TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dvd_sandwich Archive

View 0 posts and 79 comments by dvd_sandwich on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Because something something rape culture, something something patriarchy™
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:39 PM
1

Yes. I saw a post once where someone felt violated knowing that someone can think about you while masturbating, without your consent. She called it telepathic rape.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:51 PM
2

I find it laughably ridiculous when they say they're fighting for equality between the genders, when they only care about their own. It's like the KKK saying they're fighting for equality between the races.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:27 AM
5

Nobody says yes all the time, most sex is non-verbal. If one person accuses, the other can just counter accuse. Exactly. This really seems like it was written by somebody who is not very familiar with having sex. It's ridiculous to expect somebody to continuously say yes the entire time. Not saying "no", or "stop", or objecting in any way, absolutely can justify an assumption of continued consent.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:41 PM
16

So what this means for men is don't have sex during college.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:44 AM
1

It doesn't say whether it was self defense or if she instigated it. If it was self defense: it's good she wasn't arrested. If it was instigated by her: she should be given the same sentence a man would get for the same crime. Either the police were unbiased and it was clearly self defense and that's why she wasn't taken in, or it could be the police following their standard procedure of assuming the man is always the guilty one, even when he's the victim.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:48 PM
4

If my screen flickered I would have unbearable sadness, and would likely be wanking in front of a different screen.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:38 PM
3

Does her profile say she's only looking for trans people? I don't understand her first message.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:40 AM
1

But can they provide free memberships, and approve or deny a membership based on gender?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:24 AM
170

But I do love the fact that the audience appears to be on her side. Yeah, I wouldn't expect the audience for this show to agree with her, but it was great to see.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:45 AM
30

That's because women should be treated like children and not as equals. They should only be treated equal when it comes to things that benefit them, because they are entitled to the same rights, but not the same responsibilities. (This is what feminists and the majority of society believe, they just won't word it so directly.)
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:10 AM
2

I agree his self defense claim is nullified once they left his property and were no longer a threat, but if he'd used a camera instead of a gun, they wouldn't have fled and would have just taken his camera after assaulting him some more.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:13 AM
17

If you find her sexually attractive, you're objectifying her. If you don't find her attractive, then you're holding her to the unreasonably high beauty standards set in place by the Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:00 PM
8

The sexism against men comes into play when the woman believes the man is just a human dildo and can be turned on and off with the flick of a switch or a simple verbal command. Men don't work that way either. It is bizarre how difficult to understand it can be for a woman when a man doesn't want to have sex. It's as though they think it's absolutely impossible for us to not be walking around with raging boners 24/7.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 02:33 PM
8

Well, you see, his needs aren't important because he's privileged by the patriarchy™. Serious answer: as a couple both people should be willing and able to satisfy the needs/desires of the other person.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:08 AM
29

I agree with democrats on some things, and disagree with them on others. I agree with republicans on some things, and disagree with them on others. I think they're all a bunch of fucks.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:52 PM
18

One guy suggested that I should have taken another route just so I don't scare her. What a stupid asshole that is, for suggesting that. Yeah, you should go out of your way to take a different route just because somebody is fucking paranoid of 50% of the population. Fuck that shit. Just keep walking to your destination like normal. In fact, somebody repeatedly looking over at me is cause for suspicion, so I'd be suspicious of them for their odd behaviour!
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:46 PM
2

Definition of rape: the act of forcing a person to have sexual intercourse. Read More: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape What definition of rape are they using?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:30 AM
3

Then there is no reason for anyone to carry a gun, if all you have to do is not attack anyone. I don't understand what you're getting at. Yeah, not attacking someone is a great way of avoiding them potentially attacking back. If murderers, thieves, and gang members could also not carry weapons, that'd be great, but unfortunately this isn't the magical land of rainbows and unicorns. Bad people are going to have them no matter what, and it makes no sense to deny a good person the means to defend t…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:52 AM
1

Just in case the woman who they are with uses hers. Don't attack her and you won't have to worry about her defending herself against you. So then rapists just rape drunk people. Rapists being in jail not raping anybody would be preferable to this. What I was saying is drunk people shouldn't handle weapons due to increased likelihood of accidents, just like how they shouldn't handle a vehicle. Its totally and utterly stupid to have men and women armed against each other - talk about rape hysteria…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:13 AM
6

This necessitates all men carrying guns too, just in case. Just in case they get attacked? They do, already. Men are the majority of victims of violent crimes. College parties full of drunken people carrying weapons! People who don't put their weapons away before getting drunk shouldn't be allowed to own weapons or drink, because they're too damn irresponsible.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:30 AM
2

Right, because as men, none of these are cause for concern for us. I mean, some of them are straight up being paranoid, but some of them are legitimate ways of being careful which everybody should make use of, regardless of what type of genitals they have.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:42 AM
17

People who are easily offended should just all die.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:17 PM
6

It's also fucked up when they say (something not as bad as rape)* is just as bad as actual rape, because it trivializes actual victims of actual sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:47 AM
23

I think it's also sexual harassment to give a man unwanted touching because "look at his muscles"
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:07 AM
1

So you would go to court and be found guilty of defending yourself viciously assaulting and raping her instead?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:17 AM
1

It's easy to get overpowered by somebody you're forbidden from defending yourself against.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:10 AM
5

Equality, yo. Seriously, though, this is much better than the usual feminist nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:53 PM
6

None of the issues listed are the result of a non-existent patriarchy. The idea of such a thing is just laughably ridiculous. I can't tell if you're trolling or trying to be serious.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:58 AM
1

Yeah, I don't know why it does that. Even when I click to edit the post, they all show correctly.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:36 PM
2

1 Why is there constant mention of women thinking all men are rapists? Feminists like to blame all men for the actions of a very small percentage. 2 Are most men right's activists white? Average Age? Probly. Maybe. I dunno. 3 What do you say about women still getting paid lower wages then men for the same work? That's a myth and not at all true. 4 Many consider a white passing as straight male the apex of the social pyramid, thoughts? Why? Who thinks this? I'm not a white man, but I wouldn't say…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:17 AM
6

As it's mostly women who keep procreating the making of the both, you can't blame patriarchy for this one. They can blame anything on their patriarchy conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:39 AM
21

Well, that sucks. If it were a paranoid man harassing/attacking a 17 year old girl unprovoked, he would (probably) get a much more harsh sentencing.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:05 PM
6

Well, it makes sense to hire women, so they can save 25% of payroll costs. /s
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:54 PM
1

It may be fairly effective, but it's less effective than any other form of birth control.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:13 AM
3

Based on the thread you linked, it doesn't seem as bad as your title suggests. She was on birth control, and they were consensually having sex without a condom. She wasn't trying to get pregnant by forcing him to have sex with her. Also, what, was he trying to do the "pull-out" method? Because that's the dumbest/worst kind of birth control technique there is, and somewhat pointless if she's on the pill.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:47 AM
1

One of those seems like too much stuff for three days, and the other seems like not enough.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:26 AM
1

Selective service is supposed to be there for use as a last resort if we're in some kind of war and need more soldiers than how many are voluntarily enlisting. It makes sense to have it "just in case", but it's extremely unfair that only men are required to enlist.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:25 AM
1

It would be everyone since men are already required.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:58 AM
15

The ignorance of people who think it's okay is staggering. "But it's okay because he obviously wanted it and consented." Yeah, imagine trying to use that argument for defense of statutory rape of a young girl. "It's okay, she wanted it." Everybody would think (rightly so) that you're an ignorant ass. What I'm getting at here is that it's obviously wrong male or female, but nobody cares if it's adult female and young male. Any other combination of age/gender is a problem.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:55 AM
1

Also their rape culture theory.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:12 AM
11

Because they are "real men".
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:45 AM
47

Welp. No more cracked.com for me, then.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:10 PM
0

I've got no bloody idea, mate.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:48 PM
5

When it comes to the choice of aborting the unborn child or keeping/raising it, I have no say in the matter but have 50% of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:46 PM
1

If they have a dress code then everybody should have to follow it. Are boys allowed to wear shorts and not girls? Unless that's the case, I don't understand how this can be considered gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:33 PM
45

This is not hard. Listen to men, and help them achieve what THEY say is important—or please feel free to Shut the Fuck Up Yeah, they would love it.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:01 PM
1

Did they beep it out then? Cuz that would make it look/sound like he's saying bitch or cunt or something, which would make it seem much more offensive than it needs to be.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:50 AM
5

Well, if somebody did step in and say "not all men", then they'd be right. I have known men who I most certainly would not describe as awesome.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:59 AM
6

That could be risky if they discover the camera and consider it suspicious.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:47 AM
12

But if they're the ones doing it, how can it be our fault?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:41 AM
3

Well, I guess she does feel this way every time she sees a black man. Just not exclusively black men.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:19 AM
9

In what ways are we supposed to fight against rape, other than simply not doing it, and punishing those that do? Because that's already what's happening. Society does not condone such actions. Rapists and child molestors are looked down upon by everybody else. Even when they are in prison they're looked down upon by other inmates. This would not be the case if the majority of society is okay with sex crimes, as feminists would like you to believe.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:35 PM
19

They're right, we should work on the guys that do these things. Maybe we can start by making it illegal and putting them in jail when they do them. Wait, we already are doing that.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:29 PM
1

I understand that violence against women is awful. I agree and would like to add that violence against men is equally as awful. This incident that started the whole thing involved innocent men dying too, more men than women. Nobody gives a fuck about them as they make it a men vs women issue.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:07 AM
1

You probly wouldn't know him. MC Frontalot. A nerd rapper.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:19 PM
6

Thank you for sharing this as an image rather than a link so we don't give them more clicks.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:51 AM
12

As for the "not all men" argument and how easily it's disregarded, just take some of their arguments and replace "men" with "black men" and see how few people will agree, vs how many people will say "not all black men". And honestly, if a friend of mine accused me of being a rapist, or even a potential rapist, that's grounds for ending the friendship immediately, regardless of how long or how well I've known the person. What an incredibly offensive thing to say to somebody.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:38 AM
2

I agree. It's understandable to be concerned with woman's rights and all (just as some women are concerned with men's rights), but feminism completely disregards men's rights while telling us we're privileged. A "musical performer" I was a fan of made a statement on twitter about the recent shooting, saying it's absolutely what MRAs are about, and feminism is more for equality while MRAs are trying to take the equality away [evidently by killing people, more men than women, even]. I couldn't bel…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:13 AM
2

This is one of the areas in which they wish to be treated like children rather than treated as equals. (Inability to consent to sexual relations)
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:06 AM
2

I hate bleu cheese. Does that make me mentally ill?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:29 AM
1

That doesn't make any sense that I can't punch someone to get them to stop hitting me, but I can kill someone who is trying to kill me. Edit: not disagreeing with you, just saying it doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:02 PM
1

What about polar bears?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:44 PM
2

Dihydrogen monoxide should be banned! 100% of people exposed to it will die. It's an odorless/flavorless chemical that thousands of people are killed by every year. It's easily accessible. It's often a main ingredient in our drinks. It's a major component of plumbing systems. And, they also use it to feed all the animals/plants that we eat.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:26 PM
5

Feminists want women to be treated equal with men in some areas, and in others they want to be treated like children or like women are some kind of endangered species as opposed to being half of the population.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:47 AM
2

Shit like this is why I'm glad I had it made medically impossible for me to become a father.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:38 AM
1

They believe he could easily defend himself if he needed to, so he's not really a victim, yet if he did defend himself he would be the bad guy for hitting a woman.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:10 AM
2

I know he was acting, but: Perhaps he appeared scared because it's societally forbidden to hit a woman, even in self defense. If a woman is attacking you, you must either run, or "take it like a man". If it were a man attacking you, then you can of course attack back with equal force.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:58 AM
9

Religion is not a source of consistent morality, and is often used as an excuse to hurt other people or deny them rights.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:59 AM
26

I don't understand how anybody could disregard a mass murderer being crazy. As if murdering several innocent people is something which somebody with a normal functioning brain would do without thinking anything of it. "Oh what should I do today? Get some gas in the car, pick up some eggs, maybe murder a few people" He may have had anti-women views, but it obviously takes more than just that to make him kill innocent people.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:19 AM
2

They may be the same hardware, but the settings are set up differently.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:28 AM
2

Are you sure you linked the right video? It's about stupid t-shirts.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:36 AM
3

They absolutely should arrest somebody for making terrorist threats, regardless of their gender, age, or race. If they can determine that there's no real danger, then they should be released and have the charges dropped.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:48 PM
2

Some ways around this could be private sperm storage. Have a few vials put back and then have the procedure. Vasectomy is not recommended for men who wish to freeze their sperm. It should be done if you are absolutely certain you don't want any (more) kids. If there's even a slight possibility you might want a kid later, you should go with other birth control method(s). Also, sperm can not be frozen forever. It might not even still be usable by the time you decide you want a kid.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:45 PM
4

That's how it should be. I'm not married, but I have a gf. I told her I was getting it done. My mind was made up and she was okay with it. If we were married I would ask her opinion on it, but the decision would/should still be entirely mine.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:42 PM
3

They (male of female) should be judged negatively if they sleep around and don't do it safely. Spreading disease and/or causing unwanted pregnancy is extremely irresponsible. If done safely, then I don't care, it's none of my damn business, they can do what they want, and I have no positive or negative opinion about them just from that.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:34 PM
1

I had it done, and I'm glad I did. I don't want kids now, or ever. As for insurance coverage, I'm sure it depends on your insurance. Mine was covered. If you're paying for it yourself, you'd be looking at anywhere from $300-1,000. I highly recommend doing it, but only if you are absolutely certain you don't ever want kids. If you're considering freezing sperm, then you admit you might want kids, and should consider an alternative.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:56 AM
1

It's not noticeably any different.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:50 AM
1

Females are not a minority, though. They are 50% of the planet's population!
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter