TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dusty78 Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by dusty78 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Miss Spain 1918 2018
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:20 PM
3

Freedom of speech Is an ideal that they aren't upholding. And that they should be criticized for their opposition to. The First Amendment to the US Constitution just means (everything you said).
/r/MensRights19/04/21 01:55 AM
18

Edit: article says the decision isn't legally binding This appears to be a decision from the insurance court. He's already lost the paternity suit. He sued the clinic for his costs, their malpractice insurance is footing the bill for the clinic's defense. The decision that this isn't malpractice is what's currently not legally binding.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:37 PM
0

411 That's directory assistance. 311 is being rolled out in many places as the non-emergency 911
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:23 PM
41

From boxofficemojo.com. Adjusted gross is to 2016 dollars. Title Adjusted Gross Studios Ghostbusters (1984) 589,622,900 1506 Ghostbusters II (1989) 245,391,600 2410 Ghostbusters (2016) 126,426,300 3963 EDIT: Adjusted at the same rate, the budget for Ghostbusters (1984) is ~77M, so about half of the 2016 budget. EDIT2: On closer inspection, these numbers appear to be the domestic, not worldwide numbers; all 3 movies made about 250M adjusted overseas.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:12 AM
2

Dismissing a sex case will always be a political firestorm. They have a situation where they believe that they can't win on 4 of those counts (or believe that they can only win 4, I haven't been paying attention to this trial). Splitting the cases means that doubt surrounding the 4 cases doesn't "infect" the results on the others (or vice versa). Were they able to split the trials, they can win the "non-infected" cases and blame the popo/facebook scam for the loss of the other trial. I'll bet th…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:25 AM
55

I'll just leave this here to trigger wayward feminists
/r/MensRights24/07/16 05:33 PM
2

4 or more victims Close. The feds* start at 4 or more deaths (excluding perpetrator); the other media sources start at 3+ casualties. Casualty includes all injuries (sprained ankle getting away?) and usually include the perpetrator. * The Congressional Research Service currently uses 4; the FBI's "Mass Killing" category used 4 until 2013 when it was changed by Congress to 3.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:57 AM
11

Never forget: Lead and read rhyme Lead and read rhyme Lead and read don't rhyme Lead and read don't rhyme
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:51 AM
3

To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:11 AM
6

Move to Ukraine
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:44 AM
12

Especially ironic.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:46 PM
14

Wait... Shouldn't all subscribers to /r/Socialism be made mods? It belongs to all of them, right?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:56 PM
2

NSPCC is a private charity (or looks that way on it's website). It's not the prosecution. The statement, while reprehensible, isn't coming from a position of power but of overwrought victim advocacy.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:01 PM
2

sadistics This comes close, I think.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:54 PM
2

RCW9A.44.040 defines Rape (first degree). It includes elements like use (or threatened use) of a knife or other weapon; kidnapping; inflicts serious injury; enters the building feloniously. I'm guessing that they've charged what they can prove right now (they can amend the indictment later, when they have further proof). Rape second degree only needs to prove that it was forcible (forcible compulsion).
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:08 PM
2

Salute and shine boots?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:15 PM
3

1 in 340 is 0.29% 0.0029 is the chance or probability. Percent (from per cent--per hundred) is 100* probability.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:52 AM
2

The government drafted men for the armed forces during wartime from the Civil War until 1973. Conti and McQueen enlisted. This is the only mention of the two men and the draft (another mention of the draft is about the clemencies issued by Carter). It suggests that they volunteered for service (when speaking of the two, especially together, enlisted is a choice, drafted is not). Quick GIS on their names has no articles on either man being drafted (from the anti-war bias of some of the articles, …
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:07 PM
38

APUA Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics?... It's the only thing that comes up on google
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:19 PM
0

Reddit's link submission form doesn't allow both links and comments in the submission. If you post a link, you also have to comment in a non-stickey comment, like the rest of us. Put the link in your comment or resubmit.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:48 PM
1

The Ried technique For those too lazy to google :P
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:09 PM
2

This is different. He was also arrested for CP in 2002. The legalities extended til 2004 when he pled guilty to lesser charges (possessing obscene images of minors). The felony CP charges were dropped after the county DA reviewed the evidence. The city DA moved forward on misdemeanor charges that resulted in the reporting requirement.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:57 PM
5

That's the dangers of strict liability
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:51 PM
12

Hmm... dug a bit deeper. This is a note in the transcript of his interview with Stone Phillips*. It appears after Rubens discusses his and the DA's differences of opinion of 'art' with some specifics. Reubens agreed to plead guilty to possessing obscene images of minors. But the possession of child porn (what he was arrested for) was dropped. And the article makes it clear that the punishment above was directly due to the above plea. So... DAMMIT. ProTip boys and girls, stuff gets left out of wi…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:22 AM
5

No, OP's comment stems from a 2002 arrest (charges dropped in 2004), not the 1991 arrest in Florida (which he did plea to).
/r/MensRights08/02/14 06:40 AM
1

Sorry, I wasn't really replying to the OP's link, but to the poster who was commenting on the historical difference in insurance costs. Historically, it doesn't matter. Allow me to clarify fully... As a matter of information, I think it's awesome that they're trying to extract the otherwise low risk people (of any pool) out of a high variance pool. It'll more accurately keep people responsible for their individual choices/actions. (Even with their crass marketing scheme) As a matter of overall p…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:23 PM
1

If I'm not mistake the majority of commercial drivers are men so I would the raw average of men being on the road more often then women will naturally produce a higher accident count by just sheer math. This is largely irrelevant in the individual market (most policies restrict commercial use). The times I've had a company car/truck, the policies were carried by the company (so not a burden on guys). All the personal policies I've had in place restrict business use of the vehicle. With an except…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:09 PM
3

Recovering insurance adjuster, while I revel in stomping on insurance companies; I also try to temper my enthusiasm when what they're doing is justified. In the end, though accidents/distance isn't a good metric for determining insurable risk. Insurance policies are written for 6-12 months. Higher exposure (more mileage)=higher rates. As far as insurance rates go, you charge by accidents/policy term. Changing that to mileage (kilometerage?) policy would be difficult and rife for fraud (also, due…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:13 PM
1

No, IIRC, the mothers split up. The custodial parent went on welfare. The state went after the dude. The state has been seeking to have Marotta declared the child’s father so he can be responsible for about $6,000 in public assistance the state provided, as well as future child support. From the article linked to in the OP
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:02 PM
1

To be fair, we don't know what he was reacting to. Was it a PUA calling himself a MRA? Some feminist false flag? Without knowing what he's reacting to, it's hard to know if this reaction is real or just ignorant.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:47 PM
5

Courts. Which sounds better? Well, around the time we broke up, we agreed that we'd share custody. On Dec 15, just after noon, I spoke to Xxxx where we agreed on a schedule of XXXX for visitation. Then on Dec 19 we spoke again where we modified that agreement to allow for this Christmas... Even if it holds no extra force of law, it comes off as more reliable than bare recollection.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 04:42 PM
7

What is this all about? We've had one or two issues in /r/MensRights with people making self-posts (text posts), getting supportive comments from /r/MensRights, and then editing their posts to make it appear that the comments support something abhorrent. Accordingly, we have set up a bot that automatically copies the text of all /r/MensRights self-posts to /r/MRSelfPostCopies, as a back-up of the post as it appeared shortly after posting. From the "Why?" link above... It's not about readers, its…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:00 PM
2

No, we shouldn't push to limit our choices. Just illuminate the choice and be sure that those who so choose, do so knowingly and willingly.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:46 PM
3

IIRC, the 'norm' in Japan is no joint custody. Complete loss of contact is the norm. It's on it's way to change, but too late for many.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:42 AM
5

No. Sex discrimination isn't automatically sexism. The concept in a vacuum isn't sexist. In practice today (without an opposing counterpart), yes it is.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:48 PM
3

Reddit doesn't allow self comments on linked posts... If you want to comment on a link, you have to post the link and comment like the rest of us commoners. As such, we need the link.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:18 PM
2

No Charges for Dad Who Killed Daughter's Molester A Texas rancher who beat his daughter's accused molester to death moments after he discovered the man raping the 5-year-old girl, will not be charged with his homicide, officials said, as they released chilling 911 tapes of the father calling for help as the other man died. A grand jury Tuesday decided not to indict the 24-year-old father who beat ranch hand Jesus Mora Flores to death with his bare hands, after finding the man abusing his daughte…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:52 PM
1

Similar to this but with a bear. Duh...
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:23 PM
24

Prisoners don't have the legal ability to consent to sex. So it's both.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:24 AM
7

Not directly, but this statistic (work related deaths) is often pushed aside as irrelevant in the wage 'gap' debate.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:08 PM
3

Could also be arraignment, which would be pretty quick after the incident.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:45 PM
16

A confession told to his lawyer. Not in a court of law. Not sworn. Not critically examined (cross examined). Just taken at face value then thrown out in court. vs. Sworn, cross-examined, jury tested testimony. There's a bit more than man vs woman here.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:16 AM
1

From the wiki: Twelve states currently require that all parties consent to the recording. These states are: California[15] Connecticut Florida[16] Illinois (debated, see next section) Maryland[17] Massachusetts Michigan Montana [18] (requires notification only) Nevada New Hampshire[19] Pennsylvania[20] Washington[21] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws Also, if you are calling between 1 and 2 party states, the stricter of the two laws applies (not my opinion however).
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:00 AM
1

Also, to reduce paper consumption, 3 seashells in the bathrooms.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 07:56 PM
3

So Dumb-Dumb is a trailer park with a 10yr old holding a tin of chaw?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 10:46 PM
2

Recent experience here (not mine, but was in the court): The prosecutor was quite thorough in detailing her credibility and lack thereof. It was brought up by the prosecutor that she was a convicted felon (shoplifting or the like). That she had never accused anyone before was brought up. I'd say in credibility issues, if it's not touched on by either the prosecutor or the defense, it's reasonable to assume that it was excluded from testimony (and the only reason to do that would be to benefit th…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:10 PM
1

There has to be some clear distinction between inappropriate and appropriate sex. Otherwise it devolves to what the jury finds disgusting (which is a moving target at best). So yes. That is not to say that the laws must be California's all minors (arbitrary age) are illegal for everybody (even other minors). But they must be concrete (and allow for mistake of fact, like every other major crime). That is not to say that we can't provide a rolling punishment scale (0-2 yr diff=legal, 2-4 yr diff=m…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:31 AM
2

In one of those wonderful acronmyized laws... PROTECT
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:24 PM
1

You have watched Homicide: Life on the Street, I assume.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:28 PM
1

OK, good
/r/MensRights25/12/11 04:13 PM
2

in cash out of pocket If she doesn't sign for it, you may be paying this twice. At the very least, make it a check she'll have to sign (proof)
/r/MensRights25/12/11 04:05 PM
1

Wait, I thought you hunted nephilim... also really, no Monty Python? I am disappointed.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:48 PM
2

Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:03 PM
5

Reminds me of a post in r/Libertarian (paraphrased) Govt: Give me a % of your business. Business owner: OK, here's a % of my sleepless nights, of my ulcers, of my mortgage and debts, of my 80 hour weeks... That sounds fair... Govt: Wait!!! Business owner: Oh, you just want the money, well you're a dick
/r/MensRights26/11/11 04:02 AM
36

Treat me like a man OK Wait, only for the good stuff
/r/MensRights25/11/11 01:24 PM
45

Maury, Springer and Geraldo would be quite a bit less interesting.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:09 PM
1

But, I believe that 'they' don't know who they are. The militant feminist who would be offended by any of the suggestions do, but the rank and file feminists who have never equated feminism with sexism, need to be challenged in their misconception. It's those thinking feminists who mistakenly conflate the suffrage/equality feminism with modern feminism that need to be addressed. They will be put off by the old saying, challenged by mine and falsely equate MR with feminism with the OP's. EDIT: Al…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:39 PM
18

I kinda liked calling out the feminists by name, so how bout Earning scorn from feminists and other anti-equality activists since March 2008 EDIT: Aside from the visceral justification above, this wording challenges the thoughts of visiting marginal feminists when most of them equate equality with feminism, and leaving out feminists by name just leaves those same people to not associate the two. Also, the old wording made it sound like r/MR was just r/anti-feminist (which isn't the case either).
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:27 PM
1

Actually, don't tell the lawyer either. They usually have some obligation to not allow purgery in a court of law. If you are called on to testify as to how you obtained the records, he may have obligations to reveal (or at least, not ask you questions leading to your purgery). Better yet, keep it legal dude, then you don't have to lie and risk purgery/wiretapping charges.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:32 AM
2

So, she said he gave her a choice. The dude only says he recieved a BJ. These facts from the article also allow for the possibility that she lied to the police (but women never lie about rape) and that she offered rather than him. Not enough evidence to know.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 03:21 PM
1

No, me, and I'll be quiet about the problems in your relationships without a judge's order :)
/r/MensRights03/09/11 05:03 AM
16

Just went through new hire orientation... The first topic of discussion was sexual harassment... and the first example on the video was to point out that men can be sexually harassed... Things may be changing :)
/r/MensRights27/08/11 05:33 PM
2

Or, itemize and keep a record of your losses and don't pay tax on your winnings (might have to all be in one year, but still doable with planning)
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:59 AM
1

Better, write it on your arm... take picture.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 02:50 PM
-1

FUCK NO... oh, not a self.mrm post... well, this is embarrassing...
/r/MensRights27/04/11 04:39 AM
4

Usually this is my snap 'If there isn't misconduct...' reply. BUT I RTFA. Withholding evidence... tsk tsk tsk r/circlejer...politics (sorry) has this conversation about every month. First time I'll agree with the hive mind on this issue (because of the misconduct). I guess my real wondering is, except that this is a guy in the story, why is this in MR?
/r/MensRights30/03/11 01:36 PM
-1

Only if they deserve it.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:24 AM
3

I know I've read this exact case somewhere, but my Google-fu is failing right now. IIRC, the court decided that the sperm was a gift from the man. And that legal ownership of the sperm was the womans, thus hers to do with as she pleased... one turkey baster later, courts ruled that there was no difference between oral and vaginal sex. He was on the hook for support. EDIT: I've got my google-fu back... linky
/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:48 PM
10

The DA, usually
/r/MensRights06/10/10 02:18 AM
19

15 year marriage then 14 in jail... Almost spent more time in jail than he spent in prison :)
/r/MensRights09/09/10 10:56 PM
5

Forget results, I want pics
/r/MensRights20/08/10 07:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter