TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dval92 Archive

View 9 posts and 357 comments by dval92 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Based and George Foreman-pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 06:44 PM
1

The man hater continues to twist facts to suit her narrative. the woman cries out in pain as she strikes you
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 03:01 PM
1

So is /r/MensRights going the way of the default subs now?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:20 PM
1

Because she wants attention.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:01 PM
1

BDE?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 08:47 PM
11

based and data-pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 06:57 PM
2

If this fear is so repulsive to you, then surely you have constructive advice for men to dissuade them from their "nervous mentality."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 11:52 PM
2

Oh my god where did this generation of neurotic crybaby men come from? Seeing men whose lives have been ruined: https://archive.md/UZ7wO This nervous mentality is disgusting to women. Better safe than sorry 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 09:38 PM
3

It's not paranoia but risk assessment. These consequences are real and damaging. To use a metaphor I've used before: plane crashes are statistically rare phenomena, but because a plane crash can mean injury or death, civil aviation authorities require that aircraft carriers follow maintenance procedures and strict safety protocols to minimize the fallout of a crash even further, even if a crash is not likely to happen on any given flight.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 03:02 PM
2

like this? https://youtu.be/-368xecJgdE
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 06:18 AM
10

It's like children missing developmental milestones, if children don't talk or walk by a certain age, it becomes harder to develop later in life. Some of those kids end up requiring speech/language pathos. This hit me, someone with minimal relationship experience, right in the feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 04:39 AM
6

The ones who open me. The ones who allow me to open them. Even if you are a highly attractive man, that's still a very small segment of the female population. The less attractive you are, the smaller the proportion becomes such that probability of drawing an interested woman out of the total female population (much less the population of women you are interested in) is negligible. To be clear, they do want to be hit on by the right man, even if there is no chance they'll go for it, they love the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 04:17 AM
6

People might have the malice to do some shit like that, but not many have the balls or the patience to actually go through with a plot to fuck your life up. Even if it were just one woman alive who had that mentality and dedication, she still has this power at her disposal. She has society at her beck and call to punish a man who has made her feel vaguely uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 04:14 AM
1

This concerns the happiness of married men vis-a-vis unmarried men. Not necessarily single men, i.e. men who are not partnered at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:43 AM
3

disgusting negligent immature pornsick Go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:37 AM
6

Here's the thing. I've annoyed women more by not hitting on them than by hitting on them. Which crop of women are we talking about? The majority of women do not want to be hit on, especially by the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:36 AM
3

Precisely. Your physical appearance is the biggest determinant of your success on OLD, itself largely determined by genetics. If you have shit genes, you're not going to do well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:34 AM
13

it's best to hit on women in meat space. That avenue is also unavailable for most men. Approaching or even interacting with women carries non-negligible risks to your freedoms, relationships, and career.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:22 AM
1

https://i.redd.it/5iqsepwwi1m31.png
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 07:31 PM
5

Just look at the statistics surrounding single men and then look at the statistics surrounding single women. Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 05:24 AM
3

Serious question: if men and women decided to self-segregate and not have any contact with one another, what do you believe would be lost?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 03:08 AM
4

So they got the woman turned on somehow, then showed her pictures of uggocels and thought her state of arousal would forgive the uggness and she'd be so horny she would display less to no disguist? Yeah, it seems obvious that the answer would be "no" but you can't rely on assumptions. The purpose of studies like these is to investigate these assumptions and see if they hold empirical water.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 09:36 PM
0

Not jokes enough for Big Tech companies like Twitter, Facebook, Mozilla, et al. to collaborate with them to police speech online.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 07:08 PM
1

on this blessed day
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 07:08 PM
1

the ADL is sticking their nose https://youtu.be/Zu3nu6ue2qU
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 07:07 PM
1

this but unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 10:02 PM
1

Third, women in positions of power are needed and everything from governments to businesses run better when both men and women cooperate in their running, factually. imagine believing this at face value
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 05:14 AM
3

You know, I hadn't actually thought of the hebephila interpretation. Maybe I should change the flair in light of that since it looks like the spelling "hebe" as opposed to "heeb" isn't as common. My flair is a reference to "White Anglo-Saxon Hebrew," a characterization of Jewish paleocons like Paul Gottfried and Bob Weisberg, i.e. old-school anti-communist conservatives who were Jewish (as opposed to Jewish neoconservatives). I'm Jewish by ancestry and while I wouldn't call myself a paleocon I'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 02:38 AM
1

Are you using RES? For whatever reason that doesn't seem to play along well with archive.is. I'll just reproduce the pertinent text below (if you want more context or the ensuing discussion, consult the archive page): I've offered examples of men who have had their lives jeopardized because a woman did not like his advances, which were demonstrably innocuous. I should have also mentioned the UK trial that arose from a man barely grazing a woman as he walked past her in a train station. Or the Mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:40 AM
1

🙄 It's a post I wrote on AskMen with links to examples of what I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:31 AM
3

local pedophile ??? If you extrapolate from the numbers over time odds are most of those will also be below replacement between 10 or 20 years from now. Even conservative estimates have Africa continuing to experience population gains after 2030.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:30 AM
0

That's absurd, hyperbolic and doesn't happen outside the hysteria of the manosphere No, these are established consequences. We can debate whether or not the probabilities of these outcomes are negligible, but even if they were negligible, men including myself have acknowledged that the severity of the outcomes do not justify taking the risks. To put it into perspective: plane crashes are statistically rare phenomena, but because a plane crash can mean injury or death, civil aviation authorities …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:22 AM
-1

I laugh at fearful notions at the thought of there not being enough of us or foreigners taking over. they are though (video in Swedish but has English subtitles)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:12 AM
-1

I’m in the “go outside and actually talk to some women” camp. This would have been satisfactory advice ten years ago and prior. However, even casual interactions with women carry the risk of a police, HR, or Title IX investigation, and the subsequent whittling of a man's freedoms and liberties.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:10 AM
2

The world population is basically in freefall The developed world is in population freefall. The un(der)developed world, however, is experiencing explosive growth if not having TFRs above replacement level.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 12:04 AM
2

mgtow != incel
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 08:11 PM
1

https://youtu.be/Zu3nu6ue2qU
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 01:54 PM
1

at least the PUA segment of TRP is
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:07 AM
1

There are valid courses of treatment for anxiety that take several months if not years to follow through. As someone who has gone through a course and has seen marked improvement in the ability to manage stress, I endorse them 100%. But they require effort and discipline over the span of several months if not years. There is no off switch you can hit to will the anxiety away for a night.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:06 AM
2

Bars as a meeting place for hookups or relationships has probably been falling out of favor since 2013 at a dramatic rate. I don't think it's ever going to disappear. But in combination with the rise of online dating and increasing social isolation, I think one's chances of success at a bar will become too low for the average guy's effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:04 AM
1

That's a really, really bad idea for addressing anxiety or shyness, either long-term or for this one instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 05:59 AM
3

In terms of field reports, it’s bad erotic creative writing Yeah, the FR's made following the Red Pill forum unattractive to me. Many of their observations of female nature were spot on, but these pickup-artist testimonials made me think of MLMs touting their sales "successes" but not actually improving as a business. Or just making the stories up on the spot, if not embellishing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 05:47 AM
2

instructions unclear, I have un-killed Bambi's mom
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 05:43 AM
3

wtf I love china now
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 05:38 AM
1

Neoliberalism rocks!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 02:47 PM
1

women are humans human societies are hierarchical
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 02:11 PM
5

Go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 07:33 PM
5

Not OP but yes, unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 02:56 PM
1

Neoliberalism rocks!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 02:29 PM
–

It's pretty bad now, but it's only going to get worse in the coming years for everyone. Enjoy what little you can get out of it while it lasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 05:05 PM
4

Honestly this sounds ideal. The IOIs would be a lot less ambiguous and men would interpret fewer signals as false positives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 04:08 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OrAewTxBrc
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 03:52 AM
2

They don't give a shit about his silky guitar skills or his songs though, they care about him because he is the highest status guy in the room when he's on stage. This is an important observation and I wish you had posted this as a top-level comment rather than here. It's not so much his abilities as a musician inasmuch as it is his social status that his talent in part earned him that the main element in his attractiveness. Richard Stallman is among the world's most important living computer pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 02:08 AM
2

I don't think [deleted] is a woman tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 05:01 PM
2

The big social media networks are garbage even after disregarding the industry's data mining and sharing practices and their part in the neoliberal panopticon. I guess Reddit counts as social media, but it does have the advantage of pseudonymity and it's not actually a networking service like Facebook is. That's all my social media activity though. Most of my communication with friends is over text or email, which is perfectly adequate for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 07:20 AM
3

Stop giving Facebook money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 09:22 PM
7

Some call it feminism. Others call it femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 07:55 PM
14

The cure for MGTOW is grow the fuck up and stop blaming others for your failures, lack of motivation and/or lack of ability to make yourself accountable for your choices and your mistakes. The central premise of MGTOW is that women have overwhelming control over men's affairs to the extent that they can trivially destroy men's lives if they so desired, and (depending on the MGTOW you speak to) that they will. MGTOW advocates for men to cut or at least limit associations with women to reduce the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 07:54 PM
1

lmao feminists do NOT want to ban prostitution, at least not mainstream feminists. Sweden. Sale of prostitution is decriminalized but the purchase of it remains criminalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 07:00 PM
4

Except he's right. The UK police is notorious for arresting and jailing people for "hate speech", but turning a blind eye to the effects of the Islamic/third-world invasion of Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 06:40 PM
1

^^ "Conservatives" conserve in name only. They're really just neoliberals who pay lipservice to "traditional values" to pander to their voter base.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 06:38 PM
1

But dumb quote. If it were true civilization would be much more fragmented and clanish and ultimately anarchic since no one would band together to decide what the common good is, or how each family should interact with one another. Had you not said it was a Thatcher quote I would have expected to see this in a TPUSA meme with Benny "Two Passports" Shapiro's smug face on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 06:36 PM
1

I don't really have one. When I was in university the pickings would have been easier, but having recently graduated and moved across the country for work I keep to myself and I don't have many friends. I also refuse to use online dating services because of their data-trading practices and the fact that coworkers and search engines can easily discover my profile, and that participation on them is a losing proposition for men. Even in university though I didn't take advantage of the opportunity. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 03:40 PM
6

BOTSWANA
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 10:37 PM
1

gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8 it doesnt matter as long as she jumps in bed with you immediately. if she doesnt, she is a whore. if she does, she is still a whore but at least you got laid, no? you men are fcking hypocrites. I'm not into casual sex, but either way she's still promiscuous whether or not she chooses to entertain her unhealthy, hedonistic predilections with me. Also, you're allowed to swear on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 04:26 PM
1

What is the actual rate of this though?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 04:05 PM
3

The "you" was a general "you" here, not specific to you e: why the downvote?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 08:27 PM
1

Maybe the genders need to stop hating each other and find the real enemy. https://youtu.be/Zu3nu6ue2qU
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 08:21 PM
–

It's human instinct to lash out at groups we perceive to be existential threats to us. The same driving force behind the reaction to FDS is the same behind internet censorship, the ADL, the SPLC, etc. It's a misguided response. However gross you might think their viewpoint is, they should be entitled to a space where they can talk and vent; banning it is only going to drive them underground and intensify their views to extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 08:20 PM
1

What would be "far too low"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 04:26 PM
1

every time I see this I can't help but read it in William Luther Pierce's voice for some reason
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 03:23 PM
14

She lied
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:20 PM
1

What are your thoughts on women consuming pornography?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:08 PM
2

I only watch videos that have been vetted by the Eternal Coomer
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:08 PM
2

I'M GONNA COOOOOM
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:58 PM
2

The recent attention it's earned is a factor in why they continue to exist and probably up their rhetoric a bit. But they don't exist just to piss a few men on the internet off.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:44 PM
3

There's an incel dating strategy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:44 PM
5

I agree with you to an extent, but because of human mating dynamics being what they are, men will have to exert a lot more effort to achieve a high n-count. So I do think a man's sexual success to this extent requires more impulse control and a lower time preference than for it does for women. But you are right that he probably has a poor ability to pair-bond and that he prioritizes ultimately short-term pleasures, which are still red-flags especially if you are looking for a long-term partner. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:40 PM
1

If you find it, send it my way 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:21 AM
2

If that's your priority, so be it. But there are plenty of feminists, if not the majority, who will react the same as you did to the post. And I'm trying to warn them that this only makes their fight against (what they think is) the problem harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:37 PM
1

Provide those sources then, happy to read. Even happier if you have access to court documents that lay the claims and testimony out in the clear, without journalistic reinterpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 08:24 PM
1

I think his screed against it was heavily anti-semitic. I'm calling the ADL so they can send over "envoys" to "persuade" him not to have a negative opinion of it, like they did with Iceland.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 08:20 PM
2

Responses like these are precisely why men are drawn to MGTOW and the concept of AWALT carries currency. If you think misogyny is bad and you want to curb it, mockery won't help you or the men you belittle. If anything it will strengthen their resolve and perpetuate the problem you're trying to resolve.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 08:19 PM
1

s o c i e t ybottom text
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 04:48 PM
1

Being female. Associating with women is a losing game for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 04:39 PM
1

Where are you getting that he "followed her?" The girl in her testimony claims in each instance he approached her, touched her on the arm/waist, and left. No indication of following. None of this also justified the draconion sentences of sex offender registration or a near $1000 fine either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 04:01 PM
1

The ‘poor lonely guy’ this thread is putting on a saintly pedestal had been hanging around and groping girls, sometimes without even trying to talk to them, for a while. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 03:52 PM
2

podcasts
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 02:30 AM
1

647 is one of the three primary Toronto area codes
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 11:59 PM
2

xkcd (NOT "Xkcd" you salty GOP trash) is HECKIN AWESOME! IFLS! Updoots to the left!!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 02:58 PM
1

(Obligatory anti Trump statement because I can never post without mentioned my hatred) https://youtu.be/Zdky6BH_N8s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 05:00 AM
7

then I'm on board ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 07:26 PM
1

1488*
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 06:04 PM
60

it's over for tiramisù-cels
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 06:02 PM
1

grug hear echo when hear name "krug"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 04:52 PM
1

grug want know if long nose precious metal tribe behind post
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 04:19 PM
1

I'd prefer fisting time ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 04:18 PM
1

I agree with Wilhemina Luther Pierce here. Female revolution is the only solution! Woman Pride World Wide! 🙋‍♀️⚡️⚡️
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:15 PM
25

But you won't. So have fun pulling your dick to hentai and traps(which is gay btw). thought it wasn't gay unless the balls touched 🤔🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:08 PM
0

never estimate how much our neoliberal overlords thirst for our information
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:07 PM
3

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/710/412/a7c.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:06 PM
1

The conspiratorial side of me wants to think our governments in alliance with Big Tech pushed for this change to make OLD not only only more acceptable but the only acceptable avenue for dating, in order to create a new data collection apparatus
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:01 PM
1

Title IX hearings and the threat of disciplinary sactions or expulsion because a woman interprets your singular advance, however respectful, to be threating and/or unwanted conduct
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 03:00 PM
1

this queer femme proudly transcends your patriarchal gender norms checkmate boomer 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:32 PM
3

Are you kidding me you little piece of shit i’ll have you know i graduated top of my politics class and i’ve been involved in privilege checking with over 150 confirmed political demonstrations i’m trained in conflict resolution and i was the most oppressed person in my entire upper middle class high school you are nothing to me but another cultural appropriator i will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which have never been seen on this side of the 49th parallel mark my words you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:27 PM
1

y e e t u s
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:24 PM
1

go see Joker, unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:24 PM
2

Was getting caught Baneposting part of your plan?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:23 PM
3

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 12:21 PM
1

I ban anything that violates human rights, yes. t. /r/neoliberal
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:13 PM
2

Besides... you think men vote logically? I doubt that. Yup, which is why democracy is such a patently bad system, and why the US' founders structured their government as a republic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:13 PM
3

If I were reddit I'd ban any redditor who wants to take voting rights away from women. I have zero tolerance for such things. And their rejoinder will be: "women's right to vote is so innately good that we have to silence people who think otherwise." You might think you're doing a good thing but in actuality you're helping them strengthen their convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:11 PM
2

Let's grant you the "hate group" label for them. Ok, so what next? Watchdog organizations like the SPLC and the ADL use the "hate group" designation to silence the speech of people they don't like. Would you be okay with a similar outcome for MGTOW?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:09 PM
5

Let's grant you the "hate group" label for them. Ok, so what next? Watchdog organizations like the SPLC and the ADL use the "hate group" designation to silence the speech of people they don't like. Would you be okay with a similar outcome for MGTOW?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:08 PM
3

George Carlin liked your comment
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 04:28 PM
3

sorta tangential but this was an oddly wholesome response
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 03:06 PM
1

No, because it doesn't really do anything to me so there's no "emotional solidarity" so to speak to begin with I believe in freedom of expression people do not have an inherent right to be comfortable; whatever my feelings would be does not supersede their right to expression
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 03:04 PM
5

No they dont. I've literally never seen a women shame a man for those things. I have. I've been the recipient of it first-hand and observed it in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 11:03 AM
9

Women ignore ugly men. Women lash out at men low in the social pecking order, i.e. one of the main determinant's of a man's smv. The IncelTears, NiceGuys, AgainstHateSubreddits, and TrollX communities are great examples of this in action. Also, what about women mocking short men for their height?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 11:00 AM
1

Programming is language and communication skills Correct, but incomplete. Programming requires the ability to think abstractly and reason quantitatively. Like you mentioned in your example, not understanding the time (or space) complexity of your algorithm will mean you're not a good programmer. Having good language and communication chops are arguably necessary. But you can have both and still be a shitty programmer if you don't understand how to come up with a good algorithm to solve a problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 05:29 PM
1

Programming is language and communication skills Correct, but incomplete. Programming requires the ability to think abstractly and reason quantitatively. Like you mentioned in your example, not understanding the time (or space) complexity of your algorithm will mean you're not a good programmer. Having good language and communication chops are obviously helpful, and the former is probably necessary. But you can have both and still be a shitty programmer if you don't understand how to come up wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 05:28 PM
1

Programming is language and communication skills Correct, but incomplete. Programming requires the ability to think abstractly and reason quantitatively. Like you mentioned in your example, not understanding the time (or space) complexity of your algorithm will mean you're not a good programmer. Having good language and communication chops are obviously helpful, and the former is probably necessary. But you can have both and still be a shitty programmer if you don't understand how to come up wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 05:26 PM
1

Programming is language and communication skills Correct, but incomplete. Programming requires the ability to think abstractly and reason quantitatively. Like you mentioned in your example, not understanding the time (or space) complexity of your algorithm will mean you're not a good programmer. Having good language and communication chops are obviously helpful, and the former is probably necessary. But you can have both and still be a shitty programmer if you don't understand how to come up wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 05:26 PM
1

It's an expression for "what are they saying that is incorrect?" Not a response to a claim that they may have lied.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 01:55 PM
2

so I don’t believe there is anything about this job that makes men better suited The difference in sex IQ distributions along with general tendencies in what men and women seek in career paths suggest otherwise. There will always be capable and competent women, but you're also always going to have a higher population of qualified men relative to qualified women. I got 20 year veterans that I have to remind about scale and performance (don’t write stuff that scales N2 for instance). That is some …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 01:50 PM
1

Maybe a sex-segregated society isn't such a bad idea after all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 07:20 AM
1

You need to cool it with the racist remarks!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 07:16 AM
3

That being said if you are a decent human being a woman will date you even if you make less. oh I'm sure the majority of single, affectionless, sexless men will love to hear this from you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 07:13 AM
2

Same as computer programming - when it was a “female” job it paid shit and wasn’t taken seriously, now that it is a “male” job that has reversed. Just curious, do you believe the shift in the work's credibility changed because it became more male, or did it become more male because it required skills and intuition that men were more likely to have?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 07:11 AM
3

you mean TheFairerSex?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 06:43 AM
6

How do we rectify the issue? Sex segregated learning? Yes, unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 06:25 AM
1

You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/tY9wLMDtB can you make it faster pls
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 06:22 AM
2

Go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 06:13 AM
2

depends where you are
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 03:07 AM
3

higher IQ -> higher likelihood of being educated past high school + better impulse management
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 02:59 AM
5

My ex- and only girlfriend was a mathematician with an IQ in the 150s. Intelligence is very important for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 09:50 PM
5

Yeah, if anything actually strengthens their opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 02:50 PM
1

Most prople when asked about their opinion on gender equality, pre-third wave feminism, and gender diversity initiatives will respond positively.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 02:09 PM
1

Note to 16 year old self... If she gets in the sleeping bag with you, you shouldn't have to wonder if she's REALLY into you or if she's just friendly. Just friendly. Also to 19 year old self... If she sits on your lap with her arms around you, gets up to do something then comes back to your lap, she's into you. No, she still just sees you as a friend. Also also to 19 year old self, if she pulls you into her bedroom, locks the door and plays "Closer" by nine inch nails, SHE WANTS TO FUCK (ME LIKE…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 01:07 PM
2

Feminism went overboard and its dying. This is wishful thinking. Feminism, or its crypto identity "gender equality," is the establishment religion of the media, the academy, and our governments. Feminism is most certainly not dead and has just as healthy grip on society as it had years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:52 PM
1

Whether or not the company lied ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:50 PM
1

Cultural Marxists won the culture war long ago. This was just another event in which the moral police had to keep another denizen (the company) in check.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:01 PM
1

Part of the reason the company experienced such backlash is exactly because they went about it in such a ham-fisted way. All the company did was retweet the photo, cropping out her face, with the admonishment that you shouldn't supply your social media details in an application if it contains risqué material like the woman's. We can argue about whether or not the company should have reposted the photo, but: Where's the lie in what the company said? Your social media will effectively become anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:00 PM
1

and Al Bundy-pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 10:14 PM
0

I'm male and I have to wonder as well what women get out of a relationship, especially given how liberal Western societies demonize male heterosexuality and champion female independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 03:27 PM
1

Men have nothing to offer to women 🍿🍿🍿
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 01:35 PM
1

Men have nothing to offer to women 🍿🍿🍿
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 01:34 PM
1

Men have nothing to offer to women 🍿🍿🍿
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 01:33 PM
1

Nah, give me a link
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 03:55 PM
1

Nah, give me a link
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 03:33 PM
1

research confirming that men have more sex partners than women Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 02:02 PM
2

Yeah. I consider myself to be a fun-spirited person and I fucking hate dancing. But admittedly that's because I have really poor coordination from being sedentary as a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 01:16 PM
2

There literally is a power/threat differential between men and women that means unwanted touch from a woman will never carry the same weight as when it comes from a man. I can only hope this is an explanation and not a justification for this behavior. As an explanation it also doesn't pass muster. If it were true then women would be discouraged from assaulting men as OP described since a man's defensive reaction will always be more powerful. What's actually in play here is that women's soft powe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 11:49 AM
2

Redpill will trickle into mainstream Nah, our neoliberal arbiters of culture wouldn't allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 12:18 AM
0

If you were male, the sonic boom induced by your tipped fedora would be heard all the way in Antarctica
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 12:16 AM
1

Because she's a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 12:14 AM
2

this but unironically. They're huge players in smuggling opioids into the States
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 07:22 PM
3

The sexual revolution was ultimately part of the USSR's successful operation to destroy Western countries' moral fabrics, and probably fertility too. The negative consequence you describe are ultimately what our enemy in the Cold War wanted to have happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 04:03 PM
7

based and vargpilled
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 09:32 AM
1

by looking at reality, and also studying history and learning about literal communists funded by the USSR who worked their way into Hollywood and used it as a propaganda hub
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 01:34 PM
1

You have to be hellen keller to not see hollywood attacking the masculine. Or more generally attacking white men. Or even more generally Western civilization as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 12:43 PM
1

OOH yes a lot of men are suffering in America today due to changing economic forces, the prison industrial complex, racism and classism, the stress epidemic that leads to an earlier death, etc. Yup, and under the woke neoliberal forces who rule over us, these issues predominantly face white European men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 12:41 PM
2

Toxic masculinity covers more general aspects about masculinity than the "white trash" stereotype does vis-a-vis being white.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 12:39 PM
2

It happens because of chemicals in the water. Yet men are less likely to vote for pro-environmentalist parties than women. Apart from eco-fascists in the alt right I can't think of any environmentalist, who are typically leftist, who has raised concern about water pollution having a detrimental effect on testosterone levels. the attack on "toxic masculinity" Oh no, a couple of academics suggesting that maybe men should stop raping and killing people. The horror! gender quotas. They exist to figh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 12:36 PM
3

gone for it And risk his freedoms and rights as a citizen because he made the mistake of interpreting a woman's signals improperly? Nah, fuck that noise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 02:35 PM
2

Western civilization failed, more specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 12:08 PM
1

On-Line Dating
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 07:24 PM
4

People who care about their privacy should not be on OLD anyway. The conspiratorial side of me has long suspected that governments pushed OLD to become popular so that their intelligence agencies can cooperate with those companies to collect more sensitive user data. With the FTC investigating Match Group I have to wonder if the investigation is the result of a fallout with the NSA, a punishment for not cooperating well enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 03:48 PM
0

🍿
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 09:44 PM
1

don't forget the Soros bucks
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 04:24 PM
3

She's a neoliberal puppet to promote the Western subsidy of third-world countries and restrictions on basic liberties. If she were really sincere about her cause she'd decry China and India for being the world's top polluters as well as calling attention to Africa's explosive population growth. But because she's not actually serious, she won't.
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 04:19 PM
3

"Minimize" rather than "prevent" would be accurate here
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 01:36 AM
12

They even have treatments for the scary STDs now, and STD testing,.in addition to the understood generally reliable methods of protecting from pregnancy and STDs. The testing is only effective when people decide to use them and refrain from sex when they learn they're infected. Or in other words, this only works in high-trust, low time-preference societies where you can expect its people to exercise impulse control and behave responsibly. Rampant promiscuity might not be a health crisis in the N…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 12:44 AM
2

The reversal of the Flynn effect
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 08:32 PM
1

S/he means to take your comment to the automod post in the thread. Concurrences with OP go there (I think it's a little weird but them's the rules)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 11:11 PM
1

nope
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 11:41 PM
2

fleshlite Is that the diet version of the fleshlight?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 09:05 PM
7

men dont want emotional connection, they want power trips by sex, sadism,dominating women, and feeling desirable. gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 08:37 PM
6

Pattern recognition isn't a skill limited to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 07:34 PM
6

Here is the other pill that needs to be swallowed: if you aren’t getting what you want in life, self assess and change your strategy. There are socially-adjusted men who will consistently fail romantically because of characteristics they cannot control. No amount of reevaluation of their personality, strategy, or outlook will have a positive effect on their success.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 07:31 PM
4

then do it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 07:23 PM
2

I dont disagree but I think theres been a cultural swing towards sex negativity recently, just due to all the horror stories in the news, and regardless of how blown out of proportion the media made them. It's more that the media is perpetuating the naturally-aggressive-and-predatory man narrative. Western societies are actually typically oversexualized.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 06:29 PM
1

Yeah, because they see it as giving women the ability to sell sex and (wrongfully) as a course of action that will reduce human trafficking. It has nothing to do with men. The benefit it would provide to men is incidental.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 06:27 PM
17

Employers might think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 06:21 PM
2

Legalizing prostitution carries the risk of increasing sex trafficking inflow, for which there is evidence. On those grounds, I want policy decriminalizing prostitution to go hand-in-hand with stricter border policy and perhaps even additional immigration enforcement in areas where prostitution is legal or at least extralegal, by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 04:59 PM
11

Which means you're endorsing dishonesty in a marriage. Most men will not agree to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 04:47 PM
9

This is not a practical solution. First off, purchasing sex is still illegal in large chunks of the developed world. Law enforcement also routinely run stings to arrest and charge people who attempt to purchase sex, so seeking these services carry the risk of a conviction, even if the likelihood of being caught in one of these stings is <50%. If you are in the United States or Canada, the closest option for legal prostitution would be the state of Nevada. This means an international flight (if i…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 04:45 PM
1

Thanks women, very cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 01:32 PM
1

Most women are for gender equality. oh lord
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 01:29 PM
3

You did acknowledge this (although only very briefly) but sociability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for romantic success. Being sociable is important to be able build relationships with people and especially women, but making an effort to be sociable isn't enough to help one find a partner. Physical attractiveness still plays a fundamental role in your success.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 04:54 AM
0

=^.^=
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 02:46 AM
1

Isn't this the artist who had weird connections with the Clintons and the Podestas?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 05:45 PM
1

Dude I studied North Korea in grad school and worked with Andrei Lankov /r/IAmVerySmart If you're in favour of mass immigration I guess that's at least semi-consistent, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess you're not. I'm not a neoliberal, so you'd be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 02:00 PM
1

Businesses are generally state-run in North Korea, so even though the DPRK mandates maternity leave it mostly is not going to be forcing the few-and-far-between private firms to provide maternity leaves for their female employees. But imagine using a communist dictatorship to justify why the US government should start forcing, at gunpoint, companies to start giving paid off-time for absentee employees just because they want to raise children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 12:31 PM
1

Nazbol gang rise up!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 03:20 AM
1

t. Rob Tibbetts
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 03:29 AM
1

I thumbed through the firm's whitepaper on diversity. There is some dense statistics that will require deeper reading which I'm not going to dedicate now. Though I did see a p-value of 0.10 in their graphing the relationship of sex/ethnic diversity and income (Exhibit 3) which already has me pretty skeptical. But what's interesting is their proposed explanations for why workplace diversity has a supposed positive effect on economic performance which you can see for yourself on page 9 exhibit 9. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 03:27 AM
0

Do you have a problem with democracy? Yes. Democracy is a patently terrible system. Our Founding Fathers understood this and constructed a stratified government that discouraged rule by popular vote. Your link concerns primarily concerns married women in the workforce, not women in total. It also does not describe the scope of these bans, but just says In fact, businesses had been banning married women from work since at least the 1880s. and as the article noted, the justification for legal bans…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 06:23 PM
4

because it's a funny video featuring the greatest actor of all time that is pertinent to the post that I replied to
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 06:10 PM
6

Nice assumption that women are always less qualified. https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Images/Sex%20differences%20on%20the%20WISC.jpg And thanks for underscoring why diversity initiatives gets the support it does, because of attitudes like yours. Actually, diversity initiatives are highly supported throughout the Western world. Even if not democratically, the vast majority of corporate leadership and governments support increasing workplace diversity at the expense of qualified men (either indir…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 06:09 PM
3

You said feminism promotes hypergamy. More women today are marrying men who make less than them. Thanks for dodging my question. Actually it was the increase in the number of poor, hungry children and adults whose aimlessness was increasing crime rates. As poorly designed and executed as the 60s-80s welfare state was, the intention was to help people, not to line the pockets of women. I will say that the influence of social worker theories about family structures had a negative impact. This is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 05:42 PM
1

imagine not watching a three second video that has absolutely no relationship to TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 05:15 PM
3

https://youtu.be/7G_Gw8rbihY
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 04:46 PM
5

I agree with you, but I've also heard women glow in the dark and can tell when you're driving.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 04:45 PM
1

More women today marry men who make less than them in any time before. That’s what hypergamy means, marrying up. Per capita or as a percentage of married women? The expansion of the family/child welfare state happened in the 60s. This is true, and also arguably the result of increased female voter participation giving the government to the left. This is also a convenient ignoring of the graph which shows the increase starting in 1919, with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, and which only …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 04:37 PM
5

How is corporate leadership bending to the will of feminists? When the more a position pays the more likely it is to be held by a man? When 94% of CEO jobs are held by men? All of these men pay lipservice to the value and inherent goodness of feminism. Can you name a single major corporation that isn't at least pledging to improve the sex diversity in the workforce? (Even if it means, by consequence, depriving qualified men of job opportunities in favor of possibly less-qualified women.) When th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 04:31 PM
3

Most people aren't aware of "feminism" by name but they are definitely familiar with its activist wings in corporate leadership, the media, and governments. They would know it as "diversity and inclusion in the workplace" or "equal opportunity" or "gender equality."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 04:05 PM
5

Ok, I'll bite. Here's two: Increased hypergamy as a result of women flooding the workplace in the 20th century. The explosive increase in US state government expenditures once American women were given the carte blanche right to vote
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 03:59 PM
2

But in turn we're becoming another Mexico.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 12:55 PM
3

I've said time and time again that "the worst that can happen is she can say 'no'" is not true. Men now contend with significant risks to their freedoms, career, and relationships with friends/family if an uninterested woman has decided that she was uncomfortable with his approach, even if it's just the one, even if it's as simple as just asking to go out for coffee. Regret is not pleasant but I will happily take that over a police interview or a Title IX investigation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 01:05 AM
1

Disagree with OP (who's probably a troll) but to play devil's advocate, statistical averages are the best way to understand general traits and behaviors of a group. This is especially true if the variance is low for how a specific trait is distributed across the population, i.e. most people in the group are going to have that trait. For example, the existence of high-ranking sprinters of European origin isn't going to change the fact that most European sprinters are going regularly to lose to ru…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 12:41 AM
2

This person is a master troll. Have to grant them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 12:35 AM
2

Fewer women are IQ tested, hence the disparity in IQ. sampling method > sample size General rule of thumb provided by the Central Limit Theorem is that 30 samples is a good start toward estimating a median value (whether it'd be height, age, or IQ).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 12:34 AM
2

Her name "Miriam Weeks" and her visage was setting off my own chosenite radar, but it turns out she's half Punjab and half Canadian. Also lol: Weeks is a College Republican and considers herself a sex-positive feminist and libertarian. She identifies her "favorite figures in liberty" as Ayn Rand [and] economist Milton Friedman [... s]he has also shown admiration for both former Representative Ron Paul and his son Senator Rand Paul. She claims to be a Republican and a free-market capitalist, i.e.…
/r/MGTOW02/09/19 05:08 AM
3

Social media in general is a societal cancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/19 05:56 AM
5

Put your phone down, and go outside. Go to happy hour, go to a bar. Strike up conversations with women, where they can judge you on more than your appearance And get banned for harassing the female patrons, or, at the very least, dirty looks from women who "just want to be there with their friends and don't want to be bothered." As OLD has become more popular, approaching women outside of social circles IRL has become less popular and increasingly stygmatized. It's not going to become impossible…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/19 05:55 AM
0

And there it is. The feminist cries out in pain as she strikes you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 07:20 PM
0

Now that I think about it, you’re totally right, didn’t think about your brilliant suggestion. I should probably just not go out in public without a man, since that’s been the only effective way to not be approached by random dudes. Odd how that works... Dress conservatively. Do not wear makeup. Do not make eye contact with strangers. Wear headphones. Do not engage with anyone who attempts to make conversation with you. Avoid friendly expressions which may suggest to another person that you're a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 06:14 PM
-1

As a woman who is objectively considered attractive and this kind of thing being an annoying occurrence that happens whenever I’m out trying to get shit done, I can tell you it’s simply awful, despite your ‘utopian fictional world’. Mostly because I don’t give a fuck what you think about my appearance, I don’t exist for the interest of random men’s dicks. I could not care less about your opinion on how I look, and you’re wasting my time by telling me so. There are ways you can discourage men fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 06:33 AM
0

The government / schools / corporations /media / cucks / simps define what masculinity is today. https://youtu.be/Zu3nu6ue2qU
/r/MGTOW29/08/19 04:48 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu3nu6ue2qU
/r/MGTOW09/08/19 02:28 AM
1

No one popular would have endorsed virginity or celibacy. That would have meant you were weirdly religious or couldn’t get a boyfriend or something. That isn't an endorsement (or disapproval) of promiscuity though, just that you would need to meet a baseline of sexual and romantic activity to be perceived as "normal" within your social group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/19 02:41 AM
1

I just want you to be honest, which you aren't. You got to be taking notes from Trump or something. That's rich coming from the person clearly trying to infantilize another person for sayings things about women that you didn't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/19 02:32 AM
1

Good analysis re the motivations for why women would stigmatize promiscuity. I don't get this however: Ways promiscuous women avoid getting called sluts: Maintaining social status, social dominance. Dating and hooking up with high quality men. Being discreet. Staying away from guys other women have claimed. Dressing well. Generally projecting shamelessness may be a factor. When these rules are followed, it seems women actually encourage promiscuity in other women. A woman can follow all six guid…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/19 02:20 AM
1

RIP Boogie, he will be missed 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 11:25 PM
2

Which is why lots of us enjoy Patriarchy Theory 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 04:38 PM
2

*neoliberal hangwringing intensifies*
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:18 PM
4

sand countries Cool it with the Islamophobia, yo! On a more serious note I disagree we aren’t seeing a rise of crime driven by male sexlessness throughout the West. Also, since Western populations are also less naturally violent I would also wager that the frustration among these men manifests itself differently than violent crime. For example, the recent darker shift of incels’ world view this past decade and their becoming higher-profile (even without slanderous media’s help).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:18 PM
1

Wasted capital in general. Not to mention college-educated-women's contributions to the trillions of dollars on federal student loan debt here in the US, and relatedly the rising costs of education at a rate faster than inflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 06:32 PM
1

You're an outlier, not the general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 06:28 PM
3

Oh, but I know someone that didn't want kids, therefore evolutionary theory is totes bullshit!! but remember, reality has liberal bias, and Democrats are the Party of Science
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 06:28 PM
3

I certainly didn't "evolve" to want that. You personally might not want children (as don't I for different reasons), but our biological imperative is to continue the species and most people want to satisfy that primal need. The vast majority of people, women included, want children.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 06:27 PM
0

most people who made the choice to stay at home want to stay at home. So maybe we should stop wasting government and corporate funding on increasing women’s representation in the workplace if they prefer staying at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 03:18 AM
2

Miller Interesting name. Wonder where her family is from 🤔
/r/MGTOW03/05/19 03:28 PM
20

This is the better take. Giving large swathes of the population the right to vote is the bigger problem, not that women in the main can vote. Plenty of men don't deserve the franchise either.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/19 06:28 PM
5

Chevrolet Sonic Gotta go fast?
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:07 AM
1

Whoa there, you need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:05 AM
-2

OP, this image is antisemitic! Please take it down before I inform the ADL directly, via my contacts through my wife's boyfriend's rabbi.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:46 AM
-2

Whoa buddy, you need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:45 AM
1

ideologically subverted Whoa there, you need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 07:52 PM
1

Because women internalize emotions. Guys will never understand because men externalize Is this the Berenstain universe or the Berenstein universe?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 07:12 PM
1

Not looking at PornHub stats now (at work...) but I recall seeing categories of violent porn—really many kinds of “forbidden fantasy” (but legal) categories of pornography in general—be more popular with women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:57 PM
5

Even granting a different definition of objectification that makes a positive appraisal of somebody’s physical attractiveness at the expense of other attributes only a necessary condition, in popular use objectification has this as a sufficient condition. Feminists would use the examples OP gave as stellar examples of the male sexual objectification of women, had the sexes been reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:54 PM
1

Do women actually take on combat roles in the IDF though?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/19 03:29 AM
3

Because your post is inherently antisemitic, goy. Take it back or I’ll tell the ADL you’re violating the human rights of Jews by criticizing a human rights violation on its own!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:59 AM
2

also, birth control fucking SUCKS, it has horrendous side effects. Then don't take birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 02:18 AM
-1

Whoa there, you need to cool it with the anti-Semitism!
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:04 PM
1

Use a wide, open stance
/r/seduction13/01/19 06:30 PM
1

https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2018/09/06/facebooks-double-standards-censorship/ I think I lost IQ points reading that. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 03:41 PM
1

I don’t like RP’s strong claims about each of these’s applicability to every single woman on the planet, which ignores the reality of statistical distributions. Even if the distributions describing women’s personality traits having low variances is probably true (i.e. women are very similar to one another), unless the variance is a big fat 0 you are going to find women who are not average— it’s just going to be tougher. That being said, and my own autism out of the way, their observations about …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 03:37 PM
9

She is Jewish. Quelle surprise. Speaking as someone deconverted, I can’t tell you how dismissive Jews are when approached with criticism about the issue of genital mutilation and the damage it causes, often calling it “antisemitic.” Who cares? Your people do it to around 90% of your boys. You should be held liable and should be criticized for it. Your feelings of victimization are irrelevant here.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:48 AM
-5

As a 23 year old female *yawn*
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:46 AM
1

Stop noticing things!
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:45 AM
1

You better not be saying anything negative about the Chosen people, goy. Jews rock!
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:44 AM
1

That being said, men feel a lot of things down there and obviously sex is way better for them than it is for a woman. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 01:54 AM
3

he's an avid reader of the Sydney Morning Herald
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 01:51 AM
1

I read three of your articles today as I was flying back home. Unfortunately, the Lerner book is behind a paywall, so there's nothing I can review. I also didn't read the Wilson Writes article, not out of disinterest but because I did not have internet. Yale's VIRGO website didn't work on mobile. I forgot to read Loughran. But I think the remaining articles you sent me were enough information to make your case. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=383803 Very thorough discussion o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 01:46 AM
1

I don’t want to get into an extended discussion here about the problems with dual/multiple citizenship and dual citizens holding public office, because it’s tangential to our discussion (about typical responses to verboten topics, not the actual topics themselves). We can PM each other if you’d like. But granting your premise that this is “antisemitic,” how does that have any bearing on the truth or merits of what I have to say? (Same for people vis-a-vis women and their ability to control emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 03:17 PM
1

Not really, if someone isn't smart enough to use the word as intended, that doesn't change the definition of the word. But that's the problem, the -ists' definitions are always wildly in flux. Going back to what I said earlier, there are touchy subjects where introducing a counterargument, however buttressed by evidence, is enough to earn you an -ist. I can't tell you how many times a debate opponent has called me or I've seen debaters call someone an "anti-semite" for bringing up Jewish over-re…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 08:13 PM
2

If you’re just stating facts it would, by the definition, not be misogynist. Based on both the variability of an -ist term at the discretion of whomever uses it and my experience in debating race and crime or the JQ, I don’t agree that statement of facts alone would make you any less of an -ist in the eyes of the person who is using it to describe you or your arguments. Seriously every single point made by the person I directly replied to was slapped down as illogical or not a sign of emotional …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 03:32 PM
3

Ok, I’ll bite. What’s the contradiction in being both “misogynistic” and “rational”?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 03:07 PM
1

Essentially, men are at fault for the mob's overreaches, not the mobs themselves. We wouldn't have this mob without men behaving this way after all! You're confusing necessary with sufficient. It is true that demonstrably predatory men bootstrapped the MeToo movement (necessary condition), but remember that MeToo is ultimately a mob operating under mob mentality (another necessary condition). You don't have MeToo without both, i.e. you don't have MeToo without only one of them. I would also add …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:51 AM
1

I have Reddit on dark mode and RES dark mode so I can't see the colors of flairs. I changed it so that it's neutral now. Although in fairness I'd probably consider myself red-leaning, so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:49 AM
1

you ought to learn what terms mean. More talmudic mind reading from the feminist crowd. I'm not a Red Piller, but I call out obvious bait when I see it. Now, what I really should have done is called you out for your projection. And I might punish myself for that later. I sell self-harm videos, Snapchat me for more info.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:44 AM
1

You're right, I should have said misconduct in place of assault. Point still stands. it's not placating anyone, it's managing risk, as in that cost-benefit analysis you mentioned. I was responding to your response to my statement that I, as an employer, don't have an obligation to please people who do not like me. If they decide to criticize me as a bigot for choosing not hire women, that's fine but not really a concern of mine. I'm a freedom of association absolutist and I think any organizatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:13 AM
4

Why would you want to subject yourself to cult-Marx university babble? Are you some kind of masochist?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:22 AM
1

You do realize this is a bunch of men angry that they are supposedly being discriminated against responding by opening discriminating against women. And it's "our fault." Wow, your shit test couldn't be any more obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:17 AM
2

I think if most men acted appropriately and society expected them to be accountable for their actions, we wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place. That sounds a lot like victim blaming to me. 🤔 EDIT: False accusations can be disproven if you remain calm and actually didn’t do it. Are you familiar with the legal and social consequences of facing an allegation at all, much less a false one? With all due respect this is one of the most shielded, naive things I think I've ever read.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:15 AM
3

I’m not being dishonest, but thanks for the reply. *hand rubbing intensifies*
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:05 AM
1

Now the same hivemind has completely flipped on that now that feminism can be blamed. What's wrong with holding an ideology accountable?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:03 AM
1

Gender segregation is the only, viable solution to most gender dynamic issues. But except for fringe groups I've never heard feminists who want freedom and equality for women actually call for mutual separation of the sexes so that women could be free from male violence and oppression. Really gets that noggin' joggin'. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:02 AM
1

Again, discrimination lawsuits - which, again, in an ideal world would not be possible - inflict less damage on my reputation since discrimination is not as egregious or universal an evil as sexual assault misconduct, not to mention (probably) easier to litigate. why would or should I care? because you (hypothetical you) professes to care about risk management :P That's a non-sequitur. My political enemies will fight tooth and nail to discredit me. Why should I placate them? paucity of evidence …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 12:50 AM
1

Sexual discrimination is a lesser crime than sexual assault, both in the eyes of the law and in progressive public opinion. I'm not in the business of determining how my political enemies are going to think of me based on my hiring practices anyway, so why would or should I care? right this is a huge glaring difference though. we're talking about accusing someone of magic vs. accusing them of something that actually happens Given the volume of accusations and the paucity of evidence backing them…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 12:29 AM
1

and opening themselves up to the potentially disastrous consequences of dealing with a discrimination lawsuit lol. Ideally, in a society that honored freedom of association rather than paying the bare-minimum lip service to it, we wouldn't have the machinery of discrimination legislation and "equal opportunity" government boards to tell what hiring decisions they can and cannot make. Still, if I were faced with the potentials of either sex discrimination or sexual harassment lawsuit, I would gla…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 12:17 AM
4

More generally, we need to restore the freedom of association by dismantling the EEOC and undoing most discrimination legislation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 11:43 PM
3

do you agree that there are reasonable and unreasonable precautions for mitigating risk? reasonable and unreasonable emotional responses to fear? Yes, which is why I have no issue with companies after a cost-benefit analysis choosing not to hire women to avoid the potentially disastrous consequences of maintaining a gender-integrated workplace. before we go on, do you literally view metoo as having the same influence and unreasonableness as hysteria over witchcraft or are you just being cheeky? …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 11:39 PM
5

If anything, that gynocentrism is pretty real, if any attempt to avoid the issues posed by a gender-integrated workplace results in lawsuits and the government forcing you to hire people against your will, virtually at gunpoint. If you don’t coddle women in the manner leftists want you to, prepare to have your life destroyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:33 PM
1

23/36 welp
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 08:25 AM
4

Fatal plane crashes are statistically rare phenomena. Therefore, FAA regulations mandating seatbelts, safety lectures prior to takeoff, lengthy flight-crew checklists, collision-avoidance tech on all commercial planes, life vests, etc. is all just hysteria from the flightphobic. Pretty sure if these guys avoid harassing/assaulting/masturbating in front of their subordinates they’ll be just fine. If you’re not a witch, you have nothing to worry about. If you’re not a counterrevolutionary, you hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:58 AM
2

What is it with your kind and your desire to psychoanalyze your opponents, as if you think you’re master mind readers or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:54 AM
1

You need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:45 AM
8

For real. “You better hire these people, or we'll put a gun to your head and you’ll face the wrath of the federal judiciary.” Kind of wonder if a company tried for discrimination appealed to the Thirteenth Amendment in their defense...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:41 AM
3

I really hate how we don’t have freedom of association in this country. Why am I obligated to hire anyone? Especially if I can make the positive case for people I don’t want to hire having negative impacts on profitability and company efficiency.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:39 AM
3

This is a sorry state of affairs, and those businesses are run by cowardly, racist, sexist fucks. If a scientologist approached you on the street and called you a “suppressive person,” you’d laugh them off. Same thing if a fundamentalist evangelical called you a satanist. Or a Muslim called you a kaffir. Or a Maoist called you an imperialist. “Sexist” and “racist” are exactly the same. Useless terms in and of themselves that just serve to condemn someone or something as a monochrome evil, withou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:37 AM
2

Explicate?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 07:28 AM
1

this is real feminism Serious question, what is "real" feminism to you?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:31 AM
1

“We call for feminist approaches – expansively interpreted – to challenge these stereotypes, making room to consider women who are abusive, power seeking, and sexually aggressive, while taking into account the troubled background many such women possess,” the researchers concluded. “Those victimised by women are doubly harmed when we fail to treat their abuse as worthy of concern.” Of course. Leave it to the academy to use this as yet another excuse to promote the feminist religion.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:27 AM
2

Link?
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/18 01:27 PM
3

feminism is no longer what it used to be, that it became a cult in the 2010’s. I’ve got some bad news for you
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/18 01:11 PM
6

Would you say it... slays you? 😎
/r/MGTOW08/09/18 12:08 AM
2

((media)) You need to cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
/r/MensRights03/09/18 12:00 AM
1

Soy
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 05:39 PM
1

N'Shadilay! Hail Kekistan, my dudes!<sup>that hurt to type</sup>
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/18 09:39 PM
33

“This urge to send men to the slaughterhouse, instead of helping women be more autonomous, helps the enemies of sexual freedom,” the 100 women, including 74-year old Deneuve, one of France’s most famous screen stars, said in a column published by Le Monde daily. Funny how they only started caring when they saw how the campaign might negatively affect women.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:23 PM
0

That's just as dimwitted as Luce Irigaray calling Newtonian mechanics "masculine" because it has vague resemblances to masculinity. Obviously her premise isn't even true, but even granting it doesn't change the fact that a set of things having a trait doesn't mean that this trait is inherent to that set. The point I'm trying to make is that even if you buy that men have the ability to reason it does not follow that it's an inherently masculine trait. All men urinate— does that make urination a m…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:51 PM
1

I think you should visit these societies and decide for yourself. You are under no obligation to join them if you find them objectionable. For the record, I've been to a couple of meetings of my university's women-in-STEM organization. Seemed like the group was started for the purpose of "empowering" women in science fields but the meetings (atvleast the ones I attended) were purely technical, focusing on abstract data types and interviewing for tech jobs. No agenda being thrust.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:12 AM
1

The high school I currently attend, a science and engineering magnet, is 85% male. While I love my guy friends, I don't always feel comfortable in this environment and a support group does sound beneficial. When you become an adult, you will quickly find out that your feelings are irrelevant. No one will care about your level of "comfort" inasmuch as they do what you, as a scientist or engineer or programmer, can produce. Many Jewish scientists and mathematicians faced immense hostility in 19th-…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:08 AM
6

If your masculinity is that shallow and easily threatened in a world that celebrates the masculine far more than it does the feminine Tell us more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:51 PM
1

Certainly agree with you but I'd also mention that your choice of study also factors into play here. It's easier to tune out cultural Marxist propaganda if you're a STEM major and focus on the pure and cold mechanics of the nature world where feminist feels can't get you, rather than if you're a communications or English major where critical theory forms the bedrock of everything that you learn. Not to mention the actual ROI your science degree brings.
/r/MGTOW29/08/15 04:30 PM
1

lol I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic. Not because you presuppose the MRM is a "hate" movement— I coupdn't care less how you feel about it— but that you're sincerely happy that a group's freedom of speech is curtailed by people of your ilk. Either way, nice job contradicting your earlier assertion that feminists don't shut down men's movements
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 04:35 AM
2

Feminists don't shut down male advocacy groups. Oh really? So then what do you make of these feminists shutting them down?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 05:06 PM
1

Amazing sex (Studies have shown that more egalitarian relationships have a more active sex life) Breaking news: people with similar viewpoints to you make for better sex/life partners. More at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:03 PM
1

Excellent post. I don't care whether or not you're pro-gay-marriage, the SuCo ruling is an appalling affront to the Constitution and sets up dangerous precedent for the federal government to undo laws that aren't expressly within the domain of the Constitution. It's as if the Tenth Amendment no longer exists. These are very scary times we live in, and people are reacting to the wrong things. We should be scared that the judicial branch legislated on behalf of states who chose to run their govern…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 07:59 PM
10

You are a decent person for caring about the welfare of domestic violence victims regardless of their genitals. With this in mind, and given that you seem to be an intelligent and sensible person, I thought it appropriate to address the points you made toward the end of your post, especially since enough posters have given you pointers to resources/means to your goal: I learned more about feminism in college, where we discussed in my sociology of gender class how rigid gender norms harm both men…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:55 AM
–

poster says domestic violence is about "everyone," not just men or women SJW angrily tears down poster, calling it "misogynistic" Logic
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:55 PM
2

The sad thing is that this is what their sheet music probably looks like. Not even kidding.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:23 PM
1

Sounds like a really bad parody modernist European classical music. Funny, since feminists already saturate the population of performers and composers within classical music both in the US and in Europe— you'd think they'd be welcome to make music that, you know, didn't need to sound like an edgy, "innovative" artistic statement some since they'd be preaching to the masses already.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:22 PM
–

Did this guy just say that car prices are cheaper for men? Is this a fucking joke? Men are the ONLY people that insurance salesmen and product salesmen can discriminate against. Not to mention that car insurance premiums are higher for men: Auto insurance companies calculate their risk when they determine your premium. Calculating risk means using historical data to make an educated estimate of the likelihood of a covered person being in an accident. The statistics tend to show that as a group, …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:18 PM
1

Meh, let them do it. The government shouldn't be in the business of policing which costumers businesses can (or can't) serve anyway. If we give permission to fortune tellers and homeopaths to set up shops, then there's no logically consistent reason why we shouldn't let SheRides do so as well. The image in the article is p condescending tho, I'll give you that.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:47 PM
–

Equal protection applies to the federal governments (and states via incorporation), not private businesses. State and local discrimination laws which apply to businesses would determine the legality of this taxi operation, not the Constitution.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:43 PM
1

I don't think objectification (of women or men) actually exists tbh. Or, at least, not at the rate, with the same intent, and with the same consciousness behind it that feminists purport.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:00 AM
-8

go back 2 srs pls kthx
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:26 PM
2

Oh, for fuck's sake. If you make hefty claims, you need to back them up with evidence, lest the SRS karma-militia finds yet another excuse to besmirch the name of this subreddit, which they've already done. Even disregarding SRS, making up history is bad and you're only making yourself look stupid in the process.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:31 PM
-7

Manassas City Police spokeswoman Adrienne Helms said the department would not comment, and Detective David E. Abbott, the lead investigator on the case, did not return a call seeking comment. And no one except a Prince William magistrate has seen the affidavit and search warrant for the photos — they aren’t made public until after they are served and then returned to the courthouse. This right here. Of course the police and prosecutor are not going to speak publicly or confirm or deny anything. …
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:06 PM
–

The title of this post is misleading. Going to be the devil's advocate here and quote from the lede: A Manassas City teenager accused of “sexting” a video to his girlfriend is now facing a search warrant in which Manassas City police and Prince William County prosecutors want to take a photo of his erect penis, possibly forcing the teen to become erect by taking him to a hospital and giving him an injection, the teen’s lawyers said. (emphasis mine) Do we know for certain that the prosecutors are…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:36 PM
23

They actually don't. It's their way of hiding behind plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:06 PM
10

It doesn't help that the discussion on genital mutilation is spearheaded on both major fronts (the anti-FGM and pro-circ circles) by those driven more by emotion than by reason— sure, anti-FGM advocates might pay lipservice to the human right to bodily integrity (insofar as it covers women; male circumcision, as it's a "clinical" procedure in the West/America, doesn't receive the same disdain anti-FGMers have for FGM), but the majority of these pro-circ/anti-FGM activists base their arguments on…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:02 PM
1

He defends a good many MRM positions, but he has specifically said numerous times he doesn't identify with the movement.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 03:10 PM
2

I'm legitimately surprised a feminist of her strain would advocate for women being firearm owners, given the general anti-gun tilt of the feminist movement. Remember, these are the folk who will go through the mental gymnastics to frame gun control as a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:27 PM
0

Abortion is not (solely) a women's rights issue but one dependent on one's conception of what constitutes a living human being and whether or not developing children fit within that. If a person believes, say, that personhood begins at insemination and that the termination of that child in potentia is therefore murder, they're naturally going to have contempt for what Planned Parenthood would do, and a certain number of those who hold those convictions will take action against what they view as …
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:27 AM
3

aight then, I'm out
/r/MensRights06/10/13 05:28 AM
3

Except that affirmative action is the reason why I would believe this. The greater the affirmative action, the more likely it is that an unqualified person obtained their job due to their status rather than their skill. And the burden would then be on you to show that AA policies are in effect in your workplace. Otherwise, your assertion remains baseless. Not at all. Because there's no AA for men or anything based on capacity or non-capacity to rape. The comparison was between the logical struct…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:51 AM
4

Actually, s/he does have a point: you're now placing the burden of proof on them, asking to demonstrate that they're not not something— in other words, that women are hired only because of their being women (which, at this point, is just a suspicion based on a non-zero but unspecified number of women which gives no info regarding the incidence of this) is true unless they prove otherwise. Yeah, see, that's not how it works. Your concerns would be valid if you actually have data to show that the …
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:34 AM
2

sup guys. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:10 AM
6

i use programs that block trigger words, i'm not a fucking infant. what
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:20 AM
1

Contemporary feminism holds that women, as a collective, do not possess agency of their own, and that all problems that women (and, if they're charitable enough to acknowledge them, men) face are because of the Patriarchy, either by intention by or fallout of the system (the latter often the explanation when the topic is men's issues). To mention that women might have some culpability for perpetuating the problems that they face would contradict this narrative constructed by feminists. That's ba…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:20 AM
15

Jeebus, no, this does not profit me in the slightest Sure…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:42 AM
2

Mirrors of both articles for those who want to avoid accessing the website altogether
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:52 PM
2

Why don't feminists doxx MRM people? Appeal to popluarity. Also just blatantly untrue but w/e. Why is /r/mensrights and other MRM websites listed as a hatesite with the SPLC? Why aren't any feminists websites? Even radfemhub? Appeal to institution, popularity. Actually, didn't the SPLC revoke its description of /r/mensrights as a "hate group" a while ago? Not that it would matter anyway, but still. While I will agree that men need a progressive space to talk about issues facing them, the MRM is …
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:21 PM
9

"Gifted", "talented" undefined (By what metric do we measure these two terms? Actually, does "gifted" and "talented" imply some objective measurement, or does it refer to how these children are perceived by their "peers"?) "Peers" undefined (What age group, grade level(s) are we talking about? Are the peers of these "gifted", "talented" students of the same gender or those from the entire pool of children as a whole?) "Popular" undefined (What does this mean? Furthermore, are we talking about a …
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:53 PM
3

hey man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_heuristic
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:51 PM
1

Oh? Please do share when you can.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:01 PM
1

Uh, nope. MYTH Most rapes are committed against white women by men of color. TRUTH In 80%-90% of all violent crimes against women, the survivor and perpetrator are of the same race(14). The Department of Justice found no significant difference in the rate of rape and sexual assault among racial groups(15). When men rape women of other races and ethnicities, it is more often a white perpetrator raping a woman of color than a man of color raping a white woman. The myth that most rapes involve men …
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:00 PM
5

Gotta love the very first comment in that article. "Yeah, but this pales to the oppresshun women face everyday, so you should get used to yours!"
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:47 PM
2

That is a pretty sexy ATM, I have to admit.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:22 AM
6

Mirror for those who don't want TC to earn any further revenue from clicks.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:01 PM
2

"This is a serious problem that needs to be solved with extreme measures, ____. Obviously our passive American laws aren't working to effectively stop this problem." Funny, given that the the incidence of rape has been on the decrease since the 60s and that rape laws have been the most encompassing since they first appeared in lawbooks. But we can't let facts get in the way of the feminist perspective of the world, can we? That would only make it more difficult to take them seriously.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:07 PM
17

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/34881558.jpg
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:46 PM
33

There's like a millions studies that support all of this. Go look up feminism, it's a huge field. The discussion should have just stopped there. If your opponent isn't willing to furnish evidence for their claims, then their claims aren't worth taking seriously; instructing you to do the research when the onus is on them to support their argument is a red herring.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:34 PM
6

The comic also compares subreddits (public venues for discussion) with houses (private premises where entry is by invitation only and a right revokable at any given moment by the homeowner). Adorable how just in the setup they've played the victim card. Gotta love how MensRights has a fucking palatial mansion while Feminism has a humble little abode, too. Subtle.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 08:21 AM
3

Burden of proof's on you, dude.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:06 PM
9

We're going in circles. Have a nice day. :3 #420blazeit #yoloswag
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:10 AM
15

If you show me proof of feminists at the time not assembling to address the coddling of women in the courts (and that the policymakers had actually changed their tune in response to feminist activism), then you might have a point. But you don't. You... you're kidding. Are you a troll, or are you picking and choosing which codes of debate ethics to follow? You made those claims; the onus is on you to support them.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:07 AM
10

You made hefty claims but failed to support them with any evidence, reasoning instead that, because the change in attitude toward female criminals coincided with the rise of the feminist movement in the 20s, that it must have automatically been the feminists who were responsible. You could be absolutely right. If you show us proof of feminists at the time assembling to address the coddling of women in the courts (and that the policymakers had actually changed their tune in response to feminist a…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:39 AM
13

but then feminism came along... and women don't get away with murder anymore... Strange, as if with feminism came... greater equality... hey man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:26 AM
2

It's a rhetorical tool (ideological) feminists use to make their population seem larger than it actually is. People who are unaware of the ideological core of the feminist movement will be easily swayed by this reasoning thinking that feminism is just an umbrella term for any "gender equality" movement, and thus adopt the term given this understanding. In reality, feminism stands for much more than just "equality." Equality the goal to which it pays lipservice, but feminism and its various strai…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:52 PM
13

The demonization of the entire gender of men through a narrative (Patriarchy Theory + rape culture and what have you) that paint them all as the oppressors of women—or, at the very least, unknowingly misogynistic—whether or not they make the choice to be so. These concepts are untenable (hence the volume of feminist debate tactics to derail the discussion when their theories are questioned, e.g. what about teh menz, mansplaining, etc), but, sadly, feminists have been more than successful at perp…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:10 PM
10

I like the "awaiting instructions" on the child's hoodie in the original ad. It's as if he were a drone without a mind of his own, incapable of discovering on his own or even understanding why inflicting harm on other people is bad. Certainly reflective of the feminist anti-intellectualist mindset of censorship— you will accept something as good/bad, and you will not question why it is.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:50 PM
1

Maybe, but they're not specifically banned by the subreddit. If you'd prefer a mirror, I've linked to one in the comments section.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:12 PM
3

Mirror
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:12 PM
4

Meh. I think this is kind of incidental to the larger problem of news media being wont to to spread the identity of a person facing accusations of sexual assault (or any crime, really) before a trial has actually found the person to be guilty of those charges— you know, when evidence has actually been established to show that the person actually committed that crime. The accused's gender should not have any bearing on their right to privacy anyway. EDIT: accidentally a word
/r/MensRights20/04/13 05:49 PM
5

Heads up: English is spoken in a lot of other places outside of the United States.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:41 PM
-6

That implies there was anything worthwhile about her to begin with.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:22 AM
-1

Yeah man, I agree. NAFALTism is cool.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:59 AM
0

'cause patriarchy!
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:51 AM
8

This tweet is kind of a double-edged sword. On one hand, she recognizes that men can be victims of the same abuses in relationship that are typically only ascribed to them—the idea that a man in a relationship is more likely to commit adultery, or would ungracefully and unfairly "dump" the other in a relationship, etc.—since people of all walks of life are completely capable of these abuses. On the other hand, she still falls victim to the stereotype that men are incapable, and should be incapab…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:24 AM
0

United States. I don't know if I consider myself to be an MRA yet, but after period of immersion into the positions and arguments of the movement and learning the sundry ways men are victims of disenfranchisement, I'm finding myself more and more concerned with men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter