po…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:26 AM
7

I must admit, in my dismal six weeks here or so, I am surprised to learn that a /r/mensrights post is even allowed on the front page.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:48 AM
1

He never really did anything all too outrageous. It was the people who enabled him and who actually carried out the murders. Saying Hitler was terrible is excusing the true tyrants and evildoers; the people. Your post is truly offensive. http://i.imgur.com/uTIoT.jpg
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:29 AM
3

Um, I am not going to watch that video, and unless it is some sort of spoof video, I think it's asinine and counter productive to post such a link here without a great deal more explanation that you have provided. So while I appreciate reading what you have to write, I am going to downvote it.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:34 AM
1

Fuck Hitler. Fuck David Futrelle. Fuck David Futrelle with Adolph Hitler. But I would like to find a nice modern VW Westphalia camper van.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:33 AM
2

Hey check it out, David FuTrolle is doing a special on this thread! http://manboobz.com/2012/09/24/new-frontiers-in-victimology-men-are-intimidated-into-buying-women-drinks-in-bars/
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:41 AM
-2

I read his post, then reread it. Then because you and ErasmusMRA seemed to think the post was intelligible and meaningful, I read it again. Since then I've read it twice more. Insane post.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:54 AM
28

Ya know, you don't even realize how wrong you are. See the post from MartinLomax. They want to go around naked If you look at them you are bad. If you don't look at them you are bad. You are bad.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:30 AM
12

In one case I see four IP addresses of which two are in the same local 256 (ie. it's the same person on a dynamic IP from an ISP or dial up) and in the other case, I see two IP addresses that are also clearly the same person using a dial up or on a dynamic IP from an ISP. And in fact the person in the second case is already listed in the first case. So that makes three users spamming Wikipedia. This site: http://www.freewebsitereport.org/www.avoiceformen.com says AVfM gets 6,000 visitors a day. …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:24 AM
7

That was the strangest post ever. I put my photos all over tumblr but I won't put them on reddit because people oppress me with their comments. Reddit is bad, and now you lose, you won't see my boobies. Echoed with "Down with men! Men are scum!"
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:10 AM
58

Two Jews, three opinions. The problem is not that different feminists have different opinions. The problem is There appears no fundamental axioms of feminism that allow one to predict the feminist opinion It's difficult to argue with feminists because so many are not intellectually honest. Heather here writes "In a radical feminist world, there is no transphobia" but when it is pointed out in the comments how much transphobia there is in the real world, Heather and many others fall back to both …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:04 AM
-1

I think that seduction is the same, functionally and morally, as intimidation. I would love an opinion from you guys; let me know what you think. I am clicking my heels hoping to get back to Kansas.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:09 PM
3

Some people have voices meant for blogs. And when is it okay to laugh at rape jokes? When is it okay NOT to laugh at rape jokes? Or jokes about war, death, suicide, dead babies, gross things, farts, David Futrolle's dogs giving David Futrolle a pity fuck ....
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:04 PM
2

Maybe I wasn't clear (wouldn't be the first time I started off saying one thing, finished saying something different.) I think I am saying "mi-son-dry" or perhaps better, "mi-suhn-dry", is how I hear it when I read it. I think the way to change it is to use it more and more. I was at Safeway last night, and when the cashier double charged me for sardines, I loudly accused her of mi-suhn-dry. You know, just to help the cause. (kidding)
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:38 PM
1

If it's okay to paddle any child in school (and hey, I think it might be a great idea), then presumably we are hiring professionals that follow established procedures. How do we feel about male paramedics administering to females? If someone feels this is creepy, I honestly feel this says more about that person's prurience than the administrator. If people want to ban paddling of children in schools, I think that's fine, but how about a compromise where we let the principal paddle the parents?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:12 PM
24

Here they discuss both male and female http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genital_modification_and_mutilation#Female_genitals and that links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation (female) and to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision (male) how would you modify the circumcision page to better discuss male genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:50 PM
18

It's ridiculous that someone not affiliated with your site can get it blocked by spamming links to it. The policy that lets them do that allows the wikipedia admins to do any damn thing they please in the best interests of the children. It might be okay if there was chronic, rampant abuse from many IPs but from one or two sources? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:30 PM
5

They do accept self published articles but more rules apply to those and using one in an article is tricky. (I failed with submitting a direct quote the other day because it involved a claim about a 3rd party). Kudos to you. Seriously. I've mostly quit editing Wikipedia except for fixing spelling errors and obvious vandalism. Way too many wiki-lawyers and wiki-games. I've even been accused of vandalism myself for fixing what are clear incidents of vandalism by others.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:07 PM
3

If you don't upvote my comment, I'm going to eat fatty foods! And drink beer! My inevitable heart attack is on your hands
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:04 PM
2

"Misogyny" is a word that easily rolls off the tongue; "Misandry" feels like my tongue is stumbling over its own shoelaces. Not saying there couldn't be a more mellifluous word. I think the problem I have is that Misogyny has a lot more strongly and equally pronounced individual consonants and syllables. Mi-so-gyn-y. tap tap tap tap. It's a mistake to take on "misandry" that way. It's not Mi-San-Dry, or "mis-An-dry" but mi-son-dry Or something, signed, neither a bug hunter or a werd expert.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:03 PM
1

Don't confuse me with your facts and figures!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:56 PM
7

I would think that the large number of authors at AVfM, their length of time, the size of their traffic would serve to make them a reliable source. Also, since the release of the original Apple Laserwriter, we've been in a desktop publishing age of self publishers, self publishing by itself should not make a source unreliable. However, I did suggest in a thread the other day to Paul Elam that I think AVfM should incorporate and get a board of advisors.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:56 PM
12

Where did you find the unblocking criteria?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:53 PM
27

The specific reasons are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/log http://i.imgur.com/SYwIO.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=468117830#avoiceformen.com http://i.imgur.com/EE9wD.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=468118879#Sheila_Jeffreys_.2F_Jessica_Valenti_.2F_Amanda_Marcotte http://i.imgur.com/hY7im.jpg I disagree with the blacklist, especially if it is due to one or two…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:52 PM
10

I don't thin he was disparaging Crouch so much as summing up the reality of having a basement office, very little public awareness, not able to describe the members or the board, and having a 35 year history. As much as I am impressed by anyone that can devote time to this cause, I am also terribly depressed as to its current state, acknowledging that the good news is it can only get better.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:43 PM
3

My take as not an etymologist is that androphobic would be fear of men, misandry would be hatred.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:41 PM
1

That was my take, although I think adding a comment to the article that the words have a 100 - 200 year history is more than reasonable.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:40 PM
11

Definitely lawyer up. Also consider having lawyer draft a letter to your employer RIGHT NOW putting the employer on notice that these photos may be released, and are not being released with your permission, they represent lawful activity between adults, and that the lawyer will sue not just the school and the schoolboard but personally sue the principal of your school if the release of the photos has any effect on your employment or annual reviews. Also, change your reddit name from rockhardnpla…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:12 PM
3

Upvote me or else!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:09 PM
2

She had a 4 year child, so no Darwin for her.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:08 PM
1

Actually, I did so right here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10cu0j/srsers_trying_to_take_over_rbrosrights_and/c6cdyor You disagreed. It might've been one thing if you had been arguing fine details, or asking for clarification, but you fundamentally just rejected the entire argument. That was your right, but that was where the argument ended. Instead you've been hurring and durring for hours demanding I produce something I produced quite a long time ago, durring and hurring that a …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:21 AM
1

Look, you're some person that refuses to acknowledge that gaming Reddit to takeover subreddits with clearly hostile, bad faith requests is a bad thing. There is no point in discussing anything with you, and so I am not. Demonstrate signs of sentience in some future thread and you and I will have a conversation.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:54 AM
1

I ran that through several web based derp analyzers and all but one returned 500: Internal server error. One returned 506: Too much derp.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:32 AM
-2

Only men have the power to completely fuck up gender relations. Nice troll, troll.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:55 AM
-1

When I was younger, maybe, sixteen or so What's funny is that near as I can tell you're probably 20 +/- 1 year, and so righteous. Anyway, I have a song for you to leave with as a parting gift: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O5EeBjxhiY
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:52 AM
-2

Oh, so you're not a troll, you're a dumbass.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:44 AM
4

Why do you systematically force yourself into discussions where you were neither invited nor welcomed, endlessly, until womens' subreddit after womens' subreddit was left meaningless and male-dominated? Would you answer me this? Why do people come into a group, several times a week, without bothering to read the information in the sidebar, without lurking for awhile and listening and learning, without participating in any threads in any manner, and then tell that group what a bunch of assholes t…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:13 AM
3

Hey it's that thread again! With the part of NewbJustAskingQuestions played by MRdaBakkle! I read that whole article and I agree with 99% of what was said, but I do not agree with the label of men's rights. Wouldn't a better name be Equal Human Rights. That way it covers every human regardless of gender, race, creed, sexual orientation. Yes, it would certainly be better if there was no feminism or mens movement and only a movement of people trying to establish a better world for everyone. But pe…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:03 AM
2

Why would anyone vote this up? enla1 is almost certainly a troll, probably a David FuTrolle. If enla1 is not a troll, just by his behavior in the original thread he's no one I need to give the time of day to. There are plenty of things for MRAs, to discuss this guy's problems at reddit are not any of them.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:54 AM
2

You spend your time in that thread acting like a jackass, then you come here and tell us how we are all jackasses, then you whine "that nobody loves you and you're forever alone FFFFFFUUUUUUUU" Go away David Futrolle! We are onto you!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:53 AM
4

My view is that the feminists were mostly wrong to trounce on the boy from outer space -- jebus some people have a hard time making friends -- but their basic message (grudgingly) was correct even if over the top -- and that the response of Dear Boy, was actually very funny. Regardless, whenever I see feminists claiming that it is feminism that is the BFF of men and not the mens movement, and whenever they tell me that Patriarchy Hurts Men Too, well all of those are Dear Women in Outer Space mom…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:02 PM
5

Holy shit! Looks like this thread was raped by whoever "Comment removed" is. That dude should be benned!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:00 PM
4

I don't see how being insincere equates to "maliciousness" and an intent to "break reddit". What actual, concrete harms do you see arising from this request being granted? I posted some questions for AlyoshaV and her response to them indicates to me she would not be a good moderator -- she expressed no real interest or understanding of "bros rights" in a college context. Advancing false arguments in a discussion is straw manning and concern trolling. Doing this under the guise of a moderator dam…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:49 PM
8

Dear woman from outer space, don't tell us what to do. https://www.google.com/webhp?q=Dear%20woman%20from%20outer%20space%2C%20don%27t%20tell%20us%20what%20to%20do.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:41 PM
2

I'm not going to answer any of your questions because I have a crap to poop. (No offense....) But I am genuinely curious as to this: Edit: LOL, thanks, whoever reported me. Love that 9-minute lockout. I am newish to reddit, and occasionally am told something along the lines of, "I am doing that too much, I need to post again in 5 minutes, 9 minutes, etc." Is that what you are referring to? Why do you think this was due to a "report" and not just reddit functionality? Seriously, I don't know, and…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:37 PM
2

Oh, absolutely!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:34 PM
10

I need to point out that David Futrolle killed and raped a girl in 1990, and he has never denied it. So I thank you for your explicit denial that you have not raped anyone since March or April of 1978.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:31 PM
6

Read here: http://www.reddit.com/r/redditrequest/comments/10csmr/request_unbanning_and_control_of_rbrosrights_to/c6cdd6e AlyoshaV's responses clearly indicate this is a disingenuous attempt.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:25 PM
8

AlyoshaV has a history of trying to take over reddits that she seems to oppose on ideological grounds. Why does this person do this? Is reddit running out of name space? Why should her many requests be seen as anything other than gaming reddit and trying to break it? And if that is the case, how is that not malicious?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:20 PM
8

Yes, in fact, trying to break reddit is against the rules. Some might consider break reddit to be a purely technical attack like a DDOS or other exploitation, I am not an admin, but I consider frequent malicious attempts to take over other sub reddits a clear attempt to break reddit. It's not like reddit is running out of name space for new reddits.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:06 PM
2

I suspect if this fake video were done with a female and it was just as fake the only charges that would be faked against anyone would be fake charges. I also downvoted your fake video with a fake fake vote. I am still awaiting proof suicide banana that you are not a fake suicide poseur just attention whoring. Please submit evidence you are not a fake suicide, sooner the better.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:04 PM
0

I honestly don't know what you mean as a gotcha. And I don't even know what you are trying to say. In that statement you leave a quote where you say now you were blaming feminists, and then you fed that statement to /r/mensrights but you seem upset that the rest of us feel you made some unwarranted assumptions. No one is even excoriating you, near as I can tell, but I think that your statement was error full. I've been wandering lost in the woods dealing with my fucked up beyond all repair situa…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:35 AM
4

Sigh. I dunno Paul what to make of this response. (Is it right that "avoiceformen" is Paul Elam and is only used by Paul?) Perhaps legally, clintonly, you are correct, but if you weren't saying that it was feminists that caused the firing or stopping of the debate, then I think this quote makes no sense. http://i.imgur.com/ns336.jpg Paul Elam, when informed of these events remarked: “Those who believe open discussion can be silenced by intimidation, and who may be patting themselves on the back …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:53 AM
-2

Hey BMan3000, I downvoted the link ONLY because I hate these link headlines that don't tell you anything about the target of the link.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:16 AM
1

Well, so, I think I have to say that while it was a reasonable question, it was never a reasonable assumption. And that if AVfM and Paul Elam want to claim leadership roles, that there needs to be a bit more awareness of this. AVfM should never have printed an article about this until it was confirmed.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:16 AM
2

It's a pretty weird story all around, but given this story, http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/feminism-debate-delayed-due-to-outside-interference/ I'd say Paul Elam needs to do a mea culpa, explain why he jumped the gun and reported something without verifying it, and I'd like to hear how this won't happen in the future. Sigh.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:00 AM
1

The first article is what you might call empowering. I don't see an issue with articles like these, but it eventually gets a bit much. Yeah, that article wasn't so bad, think of similar articles hopefully written after Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier. Where are the articles celebrating male nurses and single and stay-at-home fathers and receptionists? And this is very insightful as well. What is the probability such a rah rah article will be written about men in a "female" position compa…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:17 AM
6

Beers to cry into on me tonight, brother!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:23 AM
2

Hmm, thanks for the link to Hostile-Aggressive Parenting, that's helpful. The problem is the kids are now reaching an age where the courts are giving their beliefs a great deal of weight. But their understanding of the world has been poisoned. So the courts are reluctant to do anything because, well, we have to respect what these kids say, and because, hey they are becoming teens you can't change their ideas anyway. For me, it's terribly depressing, humiliating, and exceedingly expensive.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:13 AM
2

I largely agree. That's why I think instead of discussing remedies to alienation, we would both agree the court should set up systems ahead of time to make sure it cannot occur and stop it quickly when it does.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:03 AM
2

Do you have joint legal custody? YES Are you prohibited from being involved in your childrens' lives by any sort of court order? NO If you do have joint legal and don't have anything against you then you can do what I did (if it's possible): bypass their mother and seek your own involvement. Sigh, I am not sure how that happens. The kids have terribly busy schedules that their mother and friends chauffeur them around to, leaving me out of it. Their activities even extend often to "my time" and t…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:02 AM
3

My kids are very alienated from me, and yes, I would like the courts to recognize it when it happens and do something effective about it. Right now, the court requires proof, that is, a $5,000 or more psych evaluation. Right now, even with that proof, the court may do nothing, say it's too late, say, do what you can at your expense. It would be nice to stop this alienation before it occurs. That said, while I totally understand that parental alienation occurs, I am really hesitant to agree with …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:38 AM
1

Thank you, I will edit that to fix it.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:07 AM
2

Those are interesting links. Re the first two, I would be genuinely curious how those two women's views have evolved (or stayed the same) in eight years. Re the third, Toddman's an asshole, that's for sure, I would like to think we could strip him of his yachts, but I suspect we will have no effect on him whatsoever.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:05 AM
9

I am absolutely against this petition. First, as said by others, the answer to ugly speech is more speech. Second, right now, it's my feeling, that society IS starting to understand that the boys are stupid message is a terrible one. With more and more articles about the boys crisis in schools, and with the recession, and with so much feminist overreach, now is the time to let Universal Pictures go forward with this and bear the likely terrible box office results and the slew of articles condemn…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:00 AM
2

I am curious if you have any point you would like to make Suicide Banana? Also, how do we know you're a real suicide banana and not a poseur suicide banana? Can we get some moderators in here to verify suicide banana is not a poseur suicide banana appropriating the label of suicide in some ugly plea for attention?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:36 AM
27

Where would researchers get the idea that women often initiate domestic violence? Where would researchers get the idea that women often are most hurt by domestic violence? Where would feminists get the idea that these two results are incompatible with each other? Also sowhatisit, this thread needed a Trigger Warning: Vertical Video
/r/MensRights22/09/12 11:58 PM
2

Not that it matters at all except to elderly geeks like me a special done on you is a Star Trek TOS reference to bread and circuses which finds the Enterprise in a parallel earth where the Romans still rule but have much modern 20th Century technology. "You bring this network's ratings down, Flavius, and we'll do a special on you!" - Master of the Games, as Flavius is whipped referring here to how Manboobz likes to cherry pick comments and have a post on them.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:31 PM
1

I only mean this, do you hate the people themselves, or their idiot idiology? The statement you made, while I totally understand it, is a statement about hating people, and as such, will surely be grabbed by fucktards and assholes of how men or mras hate women. A very similar statement could be made "I hate feminism" or "I hate feminism for what it has become" that pretty much expresses the same thought but doesn't hate on people or women, but hates on their revolting conspiracy theories and sex…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:27 PM
-2

You may wish to be like the Catholic church and proclaim that you hate the sin but love the sinner. Otherwise you may find yourself having a special done on you by David Futrolle and the SPLC.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:19 PM
1

My guess since I don't know anything about the group in question is they think it is like calling themselves sluts? Or just an in your face thing? You call my group a bunch of assholes, and hell yeah, from now on, WE'RE THE ASSHOLES! Beats me though.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:14 PM
2

Hey, I'm so tired this morning I couldn't figure out what your comment was about. Mine was mostly joking, especially about picketing the theater and getting on tv. (the heart surgery part, and iron man, and being unable to see iron man when his heart was removed, was sadly true.) so if it wasn't clear, I don't like trigger warnings and think they are bullshit. And I think /r/mensrights should have a mocking trigger warning telling people this is a free speech zone, and if they can't handle it, t…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:12 PM
5

It comes a woman named Paula Kirby who responded to elevatorgate and atheismplus with the label of femistasi. She explains it here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B02RDDb71N8Xc2EwYmw5T2Z4eDg/edit?pli=1 [google docs pdf] It's a terrific document and label, and it has the FreeThoughtBloggers / Atheism+ crowd up in arms. The label has been ironically taken up by some Vancouver feministas.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:56 AM
2

fyi, "femistasi" is a label created by Paula Kirby here:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B02RDDb71N8Xc2EwYmw5T2Z4eDg/edit?pli=1 [google docs pdf] It's a terrific document and label, and it has the FreeThoughtBloggers / Atheism+ crowd up in arms. Apparently the label has been ironically taken up by some Vancouver feministas.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:27 AM
9

In my 6 weeks here or so, I've seen comments I felt were certainly misogynistic, but I haven't seen anything that appears to be gay bashing.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:09 AM
7

anyhow gay rights are generally handled by feminism which is a multi billion dollar lobby group, but gay men have an issue there because feminist women use gay rights to further their own interests ... I think this is very true, but I am not sure what you mean by the first portion of it, anyhow gay rights are generally handled by feminism. I would say gay rights groups have their act together FAR MORE than mens rightsers do (wow, that will be a nice day), and arguably better than feminists do --…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:07 AM
1

Which are you talking about? /r/mensrights/ wiki seems down as /r/ wikis are in testing There is a wiki off to the sidebar, and yes, I need to investigate more about it -- I'd like to know more about who set it up, etc., It's about page is empty so I am not sure how permanent, temporary, unchanged any work I put there will be.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:52 PM
5

Zing! The feminists have (or had) their finally feminism 101 faq blog with it's common answers to frequently asked questions. Climate Change advocates have their Skeptical Science, which is about the same thing. I'd really like to see /r/mensrights or some mens rights group put something similar together, preferably as a editable wiki.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:47 PM
2

Also posted, also in moderation, http://i.imgur.com/JpXXq.jpg Just to make it clear, what I have learned from the civil rights movements for minorities, women, gays, and the disabled is that it is imperialistic, arrogant, patriarchal, mis-appropriation to tell a group They are not oppressed What their issues should be What their issues should not be That their leaders are terrible Who their leaders should be What groups are their natural leaders That their histories and stories are not relevant,…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:41 PM
3

Here is my response: posted, currently in moderation http://i.imgur.com/phu8L.jpg Hey, some of the articles you link to in your list, are just what you say, concern for, and support of rights for men and women coming from feminists. The way these lists are canonically used, and is used here by you http://brutereason.net/2012/09/20/in-brief-do-feminists-care-about-mens-issues-a-handy-list/#comment-4306 is not to support men but to undermine MRA groups. So the whole thing rings hollow. If you look…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:32 PM
4

Thanks. I was hoping there was something more magical about RES to definitely get this proof. (I am glad there isn't.) I admit, sometimes when rightsbot is being an attention whoring wuss, I've downvoted her gay ass too. /ObFutrolleBait
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:56 PM
2

That link from Celda is excellent -- I am looking forward to reddit implementing subgroup wikis to make it easier to organize and find this material.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:46 PM
2

When I first posted this, an SRSer called mister_smiley showed up, proudly claimed his friend wrote this article, stated misandry was a big hilarious joke, insulted me, and used alt accounts to down vote everything here to -4, including the rightsbot. I am not doubting you, I am relatively new to reddit and RES. Do you have proof or just suspicion that it was one person doing all of this? How do you find out?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:44 PM
2

Had heart surgery a few years back (got better). Iron Man had just come out, and I watched it with friends, and honestly, well, if you've seen Iron Man and just had heart surgery, ... Anyway, I picketed the theater for a week demanding trigger warnings. I got on TV and everything. Also ManAid should've given us a TW: 4chan or TW:/b/ Also: I think part of the CSS of /r/mensrights should be a floating flashing white square at the bottom left of our browser windows. Clicking on it, pops up: Trigger…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:49 PM
1

You are almost certainly right. Still, I knew this shit when I was in college. (A trillion years ago.) And people that call themselves feminists and talk about privilege and oppression and want to pretend they are like anthropologists and talk about cultures and patriarchy and societal roles can fucking well learn about anthropology and history. Yeah, I once had an anthropology minor and identified as a feminist. If littlepocketknife (or anyone) is an adult and in college, we should be able to e…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:04 PM
2

Hey, I'm (sincerely) glad you wrote back, because I had another lame metaphor. So first the metaphor Scientist 1 has a new medication she wants to introduce into the bloodstream to help cure some ailment. They introduce it and what happens? Antibodies recognize it as a foreign intruder and kill it. Why should the antibodies have done that? The antibodies are making the wrong assumptions. Well that's the antibodies problem! No, it's Scientist 1's problem. Scientist 2 comes along and she has a med…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:54 PM
2

No one's asking for an echo chamber, and indeed the response is that the GMP is an echo chamber. The GMP publishes Amanda Marcotte and Hugo Schwyzer and many other of the same old same old voices, and in the same ways. No one needs that and what you refer to as mainstream dialogue mainly becomes seen as sell out. If you want to know what is wrong with the GMP and who its authors are, read here: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/09/19/is-it-rape-if-you-dont-mean-for-it-to-be-rape and her…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:11 PM
-1

Google "wogs". You're such a brain damaged little fucktard. I didn't call you a wog. That's the point, you came in here like the British in India and around the world to satisfy your white man's burden and help raise the bloody wogs up. Go learn some history.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:00 PM
0

I didn't make assumptions, I questioned your obvious assumptions. Really sugar tits, my guess is there are a shit ton of feminist anthropologists that could tell you what was wrong with your question and tell you how arrogant and rude it was and tell you all about your assumptions. Go take a course in anthropology and ask them. Or find a reddit for feminists and ask them what you did wrong here. On the other hand, I can clearly see that making assumptions is your fucking problem, see, this is ac…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:56 PM
0

Fuck off, but if you want to come back some day and participate as something other than a privileged little cunt demanding answers of the wogs, please do so.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:47 PM
1

I wouldn't say most of the thread jumps on her, and Jill Filopovic, the blog owner, and big time feminist lawyer, certainly didn't jump on her for it. And it's not just that Amanda said it wasn't rape, lots of people said that and were not called out for it, Amanda actively turned it around and said the male had intentionally caused the problem and misled the female. If Amanda had just stuck to the program Filopovic had set out for the thread the dust up would not have occurred. Edit: change nam…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:42 PM
1

The trigger warning nonsense is just a way to create victimization and derail the conversation. I think that's close but the derail metaphor is not accurate. Trigger warnings are used to demand attention there is a victim in the thread and not to derail the conversation but to ensure conformity of speech. It actually puts rails under the conversation and drives that conversation to a predesignated target. No one can dare question the assumptions of the premise or question anything that might att…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:39 PM
2

So they did take my comment out of moderation. The whole thread is truly wonderful in many ways. There are plenty of comments from people amazed at the rape apologies and hypocrisies. The thread should be immortalized. I hope AVfM or some other mens blogs take a long and fair look at the thread. It should be copied out somewhere and then referred to in faqs. This thread and Amanda's comment should be raised and brought to the attention of her pals at Slate and Jezebel and ask if they can justify…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:23 PM
3

That's Manzboobz, not manboobz. I wish he'd change the intentionally conflicting name. Let David Futrelle's trolling and stalking, cherry picking, and distortions stand out for what they are. Futrelle is his own worst enemy to anyone that actually reads what he writes.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:00 PM
1

Oddly enough, no one here as banned you. No one here as edited your statements. No one here has "devoweled" your statements. No one here has called you a likely abuser or pedophile or rapist. Actually everyone here has given you and your question a great deal of respect and time to answer it, including my answer. That you dislike the answers is your fucking problem.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:56 PM
-1

No one said you shouldn't ask questions. No one said you shouldn't ask questions that anger us. But if you come into a group and ask a really stupid, arrogant, insulting question that reeks of privilege, I'm not going to blow smoke up your ass and tell you, precious snowflake, how there are no bad questions. Several people now have told you how arrogant your question was, but no, your question did not anger me. What I did was give you an education anyone that takes an anthropology course gets in…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:43 PM
-2

Well, it's late and maybe I'll explain more tomorrow. 1. Suffice that my position is that David Futrelle distorts everything we do here anyway, regardless,... In game theory we are playing a repeated prisoner's dilemma with Futrelle, but he keeps playing tat. The winning move, sad to say in such a tit for tat game is to mirror the other player. Since he always goes negative, for David specifically we do too. Thus in all threads everywhere we should always explicitly call him out and smear him. A…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:45 AM
2

Proof of what? I haven't read all of his blog posts, but none of the ones I've read offer his explanation of why he raped killed a girl in 1990 which frankly, is an act I do consider to be misogynistic. Otherwise google raped and killed a girl in 1990. The proof of that is right there. And have you heard Futrolle deny it?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:21 AM
3

If I understand what you are saying, I think that's fine. But that's not feminism, and it's not limited to feminism, and it's not women's civil rights issues in the US, and it's not due to patriarchy in the US. Lots of people were interested in that before feminism came along, lots of men, and still now, lots of non-feminists too. Feminism seems to like to misappropriate any issue and call it a feminist issue and blame it on the Sky Demon Patriarchy. Well any issue except an issue identified as …
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:58 AM
2

I see my comment there, it still says it is in moderation. I guess I added it 2 hours ago, night time, I think it's reasonable to check again tomorrow.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:32 AM
-3

littlepocketknife, while I sincerely believe you are not a troll, I find your question filled with arrogance, and privilege. Are you dying? What is your rush? If I wanted to know about some group, I wouldn't barge into the group and demand an answer to what you feel is the most important thing wrong with that group. I wouldn't go into that group, and say anything like, Dear feminists, as a man I am genuinely interested in your oppression. Littlepocketknife, what happens to men when they visit fe…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:20 AM
2

I have replied as follows: Jay 9.20.2012 at 10:10 pm | Permalink | Reply Can someone please verify if that is really Amanda Marcotte that made the remarks above attributed to her? Regardless of whether it is rape or not, Amanda Marcotte is not just victim blaming here but viciously claiming this was intentional gaslighting behavior on the part of the man. These are horribly misandrist claims and are ad hominem, sexist and unsupported by anything in the original article. How is this not abusive? …
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:11 AM
-6

It's crap like this ... parenting issue about chivalry. Really, it's crap like that!? Whatever babes, let me know when you got real problems.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:00 AM
2

Thanks. I've read two of his articles pimped here recently, and I can't say I disagree, but jebus, he has no taste in the community he keeps. I used to write some good stuff for Joe Stalin Magazine....
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:59 AM
1

Admittedly though I say don't link, I sometimes read. But I didn't read this one. Typically I find the articles very self-serving, and condescending. Their name says it all, it's about a bunch of people trying to tell men how to "be better". But the people are always feminists. I wouldn't read either The Palestinian Guide to Good Israelis nor the Israeli Guide to Good Palestinians. I wouldn't read "The Old KKK Almanac - how to be a better minority" And I think "The Feminists Guide to Good Men Pr…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:49 AM
1

I have now read two articles of yours, and frankly, I agree with a lot of it. But you are writing for what is, to pardon the godwinning of it, the KKK's magazine called "The Good Black Project". Between publishing Hugh Schwyzer, and even after firing him continuing a relationship with him, by publishing Amanda Marcotte, you are indeed writing for the Palestinian's Guide to the Good Israeli, or the Israeli's Magazine, "Everything you need to know to Improve your Palestinian Life". There are bette…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:57 AM
2

Well, you could claim you were being ironically hipster by using the same throwaway forever....
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:48 AM
4

Hugo Schwyzer has admitted sleeping with four students he was chaperoning, as well as trying to kill his girlfriend. He has admitted to far worse. Why are you linking to a tweet conversation with someone that is clearly a sociopath?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:32 AM
5

Hey, far be it from to be judgmental, but you've been thrway_1000 for over 5 months now buddy. Time to settle down or find a new thrway, don't ya think, guy?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:22 AM
1

Absolutely totes for realz: https://www.google.com/search?q=raped+and+murdered+a+girl+in+1990 Well about as real and non distorted as anything Futrolle does manboobz about at his site. Which is to say, I personally don't know that it's true he did rape and murder a girl in 1990, but I haven't heard him deny it, recently.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:07 AM
12

Right, this is what Lindsay Beyerstein says in that thread: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/09/19/is-it-rape-if-you-dont-mean-for-it-to-be-rape/#comment-526209 But I don’t think you can blame a person who incorrectly infers consent when all the behavioral and situational cues are pointing towards consent: He was rubbing against her, he motioned for her to get on top of him, and the two of them have a history of sex in the middle of the night. So flip that around and have two drunks sc…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:01 AM
8

I agree. But it's also reasonable to note that by their standards this would be a rape, and so to examine why they would think it something else, and to draw lessons from that and look at the very strict standards they demand of consent, especially in the case of gray rape.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:05 PM
22

It's worse than just being a rape apologist, she is actively blaming the man. And she's not just blaming the "victim", she is saying the man intentionally acted with malice. Perhaps if I read the rest of the thread I will understand how she is joking, or being hipsteriffically ironic.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:03 PM
4

I meant no offense to you, I just happen to think "The Good Men Project" is a rotten source and is actually, measurably, demonstrably, bad to men and we shouldn't link there. You can find out more about how much I think GMP and Tom Matlack suck here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/104r8a/what_makes_dudes_cry/
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:58 PM
6

Please do not link to the Concern Troll Project.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:51 PM
9

Good question, though I often do wonder how do we know you're a suicide banana, why won't you prove it? Why don't you write Jill and Amanda emails and ask if that was authentically her. Seriously, please do, I think that's an important point.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:40 PM
2

I didn't mean to say that The Good Men Project is a weak stream that shouldn't be publishing pieces about flushing urinals, I meant to say Tom Matlack is a weak stream that should be flushed down a urinal. Half the quadrant knows it.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:31 PM
2

Hey Matlack, Read Amanda Marcotte's misandric rape-y blame a man for his own rape rape apology here: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/09/19/is-it-rape-if-you-dont-mean-for-it-to-be-rape/#comment-526368 And tell us how you can publish her bullshit in a webzine titled "The Good Men Project".
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:28 PM
25

Then there is Amanda Marcotte's truly reprehensible, creepy, rape-y reply: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/09/19/is-it-rape-if-you-dont-mean-for-it-to-be-rape/#comment-526368 It's amazingly ugly and classic textbook misandry and blames all of this on the man acting intentionally badly. Trigger Warning: Amanda Marcotte, Misandry, Rape Apology, David Futrelle is a stalker, trigger warnings It’s…..possible that he was asleep. The likelier possibility is he was awake the whole time and ly…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:25 PM
9

I don't think it was rape, but I think thetrollking you are right, the man clearly could not give consent, since the woman was awake, it was her duty to make sure he was in a condition where consent could meaningfully be given and so by idiot feminist standards it was certainly rape. I don't think it was rape though. I think they are acting as rape apologists using their own standards. It's not clear to me anyone is being hypocritical unless you go back and dig up their past statements about gra…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:11 PM
6

I would think so too. JesusSaidSo asked for what women's civil rights issues are, the response was everything happening outside the first world. That sort of avoided the question though. Because men and women and kids have problems with violence in Somalia is no excuse for me to say in Arizona, I need guns to protect myself from the gangs of Somalia.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:55 PM
4

What the fuck is this Tom? http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/11-rules-for-working-out-of-a-coffee-shop/ I am hoping it is a sign of how hard up for money your rag is that you put 11 sentences on 11 pages hoping for click fraud revenue. 11 Rules for Working Out of a Coffee Shop Read more at http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/11-rules-for-working-out-of-a-coffee-shop/11/#hFeY3YyyXqpv5z1L.99 free wifi power outlets buy something tip coffee pourers don't hit on the coffee pourers lo…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:53 PM
0

Actually, I'd take as a win, that if I point out a piece is satire and explain why for long enough then dipshits like you will eventually get it through their panties that the piece was satire. In that way, all of mens rights wouldn't be as likely to be smeared as a bunch of dimwits that can't even tell who are supporters are. That would be a victory, so yeah. See, here's the thing. SCUM was written by a woman criticizing men. Heffernan is a woman and she was criticizing women.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:09 PM
1

What are the rules on reddit names? I mean, SRSkhitbash would be fun for posting horribly misogynistic jokes about women...
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:05 PM
9

Feh. I am as liberal and Jewish as they come, hard to find anything "right" about me (just ask my ex she'll tell you there's nothing right about me), and "going galt" can many times sound pretty damn attractive, and makes a lot of sense. If you'd like to have a conversation and criticize this, then do so, but name calling alone isn't helping anyone, it's just masturbation.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:56 PM
2

You're absolutely right. It's almost literally hell to live a day in Somalia, with all the guns on the loose there, which is why I demand machine guns in Phoenix. Because Patriarchy is hurting the menz of Somalia.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:49 PM
0

More like the assessment of people that can read AND UNDERSTAND english.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:45 PM
5

What Makes Dudes Cry? What made me weep. I wept after a long hard day with my daughters who disliked that I placed them in a car and drove them in one day to California from Arizona and then back to see my/their relatives. They had been busy receiving and then sending texts from their mother constantly. Because of the court, I knew I couldn't tell them this 2 day trip to California was supposed to have been a 4 day trip but that their mother had constantly sabotaged it. So after a long trip with…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:30 PM
5

Hey no offense Thomas, but I am highly suspect of your GMP, and the kinds of authors you've had there, Amanda Marcotte, really? Hugo Schwyzer, really? AND YOUR BANNING POLICIES of people that disagree with Hugo, make me disbelieve anything about you. Including that the good men project is good for men, or speaks for men. The name of it is insulting, the content is insulting, your choice in how comments are moderated is insulting, the way you allow abusers of men like Marcotte to write there is i…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:20 PM
6

I can totally relate to the man being interviewed -- it doesn't help much to have had courts and an ex alienate the kids from me.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:15 PM
7

Mainly what I hear is: "Yes, menz suicides are terrible, PATRIARCHY HURRS MEN DERP, so that is why we need to concentrate on women's oppression, and you're benned for derailing this thread with WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ"
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:13 PM
1

I stand beside my statement that if a woman tries to forcibly smear a man's cum onto his face, she deserves to be slapped. Her behavior was egregious and assault to be sure. I am not a lawyer, I have no problem with her victim, in the heat of the moment, slapping her in self defense. I don't know what the law would say about that though. I would hope treat her actions as assault. No, I am not an SRS type. I am glad to know it wasn't another blackout evening for you and you came to within 24 hour…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:38 PM
-1

Zing!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:24 PM
-1

See, this is the sad part of American education. Everyone is told how special they are. And they believe it. No, this article could not go either way. Neither could A Modest Proposal or Jessica Alba.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:36 PM
10

Related: Is there such a thing as a abbreviation, or synonym for a subreddit? I think it would be fun to have a subreddit called /r/SRSAtheism which just redirects to /r/atheismplus. The same could be done for all of the phony balloney SRS moderated "mens" subs. I would also like people to consider "reclaiming" the word dildz. The dildz lovers at SRS reddits love that word, hold it close to them, they'd probably be annoyed if other non SRS people dirtied it be using it to refer to SRS. In that l…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:02 AM
-3

It was satire and meant no harm to men. It was satire of feminists. No one was shot in this satirical article. That you couldn't figure that out marks you as a likely dumbass. Stop being a dumbass Dwayne.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:22 AM
4

You types are simply puppets. I under 6-8 beers and you're still dancing to my tune. You're letting an inebriated man get the best of you? You are not top notch (hic). There, FTFY.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:21 AM
4

Aieeee!!!! I'm going to faint!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:49 AM
4

Whatevs Futrolle! Whatevs.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:40 AM
5

Only David Futrelle, that we here in /r/mensrights don't approve of you coming over from your blog to make horribly misogynistic comments about slapping women into submission just to see how many dipshits will upvote it. We've got problems of our own Futrolle, and we're honest enough to acknowledge them, we don't need false flag trolls coming in here saying shit that is so incredibly stupid as you did just so you can print at your blog how mean /r/mensrights is and how they hate women.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:29 AM
7

You've seen cum on your face a thousand times in your short life? Yeah, I can believe that. Come on David Futrolle, you lost this round. We'll play again.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:25 AM
2

ehtheism, I am surprised you didn't add how people wonder if it means you must be gay. (With a Seinfeldian NTTAWWT). But in my time, and I'm not saying when, not having clear obvious relationships meant even parents would say things to friends like, do you think he's gay? Not helping, eh? FWIW, it seems to be easier today than a decade or so ago, to fix that problem if you want it fixed. Between Craigslist, and Vegas, and Cougars, and Backpage, or even OkCupid, just go for it, IF you want to. An…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:24 AM
9

Hah! David Futrelle! We can tell that's you! Nice try, but we win this time Manboobz. Until next time then, Futrolle!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:09 AM
1

It's not exactly as wonderful as L Ron Hubbard saying "You don't get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion", but it certainly takes some of the edginess off Ms. Sarkeesian. And it's highly reminiscent of this one: My name is Joel Goodson. I deal in human fulfillment. I grossed over eight thousand dollars in one night. Time of your life, huh kid?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:01 AM
2

Since I wrote the above, and now, I had gone back and reread what he wrote, due to "the true pooka" video of today, and damn it, I want to think Goldwag could be persuaded, but he wrote some obnoxious stuff, and then defended with some even more awfully obnoxious stuff. Still, I have to keep looking and hoping their is a feminist that can look past all the noxious propaganda....
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:37 AM
5

Is there any sort of animated reddit MMORPGS where we can visualize real time assaults of upvote / downvote brigades or commenters taking one to the knee or noob SRS members accidentally leroy jenkings a mission?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:18 AM
1

I don't know how to upvote or downvote you. And I am told I must choose one by 7pm this evening or else puppies will die. Are you saying, "Damn, that's a horribly sexist article?" Or saying "Damn, people this is satire, lighten up Francis and stop thinking like a feminist would"?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:11 AM
1

Please point some out. One reason I wonder if you can, and it's a pretty weak reason, is that google NEVER finds her name mentioned at feministing.com or feministe.us AND she was a very famous NY Times journalist/pundit.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:09 AM
-1

Don't be a dumbass, the world has too many dumbasses already.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:07 AM
1

Boy is that ever true. Even when I stopped wearing yoga pants!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:06 AM
3

Interesting article, but basically a rehash of known information. What would be more interesting would be to politely, sincerely engage Arthur Goldwag on the topic. My understanding is that Goldwag is not an SPLC employee, and they paid him to write his article. He might have something new or topical to say about Morris Dees and the allegations of that 2002 piece. From communication with Goldwag at his blog, I have a (probably misplaced) sense of optimism that someone could politely, firmly deba…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:04 AM
3

Oh gosh, I've done that on many occasions!
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:26 PM
1

No need to be sorry, and thank you for the explanation. I had to memorize Jabberwocky and several other poems in elementary school. There is only one of those poems I still remember (mumblety-number of decades later.) I was actually shocked at the article from Deacon Duncan, but admittedly, I couldn't get past the first couple of paragraphs where he seems to create this straw equity feminism out of nowhere and then slays it. Upon re-reading it, I find myself upset. With myself, for not seeing th…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:55 PM
1

I grant you this, as much as Jezebel stinks on ice, they are a lot more interesting to read.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:27 PM
1

My dumbass title for this late night post or "Duncan Deacon's"? (I am a product of American Schooling and don't know what Edward Lear sound-a-like refers to, but actually would be interested in having you explain.)
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:26 PM
7

Sigh, I need more coffee. I read 90% of her column as a subtle critique of modern feminism in our culture. And then the last 10% just seemed to end weakly, with no point at all, and no "closure" -- was this a parody of feminism or a triumphant cheer. I can see people reading it as cheering feminism on, but if so, the first 90% seems to be pretty weak about that. My conclusion: I need more coffee. EDIT: I am pretty sure Heffernan is criqituing feminism here. This column is a Swiftian commentary. …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:16 PM
2

I think she obtained the wrong amount of money, either too high or too low. At $5 to $35K, you think, okay, this is payment for her time and research for a few weeks to a few months, and then paying for some semi-professional production efforts (filming, editing, music). At $150K, you think, okay this is payment for about six to twelve months worth of time and research and writing with very high production values... So now I think that for $150K, if she is really all about the womynz gamers, I t…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:10 PM
1

Instead of downvoting why doesn't someone explain how I am wrong that communists suck when it comes to human rights? You are talking about a feminist, and though I didn't understand it for years and years, much of feminist theory WAS and IS based on communism. So hell, at least she's honest about that. So because of that, I don't see why you would give her less attention than to any feminist anywhere including the ones that would claim to be for the free market.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:32 PM
2

Another amazing A+er fights the good fight against Straw Equity Feminism. AND WINS! WOOT! SETTING UP THE STRAW PREMISE AGAINST STRAW EQUITY FEMINISM: (Ask yourself, has this blogger ever read anything at all from a primary source about equity feminism?) Thanks to the Atheism+ debate, I’m getting to learn about something called “equity feminism” versus “gender feminism.” The difference seems to revolve around the degree of activism required. I’m new to this particular debate, so take what I say w…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:19 AM
3

Very well done video. Short, well edited, to the point. With fun and amazing L Ron Hubbard like evidence at 4:35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lERF9q40iS0&feature=player_detailpage#t=274s
/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:03 AM
5

It might be interesting for someone to go back and see how she responded to ElevatorGate and Richard Dawkins' "Dear Muslima" letter. (Yeah, I will probably be disappointed in what she wrote if anyone does that.) But here she essentially seems to call bullshit on A+'s attitudes towards men and women.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:30 AM
1

Fuck yeah, HOUR OLD REDDITOR, KICK PATRIARCHY IN TEH BALLZ!
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:34 AM
4

Okay, that's plausible, and I can see that as a slight to men and more importantly one nail falsifying a feminist claim. But it does fit in nicely with the kinds of books they carry, and their targeted customer: We are one of the largest feminist bookstores in the country, stocking more than 30,000 books by and about women, children's books for all ages, and the best of lesbian and gay fiction and non-fiction.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:04 AM
2

I am not really crazed about how reddit ranks things in terms of hot or whatever. I don't want to keep people from posting these things, but idiot critics at SRS and intentionally pernicious critics like David Futrelle will take a look at what is posted and try to use it to trivialize us. That really shouldn't change our behavior, but we should, as subscribers to mensrights, be okay with people asking "how is this a mensrights issue?". On the flip side, the feminist movement has long made enormo…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:12 AM
10

Who cares? Is this a mens rights issue? If so how? What would you like the government to do about this? As long as they don't point their fingers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IfOKeZ-MWI&feature=player_detailpage#t=296s) I don't see how this is anything but a very minor minor men's issue.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:42 AM
4

The conference organizer has given different intepretations to her friends (who say she says it was feminists attacking her) and then to Jezebel (who says she says it was mras attacking her) and then to JtO (who reports she said both sides were attacking her)
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:36 AM
0

Hey, fwiw, David Manboobz Futrelle has highlighted your comment in a thread of his on this thread.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:33 AM
2

Jeez, just when I see signs you're not a trollbot, you go and give us this shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:01 AM
5

Best wishes to you and your son. You may feel alone, you may actually be alone, but your situation is not uncommon at all.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:57 AM
3

You're the only person to use the word "perve". OP used pervy and perverted. And while the content of some porn can be about deviant or perverse acts, that doesn't mean all or most porn is. There are many forms of porn, starting with very soft core lifetime channel porn. Similarly, there can be perverse, deviant, abuses of porn including addiction, but that doesn't mean that any watching of porn is deviant. That harkens back to marijuana is a gateway drug kind of thinking. To claim as you do tha…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:28 AM
8

finally feeling like I'm not alone. Definitely not. This is tragically all too common. If you're not addicted to the Internet enough, start reading Robert Franklin and Fathersandfamilies.org. Definitely google local groups (meetup groups too) in your area for support or leads to attorneys. I understand you're living paycheck to paycheck, but an attorney probably will be lots of help to you. Get someone to run a credit report of her name and SSN. Attack the OAG with a lawyer and get from them the…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:16 AM
6

It's interesting, they may not send out paper checks anymore, but just add the funds to a debit card. I don't know what your funds situation is, ... Is your son of school age? Is he enrolled? I wonder what a lawyer could do in terms of letters or whatever sent to a relative? That is, sue her mother? If you or your lawyer or a PI or facebook or their relatives really can provide no evidence your son is alive, I'd try the unlikely to work tactic of making the OAG prove the card wasn't stolen and i…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:51 AM
8

Okay, so I take it that you know where she lives, but she won't let you visit. I hear ya brother. I don't have anything more than general information to provide, a lot will depend on your state and possibly local county or city's judges, prosecutors, attorneys. I suspect you will need to lawyer up and file a claim. I strongly recommend you keep a diary, or journal, or blog of your attempts to see your son, and a smart phone to take pictures or record video that you do try to see your son. When y…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:37 AM
-1

Poor you, it is indeed a mens rights issue that all literature is not written from a gender neutral omniscient view. Here is some literature you may enjoy more: http://pastebin.com/4Dw2Acvw (Harrison Bergeron)
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:29 AM
0

hard-to-fap.jpg hopefully the story will get better as our heroine starts maturing.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:26 AM
2

I refer to aspects of Feminist Cant as "It's basic Sugar and Spice 101"....
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:25 AM
7

Where do you live? What state, or country? Are they truly missing, or just won't let you have visitation? If they are missing, how is it you are paying child support? Who is cashing the checks?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:21 AM
5

Fuck off and die terra-and-luna, we don't ban people at /r/mensrights just because of their genital details or their beliefs. Your fucked up asshole friends at SRS and at /r/atheismplus are the fucktards that do that. Take your hypocritical bullshit and jam it.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:16 AM
2

I have "panties" tourettes, and it can be embarrassing.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:26 AM
9

http://i.imgur.com/kiPTF.jpg Perversion is a concept describing those types of human behavior that deviate from what is considered to be orthodox or normal. Although it can refer to varying forms of deviation, it is most often used to describe sexual behaviors that are seen by an individual as abnormal, repulsive or obsessive. Perversion differs from deviant behavior, since the latter refers to a recognized violation of social rules or norms. It is often considered derogatory and in psychologica…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:25 AM
0

I don't think you should call her spouse. Do an AMA request instead.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:26 PM
2

I agree, including your addition to women you made elsewhere, especially when the kids are young and not experienced and subject to enormous peer pressure. It's called parenting. Feminists often seem to want to exclude parenting of adolescents, seemingly believing the ability to grow pubic hair makes mature experienced women of girls and immature, rapists out of boys.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter