~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The feminist myth of "Thousands of years of oppression" completely debunked in a new book - article in the GuardianIt’s a deeply complicated subject. If you write one paragraph about it you’d need another 99 paragraphs to explain all the exceptions and double standards which make the first paragraph wrong. I can’t give you a simple yes or no answer to agreeing with either you or with OP. If you’re accusing the United States today being an oligarchy, I would say this is even more true today than it was for the Founding Fathers. And you really can’t argue that those white men didn’t all personally risk their l… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/22 01:44 AM |
| 1 | The feminist myth of "Thousands of years of oppression" completely debunked in a new book - article in the GuardianUsing military service to gain citizenship is an ancient concept. There were just 2 ways to gain citizenship in ancient Rome. One was to be a child of two citizens, the other is through military service. And if you served in the military, they would give you a piece of land upon completing your service. Women didn't have to serve in the military, but they could still be citizens and they could own land. They just couldn't vote. Men, on the other hand, had to serve. Sometimes they would cut off t… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/22 11:10 PM |
| 22 | "All Gender Bathroom" but only the men's bathroom...I'm pretty sure it might be illegal depending on where this bathroom is. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/18 12:50 AM |
| 2 | Just lost my job due to "a very pausible reason"This is why men go to college to get a degree - so that they do not have to put up with this kind of stuff. A decade from now, this pretty female will be talking about how the Patriarchy forced her into a menial service sector job while you got to go off to become a doctor and make good money because you are a man. Just don't let it get to you. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/18 03:24 PM |
| 3 | New science study demonstrates how differently males and females communicate in STEM - males like banter and competition, females prefer sweetness and cooperationIt's easier to understand if you just start out with the conclusion and work your way back to the evidence. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/18 09:14 PM |
| 1 | Isn't it time for a women only draft?That’s not a valid rebutal to the argument. The argument is that the male-only draft was instituted to address a shortfall of male-only volunteers because policy goals called for a male-only quota. The current policy goals call for a female quota which is not being met because female volunteerism is too low. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to institute a female-only draft. That is completely in keeping with the constitution and past Supreme Court rulinrgs, by the way. So your argument … | /r/MensRights | 12/06/18 10:41 AM |
| 2 | Isn't it time for a women only draft?You’re not reading the argument. A women-only draft for the specific purpose of attaining the gender equality that feminists so proudly seek. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/18 10:26 AM |
| 1 | Men have it worse than women in our society in all major metrics(with sources). Why does society itself insist it's the other way?Maybe your brain is big enough to realize that even though your brain can be a product of evolution, your legal rights under the law can be a product of justice and human rights. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/18 09:53 AM |
| 5 | Conversion Therapy Isn’t the Cure for ‘Toxic Masculinity’The more things change, the more they stay the same. Which groups of men have the biggest problems with what feminists term as "toxic masculinity"? Poor men and minorities. The attitude behind "toxic masculinity" is no different from the attitudes when Dawes Act was signed into law to "civilize" Native Americans. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/18 10:53 PM |
| 7 | Man forced to show penis to jury is acquitted of sexual assault.By itself? Witness testimony is absolutely worthless, especially when the witness and the accuser is one and the same. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/18 09:22 PM |
| 9 | Man forced to show penis to jury is acquitted of sexual assault.“Your honor, it was her! She’s got areolas the size of dinner plates! How would I know that if she didn’t break into my house completely naked?” The defendant then proceeds to show the jury her areolas, which are merely the size of saucers. /s This is the standard of evidence that men accused of rape are up against, apparently. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/18 08:29 PM |
| 10 | Man forced to show penis to jury is acquitted of sexual assault.If showing a picture of his dick was exculpatory, there was never any evidence to begin with. The defendant was forced to prove that the accuser was lying. That is a reversal of the burden of proof if there ever was one. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/18 08:17 PM |
| 4 | Jordan Peterson is everywhere right now, and that's a good thingThe difference is that Chomsky can demolish feminism, postmodernism, and the far left, all the while being worshipped by all three. It’s actually uncanny. Peterson got to a point where they have a death wish against him. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/18 10:18 PM |
| 1 | Morgan Freeman. What's wrong with sexually suggestive comments.Asking men to reason with their lizard brains is fairly condescending, not to mention irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/18 10:08 PM |
| 1 | Morgan Freeman. What's wrong with sexually suggestive comments.That doesn’t natuarlly result in a rational outcome, and it does nothing to bolster your argument. Just makes you sound manipultive at best. Like I said, you had a good point without resorting to that emotional appeal. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/18 02:57 PM |
| 1 | Morgan Freeman. What's wrong with sexually suggestive comments.Yeah, I don’t disagree with that. For some of these men, something is hardwired in their brains for them to believe that every woman is fair game. The majority of men ask themselves if a reasonable person would expect the woman to be interested in them before they approach. That’s because most of us don’t actually enjoy being humiliated and rejected. That said, your criteria is light years ahead of the rationalizations goven out by most feminists. To feminists, it’s all about how a woman feels, … | /r/MensRights | 25/05/18 02:54 PM |
| 1 | Morgan Freeman. What's wrong with sexually suggestive comments.What does that have to do with someone being my son or daughter? You made a good point but I think you muddied your argument with that appeal to emotion. Your clarification is much better. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/18 02:45 PM |
| 10 | Former Playmate w/joint custody of son attempts to keep him in Europe for the entire summer, kills herself and son when judge revokes kid's passport for father's custody rights.People do extreme things when you try to take their children away. Loss of child custody is also a leading cause of suicide among men. The only real difference is that it’s predominantly women who file for divorce. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/18 09:54 PM |
| 22 | Former Playmate w/joint custody of son attempts to keep him in Europe for the entire summer, kills herself and son when judge revokes kid's passport for father's custody rights.This is terrible. I was just thinking about the NYT hit piece on Jordan Peterson and how they really lambasted him for his ideas about "forced monogamy". But you know what? This woman and her child would still be alive right now if courts didn't hand out divorce like candy at the dentist's office. At least educate women so that they understand that yeah, kids are not your own private personal property that you are guaranteed to keep after you throw the father to the curb. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/18 08:30 PM |
| 2 | Women, take back the floor of your open concept officeAlso, let's not forget about the Patriarchal air conditioning. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/18 08:15 PM |
| 4 | Women, take back the floor of your open concept officeA lot of people disagree with you. When colds and flus spread through open offices like an epidemic and people go home at the end of the day with splitting headaches because of the constant noise and interruption, you have problems that are caused not by some employee performance flaw but by idiotic cost-cutting measures and architectural gobbledygook theories. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/18 08:14 PM |
| 14 | 'The New York Times' Runs A Comprehensive Hit Piece On Jordan Peterson. It's Dishonest, Malicious Crap.Yeah, I thought the same thing until I actually stopped reading the hit pieces and listened to what he had to say first-hand. I don't agree with his religious or center-right views, but I can completely appreciate the positive impact he is having among that demographic. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/18 08:08 PM |
| 7 | The future of cohabitation?There's nothing to overturn. You can't overturn the absence of proof. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 05:09 AM |
| 3 | The future of cohabitation?It’s not a prenup or divorce. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 04:46 AM |
| 7 | The future of cohabitation?It doesn’t matter. The man is not trying to get out of paying something in this case. The woman has to prove that the man was promising to give her the world, instead. Saying that “I signed a contract promising me nothing under duress” does not prove that she was promised the world, but the opposite. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 03:34 AM |
| 3 | The future of cohabitation?Look up Marvin vs Marvin and "palimony". It's a lot like the old "breach of promise" laws that courts have used since the middle ages to force ex-boyfriends to pay money to women after a breakup. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 12:28 AM |
| – | The future of cohabitation?Being in a relationship is not the problem and women are not the problem. The broken government is the problem. It's not a good idea to refer to men in relationships as people who "can't help themselves". | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 12:13 AM |
| 7 | The future of cohabitation?No it hasn't. It's not a prenup. They weren't married. You can't get this tossed if she tries to sue for "palimony", because even in the most biased courtroom, the burden of proof would be on her to show that he promised to provide for her in some way. The agreement completely rules out the possibility - it makes it clear that there was no promise for her to be anything more than a "guest" for the duration of the relationship. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/18 12:05 AM |
| 2 | Women see more workplace rudeness from other women than from men, study shows"In other words, women are ruder to each other than they are to men, or than men are to women." It's a self-reported study. She doesn't know this. Women could be even worse towards men but the men might not say anything about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPOe2ypB5Qc | /r/MensRights | 12/04/18 12:46 PM |
| 1 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.It doesn't provide justification for discrimination. It is discrimination, to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 05:17 PM |
| 4 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.The way it works is that the school will take men's tuition money to give the female students additional mentorship and dedicated programs. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 02:54 PM |
| 8 | Women Brag Online About Trapping Men With Unwanted Pregnancies for Extortion and Child SupportExactly. In the United States we have a constitution and the 14th amendment has a clause which guarantees equal protection under the law. What we have now is not equal protection. If the government actually followed the constitutional law we’ve had sonce 1868, this kind of thing would never happen. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/18 02:18 PM |
| 0 | Feminist explains in detail why "all penis-in-vagina sex is always rape". Yes, they really believe thatBecause you are apologizing for people who might want to make generalizations about this entire sub based on an individual, even though you condemn the very idea of making generalizations from the behavior of an individual. So, your message is that some people hold us in ill repute for the very things that they themselves are guilty of? Okay, I can live with that. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/18 02:09 AM |
| 1 | Feminist explains in detail why "all penis-in-vagina sex is always rape". Yes, they really believe thatThe real reason why is in the incredible irony of your comment. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 01:53 PM |
| 8 | You Can Get PTSD From Staying In An Emotionally Abusive Relationship (WARNING Sexist Article, no mention of Men getting PTSD from being abused in a relationship)I don’t get how you are describing these women as toxic man-haters who have nothing to offer and then turning around to say that if only they dated “nice guys”, those men would treat them like a real lady. Are you sure about that? | /r/MensRights | 17/03/18 04:54 PM |
| 2 | Astounding statement by Jordan Peterson in his recent Tucker interview (something that people may have missed)It's something that the MRM and anti-feminists have been saying for years. It is no surprise that Peterson would say it because he's an anti-feminist. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 01:38 PM |
| 11 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"You’re quoting her out in of context. What she’s saying is that she wants to have her cake and eat it, too. She thinks it’s normal for women to fuck their way to the top, but somehow magically feminists will get rid of the men who only give jobs to prostitutes who fuck on demand. I can’t say I agree with any of that. It sounds like gibberish to me. I find it completely despicable that some women actually believe that they should be able to fuck their way to the top and then be given vast sums of… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 12:56 PM |
| 4 | Babies who look like their fathers tend to be healthier, study findsAlternative Title: paternity fraud is bad for babies' health. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/18 03:02 PM |
| 4 | Google accused in lawsuit of excluding white and Asian men to boost diversityDamore was fired last year for distributing a memo which suggested ways to improve gender diversity without illegally discriminating against men, in part, by acknowledging biological differences between men and women. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/18 12:15 AM |
| 2 | Google accused in lawsuit of excluding white and Asian men to boost diversityIt still leaves a lot of room for interpretation, though. Those were two separate arguments that got joined into one. The first part is where Damore argued that they were misguided because they discriminated against men and created a hostile work environment. The second part is where Damore argued that Google would be better served by fostering a more collaborative and supportive work environment to better to appeal to women's strengths and preferences. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/18 09:26 PM |
| 2 | Ex-engineer sues Google, saying he was fired for condemning diversity memo | TechnologyYou're implying that Google's lawyers are SJW's. For all we know, it's just their feminist-dominated HR department. So it's probably more like their legal department walked over to HR and said, "You guys really fucked up. We are about to lose a major lawsuit because you allowed this to go on. We better fix this now or it will just get worse." | /r/MensRights | 24/02/18 02:02 AM |
| 1 | I’m pretty sure that a thread discriminating against overweight women would be brigaded almost instantlyWithin a given socio-economic class, yes. But at the same time, poor people tend to have poorer nutrition and higher reproduction rates than rich people. Height is also not permanent. Any sort of economic hardship or war that is just long enough for pregnancy or infancy will have a lasting impact on people's heights for generations. And with a more severe famine than that, taller people will go broke and die out first because of their greater caloric needs. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/18 02:27 PM |
| 1 | I’m pretty sure that a thread discriminating against overweight women would be brigaded almost instantlyPeople are getting taller because of better nutrition, not because of selective breeding. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/18 01:41 PM |
| 14 | When Will We Have the Guts to Link Fatherlessness to School Shootings?But if you really want to fuck with feminists' heads, propose a law that restricts gun ownership among children of single mothers. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/18 02:52 PM |
| -1 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseThe thing is, his response is a red herring and he is just bullshitting. It’s already coming out that the White House knew about this for a year and they are flat out lying about the timeline of events. Because forget about feminists and due process for a moment. The bigger problem here is national security. You don’t give a guy access to the highest kevel of secrets in the entire country if his wife is sending people photos of herself with a black eye. That just opens that wmployee to scandal a… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/18 04:03 PM |
| 2 | Marine Corps Quietly Drops Major Obstacle to Female Infantry OfficersThe better-qualified Marines who don't get a commission as a result and all the men who die as a result. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 07:08 PM |
| 0 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseDude you're a fucking moron. Literally everyone found out about it. Literally. And you have absolutely no way of knowing who knew about the problems before that. The FBI certainly knew about it, as did Trump and the rest of the White House. The FBI was literally investigating the domestic violence problems as part of the security clearance process. You're a fucking knave if you actually believe that nobody else knew about it until the ex wives came forward to the media. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 03:54 AM |
| 0 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseFocusing on the #MeToo thing misses the point. The #MeToo thing is just the self-evident proof of why you don't let people who have a compromised personal life handle sensitive, top secret information for the president. It doesn't matter if the accusations are true. What matters is that anyone who found out about their personal lives before all the feminists on Twitter did could have used it to blackmail them. Trump knows this. The FBI knows this. Everyone at the White House knows this. So what … | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 03:47 AM |
| 0 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseThis was the same kind of thing that happened with Flynn. Trump gave two guys access to the highest level of top secret information when they should have never been given the job. Trump kept them on the job until the media found out. Trump then acts all surprised like he just found out about it and starts blaming the media and pretending that this was some sort of injustice. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 02:24 AM |
| 1 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseYes he is wrong. This was a matter of national security, not due process. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Trump decries lack of ‘due process’ for men accused of sexual harassment, abuseIt was a political move in whole. The reason you don’t hand out top secret information to people who have been accused of domestic violence isn’t because of due process, it’s because it makes you susceptible to blackmail. You also don’t give these kind of jobs to people with massive gambling debts or even just a bad credit score. For Trump to turn around and try to spin this as a men’s rights issue is just a blatant lie. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 01:20 AM |
| 21 | In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs.Except there's not. There's literally government-funded programs dedicated to improving women's health: https://www.womenshealth.gov/ There is nothing equivalent dedicated to men's health. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/18 07:55 PM |
| 9 | In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs.Go take a look at women in working class jobs sometime. They're stressed out, overworked, and fat. Do you think that we shouldn't organize groups dedicated to their healthcare needs because it's just a lifestyle choice? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/18 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Female California lawmaker behind #MeToo push is accused of groping male stafferI have zero recollection of engaging in inappropriate behavior and such behavior is inconsistent with my values. I thought that her values were to unconditionally believe the accuser. I didn't know that due process for the accused was one of the values she was advocating for. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/18 03:53 PM |
| 19 | Just came across this claptrap about mentoring. WTAF!?These kind of articles are ridiculously condescending towards professional men. On the one hand they want these "powerful" men to mentor women about the best ways to succeed in a professional environment, and yet on the other hand they want to lecture millions of male professionals about how to their jobs as if they were a bunch of prepubescent boys. You can't have it both ways, ladies! This is why nobody wants to mentor women anymore. A 50-year-old executive doesn't want to hear a 19 year old g… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/18 03:37 PM |
| 10 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."This is actually far nastier than that. What this manager is saying is that if a conference wants to have a white male speaker from Google, they must get rid of all other white male speakers from every other company. It's transparently self-serving. This manager is trying to use Google's pull with conference organizers to sideline the competition. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 09:40 PM |
| 0 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Fact: you will not benefit. Also: I earn more than you. And if you think you earn more than me, then you sure as hell aren't "middle middle" class. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 04:11 AM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'And I don't think you know how many fingers I'm holding up. So what? I don't need to know the details of your personal life to know that you have no clue what you're talking about. You're acting like the person who just maxed out $5,000 on their credit card and thinks it made them $5,000 richer. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:39 AM |
| 2 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'You don't benefit from the tax cuts. You get a couple of years of cuts, after which the massive debt that these cuts will accrue will force cuts in social services and safety nets that you yourself benefit from. The only people who benefit long-term are the rich. corporate cuts go to corporations. Corporations are not a social service designed to benefit workers. They serve the interests of their shareholders and well-placed corporate executives. Every last penny goes to them long before it goes… | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 02:52 AM |
| 1 | Feminists have been pushing the 'Husbands Stitch' lie again in order to scare expectant mothers into fearing some ridiculous conspiracy of Patriarchal doctors harming women. It's a complete myth that has literally no evidence for its existence. A complete urban legend.I find it weird that (if it actually worked) this was seen purely as a benefit to men It's not weird when you consider the motives of the woman who invented this lie. I suspect one thing that has kept the myth circulating is anxiety about the idea of men colluding behind the woman's back It was the only reason. You had a woman who wanted to turn other women against modern medicine, so she latched onto the resentment and hatred of men prevalent among women in our culture. But I know doctors and t… | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 02:35 AM |
| 2 | Feminists have been pushing the 'Husbands Stitch' lie again in order to scare expectant mothers into fearing some ridiculous conspiracy of Patriarchal doctors harming women. It's a complete myth that has literally no evidence for its existence. A complete urban legend.Yeah, it's safe to say that medical malpractice is arguably worse than something which doesn't even exist. The thing that's actually caused a great deal of harm are the quacks who came up with this term to try to scare off women from seeing their doctors: http://www.skepticalob.com/2011/02/ten-lies-my-natural-childbirth-educator.html | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 02:39 PM |
| 2 | Feminists have been pushing the 'Husbands Stitch' lie again in order to scare expectant mothers into fearing some ridiculous conspiracy of Patriarchal doctors harming women. It's a complete myth that has literally no evidence for its existence. A complete urban legend.You're being an apologist for a pejorative term used to demonize men. The article uses a motte and bailey style of argument to defend unreasonable claims, and you are going right along with it. Read their first claim: long been the rumored result of handshake deals done between husbands and doctors. And now read the "proof" that you've offered us to say that these handshake deals really exist: A very few times patients have been very persistent about it and I have performed it with written conse… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 02:34 PM |
| 5 | Feminists have been pushing the 'Husbands Stitch' lie again in order to scare expectant mothers into fearing some ridiculous conspiracy of Patriarchal doctors harming women. It's a complete myth that has literally no evidence for its existence. A complete urban legend.This instance of medical malpractice has nothing to do with the urban legend of the "husband's stitch". And even if it did, it still it's a case of medical malpractice by a single doctor that would in no way justify the use of a pejorative and disgusting which puts the blame for this unto the patents' husbands. Millions of women get their baby sons circumcised every year because they believe that it will improve women's sex lives. Innumerable feminists defend male genital mutilation by openly sa… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 02:15 PM |
| 2 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Corporate tax cuts go to the wealthiest Americans. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:24 AM |
| 2 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'The tax cuts for the rich don't expire, just the ones for the rest of us. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:12 AM |
| 4 | Men face fines of £80 if they comment about a woman's body or appearance in public under new French proposals.But they do have freedom to be pricks to anyone who doesn't speak French. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'He threatened her that unless she goes to watch him take a shower, he would ruin their friendship. The exact quote is "Don’t ruin your friendship with me for five minutes." | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 10:23 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights Movement is Active Since 1856. Have you Noticed How Men's Rights Wikipedia Page Heavily Leans Feminist Point of View?Exactly. So I don't think that Wikipedia is inherently wrong here. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 06:42 PM |
| 4 | Men's Rights Movement is Active Since 1856. Have you Noticed How Men's Rights Wikipedia Page Heavily Leans Feminist Point of View?The contemporary men’s rights movement came out of people like Warren Farrel. And these people got their start in feminism. Absolutely. That’s kind of like saying that the Civil Rights movement came out of people like Martin Luther King, Jr, and he got his start as a preacher at a church. It doesn’t mean that nobody had fought for equal rights for blacks prior to MLK making his first speech. It’s just saying that the movement that he started is the movement that he started. In that same sense, t… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 11:48 AM |
| 11 | Jordan Peterson tactfully speaks with an impatient, rude woman who repeatedly jumps to conclusions on feminist talking points.Such a shrill, unpleasant woman. This wasn’t an interview, she was literally just harrasing him in a disrespectful and unprofessional manner. If this had been a male interviewer treating a female guest that way, the interviewer would have been fired. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 11:19 AM |
| 16 | CNN's Ashley Banfield Destroys Aziz Ansari's Accuser, Publicly!MRA: please treat me like a human. Feminist: I will treat you like a dog! MRA: That’s a major step up from cocroach! | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 01:05 AM |
| 2 | Bill Clinton Says Haiti Relief Funds Didn't Pay for Chelsea's Wedding… Then Wikileaks Drops This Bomb: Possible feminist aligned charity fraud.This sounds like complete bullshit. It's just some vague, off-handed remark between random people. It hardly means anything, let alone constitutes some sort of proof of whatever you might imagine it to mean. That kind of evidence would get laughed out of court. The conclusions drawn from this are preposterous and they are contradicted by the very newspaper articles that are linked from this blog post. a claim lacking any evidence. Readers (or their friends) who viewed this as the “last straw” ab… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/18 04:46 AM |
| 1 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'Dude the shitbag was asking her to go watch him take a shower after he grabbed her tits. Emotions have nothing to do with that. She told him he had no business grabbing her tits and didn’t want to go to his room. So he kept pressuring her and ultimately threatened her. Those are the objective facts. That’s the best possible “spin” that you could put on it. But what it actually sounds like is a full-out sexual assault. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 10:41 PM |
| 4 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'This is the kind of shit that gets us labeled “rape apologists” and it’s really, really pathetic... What I'm afraid of is that some of these people are something worse than mere rape apologists, and that they might be coming here in hopes of validation and to try to normalize their own behavior. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 08:17 PM |
| 1 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'Let's say for the sake of argument that he misread some signal and thought he had a green light to grab a young woman's tits. At the point of the audio, the woman tells him in no uncertain terms that he was wrong for grabbing her tits and that she was not comfortable at all being around him. And having never even met her, just hearing her voice you can tell that she was under an immense amount of stress and discomfort around him. This is the context we're talking about. Irrefutably so. At what p… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 07:46 PM |
| 4 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.It is a criteria for it being a management fad among corporare CEO’s, however. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 06:13 PM |
| 4 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.This was not popular with management circles until recently. In fact, for a while they actively resisted it, or at most tolerated it. Now they actively promote it. Feminizing the corporate world today is what stack ranking was back when CEO’s were hanging up Jack Welch posters in their bedrooms. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 06:06 PM |
| 2 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.It’s a fad for corporate executives. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_fad If you’ve been around executives for a while, you will notice that many of them promote themselves as champions of corporate responsibility by couching whatever it is they do as somehow benefitting women. This lady is basically pitchingg herself to an even bigger companies where she stands at making a lot more money because she’s saying all the things that they want to hear. This is how fuckwits like Marrisa Maye… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 05:53 PM |
| 1 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.I’m saying it’s a fad in terms of it being part of the latest management fads for corporate executives. Everything that thos woman wrote is already part of the standard corporatese lexicon. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 05:49 PM |
| 5 | Guilty until proven innocent: company investigates man for possible sexual harassment etc, solely because of a female employee's offhand comment that she found him physically unattractive/repulsiveIt doesn’t have to be sexual, it just has to be gender-based. In this case, one of the clerks was spreading horrible rumors about a manager, all based on his gender. The rumors caused his peers to lose respect for him and to start doubting his ability to do his job. This basically hits the bullseye for creating a hostile work environment and behavior that constitutes sexual harassment. There’s nothing wrong with “sexualizing” employees, per se. As in, you’re free to ask someone out on a date or … | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 03:27 PM |
| 15 | Guilty until proven innocent: company investigates man for possible sexual harassment etc, solely because of a female employee's offhand comment that she found him physically unattractive/repulsiveI feel like I must be taking crazy pills. Isn't these women's behavior a textbook example of creating a hostile work environment? | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 12:37 PM |
| 87 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.I think it's more of a problem with rich people virtue-signaling whereas doing random crap for anyone with a vagina is just the latest celebrity cause. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 12:26 PM |
| 59 | Male CEO billionaire under fire for refusing women, adamantly insisting instead that men (and men only) receive grants, scholarships and support for men-owned business.If you got rich off of selling gimmicky underwear to insecure middle aged fat women, you probably have a guilty conscience. Maybe she can give back by giving these women a scholarship to the gym. But that would undercut her sales. At Spanx, philanthropy is part of our culture. Get in line behind every other overpaid corporate CEO that says the same thing, lady. It's a really convenient distraction from the things that actually matter. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 12:12 PM |
| 3 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'On the audio he admits to already having groped her breasts and excuses himself for doing so by telling her it’s just something that’s just normal for him to do. She tells him that this is NOT normal behavior and that she is uncomfortable around him. But instead of backing the fuck off, he keeps telling her he would feel “embarrassed” unless she comes along to his room to “sit there” while he takes a shower. She is clearly stressed and tells him repeatedly that she is uncomfortable around him, b… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 11:29 AM |
| 2 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'There’s just a lot of misconceptions in your comment. Whether or not women end up facing a backlash is not up to men’s rights groups to determine. It is up to feminists themselves to self-regulate instead of driving themselves into an angry mob upon hearing the latest accusation of a snowflake who had been flirted with. That’s just up to them, and women’s collective reputations within our society ultimately depend on what women deem to be acceptable behavior for other women. Don’t blame us for a… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 11:07 PM |
| 6 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'I have heard actual audio recordings of Weinstein sexually harrasing an actress that I think are sufficient evidence to merit his firing and never working in the movie business again. The recordings showed a disgusting individual who is rotten to the core. Whether he did something criminal will hopefully be determined by hard evidence and due process in the courts. But as far as I am concerned, the more important issue is not to let any of his self-righteous feminist friends off the hook. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 10:00 PM |
| 9 | Liam Neeson says harassment allegations are now 'a witch-hunt'So were some of the Communists. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Woman deleted messages to make man appear guilty of rape. Police never investigated his claims messages were edited. No charges for her of course.Not really, I understood that he linked to a US case where there is strict liability for statutory rape. His broader point still stands IMO because even if the UK provides the possibility of a legal defense, I don't think the woman in this case had any credibility so the idea of a defense is a moot point for her. There's a similar double standard in both countries; it's easy to conflate the two because of that. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/18 01:03 AM |
| 1 | Woman deleted messages to make man appear guilty of rape. Police never investigated his claims messages were edited. No charges for her of course.Yeah but she shot her defense to hell by falsifying the evidence to make it appear as of she had that reasonable belief. Under any other circumstances she would have zero credibility and would be found guilty of whatever applicable rape law she violated. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/18 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Woman deleted messages to make man appear guilty of rape. Police never investigated his claims messages were edited. No charges for her of course.Leave him alone he’s already been red pilled so much... | /r/MensRights | 03/01/18 07:27 PM |
| 2 | Top post on my Facebook this morning: "#GymEttiquette101 if you're a man and literally every treadmill is available, don't get on the one behind the girls."Yes, yoga pants. These are well-known issues with countless health articles advising women to limit their use of tight-fitting clothing. And no, you don't need yoga pants. They provide no legitimate benefit to a typical woman's workout over loose-fitting clothing. If you suffer from chafing on a walk, it's probably because you're fat. Lose some weight. You're confusing chafing caused by being fat with rashes caused by bacteria and fungi, which tight-fitting clothes cause. And for what it's worth… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/17 01:51 PM |
| 1 | Top post on my Facebook this morning: "#GymEttiquette101 if you're a man and literally every treadmill is available, don't get on the one behind the girls."Actually they can be pretty disgusting. A lot of women don't change out of them or shower after their workout and walk around town in them. They can cause rashes, ingrown hairs, acne, yeast infections, jock itch, among other things. Women wouldn't be wearing these things as much as they do if it weren't to show off their asses. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/17 02:17 AM |
| 7 | How women change institutions built by men...There might be a kernel of truth to some of this, but I don't see how it's productive to argue about whether or not genocidal madmen like Stalin or Hitler were more "masculine" or "feminine" in their ways of thinking. Clearly, we have left-wing authoritarians who believe that they have a moral justification for suppressing their enemies. I don't think gender has anything to do with it. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/17 07:58 PM |
| 1 | 17 years old Justin Bieber sexually assaulted by 42 years old Jenny McCarthy. Imagine the outrage if genders reversedOnly if it has caused some psychological damage Quite frankly, to be consistent, every guy who has ever had his ass grabbed by a girl in high school should be screaming bloody murder and getting all of those women arrested or fired from their jobs. It seems that men's attitudes are that it's okay if you do it to her, because you don't give a shit if she does it to you. No harm done. And women's attitudes are, it's the end of the world as we know it if he did it to me, but it's totally like fun a… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 11:31 AM |
| -1 | 17 years old Justin Bieber sexually assaulted by 42 years old Jenny McCarthy. Imagine the outrage if genders reversedNo, I think what you are being told is that the media is creating a massive Puritanical moral panic right now. You've got cases where some left-wing senator tried to steal a kiss from a indiscrete sex worker 20 years ago and now that sex worker is a right-wing 'journalist' so she just drops this tidbit for the media and poof, the entire left-wing political establishment gets played. Fuck the balance of power in the senate, fuck democracy for 320 million people, what matters most is one lady's fe… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 11:07 AM |
| 1 | Literally Hitler...At least, not without feminist concern trolls pretending to be men’s rights activists who are upset that feminism has a bad reputation because they hate men. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/17 03:22 PM |
| 2 | What are this sub’s thoughts on Mr Weinstein?I found that the audio recordings of his behavior were pretty damning. I hope the police and prosecutors get to the bottom of what happened and that he gets justice. But I've never been a fan of who he is and what he represents in our culture. Watching his Hollywood cohorts distance themselves from him is like seeing rats abandon a sinking ship. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 01:10 AM |
| 16 | Michelle Obama Says That Women Need To Stop Babying Their SonsI'd say it's just a brazen attempt to gain an advantage for her daughters by shaming other parents. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 12:49 AM |
| 1 | Feminist woman rigs the Democratic primaries? Blame it on a manDo you actually realize that nothing you just said justifies you inventing your own Truth out of thin air? Besides, I was just trying to be polite. To be more direct, the narrative that you have bought into is hopelessly out of touch with the available information today. You should really try to catch up with current events and see if you still believe that Trump-Russia is just an invention of the Clintons after you avail yourself of the facts. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 12:42 AM |
| 1 | Feminist woman rigs the Democratic primaries? Blame it on a manIt sounds like you've stuck your fingers in your ears when it comes to Russian interference and Trump-Russia collusion. Have you even watched the news recently? Your attempt to spin it as just something that Clinton made up is a bunch of hooey. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/17 01:15 PM |
| 0 | Feminist woman rigs the Democratic primaries? Blame it on a manThe Russian narratives are not going to collapse because they're not just pulled out of thin air. And Trump caused that all by himself; it had nothing to do with Clinton. He's not going to be in any position to exact payback on anyone when it's all said and done. Unfortunately, yes, this will take the focus from some much-needed DNC reform. And yes, the party establishment rigged the primaries not only for Sanders but for anyone else who could have ran. And yes, it's probably going to hurt their… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/17 12:30 PM |
| 4 | Feminist woman rigs the Democratic primaries? Blame it on a manNot sure if you've watched the news yet but the pundits are definitely out there blaming Obama for everything, including for DWS. It's got nothing to do with there being "plenty of mud". They're blaming Obama for raising a lot of money for himself but failing to do so for the DNC. That's bullshit. Obama relied on a large number of small-donors and the DNC literally refused to raise money that way. There's nothing that Obama could have done to help them squeeze more funds from the large corporate… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/17 06:06 PM |
| 9 | Michelle Obama says men feel entitled and rely on women to protect themI think you start out by being a woman and then you project. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/17 04:33 AM |
| 20 | My controversial opinion about men's reputation for unkindness.Feminism: pissing on men and telling them it’s raining since 1962. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/17 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Feminist offended that men are sharing their abuse experiences in #metoosometimes you have to protect your career Calling it a career is a bit much. It's more like an incredible sense of entitlement. They were protecting their goal of becoming rich famous based on nothing more than their looks and personality. Let's get to the real issue here. If it weren't for all the scum and villainy who serve as gatekeepers in Hollywood, the conditions for a "celebrity" career would never exist to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/17 11:21 AM |
| 12 | Feminist offended that men are sharing their abuse experiences in #metooThey're just trying to take credit for all the things moms have do every day! Like oh, if a man does it then it's somehow more special? Try doing it for a thousand years while being oppressed by the Patriarchy! /s | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 07:44 PM |
| 8 | Jerry Brown Vetoes Campus Sexual Assault Bill Because It Threatens Due ProcessIt's okay... after they make "stealthing" a crime, the desired effect will come about: it will only be illegal to spread HIV if you are a male. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 04:39 PM |
| 1 | Boys Lag Behind: How Teachers’ Gender Biases Affect Student Achievement - blind and non-blind test scores to show that middle school teachers favor girls when they grade.Yep. Except that you have several boys who utterly fail to make it in life for every one of them that overcomes the odds and gets ahead of all the women and rich people who just had things handed to them their entire lives. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Ireland struck by tropical hurricane, people being advised to stay indoors, numerous businesses closing for the day. Here's our male privilege in actionElderly ladies with young children? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 03:20 AM |
| 3 | Ireland struck by tropical hurricane, people being advised to stay indoors, numerous businesses closing for the day. Here's our male privilege in actionHow about the women who had zero parental responsibilities? Did they have to come in? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 03:18 AM |
| 20 | Boys Lag Behind: How Teachers’ Gender Biases Affect Student Achievement - blind and non-blind test scores to show that middle school teachers favor girls when they grade.It had always been an economic disadvantage. Even if you did well in school, you’d get drafted. Even if you got a good job, you paid more taxes and got back far less from the government than women. And if you got married, you were handing your loney over to a woman to imprive her lifestyle and not the other way around. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 06:28 PM |
| 1 | As a "feminist," I'm pleasantly surprised by this subFeminists also want to "improve men's lives". You could even say that about Hitler and the Dalai Llama all shared the same goal. Everyone thinks they are god's gift to mankind, so what? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/17 04:39 AM |
| 2 | Typical Liberal Media Is Blaming The Weinstein Scandal On MenThis is just an inchoate rant by some anonymous damsel in distress having a mental breakdown. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/17 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Professor says he was investigated for sexual harassment because he disagreed with womenI didn't know they allowed meddling nannies into the men's rights movement /s This has nothing to do with economic opinions; the topic being discussed here is the way in which feminists and anti-capitalists are populist brethren who, together, have appropriated left-wing political parties and ruined them for the rest of us. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/17 10:42 PM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementHow about it was none of her business? She asked him to sit and he said no; that should have been the end of it. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 11:33 PM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementYes she did. On top of it she sexually harrassed him based on what I heard in every sexual harassment training I'd ever gone to. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 11:27 PM |
| 1 | Professor says he was investigated for sexual harassment because he disagreed with womenThe "free market" Evangelicals share the same exact basis for both their religious and economic beliefs. It is the Cavinist, pre-destination, just-world fallacy which is used to rationalize the greed, injustice, and corruption that favors their in-group. It's not just a random coincidence. Whatever you said about the article not dealing with anti-capitalists is a strawman. Your objection is to the very observation that feminists and anti-capitalists are linked on an ideological level. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 05:32 PM |
| 3 | Professor says he was investigated for sexual harassment because he disagreed with womenThey both form the basis of delusional populist movements with an extremely similar set of premises and a shit ton of overlap. It's like Christianity and Judaism; might be different on the surface but ideologically and historically you know they're joined at the hip. Now, I'm not talking about the handful of self-styled waffling intellectuals who lack any practical solutions and instead spend their time avoiding any pronouncements that might be empirically testable. I care even less for those so… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 02:06 PM |
| 5 | Confessions of a Failed Female Coder | A reasonable exploration of the Google memo hysteria, by a woman who dropped out of STEMShe did invent the compiler; the whole concept. Hopper went on to champion higher-level programming languages. She went on tours giving demos to executives, often in the face of opposition from existing low-level programmers. She taught Marylin Monroe how to program in Cobol, once, and took her on a promotional tour. But then, the bigger problem became the sheer proliferation of esoteric, shitty languages. Hopper once again took a lead in driving standardization and adoption of a common language… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 12:42 PM |
| 1 | Confessions of a Failed Female Coder | A reasonable exploration of the Google memo hysteria, by a woman who dropped out of STEMJust be mindful that the compiler was invented by a woman who very much predicted what programming would become in the future. It's not that easy to reduce 20th century programming to just a few generalities. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 06:07 AM |
| 8 | Professor says he was investigated for sexual harassment because he disagreed with womenYes they do. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 12:46 AM |
| 2 | Anthony Weiner gets 21 months in Jail for sexting.It's called cognitive dissonance. I hope you're enjoying it as you piss on the 14th Amendment. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 12:44 AM |
| 7 | Women Can Be 'Intimate Terrorists' As Study Reveals They Can Be More Controlling And AggressiveWomen only make up 20% of murders; in general you are dealing with low rates such as 0.5 per 100,000 individuals. Men are far more likely to be murdered for any number of other reasons, with an overall murder rate for men at 4.7 per 100,000. So then, the real question is how do you figure out how many men get killed by their wives? That statistic is a lot harder to come by for a number of reasons. Women benefit from the notorious "battered woman defense" and literally get away with murder; they … | /r/MensRights | 25/09/17 12:00 PM |
| 4 | Bride who took stag funds 'now homeless' after family disowns her: Why won't the police provide her a bed in jail? Oh that's right, special treatment for women criminals in the UK.Sounds to me like this all started when someone made the mistake of thinking that a marriage to that beastly looking woman was cause for a celebration. This guy's friends really don't care about him at all. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/17 04:21 PM |
| 1 | Obama-era school sexual assault policy rescindedThat's not common sense at all. They're getting rid of the kangaroo courts, but they're still not bringing back due process. Common sense would be that the school shouldn't do anything unless a judge issues a restraining order. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 06:57 PM |
| 1 | Obama-era school sexual assault policy rescindedShe wouldn't manage 5 minutes without milk and cookies and pictures of puppies. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 06:51 PM |
| 3 | Feminists Tell Ivanka Trump To 'Suffer' After First Daughter Reveals Struggle With DepressionIf by "the men's movement" you mean the age-old and completely fraudulent attempts by women's group to dictate what men can and can't do, then rather than feminists "infiltrating" it, I would suggest that it's better described as the occasional man accidentally wandering into a gynocentric trap. But that's not the actual men's movement. No way. That's the reason why the men's movement denounces feminism to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 06:48 PM |
| 2 | Equifax hired a music major as chief security officer and she has just retiredMaybe I should be more pedantic with all the different ways in which you're wrong, then? You're using the tu quoque fallacy to excuse incompetent leadership when it's a totally unqualified gender quota hire by saying that all kinds of other corporate officers are also incompetent. Just because other corporate officers are bad leaders and unqualified for their domains does NOT make it okay to introduce gender quotas for critical positions whose role it is to safeguard sensitive information for hu… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 03:02 PM |
| 3 | Equifax hired a music major as chief security officer and she has just retired“[w]e’re looking for good analysts, whether it’s a data scientist, security analyst, network analyst, IT analyst, or even someone with an auditing degree. ... Security can be learned.” And just in case you don't speak corporate-speak, a "good analyst" is a euphemism for someone whose only real concern is to help the company squeeze more money out of the market. It should ring a bell if you think of the fact that she considers a "security analyst" to be an employee who can learn security at some … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 10:38 AM |
| 3 | Equifax hired a music major as chief security officer and she has just retiredThis is ridiculous. Her major isn't important. C level employees are there for leadership This was a massive failure in leadership. Maybe she was underqualified, but there are tons of idiot C level executives So you're okay with that, and think that the rest of the 140 million of us who lost our sensitive financial data should be okay with that, too? To start a witch hunt based solely off her degree shows people's ignorance Subject-matter experts have been warning the public for years that corpo… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 10:36 AM |
| 2 | Equifax hired a music major as chief security officer and she has just retiredDid you read what she herself said in the linked article? | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 09:20 AM |
| 2 | Woman collapses in court after judge rejects her bid to share ex-boyfriend’s millions: The judge said it was “hard to believe” a deal would not have been put in writing.Such a Patriarchy we have lived in, since the middle ages at least. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 11:08 PM |
| 13 | Equifax hired a music major as chief security officer and she has just retiredSo she was a person with no innate interest in security who felt that hiring people who have demonstrated a keen interest in the subject matter doesn't actually matter. That's not surprising. This is pretty much what the feminist attitude towards male-dominated STEM fields has been all along and what I would expect from an affirmative action hire who wants to justify her own existence. The outcome of this mentality is self-evident. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 11:03 PM |
| 1 | The ugliest symbol of inequality in Finland is the conscription army for men. Now they are forcing the conscripted men to take part in HeForShe related education to "decrease violence against women". I'm angry and can just hope that this will turn even more men against elite's feminist ideology.Because politicians are sociopaths. I guess? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 10:38 PM |
| 2 | The problem with how men perceive rape | Professional victim explains how her saying "yes" to sex and regretting it later is all men's fault because she has no agency and can't make decisions for herself. Thanks feminism.You're losing the argument here. Garbage collectors have one of the most dangerous jobs. Housekeepers and nurses don't even make the list. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 07:56 AM |
| 2 | r/TwoXChromosomes is upset that there is a difference in sentencing of men vs women in Wyoming.You're trying too hard. Now I get what you're thinking, but that person pointed out that there is a lack of equality all around whereas you're engaging in a fallacy of relative privation. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 06:54 AM |
| 3 | r/TwoXChromosomes is upset that there is a difference in sentencing of men vs women in Wyoming.I haven't looked too deeply through the comments, but right off the bat some of them aren't so unreasonable. Like this one, second from the top: It's about time someone pointed out women should qualify for the same state program. That said, there are some really cool vocational programs at the women's prison that aren't in all the other prisons, so... although it's in our namesake, the equality state we definitely are not. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/17 03:11 AM |
| 6 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.Every piece of evidence available to us proves that children have better outcomes with both parents in their lives. Everything that you're saying about stability is actually nothing more than whatever is convenient to selfish mothers. Maybe they shouldn't move so far away from their child's school? The benefits of having a father in their life far outweighs any reason that the mother might have for wanting to live further apart. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/17 09:59 PM |
| 1 | The (very surprising) reasons why women live longer: Men are 20 times more likely to die at work, 25% more likely to pass away in the first year of life... and being widowed is big troubleWhy are male foetuses more likely to be born prematurely https://www.nursingtimes.net/roles/midwives-and-neonatal-nurses/boys-more-likely-to-be-born-early-says-study/5065386.article The rate of premature births varies depending on the country. It's 5% in advanced European countries and it's 12% in the US. And it seems to be affected by the mother's age, blood pressure levels, etc. Looking into why some countries do better than others would be a good place to start. Maybe we should be encouraging… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/17 03:49 PM |
| 1 | The (very surprising) reasons why women live longer: Men are 20 times more likely to die at work, 25% more likely to pass away in the first year of life... and being widowed is big troubleThe monk vs nun studies claim to show that once you account for lifestyle, women's life expectancy is less than a year longer than men's. So you've got that part wrong; they haven't shown that it comes down to biology. But these monk vs nun comparisons really aren't all that good. Besides living similar lifestyles, monks and nuns also receive similar healthcare, at least where female-centric medical research hasn't given the nuns an edge. That's not true about the rest of society. And the nuns h… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/17 12:46 PM |
| 1 | When Men Are Less Moral Than Women, if your SINs scale conflates tough tactics with unethical behavior, and ignores some crimes like embezzlementhttps://i.redd.it/ros2mt6hrbay.jpg | /r/MensRights | 10/09/17 11:39 PM |
| 2 | When Men Are Less Moral Than Women, if your SINs scale conflates tough tactics with unethical behavior, and ignores some crimes like embezzlementDon't do that Trump thing, it makes you sound like a nut. You're totally right, though. It is unfortunate that the mass media is dominated by biased journalists who hate men even when it comes to science reporting. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/17 07:58 PM |
| 38 | I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrongYes. It already has both a gendered root and a negative connotation about the male gender. And yes, I'm assuming you're male, so by definition anything you say is evil at it's root. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/17 08:43 PM |
| – | I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrongThere's no justification for "mansplaining" to have ever been coined except as a sexist slur for feminists to insult men with. There is already a word for this; it's called patronizing. The word literally means for someone to be condescending in a very male (fatherly) way. Whereas the word "matronizing" means to fulfill the role of a matron. No negative connotation, just a neutral word referring to being a mother-figure. Meanwhile, the word patronage means giving someone money. So I guess the fe… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/17 06:14 PM |
| 1 | Tinder Experiments - and we are told there is no such thing as Female Privilege?You're being very charitable. This whole thing got pulled put out of someone's ass. It is one guy's opinion about which of 27 women he messaged were "hot" after he set up what was in his opinion a "hot" Tinder profile and asked them if they believe that the men they are attracted to are attractive. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/17 01:28 PM |
| 1 | How much of MRA is a Guise for Economic Discrimination?You have provided no evidence. It seems to me that you are confused between what actual evidence looks like versus a handful of anecdotes about a cousin of yours who hobnobbed it with the Trump family. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 10:00 PM |
| 1 | How much of MRA is a Guise for Economic Discrimination?So, you haven't seen anything to make you reconsider a conclusion that you came to based on no evidence whatsoever. You don't see anything wrong with that approach? I think you owe it to yourself to look into these issues some more. Do some light reading on some general, population-level statistics about our society. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 09:46 PM |
| 2 | How much of MRA is a Guise for Economic Discrimination?So you actually do believe that female criminals are simply richer than male criminals. Got it. I mean, I try to avoid personal attacks but this is just a simple fact: you put forth an inchoate, incoherent brain fart of an idea. There are so many problems with it that a reasonable person would have to conclude that you are simply ignorant of the subject matter. Which would be okay if it's just your first attempt at understanding the issues, but it's not okay when you show an abject disregard for… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 05:05 PM |
| 2 | How much of MRA is a Guise for Economic Discrimination?You are arguing that females have better representation because they have more money to pay for better representation. You said it yourself - this was your very own example of how discrimination against men is actually nothing more than economic discrimination against the poor. Are you reconsidering your theory yet? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 04:50 PM |
| 1 | Who Benefits from Artificial Wombs? Artificial wombs are a lot closer to becoming a reality. But who will benefit from this groundbreaking technology?Testing is a temporary problem. There will be lots of reasons to test and develop both in and outside of the US, for humans as well as for livestock. We'll probably perfect it for numerous other species first, while applying it to human babies on a case by case basis (premature, chemo, etc). After a while, it will become less of a mystery and more of a predictable process. Testing on humans will not be any more of an ethical issue than with any other medical research that's ever been done on wom… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 08:48 AM |
| 4 | How much of MRA is a Guise for Economic Discrimination?So you're suggesting that women on average receive shorter jail sentences than men because female criminals are richer than male criminals? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 07:23 AM |
| 3 | Trickle-Down Equality and Framing Men’s Issues as Really Being About WomenI am genuinely not really seeing the problem in framing the issue this way. The issue isn't really about how the issue gets framed, but why it gets framed this way. The reason is because feminists actively work against equality for men. Not just by solely focusing on women's issues, but by actively opposing anything that would be of benefit to men. Sometimes, they actively try to harm men. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 06:30 AM |
| 2 | Who Benefits from Artificial Wombs? Artificial wombs are a lot closer to becoming a reality. But who will benefit from this groundbreaking technology?The only possible ethical issues surrounding this kind of technology has to do with it not being as healthy for babies as natural gestation. The only uphill battle will be to make it as good or even better. Once that milestone is reached, whenever that happens, then all the ethical issues will run in the other direction. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/17 05:14 AM |
| 2 | The horror of Baby PPlease refer to my previous refutations. You haven't refuted anything, let alone acknowledged your errors. So, I conclude that you want everyone to forget about what actually happened and start entertaining hypothetical scenarios, without a shred of evidence, of how horrible the father might have been, in order to rationalize this horrific failure of feminism and the family court system. Based on the fact that you think constitutional protections apply in England, I don't care, nor do I even und… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/17 04:23 AM |
| 2 | The horror of Baby PNice try. But you're making a positive claim, that the father was an unfit parent, without providing a shred of proof. How do you think this actually works? That the presumption of innocence goes to the family law courtroom that handed custody over to the mother? That the father was an unfit parent until proven otherwise? Am I using feminist "rape culture" arguments when I say you have bo reason to assume that the father was a deadbeat and every reason to assume that the child would still be alo… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 11:41 PM |
| 1 | The horror of Baby PThat's not even close to what I said. Yes, it is. You jumped right into slandering the dad and saying he must have really been a piece of shit if he didn't get shared custody. A completely unwarranted and mean-spirited assumption given the state of family law courts. There is no reason to shift the burden of proof onto the father; we know that everything else being equal, a perfectly fit father would have had a hard time getting equal custody from a mother, regardless of whether she was deemed t… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 06:47 PM |
| 10 | Call to rename Father’s Day "Special Person’s Day"I'm torn between riding hoods and cranberry farming. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 01:10 PM |
| 4 | The horror of Baby PIf you want to dismantle it then stop indulging in it. But it's like you can't even help yourself. So, you're still glued to this idea that the court had no other choice than to give the mother custody if it wasn't proven that she was an unfit mother. And with no shortage of cognitive dissonance, you still view this status quo of the family court system as the equivalent of saying that the father who was denied custody must have been a deadbeat. So that's your entire argument: that we shouldn't … | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 01:04 PM |
| 5 | The horror of Baby PYou're not doing much to move away from the narrative that we should assume that all women are naturally good mothers without requiring any proof, but that all fathers are deadbeats until proven otherwise. I don't know you from jack shit, but that's why I don't have a single reason to presume that you're incapable of raising your own kid. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 08:18 AM |
| 4 | The horror of Baby PHave I misunderstood? Let's examine carefully. You've made your own set of assumptions. A man's son was murdered by an unfit mother and her Nazi boyfriend, and you are using this horrible outcome as an opportunity to slander the biological father: You're assuming he would have been a good father The burden of proof would be on you - or rather, let's say the BBC - to provide us with a shred of evidence to suggest otherwise. Don't even say it unless you can back it up. Your reasoning is really sne… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 07:53 AM |
| 3 | The horror of Baby PYou are presuming that if the father got custody, it would turn out worse than handing the child over to a Nazi who pulled out its' fingernails and killed it. What do you think the actual odds of that really are? | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 02:44 AM |
| 7 | Where have all the good women gone? Men fight back with a vengeance against the women who SLAMMED chaps today as boring, grumpy slobsIt's actually rather galling While women — now so independent in outlook and behaviour How can the author write this just a few sentences after describing women who a) demand that men pay for everything, b) barge in and size up someone's home on a first date and then ask, "so where are we now?", and c) get jealous at a man keeping a photo of his late wife in his home. Desperate, yes. Entitled, yes. Bitter? Absolutely. But an independent outlook and behavior? Seriously? Where? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/17 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Girls Who Code Founder Reshma Saujani, a Misandrist Who Believes Men Lack Empathy and Build Technology to Replace Their Mothers, Featured on CNNYes, women tend to be more empathetic on average. But nothing in evolutionary psychology shows that empathy makes anyone a better problem solver, whether for themselves or for anyone else's problems. That would require a huge leap of logic. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 11:13 PM |
| 1 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellYeah, I replied and said they're wrong for calling it an earnings gap. Which part did you fail to understand? | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 07:55 PM |
| 1 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellWhy would I care? I'm not the one calling it an earnings gap. Ask the people who want to call it an earnings gap. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 07:42 PM |
| 1 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellBefore you wrote any of that, did you think about what your point was? Because I'm trying really hard to figure that out what it is that you think you're telling me that I don't already know. Were you trying to respond to some other comment? Salaries and wages are comparable. That's literally what I said. You just divide a salary by hours worked and you get the equivalent hourly earnings. One's salary tends to take into account the number of hours worked, everything else being equal. Literally w… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 07:41 PM |
| 1 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellSalaries are set by taking into account the number of hours a person works. That's why a male engineer working 60 hours per week will get a higher salary than a female engineer working 40 hours per week. This seems to be going way over your head. It's one of the very things that feminists consistently get wrong... and you're getting it wrong too. You're simply wrong and I have absolutely no clue where you came up with the completely wrong idea that the feminist wage gap statistics don't include … | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 07:07 PM |
| 0 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellAnd anyone that does get a salary is not included in "wage gap" calculations Yes they are. The "78 cent on a dollar" wage gap calculations includes all full time positions whether they are salaried or not, and regardless of the hours worked. 2 people who are getting the same salary, make the same money... And 2 people who are getting the same wage, make the same money. You're not blowing my mind here with your logic. Here's the reality: men earn higher incomes than women in higher paying salarie… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 04:37 PM |
| 0 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellWhile you are correct in the earnings being all your income Yes, I am. That's why I'm saying that calling it an "earnings gap" is no better than calling it a "wage gape". salary is a different term Salary is income. If you therefore want to call their statistic a "wage and salary gap" that's fine by me, but you're calling it an "earnings gap", which is your mistake. Of course, then again, the "wage gap" would actually be the most correct term to use if you simply adjusted for hours worked, like … | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 01:43 PM |
| 0 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellA wage or a salary, please pick. Earnings include BOTH. And income from investments and rental properties applies to what percentage of women, when referencing all here? Earnings include all forms of income. I am not the one calling it an earnings gap; that would be you. So why don't you figure out what you'd actually like to be comparing yourself? | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 01:28 PM |
| -6 | AMA on the "Wage Gap" doesn't go too wellHe's wrong. But whatever. A wage (as opposed to a salary) is your hourly income from an employer. Earnings is every kind of income, including wages, salaries, investments that you've made, rental income on a property you own, etc. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/17 12:07 AM |
| 4 | 'If you were a man, you'd be going to jail,' judge tells woman burglarWhat the other guy was saying is that under UK law it's perfectly okay to hand out cruel and unusual punishment for the same exact crime. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/17 09:17 PM |
| 34 | 'If you were a man, you'd be going to jail,' judge tells woman burglarYeah, the UK is really screwed up. So is the US but at least the constitution supports individual rights in a way that makes sense. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/17 08:19 PM |
| 1 | 'If you were a man, you'd be going to jail,' judge tells woman burglarThat's the idea. That's what would happen the next time this same judge tries to send a male burglar to jail. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/17 06:35 PM |
| 3 | [Everyday Misandry] "Ten dating mistakes that men always make" - and why men are always at fault for a feminist's presumptions.That one goes even further than that. This girl went out on serial dates with 60 different men and expected each one of them to be into her. I guess she feels entitled to be disinterested in 60 different men, but none of those men are entitled to be disinterested in her? | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 06:13 PM |
| 6 | [Everyday Misandry] "Ten dating mistakes that men always make" - and why men are always at fault for a feminist's presumptions.This list is dumb, but it's not as horrible as I thought. My biggest issue is that most of these points should apply to both genders, if not especially so to women. The author is just projecting. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 02:55 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!Don't look at me, I didn't turn the UK courts into a dysfunctional mess. But don't sit there and pretend to tell me that a doctor has the legal authority of a court of law. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 05:26 AM |
| 8 | Dear America, Your Love Of Circumcision Is WEIRD!I see, it's because male babies are not really male. And even though it is illegal to mutilate female genitals even for consenting adult women, we have to pretend that this isn't a gendered issue affecting men. Because reasons. What those reasons are, I'll never know. I guess you just don't like it that men face actual, real issues because of their sex, from the day they are born? Better just pretend this isn't a men's right issue, then! | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 03:43 AM |
| 10 | Dear America, Your Love Of Circumcision Is WEIRD!but if both parents have equal say in whether or not the kid gets clipped "Men's rights" is about men's rights; it's not limited to bad things that women (and only women) do to men. You know which babies routinely get clipped without their consent? Male babies. Therefore men's rights. It's one of the key issues for men's rights in the United States. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 02:03 AM |
| 2 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!So I guess what you're saying is that in real life, after the Nazi consented to drinking from the wrong cup, he would have regretted it and filed a Title IX lawsuit against Professor Jones? /s (pretty funny analogy). | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 01:53 AM |
| 2 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!So they are mentally unfit to make their own medical decisions, but they can consent to marrying someone who can make those decisions on their behalf? Just not allowed to have sex with that same person. Yes, I would say that is pretty insane. We're talking about giving them the legal right to make the decision about pulling the plug should you find yourself on life support. Allowed to give them that right, but not allowed to let them have sex with you. When you agree to marriage, you are agreein… | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 01:02 AM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!No they wouldn't. A doctor would tell the court about the medical condition of the patient and nothing more. The court would take the medical facts into consideration when making the legal decision about the ability to consent. The distinction may be lost on you but it's not something you can short-circuit. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/17 12:05 AM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!Even in an actual court, the court will bring in doctors to make that decision. That's not how anything works. Courts bring in witnesses to give testimony and provide evidence. Judges make the legal decision. Doctors provide their medical advice. How do you think this really works? Does the judge also let the doctor put on his wig and bang on the gavel a bit while the doctor determines the legality of someone being allowed to have sex with his wife? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 11:26 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!Any such law that applies to legally married couples is insane. And even if you're going to make that kind of determination, the decision should be made by a judge with a court order, not by a social worker. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 11:23 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!The doctor made the determination that the man didn't have the capacity to consent. Yes, that's the point. He's a doctor, not a judge. Doctors give advice and prescribe treatment plans. Nobody has to consent to what their doctor tells them that they should do. Doctors don't tell their patients to move out of their spouse's bedroom and stop showing them any affection, emotional or otherwise, lest they be jailed, because that's legal advice, not medical advice. Do you really not understand this? I… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 11:19 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!You obviously do need to inject some qualified legal advice into this sort of extra-judicial process. That's just obvious given how this turned out - they literally got a lawyer to finally represent their own interests and that's how an actual judge finally got involved in resolving the situation. How can you say that this situation didn't warrant competent legal representation? The shrink did not make the determination that the man needed to take a class. That's fine and dandy. That's not the p… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 08:44 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!The social workers were not qualified to hand out legal advice or threaten their own patients and their families with criminal prosecution. The fact that the course wasn't administered for a year is a direct consequence of the social workers being way out of their element. If they thought that this couple shouldn't be allowed to have sex for an entire year, they should have asked a judge to issue that kind of order. That's what is so very fucked up about what these people did. These social worke… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 07:32 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!Yes; telling them that they are not allowed to have sex was illegal and unethical for every moment during which the course itself was not being administered. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 07:20 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!You understand that what these social workers were doing was both illegal and unethical, right? That's why the man was awarded $10k in compensation by a judge. Now, you go find yourself some mentally disabled married ladies and pitch this idea of telling them they can't have sex with their husbands until the women undergo mandatory consent training. See how well that will be received. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 05:39 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!LMAO. Okay, go to a college campus and tell the campus feminists that they are never allowed to have sex again until they take mandatory training to learn about what they are consenting to. I dare you. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 05:18 PM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!So what you're saying is that he had to go through mandatory training to teach him how to not get raped. I can't even count how many levels of stupid this is. Just reverse the genders. Ask yourself how it would go over if feminists got wind of a mentally disabled woman who was forced to undergo sexual consent training to keep her husband from raping her. And how do you "threaten" someone with "legal action" for this? Rape is a criminal matter, not a tort, not something that social workers should… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Our Young Men Are Telling Us They Can't CopeI was reading along and things were going well, then suddenly the whole article went off the rails: We force children to learn math and science, but what about penetrating their own their feelings? How many times during the day do you confront your emotions or use some coping mechanism to resolve conflict? Good grief. So when a mentally ill person complains to a doctor about feelings of anger, the doctor prescribes a medication whose side effects include violent thoughts and rage. And then thing… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 03:45 AM |
| 6 | Another day, another female school teacher "romping" with one of her students.She was charged with statutory rape -- unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, Im said. Alternative headline: strong independent woman commits party foul. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 02:34 AM |
| 1 | A man with Down's Syndrome has been awarded £10,000 compensation after ""Social Workers" banned him from having sex with his wife. "He" Could Consent To Marriage But Not Sex!You mean he had to go through mandatory training to have sex with his own wife because they saw him as being a potential victim? Or because they thought he would rape his wife? | /r/MensRights | 20/08/17 11:03 PM |
| 2 | I'm a woman in computer science. Let me ladysplain the Google memo to you.I lost interest in this after a few paragraphs of logical fallacies. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/17 05:31 AM |
| 3 | The full Google Ideas team, responsible for what is and isn't shown in Google products. A picture speaks a thousand words.They are all wearing temporary guest badges. So no, at least not when this photo was taken. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/17 02:11 AM |
| 4 | I have no idea why this guy would lie about this to make him seem more credible than he really is. But one has to wonder what else is he misrepresenting or stretching to give himself more credibilityIt sucks given the situation he's in, but not everyone's LinkedIn is accurate or up to date. My LinkedIn said that I was still working at Google for about a year after I quit, just because I really don't care about it; I only update it if I'm unhappy about the reams of recruiting emails that I get from it. When recruiters start writing me about stupid stuff and it annoys me sufficiently, that's when I might spend the time to update that profile. Who cares? The guy probably had set it up when he … | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 06:59 PM |
| 5 | Clementine Ford: If it takes a village to raise a child, let it have lots of menWhat do i think of her screed? I think she is working against her own stated goals by being as insulting and condescending as possible. When feminists use the word "mansplaining", we know they're just projecting and articles like this are the proof. It's like she's come to this realization that she's been wrong all this time and that she actually desperately needs the help of men in order to cope with her baby, which she is incapable of doing on her own. But she's twisting it into something wher… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 09:44 AM |
| 10 | "To The People Freaking Out Over Male Circumcision: Get Over It"- Feminist blogger Mary MalcolmThat experiment has already been done before. To this day, feminists can't get over how evil Paul Elam was for proposing Bash a Violent Bitch Month. Feminist have no sense of irony or hypocrisy, so turnabout is generally lost upon them. If it weren't, they probably wouldn't have been feminists to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 06:55 AM |
| 3 | UK: Rape juries to hear more about men's sexual history to increase chance of conviction.Are you sure this is true in the UK and not just in the USA? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 06:42 AM |
| 3 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechThat's how reprisals work. Worker mentions illegal practices and company fires him for making them look bad. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 01:43 AM |
| 24 | Playing Into Every Female Stereotype, Women At Google Stay Home After Memo For Emotional ReasonsThis sort of behavior is what men can expect to encounter when discussing gender equality. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 10:56 PM |
| 1 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechWhere did you hear that? Multiple news outlets have said PhD. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 05:36 PM |
| 2 | Child miners aged four living a hell on Earth so YOU can drive an electric car - Daily Mailthe ethical problems stem from common unethical labour practices in Africa Doesn't matter. Industrial-grade diamonds are abundant in nature and can also be produced synthetically. There is so much of the stuff that diamond producers have to hoard it or throw it in the ocean to keep diamond prices up. Nobody would ever need to be exploited if all we needed were industrial diamonds. Why do we buy chocolate? Because women get PMS. You can say that chocolate is big on holidays, but so are roses, gre… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 05:27 PM |
| 2 | Child miners aged four living a hell on Earth so YOU can drive an electric car - Daily MailUnlike diamond jewelry, electronics are a necessity for modern life. If we stopped using electronics, it would lead to large die-offs of humans and severe environmental damage. Just about all science and research would come to a halt. Unlike diamonds, there is a very real benefit to electronics. so should you feel guilty every time you by chocolate? Yes. Bear in mind, we don't buy chocolate due to social pressure. It's not a status symbol. It's not tied in to our culture the same way. jewelery m… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 04:52 PM |
| 3 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechGoogle will last a very long time even under the worst management imaginable. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in Tech:) | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 03:37 PM |
| 2 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechPlease check it yourself first, then. Nobody else had posted the link to the New York Times. This article had the most thorough reporting on this subject when I posted it; it contains information that no other link had. I literally looked at every single post and read each article before I decided to post this one. Great, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 03:32 PM |
| 11 | The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond | Scientists with actual research experience in sex differences agree the memo is scientifically accurate; Feminists & SJWs are wildly wrong, yet againBut yet you are completely deluded. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 02:24 PM |
| 5 | Child miners aged four living a hell on Earth so YOU can drive an electric car - Daily MailAnd consumers have absolutely no way of verifying the claims. No one should be buying diamond jewelry, period. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 02:22 PM |
| 11 | The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond | Scientists with actual research experience in sex differences agree the memo is scientifically accurate; Feminists & SJWs are wildly wrong, yet againYou're really a troll, aren't you? | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 02:18 PM |
| 3 | Alamo Drafthouse Admits Its Women Only Screenings Were Discriminatory."It was a joke you see? That's why we made fun of the people who compmai ed and decided to do the same thing in other cities! Because gender-based doscrimination is so funny to us!" | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 02:15 PM |
| 27 | The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond | Scientists with actual research experience in sex differences agree the memo is scientifically accurate; Feminists & SJWs are wildly wrong, yet againThat's assuming that he won't take a big pay cut by going to a tiny startup. Jobs in tech are normally very easy to find, especially for someone who spent a few years at Google. But in his case, that's been reduced to a small number of firms who are not afraid of taking a stand against PC narratives. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 02:02 PM |
| 5 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechThat entire article is a pretty sick burn. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 12:59 PM |
| 4 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechHe was fired for making a complaint about sexual discrimination and potentially illegal practices. If he gets a really good lawyer, he could do some damage. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 12:44 PM |
| 22 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechThis should not be controversial at all and it's quite depressing that it is. It's not controversial when feminists are talking about women getting into the special forces. But whatever. I hope that the author of the paper won himself an audience with what he did. He has a PhD in biology from Harvard, so we could have been worse-served than having someone like that write this memo. And this is definitely an MRA issue because as he points out, Google has a program, available only to women, to tea… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 05:17 AM |
| 18 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechI think this company might have really screwed itself over. Some of the management emails that were leaked on this website sound like they might turn out to be a lawyer's wet dream: http://voxday.blogspot.nl/2017/08/suppressing-dissent-at-google.html | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 04:40 AM |
| 10 | Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in TechYeah, and I think he knew it too. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/17 04:34 AM |
| 27 | IT hiring manager in r/networking passes over 30 male resumes looking for a female to increate "diversity"What Steve Jobs said about HR is absolutely true. I’ve never met one of you who didn’t suck. I’ve never known an HR person who had anything but a mediocre mentality No one with any amount of ambition joins this field. Listening to them only brings about more mediocrity. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/17 06:31 PM |
| 14 | Why you need to be sceptical of all things SJW. Their logic demands that male rape victims are second class citizens because other men are criminals. DUH!It would be a bunch of feminists telling us that "real" feminists don't behave this way. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/17 06:10 PM |
| 9 | UCLA Shock Study: Women Have Raped 3.6 Million American Men"3.6 million Americans raped; women and children affected most." | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 11:29 PM |
| 1 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"A riot needs to be measured not just by the number of participants but also by how opinionated they were. This one had 100-500 dead, 2000+ injured, hundreds of buildings burnt to the ground, close to $100 million in damage. By comparison, every other riot we've ever had was a peace march filled with indifferent bystanders and spectators. Unlike most other riots, this one actually marked a significant shift in the balance of power in favor of the poor underclass. New York politics have never been… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 11:06 PM |
| 1 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"His actual claim is that there has never been any resistance to the draft until women were threatened with it. Now he's just moving goal posts and trying to split hairs about the significance of the draft riots. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"It's not my opinion dude, read what actual historians say about it. This riot almost managed to overthrow the government. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 03:11 PM |
| 3 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"NYC Draft Riots. The riots remain the largest civil and racial insurrection in American history, aside from the Civil War itself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_draft_riots | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 03:03 PM |
| 9 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"The female draft vs the existence of the draft have notjing to do with each other. Their entire argument is a red herring. And it's their loss. As a veteran, I will never consider women as equals to men until they too are subject to the draft. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 02:20 PM |
| 12 | Women in the draft = the "wrong kind of equality"To be fair the biggest riots in US history were over the draft. What you really mean is there is never this kind of push from feminists until women may be drafted. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 02:07 PM |
| 5 | Reddit founder says "Men are useless" and their baby must be a girl because "only a women could be strong enough" to go through what the baby went throughDenigrating men for havig been cheated on? That's not what this sub is about. I see that you're from TRP. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 01:51 AM |
| 2 | Reddit founder says "Men are useless" and their baby must be a girl because "only a women could be strong enough" to go through what the baby went throughI have famously large turds. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 01:48 AM |
| 2 | Reddit founder says "Men are useless" and their baby must be a girl because "only a women could be strong enough" to go through what the baby went throughHe didn't have to say anything at all. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 01:46 AM |
| 23 | Reddit founder says "Men are useless" and their baby must be a girl because "only a women could be strong enough" to go through what the baby went throughThe one thing feminists and MRA's agree on... feminist men are the absolute biggest douchebags. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/17 01:45 AM |
| 14 | Mother punishes neighbor's son (9 years old) by shaving his head, writing 'pervert' on his forehead. [That's how boys are seen by many women, I suppose, though they don't show it?]Your title sucked | /r/MensRights | 03/08/17 01:51 PM |
| 2 | Female student: USC threatened me because I said my boyfriend didn't beat me upIt's not a misogynist tool. The only real problem with it is that it's an evidence-free tool. If there was hard evidence that this guy was beating her and threatening her then disregarding her testimony would have made sense. You have to realize the situation is the same for false accusers; feminists would be taking the accuser's word for it even if there was evidence to the contrary. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/17 12:29 PM |
| 6 | Female student: USC threatened me because I said my boyfriend didn't beat me upthat's some of the most extreme misogyny I understand the deep irony, but hatred or contempt for women wasn't an actual motivating factor here. What they are worried about is something akin to a confession obtained by means of torture. It may be counter-intuitive, but this is all part of prejudice in favor of women. This same exact attitude is what lets women brutally murder their husbands and get off scot free thanks to the battered woman defense. And let's not pretend that this woman was their… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/17 03:44 AM |
| 1 | Women as wartime rapists: a new book explores 'the impossible': "Academic Laura Sjoberg argues that our gendered assumptions about sexual violence in conflict limit our understanding of these crimes."Let me guess, there will be a call to provide special conseling and support networks for female war criminals. That's what happened when feminists realized that female civilians could be rapists. England was court-martialled and jailed in 2005 for her role in sexually abusing the prisoners. Sjoberg said she “was on the front page of the Los Angeles Times in 2003 and I sat staring at the page for 20 minutes, because it didn’t make sense to me. And then I stared at it for another three hours becau… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/17 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Women as wartime rapists: a new book explores 'the impossible': "Academic Laura Sjoberg argues that our gendered assumptions about sexual violence in conflict limit our understanding of these crimes."It was never debunked as a myth or propaganda. It was a real woman who went on trial for it but there was insufficient evidence to convict her for these accusations. They never found the lampshades, but there were many accounts of them being there. She was still a horrific war criminal. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/17 12:40 AM |
| 2 | Found this on a pole in my university. Seriously?Because when you're purporting to participate in a discussion in good faith, you don't troll some comments for links to evidence while ignoring other comments which actually provide links to evidence. That's just not going to get people to take you seriously. And also, because ignorance is not an argument. You may find the claim offensive or controversial, but it doesn't mean that it's false just because you've never heard of it before. So maybe you should actually pull your head out of your own… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/17 09:48 PM |
| 6 | Found this on a pole in my university. Seriously?Yeah I can see how you could interpret the comment that way, but the first thing that came to my mind is the moral panic that's been permeating through the feminist-sphere about how sex dolls for men objectify women and condition men to become rapists. So like you say, there is a real difference between a fantasy and the real thing. But not when it comes to men, according to feminists. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/17 09:31 PM |
| 3 | Found this on a pole in my university. Seriously?Why not look briefly at other comments which provide this "any" that you are seeking? | /r/MensRights | 02/08/17 09:08 PM |
| 5 | Artificial Wombs Reveal an Ugly Truth about the Abortion-Rights Movement... "giving her back control of her own body but still forcing her into parenthood."Yeah, the irony of it really escapes them. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/17 01:00 AM |
| 6 | Why is it hateful to teach men not to rape?Yep I had that backwards. I was looking for rates per 100k for both but the wrong chart came up. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/17 08:42 AM |
| 1 | “Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” | An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminismHe's not saying it's illegal to have shared custody, he's just being a male feminist. Remember, feminists promulgate the idea that women are more deserving of child custody and that kids are better off with their mothers. This guy just wants to be a martyr for the cult. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/17 01:37 AM |
| 13 | Why is it hateful to teach men not to rape?I'm not surprised that your name-calling has little to back it up with. Here are actual rape statistics, which have been dropping to extremely low levels; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#/media/File:Rapes_per_1000_people_1973-2003.jpg By comparison, you are at least 10 times as likely less likely to be murdered: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/images/murderrate.png (okay that was a bad comparison, but the reality is nowhere near the 1 in 5 figure that feminists like to put forth) | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 09:53 PM |
| 6 | The Growing Movement of "Women Against Feminism"!Why should they have to do anything? Are you the arbiter of their freedom of speech? I for one think they've done a great service already. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 09:19 PM |
| 6 | It's Feminist Meme Recalibration Season, Because Not All Women Agree With Demonising All Men.So she's walking back just enough to still be completely wrong and an anti-intellectual coward at the same time? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 09:14 PM |
| 15 | “Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” | An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminismIt probably requires significant psychological expertise It would require hard evidence. Beyond that, your guess is as good as mine. It follows the classical order of a marketing piece But do you think it's compelling, as such? It's cringe-worthy. How many men is he going to sway with his psychosis? Who the flying f falls into depression, recovers in 3 years, acquires and loses 3 jobs in that time, is missing his daughter and wife and then blames the patriarchy that he has no power and no contro… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 05:28 PM |
| 33 | Why is it hateful to teach men not to rape?Rape pretty much has gone away entirely. Actual rape of women by men is very rare in our society, especially in the rich white parts of society that feminists live in. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 03:26 PM |
| 9 | “Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” | An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminismThis guy sounds like he is dangerously mentally ill and his feminist beliefs are clearly making it worse on him. I hope he doesn't end up killing himself or, like he hinted at, resorting to violence againsf his ex wife. He says it's not feminists' fault but let's be honest, this dude is projecting. I was just arguing about family law with a similarly minded male feminist. The dude kept insinuating over and over again that this kind of outcome doesn't happen to "good" men. You never know who the … | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 03:19 PM |
| 1 | “Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” | An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminismI'm pretty sure it's real. It's written in the style of a male feminist who thinks that he has to throw all other men under the bus in order to gain sympathy for himself. This isn't uncommon for male feminists, at all. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/17 02:52 PM |
| 0 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testDude, 5 seconds on Google: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/About%20Us/Directorates%20and%20Program%20Offices/RAIO/nexus-protected-grounds.pdf Point in fact, this comes from an international law which defines what a refugee is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_Relating_to_the_Status_of_Refugees This is literally the text from the law: A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 09:27 PM |
| 0 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testI already did. You must have skipped the part where I told you about the grounds of persecution that are considered applicable for asylum. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 09:06 PM |
| 2 | Women DON'T struggle more than men to juggle work and family life, study findsThis study says that men and women complain the same amount. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testYou're not getting it. You're not getting it. It isn't child support, because the child was never his. So he went to court for a parking ticket? Please don't insult our intelligence. This is straight-up extortion It doesn't matter. Extortion is not grounds for political asylum. If he doesn't pay he will be jailed Doesn't matter, it's not persecution along protected grounds. He's going to go to jail for failing to pay court-mandated child support. He's not going to jail because of his race, polit… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 07:10 PM |
| 3 | One Airline's Harassment Fix: No Middle Seats for WomenThe article says it's because women don't like middle seats. Nobody likes middle seats. I still don't understand how any of these things have anything to do with harassment. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testInternational law only grants asylum for persecution along protected grounds. It's not as if this criteria is undefined by the law, even if the quote you provided glosses over that part. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 06:50 PM |
| -1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testThat doesn't make it something other than losing a child support case. And you won't get asylum just because you lost a child support case, even if it's unfair. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 06:35 PM |
| -2 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testIt counts as persecution for losing a court case. It doesn't count as persecution for any of the aforementioned reasons why asylum is granted. You might as well file for asylum over a parking ticket dispute, you will have just as good of a chance at getting it. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 02:48 PM |
| 1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testHeh, yes I am aware that it has never happened. This is not an issue of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. You will never get political asylum for it. You can get as many lawyers as you want but you will never convincs a judge to change the lw as itnis written. They don't hand out asylum for issues like this. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 02:42 PM |
| -14 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testYou didn't have an argument, just an unsubstantiated claim. It's pretty clear to me that you're engaging in wishful thinking. You didn't answer my question, anyway. Can you name one country that would do this for you or a time when it ever happened before? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 02:08 PM |
| -25 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testGood luck with that. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 01:09 PM |
| 1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testThat's pretty much how child support has always worked. The question still remains - name one country that would let you in over this. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 12:57 PM |
| 3 | One Airline's Harassment Fix: No Middle Seats for WomenWhat do middle sears and luggage have to do with harrasment? Am I just missing something in the logic for this? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 11:53 AM |
| 21 | Women DON'T struggle more than men to juggle work and family life, study findsThe feminist claims that unlike men, women work a "double shift" were always suspect. All the time-use data has always contradicted them, too. This is pretty important for the wage gap debate, where feminists have shifted away from the mantra of equal pay for equal work to claiming that, among ofher things, different work pressures on mothers is how they are discriminated against. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 11:30 AM |
| 1 | Texas man ordered to pay more than $67K in child support for girl who isn't his daughter: The Texas Family Code states that a negative paternity test only ends future child support obligations; it doesn't absolve the man of payments accrued before the testYou wouldn't get it for this. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 11:09 AM |
| 3 | Unequal Gender Ratios at Colleges Are Driving Hookup CultureI thought relationships were oppressive towards women /s. So when men have to compete, it leads to courtship, marriage, children, housewivery, pay gap, Patriarchy, oppression, etc. Lo-and-behold, all of that is actually what happens when women have more control over mating opportunities. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 05:31 AM |
| 2 | This guy says it perfectlyLook up Mary P Koss. She's far from the only feminist who cooks statistics, but she was the leading pioneer of rape surveys that don't ask women if they had actually been raped; instead they ask if they had sex after a guy gave them a drink, which is then interpreted as rape by the reseaechers. That is part of how the "1 in 5" rape statistics got started. This has been a mainstay of feminist-driven rape studies ever since. I see that you have been making rounds on this sub asking people for link… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/17 01:46 PM |
| 1 | This guy says it perfectlySo you like to take advantage of your wife when she's drunk? Or is it only taking advantage when other people do it? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/17 12:40 AM |
| 2 | This guy says it perfectlySo you never heard of every feminist "1 in 5/4/3/2" rape studies that all count drunk sex as rape? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/17 12:31 AM |
| 5 | He graded/corrected his ex-girlfriend’s apology letter & tweeted it out. Florida college then suspended him for it.So his ex is a stalker and he got punished for it. Great job, UCF. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/17 12:53 PM |
| 1 | Man who was abused as a child is having half of his compensation payout taken from him and given to his ex-wifeSo what? He got raped before he met her. Just pretend like he put it into a trust then. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 10:00 AM |
| 1 | Man who was abused as a child is having half of his compensation payout taken from him and given to his ex-wifeBy doing what, exactly? Getting raped as a kid? | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 07:53 AM |
| 7 | Cassie Jaye on Laci Green; Media Backlash | HoneyBadgerRadioFeminists really don't understand just how awful other feminists are. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 04:59 AM |
| 3 | Young American Men Are Choosing Video Games Over Work in Staggering NumbersI'm pretty sure the average housewife watches way more TV than that. Pretty sure they're even watching TV while their young kids spend their time playing video games. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 03:38 AM |
| 19 | My ex-wife makes twice my income. I owe her alimony. I found this subreddit.Yeah, don't get me wrong, alimony is bogus. But your story is basically that you have to pay alimony because the court has yet to see any evidence that your ex makes more than you. Doesn't seem like the end of the world? Once the court sees her old tax returns, make sure you ask for alimony from her. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 03:31 AM |
| 6 | Top Civil-Rights Official Says 90% of Campus Rape Cases Stem From RegretYou're partly right, but not really. In this case, it would be like holding a landlord accountable for a crime committed by a tenant even though the tenant was never charged or convicted with any crime. And instead of the municipality providing a well-regulated legal process for eviction, the law demanded that every landlord instituted their own process that heavily discriminated against a particular race or gender and then letting all of the neighbors sue the landlord for failing to evict someo… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 02:33 PM |
| 5 | Top Civil-Rights Official Says 90% of Campus Rape Cases Stem From RegretSorry but no, this was happening long before that. The Obama administration only required lowering the standard of proof used to expel men. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 02:22 PM |
| 2 | "Andy Murray corrects journalist's 'casual sexism' - BBC News" - When talking about to a Men's Tennis player about Men's Tennis, you are sexist if you don't include Women's Tennis.Oh come on, that just sounds like something that any self-respecting passive-aggressive British tennis player would say in order to downplay his opponent's win. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 05:49 AM |
| 1 | If You Say SoNo offense, but that doesn't sound like a whole lot of power. I mean, what they did was ridiculously stupid, but you're not going to convince anyone that they're a powerful political party by referencing that. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/17 05:04 PM |
| 1 | If You Say SoDo you just consider it harmless when politicians in your country say these kind of things? Assuming they do say it, wouldn't you want to hear about it on the news so that you can vote for somebody else next time? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/17 04:02 PM |
| 2 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childNice attempt to use shame as an argument. Unfortunately it makes zero sense. Extending the active lives of men means spending more money on men's healthcare. Creating a bigger pool of young people means spending less money on women's reproductive options. Wouldn't it be ironic if that's how it worked out? You wouldn't be able to get an abortion so that I could live longer and your kid could wipe my ass in my old age? I would seriously laugh. Your real problem here is that I will be dying alone, … | /r/MensRights | 09/07/17 03:40 PM |
| 0 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childOr we could use statistics in a way that actually makes sense when talking about discrimination. Your opinion on the free market is completely besides the point. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/17 03:29 PM |
| 0 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childThe point is that statistics show that white-collar crime by white people is actually the worst of all. It's like using statistics to say that, whelp, men live the shortest lives so let's give them the least amount of healthcare funding. Actually looking at statistics would reduce discrimination in both cases, you see? Here is the real problem. Men pay more for healthcare than women do. This is a no-brainer, because men pay for women's health care in addition to their own. If you wanted to give … | /r/MensRights | 09/07/17 03:15 PM |
| 0 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childBlacks are not responsible for a large amount of crime. Most crime is white but blacks do get punished for their share of crimes disproportionately. The most costly and deadliest crimes are white-collar crimes by banksters and CEO's. People get their entire life savings stolen in pump and dump schemes, lose decades of their lives when some factory dumps toxic waste into a river, etc. Perhaps the biggest crime in the past century have been the oil companies lying about global warming while they d… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/17 03:05 PM |
| 1 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childThat's a strawman. Banning reproductice rights is not an MRM position. People constantly point out the hypocrisy of letting women have abortions while not letting men have any reproductive rights. This is, like, the vast majority of how the whole issue gets brought up. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/17 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childBut do you agree with what this woman is saying? She thinks that she is god's gift to mankind and therefore she is entitled to having all men pay for her life on the off-chance that she has sex with one and produces a baby. By this woman's own logic, every man who pays extra for women's health insurance is entitled to have sex and receive babies from her and every other woman. She is basically saying that she is bought and paid for. Personally, I think she is a spoiled brat with a huge sense of … | /r/MensRights | 08/07/17 03:38 PM |
| 2 | Men have to pay for women's insurance but should not have choice about aborting the childI think you missed the point. She feels that men owe her something for having sex with her. The title is about the hypocrisy of what she is saying. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/17 03:17 PM |
| 6 | You were flirting to try and make a sale? That's sexual harassment.Why would you think that would be an unpopular opinion around here? The only problem is why you take soemthing that makes sense in calling for an objective rule of law and conclude that Anarchy is the solution? | /r/MensRights | 08/07/17 01:44 AM |
| 3 | Facebook's Hate Speech Rules Make 'White Men' a Protected GroupNo, you're understanding the policy. And it's not an "algorithm", that's just another part of the smear because it's a tech company. they treat a targeted group as a "protected class" if every attribute used to target them was a protected class. No, this is just used to determine how much evidence you have that the speech is really hate speech or not. If you said that white men need to be spanked, that's probably hate speech. But if you said that black children need to be spanked, then that may … | /r/MensRights | 29/06/17 05:03 PM |
| 42 | Facebook's Hate Speech Rules Make 'White Men' a Protected GroupTL&DR Facebook tried to treat white men as equal human beings and this has predictably created outrage in the mainstream media. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/17 06:13 AM |
| 48 | Seeing women post this constantly on facebook not knowing it was halted because it was causing permanent infertility. Nope men are just babies.https://www.thecut.com/2016/11/the-real-reason-the-male-birth-control-study-was-halted.html Turns out women dropping out of these kind of studies is routine. Just remember, these SJWs are going to be first in line to hysterically whine and sneer about toxic masculinity if a man actually does suck it up quietly and suffers the consequences. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/17 01:48 PM |
| 1 | Feminists/SJWs whine about "lack of diversity" in Dunkirk. *FACEPALM!*A lot of them actually think it is the most romantic story ever. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/17 01:30 PM |
| 3 | Feminists/SJWs whine about "lack of diversity" in Dunkirk. *FACEPALM!*Well, moral panics are their specialty after all. They won't want to be remembered for this one, either. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/17 01:27 PM |
| 1 | Imagine if they reversed the genders X/post r/crappydesignShe was making stuff up and then gloated about it. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/17 07:55 AM |
| 22 | "Unemployed men: how female partners suffer"Some women would alter their default style to avoid insulting their partner. Oh those poor dears! It must really be terrible not to be an insufferable bitch for a while. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/17 04:22 PM |
| 10 | Survey: Many Women Refuse to Date Men Who Earn Less Than They Do | The only thing that surprises me is that the numbers aren't much biggerFeminists wouldn't have narrative if it wasn't for projection. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/17 03:01 PM |
| 23 | Survey: Many Women Refuse to Date Men Who Earn Less Than They Do | The only thing that surprises me is that the numbers aren't much biggerSo much for men being "threatened" by a strong independent womyn. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/17 07:33 AM |
| 8 | Proof that people will only care about the suicide epidemic once it starts to affect girlsthere is no hard data indicating that the 17 suicides were mostly male Literally, what? Just because a biased article doesn't give you the facts doesn't mean that there is "no hard data". Ever heard of a coroner? Look at the way this article is constructed. Actual instances of female suicides are called out, one by one, whereas not a single instance of a male suicide is mentioned. Whenever the tally includes men or even solely men, the article says "people", instead. It is purposefully designed … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/17 07:10 PM |
| 3 | Old but goldBut they're other employees, right? So I'm a software engineer. If I couldn't do my job, I"d get fired. So why does someone whose day to day work require them to use a computer get to keep their job if they don't know how to use a computer and refuse to learn? If you buy into the Anderson Horowitz idea that "software is eating the world", then unproductive people who are a drain on the company's IT resources should be fired. Besides, it's literally creating a hostile work environment for everyon… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 01:56 AM |
| 6 | Old but goldYou should have the right to fire someone like that on the spot for lying about their qualifications. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 12:21 AM |
| 1 | Google forgets to make Father's Day about womenBut what does you being gay have to do with anything? Poe's law does not allow for any exceptions. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 12:06 AM |
| 1 | Google forgets to make Father's Day about womenI don't think so. It's just a cute drawing and it shows that they made a good-faith attempt to not pigeonhole anyone and treat mothers and fathers equally. There's no need to save face here, it's okay if you admit you jumped to conclusions the first time around. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 10:32 PM |
| 2 | Why Marriage is Too Risky for Men | Karen Straughan's speech to the Sydney InstituteLook, come back and talk to me after you've actually had a few relationships. This sappy nonsense about finding "your one true love" to be quite boring. No one owes you a relationship just because you're a woman, ok? It doesn't matter how "nice" you believe some women are. Realistically, some demographics are totally fucked when it comes to relationship. For example, black men, as a group, are fucked. Poor men are fucked. Disabled men are fucked. And in general, at least half of all marriages en… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 12:30 AM |
| 8 | Google forgets to make Father's Day about womenhttps://www.google.com/doodles/mothers-day-2017 Same exact thing they did for mother's day. Nothing to get worked up about. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 11:45 PM |
| 2 | Bill Cosby still innocent until proven guilty despite public opinion and media biasSo you got nothing, do you? Nothing to back up a single one of your extraordinary claims. I guess you're one of those types who like to hang black men from trees on the mere accusation of rape. No proof necessary, just say you've got the proof. Right? | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 11:13 PM |
| 3 | Bill Cosby still innocent until proven guilty despite public opinion and media biasFirst of all, you're a fucking idiot and you're pulling shit out of your ass. Quaaludes were the "party drug of the 1970's" and people willingly took them specifically because it would release your sexual inhibitions. http://www.newsweek.com/do-people-still-take-quaaludes-357914 You can flat out lie about how the drug was used all you want, but people weren't willingly taking the drug so they could pass out before sex. The best sex was right after you took them; that was the whole point. You sho… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 10:56 PM |
| 3 | Why Marriage is Too Risky for Men | Karen Straughan's speech to the Sydney InstituteI don't agree with the previous comment, but I also don't agree with yours. I'm sure that there are plenty of "amazing" women if you're rich and handsome and lucky. But there's certainly not enough to go around, and it's next to impossible to actually tell them apart. And from the perspective of many men who are not marrying, there really are none. I don't think it's necessary to say that all women are evil incarnate in order to say that for many men, there just isn't a real choice. And I am per… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 01:46 PM |
| 7 | Bill Cosby still innocent until proven guilty despite public opinion and media biasDid he now? I'm afraid you don't know what you're talking about. Bill Cosby, under oath, admitted to getting party drugs for women who knowingly wanted to take them. He never said that he drugged anyone against their will; that is just innuendo that you are trying to pass off as fact. Isn't it fun to take people at their word when you put the words in their mouth yourself? This kind of "evidence" is indeed laughable. And where do you get this idea that he was on trial for raping 60 women? He was… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 01:02 PM |
| 2 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.I am not surprised at all. This is what happens when schools water down computer science curriculum to the point where they are no longer requiring that students master the fundamental ideas behind finite state machines, boolean algebra, machine architecture, etc. These things used to be the regular curriculum for the "weed out" classes that freshmen had to take but schools really toned them down, at least in large part because women just weren't able to deal with it. No one who mastered the bas… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/17 04:16 AM |
| 11 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.Oh, you're pulling my leg again. Educators love to bandy about attaching "holistic" to everything and associate it with their teaching methodology. In fact, search for the term "holistic engineering" and you'll get back tons of results for "holistic engineering education" and little of anything else! I'm not stupid, you know? Don't play ignorant with me. I'm not calling you out because I'm angry. I'm calling you out because I can't let this sort of agenda-driven sophistry go unchallenged. Let's … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 07:17 PM |
| 14 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.Nothing is watered down, So prove it! Show me an example of a computer science concept that is presented in a "hollistic' way for women that isn't also drastically easier for men. Your bias is showing. Pot calling the kettle black. You wrote that men are better at the "basics" of programming. It's such an extraordinary claim given with absolutely no proof and plenty of evidence to the contrary. I wasn't talking about abstract thought. I was talking about linear vs. non-linear thinking, Abstract … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 06:29 PM |
| 47 | Bill Cosby still innocent until proven guilty despite public opinion and media biasIsn't it amazing how the man can have his life so thoroughly destroyed by the court of public opinion, to the point where it's taboo to even suggest that he might be innocent? But when an actual jury has to listen to the actual facts, they find it far too difficult to come to any sort of consensus? Everyone knew going in that the accusations were way too old for anyone to reasonably be able to defend themselves against, as well as that they lacked any compelling evidence. But that didn't stop us… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 04:44 PM |
| 13 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.Show me an example of computer science curriculum getting watered down for women in a way that doesn't also make it drastically easier for men (but a far lower value to them). holistic in engineering I'm reading your comment and to me it sounds like a bunch of nonsense. And quite frankly it's offensive. Yes, men are generally better at grasping the basics of programming What you actually mean is that men are more capable of abstract thought. Whereas women need to be presented with the solution a… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 04:27 PM |
| 12 | CBC blames "Toxic Masculinity" for quadrupling of male suicide rate.Are we trying to make excuses for them by playing a game of whisper down the lane? Let's read the complete quote. in which we raise boys to deny any human emotion that isn't linked to aggressive power. Just the same old man-hating feminist theories we've all come to expect. This isn't just a "name choice" but an outright refusal to examine the actual leading causes of suicide among men. When one actually looks at those, they are forced to acknowledge that women faced with similar circumstances a… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:50 PM |
| 6 | Mangina Andrew O'Keefe GETS OWNED by Red Pill Movie director Cassie JayeThese clowns are only saying they didn't watch the movie because they couldn't blatantly lie about it if they had. But Cassie exposed them to be a bunch of liars anyway. Not only did they accuse her of not giving them a copy of the full video, which she did, but they claim to have come to their conclusion based on the short clips that they said she did gave them. Ask yourself, why would she or her producers have given them clips that misconstrue nature of her own film? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 02:16 PM |
| 3 | Mangina Andrew O'Keefe GETS OWNED by Red Pill Movie director Cassie JayeIt would not be reasonable. If some book-burners were setting crosses aflame on your front lawn, the issue wouldn't be whether or not they did it because you happen to be prone to rape and horse-thievery. But pricks like these talk show hosts would be saying, "never-mind the burning crosses, let's talk about this mischievous mindset of yours". Do you think it's reasonable to give in to their mindset and help normalize what they're doing to people they disagree with? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 01:59 PM |
| 7 | Mangina Andrew O'Keefe GETS OWNED by Red Pill Movie director Cassie JayeBecause she made a whole movie about that and the problem isn't that Elam is a misogynist, it's that these twats are banning the movie. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 01:00 PM |
| 4 | TIL that if you wear cameo clothing, your anti-feministI support the female draft 100%. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/17 12:45 PM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.That was what you said, earlier code was harder to deal with, therefor it was more suitable. Perhaps you meant something different. Yep, more suitable for high-value work than for low-value work. Like I said, buddy, this comes down to reading comprehension. Macros convert abstract languages to assembly? Nice, so you will show me how a macro converts C or Python into assembly instructions. Again, reading comprehension. I did not say that this is how compilers work. You did. Your one and only repe… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/17 03:21 PM |
| 2 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Marilyn Monroe was 19 years old at the time. She wasn't famous yet. According to Hopper, she chose Monroe because she was "much like other young women who window-shopped during their lunch hours and looked forward to their evening dates and dancing". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY6Hk8_eiKs The part about Monroe is about 39-40 minutes into the video. Hopper was selling the idea of compiled programming languages to businesses by telling them that it would make it easy enough for a high school … | /r/MensRights | 04/06/17 03:19 AM |
| 0 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Earlier code was harder to deal with, so we used it a lot? Makes sense. How can I respond to such a statement? If you had improved reading comprehension then yes, it would make sense. Things were harder so you only spent your time working on very important problems. But on the balance, you spent relatively little effort to accomplish things which were, at the time, far more important than what programmers spend their time on now. Calculating missile trajectories is pretty simple relatively speak… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 11:56 PM |
| 0 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.with higher level problem solving tasks akin to maths were introduced. Except no, you're mistaken. The earlier code was harder to deal with so it was more suitable for high-value, pure mathematics where things like winning a war were at stake. Whether it was generating range tables for artillery or, one of the problems Grace Hopper got, calculating the optimal placement of explosives in a nuclear bomb to set off the nuclear reaction. This wasn't "repetitive" work because it's not like people wer… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 09:43 PM |
| -8 | Kathy Griffin's lawyer accuses Keith Olbermann of mansplainingOpinions are like assholes, everyone's got one. McCain swore up and down that he couldn't possibly vote for Clinton, so your assumption isn't worth shit. Besides, who the fuck cares? This guy votes in the Senate every day along Republican party lines, voting to confirm every foreign agent and traitor that Trump put up for his pro-Russian administration. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 08:09 PM |
| – | Kathy Griffin's lawyer accuses Keith Olbermann of mansplainingAt least he's not 'very disturbed' McCain voting along party lines to prop up a clusterfuck president who will destroy their party all on his own. Olbermann calling these lunatics out is what the behavior of a reasonable person looks like. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:05 PM |
| 6 | Clinton Says Obama Broke Through The Racial Barrier Because He’s An “Attractive, Good-Looking Man”Let the hypocrisy sink in. Clinton, after claiming that she only lost because of misogyny, claims that Obama only won because of his looks. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.whereas women are more likely to enter empathetic fields. Let's stop beating around the bush. Women make their career decisions the same way that wealthy heirs do. They just don't look at income potential and just focus on intellectual curiosity and the personal enjoyment of it all. They're not worried about money because they feel entitled to a husband who takes care of all of the dirty work of actually supporting the family. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 01:46 PM |
| 27 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.I'm pretty sure he misremembered what the actual situation was. Before FORTRAN, programs could only be written by elite wizard-level programmers working in the native machine code unique to a particular computer. FORTRAN promised to make programming accessible to regular scientists and smart people. There was never this situation where programmers were stupid 'helper monkeys'. Speaking of women, the team of people who created FORTRAN included women as well: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/busi… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 01:36 PM |
| 2 | Clinton Says Obama Broke Through The Racial Barrier Because He’s An “Attractive, Good-Looking Man”I don't know about that but that's really not why I posted this link. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 01:10 PM |
| 65 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Where did you read this about FORTRAN and programmers? Here is the very first manual from 1956. https://www.fortran.com/FortranForTheIBM704.pdf Care to point out where any such distinction is made? Notice right on the cover that it's called a Programmer's Reference Manual. Early programmers had serious math and science backgrounds, including the women. The creator of FORTRAN was a mathematician hired by IBM as a programmer. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 05:39 AM |
| 14 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Why? | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:35 AM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Collective bargaining is the only thing that matters. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:26 AM |
| 9 | Boys Welcome? The mayor of Paris has called for a black feminist festival in the city to be banned on the grounds that it excludes white people.Can they at least offer spectator seats and lots of popcorn for men who want to watch SJW's self-destructing? | /r/MensRights | 29/05/17 06:34 PM |
| 18 | Judges Reject Orange County's Claim That Social Workers Didn't Know Lying In Court Was WrongYou mean to tell us due process is consistent with a government official submitting perjured testimony and false evidence? How is that consistent? I mean I hate to get pumped up about this but I'm just staggered by the claim that people in the shoes of your clients wouldn't be on notice that you can't use perjury and false evidence to take away somebody's children. That to me is mind boggling. What's really mind boggling is that they've been doing it to men for the longest time and no one ever s… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/17 04:26 PM |
| 3 | Some Saturday sanityIt's a bit of a stretch to describe these places as Western. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 10:17 PM |
| 2 | 'Feminists hate me as I invalidate what they say'. They do not want equality they want special treatment: A man who realised he liked both genders when he was 19, says that it was only by dating men was he able to see what true equality means in a relationship.I don't get it. This article seems to suggest that male sexuality is lacking until it becomes more like women's and that women have diverse views when they actually just make stuff up. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap is violence against women says Salma Hayek | Feminists never seem to tire of this sort of hysterical stupidityDoes the dumb part turn you on? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 12:31 PM |
| 6 | Women dislike having a female boss in the workplace MORE than men do, study findsThey're not worried about being exposed. They are worried about a queen bee from whom the have no male protection. Female power dynamics are a nasty piece of work. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 11:26 PM |
| 13 | Women dislike having a female boss in the workplace MORE than men do, study findsYes. Because having a boss who has his shit together allows you to have a healthy work/life balance. Women want this even more, so they dislike having an incompetent boss more. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 11:09 PM |
| 1 | Is It A Privilege To Serve In The US?Well the poster is 100% on the money in saying that immigrant men can't become citizens if they don't register. So the only person who is spreading misinformation and half truths is you. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 10:27 PM |
| 3 | Is It A Privilege To Serve In The US?I don't think failure to register for the draft removes your citizenship No, only you ever thought this. Nobody else. Does not change the severity of denying men citizenship. Male immigrants are still men. I know it's really easy to "other" men into some non-person status to dismiss bad things that are done to them, but not in this sub. The irony is that part of the oath of citizenship is "I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America" and women actually say… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 12:22 PM |
| 2 | Is It A Privilege To Serve In The US?Who else would it apply to? Stop pretending like you can't read what the poster actually says. Your schtick looks like you're just trying to tear down strawmen just to make some noise and try to muddle the issue. As if there is any sort of uncertainty about just how discriminatory this is. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 12:02 PM |
| 1 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTzsorFjzLw | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 03:43 AM |
| 1 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.No, you're not good. You're wasting everyone's time with your nonsense. And I'll tell you what. IF you ever find a MRA professor writing crazy nonsense in a major newspaper and feminists are up in arms about it, here's what you should do. Go to all the feminist subs and troll them the way you are trolling us. Tell them they're not allowed to mention anything that makes MRA's look bad as an example of what MRA's do, etc. Basically same shit you're doing here, now. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 03:29 AM |
| 1 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.Feminist or not, you have a misplaced concern. Take your concern to actual feminists. You know, the 'real' ones that 'look like feminists' to you. Don't come here and get bent out of shape when people use articles from major newspapers written by actual feminist professors to discuss what feminism actually does, in fact, look like. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 02:23 AM |
| 2 | Fake paper deliberately composed of gibberish and nonsense is published in feminist journal: “We assumed that if we were merely clear in our moral implications that maleness is intrinsically bad and that the penis is somehow at the root of it, we could get the paper published."NORMA recommended Cogent to them and there is apparently an affiliation between the two. If this was the hoaxers selecting a journal specifically because it was weak, you would have more of a point. And they weren't trying to prove that nobody reads this crap. That is just a strawman. The reviewers did read it and gave them glowing reviews. People do read this crap, and they do publish it. Just a few weeks ago the Huffington Post published a similar hoax. The truth is it is impossoble to tell re… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 01:59 AM |
| 10 | Why is no one studying transfer of wealth from men to women?Yeah that's a self-reported survey. It's a hilariously flawed question to ask. I, too, am extraordinarily humble! I, too, prioritize saving the planet and I completely deserve to be given endless amounts of money to do with as I please! You trust me? If not then you shouldn't trust such a bogus survey. This kind of self-congratulatory nonsense is the reason why we should be studying the transfer of wealth from men to women from a far more skeptical point of view. You have to understand that mark… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 05:25 PM |
| 1 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.There's an easy solution to this. Provide a link to a feminist discussion of this article or any of the hundreds just like it where feminists clearly renounce these gender studies professors as not real feminists. Bonus points if they counter by pointing out the gender sentencing gap and say that women should definitely be getting longer jail sentences. Have you brought any proof with you? If not, then what the hell are you even doinng here? Shouldn't you be on some feminist sub makig sure they … | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 04:11 PM |
| 6 | Why is no one studying transfer of wealth from men to women?probably just because of how families divide their labor: the woman usually does the grocery shopping for the family That can be very misleading. A woman buying overpriced low-quality prepared foods in order to free up her time for some personal hobbies is counted the same way as a woman who buys fresh ingredients and spends the time to cook healthy meals. Women can and do make decisions that prioritize their own needs over that of their families. And even a cursory look at a typical department … | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 02:09 PM |
| 2 | Sandra Harding, feminist "scholar" reviewed by an actual scientist8 is better than 20 in her case. They were all so god damned awful. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/17 11:50 PM |
| 2 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityYes I know, the real feminists disappear into a magical bubble that is immune from criticism whenever someone says anything you don't like to hear about feminism. No one who ever says anything bad could possibly know about the special magic feminism that only a True Feminist Believer has access to, right? It's like a squid leaving an ink excretion to confuse it's enemy as it gets away. Except in the case of feminism, it is Tumblrinas, academics, uneducated activists, or whichever group seems mos… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 12:10 PM |
| 1 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityWow so edgy. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 11:51 AM |
| 4 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityBecause you're cherry-picking the facts to suit your unfalsifiable theory that everything is men's fault. It's like if I used the fact that all humans come out of a vagina and most children are primarily raised by women to say that we live in a Matriarchy. It's incredible nonsense, but 100% just as valid as any theory that feminists ever came up with. Feminists have a flawed and incomplete theory of the way the world works and are making predictions with it that don't actually hold up in the rea… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 05:39 AM |
| 0 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunitySure whatever you say. http://i.imgur.com/NsDpauY.gifv | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 04:40 AM |
| 12 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Communityby real feminists at university No True Scotsman People who are on the ground, activists, actually going to other countries and helping bring equality No True Scotsman. Also, cherry-picking the facts. Also, it's entirely debatable what any of those activists are actually doing. Especially the contributions of feminism itself to their actions. Your argument is basically like saying "Christians who are on the ground, not committing murder, actually helping their neighbors..." Yeah, that's a shit a… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 04:33 AM |
| 3 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityFirst of all, that was an analogy. Second of all, nothing about the fallacy of division says that no member of a group can ever exhibit the qualities of the group. That would be ridiculous. Also, keep in mind that you're trying to make an appeal to coincidence. Denying the inductive conclusion when faced with mountains of evidence, that is just as much a logical fallacy as the fallacy of division or hasty generalization. The problem with your (and all the other brigaders') objections is that thi… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 04:07 AM |
| 3 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityExcept that I am basing my opinion on the collective actions of the group and the actual feminist theories and that underpin the movement. Not using any one member of the group as the basis of my conclusions. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 03:56 AM |
| 12 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityThis kind of comment is like hearing a flat-earther call you an idiot for not knowing that you'll fall off the edge if you go too far out to sea... except that it's just in the form of sexism against men. Bad assumptions, strongly held, by bigots. That's what I'm getting here. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 03:32 AM |
| 6 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityYep, go on with your bad self. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 03:31 AM |
| 1 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityI just don't know what you're talking about, sorry. Something must be getting lost in translation. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 03:30 AM |
| 9 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityBut we shouldn't be dehumanizing feminists just because they're wrong. Again, what the hell are you talking about? I stated a fact that feminists consider men to be their enemy. Not MRA's, but all men as a whole. Their theories and collective actions demonstrate it beyond any reasonable doubt. Now, how should I sugarcoat this for you so that you don't come away thinking that I am dehumanizing feminists by pointing this out? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 02:10 AM |
| 5 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityThe underlying implication, that in order for something to be true about the whole, it must be true for all or most of its individual parts, is based on a logical fallacy. This is called the fallacy of division. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_division The error in your thinking is that you assume that by pointing out something that is true for the whole, that it is a slight against some of the individuals. But it's not, at least not unless you fall into an unreasonable way of thinking. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 02:05 AM |
| 11 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityWhat the hell are you talking about? Feminists claim to be about equality but are actually about a zero sum game that is adverserial towards men. I am pointing out the fact that they have created a movement that is adverserial to men. That is a fact. How should I be sugarcoating this for you? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 01:40 AM |
| – | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityIf feminists think 1+1=3 and I said that 1+1=2, you would be telling me to accept that 1+1=2.5 in order to avoid sinking to their level. Unfortunately, feminist theory really does, quite literally, view men as the enemy. And even a little bit of compassion towards men is seen as misogynistic hatred of women. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/17 11:38 PM |
| – | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityBut it actually means men. Because feminists hate men and consider them an enemy. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/17 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Men are fighting back against sexual assault allegations, and 70% are winningThere was always the threat. It's called Title IX. They were using it to force schools to expel male students accused of rape for a long time. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/17 07:45 PM |
| 5 | Men are fighting back against sexual assault allegations, and 70% are winningEnforcement was already mandatory and many schools already were already practicing far more extreme witch trials than what the Dear Colleague letter asked for. In fact one of the typical excuses used be the department of education when cases like this end up in court is that they never asked schools to go that far. The Dear Colleague petter did make things uniformally worse, but it's not like there was a single school that actually gave male students a fair deal and left criminal accusations to … | /r/MensRights | 29/04/17 02:42 PM |
| 161 | Men are fighting back against sexual assault allegations, and 70% are winningThis started well before Obama. I'm not saying that he made it better, but the college kangaroo courts were bad enough well before the Dead Colleague letter. Fucking over men is the one thing that both Republicans and Democrats can actually agree on. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/17 02:09 AM |
| 3 | Stealthing: NBA Tells Players to Take Used Condoms HomeEven the article you quoted has her telling the police she was asleep Nope. That is a paraphrasing of a police report by a newspaper. It's basically hearsay from sources which can't be trusted. Do you have a direct confirmation, from her, saying that she was asleep? You don't. You really don't. The only tangible, credible evidence that we actually know of what she actually said are her text messages, which are in police custody, where she tells friends that she was only "half asleep". Here, let … | /r/MensRights | 28/04/17 06:51 AM |
| 3 | Stealthing: NBA Tells Players to Take Used Condoms HomeA) I quoted Assange. You quoted him saying she was awake and consenting, you nincompoop. So are you claiming this quote is where you got the idea that she was asleep and not consenting? Or was it the other parts of your link where the Guardian flat out lied about it? B) Please find her stating she consented to unprotected sex. Find some proof that she didn't. One place where she claims she was raped. Anything quoting her saying that the sex was anything but consensual. Not speculation and innuen… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/17 02:12 AM |
| 6 | Stealthing: NBA Tells Players to Take Used Condoms HomeBuddy, you will find a million other sources that don't misconstrue what the woman actually said. So why pick the utter garbage called the Guardian? Oh hell, I will do you one better. I will give you a link to the Guardian itself that contradicts your "facts": https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden They say that she never indicated to Assange that she did not want to have sex with him. They also say that in a text message to a friend, she never suggested she had been… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/17 11:02 PM |
| 11 | Stealthing: NBA Tells Players to Take Used Condoms HomeThere's a guy who's been holed up in an Ecuadorian embassy for a few years because his condom broke during sex and he's wanted for questioning because prosecutors think that this might be rape. If the tables were turned he would be paying child support and the media would be calling him a deadbeat. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/17 04:20 PM |
| 6 | Hot Sauce In Condoms Outrage! In 2009 Jezebel was outraged at a man acting to stop stealthing and "Stealth-Pregnancy".Hot sauce is not going to cause some sort of permanent injury and the screaming coming from the bathroom should immediately tell you about the kind of woman you're with. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/17 04:11 PM |
| 0 | This Is What "Stealthing" Looks Like - And The Ladies Think It's HilariousGot some hard evidence to back that up with? There is no way that they can stop it. And ideologically they have their hands tied. [Edit] Yeah you may want to send your memo to the Parsemus foundation. Tell them they might as well hang up the towel, the FDA tests they are pursuing are never going to pass because the FDA is nothing more than a subsidiary of NOW with all the feminists running amuck. What's especially funny to me about this sort of baseless paranoia is that it's the same exact basel… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/17 01:47 PM |
| 2 | Sign in a shared restroom in ClevelandEvery time I see the word mansplaining, a brain cell explodes inside my head and dies... Theres nothing gender specific about being condescending Okay but the problem isn't that "mansplaining" is something condescending that men do. It's something condescending that feminists say about men. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/17 09:25 PM |
| 6 | This Is What "Stealthing" Looks Like - And The Ladies Think It's HilariousI just think that the harder they laugh about it now, the more crow they'll have to eat when men finally have safe, reversible birth control. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/17 09:10 PM |
| – | "Things you wouldn't write in a sympathetic tone if the shoe were on the other foot" for $400 please AlexThey should follow this up with a similarly themed article about women who hire hitmen to murder their husbands, after which they should run a piece on women who leave their newborns in a dumpster. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 03:34 PM |
| 2 | Dear Feminists: military service was never intended to be an esteem-building program for the ladiesI'm laughing my ass off. I just wish I had one of my unwashed socks that I wore for 2 months straight during the invasion of Iraq so I could stuff it in your mouth to prevent you from saying anything else stupid. Two weeks my ass, buddy. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 04:07 AM |
| 3 | Dear Feminists: military service was never intended to be an esteem-building program for the ladiesLMAO. "Actively gassed" What the fuck does that even mean? You mean gas they used back in the the 1980's when Rummy sold it to them and actively encouraged them to use it? Do you realize that this was the nineteen-fucking-eighties? Do you not realize that we already had a war with Iraq in 1990 and since then dismantled their chemical weapons program? Do you know how stupid you sound? That's like starting a war with Germany because of something you remembered them doing in WW1. It's like it's 195… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 03:59 AM |
| 5 | Dear Feminists: military service was never intended to be an esteem-building program for the ladiesYou mean the fuck ton of oil that ISIS financed itself with? Or do you mean the oil that we already had access to all along and which Iraq was offering to increase production of for years before the war? Or do you mean the oil that we didn't actually need because of the massive shale deposits in the US and Canada? Or do you mean the oil production that was actually reduced in Iraq because of the war? Or the gasoline prices that went up afterwards? Which of these wins are you referring to? | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 03:17 AM |
| 5 | Dear Feminists: military service was never intended to be an esteem-building program for the ladiesI took part in the invasion of Iraq. It took more than two weeks. I hadn't even gotten to take a shower or a change of clothes from when it started in March to the time Bush gave his "Mission Accomplished" speech in May. Which everyone laughed at. And a year later I was back there again, fighting in Fallujah and Ramadi. Two weeks my ass. And what do you think the point of all of that was? If you're saying we "won" because Saddam got hanged, then you've really got your priorities mixed. They did … | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 02:58 AM |
| 1 | ADHD -- which overwhelmingly affects boys -- is a fake "disorder", claims world renowned scientistBut the actual "factory model" of education had recess and gym and competitive classrooms. Boys performed at least as well as girls without any ADHD medication. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 12:31 AM |
| 3 | Read the "article", then read godzilla502's comment which is spot on.It's like Marxism for narcissits. From each man regardless of his ability to each woman according to her sense of entitlement. Oh wait, no, that's feminism. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 12:12 AM |
| 6 | Dear Feminists: military service was never intended to be an esteem-building program for the ladiesUh, no. There is no hypocrisy. The hypocrisy was the US Supreme Court saying that women can't be drafted because they're not suitable for combat. As if men only get drafted for combat (majority get drafted for support roles). And that men can't vote without registering, but women can. And now that feminists demand that all combat roles be open to women, they still want to be exempt from the draft. Oh and women needed Title-IX because war veterans returning from WW2 and Vietnam got the GI-Bill. T… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 11:27 PM |
| 19 | Ben Shapiro on equal representation: "What about when we have an electorate that is 54% women?"And who don't have to register for the draft. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 11:06 PM |
| 6 | Ben Shapiro on equal representation: "What about when we have an electorate that is 54% women?"Don't worry, they would shame the other half into serving exclusively women in no time, as well. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 11:02 PM |
| 2 | Woman punches man at Trump rally. Man punches her back. Media reports it as him sucker punching her. Only explanation to describe it as a "sucker punch" is her believing that she wouldn't get hit back.It actually does. In identity politics if you're not with them, you're against them. People who use rational thought and participate in an open exchange of ideas do not exist. Everyone must be pigeonholed into a finite number of easily identifiable black-and-white groups. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 07:55 PM |
| 13 | Good job Huffington PostCan't wait to read HuffPo when those lines cross. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 07:54 PM |
| 11 | UCSC Girls: College Boys are Creepy, Arrogant, and Suck in Bed (Imagine If they Said this About Women)Or maybe it's $CURRENT_YEAR, time to learn that being the town whore is not a good dating strategy. She's in for a rude awakening if she thinks this is just a problem with college men. Just wait until she gets a little older and over-eager older rich men no longer take an interest in her This girl fails at math. She wants to fuck 50% of the men in her class but wants all of them to be in the top 1% of high quality men. There's nothing wrong with wanting the top 1% of men, but at a certain point … | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 03:25 PM |
| 0 | Woman punches man at Trump rally. Man punches her back. Media reports it as him sucker punching her. Only explanation to describe it as a "sucker punch" is her believing that she wouldn't get hit back.Sorry, but you're spinning this pretty hard. If you just said they are an identity politics group for white people, I would have said fine, that's not for me but no worse than feminism and the modern left. My experience with these white pride groups is that they are full of shit. They try to give credit for the Enlightenment to their own regressive religious traditions, for example. They are anti-EU, against the free movement of people from the very countries whose contributions they claim to ch… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 01:16 PM |
| 5 | Woman punches man at Trump rally. Man punches her back. Media reports it as him sucker punching her. Only explanation to describe it as a "sucker punch" is her believing that she wouldn't get hit back.According to what I'm hearing from liberals, it's because you are a 70-year-old sucker with disposable income who has been listening to Rush Limbaugh for 20 years. And after you voted for a black man, you realized you were actually racist and voted for Trump. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 12:47 PM |
| 1 | Geography teacher cleared of raping pupil says men should stay away from teachingIt's time to brush of the Title IX playbook and start firing female teachers until a 50/50 gender balance is achieved. And also, bring back male-only schools. Men deserve the career opportunities to teach, and boys deserve the opportunity to be taught by male role models. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 04:15 PM |
| 2 | If a woman hits you, you're an asshole.Usually through violence /s. You just have to make fun of them for their idiocy to prevent it from becomeing infectious. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/17 04:42 PM |
| 3 | If a woman hits you, you're an asshole.Imagine the reaction if the cops were trained to ask women these kind of questions. "Ma'am, we understand he gave you a black eye but before but before we determine that you are a genuine victim, tell us what you did to deserve it?" | /r/MensRights | 16/04/17 04:39 PM |
| 2 | "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?"Okay you're taking this too literally. First, you'd never have a mass exodus of 90 million people in one shot, they would not all go to the same place, and they don't necessarily have to go into a desert. Also, there's only about 4.6 million white people in South Africa, anyway and I'm not sure where 90 million came from. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 07:23 PM |
| 2 | "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?"There's always Malta. But the destination wasn't really relevant to my point. If you took 90 million skilled, educated white men and put them on a deserted island, a few years later they'd be the ones having a hard time keeping other people out. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 06:58 PM |
| 2 | "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?"I never said that skilled, educated white men would want to go to the UK. I think it's the other way around isn't it? http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/754294/NHS-crisis-doctors-leave-hospital-battle | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 06:47 PM |
| 3 | "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?"I mean, not to get too serious about this silly subject, but... It's 2017 and they can't stop dirt poor, uneducated Africans from getting into Europe. Educated, skilled, English-speaking white men wouldn't have any problems. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 06:21 PM |
| 2 | "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?"So, what would they do after every white man in their country decided to move somewhere else? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 01:03 PM |
| 18 | Woman attacks man after false allegation: Moment a furious mob pin a man to the ground as a terrified woman accuses him of filming up her skirt at Oxford CircusShe was literally kicking him, too. They did not look for her and arrested her, they only wanted her to make a statement to see if they could really get something on the guy that she did this to. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 12:55 PM |
| 5 | Fearless Bull artist thinks the "little girl" statue violates his rights. Feminists abuse and mock him as usual.The message is, buy your advertising campaign from the conpany that will vandalize real artwork for the benefit of a paying client. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 12:46 PM |
| 7 | Fearless Bull artist thinks the "little girl" statue violates his rights. Feminists abuse and mock him as usual.Art is art. If it crosses the line from gorilla art into cultural icon, that has to be respected. And even if it doesn't, invading a public space is different from invading another artwork's space. Also, the origins of the bull make it far more authentic than the statue of the girl, which is nothing more than a corporate advertising campaign. And they're not even selling feminism; they are selling ads. This statue is telling you that this company will happily fuck over our cultural heritage for … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Fearless Bull artist thinks the "little girl" statue violates his rights. Feminists abuse and mock him as usual.Then why not move the girl statue somewhere else? Let's say, staring up at the bull's ass? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/17 12:35 PM |
| 9 | Why sex crimes have statutes of limitationsSo, why, exactly? Because the Pope lobbied for them? What an incredibly misleading article. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/17 10:03 AM |
| 20 | How is it that we can be this callous towards boys, yet rouse all our incredulity when someone calls a girl ‘bossy’?We want the government to kill them all, including the children, so we don’t have a resurgence of this,” she said, referring to the Boko Haram fighters. #KillOurBoys The same thing happened with the rampant child rape in Afghanistan. The victims are boys, so the world does nothing even as boys are raped on Western military bases. #RapeOurBoys Now, there are thousands of kidnapped boys we know of, yet the majority of the media coverage is on the unspecified number of injured and dead girls #ButTh… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 04:06 PM |
| 1 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?What's more idealistic, though? Millenials who came to the conclusion that the feminist model of a marriage is bulllshit, or the Boomers and Gen-Xers who really tried to embrace it? | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 06:04 AM |
| 4 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?The nerve of those high-earning Silicon Valley men for wanting to have the option of a wife who sits around by the pool all day reading books. At least for the first 10 years. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 05:02 AM |
| 4 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?I think it's more about the realization that women having careers hasn't actually benefited men in any way whatsoever. It's not that they want to support a mooch. It's that they don't want to support a mooch only to come home to a sink full of dirty dishes while she's spending her paycheck on girls' night out. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 05:00 AM |
| 3 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?You'll love this comment Living in Silicon Valley, I have found that many men do want wives to stay at home and this is particularly true for men in high profile roles. They want come to be the COO at home so they can focus on work. Women unfortunately don't have this option. I see women VP, CMOs, and CFOs still carrying the torch at home as well as work. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 04:51 AM |
| 5 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?That is not surprising at all. Still, the article is a departure from the feminist party line in that she actually considers male points of view and actually looks to statistics for an explanation. I think we're getting over the "Where have all the good men gone" phase where they're still focusing entirely on what women feel entitled to and it's slowly starting to dawn on them that their prospects of getting it are pretty much fucked. Because if women judged their jobless husbands harshly, that … | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 04:35 AM |
| 11 | Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?Some of the comments the NYT editors picked out (kudos to them) actually add some pro-male perspectives: The two income household is a failure. Who wants to work all day to scrape by, and outsource parenting to sitters or daycare centers In other words, part of this is men starting to realize that feminist ideals have been a race to the bottom. With wages that have been stagnant since the 1970's, the last thing the middle class needs to do is gift our corporate overlords with a a surplus of labo… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 04:20 AM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.It's a Muslim ban because Trump called it a Muslim ban and then signed executive orders that singled out Muslims. This has nothing to do with "activist judges", it's just common sense. And listen, buddy, I studied set theory in college. I'm so tired of this nonsense about it not being a Muslim ban because it doesn't ban all Muslims. Are you kidding me? It only bans Muslims. And that's the criteria. It doesn't have to be all Muslims to qualify. Just stop it, you should be absolutely embarrassed. … | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 07:34 PM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Dude, you're seeing with your own eyes how the laws work. That's why his executive orders got blocked by the courts. When you say you are going to violate the Constitution as a campaign promise, and then you call your own executive order a Muslim ban, there are no "take backs". You get dragged into court. This is just plain old incompetence. Also, it is actually a Muslim ban. Trump is not doing for any other reason than to ban a bunch of Muslims for being Muslim. It doesn't matter what the prete… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 07:23 PM |
| 3 | I love how MRAs have female leaders in their movements.Uh, no feminism did not start out that way. It was basically always the way it is now, maybe even crazier. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 06:18 PM |
| 6 | National Frat Chief: Harvard Actively Discriminates Against MenThey were going to fail anyway. Education should be free & offer practical skills. These schools mainly just charge a whole lot of money in exchange for lifelong personal connections. In that sense, fraternities are part of the problem. Doesn't mean that feminist sexism is okay, but in a way it is also inevitable that this is how it would go down. Feminists don't bother with meritocracy, they go after the shortcuts to wealth and power. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 05:29 PM |
| 1 | Why Some Male Members of Congress Won't Be Alone With Female Staffers | The inevitable result of #BelieveHer & similar feminist campaigns is a need for men to keep women at a safe distance at workWe're largely on the same page. I just want to highlight that it's not the lying per se which is a problem, but the abdication of due process for the accused. Sexual Harassment laws are designed to be abused. To be frank, I have a hard time seeing how "sexual harassment" is anything more than a double standard for women to have their cake and eat it too. You don't hear of very many women filing complaints about being promoted after having sex the boss. You only hear the complaints after a failed… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 04:56 PM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.It doesn't matter if it "is" or "isn't" a Muslim ban (it is, but that's actually irrelevant). What matters is that Trump promised that it will be a Muslim ban. This is a failed promise. The ill-conceived promise by itself is enough to fuck him over from implementing any policy which bans any group of people who happen to be Muslim. Doesn't matter what the ostensible reason is because his campaign promise will send that shit straight to court. And beyond that, can you please pull your head out of… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 03:26 PM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.You still didn't actually know what the 1st amendment was. I had to tell you. And it's a fucking ban on religion you numbskull. Trump personally said that it was going to be a ban on religion. It's still on his own fucking campaign website: (New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration I swear, you can't … | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 01:44 AM |
| 1 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Oh great, so you don't seem to actually know what the first amendment is. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Look, before you make yourself look even more foolish, you should do a full stop yourself and take a high school level civics class. Because right now, you wouldn't even pass the naturalization test they give to immigrants who want to become citizens. Now, don't make me laugh. He promised his voters he would ban Mu… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 01:29 AM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.The first amendment says that Trump can't decide to ban people just because they're Muslims. Surely you know this. You do know this, right? Then surely you must realize how fucking stupid it was for Trump to say that he would create a Muslim ban as one of his campaign promises. It was bound to get tied up in court. He should have been making a case for a national security concern for specific countries from the start instead of talking about a Muslim ban. has itemized power to control immigratio… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/17 12:26 AM |
| 4 | Why Some Male Members of Congress Won't Be Alone With Female Staffers | The inevitable result of #BelieveHer & similar feminist campaigns is a need for men to keep women at a safe distance at workIt's not that due process is a problem or even that false accusations are a problem; it's that people are trying do hard to circumvent due process and create subjective laws where even normal, innocent behavior can be arbitrarily criminalized after the fact. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 08:07 PM |
| 6 | New male contraceptive is safe, effective and inexpensive â but no company has agreed to sell it; maybe we should crowdfund and start our own companyChildbirth comes naturally and is desirable to women. The desire to find a male provider for the baby is also natural. Evolution resulted in humans being this way and there is no sense in being aghast at it. The only real problem is when modern legal instruments come into play and it becomes a matter of power and control over another person (the father). | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:37 PM |
| 1 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.The first amendment. And other laws. This is where Trump and his base are idiots. Trump shouldn't have promisef them a ban on Muslims. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 11:27 PM |
| 1 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.You only give a shit about Trump trolls and discrediting this sub. You literally don't care about anything else, so you can't claim to be participating in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 07:07 PM |
| 0 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Anyone else who also makes bullshit campaign promises that fail to materialize also fails to deliver on them. It doesn't translate into Trump being a success. Trump actually takes it to a new level with flat out impossible lies and wishful thinking. He is objectively and utterly a failed right-wing huckster. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 07:04 PM |
| 1 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.That's completely irrelevant right now. I hate Hillary as a politician, too. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 05:04 PM |
| 3 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Your only interest is to piggyback on Russian trolls to discredit this sub, which makes you the ultimate bottom-feeder in the troll hierarchy. Now, if you actually bothered to comment on anything but the 1 or 2 pro-Trump posts that have been made in this sub, you would at least have a cover and it wouldn't immediately give you away as a SJW concern troll. But here you are, and here we are. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 04:57 PM |
| 2 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.You're also a troll. You are solely interested in posting about how Trump took over this sub and trying to get people to talk about their small dicks. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 04:00 PM |
| 2 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.True enough. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 03:52 PM |
| -12 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Wow, an account created just to make this comment. Can't make this shit up. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 03:20 PM |
| 4 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Dude it's like a handful of troll posts. This sub has always been trolled and briigated, that's nothing new. Doesn't mean there are not legitimate discussions happening elsewhere. Downvote this shit and move on. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:54 PM |
| -17 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Let's be fair, when you encounter a Trump supporter on Reddit it's hard to tell if he isn't a paid Russian internet troll. Republicans who support Trump are letting their party get fucked in the ass by Putin. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:48 PM |
| 4 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.How is it not Trump's failure for making transparently unconstitutional campaign promises and then getting them tied up in court? It should have been obvious to anyone with even half a brain that they were wasting their vote if they thought that it was going to work out the way he claimed. Even the mainstream media was pointing this out, so you didn't even have to be a rocket scientist to know that Trump's campaign promises were utter bullshit. Mexico was going to pay for the wall? We'll just ba… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:39 PM |
| 1 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.The approval ratings tell you that even people who just voted for him a couple months ago regret it now. Besides, his administration has been an abject failure. They haven't delivered a single campaign promise since he took office and it looks like it is set to only get worse for him. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:24 PM |
| 3 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Way to miss the point, buddy. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:10 PM |
| 2 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.That's because he didn't actually include men. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:06 PM |
| -5 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.What does that have to do with "here"? Trump supporters, including paid Russian shills, are everywhere. They're a cancer. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:04 PM |
| -13 | President Donald J. Trump Proclaims April 2017 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. And he refers to "women, children and men" throughout. Progress.Let's be fair, Trump supporters are also the problem. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 02:01 PM |
| 11 | Feminist writer Jill Filipovic thinks it is "immoral" for men to avoid situations where they might be falsely accused of sexual harassment/assault, because it "hurts women's careers."Like you said, she believed that every accusation was true. Including the false ones. And she only advocated for women to make lots and lots of true accusations which no one should ever question. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/17 04:26 AM |
| 1 | Bridgegate scandal: Same exact convictions, same judge, same case. Man gets two years, woman gets 18 months. It's so blatant at this point.Right, and someone could get killed in an attempted murder. Does that mean we should only give attempted murderers a fine because running a red light only gets a fine? Get the hell out of here. You're talking about official misconduct, which is premeditated and malicious. And it put people's lives at risk, with at least one person dying as a result. That's a pretty serious crime. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/17 08:17 PM |
| 9 | Feminist writer Jill Filipovic thinks it is "immoral" for men to avoid situations where they might be falsely accused of sexual harassment/assault, because it "hurts women's careers."It wouldn't be feminism if it didn't involve a hasty generalization. And yes, this goes beyond even the apex fallacy because Pence doesn't even resemble the average powerful man. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/17 07:27 PM |
| 6 | College plans to fire professor who taught 'Men in Literature' classThe class wasn't called "famous male authors you already knew oppressed you". But good luck with that theory. Also, in "fairness", you don't fire a professor for refusing to conform to your ideological litmus test. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/17 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Bridgegate scandal: Same exact convictions, same judge, same case. Man gets two years, woman gets 18 months. It's so blatant at this point.Sure you did /s. You have no clue. People could have been killed, especially as the corrupt officials didn't bother to notify local police, fire, and medical services of their hijinks. They didn't get charged for closing a bridge. They got charged for official misconduct. They received sentences at the very low end of the federal guidelines for the type of crime they commited. You don't seem to get it that abuse of power and corruption are extremely serious crimes. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/17 12:44 PM |
| 5 | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.I believe the bare minimum is that a woman should drop the sexist, gynocentric, social norms before she acceptable for social interaction. You can get more extreme, but it's pretty obvious that wanting to sleep with a rabid man-hater pretty much voids his MGTOW card. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 07:57 PM |
| 2 | Bridgegate scandal: Same exact convictions, same judge, same case. Man gets two years, woman gets 18 months. It's so blatant at this point.Maybe they should have stuck to assaulting people on the bridge, then. What they did was a lot worse. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 04:54 PM |
| 2 | Bridgegate scandal: Same exact convictions, same judge, same case. Man gets two years, woman gets 18 months. It's so blatant at this point.No, they schemed to shut down the busiest bridge in the world as a political reprisal against a mayor who didn't endorse their boss. The multi-day gridlock didn't "just happen". | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 04:53 PM |
| 2 | Bridgegate scandal: Same exact convictions, same judge, same case. Man gets two years, woman gets 18 months. It's so blatant at this point.You would if you had to drive over that bridge during their hijinks. They broke the law in a very corrupt way and wasted a lot of people's time and money, and hurt public safety, as a reprisal against political opponents they did not like. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 04:48 PM |
| 11 | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.He posts to MGTOW so I think what he really meant to say was "I'm just a hypocrite". | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 04:46 PM |
| 2 | Holden and Kia pull ads from YouTube as Google boycott widens "The series of videos by one YouTube user centred around a men's rights movement known as MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) – a group of straight men who will not date women and believe feminism has ruined society."Use an ad blocker. That targets the marketers themselves. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/17 09:49 PM |
| 2 | Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus.Nope. Unless she was holding down a job and earning millions for 40 years, her status as a "millionaire" is contingent upon holding up her end of the deal. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/17 12:44 AM |
| 2 | ‘Sometimes, it’s ok to throw rocks at girls’: Jewelry store billboard stirs outrage. I smell just a tiny hit of hypocrisy hereChelsea Clinton is going to lose the election to Donald Duck. In all seriousness, hopefully the Clinton insiders who rigged the Democratic primary will be long gone by then. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/17 12:35 AM |
| 3 | ‘Sometimes, it’s ok to throw rocks at girls’: Jewelry store billboard stirs outrage. I smell just a tiny hit of hypocrisy hereIt's not only that. This campaign is obviously a parody. It's a play on the "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" meme that literally says that in response, it is acceptable for men to give women diamonds. And given that it's the jewelry industry, I would not be surprised if it was the brainchild of female marketers. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/17 12:28 AM |
| 11 | As a female who has subscribed to this subreddit for a few years now...Upvoting is not reliable because we constantly get brigaded by other subs. You have to take a long view of the discussion over time and decide for yourself what's really representative and what isn't. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/17 11:53 PM |
| -1 | Where Have All the Good Men Gone?: Gender Differences in MarriageabilityWhere did I say 100% anything... even successful adaptions aren't 100% Your argument is inherently contingent on a 100% death rate for offspring because you are attempting to rationalize why a woman would choose to not even reproduce rather than be with an unemployed man. ( look up "satisficing") Look up "ecological fallacy". You might also want to refresh your memory on confusing cause and effect. Your line of reasoning is that women who are attracted to unemployed men and have children with th… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/17 07:29 PM |
| 1 | Where Have All the Good Men Gone?: Gender Differences in MarriageabilityI think you're missing the point. It's not that women need men to be rich to find them attractive. They only need them to be richer than they are. This sign of fitness tends to make long term relationships work and children have good outcomes as a result. The problem is that when you havd a woman money for no good reason, she suddenly views the same exact man who was fit before as unfit now. The evolutionary outcome hasn't changed, but the heuristics that we have evolved to use no longer work. R… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/17 01:38 PM |
| 1 | Where Have All the Good Men Gone?: Gender Differences in MarriageabilityI would like to see you actually try to answer his question instead of making fun of strawmen. I agree with him that you are resorting to cop-outs. I imagine this world where 100% of all children born to ugly mothers or unemployed fathers die. Except of course that's not how any of it works. Remaining single and not having kids because she's ugly and you're jobless is also an "evolutionary" dead end. Your kids' survival rate will be lower for sure, but it does not mean you don't get married and … | /r/MensRights | 27/03/17 01:21 PM |
| 15 | Orchestrated advertiser attack on YouTube is starting to target Men's Human Rights Movement videos there. Make sure your next car isn't from GM.This is why I use an ad blocker at all times. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/17 02:39 AM |
| 9 | Where Have All the Good Men Gone?: Gender Differences in MarriageabilityI think her name was Hanna Rosin. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/17 07:30 PM |
| 2 | My husband is not the biological father of my child and he doesn't know • r/offmychestThose are examples of "difficult" choices that are nevertheless wrong, for instructional purposes only. Willful ignorance is never a "noble" choice even if it's made under difficult circumstances. Be careful not to transpose his choice to be a father to his son with his choice to be willfully ignorant. Two separate things. One does not make the other noble. The former does not depend on the latter. In fact, the choice of willful ignorance only serves to demean the otherwise honorable decision to… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/17 02:10 AM |
| 2 | My husband is not the biological father of my child and he doesn't know • r/offmychestSo is lying. So is stealing. So is cheating. All difficult choices, right? Not much different from willingly choosing to ignore reality. Yes, some people stick their fingers in their ears and sing, "la la la la" and just live out their lives in denial. And you know, they just cross their fingers and hope that nothing else bad happens as a result of their cowardice and inaction. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/17 12:59 AM |
| 2 | My husband is not the biological father of my child and he doesn't know • r/offmychestIt's only a difficult choice if it's made knowing the truth. What he decided is really just a combination of ignorance and negligence. And to be honest, he could be the real father and he is also just letting this doubt fester over time. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/17 10:36 PM |
| 3 | My husband is not the biological father of my child and he doesn't know • r/offmychestSomehow I read that as over 10. But that makes it worse to me. Two decades of fear and doubt. I have no respect for the willfully ignorant. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/17 09:24 PM |
| 3 | My husband is not the biological father of my child and he doesn't know • r/offmychestYou know what the truly messed up part about your comment is? That you you love your son so much that it makes you afraid of the truth. Should your son have other genetic conditions in his medical history, he will never know when talking to his doctor because you and your wife decided that you both prefer to live in a lie. Your ignorance has the potential of killing your son. Also, if he is not your son, maybe you should make sure that you are legally protected as his father. Maybe you need to t… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/17 08:55 PM |
| 1 | BBC dad parody: Moms can do everything, but Dads can't even find a missing sock.I mean, they're supposed to get you to stop masturbating. Mainly by hating your life after you eat them. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/17 06:49 PM |
| 22 | Innocent man who spent 25 years in jail could lose $4m compensation to ex-wifeActually I never heard how that turned out, so that is great to hear. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/17 02:49 PM |
| 3 | Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why?You're an utter idiot if you actually believe that Christians are getting circumcisions because Jews made them do it. If you don't want to be ignorant, the actual reason was that during the Victorian era anti-sex Protestant prudes thought it was a great way to cut down on masturbation and make sex less enjoyable. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/17 01:54 AM |
| 5 | Found in Sociology Textbook. Women win custody battles but are still somehow the victims?You're a mysoginist if you don't. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 10:47 PM |
| 5 | Found in Sociology Textbook. Women win custody battles but are still somehow the victims?You're ready to make a hasty genetalization from a single comment on this sub, while ignoring the large grain of truth in that comment as it relates to the status quo. Seems like you don't think that "proof" applies to you at all. But you're not willing to acknowledge the most prevalent view about fathers among feminists? One that is repeated time after time after time? You're into alternative fact territory here. So what do you want? Video of prominent feminist professors saying it? Press relea… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 10:06 PM |
| 9 | Found in Sociology Textbook. Women win custody battles but are still somehow the victims?You missed the part where the overwhelming vast majority of feminists believe that men are only in it for the money. So, pot calling the kettle black. And actually, the only reason why anyone would be against shared custody arrangements as the default & preferred solution are women who only want custody for the money. And you know what? For fathers who have to go through the family court system, these are the only women who matter. Because these are the man-hating, greedy feminists who control t… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 05:52 PM |
| – | Found in Sociology Textbook. Women win custody battles but are still somehow the victims?Just think of all the free stuff men get by starting a new family. Women pay for dates, put a roof over their head, clothes on their back. Men have it made. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 02:48 PM |
| 7 | Found in Sociology Textbook. Women win custody battles but are still somehow the victims?Actually that is nowhere near the majority point of view in this sub. But you know what? By that logic, all of feminism is a complete and utter joke. And has been for generations. Because the prevailing view is that men are horrible absentee fathers who only file for custody to get out of having to pay child support. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 02:46 PM |
| 8 | Canadian woman loses bid to force ex-husband to pay child support for son that isn’t hisit's for when you were responsible for a child's financial stability to continue to provide I know, it's so convenient isn't it? I'm going to stop you right there, though. Being "responsible" requires a hell of a lot more than, "well, he paid for a few years when I was whorring around town, and now I'm going to use the 'not the father' argument in the child custody case, but let's just say he's still responsible for paying, mmm'kay? I'm the victim here because I sat around eating bon-bons and sp… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 01:26 PM |
| 3 | Canadian woman loses bid to force ex-husband to pay child support for son that isn’t hisWhen your premise leads to fucked up outcomes, you should re-examine your premise. There's just so many wrong assumptions in your argument and they all have an uncanny way of lining up with whatever happens to be convenient to a woman, regardless of how shitty she was. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 01:05 PM |
| 1 | Woman driver who lost license 30 times gets probation in fatal hit-and-run | NJ.comPretty soon she'll be denounced as a straight white guy. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 12:45 PM |
| 3 | Female applicants to be given preference for firefighting jobs: "preference in selection will be given to female applicants assessed as suitable" Male teacher applicants in elementary education are expected to remain silent.especially females of middle eastern origin as me doing that procedure is a big no no And what happens if there is no female paramedic present? They refuse treatment and die? | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 04:04 AM |
| 3 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'You don't understand. She is making abortion look ridiculous. She is taking a jab at men while making it obvious that men don't actually have any rights that are in any way comparable to getting out of being a parent. It just makes feminists look entitled and detached from reality. A "ridiculous" bill would be something along the lines of making it illegal for elected officials to get their appendix removed. At least that would have something to do with government messing with bodily autonomy, w… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 01:26 AM |
| 2 | Calling Out Dr. Michael Kimmel's BS on MRAs being against domestic violence shelters for women (?)Either way, hotel vouchers show that there is not a "genuine" comcern for men. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 03:40 PM |
| 31 | Tired of seeing this poster plastered around my campus.*As defined by man-hating feminazis on their periods. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 03:31 PM |
| 8 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'The bill is the equivalent of making women's periods illegal. It is ridiculous as an analogy for abortion and only goes to show just how out of touch feminists are. Do you want to eliminate the equivalent right for men? Then ban the paper abortion. Oh wait... men don't have that do they? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 02:39 PM |
| 2 | While the husband is awayYou don't have to live in the barracks anymore and get to have some semblance of normal life. You also get more pay. In theory, it's a great idea. In practice, it rarely ends well. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 05:45 PM |
| 14 | Mother abandons new born possibly to cover up an affair. Baby dies. Public response: so far 53 people have donated $4,900 to her legal defense.Reality: documents filed in court by prosecutors say DNA testing shows a man other than Ard's husband to be the father How our society sees it: In the commercial, a woman with a trembling lower lip walks through a snowstorm to hand a newborn swaddled in a pink blanket to a fireman. "The nurse said I need to keep my baby safe, but I can't even keep myself safe. But a law called safe surrender would let me give my baby up if I couldn't care for it. No one will understand why I gave my baby up. But… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Feminists continue their civil war against each other as soon as one in their ranks dare show any sign of sexuality.Vanity Fair is pop culture magazine for boring yuppies. Exactly the kind of place where a haughty English white girl would pose in provocative photos to appeal to a rarified set of feminist dandies. All the special pleading aside, exploiting your sexuality for fun and profit is just that. It does not matter who your audience is. Selling fashion magazines with your tits is far more base than selling works of art. Watson is a hypocrite to have gone through all the navel gazing about Beyonce's vide… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 11:36 AM |
| 16 | Scarlett Johansson's divorce case shows why men are scared of being stay-at-home dadsHe's just being clever with public relations. He's associating a favorable outcome for his client with a just system. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 02:22 AM |
| 1 | TIL in 1968 a feminist wrote a public manifesto proposing that "all men must be exterminated". Then she shot several times Andy Warhol almost killing him. She was freed after only 3 years and continued to stalk and threaten Andy Warhol. Feminist organizations praise her even todayWe need your support to make that happen Sorry but what you need is to actually start listening to men. Rational feminists who do that will usually drop the feminist label in short order. As an aspiring politician, listening may even win you the support of a lot of male voters. As far as crazy MRA's, if they were really so common then one might think that feminists wouldn't have to resort to making them up out of thin air all the time. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 12:33 AM |
| 5 | TIL in 1968 a feminist wrote a public manifesto proposing that "all men must be exterminated". Then she shot several times Andy Warhol almost killing him. She was freed after only 3 years and continued to stalk and threaten Andy Warhol. Feminist organizations praise her even todayThere are shitty people in every movement yes. But only some movements present hate speech written by a deranged lunatic as a seminal work of literature and rationalize the hatred instead of presenting it critically for what it really is. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/17 09:17 PM |
| 50 | TIL in 1968 a feminist wrote a public manifesto proposing that "all men must be exterminated". Then she shot several times Andy Warhol almost killing him. She was freed after only 3 years and continued to stalk and threaten Andy Warhol. Feminist organizations praise her even todayIgnorance is not an excuse, though. Of those feminists who have heard of her, they all embrace her. If you have never heard of the SCUM manifesto then I am sorry, but it is taught to 100% of all women's studies majors. As a positive thing. I wasn't anywhere near women's studies and yet it was taught to me as a positive feminist thing in a mandatory English literature class. To this day, even though this woman tried to violently murder a man, feminists continue to embrace this notion that her wor… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/17 05:04 AM |
| 5 | Never married women earn 8% more than never married menNo, married women are not "tied down" with family. What they have are their husbands' incomes and simply choose not to work as hard. Moreover, there is a self-selection bias. Women do not marry men who earn less. Many studies have shown this. So after a while, you can expect the married population to have couples where the man earns more whereas the single population will be evryone who is left over. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/17 06:05 PM |
| 1 | When Factory Jobs Vanish, Men Become Less Desirable PartnersBasically, with the addition of forced child support where they get the father's money anyway. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/17 04:12 AM |
| 2 | When Factory Jobs Vanish, Men Become Less Desirable PartnersYeah and this is coming from the left. The amount of cognitive dissonance is stunning. Part of it is not capitalist spin, though. They have spent the past couple of years writing celebratory "The End Of Men" articles that were spinning male job loss as a grand victory for feminism. Now they are bound to continue spinning it as something that doesn't really have any negative ramifications for men. Any other spin and they would have to acknowledge that this isn't just a failure of masculinity. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/17 11:29 PM |
| 6 | When Factory Jobs Vanish, Men Become Less Desirable PartnersTLDR: Under-employed straight white men are only angry because they can't get laid. Women are the real victims. What they're really saying is that women are entitled to men's money in order to improve their own personal lifestyles. It's actually pretty funny because they flat out say that this doesn't happen the other way around. That men don't leave women out in the cold when it's women who can't find a job. And they flat out say that women's own horrible decisions are what is directly responsi… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/17 09:12 PM |
| 3 | Feminists continue their civil war against each other as soon as one in their ranks dare show any sign of sexuality.Like I always say, if it weren't for double standards, feminists wouldn't have any. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/17 04:56 PM |
| 2 | Feminists continue their civil war against each other as soon as one in their ranks dare show any sign of sexuality.You mean like Emma Watson when it wasn't her tits on a magazine cover? She certainly seemed opposed to it before. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/17 03:49 PM |
| 1 | Anti-Men Media Machine strikes againAnd yet this is what the majority of feminists believe. Shitty journalism. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/17 09:23 PM |
| 2 | TIL that feminists are actually anti-feministsBut all of them were against the idea of black men, who were already being drafted, getting the vote before white women did. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/17 09:13 PM |
| 1 | Bill Maher Under Fire for 1998 Comments Condoning Sex Between 35-Year-Old Woman, 12-Year-Old BoyI don't know what will happen to Milo, but it's too early to write him off. What he did say about pedophilia has to be reckoned with, though. Especially the part where he admitted that he knows of a whole lot of other child rapists but does not want to expose them. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/17 04:54 PM |
| 4 | Bill Maher Under Fire for 1998 Comments Condoning Sex Between 35-Year-Old Woman, 12-Year-Old BoyMaher lost me a long time ago when he rejected Western medicine in favor of quack science. But I don't think Milo's career is over. The video was a coordinated hit piece covered by many outlets in the mainstream media who declared that this was to be the downfall of Milo before the dust even settled. The Maher video is going to make the mainstream media look like a bunch of hypocrites and even more people are going to abandon them. In that case, Milo won more for his cause than he lost for himse… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 04:25 PM |
| 1 | "it makes little sense to refer to something as "child sex abuse" if, as an adult, the individual doesn't personally feel harmed". What the Law Says Versus What the Science Says.There's cases that you can be reasonably sure about and there's cases that you really can't be certain of and should not rely upon to tell you anything of substance. Self-reports are notoriously unreliable. So although it's very nice of you to wish that you could count cases that failed to convict or never made it to court, you actually need a good way of determining what those cases actually were without opening the floodgates for garbage data to skew your entire study. Do you actually believe … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 05:33 AM |
| 3 | "An Ex-Uber Coder's Accusations of Discrimination and Harrassment Show Tech Still Has a Big Problem"More of the same old bullshit. In this case, if anything, it's Uber that has a problem. They've long had a reputation as an unethical place to work and their business model is built around skirting regulations and labor laws. Whether this individual woman's blog has any merit or not is beside the point. Instead, let's leave it for the haughty ladies at Condé Nast and the rest of the media to jump on this to use the male-dominated industry as their punching bag just because it's male dominated. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 05:08 AM |
| 3 | On the topic of male objectification, do you think this guy makes any good points?Can't decide if this guy is a shill or just an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 04:39 AM |
| 3 | Court makes 14-year-old male rape victim pay child support. "It's for the child" they say.He's pulling shit out of his ass. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 04:23 AM |
| 3 | Court makes 14-year-old male rape victim pay child support. "It's for the child" they say."We're trying to keep them off the cash assistance, and we're trying to get back some of the cash assistance money. It benefits everybody at the end of the day." This guy could have been a guard at Auschwitz. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 04:08 AM |
| 2 | "it makes little sense to refer to something as "child sex abuse" if, as an adult, the individual doesn't personally feel harmed". What the Law Says Versus What the Science Says.It would be no worse than self-reported data from a group of college students. This study would give you similar results if you asked the mythical 1 in 5 or 1 in 4 college women who are supposedly rape vicims if they, too, have suffered any negative consequences as a result of their supposed rapes. You'd find that they didn't. Well, the problem is that the vast majority of them couldn't possibly have been rape victims. Same here. They have created an incredibly flawed study, as per usual for soc… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 04:25 PM |
| 2 | "it makes little sense to refer to something as "child sex abuse" if, as an adult, the individual doesn't personally feel harmed". What the Law Says Versus What the Science Says.No, it's by your logic that you would conclude that forcible rape is also harmless and should be legalized because hey, some people come out of it okay. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 03:14 PM |
| 1 | "it makes little sense to refer to something as "child sex abuse" if, as an adult, the individual doesn't personally feel harmed". What the Law Says Versus What the Science Says.Wow, so basically they found that 17 year old girls who had 18 year old boyfriends and didn't experience profound psychological trauma. Everyone already knew that, except for most feminists and judges. On the other hand, out of a sample of 35k college students, they probably had no more than a small handful of victims of pedophilia which we can say were proven in a court of law. Between that and all of the faults inherent in studies based on self-reported self-selected samples, there's just a hu… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 03:08 PM |
| 5 | Down Under Misandry Takes A New Twist: Australian Bar Prohibits Men From Approaching Women, Must Speak ‘As They Would to Their Mother’Ma! The meatloaf! | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Pamela Anderson will campaign for men falsely accused of rapeYou already destroyed your own point with your own example. Now you're just completely conflating sexual behavior as a component of discrimination with discrimination itself. And no, what people consider "their tribe" is not the same as being racist towards everyone else. You don't have to change your "tribe" to stop being racist. That'd be like saying that the Chiefs and Raiders should join together to form one team so that their fans can stop brawling. You're just conflating too many things.. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 12:48 PM |
| 1 | Bill Maher: "How can a woman rape a man?“ - on a relationship between a 35 year old woman and a 13 year old boy.He got banned until the school reversed the decision made by student groups. Milo never actually got banned, but the school cancelled the event that was already under way because of safety concerns caused by rioting students. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 12:29 AM |
| -1 | Pamela Anderson will campaign for men falsely accused of rapeYou're really just strawmanning. Clearly one would be the "biological component" that can lead to or otherwise influence the other. The biological components to racism are also just "preferences" that someone with a twisted and ignorant mind turned into a nasty ideology. Maybe you've never heard of the Nazis before? They would literally kidnap blue eyed babies in hopes of creating a master race. You just tried to poke fun at the idea of brunettes banding together against blondes, but stuff like … | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 11:07 PM |
| 3 | Pamela Anderson will campaign for men falsely accused of rapeActually people absolutely do discriminate against others based on hair color, eye color, etc. It is a big factor in sexual selection when there is a shortage of one gender or the other. In the case of recessive genes for blue eyes or blonde hair, it would be a case of people discriminating against brown eyed brunettes when there is an abundance of mating options. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 10:52 PM |
| 4 | Bill Maher: "How can a woman rape a man?“ - on a relationship between a 35 year old woman and a 13 year old boy.http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/30/living/bill-maher-commencement-speaker/ | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 02:59 PM |
| – | did you like the subreddit /pussypass?....it's goneYou're not looking for /r/pussypass to promote radical right winger ideas. You're looking for /r/pussygrab | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 01:55 PM |
| 3 | Bill Maher: "How can a woman rape a man?“ - on a relationship between a 35 year old woman and a 13 year old boy.The people who are bashing Milo aren't really huge fans of Maher. And FYI, Maher recently had Milo on as his guest. Guess which two guys got blocked by protesters from speaking at Berkley? You got it - Milo and Maher. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 01:45 PM |
| 1 | Milo being trashed for a bad joke. Lena Dunham publicly admits to sexually abusing a child and is celebrated as a liberal hero and an icon of women's rights.Let's stick to the facts, shall we? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 01:25 PM |
| 1 | How it's "sexy" when women post body-positive pics on dating sites/apps, but "disgusting" when men do.I'm suggesting that we stick to the facts. Here's how I see it. For women, having sex before marriage meant that they got to put their hypergamy into overdrive, using their sexuality to hold out for a higher status mate while having less actual sex overall. For men, it meant paying a far heavier price for a lot less sex than before. But, we got porn. If you look at what actually happened, men's sexuality has become extremely stigmatized and heavily policed. Men are shamed for being men. Teenage … | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 05:01 AM |
| 1 | How it's "sexy" when women post body-positive pics on dating sites/apps, but "disgusting" when men do.Not sure what you're getting at, but I'm assuming it's the idea that there might be some sweet spot where single men get laid more than married men. Well, here's another website writing about the same study: For instance, just consider single guys between ages 18-24. What percentage of them report having sex more than 2 times per week? Just over ten percent. How about married guys in the same age range? A full two-thirds (just over 66%)! In fact, over 20% of married guys in this age group report… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 04:32 AM |
| 1 | Milo being trashed for a bad joke. Lena Dunham publicly admits to sexually abusing a child and is celebrated as a liberal hero and an icon of women's rights.Who needs to pay for shills when feminists will do the work for free? Or is that part of the wage gap? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 04:01 AM |
| 1 | How it's "sexy" when women post body-positive pics on dating sites/apps, but "disgusting" when men do.Women got more sex out of birth control, but that benefits married couples far more than singles. An average of 61 percent of singles reported that they hadn’t had sex within the past year, compared with 18 percent of married people. Looking specifically at those between the ages of 25 and 59, 25 percent of married people reported that they were still having sex two to three times per week versus less than five percent of singles. -- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/13/marriage-sex_n_142264… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 03:55 AM |
| 3 | Milo being trashed for a bad joke. Lena Dunham publicly admits to sexually abusing a child and is celebrated as a liberal hero and an icon of women's rights.Milo was sexually molested by a Catholic priest as a child. Dunham raped her baby sister. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 12:32 AM |
| -4 | Milo being trashed for a bad joke. Lena Dunham publicly admits to sexually abusing a child and is celebrated as a liberal hero and an icon of women's rights.He did just say that. He was talking about himself as a 17 year old in a consensual relationship. People then immediately claimed that he was actually talking about the priest who raped him as a child. However, Milo has never portrayed the earlier experiences as anything but sexual abuse by a pedophile. People are just refusing to acknowledge his entire history of statements about his sexual abuse and instrad are putting words in his mouth in order to destroy hos reputation. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 09:50 PM |
| 3 | TIL feminist play "The Vagina Monologues" celebrates the statutorily rape of a 13 year old girl by a 24-year-old woman, describing it as a "positive, healing experience" and a "good rape".He was literally talking about a relationship he had when he was over the age of consent. Then, he joked of his being victimized by a priest by saying that it taught him how to give head. As a victim he is entitled to joke about it if that is his coping strategy, and this is where people need to chill out. He has never portrayed his experience as anything but sexual abuse by a pedophile. He has been outspoken against child sexual abuse. There's just nothing really there beyond people who want to… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 09:44 PM |
| 1 | How it's "sexy" when women post body-positive pics on dating sites/apps, but "disgusting" when men do.They never did, as there used to be brothels everywhere. And actually, married couples have more sex than singles. And it's getting worse for single men, sonce their opportunities to get laid are tied to their bank accounts more than ever. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Kentucky lawmaker’s bill forces men to get note from wives before purchasing ViagraThe people who view this false equivalency as legitimate actually do view men as slaves. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 01:04 PM |
| 2 | Kentucky lawmaker’s bill forces men to get note from wives before purchasing ViagraA protest bill to legalize FGM would actually make too much sense. You have to come up with something that's complete nonsense. Like, oh hey, let's ban gynecologists until women start registering for the selective service. Haha, hilarious! /s | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 02:24 AM |
| 6 | Kentucky lawmaker’s bill forces men to get note from wives before purchasing ViagraThe same kind of people who think it's hillarious when a woman severed her husband's penis and put it through the garbage disposal after he asked for a divorce. It's the "two wrongs make a right" crowd, even when theor sense of dairness and equitty is skewed beyond recognition. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 09:48 PM |
| – | Kentucky lawmaker’s bill forces men to get note from wives before purchasing ViagraIt succeeded in making feminists sound stupid and entitled. I don't know how anyone things that this will sway the anti-choice crowd from trying to undermine Roe vs Wade. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 09:34 PM |
| 9 | Kentucky lawmaker’s bill forces men to get note from wives before purchasing ViagraCalling these "two wrongs" is a false equivalency. Depriving women of a right that men did not have to begin with is not the same as randomly lashing out at men who suffer from a legitimate medical condition. If feminists wanted to "show men" just how important abortion rights were to them, they would be introducing bills for legal parental surrender. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 09:27 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?There probably is. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/17 05:00 AM |
| 4 | Women now filing 80% of divorcesBut there's a certain line to be drawn. Once it involves a penis and a garbage disposal, then it's hillarious. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/17 02:29 AM |
| 2 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?lol | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 11:39 PM |
| -1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?yourself would be the ones leaving You couldn't afford to hire me so no problem. Showed 2 friends. Both found it eh but not unfunny. Yeah that's the whole point. It's "eh". There are plenty of funny race jokes about every race and sex. But this one is "eh". If you've got a single brain cell in your skull that serves as a filter for the shit you say, then try to use that brain cell to picture a little scale of pros and cons. On the one side of the scale you have raping black slaves. On the other … | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 06:10 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Yeah, I'm so worried about a couple downvotes from butthurt trolls who are brigading this thread. I'll get right on that and make that the standard by which I gauge the social acceptability of slave rape jokes. /s | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 03:48 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Yep. Here we are. I'm still on the side of people who are saying, hey, maybe you shouldn't drag out the jokes about raping black slaves the moment anyone else makes a racist or sexist joke. You're ruining all the fun, dude. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?I'm telling you there's a huge difference between a lighthearted racist joke and a fucking cruel and mean-spirited racist joke. personally don't think the joke being made by the text on the bag is particularly funny. It's not about it being funny. It's about it being lighthearted enough that you could get away with it in polite company. Comparing it to a cruel and depraved joke about slave rape just shows that you really do lack a sense of humor. Basically, calm yourself. It's a joke. You also l… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?That is the difference between the bag joke and the slave boat joke. The bag joke was actually funny. The slave boat joke was just fucking dumb. In one you've got some actual humor, in the other you've only got the racism going for you. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 02:11 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?And you are the arbiter of what is and is not funny? I encourage you to print your slave boat joke on a bag and carry it with you to work. By all means, and let us know if you've still got a job by the end of the day. You and your sensibilities aren't the measure of morality. I think you'll find there is a broad consensus on this one. Idiotic: Nope. It draws on historical context to make the point. Nope. It draws on an irrelevant historical fact to remind people that even though you're a complet… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 01:56 PM |
| 1 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Yeah, we agree on this. A racist dumb-fuck is going to find some garbage jokes funny and get butthurt about not being able to openly make slave boat jokes in his workplace. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 01:44 PM |
| -7 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Case and point the ship guy. He is simply using an offensive joke to illustrate that if they want to make racist and sexist jokes And he would have had a point, too, if the joke was actually funny. The joke just isn't funny. Not because it's offensive, but because it's crude, idiotic, and irrelevant. if we only allow one kind of racist or sexist joke I'm okay with the funny ones. If you're going to react to a funny racist joke by offering up a totally stupid one just to be racist out of spite, t… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 09:13 AM |
| -13 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?No you illiterate muppet (you like that humor?), the article was supposed to give you an inkling of a clue about how "it could have ended very differently" (can you not fucking read?). I linked it to you so that maybe you could fucking understand why I was in a situation and had to make a horrible life or death decision. But alas I am seriously doubting your ability to understand logic, let alone humor. You don't get it, do you? There is a reason for off-color humor. There's always a motivation … | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 08:27 AM |
| -18 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Let me explain it to you then. I was in the Marines. I can deal with jokes about skull-fucking dead babies. But this joke is just lame. It can only really be appealing to guys who are insecure about their dick size and can't get laid. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 07:56 AM |
| 2 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.In this case, the 14-year-old girl produced and distributed child pornography. She should be in jail and on a life-long sex offenders' registry by the same exact legal standards that you are claiming we have "reasons" for. As /u/mwobuddy pointed out, the only real reason is just to punish males. It's all going according to plan so long as everyone turns a blind eye toward females who break the same exact laws. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 04:52 AM |
| 2 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Sorry but identity politics afflicys every race, sex, and national origin. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 02:54 AM |
| -16 | Bag that women at my work like. How is this not horribly sexist?Yeah. But the bag joke is actually funnier than the one you picked out. Even if they're both sexist and racist, at least one of them isn't making a sick reference to crimes against humanity. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 02:43 AM |
| 1 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.You should really take care to consider all the criteria set out in your Wikipedia link. You missed the part about severity. Whether or not the punishment fits the crime. In this regard, "unusual" means that the punishment is unusually severe for that type of crime. The frequency of the punishment is more useful in figuring out if it is cruel in overall terms; for example, we do not use medieval torture devices frequently so this would suggest that issuing such a sentence would be cruel and unus… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 02:16 AM |
| 1 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.No, that aspect of it would fall under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The 350-year prison sentence for suggestive teenage internet messages itself falls under the "cruel and unusual" standard even if you didn't have gender-based discrimination thrown in on top of it. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 01:32 AM |
| 3 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.Thats not what that means. Unusual is not talking about how often the punishment is handed out. It's talking about it being unusual versus the punishment normally given for other similar types of crimes. For example, the death penalty might not be unusual for killing a cop but it would be very unusual for a speedig ticket. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 11:28 PM |
| 10 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.He's getting downvoted for missing the point, as are you. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 08:20 PM |
| 15 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.The US has a constitution. The Constitution includes the 8th Amendment which forbids lawmakers and courts from applying cruel and unusual punishment. Prosecutors threatening a kid with 350 years in jail over having suggestive conversations with his online girlfriend is extreme and completely unreasonable any way you try to spin it. Every last thing that happened here should be protected by reasonable Romeo and Juliet laws as well as a healthy dose of discretion on the part of the prosecutors and… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 07:16 PM |
| 1 | Oklahoma abortions: Women may need partners' permissionThis is the wrong solution to your problem. Your genes are important and you should care about them. But it has nothing to do with another person's ability to have control and full ownership over their own body. You should be more concerned with how women & the law are able to exploit your own body through forced labor rather than trying to return the favor by fucking over women in kind. What you really want is something akin to a surrogacy contract. The good news is there is already a lot of pr… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 06:13 PM |
| 23 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.Tell that to the 40-year-old women who get off scot-free after they claim that the multiple underage boys they had raped "seduced" them. The issue first and foremost is one of discrimination and human rights violations. This is a violation of Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. The second issue is that by any reasonable standard, this constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, which is covered by … | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 04:57 PM |
| 21 | Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.The punishment he was given is the same as for rapists and murderers. In other words, when a teenage girl sends a non-identifiable photo of herself in her underwear to her boyfriend, the boyfriend deserves to be put on the same list as a convicted murderer or violent rapist. And you are defending this? Also, you know what? Age has nothing to do with the discrimination that is happening here. If a 12 year old boy received photos from a 17 year old girl, they would likewise arrest the boy for dist… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 04:34 PM |
| 1 | How boys are welcomed into this world - America vs. Japan, France, Germany etc.Please don't go with the "internalized misandry" argument to try to rationalize a wrongheaded point of view. Men and women are both just as much of a problem when it comes to this issue. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 02:54 PM |
| 9 | Oklahoma abortions: Women may need partners' permissionThe bill is only for husbands. This terribly written article is trying to make it sound like it's even worse than it already is. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/17 02:42 PM |
| 3 | Oklahoma man is forced to pay child support for baby his cheating wife conceived with her lover, because he filed a paternity test too late.Signing the birth certificate is a bullshit excuse. Did you have a lawyer present when you signed the birth certificate? Were you aware of the legal ramifications? Did you know that it wasn't your kid? Judges routinely throw out prenups on the basis that it was an unreasonable agreement and that the woman did not have all the necessary information to give her informed consent. Often, these claims are dubious, where women who literally had a lawyer negotiating on their behalf still manage to get … | /r/MensRights | 29/01/17 06:44 PM |
| 3 | Ladies night from hell 2Lady, they posted something anonymously to a public forum. First of all, their privacy is completely in tact. Second of all, there are no "take backs" on the internet. Third of all, human decency is the ability to value another person's rights over your own feelings. If you don't see the importance of posting stories like this to a men's rights forum, then you are a scumbag, filthy excuse for a human being without an ounce of decency in you. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 10:36 PM |
| 13 | 🤔🤔I'm not in. We don't have to ape feminist activism. We don't need a million people in every major city to march defiantly for reasons that no one is completely sure of. They have the numbers but not the actual issues on their side. But our march would be deemed a failure because we don't have the numbers even though we actually have legitimate concerns. Plus, most of us have jobs and mouths to feed and can't devote our time and money to navel gazing that won't achieve much. We are just going to … | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 07:11 PM |
| 3 | Ladies night from hell 2It's only a violation of rights if it's an actual right. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Posted in the lobby of my dormOr, let's say you invite a bunch of rival gang members to show up unbeknownst to each other. I'd be curious to see how this male-bashing party would turn out if the organizers were suddenly faced with spreading their message to men who were actually violent. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 07:17 AM |
| 6 | "Equal Pay is Not Enough", says violent feminist ad for overpriced shoes complaining that women pay more for thingsI assure you, they are launching a protest against it right now. /s | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 02:37 AM |
| 1 | Donna Hylton kidnapped, tortured, and murdered a white man. Years later, is featured speaker at the anti-Trump Women's March. Establishment media treats her as a hero, white-washes her history.I was just saying the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 03:00 PM |
| 6 | Parents short-changing girls on pocket money, survey shows - BBC NewsGirls are trusted less with money, or parents prefer buying girls gifts, that's your 'issue'. Every other study shows that parents spend more money on girls than on boys. So they may actually just be broke. This could also be a matter of social expectations, whether it's based on previous experience or entitlement. Parents of girls, who buy lots of things for their daughters, may also expect other people to also pay for their daughters. Parents of sons may not be able to expect anyone else to pa… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:47 PM |
| 3 | Donna Hylton kidnapped, tortured, and murdered a white man. Years later, is featured speaker at the anti-Trump Women's March. Establishment media treats her as a hero, white-washes her history.The thing is, she has a stable full of useful idiots - feminists - doing the convincing for her. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:15 PM |
| 6 | You Are Not Equal. I’m Sorry.Don't read the comments. It gets even worse. This is just a cult mentality. Years ago when I was debating Christians, they would do the same exact thing. If you did a good deed, then that was very Christian of you. If you came home from war in one piece, then that was because their deity had a greater purpose for you. If you told them that you weren't interested in their religion, they would admonish you about how Jesus died for your sins. Except with feminism, original sin is being a man and fe… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 05:18 AM |
| 1 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsIf you can't distinguish the petty bullshit from the substantive issues, that's your problem. I can. You literally can't. That's the whole problem. This is what you just said a comment ago: I don't take this subreddit seriously So that's right - if you can't take this subreddit seriously then it's because you can't distinguish between serious issues and the petty bullshit and troll posts that sometimes show up. If what you're looking for is a tightly controlled safe space where only a very narro… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 06:12 PM |
| 27 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themYes, those are the safe, easy jobs that firefighters get to do when they are sick or injured. Putting a woman on them full-time takes away the flexibility that men who perform dangerous work need in order to make a living at it. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 03:58 PM |
| 2 | Western countries are not patriarchies, but perhaps feminists secretly want them to be? I can see no other explanation for this...It's a symbol of man-hatred, maybe. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 03:00 PM |
| 0 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsDon't worry, the important part is no one who isn't a troll themselves will mistake you for an MRA now. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 08:48 PM |
| 2 | Feminists are butthurt over the fact that people think anyone who rapes should be jailedThe UK is one of the reasons why many third world shitholes have similar laws. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 08:44 PM |
| 0 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsThat would be called troll bait. It's designed to make trolls give themselves away and identify themselves as the fucking idiots that they are to anyone else who might have the misfortune of coming up against the mental turd droppings that they leave behind. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 07:27 PM |
| 1 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsSo what, do you also not take police brutality against blacks seriously because you don't like the way they go around with their pants hanging down? That's on you, buddy. If you're going to ignore the substantive issues put forth by the MRM because of an immature troll post you found on the internet, then I value your opinion less than a piece of dog shit on the sidewalk. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 07:24 PM |
| 1 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsBut do you actually understand that trolls and brigades are a problem for every sub on every topic? And do you actually understand that this is not a real issue? The real issue is that people like Warren Farrel get smeared and their words get twisted. The real issue is that when a man in a position of authority dares to mention a verifiable fact, his career gets destroyed by feminist agitators egging on a hysterical lynch mob. So to those of us who have been around for a while, these kinds of re… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 07:16 PM |
| 2 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsThe problem here seems to be that we have had a large number of trolls come in here and start upvoting other trolls. This is an issue. But those people who constantly comment on how this or that makes the MRM look stupid are severely misguided. They are typically the kind of person who also does not understand why feminists and men's rights activists can't just get along and they come here looking for a reason to blame it all on men's rights activists. The big tell is they typically also object … | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:44 PM |
| 3 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsNo, it's not like camping, it's like public sanitation. If they don't leave it in one place such as this, it will end up filling every other refuse bin from DC to wherever they came from. That, in turn, would actually result in all kinds of other people throwing trash on the sidewalk, including food which would be eaten by rats and contribute to rodent problems. And it would be far more expensive to clean up. I've gone camping and packed out even my shit. Actual shit. But I didn't take it all th… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:34 PM |
| 0 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsDon't get me wrong you're still an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:25 PM |
| 1 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?So instead of responding to the substance of my argument, which you absolutely have no response for, you are launching into an ad-hominem attack by pulling shit out of your ass about how I supposedly hate women. Yes, I'm a dick. Are you a pussy or an asshole? | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:24 PM |
| 0 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsLMAO. Okay, you got me. Man, I actually thought you were an idiot for a moment. But now I see that you're really just a troll. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:13 PM |
| 2 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsThere's two kinds of trolls in this world. There are the ones who post stupid shit and there are the ones who wait for stupid shit to get posted just to say "this is why nobody takes men's rights seriously". | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:11 PM |
| 1 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?Right, I read it using objective reason and logic. I forgot that I had to sink to the level of a hysterical lynch mob to exhibit "human understanding and compassion". Fuck you, buddy. I don't even like Trump, but you're just an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:07 PM |
| 2 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsYeah, no kidding. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:05 PM |
| 2 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsThere's trash receptacles for cups at marathons, And they are rarely used. Runners throw them on the street and cleaning crews pick them up afterward. 3D glasses are cleaned and recycle And so are these protest signs, you dope. They were told to leave the signs here so they can be easily collected and recycled. how ok it is for people to just leave their shit behind You lack the capacity of abstract thought. I guess if the city had built a giant cardboard box with poster-sized holes in it that w… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:04 PM |
| 1 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?As opposed to your "full" exchange when you take the words out and add your own words in? You're spinning this and twisting it so hard it makes you sound like you're wearing a tin foil hat. Here's what happened. In the first part of the exchange, Trump said that he got turned down by a woman. He admits that she was married. In other words, he did not say that he assaulted her. He said that she said "no" and he did not get any play. In the second part of the exchange, he explains why he was tryin… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 05:56 PM |
| -2 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsOkay from now on, bring all your trash home with you wherever you go. You know those little paper cups with water they give out to people running a marathon? Next time you run one, I need you to carry all your cups to the finish line and take them home with you. Going to see a movie? Getting some popcorn? I'm going to need you to carry your empty popcorn bag home with you. Oh, you said it's a 3D movie? I'm going to need you to take your disposable 3D glasses home with you. I want you to be such … | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 05:38 PM |
| 1 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?I'm sorry but you must be confused. The "full exchange" does not mean that you can cherry pick some of the words and leave out others. You do know that, right? Do you? Do you know that you can't leave out the part where Trump says that they LET HIM do it in order to twist it around to sound like a sexual assault? Seriously, do you know what a "full exchange" means? It doesn't mean "more material for me to cherry pick and twist around". | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 05:24 PM |
| 6 | The Film Industry Recognises Cassie Jay and "The Red Pill" with three historical awards.official recognition to material that deals with men's rights. I don't think it's historic for a controversial film to win an award because that happens all the time. Why is the age of the fest significant? Because the wording used by the OP made it sound like it was historic due to being the first ever documentary to win the top prize. given the number of films in the race Cassie herself has in the past written about the importance of promoting films by entering them into as many festivals as p… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 05:18 PM |
| -5 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsNo, it's a stupid post, but if anyone has the market cornered for reasons not to be taken seriously, it's feminism. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 04:30 PM |
| 18 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsNo, it's because when you have more than one million people in one place it is going to generate more trash than can fit into a normal trash receptacle on the sidewalk. They literally did clean up after themselves if this is as neat and organized as the photo makes it look. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 04:06 PM |
| 16 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsI don't think it's "we". This post is just ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 03:59 PM |
| 34 | "Feminists care about the environment". Here's what they left behind after their protestsWho cares why? It'll get recycled. This thread is so stupid. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 03:53 PM |
| 3 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?You're literally making shit up. I despise Trump but people like you are an embarrassment. against their will No, he said they LET HIM. using fame as an intimidating factor No, he said they LET HIM. At no point in that exchange did Trump confess to any sort of sexual assault. He literally said the opposite of what you imagine him to have said. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 09:50 AM |
| 3 | Don't know where they were going with this one..It's absolutely true. One of my Fusion Proglide blades lasts for 4-5 shaves, which is a miracle of modern engineering. Traditional safety razor blade will get me 2-3 shaves but keep in mind that "safety" is relative to a straight razor. A cheap disposable razor will not last through half a shave before the edge looks like a row of miniature shark teeth and slices right through my skin. By comparison, when my girlfriend appropriates my Fusion Proglide blades, she gets 50-60 shaves out of a single… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 04:17 AM |
| 16 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?You can't rape the willing. His entire comment was that they let you do anything. LET YOU. In other words, women welcome things that would otherwise be sexual assault. Which is absolutely true and it does not reflect poorly on Trump but on women. And getting angry about it reflects poorly on those who can't handle a man speaking honestly about his experience. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 12:51 AM |
| 2 | BREAKING - Seattle: "MILO Protest Shooting Suspect In Custody - Breitbart." Man is seriously woundedI wouldn't be surprised if they claim that he beats his wife. I've already seen him described as some sort of skinhead. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 12:24 AM |
| 6 | The Film Industry Recognises Cassie Jay and "The Red Pill" with three historical awards.I think it's a great thing. But I am not going to embarrass myself by telling people that she won a historic prize at the premier festival of the film industry and that it is considered the best movie of the year. I think it is a great film because it put men's rights activism in a positive light. I think it's great that it won awards. But that's the extent of it. Best film of the year? That's a bit much. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 10:23 PM |
| 13 | The Film Industry Recognises Cassie Jay and "The Red Pill" with three historical awards.the mindshare and marketshare of this festival don't matter It is when you are calling them "prestigious" and the win "historical", or one of the "highest honours in the Industry". This is what is getting carried away. In reality, this festival appears to be only 8 years old. And the only news sources that OP posted to support any of his claims were from the Idyllwild Town Crier. There was decent competition I really don't know one way or the other and I don't think anyone here does either. The … | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 07:34 PM |
| -3 | Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.Talk about finding a silver lining in a shit policy. He's going to use all those "spending cuts" to give tax breaks to greedy rich fucks and spend the rest of your tax money building a fucking wall and handing out kickbacks to cronies. There will be no savings to the average taxpayer. And many of the other things he wants to cut will hurt the economy and cost us far more money than it saves. Besides, these savings are trumped up bs. Over 10 years? It will take a miracle for this guy to last 4 ye… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 02:34 PM |
| 2 | How the media reports female child rapists.For fuck's sake, let me spell this out for you. If the legislature passed a statutory hand-rape law and she broke that law, your refusal to acknowledge that she actually broke the actual law as it exists in actual real life would still be just as much of a derail. The issue at hand is simple and it is clear. The woman was found guilty under a law just as any man would. Whether she was "seduced" by a 13-year-old or not is irrelevant to the law she was convicted of because it entails strict liabil… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 05:36 AM |
| 1 | How the media reports female child rapists.These laws are just one specific example of the kind of due process violations that feminists have been pursuing on every conceivable level and not just with regard to rape. Another example are the recent "yes means yes" laws which put the burden of proof on the accused to show that he was innocent. Another example are the strict liability in child support that feminists have ardently pushed for and refused to reform. Does not matter if DNA tests show that you are a victim of paternity fraud. Do… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:10 PM |
| 2 | How the media reports female child rapists.Your make-believe fantasy does not preclude reality. I don't care about what your agenda here is, but it has nothing to do with men's rights. You are actively hurting the cause of equal treatment under the law when you refuse to acknowledge that this woman violated statutory rape laws. Equality under the law is not subservient to whatever side-agenda that you may have. At least on this sub. Furthermore, your mixed up reasoning strains any credulity that you might otherwise have about what you be… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 03:31 PM |
| 2 | How the media reports female child rapists.I said we can talk when you decide to acknowledge that an adult woman having sex with a child violates the relevant statutory rape laws. Did you acknowledge this? Yes or no? | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 10:03 AM |
| 3 | How the media reports female child rapists.Because it's statutory rape. Learn to read and perhaps find out what these things called "statutes" are. Your problem is that you are freely substituting reality with what you believe reality should be in order to argue that reality does not exist. Stop it. Get with the program and realize that an adult woman who sleeps with an underage child is violating statutory rape laws. Get this fact through to your head and then we can talk. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 09:50 AM |
| 5 | How the media reports female child rapists.I know it's hard to parse words, but it's called statutory rape, not rape. Statutory rape means that your favorite state senators and the guv'nor made a law that says it's rape when XYZ happens. If you want to make a cogent argument, it would help if you actually recognized this fact as a fact instead of denying it. Now, I don't know if you're playing the part of pedophile apologist or feminist, but either way, the only thing you are defending here is the notion that the laws we have on the book… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 09:10 AM |
| 54 | The Film Industry Recognises Cassie Jay and "The Red Pill" with three historical awards.Let's not get carried away. Most of use have never heard of these awards before. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 03:11 AM |
| 1 | How the media reports female child rapists.That's not what it means. It means that it was enacted by legislative body as opposed to common law. It has nothing to do with intent. For example, drug laws are statutory but possession with intent to distribute is a statutory crime where demonstrating intent is very much necessary. But what is your actual point here? Repeating what I said about statutory rape laws removing intent from the equation does not only apply to men. It does not make it okay for a woman to sleep with a child and claim … | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 11:33 PM |
| 3 | How the media reports female child rapists.Statutory does not mean it's "seduction" when a woman does it. Not sure what you are trying to say. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 10:01 PM |
| 64 | How the media reports female child rapists.Stop plying little children with alcohol you vile pedo... /s | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 08:15 PM |
| – | How the media reports female child rapists.Men have gotten in trouble with underage girls who had fake id's. It's strict liability, it does not matter even if you were lied to and did not mean to do it. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 05:04 PM |
| 9 | "Did the Patriarchy Steal Friday the 13th From Women?"This is not a good enough reason to like Rebecca Watson. AFAIK she is still a full supporter of Patriarchy Theory, which makes her attempts at being rational all the more misleading. It's really easy to be rational when you are debunking batshit crazy psychics. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 01:51 AM |
| 28 | Make College Great Again: President Trump's new Education Secretary to Fight False Rape Culture on CampusSo this think tank is giving us a preview of what feminist propaganda is going to be like for the mext 4 years. The good news is that it's nothing new. The bad news, for them, is that the blatant lying is going to turn people away from feminism at even greater rates. But hey, if it didn't work the first time, try, try again... Here's hoping that we see more Matress Girls and Rolling Stone exposes of rapes on campus in 2017. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 10:39 PM |
| 55 | Make College Great Again: President Trump's new Education Secretary to Fight False Rape Culture on CampusThey're not missing the point. It's called lying. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 10:26 PM |
| 19 | There is a company that operates lounges at conferences and to promote equality, men are charged more for refreshments based on the gender pay gapI'd love to go. This is one of those bars where women buy the men drinks, right? /s | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 10:12 PM |
| 24 | Men's right activists show their creativity and steal the show in one of the top 10 Marathons of the worldI think they are helping him convey his message more strongly than his sign alone ever could. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/17 03:59 PM |
| 1 | argumentative essay on mens rightsYou can argue that the term should be redefined but you can't say that someone is using it incorrectly when they are following the accepted definition in the correct context. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/17 01:37 AM |
| 1 | argumentative essay on mens rightsWell it's definitely correct. In the United States, African American refers to a specific cultural/ethnic group with a particular history. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Philip Davies makes his debut on equalities committeeYou're concern trolling now. Face it. Day one on the job and you're calling the guy out for failing to do something. Which, given your feminism, will have to be a feminist act for it to actually count in his favor under your reckoning. And for the record, calling out our resident feminist dissenter for concern trolling does not make me a "fanatic". That's just bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 01:56 PM |
| 2 | Philip Davies makes his debut on equalities committeeNo, you're just concern trolling, that is just a simple fact. Dissent and debate is encouraged in this sub. But you're not doing so in good faith right now. You are one of our resident feminist dissenters who has made it perfectly clear that he is set against this movement and wants to see it fail. And here you are now twisting the old feminist canard about how this group has failed to achieve anything. So, on day one of Davies taking up his position, you're already claiming that he is a failure… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 01:44 PM |
| 2 | If feminism is bad for men, why are men happier than ever?That's like saying that murder is not bad because it hasn't reversed population growth. If you bothered to read your own articles, they point out things such as that automation has been taking a lot of the drudgery out of men's work. Men are also seeing a historical drop in their labor participation rate, etc. Disregarding your post hoc fallacy, it turns out that drudgery is correlated to being less happy. And the causal relationship between the two is self-evident. Who would have thunk? Also, s… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 01:42 PM |
| 1 | If feminism is bad for men, why are men happier than ever?I give you academic citations TIL that Daily Mail is an academic citation /s. You're such a troll. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 01:26 PM |
| 1 | Philip Davies makes his debut on equalities committeeYou're just being a concern troll. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 01:00 PM |
| 1 | argumentative essay on mens rightsThis is about as offensive as refering to citizens of the USA as Americans. African American refers to a specific cultural group which happens to be black. It's an idiomatic term to those who are familiar with American culture, history, and politics. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/17 04:39 AM |
| 2 | Can someone in the comments explain how this works?I agree it should be clear where it came from and have the proper context for why it is relevant. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 07:18 PM |
| 41 | Can someone in the comments explain how this works?Sillymod, you know as well as anyone else here that the only thing that has changed since this poster was made was the propaganda they use to defend this exact policy. Take a look at the blurred out university logo in the bottom corner. This is the most accurate poster I have ever seen of what current college policies are like. There is case after case of this exact posture being applied by college kangaroo courts. And then look at the more recent defense strategies by schools who get dragged in… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 06:06 PM |
| 2 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?"Yes, I'd like an angel shot please. cough... with a lime..." Somehow I don't see this happening. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 02:35 PM |
| 22 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?That's a narrow-minded answer. Nobody forces women to go on a date to Hooters any more than forcing them to work there. There's obviously some group of women who actually like that place. Also, the "omg he wants the waitress more than me" reaction is the first sign of an insecure woman. From the handful of times that I've been to this restaurant, I had noticed a lot of older couples there on dates. And they looked like they were having a good time while socializing with the people around them. T… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 02:16 PM |
| 5 | Judge sides with student punished by university after it exonerated him of rape claimsShe actually attacked him. If she didn't back him up he would have been forced to file actual charges against her. Not that it would hve worked, but maybe she haf a guilty conscience and this was her first time around the block with our slanted justice system. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 03:09 AM |
| 12 | Judge sides with student punished by university after it exonerated him of rape claimsThe truth is that there is no credible threat. These are majority female student bodies who would be affected by funding cuts. The funding cuts would also have to get through real courts with real lawyers. If this really came to pass, we would be witnessing a bizarre new world where suddenly the "primary" victims of false accusations and kangaroo courts were women. Also, many of these schools have gone well beyond what is called for by the feminist federal guidelines. They actually support these… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 02:48 AM |
| 4 | Ex-Marine mom kills daughter rather than returning her to the custodial father. Of course, it has to be PTSD or something. It couldn't possibly be anger at not having custody.Diminished doesn't even cut it. When a woman does something horrible to a man, she is the victim. When a man does something terrible to himself, the nearest woman is the victim. And when someone tries to point out that a man was the victim, they're only saying it because they hate women. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 02:25 AM |
| 10 | Ex-Marine mom kills daughter rather than returning her to the custodial father. Of course, it has to be PTSD or something. It couldn't possibly be anger at not having custody.Talk about double standards. Google "don't blame it on ptsd" and you'll get pages of articles decrying anyone who dares mention PTSD when a mentally ill male veteran murders someone. Because when men do it, it's because of male violence and toxic masculinity and Patriarchy and "men doing it to themselves". And how dare anyone disparage the mentally ill by associating them with things that mentally ill men do? That is so ablist! Why, if this ever happens, then mentally ill people will end up bein… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/17 03:45 PM |
| 1 | “radicalization of white men…”Okay then why don't you start making equally unreasonable, bullshit arguments, then? Why are you making perfectly reasonable, common-sense arguments and calling it a "mirror match"? It's not. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/17 03:43 PM |
| 1 | “radicalization of white men…”Feminists != all women. They are a special interest group representing a rather hateful and dogmatic worldview. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 08:29 PM |
| 2 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?From another comment that she made, apparently she is trying to stick gummy bears up her nose until they touch her brain. Maybe that's the problem. The anger and vitriol makes her indistinguishable from a feminist, especially an angry feminist. But I see her post history is pretty much out there even by feminist standards. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?He can afford a Mercedes, he can afford to replace the Mercedes keys... I'm not any kind of accountant. If you're not any kind of of accountant, then maybe you shouldn't be making financial decisions on behalf of other people? Have you ever considered that? These kind of mental gymnastics are how people such as yourself end up getting in way over your heads. Instead of doing property damage based on what you believe your boyfriend can afford, you should be basing it on what you can afford to pay… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 08:08 PM |
| 2 | “radicalization of white men…”Are they being sensible? That's exactly my point. Their claims of oppression are completely out there and their radicalization is completely out there. To the point where they no longer care about the human rights of their supposed oppressors. It's really a bad idea to even begin to compare what they call for to what MRA's call for. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?I saw that comment but I think she's really just a typical feminist. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?Where did I threaten to sue? Is that some sort of Freudian slip from your real life, or are you confusing me with another commenter? The cheaters are always the first to suspect cheating from other The cheaters are the ones who think up hypothetical scenarios of how they would wreck their partner's life if they were to find out that they were being cheating on. This is part of the paranoia of a cheater, driven by their own guilty mindset. Normal people just walk away from unhealthy relationships… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 07:18 PM |
| 1 | “radicalization of white men…”This Tweet lacks any sort of context. If they are talking about white nationalism, then they at least might have some sort of a point. If white nationalists were only men. And if they were flying airplanes into skyscrapers. And if their predicament was created by a dogmatic, intolerant religion, as opposed to economic hardship. If their existence wasn't being fueled by fervant identity politics that nlamed all of the world's problems on them. If the country she lives in could no longer rely on w… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 02:46 PM |
| 0 | “radicalization of white men…”As a grievance, it doesn't rise to the level of the other two. You can't actually be sensible while claming the need to radicalize your special-interest group. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 02:39 PM |
| 16 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?The problem is that if they ever allowed for the possibility of a man being the victim of financial abuse, then just about every single one of us would be a victim multiple times over. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 01:14 PM |
| 5 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?Why, because throwing someone's 20-dollar car keys into the water is so traumatic? Because maxing out the cards on a man who owns a Mercedes is probably like, a month's pay for this guy. A set of replacement Mercedes keys costs up to $500. You're clearly not a brilliant accountant, so perhaps you should refrain from being "creatively wild" when trying to estimate how much property damage and credit card fraud you are inflicting against someone who hurt your feelings. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 01:03 PM |
| 15 | Woman Leaves Posters All Over Town To Get Revenge On Cheating Partner | TheLADbible: " Linda also went and threw the keys to his Mercedes in the canal, she's changed the locks (presumably to their house and not the car) and maxed his cards." Financial abuse?And yet you claim that this is not abusive behavior? You have only made the case that it is by showing us just how abusive your own mindset is. The irony is that you are probably a cheater yourself. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 12:53 PM |
| 15 | Intel has partnered with a sexist, racist, hypocritical, lying con-artist in their initiative to promote diversity in techI have always thought that it was because the c-level management of these companies really hates their engineering employees. I can understand how this could be a wage suppression strategy or a sort of career ceiling above which most engineers are not supposed to rise within the organization. But can't even begin to understand how it could be a marketing strategy. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/17 05:35 PM |
| 2 | Discussion: What should the Men's Rights Movement do next?they're here more for the anti-SJW circlejerk I don't think that's why they are here. I think they are here because they have heard that men's rights activists were white nationalists in the mainstream media. Once they realize that it's not actually true, they will leave. They might gravitate towards the anti-SJW posts for now because there's really not much else for them to do here. It's important to keep in mind that correlation doesn't mean causation. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/17 06:23 AM |
| 1 | College can't force conservative students to lobby for leftist causes, groups tell high court - The College Fix"Lobbying" has nothing to do with social work, no more so than with coal mining or defense contracting. Lobbying is a purely political activity whether you agree with the cause or not. It is perfectly fine for a professional organization to lobby on behalf of its members. But to force non-members to engage in lobbying they do not agree with in order to receive a publically funded education is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 10:00 PM |
| 1 | College can't force conservative students to lobby for leftist causes, groups tell high court - The College FixThe problem is that he was told that unless he became a leftist, he could not be a social worker and would get kicked out of school. It's pretty much soelled out in the emails he received from his professor. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 12:43 AM |
| 1 | College can't force conservative students to lobby for leftist causes, groups tell high court - The College FixNobody was asking you to lobby for a flat earth society, either! Your anecdote is completely different in nature. This student was told that not only was he required to lobby for partisan political campaigns, but that failing to adopt the point of view of prominent social services industry groups would result in him getting kicked out of the academic program. In other words, he was told that the purpose of his education was to further a leftist social justice agenda. It was not meant as a nonpar… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 12:31 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW seems to be an epitomization of men's rights, but I've seen it criticized even in the manosphere. So tell me, men's rights supporters who dislike, hate or otherwise disapprove of MGTOW, why do you?If you want a scientific study of the movement I'm afraid I won't be able to point you in the direction of one. My opinion is based on years of anecdotal experience. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 12:05 AM |
| 7 | College can't force conservative students to lobby for leftist causes, groups tell high court - The College FixThere's a huge difference between a professional group supporting political causes on behalf of its members and professors using public funding and blackmail to force students to engage in political activism. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/17 03:25 PM |
| 5 | College can't force conservative students to lobby for leftist causes, groups tell high court - The College FixNobody was asking you to present the flat earth theory as though it were your own outside of the classroom. Did you read the article? | /r/MensRights | 06/01/17 03:09 PM |
| 2 | The naked truth about "male privilege"But thats just men doing it to themseves because Patriarchy! /s | /r/MensRights | 05/01/17 07:14 PM |
| 1 | HuffPo is cancer: "if your boyfriend doesn't give you total control over him, he's micro-cheating you"You mean you haven't micro-cheated on your wife? | /r/MensRights | 04/01/17 01:24 PM |
| 2 | Unbelievably lenient: Young mother, 20, who left her ex-boyfriend with brain damage after she drunkenly mowed him down grins and gives a thumbs up as she AVOIDS jailHell, by crippling him she probably kept him from doing something really stupid and killing himself... like the judge said, they were both very lucky. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 11:58 PM |
| 20 | Unbelievably lenient: Young mother, 20, who left her ex-boyfriend with brain damage after she drunkenly mowed him down grins and gives a thumbs up as she AVOIDS jailjudge said she did not want to 'wreck' the life of her young son, now aged four. TIL leaving a father with permanent brain damage after an attempted murder does not count as wrecking a child's life. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 10:10 PM |
| 3 | Women's shelters team up to shut down the first men's health programIt's also ridiculous when they say that men only have preexisting problems all caused by men and the Patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 10:00 PM |
| 2 | Harvard finds that women employees under-perform because they receive vague criticism. "This protective hesitation — the failure to give feedback due to worry that the recipient might be upset — is a critical barrier." Nobody mentions WHY males are so afraid to criticize females.I edited out the advice. I realized you probably already knew that. From what I have seen, the hiring of lots of designers seems to have come along with diversity initiatives in STEM fields. The problem is that there are sometimes different reporting structures so that neither one reports to the other. There is a lack of leadership clarity as to whom is in charge of anything. I thought maybe that is what was going on in your story. So while the designers should be junior employees until they bec… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 02:20 PM |
| 0 | Harvard finds that women employees under-perform because they receive vague criticism. "This protective hesitation — the failure to give feedback due to worry that the recipient might be upset — is a critical barrier." Nobody mentions WHY males are so afraid to criticize females.I thought you said she was a designer, not an engineer. This makes a huge difference. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 01:04 PM |
| 6 | Harvard finds that women employees under-perform because they receive vague criticism. "This protective hesitation — the failure to give feedback due to worry that the recipient might be upset — is a critical barrier." Nobody mentions WHY males are so afraid to criticize females.You're not responding within the context of what I said. Nobody owes feedback to an employee who is incapable of handling it in a positive manner. Normally, you would just fire these kinds of underperforming employees. Or you wouldn't even hire them, to begin with. But then, we are talking about female employees in a PC workplace environment where gender-based quotas are a very real thing. Does it hurt a lot of good employees? Yes, it does. But that's been the argument against affirmative action… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 03:54 AM |
| 18 | Harvard finds that women employees under-perform because they receive vague criticism. "This protective hesitation — the failure to give feedback due to worry that the recipient might be upset — is a critical barrier." Nobody mentions WHY males are so afraid to criticize females.Let's put it another way. Nobody needs to put their own career at risk in order to help a thin-skinned underperformer advance in hers. Especially for all the quota hires that everyone knows are not up to the task, but is too afraid to say anything about it openly. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/17 12:13 AM |
| 2 | America's Top Sex Crimes Expert SaysI have a simpler explanation which resonnates with me: they are a dogmatic ideology. If these people wanted to make money, there are plenty of more valuable things they could have done with their lives. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 07:51 PM |
| 30 | Harvard finds that women employees under-perform because they receive vague criticism. "This protective hesitation — the failure to give feedback due to worry that the recipient might be upset — is a critical barrier." Nobody mentions WHY males are so afraid to criticize females.Maybe the women underperform because they react badly to criticism, not because it's vague. Or maybe they react badly to criticism just because they are under-performers. Either way, nobody owes them honest criticism. They have to seek it out for themselves instead of crying bloody murder when reality hits them in the face. [Edit] It also occurred to me that since they were reviewing technical firms, there's probably a paucity of women who were actually working in technical roles. The vague & co… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 07:23 PM |
| 24 | Marvel was hijacked by cancerous propagandaI have never been a comic book expert. But it is my understanding that comic books have alwaya been a propaganda machine. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 07:08 PM |
| 1 | America's Top Sex Crimes Expert SaysYes, I do believe that this is the dillemma for feminists. Either claim that nobody cares about rape victims or acknowledge that there is an incredibly high rate of false accusations and throw away their entire social agenda since the days of Andrea Dworkin. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 06:57 PM |
| 1 | Men Can Be Such Fools: But She Told Me She Couldn’t Get Pregnant!Not all of us and not like that. This guy did not have the ability to think to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 06:07 PM |
| 2 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.And all that I said is that I have no problem with increased burden on society so long as it's paid for by women. So saying that this would be hard to do is either an argument against change or you don't really have any disagreements with me. I think it's the latter. Actually, I see the problem more in terms of incentives than just some willy-nilly transfer of wealth from men to women. For example, I would find it agreeable for men to subsidize women's birth control while forcing single women to… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 05:49 PM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.That may have been true to some extent for the past 150 years or so, but it's a counterproductive argument that's most often used to prevent change. Before the Tender Years doctrine, for example, women had no hope of using babies as a payday because custody would always be awarded to the father who could afford it. More to the point, it's entirely possible to reduce the types of transfer payments that encourage single motherhood and encourage good-faith behavior from women without necessarily cu… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 04:49 PM |
| 3 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.He never claimed to be a feminist. He claimed to be a dictionary definition of a feminist. This person is arguing in bad faith. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 03:47 PM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.What, that I wrote, are you referring to? What are you agreeing or disagreeing with? I made several statements, none of which were in the form of a question. So then which part "would be men". I'd like to know what your point is. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 03:27 PM |
| 2 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.You're embarrassing yourself. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 03:24 PM |
| 5 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.No, a dictionary is not a proof, any more than "Wanda is a whore" written on the bathroom wall is proof that Wanda is or ever was a whore. Look, I hate to be the guy who says that he knows feminists better than you do, but that much is clear. I believe that you're well intentioned and that you support this issue. No problem, that is great. We're all individuals with individual beliefs. But, please don't presume that your poorly argued claims about the nature of feminists will have any sway over … | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 08:27 AM |
| 6 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Here is a fact. Nope. OR they will agree with me as they believe in the equality of the sexes. You have zero credibility until you try it. Let me know how it works out. Literally all my feminist friends support legal abortion You'd have to first prove that you have friends if you're going to use this line of argumentation. I think you'll find that it is feminists that are campaigning in Sweden I really don't care. LUF also thinks that incest and necrophilia should be legal. If that's how far you… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 08:00 AM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.What are you referring to? | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 07:13 AM |
| 1 | Men Can Be Such Fools: But She Told Me She Couldn’t Get Pregnant!I lost hope for this guy after the hot tub. And I was not wrong. The more I hear, the worse it gets. But I'm not seeing what it has to do with men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 06:17 AM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.No, I'm not "mad" about it. Regardless of how I feel, your earlier rhetoric was a false choice. Your 3 hypothetical options are much better than the current system, but they are not the only possible option that is fair. In fact they're not even the most fair, or free of perverse incentives. Before the Tender Years doctrine, people would have laughed at your lack of good judgment if you were to make your 3 suggestions. Abortion was very much illegal, but custody went to the parent who could best… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 04:41 AM |
| 15 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Nope, it has nothing to do with a No True Scotsman. It has to do with you trying to use the dictionary definition to tell me what a feminist is. The fact is, you are either lying or you are ignorant of what feminists are really like. Supporting equally of the sexes makes you a former feminist. Perhaps a former feminist who doesn't know it yet. And if you don't believe me, go tell some of your feminist friends about your egalitarian views. You will become a persona non grata faster than a Russian… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 02:36 AM |
| 2 | Tesco cuts price of women's razors so they cost the same as mens (x-post from /r/twoxchromosomes)I've since looked up the origin of the hairstyle. Here's what I found: the fauxhawk was later popularised by David Beckham, the famous soccer player, who himself copied the style from Tunisian-French fashion designer Hedi Slimane. http://askthenerdblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/who-invented-fohawk.html So, yes, I was right. David Beckham? Tunisian-Fench fashion designer? Yes, that is exactly the kind of "men's haircut" that a finicky woman would pay a lot of money for. It doesn't sound like a $20 men… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 01:48 AM |
| 13 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Hah! Yeah, you're not a real feminist. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 01:14 AM |
| 1 | Tesco cuts price of women's razors so they cost the same as mens (x-post from /r/twoxchromosomes)they often still charge me for a more expensive "women's haircut" Yes, but... then you said this: said they actually only do one basic men's cut. (A fauxhawk) No man would ask such a question. I've been a man for nearly 40 years and I've never even heard of a fauxhawk. Honestly, that sounds like the name of a man's haircut that a woman would get. A cheap man's haircut is referred to as something like this: "half an inch shorter, please." As numerous stylists and barbers have repeatedly pointed o… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 01:13 AM |
| 4 | r/Enoughtrumpspam user believes men's rights films are breeding grounds for rapists.Unless I'm mistaken I think they were talking about theredpill sub on Reddit, not the movie. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/17 12:38 AM |
| 2 | We Are Living in a Post-Shame World—And That’s Not a Good ThingI'm so sick of iPhone's auto-misspell feature. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 11:54 PM |
| 9 | We Are Living in a Post-Shame World—And That’s Not a Good ThingJust a bunch of bullshit. If someone like Trump had been found guilty of rape prior to the election, he would have never won. What people got tired of has been several years of sensationalist false accusations that fall apart under scrutiny. Trump benefited from the railroading of public figures like Dominique Strauss-Khan, Jullian Assange, and even Bill Cosby. If the takeaway is for people to look for evidence before agreeing to destroy other people's careers and lives, then nothing has been lo… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 10:35 PM |
| 4 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.without putting something else in its place You can replace it with personal accountability. Women already receive subsidized birth control and reproductive care. In fact, women should actually receive fewer subsidies from taxes paid by men, and should have to start paying for it themselves, as a group. You will see feminists take an entirely different view of single motherhood once it's their money that is going out to subsidize these mothers. parenthood becomes an even more dangerous propositi… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 08:25 PM |
| 3 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Especially if they have cheap birth control and abortion available to them. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 08:12 PM |
| 3 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.I have no problem with that increased burden as long as long as it gets paid for by women. Otherwise, it's a circular argument where you are saying that men have to pay because men have to pay. I suggest that women's social-welfare programs should be paid for by uterus insurance. The elephant in the room is, of course, the fact that women who make irresponsible decisions with regards to their right to an abortion should never be given custody. We should roll back the Tender Years doctrine and aw… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 08:02 PM |
| 6 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.It really doesn't matter. He would have to win a precedent-setting case in front of the supreme court for any of it to help him out now. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 07:58 PM |
| 11 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.This thread seems to have attracted a large group of feminists as well as very vocal pro-life supporters who are trying to make their respective arguments without identifying themselves as such. You, however, are either not a feminist or you don't really believe that. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 07:48 PM |
| 8 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.You're comparing a fringe minority's view of social issues on the one hand to the majority position on legal issues on the other. The largest, most prominent feminist organizations as well as feminist political leaders in government, business, entertainment, academia, etc., virtually all oppose equal rights for men. Meanwhile, the few prominent MRM organizations and individual leaders that hold this movement together really do support gender equality in the legal sense. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 05:34 PM |
| 9 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.No. Personal accountability for women. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 05:25 PM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Sterilization is not 100% effective and neither is abstinence. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 05:20 PM |
| 3 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Because I'm not ignorant. A zero sperm count only means that at the time that you took the test, the test failed to detect any sperm. Men still produce sperm after a vasectomy. And through a process called recanalization, it is possible for the sperm to find their way back into the ejaculate. Or, the test could have been inaccurate. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 05:12 PM |
| 2 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.No, buddy. You have sex with birth control under the premise that in the unlikely event that it fails, you can get an abortion, leave it at a safe haven, or put it up for adoption. What's more, which goes above your head because you are numerically illiterate, combining more than one birth control measure decreases the odds drastically. You might have to have sex for a ten thousand years before a chance pregnancy occurs, as opposed to the hundred years that it would take for an IUD to result in … | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 05:04 PM |
| 3 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Wrong. You could have a vasectomy, wait until your sperm count is zero, and then still conceive a child at some later point. Because it is not 100% effective. Let me ask you a question, then. If you spread bullshit misinformation about the effectiveness of birth control, shouldn't that make you responsible? | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 04:47 PM |
| 0 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Yes, men are more likely to see the government as the enemy. But it does not follow that they should be conservative as a result. It's always been conservative governments that took the most from men. And lest we forget, Feminism itself started out as a socially conservative religious movement. Even suffragists were rich white women who were alarmed at the thought of black male war veterans earning a right to vote before rich white women could. Prohibition, etc., was as conservative as it gets. … | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 04:41 PM |
| 3 | Domestic violence has no gender: Award-Winning Connecticut Cop Arrested for Domestic Violence Hours After Arresting Man for Domestic Violence for Reality Cop ShowThis article reads like a cherry-picked version of the original: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/TV-cop-star-arrested-for-domestic-violence-10425506.php Here's what they left out. First, the woman entered her boyfriend's house through a security code. It sounds like she could have had permission to enter. And then: While he claimed they had broken up two weeks ago, she maintained they were still involved in a relationship, and were to attend a wedding together on Sunday. While the boyfriend … | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 04:13 PM |
| 5 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.I mean he's probably already there, we are just asking him to put the phone down and go back to holding his sign. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 03:25 PM |
| 1 | I just wanted to end 2016 on this note -X-Repost.Sorry eggs, but that is bullshit. Even if religious traditionalists were to make abortion illegal, it does not follow that men should be financially responsible for the baby for 21 years. You've presented us with a false choice. It would be kind of like saying that we should either strive to help men live as long as women or kill women five years early. Either way, right? Because of equality /s. No, it's just a really huge clue about something we should have all learned as kids: two wrongs don't… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 03:21 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.I have empathy, which is why I can't put one person's feelings above another person's rights. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 02:32 AM |
| 1 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.No, your personal feelings do not make for a persuasive argument against bodily autonomy. I can sympathize with your anxiety but there is no way that this should supersede other people's rights. Again, you're just trying to dress up a pro-life position in an emotional argument targeted at men. I actually think it's kind of a jerk move. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 10:27 PM |
| 15 | huffingtonpost.in: Dear Men's Rights Activists, We Need More Feminism For Gender Justice, Not Less: are based largely to discredit women's movements, then these calls are highly suspect.Violence against women is lower than violence against men by orders of magnitude. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 08:35 PM |
| 2 | More men are developing eating disorders. Why are we treating it as only a women’s disease?For the same exact reason why breast cancer research gets more funding than prostate cancer research. Also, the feminist narrative on eating disorders is completely hysterical and not worth emulating. There are many far more important men's rights issues, IMO. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.So you find it terrifying that your wife has bodily autonomy? That's too bad. But people's rights should be based on reason and logic, not feelings. You are expressing a pro-life point of view which is very much contrary to everything that the MRM is trying to achieve. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 08:05 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.If you are afraid that your wife would abort your kids then you've got much bigger problems in your marriage than her right to an abortion. No matter what, your marriage is over. If she gets an abortion, if you forbid her from getting one, or if pro-lifers manage to outlaw it altogether, you now have a marriage on your hands that you really don't want. You will have to deal with divorce, loss of custody, and the child support system. You will not get a penny back from the hundreds of thousands o… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 03:24 PM |
| 3 | When men express human emotions it traumatizes womenThe post is talking about boys. And quite frankly it is astounding that an adult woman would find this triggering. I hope she is not a parent. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 09:27 PM |
| 4 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.Okay I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt that you've encountered a few, but it is my experience that these views are insignificant. I would never agree to the idea that this is in any way a mainstream MRA position, or that it has any correlation to wanting kids or not wanting kids. All of those claims are conjecture at best. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 08:49 PM |
| 5 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.Okay, not every pro-lifer is a religious nutjob. But that's beside the point. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 07:47 PM |
| 7 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.Okay, you're linking to your own posts where you claim that this is what MRA's believe. And the one comment where someone actually did believe this had several responses calling it out as ill-conceived and wrong. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 07:46 PM |
| 11 | Feminist Bias Against "The Red Pill" is More Extreme Than The Westboro Baptist Church? Cassi Jaye's best interview yet.Some MRAs that want children at this time in their life: "If I get a woman pregnant, she should require my consent to terminate the pregnancy." Like who? Where are these MRA's? I have heard this in the past from religious conservatives who really just say that as part of their broader opposition to abortion. It's not "MRAs that want children". More often than not they have a lot of anti-MRA views. If/when I do want children, I still cant imagine taking that view. Well, you're strawmanning the MR… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 04:40 PM |
| 1 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistYou're seriously warped. You are now at the point of claiming that protecting oneself against faked pregnancy claims makes someone a cuck. You are claiming that digging up evidence of fraud or deceit is seeking emotional support from others. Up is down, down is up. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 04:15 PM |
| 1 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistYou sound like every other cuck I've ever met. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 03:59 PM |
| 1 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistThanks for the laughs. From the sound of things you could be dating crazy right now and not even know it. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 03:21 PM |
| 4 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistOh you are just so trusting and loyal. You haven't been in too many relationships if you actually believe in that chivalric nonsense about walking away with your tail tucked between your legs and nothing bad ever happening after that. I'm all about sticking up for myself and sleeping soundly at night. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/16 02:51 AM |
| 3 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistOnly you are missing the point. If the man breaks up with the woman there is 0 chance of pregnancy. But if the woman convinces him that she is pregnant she stands a chance at continuing to have sex and compromising birth control measures. Any pregnancy that results after that initial lie is fraud by extension. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 10:08 PM |
| 3 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistHalf jokingly, I mean that getting a vasectomy does not mean you can safely stick your dick in crazy. You will still have the one who steals your credit cards and maxes them out, the one who gets angry and starts making false accusations, the one who keys your car or tries to set your house on fire, or even the one who tries to track down your next girlfriend and claw her eyes out. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 08:02 PM |
| 3 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistIf she lied to continue the relationship and then manages to get pregnant then it is fraud. If he is financially supporting her and she lied to continue the relationship then it is fraud. The specter of child support payments is more than a big enough threat to convince any man to reconsider his desire to break off a bad relationship. And in light of this type of paternity fraud, the man was not wrong at all to want to end the relationship. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 08:00 PM |
| 3 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistSounds to me like he was setting himself up for a false rape accusation. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 07:08 PM |
| 5 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistThis is just the first step. If there is an impending breakup, this can buy 2-3 months of time. During that time, the woman might try to either get pregnant for real and therefore legally trap the man. And the man has no legal recourse to claim fraud, so it's definitely a rights issue. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:57 PM |
| 16 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistA vasectomy is not 100% reliable against crazy. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:38 PM |
| 18 | Pregnant woman earns $200 A DAY by selling her positive pregnancy tests on CraigslistOh no, it's not crazy at all. When a woman is attempting to defraud you, breaking up with her is risky. You need to protect yourself against any other false accusations she might make. A false pregnancy test is a pretty serious problem and could have been the first step in extortion. Whatever she was trying to do could have had serious financial consequences for life. Or maybe she was just scheming to get him to hand over $500 for an "abortion" that she was going to use to help finance her doubl… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:13 PM |
| 2 | The biggest german public news service just posted, that "white men" are the reason for growing right-wing populism in Europe. Without any statistics or studies ofc.I'm critical of the fact that he was not prepared. There was nothing else for him to do because he and his administration ignored the intelligence leading up to the attacks and did not have a plan. So upon hearing the news he looked indecisive. Unsure of himself. I'm saying that the look on his face was a symptom of the underlying problem. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 03:08 AM |
| 2 | The biggest german public news service just posted, that "white men" are the reason for growing right-wing populism in Europe. Without any statistics or studies ofc.Hey, long time no hear! Glad to see you in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 02:34 AM |
| 2 | The biggest german public news service just posted, that "white men" are the reason for growing right-wing populism in Europe. Without any statistics or studies ofc.Not looking like a deer in the headlights would have been a great start. He didn't do anything because he didn't bother to prepare for what to do. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 02:27 AM |
| 3 | The biggest german public news service just posted, that "white men" are the reason for growing right-wing populism in Europe. Without any statistics or studies ofc.It's a fact recorded on video that someone literally walked up to Bush and whispered in his ear that jets were plowing into the WTC building and Bush just stood there dumbfounded. You can interpret that whichever way you like but to me, it's emblematic of a man who was failing in his leadership role. We'll never know if Bush could have prevented the 9/11 attacks, but that's the wrong question. The right question is whether he was doing everything possible to stop it. I think the evidence we do h… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 01:41 AM |
| 1 | Just a random post on Whisper. Backs up some claims I've seen made hereYeah, but for every wasted MD there's a hundred basket weaving degrees that also waste resources. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 01:19 AM |
| 6 | Just a random post on Whisper. Backs up some claims I've seen made hereAny degree is bullshit when you're only taking it for the entertainment value. Female MD's, in particular, are in it to land a rich husband and they don't wait long after that before dropping out. That's also why you don't see women entering into difficult majors that merely produce middle-class men. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 12:37 AM |
| 8 | Just a random post on Whisper. Backs up some claims I've seen made hereThat's likely more to do with being rich. Getting a PhD in feminist jazz theory probably means you're just using your daddy's money to delay entering into the workforce to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 11:38 PM |
| 5 | The biggest german public news service just posted, that "white men" are the reason for growing right-wing populism in Europe. Without any statistics or studies ofc.This is an incredibly sugar-coated version of the status quo. The reality is that the feminist parties are rabidly anti-male so they are not really a great option for men. They are also corrupt and pursue a corporatist version of globalization, which destroys middle-class jobs. But the right wing nutjobs are not much better. The right wing creates plenty of confrontation and start wars. They suck ass at diplomacy. They actively spread lies about foreign and economic policies, from trickle-down t… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 11:07 PM |
| 1 | BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake newsThis is adding fuel to the alternative reality fire. There is already a widely accepted narrative that women are being discriminated against in the tech industry, when the reality is that women actually benefit from favoritism. It does hurt the industry and the people who work in it. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 09:16 PM |
| 4 | BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake newsYeah but then the kind of people who believe in ghosts and alien abductions decided that destroying the planet will make Jesus come back sooner. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 09:10 PM |
| 1 | BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake newsThat's a really good description of the Brittish Empire. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 08:50 PM |
| 2 | A Statement By Feminist Scholars On The Election Of Donald Trump As President Of The United States: Compare to shameful and continuing silence as 307,000 veterans died, foster children and prisoners were raped, and boys and man were denied equality under Title IX.But was he really running or was he just talking about himself because that's the only thing he ever does anyway? | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 12:43 AM |
| 3 | A Statement By Feminist Scholars On The Election Of Donald Trump As President Of The United States: Compare to shameful and continuing silence as 307,000 veterans died, foster children and prisoners were raped, and boys and man were denied equality under Title IX.Regardless of the humor about qualifications, Trump was among the most unpopular candidate ever elected. At least in terms of favorabimity ratings. He likely won because of a combination of Russian and FBI meddling in the election, along with a very weak opponent. Mickey Mouse could have won over Trump. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 12:08 AM |
| 23 | A Statement By Feminist Scholars On The Election Of Donald Trump As President Of The United States: Compare to shameful and continuing silence as 307,000 veterans died, foster children and prisoners were raped, and boys and man were denied equality under Title IX.I love how these Orwellian nutjobs want to reject democracy in order to save it. I love how they blatantly say that they will refuse to "understand" anyone with a different point of view. That's basically what lost them the election in the first place, against pretty much the weakest and least qualified presidential candidate in American history. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/16 05:13 AM |
| 2 | Have you ever noticed how the second the lack of male-reproductive rights are brought up, Abstinence-only suddenly becomes a legitimate argument?Don't know why you were downvoted. You're absolutely right. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/16 04:27 AM |
| 1 | Australian male cricketers 'should give up their revenue share' to help female players earn more - abc.net.au | Somehow "Equality" always translates to "Men handing over their money to women, because reasons"See, now you're cheating. We are talking about average life expectancy. You can't just compare upper class white guys with no major illnesses or injuries against average women and claim that men, on average, are held back by a theoretical limit. And no, people do not just get old and die. Death by "natural causes" actually means that any number of disease processes has progressed and caused organ failure where biased medical research and spending play an important role. Alzheimer's is actually a… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/16 03:20 PM |
| 1 | Australian male cricketers 'should give up their revenue share' to help female players earn more - abc.net.au | Somehow "Equality" always translates to "Men handing over their money to women, because reasons"No, I'm sorry but you are fixated on this ridiculous idea that the theoretical biological limit has anything to do with the practical limits we encounter in the real world. I told you from the very beginning that this is a red herring. It's like this. We're giving women Porsches and we're giving men Ford Fiestas, but you keep going back to talk about how women's smaller bodies might be better suited to setting the land speed record. The theoretical limit would only come into play if you did ever… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/16 02:27 AM |
| 4 | CNN opinion article-written by female doctor- claims that women make better doctors.Which is the important part. Not only do male doctors take on the more difficult cases, but they see more patients and work for many more years. If we were left up to women, there would be a massive shortage of doctors and many more people would die as a result. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 08:44 PM |
| 4 | When Men's Rights Means Anti-Women, Everyone Loses | Noah Berlatsky on PatreonThe reason his article hasn't been published is because it concedes too many points to the MRM all at the same time. The usual format for this kind of propaganda is to only acknowledge one MRM argument and claim that it was actually a feminist idea all along. This allows feminists who use it as a reference to continue denying every other point while claiming that they are not really conceding the one that they are presently losing ground on. But, this male feminist tries to appropriate too many … | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Australian male cricketers 'should give up their revenue share' to help female players earn more - abc.net.au | Somehow "Equality" always translates to "Men handing over their money to women, because reasons"Live longer, incur most costs. So it's a bit of a feedback mechanism. I'm afraid you've got the cause & effect backward. It's, spend more and therefore live longer, not live longer and therefore spend more. And this is especially important because women's health care is largely paid for by men. Let's do a quick thought experiment. What do you think would happen to women's life expectancy under the following conditions: Women have to cover all of their own healthcare costs through their own earni… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 06:13 PM |
| 5 | US median pre-tax income for men hasn't gone up in 50 years. (Piketty, Saez and Zucman 2016)The problem is that wages should have gone up along with productivity growth. Feminism is the white elephant in the room. Why are women needed in the workplace, again? | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 03:18 AM |
| 0 | Feminist Jessica Valenti in a nutshellRemindMe! 4 years "u/MattClark0995 being bent out of shape like a whiny baby because his side lost an election" | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 11:44 PM |
| -1 | Feminist Jessica Valenti in a nutshellI think for myself. I guess that makes me a "nobody" from the perspective of political groupthink. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 06:06 PM |
| 2 | Is History Repeating Itself?The Suffragettes and Suffragists were about being more equal than men. They wanted none of the civic responsibilities of men, such as getting conscripted for military service, while wanting anything they saw as a perk, such as getting to vote on matters such as national security. They already had the right to vote where it most affected their lives - for local elections, school boards, etc. They just wanted that extra bit of control over men's lives as well. And to boot, look at what they believ… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 04:08 PM |
| -1 | Feminist Jessica Valenti in a nutshellLet's not get into the idea of liberals being the shrill ones, lest it's time I remind you of the War on Christmas you crazy fuckwits are always up in arms about. You're all shrill idiots - both the liberals and the conservatives. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 11:55 AM |
| 1 | Australian male cricketers 'should give up their revenue share' to help female players earn more - abc.net.au | Somehow "Equality" always translates to "Men handing over their money to women, because reasons"You've probably heard some biological argument based on a woman's survivability once she gets into her 70's and 80's. This argument is a red herring. Women could hardly hope to get past their 20's on their own, let alone to a ripe old age of 80. The whole reason they live longer is because throughout their entire lives they are subsidized by men. They collect more social security than they pay for, they use more health insurance than they pay for, and they receive more taxpayer funded medical re… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 03:26 AM |
| 1 | Trump Team Asks State Dept. To Name Those Working On Gender EqualityI don't care what they call it as long as equal treatment under the law is the underlying basis. I'd be just as happy if nothing was called "rape" and, instead, people used objective standards to treat similar crimes in similar ways, without conflating a disparate and every-expanding list of female grievances under this taboo word. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 07:03 PM |
| 7 | Reality Check: Do men earn less for part-time work?Seriously, what the fuck? But this does not tell the whole story. If you look at full-time and part-time workers together, you can see that there is a gender pay gap First of all, adding in full-time workers does not tell us the "whole story" on part-time workers. It has nothing to do with part-time workers. Second of all, the pay gap for part-time workers is in fact a "gender pay gap". It just doesn't fit in with the feminist female victim narrative. And men working fewer than 10 hours a week a… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 04:23 PM |
| 3 | Australian male cricketers 'should give up their revenue share' to help female players earn more - abc.net.au | Somehow "Equality" always translates to "Men handing over their money to women, because reasons"Life expectancy can be attributed to medical advances made by men that favor women coupled with mating rituals and government policies that create work for men and leisure for women. These are things that we can actually remedy by making greater investments in men's wellbeing. But that would require men to hand over a little less money to women than they have for the past, say, length of human history. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 01:28 AM |
| 6 | Remember Christine Lagarde, who obtained power after a false rape accusation, then claimed men are inherently corrupt and "Lehman Sisters" would have prevented global recession? "Christine Lagarde found guilty in French fraud case."You forgot to add, the woman makes sexist remarks calling men incompetent and corrupt. The women fails to do her job, with levels of negligence bordering on criminal. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/16 01:41 AM |
| 11 | Remember Christine Lagarde, who obtained power after a false rape accusation, then claimed men are inherently corrupt and "Lehman Sisters" would have prevented global recession? "Christine Lagarde found guilty in French fraud case."She was found guilty of something that people thought would carry a jail sentence. But she wasn't given a jail sentence and the verify would not go on her record. This is normally called a pussy pass. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/16 01:35 AM |
| 2 | Hidden Camera Reveals Sexist Attitudes toward Domestic ViolenceCan you explain? | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 06:29 AM |
| 1 | "We cannot ignore the male victims of revenge porn."Every media report on revenge porn starts the same way: a teary-eyed white girl dressed up like a church girl talking about how her reputation was ruined and how she called the police and they said they couldn't do anything. Well no shit, that's because you're supposed to call a lawyer. Slander isn't a crime, either, it's a tort. So is the intentional infliction of emotional abuse. Lots of people have their lives ruined because other people do lots of mean things and yet they still have to pay o… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/16 07:29 AM |
| 6 | Washington Post columnist says a new "male" member of the family places children at riskWell, I guess now it got 25 upvotes and 1 downvote. I'm okay with that. Can you guess what twice a tiny number is? If you guessed "still a tiny number" then you'd be right. So why even bother to bring up how much more likely child molestation is than child murder? If you're going to treat men like potential child molesters because they are members of 49% of the population, then you might as well treat women like potential child murderers because they are members of the other 51%. It's not about … | /r/MensRights | 16/12/16 03:36 AM |
| 2 | MGTOW seems to be an epitomization of men's rights, but I've seen it criticized even in the manosphere. So tell me, men's rights supporters who dislike, hate or otherwise disapprove of MGTOW, why do you?Not anymore, they're not. But a lot of this seems to stem from high levels of anxiety and social awkwardness. There's a lot of former PUAs in this group. So you could say that not only did they try harder than just about anyone else, but that their clinging to MGTOW for their sense of identity is still a rationalization for trying and failing. There's a reason why there is such a huge overlap between this group, redpillers, and PUAs. For many it is a natural transition from one to the next. Thes… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 04:12 PM |
| 14 | "We cannot ignore the male victims of revenge porn."This is a bullshit policing of free speech. And you can bet your ass that if men start claiming it in large numbers, feminists will busy themselves criminalizing whatever alleged behaviors "forced" women to go with the revenge porn approach. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Hate Hoax: NYC Muslim Arrested After Claiming Attack by Male Trump FansLet's not get too melodramatic. The media sensationalized identity politics and race-baiting demagogues like Trump use it to get elected. That's their fault. If alien abductions were all the rage, attention-seeking girls would be claiming that when coming up with excuses. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 03:21 PM |
| 28 | Washington Post columnist says a new "male" member of the family places children at riskDon't worry, just about any "female" member of the family will murder the kids before any harm befalls them. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 03:04 PM |
| 0 | MGTOW seems to be an epitomization of men's rights, but I've seen it criticized even in the manosphere. So tell me, men's rights supporters who dislike, hate or otherwise disapprove of MGTOW, why do you?Unlike the lesbian separatists of radical feminism, MGTOW has a lot of guys who are "involuntarily celibate" but would like you to think that it's actually by choice. There's an undercurrent of paranoia and resentment towards men who do have relationships with women. Not quite at the level of "die cis scum", but just enough to make you think twice about having a MGTOW as your drinking buddy. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 05:35 AM |
| 12 | "Rolling Stone, it seems, is only interested in rape when it can claim falsely that the perpetrators were white men and the coverup is by white administrators. There is no outrage when the assault is on a Native American Camp and the coverup is by a Native American Leadership." -- Phelim McAleerThis story doesn't pass the bullshit detector. It is severely biased against the protestors. Lot's of bullshit claims without a shred of proof. Not only was no one raped to begin with, but we don't know if there was even an attempted rape. OP tries to be sly by talking about "first hand" accounts of some guy getting kicked out as if they were first hand accounts of an actual rape attempt. Unlike UVA, these protestors are practically at war with the police. So this OP thinks it's a great idea to … | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 03:30 AM |
| 1 | InterestingIn Canada there are none. Do you know what country she's from? | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 01:27 AM |
| 1 | Ex Husband claims additional child support as ex wife earns more money (Awww, not fair)Oh no, it's kinder and gentler. The statistics bear this out - women in similar circumstances get lower child support rulings which are not enforced as diligently as rulings against men. You can bet safely assume that if the tables were turned, not only would the guy have a higher child support amount but also a massive alimony payment. And if he ever fell behind on it he'd be in jail. There's nothing to suggest that this ruling is actually equitable with what a man would get. But that's not rea… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Ex Husband claims additional child support as ex wife earns more money (Awww, not fair)Yeah, well it's incredibly hard not to see the humor in the butt hurt feminists having their own laws applied to them. Unless you're humorless. Soooo because she's rich and can afford it means its okay Continuing on with the false equivalency? It's not about being rich. It's about having reproductive rights. Not even the richest man on the planet has any reproductive rights. You can't flip this around and say that a woman who chose to get a surrogate mother should be entitled to abandon the chil… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 03:33 PM |
| 2 | Ex Husband claims additional child support as ex wife earns more money (Awww, not fair)This isn't about being bitter or hypocritical. No. That would require a massive false equivalence. You're asking people here to acquiesce to having two sets of laws - one for men and one for women. Where nasty, entitled women can do whatever it is they want and be treated with kid gloves, while men who had no reproductive choice get slammed with exorbitant rulings, turning them into indentured servants for the rest of their lives. Speaking of reproductive rights, surrogacy serves the whims of ri… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 02:15 PM |
| 5 | Hmmmm.It's a false equivalence, though. Barber shops offer personal hygiene services that are only relevant to men. It's like having a woman walk into the men's bathroom to take a shit. Taxi services do not offer a service which is gender-specific and they are doing so by sectioning off a public space that used to be gender-neutral (public roads) and claiming it for women only. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 11:53 AM |
| 1 | Just less than a month apart.Yes, a lot of things going on. I don't mean to be mean but you're missing the point and really haven't thought much through from a man's perspective. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 02:02 AM |
| 2 | Just less than a month apart.I'm not really sure where you are coming from on this. But let's agree on one thing: men don't owe it to you to approach you any different from any other women. Your unique views and perspectives don't make a difference in a society where the vast majority of women take a very dim view of men who are in the need of any sort of help. The popular opinion Men don't behave a certain way because "popular culture" tells them to. It's because they've tried to show their emotions and the pushback they g… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 03:35 PM |
| 1 | This year the awarded most attractive men in the world will lose hundreds of millions to their divorcing wives: Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt and now George Clooney too: his wife is ready to get at least $ 300 million dollars from himI don't know if there's anything really useful beyond scattered pieces of information in various sources. Edit: it actually just occurred to me. It wasn't so much that alimony was created because women sacrificed their careers to help further their husbands. On the contrary, marriage was created to get men to take care of women because women couldn't support themselves. And if you've read much on colonial-era marriage laws, this would be abundantly obvious. This should be our starting point in l… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 08:11 AM |
| 1 | 58 of New York’s 10,000+ firefighters and officers are women. $77 MILLION has been spent on women’s bathrooms and locker rooms since 2002.And which are already cramped spaces in one of the densest cities in the world, but what's a few square feet when you can have "equality"? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 04:36 AM |
| 1 | 58 of New York’s 10,000+ firefighters and officers are women. $77 MILLION has been spent on women’s bathrooms and locker rooms since 2002.If you're volunteering to run into a burning building with a group of people, having them see your tits should be at the bottom of your concerns. That 77 million dollars could have gone to a lot of life-saving equipment. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 04:29 AM |
| 1 | 58 of New York’s 10,000+ firefighters and officers are women. $77 MILLION has been spent on women’s bathrooms and locker rooms since 2002.No, this is ridiculous. The worst part is that after 9/11, the number of women applying for the job plummeted. Those bathrooms will be in disrepair and the entire building will be ready to be demolished and rebuilt before they see enough female employees to justify the cost. So unless you have a plan for making terrorist attacks and house fires lady-friendly, spending a million per employee for private toilets isn't going to do a damn thing to make women feel comfortable doing this job. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 04:13 AM |
| 5 | Just less than a month apart.With all due respect, my statement was not black and white. More to the point, you cannot expect men to acclimate themselves to our society by opening up about their troubles in hopes that they catch the rare woman who happens to be feeling charitable that day. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 02:19 AM |
| 7 | Just less than a month apart.Fake-tears about baby seals being clubbed to death at the North Pole might win respect from some women. Shedding a few tears while walking through molten lava to save a baby might also be appreciated. But it's exceedingly rare for women to react to anything resembling self-pity or weakness with anything short of scornful derision. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 12:57 AM |
| 3 | This year the awarded most attractive men in the world will lose hundreds of millions to their divorcing wives: Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt and now George Clooney too: his wife is ready to get at least $ 300 million dollars from himIt's got nothing to do with religion. Marriage worked when the laws didn't disproportionately fuck over men. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/16 01:30 AM |
| 3 | This year the awarded most attractive men in the world will lose hundreds of millions to their divorcing wives: Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt and now George Clooney too: his wife is ready to get at least $ 300 million dollars from himA few things you should realize about alimony. At the time that women would have had trouble supporting themselves, divorce was by and large illegal. During divorce, fathers would be awarded custody of the children because he was he one who could afford to raise them. The labor participation rate of women plummeted after divorce laws were liberalized, child custody switched over to mothers, and severe alimony and child support rulings enforced by the government on divorced men. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/16 01:22 AM |
| 2 | Can you just FEEL the male privilege oozing from this email I got?No, qualified engineers are not going to be working call center jobs anytime soon. That's not even remotely realistic. And I'm not sure if you missed what I said, but trusts and monopolies are the problem, not feminism. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/16 10:48 PM |
| 1 | Can you just FEEL the male privilege oozing from this email I got?I don't really believe that it's as foolproof as it is claimed. The interview process generates a disproportionate number of false negatives. Qualified people are turned down and asked to try again after 6 months or a year, with many of the people they end up hiring having attempted to get past the interviews several times. And while the people who do the interviews are conducting a merit-based interview, the results go up to a hiring committee which compares numerous interviews against one anot… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/16 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Can you just FEEL the male privilege oozing from this email I got?I'm not worried about it. It just says that Google's days of being able to innovate are fading. But another company will take it's place. The real problem in the tech industry are trusts and monopoly. The big companies might not be innovative anymore but they can still buy up smaller innovative companies or just outright destroy them. In a way it doesn't matter who Google hires. What matters is who the companies that Google buys up hires. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/16 08:24 PM |
| 4 | Can you just FEEL the male privilege oozing from this email I got?If it's the case that the "top female students" don't rank within the top half of male students, then this email suggests that the women will be offered spots that should be going to better qualified men. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/16 08:00 PM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".Well, prison guards tend to be better qualified than the average teacher so maybe I'm being unfair to prison guards? You're not making a reasoned argument here. You are "LMFAO"-ing at the idea that a teacher is an authoritarian figure who kids are forced to submit to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR5ApYxkU-U | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 11:13 AM |
| 1 | Julian Assange says texts show he is 'entirely innocent' of rape;Sorry but I was not expressing surprise that violating human rights that had developed over thousands of years of Western justice invariable leads to abuses of power by the government. I was pointing out how glaringly idiotic their excuses are. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 10:28 AM |
| 1 | Julian Assange says texts show he is 'entirely innocent' of rape;This part really doesn't matter. The fact that there was never any evidence is what matters. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 10:21 AM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".Yes it is. It is the same as a prison guard having sex with a kid in a juvenile detention facility. The whole point of making certain age disparities into statutory rape is because of the perceived level of power and control that the older person has over the younger person. With teachers and prison guards, it is not a perceived difference in power and authority, it is an absolutely real difference. What's happened here is that people have internalized the idea that something as small as a 2 yea… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 10:12 AM |
| 1 | Julian Assange says texts show he is 'entirely innocent' of rape;As far as I could ever understand the accusation, the alleged rape was the result of a condom failure. No lying was ever involved. He had merely stated that he did not like condoms at an earlier time. Of course, as it turned out, the alleged broken condom which was put into evidence did not even have his DNA on it. Then there was the other matter of one of the girls being "half asleep" when he initiated consensual sex with her. Apparently in Sweeden it is rape if you convince someone to have sex… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 09:50 AM |
| 1 | Julian Assange says texts show he is 'entirely innocent' of rape;Now there's cognitive dissonance for you. They're denying him due process by claiming that he would publicly release the alleged evidence of his guilt? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 09:20 AM |
| 7 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".You can't have your cake and eat it too. Statutory rape is not the same as forcible rape. You can't say that an "attack" took place because if it had, then that would just be plain old regular rape. So if you want to split hairs on what is the right term and what is not, let's actually start there. Because the difference between a 28 year old teacher with a 16-17 year old high school student and a 14 year old sleeping with a 19 year old is a whole lot murkier. The teacher & student issue is actu… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 04:00 PM |
| 2 | 2016 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 50 years — high school boys are better at math than girlsThe contingency tables in your other link are pretty interesting. It's too bad they basically don't tell us anything beyond men intrinsically are better at math. It would be nice if they correlated the results against something more than feminist-influenced women's equality indexes. Every one of these indexes is a way of "topping out" when metrics actually show women doing better than men, so it's going to be hard to use them to make any meaningful conclusions about actual data. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 10:54 PM |
| 9 | 2016 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 50 years — high school boys are better at math than girlsI guess you don't use math in your professional career? You'd see a much clearer connection if you worked in STEM and experienced women receiving preferential treatment while everyone bashes you and your male colleagues for being sexist. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 07:03 PM |
| 8 | 2016 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 50 years — high school boys are better at math than girlsI don't understand how you could look at a situation where women are given higher grades by their math teachers but actually score lower on standardized tests and then turn around and drag out the old canard about women getting discouraged. The observation that you have presented us with suggests the complete opposite of what you think it does. It suggests that women are worse at math in spite of having teachers who expect them to be the best. It makes the discrepancy in math ability look even b… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 06:41 PM |
| 3 | More nonsense about unconscious sexism.These things are like a modern day inkblot tests. The person who is administering the test can always cherry-pick the questions and subsequently interpret the answers to mean whatever it is that they want them to mean. And they almost always prefer unfalsifiable theories over deeper empirical research to attempt to separate correlation from causation. It's just all sexism, all the time, because that's what they set out to show. For example, when men prefer male leaders they are guilty of misogyn… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 06:48 AM |
| 0 | More nonsense about unconscious sexism.There are literally no ads on that site and some of the comments call out the author. There is no point in archiving. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 03:52 AM |
| 3 | Real Story of The Last Tango in Paris Rape SceneThis article reads like a downward spiral of feels over reals. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 03:10 AM |
| 2 | More nonsense about unconscious sexism.It's ironic because when I think of a psychologist engaging in massive amounts of confirmation bias, I think of a woman. Does that make me sexist? | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 03:00 AM |
| 8 | You Know You Are Winning When ALL The Protesters Are So Embarrassed They Keep Their Faces Covered. "Protest of The Red Pill Movie at Ottawa City Hall" 05 Dec 2016They're not embarrassed, they are just projecting. Whether it's white hoods or bandanas, they are just bullies who don't want you to be able to do to them what they have in mind for you. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 02:02 AM |
| 5 | The full truth about "Teach men not to rape"There's a huge difference between a rape that never made it to court because it never happened and a false accusation that never made it to court even though it did happen. And like always, feminists stand on the wrong side of justice, logic, and reason. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 01:54 AM |
| 17 | The full truth about "Teach men not to rape"I'm sure that neither one of your stats is even remotely true beyond what you were able to quickly pull out of your ass. The 2-8% stat sounds like it is the one that feminists like to use for men who have been accused of rape. So it's not for all men, unless you believe that all men have been accused of rape and that 92% to 98% of them are rapists. Although in reality, when you look at the "teach men not to rape", yes, as a matter of fact 100% of all American men have been accused of rape hundre… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/16 08:41 PM |
| 35 | The full truth about "Teach men not to rape"Wrong. Claims made without any evidence can be summarily dismissed without evidence. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/16 08:26 PM |
| 2 | r/relationships reminding us that men have no right to their prenatal child's health, even when it comes to ending it.Yep, that was pretty ironic. I'm still not sure if that's some sort of a gender swap parody. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/16 01:59 PM |
| 5 | r/relationships reminding us that men have no right to their prenatal child's health, even when it comes to ending it.You're putting the cart before the horse. If men had equal reproductive rights then I would agree that no man should ever be able to force a woman to keep the pregnancy. But they don't. If fathers earn veto power over abortion, it would only take away privileges from women that men never had to begin with. There are other issues at play here, such as the investment of time and money that men make into starting a family. When a woman enjoys free food and shelter for 5, 10 years from a guy who is … | /r/MensRights | 05/12/16 02:17 AM |
| 1 | UK media still confusing rape and relationship - "‘Model’ mum had sex with schoolboy then threatened him when he ended their relationship" .... That's Rape Culture.If the U.K. law told you to jump off a bridge, would you? It looks like there is little interest in critical thinking among the U.K. media; according to your comment they just print what they are told and cannot be held accountable for anything. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 08:40 PM |
| 7 | Mommy said no Christmas tree since she only gets to see me for "a few hours" for Christmas ...Her behavior is typical. Period. Her behavior is incentivised by the state. People come out of the woodwork to defend "women" like her on the grounds that they are "women" but then when this system is criticized, they defend "women" on the grounds that that not all women are like that. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 09:31 PM |
| 1 | Feminist filmmaker Cassie Jaye: women's rights have gone too far are now silencing men.It's not like nazis voted for Clinton any more than feminazis voted for Trump, so there's no question there. But what difference does that make? It didn't determine the election or say much about how all the other people voted or their reasons for doing so. The real story was that compared to past elections, Trump's race-baiting machismo did not cost him too many minority or women voters, while Clinton's male-bashing lost her a ton of male support without doing much gain extra female supporters.… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/16 05:58 AM |
| 1 | Feminist filmmaker Cassie Jaye: women's rights have gone too far are now silencing men.I doubt there are enough Neo-Nazis to constitute "droves". On the other hand I've seen the mainstream media such as MSNBC conflating Milo Yiannopoulos, a flamboyant British gay man, with straight-white anti-gay male Neo-Nazis because he criticized feminism. As a liberal, it's incredibly hard to believe anything coming out of the Progressive echo hammer. I find it very difficult to believe that there was any legitimate Neo-Nazi presence for Trump supporters to even notice, let alone make a huge s… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/16 02:52 AM |
| 3 | Feminist filmmaker Cassie Jaye: women's rights have gone too far are now silencing men.Wow you're so right just look at the throngs of feminists putting together screenings to watch Cassie Jaye's film! | /r/MensRights | 02/12/16 02:12 AM |
| 16 | How The Discrimination Against Short Men Is Perpetuated By WomenExcept that 34DD's are the average cup size in America. You'll have to add in no fatties and no fake tits to filter most of them out. And even then, there will be far more of them than 6ft or taller men. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 10:12 PM |
| 4 | Is There a Link Between Bipolar Disorder and Lying? Can we always believe the victims? Can we always believe the victims of false allegations?When a person with bipolar disorder tells lies, they are not necessarily trying to deceive people. Maybe the person who wrote this is bipolar? The cognitive dissonance in this statement is pretty strong. Lying by definition means you are necessarily trying to deceive people. Counseling and awareness can help family and friends to empathize, as they come to understand the link between the symptoms and the lies, or perceived lies. What the hell does that even mean? Is he actually encouraging peopl… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 05:31 PM |
| 2 | How China Trade Could Help Explain Rising Mortality Among White Middle-Aged MenSome of my thoughts about this article. Finally, there is some sorely lacking research that ties policy issues into men's issues. Rather than the typical feminist claptrap of, "Men kill themselves because of toxic masculinity. Women are better than men." This also offers us a healthy alternative to the SJW narrative that Hillary Clinton lost the election because of "racist straight white men". No, she lost the election because she stood on the wrong side of pro-corporation trade deals on the one… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"No, s is for sarcasm. But I really think it should be made as a legitimate offer. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 08:16 PM |
| 1 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"Well I'm not being sarcastic. Doesn't mean it's not funny, though. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 07:44 PM |
| 1 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"Well yeah, but feminists compare vascectomies to basic reproductive rights. And turnabout is fair play! Besides, they are the relevant surgical solutions to the problems at hand: kids for one, periods for the other. You're really trying too hard to introduce fairness into my twisted sense of humor. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"Spaying is the removal of the entire reproductive tract. Uterus, overies, everything. Look it up, if you've never had a dog or a cat. It totally eliminates periods because the organs that create periods are literally gone. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 07:04 PM |
| 2 | In the news: Women cheat and it's a man's fault!Again, this is meaningless drivel. This is the criminal defending himself in court by claiming they have had a difficult childhood. People just choose their explanation for their shitty behavior based on what they think is the most socially acceptable excuse. And based on projecting their own faults onto the other person to try to transfer those guilty feelings onto their victim and make them out to be the bad guy. They're mind-numbingly awful excuses and no one should spend more than 2 seconds … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 06:56 PM |
| 1 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"Yeah but spaying eliminates periods, so maybe they'd finally shut the fuck up about being so terribly oppressed. I'm just saying. Feminists have never had a problem telling men to get a vascectomy if they don't like the idea of paying child support for an unwanted kid that wasn't their choice. It seems that spaying is just as good of a solution for women who don't like the idea of paying for their own feminine hygiene products. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 06:44 PM |
| 6 | In the news: Women cheat and it's a man's fault!Nah, because that's just such a tautological argument that it's not even worth mentioning. Of course the common theme for cheaters is to find a way to blame it on the person they are cheating on. And "not helping with chores" is the socially acceptable accusation that will draw the focus away from their own behavior and onto the man. They're scummy people. They cheat, steal, and lie while maintaining an unrealistic sense of entitlement. What do you expect? For a cheater to accuse someone else of… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 03:08 PM |
| 11 | Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism"I'll gladly chip in to get the feminists who came up with this idea spayed. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 08:41 AM |
| 12 | In the news: Women cheat and it's a man's fault!So you're blaming the man with your contrived hypothetical example. The truth is that some people are just selfish cheaters. They could easily break up if they're not happy. You could do that, if you weren't an asshole who is looking to make up an excuse to fuck someone over. The incentive is certainly there for female cheaters. They will demand gifts and favors from one guy only to turn around and demand even more gifts and favors from another guy, or even many other guys. So many of the men I … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 01:58 AM |
| 7 | Twittergate: More 'massive child porn rings' emerge on following shock discoveryYou have to ask yourself why The Vagina Monologues are so popular and why people like Lenah Dunham are in good standing. But otherwise yeah, we don't know the exact extent. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/16 01:45 AM |
| 1 | Politics vs Men's RightsI understand your point. But I guess what I am saying is that there should be a more ambitious goal in addition to this. It should be to use political debate centered around men's issues to form a well-supported political point of view that we can promote to the mainstream media, rather than simply claiming that we are politically neutral, as we have always claimed. The end result should be that rather than trying to appeal to mainstream political sensibilities, we have to make it perfectly clea… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/16 05:30 PM |
| 6 | Politics vs Men's RightsI'm torn on this, given the current political climate outside of this sub. Look at other allegedly non-partisan subs, even things like /r/science and they tend have a very overtly political, pro-feminist censorship policy. Reddit, the company itself, has an incredibly well-documented SJW bias and pro-censorship point of view. Likewise, look at the current ad-hominem attacks against the "alt-right" media by the mainstream media, where they have boiled it down to a two step process of making a vag… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/16 03:35 PM |
| 6 | Watch Your Language - "Children do not have affairs with older women, they are abused by them"Woosh. Over your head! The Guardian isn't the problem, Ally Fogg's brand of PC feminism is. He has a very long history of trying to subvert and discredit the MRM community. Paul Elam has referred to it as a "rehash and bash" tactic. The gist of it is that people like Fogg have a penchant of swooping in after feminist she have already lost the debate. They will acknowledge one or two truths while holding on to a sea of lies. They will claim the truth, which they had lost the narrative on momentar… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/16 07:16 PM |
| 21 | Hillary only thanks women and girls in her concession speech. Then she wonders why so many men don't vote for her. Feminists & SJWs seem unable to learn anything.The problem with these people isn't that they are the intellectual elite. It's that they aren't. They're simply entitled, but intellectually bankrupt. They were playing out of a playbook full of identity politics and they can't see that they lost the game on their very own terms. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 01:27 AM |
| 1 | On one hand...It's a strawman because you think that the Hitler analogy has something to do with immigration. It doesn't, or at least it's beside the point. The Hitler analogy is the fact that a overtly boorish idiot played the entire political system and yet people like you continue to believe that there's "nothing to worry about". When on the other hand, he is likely to become a very powerful ruler who has a good chance of consolidating a lot of power. As for policy, Trump could hardly fumble his way throug… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 09:55 PM |
| 1 | On one hand...Nice strawman. The analogy to Hitler is about the idea that establishment politicians can "control" a guy like Trump. They can't. They have every single thing to worry about. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 09:11 PM |
| 2 | On one hand...That's what they said about Hitler, too. Trump will be a powerful political figure because he got to where he is without owing anyone any favors. He can do pretty much whatever he wants. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 08:21 PM |
| 6 | Anyone else seeing posts like this?Well, that was basically what Trump was calling for were he to lose. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 06:26 PM |
| 8 | More than half of white women voted for Trump. Feminists/SJW's are gonna be mad.Well, there was an outright revolt against Clinton. A lot of rural Trump voters would have stayed home if they hadn't been motivated so much to rebel against Clinton's establishment politics. These were all the people who hadn't been accounted for by historical likely voter turnout in the polls. Just about anyone other than Clinton would have easily won against an otherwise weak candidate like Trump. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 06:20 PM |
| 13 | The Sexists Vagina Vote Is Already Setting Itself Up for 2020; "Michelle Obama is the popular choice to run for president in 2020 after the Donald Trump win"That's like saying that blacks didn't vote for Trump because blacks are racist. Clinton is the most prominent anti-male bigot in American politics. She didn't deserve a single male vote. But that's beside the point. Clinton is also the biggest insider politician that we have had in decades. She represents an incredibly unpopular dynastic, corporatist rule, which the Republicans repudiated from their party by nominating an outsider, while the Democrats continued to try to shove down everyone's th… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 06:06 PM |
| 16 | The Sexists Vagina Vote Is Already Setting Itself Up for 2020; "Michelle Obama is the popular choice to run for president in 2020 after the Donald Trump win"Oh, they're drinking cupfulls of male tears today. Except that white men are not a majority. Women are the single biggest voting block and a majority of white women voted for Trump. This election was decided by people who the left and feminists refuse to acknowledge, while they were out mocking and disparaging men. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 05:58 PM |
| 13 | More than half of white women voted for Trump. Feminists/SJW's are gonna be mad.You may actually want to wait for that to happen before proclaiming that it did. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 05:39 PM |
| 13 | More than half of white women voted for Trump. Feminists/SJW's are gonna be mad.Maybe next time Democrats can run an actual primary. This is the DNC's fault for having anointed Clinton as the heir apparent and rolled over candidates like Sanders. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 05:11 PM |
| 16 | Anyone else seeing posts like this?The identity politics have blown up in their faces, but they continue to be in denial. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 05:03 PM |
| 12 | People flock to put there "I Voted" sticker on the grave of a woman who campaigned for women's right to vote. But what about the graves of hundreds-of-thousands of men who GAVE THEIR LIVES so we could ALL vote?Yeah, this is all a bunch of nonsense. There are thousands of men currently alive who had been drafted to fight in Vietnam before they old enough to have the right to vote. Meanwhile, people are putting these stupid stickers on a long-dead woman's grave to celebrate their vote for a warmongering woman who never, ever had to face the prospect of going to fight in a war herself. They had never been deprived of any rights and have no clue what it actually means to be disenfranchised. They form a ma… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 07:57 PM |
| 2 | Video of woman punching man outside 7-Eleven goes viral | And it's prompted a discussion about female-on-male violence, with a majority of comments agreeing it's a serious and under-recognised problemThis is not Doxxing, let's get that straight. This is a person committing criminal acts in a public space with absolutely zero expectation of privacy. Doxxing is when you try to retaliate against people who are trying to express an opinion you don't like on a forum where there is an expectation of anonymity. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/16 01:07 PM |
| 5 | Rolling Stone Editor and Writer Are Still Standing By Article After it's Been DebunkedI wouldn't call that masterful, it's just a low blow. Jackie is a manipulative liar. At the time she was fearful of being exposed by people who knew more of the truth, so she was telling her friends that Rolling Stone was twisting her words even while she was lying to Rolling Stone. She has no credibility. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/16 05:23 AM |
| 5 | That Male Birth Control Trial You’re All Laughing About Left People Infertile | Another example of the disposable male, once again society doesn't much care about harm done to menIt will be impossible to ban once the need for a laboratory is eliminated. Besides, you don't need a test to know it's not yours if you're on the pill. You'll know that something is wrong months before the baby is even born. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/16 06:56 PM |
| 5 | Woman dumps husband to work in an illegal immigrant camp. Then has affair with an Afghan man. BBC make her out to be a hero.Oh no! She's spending her own money on charity! How horrible! It was her family's joint assets. This is why money usually get split 50/50 in a divorce. She doesn't work in a high-earning profession so it's also likely that she was mooching off of her husband's income while dumping thousands into her new lifestyle. Oh...no? I mean, she didn't actually. She did, actually. She literally got divorced. Oh c'mon, this isn't even a downside! What do you have against living with strangers? She's a mothe… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 11:16 PM |
| 4 | Woman dumps husband to work in an illegal immigrant camp. Then has affair with an Afghan man. BBC make her out to be a hero.What I can say is that healthy marriages don't suddenly end You're begging the question. Marriages don't have problems apart from the actions of one or more of the people involved. This story has all the hallmarks of someone in a marriage making selfish, unilateral decisions to the detriment of her husband and children. If she behaved this way even earlier, it does not excuse her from being a shitty person now. I don't know where people got the impression this is a full-time thing She got divorc… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 07:11 PM |
| 2 | Woman dumps husband to work in an illegal immigrant camp. Then has affair with an Afghan man. BBC make her out to be a hero.two people - who, as the article states, already had strains in their marriage We've only heard one person's side of the story, and boy was it a doozie. Can you say with any confidence that the husband was doing anything that could be construed as putting strain on the marriage? The impression that I got is that this disaster for the husband and children was probably the sole handiwork of this woman and her unrealistic attitudes. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 02:34 PM |
| 3 | Feminists are Choking on The Red Pill MovieThis is the only reason why rape shield laws were introduced to begin with. Rather than striking down evidence that is actually irrelevant to the case, they have a blanket ban on everything that could be used to establish a pattern of behavior. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/16 05:15 AM |
| 4 | Teacher sentenced to 30 years for molesting a female student files appeal, says she wouldn't have been punished so harshly if her victim had been a boyNah, all he has to do is look over his old cases where a man was on trial. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/16 05:01 AM |
| 6 | "An astonishing one-third of Iceland’s women are members of a closed Facebook group – ironically named 'Beauty Tips' – in which they actively discuss gender issues." That presumably helps their protest today about equal pay. From: "Why is Iceland the best place in the world to be a woman?"They will never achieve it. If the gap disappeared on average, they would still turn over every rock until they found cases of inequality. Eventually you'd just have to pay all men less than all women. And even that wouldn't matter because being a mother is the "hardest job on the planet". It will never end so long as some white knight still thinks he's going to get laid by buying into this bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/16 01:07 AM |
| 1 | "Jackie" feels PTSD from the UVA case. I didn't know you could get PTSD from lying about rape.This woman is such a nightmare. She just can't stop lying. And the media keeps presenting her side of the story as if it may have actually happened. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/16 12:58 AM |
| 10 | Jessica Valenti implicated in latest Wikileaks releaseThis is very strong circumstantial evidence. We know the Clinton campaign was coordinating talking points with Valenti. And we know that the incredibly misleading hit piece she wrote was exactly what the Clinton campaign was trying to get her to say, This is more than just biased journalism, this is basically a campaign ad disguised as an op ed. Marketers call this kind of propaganda 'native advertising'. If they paid her off, then she's just a dirty, corrupt journalist. But if Valenti provided … | /r/MensRights | 24/10/16 11:05 PM |
| 1 | Thousands of California soldiers forced to repay enlistment bonuses a decade after going to warRefusing to enlist was the problem to begin with. There were a lot of politics behind this, with the D-word circulating around in the press and the Bush administration adamantly denying that they had pushed the all-volunteer force past it's breaking point. The military was cutting corners all over the place, whether by relaxing educational standards or criminal background checks, or just trying to throw money at the problem. This is how we avoided a draft. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/16 08:15 PM |
| 8 | Why are we men forced to pay for a child we didn't want?Until the advent of child support, it was never the case that women needed money for themselves and their children. Because if the father had any money to speak of, the courts would have awarded him custody straight away. You are talking about a time before income taxes, when governments would often finance themselves through liquor tax because they pretty much lacked any visibility into the rest of the economy, let alone people's individual incomes. Governments were small and collecting child s… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/16 05:59 PM |
| 22 | Heat St: "Rolling Stone UVA ‘Fake Rape’ Story Defamation Trial Gets Ugly"I love the fact that Rolling Stone's lawyers are still trying to use the fact that no one had been expelled by the school for rapes that never happened as proof that the anti-male policies and feminist staff are actually the opposite of what they are. Two feminist organizations arguing amongst themselves about who the real feminists are. The false false rape accusation and the damage that it caused to the lives of male students on UVA's campus and across the country is the elephant in the room. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/16 03:48 PM |
| 4 | Men and boys killed en masse again--where are the outraged gender zealots?Title of the news piece says it all: ISIS kills hundreds [of blank] in Mosul area, source says | /r/MensRights | 22/10/16 03:22 PM |
| 13 | Students told term 'be a man' represents toxic masculinityI disagree. It represents toxic femininity. Telling men to kill themselves for women's benefit. Men who accept the message are not afflicted with toxic masculinity. They are the victims of a gynocentric society. Their masculinity isn't the problem. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 02:52 PM |
| 2 | Millions of Men Are Missing From the Job MarketSeriously, what to do? Oh I know, let's take away their disability pay and painkillers! That'll show 'em! /s This article is nothing but veiled contempt for men. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 02:19 PM |
| 3 | "Portlandia is ruining Portland: feminist bookstore publicly cuts ties with show | US news"Wait a minute, they're claiming that this show is actually making people want to move there? | /r/MensRights | 14/10/16 09:40 PM |
| 1 | Apparently it is our fault that women aren't in combat positions, and we have to "fix" this "problem."Wait, I thought all of those career opportunities that feminists kept clamoring about would be enough of a reason for women to sign up for combat? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/16 05:56 AM |
| 5 | The Distribution of Income and Fiscal By Age and Gender study in New Zealand shows women receive more benefits than they pay in taxes, while men pay for it.That kind of thinking is how we get into this kind of mess to begin with. If you're a male breadwinner, it already ensures that you don't take out more than you put in. And if you're a male breadwinner's wife, your benefits also depend on how much he puts in. Unemployment benefits and social security depend on how much men pay into them. Child support, alimony, it all works the same way. Men pay in, women take out based on the man's rate, sometimes long after the man is already dead. On child su… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Ex-Yahoo employee sues Marisa Mayer claiming she led an illegal purge of male employees'Mayer encouraged and fostered the use of an employee performance-rating system to accommodate management's subjective biases and personal opinions For what it's worth that's what performance review systems are all about. Especially the stack-ranking variety favored by Silicon Valley executives. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 02:45 PM |
| 24 | Tennessee Student Accidentally Puts Porn Star’s Name On Quiz, Professor Gives Him 0 For Sexual HarrassmentThis sounds like a textbook example of school employees creating a hostile learning environment for a student because of his gender. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 01:50 PM |
| 0 | California makes drunk consensual sex illegal and imposes mandatory sentencing for it. Not sex with someone unconscious or incapacitated. But now having sex with an intoxicated woman is illegal and will put you in prison for years. Drunk sex has NEVER been illegal in the US before this.Ah yes. Don't have a real argument to make, just play the old "it is beneath me to respond!" card. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 09:39 AM |
| 0 | California makes drunk consensual sex illegal and imposes mandatory sentencing for it. Not sex with someone unconscious or incapacitated. But now having sex with an intoxicated woman is illegal and will put you in prison for years. Drunk sex has NEVER been illegal in the US before this.Like which jail to send the guy to for having drunk sex? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 03:28 AM |
| 2 | California makes drunk consensual sex illegal and imposes mandatory sentencing for it. Not sex with someone unconscious or incapacitated. But now having sex with an intoxicated woman is illegal and will put you in prison for years. Drunk sex has NEVER been illegal in the US before this.How does it not follow? You removed the judge's discretion of not sending someone to jail. That's not some trifling little detail. That's all of it. All the discretion. What remains are the trifling details. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 09:29 PM |
| 2 | After a decade of complaining about use of pronouns, feminists back-peddle. There is no pleasing these people, if you do exactly what they say, they change what they want.It has been part of British English yes. American english less so. So the solution is "Ou" or "Xe"? You're kidding, right? | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 05:19 AM |
| 1 | There is no gender pay gap, people get what they're worthAre you entertaining the idea that the wage gap exists because of sexism against men? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 04:18 AM |
| 4 | There is no gender pay gap, people get what they're worthHis opinion was wrong. He got downvoted for being wrong. I did not downvote him myself, but I did explain to him why he is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 01:30 AM |
| 10 | There is no gender pay gap, people get what they're worthThere's a grain of truth to this. Let's say someone has a criminal record or is in the country on an H1-B visa. They are going to get paid less; often far less, because they can't easily switch jobs to increase their pay. Changing jobs is obviously a very important part of getting pay increases for people all over the world. But this is a double edged sword. These same workers are also bringing down the wages of everyone. H1-B workers depress the wages of local workers while depriving other loca… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/16 07:43 PM |
| 1 | 2014: "I hate that men are harassing me by looking at me!", same feminist 2015: "I hate that men don't look at me anymore!"I wouldn't say that. Both are incredibly dysfunctional systems that tend to fail men in various ways. I don't think it's worth celebrating a system that is failing to adequately meet the our needs. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/16 02:30 PM |
| 5 | TheDailyBeast calls pickup artists charged with rape MRA'sThey're not stupid. Their bread and butter comes from peddling feminist nonsense to a majority-female audience, which lets them sell advertising space to marketers who primarily market to women. The MRM poses an existential threat to their business model and as such, they have an interest in discrediting it. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/16 01:42 PM |
| 2 | Women refuse to take her bag from an empty seat, while elderly gentlemen was standing near her.This wouldn't be an issue if feminists hadnt been going apeshit about "manspreading" on public transport and have even convinced governments to run public service campaigns against it. Now everyone is starting to notice just how rude and inconsiderate women can be. In general most of the trains I've been on have been plastered with signs describing proper train etiquette, and conductors even announce when the train is full for people to move their bags off the seats. To get to the point where th… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/16 04:20 PM |
| 1 | Woman accuses man of sexual harassment after he says hello to herIt is sexual harassment if she is targeting him for harassment because of his sex. How she chooses to harass him is not as important as her motivation for it. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/16 03:37 PM |
| 10 | Girl headbutts boyfriend, and no one does anything. He punches her, and everyone loses their shit.He would have also easily knocked out a fully grown man and no one would have given it a second thought. If you want to infantilize an abusive adult woman and refuse to hold her responsible for her own actions, that's on you. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/16 03:44 PM |
| 13 | Girl headbutts boyfriend, and no one does anything. He punches her, and everyone loses their shit.something men are supposed to learn But not women, right? For women, we have all the expectations that we would of a 10 year old child? They can just do whatever the fuck they want, including attacking NFL players. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/16 03:14 PM |
| 1 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Facetious is a really charitable way of spinning it. You were being duplicitous and refusing to address the issue head-on. You said several times that you believe that it's mutilation when it happens to a female and since then you've been dealing in a whole lot of special pleading. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 07:43 PM |
| 6 | Less then a year after Its creation, r/Menslib is declared and MRA soft sell. Let this be a lesson, any mention of mens issues is Apostasy to Feminism.You're wrong about the current generation being any more extreme than in the past. Susan BrownMiller, Andrea Dworkin, and hundreds of other now-dead feminists were far more extreme than anything we see today. It started with White Feather campaigns and Prohibition, which is absolutely crazy. Feminists used to plot terrorist acts, commit arson, bombings, and assassination attempts on public officials. Those were the same feminists that infiltrated their way into academia, non-profit, and governme… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 07:21 PM |
| 1 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...You're right. I will absolutely call it mutilation when someone removes the clitoral hood on a male baby. I'm sorry if you're finding this discussion inconvenient to maintaining your cognitive dissonance. I can appreciate the similarity to many political discussions. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 07:14 PM |
| 3 | Less then a year after Its creation, r/Menslib is declared and MRA soft sell. Let this be a lesson, any mention of mens issues is Apostasy to Feminism.Donald Trump would be a boon for feminist recruitment. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 12:47 PM |
| 3 | Vox: There's a better way to talk about men's rights activism — and it's on RedditWow, so much straw went into those arguments. I'm surprised even by feminist false-flag standards. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 12:59 AM |
| 0 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Yes you did. You're painting yourself into a corner because unlike mutilating baby penises, a large proportion of FGM is carried out as a rite of passage into adulthood by consenting women. Still called FGM by everyone. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Sure it's subjective but it's not relative. You could choose say that cutting off an arm is mutilation or not. But you can't say that cutting off an arm is mutilation but that cutting off a finger is not, because you don't feel that removing a finger is as "disfiguring" or "damaging" as an arm. What's worse is when you get into the sad state of affairs of claiming that removing a female finger is mutilation but removing a male arm is not, because "reasons". | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 05:03 PM |
| 3 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Oh I see, so it's only "mutilation" when it's a body part that the other gender doesn't have? So I guess that makes removal of the foreskin, also, mutilation. How far are you willing to go with your special pleading? This is getting pretty ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:05 PM |
| 2 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Doesn't matter what you can or can't elect to amputate from your body. If you're going to call it mutilation when it's done to a female baby, then you'd better also call it mutilation when it's done to a male baby. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 03:50 PM |
| 3 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...It's not about semantics, it's about special pleading. You can't call it mutilation when done to female babies but refuse to use the same word to describe the same or worse when it is done to male babies. It's the subjectivity itself forces you to be consistent in spite of anything you might believe about what counts as damage or disfigurement. You're defending a situation where a ritualistic pin prick is an illegal form of female genital mutilation, while a dangerous and completely unnecessary … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 03:19 PM |
| 3 | Even on a forum of Atheists, male genital mutilation can be seen as okay...Yes, it matters. What you have is a self-defeating argument. If billions of men were getting it, then surely there would be no need to do it to babies against their will. If only a handful of men are getting it, then you still don't have an argument for saying it's not mutilation when it happens to billions of babies. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 03:00 PM |
| 14 | Just because men have no reproductive rights doesn't mean they shouldn't have reproductive responsibilities...The same mentality will set these people against male birth control pills because that would deprive women from their ability to have a baby if and when they choose. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 02:36 PM |
| 20 | Feminists have already begun defending the 'Bowl of M&M's' analogy and declaring it different "for reasons" to the refugee 'Bowl of Skittles' analogyYeah, they're just being dishonest. No feminist has ever used the M&M meme to argue for why women should cross the street. It's always been an argument for why men should be forced to give up their Constitutionally protected rights. On the other hand, asylum seekers have never been guaranteed any such rights. That's what the process of applying for refugee status is all about. The burden of proof is necessarily on them to show that they are not terrorists, as difficult as it might be for innocen… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 01:52 PM |
| 1 | Do Women Prefer Female Bosses? Study: "female job satisfaction is lower under female supervision. Male job satisfaction is unaffected by the gender of the boss." #notoppressingmeShow me these statistics if they exist. A friendly word of advice. If you're going to ask a potentially stupid question that reveals your ignorance on an issue but you still want to be taken seriously, try Googling it first. You're on the internet. But, since you did ask: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/08/us/study-supports-suspicion-that-police-use-of-force-is-more-likely-for-blacks.html The point that is always raised about the overrepresentation of blacks among violent criminals in general The… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 12:00 PM |
| 2 | Do Women Prefer Female Bosses? Study: "female job satisfaction is lower under female supervision. Male job satisfaction is unaffected by the gender of the boss." #notoppressingmeNo. What I'm saying is that the police are real, police brutality is real, and blacks being disproportionately targeted by it is a statistical reality. The Patriarchy is not real, 'rape culture' is not real, and men disproportionately targeting women for any sort of violence or oppression is not real. I'm also saying that what men do to men, women do to women, or blacks do to other blacks doesn't justify anything. I'm not going to dismiss a BLM protestor just because "black kill other blacks mor… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:22 AM |
| – | Do Women Prefer Female Bosses? Study: "female job satisfaction is lower under female supervision. Male job satisfaction is unaffected by the gender of the boss." #notoppressingmeI don't endorse BLM but it's really not the same. Blacks being violent towards other blacks doesn't justify racially motivated police brutality. It's really not at all similar to women treating each other like shit while men treat them nicely, even better than how men treat one another. Feminism is more like if there was no police brutality and blacks were just hating cops anyway, for doing nothing more than protecting their communities. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 12:12 AM |
| 0 | Conan on sexismEven if the girl in the video really did slap her boyfriend in the past, she realized it was wrong to do so. Stop calling her a terrible person for improving herself. I'm not calling you a terrible person because you stopped beating your wife. I'm calling you a terrible person because it took you so long to figure out that you shouldn't be beating your wife. You can stop beating your wife as many times as you want, but it will never put you on the same level as the guy who had never beat his wif… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 08:03 PM |
| 0 | Conan on sexismIt was not hypothetical when the girl in the video said that she was surprised to learn that men did not enjoy being slapped. IIRC her moment of epiphany came after actually slapping a boy and seeing his hurt reaction. But what was this hypothetical part that you speak of? At any rate, be sure to tell us in your video about the time that you, too, realized that beating your wife was wrong. Tell us about how you felt betrayed by the Disney cartoons that had taught you since childhood that beating… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 04:28 PM |
| 1 | Conan on sexismHave you stopped beating your wife? If so, you should definitely make a video about how you're better than all the other wife beaters because you realized that it's bad and promise not to do it again. Feminists will love you for it and will carry you on their shoulders as everything that their movement stands for. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 03:46 PM |
| 2 | Conan on sexismAnd knowing that Reddit admins will never do anything to enforce their own rules when it doesn't suit them. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 03:43 PM |
| 11 | If the State & Society is going to punish underage sex, then PUNISH BOTH. This video shows that girls are pushing for sex too.The problem with all sex is that men haven't consented to pregnancy. This is especially true for all the male children who have been raped by an older, responsible adult woman only to be forced into paying child support on their 18th birthday. I really don't care what happens to middle aged adults who sleep with 15 year olds; they deserve whatever punishment they get. But let's not kid ourselves, if it happens to a boy we punish the boy. If it happens to a girl we punish the adult. And if two eq… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 02:14 PM |
| 5 | » Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Addicted Boysthey never talk about boys being pressured into weird shit by women It's not even limited to weird shit. From the article: I asked a 15-year-old about her first sexual experience. She replied: “I think my body looked OK. He seemed to enjoy it.” She's pulling a Sabrina Erdely with this. If she had merely bothered to ask the same question to a boy, she would have learned that it's not just girls. It's almost as if it were perfectly normal for virgins to feel apprehensive about their first time and… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 05:08 AM |
| 8 | » Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Addicted BoysTL&DR: Sex-addled teenage girls want to play hard to get but still get laid in the end. Feminists blame men and porn. girls quickly learn that they are service stations for male gratification Man-hating feminists have been saying that since the 1950's, so what's new? A 15-year-old girl said she didn’t enjoy sex at all This is a normal, well-adjusted girl according to feminists. Many of them have seen 50 Shades of Grey, and wonder if a boy wants to hit me, tie me up and stalk me, does that mean h… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 01:32 AM |
| 11 | Conan on sexismI'm pretty sure this thread is being brigaded. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 06:53 PM |
| 2 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.You're right, The choice of material is downright bizarre. And shows like Sex in the City don't have to be twisted completely out of context to be downright bigoted against men. Take notes. Remain silent. Nah, I think you were right when you said that this TA planned to harass a male student all along. There's no simpler explanation. Keeping quiet is what they want. They want to lie to our face in front of everyone else and have you just sit there and take it. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 02:31 PM |
| 1 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.Would that give back some of her credibility or only serve to make it worse? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 02:26 AM |
| 7 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.Neither do you, and there's no evidence No shit, Sherlock, this is why you have to report these things. There is no other way for someone to successfully use it in a court case. The first thing that a court will do is ask if the student tried to resolve it through the school, at which point the lawyers will subpoena all the records of men making civil rights complaints against the school. And the fact that the school is most likely not going to do anything now will only help bolster a class acti… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 11:32 PM |
| 1 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.Have you forgot the /s? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 09:51 PM |
| 6 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.edit 4: and the italian guy...italians count as white, right? So wait, this woman made a video that included stereotypes about Italian men and then, without knowing a damn thing about your ethnicity, told you to your face that you had no idea what it's like to deal with stereotypes about your ethnicity? Because according to her, you are a privileged white male? She's not just a bigot, but her lack of self awareness is mind boggling. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 09:49 PM |
| 10 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.What court? That's not how it works. Pray tell me, how does one go about establishing a pattern of discrimination against men if no one ever reports it? You don't know if this TA has been sexist towards other men. Which is good, because if they filed complaints independently of this complaint, it bolsters all of their claims. By reporting it you are creating documentation that can later be subpoenaed in court, if it ever does come to that. By reporting it, if the school fails to take action to r… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 09:41 PM |
| 27 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.Don't wait for your TA or professor to retaliate against you. Report it to your school's Title IX officer. If you don't, and you bring them a sob story about how your shitty grades are a result of discrimination against men, these people will just laugh at you. But if you report it now you at least have a chance. Write a formal complaint and don't pull any punches. You were shown a show that is predominantly known for stereotypes about middle aged white guys and while the rest of the class was a… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 08:26 PM |
| 36 | I laughed at a Family Guy and now I am potentially in serious trouble at my university.It's obviously sexist. In terms of Title IX, this teacher is creating a hostile environment for male (presumably white) students. Here's what actually happened. She showed the class clips of a show that makes fun of a middle aged white guy who is actually a complete buffoon, but always comes out on top because of an incredible amount of privilege. She then allowed everyone else in the class to laugh at the jokes except for the white male, because of his sex (presumably, white women were allowed … | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 08:21 PM |
| 3 | Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2015 for 7th straight year and outnumber men in grad school 135 to 100This is part of my problem with the way that financial aid is getting cut for for-profit vocational schools like ITT. There is absolutely no effort made to accommodate all of these male students in traditional accredited colleges. This alone should be grounds for many Title IX lawsuits. If the government can dictate which sports are played to favor women, they surely can dictate which makors are taught to favor the people who will actually go out and support our economy. There would have been no… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 04:05 PM |
| 5 | Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2015 for 7th straight year and outnumber men in grad school 135 to 100She was, understandably, furious with me for asking "how is that worthy of a PhD?" It would certainly be worthy of a PhD in gender studies if she asked whether or not gender studies was easier than STEM and concluded that yes, yes it is. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 03:54 PM |
| 2 | Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2015 for 7th straight year and outnumber men in grad school 135 to 100It's easy relative to the work people put in for a real college degree. I'm not sure what else it's worth comparing it to. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeOnly one side is right. You can't have due process protections and not have them at the same time. there is a backlog of rape kits There is not, this is a misleading piece of feminist propaganda. But even Gloria Allred admits that statutes of limitations are needed when prosecutors sit on evidence. And here you have exactly that. An argument in favor of keeping statutes of limitations in place. The reality is that cops and prosecutors choose not to test rape kits if they don't think it will work… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 02:54 PM |
| 1 | "Men want a say in abortion rights? Men aren't allowed a say, so shut up! Are you *silencing* me??"It doesn't matter if they believe it's murder or that space aliens will kill a puppy anytime it happens. It comes down to one group of people wanting to make the reproductive decisions for others. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 03:30 AM |
| 9 | "Men want a say in abortion rights? Men aren't allowed a say, so shut up! Are you *silencing* me??"The pro-choice side says, "my body, my choice, his responsibility". The pro-life side says, "her body, our choice, his responsibility". They're two sides of the same traditionalist coin. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/16 06:52 PM |
| 11 | He won, I can't handle the cringe enough to respond...My god, this guy should quit customer service and get into the cherry picking business. We still have a male-only draft, but he thinks that an anecdote about someone taking an angry tone with female coworker proves that it's women who are oppressed. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 07:30 PM |
| 6 | Why 'Women in Tech Day' at Gamescom 2016 excluded menI'm sorry but I'm talking about engineering managers who get promoted to assistant directors or directors, who go from having 4-5 reports to 25-100, who go from managing one or two million dollars' worth of projects to the sky being the limit. I'm not talking about managing software updates, but actual leadership roles within a technology organization. You don't get to the c-suite by managing software updates, and the major complaint by women in tech is about getting to the c-suite. The pressure… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 06:55 PM |
| 16 | Why 'Women in Tech Day' at Gamescom 2016 excluded menThey're not being supported. They're not. They are, and then some. Millions of dollars spent on community and industry outreach, women-only events, mentoring, right down to preferential hiring practices and recruiting drives. Men get far less support. I've never seen a single woman quit a job due to "lack of support" and I've really got no idea what you're talking about. What I see is that, when push comes to shove, women are not prepared for the high stress and long work hours of the industry. … | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 04:42 PM |
| 7 | UN Official Urges 'Well-fed, Grown Men' to Stop Holding Up help....for women and girlsMust have not happened, then! /s Or maybe the article's been edited. Look at the hyperlink: http://www.voanews.com/a/un-official-urges-well-fed-grown-men-to-stop-holding-up-syria-aid-convoys/3510163.html Look for other articles, such as the NYT, which still include the quote: “Can well-fed, grown men please stop putting political, bureaucratic and procedural roadblocks for brave humanitarian workers that are willing and able to go to serve women, children, wounded civilians in besieged areas?” h… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 04:21 PM |
| 4 | UN Official Urges 'Well-fed, Grown Men' to Stop Holding Up help....for women and girlsBasically an inept, passive-aggressive diplomat. When was the last time anyone's reached a peace agreement by showing blatant disrespect towards a warring faction or sovereign government? | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 04:19 PM |
| 2 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeLet's not go with a middle ground fallacy here. One side is right and the other side is not. The other side's "points" do not give us an excuse for abolishing due process provisions which protect the innocent. I don't believe for a minute that telling people to take responsibility for personal safety has ever prevented reporting of crimes. To the extent that this may happen, it happens for all crimes where the victim did something particularly stupid and humiliating. It's just another case of fe… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 03:31 PM |
| 2 | University study which claimed to be about men's attitudes to "health and wellbeing" revealed to be feminist research about "traditional views of masculinity".Don't bother asking these feminists to remove your survey responses. You're just proving them with another data point to draw negative correlations about men from. Write to Movember and ask them to take their name off of this terrible survey. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 03:01 PM |
| 4 | University study which claimed to be about men's attitudes to "health and wellbeing" revealed to be feminist research about "traditional views of masculinity".That's because this is a garbage survey and the questions have a completely different meaning in the context of health and wellbeing vs traditionalist views about gays. I'm really disappointed that Movember was used as a cover for this man-hating gender studies nonsense. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 02:36 PM |
| 3 | Obama's female staffers banded together and repeated what other female staffers said to make sure it was heard. So this is how some of the most important decisions in our country were madeNothing got done because of the do-nothing Republican-controlled Congress. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 01:05 AM |
| 5 | "Do Dating Apps Ruin Men's Self-Esteem?"I don't think that the real word is the same experience as online dating for average women. Sure, maybe for young and attractive women, but not the average woman. The point is that it's never any worse. This is why women post photos of their younger, skinnier selves. They have little interest in dating sites if it's not improving on the kind of man they can already find in real life. I mentioned it being by design. In real life, if there was already a group of men talking to talk to an attractiv… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 10:25 PM |
| 3 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeYour point still stands | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 09:10 PM |
| 4 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeI'm not a woman, I was in the Marine Corps. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:59 PM |
| 0 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeAgreed. At least get rid of plea bargaining. Allred is pushing for this because it's in her financial best interest to settle out of court with rich men whose reputations she threatens to drag through the mud. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:31 PM |
| 2 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeTL&DR: "Women in Far Far Away Land are Oppressed! Let's beat men in California with a big stick!" | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:30 PM |
| 14 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapeWhen I was getting shot at in what we affectionally called the snake pit in Ramadi, Iraq, I did not feel safe. It's really difficult for me to fit into my head how a feminist will say that she does not feel safe when a man uses logic in an argument. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:22 PM |
| 5 | No more slapping - Why I stopped slapping my boyfriend in the face"Why yes, I have stopped beating my wife!" It's one thing when you walk into a loaded question but it's a whole other thing when it's actually true... | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 07:31 PM |
| 5 | Alice Walpole smashed a glass into a stranger's face and almost blinded him in completely unprovoked attack after flirting with him in a bar - suspended sentenceHe's clearly not talking about what would happen to a man who viciously attacks a girl. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 07:25 PM |
| 9 | Alice Walpole smashed a glass into a stranger's face and almost blinded him in completely unprovoked attack after flirting with him in a bar - suspended sentenceYeah so, the jail time a man would get for this would make his job irrelevant anyway. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 07:23 PM |
| 5 | "Do Dating Apps Ruin Men's Self-Esteem?"And it would be the same for women if there were 1.5 women for every 1 man This would never happen. Women only go on dating sites because it involves no effort. Otherwise they'd stick to real life, where they already enjoy dating without having to make an effort. Just like if there were 1.5 teachers ready to teach per 1 teaching job But there are not 1.5 men for every 1 women. Not in real life. Women get to have that "it's raining men" experience because that is how the dating site is designed t… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 06:03 PM |
| 2 | Feminists want to get rid of statutes of limitations for rapemistakenly blame themselves for what happened This is a euphemism for having consented or nothing having ever happened in the first place. Literally no one ever thinks, "it's my fault those 20 frat boys gang raped me on top of broken glass for 8 hours". They only "think" that when trying to explain away why they didn't go to the cops when they are making a false accusation to a Rolling Stone reporter. Police and prosecutors aren’t holding onto evidence; they haven’t been informed that there was … | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 05:03 PM |
| 5 | Update on Lena Dunham / Odell Beckham Jr. incident. Amy Schumer Deletes Tweet Claiming Black Men ‘Statistically” More Likely to Harass Women.Good point. So what we have here are two avowed rapists demanding that black men sexualize them to assuage their fragile female egos, while at the same time complaining that all black men are sex crazed animals. Feminist projection never fails. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/16 06:05 PM |
| 11 | Update on Lena Dunham / Odell Beckham Jr. incident. Amy Schumer Deletes Tweet Claiming Black Men ‘Statistically” More Likely to Harass Women.Wait, so in response to Dunham eye-raping a black man who was just quietly sitting there and minding his own business, Schumer responds by pointing out that black men are a bunch of harassers? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/16 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Rosie Batty, poster child for domestic violence against women due to her husband killing his son and then himself, praises MensLink (a group that blames boys and tells them to not abuse women, not help those boys) saying her son could've used themIt sounds like it was a tragedy, but it's not surprising that when married to such an opportunistic and narrow minded individual, a spouse suffering from mental illness is less likely to get the help they need. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/16 02:37 PM |
| 4 | Man write a well-reasoned opinion piece about not dating feminists. Predictably, every single comment is "you're so fat and ugly nobody would date you anyway". So only handsome men get an opinion?You mean, if a woman actually had a valid point? I would defend her. But have you actually read the kind of dating articles that women typically write? | /r/MensRights | 11/09/16 01:20 AM |
| 2 | This a true feministcertainly are not more likely to do it more than women Right, like all the American women who also died after volunteering to fight alongside the Kurds: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/21/american-volunteer-dies-fighting-isis-levi-jonathan-shirle Oh wait no, that was a man. No American women did that. Oops. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 08:36 AM |
| 0 | "Meet the Vagina Voters" "The women voting for Hillary because she's a woman are setting feminism back a hundred years."Trump could end two ways. A quick impeachment or literally Hitler. Hillary can end one way - a corporatist warmongering Orwellian state for the next hundred years. The question is - are we feeling lucky? | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 12:27 AM |
| 8 | Hilary Clinton talks about taking the admissions test for law school, says she heard men say, "If you take my spot, I'll get drafted, and I'll go to Vietnam, and I'll die." That wasn't sexism, Ms. Clinton. That was a person desperate not to have to fight in a war.My analogy has clearly hit a nerve. Good! Let's examine your reaction to it. I hate to break be the bearer of reality, but in the grand scheme of things, getting to go to Yale to pursue the career of your dreams is a pleasure cruise. Short of saying that you want to become a princess, I can't think of very many things that are less necessary for a fulfilling life. I'll tell you how I see it. Man, woman, black, white, albino, it doesn't matter. If it's 1969 and I know I'm not going to war, and so… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 10:06 PM |
| 1 | "Meet the Vagina Voters" "The women voting for Hillary because she's a woman are setting feminism back a hundred years."Clinton set herself up for it when she brought people into her Campaign who said there is a "special place in hell" for women who don't support her, or attacked Bernie supporters as a bunch of "Bernie Bros". Palin never accused anyone of being "sexist" for voting for the other guy. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 08:37 PM |
| 10 | Hilary Clinton talks about taking the admissions test for law school, says she heard men say, "If you take my spot, I'll get drafted, and I'll go to Vietnam, and I'll die." That wasn't sexism, Ms. Clinton. That was a person desperate not to have to fight in a war.The problem is that the "someone else" would never be a woman. Imagine a ship that hits an ice berg and starts to sink. There are not enough lifeboats for everyone. A debate ensues about who will get a seat and who will die. It's a really difficult debate. Some volunteer to stay behind. Others are cowards who sneak on a life boat when no one's looking. It's a tough situation to be in and everyone can agree on that. Now imagine a second ship sailing by, the SS Feminist Clinton. But it's not there… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Hilary Clinton talks about taking the admissions test for law school, says she heard men say, "If you take my spot, I'll get drafted, and I'll go to Vietnam, and I'll die." That wasn't sexism, Ms. Clinton. That was a person desperate not to have to fight in a war.I'm sure the part about men being afraid of the draft was true, the part about them yelling at her was made up. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 07:23 PM |
| 3 | Feminist whines that the real problem with Brock Turner's "light" sentence is it forced feminists to agitate for a law change that will primarily affect minorities. Shotgun, check! Foot, check!Separate the black from the man, claim the victimhood for women. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Feminist whines that the real problem with Brock Turner's "light" sentence is it forced feminists to agitate for a law change that will primarily affect minorities. Shotgun, check! Foot, check!They would totally do it if it wasn't for the pesky Constitution. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 07:12 PM |
| 1 | The Truth Is Out There...No, you can't get out of it. But at the same time the cops will track down the bar you were at and there will be hell to pay for them, too, if it turns out that they let you walk out of there when you were clearly drunk. The difference is that there are receipts, surveillance video, plenty of witnesses, etc., along with an actual crime that caused property damage and even death. That's what really matters - there is evidence. And similarly, what you have with the Amy Schumer case is that she con… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/16 06:38 PM |
| 13 | The Truth Is Out There...If you believe that somebody who is intoxicated cannot consent This isn't some sort of gray area of some damsel in distress having a sip of wine and regretting the sex later. This is about Schumer complaining about how the guy could no longer get it up right before he fell completely unconscious. When I read her account of it I thought she might prefer guys with rigor mortis. No normal, well adjusted person would continue having sex by that point, let alone walk away from the experience holding … | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 05:20 PM |
| 24 | The Truth Is Out There...The most amazing part is that this is all by her own admission. She actually believes that a personal account of her raping a man who was drunk to the point of falling unconcious is really a story about how men are scum for not wanting to have sex with her in college. It's pretty incredible. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 04:35 PM |
| 1 | UWL students refuse to take responsibility over OFF CAMPUS "harmful sign." Response: "Feminism is cancer."The other thing he doesn't get is that employment contracts and workplace policies limit the conditions under which you can be terminated, even in "at will" states. If your HR policy says that firing must include a formal review and you never got one because your boss was simply angry that you gave his daughter a "cream pie", then you can sue for wrongful termination. Otherwise, your boss can get his whole HR team together and they can all discuss how they need to fire you because the boss feels… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 04:10 PM |
| 1 | UWL students refuse to take responsibility over OFF CAMPUS "harmful sign." Response: "Feminism is cancer."I see, so you posted a wall of fascist bullshit and expected that no one would reply to the whole thing. Well, good luck to you. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 03:00 PM |
| 3 | UWL students refuse to take responsibility over OFF CAMPUS "harmful sign." Response: "Feminism is cancer."The First Amendment protects you from the government Freedom of speech is not the same thing as the First Amendment. It is a broader concept, as is censorship. Secondly, schools that accept government money act on behalf of the government, which is all schools. ITT recently shut down completely because the government pulled funding. It doesn't protect you from being expelled if you violate a school's code of conduct on or off campus Contract law, the constitution, even laws like Title IX are exa… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 02:52 PM |
| 3 | UWL students refuse to take responsibility over OFF CAMPUS "harmful sign." Response: "Feminism is cancer."You're really confusing censorship with free speech. They're opposite concepts. Employers who are spying on their employees' social media accounts is really odious, by the way. It may even run up against various labor laws if it results in reprisals against the employee. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 01:19 PM |
| 1 | UWL students refuse to take responsibility over OFF CAMPUS "harmful sign." Response: "Feminism is cancer."The university no doubt has a code of conduct to which its students are expected to adhere. Lewd signs and conduct almost certainly violate this code That is not in keeping with the principles of free speech. That is in keeping with censorship. Given that this sign was posted off-campus, any action by the university against any involved students would be rightly seen as a reprisal. Not only would it violate the premise of free speech, but that of free association. I don't disagree with you that … | /r/MensRights | 07/09/16 01:15 PM |
| 7 | And just like that, with no physical evidence, I'm dating a RSO. How do I support him?Whatever it is you think about a lawyer being expensive, not getting one is even more expensive. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 08:57 AM |
| 3 | Google doodles shows only women's faces on Labor Day doodle doing blue collar jobs barely any women doBecause its a fucking Google doodle SJW propaganda. FTFY. Pointing out that SJW propaganda is SJW propaganda doesn't make you "just like a SJW". | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 08:19 PM |
| 0 | Google doodles shows only women's faces on Labor Day doodle doing blue collar jobs barely any women doLike, 3 of them could be either and the others are women doing jobs that women never do. Sounds reasonable. Kind of like the other post about the "Gender neutral" bathrooms at York university. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 06:35 PM |
| 27 | Google doodles shows only women's faces on Labor Day doodle doing blue collar jobs barely any women doThere isn't much logic to it. He's basically saying let's turn a blind eye to SJW hysteria distorting reality or else we are just like them. I don't think so. This kind of doodle is part and parcel to the same exact SJW mentality that sees tall buildings as phallic symbols of Patriarchal oppression. They have to pretend that women do the same exact kind of work, which they have never done, in order to justify pushing statistical lies such as the "wage gap". They're taking a holiday for workers w… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 06:32 PM |
| 2 | Google hides news stories about boys getting raped by women. Bing gives the right results.Wow thanks so much it's almost like we are having a thread in which people share insights about which search engine works best. Oh wait no, we can't have that. Take your own advice. Delete your comment. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 04:32 PM |
| 0 | Google hides news stories about boys getting raped by women. Bing gives the right results.Yes it is. Men need to be able to search for men's related content. It's totally a men's issue to try to find a search engine that works. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 03:06 PM |
| 0 | Google hides news stories about boys getting raped by women. Bing gives the right results.Yes, but in a lot of ways it doesn't really matter. It can be maddeningly difficult to search for gender-related content no matter what search terms you use. It doesn't matter if the search algorithm is "flawed" or deliberately broken, we give up too much of our personal information to Google in exchange for such low quality results. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 02:19 PM |
| 5 | Yes they can!No, it's not. It's misleading. Everyone eventually dies. If you die of heart disease at the ripe age of 90, it's not the same as dying of it at 45. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/16 02:22 PM |
| 4 | Saudi want to end male guardianship - Without losing their financial privilege of having a wage slave.They are allowed to hold jobs and are doing so in record numbers. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/16 10:01 PM |
| 3 | Only imagine the national outrage if the genders were reversedApparently this is a case of feminists suffering from amnesia. Yes ladies, you've already got that one - it's been okay for you to batter any man you want, consequence free, for a number of decades all thanks to your ideological sisters | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 07:32 PM |
| 2 | Feminism Is Its Own Worst Enemy. Gender theory will be the death of feminism. And feminists came up with it.feminism is not encumbered with logic and theoretical exhaustivity Agreed. "Women's ways of knowing" has no rational basis. Feminists just say whatever they feel like, whenever they feel like it. It usually boils down to having their cake and eating it too. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Men Will Face Minimum 3-8 Years in Prison for Sex With A Drunk Woman Under California's New "Rape" LawThis effectively changes everything for a jury. Instead of being asked, "assuming these events took place, on a scale of 1-10, did it amount to rape?" Now the law is asking them, "Did the woman have at least one sip of wine before having sex?" [Edit: hello, SJW brigaders!] | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 02:05 PM |
| 1 | Men Will Face Minimum 3-8 Years in Prison for Sex With A Drunk Woman Under California's New "Rape" LawMaybe, but it will still lead to a lot more men going to jail for a long time over a whole lot of bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 02:03 PM |
| 1 | Men Will Face Minimum 3-8 Years in Prison for Sex With A Drunk Woman Under California's New "Rape" LawMake no mistake, sex is not required for this kind of law to be used against you. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 01:55 PM |
| 1 | Men Will Face Minimum 3-8 Years in Prison for Sex With A Drunk Woman Under California's New "Rape" LawOh, it's even more interesting when it's women who are denied a pussy pass by mandatory minimum sentences. Then we hear no shortage of grief about how jail is so much worse for women than for men from the same exact politicians who pushed hard for the mandatory minimum sentences in the first place. This is what happens when feminists buy into their own propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/16 01:50 PM |
| 0 | Mod on /r/legaladvice makes post about the male side of pregnancy, thinks it's as simple as "If you're going to have sex, you need to prepare for unintended children". Women don't have to- the man can be on the hook for 18 years at their discretion. This is an issue. "Be an adult" is not a solution.They didn't dump them into dumpsters. They dumped them directly into gutters on the street. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 01:31 PM |
| 0 | Mod on /r/legaladvice makes post about the male side of pregnancy, thinks it's as simple as "If you're going to have sex, you need to prepare for unintended children". Women don't have to- the man can be on the hook for 18 years at their discretion. This is an issue. "Be an adult" is not a solution.If you choose to rip apart your "yacht" to build another little baby "yacht" that's your choice. No amount of partying or trashing the place will make that any less of your choice. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 01:28 PM |
| 4 | Mod on /r/legaladvice makes post about the male side of pregnancy, thinks it's as simple as "If you're going to have sex, you need to prepare for unintended children". Women don't have to- the man can be on the hook for 18 years at their discretion. This is an issue. "Be an adult" is not a solution.Skip the DNA test, go straight to paying child support. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Mod on /r/legaladvice makes post about the male side of pregnancy, thinks it's as simple as "If you're going to have sex, you need to prepare for unintended children". Women don't have to- the man can be on the hook for 18 years at their discretion. This is an issue. "Be an adult" is not a solution.Don't bother asking lawyers about fighting things that make a lot of money for lawyers. They'll just insult you and attack your character, just like they did here. The best thing will be when lawyers and judges start getting replaced with software. There will be fewer of these bloodsuckers to go around and it will be dirt simple to test - and ensure - their impartiality. The other amazing thing will be when male birth control comes onto the market and these assholes are going to have to eat thei… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 01:12 PM |
| 1 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.There is only one very simple point to be made here. Being aware of your surroundings is different than being aware of your surroundings "because you are female". Rather than making you more vulnerable, being female actually makes you safer. Whether it means you are a more capable martial artist is a whole other story and of course on that point I would concede. But this should be no cause for alarm. You're actually safer. That's all I am trying to point out. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 01:57 AM |
| -1 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.There are two separate points here. First point is that yes, yes you should take responsibility for your own safety. The second point is that no, it's not because you are small and weak, because in reality as a woman you are safer than a man would be in most situations. Your small size and female gender makes you statistically less likely to get hurt, not more. You should take responsibility for your safety but this has very little to do with you being a woman. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 08:43 PM |
| 1 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.No, a typical woman will never be on par with a typical man no matter what she does. But a typical man will never be violent towards her. So it doesn't matter! The woman can be an obnoxious, insulting bitch and were she a man, she would be bleeding unconscious on the floor, but because she is a woman, nothing will happen to her. A "typical" man walking through a dark alley will be jumped and left for dead, whereas a typical woman might get cat-called in the same situation. A "typical" man might … | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 12:17 PM |
| 2 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.You are indeed denying the facts. The "stakes" are in fact lower, as even within the context of being victimized, a woman is simply less likely to be hurt due to violence than a man. In every conceivable situation, everything else being equal, it is men for whom the stakes are higher and it is men who have to do more to protect themselves against violence. That is just the reality of it and it is backed up by statistics and even the evolved biological difference me between the sexes. Women are w… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 04:55 AM |
| 5 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.Shit happens yes, but that doesn't change that your earlier reasoning was flawed. It just so happens that big strong men are far more likely to face more danger than you ever have or will. It's almost as if they evolved to be stronger and bigger for a reason. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 10:02 PM |
| 3 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.No, they're not higher. That's the whole point. The "added" paranoia is irrational. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 09:59 PM |
| 2 | Why Do We Have To Bring In Feminism Every Time A Woman Achieves Something?Well, it is something special because women generally accomplish less than men. It's just that it's got nothing to do with defeating the Patriarchy. If only these occasions were marked as an example for other women to live up to, rather than the whole group patting themselves on the back for what one woman managed to do a couple hundred years after the first man did it, then it would be worth celebrating. Instead, it's just another opportunity to bash men for having sacrificed and provided for t… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 05:05 PM |
| 7 | A slightly larger percentage of women are afraid to walk alone at night than men. Study shows large swathes of women are unreasonably paranoid. The problem is not with toxic masculinity, it's with paranoia.It's important to take responsibility for personal safety. But here is the thing. You're less likely to be victimized even than a physically fit man who is able to defend himself. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 04:21 PM |
| 2 | Women falsely accuses husband of abuse after stealing millions from him, gets caught on camera self-inflicting bruises on her face!Then there's stuff like this: http://www.mtv.com/news/1941706/keanu-reeves-stalkers-knock-knock/ | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 04:06 PM |
| 7 | A U.S. Senator thinks it's your son's responsibility to keep his daughters from being rapedAh, just another US Senator encouraging impressionable young men to take the law into their own hands and become vigilantes, perhaps even inflict violence onto innocent people. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/16 03:20 AM |
| 3 | Student who fathered teacher's baby receives $6-million abuse settlement from Redlands schoolsGood. Something to help with the child support. /s | /r/MensRights | 20/08/16 11:55 PM |
| 1 | The same skills that men need in dating help them in career and business. Is this an important reason why men on average are so much better in those areas? Confidence, resilience, planning etc. (It's a podcast interviewing Mark Manson who talks about it after about 41 min is left.)None of what you just said has anything to do with PUAs giving business advice or PUAs in general. Let's start by looking at your own headline. There are men with successful careers who are terrible with women and there are unemployed, broke men who are good with women. Already, this entire theory is disproven. It's transparently self-serving claim by a guy who used to run a PUA website and now wants to hand out business advice. When the only business experience he's had was running a PUA websit… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 06:04 PM |
| – | The same skills that men need in dating help them in career and business. Is this an important reason why men on average are so much better in those areas? Confidence, resilience, planning etc. (It's a podcast interviewing Mark Manson who talks about it after about 41 min is left.)Oh great, so now PUAs are giving out business advice. I'm sorry but this is a joke. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 12:36 PM |
| 5 | Amber Heard donates entire divorce settlement to charityIt's worth pointing out that while she may be doing this as a PR move, at the same time it shows us just how much of a joke the family law system has become. She threatened to go all out to try to wreck her husband's reputation in order to get money from him which she clearly did not need to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 12:33 PM |
| – | Amber Heard donates entire divorce settlement to charityIt shouldn't have been hers to give away She clearly did not need it. Her actions make a mockery of the family law system. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 12:23 PM |
| 7 | "Naked Donald Trump statue leaves New Yorkers with the giggles" - Now imagine a naked Hillary statue ...Clinton has done plenty to "invite this sort of thing". She has been campaigning with what she's got between her legs since the start of her political career and more than deserves to get mocked for it. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 11:51 AM |
| 10 | "The Princeton University HR department has largely wiped the word 'man' from its vocabulary. The relatively new policy in effect at the Ivy League institution spells out the directive in a four-page memo that aims to make the department more gender inclusive."You know this has nothing to do with actual equality. It won't stop them from promoting a myriad of women-only clubs, events, scholarships, and even entire majors focused exlusively on women and male-bashing. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 02:05 PM |
| 2 | "The Princeton University HR department has largely wiped the word 'man' from its vocabulary. The relatively new policy in effect at the Ivy League institution spells out the directive in a four-page memo that aims to make the department more gender inclusive."It's heavyobjectlifter according to these Orwellian authoritarians. Let's just wait until they run their next gender neutral "Teach persons who have a penis not to rape" campaign. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 01:52 PM |
| 1 | All Clubs at Harvard Have to Be Gender Neutral—Except Women’s ClubsYes, but will that still be the case after these schools dismantle all the men's organizations that have for a very long time cultivated some of the best leadership in this country? What happens after they kill the golden goose? It will hurt people like you, because part of your value is being able to hire quality young talent to fill the ranks as you rise in management. What happens when the talent goes elsewhere? It wasn't long ago where you had a better odds becoming a Fortune 500 CEO if you … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 02:18 AM |
| 1 | Destroy your emails before students accused of rape can sue you, lawyers advise colleges - The College Fix"Let's hold a kangaroo court and ruin someone's life. They won't sue us, will they?" | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Destroy your emails before students accused of rape can sue you, lawyers advise colleges - The College FixSo what happens when there is both a routine retention policy and a reasonable likelihood of litigation at the same time? | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 01:17 AM |
| 11 | "staring at breasts is an offense.... and we'll deal with the offender and take them to court"I used to be very athletic (served in the Marine Corps and played competitive sports since I was a teen) and the kind of things that women have said and did to me would probably have you reaching for the fainting couch. If I went running shirtless (I lived by the beach and would often go swimming to cool off after my run) it was pretty normal for women to shout things at me or honk their horn as they drove by. When I worked a summer job as a pool boy, women old enough to be my mother would ask m… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/16 02:12 PM |
| 1 | Facebook finally paid off. This post would be unthinkable the other way around.It's pretty hillarious. Therefore it must have been written by a man. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/16 01:25 PM |
| 10 | Woman tells police she was RAPED by a Pokemon Go character after she felt an ‘assault’Rolling Stone would publish a long expose about gang rape by a fraternity member named Pikachu. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 05:15 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Ghostbusters Reboot Heading for a $ 70 Million + Plus Loss. Sequel UnlikelyThe movie is what it is. Sony will view their tactics of attempting to attack their critics as having averted an even bigger financial loss. Same for their ham-fisted efforts to force people like Bill Murray to promote these terrible movies. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 05:05 PM |
| 7 | Falsely accused "subway rapist" Mark Pearson interviewed by Paul Elam. His false accuser was Game of Thrones actress Souad Faress.What rape? | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 04:40 PM |
| 3 | To protect illegal women-only lounge, hundreds of women (and some men) promise to squat - The College FixSince when did Title-IX care about innate biological differences? | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Privileged Woman With an Entitlement Complex Assaults Man With medical Condition on His Way to Doctors Appointment for Riding His Bike on a Bike PathYou are allowed to use reasonable force to move them out of the way. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/16 04:16 AM |
| 0 | 'Star Trek' & 'Ghostbusters': Social Justice Flops at the Box OfficeYou seriously don't know what an easter egg is? I literally just gave you a link titled "All the 'Star Trek Beyond' Easter Eggs You Could Ever Want". | /r/MensRights | 06/08/16 01:41 AM |
| 2 | I'm a feminist and I just got banned from r/feminism by expressing concern over free speechI mean, you really shouldn't be saying that women have it worse if you're not willing to dive into a sincere comparison between the two. This is honestly the problem with feminism and their relationship to free speech. If you move away from the feminist cone of silence, you'll have to deal with people who are more than happy to make comparisons. So take the whole idea of baby boy foreskins being turned into beauty creams for women. I'm sure baby girl clitorises would have the same rejuvenating p… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 11:33 PM |
| 4 | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"Literally, I just did it. You're telling me I didn't? Let's see why the OP posted it, from his own words? I agree. People like to look at at good-looking, sexually attractive people, and that should be completely fine. Feminisms influence is of course stifling, controlling and Orwellian, but at least we can point out the utter hypocrisy of it and highlight its absurdity. So thats also exactly what OP is doing. Please, take your crystal ball back to your psychic, it's defective. Next time just re… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Student informs school he was being falsely accused, school investigates himWow the irony of your comment. Nothing about the alleged rape was actually described in the article. Had you actually read the article or my comment then you would have understood that nothing in the article explains how it is that missing feet was a solid alibi for this rape. Was it because he had to chase her down through a cornfield and couldn't do it? Was is because she claimed that he penetrated her with a foot? | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 07:37 PM |
| -9 | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"Buzzfeed and Buzzfeed. Same group of people both times. Same editors, same management, even the same exact authors at times. Plus, the same target audience consisting of thousands upon thousands of hypocritical feminist women. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Teen Girl Sells Sex. Teen Boy Serves as Bodyguard. Teen Boy Gets Arrested by Homeland Security for Child Sex-TraffickingWhen was the last time anyone's actually arrested a real pimp? | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:40 PM |
| 9 | Student informs school he was being falsely accused, school investigates himI don't know how not having feet (as opposed to legs) makes it impossible to rape, but the fact remains that the male student reported gender-based harassment and a hostile academic environment and the school not only refused to investigate it, but they joined in on the hostilities. It gets even better. The school basically went up to the headset and said, "look, you'd better take this the whole way and ruin this guy's entire life and you won't be held responsible or, you know, we might actually… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:29 PM |
| – | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"No, we don't give a shit. If some gay men's magazine wrote lustful articles about the Olympics we wouldn't care. What we are actually doing is calling out the feminist assholes who want to have their victim cake and eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:11 PM |
| -1 | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"I suppose "No True Woman" would ever write an article like this for the stinking fishwrap known as Buzzfeed? | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:07 PM |
| 8 | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"Feel free to write an article about how you could eat all the sand in the female beach volleyball players' court. Let us know when Buzzfeed publishes it and you're given a warm reception from all the "sex positive" feminists out there. But until then... | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:04 PM |
| 0 | 'Star Trek' & 'Ghostbusters': Social Justice Flops at the Box OfficeNo, you're being ignorant. I said the movie is full of similar references. Respond to the argument! Examine the evidence that backs it up. Don't bullshit me. Yes, the original actor was gay. Yes, the original air date was September 1966 (Day 966). Yes, Kirk was feeling "episodic". Yes, the elder Spock had a literal photo of the original crew from the original series. I gave you a link sufficient enough to show that the movie was stuffed to the gills with irrelevant little tributes to Star Trek t… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 12:49 PM |
| 1 | 'Star Trek' & 'Ghostbusters': Social Justice Flops at the Box OfficeYes, but that right there just proves that it was nothing more than a tribute to the actor, not a SJW stunt. The movie was full of similar tributes. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 11:37 AM |
| 0 | 'Star Trek' & 'Ghostbusters': Social Justice Flops at the Box OfficeI literally already explained it. Respond to the actual argument I made or don't bother. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 11:30 AM |
| 1 | 'Star Trek' & 'Ghostbusters': Social Justice Flops at the Box OfficeBecause the original actor is gay. The whole movie is full of silly easter eggs and homages to the franchise's past and many of them have nothing to do with the actual content of past shows. https://www.inverse.com/article/18618-star-trek-beyond-complete-easter-eggs | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 02:37 AM |
| 5 | "The _Atlantic_ has a love-hate relationship with men’s economic contributions. The magazine alternates between gloating that feminism has destroyed men’s economic status once and for all, and worrying that men are no longer fulfilling their traditional roles as bread winners."You must be suggesting that some of these feminists have split personalities. Have you not noticed that it's the same exact people who will damn men if they do and damn them if they don't? The Atlantic really doesn't publish articles from a man's point of view. Nothing that honestly takes into account what is actually in men's best interest. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 12:04 AM |
| 2 | Clinton cheating her way to Democratic nomination is no grand victory for womenTo win. That's your opinion but it wouldn't have helped him win. Sanders had to convert die-hard Democrats, he already had all the independents. Pushing independents even more away from Clinton would have only helped Trump win in the general election. Clinton already had record high negatives, if that wasn't enough to turn her supporters away from her after twenty years of negative attacks, then a couple months of Sanders doing it wouldn't have made any difference. doesn't appear he was aiming t… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/16 11:21 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter