TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dward_45 Archive

View 1 post and 213 comments by dward_45 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Progressdward_45/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You guys are such pussies. Everybody wants to be a victim
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:38 PM
1

I’m not sure how the law works over there but in the US he wins this
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:12 PM
0

I agree. I just don’t think including women in the draft is a good idea, and definitely don’t think taking their right to vote away makes any sense.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:37 AM
1

English is your fourth language? Honestly, good for you. You’re right, the law is technically discriminatory. I think, if the law is going to exist, then it makes sense for it to be discriminatory. I don’t think that justifies not allowing women to vote. If there was a law that was exclusive to black people and was unfair, that wouldn’t be good justification for taking away white people’s right to vote. The only remedy for the unfairness is to get rid of the discriminatory law. If the discrimina…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:18 AM
1

Ok, so you would agree then that all people are entitled to the same rights unless they break the law? “Mens rights are in 2000 BCE”. Calling me low IQ while fucking up your grammar is pretty iconic. You sure for me there. Make sure to write that one down.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:21 AM
1

Fair point, but not the only way to think.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:39 PM
1

I’m not brushing it away, it’s a valid but limited point. In this country’s most of your rights come with the responsibility to uphold the law. I can’t think of any other conditions, can you? I am a man by the way. I don’t hate myself, I just don’t think drafting women is best for the military or society.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:35 PM
-1

Either you’re dumb or English is your second language and you’re struggling. You want me to research literally half the shit that the US has done abroad and domestically. Half?? Of all things the US has done? We’ll be here all day. I’m assuming you must have misspoke. The siege of suiyang happened in the year 757. The fact that I’m not understanding how that’s relevant to this discussion isn’t my fault.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:21 PM
1

Ok. So people convicted of crimes have their rights taken away. That’s true. Any other examples? Or do you have to commit a crime to not be afforded the same rights as everyone else?
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:11 PM
-1

Lol, what’s your point of bringing up a war from ancient Chinese times? I think it’s completely unethical to use anyone as a suicide bomber. Obviously the US would never do this. You’re suggesting using women as suicide bombers? In the same breath as saying that men are treated unfairly? That’s utterly ridiculous. You guys are mad like women did this to you
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:10 PM
0

A single father shouldn’t be turned away at the border and his kid taken into state custody. I don’t think that’s right. But doing that to every child’s mother wouldn’t make it any better. I can’t disagree with evacuating everybody being the best course of action. However, to do so would probably be the same as conceding the country to Russia. If the goal is to win the war and not destroy the entire Ukrainian population in the process, it makes sense to send the men and evacuate the women. I don…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:00 PM
0

Yeah, let’s just make women suicide bombers because I think the world is unfair to me because I’m a man
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:55 PM
1

Can you re-post this on the post arguing that women should get drafted into the military?
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:26 PM
0

Jesus, you sick fuck.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:17 PM
0

If someone else is giving you your “superior” status, then you don’t actually hold superior authority, the person who gives you that status holds the authority. A king who treats his queen better than himself is still the king. If the men in power in this country decide to treat women better than men, that doesn’t mean men aren’t still the ones in power to make those decisions.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:16 PM
0

Do you not understand how democracy works? The “rich assholes” making these decisions were democratically elected. Not a single candidate has campaigned in incorporating women in the draft. If we didn’t like the decision, we’ve had plenty of chances to change it over the past 80 years. YOU are trying to blame WOMEN as a group for a decision made time and time again by men. The fact that women are excluded from the draft has nothing to do with women. You’re frustration should be directed at the p…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:12 PM
0

I’m not talking about a ww2 era sniper rifle. Military snipers are heavy with major recoil. Not to say a woman can’t handle one, but it absolutely takes strength. Y’all play too much call of duty. I’m not gonna keep arguing with you. You’re obviously an incel who hates women. It’s a “sexist” policy that we (men) created, and only the rare breed like you thinks it’s a problem. You’d rather leave every child parentless than evacuate women with their children. You really can’t get more narrow minde…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:04 PM
0

It requires a significant amount of strength to handle a sniper rifle. People aren’t typically drafted into non-combat roles. If you get drafted, and aren’t exceptionally talented in another area that needs support, you’ll be serving a front line role. It just makes sense to evacuate women and children and conscript men during this invasion, if conscripting people is necessary. Are they going to prevent all citizens from leaving? Evacuate the children without their parents? Leave the women to fi…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:50 AM
0

Is men treating women better than men female supremacy? No, that’s not at all what supremacy means. The MEN who created the draft disagree with you. Teddy Roosevelt disagrees with you. There’s no connection between responsibility and rights in the United States. The responsibility placed on you does not affect the rights you are entitled to. Maybe it should be that way, but then “rights” wouldn’t be rights, they would be “privileges”.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:45 PM
0

You’re not stating facts that can be proven wrong choice, you’re just saying your obviously biased opinion. You said “authority without responsibility is tyranny”, and when I offered other examples of “authority without responsibility” you didn’t address it, now you’re changed the subject. You said the draft is female supremacy. I talked about how men were the creators of our rules regarding the draft, and you didn’t address that. Obviously I’m not going to convince you anything, you aren’t inte…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:41 PM
-1

No, because old ladies won’t make good soldiers.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:35 PM
1

What rights are some Americans entitled to that others aren’t?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:34 PM
1

It sounds like you just don’t want them to have political power. I don’t see how it’s female supremacy at all. Rules imposed on men by men don’t equate to female supremacy to me. I think many, if not most men agree that drafting women is a bad idea. Roosevelt felt that way when he started the first draft. Any of the presidents who followed him could have done away with it but didn’t. Not sure how that’s female supremacy.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:39 PM
0

Well there hasn’t been a draft since 1973. Did every man who didn’t have to serve bear the responsibility? Do men who get exempt from the draft bear responsibility? Citizens elect congress members who vote on many things that don’t require those citizens to act. What you’re saying isn’t practical. Can congress not make it illegal to sell heroine? Only police have the responsibility of enforcing that law. No authority without responsibility? Then democracy is quite tyrannical. We also don’t have …
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:34 PM
0

I don’t like the draft, but I would support it in specific circumstances. If we were being invaded like Ukraine is by Russia, I think a draft would be necessary. I also think women and children should be prioritized in the evacuation.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:58 PM
0

No one in America can vote before 18. It’s not female supremacy. It’s not like our matriarchs invented the draft. We, as men, did that to ourselves. And not for no reason. The military doesn’t want to draft women. Men make better soldiers on average. Someone has to care for the children. If someone has to go to war, it makes sense that the men fight and the women are exempt. Refusing to participate in the draft or refusing to go when you are selected is illegal, and that is why you can lose your…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:41 PM
1

I’m not ignoring the value of human life, quite the opposite actually. The draft isn’t a “good” thing, but if it’s deemed necessary, it makes sense to send men over women. I don’t want men to die fighting in a war against their will, but I see no functional reason to make women do so too other than out of spite. I think this argument is just a way to try to get feminist to shut up or acknowledge a hole in their argument that women are equal in every way. I don’t think you genuinely think women m…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:26 PM
1

And that man will not fight in war. He won’t make it through training.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:12 PM
1

Tell me what added benefits you think men should reap and I’ll tell you if I agree. I personally don’t expect to get drafted, and don’t think I should be rewarded for my “service” if I don’t get drafted. It’s not about fairness. It’s about having an effective military. Drafting women might be fair, doesn’t work towards the goal of strengthening the military.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:10 PM
0

I didn’t realize the decision was made exclusively by women. I didn’t think the 15 women in congress had that power.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:08 PM
1

I agree with the second part. There are significant benefits for serving, but I would support additional benefits for people who were conscripted. It hasn’t happened since 1973, so I don’t feel like this is a crisis. But if there is another draft, I still don’t think it makes sense to send women, but it would make sense to further compensate those who were forced to upend their lives and join the military.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:00 PM
1

Obviously. But how would you properly compensate every man who signs up for selective service but never has to serve? Some people have suggested taking away women’s right to vote. I don’t see how that is a privilege for men
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:55 PM
1

Including women in the draft isn’t going to target the type of person you described, it’s going to incorporate all women including the ones who have no place on the battlefield. The military doesn’t want to draft the “average woman”, and a man who is smaller and weaker than the average woman would probably not be fit enough to serve.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:44 PM
1

You use muscle to be a soldier. There are 0 female navy seals for a reason. Women have a much harder time meeting the physical requirements necessary to serve. If physicality didn’t matter in war it wouldn’t be such a vital part of military training.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:35 PM
1

The United States
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:31 PM
-1

You have to follow the law to keep all of your rights. That doesn’t make your rights privileges. You also have to pay your taxes if you want to vote. That doesn’t make voting a privilege that you earn by not committing tax fraud. Regardless, it’s not about fairness. It’s about efficiency. The military doesn’t want to draft women. Women generally aren’t as good fighters, and mothers are important to raising children and maintaining a healthy population. I don’t like conscription, but if somebody …
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:30 PM
1

I don’t like the idea of a draft and hope we never have to conscript people again. At the same time, if somebody has to be forced to fight, isn’t it obvious who to send? There should be some benefit for the people conscripted into the military. They already get the G.I Bill, but I would support some added compensation for being conscripted as opposed to volunteering. Do I think men should get extra privileges for simply registering for the draft? No, I don’t think those privileges should be gran…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:25 PM
0

When did women vote to send us to war?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:19 PM
0

I think there are very practical reasons to exclude women from the draft
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:14 PM
1

Well first, that’s just not true. The tallest people in the world are European. The average white American man is about an inch taller than the average black American man. This wouldn’t justify only sending white men. The discrepancy is way too small. The average woman is 30 pounds lighter and 5 inches smaller than the average man. Big difference. Not to say that women can’t be effective in the military, it’s just not practical to add them to the pool of people who can get drafted.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:09 PM
0

Like that time they wanted the right to vote. Those female supremacists! Do you guys think the good old days were back when was legal to rape your wife?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:51 PM
0

Lol, okay. What you’re saying now is a big step down from “most women don’t want kids and get abortions”. About 1 in 5 pregnancies ends in abortion. If it were most women, that number would be significantly higher.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:49 PM
-1

I don’t want equality at the expense of common sense. Like I said before, you don’t gain the right to vote when you register for the draft. You lose the right to vote when you break the law. It’s also the opposite of supremacy. Women didn’t have to campaign to not be drafted, the men in charge don’t want to draft them into the army. We shouldn’t weaken country for the sake of equality.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:45 PM
0

That’s not true. Mothers and fathers kill their children at roughly the same rate. Mother’s are more likely to do it in infancy, fathers are more likely with children over the age of 8. Fathers are certainly more likely to abandon their children. None of this is relevant though. You can’t have children without women. Additionally, men in general make better soldiers than women. If somebody has to fight, someone still has to take care of the family. It’s obvious who should do which.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:34 PM
-2

Clearly you don’t know much about voting. It’s not a privilege that you earn, it’s a right that can be taken away. Just like you can lose the right to vote for committing a felony, you can lose the right to vote for refusing to register for selective service. You don’t earn that right by registering for selective service, you already had that right and it could be taken from you if you don’t follow the nation’s laws. What basis do you have to argue that women should lose the right to vote?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:22 PM
0

Most women hate children and get abortions Lol, wow. Do you really believe that? What makes you think that? I feel like a lot less people would exist if most women got abortions. I’m gonna guess you didn’t look this one up, but you just know for a fact that it’s true.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:04 PM
0

The thing about rights is you don’t have to earn them, you’re given them by default and they can be taken away. We don’t gain the privilege of of voting because we register for selective service. They can take away your right to vote if you break the law, and refusing to register for selective service is illegal. I don’t see the justification for taking women’s rights to vote here.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:56 PM
1

I don’t like the idea of conscription, but not because it’s unfair that women aren’t drafted too. If there has to be a draft, the most effective way to do so is to draft men and exempt women. If we have to have a draft, we shouldn’t further weaken ourselves for the sake of equality.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:28 PM
1

You didn’t have to earn your rights as an American. If you live here, you are entitled to the same rights as everybody else. I won’t resort to insulting your intelligence as you have. I’d rather explain my own argument than insult you for apparently not getting it.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:26 PM
0

I mean, there are definitely capable women who don’t plan to have children and would be good soldiers. How are you going to specifically draft them?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:50 PM
1

How is that so? Sending useless soldiers to die as fodder isn’t efficient. That’s the opposite of efficient. Efficient would be to send the best soldiers to fight and the best people at other things to do other things.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:36 PM
0

Lol. Calling someone stupid for not “understanding” while refusing to explain the point you tried to make is pretty wild lack of self-awareness. If what you said made any sense then you could explain it without calling other people stupid. People resort to childish insults when their argument can’t stand on its own. Instead of defending your opinion, you insult others intelligence.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:32 PM
2

Well a 60 year old with health problems shouldn’t be drafted. But a 60 year old without health problems is still stronger and larger than most 25 year old women. Ideally, you won’t draft 60 year olds, but the ones that got drafted would probably be more fit to serve on the front line than the average woman.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:30 PM
1

I understand what you’re saying, I just disagree. Drafting women as well would weaken the military and lower the quality of life for most civilians.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:25 PM
-2

So you think even if it’s worse for the country overall, if it’s better for men then you support it?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:22 PM
1

I don’t like the draft either, but I recognize that it might be necessary in exceptional circumstances. I think what’s happening in Ukraine would qualify.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:55 PM
1

Men who refuse to sign are treated like anyone else who breaks the law. You aren’t only given the price page to vote if you register with selective service, you break the law by not doing so and lose your already given right. I don’t think you should lose the right to vote for breaking the law, but that’s a separate issue.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:54 PM
1

Im just trying to be realistic
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:52 PM
0

That doesn’t address the fact that the average man is 30 pounds heavier and 5 inches taller than the average women. I would be okay with the US drafting women who met certain physical requirements and the percentage of women drafted was capped at a certain number.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:52 PM
0

No, but every woman who does join the army is from the top percentile of physically and mentally capable women. The average man is about 5 inches and 30 pounds bigger than the average female. During a draft, the weakest man in a squad would still probably be as strong or stronger than the average woman.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:42 PM
1

It does in this specific scenario. Men are better built for war, women are better built for childcare. When you’re choosing who has to go to war and who has to stay, the choice is pretty obvious if you aim to maximize efficiency.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:41 PM
1

How am I fighting against my own best interests? We haven’t had a draft in the US since 1973, I don’t expect to get drafted and if I do, I don’t think it’s in my best interest for women to be drafted alongside me. I don’t see how that will improve our military or life at home for those who aren’t drafted, and that’s what really matters.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:40 PM
-3

Most women don’t want children? Where did you get that? I didn’t realize you believed that women can do everything a man can do equally, if not better. But I’m not even arguing that a woman can’t make a better soldier than a man. I’m just saying that it doesn’t make sense to conscript them because in average, they don’t make great soldiers compared to able bodied men of the same age group.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:33 PM
1

Are you too stupid to explain why they are related?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:30 PM
1

I wish you would answer my question. What privileges and extra resources are women given that men aren’t? It’s not about discriminating based on physical characteristics, it’s about efficiency. Men are, in general, better for war. Women are, in general, better for taking care kids. A man can be a better caretaker than a woman, just as a woman can be a better soldier than a man, but the gender roles do still exist in these scenarios.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:29 PM
0

I’m not assuming every single woman would die. It wouldn’t take that to cause a huge issue for the Ukrainian population. If Ukraine drafted men and women equally and hypothetically, Russia used a nuclear weapon in Kiev, the population would take a devastating hit. If they only drafted men, and somehow hypothetically every Ukrainian man except for one died, the population would survive. Women play a vital role in society that men can’t do themselves. Sending women who couldn’t have kids would mak…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:03 PM
1

Lol, I’m not a woman. What you said just doesn’t make any sense without more of an explanation.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:56 PM
0

You haven’t answered my question. I live in the US. How does women’s access to education and healthcare reduce mine?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:54 PM
1

I am an American man. Why should a woman’s right to vote be taken away because they can’t get drafted? By that same note, should men who didn’t get drafted lose their right to vote? Should men who got drafted but were later exempt lose their right to vote? Since when does the right to vote come from participation in the draft? Voting isn’t a privilege that you earn from registering with selective service, it’s a right given to everybody that can be taken away if you commit a crime. I’m not seein…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:47 PM
0

That’s a pretty big jump. I don’t see why that would be necessary—unless there weren’t enough women. Not conscripting women basically assures that we won’t have that problem. I don’t know what basic human rights I’m throwing out the window. I don’t like the draft, I just don’t understand the logic behind advocating for women to participate in it. That would hurt society as a whole.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:42 PM
0

This is the reason that there have been 0 female navy seals. The issue with that is I think it’s important for women to stay at home with children if we are sending men to war. Gender roles do exist.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:38 PM
0

It seems like English might not be your first language, and that’s what’s confusing me. Are you suggesting that men with disabilities don’t have the right to vote because they didn’t sign up for the draft?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:33 PM
-1

Indeed. But men cannot carry a child in the womb. Women play a vital, irreplaceable role in sustaining a population.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:32 PM
0

Could you please explain how giving women health care and education harms men? I don’t like the draft, but there’s a very practical reason for sending men and not women. Men are better soldiers, women are better mothers. You can’t have children without women. If someone has to be forced to fight for their country, the country is wise to send men.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:24 PM
-2

I’m a man, living in the US. There hasn’t been a draft here since 1973. I don’t think any of my rights are derived from the fact that I can get drafted. I don’t think that’s in the constitution. You share the same rights with all citizens of your country just because you live there, not because you can get forced to defend the country. The country decided all people deserve these rights, not just the ones who choose to serve, and not just the ones who can be made to serve. We also had a draft do…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:17 PM
-5

Geez, no reason for the insults. I’m not sure how women fighting for better access to education and healthcare impacted men’s rights. My point by mentioning children was that women serve a role in society than men cannot serve. Why would we send the people responsible for making and caring for children to war?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:10 PM
1

Should we make impractical policy decisions during an invasion for the sake of equality?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:58 PM
-1

Gender roles still exist. Not every position is on the front lines, but the majority of people drafted will not be serving those roles. Those are typically high skill roles that require lots of training, not what you draft people during a war to do. Soldiers are drafted to fill vacant roles, which is typically going to be front line roles. Men are on average bigger and stronger. That makes them better soldiers. Obviously women in the military make better soldiers than people like me (men, not in…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:56 PM
0

That’s unrealistic. People are going to protect themselves first, which is understandable. Not every country has conscription, but when it happens it makes sense to draft men and not women. That’s better for the soldiers fighting and for the families who don’t have to fight.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:48 PM
-1

Why? My rights don’t come from my ability to get drafted
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:40 PM
-2

It’s not about want. You live in this country, and now it’s under attack. In certain scenarios, all hands on deck are needed or the country will be lost. If mandatory service is necessary, and I feel that a full scale invasion by a foreign superpower could make it necessary, it makes to send able bodied men first. Men are more effective in combat and women are more essential to mothering children. If all the men in a society except for one die, the population can survive. If all the women in a s…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:40 PM
-6

I think there’s very practical reasons for conscripting men and not women or children.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:35 PM
-8

Men make better soldiers and somebody has to mother children. You send men to battle and protect women and children because you need women to sustain your population more so than you need men.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:34 PM
-3

A 60 year old man in good health will probably make a better soldier than your average 25 year old woman in good health
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:28 PM
-9

Because sending women to war is a brilliant idea
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:27 PM
2

He thinks less people should do it, actually
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:26 PM
0

I’m sorry what? In the US? The right to vote, go to war, and drive are not related. There are plenty of men exempt from the draft who still vote. A known draft dodger became president.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:25 PM
-1

At least in the US, bearing the burden of war has nothing to do with your right to vote. Most people in selective service will not be forced to serve. So why should we get to vote just because our name could be called? Women aren’t drafted for practical reasons.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:24 PM
-4

Because sending women to war is so effective
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:21 PM
0

“Inclusion” hurts everyone here
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:15 PM
0

Well, you should watch CNN I guess.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:15 PM
-10

Yeah, because conscripting the women would be so much more effective in war…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:14 PM
1

Russian propaganda!
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:13 PM
-3

Why are these two things related? You don’t have to fight to vote. Most people who can be conscripted will never be.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:13 PM
-1

I think society is better off if women are excluded from conscription
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:11 PM
-2

What? Women shouldn’t vote??
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:10 PM
-1

I think it’s a necessary safeguard for certain situations like a full-scale invasion from another country. And excluding women from the draft makes sense, practically speaking.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:04 PM
1

What is the solution?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:02 PM
1

I don’t see the problem here guys. Do you have a problem with over the top violence against men in tv shows? I think most of us find it entertaining. I imagine rape victims might not like to see rape occur in shows they watch. At the same time, stories can suffer by removing important plot elements for reasons like that. What is the request here? Do we want producers to be hesitant to show any type of violence in their show for the sake of our feelings?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:00 PM
1

She would have to prove that she was under duress
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:58 PM
1

Well, I definitely don’t believe all men are rapists, and I don’t think this video is a good idea. Yeah, the video could have a time stamp. That doesn’t stop a person from trying to use it to push a narrative anyway. I mean, he could literally tweet it. It wouldn’t be useful in court anyway, but it could absolutely be used against the girl by a person with bad intentions. They could break up and he could text her next guy that video. Why give him that dirt on her after 6 months? What incentive d…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:56 PM
0

Not really
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:53 PM
1

I wouldn’t just simply accept that, sorry. That is absolutely something I would throw my life away over.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/22 10:44 AM
-1

That’s why I’m saying, I contract. You sign on one line before, and you sign on another line after. If that’s what you wanna do.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:54 AM
2

Anyone can withdraw consent from sex at anytime. If you’re having sex with a girl then decide, I don’t wanna have sex with her anymore, you can stop. She can’t make you keep going. That’s how it works, you can withdraw it at anytime.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:53 AM
1

If some dude held me down and stuck his dick in my ass, absolutely I would fight him to the death
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/22 02:51 AM
1

Do you at least see the other side of that?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:49 AM
3

No that’s not what I mean. Obviously she shouldn’t be able to do that. I mean she gains nothing from agreeing to that video, and gives him power over her. In a small case, he could show it to somebody. In an extreme case, he actually rape her, and now he has a video that he can try to use to argue that she gave consent. I think he would be better off with a contract.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:46 AM
0

Society has definitely over-corrected. Women used to not be able to get divorced and it was legal to rape your wife. The system used to be broken, now it’s just skewed in the other direction to an extent. Still, you won’t get charged off mere accusations. The legal system still requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. I think your comment about women being narcissistic liars is more based on your limited experience than reality. Everyone is capable of having those qualities. Still, you have to …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:33 PM
1

Hmm, wow. Well, I’m a guy, and getting raped by a guy is probably one of the worst things I can imagine. I mean, if somebody raped me I’d have to kill them. Anyway, comparing rape to being accused of rape is stupid. They’re both bad, but should be treated like what they are and the punishments should be as severe as the crime. If society believes falsely accusing someone of rape is even worse than rape itself, then the punishment should be worse. The punishment would still be based on the harm c…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/22 08:29 PM
1

No it couldn’t, because the contract was dated and specifically stated that she was consenting this time and this time only. I suppose a video of her reading a carefully written statement before and after sex with time stamps on the video wouldn’t be close to the same. I don’t think she has any incentive to sign the contract either, but I think it would be more effective for the guy if she claimed she was raped.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:24 PM
3

I wouldn’t blame either side for trying to protect themselves, I just think the contract would be more effective for him if he wanted to go that route. I mainly see no incentive for the girl to agree to the recording. Even if he never plans to rape her, giving him that recording gives him power over her that she has no incentive (that I can see) to give him. I would tell the girl not to agree to be recorded and I would tell the guy that the recording isn’t the way to go.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:19 PM
0

If he ignores her “no” later, he has a video of her saying “yes” that he can try to argue was consent for the time that he actually raped her. She should trust him enough to let him record her giving consent, but he shouldn’t trust her enough to not obtain the recording? How can you expect him to protect himself but not for her to protect herself?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:13 PM
-1

There would have to be no coercion. Coercion would void the contract. Same goes for the video, if it were legally binding. And there’s no way to prove that she wasn’t coerced into making the recording. Hypothetically, the contract could be signed before and after sex to indicate that consent was obtained and maintained throughout the sex
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:11 PM
2

1000%. But I think this is more effective and less offensive than the video idea.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:08 PM
-10

A contract would be better. Either way, how does a video of her saying she consents give her any protection? I think the video actually puts her more at risk. If this guy decides to rape her in the future, he has a video that he can try to use to say it wasn’t rape.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:07 PM
0

The contract would certainly be more binding in court. The contract could use specific language that would make it hard to argue that she didn’t consent. For example, the could be a line to sign before sex and a line to sign after sex. The contract would be much more sound.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:04 PM
-5

It’s the worst way to try to achieve the protection that he could get by asking her to sign a contract
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:51 PM
-1

On the other hand, if you were friends with this girl would you recommend she agree to the recording?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:49 PM
-6

He would be better off with a contract. She could have rescinded consent immediately after the recording was taken but before sex began. A video could be edited after the fact, so it’s credibility would be challenged more so than a contract with a signature and date.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:48 PM
-11

Not insisting on giving her power. I don’t think it’s in her own best interest to agree to the recording, so I don’t think she should do it. She gains nothing from letting him record her, that would be a short-sighted and naive decision. Sure, if he recorded the entire thing (with her consent) it would provide him the protection he is looking for. I got the sense that he didn’t plan to do that, he wanted to record her saying “I consent to this” then then the camera off. He would be better off as…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:46 PM
1

I’m sure this guy would say that he didn’t think she was capable of that when he started dating her. This lady went even further than to just accuse him, she staged a crime. As you can see, it takes a little more than a mere accusation to convict someone (and obviously they still messed up). Obviously this thing can happen. My point was this guy made a mistake, most mistakes are avoidable.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:42 PM
-11

Sexist? I don’t think so. I’m just trying to think objectively about what would be best for each individual. If I knew this girl, I’d tell her to say no to the recording. If he decided to rape her after, she gave him something to use to try to argue that she consented. If I knew this guy, I’d tell him that the recording is a bad idea. She can withdraw consent at any time, so it’s not likely that the video would help him. He would be better off asking her to sign a contract.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:18 PM
-8

Sure, but idk, I think if you’ve been with a woman for years and she suddenly decided to falsely accuse you of rape because she was mad at you, you never really knew her as well as you thought. This guy should have asked her to sign and date a contract, rather than consent to a recording.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:15 PM
-5

A contract would be better. Something she could sign saying she agreed to have sex with this person on this day. That’s what he should have done, if he felt he needed protection.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:11 PM
-1

Legally, she can’t withdraw consent for the previous 12 times that she already consented and had sex. She can try to lie, which would be perjury. Just like you can’t withdraw your consent days after your colonoscopy, a person can’t withdraw their consent for sex days after it happened. I just figured out the right answer to this guy’s solution. He shouldn’t have asked her to agree to be recorded, he should have asked her to sign a contract. Contract says “on this day, I ____ agreed to have sexua…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:03 PM
-1

We are conflating a couple different things here: False imprisonment, by itself, isn’t necessarily a violent crime. False imprisonment is when a person confines another person within a fixed boundary, and the victim is either aware of the imprisonment or harmed by it. That isn’t technically what is happening here. Being falsely accused of a crime in itself isn’t a violent act. It can result in violence and a violation of your rights, but it isn’t violence in itself. Additionally, if the false ac…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/22 06:53 PM
-5

I guess she wasn’t trustworthy after 3 months. Plenty of people have sex with women who they can trust. Not every female is a narcissistic liar. You should always protect yourself in every way possible, but it’s not impossible to do so. He should have stuck with the conversation, without the recording. While an accusation can be life ruining, you need more than an accusation to be convicted. Maybe 6 months isn’t long enough to develop the right level of trust.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:43 PM
-2

Yeah, it would be understandably hard to believe. Still, men have been raped by women before.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:38 PM
-24

I understand why he is concerned, but this isn’t the answer. She can withdraw consent at any time, and even so, I wouldn’t recommend agreeing to being recorded. If he does decide to rape her, he has a video he could use to try to argue that she consented.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:36 PM
-11

Ok but practically speaking, this is the only way consent can work. If she agrees to have sex with you today, did she also agree to have sex with you tomorrow? If during sex you do something that makes her want to stop, is she not allowed to stop? If you agree to let your doctor give you a colonoscopy, is that doctor now allowed to give you a colonoscopy every time you go into his office? Consent must be an ongoing thing to be real.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:34 PM
-9

Not a good idea homie
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:30 PM
-8

And if he does decide to rape you, now there’s a recording of you giving consent
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:29 PM
-7

Agreeing to that recording is not in her best interest. I also understand his concern, but the recording would probably provide him no legal protection.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:29 PM
-18

Or just only do it with someone you can trust
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:28 PM
-28

Her agreeing to that recording isn’t in her best interest, the comments are right.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:27 PM
14

Some people might think that, but it’s not true in a legal sense.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:27 PM
-11

He could make the same arguments that she makes
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:26 PM
4

I’m not sure if a sex tape would be admissible evidence, but I imagine he would have to record her consenting before, during, and after for it to prove that she consented. And she would obviously have to consent to the recording.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:25 PM
-48

To be fair, I see no reason to be sympathetic to anyone yet, and the girl was asking for advice. And the right answer (for her own best interest) is NO, she shouldn’t let him make that recording.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:16 PM
-26

She shouldn’t agree to that. After taking the recording he could rape her, then use the as a defense to argue that she is lying. He also shouldn’t rely on that recording as protection against a false accusation. She could withdraw her consent at any time after that video. Her consenting today doesn’t mean she consents tomorrow, or even in an hour when it’s time to have sex.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:15 PM
-2

I couldn’t disagree more. I think even if we were to accept that the emotional pain of being falsely accused is greater than the emotional pain of being raped, it wouldn’t account for the physical pain suffered by the rape victim. The law should always recognize violent crimes as a higher degree of criminality than non-violent crimes. Words can be harmful, but they aren’t violence. The punishment for falsely accusing someone of a crime should be a reflection of the harm caused by the false accus…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/22 06:05 PM
-1

I don’t agree with this. I think the punishment should be severe, but not the same punishment as the punishment for rape. One is a violent crime, one isn’t a violent crime. The punishment should reflect the nature of the crime and the harm caused by the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/22 05:35 PM
44

Don’t take any of the advice here and keep trying. It’s a numbers game, believe in yourself and keep trying.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 10:32 PM
2

I guess that’s a good point. I’m very happy with my circumcision, but i guess I didn’t have any say in the matter
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:24 PM
-1

What bodily autonomy right do men not have?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:29 AM
1

I think a lot of customs in society unfairly favor women at men’s expense, but I don’t think they legally have any more rights than men do in the United States. A lot of those things you said aren’t “rights”. Men commit suicide more often than women, but everyone has an equal right to do so. Less women die in combat, but less women serve combat roles. Most of that is voluntary, but until 1994 they weren’t allowed to serve in combat roles, so that result is most likely a result of women having le…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:15 PM
3

What rights do women have that we don’t?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:48 PM
1

Nothing at all. She just has blue hair and is screaming on the internet so she’s a “feminist”
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 09:11 PM
1

When the governing body is authoritarian it doesn’t matter what the people think. Muslim men are also victims of their situation but I think it’s obvious that women have it worse.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:17 PM
0

Men hating loser? Come on man, I support men’s rights just like you do. There are definitely restrictive laws for everyone under sharia law but women can’t leave the house without being accompanied by a man. When in public, they have to be completely covered from face to toe. If accused of adultery they can be tortured. They are honestly legit victims of everything that people in the west believe is happening to them. It’s basically slavery. Maybe they shouldn’t prioritize anyone. But I get it
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:04 AM
3

That is indeed a problem, but under sharia law (I spelled it wrong I think) ALL of the women are practically enslaved. If we had to prioritize something I think it’s protecting the ladies in this situation.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:59 PM
1

Doesn’t this mean that they earn less on average?
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/21 05:03 PM
-9

The domestic violence charge. What did he get charged for?
/r/TheRedPill05/08/21 01:09 PM
-17

He didn’t explicitly say that, but he also said that that he was charged with domestic violence, that’s why I’m asking. Domestic violence charges usually only happen when there is a physical altercation.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/21 01:08 PM
-29

Sounds like he put his hands on her or engaged her physically, is that true?
/r/TheRedPill05/08/21 12:24 PM
1

You could, and people often do, say the same thing about men. But the same goes for almost all statements like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:40 PM
3

Okay guys but from the same website, 24.6% of men aged 26-29 also had some type of mental illness. Let’s not share misleading information. https://www.statista.com/statistics/673049/mental-illness-in-the-past-year-among-us-men-by-age/
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 07:47 PM
3

Self preservation is the top answer and it should be. This page isn’t about hating women, even though many people might take it to be that.
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 07:43 PM
3

Report abuse
/r/MGTOW204/05/21 01:22 PM
4

I’m always saying this on here: it’s all about the lawyers. Make sure you have good representation gentlemen.
/r/MGTOW219/02/21 01:22 PM
1

The gun is the great equalizer that can put a fragile woman and a macho man on the same level. I definitely agree with that. I’m more speaking out of personal experience as a relatively strong man with a background in wrestling. If someone tries to rob me with a knife, I’m confident in my ability to get away. If somebody tries to rob me with a gun, there’s nothing I can do (unless I also have a gun). It raises the bar on what you need to protect yourself. I can’t defend myself with my physical a…
/r/MGTOW218/02/21 06:04 PM
1

Yes. My point is, I feel like HAVE to get a gun to be safe in America because everyone and their neighbor has a gun. In a country with stricter gun control laws, there is less need to own a gun in the first place.
/r/MGTOW218/02/21 04:48 AM
2

In America, yes, arguably too much. I would feel safer if it wasn’t so easy to get a gun in America. If everyone has a gun, shit I need to get one too just to be on level ground.
/r/MGTOW217/02/21 03:43 PM
2

That’s crazy bro. Horrible.
/r/MGTOW217/02/21 06:44 AM
1

I personally don’t think the bias is as extreme today in 2021 as you suggest. If the only problem with our legal system is bias in decision making, that means the laws are well written.
/r/MGTOW216/02/21 05:52 PM
1

The “unfairness” in the legal system is the fact that bias plays a role and skilled actors can exploit the system to their benefit. The laws pertaining to marriage do not favor the women, so it has to be bias in the courts that favor women. And in that sense, the legal system has never been fair in any area. There is always bias, and that is definitely a hole in our legal system. But at the end of the day, if you have a good lawyer and haven’t broken any laws you should be able to protect yourse…
/r/MGTOW216/02/21 05:32 PM
6

My only point is the law, as it is written, is not exclusive to women. Most men end up “screwed” in marriage disputes due to inadequate representation in court. If two men are getting divorced and one shows up without a lawyer, that should expect to get screwed left and right. It’s also worth noting that while it’s probably much rarer than a man getting taken advantage of, there are cases of women getting screwed in court by their husbands who can afford good lawyers or who are lawyers themselve…
/r/MGTOW216/02/21 05:26 PM
4

Are you positive that a male boyfriend can’t do that to you? In a legal sense, no one can get convicted of rape based solely off accusations. In settings like a college campus, you can be removed from campus based on rape allegations without due process which is craziness, but that rule definitely doesn’t only apply to men, it’s just mostly only used on men because men rarely report rape or sexual assault. I actually have seen a girl be removed from campus because she raped someone. There was no…
/r/MGTOW216/02/21 05:19 PM
10

That’s not true at all my friend. Anyone can screw over anyone when it comes to family court, it’s a big misconception that the laws enforced in family court only apply to women.
/r/MGTOW216/02/21 05:12 PM
1

It happens more than you think. 50/50 should be standard and more and more people are realizing that. Men are getting better represented in court these days and joint custody is becoming the norm for divorced couples with children.
/r/MGTOW212/02/21 04:04 PM
1

At what point are you going to acknowledge......
/r/MGTOW212/02/21 03:58 PM
1

Dude how can you say that? There are women with no kids and jobs. I know women who aren’t interested in having a family and don’t want to have kids. You have a horrible tainted perception of the world my friend. Women typically can’t be as affective in blue color jobs, but a woman could take an MGTOW route just like we do and be successful. Stop worrying so much about what the women are doing and worry about yourself. They can’t control you and you aren’t powerless. Cut them out of your life if …
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 08:28 PM
1

That’s a fair point.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 08:24 PM
1

I never said a woman HAS to have the baby, I said the woman HAS to face the consequences. So does the man. This is reality, it won’t change no matter how much you and the feminists complain about it. Of the “three legal ways” you claim a woman can choose not to be a parent, two of them also apply to single men, and don’t apply to married women or divorced women with joint custody. The third one, abortion, could never be a right for men because we cannot get abortions. Even if it was illegal, wom…
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 05:17 PM
1

Condoms definitely aren’t a 100% guarantee, but there enough for me to feel responsible if I get somebody pregnant. Even if their plan was to trap me, that means I fell for it which was definitely avoidable.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 04:49 PM
1

Talk to your lawyer before you get married. Make sure you exactly what you’re signing up for before you go in, which will make it easier to get out. Signing a prenup is a good idea, but even if you don’t have a prenuptial agreement just speaking to your lawyer and understanding the legal ramifications of marriage before you agree to it will make you more equipped to get out of it with out assets in tact. You’re not nearly as powerless as women think you are.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 04:47 PM
2

One word. Female condoms
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:16 AM
2

Why do y’all act like protection isn’t a thing? I’m not getting anyone pregnant anytime soon 🙅🏿‍♂️ protect yourself y’all don’t let them get you. Condoms all you need
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:15 AM
1

I somewhat agree. My only point is I think it’s more important to focus on what we can do rather than what we can’t do. Getting “baby trapped” is entirely within you’re control, you just have to be responsible and take precautions. Same goes for marriage. We aren’t powerless, you have to allow yourself to be taken advantage of.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:14 AM
1

I would indeed tell a woman that because she had sex she has to face the consequences of her decision. That’s reality. It’s a fact of life. Feminists could try to deny it but that would be delusional. It’s not sexist if it’s reality. You sound like a feminist denying reality right now. My point here is the point of MGTOW isn’t taking the feminists flawed arguments and throwing it back at them. You don’t actually think what I said is sexist, unless you also think it’s sexist to say the same about…
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:10 AM
1

No. The laws of the state you reside in apply. I’m sure if you keep moving that would complicate things, but if you just don’t live with her you’re fine. You shouldn’t live with toxic people anyway so just get out. There can be no common law marriage in any state if you don’t live together.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:03 AM
1

Avoiding rape versus wearing a condom? Come on bro.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 07:01 AM
1

You’re just wrong about common law my friend. Also laws vary state by state but if you know the common law marriage rules in you’re state you can avoid anyone forcing you into common law marriage. You almost always have to live together, so it’s not hard to avoid being “trapped” into a common law marriage. You need to read up on it as well. https://www.robinsonandhenry.com/colorado/family-law/common-law-marriages/
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 06:01 AM
1

How can you possibly say what don’t have a choice to be a parent. You have to make several decisions before you can get anyone pregnant. You have to choose to have sex with a girl and choose not to use protection. You have complete control over whether or not you’ll become a parent. That’s entirely in you’re control and if you think it’s not you’re not accepting responsibility for your own actions. You have to allow yourself to be baby trapped.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 05:57 AM
0

That’s an exception because children were being illegally abandoned at an alarming rate. That’s not actual abandonment. A single father could do the same in a state with Safe Haven laws. A married mother can’t drop her child off at a police station Hospital Church without the fathers permission, that’s hyper illegal. The woman had no more legal rights than the man.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 05:54 AM
1

Yes. See comment above.
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 05:50 AM
1

It’s not about the ceremony, marriage is a legal agreement that you have to winningly join. You literally cannot marry someone without their permission. A woman cannot legally drop their child off at a church or with the police. That’s not a legal thing someone can do. Abandoning your children is illegal, putting them up for adoption is not. If a father is in sole custody of a child the same rules apply to him as it would to a mother in sole custody of a child. If you’re married or have joint cu…
/r/MGTOW211/02/21 05:43 AM
0

You gotta elaborate on that, you can’t just say it. How does common law trap men into marriages in the US? You also haven’t explained what you meant by “legal abandonment” or the thing you said about adoptions. I’d like to continue this discussion if you have anything to support these claims.
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 11:02 PM
0

This entire argument is flawed. You’re not forced into marriage, you have to consent to it. A woman can try to trap you in marriage by getting pregnant but that’s not a guarantee. You don’t have to marry the mother of your child—you actually really shouldn’t if you think you’re being trapped. Getting married in this instance is the worst thing you can do for yourself. But in order for a girl to do that you have to 1) get her pregnant, which you have to accept responsibility for, and 2) agree to …
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 07:56 PM
1

Do you have the legal right to choose to be a parent?: Yes. And no more than a woman does, except for the biological factor that she has to take care of the baby and not abort it for it to be born. A woman has a physical right to choose not to be a parent I guess, but the legal right is the same. Do you have the legal right to refuse to be married?: Yes, absolutely. That’s not how marriage works. It has to be consensual. Do you have a legal right as a father?: Depends what you mean, but yes. I h…
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 05:23 AM
0

You’ve done extensive research and concluded that men do not have any basic human rights? Please tell me what human rights you’re denied. I don’t think I’m denied any. Women (in this country) are very free, undeniably.
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 04:30 AM
0

See it’s stuff like this. It’s not in their biology to want children anymore than it is for men.... they might be brainwashed to want children from a young age, but it’s not anymore biological than it is for men. That’s just nonsensical, and has nothing to do with MGTOW
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 04:25 AM
0

I agree with a lot of the stuff I see on here but not all of it. A lot of y’all are to MGTOW what Trumpers are to Republicans. Y’all say the overwhelming majority of women are one way or another, but think it’s fucked up when women say “all men are (insert insulting over generalization). Don’t be as bad as the feminist you claim to hate. Or rather if you are gonna do that, go to a feminist page and leave that away from MGTOW. This isn’t an anti-women or complain about women sub, it’s about men f…
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 11:30 PM
1

No, if you’re responsible enough to go to court properly represented, you might not get taken advantage of. That’s not exclusive to divorce court, it’s also not exclusive to men. You have to listen to the feminists argument, directly from the source. That’s the only way to actually know for sure that you’re right when you say they’re argument is absurd. If you don’t listen to the other side you have no way of knowing that your side is correct. I listen to both sides, don’t agree with everything …
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 11:06 PM
0

I’m not contradicting myself, you’re missing my point. Just because something can happen doesn’t mean it will happen. The risks are real, yes, but the extent that you say they exist is exaggerated and immaculate. When you swim in the ocean, you can get attacked by a shark. That doesn’t mean nobody should swim in the ocean because sharks can attack. This is the same thing. A woman might be able to exploit you, but the odds of that happening go down immensely if you’re well represented in court. M…
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 09:46 PM
-4

Man, I like so much of MGTOW but don’t like posts like this. We get upset when women make blanket statements about us but do the same about them. Not every woman wants a child. I know you said you’re not trying to generalize women but you are when you say blanket statements like this that definitely don’t apply to most women in my experience. IT DEFINITELY APPLIES TO SOME But let’s not take these things too far and become the thing we hate.
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 02:45 PM
1

You have a tainted perception of the world. I’ve repeatedly said that I agree these problems exist, but they’re not nearly as extreme as you say. Getting married and having kids shouldn’t be an easy decision, it’s always been a huge risk for your financial and emotional well being. And when you say it’s “so easy” for a woman to get full custody, that’s simply inaccurate. If a women goes to court expecting them to just give her custody and the man is lawyered up and she’s not, she’s not getting h…
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 02:37 PM
0

Overgeneralizing: the bias exists but it’s not as extreme as you suggest.
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 05:55 AM
1

I’m saying you’re making generalizations based on your own experience that aren’t accurate for the rest of the world. I don’t fully understand your analogy. If you jump out of a plane without a parachute, you should die. That’s what’s supposed to happen when you make that mistake. Someone could possibly survive, but that’s an anomaly. A man winning in divorce court (or maybe just not getting screwed) isn’t as much of an anomaly. I think the problem is less with the law and more with how it’s int…
/r/MGTOW209/02/21 12:11 AM
1

No bro. You’re taking it too far. There are men who win custody of their kids. I personally lived with my father while my parents had joint custody—the arrangement is usually the kid goes with the mother but my father happened to have better representation. That’s just one example though. There are definitely instances of fathers getting railed in court but it’s wrong to say that’s all that family court is.
/r/MGTOW208/02/21 08:58 PM
1

Depends what you mean by “subservient”, and more than half of all married women have careers. Of course the rabbit hole goes as deep as you can possibly imagine, but most people don’t subscribe to the extreme belief or fit your extreme description
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 08:23 AM
2

My point is, what you’re saying right now, is not really the most popular opinion, or a consensus among femanists or society in general. That’s an extreme perspective, and it’s wrong to assume everyone holds that belief. Just like it’s wrong to assume MGTOW is sexist because some sexists call themselves MGTOW. Do yo my understand?
/r/MGTOW206/02/21 05:49 PM
10

I mean.... I technically agree with this caption but imagine for a second that this conversation is happening between two men... I don’t think anybody would have a problem with this. They didn’t say men are bad. MGTOW isn’t censored for things like this, it’s censored because 1% of people who claim to be MGTOW are mysoginists who thinks this is an anti-women group, and every group is defined by their most extreme member these days.
/r/MGTOW206/02/21 05:12 PM
2

Could you link a feminist on YouTube who promotes violence against men? I’m not saying they don’t exist, but I have never seen one would would like to be enlightened. I did a search on my own and couldn’t find anything that I would call “violent”. A lot of craziness, but no violence. Regardless none of the content on this subreddit seems worthy of being banned. That’s absurd
/r/MGTOW213/01/21 10:43 PM
1

Can I ask, where did it all go wrong?
/r/MGTOW210/01/21 10:09 PM
13

Gotta stick around for your kids tho
/r/MGTOW203/01/21 03:58 AM
10

These are awesome characters but definitely not role models.
/r/MGTOW203/01/21 03:58 AM
1

That’s actually great to hear. They still aren’t allowed to drive though, right?
/r/MGTOW213/12/20 04:15 PM
0

My ladies need to let they hair down thoughhhhhh
/r/MGTOW213/12/20 03:35 PM
1

Arab world needs some feminism tbh...
/r/MGTOW212/12/20 06:12 PM
3

I wish prostitution was legal in this country. Any “professional” that I’ve come across is much more of a risk than any normal woman for a lot of reasons. Have any of you guys been mugged by Cardi B?
/r/MGTOW209/12/20 08:41 PM
2

So no more sex?
/r/MGTOW209/12/20 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter