TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dupek11 Archive

View 4 posts and 96 comments by dupek11 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Creating controversy to get attention is attention whoring. And the proper way of dealing with attention whores is to ignore them. I don't think I am the only one getting sick of the MRM when I see all this drama and people upvoting this kind of immature content when they should be downvoting it into oblivion. If this is MRM than stop the train as I'm getting out at the Egalitarianism station.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:59 PM
-6

Yeah, you are right they are just like the guys who pushed men and women with infants on their arms into gas chambers. When russian soldiers got hold of Nazis in uniforms (SS or nazi party members) they didn't take them prisoner, they slowly cut their throats to show them they are animals not worth a bullet to the head. So how do you suggest we should deal with radical feminists if according to you they act like nazis?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:40 PM
-7

You are missing the point. The word "nazi" is not a synonym for "asshole".
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:21 PM
-10

Have you ever seen a gas chamber in a Nazi concentration camp? I have. So stop trivialising Nazism.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:12 PM
-4

You need visibility? Then sign the posters next time. The posters campaign was a solid 9/10 IMHO. I just don't like the article we are discussing in this thread. It is immature, counterproductive and I wouldn't recommend reading it to anyone.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:08 PM
-2

They might think they know what they are doing but by doing what they are doing they are making MRM lose more credibility than any feminist could hope to. There is a Russian saying that goes "if I didn't know it was pure stupidity I would consider it sabotage" and this saying fits perfectly in this case.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:45 PM
-4

Because other people are listening, because "only cows never change their views" (a Polish proverb), because if we speak the truth there is no need to hide it. What they do with that information is their choice.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:39 PM
-1

We do not want nor need their approval. Do you think only feminists and MRA's see those articles?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:34 PM
-1

Insults do not bring anything useful to the discussion on the contrary they give an opportunity to change the subject of a discussion. Y: X is a stupid sexist. X:(ignores the part about sexism) See how Y insulted me and called me stupid? This is why we can't have a rational discussion with him. This is why we must ignore and censor Y.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:05 PM
1

You're right, let's call them "stupid cunts that are literally worse than Hitler" in the next AVFM article. That will make them take us seriously!
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:45 PM
-3

Since the article we are discussing calls the feminists nazis a link to Godwin's law seems pretty relevant to me. But fuck me for trying to stop the intellectual degradation of the men's right movement, right?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:06 PM
-2

So if we started the discussion with calling them Nazis then where do we go from there? When a feminist calls me a "rape apologist" it is the end of a discussion for me as I refuse to argue against that or hear out any other of their arguments no matter how good they might be. If we want the feminists to understand our point of view we must let them read the articles that outline our point of view, and feminists will not read our articles if we insult them in the lead.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:01 PM
-5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:03 PM
-2

Ever heard about Godwin's law?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:53 PM
-12

I have seen some facts in that article and a lot of feels. Ever heard about Godwin's law?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:46 PM
-10

Is it me or are the people from "A Voice For Men" just as emotional as the feminists they don't like for being too emotional? How about acting all calm and rational for a change, you know like men are supposed to act.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:33 PM
11

And much of men spend on themselves is spent to impress women.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:40 PM
-2

Here is an idea. Instead of arguing with feminists on facebook how about you join a political party and actualy take part in the process of proposing and creating new laws?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:22 PM
1

Well they think they have something in common with us as they keep spamming us. Reading about them and their views brings some much needed comic relief to this usually depresing subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:47 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1fo17y/please_dont_feed_the_manhood_academy_trolls/
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:32 PM
1

I think they are trying their best to discourage males from becoming their customers without breaking the law. Just look at the "girly" website I wouldn't be suprised if the insurance documents were printed on pink paper. A reasonable, middle aged man who knows how to count won't be discouraged if he can save money by becoming their customer but an 18 year old male driver probably will and this is just the demographic they want to avoid. So props to the marketing team.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:12 PM
-5

Define "feminist". There are many types of feminists and many types of feminists views some of which contradict each other. There are also people who identify both as feminists and MRA's. You should find the websites of influential feminist organizations and see what proposed laws they are opposing. IMHO it's a waste of time to pay attention to vocal but devoid of any real influence radical feminist groups.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:42 PM
3

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250863/Womens-car-insurance-300-tomorrow-new-EU-rules-ban-setting-prices-according-gender-come-force.html
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:14 PM
2

You don't even need a wire. I have heard about a motorcyclist getting killed because some kids put scotch tape across a road and when a motorcyclist drove into the tape it streched, made him lose his balance and crash into a tree.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:29 PM
1

It's better to have an ugly trial than a nice funeral.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:22 PM
3

It's still an amazingly well done movie. And if you want to recommend it to someone who thinks that "false rape accusations aren't a big deal" then you should first check it out yourself.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:03 PM
2

Someone wanted to kill him or just scare him so either way he will never be safe again and the whole affair will never go away. In real life he should have called the police. The shooter might have left an empty cartridge casing that could be linked to a rifle or they might have found the shooter by his footprints.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:00 PM
5

If 90% is low then what seems high to you? It seems very high to me. I wonder how the control group was chosen. Perhaps those were people with some form of mental illness?. For example there is an extremly high rate of false accusations of theft among people with late stages of alzheimers disease. But sure lets just make fun of that number just because you don't like it.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:56 PM
6

They happen a lot more often then you think. 90% of rape accusations were false according to one study [Stewart (1981)] . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_rape_accusations
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:23 PM
10

"Is that a microphone in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:22 PM
9

"Read before you sign", "Don't sign it if you don't understand it" and "Always get evidence on paper". Are the 3 most valuable things I learned in law school.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 06:49 PM
19

As the lawyers say "speech is grass, paper is solid" Apply again, this time on paper and request a written reply. If they reply with a refusal on the grounds that you are a male than congratulations you have solid evidence of sexism in that charity. Ask them to reconsider their stance on accepting male volunteers, inform the papers or sue them. A charity needs to take care of it's reputation. edit:spelling
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:29 PM
3

They are a bunch of spammers and assholes giving MRM a bad name and that is all you need to know. If the content on their website wasn't a bunch of immature, misogynistic gibberish that looks like it was written by a 13 year old boy then perhaps they would have pageviews without the need for spamming.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:25 AM
10

manhood academy spam, downvote, report and ignore.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:58 PM
5

It's only clever if you want to get fired. If enough people complain to the HR department in a corporation about you being a sexist the HR department won't make an investigation to find out if you are really sexist. They will just fire you "to keep harmony in the workplace".
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:55 PM
7

Talk about male suicide. Working in a corporation does not make you immune to it. My father's friend was a successful doctor in his early 50's, he had a wife and two grown up daughters a dog, a large house, money, prestige, a new car, everything a man might want. On the outside everything seemed ok and one day he just decided to kill himself. When he hung himself they found out that he was planning his suicide for weeks. Perhaps there were some warning signs but nobody noticed. You can talk abou…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:33 PM
20

I counted 15 "nos" and 1 "stop it".
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:42 PM
1

Well if it is any comfort to you it could have been much worse. My friend with another male friend and a female friend took some anti-depression medicine and drank a lot of vodka (IMHO that was retarded and irresponsible). Then they all passed out. When they woke up in the morning the girl was without a bra, she panicked, cried rape and went to a police station. At the police station they accepted her report and sent her to a doctor who found no evidence of penetration so the charges were droppe…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:23 PM
39

"Obviously if you're watching a scene with a woman tied to a bed while a man forces sex on her, the final act of that movie will involve said man getting shot in the face by Bruce Willis. If, on the other hand, it's a man being tied down and forced into sex by a pretty lady, well, you're watching a wacky romantic comedy." —C. Coville, Cracked, 6 Romantic Movie Gestures That Can Get You Prison Time http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardRapeFemaleOnMale
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:32 PM
10

You can say he was raped three times. A woman who was raped and got pregnant can get an abortion a man has no such choice.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:51 PM
6

The movie "Super" from 2010 depicts a female protagonist raping the male protagonist, see it for yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHZpBGrecd4
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:45 PM
12

Interesting comment by shenpen in r/economics "Women sell sex and buy emotional commitment and emotional validation, men sell emotional commitment and buy sex. Women shame women who sell sex cheap i.e. without emotional commitment and emotional validation, becasue it lowers the asking price of it. They are usually called "sluts". Men should shame men who sell emotional commitment cheap i.e. without sex, the type who confesses everlasting love at the first coffee date, or the men who sell emotion…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:14 PM
3

Link does not work. Mirror?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:38 PM
12

So what exactly does the new law say? Is it gender neutral? If it criminalizes repeated unwanted sexual advances than I might be ok with it. If it criminalizes all sexual advances then I am not ok with it since if you are the active party you have no way of knowing if a sexual advance is welcome before you try it.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:07 PM
2

It went fine. I chose to go to the date wearing pants this time.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:28 PM
2

Thanks for your opinion. Im not very good with words so perhaps you could preapare for me a short 3 to max 5 minute speech about men wearing skirts and patriarchy? I want to start the date with that speech because she will probably notice my skirt and I don't want her feeling confused or awkward on our first date.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:21 AM
4

I intended to say that kilts are "manly" not that skirts are "un manly". Of course what is manly and what is not manly is subjective. I live in Europe, I am a man and I have a date tomorrow with a woman who I will meet for the first time. What do you think I should wear? Trousers or a skirt? (sadly I do not own a kilt)
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:48 PM
4

I am not saying that wearing a skirt is bad. If you are a man and you want to wear a skirt that is fine with me... whatever floats your boat. Edit: In retrospection "They might want to consider wearing kilts" would be a better choice of words rather than "They should start wearing kilts". Edit2: Please do not engage in bashing a non-native speaker's usage of English.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:55 PM
4

No I did not need to link to the Wikipedia page for a kilt. But some people especially if they are young may not know what a kilt is so I made it convenient for them to find out.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:16 PM
10

If they would have quit their jobs as a protest against the company's dress code that would not be news worthy material.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:55 PM
11

They should start wearing kilts. That way they could can still look manly while technically wearing a skirt.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:46 PM
1

So how is it related to male rights? This could be one of the causes of antisocial behaviour among males from fatherless homes. http://www.fathermag.com/news/2778-stats.shtml
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:56 PM
5

The AMA went better than expected.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:29 PM
12

Wow, it was only 6 months ago that we passed 50 000 readers. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/123m7j/congratulations_rmensrights_for_achieving_50000/
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:54 PM
8

To be a modern day garbage man you have to know how to drive a truck or operate a trash compactor that can easily kill or mutilate someone if not used with care. This is not McDonald's where you can pick up a guy straight of the street and teach him the basics of his job in 2 hours.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:19 PM
-3

Nope. We might not need conscription now but somwhere in the future the draft might be reinstated and I hope by then we can make it mandatory for both men and women.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:44 PM
8

Apply anyway. If your appliction gets rejected, demanand written explenation why it was rejected. If your application has been rejected because you are a male sue them for sexual discrimination. Notify the press and the MRM about the lawsuit.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:24 PM
2

My mother likes to drive more than me, she is a more aggressive driver than me and drives faster and overtakes more cars on single lane roads than I do. So your anecdotal evidence proves nothing.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:42 PM
3

"Abraham Lincoln Listeni/ˈeɪbrəhæm ˈlɪŋkən/ (February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865) was the 16th President of the United States, serving from March 1861 until his assassination in April 1865. Lincoln successfully led the United States through its greatest constitutional, military, and moral crisis—the American Civil War—preserving the Union. Reared in a poor family on the western frontier, Lincoln was mostly self-educated, and became a country lawyer, a Whig Party leader, Illinois state legislator …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:04 PM
2

Other then a sense of fulfilment and self satisfaction there is not much you can gain from editing Wikipedia. And if you try to keep the crazy out of articles about events like the 9/11 attacks you get stalkers and death threats. Reading comments on the internet how much Wikipedia is biased and worthless even when everybody uses it does not encourage participation.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:01 PM
-5

Me: Stop Here is your problem. That can't be the first word you say to an unknown woman. It's negative and that sounded like he ordered her to stop. You shouldn't do that. Say something like: Me: Excuse me. You seem to be very busy but can I take a minute of your time? I noticed .... bla bla bla... perhaps we can meet for coffee some time later? Because you started with apologising for being a man for taking her time you don't come off as rude or dangerous. Also too much eye contact with a woman…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:02 PM
1

That's not an argument against women in the military but an argument against mixed-sex units.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:25 PM
1

Wouldn't it be better to do interviews with fatherless ex and current gang members in prison? It would be safer, plus the inmates have time to reflect on their lives. Them being convicted felons you could also cut the "gang members? we are respectable members of society" crap.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:59 PM
10

The GTA and Mafia series of "sandbox games", plenty of civillian women walking on the streets and almost 0% women as enemies.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:09 PM
142

During the single player campaign of Medal of Honor: Airborne I killed 653 (or was it 853?) imaginary Italian fascists and German nazis. 0% of them were imaginary women.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:42 PM
9

It's not the 1950's anymore and sexual harassment is illegal. If you report sexual harrassment to your employer and he/she is not willing to put a stop to it you should sue.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:44 PM
5

tldr: No fun allowed.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:21 PM
5

Lowering the physical standards for soldiers might be beneficial for men. Right now men are required to carry ridiculous loads - backpacks as heavy as 175lb / 89,4kg which can cause permanent back injuries. http://www.eorthopod.com/content/nerve-injuries-from-heavy-backpacks-in-soldiers http://www.npr.org/2011/04/10/134421473/weight-of-war-soldiers-heavy-gear-packs-on-pain
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:25 AM
5

Done
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:26 PM
4

Collect all these documents. Your son's mother will try to turn him against you. When he is old enough, show him all the document and let him make up his own mind about his mother.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:36 PM
2

I am not sure, such linguistic issues sometimes escape me as I am not a native english speaker. This article can be moved under a different title if there will be such a need.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:21 AM
1

Thanks. PM sent
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:35 PM
1

Anybody knows how to make graphs with open source software? These graphs by the WHO are copyrighted but the data itself is not http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/unitstates.pdf
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:31 PM
11

"Listen here you stupid bitches" was that necessary?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:28 PM
3

Wikipedia has it's strenghts and it's weaknesses but it is currently the 6th most popular website on the internet according to Alexa. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.org Jurnalists take a look at Wikipedia before interviews, politicians take a look at Wikipedia before working on laws, lawyers take a look at Wikipedia before they write an appeal to the Supreme court. So everybody uses it and everyone is more or less affected by Wikipedia. The only thing more amazing is how much we relay o…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:04 PM
5

Be bold You only need a few hours to get to know the basic rules of Wikipedia. After a week or two you can be considered an experienced Wikipedia editor.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:20 AM
10

I am a longtime Wikipedia editor and administrator on one of the european Wikipedias, but I hardly ever edit Wikipedia these days. There is no conspiracy to withold information on Wikipedia, just nobody is willing to put in the time and effort to change the article on wikipedia. Apparently everybody is waiting for someone else to do it. The only thing worse than doing nothing is "drive by editing". To change controversial articles on Wikipedia, you must take the time to know the rules of Wikiped…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:54 AM
27

Sue her for defemation and do it as quickly as possible. Also make sure the court brings in some of those harrasses as witnesses, they wouldn't be degrading you If they didn't have proof of you being a rapist, right? Let them make fools of themselves in front of the court.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:56 PM
-4

Sounds legit. Those slave owners from the American South must have been really oppressed by their black house servants who held the doors open for them.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:45 AM
3

Do not feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:00 PM
6

Recordings can be contested in court as doctored / fake so IMHO an old school tape recording on a previously unused tape would be much better evidence than an mp3 file.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:12 PM
3

"Spamhood academy" is a known spammer. Please do not feed the spammers and do not link to their website or their videos on youtube.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:21 PM
4

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:38 PM
1

I would appreciate it if you would link that video again if you can.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:00 PM
8

Perhaps you should warn her future boyfriends about the possible "suprise baby" part of their relationship.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:50 PM
2

Downvoted for spamhood101.com link in the description of the video.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:35 PM
2

Stats on this subreddit should be marked as region specific e.g [US], [EU]. Stats from Europe, N. America, Africa, Asia and other continents might be significantly different and feminists might claim that being from another, culturally different region "they are not relevant".
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:23 PM
14

Wikipedia - Not Even Once.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:07 PM
1

"In gender studies, cisgender and cissexual gender identities are two related types of gender identity where an individual's self-perception and presentation of their gender matches the behaviors and roles considered appropriate for one's sex." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender tldr: If you were born and raised as a heterosexual male / female and plan to stick with that identity.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:52 AM
83

Looking at the way the woman was drawn it was clear from the start that she would be the villain in this story. IMHO that was rather anticlimatic. Just like in real life bad people should be identified by their actions and not their looks.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:21 AM
2

So people are supposed to belive that fake rape claims are a real problem because we say so? How about we provide some proof of our claims. And by proof I do not mean easily faked images of unknown origin. /devil's advocate
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:49 PM
9

It is a real problem only if we can prove that the screenshot was legit. And we can't prove it.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:50 PM
13

In case no feminists show up for the debate, ask a few MRA's to prepare in advance to play the devil's advocate and present the feminist's point of view. Let's not turn this debate into a MRA circlejerk. Officially invite local human rights and feminist organisations to the debate. Film everything just in case feminists show up to disrupt the debate.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:23 AM
1

I'm all for correcting mistakes and setting things proper but I am against using this kind of language and emotional arguments. We are not a bunch of angry anti-feminists, we are Men's Rights Activists, capable of calm, civil, rational and fact based discourse. tldr: When a monkey throws feces at you, you do not throw your own feces back at the monkey.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:23 AM
1

If possible have more than one friends with cameras filming you. That will help repel the accusations that the footage has been edited. Also If things get ugly take out your own smartphone / camera and start filming "for evidence" that might help to calm things down a bit. Don't forget to upload to youtube.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:11 AM
-4

Let's not lower ourselves to their level.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 09:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter